Next Article in Journal
Transcriptome and Biochemical Analyses of a Chlorophyll-Deficient Bud Mutant of Tea Plant (Camellia sinensis)
Next Article in Special Issue
XB2Bi2 (X = Si, Ge, Sn, Pb): Penta-Atomic Planar Tetracoordinate Si/Ge/Sn/Pb Clusters with 20 Valence Electrons
Previous Article in Journal
The IGF-Independent Role of IRS-2 in the Secretion of MMP-9 Enhances the Growth of Prostate Carcinoma Cell Line PC3
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Linker Substituent Nature on Performance of Active Sites in UiO-66: Combined FT-IR and DFT Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 20
10.3390/ijms242015069
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nickel(II) and Palladium(II) Complexes with η5:κ1(N)-Coordinated Dicarbollide Ligands Containing Pendant Pyridine Group

by
Dmitriy K. Semyonov
1,2,
Marina Yu. Stogniy
1,*,
Sergey A. Anufriev
1,
Sergey V. Timofeev
1,
Kyrill Yu. Suponitsky
1,3 and
Igor B. Sivaev
1
1
A.N. Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences, 28 Vavilov Str., 119991 Moscow, Russia
2
M.V. Lomonosov Institute of Fine Chemical Technology, MIREA—Russian Technological University, 86 Vernadsky Av., 119571 Moscow, Russia
3
Basic Department of Chemistry of Innovative Materials and Technologies, G.V. Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 36 Stremyannyi Line, 117997 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(20), 15069; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015069
Submission received: 13 September 2023 / Revised: 4 October 2023 / Accepted: 10 October 2023 / Published: 11 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal-Organic Coordination Compounds: Synthesis, Structure, Spectra, Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A series of C- and B-substituted nido-carborane derivatives with a pendant pyridyl group was prepared. The synthesized compounds were used as ligands in the complexation reactions with bis(triphenylphosphine)nickel(II) and palladium(II) chlorides to give six new metallacomplexes with unusual η5:κ1(N)-coordination of the metal center. The single crystal structures of 1-(NC5H4-2′-S)-1,2-C2B10H11, 1-(NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-1,2-C2B10H11, Cs [7-(NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-7,8-C2B9H11] closo- and nido-carboranes and 3-Ph3P-3-(4(7)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 and 3-Ph3P-3-(4(7)-NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 metallacarboranes were determined using single crystal X-ray diffraction.

1. Introduction

nido-Carborane [nido-7,8-C2B9H12]− is one of the most important members of the family of polyhedral boron hydrides, located at the junction of inorganic and organic chemistry. nido-Carborane (from Latin nidus, meaning “nest”) is formed upon the removal of the boron atom adjacent to the carbon atoms from the icosahedral ortho-carborane 1,2-C2B10H12, which has the closo-structure (a corruption of clovo, from Latin clovis, meaning “cage”), under the action of strong nucleophiles and has an open pentagonal face [1,2]. After the removal of endo-hydrogen from nido-carborane, the resulting dicarbollide anion [nido-1,2-C2B9H11]2- can act as a ligand similar to a cyclopentadienyl one [3,4,5,6,7,8]. It is known that transition metal complexes with cyclopentadienyl ligands containing pendant donor groups are good catalysts for various organic reactions [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16], and some of them are also promising luminescent materials [17,18]. One such pendant substituent is the pyridyl group [19,20]. In addition to the purely scientific interest associated with various types of coordination of such ligands [21,22,23,24], it was shown that titanium complexes with the cyclopentadienyl ligand containing the 2-picolyl substituent exhibit high catalytic activity during the ethylene polymerization reaction [25]. Therefore, the synthesis of nido-carboranes with a pendant pyridyl group and metallacarboranes based on them is of considerable interest.
To date, the synthesis of many ortho-carborane derivatives with a pyridyl group as a substituent has been described [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38], most of which were obtained by the reaction of lithium derivatives of carboranes with pyridylaldehydes [33,34,35,36,37,38]. A number of transition metal complexes of various structures with pyridyl ortho-carborane ligands were synthesized as well [28,29,31,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. However, only a few examples of nido-carborane derivatives with a pyridyl group have been described [39,49,50,51], and a few transition metal complexes (metallacarboranes) based on them [50]. This is in sharp contrast to nido-carborane derivatives with other pendant substituents, such as the Me2N group, based on which numerous metallacarboranes have been prepared [52,53,54,55,56,57], and it motivates our interest in research in this area.
In this contribution we describe the synthesis of new nido-carborane derivatives with a pendant pyridine group and nickel(II) and palladium(II) complexes thereof (Figure 1).

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Design of Dicarbollide Ligands with Pendant Pyridine Group: General Principles

There are two main points to consider when designing dicarbollide ligands with a pendant pyridyl group. The first of these is the presence and length of a spacer between the carborane cage and the pyridyl ring. This determines the size and stability of the metallocycle formed during coordination. Clearly, in the absence of such a spacer [49], the formation of only a strained four-membered metallocycle is possible, which is unfavorable for most d-metals. Indeed, in structurally characterized iridium complexes with pyridyl substituted nido-carborane [7-(NC5H4-2′)-7,8-C2B9H11]−, the latter is coordinated to the metal atom by the κ2-type through the nitrogen atom of the pyridyl group and the BH group of nido-carborane [58], rather than by the η5:κ1-type. At the same time, in the case of ligands with a monoatomic spacer between the carborane cage and the pyridyl ring, for example, [7-(NC5H4-2′-CH2)-7,8-C2B9H11]−, metal coordination occurs with the formation of a stable five-membered metallocycle according to the η5:κ1-type [50]. As for complexes based on nido-carborane with a diatomic spacer between the carborane cage and the pyridine heterocycle, to the best of our knowledge, there is only one such complex [3,3-(κ2(N,O)-NC5H4-2″-C(O)O)-3-(κ1(N)-1-NC5H4-2′-C(OH)H)-3,1,2-CoC2B9H10], which was accidentally obtained by leaving the ortho-carborane complex trans-[Co(κ2(N,O)-1-NC5H4-2′-C(O)H-1,2-C2B10H11)2] in an acetone solution for several days or weeks under air [40].
The second point is the position of the substitution in the nido-carborane basket. Unlike the cyclopentadienide ligand, in which all the carbon atoms in the five-membered ring are identical, the pentagonal face of the dicarbollide ligand is formed by two carbon atoms and three boron atoms. In this case, by introducing a substituent at the carbon atom or boron atom, it is possible to vary both the properties of the ligand itself and the properties of the metal complexes based on it. Firstly, this is due to the different electronic effects of the nido-carborane cage substituted at the boron and carbon atoms, which in the case of a short spacer can have a significant effect on the pendant donor group. Another less obvious point that can affect the stability and reactivity of metal complexes is the mutual orientation of the ligands. Due to the non-equivalence of atoms in the pentagonal face of the dicarbollide ligand, they interact differently with the metal atom, which leads to energetic inequality of different conformations due to the rotation of the dicarbollide ligand around the M–B(10) axis. In particular, for complexes of the d8 metal ions, such as Ni(II), Pd(II), and Pt(II), the preferred orientation is one in which the angle θ between the L–M–L plane and the B(8}–M–Center(C(1)–C(2)) planes is 90° [59,60,61,62]. Another feature is the displacement of the metal atom from the center of the pentagonal face of the ligand towards the boron atoms, the so-called “slippage” of the dicarbollide ligand, which is especially characteristic of nickel(II) bis(dicarbollide) complexes [63,64]. The introduction of substituents at the carbon atoms into the dicarbollide ligand can lead to a significant deviation of the angle θ from the ideal value due to steric repulsion between the ligands [65,66], and in extreme cases, this even results in the isomerization of the dicarbollide ligand [67,68]. It is clear that the position of attachment of the pendant donor group to the dicarbollide ligand will have a significant effect on the structure, and consequently, the properties of the resulting metal complexes [52,69,70].

2.2. Synthesis of nido-Carborane Derivatives with Pendant Pyridine Group

To prepare metallacarboranes with a pendant pyridyl group attached to the boron atom of the dicarbollide ligand, we decided to use the 9-pyridylsulfenyl derivative of nido-carborane [9-(HNC5H4-2′-S)-7,8-C2B9H11] described in the literature [51]. First, via the reaction of the tetramethylammonium salt of nido-carborane with 2-pyridylsulfenyl chloride in a mixture of acetonitrile and acetic acid, the N-protonated derivative [9-(HNC5H4-2′-S)-7,8-C2B9H11] (H[1]) was obtained, which was then converted to the cesium salt Cs[9-(NC5H4-2′-S)-7,8-C2B9H11] (Cs[1]) via treatment with CsOH in aqueous acetone (Scheme 1).
The obtained carboranes were characterized using methods of 1H, 13C, and 11B NMR and IR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (See Supplementary Materials, Figure S1–S70 and Table S1). The 11B NMR spectrum of Cs[1] in acetone-d6 contains a singlet at −3.1 ppm and seven doublets at −6.8, −15.6, −18.4, −22.5, −24.3, −30.6, and −37.8 ppm with an integral intensity ratio of 1:1:1:2:1:1:1:1, which is significantly different from the spectrum of the N-protonated form H[1] [51], indicating a rather strong interaction between the carborane cage and the pyridine ring. The 1H NMR spectrum of Cs[1], in addition to the signals of the CH and BH groups of the nido-carborane cage, contains a set of signals of the pyridyl group, which appears in the form of two doublets at 8.22 and 7.67 ppm and two triplets at 7.49 and 6.87 ppm.
To obtain a related nido-carborane with a pendant pyridyl group attached to the carbon atom, as a development of the known approach to the arylation and heteroarylation of 1-mercapto-ortho-carborane [71,72,73,74], we used the reaction of the trimethylammonium salt of 1-mercapto-ortho-carborane with 2-bromopyridine. The reaction in refluxing ethanol gave a mixture of the expected pyridyl derivative of ortho-carborane 1-(NC5H4-2′-S)-1,2-C2B10H11 (2) and its deboronation product as the N-protonated intramolecular salt [7-(HNC5H4-2′-S)-7,8-C2B9H11] (H[3]), which were separated using column chromatography on silica followed by the conversion of the latter to the cesium salt Cs[7-(NC5H4-2′-S)-7,8-C2B9H11] (Cs[3]) (Scheme 2). The cesium salt Cs[3] was also obtained via the deboronation of the corresponding ortho-carborane 2 with CsF in refluxing ethanol (Scheme 2).
In the 1H NMR spectrum of Cs[3], the signals of the pyridyl group appear as a doublet at 8.30 ppm, a triplet at 7.70 ppm, a doublet at 7.24 ppm, and a triplet at 7.02 ppm, demonstrating a significant difference in the electronic effects of the nido-carborane cage substituted at the boron and carbon atoms.
The solid-state structure of 1-(NC5H4-2′-S)-1,2-C2B10H11·HBr (2·HBr) (see Supplementary Materials) was determined using single crystal X-ray diffraction (Figure 2).
The reaction of the trimethylammonium salt of 1-mercapto-ortho-carborane with 2-bromomethyl pyridine followed by the deboronation of the resulting pyridine-containing ortho-carborane 1-(NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-1,2-C2B10H11 (4) was used to prepare the nido-carborane derivative with a longer spacer between the carborane cage and the pendant pyridyl group Cs[7-(NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-7,8-C2B9H11] (Cs[5]) (Scheme 3). Previously, this approach was used for the synthesis of various alkylsulfenyl derivatives of ortho- and nido-carboranes including those containing various functional groups [75,76,77,78,79].
The obtained carboranes were characterized using methods of 1H, 13C, and 11B NMR and IR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (See Supplementary Materials). In the 1H NMR spectrum of 4 in acetone-d6, the signal of the methylene group appears as a singlet at 4.42 ppm, whereas in the spectrum of Cs[5], the signals of the methylene group appear as two doublets at 4.13 and 3.89 ppm (2JHH = 12.8 Hz) due to chirality of the C-monosubstituted nido-carborane cage that causes protons to become diastereotopic and magnetically inequivalent.
The solid-state structures of 1-(NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-1,2-C2B10H11 (4) and Cs[7-(NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-7,8-C2B9H11]·0.5Me2CO (Cs[5]·0.5Me2CO) (see Supplementary Materials) were determined using single crystal X-ray diffraction (Figure 3).

2.3. Synthesis of Nickela- and Platinacarboranes with Pendant Chelating Pyridine Group

The deprotonation of Cs[1] with t-BuOK in dry THF followed by the addition of triphenylphosphine complexes of nickel(II) or palladium(II) [(Ph3P)2MCl2] (M=Ni, Pd) results in the corresponding metallacarboranes 3-Ph3P-3-(4(7)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-MC2B9H10 (M=Ni (6), Pd (7)), which were isolated in moderate yields after column chromatography on silica (Scheme 4).
The obtained metallacarboranes were characterized using methods of 1H, 13C, 11B, and 31P NMR spectroscopy, as well as IR and UV spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The solid-state structure of 3-Ph3P-3-(4(7)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (6) was determined using single crystal X-ray diffraction (see Supplementary Materials). A general view of the nickelacarborane molecule is given in Figure 4.
The orientation of the σ-donor ligands (the pendant pyridine and triphenylphosphine) with respect to the dicarbollide ligand significantly deviates from the ideal orientation with the θ angle between the N(1)-Ni(1)-P(1) plane and the B(8)-Ni(1)-Center-(C(1)-C(2)) plane being ~ 60°, and the pyridyl group is rotated around the B(9)-S(1) bond toward the carbon atoms of the dicarbollide ligand (Figure 3). No noticeable “slippage” of the dicarbollide ligand was found.
In a similar way, metallacarboranes 3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (8) and 3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-PdC2B9H10 (9) were prepared starting from the C-substituted nido-carborane Cs[3] (Scheme 5). The obtained metallacarboranes were characterized using methods of 1H, 13C, 11B, and 31P NMR spectroscopy, as well as IR and UV spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. Unfortunately, we were unable to obtain crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction studies of single crystals.
Metallacarboranes with a more flexible spacer between the dicarbollide ligand and the pyridyl group 3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (10) and 3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-closo-3,1,2-PdC2B9H10 (11) were synthesized in a similar way starting from the C-substituted nido-carborane Cs[5] (Scheme 6).
The obtained metallacarboranes were characterized using methods of 1H, 13C, 11B, and 31P NMR spectroscopy, as well as IR and UV spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The solid-state structure of 3-Ph3P-3-(4(7)-NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (10) was determined using single crystal X-ray diffraction (see Supplementary Materials). A general view of the nickelacarborane molecule is given in Figure 5.
The orientation of the σ-donor ligands (the pendant pyridine and triphenylphosphine) with respect to the dicarbollide ligand strongly deviates from the ideal orientation with the θ angle between the N(1)-Ni(1)-P(1) plane and the B(8)-Ni(1)-Center-(C(1)-C(2)) plane being ~16°. The six-membered ring Ni(1)-C(1)-S(1)-C(3)-C(4)-N(1) adopts a highly distorted boat conformation with a nickel atom and a methylene group located at the bow and stern (Figure 4). No noticeable “slippage” of the dicarbollide ligand was found.

3. Methods and Materials

3.1. Materials and Methods

The trimethylammonium salt of 1-mercapto-ortho-carborane [78], bis(triphenylphosphine)nickel(II) chloride [(Ph3P)2NiCl2] [80] and bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) chloride [(Ph3P)2PdCl2] [81] were synthesized according to the literature described methods. 2-Bromopyridine and 2-(bromomethyl)-pyridine hydrobromide were purchased from Acros Organics and used without purification. Tetrahydrofuran was dried using standard procedure [82]. The reaction progress was monitored using thin-layer chromatography (Merck F254 silica gel on aluminum plates) and visualized using 0.5% PdCl2 in 1% HCl in aq. MeOH (1:10). Acros Organics silica gel (0.060–0.200 mm) was used for column chromatography. The NMR spectra at 400.1 MHz (1H), 128.4 MHz (11B), 100.0 MHz (13C), and 162 MHz (31P) were recorded with a Varian Inova 400 spectrometer. The residual signal of the NMR solvent relative to Me4Si was taken as an internal reference for 1H and 13C NMR spectra. 11B NMR spectra were referenced using BF3.Et2O as an external standard. 31P NMR spectra are given relative to 85% H3PO4 as an external standard. Infrared spectra were recorded on an FSM-2201 (INFRASPEC, Saint Petersburg, Russia) instrument. UV/Vis spectra were recorded with SF-2000 spectrophotometer (OKB SPECTR LLC, Saint Petersburg, Russia) using 1 cm cuvettes. High resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were measured on a Bruker micrOTOF II instrument using electrospray ionization (ESI).

3.2. Synthesis of Cs[9-(NC5H4-2′-S)-7,8-C2B9H11] (Cs[1])

Compound Cs[1] was prepared from described in the literature N-protonated [9-(HNC5H4-2′-S)-7,8-C2B9H11] (H[1]) (0.30 g, 1.23 mmol) [51] by dissolving it in acetone (7 mL) and reprecipitated with aqueous CsOH (0.28 g, 1.85 mmol in 40 mL of water) to give 0.44 g (95% yield) of cesium salt of 5. 1H NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 8.22 (1H, d, J = 4.7 Hz, Hpy), 7.67 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, Hpy), 7.49 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz, Hpy), 6.87 (1H, m, Hpy), 2.29 (1H, br s, CHcarb), 1.86 (1H, br s, CHcarb), 2.6 ÷ (−0.1) (8H, br m, BH), −2.38 (1H, br m, BHB). 11B NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ −3.1 (1B, s), −6.8 (1B, d, J = 138 Hz), −15.6 (1B, J = 138 Hz), −18.4 (2B, d, J = 160 Hz), −22.5 (1B, d, J = 151 Hz), −24.3 (1B, d, J = 139 Hz), −30.6 (1B, d, J = 137 Hz), −37.8 (1B, d, J = 141 Hz).

3.3. Synthesis of 1-(NC5H4-2′-S)-1,2-C2B10H11 (2), [7-(NC5H5-2′-S)-7,8-C2B9H11] (H[3]) and Cs[7-(NC5H4-2′-S)-7,8-C2B9H11] (Cs[3])

2-Bromopyridine (0.24 mL, 2.55 mmol) was added to a solution of the trimethylammonium salt of 1-mercapto-closo-carborane (0.60 g, 2.55 mmol) in ethanol (30 mL) and the reaction mixture was refluxed for about 5 h, cooled to ambient temperature and evaporated to dryness in vacuum. The obtained product was isolated using column gradient elution chromatography on silica with CH2Cl2:acetone mixture (from 19:1 to 1:1) as an eluent to give 0.17 g (26% yield) of white crystalline product 2 and 0.17 g (27% yield) of white crystalline H[3]. Compound H[3] was dissolved in acetone (5 mL) and reprecipitated with aqueous CsOH (0.15 g, 1.00 mmol in 30 mL of water) to give 0.26 g (99% yield) of cesium salt of Cs[3].
The cesium salt Cs[2] was also obtained by refluxing 2 (0.14 g, 0.55 mmol) in ethanol (10 mL) with cesium fluoride (0.17 g, 1.11 mmol) for 12 h. The precipitate formed was filtered off and the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in acetone (10 mL) and unreacted CsF was filtered off. The filtrate was evaporated in vacuo to give a white solid of Cs[3] (0.20 g, 97% yield).
Spectral data for 2. 1H NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 8.70 (1H, d, J = 6.3 Hz, H(6)py), 7.95 (1H, t, J = 7.4 Hz, H(4)py), 7.72 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz, H(3)py), 7.56 (1H, t, J = 6.2 Hz, H(5)py), 5.12 (1H, br s, CHcarb), 3.0 ÷ 1.2 (10H, br m, BH). 13C NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 152.1 (C(2)py), 151.1 (C(6)py), 138.5 (C(4)py), 130.9 (C(3)py), 125.4 (C(5)py), 74.1 (CcarbS), 65.5 (CcarbH). 11B NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ −1.90 (1B, d, J = 143 Hz), −5.15 (1B, d, J = 147 Hz), −9.7 (4B, J = 160 Hz), −11.6 (2B, d, J = 158 Hz), −12.4 (2B, d, J = 161 Hz). IR (film, cm−1): 3012 (νC-H), 2976 (νC-H), 2933 (νC-H), 2603 (br, νB-H), 2580 (br, νB-H), 1439, 1423, 1386, 1289. ESI HRMS: m/z for C7H15B10SN, calcd. 254.2005 [M + H]+, obsd. 254.2008 [M + H]+.
Spectral data for H[3]. 1H NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 8.44 (1H, t, J = 4.5 Hz, Hpy), 8.01 (1H, m, Hpy), 7.45 (1H, m, Hpy), 7.27 (1H, m, Hpy), 2.15 (1H, br s, CHcarb), 2.9 ÷ (−0.2) (8H, br m, BH), −2.54 (1H, br m, BHB). 11B NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ −8.1 (1B, d, J = 144 Hz), −9.7 (1B, d, J = 137 Hz), −13.6 (1B, J = 162 Hz), −15.9 (1B, d, J = 144 Hz), −17.0 (1B, d, J = 133 Hz), −18.0 (1B, d, J = 142 Hz), −21.5 (1B, d, J = 153 Hz), −32.0 (1B, dd, J = 131, J = 31 Hz), −36.1 (1B, d, J = 141 Hz).
Spectral data for Cs[3]. 1H NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 8.30 (1H, d, J = 6.2 Hz, H(6)py), 7.70 (1H, t, J = 7.7 Hz, H(4)py), 7.24 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, H(3)py), 7.02 (1H, t, J = 7.3 Hz, H(5)py), 2.10 (1H, br s, CHcarb), 3.2 ÷ 0.3 (8H, br m, BH), −2.42 (1H, br m, BHB). 13C NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 166.0 (C(2)py), 148.6 (C(6)py), 136.5 (C(4)py), 121.4 (C(3)py), 118.9 (C(5)py), 52.6 (CcarbS), 50.4 (CcarbH). 11B NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ −8.1 (1B, d, J = 145 Hz, B(11)), −9.7 (1B, d, J = 141 Hz, B(9)), −13.6 (1B, J = 158 Hz, B(3)), −16.0 (1B, d, J = 132 Hz, B(5)), −17.0 (1B, d, J = 138 Hz, B(6)), −17.9 (1B, d, J = 130 Hz, B(4)), −21.5 (1B, d, J = 149 Hz, B(2)), −32.0 (1B, dd, J = 130, J = 40 Hz, B(10)), −36.1 (1B, d, J = 140 Hz, B(1)). IR (film, cm−1): 3010 (νC-H), 2973 (νC-H), 2929 (νC-H), 2350 (br, νB-H), 1441, 1354, 1295. ESI HRMS: m/z for C7H15B9SN, calcd. 243.1810 [M]−, obsd. 243.1815 [M]−.

3.4. Synthesis of 1-(NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-1,2-C2B10H11 (4)

2-(Bromomethyl)pyridine hydrobromide (0.54 g, 2.12 mmol) was added to a solution of the trimethylammonium salt of 1-mercapto-closo-carborane (0.50 g, 2.12 mmol) in ethanol (20 mL) and the reaction mixture was refluxed for about 5 h, cooled to ambient temperature and evaporated to dryness in vacuum. The obtained product was isolated using column gradient elution chromatography on silica with CH2Cl2:acetone mixture (from 19:1 to 1:1) as an eluent to give 0.21 g (37% yield) of white crystalline product 3. 1H NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 8.52 (1H, d, J = 4.8 Hz, H(6)py), 7.77 (1H, m, H(4)py), 7.47 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz, H(3)py), 7.30 (1H, m, H(5)py), 4.93 (1H, br s, CHcarb), 4.42 (2H, s, CH2), 3.3 ÷ 1.4 (10H, br m, BH). 13C NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 155.1 (C(2)py), 149.7 (C(6)py), 137.5 (C(4)py), 123.8 (C(3)py), 123.2 (C(5)py), 75.4 (CcarbS), 68.7 (CcarbH), 43.3 (CH2). 11B NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ −2.1 (1B, d, J = 148 Hz), −5.4 (1B, d, J 148 = Hz), −9.4 (4B, J = 154 Hz), −11.9 (2B, d, J = 181 Hz), −12.4 (2B, d, J = 159 Hz). IR (film, cm−1): 3071 (νC-H), 3019 (νC-H), 2933 (νC-H), 2600 (br, νB-H), 1594, 1574, 1475, 1439. ESI HRMS: m/z for C8H17B10SN, calcd. 268.2162 [M + H]+, obsd. 268.2155 [M + H]+.

3.5. Synthesis of Cs[7-(NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-7,8-C2B9H11] (Cs[5])

Compound 4 (0.19 g, 0.71 mmol) was dissolved in ethanol (20 mL) and cesium fluoride (0.22 g, 1.42 mmol) was added. The solution was refluxed for about 20 h. The precipitate formed was filtered off and the filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in acetone (15 mL) and unreacted CsF was filtered off. The filtrate was evaporated in vacuo to give a white solid of 4 (0.27 g, 98% yield). 1H NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 8.46 (1H, d, J = 4.2 Hz, H(6)py), 7.68 (1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, H(4)py), 7.40 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, H(3)py), 7.17 (1H, m, H(5)py), 4.13 (1H, d, J = 12.8 Hz, CH2), 3.89 (1H, d, J = 12.8 Hz, CH2), 1.63 (1H, br s, CHcarb), 3.2 ÷ 0.2 (8H, br m, BH), −2.57 (1H, br m, BHB). 13C NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 159.9 (C(2)py), 149.0 (C(6)py), 136.2 (C(4)py), 123.4 (C(3)py), 121.6 (C(5)py), 52.3 (CcarbH), 43.2 (CH2). 11B NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ −9.3 (1B, d, J = 137 Hz), −10.4 (1B, d, J = 135 Hz), −14.9 (1B, J = 159 Hz), −17.2 (3B, d, J = 139 Hz), −22.1 (1B, d, J = 148 Hz), −32.9 (1B, dd, J = 124, J = 32 Hz), −36.8 (1B, d, J = 138 Hz). IR (film, cm−1): 3059 (νC-H), 3011 (νC-H), 2972 (νC-H), 2928 (νC-H), 2528 (br, νB-H), 1597, 1570, 1479, 1439, 1253. ESI HRMS: m/z for C7H15B9SN, calcd. 257.1962 [M]−, obsd. 257.1967 [M]−.

3.6. General Procedure for Synthesis of Metallacarboranes 6–11

To solution of nido-carborane derivative 2, 4 or 5 in anhydrous THF under argon atmosphere, the 3-fold excess of potassium tert-butoxide was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for about 10 min and the 1.1-fold excess of phosphine complexes [(Ph3P)2MCl2] (M=Ni, Pd) was added to one portion. Immediately, a dark brown solution was observed. The resulting mixture was stirred at ambient temperature for about 30 min and the solvent was evaporated to dryness under vacuum conditions. The target complex was isolated using column chromatography on silica using CH2Cl2 as eluent. If necessary, an additional column chromatography on silica using hexane as eluent was performed to purify the complex from uncoordinated triphenylphosphine.
3-Ph3P-3-(4(7)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (6). The synthesis was carried out using Cs[1] (0.15 g, 0.40 mmol), t-BuOK (0.13 g, 1.20 mmol), and [(PPh3)2NiCl2] (0.29 g, 0.44 mmol) in THF (15 mL) to give brown solid of 6 (0.08 g, 31% yield). 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, ppm): δ 7.79 (7H, m, PPh3 + Hpy), 7.50 ÷ 7.36 (9H, br m, PPh3), 7.21 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, Hpy), 7.03 (1H, t, J = 7.7 Hz, Hpy), 6.03 (1H, t, J = 6.7 Hz, Hpy), 2.77 (1H, br s, CHcarb), 2.44 (1H, br s, CHcarb), 2.6 ÷ 0.1 (8H, br m, BH). 13C NMR (CD2Cl2, ppm): δ 152.6 (Cpy), 135.0 (Cpy), 134.23 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, Ph), 130.8 (Ph), 128.62 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, Ph), 125.0 (Cpy), 117.2 (Cpy), 33.0 (CcarbH), 31.3 (CcarbH). 11B NMR (CD2Cl2, ppm): δ −1.0 (1B, d, J = 119 Hz), −8.0 (2B, s + d, J = 127 Hz), −10.8 (2B, d, J = 124 Hz), −16.4 (1B, d, J = 144 Hz), −19.8 (1B, d, J = 150 Hz), −23.4 (2B, d, J = 138 Hz). 31P NMR (CD2Cl2, ppm): δ 31.2 (PPh3). IR (film, cm−1): 3039 (νC-H), 2992 (νC-H), 2940 (νC-H), 2877 (νC-H), 2556 (br, νB-H), 1471, 1455, 1438, 1392, 1364, 1226, 1194. ESI HRMS: m/z for C25H29B9NiNPS, calcd. m/z 563.2079 [M + H]+, obsd. m/z 563.2071 [M + H]+. UV (acetone, nm): λ 207, 247, 275, 323.
3-Ph3P-3-(4(7)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-PdC2B9H10 (7). The synthesis was carried out using Cs[1] (0.15 g, 0.40 mmol), t-BuOK (0.13 g, 1.20 mmol), and [(PPh3)2PdCl2] (0.31 g, 0.44 mmol) in THF (15 mL) to give dark brown solid of 7 (0.06 g, 25% yield). 1H NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 7.80 (6H, m, PPh3), 7.60 ÷ 7.47 (10H, br m, PPh3 + Hpy), 7.38 (2H, Hpy), 6.40 (1H, m, Hpy), 4.48 (1H, br s, CHcarb), 3.75 (1H, br s, CHcarb), 3.4 ÷ (−0.5) (8H, br m, BH). 13C NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 152.5 (Cpy), 136.3 (Cpy), 134.30 (d, J = 12.6 Hz, Ph), 131.1 (Ph), 128.73 (d, J = 10.3 Hz, Ph), 124.6 (Cpy), 117.1 (Cpy), 55.0 (CcarbH). 11B NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 18.5 (1B, d, J = 136 Hz), −5.9 (2B, d, J = 146 Hz), −9.0 (2B, s + d, J = 142 Hz), −10.8 (2B, d, J = 144 Hz), −22.0 (1B, d, J = 140 Hz), −25.1 (1B, d, J = 131 Hz). 31P NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 32.1 (PPh3). IR (film, cm−1): 2964 (νC-H), 2933 (νC-H), 2857 (νC-H), 2560 (br, νB-H), 1594, 1483, 1459, 1435, 1415, 1249. ESI HRMS: m/z for C25H29B9PdNPS, calcd. m/z 610.1782 [M + H]+, obsd. m/z 610.1771 [M + H]+. UV (acetone, nm): λ 206, 247, 269, 327.
3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (8). The synthesis was carried out using Cs[3] (0.20 g, 0.58 mmol), t-BuOK (0.19 g, 1.74 mmol), and [(PPh3)2NiCl2] (0.42 g, 0.64 mmol) in THF (15 mL) to give brown solid of 8 (0.07 g, 22% yield). 1H NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 8.04 (6H, m, PPh3), 7.73 ÷ 7.43 (10H, br m, PPh3 + Hpy), 7.39 (1H, m, Hpy), 7.29 (1H, m, Hpy), 6.45 (1H, m, Hpy), 3.44 (1H, br s, CHcarb), 2.7 ÷ 0.5 (9H, br m, BH). 13C NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 151.7 (Cpy), 136.4 (Cpy), 135.05 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, Ph), 134.2, 131.8 (Ph), 131.1 (Ph), 130.3, 128.48 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, Ph), 120.3 (Cpy), 119.0 (Cpy). 11B NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ −2.5 (1B, d, J = 120 Hz), −7.0 (1B, d, J = 138 Hz), −10.8 (1B, d, J = 143 Hz), −11.8 (1B, d, J = 120 Hz), −14.6 (2B, d, J = 126 Hz), −18.1 (2B, d, J = 135 Hz), −20.7 (1B, d, J = 153 Hz). 31P NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 43.7 (PPh3). IR (film, cm−1): 3084 (νC-H), 3062 (νC-H), 2968 (νC-H), 2931 (νC-H), 2860 (νC-H), 2559 (br, νB-H), 1598, 1440, 1421, 1364. ESI HRMS: m/z for C25H29B9NiNPS, calcd. m/z 563.2079 [M + H]+, obsd. m/z 563.2064 [M + H]+. UV (acetone, nm): λ 213, 325, 397.
3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-PdC2B9H10 (9). The synthesis was carried out using Cs[3] (0.19 g, 0.51 mmol), t-BuOK (0.17 g, 1.53 mmol), and [(PPh3)2PdCl2] (0.39 g, 0.56 mmol) in THF (15 mL) to give dark brown solid of 9 (0.10 g, 33% yield). 1H NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 7.88 (6H, m, PPh3), 7.61 ÷ 7.47 (10H, br m, PPh3 + Hpy), 7.40 (1H, m, Hpy), 7.36 (1H, m, Hpy), 6.67 (1H, t, J = 6.4 Hz, Hpy), 3.85 (1H, br s, CHcarb), 3.6 ÷ (−0.1) (9H, br m, BH). 13C NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 150.2 (Cpy), 137.1 (Cpy), 134.87 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, Ph), 134.0, 131.5 (Ph), 129.8, 128.89 (d, J = 10.9 Hz, Ph), 120.4 (Cpy), 119.6 (Cpy), 39.4 (CcarbH). 11B NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 1.9 (1B, d, J = 138 Hz), −3.4 (1B, d, J = 121 Hz), −6.3 (1B, d, J = 124 Hz), −12.7 (1B, d, J = 132 Hz), −13.7 (3B, d, J = 157 Hz), −22.4 (1B, d, J = 147 Hz), −25.3 (1B, d, J = 133 Hz). 31P NMR (acetone-d6, ppm): δ 45.4 (PPh3). IR (film, cm−1): 3091 (νC-H), 2965 (νC-H), 2932 (νC-H), 2861 (νC-H), 2554 (br, νB-H), 1595, 1442, 1250. ESI HRMS: m/z for C25H29B9PdNPS, calcd. m/z 628.2037 [M + NH4]+, obsd. m/z 628.1990 [M + NH4]+; calcd. m/z 632.1601 [M + Na]+, obsd. m/z 632.1636 [M + NH4]+. UV (acetone, nm): λ 207, 215, 323.
3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (10). The synthesis was carried out using Cs[5] (0.12 g, 0.31 mmol), t-BuOK (0.10 g, 0.93 mmol), and [(PPh3)2NiCl2] (0.22 g, 0.34 mmol) in THF (15 mL) to give brown solid of 10 (0.06 g, 34% yield). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, ppm): δ 8.76 (1H, d, J = 5.3 Hz, Hpy), 7.73 (1H, t, J = 7.7 Hz, Hpy), 7.59 (1H, m, Hpy), 7.54 ÷ 7.40 (8H, br m, PPh3), 7.40 ÷ 7.29 (7H, br m, PPh3), 7.10 (1H, t, J = 6.6 Hz, Hpy), 4.63 (1H, d, J = 13.6 Hz, CH2), 4.23 (1H, d, J = 13.6 Hz, CH2), 2.3 ÷ 0.9 (9H, br m, BH). 13C NMR (CDCl3, ppm): δ 152.7 (Cpy), 139.3 (Cpy), 133.8 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, Ph), 130.5 (Ph), 128.4 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, Ph + Cpy), 123.4 (Cpy). 11B NMR (CDCl3, ppm): δ −7.7 (1B, d, J = 158 Hz), −9.8 (3B), −13.3 (2B, d, J = 130 Hz), −17.6 (2B), −22.5 (1B). 31P NMR (CDCl3, ppm): δ 37.4 (PPh3). IR (film, cm−1): 2965 (νC-H), 2928 (νC-H), 2857 (νC-H), 2544 (br, νB-H), 1609, 1483, 1439, 1356, 1186, 1158, 1122. ESI HRMS: m/z for C26H31B9NiNPS, calcd. m/z 594.2501 [M + NH4]+, obsd. m/z 594.2543 [M + NH4]+. UV (acetone, nm): λ 206, 243, 291, 323.
3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-closo-3,1,2-PdC2B9H10 (11). The synthesis was carried out using Cs[5] (0.23 g, 0.59 mmol), t-BuOK (0.20 g, 1.77 mmol), and [(PPh3)2PdCl2] (0.46 g, 0.65 mmol) in THF (15 mL) to give dark brown solid of 9 (0.10 g, 27% yield). 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, ppm): δ 8.12 (1H, m, Hpy), 7.64 (1H, t, J = 7.9 Hz, Hpy), 7.55 ÷ 7.37 (9H, br m, PPh3 + Hpy), 7.36 ÷ 7.27 (7H, br m, PPh3), 6.82 (1H, t, J = 6.6 Hz, Hpy), 4.59 (1H, m, CH2), 4.03 (1H, m, CH2), 2.5 ÷ 0.5 (9H, br m, BH). 13C NMR (CD2Cl2, ppm): δ 152.1 (Cpy), 139.2 (Cpy), 134.0 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, Ph), 130.8 (Ph), 128.4 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, Ph), 123.6 (Cpy). 11B NMR (CD2Cl2, ppm): δ −4.5 (1B, d, J = 149 Hz), −6.6 (1B, d, J = 119 Hz), −9.5 (1B, d, J = 143 Hz), −10.7 (1B, d, J = 140 Hz), −14.2 (2B), −15.0 (2B), −24.6 (1B). 31P NMR (CD2Cl2, ppm): δ 47.6 (PPh3). IR (film, cm−1): 2968 (νC-H), 2928 (νC-H), 2861 (νC-H), 2552 (br, νB-H), 1602, 1487, 1435, 1399, 1312, 1190. ESI HRMS: m/z for C26H31B9PdNPS, calcd. m/z 642.2194 [M + NH4]+, obsd. m/z 642.2190 [M + NH4]+. UV (acetone, nm): λ 207, 251, 325.

3.7. Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction Study

Single crystal X-ray diffraction experiments for 2·HBr, 4, Cs[5]·0.5Me2CO, 8, and 10 were carried out using SMART APEX2 CCD diffractometer (λ(Mo-Kα) = 0.71073 Å, graphite monochromator, ω-scans) at 140 K (See Supplementary Materials). Collected data were processed using the SAINT and SADABS programs incorporated into the APEX2 program package [83]. The structure was solved using the direct methods and refined using the full-matrix least-squares procedure against F2 in anisotropic approximation. The refinement was carried out with the SHELXTL program [84]. The CCDC numbers (2294563 for 2·HBr, 2294561 for 4, 2294562 for Cs[5]·0.5Me2CO, 2294564 for 8, and 2294565 for 10) contain the Supplementary Materials for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif (accessed on 9 October 2023).

4. Conclusions

A series of C- and B-substituted nido-carborane derivatives with a pyridyl pendant group was prepared. The obtained compounds were used as ligands in the complexation with [(Ph3P)2NiCl2] and [(Ph3P)2PdCl2] to give the corresponding η5:κ1(N)-coordinated complexes of nickel(II) and palladium(II), 3-Ph3P-3-(4(7)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-MC2B9H10, 3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-MC2B9H10, and 3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-closo-3,1,2-MC2B9H10 (M=Ni, Pd). The study of the catalytic activity of the obtained complexes is in progress.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms242015069/s1, The NMR spectra of compounds 1–11 and crystallographic data on compounds 2, 4, 5, 8, and 10.

Author Contributions

Experiment design, synthesis, IR and UV spectroscopy studies, and manuscript writing, M.Y.S.; synthesis, D.K.S.; NMR spectroscopy studies, S.A.A.; synthesis, S.V.T.; single crystal X-ray diffraction experiments, K.Y.S.; supervision and manuscript concept, I.B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (21-73-10199).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Crystallographic data are available from CCDC, UK, see Supplementary Material for details.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Hawthorne, M.F.; Young, D.C.; Garrett, P.M.; Owen, D.A.; Schwerin, S.G.; Tebbe, F.N.; Wegner, P.A. Preparation and characterization of the (3)-1,2- and (3)-1,7-dicarbadodecahydroundecaborate(-1) ions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 862–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Grimes, R.N. Chapter 7—Eleven-Vertex Carboranes. In Carboranes, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2016; pp. 179–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hawthorne, M.F.; Young, D.C.; Wegner, P.A. Carbametallic boron hydride derivatives. I. Apparent analogs of ferrocene and ferricinium ion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 1818–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hawthorne, M.F.; Pilling, R.L. Carbametallic boron hydride derivatives. III. The π-C5H5Fe(π-B9C2H11) system. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 3987–3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zalkin, A.; Templeton, D.H.; Hopkins, T.E. The crystal and molecular structure of C5H5FeB9C2H11. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 3988–3990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hawthorne, M.F.; Young, D.C.; Andrews, T.D.; Howe, D.W.; Pilling, R.L.; Pitts, A.D.; Reintjes, M.; Warren, L.F.; Wegner, P.A. π-Dicarbollyl derivatives of the transition metals. Metallocene analogs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 879–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Grimes, R.N. Chapter 13—Metallacarboranes of the Transition and Lanthanide Elements. In Carboranes, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2016; pp. 711–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kar, S.; Pradhan, A.N.; Ghosh, S. Polyhedral metallaboranes and metallacarboranes. In Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry IV; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; Volume 9, pp. 263–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jutzi, P.; Siemeling, U. Cyclopentadienyl compounds with nitrogen donors in the side-chain. J. Organomet. Chem. 1995, 500, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Siemeling, U. Chelate complexes of cyclopentadienyl ligands bearing pendant O-donors. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1495–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Butenschön, H. Cyclopentadienylmetal complexes bearing pendant phosphorus, arsenic, and sulfur ligands. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1527–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Müller, C.; Vos, D.; Jutzi, P. Results and perspectives in the chemistry of side-chain-functionalized cyclopentadienyl compounds. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 600, 127–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Krut’ko, D.P. Zirconium and titanium complexes with side-chain functionalized cyclopentadienyl ligands. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2009, 58, 1745–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Son, K.; Waymouth, R.M. Stereospecific styrene polymerization and ethylene–styrene copolymerization with titanocenes containing a pendant amine donor. J. Polym. Sci. A 2010, 48, 1579–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Batuecas, M.; Esteruelas, M.A.; García-Yebra, C.; Oñate, E. Redox isomerization of allylic alcohols catalyzed by osmium and ruthenium complexes containing a cyclopentadienyl ligand with a pendant amine or phosphoramidite group: X-ray structure of an η3-1-hydroxyallyl-metal-hydride intermediate. Organometallics 2010, 29, 2166–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Varga, V.; Večeřa, M.; Gyepes, R.; Pinkas, J.; Horáček, M.; Merna, J.; Lamač, M. Effects of the linking of cyclopentadienyl and ketimide ligands in titanium half-sandwich olefin polymerization catalysts. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 3160–3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dunlop, D.; Večeřa, M.; Gyepes, R.; Kubát, P.; Lang, K.; Horáček, M.; Pinkas, J.; Šimková, L.; Liška, A.; Lamač, M. Luminescent cationic Group 4 metallocene complexes stabilized by pendant N-donor groups. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 7315–7328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Urbán, B.; Dunlop, D.; Gyepes, R.; Kubát, P.; Lang, K.; Horáček, M.; Pinkas, J.; Šimková, L.; Lamač, M. Luminescent zirconocene complexes with pendant phosphine chalcogenide donor groups. Organometallics 2023, 42, 1373–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Krut’ko, D.P.; Kirsanov, R.S.; Belov, S.A.; Borzov, M.V.; Churakov, A.V. Complexes of titanium and zirconium based on [C5Me4CH2-(2-C5H4N)] ligand. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692, 1465–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ackroyd, N.C.; Katzenellenbogen, J.A. Pyridyl-cyclopentadiene Re(CO)2+ complexes as a compact core system for SPECT ligand development. Organometallics 2010, 29, 3669–3671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, D.; Li, Y.; Wang, B.; Xu, S.; Song, H. Reactions of pyridyl side-chain-functionalized cyclopentadienes with metal carbonyl:  Intramolecular C-H activation of pyridine. Organometallics 2006, 25, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lin, J.; Ma, Z.-H.; Li, F.; Zhao, M.-X.; Liu, X.-H.; Zheng, X.-Z. Reactions of pyridyl side chain functionalized cyclopentadiene with ruthenium carbonyl. Trans. Met. Chem. 2009, 34, 855–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, Z.-H.; Han, Y.-X.; Wang, H.; Han, Z.-G.; Zheng, X.-Z.; Lin, J. Synthesis and crystal structures of three metal carbonyl complexes based on pyridyl side chain functionalized tetramethylcyclopentadienyl ligand. Chin. J. Struct. Chem. 2015, 34, 931–937. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang, S.; Liu, K.; Zhu, B. Reactions of pyridine-2-ethyl/methyl cyclopentadienes with metal carbonyls. J. Coord. Chem. 2018, 71, 16–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Blais, M.S.; Chien, J.C.W.; Rausch, M.D. Pendent aminoalkyl-substituted monocyclopentadienyltitanium compounds and their polymerization behavior. Organometallics 1998, 17, 3775–3783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Coult, R.; Fox, M.A.; Gill, W.R.; Herbertson, P.L.; MacBride, J.A.H.; Wade, K. C-arylation and C-heteroarylation of icosahedral carboranes via their copper(I) derivatives. J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 462, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Alekseyeva, E.S.; Batsanov, A.S.; Boyd, L.A.; Fox, M.A.; Hibbert, T.G.; Howard, J.A.K.; MacBride, J.A.H.; Mackinnon, A.; Wade, K. Intra- and inter-molecular carboranyl C–H⋯N hydrogen bonds in pyridyl-containing ortho-carboranes. Dalton Trans. 2003, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, X.; Jin, G.-X. Preparation, structure, and olefin polymerization behavior of a picolyl-functionalized carborane nickel(II) complex. Organometallics 2004, 23, 6319–6322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, X.; Jin, G.-X. Preparation, structure, and ethylene polymerization behavior of half-sandwich picolyl-functionalized carborane iridium, ruthenium, and rhodium complexes. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 5758–5764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Lu, J.-Y.; Wan, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Du, Y.; Li, C.; Liu, Z.-T.; Liu, Z.-W.; Lu, J. Palladium-catalyzed direct cross-coupling of carboranyllithium with (hetero)aryl halides. Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 17542–17546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Islam, M.J.; Smith, M.D.; Peryshkov, D.V. Sterically encumbered dianionic dicarboranyl pincer ligand (C5H3N)(C2B10H11)2 and its CNC nickel(II) complex. J. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 867, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Anderson, K.P.; Mills, H.A.; Mao, C.; Kirlikovali, K.O.; Axtell, J.C.; Rheingold, A.L.; Spokoyny, A.M. Improved synthesis of icosahedral carboranes containing exopolyhedral B-C and C-C bonds. Tetrahedron 2019, 75, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Terrasson, V.; Planas, J.G.; Prim, D.; Viñas, C.; Teixidor, F.; Light, M.E.; Hursthouse, M.B. Cooperative effect of carborane and pyridine in the reaction of carboranyl alcohols with thionyl chloride: Halogenation versus oxidation. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 9140–9143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Terrasson, V.; Planas, J.G.; Viñas, C.; Teixidor, F.; Prim, D.; Light, M.E.; Hursthouse, M.B. closo-o-Carboranylmethylamine-pyridine associations: Synthesis, characterization, and first complexation studies. Organometallics 2010, 29, 4130–4134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Di Salvo, F.; Camargo, B.; García, Y.; Teixidor, F.; Viñas, C.; Planas, J.G.; Light, M.E.; Hursthouse, M.B. Supramolecular architectures in o-carboranylalcohols bearing N-aromatic rings: Syntheses, crystal structures and melting points correlation. CrystEngComm 2011, 13, 5788–5806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Peng, B.; Nie, Y.; Miao, J.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, M.; Sun, G. Synthesis, structures and photophysical properties of (o-carboranyl)-(pyridyl)methanols. J. Mol. Struct. 2012, 1007, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Di Salvo, F.; Paterakis, C.; Tsang, M.Y.; García, Y.; Viñas, C.; Teixidor, F.; Planas, J.G.; Light, M.E.; Hursthouse, M.B.; Choquesillo-Lazarte, D. Synthesis and crystallographic studies of disubstituted carboranyl alcohol derivatives: Prevailing chiral recognition? Cryst. Growth Des. 2013, 13, 1473–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tsang, M.Y.; Viñas, C.; Teixidor, F.; Planas, J.G.; Conde, N.; SanMartin, R.; Herrero, M.T.; Domínguez, E.; Lledós, A.; Vidossich, P.; et al. Synthesis, structure, and catalytic applications for ortho- and meta-carboranyl based NBN pincer-Pd complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 9284–9295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Teixidor, F.; Laromaine, A.; Kivekäs, R.; Sillanpää, R.; Viñas, C.; Vespalec, R.; Horakova, H. Synthesis, reactivity and complexation studies of N,S exo-heterodisubstituted o-carborane ligands. Carborane as a platform to produce the uncommon bidentate chelating (pyridine)N-C-C-C-S(H) motif. Dalton Trans. 2008, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Di Salvo, F.; Teixidor, F.; Viñas, C.; Planas, J.G.; Light, M.E.; Hursthouse, M.B.; Aliaga-Alcalde, N. Metallosupramolecular chemistry of novel chiral closo-o-carboranylalcohol pyridine and quinoline ligands: Syntheses, characterization, and properties of cobalt complexes. Cryst. Growth Des. 2012, 12, 5720–5736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Di Salvo, F.; Teixidor, F.; Viñas, C.; Planas, J.G. A distinct tetradentate N2O2-type ligand: (o-Carboranyl)bis(2-hydroxymethyl)pyridine. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2013, 639, 1194–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bae, H.J.; Kim, H.; Lee, K.M.; Kim, T.; Eo, M.; Lee, Y.S.; Do, Y.; Lee, M.H. Heteroleptic tris-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes supported by an o-carboranyl-pyridine ligand. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 8549–8552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Di Salvo, F.; Tsang, M.Y.; Teixidor, F.; Viñas, C.; Planas, J.G.; Crassous, J.; Vanthuyne, N.; Aliaga-Alcalde, N.; Ruiz, E.; Coquerel, G.; et al. A racemic and enantiopure unsymmetric diiron(III) complex with a chiral o-carborane-based pyridylalcohol ligand: Combined chiroptical, magnetic, and nonlinear optical properties. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 1081–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tsang, M.Y.; Teixidor, F.; Viñas, C.; Choquesillo-Lazarte, D.; Aliaga-Alcalde, N.; Planas, J.G. Synthesis, structures and properties of ironIII complexes with (o-carboranyl)bis-(2-hydroxymethyl)pyridine: Racemic versus meso. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2016, 448, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tsang, M.Y.; Rodríguez-Hermida, S.; Stylianou, K.C.; Tan, F.; Negi, D.; Teixidor, F.; Viñas, C.; Choquesillo-Lazarte, D.; Verdugo-Escamilla, C.; Guerrero, M.; et al. Carborane bis-pyridylalcohols as linkers for coordination polymers: Synthesis, crystal structures, and guest-framework dependent mechanical properties. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17, 846–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tsang, M.Y.; Viñas, C.; Teixidor, F.; Choquesillo-Lazarte, D.; Planas, J.G. Crystalline inclusion compounds of a palladacyclic tetraol host featuring o-carborane units. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 2017, 4589–4598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Guo, S.-T.; Cui, P.-F.; Gao, Y.; Jin, G.-X. Regioselective B-H/C-H activation and metal–metal bond formation induced by half-sandwich metals complexes at hydroxy-substituted o-carboranes. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 13641–13646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Islam, M.J.; Park, K.C.; Manley, O.M.; Smith, M.D.; Makris, T.M.; Peryshkov, D.V. Room-temperature aerobic C-CN bond activation in nickel(II) cyanomethyl dicarboranyl complex. Organometallics 2023, 42, 1997–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Viñas, C.; Laromaine, A.; Teixidor, F.; Horakova, H.; Langauf, A.; Vespalec, R.; Mata, I.; Molins, E. Synthesis and investigation of the boron cluster anion [7-(2′-pyridyl)-7,8-nido-dicarbaundecaborate] and its protonated form. Dalton Trans. 2007, 3369–3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lee, J.-D.; Lee, Y.-J.; Son, K.-C.; Han, W.-S.; Cheong, M.; Ko, J.; Kang, S.O. Synthesis, characterization, and reactivity of new types of constrained geometry group 4 metal complexes derived from picolyl-substituted dicarbollide ligand systems. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692, 5403–5413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Frank, R.; Grell, T.; Hiller, M.; Hey-Hawkins, E. Electrophilic substitution of the nido-dicarbaborate anion 7,8-nido-C2B9H12− with sulfenyl chlorides. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 6155–6161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Park, J.-S.; Kim, D.-H.; Kim, S.-J.; Ko, J.; Kim, S.H.; Cho, S.; Lee, C.-H.; Kang, S.O. Preparation and reactions of a half-sandwich dicarbollyl nickel(II) complex containing a dimethylamino pendent group. Organometallics 2001, 20, 4483–4491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lee, J.-D.; Lee, Y.-J.; Son, K.-C.; Cheong, M.; Ko, J.; Kang, S.O. New types of constrained geometry group 4 metal complexes derived from the aminomethyldicarbollyl ligand system:  Synthesis and structural characterization of mono-dicarbollylamino and bis-dicarbollylamino group 4 metal complexes. Organometallics 2007, 26, 3374–3384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lee, J.-D.; Kim, S.-K.; Kim, T.J.; Han, W.-S.; Lee, Y.-J.; Yoo, D.-H.; Cheong, M.; Ko, J.; Kang, S.O. Dicarbollylamine ligand as a tunable template for σ,σ- and π,σ-bonding modes: Syntheses, structures, and theoretical studies of η5:η1-coordinated constrained-geometry group 13 metal complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9904–9917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kang, S.O.; Lee, J.-D. New types of charge-compensated metallacarboranes: Synthesis, characterization, and structural studies of [(η5-RC2B9H9CH2NMe2)Cr(μ-Cl)Cl]2 (R = H, Me). J. Organomet. Chem. 2015, 798, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, D.; Qiu, Z.; Xie, Z. Synthesis, structure, and alkyne insertion of a mixed-sandwich zirconacarborane alkyl. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2015, 2, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, D.; Qiu, Z.; Xie, Z. Synthesis, structure, and reactivity of mixed-sandwich zirconacarborane methyl complex (η5-C5Me5)[η1:η5-(Me2NCH2CH2)C2B9H10]ZrMe. J. Organomet. Chem. 2016, 822, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Axtell, J.C.; Kirlikovali, K.O.; Djurovich, P.I.; Jung, D.; Nguyen, V.T.; Munekiyo, B.; Royappa, A.T.; Rheingold, A.L.; Spokoyny, A.M. Blue phosphorescent zwitterionic iridium(III) complexes featuring weakly coordinating nido-carborane-based ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 15758–15765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mingos, D.M.P.; Forsyth, M.I.; Welch, A.J. X-Ray crystallographic and theoretical studies on ‘slipped’ metallacarboranes. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1977, 605–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mingos, D.M.P. Molecular-orbital studies on carbametallaboranes. Part 1. Icosahedral carbaplatinaborane polyhedral. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1977, 602–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mingos, D.M.P.; Forsyth, M.I.; Welch, A.J. Molecular and crystal structure of 3,3-bis(triethylphosphine)-1,2-dicarba- 3-platinadodecaborane(11), and molecular-orbital analysis of the ‘slip’ distortion in carbametallaboranes. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1978, 1363–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kennedy, R.D.; Kennedy, J.D. The contrarotational fluxionality of [3,3-(PMe2Ph)2-closo-3,1,2-PtC2B9H11] and related species. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 9620–9629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sivaev, I.B.; Bregadze, V.I. Chemistry of nickel and iron bis(dicarbollides). A review. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 614–615, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nan, R.; Li, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Qi, F.; Xiao, X.-Q. Nickelacarborane-supported bis-N-heterocyclic carbenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 15538–15546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Semyonov, D.K.; Slushko, G.K.; Stogniy, M.Y.; Anufriev, S.A.; Godovikov, I.A.; Suponitsky, K.Y.; Bregadze, V.I.; Sivaev, I.B. Interligand interactions in half-sandwich nickelacarboranes with phosphine ligands: Away from skeletal rearrangements. Organometallics 2023, 42, 2522–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Semyonov, D.K.; Stogniy, M.Y.; Suponitsky, K.Y.; Sivaev, I.B. Half-sandwich nickelacarboranes derived from [7-(MeO(CH2)2S)-7,8-C2B9H11]-. Inorganics 2023, 11, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mandal, D.; Man, W.Y.; Rosair, G.M.; Welch, A.J. Steric versus electronic factors in metallacarborane isomerisation: Nickelacarboranes with 3,1,2-, 4,1,2- and 2,1,8-NiC2B9 architectures and pendant carborane groups, derived from 1,1′-bis(o-carborane). Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 15013–15025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Mandal, D.; Rosair, G.M. Exploration of bis(nickelation) of 1,1′-bis(o-carborane). Crystals 2021, 11, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Stogniy, M.Y.; Erokhina, S.A.; Suponitsky, K.Y.; Markov, V.Y.; Sivaev, I.B. Synthesis and crystal structures of nickel(II) and palladium(II) complexes with o-carboranyl amidine ligands. Dalton Trans. 2021, 50, 4967–4975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Stogniy, M.Y.; Erokhina, S.A.; Suponitsky, K.Y.; Sivaev, I.B.; Bregadze, V.I. Coordination ability of 10-EtC(NHPr)=HN- 7,8-C2B9H11 in the reactions with nickel(II) phosphine complexes. Crystals 2021, 11, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hao, E.; Friso, E.; Miotto, G.; Jori, G.; Soncin, M.; Fabris, C.; Sibrian-Vazquez, M.; Vicente, M.G.H. Synthesis and biological investigations of tetrakis(p-carboranylthio-tetrafluorophenyl)chlorin (TPFC). Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 3732–3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gibbs, J.H.; Wang, H.; Bhupathiraju, N.V.S.D.K.; Fronczek, F.R.; Smith, K.M.; Vicente, M.G.H. Synthesis and properties of a series of carboranyl-BODIPYs. J. Organomet. Chem. 2015, 798, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kellert, M.; Lönnecke, P.; Riedl, B.; Koebberling, J.; Hey-Hawkins, E. Enlargement of a modular system—Synthesis and characterization of an s-triazine-based carboxylic acid ester bearing a galactopyranosyl moiety and an enormous boron load. Molecules 2019, 24, 3288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Alpatova, V.A.; Rys, E.G.; Kononova, E.G.; Khakina, E.A.; Markova, A.A.; Shibaeva, A.V.; Kuzmin, V.A.; Ol’shevskaya, V.A. Multicomponent molecular systems based on porphyrins, 1,3,5-triazine and carboranes: Synthesis and characterization. Molecules 2022, 27, 6200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Stogniy, M.Y.; Sivaev, I.B.; Petrovskii, P.V.; Bregadze, V.I. Synthesis of monosubstituted functional derivatives of carboranes from 1-mercapto-ortho-carborane: 1-HOOC(CH2)nS-1,2-C2B10H11 and [7-HOOC(CH2)nS-7,8-C2B9H11]− (n = 1-4). Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 1817–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Stogniy, M.Y.; Zakharova, M.V.; Sivaev, I.B.; Godovikov, I.A.; Chizov, A.O.; Bregadze, V.I. Synthesis of new carborane-based amino acids. Polyhedron 2013, 55, 117–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Stogniy, M.Y.; Sivaev, I.B.; Godovikov, I.A.; Starikova, Z.A.; Bregadze, V.I.; Qi, S. Synthesis of new ω-amino- and ω-azidoalkyl carboranes. New J. Chem. 2013, 37, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Stogniy, M.Y.; Erokhina, S.A.; Druzina, A.A.; Sivaev, I.B.; Bregadze, V.I. Synthesis of novel carboranyl azides and “click” reactions thereof. J. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 904, 121007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Druzina, A.A.; Stogniy, M.Y. Synthesis of cholesterol derivatives based on closo- and nido-carboranes. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2021, 70, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Standley, E.A.; Smith, S.J.; Müller, P.; Jamison, T.F. A broadly applicable strategy for entry into homogeneous nickel(0) catalysts from air-stable nickel(II) complexes. Organometallics 2014, 33, 2012–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Itatani, H.; Bailar, J.C. Homogenous catalysis in the reactions of olefinic substances. V. Hydrogenation of soybean oil methyl ester with triphenylphosphine and triphenylarsine palladium catalysts. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1967, 44, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Armarego, W.L.F.; Chai, C.L.L. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals, 6th ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Burlington, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  83. APEX2 and SAINT; Bruker AXS Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2014.
  84. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Cryst. C 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 15069 g001
Figure 1. General view of metal complexes based on nido-carboranes with pendant pyridine group.
Figure 1. General view of metal complexes based on nido-carboranes with pendant pyridine group.
Ijms 24 15069 g001
Ijms 24 15069 sch001
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Cs[9-(NC5H4-2′-S)-7,8-C2B9H11] (Cs[1]).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Cs[9-(NC5H4-2′-S)-7,8-C2B9H11] (Cs[1]).
Ijms 24 15069 sch001
Ijms 24 15069 sch002
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Cs[7-(NC5H4-2′-S)-7,8-C2B9H11] (Cs[3]).
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Cs[7-(NC5H4-2′-S)-7,8-C2B9H11] (Cs[3]).
Ijms 24 15069 sch002
Ijms 24 15069 g002
Figure 2. General view of 1-(NC5H4-2′-S)-1,2-C2B10H11·HBr showing numbering scheme. Thermal ellipsoids are given at 50% probability level. The closest contacts formed by the Br− anion are shown by dashed lines.
Figure 2. General view of 1-(NC5H4-2′-S)-1,2-C2B10H11·HBr showing numbering scheme. Thermal ellipsoids are given at 50% probability level. The closest contacts formed by the Br− anion are shown by dashed lines.
Ijms 24 15069 g002
Ijms 24 15069 sch003
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Cs[7-(NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-7,8-C2B9H11] (Cs[5]).
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Cs[7-(NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-7,8-C2B9H11] (Cs[5]).
Ijms 24 15069 sch003
Ijms 24 15069 g003
Figure 3. General view of 1-(NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-1,2-C2B10H11 (4) (left) and Cs[7-(NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-7,8-C2B9H11]·0.5Me2CO (Cs[5]·0.5Me2CO) (right) showing numbering scheme. Thermal ellipsoids are given at 50% probability level. The closest contacts formed by the Cs+ cation are shown by dashed lines.
Figure 3. General view of 1-(NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-1,2-C2B10H11 (4) (left) and Cs[7-(NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-7,8-C2B9H11]·0.5Me2CO (Cs[5]·0.5Me2CO) (right) showing numbering scheme. Thermal ellipsoids are given at 50% probability level. The closest contacts formed by the Cs+ cation are shown by dashed lines.
Ijms 24 15069 g003
Ijms 24 15069 sch004
Scheme 4. Synthesis of metallacarboranes 3-Ph3P-3-(4(7)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (6) and 3-Ph3P-3-(4(7)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (7).
Scheme 4. Synthesis of metallacarboranes 3-Ph3P-3-(4(7)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (6) and 3-Ph3P-3-(4(7)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (7).
Ijms 24 15069 sch004
Ijms 24 15069 g004
Figure 4. General view of 3-Ph3P-3-(4(7)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (6) showing numbering scheme. Thermal ellipsoids are given at 50% probability level.
Figure 4. General view of 3-Ph3P-3-(4(7)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (6) showing numbering scheme. Thermal ellipsoids are given at 50% probability level.
Ijms 24 15069 g004
Ijms 24 15069 sch005
Scheme 5. Synthesis of metallacarboranes 3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (8) and 3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (9).
Scheme 5. Synthesis of metallacarboranes 3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (8) and 3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (9).
Ijms 24 15069 sch005
Ijms 24 15069 sch006
Scheme 6. Synthesis of metallacarboranes 3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (10) and 3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (11).
Scheme 6. Synthesis of metallacarboranes 3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (10) and 3-Ph3P-3-(1(2)-NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (11).
Ijms 24 15069 sch006
Ijms 24 15069 g005
Figure 5. General view of 3-Ph3P-3-(4(7)-NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (10) showing numbering scheme. Thermal ellipsoids are given at 50% probability level.
Figure 5. General view of 3-Ph3P-3-(4(7)-NC5H4-2′-CH2S)-closo-3,1,2-NiC2B9H10 (10) showing numbering scheme. Thermal ellipsoids are given at 50% probability level.
Ijms 24 15069 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Semyonov, D.K.; Stogniy, M.Y.; Anufriev, S.A.; Timofeev, S.V.; Suponitsky, K.Y.; Sivaev, I.B. Nickel(II) and Palladium(II) Complexes with η5:κ1(N)-Coordinated Dicarbollide Ligands Containing Pendant Pyridine Group. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15069. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015069

AMA Style

Semyonov DK, Stogniy MY, Anufriev SA, Timofeev SV, Suponitsky KY, Sivaev IB. Nickel(II) and Palladium(II) Complexes with η5:κ1(N)-Coordinated Dicarbollide Ligands Containing Pendant Pyridine Group. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(20):15069. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015069

Chicago/Turabian Style

Semyonov, Dmitriy K., Marina Yu. Stogniy, Sergey A. Anufriev, Sergey V. Timofeev, Kyrill Yu. Suponitsky, and Igor B. Sivaev. 2023. "Nickel(II) and Palladium(II) Complexes with η5:κ1(N)-Coordinated Dicarbollide Ligands Containing Pendant Pyridine Group" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 20: 15069. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015069

APA Style

Semyonov, D. K., Stogniy, M. Y., Anufriev, S. A., Timofeev, S. V., Suponitsky, K. Y., & Sivaev, I. B. (2023). Nickel(II) and Palladium(II) Complexes with η5:κ1(N)-Coordinated Dicarbollide Ligands Containing Pendant Pyridine Group. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(20), 15069. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015069

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop