Next Article in Journal
Study on the Antioxidant Effect of Shikonin-Loaded β-Cyclodextrin Forming Host–Guest Complexes That Prevent Skin from Photoaging
Next Article in Special Issue
Circulating Proteins as Diagnostic Markers in Gastric Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Suppressors of lapC Mutation Identify New Regulators of LpxC, Which Mediates the First Committed Step in Lipopolysaccharide Biosynthesis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inhibition of HSP90 in Driver Oncogene-Defined Lung Adenocarcinoma Cell Lines: Key Proteins Underpinning Therapeutic Efficacy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Searching for Atherosclerosis Biomarkers by Proteomics: A Focus on Lesion Pathogenesis and Vulnerability

by
Gabriele Nieddu
,
Marilena Formato
and
Antonio Junior Lepedda
*
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(20), 15175; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015175
Submission received: 19 July 2023 / Revised: 11 October 2023 / Accepted: 12 October 2023 / Published: 14 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Proteomics and Its Applications in Disease: 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
Plaque rupture and thrombosis are the most important clinical complications in the pathogenesis of stroke, coronary arteries, and peripheral vascular diseases. The identification of early biomarkers of plaque presence and susceptibility to ulceration could be of primary importance in preventing such life-threatening events. With the improvement of proteomic tools, large-scale technologies have been proven valuable in attempting to unravel pathways of atherosclerotic degeneration and identifying new circulating markers to be utilized either as early diagnostic traits or as targets for new drug therapies. To address these issues, different matrices of human origin, such as vascular cells, arterial tissues, plasma, and urine, have been investigated. Besides, proteomics was also applied to experimental atherosclerosis in order to unveil significant insights into the mechanisms influencing atherogenesis. This narrative review provides an overview of the last twenty years of omics applications to the study of atherogenesis and lesion vulnerability, with particular emphasis on lipoproteomics and vascular tissue proteomics. Major issues of tissue analyses, such as plaque complexity, sampling, availability, choice of proper controls, and lipoproteins purification, will be raised, and future directions will be addressed.

1. Introduction

Atherosclerosis stands as the primary contributor to the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), the leading cause of death and illness in developed nations, being responsible for major acute clinical events, such as ischemic heart disease (IHD), and stroke (16.17% and 11.59% of global deaths in 2019, respectively) (Figure 1).
It is a multifactorial disease, in which several genetic (e.g., high LDL-cholesterol, low HDL-cholesterol, hypertension, diabetes, gender) and environmental (e.g., high-fat diet, smoking, lack of exercise) factors play a role. Atherogenesis begins with the formation of a fatty streak into the subendothelial space of medium and large arteries in the first decade of life [1], which may evolve toward the development of an atherosclerotic plaque with significant intra- and inter-individual heterogeneity in terms of both growth rate and pathologic features [2]. The occurrence of plaque rupture or erosion leading to atherothrombosis is the underlying pathology responsible for major acute events, such as stroke, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and peripheral artery occlusion [3,4]. In this respect, several lines of evidence suggest that unstable plaques are characterized by a more pronounced inflammation and proteolysis [5,6], as well as a pro-oxidant environment [7,8]. To date, considerable efforts have been focused on both elucidating the determinants of carotid plaque vulnerability and identifying reliable and specific markers for the susceptibility of plaques to ulceration, in order to prevent significant adverse clinical events associated with thrombosis and artery occlusion [9].
Figure 1. Picture showing the contribution of major acute cardiovascular events such as IHD and stroke to global deaths in 2019 [10]. Blue: non-communicable diseases. Red: communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases. Green: injuries.
Figure 1. Picture showing the contribution of major acute cardiovascular events such as IHD and stroke to global deaths in 2019 [10]. Blue: non-communicable diseases. Red: communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases. Green: injuries.
Ijms 24 15175 g001
Gaining a thorough understanding of the arterial protein networks involved in the development of plaque formation, as well as their subsequent alterations during the early stages of atherosclerosis, may contribute to implementing personalized therapies [11]. Accordingly, over the past two decades, advancements in proteomic tools have enabled the application of large-scale technologies to unravel pathways involved in atherosclerotic degeneration, also allowing the identification of new circulating markers that are useful as early diagnostic traits or as targets for new drug therapies, besides being indicative of physiological alterations associated with vascular aging [12]. To tackle this challenge, several proteomic approaches, such as one-dimensional and two-dimensional electrophoresis (1-DE and 2-DE) followed by mass spectrometry (MS) analyses, protein arrays [13,14], and gel-free MS-based proteomics, have been applied to different matrices of human origin [15], such as vascular cells [16,17,18] and arterial tissues, targeting total extracts [19], extracts from laser capture microdissection (LCM) [20], secretomes [21], plasma/serum [22], urine [23], and purified plasma lipoprotein fractions [24,25] (Figure 2). In addition, platelets, which are known to be key modulators of inflammation and immune response [26,27], as well as the primary target for the prevention of arterial thrombus formation, have been investigated through different -omics approaches including proteomics, lipidomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics, and translatomics, as recently described by Gutmann et al. [28]. Besides this, proteomics has been applied to animal models such as apo E knock-out mice [29,30,31,32], rabbits [33,34,35], and pigs [36,37] to unveil significant insights into the molecular mechanisms influencing atherogenesis. Although in its infancy, further support in the search for additional markers of atherogenesis and plaque degeneration has been provided by lipidomics of plasma/lipoprotein fractions [38,39,40], as well as of atherosclerotic tissues [41,42].
Herein, the results of an in-depth literature search using MEDLINE (PubMed) were reported, with the aim to provide an overview of the last 20 years of proteomics and lipidomics studies on atherosclerosis, with particular emphasis on lipoproteins and atherosclerotic tissues.

2. Application of MS-Based Technologies to the Study of Lipoproteins Involvement in Atherogenesis

Lipoproteins are supramolecular complexes that deliver insoluble lipids from the tissues where they are synthesized to those that metabolize or store them. They consist of a hydrophobic core, mainly composed by triacylglycerols and cholesteryl esters, stabilized by a coat of amphipathic compounds, namely phospholipids, unesterified cholesterol, and proteins, with the latter referred to as apolipoproteins (apo) [44].
Lipoprotein classes that have been described so far differ in terms of chemical compositions, physical properties, as well as metabolic functions, and may be classified according to their densities in chylomicrons (d < 0.95 g/mL), very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL, d < 1.006 g/mL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL, 1.019 < d < 1.063 g/mL) and high-density lipoproteins (HDL, 1.063 < d < 1.21 g/mL) [45]. A further class of lipoprotein particles is known as lipoprotein(a) or Lp(a), an LDL-like particle that carries a heavily glycosylated multi-kringle protein named apolipoprotein(a), linked to apo B100 by a single disulfide bond. The physiological role of Lp(a) is still unknown, although it has been demonstrated to be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease [46]. Lipoproteins, especially low-density and high-density lipoproteins (LDL and HDL), have attracted a great deal of interest because of their implications in the development of cardiovascular diseases. LDL is the main carrier of cholesterol to the peripheral tissues, and a well-established major risk factor for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases [47]. Indeed, in 1995, Williams and Tabas published the “response-to-retention” hypothesis; according to this theory, early events in atherogenesis are related to the selective retention of LDL in the sub-endothelial space of the artery wall by means of specific interactions with some extracellular matrix components [48]. HDL exerts significant vascular protective effects by facilitating the elimination of cholesterol excess from cells and its transport to the liver (reverse cholesterol transport) [49], besides performing antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-thrombotic activities [50]. Furthermore, Vaisar et al. reported that HDL is enriched in several proteins involved in the complement cascade, suggesting a role in innate immunity [51].

2.1. Lipoproteomics

In recent years, it has become more evident that the protein composition of each lipoprotein class is largely responsible for its various functions, particularly in relation to pathological conditions, including atherosclerosis. Consequently, acquiring detailed information about the composition and structure of their apolipoproteins cargo could potentially shed light on their involvement in atherogenesis and on the progression of atherosclerotic lesions, ultimately leading to the formation of vulnerable plaques. In this respect, the method adopted for the isolation of lipoproteins has to be taken into great consideration, as it may significantly affect the protein content of the purified particles [52]. Traditional methods, established in the 1950s [53], include ultracentrifugation in high-salt media containing KBr or NaBr (Figure 3). It is worth mentioning the recent review by Chary and Hedayati, in which some techniques used to isolate and measure LDL and HDL subclasses are reported, including agarose gel electrophoresis, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and LipoPrint [54].
Several lipoproteomic studies have been published using these procedures of lipoprotein isolation (see Supplementary Materials 1 of Finamore et al. [56]). However, the high ionic strength and the high centrifugal field forces might cause either the dissociation of proteins or their exchange between different lipoprotein classes, potentially altering the pattern of associated exchangeable apolipoproteins. Indeed, some of these studies reported a loss of proteins after a second step of ultracentrifugation [57,58,59]. Some others employed two ultracentrifuge procedures, using both salts and other compounds, such as sucrose and iodixanol [60,61], reporting comparable results. In this respect, Stahlman et al. reported that deuterium oxide (D2O) has to be preferred over salts for isolating both LDL and HDL, due to the abovementioned high ionic strength of the isopycnic medium [62]. Alternatively, lipoproteins can be isolated by means of immunopurification methods that rely on specific antibodies for the dominant protein of each class. Although this procedure does not lead to the loss of weakly associated proteins, it may co-purify nonspecifically associated proteins, such as serum contaminants and/or other lipoprotein fractions carrying the same antibody target (e.g., apolipoprotein A-I is the main HDL apolipoprotein, but it is also present in both VLDL and LDL fractions). Other lipoprotein isolation methods that have been applied in lipoproteomic studies involve electrophoretic techniques, specifically free solution isotachophoresis [63], and chromatographic techniques, such as fast protein liquid chromatography [64], and size exclusion/affinity chromatography [65,66]. Besides the method used for lipoprotein purification, the performance of the mass spectrometry analysis as well as the sample heterogeneity are major contributors to the differences reported from study to study (see Davidson et al. 2022 [67] for a detailed discussion).
An updated list of all identified HDL (last update 20 April 2023) and LDL (last update 18 February 2015) proteins, ranked according to the frequency of identification in MS studies, can be downloaded at the “The Davidson/Shah lab” website (www.DavidsonLab.com, accessed on 14 July 2023).
According to “The HDL Proteome Watch Database” by the Davidson Laboratory, which has included 51 proteomics studies on HDL, published up to 2022, 1030 proteins have been identified, of which 285 (defined as “likely” HDL proteins) have been reported by at least three different laboratories. Gene ontology analyses on the “likely” HDL proteins revealed that they are implicated in several biological processes including lipid transport, hemostasis/protease inhibition, inflammation/acute phase, immunity/anti-microbial and cell/heparin binding [67]. With regard to LDL, the Davidson database lists 60 proteins from four proteomics studies up to 2015; amidst these, 22 (defined as “likely” LDL proteins) were identified independently by at least two studies (apolipoproteins A-I, A-II, A-IV, B, C-I, C-II, C-III, C-IV, D, E, F, J, L1, M, (a), serum amyloid A1, A2, A4, albumin, alpha-1-antitrypsin, cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide, dermcidin, fibrinogen alpha chain).
Recently, by applying shotgun proteomics to identify the apolipoprotein signatures of both HDL and LDL from healthy volunteers and atherosclerotic patients with different carotid plaque typologies, we enriched the list of LDL-associated proteins with 21 proteins that, by means of gene ontology analysis, were shown to be involved in complement and coagulation cascades, and the acute-phase response, potentially doubling the protein species of LDL cargo [56] (Figure 4).
Only a few studies dealt with the VLDL proteome, mostly comparing it with that of LDL and/or HDL under physiological conditions [57,61,62,70,71,72,73]. Among them, Dashty et al. identified 95 VLDL- and 51 LDL-associated proteins (of which 39 shared proteins and 56 and 12 were unique for VLDL and LDL, respectively), including all known apolipoproteins and lipid transport proteins, and a set of coagulation proteins, complement system proteins, and anti-microbial proteins [68].
Scant data have been reported on the Lp(a) proteome so far. Von Zychlinski et al. performed two-dimensional liquid chromatography-coupled tandem mass spectrometry on highly purified Lp(a) particles that underwent tryptic digestion, identifying with high confidence 35 proteins involved in two major biological processes of lipid metabolism and response to wounding, the latter including the processes of coagulation, complement activation, and inflammatory response [74]. Bourgeois and colleagues performed a discovery analysis on both Lp(a) and LDL identifying 154 associated proteins, whereas a differential analysis between the Lp(a) and LDL proteomes showed 15 proteins preferentially associated with Lp(a) with potential implications for acute inflammatory response, extracellular structure organization, and protease inhibition [75]. Very recently, Mueller et al. set up a method for the isolation of Lp(a), starting from very small volumes of plasma samples (0.4 mL), suitable for different applications including in-depth analysis by mass spectrometry, opening up the opportunity to perform proteomics on casuistries with a limited availability of samples [76].
Over the past two decades, numerous proteomic studies have been conducted on purified lipoprotein fractions, investigating both physiological and pathological conditions, the latter including coronary artery disease (CAD), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), end-stage renal disease, type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM and T2DM), and experimental atherosclerosis (Table 1).
To the best of our knowledge, the application of both proteomics and lipidomics to lipoproteins from atherosclerotic tissue remains a path that is partially unexplored, probably because of the intrinsic issues in purifying them from the extracellular lipid-rich matrix of the plaque.

2.2. Lipidomics

Despite providing valuable insights into the various functions of each lipoprotein class in relation to cardiovascular disease, there is currently a lack of the additional information required to assess the risk of acute clinical event onset. Indeed, the multifaceted biological functions of lipoproteins, especially HDL, arise from the combined protein and lipid components, and any disruptions or modifications of these components can lead to dysfunctional particles [122]. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in plasma lipidomics due to compelling evidence linking specific plasma lipid species to the development of atherosclerosis [38,123,124,125,126,127,128,129], and the onset of adverse clinical events [39,130,131,132,133,134]. However, to date, only a limited number of studies have explored the association between biologically active lipids, particularly those associated with their lipoprotein carriers, and cardiovascular disease (CVD), as also recently reviewed by Ding and Rexrode [135].
The majority of the published studies have evidenced changes in the HDL phospho- and sphingo-lipidomes in relation with type 1 diabetes [136], type 2 diabetes [137,138], obesity and metabolic syndrome [139,140], dyslipidemia [141,142], and experimental atherosclerosis [143,144]. Furthermore, it has been shown that either Pitavastatin treatment [145] or lifestyle changes, involving weight loss and physical activity [146], were able to revert the HDL lipidome in metabolic syndrome. Besides this, both statin treatment [147] and phytosterol and omega-3 diet supplementation [148] were found to induce changes in LDL lipidome, resulting in a decreased cardiovascular risk.
The lipidome profiles of both HDL and LDL were also examined in relation to CAD and ACS [149,150,151], showing distinct profiles with respect to healthy controls, whereas the HDL phosphosphingolipidome was shown to have distinct signatures in subjects affected by hyperalphalipoproteinemia, a rare condition characterized by high plasma HDL-cholesterol levels associated with an increased risk of early CAD onset [152,153].
From our side, in order to identify further markers of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability, we performed lipidomics via selected reaction monitoring-based high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (SRM-based HPLC-MS/MS) analysis on plasma HDL, LDL, and VLDL fractions purified from twenty-eight patients with advanced carotid lesions, sorted according to the typology of plaque by ultrasonography into hypoechoic, or “soft”, and hyperechoic, or “hard”. By this approach, we evidenced a significant dysregulation of LDL phosphatidylethanolamine (38:6), sphingomyelin (32:1), and sphingomyelin (32:2) between the two groups of patients, in line with the current knowledge of the key roles of these phospholipids in lipoprotein metabolism and cardiovascular disease [55].
With the aim of obtaining a deeper insight into lipoproteins’ metabolism in association with CVD, very recently, Wang and coworkers developed a high-resolution method to depict both the proteome and lipidome of lipoproteins, and their interconnections [40]. Using this approach, they demonstrated that the combined results yielded enhanced differentiation between ACS and healthy individuals compared to either proteomics and/or lipidomics alone.

3. Atherosclerotic Plaque Dissection through Proteomics

Although tissue analyses frequently provide useful information, there are major issues in analyzing human atheromas specimens. In fact, the atherosclerotic plaque environment is a very complex tissue in terms of cell types involved, as well as inflammatory, proteolytic, and oxidative mechanisms, which ultimately reflect a systemic condition resulting from the long-term persistence of multiple environmental and genetic risk factors. In this respect, besides vascular smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells, plaque contains many types of inflammatory cells, filtered plasma proteins, newly formed extracellular matrices, cellular debris and end-products of lipid and protein oxidation [2,3,4]. This issue could be partially overcome by selecting specific cells or plaque areas using LCM, a path explored only to a limited extent by proteomics, which holds significant promises. Another critical point of the in situ analyses is the choice of an appropriate control. To minimize inherent tissue differences, it would be desirable to use control specimens from the same vascular district of the same patient. Furthermore, specimens should be taken from surgical endarterectomy rather than from post-mortem material, to avoid tissue degradation before the analysis. The availability of a poor number of human specimens could be a limitation, as well. Because of the heterogeneity of the different types of advanced lesions in terms of fibrous cap thickness, inflammatory and proteolytic components, calcifications, surface erosion, thrombosis, and intraplaque hemorrhage, a careful histochemical classification prior to biochemical analyses is desirable [154,155].
In the last few years, different proteomic technologies have been applied to diseased human tissues to provide further insights into the molecular mechanisms of advanced atherosclerotic plaque development, as well as to identify diagnostic traits of plaque instability useful as therapeutic targets or as markers for patient follow-up. With this aim, both plaque extracts and secretomes, obtained by culturing different typologies of plaque segments, have been the topic of these studies. Besides this, to delve deeper into the mechanisms underlying the early stages of lesion formation, some animal models, mainly rodents, have been investigated.

3.1. Studies on Human Plaque Extracts

Since 2003, about twenty studies on human atherosclerotic plaque proteomics have been published (Table 2). Most of them focus on coronary or carotid atherosclerosis, using mostly 1-DE, 2-DE, or two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) coupled with image analysis to reveal differentially expressed proteins, followed by protein identification by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight (MALDI-TOF) MS or liquid chromatography (LC) MS/MS. Some limitations of these studies include the low number of analyzed specimens and the choice of the appropriate controls, usually from unaffected vascular districts and/or patients, thus omitting intrinsic tissue and/or inter-individual differences. Sometimes, a proper validation undertaken on an independent cohort of subjects by complementary approaches is also missing.
The first large-scale protein profile of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries was obtained by Bagnato et al., who were able to identify 806 unique proteins with high confidence [159]. They applied the direct tissue proteomic (DTP) approach, a method developed by Hwang et al. for the identification of candidate markers from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cancer specimens [174], to paraffin or frozen blocks from 35 coronary atherosclerotic lesions, classified by histopathological examination in early, intermediate, and advanced stages. In particular, different plaque areas were laser-microdissected from both paraffin and frozen section specimens and subjected to tryptic digestion followed by LC MS/MS to obtain area-specific proteomic information. Frozen sections were also homogenized; the obtained proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, and then analyzed by LC MS/MS. Moreover, they used AQUA (absolute quantitation) methodology to quantify Stromal Cell-derived Factor 1 α (SDF1-α) and growth factors not detected by the above-mentioned methods. By this approach, Bagnato et al. showed that LCMs applied to plaque proteomics represent a suitable tool to compare different areas of the plaque, such as necrotic core and shoulders/fibrous cap, providing valuable spatial information.
LCM was also applied by de la Cuesta et al. to isolate the intimal layers from human atherosclerotic coronaries, and from pre-atherosclerotic coronary and radial arteries, which were analyzed by 2D-DIGE coupled to MALDI-TOF/TOF MS protein identification [163]. They evidenced an altered expression of 13 proteins involved in key processes of plaque development, including vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) migration, extracellular matrix (ECM) composition, coagulation, apoptosis, heat shock response, and intraplaque hemorrhage deposition.
With the aim of going deeper into the plaque proteome, Hao et al. applied multidimensional LC-MS/MS to the analysis of two extract pools from thirty-eight carotid plaques. In total, 4702 proteins were identified, including many low-abundance proteins previously unidentified by MS [165]. In this proof of concept study, an impressive number of proteins was identified, most of them being associated with pathways related to atherogenesis and plaque progression, showing the great potential of proteomics applied to atherosclerosis.
Alonso-Orgaz et al. performed the first proteomic analysis on thrombus, recovered from patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) by percutaneous intracoronary thrombectomy during primary angioplasty. By applying three different proteomic approaches, they were able to identify a total of 708 proteins in the thrombus, including the protein death-inducer obliterator 1, which was proven to be increased in the plasma of STEMI patients, paving the way in the search for biomarkers of thrombosis [167].
By applying proteomics to different regions of human carotid atherosclerotic arteries, namely, internal control, fatty streak, plaque shoulder, plaque center, and fibrous cap, Yuan’s team was able to identify site-specific alterations, some of them gender-specific, with clear associations to extracellular matrix remodeling processes. Overall, their results suggest that women develop plaques with a lower inflammatory profile and a greater stability than men [168,172].
With the aim of identifying novel markers of plaque disruption, Lee et al. performed proteomics on plaque debris obtained during coronary angioplasty, recovered using filterwire devices, identifying 423 proteins. Patients who underwent angiography without stenting were used as controls [169]. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) was found to be significantly increased in lipid-rich plaques, as well as in the plasma of patients following plaque disruption by stenting. The developed method represents a novel approach to the discovery of circulating biomarkers of plaque erosion, which surely represents one of the most important pathological mechanisms underlying major acute clinical events.
Atherogenesis is a degenerative disease of arteries that remains silent for decades, although early lesions can appear in children or young adults. Identifying arterial protein networks and their alterations during the early stages of atherosclerosis may have great diagnostic and therapeutic potential, as well as being useful for acute clinical event prevention. In this respect, Herrington et al. performed a study focused on identifying features of early atherosclerosis by analyzing one hundred coronary and one hundred aortic autoptic specimens from young adults. By this approach, they were able to identify 1925 proteins, as well as numerous networks and pathways associated with early atherosclerosis. Furthermore, based on the obtained results, they selected a panel of thirteen plasma proteins that were demonstrated to be effective in predicting the presence of coronary artery disease in an independent clinical cohort of patients [11].

3.2. Studies on Human Plaque Secretomes

Theoretically, the secretome should reflect the tissue-specific metabolic activities under both physiological and pathological conditions. With respect to plasma, it is also characterized by a lower number of protein species as well as a narrower dynamic range of concentrations. Therefore, it may represent a rich source of biomarkers with potential implications in clinical practice.
The approach of studying the cultured plaque secretome was pioneered by the teams of Vivanco and Egido, and was adopted successfully in some research in the following years (Table 3). To obtain the secretome (the whole set of proteins released/secreted by the plaque), specimens are cultured in serum-free medium, and the supernatant is collected for proteomics analysis. The method set up by Duran et al. analyzed the secretomes from different regions of the same carotid specimens obtained by endarterectomy (normal segments, non-complicated plaques, and complicated plaques with a thrombus), thus avoiding the intra- and inter-individual variability of the control specimens, through 2DE coupled with MS [175].
This method was applied by Martin-Ventura et al. to the analysis of the protein secretion profiles obtained from 35 cultured atherosclerotic plaques (10 femoral, 25 carotids) and 36 control arteries (24 mammary, 12 radial) with the aim of identifying new biological markers potentially released by the arterial wall into the plasma [176]. They showed that heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) secretion into the culture medium was significantly lower in atherosclerotic plaques and barely detectable in complicated plaque supernatants compared to control arteries, as confirmed by western blotting analysis. They also proposed HSP27 as a possible marker of atherosclerosis, since they evidenced a 20-fold reduction in its plasma levels in patients with carotid stenosis with respect to healthy controls. Interestingly, by analyzing the 2DE protein profiles of extracts from nineteen stable and twenty-nine unstable human carotid plaques, we found a reduced expression of HSP27 in the latter [6]. The abovementioned teams evaluated the effects of incubation with atorvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoenzymeA reductase inhibitor, on the secretomes of cultured atherosclerotic plaques [177]. They identified 24 proteins that were increased and 20 proteins that were decreased in atherosclerotic plaque supernatants compared to controls. It is noteworthy that the presence of atorvastatin in the culture medium reverted the secretion of 66% of proteins to their control values. Some of these proteins may contribute to plaque instability, representing potential pharmacological targets.
By applying surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization (SELDI) TOF MS profiling to secretomes from seven carotid atherosclerotic plaques and seven mammary artery specimens, Blanco-Colio et al. identified soluble tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (sTWEAK), which was less expressed in plaques with respect to normal arteries. Notably, this protein was found negatively associated with carotid intima-media thickness, an index of subclinical atherosclerosis, in a group of 106 asymptomatic subjects enrolled for a general health check-up [178].
De la Cuesta et al. performed LC MS/MS analyses on secretomes from human atherosclerotic coronary arteries, pre-atherosclerotic coronaries, and mammary arteries, identifying 64 proteins, 15 of which were not previously reported in plasma. They showed that, due to the reduced dynamic range of the protein concentration of the secretome, it was possible to identify low-expression proteins, not detectable in plasma, with potential therapeutic implications [179].
Rocchiccioli et al. applied LC MS/MS to secretomes from fourteen carotid endarterectomy specimens, using their downstream distal side segments as controls, to obtain detailed protein profiles, thus allowing for the identification of 463 proteins, 31 of which were shown to be differentially secreted. Some of the latter were chosen for further validation by immunohistochemistry and their levels were assessed by ELISA on plasma samples from 34 patients and 10 healthy volunteers, confirming a significantly higher concentration of thrombospondin-1 and the vitamin D-binding protein in atherosclerotic subjects [21].
Another gel-free proteomic approach was adopted by Aragonès et al., which combined tandem immunoaffinity depletion, isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) labeling, and nanoflow liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry for the analysis of secretomes from 12 carotid atherosclerotic plaque and 10 non-atherosclerotic mammary artery specimens [180]. By this approach, 162 proteins were quantified, including 25 proteins showing statistically significant differences. Validation by ELISA was performed for neutrophil defensin 1, apolipoprotein E, clusterin, and zinc-alpha-2-glycoprotein, which showed higher levels in secretomes from carotid atherosclerotic plaques. Although interesting, these results need to be validated on plasma from a large cohort of patients.
Table 3. Proteomics studies on human plaque secretomes. The sample source, the methodology applied, and the most relevant findings are reported. Reduced (↓) or increased (↑) levels of protein concentrations are indicated.
Table 3. Proteomics studies on human plaque secretomes. The sample source, the methodology applied, and the most relevant findings are reported. Reduced (↓) or increased (↑) levels of protein concentrations are indicated.
SamplesProteomicsMain FindingsReferences
Secretome from normal carotid artery segments vs. non complicated plaque vs. complicated plaque with thrombus2DE coupled with MALDI TOF MSThe more complicated the lesion, the higher the number of secreted proteins, suggesting the production of specific proteins relating to the complexity of the atherosclerotic lesion[175]
Secretome from 35 atherosclerotic endarterectomies (10 femoral, 25 carotids) vs. 36 control endarteries (24 mammary, 12 radial)2DE coupled with LC-MS/MSDecreased secretion of HSP27 in complicated atherosclerotic plaques[176]
21 carotid arteries secretomes—stenosing complicated zone (incubated in the presence or absence of atorvastatin) vs. the adjacent fibrous zone2DE coupled with MALDI TOF MS/Q TOF MS↑ 24 proteins ↓ 20 proteins; 66% of the proteins differentially released by atherosclerotic plaques reverted to control values after the administration of atorvastatin[177]
Secretomes from 7 carotid arteries vs. 7 mammary arteriesSELDI TOF MS↓ soluble tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (sTWEAK); sTWEAK concentrations negatively correlated with the carotid intima-media thickness (r 0.4; p 0.001)[178]
Secretomes from three biological replicates of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries (APC), preatherosclerotic coronaries (PC) and mammaries (M)1DE coupled with LC MS/MSIn total, 64 proteins were identified in the 3 replicates of at least one of the 3 groups and 15 secreted proteins have not been previously reported in plasma. Four proteins were significantly released in higher amounts by mammary tissue: gelsolin, vinculin, lamin A/C and phosphoglucomutase 5[179]
Secretomes from carotid endarterectomy specimens of 14 patientsLC MS/MSIn total, 463 proteins were identified, of which 31 proteins were differentially secreted between plaques and the corresponding downstream segments[21]
Secretomes from 12 carotid atherosclerotic plaque vs. 10 nonatherosclerotic mammary arteryTandem immunoaffinity depletion, iTRAQ labeling, and nano LC-MS/MSIn total, 162 proteins were quantified, of which 25 were differentially expressed in secretome between carotid atherosclerotic plaque and non-diseased mammary artery. ↑ neutrophil defensin 1, apolipoprotein E, clusterin, and zinc-alpha-2-glycoprotein in CAP secretomes[180]

3.3. Studies on Animal Models

Proteomics has been applied to widely used animal models of atherosclerosis to unveil significant insights into the molecular mechanisms influencing atherogenesis (Table 4). In this respect, the apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse is the most widely used murine model in cardiovascular research.
Mayr et al. analyzed aortic lesions from apolipoprotein E-/- and wild type mice classified as light, medium, and severe according to lesion-covered areas on the aortic surface [29]. As expected, the authors found an increase in inflammatory cells, a decrease in VSMCs, and an accumulation of serum proteins associated with an impaired endothelial barrier function with lesion progression. Interestingly, immunoglobulins, which were barely detectable in apolipoprotein E+/+ mice, accumulated even in the aortas of young apolipoprotein E-/- mice. The authors identified 79 differentially expressed spots. Moreover, they suggested an increase in oxidative stress together with lesion progression by evaluating the ratio between the oxidized and reduced forms of peroxiredoxin, the former resulting in a charge shift toward a more acidic isoelectric point. Overall, they found a linear relationship between the degree of peroxiredoxin-Cys oxidation and the extent of lesion formation in aortas of apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. A great deal of research has shown a contributory role of oxidative modifications (particularly LDL) within the arterial wall in the early events of atherogenesis [181,182]. The abovementioned results are in agreement with the evidence for a higher protein-sulfhydryl oxidation in unstable human carotid plaques, with respect to the stable ones, due in part to higher levels of sulfhydryl-thiolation, indicative of a more pronounced oxidative environment in advanced human carotid lesions [7,8].
Almofti et al. applied 2DE coupled to MALDI-TOF MS analysis to a rat model of atherosclerosis. They induced atherosclerosis by a single dose of vitamin D3 associated with a high-fat diet and identified 46 proteins differently expressed in diseased tissues. Among them, 18 proteins, including a group of oxidization-related enzymes, were found to be upregulated, while 28 proteins were found downregulated [183].
The vascular endothelium plays important physiological roles in vascular homeostasis, coagulation, inflammation, as well as in tissue growth and repair. The impairment of the endothelial function is an early event in atherosclerotic lesion formation leading to the overexpression of adhesion molecules, as well as the secretion of pro-inflammatory and chemotactic cytokines [184]. An affinity-based proteomic approach was used by Wu et al. [30] to identify vascular endothelial surface proteins differentially expressed in aortic tissues of apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. After in situ perfusion of the vascular bed with a solution containing a biotin derivative, biotinylated endothelial proteins were extracted, purified by affinity enrichment with streptavidin-agarose beads, and resolved by SDS-PAGE. The whole gel lanes were cut into slices and were subjected to tryptic digestion for nano-LC MS/MS analysis. In this way, 454 proteins, mainly extracellular or associated to the cell membrane, were identified. Among them, there were cell adhesion molecules, accounting for the largest category, followed by proteins involved in signal transduction and transport. Interestingly, proteins associated with immune and inflammatory responses were more than doubled in atherosclerotic aorta (13%) in comparison to normal aorta (6%). On the other hand, proteins involved in lipid metabolism were decreased by 34% in atherosclerotic aorta.
A rat model has been used in a proteomic study on the effects of blood shear stress on atherogenesis [185]. It is well known that blood shear stress affects endothelial cell shape and orientation, as well as vascular wall permeability. Indeed, regions of arterial branching or curvature, where blood flow is not uniform, are the preferential sites for lesion initiation. By comparing homogenates of aortas kept under two levels of shear stress in a perfusion culture system for 24 h, Qi et al. detected a reduced expression of protein Rho-GDP dissociation inhibitor alpha (Rho-GDIα) in low-shear stress conditions, and demonstrated, by siRNA technology, that this reduction enhances VSMC migration and apoptosis.
To identify early changes in protein expression during atherogenesis, Rodger et al. applied 2-DE coupled with MS to the analysis of the aortic arch of transgenic mice expressing a human apo(a) cDNA encoding seventeen KIV domains and human apo B100 [186]. By this approach, they identified a panel of differentially expressed proteins indicative of metabolic changes that precede the onset of atherosclerotic lesions.
Pelosi et al. applied a system approach by integrating information from histology indexes, as well as circulatory and local factors, to a high cholesterol-fed swine model to investigate the pathogenesis of coronary atherosclerotic lesions. This represents the model that best mimics human pathology. The main findings show that systemic inflammation is locally associated with macrophage/phagocytosis-related artery-specific protein expression, having an impact on atherosclerosis severity [36]. Rocchiccioli et al. obtained a map of 224 proteins secreted by coronary plaques in culture from the same pig model as Pelosi’s, and evidenced a strong relationship between VSMCs activation/migration and lesion development [37].
Hanzawa et al. performed proteomics on both the plasma and atherosclerotic tissue of apo E-deficient and wild type mice fed a high-fat diet, harvested at four different degrees of lesion development, evidencing quantitative variations of proteins involved in inflammation, thrombus formation, and vascular remodeling, according to the lesion progression [31].
Xu et al. applied an iTRAQ coupled with LC-MS/MS to measure protein-level changes in the ascending aortas of a cholesterol-fed rabbit model. By this approach, they identified 453 unique proteins, with 67 differentially expressed in response to hypercholesterolemia. Among them, there were apolipoproteins, extracellular matrix adhesion proteins, glycolytic enzymes, heat shock proteins, and proteins involved in immune defense, as well as a set of novel proteins not yet known for their involvement in atherogenesis that deserve further investigation [34].
ECM plays key roles in cell signaling and inflammatory processes during atherogenesis, as well as in stabilizing the fibrous cap during plaque development. However, the MS-based study on ECM is complicated by both the insolubility of its constituents and the presence of intracellular protein contaminants [187]. In this respect, Wierer et al. developed a very sensitive in-depth approach termed Quantitative Detergent Solubility Profiling (QDSP), which was applied to study the matrisome in intermediate and advanced lesions developed by apo E knock-out mice fed with a high-fat diet. Among all 5117 proteins identified, 182 showed differences concurrently with atherosclerotic plaque development. With regards to the insoluble ECM components, the expressions of 65 proteins, including collagens, matrix metalloproteinases, and macrophage-derived proteins, as well as proteins involved in vascular calcification, changed significantly [32].
Inflammation and proteolysis play central roles in atherosclerotic plaque degeneration towards instability, as also shown previously with regards to advanced human carotid lesions [5]. Vaisar et al. generated transgenic mice developing ruptured aortic plaques and assessed their suitability as a mouse model for studying plaque ulceration by comparing their proteomic profiles with those obtained from human carotid plaques [188]. In particular, the apo E-/- mouse model overexpressed the urokinase-type plasminogen activator, a serine protease involved in tissue remodeling and cell migration. By shotgun proteomics, they evidenced common features leading to plaque instability, including extracellular matrix and basement-membrane proteolysis, suggesting that the loss of basement-membrane proteins may play a central role in advanced plaque rupture.
Table 4. Proteomics studies on animal models. The sample source, the methodology applied, and the most relevant findings are reported. Reduced (↓) levels of protein concentrations are indicated.
Table 4. Proteomics studies on animal models. The sample source, the methodology applied, and the most relevant findings are reported. Reduced (↓) levels of protein concentrations are indicated.
SamplesProteomicsMain FindingsReferences
Aortas from 10-week-old, 12-month-old, and 18-month-old apolipoprotein E-/- mice2DE coupled with LC-MS/MSIn total, 79 protein species were identified as altered during various stages of atherogenesis. Immunoglobulin deposition, redox imbalance, and impaired energy metabolism preceded lesion formation in apolipoprotein E-/- mice[29]
Atherosclerotic aorta vs. normal aorta from Wistar rats (Atherosclerosis was induced by a single dose of vitamin D3 followed by a high fat diet)2DE coupled with MALDI TOF MSFound 46 differentially expressed proteins [183]
Aorta from apo E-/- mice vs. WT miceAffinity proteomic strategy for in situ isolation and differential mapping of vascular endothelial proteins: perfusion with biotin, capturing with streptavidin chromatography, SDS-PAGE followed by LC-MS/MSHere, 454 proteins identified, and 81 differentially expressed proteins involved in immune and inflammatory responses, cell adhesion, and lipid metabolism[30]
Rat aorta cultured under two levels of shear stress, 5 and 15 dyn/cm22DE coupled with MALDI TOF MS↓ Rho-GDIα in low shear stress vessels[185]
Aortas from Lipoprotein(a) transgenic mice vs WT mice2-DE followed by MALDI-TOF/TOF MSHere, 34 differentially expressed proteins found involved in energy, redox, and lipid metabolism[186]
Ascending arch of thoracic aorta from 24 male albino rabbits assigned randomly into 4 groups: control, cholesterol, cholesterol plus vitamin E and vitamin E groupsLC MS/MSDifferential expression of proteins following cholesterol and also vitamin E treatments[33]
Secretomes of coronary arteries from pigs fed on standard or high-cholesterol dietLC MS/MSTNFα was identified as an associated plasma marker, oxLDL and HDL as relevant lipoproteins; macrophage function-related antioxidant Catalase enzyme, lysosome-associated Cathepsin D, S100-A10, and Transforming growth factor-beta-induced protein ig-h3 were identified and selected as associated to atherogenesis outcome[36]
Low-dose streptozotocin-induced diabetic mouse model (10 animals)LC MS/MSDysregulation of molecules involved in myogenesis, vascularization, hypertension, hypertrophy (associated with thickening of the aortic wall), and a substantial reduction in fatty acid storage. A novel finding is the pronounced downregulation of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (Gsk3β) and the upregulation of molecules linked to the tricarboxylic acid cycle (e.g., aspartate aminotransferase (Got2) and hydroxyacid-oxoacid transhydrogenase (Adhfe1)). In addition, pathways involving primary alcohols and amino acid breakdown are altered, potentially leading to ketone-body production. Conclusions: streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus in animals leads to a reduction in fatty acid biosynthesis and an upregulation of an alternative ketone-body formation pathway[189]
Plasma and aortic tissue from apo E deficient and wild-type mice ICAT followed by nanoLC-MS/MSHere, 13 proteins in the plasma and 36 in the arterial tissues showed significant difference in abundance. These proteins were found to be components of inflammation, thrombus formation, and vascular remodeling, suggesting drastic and integrative alterations in accordance with atherosclerosis development[31]
Cholesterol-fed rabbitsLC MS/MS iTRAQHere, 453 unique proteins were identified and quantified; 67 proteins differentially expressed, 62 higher (e.g., apolipoproteins, extracellular matrix adhesion proteins, glycolytic enzymes, heat shock proteins and proteins involved in immune defense) and 5 lower in ascending aortas from HCD-fed rabbits compared to controls[34]
Secretomes of coronary arteries from pigs fed on standard or high-cholesterol dietLC MS/MSA wide coronary artery map of secreted proteins has been obtained in high-fat (HF) diet-induced ATS swine model and a significantly different expression of many proteins related to VSMC activation/migration has been identified[37]
Aortas from apo E knock-out miceLC MS/MSHere, 5117 proteins were identified, 182 of which changed their expression status in response to vessel maturation and atherosclerotic plaque development. In the insoluble ECM proteome, 65 proteins significantly changed, including relevant collagens, matrix metalloproteinases and macrophage derived proteins[32]
Aortas from SR-uPA+/0 (n = 6) vs. SR-uPA0/0 (n = 6) apo E-/- mice; ruptured (n = 6) and stable (n = 6) areas of human carotid plaques LC MS/MSHere, 775 unique proteins were identified; overexpression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator may cause plaque rupture by activating proteolytic and proinflammatory mechanisms leading to ECM and basement-membrane protein depletion, as well as by upregulating the intracellular pathways related to cell–cell adhesion and cell–matrix adhesion. Several biochemical features in common between ruptured human carotid plaques and SR-uPA+/0 mouse aortas[188]

4. Conclusions

In the last few years, proteomics has emerged as a powerful tool in the search for novel cardiovascular biomarkers with diagnostic/prognostic value, offering an unparalleled opportunity to capture the multifaceted aspects of atherosclerosis and its progression, and bridging the gap between fundamental research and practical clinical applications. Both lipoproteins and atherosclerotic tissues, particularly plaque extracts and secretomes, represent a rich source of information with regard to both early events of atherogenesis and predictors of acute clinical events. Furthermore, the analysis of LCM by proteomics, although in its infancy, could reveal valuable topological differences between specific areas of such a heterogeneous environment.
However, several issues hinder the step towards a translational medicine: in primis, the intrinsic complexity of the atherosclerotic tissue, its availability, as well as the choice of the proper controls, could hinder the interpretation of the results. Besides this, large-scale studies are required to validate the usefulness of the newly identified biomarkers. Finally, although several databases enclosing results from genome-wide association studies or gene expression profiling exist, as far as we know, no proteomics datasets focused on atherosclerosis are available. Therefore, in the near future, it will be essential to dedicate efforts to conducting a thorough investigation of the vast amount of data generated so far by proteomics, and to create shared datasets to collect all the identified markers. In this respect, artificial intelligence tools could represent a profound change in data analysis and interpretation, being able to perform both fast and iterative processing on a large amount of information, such as those obtained by means of all the abovementioned technologies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.N., M.F. and A.J.L.; data curation, G.N.; writing—original draft preparation, A.J.L.; writing—review and editing, G.N., M.F. and A.J.L.; supervision, A.J.L.; funding acquisition, G.N., M.F. and A.J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

A.J.L., G.N. and M.F. thank the Fondazione di Sardegna (BANDO FONDAZIONE DI SARDEGNA 2022 E 2023—PROGETTI DI RICERCA DI BASE DIPARTIMENTALI (D.R.16/2022)) and the European Union (PROGETTI DI RICERCA INTERDISCIPLINARE—DM 737/2021, RISORSE 2021–2022, Finanziato dall’Unione Europea Ijms 24 15175 i001—NextGenerationEU) for their financial support.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mendis, S.; Nordet, P.; Fernandez-Britto, J.E.; Sternby, N. Atherosclerosis in children and young adults: An overview of the world health organization and international society and federation of cardiology study on pathobiological determinants of atherosclerosis in youth study (1985–1995). Prev. Control 2005, 1, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hansson, G.K.; Libby, P.; Tabas, I. Inflammation and plaque vulnerability. J. Intern. Med. 2015, 278, 483–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Badimon, L.; Vilahur, G. Thrombosis formation on atherosclerotic lesions and plaque rupture. J. Intern. Med. 2014, 276, 618–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Libby, P.; Buring, J.E.; Badimon, L.; Hansson, G.K.; Deanfield, J.; Bittencourt, M.S.; Tokgozoglu, L.; Lewis, E.F. Atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2019, 5, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Formato, M.; Farina, M.; Spirito, R.; Maggioni, M.; Guarino, A.; Cherchi, G.M.; Biglioli, P.; Edelstein, C.; Scanu, A.M. Evidence for a proinflammatory and proteolytic environment in plaques from endarterectomy segments of human carotid arteries. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2004, 24, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lepedda, A.J.; Cigliano, A.; Cherchi, G.M.; Spirito, R.; Maggioni, M.; Carta, F.; Turrini, F.; Edelstein, C.; Scanu, A.M.; Formato, M. A proteomic approach to differentiate histologically classified stable and unstable plaques from human carotid arteries. Atherosclerosis 2009, 203, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lepedda, A.J.; Zinellu, A.; Nieddu, G.; Zinellu, E.; Carru, C.; Spirito, R.; Guarino, A.; De Muro, P.; Formato, M. Protein sulfhydryl group oxidation and mixed-disulfide modifications in stable and unstable human carotid plaques. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2013, 2013, 403973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lepedda, A.J.; Formato, M. Oxidative modifications in advanced atherosclerotic plaques: A focus on in situ protein sulfhydryl group oxidation. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 6169825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Puig, N.; Jimenez-Xarrie, E.; Camps-Renom, P.; Benitez, S. Search for reliable circulating biomarkers to predict carotid plaque vulnerability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Available online: https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/InstituteforHealthMetricsandEvaluation (accessed on 14 July 2023).
  11. Herrington, D.M.; Mao, C.; Parker, S.J.; Fu, Z.; Yu, G.; Chen, L.; Venkatraman, V.; Fu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Howard, T.D.; et al. Proteomic architecture of human coronary and aortic atherosclerosis. Circulation 2018, 137, 2741–2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tunon, J.; Martin-Ventura, J.L.; Blanco-Colio, L.M.; Lorenzo, O.; Lopez, J.A.; Egido, J. Proteomic strategies in the search of new biomarkers in atherothrombosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 55, 2009–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Martinet, W.; Schrijvers, D.M.; De Meyer, G.R.; Herman, A.G.; Kockx, M.M. Western array analysis of human atherosclerotic plaques: Downregulation of apoptosis-linked gene 2. Cardiovasc. Res. 2003, 60, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Slevin, M.; Elasbali, A.B.; Miguel Turu, M.; Krupinski, J.; Badimon, L.; Gaffney, J. Identification of differential protein expression associated with development of unstable human carotid plaques. Am. J. Pathol. 2006, 168, 1004–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Napoli, C.; Zullo, A.; Picascia, A.; Infante, T.; Mancini, F.P. Recent advances in proteomic technologies applied to cardiovascular disease. J. Cell. Biochem. 2013, 114, 7–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yang, P.Y.; Rui, Y.C.; Yang, P.Y.; Yu, Y.L. Proteomic analysis of foam cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 2007, 357, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Yu, J.; Fu, J.; Zhang, X.; Cui, X.; Cheng, M. The integration of metabolomic and proteomic analyses revealed alterations in inflammatory-related protein metabolites in endothelial progenitor cells subjected to oscillatory shear stress. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 825966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Eligini, S.; Gianazza, E.; Mallia, A.; Ghilardi, S.; Banfi, C. Macrophage phenotyping in atherosclerosis by proteomics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Eslava-Alcon, S.; Extremera-Garcia, M.J.; Gonzalez-Rovira, A.; Rosal-Vela, A.; Rojas-Torres, M.; Beltran-Camacho, L.; Sanchez-Gomar, I.; Jimenez-Palomares, M.; Alonso-Pinero, J.A.; Conejero, R.; et al. Molecular signatures of atherosclerotic plaques: An up-dated panel of protein related markers. J. Proteom. 2020, 221, 103757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. De la Cuesta, F.; Alvarez-Llamas, G.; Maroto, A.S.; Barderas, M.G.; Vivanco, F. Laser microdissection and saturation labeling dige method for the analysis of human arteries. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013, 1000, 21–32. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rocchiccioli, S.; Pelosi, G.; Rosini, S.; Marconi, M.; Viglione, F.; Citti, L.; Ferrari, M.; Trivella, M.G.; Cecchettini, A. Secreted proteins from carotid endarterectomy: An untargeted approach to disclose molecular clues of plaque progression. J. Transl. Med. 2013, 11, 260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lygirou, V.; Latosinska, A.; Makridakis, M.; Mullen, W.; Delles, C.; Schanstra, J.P.; Zoidakis, J.; Pieske, B.; Mischak, H.; Vlahou, A. Plasma proteomic analysis reveals altered protein abundances in cardiovascular disease. J. Transl. Med. 2018, 16, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Delles, C.; Diez, J.; Dominiczak, A.F. Urinary proteomics in cardiovascular disease: Achievements, limits and hopes. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2011, 5, 222–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hoofnagle, A.N.; Heinecke, J.W. Lipoproteomics: Using mass spectrometry-based proteomics to explore the assembly, structure, and function of lipoproteins. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, 1967–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shah, A.S.; Tan, L.; Long, J.L.; Davidson, W.S. Proteomic diversity of high density lipoproteins: Our emerging understanding of its importance in lipid transport and beyond. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 2575–2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wagner, D.D.; Burger, P.C. Platelets in inflammation and thrombosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2003, 23, 2131–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Thomas, M.R.; Storey, R.F. The role of platelets in inflammation. Thromb. Haemost. 2015, 114, 449–458. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gutmann, C.; Joshi, A.; Mayr, M. Platelet “-omics” in health and cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis 2020, 307, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mayr, M.; Chung, Y.L.; Mayr, U.; Yin, X.; Ly, L.; Troy, H.; Fredericks, S.; Hu, Y.; Griffiths, J.R.; Xu, Q. Proteomic and metabolomic analyses of atherosclerotic vessels from apolipoprotein e-deficient mice reveal alterations in inflammation, oxidative stress, and energy metabolism. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2005, 25, 2135–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, J.; Liu, W.; Sousa, E.; Qiu, Y.; Pittman, D.D.; Maganti, V.; Feldman, J.; Gill, D.; Lu, Z.; Dorner, A.J.; et al. Proteomic identification of endothelial proteins isolated in situ from atherosclerotic aorta via systemic perfusion. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 4728–4736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hanzawa, H.; Sakamoto, T.; Kaneko, A.; Manri, N.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, S.; Tamaki, N.; Kuge, Y. Combined plasma and tissue proteomic study of atherogenic model mouse: Approach to elucidate molecular determinants in atherosclerosis development. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 4257–4269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wierer, M.; Prestel, M.; Schiller, H.B.; Yan, G.; Schaab, C.; Azghandi, S.; Werner, J.; Kessler, T.; Malik, R.; Murgia, M.; et al. Compartment-resolved proteomic analysis of mouse aorta during atherosclerotic plaque formation reveals osteoclast-specific protein expression. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2018, 17, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kaga, E.; Karademir, B.; Baykal, A.T.; Ozer, N.K. Identification of differentially expressed proteins in atherosclerotic aorta and effect of vitamin e. J. Proteom. 2013, 92, 260–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xu, J.; Jullig, M.; Middleditch, M.J.; Cooper, G.J. Modelling atherosclerosis by proteomics: Molecular changes in the ascending aortas of cholesterol-fed rabbits. Atherosclerosis 2015, 242, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rather, R.A.; Malik, V.S.; Trikha, D.; Bhat, O.; Dhawan, V. Aqueous terminalia arjuna extract modulates expression of key atherosclerosis-related proteins in a hypercholesterolemic rabbit: A proteomic-based study. Proteomics. Clin. Appl. 2016, 10, 750–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pelosi, G.; Rocchiccioli, S.; Cecchettini, A.; Viglione, F.; Puntoni, M.; Parodi, O.; Capobianco, E.; Trivella, M.G. Inflammation blood and tissue factors of plaque growth in an experimental model evidenced by a systems approach. Front. Genet. 2014, 5, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Rocchiccioli, S.; Cecchettini, A.; Ucciferri, N.; Terreni, M.; Viglione, F.; Trivella, M.G.; Citti, L.; Parodi, O.; Pelosi, G. Site-specific secretome map evidences vsmc-related markers of coronary atherosclerosis grade and extent in the hypercholesterolemic swine. Dis. Markers 2015, 2015, 465242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ekroos, K.; Janis, M.; Tarasov, K.; Hurme, R.; Laaksonen, R. Lipidomics: A tool for studies of atherosclerosis. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2010, 12, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Stegemann, C.; Pechlaner, R.; Willeit, P.; Langley, S.R.; Mangino, M.; Mayr, U.; Menni, C.; Moayyeri, A.; Santer, P.; Rungger, G.; et al. Lipidomics profiling and risk of cardiovascular disease in the prospective population-based bruneck study. Circulation 2014, 129, 1821–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, D.; Yu, B.; Li, Q.; Guo, Y.; Koike, T.; Koike, Y.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Mao, L.; Tang, X.; et al. HDL quality features revealed by proteome–lipidome connectivity are associated with atherosclerotic disease. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 14, mjac004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stegemann, C.; Drozdov, I.; Shalhoub, J.; Humphries, J.; Ladroue, C.; Didangelos, A.; Baumert, M.; Allen, M.; Davies, A.H.; Monaco, C.; et al. Comparative lipidomics profiling of human atherosclerotic plaques. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet. 2011, 4, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Moerman, A.M.; Visscher, M.; Slijkhuis, N.; Van Gaalen, K.; Heijs, B.; Klein, T.; Burgers, P.C.; De Rijke, Y.B.; Van Beusekom, H.M.M.; Luider, T.M.; et al. Lipid signature of advanced human carotid atherosclerosis assessed by mass spectrometry imaging. J. Lipid Res. 2021, 62, 100020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lepedda, A.J.; Zinellu, E.; Formato, M. Overview of Current Proteomic Approaches for Discovery of Vascular Biomarkers of Atherosclerosis. In Proteomics; Tsz-Kwong, M., Ricardo, J.F., Eds.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; Chapter 1. [Google Scholar]
  44. Jonas, A.; Phillips, M.C. Chapter 17—Lipoprotein structure. In Biochemistry of Lipids, Lipoproteins and Membranes, 5th ed.; Vance, D.E., Vance, J.E., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 485–506. [Google Scholar]
  45. Vance, J.E.; Vance, D.E. Biochemistry of Lipids, Lipoproteins and Membranes; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  46. Scanu, A.M. Lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk factor. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 1991, 1, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ferhatbegovic, L.; Mrsic, D.; Kusljugic, S.; Pojskic, B. LDL-c: The only causal risk factor for ascvd. Why is it still overlooked and underestimated? Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2022, 24, 635–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Williams, K.J.; Tabas, I. The response-to-retention hypothesis of early atherogenesis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1995, 15, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ouimet, M.; Barrett, T.J.; Fisher, E.A. HDL and reverse cholesterol transport. Circ. Res. 2019, 124, 1505–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kajani, S.; Curley, S.; McGillicuddy, F.C. Unravelling HDL-looking beyond the cholesterol surface to the quality within. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vaisar, T.; Pennathur, S.; Green, P.S.; Gharib, S.A.; Hoofnagle, A.N.; Cheung, M.C.; Byun, J.; Vuletic, S.; Kassim, S.; Singh, P.; et al. Shotgun proteomics implicates protease inhibition and complement activation in the antiinflammatory properties of HDL. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 746–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Holzer, M.; Ljubojevic-Holzer, S.; Souza Junior, D.R.; Stadler, J.T.; Rani, A.; Scharnagl, H.; Ronsein, G.E.; Marsche, G. HDL isolated by immunoaffinity, ultracentrifugation, or precipitation is compositionally and functionally distinct. J. Lipid Res. 2022, 63, 100307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Havel, R.J.; Eder, H.A.; Bragdon, J.H. The distribution and chemical composition of ultracentrifugally separated lipoproteins in human serum. J. Clin. Investig. 1955, 34, 1345–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chary, A.; Hedayati, M. Review of laboratory methods to determine HDL and LDL subclasses and their clinical importance. Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 23, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nieddu, G.; Michelucci, E.; Formato, M.; Ciampelli, C.; Obino, G.; Signore, G.; Di Giorgi, N.; Rocchiccioli, S.; Lepedda, A.J. Molecular characterization of plasma HDL, LDL, and VLDL lipids cargos from atherosclerotic patients with advanced carotid lesions: A preliminary report. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Finamore, F.; Nieddu, G.; Rocchiccioli, S.; Spirito, R.; Guarino, A.; Formato, M.; Lepedda, A.J. Apolipoprotein signature of HDL and LDL from atherosclerotic patients in relation with carotid plaque typology: A preliminary report. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Mancone, C.; Amicone, L.; Fimia, G.M.; Bravo, E.; Piacentini, M.; Tripodi, M.; Alonzi, T. Proteomic analysis of human very low-density lipoprotein by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and maldi-tof/tof. Proteomics 2007, 7, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Banfi, C.; Brioschi, M.; Barcella, S.; Wait, R.; Begum, S.; Galli, S.; Rizzi, A.; Tremoli, E. Proteomic analysis of human low-density lipoprotein reveals the presence of prenylcysteine lyase, a hydrogen peroxide-generating enzyme. Proteomics 2009, 9, 1344–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Davidson, W.S.; Silva, R.A.; Chantepie, S.; Lagor, W.R.; Chapman, M.J.; Kontush, A. Proteomic analysis of defined HDL subpopulations reveals particle-specific protein clusters: Relevance to antioxidative function. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2009, 29, 870–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bondarenko, P.V.; Cockrill, S.L.; Watkins, L.K.; Cruzado, I.D.; Macfarlane, R.D. Mass spectral study of polymorphism of the apolipoproteins of very low density lipoprotein. J. Lipid Res. 1999, 40, 543–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sun, H.Y.; Chen, S.F.; Lai, M.D.; Chang, T.T.; Chen, T.L.; Li, P.Y.; Shieh, D.B.; Young, K.C. Comparative proteomic profiling of plasma very-low-density and low-density lipoproteins. Clin. Chim. Acta Int. J. Clin. Chem. 2010, 411, 336–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Stahlman, M.; Davidsson, P.; Kanmert, I.; Rosengren, B.; Boren, J.; Fagerberg, B.; Camejo, G. Proteomics and lipids of lipoproteins isolated at low salt concentrations in d2o/sucrose or in kbr. J. Lipid Res. 2008, 49, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bottcher, A.; Schlosser, J.; Kronenberg, F.; Dieplinger, H.; Knipping, G.; Lackner, K.J.; Schmitz, G. Preparative free-solution isotachophoresis for separation of human plasma lipoproteins: Apolipoprotein and lipid composition of HDL subfractions. J. Lipid Res. 2000, 41, 905–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Collins, L.A.; Olivier, M. Quantitative comparison of lipoprotein fractions derived from human plasma and serum by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Proteome Sci. 2010, 8, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gordon, S.M.; Deng, J.; Lu, L.J.; Davidson, W.S. Proteomic characterization of human plasma high density lipoprotein fractionated by gel filtration chromatography. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 5239–5249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Javeed, R.; Hussain, D.; Jabeen, F.; Saeed, A.; Fatima, B.; Ashiq, M.N.; Najam-Ul-Haq, M. Enrichment of HDL proteome and phospholipidome from human serum via imac/moac affinity. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2020, 34, e4693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Davidson, W.S.; Shah, A.S.; Sexmith, H.; Gordon, S.M. The HDL proteome watch: Compilation of studies leads to new insights on HDL function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2022, 1867, 159072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dashty, M.; Motazacker, M.M.; Levels, J.; de Vries, M.; Mahmoudi, M.; Peppelenbosch, M.P.; Rezaee, F. Proteome of human plasma very low-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein exhibits a link with coagulation and lipid metabolism. Thromb. Haemost. 2014, 111, 518–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Bancells, C.; Canals, F.; Benitez, S.; Colome, N.; Julve, J.; Ordonez-Llanos, J.; Sanchez-Quesada, J.L. Proteomic analysis of electronegative low-density lipoprotein. J. Lipid Res. 2010, 51, 3508–3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Heller, M.; Stalder, D.; Schlappritzi, E.; Hayn, G.; Matter, U.; Haeberli, A. Mass spectrometry-based analytical tools for the molecular protein characterization of human plasma lipoproteins. Proteomics 2005, 5, 2619–2630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Collins, L.A.; Mirza, S.P.; Kissebah, A.H.; Olivier, M. Integrated approach for the comprehensive characterization of lipoproteins from human plasma using fplc and nano-hplc-tandem mass spectrometry. Physiol. Genom. 2010, 40, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Queiroz, K.C.; Tio, R.A.; Zeebregts, C.J.; Bijlsma, M.F.; Zijlstra, F.; Badlou, B.; de Vries, M.; Ferreira, C.V.; Spek, C.A.; Peppelenbosch, M.P.; et al. Human plasma very low density lipoprotein carries indian hedgehog. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 6052–6059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Von Zychlinski, A.; Williams, M.; McCormick, S.; Kleffmann, T. Absolute quantification of apolipoproteins and associated proteins on human plasma lipoproteins. J. Proteom. 2014, 106, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Von Zychlinski, A.; Kleffmann, T.; Williams, M.J.; McCormick, S.P. Proteomics of lipoprotein(a) identifies a protein complement associated with response to wounding. J. Proteom. 2011, 74, 2881–2891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bourgeois, R.; Girard, A.; Perrot, N.; Guertin, J.; Mitchell, P.L.; Couture, C.; Gotti, C.; Bourassa, S.; Poggio, P.; Mass, E.; et al. A comparative analysis of the lipoprotein(a) and low-density lipoprotein proteomic profiles combining mass spectrometry and mendelian randomization. CJC Open 2021, 3, 450–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Mueller, P.A.; Yerkes, E.; Bergstrom, P.; Rosario, S.; Hay, J.; Pamir, N. A method for lipoprotein (a) isolation from a small volume of plasma with applications for clinical research. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 9138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Green, P.S.; Vaisar, T.; Pennathur, S.; Kulstad, J.J.; Moore, A.B.; Marcovina, S.; Brunzell, J.; Knopp, R.H.; Zhao, X.Q.; Heinecke, J.W. Combined statin and niacin therapy remodels the high-density lipoprotein proteome. Circulation 2008, 118, 1259–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Heller, M.; Schlappritzi, E.; Stalder, D.; Nuoffer, J.M.; Haeberli, A. Compositional protein analysis of high density lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemia by shotgun lc-ms/ms and probabilistic peptide scoring. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2007, 6, 1059–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Vaisar, T.; Mayer, P.; Nilsson, E.; Zhao, X.Q.; Knopp, R.; Prazen, B.J. HDL in humans with cardiovascular disease exhibits a proteomic signature. Clin. Chim. Acta Int. J. Clin. Chem. 2010, 411, 972–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Levels, J.H.; Geurts, P.; Karlsson, H.; Maree, R.; Ljunggren, S.; Fornander, L.; Wehenkel, L.; Lindahl, M.; Stroes, E.S.; Kuivenhoven, J.A.; et al. High-density lipoprotein proteome dynamics in human endotoxemia. Proteome Sci. 2011, 9, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cubedo, J.; Padro, T.; Garcia-Moll, X.; Pinto, X.; Cinca, J.; Badimon, L. Proteomic signature of apolipoprotein j in the early phase of new-onset myocardial infarction. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Alwaili, K.; Bailey, D.; Awan, Z.; Bailey, S.D.; Ruel, I.; Hafiane, A.; Krimbou, L.; Laboissiere, S.; Genest, J. The HDL proteome in acute coronary syndromes shifts to an inflammatory profile. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2012, 1821, 405–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Riwanto, M.; Rohrer, L.; Roschitzki, B.; Besler, C.; Mocharla, P.; Mueller, M.; Perisa, D.; Heinrich, K.; Altwegg, L.; von Eckardstein, A.; et al. Altered activation of endothelial anti- and proapoptotic pathways by high-density lipoprotein from patients with coronary artery disease: Role of high-density lipoprotein-proteome remodeling. Circulation 2013, 127, 891–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Lepedda, A.J.; Nieddu, G.; Zinellu, E.; De Muro, P.; Piredda, F.; Guarino, A.; Spirito, R.; Carta, F.; Turrini, F.; Formato, M. Proteomic analysis of plasma-purified VLDL, LDL, and HDL fractions from atherosclerotic patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: Identification of serum amyloid a as a potential marker. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2013, 2013, 385214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Mazur, M.T.; Cardasis, H.L. Quantitative analysis of apolipoproteins in human HDL by top-down differential mass spectrometry. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013, 1000, 115–137. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Yan, L.R.; Wang, D.X.; Liu, H.; Zhang, X.X.; Zhao, H.; Hua, L.; Xu, P.; Li, Y.S. A pro-atherogenic HDL profile in coronary heart disease patients: An itraq labelling-based proteomic approach. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Tan, Y.; Liu, T.R.; Hu, S.W.; Tian, D.; Li, C.; Zhong, J.K.; Sun, H.G.; Luo, T.T.; Lai, W.Y.; Guo, Z.G. Acute coronary syndrome remodels the protein cargo and functions of high-density lipoprotein subfractions. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e94264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Yassine, H.N.; Jackson, A.M.; Borges, C.R.; Billheimer, D.; Koh, H.; Smith, D.; Reaven, P.; Lau, S.S.; Borchers, C.H. The application of multiple reaction monitoring and multi-analyte profiling to HDL proteins. Lipids Health Dis. 2014, 13, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Jorge, I.; Burillo, E.; Mesa, R.; Baila-Rueda, L.; Moreno, M.; Trevisan-Herraz, M.; Silla-Castro, J.C.; Camafeita, E.; Ortega-Munoz, M.; Bonzon-Kulichenko, E.; et al. The human HDL proteome displays high inter-individual variability and is altered dynamically in response to angioplasty-induced atheroma plaque rupture. J. Proteom. 2014, 106, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Krishnan, S.; Huang, J.; Lee, H.; Guerrero, A.; Berglund, L.; Anuurad, E.; Lebrilla, C.B.; Zivkovic, A.M. Combined high-density lipoprotein proteomic and glycomic profiles in patients at risk for coronary artery disease. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 5109–5118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Pedret, A.; Catalan, U.; Fernandez-Castillejo, S.; Farras, M.; Valls, R.M.; Rubio, L.; Canela, N.; Aragones, G.; Romeu, M.; Castaner, O.; et al. Impact of virgin olive oil and phenol-enriched virgin olive oils on the HDL proteome in hypercholesterolemic subjects: A double blind, randomized, controlled, cross-over clinical trial (VOHF study). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0129160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Marsillach, J.; Becker, J.O.; Vaisar, T.; Hahn, B.H.; Brunzell, J.D.; Furlong, C.E.; de Boer, I.H.; McMahon, M.A.; Hoofnagle, A.N.; Group, D.E.R. Paraoxonase-3 is depleted from the high-density lipoproteins of autoimmune disease patients with subclinical atherosclerosis. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 2046–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gordon, S.M.; Li, H.; Zhu, X.; Tso, P.; Reardon, C.A.; Shah, A.S.; Lu, L.J.; Davidson, W.S. Impact of genetic deletion of platform apolipoproteins on the size distribution of the murine lipoproteome. J. Proteom. 2016, 146, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Oberbach, A.; Adams, V.; Schlichting, N.; Heinrich, M.; Kullnick, Y.; Lehmann, S.; Lehmann, S.; Feder, S.; Correia, J.C.; Mohr, F.W.; et al. Proteome profiles of HDL particles of patients with chronic heart failure are associated with immune response and also include bacteria proteins. Clin. Chim. Acta Int. J. Clin. Chem. 2016, 453, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Burillo, E.; Jorge, I.; Martinez-Lopez, D.; Camafeita, E.; Blanco-Colio, L.M.; Trevisan-Herraz, M.; Ezkurdia, I.; Egido, J.; Michel, J.B.; Meilhac, O.; et al. Quantitative HDL proteomics identifies peroxiredoxin-6 as a biomarker of human abdominal aortic aneurysm. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Ljunggren, S.A.; Helmfrid, I.; Norinder, U.; Fredriksson, M.; Wingren, G.; Karlsson, H.; Lindahl, M. Alterations in high-density lipoprotein proteome and function associated with persistent organic pollutants. Environ. Int. 2017, 98, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Gordon, S.M.; Chung, J.H.; Playford, M.P.; Dey, A.K.; Sviridov, D.; Seifuddin, F.; Chen, Y.C.; Pirooznia, M.; Chen, M.Y.; Mehta, N.N.; et al. High density lipoprotein proteome is associated with cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis burden as evaluated by coronary ct angiography. Atherosclerosis 2018, 278, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Emmens, J.E.; Jones, D.J.L.; Cao, T.H.; Chan, D.C.S.; Romaine, S.P.R.; Quinn, P.A.; Anker, S.D.; Cleland, J.G.; Dickstein, K.; Filippatos, G.; et al. Proteomic diversity of high-density lipoprotein explains its association with clinical outcome in patients with heart failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2018, 20, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Natarajan, P.; Collier, T.S.; Jin, Z.; Lyass, A.; Li, Y.; Ibrahim, N.E.; Mukai, R.; McCarthy, C.P.; Massaro, J.M.; D’Agostino, R.B., Sr.; et al. Association of an HDL apolipoproteomic score with coronary atherosclerosis and cardiovascular death. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 73, 2135–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Jin, Z.; Collier, T.S.; Dai, D.L.Y.; Chen, V.; Hollander, Z.; Ng, R.T.; McManus, B.M.; Balshaw, R.; Apostolidou, S.; Penn, M.S.; et al. Development and validation of apolipoprotein ai-associated lipoprotein proteome panel for the prediction of cholesterol efflux capacity and coronary artery disease. Clin. Chem. 2019, 65, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Okada, T.; Ohama, T.; Takafuji, K.; Kanno, K.; Matsuda, H.; Sairyo, M.; Zhu, Y.; Saga, A.; Kobayashi, T.; Masuda, D.; et al. Shotgun proteomic analysis reveals proteome alterations in HDL of patients with cholesteryl ester transfer protein deficiency. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2019, 13, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Plubell, D.L.; Fenton, A.M.; Rosario, S.; Bergstrom, P.; Wilmarth, P.A.; Clark, W.M.; Zakai, N.A.; Quinn, J.F.; Minnier, J.; Alkayed, N.J.; et al. High-density lipoprotein carries markers that track with recovery from stroke. Circ. Res. 2020, 127, 1274–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Shao, B.; Mathew, A.V.; Thornock, C.; Pennathur, S.; Michigan Kidney Translational Core, C.I.G. Altered HDL proteome predicts incident cvd in chronic kidney disease patients. J. Lipid Res. 2021, 62, 100135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Holzer, M.; Birner-Gruenberger, R.; Stojakovic, T.; El-Gamal, D.; Binder, V.; Wadsack, C.; Heinemann, A.; Marsche, G. Uremia alters HDL composition and function. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN 2011, 22, 1631–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Mange, A.; Goux, A.; Badiou, S.; Patrier, L.; Canaud, B.; Maudelonde, T.; Cristol, J.P.; Solassol, J. HDL proteome in hemodialysis patients: A quantitative nanoflow liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry approach. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e34107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Tolle, M.; Huang, T.; Schuchardt, M.; Jankowski, V.; Prufer, N.; Jankowski, J.; Tietge, U.J.; Zidek, W.; van der Giet, M. High-density lipoprotein loses its anti-inflammatory capacity by accumulation of pro-inflammatory-serum amyloid a. Cardiovasc. Res. 2012, 94, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Weichhart, T.; Kopecky, C.; Kubicek, M.; Haidinger, M.; Doller, D.; Katholnig, K.; Suarna, C.; Eller, P.; Tolle, M.; Gerner, C.; et al. Serum amyloid a in uremic HDL promotes inflammation. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN 2012, 23, 934–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Shao, B.; de Boer, I.; Tang, C.; Mayer, P.S.; Zelnick, L.; Afkarian, M.; Heinecke, J.W.; Himmelfarb, J. A cluster of proteins implicated in kidney disease is increased in high-density lipoprotein isolated from hemodialysis subjects. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 2792–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Rubinow, K.B.; Henderson, C.M.; Robinson-Cohen, C.; Himmelfarb, J.; de Boer, I.H.; Vaisar, T.; Kestenbaum, B.; Hoofnagle, A.N. Kidney function is associated with an altered protein composition of high-density lipoprotein. Kidney Int. 2017, 92, 1526–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Wang, K.; Zelnick, L.R.; Hoofnagle, A.N.; Vaisar, T.; Henderson, C.M.; Imrey, P.B.; Robinson-Cohen, C.; de Boer, I.H.; Shiu, Y.T.; Himmelfarb, J.; et al. Alteration of HDL protein composition with hemodialysis initiation. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. CJASN 2018, 13, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Florens, N.; Calzada, C.; Delolme, F.; Page, A.; Guebre Egziabher, F.; Juillard, L.; Soulage, A.C.O. Proteomic characterization of high-density lipoprotein particles from non-diabetic hemodialysis patients. Toxins 2019, 11, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Manjunatha, S.; Distelmaier, K.; Dasari, S.; Carter, R.E.; Kudva, Y.C.; Nair, K.S. Functional and proteomic alterations of plasma high density lipoproteins in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Metab. Clin. Exp. 2016, 65, 1421–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Shao, B.; Zelnick, L.R.; Wimberger, J.; Himmelfarb, J.; Brunzell, J.; Davidson, W.S.; Snell-Bergeon, J.K.; Bornfeldt, K.E.; de Boer, I.H.; Heinecke, J.W. Albuminuria, the high-density lipoprotein proteome, and coronary artery calcification in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019, 39, 1483–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Gourgari, E.; Ma, J.; Playford, M.P.; Mehta, N.N.; Goldman, R.; Remaley, A.T.; Gordon, S.M. Proteomic alterations of HDL in youth with type 1 diabetes and their associations with glycemic control: A case-control study. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2019, 18, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Vaisar, T.; Kanter, J.E.; Wimberger, J.; Irwin, A.D.; Gauthier, J.; Wolfson, E.; Bahnam, V.; Wu, I.H.; Shah, H.; Keenan, H.A.; et al. High concentration of medium-sized HDL particles and enrichment in HDL paraoxonase 1 associate with protection from vascular complications in people with long-standing type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2020, 43, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Kheniser, K.G.; Osme, A.; Kim, C.; Ilchenko, S.; Kasumov, T.; Kashyap, S.R. Temporal dynamics of high-density lipoprotein proteome in diet-controlled subjects with type 2 diabetes. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Gourgari, E.; Nadeau, K.J.; Pyle, L.; Playford, M.P.; Ma, J.; Mehta, N.N.; Remaley, A.T.; Gordon, S.M. Effect of metformin on the high-density lipoprotein proteome in youth with type 1 diabetes. Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab. 2021, 4, e00261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Toyoshima, M.T.K.; Santana, M.F.M.; Silva, A.R.M.; Mello, G.B.; Santos-Bezerra, D.P.; Goes, M.F.S.; Bosco, A.A.; Caramelli, B.; Ronsein, G.E.; Correa-Giannella, M.L.; et al. Proteomics of high-density lipoprotein subfractions and subclinical atherosclerosis in type 1 diabetes mellitus: A case-control study. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2023, 15, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Khovidhunkit, W.; Duchateau, P.N.; Medzihradszky, K.F.; Moser, A.H.; Naya-Vigne, J.; Shigenaga, J.K.; Kane, J.P.; Grunfeld, C.; Feingold, K.R. Apolipoproteins a-iv and a-v are acute-phase proteins in mouse HDL. Atherosclerosis 2004, 176, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. O’Reilly, M.; Dillon, E.; Guo, W.; Finucane, O.; McMorrow, A.; Murphy, A.; Lyons, C.; Jones, D.; Ryan, M.; Gibney, M.; et al. High-density lipoprotein proteomic composition, and not efflux capacity, reflects differential modulation of reverse cholesterol transport by saturated and monounsaturated fat diets. Circulation 2016, 133, 1838–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Cao, J.; Xu, Y.; Li, F.; Shang, L.; Fan, D.; Yu, H. Protein markers of dysfunctional HDL in scavenger receptor class b type i deficient mice. J. Transl. Med. 2018, 16, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Camont, L.; Lhomme, M.; Rached, F.; Le Goff, W.; Negre-Salvayre, A.; Salvayre, R.; Calzada, C.; Lagarde, M.; Chapman, M.J.; Kontush, A. Small, dense high-density lipoprotein-3 particles are enriched in negatively charged phospholipids: Relevance to cellular cholesterol efflux, antioxidative, antithrombotic, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptotic functionalities. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013, 33, 2715–2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Borodzicz, S.; Czarzasta, K.; Kuch, M.; Cudnoch-Jedrzejewska, A. Sphingolipids in cardiovascular diseases and metabolic disorders. Lipids Health Dis. 2015, 14, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Dang, V.T.; Huang, A.; Zhong, L.H.; Shi, Y.; Werstuck, G.H. Comprehensive plasma metabolomic analyses of atherosclerotic progression reveal alterations in glycerophospholipid and sphingolipid metabolism in apolipoprotein e-deficient mice. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Mantovani, A.; Bonapace, S.; Lunardi, G.; Canali, G.; Dugo, C.; Vinco, G.; Calabria, S.; Barbieri, E.; Laaksonen, R.; Bonnet, F.; et al. Associations between specific plasma ceramides and severity of coronary-artery stenosis assessed by coronary angiography. Diabetes Metab. 2020, 46, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Hilvo, M.; Meikle, P.J.; Pedersen, E.R.; Tell, G.S.; Dhar, I.; Brenner, H.; Schottker, B.; Laaperi, M.; Kauhanen, D.; Koistinen, K.M.; et al. Development and validation of a ceramide- and phospholipid-based cardiovascular risk estimation score for coronary artery disease patients. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Poss, A.M.; Maschek, J.A.; Cox, J.E.; Hauner, B.J.; Hopkins, P.N.; Hunt, S.C.; Holland, W.L.; Summers, S.A.; Playdon, M.C. Machine learning reveals serum sphingolipids as cholesterol-independent biomarkers of coronary artery disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2020, 130, 1363–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Michelucci, E.; Giorgi, N.D.; Finamore, F.; Smit, J.M.; Scholte, A.; Signore, G.; Rocchiccioli, S. Lipid biomarkers in statin users with coronary artery disease annotated by coronary computed tomography angiography. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 12899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Di Giorgi, N.; Michelucci, E.; Smit, J.M.; Scholte, A.; El Mahdiui, M.; Knuuti, J.; Buechel, R.R.; Teresinska, A.; Pizzi, M.N.; Roque, A.; et al. A specific plasma lipid signature associated with high triglycerides and low HDL cholesterol identifies residual cad risk in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Atherosclerosis 2021, 339, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Meikle, P.J.; Wong, G.; Tsorotes, D.; Barlow, C.K.; Weir, J.M.; Christopher, M.J.; MacIntosh, G.L.; Goudey, B.; Stern, L.; Kowalczyk, A.; et al. Plasma lipidomic analysis of stable and unstable coronary artery disease. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011, 31, 2723–2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Ellims, A.H.; Wong, G.; Weir, J.M.; Lew, P.; Meikle, P.J.; Taylor, A.J. Plasma lipidomic analysis predicts non-calcified coronary artery plaque in asymptomatic patients at intermediate risk of coronary artery disease. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2014, 15, 908–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Cheng, J.M.; Suoniemi, M.; Kardys, I.; Vihervaara, T.; de Boer, S.P.; Akkerhuis, K.M.; Sysi-Aho, M.; Ekroos, K.; Garcia-Garcia, H.M.; Oemrawsingh, R.M.; et al. Plasma concentrations of molecular lipid species in relation to coronary plaque characteristics and cardiovascular outcome: Results of the atheroremo-ivus study. Atherosclerosis 2015, 243, 560–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Meikle, P.J.; Formosa, M.F.; Mellett, N.A.; Jayawardana, K.S.; Giles, C.; Bertovic, D.A.; Jennings, G.L.; Childs, W.; Reddy, M.; Carey, A.L.; et al. HDL phospholipids, but not cholesterol distinguish acute coronary syndrome from stable coronary artery disease. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2019, 8, e011792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Karjalainen, J.P.; Mononen, N.; Hutri-Kahonen, N.; Lehtimaki, M.; Hilvo, M.; Kauhanen, D.; Juonala, M.; Viikari, J.; Kahonen, M.; Raitakari, O.; et al. New evidence from plasma ceramides links apoe polymorphism to greater risk of coronary artery disease in finnish adults. J. Lipid Res. 2019, 60, 1622–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ding, M.; Rexrode, K.M. A review of lipidomics of cardiovascular disease highlights the importance of isolating lipoproteins. Metabolites 2020, 10, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Denimal, D.; Pais de Barros, J.P.; Petit, J.M.; Bouillet, B.; Verges, B.; Duvillard, L. Significant abnormalities of the HDL phosphosphingolipidome in type 1 diabetes despite normal HDL cholesterol concentration. Atherosclerosis 2015, 241, 752–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Kostara, C.E.; Ferrannini, E.; Bairaktari, E.T.; Papathanasiou, A.; Elisaf, M.; Tsimihodimos, V. Early signs of atherogenic features in the HDL lipidomes of normolipidemic patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Kostara, C.E.; Karakitsou, K.S.; Florentin, M.; Bairaktari, E.T.; Tsimihodimos, V. Progressive, qualitative, and quantitative alterations in HDL lipidome from healthy subjects to patients with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes. Metabolites 2022, 12, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Denimal, D.; Nguyen, A.; Pais de Barros, J.P.; Bouillet, B.; Petit, J.M.; Verges, B.; Duvillard, L. Major changes in the sphingophospholipidome of HDL in non-diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome. Atherosclerosis 2016, 246, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Mocciaro, G.; D’Amore, S.; Jenkins, B.; Kay, R.; Murgia, A.; Herrera-Marcos, L.V.; Neun, S.; Sowton, A.P.; Hall, Z.; Palma-Duran, S.A.; et al. Lipidomic approaches to study HDL metabolism in patients with central obesity diagnosed with metabolic syndrome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Orsoni, A.; Therond, P.; Tan, R.; Giral, P.; Robillard, P.; Kontush, A.; Meikle, P.J.; Chapman, M.J. Statin action enriches HDL3 in polyunsaturated phospholipids and plasmalogens and reduces LDL-derived phospholipid hydroperoxides in atherogenic mixed dyslipidemia. J. Lipid Res. 2016, 57, 2073–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Kostara, C.E.; Tsimihodimos, V.; Elisaf, M.S.; Bairaktari, E.T. Nmr-based lipid profiling of high density lipoprotein particles in healthy subjects with low, normal, and elevated HDL-cholesterol. J. Proteome Res. 2017, 16, 1605–1616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Chen, Y.; Wen, S.; Jiang, M.; Zhu, Y.; Ding, L.; Shi, H.; Dong, P.; Yang, J.; Yang, Y. Atherosclerotic dyslipidemia revealed by plasma lipidomics on apoe(-/-) mice fed a high-fat diet. Atherosclerosis 2017, 262, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Takeda, H.; Izumi, Y.; Tamura, S.; Koike, T.; Koike, Y.; Shiomi, M.; Bamba, T. Lipid profiling of serum and lipoprotein fractions in response to pitavastatin using an animal model of familial hypercholesterolemia. J. Proteome Res. 2020, 19, 1100–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Meikle, P.J.; Wong, G.; Tan, R.; Giral, P.; Robillard, P.; Orsoni, A.; Hounslow, N.; Magliano, D.J.; Shaw, J.E.; Curran, J.E.; et al. Statin action favors normalization of the plasma lipidome in the atherogenic mixed dyslipidemia of mets: Potential relevance to statin-associated dysglycemia. J. Lipid Res. 2015, 56, 2381–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Khan, A.A.; Mundra, P.A.; Straznicky, N.E.; Nestel, P.J.; Wong, G.; Tan, R.; Huynh, K.; Ng, T.W.; Mellett, N.A.; Weir, J.M.; et al. Weight loss and exercise alter the high-density lipoprotein lipidome and improve high-density lipoprotein functionality in metabolic syndrome. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2018, 38, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Chapman, M.J.; Orsoni, A.; Tan, R.; Mellett, N.A.; Nguyen, A.; Robillard, P.; Giral, P.; Therond, P.; Meikle, P.J. LDL subclass lipidomics in atherogenic dyslipidemia: Effect of statin therapy on bioactive lipids and dense LDL. J. Lipid Res. 2020, 61, 911–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Padro, T.; Vilahur, G.; Sanchez-Hernandez, J.; Hernandez, M.; Antonijoan, R.M.; Perez, A.; Badimon, L. Lipidomic changes of LDL in overweight and moderately hypercholesterolemic subjects taking phytosterol- and omega-3-supplemented milk. J. Lipid Res. 2015, 56, 1043–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Sutter, I.; Velagapudi, S.; Othman, A.; Riwanto, M.; Manz, J.; Rohrer, L.; Rentsch, K.; Hornemann, T.; Landmesser, U.; von Eckardstein, A. Plasmalogens of high-density lipoproteins (HDL) are associated with coronary artery disease and anti-apoptotic activity of HDL. Atherosclerosis 2015, 241, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Lee, J.H.; Yang, J.S.; Lee, S.H.; Moon, M.H. Analysis of lipoprotein-specific lipids in patients with acute coronary syndrome by asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation and nanoflow liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2018, 1099, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Avela, H.F.; Siren, H. Advances in lipidomics. Clin. Chim. Acta Int. J. Clin. Chem. 2020, 510, 123–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Hancock-Cerutti, W.; Lhomme, M.; Dauteuille, C.; Lecocq, S.; Chapman, M.J.; Rader, D.J.; Kontush, A.; Cuchel, M. Paradoxical coronary artery disease in humans with hyperalphalipoproteinemia is associated with distinct differences in the high-density lipoprotein phosphosphingolipidome. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2017, 11, 1192–1200.e1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Giammanco, A.; Noto, D.; Barbagallo, C.M.; Nardi, E.; Caldarella, R.; Ciaccio, M.; Averna, M.R.; Cefalu, A.B. Hyperalphalipoproteinemia and beyond: The role of HDL in cardiovascular diseases. Life 2021, 11, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Stary, H.C. Natural history and histological classification of atherosclerotic lesions: An update. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2000, 20, 1177–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Virmani, R.; Kolodgie, F.D.; Burke, A.P.; Farb, A.; Schwartz, S.M. Lessons from sudden coronary death: A comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2000, 20, 1262–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. You, S.A.; Archacki, S.R.; Angheloiu, G.; Moravec, C.S.; Rao, S.; Kinter, M.; Topol, E.J.; Wang, Q. Proteomic approach to coronary atherosclerosis shows ferritin light chain as a significant marker: Evidence consistent with iron hypothesis in atherosclerosis. Physiol. Genom. 2003, 13, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Donners, M.M.; Verluyten, M.J.; Bouwman, F.G.; Mariman, E.C.; Devreese, B.; Vanrobaeys, F.; van Beeumen, J.; van den Akker, L.H.; Daemen, M.J.; Heeneman, S. Proteomic analysis of differential protein expression in human atherosclerotic plaque progression. J. Pathol. 2005, 206, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Sung, H.J.; Ryang, Y.S.; Jang, S.W.; Lee, C.W.; Han, K.H.; Ko, J. Proteomic analysis of differential protein expression in atherosclerosis. Biomark. Biochem. Indic. Expo. Response Susceptibil. Chem. 2006, 11, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Bagnato, C.; Thumar, J.; Mayya, V.; Hwang, S.I.; Zebroski, H.; Claffey, K.P.; Haudenschild, C.; Eng, J.K.; Lundgren, D.H.; Han, D.K. Proteomics analysis of human coronary atherosclerotic plaque: A feasibility study of direct tissue proteomics by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2007, 6, 1088–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Terzuoli, L.; Felici, C.; Ciari, I.; Guerranti, R.; Pagani, R.; Marinello, E.; Porcelli, B. Synthetic gel of carotid artery plaque. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2007, 20, 637–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Olson, F.J.; Sihlbom, C.; Davidsson, P.; Hulthe, J.; Fagerberg, B.; Bergstrom, G. Consistent differences in protein distribution along the longitudinal axis in symptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaques. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 401, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. De Kleijn, D.P.; Moll, F.L.; Hellings, W.E.; Ozsarlak-Sozer, G.; de Bruin, P.; Doevendans, P.A.; Vink, A.; Catanzariti, L.M.; Schoneveld, A.H.; Algra, A.; et al. Local atherosclerotic plaques are a source of prognostic biomarkers for adverse cardiovascular events. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010, 30, 612–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. De la Cuesta, F.; Alvarez-Llamas, G.; Maroto, A.S.; Donado, A.; Zubiri, I.; Posada, M.; Padial, L.R.; Pinto, A.G.; Barderas, M.G.; Vivanco, F. A proteomic focus on the alterations occurring at the human atherosclerotic coronary intima. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2011, 10, M110 003517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Malaud, E.; Piquer, D.; Merle, D.; Molina, L.; Guerrier, L.; Boschetti, E.; Saussine, M.; Marty-Ane, C.; Albat, B.; Fareh, J. Carotid atherosclerotic plaques: Proteomics study after a low-abundance protein enrichment step. Electrophoresis 2012, 33, 470–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Hao, P.; Ren, Y.; Pasterkamp, G.; Moll, F.L.; de Kleijn, D.P.; Sze, S.K. Deep proteomic profiling of human carotid atherosclerotic plaques using multidimensional lc-ms/ms. Proteomics. Clin. Appl. 2014, 8, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Malaud, E.; Merle, D.; Piquer, D.; Molina, L.; Salvetat, N.; Rubrecht, L.; Dupaty, E.; Galea, P.; Cobo, S.; Blanc, A.; et al. Local carotid atherosclerotic plaque proteins for the identification of circulating biomarkers in coronary patients. Atherosclerosis 2014, 233, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Alonso-Orgaz, S.; Moreno-Luna, R.; Lopez, J.A.; Gil-Dones, F.; Padial, L.R.; Moreu, J.; de la Cuesta, F.; Barderas, M.G. Proteomic characterization of human coronary thrombus in patients with st-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. J. Proteom. 2014, 109, 368–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Liang, W.; Ward, L.J.; Karlsson, H.; Ljunggren, S.A.; Li, W.; Lindahl, M.; Yuan, X.M. Distinctive proteomic profiles among different regions of human carotid plaques in men and women. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Lee, R.; Fischer, R.; Charles, P.D.; Adlam, D.; Valli, A.; Di Gleria, K.; Kharbanda, R.K.; Choudhury, R.P.; Antoniades, C.; Kessler, B.M.; et al. A novel workflow combining plaque imaging, plaque and plasma proteomics identifies biomarkers of human coronary atherosclerotic plaque disruption. Clin. Proteom. 2017, 14, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Li, J.; Liu, X.; Xiang, Y.; Ding, X.; Wang, T.; Liu, Y.; Yin, M.; Tan, C.; Deng, F.; Chen, L. Alpha-2-macroglobulin and heparin cofactor ii and the vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaques: An itraq-based analysis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 483, 964–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Langley, S.R.; Willeit, K.; Didangelos, A.; Matic, L.P.; Skroblin, P.; Barallobre-Barreiro, J.; Lengquist, M.; Rungger, G.; Kapustin, A.; Kedenko, L.; et al. Extracellular matrix proteomics identifies molecular signature of symptomatic carotid plaques. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 1546–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Ward, L.J.; Olausson, P.; Li, W.; Yuan, X.M. Proteomics and multivariate modelling reveal sex-specific alterations in distinct regions of human carotid atheroma. Biol. Sex Differ. 2018, 9, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Stakhneva, E.M.; Meshcheryakova, I.A.; Demidov, E.A.; Starostin, K.V.; Sadovski, E.V.; Peltek, S.E.; Voevoda, M.I.; Chernyavskii, A.M.; Volkov, A.M.; Ragino, Y.I. A proteomic study of atherosclerotic plaques in men with coronary atherosclerosis. Diagnostics 2019, 9, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Hwang, S.I.; Thumar, J.; Lundgren, D.H.; Rezaul, K.; Mayya, V.; Wu, L.; Eng, J.; Wright, M.E.; Han, D.K. Direct cancer tissue proteomics: A method to identify candidate cancer biomarkers from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded archival tissues. Oncogene 2007, 26, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Duran, M.C.; Mas, S.; Martin-Ventura, J.L.; Meilhac, O.; Michel, J.B.; Gallego-Delgado, J.; Lazaro, A.; Tunon, J.; Egido, J.; Vivanco, F. Proteomic analysis of human vessels: Application to atherosclerotic plaques. Proteomics 2003, 3, 973–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Martin-Ventura, J.L.; Duran, M.C.; Blanco-Colio, L.M.; Meilhac, O.; Leclercq, A.; Michel, J.B.; Jensen, O.N.; Hernandez-Merida, S.; Tunon, J.; Vivanco, F.; et al. Identification by a differential proteomic approach of heat shock protein 27 as a potential marker of atherosclerosis. Circulation 2004, 110, 2216–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Duran, M.C.; Martin-Ventura, J.L.; Mohammed, S.; Barderas, M.G.; Blanco-Colio, L.M.; Mas, S.; Moral, V.; Ortega, L.; Tunon, J.; Jensen, O.N.; et al. Atorvastatin modulates the profile of proteins released by human atherosclerotic plaques. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 562, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Blanco-Colio, L.M.; Martin-Ventura, J.L.; Munoz-Garcia, B.; Orbe, J.; Paramo, J.A.; Michel, J.B.; Ortiz, A.; Meilhac, O.; Egido, J. Identification of soluble tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (stweak) as a possible biomarker of subclinical atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2007, 27, 916–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. De la Cuesta, F.; Barderas, M.G.; Calvo, E.; Zubiri, I.; Maroto, A.S.; Darde, V.M.; Martin-Rojas, T.; Gil-Dones, F.; Posada-Ayala, M.; Tejerina, T.; et al. Secretome analysis of atherosclerotic and non-atherosclerotic arteries reveals dynamic extracellular remodeling during pathogenesis. J. Proteom. 2012, 75, 2960–2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Aragones, G.; Auguet, T.; Guiu-Jurado, E.; Berlanga, A.; Curriu, M.; Martinez, S.; Alibalic, A.; Aguilar, C.; Hernandez, E.; Camara, M.L.; et al. Proteomic profile of unstable atheroma plaque: Increased neutrophil defensin 1, clusterin, and apolipoprotein e levels in carotid secretome. J. Proteome Res. 2016, 15, 933–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Stocker, R.; Keaney, J.F., Jr. Role of oxidative modifications in atherosclerosis. Physiol. Rev. 2004, 84, 1381–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Steinberg, D.; Witztum, J.L. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein and atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2010, 30, 2311–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Almofti, M.R.; Huang, Z.; Yang, P.; Rui, Y.; Yang, P. Proteomic analysis of rat aorta during atherosclerosis induced by high cholesterol diet and injection of vitamin d3. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2006, 33, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Lepedda, A.J.; Nieddu, G.; Piperigkou, Z.; Kyriakopoulou, K.; Karamanos, N.; Formato, M. Circulating heparan sulfate proteoglycans as biomarkers in health and disease. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2021, 47, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Qi, Y.X.; Qu, M.J.; Long, D.K.; Liu, B.; Yao, Q.P.; Chien, S.; Jiang, Z.L. Rho-gdp dissociation inhibitor alpha downregulated by low shear stress promotes vascular smooth muscle cell migration and apoptosis: A proteomic analysis. Cardiovasc. Res. 2008, 80, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Rodger, E.J.; Suetani, R.J.; Jones, G.T.; Kleffmann, T.; Carne, A.; Legge, M.; McCormick, S.P. Proteomic analysis of aortae from human lipoprotein(a) transgenic mice shows an early metabolic response independent of atherosclerosis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Lynch, M.; Barallobre-Barreiro, J.; Jahangiri, M.; Mayr, M. Vascular proteomics in metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. J. Intern. Med. 2016, 280, 325–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Vaisar, T.; Hu, J.H.; Airhart, N.; Fox, K.; Heinecke, J.; Nicosia, R.F.; Kohler, T.; Potter, Z.E.; Simon, G.M.; Dix, M.M.; et al. Parallel Murine and Human Plaque Proteomics Reveals Pathways of Plaque Rupture. Circ. Res. 2020, 127, 997–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Husi, H.; Van Agtmael, T.; Mullen, W.; Bahlmann, F.H.; Schanstra, J.P.; Vlahou, A.; Delles, C.; Perco, P.; Mischak, H. Proteome-based systems biology analysis of the diabetic mouse aorta reveals major changes in fatty acid biosynthesis as potential hallmark in diabetes mellitus-associated vascular disease. Circulation. Cardiovasc. Genet. 2014, 7, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 2. Overview of the main targets of proteomic studies searching for both mechanisms of atherogenesis and biomarkers of atherosclerotic lesion presence and progression. Dotted lines represent partially unexplored paths. LCMs, laser-captured microdissections. Modified from [43].
Figure 2. Overview of the main targets of proteomic studies searching for both mechanisms of atherogenesis and biomarkers of atherosclerotic lesion presence and progression. Dotted lines represent partially unexplored paths. LCMs, laser-captured microdissections. Modified from [43].
Ijms 24 15175 g002
Figure 3. Lipoprotein purification and quality assessment procedures workflow. (I). Isopycnic salt gradient ultracentrifugation. (a) Ultracentrifugation tube containing 0.9 mL of plasma sample combined with NaBr, overlaid with 2.1 mL of a 0.6% NaCl solution; (b) self-generated density gradient following ultracentrifugation at 541,000× g for 3 h at 4 °C in a TL-100 series ultracentrifuge equipped with a TLA-100 fixed-angle rotor (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), showing the three main lipoprotein classes; (c) LDL on the top of the tube following a further flotation step at d = 1.063 g/mL. (II). Concentration and dialysis using Amicon Ultra-0.5 mL centrifugal filter units (10 KDa MWCO, Merck-Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). (III). Quality assessment using sodium dodecyl sulfate—polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Representative mono-dimensional profiles of HDL (d), LDL (e), and VLDL (f) fractions obtained by SDS-PAGE in either 12% T (for HDL, under reducing conditions) or 6% T (for both LDL and VLDL, under non-reducing conditions) resolving gels (modified from Nieddu et al. [55]).
Figure 3. Lipoprotein purification and quality assessment procedures workflow. (I). Isopycnic salt gradient ultracentrifugation. (a) Ultracentrifugation tube containing 0.9 mL of plasma sample combined with NaBr, overlaid with 2.1 mL of a 0.6% NaCl solution; (b) self-generated density gradient following ultracentrifugation at 541,000× g for 3 h at 4 °C in a TL-100 series ultracentrifuge equipped with a TLA-100 fixed-angle rotor (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), showing the three main lipoprotein classes; (c) LDL on the top of the tube following a further flotation step at d = 1.063 g/mL. (II). Concentration and dialysis using Amicon Ultra-0.5 mL centrifugal filter units (10 KDa MWCO, Merck-Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). (III). Quality assessment using sodium dodecyl sulfate—polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Representative mono-dimensional profiles of HDL (d), LDL (e), and VLDL (f) fractions obtained by SDS-PAGE in either 12% T (for HDL, under reducing conditions) or 6% T (for both LDL and VLDL, under non-reducing conditions) resolving gels (modified from Nieddu et al. [55]).
Ijms 24 15175 g003
Figure 4. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of the 21 proteins identified by Finamore et al. [56], not yet included in the “likely” LDL proteins list of the Davidson’s Lab database, but already reported to be associated with LDL by either Dashty et al. [68] or Bancells et al. [69].
Figure 4. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of the 21 proteins identified by Finamore et al. [56], not yet included in the “likely” LDL proteins list of the Davidson’s Lab database, but already reported to be associated with LDL by either Dashty et al. [68] or Bancells et al. [69].
Ijms 24 15175 g004
Table 1. Proteomic studies performed on purified lipoprotein fractions, investigating pathological conditions including coronary artery disease (CAD), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (⁕), chronic kidney disease (CKD), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (#), type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM and T2DM) (§), and experimental atherosclerosis (ǂ). Reduced (↓) or increased (↑) levels of protein concentrations are indicated.
Table 1. Proteomic studies performed on purified lipoprotein fractions, investigating pathological conditions including coronary artery disease (CAD), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (⁕), chronic kidney disease (CKD), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (#), type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM and T2DM) (§), and experimental atherosclerosis (ǂ). Reduced (↓) or increased (↑) levels of protein concentrations are indicated.
Lipoprotein FractionsPurificationProteomicsMain FindingsReferences
Group 1: HDL from 20 healthy volunteers; Group 2: HDL3 from 6 controls and 7 CAD patients; Group 3: HDL3 from 32 controls and 32 CAD; HDL from atherosclerotic tissueUltracentrifugation/immunoaffinity chromatographyLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis48 proteins identified in HDL involved in lipid metabolism, complement regulation, proteinase inhibition, acute-phase response. Apo C-IV, paraoxonase-1, Complement C3, apo A-IV, apo E (confirmed by WB on HDL3 fraction from 64 subjects) enriched in HDL3 from CAD. More than 100 proteins identified in HDL from atherosclerotic plaque[51]
Group 1: HDL3 from 6 CAD, 6 CAD + Statin/Niacin, 6 healthy controls; Group 2: HDL3 from 18 CAD, 18 CAD + Statin/Niacin. 12 months therapySequential density ultracentrifugationLC-FTICR MSAfter 12 months of therapy, ↓ apo E, ↑ apo F and phospholipid transfer protein; combination therapy may revert CAD-associated changes in HDL3 protein composition[77]
HDL from 7 hypercholesterolemia subjects and 9 normolipidemic subjectsSalt Gradient UltracentrifugationLC-MS/MS analysisThe quantitative HDL protein pattern correlates with the corresponding concentration and distribution of cholesterol from serum lipid measurements; hypercholesterolemia in unrelated individuals is the result of different deficiencies[78]
HDL2 from 18 CAD and 20 controlsSequential density ultracentrifugationMALDI-TOF-TOF MS and pattern recognition analysis; LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF MSHDL2 from CAD contains methionine sulfoxide residues in apolipoprotein A-I and elevated levels of apolipoprotein C-III; specific proteomic signatures of HDL2 accurately classify CAD and control subjects[79]
HDL from 10 healthy men with low HDL cholesterol and 10 men with high HDL cholesterol levels challenged with endotoxinImmunoaffinity chromatography (anti-apo A-I antibodies); density gradient ultracentrifugationPS20 protein-chips (anti-apo A-I antibodies) coupled with SELDI-TOF MS analysis/2DE analysisProfound changes in 21 markers (including SAA-1/2 and paraoxonase-1) were observed in the proteome in both groups; no relationship between baseline HDL cholesterol levels and HDL protein dynamics after endotoxin challenge[80]
HDL from 39 new-onset AMI-patients vs 60 healthy individualsSalt Gradient Ultracentrifugation2DE coupled with MALDI-TOF MS analysisAltered glycosylation pattern in AMI-patients within the first 6 h after the onset of the event[81]
HDL from 10 healthy controls, 10 CAD and 10 ACSSequential ultracentrifugation1DE coupled with LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis67 HDL-associated proteins identified; ↓ apo A-IV, ↑ SAA, ↑ Complement C3 in ACS vs. both CAD and controls [82]
HDL from CAD, ACS, and healthy controlsSequential ultracentrifugation or gel filtration chromatographyLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis↓ clusterin, ↑ apolipoprotein C-III in both CAD and ACS; HDL-proteome remodeling plays an important role for these altered functional properties of HDL (stimulation of proapoptotic pathways)[83]
VLDL, LDL and HDL from four pooled plasma samples from 79 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy and 57 healthy normolipidemic volunteersDensity gradient ultracentrifugation2DE coupled with MALDI-TOF-MS↑ acute-phase serum amyloid A protein (AP SAA) in all lipoprotein fractions, especially in LDL from atherosclerotic patients[84]
HDL3 from 3 low HDL-c and 3 high HDL-c subjectsDensity gradient ultracentrifugationTop-Down Differential Mass Spectrometry: ETD LC-ESI-MS/MSProof-of-concept study; higher abundances of three apo C-III glycoforms in HDL3 from donors with low HDL-c[85]
HDL from 10 congenital heart disease (CHD) patients vs. 10 controlsSequential ultracentrifugationiTRAQ technology coupled with nanoLC-MS/MS196 proteins identified, 5 upregulated proteins (inflammatory reactions) and 7 downregulated (lipid metabolism) proteins; HDL proteome changes to a pro-atherogenic profile in CHD patients[86]
HDL2 and HDL3 from 40 ACS vs. 40 controlsTwo-step discontinuous density-gradient ultracentrifugation2DE and 2DIGE analysis coupled with MALDI-TOF/TOF MS17 differentially expressed HDL-associated proteins identified, shifting to a dysfunctional HDL subfractions[87]
HDL from diabetes and CVDSequential ultracentrifugation MAP/LC-MRM/MS69 and 32 HDL proteins quantified, respectively, with multi-analyte profiling (MAP) and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM); high-throughput approach to examine changes in HDL proteins in diabetes and CVD[88]
HDL from 21 CAD pre- and post- percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)Immunoaffinity chromatography (anti-apo A-I antibodies)Quantitative 16O/18O analysis/iTRAQ technology coupled with LC–MS/MS/system biology analysis 225 identified proteins; high protein variability in HDL composition between individuals; post-PTCA increase in two protein clusters that included several apolipoproteins, fibrinogen-like protein 1 and other intracellular proteins, and a decrease in antithrombin-III, annexin A1 and several immunoglobulins[89]
HDL from 20 subjects at risk for CAD: 10 patients had CAD and 10 did notSequential ultracentrifugationShotgun proteomic, glycomic, and ganglioside analyses using LC-MSCombined HDL proteomic and glycomic profiles distinguished at-risk subjects with atherosclerosis from those without; CAD patients had ↓ apo A-I, ↓ apo A-II, ↓ apo E, ↓ SAA2, ↓ SAA4 (p = 0.007), ↑ sialylated glycans [90]
HDL from 33 hypercholesterolemic subjects included in a clinical trial evaluating effects of virgin olive oil (VOO) and phenol-enriched VOOSequential density ultracentrifugationNano LC-MALDI MS/MS and nano LC-ORBITRAP-ESI MS/MS127 HDL-associated proteins identified; 15 differentially expressed proteins involved in liver X receptor-retinoid X receptor activation, acute phase response, and atherosclerosis; consumption of VOO or phenol-enriched VOOs, has an impact on the HDL proteome in a cardioprotective mode by upregulating proteins related to cholesterol homeostasis, protection against oxidation and blood coagulation while downregulating proteins implicated in acute-phase response, lipid transport, and immune response[91]
HDL from 54 systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients (with and without atherosclerotic plaque), 25 controls, patients with type 1 diabetes with or without coronary artery calcificationSequential density gradient ultracentrifugationTargeted proteomics (18 proteins): LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis↓ PON3 in HDL of both SLE and T1DM patients with subclinical atherosclerosis[92]
LDL and HDL from 10 healthy individuals with normal LDL-C treated with rosuvastatin for 28 daysSize-exclusion chromatographyLC-ESI-MS/MS analysisAmong the differentially expressed proteins, α-1-antirypsin increased dramatically in HDL; enhanced HDL anti-inflammatory activity, contributing to the non-lipid lowering beneficial effects of statins[93]
HDL from 5 chronic heart failure (CHF) patients vs. 5 controlsSequential ultracentrifugationSCX/RP LC–MS/MS494 proteins identified; 23 newly identified HDL-associated proteins; 223 bacterial peptides were found in both CHF and controls[94]
HDL from 14 abdominal aortic aneurism (AAA) patients vs. 7 controlsSequential ultracentrifugationiTRAQ technology coupled with nanoLC-MS/MS↑ peroxiredoxin-6, ↑ class I histocompatibility antigen, ↑ retinol-binding protein 4, ↑ paraoxonase/arylesterase 1, ↓ α-2 macroglobulin, ↓ C4b-binding protein[95]
HDL from 10 CVD vs. 7 controlsTwo-step discontinuous density-gradient ultracentrifugationnLC-MS/MS analysis118 proteins identified; 10 proteins positively associated with the combined level of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) or with highly chlorinated polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) congeners. Among these, cholesteryl ester transfer protein and phospholipid transfer protein, as well as the inflammatory marker serum amyloid A, were found. The serum paraoxonase/arylesterase 1 activity was inversely associated with POPs. Pathway analysis demonstrated that upregulated proteins were associated with biological processes involving lipoprotein metabolism, while downregulated proteins were associated with processes such as negative regulation of proteinases, acute phase response, platelet degranulation, and complement activation[96]
HDL from 126 subjects with clinical indication for a coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)High-resolution size exclusion chromatography followed by phospholipid-associated proteins capture (Calcium Silicate Hydrate)LC-ESI-MS/MS72 HDL-associated proteins detected in at least 75% of subjects; 13 proteins significantly associated with calcified plaque burden including cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide, gelsolin (GELS), kininogen-1 (KNG1), and paraoxonase-1 (inverse relationships), apo A-IV, vitamin D binding protein, alpha-2- macroglobulin, and apo C-II (positive relationships); 15 proteins significantly associated with non-calcified plaque burden including apo A-I, apo F, antithrombin III, and apo C-I (inverse relationships), serum amyloid A1, immunoglobulin heavy constant alpha 1, complement factor B, complement C2, complement C3, complement bC1s subcomponent (positive relationships); among the evaluated risk factors, BMI has the greatest overall impact on the protein composition of HDL[97]
HDL from heart failure patients: cardiovascular deaths vs. survivors (1:1)Calcium silicate matrixnLC-MS/MS analysis647 proteins identified; 49 HDL proteins were significantly different; a set of 12 selected proteins predicted death with 76% accuracy[98]
HDL from 943 participants without prevalent myocardial infarction referred for coronary angiography in the CASABLANCA study15NHis6Apo A-I was added to human serum, incubated, diluted, and then purified using PhyTips (Phynexus, San Jose, CA, USA), packed with Ni-NTA HisBind Superflow stationary phaseTargeted proteomics (apolipoprotein A-I, C-1, C-2, C-3, and C-4): LC-ESI-MS/MS analysisAn HDL apolipoproteomic score is associated with the presence of CAD, independent of circulating apo A-I and apo B concentrations and other conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Among individuals with CAD, this score may be independently associated with cardiovascular death[99]
Apolipoprotein AI-associated lipoproteins from 231 healthy individuals and patients with CADMetal chelate affinity chromatographyTargeted proteomics (21 proteins): LC-MS/MS analysisA multiplexed proteomic assay useful for the estimation of cholesterol efflux and CAD risk in the clinical laboratory[100]
HDL from 8 patients with complete deficiency of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) vs. 8 normolipidemic healthy subjectsSequential ultracentrifugationLC-MS/MS analysis79 HDL-associated proteins identified, involved in lipid metabolism, protease inhibition, complement regulation, and acute-phase response, including 5 potential newly identified HDL-associated proteins; ↑ apo E, ↑ Complement C3, C4a, C4b, and C9, ↑ apo C-III[101]
HDL from patients after acute ischemic stroke at 2 time points (24 h, 35 patients; 96 h, 20 patients) and from 35 control subjectsSequential density ultracentrifugationData-dependent acquisition (DDA) mass spectrometry and parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) mass spectrometrySome proteins involved in acute phase response and platelet activation were significantly altered in stroke HDL at 24 and 96 h (p < 0.05). Accordingly, cholesterol efflux capacity was reduced by 32% (p < 0.001) at both time points[102]
HDL from 46 incident new CVD and 46 one-to-one matched controls, at various stages of CKDSequential ultracentrifugationTargeted proteomics (31 proteins): LC-MS/MS analysisPON1, PON3, LCAT, and apolipoprotein A-IV levels inversely associated with incident CVD events in CKD patients[103]
HDL and LDL from pooled plasma samples from 75 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy and 50 healthy normolipidemic volunteersDensity gradient ultracentrifugationnanoLC-MS/MSProtein signatures specific for patients with “hard” or “soft” carotid plaques[56]
#HDL from 27 ESRD vs. 19 healthy subjectsSalt Gradient UltracentrifugationLC-MS/MS Analysis35 HDL-associated proteins identified; antitrypsin, retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4), transthyretin, apo A-VI, and further minor proteins were exclusively detected in uremic HDL; ↑ SAA1, ↑albumin, ↑lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, ↑ apo C-III, ↓ apo A-I, ↓ apo A-II[104]
#HDL from 7 chronic hemodialysis patients vs. 7 healthy controlsSequential density ultracentrifugationiTRAQ technology coupled with 2D nano-LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF MS122 proteins identified, 40 proteins differentially expressed[105]
#HDL from 34 ESRD vs. 17 healthy controlsSequential density ultracentrifugationHPLC coupled with MALDI-TOF-TOF MSSAA is enriched in HDL from ESRD patients correlating with its reduced anti-inflammatory capacity[106]
#HDL from 10 ESRD vs. 10 healthy controlsSequential ultracentrifugation1DE coupled with LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis49 HDL-associated proteins identified; ↑ surfactant protein B (SP-B), ↑ apolipoprotein C-II, ↑ serum amyloid A (SAA), ↑ α-1-microglobulin/bikunin precursor; SAA promotes inflammatory cytokine production[107]
#HDL from 40 ESRD vs. 20 controlsSequential ultracentrifugationLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis63 identified proteins; ↑ 22 proteins, ↓ 6 proteins; HDL proteome is extensively remodeled in uremic subjects[108]
#HDL from 509 CKD; estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2Two-step density gradient ultracentrifugationnLC-MS/MS analysis (targeted proteomics: quantification of 38 HDL-proteins)↑ retinol binding protein 4, ↑ apo C-III, ↑ apo L1, ↓ vitronectin[109]
#HDL from 143 patients starting hemodialysis vs. 110 patients with advanced CKDTwo-step density gradient ultracentrifugationnLC-MS/MS analysis (targeted proteomics: quantification of 38 HDL-proteins)↑ serum amyloid A1, A2, and A4, ↑ hemoglobin-b, ↑ haptoglobin-related protein, ↑ cholesteryl ester transfer protein, ↑ phospholipid transfer protein, ↑ apo E; hemodialysis initiation is associated with higher concentrations of HDL-proteins related to inflammation and lipid metabolism[110]
#HDL from 9 non-diabetic hemodialysis patients vs. 8 control patientsSequential ultracentrifugationnLC-Quadrupole-Orbitrap-MS326 proteins identified; ↑ 10 proteins (UDP-glucose: glycoprotein glucosyltransferase 1, Beta-2-microglobulin, Pulmonary surfactant-associated protein B, Protein AMBP, Insulin-like growth factor II, Immunoglobulin heavy constant alpha 2, Immunoglobulin lambda constant 2, HLA class I histocompatibility antigen B-58 alpha chain, Complement factor D, Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H1), ↓ 9 proteins (Guanylin, Calpain-1 catalytic subunit, Keratin, type I cytoskeletal, Ras-related protein Rab-6B, Ganglioside GM2 activator, Prostaglandin-H2 D-isomerase, Secretoglobin family 3A member 2, Thioredoxin-dependent peroxide reductase mitochondrial, Solute carrier family 2 facilitated glucose transporter member 2) involved in lipid metabolism, hemostasis, wound healing, oxidative stress, and apoptosis pathways[111]
§HDL from 30 T1DM vs. 30 controlsSingle Vertical Spin Density Gradient UltracentrifugationLC-ESI-MS/MS analysisCompromised HDL anti-oxidant functions due to higher abundance of irreversible PTMs of proteins in T1DM[112]
§HDL from 191 T1DM subjectsSequential ultracentrifugationTargeted proteomics (46 proteins): LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis8 proteins associated with albuminuria including AMBP (α1-microglobulin/bikunin precursor) and PTGDS (prostaglandin-H2 D-isomerase) that strongly and positively associated with the albumin excretion rate. PON1 and PON3 levels in HDL strongly and negatively associated with the presence of coronary artery calcium. Only PON1, associated with both albumin excretion rate and coronary artery calcification. The HDL proteome is remodeled in type 1 diabetes mellitus subjects with albuminuria[113]
§HDL from 26 patients with T1DM vs. 13 healthy controlsHigh-resolution size exclusion chromatography followed by phospholipid-associated proteins capture (Calcium Silicate Hydrate) nLC-TripleTOF-MS78 HDL-bound proteins were measured; youths with T1DM show proteomic alterations of their HDL compared to healthy controls, despite similar concentration of HDL cholesterol. The influences of these compositional changes on HDL function are not yet known[114]
§HDL from two cohorts of T1DM patients (n = 47, n = 100). T1DM without complications vs. T1DM with complications Sequential density ultracentrifugationTargeted proteomics (35 proteins): LC-MS/MS analysisElevated concentrations of M-HDL particles and elevated levels of HDL-associated PON1 may contribute to long-term protection from the vascular complications of diabetes by pathways that are independent of total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol. ↑ apo C-I, apo E, complement C3, apo C-II, apo M, and PON1, ↓ apo A-IV and retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4). In the female subgroup analysis: ↑ apo C-I and PON1, ↓ apo A-IV. Targeted proteomics in the replication cohort: ↑ PON1[115]
§HDL from 9 newly diagnosed T2DM patients and 8 healthy controlsImmunoaffinity chromatographyLC-MS/MSPlasma adiponectin levels were reduced in subjects with T2DM, which was directly associated with suppressed ABCA1-dependent cholesterol efflux capacity of HDL. The fractional catabolic rates of HDL cholesterol, apo A-II, apo J, apo A-IV, transthyretin, complement C3, and vitamin D-binding protein (all p < 0.05) were increased in subjects with T2D. Despite the increased HDL flux of acute-phase HDL proteins, there was no change in the proinflammatory index of HDL. Although lecithin-cholesterol acyl transferase (LCAT) and CETP activities were not affected in subjects with T2DM, LCAT was inversely associated with blood glucose and CETP was inversely associated with plasma adiponectin. The degradation rates of apo A-II and apo A-IV were correlated with hemoglobin A1c. In conclusion, there were in vivo impairments in HDL proteome dynamics and HDL metabolism in diet-controlled patients with T2DM[116]
§HDL from obese adolescents with T1DM (25 treated with metformin as adjunct therapy and 10 with placebo): double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trialSize-exclusion chromatography followed by lipophilic absorptionData-independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometryTwo proteins out of eighty-four were significantly affected by metformin treatment, peptidoglycan recognition protein 2 and alpha-2-macroglobulin. Metformin did not significantly affect cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC). Changes in affected HDL proteins did not correlate with CEC[117]
§HDL2 and HDL3 from case–control study that enrolled 50 T1DM and 30 non-diabetes control individualsDiscontinuous density ultracentrifugation45 proteins quantified by parallel reaction monitoring13 proteins in HDL2 and 33 in HDL3 were differentially expressed in T1DM. Six proteins related to lipid metabolism, one to inflammatory acute phase, one to complement system and one to antioxidant response were more abundant in HDL2, while fourteen lipid metabolism, three acute-phase, three antioxidants and one transport were found in HDL3 of T1DM subjects. Three proteins (lipid metabolism, transport, and unknown function) were more abundant in HDL2, and ten (lipid metabolism, transport, protease inhibition) were more abundant in HDL3 of controls[118]
ǂHDL from C57BL/6 mice challenged with intraperitoneal endotoxin vs. controls injected with salineSequential ultracentrifugationTwo-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE) coupled with LC-MS/MS analysis↑ SAA, apo E, apo A-IV, apo A-V; ↓ apo A-I, apo A-II[119]
ǂHDL from C57BL/6j mice following 24 weeks on saturated fatty acids (SFA)- or monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA)-enriched high-fat diets (HFDs) or low-fat dietFast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC)nLC-ESI-MS/MS analysisHDL particles were enriched with acute-phase proteins (serum amyloid A, haptoglobin, and hemopexin) and depleted in paraoxonase-1 after SFA-HFD in comparison with MUFA-HFD[120]
ǂHDL from knock-out (for apo A-I, apo A-II or apo A-IV) and wild type C57BL/6J miceHigh-resolution size exclusion chromatography followed by phospholipid-associated proteins capture (Calcium Silicate Hydrate)LC-ESI-MS/MS analysisThe loss of apo A-I or apo A-II massively reduced HDL lipids and changed the plasma size pattern and/or abundance of several plasma proteins. Surprisingly though, many HDL proteins were not affected, suggesting they assemble on lipid particles in the absence of apo A-I or apo A-II. In contrast, apo A-IV ablation had minor effects on plasma lipids and proteins, suggesting that it forms particles that largely exclude other apolipoproteins. Overall, the data indicate that distinct HDL subpopulations exist, and that they do not contain, nor depend on, apo A-I, apo A-II or apo A-IV, and these contribute substantially to the proteomic diversity of HDL[93]
ǂHDL from Scavenger receptor class B type I−/− mice vs. wildtype (WT) miceApo B containing lipoproteins precipitation followed by ultracentrifugationLC–MS/MS analysis/2DE analysis↓ apo A-I, ↓ PON1, ↑ SAA, ↑ apo A-IV, ↑ α-1-antitrypsin; impaired cholesterol homeostasis in macrophages, and reduced anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory effects[121]
Table 2. Proteomics studies on human plaque extracts. The sample source, the methodology applied, and the most relevant findings are reported. Reduced (↓) or increased (↑) levels of protein concentrations are indicated.
Table 2. Proteomics studies on human plaque extracts. The sample source, the methodology applied, and the most relevant findings are reported. Reduced (↓) or increased (↑) levels of protein concentrations are indicated.
SamplesProteomicsMain FindingsReferences
10 coronary arteries from CAD vs. 7 coronary arteries from normal individuals2DE coupled with LC-MS/MSIncreased expression of the ferritin light chain in CAD (1.41 vs. 0.75; p = 0.01)[156]
5 stable carotid plaques vs. 6 lesions with a thrombus2DE coupled with MALDI-TOF/TOF MSExpression of six isoforms of alpha1 anti-trypsin (AAT) in advanced plaques, one of which was uniquely expressed in thrombus-containing plaques[157]
7 atherosclerotic aortas vs. 7 normal aortas specimens from the same patients2DE coupled with MALDI TOF MS27 differentially expressed proteins identified involved in a number of biological processes, including calcium-mediated processes, migration of vascular smooth muscle cells, matrix metalloproteinase activation and regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines[158]
35 human coronary atherosclerotic specimens (frozen, embedded, LCM specimens)LC-MS/MS806 proteins identified; first large-scale proteomics map of human coronary atherosclerotic plaques[159]
10 carotid plaques2DESynthetic gel from 2DE[160]
29 unstable carotid plaques vs. 19 stable plaques2DE coupled with MALDI TOF MS57 spots identified
↓ SOD3, GST, HSP27, HSP20, annexin A10, and Rho GDI
↑ ferritin light subunit, SOD2 and fibrinogen fragment D
[6]
10 complicated segments in the internal carotid artery vs. more stable segments in the common carotid artery of the same patients2-D DIGE coupled with nano-LC ESI MS/MS↑ Protein S100A10, Fibrinogen beta, Ferritin light chain, AAT, Protein S100-A9, Serum albumin
↓ Apolipoprotein E, Actin, cytoplasmic 1, L-Lactate dehydrogenase B, Myosin regulatory light polypeptide 9, Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase, mitochondrial, Actin, aortic smooth muscle, Transgelin, Calponin-1, Tropomyosin beta, Annexin A5, Myosin light polypeptide 6
[161]
80 carotid plaques from patients who had a cardiovascular event vs. 80 carotid plaques from patients who remained stable during follow-upTwo-dimensional LC-MS/MSPlaque osteopontin levels in single lesions are predictive for cardiovascular events in other vascular territories. Local atherosclerotic plaques are a source of prognostic biomarkers with a high predictive value for secondary manifestations of atherosclerotic disease[162]
Intimal proteome from the human atherosclerotic coronary artery (LCM) vs. preatherosclerotic coronary vs. radial arteries2-D DIGE coupled with MALDI TOF/TOF MS13 proteins were differentially expressed (7 upregulated and 6 downregulated), and are implicated in the migrative capacity of vascular smooth muscle cells, extracellular matrix composition, coagulation, apoptosis, heat shock response, and intraplaque hemorrhage deposition[163]
Noncomplicated and complicated plaques from carotid atherosclerotic lesions Enrichment step with Proteominer. 1DE and 2DE coupled with nLC-MS/MSNovel low-abundance proteins were associated very well with biological alterations related to atherosclerosis[164]
38 carotid atherosclerotic plaques pooled into two samples and analyzed in triplicateMultidimensional LC-MS/MSA total of 4702 proteins were identified from atherosclerotic plaques at a false discovery rate (FDR) of 1%, of which 3846 were identified with at least 2 unique peptides[165]
Fibrotic and hemorrhagic carotid atherosclerotic plaques from coronary patientsEnrichment step with Proteominer. 2DE coupled with nLC-MS/MS118 proteins, differentially expressed in fibrotic and hemorrhagic plaques, allowed for the identification of three biological processes related to atherosclerosis (platelet degranulation, vascular autophagy and negative regulation of fibrinolysis). Combinations of such circulating biomarkers could be used to stratify coronary patients[166]
Human coronary thrombus2-DE followed by MALDI MS/MS
1-DE followed by LC–MALDI-MS/MS
1-DE followed by LC–ESI-MS/MS)
708 proteins were identified in the thrombus. A positive correlation of 5 proteins (fermitin homolog 3, thrombospondin-1, myosin-9, beta parvin and ras-related protein Rap-1b) with CD41 was found, pointing out the potential activation of a focal adhesion pathway within thrombus platelets[167]
Different regions of human carotid plaques from men and women2-DE followed by MALDI-TOF MS/nLC-MS/MSExpression levels of 18 proteins were significantly altered in plaque regions compared to the internal control region. In total, 9 proteins showed site-specific alterations, irrespective of gender, with clear associations to extracellular matrix remodeling; 5 proteins displayed gender-specific alterations with 2-DE, with two alterations validated by nLC-MS/MS. Gender differences in ferritin light chain and transthyretin were validated using both techniques. The validation of immunohistochemistry confirmed significantly higher levels of ferritin in plaques from male patients[168]
23 lipid-rich plaques and 13 non-lipid-rich plaquesLC MS/MSLibrary of 423 proteins that are present in coronary plaque debris; MMP-9 and another 5 plaque-enriched proteins (lipopolysaccharide binding protein, Annexin A5, eukaryotic translocation initiation factor, syntaxin 11, cytochrome B5 reductase 3) significantly enriched in plaque and in plasma after plaque disruption[169]
28 vulnerable carotid plaques vs. 30 stable plaquesiTRAQ nanoLC MS/MS28 proteins were differentially expressed, including alpha-2-macroglobulin (a2M) and heparin cofactor II (HCII). The plasma level of a2M was found to be positively correlated, while HCII level was negatively correlated, with the higher vulnerability of carotid plaques. Both proteins were efficient in differentiating stable and vulnerable carotid plaques[170]
Human carotid endarterectomy specimens from 6 symptomatic versus 6 asymptomatic patients(Three steps extraction of carotid plaque ECM) nanoLC MS/MSA 4-biomarker signature (matrix metalloproteinase 9, S100A8/S100A9, cathepsin D, and galectin-3-binding protein) improved risk prediction and was successfully replicated in an independent cohort in the SAPHIR study[171]
Human coronary arteries (n = 100) and aortas (n = 100)LC MS/MSIdentified hundreds of proteins (n = 1925) and numerous networks and pathways that are associated with early atherosclerosis[11]
Carotid plaques from 10 men vs. 10 womenLC MS/MSSex-specific differences were identified both in general levels and from the lesion region-specific perspective. In this study, men were shown to have greater levels of inflammatory response proteins like lysozyme C and sPLA2, and women to have greater levels of serine protease inhibitors and afamin. These differences in the proteome may be suggestive of women developing plaques with a lower inflammatory profile, and greater stability, than men[172]
Coronary arteries at different stages of development, from 15 patients2-DE followed by MALDI-TOF MS The amounts of the following proteins were increased in stable atherosclerotic plaques at the stage of lipidosis and fibrosis: vimentin, tropomyosin β-chain, actin, keratin, tubulin β-chain, microfibril-associated glycoprotein 4, serum amyloid P-component, and annexin 5. In plaques at the stage of fibrosis and calcification, the amounts of mimecan and fibrinogen were increased. In the unstable atherosclerotic plaque of the necrotic–dystrophic type, the amounts of human serum albumin, mimecan, fibrinogen, serum amyloid P-component and annexin were increased[173]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nieddu, G.; Formato, M.; Lepedda, A.J. Searching for Atherosclerosis Biomarkers by Proteomics: A Focus on Lesion Pathogenesis and Vulnerability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15175. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015175

AMA Style

Nieddu G, Formato M, Lepedda AJ. Searching for Atherosclerosis Biomarkers by Proteomics: A Focus on Lesion Pathogenesis and Vulnerability. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(20):15175. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015175

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nieddu, Gabriele, Marilena Formato, and Antonio Junior Lepedda. 2023. "Searching for Atherosclerosis Biomarkers by Proteomics: A Focus on Lesion Pathogenesis and Vulnerability" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 20: 15175. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015175

APA Style

Nieddu, G., Formato, M., & Lepedda, A. J. (2023). Searching for Atherosclerosis Biomarkers by Proteomics: A Focus on Lesion Pathogenesis and Vulnerability. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(20), 15175. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015175

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop