Next Article in Journal
Deubiquitinase USP17 Regulates Osteoblast Differentiation by Increasing Osterix Protein Stability
Previous Article in Journal
Challenges in Imaging Analyses of Biomolecular Condensates in Cells Infected with Influenza A Virus
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Crosstalk between Gut Microbiota and Nervous System: A Bidirectional Interaction between Microorganisms and Metabolome
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Dysbiotic Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites and Their Role in Non-Communicable Diseases

1
Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
2
School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
3
Sydney Medical School and Charles Perkins Centre Nepean, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
4
Sydney Cytometry, The Centenary Institute and The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(20), 15256; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015256
Submission received: 22 September 2023 / Revised: 13 October 2023 / Accepted: 15 October 2023 / Published: 17 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbiome and Metabolome in the Gastrointestinal Tract)

Abstract

:
Dysbiosis, generally defined as the disruption to gut microbiota composition or function, is observed in most diseases, including allergies, cancer, metabolic diseases, neurological disorders and diseases associated with autoimmunity. Dysbiosis is commonly associated with reduced levels of beneficial gut microbiota-derived metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) and indoles. Supplementation with these beneficial metabolites, or interventions to increase their microbial production, has been shown to ameliorate a variety of inflammatory diseases. Conversely, the production of gut ‘dysbiotic’ metabolites or by-products by the gut microbiota may contribute to disease development. This review summarizes the various ‘dysbiotic’ gut-derived products observed in cardiovascular diseases, cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, metabolic diseases including non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and autoimmune disorders such as multiple sclerosis. The increased production of dysbiotic gut microbial products, including trimethylamine, hydrogen sulphide, products of amino acid metabolism such as p-Cresyl sulphate and phenylacetic acid, and secondary bile acids such as deoxycholic acid, is commonly observed across multiple diseases. The simultaneous increased production of dysbiotic metabolites with the impaired production of beneficial metabolites, commonly associated with a modern lifestyle, may partially explain the high prevalence of inflammatory diseases in western countries.

1. Introduction

A finely-tuned interaction between the gut microbiota and the host is important for supporting the physiology and immunity of the host across its entire lifespan [1]. Disruption to this interaction, resulting from antibiotics usage or poor diet consumption, is linked to disturbances in both the composition and function of the gut microbiota. This disturbance, known as dysbiosis, is believed to set the scene for the development of chronic diseases [2,3].
The gut microbiota communicates with and exerts its influence on the host through multiple pathways. It does so via the binding of conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) to pattern recognition receptors expressed mostly on innate immune cells, such as epithelial cells and macrophages [4]. These PAMPs are typically found on the surface of bacteria but also on the surface of extracellular vesicles produced by bacteria [5]. The other major pathway of communication is the production of metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFA). SCFA can activate G protein-coupled receptors expressed by cells in the gut or in other organs, explaining the local [6,7] and systemic effects of the gut microbiota on the host [8,9]. The effects of SCFA include inducing tolerogenic dendritic cells and regulatory T cells (Treg) [10], which offer protection from the development of allergies [6], or activating the NLRP3 inflammasome in colonic epithelial cells, offering protection from colitis and colorectal cancer [7]. Other metabolites, such as secondary bile acids, have also been shown to support Treg development by activating nuclear receptors such as the vitamin D receptor [11]. Finally, gut microbiota-derived SCFA can also directly enter cells and hijack their metabolic pathways, supporting the development of anti-inflammatory IL-10-producing B cells both in mice and humans, with benefits to those who suffer from arthritis [12].
Currently, the focus of most research has been on understanding and harnessing the health benefits of the gut microbiota. This includes identifying and characterizing prebiotics (foods that beneficially reshape the gut microbiota), probiotics (beneficial gut bacteria) or postbiotics (beneficial bacterial by-products) and their mechanisms of action. Recent work has, however, highlighted the need to better understand the potential detrimental effects of gut bacterial by-products on disease development and/or in response to therapies [13]. The gut microbiota has the potential to not only contribute to or perpetuate diseases such as periodontitis, colitis, endometriosis, tumorigenesis, but can also impair the efficacy of treatments. Gut bacterial by-products could thus be used as biomarkers for better diagnostics [14] or to predict treatment efficacy. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current knowledge on the link between bacterial metabolites associated with dysbiosis, non-communicable disease development and response to therapies.

2. Cardiovascular Diseases and Periodontitis

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death worldwide and are commonly associated with obesity or metabolic disorders. However, increasing numbers of patients with CVD have no such associated disorders, suggesting that other lifestyle factors are involved. Recent evidence suggests that gut dysbiosis and gut bacterial metabolites may contribute to CVD [15]. These effects are not only attributed to bacteria in the colon but also to bacteria located in the oral cavity, with periodontitis being a major risk factor for CVD.
Among the detrimental metabolites, trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) has been well-studied in metabolic diseases and CVD. Trimethylamine (TMA) is produced by certain gut bacteria from dietary choline, L-carnitine, glycine and betaine. The majority of TMA is then oxidised by hepatocytes via flavin monooxygenases in the liver, producing TMAO while a small amount may be utilized by methanobacteria to generate methane and ammonia. The intake of TMAO precursors such as L-carnitine, present in red meat, is directly associated with TMAO level, which in turn has been identified as one of the strongest predictive risk factors for CVD [16]. GWAS studies have also demonstrated that gut bacteria-derived betaine is causally associated with increased risk of CVD [17]. This increased risk likely relates to the pro-inflammatory functions of TMAO. TMAO activates p38 MAPK signalling in vivo as well as in vitro in primary human endothelial and smooth muscle cells, which upregulates pro-inflammatory factors such as COX-2, IL-6, E-selectin and ICAM-1 [18]. TMAO also enhances trained immunity in endothelial cells by increasing endoplasmic reticulum stress and metabolic reprogramming, which has been shown to induce a pro-inflammatory phenotype [19]. TMAO can also activate the NLRP3 inflammasome, leading to IL-1β secretion and endothelial cell dysfunction [20]. Consumption of a diet rich in TMAO precursors has also been shown to increase pro-inflammatory markers related to macrophage recruitment in aortic tissues [18]. On the other hand, this proinflammatory effect and increased activation of immune cells by TMAO may be beneficial in some contexts, such as in cancer. TMAO has been shown to improve anti-PD1 and/or anti-Tim3 immune checkpoint blockade in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by potentiating IFN-g response [21] and activating CD8 T cell antitumor response, as well as by directly inducing the pyroptosis of tumour cells by increasing endoplasmic reticulum stress in triple-negative breast cancer [22]. TMAO thus perpetuates inflammation via various pathways, which may be beneficial or detrimental depending on the disease context.
Products of microbial amino acid metabolism can also impact the host. Microbial metabolism of L-tryptophan and L-tyrosine produces indole and p-Cresyl respectively, which can be further metabolized in the liver into indoxyl sulphate and p-Cresyl sulphate. Indoxyl sulphate is a cardiotoxin and 7-week exposure to p-Cresyl sulphate or indoxyl sulphate has been shown to induce arterial calcification in mice [23]. Exposure has also triggered a prodiabetic state characterized by impaired glucose homeostasis and a decrease in GLUT1 expression [23]. Another gut bacteria-derived tryptophan metabolite, indole-3-propionic acid (IPA), has been shown to increase blood pressure in rats. The echocardiographic analysis revealed higher heart contractility in IPA treated rats and IPA modified cardiomyocytes metabolism in vitro [24]. However, IPA levels have been shown to be inversely correlated with atherosclerosis [25]. Microbial metabolism of another amino acid, phenylalanine, produces phenylacetic acid. Phenylacetic acid can be transformed into phenylacetylglutamine in the liver, a metabolite associated with CVD and its incidental, major and adverse cardiovascular events [26]. Phenylacetylglutamine contributes to CVD by acting on α2A, α2B, and β2-adrenergic receptors on platelet cells, leading to an activated phenotype with enhanced thrombosis potential [26]. Finally, elevated blood N,N,N-trimethyl-5-aminovaleric acid (TMAVA), a metabolite derived from microbial metabolism of trimethyl-lysine, is associated with incidental cardiac death and higher transplantation risk [27]. TMAVA may contribute to cardiac dysfunction by impairing cardiac carnitine metabolism and fatty acid oxidation, enhancing myocardial lipid accumulation and oxidative stress [27].
Periodontitis is also a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, including peripheral artery disease, atherosclerosis, heart failure and stroke [28]. Periodontitis can lead to systemic inflammation by facilitating the translocation of periodontal pathogens such as Porphyromonas gingivalis from the oral cavity to the bloodstream, and P. gingivalis is commonly detected in human atherosclerotic plaques [29]. P. gingivalis may promote inflammation via TLR-NF-κB signalling [30] but also through the release of the enzyme P. gingivalis-derived peptidyl arginine deiminase (PPAD). PPAD catalyses the conversion of arginine into citrulline, which can act as a substrate for citrullination, a form of post-translational modification. Citrullination can lead to antigen conformational changes exposing PAMPs or inducing the generation of anti-citrullinated antibodies that contribute to autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis [31]. While citrullinated proteins are enriched in atherosclerotic plaques [32], their role in CVD is less defined compared with autoimmune diseases.
Finally, while secondary bile acids have been shown to affect the immune response and could play a role in vascular calcification in patients with chronic kidney disease [33], a study found no association between deoxycholic acid (DCA) and atherosclerosis but did find an association between DCA and all-cause mortality and end-stage kidney disease [34].

3. Metabolic and Liver Diseases

Obesity and metabolic diseases are both correlated with changes in the gut microbiota composition. Landmark work from the team of Jeffrey Gordon further showed that the colonisation of germ-free mice with gut microbiota from discordant human twins could transfer the obesity phenotype [35]. While others have also confirmed that the gut microbiota composition are shifted in obesity and in metabolic diseases, there is still no clear understanding of how the gut microbiota perpetuate or contribute to metabolic alteration. The gut microbiota can affect the energy extraction efficacy from diet [35] and advances in multi-omics have identified a growing list of bacterial by-products associated with metabolic diseases.
Several lines of evidence suggest that chronic (low-grade) systemic inflammation plays a critical role in the development of metabolic syndrome. Gut epithelial disruption can increase the translocation of bacterial products, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), leading to endotoxemia and systemic inflammation. Subsequently, this results in insulin resistance and adipose tissue dysfunction. Patients with intestinal barrier dysfunction have increased circulating LPS-positive bacterial extracellular vesicles [36]. Increased translocation of microbiota-derived extracellular vesicles (MEV) has also been reported in obesity or type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, which has led to increased transfer of microbial DNA to pancreatic β cells [37], liver, skeletal muscle and epididymal fat [38], resulting in inflammation, β cell dysfunction and insulin resistance. Microbial DNA from MEV also trigger adrenomedullary dysfunctions and hypertension in obese mice [39]. It is interesting to note that MEV derived from specific bacteria can elicit a much stronger impact on the host’s metabolism, with the administration of Pseudomonas panacis-derived EV promoting glucose intolerance in mice [40].
Obesity and metabolic diseases are associated with the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and similar dysbiotic properties are reported across these diseases, including increased blood levels of circulating branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) and aromatic amino acids such as phenylacetic acid. In liver steatosis, these amino acids were shown to be microbiota-derived with the faecal transplantation of gut microbiota from a patient with steatosis into mice, increasing circulating BCAA (valine) and phenylacetic acid levels. This was shown to be associated with increased liver triglyceride levels within 2 weeks post faecal transplantation [41]. The effect of phenylacetic acid seems direct, as its addition to primary human hepatocytes in vitro resulted in increased triglyceride accumulation, fibrosis and reduced response to insulin, as indicated by lowered AKT phosphorylation [41]. Other by-products of amino acid metabolism can also impair host metabolism. Elevation of 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)lactate, a by-product of microbial aromatic amino acid metabolism, was shown to be associated with hepatic steatosis and fibrosis and was significantly higher in individuals with NAFLD [42]. Furthermore, patients characterized with a ‘high fat’ liver had greater faecal levels of the lysine and histidine degradation products saccharopine and N-omega-acetylhistamine [43]. While the role of these products in liver disease are yet to be delineated, it highlights that the products of microbial amino acid metabolism are altered in NAFLD patients, and that they may serve as useful biomarkers for this disease.
TMAVA, derived from the precursor trimethyllysine, has also been found to be increased in the plasma of patients with liver steatosis [44]. Supplementation of TMAVA to mice drives early liver steatosis, characterized by increased plasma and hepatic triglyceride content as well as increased lipid accumulation in the liver [44]. TMAVA elicits these effects by inhibiting hepatic carnitine biosynthesis and fatty acid oxidation by competitively binding to γ-Butyrobetaine hydroxylase with γ-Butyrobetaine [44]. Notably, TMAVA is also a precursor for TMAO, with some evidence suggesting that TMAO could also be involved in liver disease. Several studies have reported an association of TMAO levels with triglyceride accumulation as well as with the severity of NAFLD [45]. However, its contribution to NAFLD pathogenesis or severity remains unclear, with one preclinical study demonstrating a beneficial effect of TMAO on the progression of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [46].
The increased production of endogenous ethanol by the gut microbiota may also contribute to NASH development. Ethanol causes oxidative stress and is mostly metabolised into acetate in the liver, providing a source of acetyl-CoA that drives de novo lipogenesis [47] and consequently steatosis. Increased concentration of ethanol has been detected from the exhaled breath of obese mice in the absence of ethanol ingestion, and is attributed to the gut microbiota [48]. NASH patients also exhibit significantly elevated blood ethanol levels, though obese individuals without NASH do not [49]. The same trend has also been observed in the faeces of children with NAFLD [50], which excludes exogenous ethanol consumption. NASH and NAFLD patients are characterized by significantly higher abundance of ethanol-producing microbes, such as Escherichia and Klebsiella pneumoniae [49,51]. The transfer of high ethanol-producing strains of K. pneumoniae into mice could cause NAFLD [51]. Further, alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitors induced a 15-fold increase in blood ethanol levels in patients with NAFLD, but this effect was abrogated when individuals were treated with antibiotics [52]. Altogether, gut microbiota-derived ethanol is one factor that strongly correlates with liver disease pathogenesis.

4. Allergic Diseases

While there is strong evidence for dysbiosis and the establishment of allergic sensitization, there is limited knowledge on the extent to which microbial-derived metabolites may contribute to or aggravate allergy development. Neonates classified as high-risk for developing atopy and asthma at 2 and 4 years had significant enrichment of faecal 12,13 DiHOME, stigma- and sito-sterols, 8-hydroxyoctanoate, α-CEHC and γ-tocopherol [53]. Similarly, increased faecal concentration of 12,13-diHOME, a linoleic acid metabolite, has been associated with increased susceptibility to atopy, eczema or asthma during childhood [54]. While SCFA offers protection from allergic diseases in mice [6,55], children with a dysfunctional gut microbiome from the age of 3 months, characterised by the depletion of 40% of bacteria specialised in the generation of SCFA, were more likely to develop atopy [56,57], suggesting that not only are SCFA beneficial but that decreased levels of SCFA could be a risk factor for allergic diseases.
Gut-derived MEV are also altered in allergic patients. The abundance of EV produced by gut bacteria of the genus Bacteroidota is significantly increased in the blood of asthmatic patients compared with healthy participants [58]. Another study has shown the dominance of Bacillota-derived EV in the urine of allergic airway children [59]. How and whether MEV contribute to asthma pathogenesis is unclear, however, EV derived from the pathogenic bacteria Staphylococcus aureus has been shown to trigger atopic dermatitis-like skin inflammation [60] as well as α-hemolysin-induced barrier disruption in mice [61].

5. Autoinflammatory Diseases

5.1. Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Psoriasis

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) development is highly linked to the gut microenvironment, with beneficial metabolites such as SCFA attenuating the inflammatory response and protecting against IBD in mice [7]. Indeed, SCFA levels have been found to be lower in both Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis patients [62]. Microbial-derived metabolites may also aggravate IBD. Altered microbial sulphur metabolism and increased faecal sulphated compounds, such as tauro-conjugated bile acids and glycocholic acid, are associated with IBD [63]. Desulfovibrio, a gut bacteria enriched in IBD patients [64], is specialised in sulphate metabolism and produces hydrogen sulphide (H2S) which is toxic at high concentrations. H2S can inhibit Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase in colonocytes which impairs butyrate oxidation, depriving epithelial cells from their major source of energy and inducing oxidative stress [65]. Furthermore, microbial H2S has mucolytic properties and can reduce sulphide bonds of mucus structures. This mechanism results in gut integrity degradation, which promotes hyperproliferation of epithelial cells [66]. Thus, high concentrations of H2S may directly contribute to the pathology of IBD by disrupting the normal physiology of colonocytes.
Interestingly, sulphate reduction produces acetate as an end-product [67], a beneficial metabolite for IBD. Thus, the association between concentrations of acetate and H2S must be considered to define a state of dysbiosis that is predisposed to IBD. It is likely that the level of acetate produced via this pathway does not reach the threshold required for protection. It could also be that acetate has mostly preventive rather than therapeutic effects, or is beneficial when Desulfovibrio and other sulphate-reducing bacteria are low, while potentially detrimental once IBD has been established and H2S levels are high [67].
The process of sulphate reduction requires the presence of electron donors, and microbial-derived lactate is a major exogenic electron donor. While lactate is typically considered anti-inflammatory, its presence in an environment with high sulphide-reducing bacteria could exacerbate IBD. Indeed, higher levels of lactic acid have been demonstrated in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease [68,69]. It appears that lactate may be detrimental in chronic inflammatory diseases, by reducing the mobility of effector T cells to entrap them at the site of inflammation and by directly upregulating IL-17 production, as seen in rheumatoid arthritis [70,71] and, similarly, in peritonitis [72]. However, lactic acid is typically also increased during inflammation due to increased utilisation of anaerobic glycolysis to generate ATP (particularly by tumour cells, coined the Warburg effect). Therefore, whether the increased lactic acid observed in IBD and other diseases is of microbial origin must first be elucidated.
Succinate is another microbial metabolite increased in IBD, with increases observed in both the plasma and intestinal tissues of patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. IBD has also been characterised by the elevated intestinal expression of the succinate receptor SUCNR1 [73,74]. Deletion of SUCNR1 in mice protected against 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid-induced colitis [73], indicating the direct effect of succinate on the host, contributing to IBD. Mechanistically, SUCNR1 has been found to be associated with pro-inflammatory NF-κB and ERK signalling [74] as well as the upregulation of inflammasome components in intestinal epithelial cells. Due to the high expression of SUCNR1 on various immune cells [8], it is likely that succinate can directly influence the inflammation in IBD. Indeed, SUCNR1-expressing macrophages detect extracellular succinate when activated, leading to enhanced pro-inflammatory IL-1β expression [75]. SUCNR1 is also critical for dendritic cell functionality and migratory capacity, supporting dendritic cell-induced antigen specific CD4+ T cell response [76] and acting as a ”chemokine” that guides their migration into lymph nodes to induce Th17 cells in arthritis [77]. We, and others, have shown that psoriasis induction in mice leads to the higher production of succinate by the gut microbiota, which induces the proliferation of resident colonic macrophages and increased levels of TNF in the gut [78,79]. Higher succinate and TNF levels in the colon have also been reported in human psoriasis [80]. Colonic inflammation associated with psoriasis aggravated colitis development in mice, which is aligned with the idea that the highest risk of developing IBD is in patients with psoriasis [79]. Interestingly, psoriasis appears to be associated with a dysregulated faecal lipid profile, with higher levels of oleic acid and linoleic acid reported in mouse psoriasis [81]. Similarly, lipid profiles were disturbed in patients with lower plasma levels of microbial-derived taurochenodeoxycholic acid, deoxycholic acid glycine conjugate, chenodeoxycholic acid glycine conjugate, and L-kynurenine [82]. Pathway analysis of differentially abundant plasma metabolites from these patients revealed enhanced α-linolenic acid and linoleic acid metabolism, which may relate to the greater production of these fatty acids by the gut microbiota in psoriasis [82].
Bacterial proteolytic fermentation and their generated by-products are also increased in patients with IBD. Such by-products include p-Cresyl sulphate and 3-indoxyl sulphate, both produced at higher levels in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis patients [83]. Finally, fatty acid metabolism can also be a risk factor, with sphingolipids, sphingomyelins and ceramides being increased in the stool of Crohn’s disease patients [83].
MEV can also modulate IBD development, with the transfer of MEV derived from the gut microbiota of healthy mice protecting mice from DSS colitis. The benefits were derived via the changes in gut microbiota composition, restoration of the gut barrier integrity via the modulation of epithelial miRNA profile and the reduction of colonic inflammation [84]. Among the beneficial MEV, Clostridium butyricum-derived EV are protective against DSS-induced colitis by programming macrophages towards an M2 phenotype [85]. Dysbiotic MEV can also contribute to IBD by activating host TLR, leading to inflammatory responses [86]. They may also contribute to DSS colitis in a dose-dependent manner. We found that a high-protein diet increased the generation of gut MEV, which aggravated DSS-induced colitis in mice [87]. The mechanism likely involves TLR activation and NF-κB signalling contributing to pro-inflammatory responses.

5.2. Multiple Sclerosis

The occurrence of autoimmune diseases depends in part on a dysregulation of Treg cells, whose functions are heavily regulated by metabolites of the gut microbiome, particularly SCFA [88,89]. Alterations in the composition of the gut microbiota and of microbiota derived by-products have been reported in people with MS [90].
Patients with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) had higher levels of p-Cresyl sulphate, indoxyl sulphate and N-Phenylacetyl-glutamine compared with patients treated with dimethyl fumarate. Increased levels of these metabolites correlated with a higher degree of neurodegeneration [91] as well as progression of MS [92]. Supplementation of these metabolites directly onto neuronal cell cultures induced neurotoxic effects, causing axonal damage and affected neuronal signalling [91]. Supplementation of primary oligodendrocyte progenitors with p-Cresyl reduced myelin gene expression and may contribute to myelin sheath degradation [93]. p-Cresyl sulphate might also exacerbate MS due to its structural similarities to myelin basic protein and have similar reactivity with MBP peptide 83–89 to immunoreactivity assays [92]. As discussed in the cardiovascular section, periodontitis is a risk factor for autoimmune diseases due to the citrullination of host protein by P. gingivalis-derived PPAD. The resulting autoantibodies directed against these proteins contribute to the development of rheumatoid arthritis, and the same mechanism could also potentiate other autoimmune diseases including MS. A recent longitudinal multi-omics and mass spectrometric study of RRMS patients has identified microbiota positively or negatively correlated with degree of disability. Circulating levels of metabolites, particularly the linoleate metabolic pathway, fatty acid biosynthesis, chalcone, dihydrochalcone, 4-nitrocatechol and methionine were altered [94]. This study pinpointed a potential correlation network linking meat servings with decreased gut microbe Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, increased Th17 cell and greater abundance of meat-associated blood metabolites [94].
Interestingly, microbial-derived products appear to be important regulators of brain and neuronal activity. Mice susceptible to traumatic stress had increased p-Cresyl in the prefrontal cortex and this was associated with abnormal levels of dopamine and increased dopamine D3 receptor expression [95]. 4-Ethylphenyl sulphate, derived from the microbial metabolism of L-tyrosine, was increased in a mouse model of atypical neurodevelopment, and could alter oligodendrocyte maturation, function and oligodendrocyte-neuron interactions [96]. Importantly, mice colonized with 4-ethylphenyl sulphate-producing bacteria displayed reduced myelination of neuronal axons [96]. This indicates that 4-ethylphenyl sulphate may potentially aggravate MS, however, this remains to be investigated.

5.3. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

SLE is a complex autoimmune disease that affects numerous organs and systems in the body. While the exact cause of lupus is not fully understood, it is believed to involve a combination of genetic, environmental, and immunological factors. As in other autoimmune diseases, a role for gut bacteria metabolites in the development and progression of SLE has been proposed. Gut bacteria can produce indole derivatives and LPS that can directly activate immune cells or affect immune responses through various signalling pathways. These metabolites can potentially promote inflammation and contribute to the pathogenesis of SLE.
The role of gut microbiota dysbiosis has been studied abundantly. One of the major SLE complications, lupus nephritis, has been associated with an overall 5-fold greater representation of Ruminococcus gnavus of the Lachnospiraceae family in the gut microbiome [97]. Metabolic changes associated with active SLE include higher levels of 2-hydroxyisobutyrate and glutamate and lower levels of citrate, glycerol, linoleic acid, and propylparaben in serum [98]. Serum levels of 2-hydroxyisobutyrate are significantly higher in active patients compared with healthy individuals and inactive patients. Additionally, 2-hydroxyisobutyrate upregulation is also found in the urine of SLE patients [99].
In murine SLE models, metabolomic screening identified changes in the amount of tryptophan and derived metabolites, including higher kynurenine levels and lower 5-HT expression in the sera and faeces of triple congenic (B6.Sle1.Sle2.Sle3) lupus-prone mice compared with C57BL/6 mice. Antibiotic treatment was shown to be able to restore the faecal tryptophan of triple congenic mice to normal, and dietary tryptophan restriction exerted a protective effect on lupus progression [100]. Tryptophan metabolism could control lupus progression via multiple mechanisms. Among tryptophan-derived metabolites, indole-3-aldehyde, indole-3-acetic acid, 3-methylindole, and tryptamine, are aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligands. AhR activation has been shown to be able to upregulate genes encoding IL-10, which regulates immune tolerance [101], so a failure to activate AhR could result in SLE exacerbation.

6. Cancer

The role of the gut microbiota in cancer progression has been demonstrated by the transfer of gut microbiota from colorectal cancer patients to germ free mice, which led to accelerated tumour growth in various models [102]. Increasing numbers of gut bacteria have been identified as supporting the anti-tumour response, or as risk factors favouring tumour growth or reduced treatment efficacy, reviewed elsewhere [103]. Only a small number of bacterial metabolites have been reported to affect tumorigenesis. A study in mice has shown that diet-induced obesity exacerbated hepatocarcinoma development due to the higher generation of DCA by the gut microbiota. Clostridium cluster XI and XIV, which produce secondary bile acids, were enriched in these obese mice and antibiotic treatment or inhibition of the enzyme 7a-dehydroxylase, which metabolises bile acids into DCA, reversed the phenotype. DCA were found to be pro-tumorigenic by accelerating cell senescence. Intriguingly, these effects were observed in obese mice only, suggesting that additional factors were involved [104]. The pro-tumorigenic effect of DCA extends beyond liver cancer, as treatment of AKR/J mice with DCA aggravated colorectal cancer development after treatment with azoxymethane, in this cancer resistant strain [105]. While gut microbiota derived metabolites can modulate tumour development, more and more evidence suggest that the presence of gut bacteria within tumours, known as tumour microbiota, play a role in disease severity. For example, the presence of Fusobacterium nucleatum in human colorectal carcinoma tissue was reported in 13% of the biopsies studied [106]. F. nucleatum virulence factors Fap2, FadA, RadD and FomA contributed to tumour colonization, cancer cell proliferation, metastasis and immune evasion [107]. F. nucleatum is one of the most extensively studied tumour bacteria, with its presence being correlated with poor anti-tumour response and with lower anti-tumour immune response, as shown by decreased tumour infiltration by CD3+ T cells [106]. The colonization of mice with F. nucleatum led to more and larger colorectal tumours as well as a higher number of anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages [108]. However, F. nucleatum may also impair host’s anti-tumour immune response via the release of metabolites particularly formate and succinate. F. nucleatum has been shown to support metastasis through the release of formate. Experiments undertaken using Gut-on-Chip co-culture models have confirmed the pro-tumorigenic effect of F. nucleatum in primary human colorectal cancer cells but also increased their invasiveness capability via the release of formate. They confirmed that the pretreatment of tumour cells with formate leads to larger tumour and metastasis in administered mice and that treatment of mice with formate mimicked the pro-tumorigenic and metastatic effect of F. nucleatum. The mechanisms involved the activation of AhR by formate, leading to Wnt activation [109]. How the gut microbiota or tumour bacteria-derived metabolites affect tumorigenesis is still not fully understood. The development of in silico models could address this gap of knowledge in the future [107].
The gut microbiota also affects the response to therapies. Patients that do not respond to immunotherapy or chemotherapy have an altered gut microbiota composition. This effect is reversible, as faecal transplantation from melanoma patients that responded to anti-PD1 immunotherapy to non-responder patients increased their response to anti-PD1, as well as their CD8+ T cell activation [110]. To our knowledge, succinate is the only reported bacterial metabolite that can modulate response to immunotherapy. Succinate production by F. nucleatum reduced the tumour infiltration by CD8+ T cells in response to anti-PD1 immunotherapy in a mouse model of colorectal cancer. Succinate impaired the type I interferon response cGAS pathway, which decreased the expression of CCL5 and CXCL10 chemokines, responsible for tumour T cell infiltration. These effects have been shown to be reversible, as antibiotics treatment targeting F. nucleatum restores the efficacy of anti-PD1 treatment [111].
While the gut microbiota can affect a response to chemotherapy, whether bacterial-derived metabolites impair the response to chemotherapy remains elusive. A recent study has elegantly shown the beneficial effects of gut microbiota tryptophan metabolite indole-3-acetic acid on pancreatic cancer chemotherapy in mice directly treated with indole-3-acetic acid or with tryptophan. Levels of indole-3-acetic acid were also seen to be significantly lower in non-responder patients, suggesting an active role in the human response to treatment. Interestingly, this study shows that mice treated with tryptophan for 14 days developed worsened disease due to a direct impact of tryptophan on tumorigenesis, suggesting that dietary intervention must be strictly controlled [112].

7. Conclusions and Future Directions

Gut bacterial-derived metabolites are similarly complex in terms of their diversity and composition to the gut microbiome itself. This review highlights the way in which gut dysbiosis and a number of diseases are associated with dysbiotic patterns of metabolites, which has major implications for the initiation and perpetuation of diseases, as well as response to therapies (Table 1). Associating the gut microbiome with diseases has already resulted in compelling evidence for the role of the microbiome–host interaction.
Moving forward, the next frontier in this field is to unlock the potential of bacterial metabolites for targeted therapeutic and preventive strategies. This involves a deeper understanding of how these metabolites work in specific contexts, and harnessing this knowledge to develop interventions that can manipulate or modulate these metabolites to benefit human health. In almost all cases, detrimental metabolites were identified in individuals with established diseases. The next step is to identify whether these metabolites are useful biomarkers for identifying an individual’s risk to various diseases, and whether their reduction can prevent disease development. One strategy would be to manipulate the diet of susceptible individuals to shift their gut microbiota activity away from the production of dysbiotic metabolites. This could simply involve reducing the consumption of foods containing high levels of L-carnitine or L-tyrosine, for example. However, the role of the gut metabolome on health is complex and will likely involve the alteration of more than one metabolite. A more appropriate strategy would involve interventions that simultaneously promote the increase of beneficial metabolites and the decrease of detrimental metabolites. Diet is the biggest lifestyle factor that defines gut microbiota composition and provides the substrates for microbial metabolism. However, the efficacy of specific diets in changing the gut microbiome is dependent on an individual’s existing gut microbiota composition and the metabolic enzymes they possess, and whether diet-induced changes persist in the long-term, both during and after cessation of the diet, remains to be demonstrated [115]. Supplements, such as probiotics and prebiotics, have similar shortfalls. The careful consideration of the type of supplement (or diet), the disease context, and the desired outcomes may need to be considered before the intervention to increase the success of such strategies [116]. More invasive methods, such as faecal microbiota transplants, may also be appropriate, as they have been shown to stably alter the recipient’s gut microbiota composition [117].
Regardless, if it is found that the reduction of detrimental metabolites can indeed reduce the susceptibility, or severity to disease, then these strategies may fundamentally transform how we manage non-communicable diseases.

Author Contributions

J.T. (Jian Tan), J.T. (Jemma Taitz), R.N., G.G. and L.M. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by the Australian Research Council grant APP160100627 and APP210102943. JJT is a recipient of the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ghosh, T.S.; Shanahan, F.; O’Toole, P.W. The Gut Microbiome as a Modulator of Healthy Ageing. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 19, 565–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tan, J.K.; Macia, L.; Mackay, C.R. Dietary Fiber and SCFAs in the Regulation of Mucosal Immunity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2022, 151, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tan, J.; Navarro, S.; Macia, L. Editorial: Deciphering Host-Gut Microbiota Communication in Immunity and Disease. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1178039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, D.; Wu, M. Pattern Recognition Receptors in Health and Diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Taitz, J.J.; Tan, J.K.; Potier-Villette, C.; Ni, D.; King, N.J.; Nanan, R.; Macia, L. Diet, Commensal Microbiota-Derived Extracellular Vesicles, and Host Immunity. Eur. J. Immunol. 2023, 53, e2250163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tan, J.; McKenzie, C.; Vuillermin, P.J.; Goverse, G.; Vinuesa, C.G.; Mebius, R.E.; Macia, L.; Mackay, C.R. Dietary Fiber and Bacterial SCFA Enhance Oral Tolerance and Protect against Food Allergy through Diverse Cellular Pathways. Cell Rep. 2016, 15, 2809–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Macia, L.; Tan, J.; Vieira, A.T.; Leach, K.; Stanley, D.; Luong, S.; Maruya, M.; Ian McKenzie, C.; Hijikata, A.; Wong, C.; et al. Metabolite-Sensing Receptors GPR43 and GPR109A Facilitate Dietary Fibre-Induced Gut Homeostasis through Regulation of the Inflammasome. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Tan, J.K.; McKenzie, C.; Mariño, E.; Macia, L.; Mackay, C.R. Metabolite-Sensing G Protein-Coupled Receptors-Facilitators of Diet-Related Immune Regulation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 35, 371–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Tan, J.; McKenzie, C.; Potamitis, M.; Thorburn, A.N.; Mackay, C.R.; Macia, L. The Role of Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Health and Disease. Adv. Immunol. 2014, 121, 91–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Goverse, G.; Molenaar, R.; Macia, L.; Tan, J.; Erkelens, M.N.; Konijn, T.; Knippenberg, M.; Cook, E.C.L.; Hanekamp, D.; Veldhoen, M.; et al. Diet-Derived Short Chain Fatty Acids Stimulate Intestinal Epithelial Cells To Induce Mucosal Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 2172–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Song, X.; Sun, X.; Oh, S.F.; Wu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, W.; Geva-Zatorsky, N.; Jupp, R.; Mathis, D.; Benoist, C.; et al. Microbial Bile Acid Metabolites Modulate Gut RORγ+ Regulatory T Cell Homeostasis. Nature 2020, 577, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Daïen, C.I.; Tan, J.; Audo, R.; Mielle, J.; Quek, L.-E.; Krycer, J.R.; Angelatos, A.S.; Duares, M.; Pinget, G.V.; Ni, D.; et al. Gut-Derived Acetate Promotes B10 Cells with Anti-Inflammatory Effects. JCI Insight 2021, 6, e144156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Simpson, R.C.; Shanahan, E.R.; Batten, M.; Reijers, I.L.M.; Read, M.; Silva, I.P.; Versluis, J.M.; Ribeiro, R.; Angelatos, A.S.; Tan, J.; et al. Diet-Driven Microbial Ecology Underpins Associations between Cancer Immunotherapy Outcomes and the Gut Microbiome. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 2344–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Coker, O.O.; Liu, C.; Wu, W.K.K.; Wong, S.H.; Jia, W.; Sung, J.J.Y.; Yu, J. Altered Gut Metabolites and Microbiota Interactions Are Implicated in Colorectal Carcinogenesis and Can Be Non-Invasive Diagnostic Biomarkers. Microbiome 2022, 10, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Marques, F.Z.; Nelson, E.; Chu, P.-Y.; Horlock, D.; Fiedler, A.; Ziemann, M.; Tan, J.K.; Kuruppu, S.; Rajapakse, N.W.; El-Osta, A.; et al. High-Fiber Diet and Acetate Supplementation Change the Gut Microbiota and Prevent the Development of Hypertension and Heart Failure in Hypertensive Mice. Circulation 2017, 135, 964–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, Z.; Klipfell, E.; Bennett, B.J.; Koeth, R.; Levison, B.S.; Dugar, B.; Feldstein, A.E.; Britt, E.B.; Fu, X.; Chung, Y.-M.; et al. Gut Flora Metabolism of Phosphatidylcholine Promotes Cardiovascular Disease. Nature 2011, 472, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhuang, Z.; Li, N.; Wang, J.; Yang, R.; Wang, W.; Liu, Z.; Huang, T. GWAS-Associated Bacteria and Their Metabolites Appear to Be Causally Related to the Development of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2022, 76, 1024–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Seldin, M.M.; Meng, Y.; Qi, H.; Zhu, W.; Wang, Z.; Hazen, S.L.; Lusis, A.J.; Shih, D.M. Trimethylamine N-Oxide Promotes Vascular Inflammation Through Signaling of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase and Nuclear Factor-κB. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2016, 5, e002767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Saaoud, F.; Liu, L.; Xu, K.; Cueto, R.; Shao, Y.; Lu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Snyder, N.W.; Wu, S.; Yang, L.; et al. Aorta- and Liver-Generated TMAO Enhances Trained Immunity for Increased Inflammation via ER Stress/Mitochondrial ROS/Glycolysis Pathways. JCI Insight 2023, 8, e158183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Boini, K.M.; Hussain, T.; Li, P.-L.; Koka, S. Trimethylamine-N-Oxide Instigates NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation and Endothelial Dysfunction. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 44, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mirji, G.; Worth, A.; Bhat, S.A.; Sayed, M.E.; Kannan, T.; Goldman, A.R.; Tang, H.-Y.; Liu, Q.; Auslander, N.; Dang, C.V.; et al. The Microbiome-Derived Metabolite TMAO Drives Immune Activation and Boosts Responses to Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Pancreatic Cancer. Sci. Immunol. 2022, 7, eabn0704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, H.; Rong, X.; Zhao, G.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Ma, D.; Jin, X.; Wu, Y.; Yan, Y.; Yang, H.; et al. The Microbial Metabolite Trimethylamine N-Oxide Promotes Antitumor Immunity in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cell Metab. 2022, 34, 581–594.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Opdebeeck, B.; Maudsley, S.; Azmi, A.; De Maré, A.; De Leger, W.; Meijers, B.; Verhulst, A.; Evenepoel, P.; D’Haese, P.C.; Neven, E. Indoxyl Sulfate and P-Cresyl Sulfate Promote Vascular Calcification and Associate with Glucose Intolerance. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2019, 30, 751–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Konopelski, P.; Chabowski, D.; Aleksandrowicz, M.; Kozniewska, E.; Podsadni, P.; Szczepanska, A.; Ufnal, M. Indole-3-Propionic Acid, a Tryptophan-Derived Bacterial Metabolite, Increases Blood Pressure via Cardiac and Vascular Mechanisms in Rats. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2021, 321, R969–R981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Cason, C.A.; Dolan, K.T.; Sharma, G.; Tao, M.; Kulkarni, R.; Helenowski, I.B.; Doane, B.M.; Avram, M.J.; McDermott, M.M.; Chang, E.B.; et al. Plasma Microbiome-Modulated Indole- and Phenyl-Derived Metabolites Associate with Advanced Atherosclerosis and Postoperative Outcomes. J. Vasc. Surg. 2018, 68, 1552–1562.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nemet, I.; Saha, P.P.; Gupta, N.; Zhu, W.; Romano, K.A.; Skye, S.M.; Cajka, T.; Mohan, M.L.; Li, L.; Wu, Y.; et al. A Cardiovascular Disease-Linked Gut Microbial Metabolite Acts via Adrenergic Receptors. Cell 2020, 180, 862–877.e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhao, M.; Wei, H.; Li, C.; Zhan, R.; Liu, C.; Gao, J.; Yi, Y.; Cui, X.; Shan, W.; Ji, L.; et al. Gut Microbiota Production of Trimethyl-5-Aminovaleric Acid Reduces Fatty Acid Oxidation and Accelerates Cardiac Hypertrophy. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Sanz, M.; Marco Del Castillo, A.; Jepsen, S.; Gonzalez-Juanatey, J.R.; D’Aiuto, F.; Bouchard, P.; Chapple, I.; Dietrich, T.; Gotsman, I.; Graziani, F.; et al. Periodontitis and Cardiovascular Diseases: Consensus Report. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2020, 47, 268–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kozarov, E.V.; Dorn, B.R.; Shelburne, C.E.; Dunn, W.A.; Progulske-Fox, A. Human Atherosclerotic Plaque Contains Viable Invasive Actinobacillus Actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas Gingivalis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2005, 25, e17–e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wallet, S.M.; Puri, V.; Gibson, F.C. Linkage of Infection to Adverse Systemic Complications: Periodontal Disease, Toll-Like Receptors, and Other Pattern Recognition Systems. Vaccines 2018, 6, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Olsen, I.; Singhrao, S.K.; Potempa, J. Citrullination as a Plausible Link to Periodontitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Atherosclerosis and Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Oral. Microbiol. 2018, 10, 1487742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sokolove, J.; Brennan, M.J.; Sharpe, O.; Lahey, L.J.; Kao, A.H.; Krishnan, E.; Edmundowicz, D.; Lepus, C.M.; Wasko, M.C.; Robinson, W.H. Brief Report: Citrullination within the Atherosclerotic Plaque: A Potential Target for the Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2013, 65, 1719–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Miyazaki-Anzai, S.; Masuda, M.; Shiozaki, Y.; Keenan, A.L.; Chonchol, M.; Kremoser, C.; Miyazaki, M. Free Deoxycholic Acid Exacerbates Vascular Calcification in CKD through ER Stress-Mediated ATF4 Activation. Kidney360 2021, 2, 857–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Frazier, R.; Cai, X.; Lee, J.; Bundy, J.D.; Jovanovich, A.; Chen, J.; Deo, R.; Lash, J.P.; Anderson, A.H.; Go, A.S.; et al. Deoxycholic Acid and Risks of Cardiovascular Events, ESKD, and Mortality in CKD: The CRIC Study. Kidney Med. 2022, 4, 100387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Turnbaugh, P.J.; Ley, R.E.; Mahowald, M.A.; Magrini, V.; Mardis, E.R.; Gordon, J.I. An Obesity-Associated Gut Microbiome with Increased Capacity for Energy Harvest. Nature 2006, 444, 1027–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tulkens, J.; Vergauwen, G.; Van Deun, J.; Geeurickx, E.; Dhondt, B.; Lippens, L.; De Scheerder, M.-A.; Miinalainen, I.; Rappu, P.; De Geest, B.G.; et al. Increased Levels of Systemic LPS-Positive Bacterial Extracellular Vesicles in Patients with Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction. Gut 2020, 69, 191–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gao, H.; Luo, Z.; Ji, Y.; Tang, K.; Jin, Z.; Ly, C.; Sears, D.D.; Mahata, S.; Ying, W. Accumulation of Microbial DNAs Promotes to Islet Inflammation and β Cell Abnormalities in Obesity in Mice. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Luo, Z.; Ji, Y.; Gao, H.; Reis, F.C.G.D.; Bandyopadhyay, G.; Jin, Z.; Ly, C.; Chang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Kumar, D.; et al. CRIg+ Macrophages Prevent Gut Microbial DNA-Containing Extracellular Vesicle-Induced Tissue Inflammation and Insulin Resistance. Gastroenterology 2021, 160, 863–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gao, H.; Jin, Z.; Tang, K.; Ji, Y.; Suarez, J.; Suarez, J.A.; Cunha e Rocha, K.; Zhang, D.; Dillmann, W.H.; Mahata, S.K.; et al. Microbial DNA Enrichment Promotes Adrenomedullary Inflammation, Catecholamine Secretion, and Hypertension in Obese Mice. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2022, 11, e024561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Choi, Y.; Kwon, Y.; Kim, D.-K.; Jeon, J.; Jang, S.C.; Wang, T.; Ban, M.; Kim, M.-H.; Jeon, S.G.; Kim, M.-S.; et al. Gut Microbe-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Induce Insulin Resistance, Thereby Impairing Glucose Metabolism in Skeletal Muscle. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hoyles, L.; Fernández-Real, J.-M.; Federici, M.; Serino, M.; Abbott, J.; Charpentier, J.; Heymes, C.; Luque, J.L.; Anthony, E.; Barton, R.H.; et al. Molecular Phenomics and Metagenomics of Hepatic Steatosis in Non-Diabetic Obese Women. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1070–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Caussy, C.; Hsu, C.; Lo, M.-T.; Liu, A.; Bettencourt, R.; Ajmera, V.H.; Bassirian, S.; Hooker, J.; Sy, E.; Richards, L.; et al. Novel Link between Gut-Microbiome Derived Metabolite and Shared Gene-Effects with Hepatic Steatosis and Fibrosis in NAFLD. Hepatology 2018, 68, 918–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Driuchina, A.; Hintikka, J.; Lehtonen, M.; Keski-Rahkonen, P.; O’Connell, T.; Juvonen, R.; Kuula, J.; Hakkarainen, A.; Laukkanen, J.A.; Mäkinen, E.; et al. Identification of Gut Microbial Lysine and Histidine Degradation and CYP-Dependent Metabolites as Biomarkers of Fatty Liver Disease. mBio 2023, 14, e0266322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhao, M.; Zhao, L.; Xiong, X.; He, Y.; Huang, W.; Liu, Z.; Ji, L.; Pan, B.; Guo, X.; Wang, L.; et al. TMAVA, a Metabolite of Intestinal Microbes, Is Increased in Plasma From Patients With Liver Steatosis, Inhibits γ-Butyrobetaine Hydroxylase, and Exacerbates Fatty Liver in Mice. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 2266–2281.e27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dai, X.; Hou, H.; Zhang, W.; Liu, T.; Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, B.; Cao, H. Microbial Metabolites: Critical Regulators in NAFLD. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 567654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhao, Z.-H.; Xin, F.-Z.; Zhou, D.; Xue, Y.-Q.; Liu, X.-L.; Yang, R.-X.; Pan, Q.; Fan, J.-G. Trimethylamine N-Oxide Attenuates High-Fat High-Cholesterol Diet-Induced Steatohepatitis by Reducing Hepatic Cholesterol Overload in Rats. World J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 25, 2450–2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Martino, C.; Zaramela, L.S.; Gao, B.; Embree, M.; Tarasova, J.; Parker, S.J.; Wang, Y.; Chu, H.; Chen, P.; Lee, K.-C.; et al. Acetate Reprograms Gut Microbiota during Alcohol Consumption. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cope, K.; Risby, T.; Diehl, A.M. Increased Gastrointestinal Ethanol Production in Obese Mice: Implications for Fatty Liver Disease Pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 2000, 119, 1340–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhu, L.; Baker, S.S.; Gill, C.; Liu, W.; Alkhouri, R.; Baker, R.D.; Gill, S.R. Characterization of Gut Microbiomes in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) Patients: A Connection between Endogenous Alcohol and NASH. Hepatology 2013, 57, 601–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Michail, S.; Lin, M.; Frey, M.R.; Fanter, R.; Paliy, O.; Hilbush, B.; Reo, N.V. Altered Gut Microbial Energy and Metabolism in Children with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2015, 91, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yuan, J.; Chen, C.; Cui, J.; Lu, J.; Yan, C.; Wei, X.; Zhao, X.; Li, N.; Li, S.; Xue, G.; et al. Fatty Liver Disease Caused by High-Alcohol-Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae. Cell Metab. 2019, 30, 675–688.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Meijnikman, A.S.; Davids, M.; Herrema, H.; Aydin, O.; Tremaroli, V.; Rios-Morales, M.; Levels, H.; Bruin, S.; de Brauw, M.; Verheij, J.; et al. Microbiome-Derived Ethanol in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 2100–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Fujimura, K.E.; Sitarik, A.R.; Havstad, S.; Lin, D.L.; Levan, S.; Fadrosh, D.; Panzer, A.R.; LaMere, B.; Rackaityte, E.; Lukacs, N.W.; et al. Neonatal Gut Microbiota Associates with Childhood Multisensitized Atopy and T Cell Differentiation. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 1187–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Levan, S.R.; Stamnes, K.A.; Lin, D.L.; Panzer, A.R.; Fukui, E.; McCauley, K.; Fujimura, K.E.; McKean, M.; Ownby, D.R.; Zoratti, E.M.; et al. Elevated Faecal 12,13-diHOME Concentration in Neonates at High Risk for Asthma Is Produced by Gut Bacteria and Impedes Immune Tolerance. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 1851–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Thorburn, A.N.; McKenzie, C.I.; Shen, S.; Stanley, D.; Macia, L.; Mason, L.J.; Roberts, L.K.; Wong, C.H.Y.; Shim, R.; Robert, R.; et al. Evidence That Asthma Is a Developmental Origin Disease Influenced by Maternal Diet and Bacterial Metabolites. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Macia, L.; Mackay, C.R. Dysfunctional Microbiota with Reduced Capacity to Produce Butyrate as a Basis for Allergic Diseases. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019, 144, 1513–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cait, A.; Cardenas, E.; Dimitriu, P.A.; Amenyogbe, N.; Dai, D.; Cait, J.; Sbihi, H.; Stiemsma, L.; Subbarao, P.; Mandhane, P.J.; et al. Reduced Genetic Potential for Butyrate Fermentation in the Gut Microbiome of Infants Who Develop Allergic Sensitization. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019, 144, 1638–1647.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lee, J.-H.; Choi, J.-P.; Yang, J.; Won, H.-K.; Park, C.S.; Song, W.-J.; Kwon, H.-S.; Kim, T.-B.; Kim, Y.-K.; Park, H.-S.; et al. Metagenome Analysis Using Serum Extracellular Vesicles Identified Distinct Microbiota in Asthmatics. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Samra, M.S.; Lim, D.H.; Han, M.Y.; Jee, H.M.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, J.H. Bacterial Microbiota-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Children With Allergic Airway Diseases: Compositional and Functional Features. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2020, 13, 56–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hong, S.-W.; Kim, M.-R.; Lee, E.-Y.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, Y.-S.; Jeon, S.G.; Yang, J.-M.; Lee, B.-J.; Pyun, B.-Y.; Gho, Y.S.; et al. Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Staphylococcus Aureus Induce Atopic Dermatitis-like Skin Inflammation. Allergy 2011, 66, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Hong, S.-W.; Choi, E.-B.; Min, T.-K.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, M.-H.; Jeon, S.G.; Lee, B.-J.; Gho, Y.S.; Jee, Y.-K.; Pyun, B.-Y.; et al. An Important Role of α-Hemolysin in Extracellular Vesicles on the Development of Atopic Dermatitis Induced by Staphylococcus Aureus. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhuang, X.; Li, T.; Li, M.; Huang, S.; Qiu, Y.; Feng, R.; Zhang, S.; Chen, M.; Xiong, L.; Zeng, Z. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Short-Chain Fatty Acid Characterization in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2019, 25, 1751–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Metwaly, A.; Dunkel, A.; Waldschmitt, N.; Raj, A.C.D.; Lagkouvardos, I.; Corraliza, A.M.; Mayorgas, A.; Martinez-Medina, M.; Reiter, S.; Schloter, M.; et al. Integrated Microbiota and Metabolite Profiles Link Crohn’s Disease to Sulfur Metabolism. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rowan, F.; Docherty, N.G.; Murphy, M.; Murphy, B.; Calvin Coffey, J.; O’Connell, P.R. Desulfovibrio Bacterial Species Are Increased in Ulcerative Colitis. Dis. Colon. Rectum 2010, 53, 1530–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Roediger, W.E.; Duncan, A.; Kapaniris, O.; Millard, S. Reducing Sulfur Compounds of the Colon Impair Colonocyte Nutrition: Implications for Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterology 1993, 104, 802–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ijssennagger, N.; Belzer, C.; Hooiveld, G.J.; Dekker, J.; van Mil, S.W.C.; Müller, M.; Kleerebezem, M.; van der Meer, R. Gut Microbiota Facilitates Dietary Heme-Induced Epithelial Hyperproliferation by Opening the Mucus Barrier in Colon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 10038–10043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kushkevych, I.; Dordević, D.; Vítězová, M. Possible Synergy Effect of Hydrogen Sulfide and Acetate Produced by Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria on Inflammatory Bowel Disease Development. J. Adv. Res. 2021, 27, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kaczmarczyk, O.; Dąbek-Drobny, A.; Woźniakiewicz, M.; Paśko, P.; Dobrowolska-Iwanek, J.; Woźniakiewicz, A.; Piątek-Guziewicz, A.; Zagrodzki, P.; Mach, T.; Zwolińska-Wcisło, M. Fecal Levels of Lactic, Succinic and Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn Disease: A Pilot Study. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vernia, P.; Caprilli, R.; Latella, G.; Barbetti, F.; Magliocca, F.M.; Cittadini, M. Fecal Lactate and Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterology 1988, 95, 1564–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pucino, V.; Bombardieri, M.; Pitzalis, C.; Mauro, C. Lactate at the Crossroads of Metabolism, Inflammation, and Autoimmunity. Eur. J. Immunol. 2017, 47, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pucino, V.; Certo, M.; Bulusu, V.; Cucchi, D.; Goldmann, K.; Pontarini, E.; Haas, R.; Smith, J.; Headland, S.E.; Blighe, K.; et al. Lactate Buildup at the Site of Chronic Inflammation Promotes Disease by Inducing CD4+ T Cell Metabolic Rewiring. Cell Metab. 2019, 30, 1055–1074.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Haas, R.; Smith, J.; Rocher-Ros, V.; Nadkarni, S.; Montero-Melendez, T.; D’Acquisto, F.; Bland, E.J.; Bombardieri, M.; Pitzalis, C.; Perretti, M.; et al. Lactate Regulates Metabolic and Pro-Inflammatory Circuits in Control of T Cell Migration and Effector Functions. PLoS Biol. 2015, 13, e1002202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Macias-Ceja, D.C.; Ortiz-Masiá, D.; Salvador, P.; Gisbert-Ferrándiz, L.; Hernández, C.; Hausmann, M.; Rogler, G.; Esplugues, J.V.; Hinojosa, J.; Alós, R.; et al. Succinate Receptor Mediates Intestinal Inflammation and Fibrosis. Mucosal Immunol. 2019, 12, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Bauset, C.; Lis-Lopez, L.; Coll, S.; Gisbert-Ferrándiz, L.; Macias-Ceja, D.C.; Seco-Cervera, M.; Navarro, F.; Esplugues, J.V.; Calatayud, S.; Ortiz-Masia, D.; et al. SUCNR1 Mediates the Priming Step of the Inflammasome in Intestinal Epithelial Cells: Relevance in Ulcerative Colitis. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Littlewood-Evans, A.; Sarret, S.; Apfel, V.; Loesle, P.; Dawson, J.; Zhang, J.; Muller, A.; Tigani, B.; Kneuer, R.; Patel, S.; et al. GPR91 Senses Extracellular Succinate Released from Inflammatory Macrophages and Exacerbates Rheumatoid Arthritis. J. Exp. Med. 2016, 213, 1655–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rubic, T.; Lametschwandtner, G.; Jost, S.; Hinteregger, S.; Kund, J.; Carballido-Perrig, N.; Schwärzler, C.; Junt, T.; Voshol, H.; Meingassner, J.G.; et al. Triggering the Succinate Receptor GPR91 on Dendritic Cells Enhances Immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2008, 9, 1261–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Saraiva, A.L.; Veras, F.P.; Peres, R.S.; Talbot, J.; de Lima, K.A.; Luiz, J.P.; Carballido, J.M.; Cunha, T.M.; Cunha, F.Q.; Ryffel, B.; et al. Succinate Receptor Deficiency Attenuates Arthritis by Reducing Dendritic Cell Traffic and Expansion of Th17 Cells in the Lymph Nodes. FASEB J. 2018, 32, fj201800285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Shinno-Hashimoto, H.; Hashimoto, Y.; Wei, Y.; Chang, L.; Fujita, Y.; Ishima, T.; Matsue, H.; Hashimoto, K. Abnormal Composition of Microbiota in the Gut and Skin of Imiquimod-Treated Mice. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pinget, G.V.; Tan, J.K.; Ni, D.; Taitz, J.; Daien, C.I.; Mielle, J.; Moore, R.J.; Stanley, D.; Simpson, S.; King, N.J.C.; et al. Dysbiosis in Imiquimod-Induced Psoriasis Alters Gut Immunity and Exacerbates Colitis Development. Cell Rep. 2022, 40, 111191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Connors, J.; Dawe, N.; Van Limbergen, J. The Role of Succinate in the Regulation of Intestinal Inflammation. Nutrients 2018, 11, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhao, Q.; Yu, J.; Zhou, H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, C.; Hu, J.; Hu, Y.; Zheng, H.; Zeng, F.; Yue, C.; et al. Intestinal Dysbiosis Exacerbates the Pathogenesis of Psoriasis-like Phenotype through Changes in Fatty Acid Metabolism. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Chen, D.; He, J.; Li, J.; Zou, Q.; Si, J.; Guo, Y.; Yu, J.; Li, C.; Wang, F.; Chan, T.; et al. Microbiome and Metabolome Analyses Reveal Novel Interplay Between the Skin Microbiota and Plasma Metabolites in Psoriasis. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 643449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Vich Vila, A.; Hu, S.; Andreu-Sánchez, S.; Collij, V.; Jansen, B.H.; Augustijn, H.E.; Bolte, L.A.; Ruigrok, R.A.A.A.; Abu-Ali, G.; Giallourakis, C.; et al. Faecal Metabolome and Its Determinants in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gut 2023, 72, 1472–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Shen, Q.; Huang, Z.; Ma, L.; Yao, J.; Luo, T.; Zhao, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Jin, Y. Extracellular Vesicle miRNAs Promote the Intestinal Microenvironment by Interacting with Microbes in Colitis. Gut Microbes 2022, 14, 2128604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Liang, L.; Yang, C.; Liu, L.; Mai, G.; Li, H.; Wu, L.; Jin, M.; Chen, Y. Commensal Bacteria-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Suppress Ulcerative Colitis through Regulating the Macrophages Polarization and Remodeling the Gut Microbiota. Microb. Cell Fact. 2022, 21, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Macia, L.; Nanan, R.; Hosseini-Beheshti, E.; Grau, G.E. Host- and Microbiota-Derived Extracellular Vesicles, Immune Function, and Disease Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 21, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Tan, J.; Ni, D.; Taitz, J.; Pinget, G.V.; Read, M.; Senior, A.; Wali, J.A.; Elnour, R.; Shanahan, E.; Wu, H.; et al. Dietary Protein Increases T-Cell-Independent sIgA Production through Changes in Gut Microbiota-Derived Extracellular Vesicles. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Smith, P.M.; Howitt, M.R.; Panikov, N.; Michaud, M.; Gallini, C.A.; Bohlooly-y, M.; Glickman, J.N.; Garrett, W.S. The Microbial Metabolites, Short-Chain Fatty Acids, Regulate Colonic Treg Cell Homeostasis. Science 2013, 341, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Tan, J.; Taitz, J.; Sun, S.M.; Langford, L.; Ni, D.; Macia, L. Your Regulatory T Cells Are What You Eat: How Diet and Gut Microbiota Affect Regulatory T Cell Development. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 878382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Mirza, A.; Forbes, J.D.; Zhu, F.; Bernstein, C.N.; Van Domselaar, G.; Graham, M.; Waubant, E.; Tremlett, H. The Multiple Sclerosis Gut Microbiota: A Systematic Review. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2020, 37, 101427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Ntranos, A.; Park, H.-J.; Wentling, M.; Tolstikov, V.; Amatruda, M.; Inbar, B.; Kim-Schulze, S.; Frazier, C.; Button, J.; Kiebish, M.A.; et al. Bacterial Neurotoxic Metabolites in Multiple Sclerosis Cerebrospinal Fluid and Plasma. Brain 2021, 145, 569–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Cao, L.; Kirk, M.C.; Coward, L.U.; Jackson, P.; Whitaker, J.N. P-Cresol Sulfate Is the Dominant Component of Urinary Myelin Basic Protein like Material. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2000, 377, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gacias, M.; Gaspari, S.; Santos, P.-M.G.; Tamburini, S.; Andrade, M.; Zhang, F.; Shen, N.; Tolstikov, V.; Kiebish, M.A.; Dupree, J.L.; et al. Microbiota-Driven Transcriptional Changes in Prefrontal Cortex Override Genetic Differences in Social Behavior. eLife 2016, 5, e13442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cantoni, C.; Lin, Q.; Dorsett, Y.; Ghezzi, L.; Liu, Z.; Pan, Y.; Chen, K.; Han, Y.; Li, Z.; Xiao, H.; et al. Alterations of Host-Gut Microbiome Interactions in Multiple Sclerosis. EBioMedicine 2022, 76, 103798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Laudani, S.; Torrisi, S.A.; Alboni, S.; Bastiaanssen, T.F.S.; Benatti, C.; Rivi, V.; Moloney, R.D.; Fuochi, V.; Furneri, P.M.; Drago, F.; et al. Gut Microbiota Alterations Promote Traumatic Stress Susceptibility Associated with P-Cresol-Induced Dopaminergic Dysfunctions. Brain Behav. Immun. 2023, 107, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Needham, B.D.; Funabashi, M.; Adame, M.D.; Wang, Z.; Boktor, J.C.; Haney, J.; Wu, W.-L.; Rabut, C.; Ladinsky, M.S.; Hwang, S.-J.; et al. A Gut-Derived Metabolite Alters Brain Activity and Anxiety Behaviour in Mice. Nature 2022, 602, 647–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Azzouz, D.; Omarbekova, A.; Heguy, A.; Schwudke, D.; Gisch, N.; Rovin, B.H.; Caricchio, R.; Buyon, J.P.; Alekseyenko, A.V.; Silverman, G.J. Lupus Nephritis Is Linked to Disease-Activity Associated Expansions and Immunity to a Gut Commensal. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2019, 78, 947–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Yan, B.; Huang, J.; Zhang, C.; Hu, X.; Gao, M.; Shi, A.; Zha, W.; Shi, L.; Huang, C.; Yang, L. Serum Metabolomic Profiling in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus by GC/MS. Mod. Rheumatol. 2016, 26, 914–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yan, B.; Huang, J.; Dong, F.; Yang, L.; Huang, C.; Gao, M.; Shi, A.; Zha, W.; Shi, L.; Hu, X. Urinary Metabolomic Study of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Based on Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2016, 30, 1877–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Choi, S.-C.; Brown, J.; Gong, M.; Ge, Y.; Zadeh, M.; Li, W.; Croker, B.P.; Michailidis, G.; Garrett, T.J.; Mohamadzadeh, M.; et al. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis and Altered Tryptophan Catabolism Contribute to Autoimmunity in Lupus-Susceptible Mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020, 12, eaax2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Shinde, R.; Hezaveh, K.; Halaby, M.J.; Kloetgen, A.; Chakravarthy, A.; da Silva Medina, T.; Deol, R.; Manion, K.P.; Baglaenko, Y.; Eldh, M.; et al. Apoptotic Cell-Induced AhR Activity Is Required for Immunological Tolerance and Suppression of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Mice and Humans. Nat. Immunol. 2018, 19, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Wong, S.H.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, X.; Nakatsu, G.; Han, J.; Xu, W.; Xiao, X.; Kwong, T.N.Y.; Tsoi, H.; Wu, W.K.K.; et al. Gavage of Fecal Samples From Patients With Colorectal Cancer Promotes Intestinal Carcinogenesis in Germ-Free and Conventional Mice. Gastroenterology 2017, 153, 1621–1633.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Park, E.M.; Chelvanambi, M.; Bhutiani, N.; Kroemer, G.; Zitvogel, L.; Wargo, J.A. Targeting the Gut and Tumor Microbiota in Cancer. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 690–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Yoshimoto, S.; Loo, T.M.; Atarashi, K.; Kanda, H.; Sato, S.; Oyadomari, S.; Iwakura, Y.; Oshima, K.; Morita, H.; Hattori, M.; et al. Obesity-Induced Gut Microbial Metabolite Promotes Liver Cancer through Senescence Secretome. Nature 2013, 499, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Flynn, C.; Montrose, D.C.; Swank, D.L.; Nakanishi, M.; Ilsley, J.N.M.; Rosenberg, D.W. Deoxycholic Acid Promotes the Growth of Colonic Aberrant Crypt Foci. Mol. Carcinog. 2007, 46, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Mima, K.; Sukawa, Y.; Nishihara, R.; Qian, Z.R.; Yamauchi, M.; Inamura, K.; Kim, S.A.; Masuda, A.; Nowak, J.A.; Nosho, K.; et al. Fusobacterium Nucleatum and T Cells in Colorectal Carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2015, 1, 653–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Ternes, D.; Karta, J.; Tsenkova, M.; Wilmes, P.; Haan, S.; Letellier, E. Microbiome in Colorectal Cancer: How to Get from Meta-Omics to Mechanism? Trends Microbiol. 2020, 28, 401–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Sanmamed, M.F.; Chen, L. A Paradigm Shift in Cancer Immunotherapy: From Enhancement to Normalization. Cell 2018, 175, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ternes, D.; Tsenkova, M.; Pozdeev, V.I.; Meyers, M.; Koncina, E.; Atatri, S.; Schmitz, M.; Karta, J.; Schmoetten, M.; Heinken, A.; et al. The Gut Microbial Metabolite Formate Exacerbates Colorectal Cancer Progression. Nat. Metab. 2022, 4, 458–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Davar, D.; Dzutsev, A.K.; McCulloch, J.A.; Rodrigues, R.R.; Chauvin, J.-M.; Morrison, R.M.; Deblasio, R.N.; Menna, C.; Ding, Q.; Pagliano, O.; et al. Fecal Microbiota Transplant Overcomes Resistance to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Melanoma Patients. Science 2021, 371, 595–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Jiang, S.-S.; Xie, Y.-L.; Xiao, X.-Y.; Kang, Z.-R.; Lin, X.-L.; Zhang, L.; Li, C.-S.; Qian, Y.; Xu, P.-P.; Leng, X.-X.; et al. Fusobacterium Nucleatum-Derived Succinic Acid Induces Tumor Resistance to Immunotherapy in Colorectal Cancer. Cell Host Microbe 2023, 31, 781–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Tintelnot, J.; Xu, Y.; Lesker, T.R.; Schönlein, M.; Konczalla, L.; Giannou, A.D.; Pelczar, P.; Kylies, D.; Puelles, V.G.; Bielecka, A.A.; et al. Microbiota-Derived 3-IAA Influences Chemotherapy Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer. Nature 2023, 615, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Duscha, A.; Gisevius, B.; Hirschberg, S.; Yissachar, N.; Stangl, G.I.; Eilers, E.; Bader, V.; Haase, S.; Kaisler, J.; David, C.; et al. Propionic Acid Shapes the Multiple Sclerosis Disease Course by an Immunomodulatory Mechanism. Cell 2020, 180, 1067–1080.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Correale, J.; Hohlfeld, R.; Baranzini, S.E. The Role of the Gut Microbiota in Multiple Sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2022, 18, 544–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Leeming, E.R.; Johnson, A.J.; Spector, T.D.; Le Roy, C.I. Effect of Diet on the Gut Microbiota: Rethinking Intervention Duration. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Reid, G.; Gaudier, E.; Guarner, F.; Huffnagle, G.B.; Macklaim, J.M.; Munoz, A.M.; Martini, M.; Ringel-Kulka, T.; Sartor, B.R.; Unal, R.R.; et al. Responders and Non-Responders to Probiotic Interventions. Gut Microbes 2010, 1, 200–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Grehan, M.J.; Borody, T.J.; Leis, S.M.; Campbell, J.; Mitchell, H.; Wettstein, A. Durable Alteration of the Colonic Microbiota by the Administration of Donor Fecal Flora. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2010, 44, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. List of major microbiota-derived factors associated with dysbiosis, their association with different diseases and potential pathways involved.
Table 1. List of major microbiota-derived factors associated with dysbiosis, their association with different diseases and potential pathways involved.
Microbiota-Derived FactorSourceDisease Association/OutcomeSignalling PathwaysRef
Metabolites
Trimethylamine N-oxideTMA derived from the metabolism of dietary choline, L-carnitine, glycine, and betaine by the gut microbiotaRisk factor for CVDInduction of pro-inflammatory factors
COX-2, IL6, E-selectin, ICAM-1 via p38 MAPK signalling in endothelial and smooth muscle cells
Activates endothelial inflammatory response via endoplasmic reticulum stress and NLRP3 activation
[16,18,19,20]
Cancer: improved checkpoint blockade in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaPotentiates IFN-g response
CD8+ T cell antitumour response, tumour cell pyroptosis via induction of ER stress
[21,22]
Associated with triglyceride accumulation and
NAFLD severity,
beneficial in NASH progression
[45,46]
Indole-3-acetic acidL-tryptophan metabolismPancreatic cancerInduces ROS accumulation and downregulation of autophagy in cancer cells[112]
Altered in SLE patientsAryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand[100]
Indoxyl sulphateL-tryptophan metabolismCardiotoxic: induces arterial calcification, impaired glucose homeostasisDecreased GLUT1 expression[23]
Increased in Crohn’s and ulcerative colitis patients [83]
Increased in relapsing remitting MS patientsDirect supplementation with neuronal cells induces neurotoxicity, altered neuronal signalling[91]
p-Cresyl sulphateL-tyrosine metabolismCardiotoxic: induces arterial calcification, impaired glucose homeostasisDecreased GLUT1 expression[23]
Increased in Crohn’s and ulcerative colitis patients [83]
Increased in relapsing remitting MS patientsSupplementation to neuronal cells induce neurotoxicity, altered neuronal signalling
Supplementation to primary oligodendrocyte progenitors decreased myelin gene expression
Similar structure to myelin basic protein
[91,92,93]
Indole-3-propionic acidL-tryptophan metabolismIncreased blood pressure in ratsAltered metabolism of cardiomyocytes in vitro[24]
Inverse correlation with atherosclerosis [25]
PhenylacetylglutaminePhenylalanine metabolismAssociated with CVD and adverse cardiovascular eventsPlatelet activation via α2A, α2B, and β2-adrenergic receptors, enhancing thrombosis potential[26]
Increased in relapsing remitting MS patientsSupplementation with neuronal cells induces neurotoxicity and altered neuronal signalling[91]
N,N,N-trimethyl-5-aminovaleric acid Trimethyl-lysine metabolism Incidental cardiac death and transplantation riskEnhance cardiac lipid accumulation and oxidative stress via alterations in fatty acid oxidation and carnitine metabolism[27]
Increased in plasma of patients with liver steatosis,
drives early steatosis in mice
Inhibits hepatic fatty acid oxidation and carnitine biosynthesis[44]
Deoxycholic acidMicrobiota modification of host bile acidsAssociation with all-cause mortality and end-stage kidney disease [34]
Clostridium cluster XI and XIVExacerbated hepatocarcinoma development in obese miceAcceleration of cell senescence[104]
Aggravated colorectal cancer development in AKR/J mice [105]
Phenylacetic acids Associated with liver steatosisDirectly increased triglyceride accumulation, fibrosis, and impaired insulin response in primary human hepatocytes[40,41]
Valine Associated with liver steatosis.
Increased circulating levels in patient with steatosis
Increased triglyceride levels in liver in mice transplanted with steatosis microbiota[40]
3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)lactateAromatic amino acid metabolismAssociated with hepatic steatosis and fibrosis. Higher in individuals with NAFLD [42]
SaccharopineLysine metabolismIncreased faecal levels in patients with “high fat” liver [43]
N-omega-acetylhistamineHistidine metabolismIncreased faecal levels in patients with “high fat” liver [43]
12,13 DiHOMELinoleic acid metaboliteEnriched in faeces of neonates at high risk for atopy and asthma [53]
Associated with increased susceptibility to atopy, eczema and asthma in childhood [54]
Propionate Beneficial in MS patient relapses, but may promote inflammation in blood brain barrierRestoration of Treg/Th17 balance[113,114]
2-hydroxyisobutyrate Increased in active SLE patients [97,98,99]
Hydrogen sulphideDesulfovibrioEnriched in IBD patientsInhibits colonocyte metabolism, inducing oxidative stress in epithelial cells.
Impairs mucus layer via reduction of sulphide bonds in mucus, triggering epithelial cell hyperproliferation
[64,65,66]
LactateMicrobiota or hostIncreased in Crohn’s and ulcerative colitis patientsElectron donor for sulphate reduction, exacerbating effects of sulphide-reducing bacteria[68,69]
Microbiota or hostRheumatoid arthritis, peritonitisUpregulates IL-17 production, reduces mobility of T effector cells[70,71,72]
SuccinateMicrobiotaIncreased in the plasma and tissue of Crohn’s and ulcerative colitis patientsDeletion of receptor SUCNR1 is protective in murine colitis, via NF-κB, ERK signalling, inflammasome[73,74]
Psoriasis in humans and miceProliferation of resident colonic macrophages, increasing gut TNF[78,79,80]
Pro-inflammatory effects on immune cellsSUCNR1 activation on macrophages enhances IL-1β, supports DC antigen-specific response, induces Th17 cells[75,76,77]
Fusobacterium nucleatumDecreased response to immunotherapy in mouse colorectal cancerReduced CD8+ tumour infiltration in anti-PD-1 therapy due to decreased chemokine expression via impaired cGAS pathway[111]
FormateFusobacterium nucleatumPro-tumorigenic in primary human colorectal cancer cellsActivation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor triggering Wnt activation[109]
EthanolEndogenous production by gut microbiotaPromotes steatosisMetabolism to acetyl-CoA that drives de novo lipogenesis[47]
Increased abundance of EtOH promoting microbes Escherichia and Klebsiella pneumoniaeElevated blood levels in NASH patients, children with NAFLD [49,50,51]
Enzymes, vesicles, virulence factors
Peptidyl arginine deiminase (PPAD)P. gingivalis in oral cavityPeriodontitis risk factor for CVD, P. gingivalis associated with atherosclerotic plaquesTLR-NF-kB signalling[28,29,30]
Periodontitis risk factor for autoimmune disease, associated with rheumatoid arthritisPPAD promotes protein citrullination, generating anti-citrullinated antibodies which contributes to autoantibodies[31]
Microbiota extracellular vesicles (MEV)MicrobiotaMay contribute to systemic inflammation in metabolic disease. Increased translocation of MEV in blood of obese and T2DM patientsMicrobial DNA exposure to pancreatic β cells, liver, muscle and fat cells, causing dysfunction and insulin resistance[37,38]
Hypertension in obese miceMicrobial DNA triggers adrenomedullary dysfunction[39]
Pseudomonas panacisIncreased glucose intolerance in mice [40]
BacteroidetesIncreased EVs in asthmatic patient blood [58]
FirmicutesIncreased EV in urine of allergic children [59]
Staphylococcus aureusEV trigger skin inflammation in miceSkin barrier disruption by α-hemolysin[60,61]
Healthy microbiota Protective in DSS colitisAltered microbiota composition, improved gut barrier integrity via modulating epithelial miRNA [84]
Clostridium butyricumProtective in DSS colitisPromote M2 macrophage phenotype[85]
Dysbiotic microbiota, increased in high protein dietAggravate IBDActivating host TLRs[86,87]
Fap2, FadA, RadD and FomA Fusobacterium nucleatumCancerVirulence factors that promote tumour colonization, cancer cell proliferation, metastasis and immune evasion[106,107]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tan, J.; Taitz, J.; Nanan, R.; Grau, G.; Macia, L. Dysbiotic Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites and Their Role in Non-Communicable Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015256

AMA Style

Tan J, Taitz J, Nanan R, Grau G, Macia L. Dysbiotic Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites and Their Role in Non-Communicable Diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(20):15256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015256

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tan, Jian, Jemma Taitz, Ralph Nanan, Georges Grau, and Laurence Macia. 2023. "Dysbiotic Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites and Their Role in Non-Communicable Diseases" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 20: 15256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015256

APA Style

Tan, J., Taitz, J., Nanan, R., Grau, G., & Macia, L. (2023). Dysbiotic Gut Microbiota-Derived Metabolites and Their Role in Non-Communicable Diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(20), 15256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242015256

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop