Next Article in Journal
Insertion of Transposable Elements in AVR-Pib of Magnaporthe oryzae Leading to LOSS of the Avirulent Function
Previous Article in Journal
Therapeutic Approaches in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension with Beneficial Effects on Right Ventricular Function—Preclinical Studies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 21
10.3390/ijms242115535
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

METTL3-Dependent N6-Methyladenosine Modification Programs Human Neural Progenitor Cell Proliferation

by
Yuan Zhao
1,2,†,
Jianguo Li
1,2,†,
Yilin Lian
1,2,
Qian Zhou
1,2,
Yukang Wu
1,2,* and
Jiuhong Kang
1,2,*
1
Clinical and Translational Research Center of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal Fetal Medicine, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center of Stem Cell Research, National Stem Cell Translational Resource Center, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(21), 15535; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242115535
Submission received: 31 July 2023 / Revised: 11 October 2023 / Accepted: 19 October 2023 / Published: 24 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Neurobiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
METTL3, a methyltransferase responsible for N6−methyladenosine (m6A) modification, plays key regulatory roles in mammal central neural system (CNS) development. However, the specific epigenetic mechanisms governing human CNS development remain poorly elucidated. Here, we generated small−molecule−assisted shut−off (SMASh)−tagged hESC lines to reduce METTL3 protein levels, and found that METTL3 is not required for human neural progenitor cell (hNPC) formation and neuron differentiation. However, METTL3 deficiency inhibited hNPC proliferation by reducing SLIT2 expression. Mechanistic studies revealed that METTL3 degradation in hNPCs significantly decreased the enrichment of m6A in SLIT2 mRNA, consequently reducing its expression. Our findings reveal a novel functional target (SLIT2) for METTL3 in hNPCs and contribute to a better understanding of m6A−dependent mechanisms in hNPC proliferation.

1. Introduction

METTL3 (methyltransferase−like 3, also termed MTA70), a methyltransferase responsible for N6−methyladenosine (m6A) modification, plays key regulatory roles in RNA stability, splicing and translation, and is involved in the cell differentiation and reprogramming, embryonic development and tumor progression [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Recent studies have indicated that METTL3 exerts significant and multifaceted biological functions within the neuronal system. For example, deletion of METTL3 in mouse hippocampus has been shown to diminish long−term memory integration [7]. Depletion of METTL3 in adult neural stem cells (aNSCs) not only inhibits neuronal development and skews the differentiation of aNSCs more toward glial lineage, but also impacts the morphological maturation of newborn neurons in the adult brain [8]. However, few studies have thus far explored the role of METTL3 in human central neural system (CNS) development.
Mammal CNS development is a sequential and highly organized process that involves neural progenitor cells (NPCs) differentiating into various subtypes of neurons and glial cells [9]. NPCs share the characteristics of stem cells, possessing the capacity for both proliferation and differentiation into specialized progeny [10]. Proper proliferation and differentiation of NPCs are essential for preserving the neural progenitor pool and supporting brain development [11,12,13,14]. Dysregulation of NPC proliferation and differentiation can lead to severe neurodevelopment disorders, including microcephaly and autism spectrum disorder [15,16,17,18]. Yoon et al. have discovered that knockout METTL14 in mouse brains extends the cell cycle of radial glia cells and prolongs cortical neurogenesis into postnatal stages [19]. Using the conditional knockout mouse model, Cao et al. have found that deletion of FTO in aNSCs enhances the proliferation and neuronal differentiation of aNSCs both in vitro and in vivo, but that over the long term the specific deletion of FTO hinders adult neurogenesis and neuronal development [20]. However, exploring the mechanisms underlying human CNS development remains challenging because of the absence of an appropriate model system.
Neural specification of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) provides a valuable model to investigate human CNS development at the molecular and cellular levels [9,21,22,23]. Our previous research has demonstrated that EZH2, the methyltransferase for H3K27me3, specifies the normal neural fate decision by suppressing the competing meso/endoderm program [24]. Another study has shown that deletion of KDM6s does not inhibit NPC formation from hESCs. However, NPCs deficient in KDM6s display limited proliferation capacity and are unable to undergo differentiation into glial cells and neurons [25]. To date, attempts to create hESCs devoid of METTL3 have not yielded success, leaving the role of METTL3 in human CNS development unknown.
Here, we generated small−molecule−assisted shut−off (SMASh)−tagged hESC lines to diminish METTL3 protein, and found that METTL3 is not required for human neural progenitor cell (hNPC) formation and neuron differentiation, but the proliferation of hNPCs decreases with METTL3 deficiency by reducing slit guidance ligand 2 (SLIT2) expression. Mechanistic studies revealed that METTL3 degradation in hNPCs significantly decreased the enrichment of m6A in SLIT2 mRNA, consequently reducing its expression. Our findings identified SLIT2 as a functional target of METTL3 in hNPCs.

2. Results

2.1. Generation of METTL3−SMASh−Tagged hESCs

To gain insights into the role of METTL3 in cell fate determination, we created SMASh tagged hESCs through CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in conjunction with homologous recombination [26] (Figure 1a). To confirm the SMASh inserted into hESCs, we amplified the METTL3 genome using PCR, and the results showed that we obtained three METTL3−SMASh−tagged hESC (H9−METTL3s/s) lines (Figure 1b). To test whether SMASh could effectively reduce the expression level of METTL3 in hESCs, we treated the cells with 2 µM asunaprevir (ASV) for 4 days, and found that ASV significantly reduced the protein level of METTL3 (Figure 1c). Thus, we have established H9−METTL3s/s hESCs.
To confirm the role of METTL3 in the maintenance of hESCs, we examined the morphology of cells and quantified the number of colonies using alkaline phosphatase (AP) staining. We noted that the cells maintained a typical undifferentiated state and the number of AP positive colonies was similar for H9 hESCs and H9−METTL3s/s after ASV administration (Figure 1d, e). Furthermore, we assessed the expression levels of pluripotency-related genes, and found that the expression levels of OCT4 and NANOG were similar for H9 hESCs and H9−METTL3s/s after ASV administration (Figure 1f). Together, these findings suggest that METTL3 is not essential for the maintenance of an undifferentiated state of hESCs.

2.2. METTL3s/s hESCs Undergo Normal Neural Differentiation and Neuron Differentiation

To investigate the role of METTL3 in human CNS development, we performed neural specification of METTL3s/s hESCs using a well−defined protocol involving dual inhibition of TGFβ/BMP signaling and the EB method [21,27] (Figure 2a). Upon differentiation, with/without ASV treatment, we observed a significant suppression of the pluripotent genes OCT4 and NANOG, alongside an upregulation of the NPC genes PAX6 and SOX1 at day 16 of differentiation (Figure 2b, Supplementary Figure S1a). As expected, ASV treatment significantly reduced the expression level of METTL3 at day 8 and 16 of differentiation process (Figure 2c, Supplementary Figure S1b,c). These data indicate that the decreased expression of METTL3 does not impede the transition from pluripotency to NPC differentiation in hESCs. In contrast to EZH2−/− hESCs (used as a negative control) [24], METTL3s/s hESCs, both treated and untreated with ASV, exhibited a rosette-like morphology, the typical NPC phenotype in hESC neural specification, while PAX6 positive cells and PAX6 protein levels remained consistently in both ASV−treated and untreated METTL3s/s hESCs (Figure 2c,d, Supplementary Figure S1b,d–f). Additionally, immunostaining data demonstrated that the rosette-like cells derived from METTL3s/s hESCs (with or without ASV) exhibited high expression of the canonical NPC marker SOX1 (Figure 2d, Supplementary Figure S1d,e). Together, these data demonstrate that METTL3 deficiency in hESCs does not hinder fate transition at the early stage of neural specification.
To further examine the role of METTL3 in hNPC differentiation, we initiated spontaneous neuron differentiation with the addition of BDNF, GDNF and cAMP (Figure 2a). After 14 days of culture, the hNPCs ceased proliferation and began differentiating into neurons, as indicated by immunostaining for neuron marker MAP2 and hNPC marker SOX2 (Figure 2e). We also found that ASV treatment did not influence the percentage of SOX2+ hNPCs and MAP2+ neurons or the percentage of NEUN+/TUJ1+ neurons (Figure 2e,f, Supplementary Figure S1g). In summary, our data confirm that METTL3 deficiency does not impede spontaneous neuron differentiation of hNPCs.

2.3. METTL3 Regulates hNPC Proliferation In Vitro

NPCs have the potential to proliferate and differentiate [10,28]. To examine the role of METTL3 in hNPC proliferation, we isolated rosette−like hNPCs and cultured them as neurospheres in the specified medium with an equal initial cell count. During passaging, we found that upon administration of ASV the number of hNPCs reduced rapidly (Figure 3a). Consistently, the EdU incorporation of METTL3s/s hNPCs (treated with ASV) at P1 was lower than METTL3s/s hNPCs (Figure 3b,c). Additionally, as METTL3 levels decreased, there was a noticeable shift in the cell cycle, characterized by a decrease in the S phase and an increase in the G1 phase at P1 (Figure 3d,e). We then performed apoptosis analysis, with the results showing that METTL3 deficiency had no effect on the hNPC apoptosis (Figure 3f,g). Using the EB method, the number of neurospheres was reduced after ASV administration, while the neurosphere diameter was similar (Supplementary Figure S2a,b). The results revealed a reduction in the number of hNPCs following ASV administration. Taken together, our findings reveal that METTL3 is essential for hNPC proliferation.

2.4. METTL3 Deficiency Reduces m6A Modification on hNPCs-Related Genes

METTL3 is the major methyltransferase that catalyzes the formation of m6A in mRNAs [29,30,31,32,33]. Thus, we performed methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeRIP−seq) in METTL3s/s hNPCs with or without ASV. Bioinformatic analysis indicated an abundance of m6A peaks in 3′ untranslated regions (3′ UTR) (Figure 4a, b, Supplementary Figure S3a). Further analysis showed that, along with the METTL3 deficiency, m6A signals were downregulated near the transcription start site (TSS) and transcription end site (TES) (Figure 4a, Supplementary Figure S3a). Consistent with existing knowledge, these m6A peaks exhibited a distinct RRACH (R = G/A, H = A/C/U) consensus motif (Figure 4c). Additional Gene Ontology (GO) analysis revealed that the genes that lost m6A peaks were related to RNA splicing, histone modification, mitotic cell cycle phase transition and CNS development (for example, synapse organization, axon development and forebrain development) (Figure 4d, Supplementary Table S4). Consistently, the administration of ASV led to many known hNPCs genes such as PAX6, EN−1 and OTX2 reducing the m6A signals near 3′ UTR (Figure 4e). To draw a conclusion, METTL3 deficiency reduces m6A modification on certain hNPC genes.

2.5. SLIT2 Is the Functional Target of METTL3 in hNPCs

To further investigate the potential targets of METTL3 in hNPCs, we performed RNA sequencing (RNA−seq) in METTL3S/S hNPCs treated with or without ASV. A total of 451 and 228 genes were found to be downregulated or upregulated, respectively, in hNPCs treated with ASV (Figure 5a). Intriguingly, GO analysis showed that genes downregulated in hNPCs treated with ASV were specifically enriched for pattern specification, central nervous system development (for example, axon development, synapse organization, forebrain development and neurogenesis) and epithelial cell proliferation, whereas the upregulated genes were closely related to non−neural development, such as ear development, kidney development and reproductive structure development (Figure 5b,c, Supplementary Figure S3b, Supplementary Tables S5 and S6). Furthermore, immunoprecipitation sequencing (RIP−seq) was performed to decipher the METTL3 landscape in normal hNPCs. Notably, METTL3 peaks were significantly abundant in 3′ UTR, consistent with m6A peaks (Figure 5d, Supplementary Figure S3c). Moreover, the signals of METTL3 peaks showed a clear RRACH consensus motif (Figure 5e).
To find the key target genes of METTL3 in hNPCs, we stratified the differential expression genes in METTL3S/S hNPCs (treated with ASV) with m6A marking genes, and found that 56 downregulated genes were regulated by m6A methylation (Figure 5f,g); the top genes are listed in Supplementary Figure S4a. In combination with the METTL3−modified transcripts, we found that only four downregulated genes, SLIT2, CSRNP3, RNU6−505P and AC092468.1 were regulated by METTL3−modified m6A methylation (Figure 5g). Among these genes, RNU6−505P and AC092468.1 were pseudogenes, representing remnants of genes that have lost their biological functions. Our previous RNA−seq and qPCR showed that SLIT2 manifested elevated expression levels in hNPCs, while CSRNP3 was predominantly expressed during the hESCs−to−hNPCs transition (Supplementary Figure S4b,c). These results imply that SLIT2 may be the target of METTL3 in hNPCs.
SLIT2 has crucial roles in organ development, including nervous system development), tumor progression, stem cell regulation, and cell proliferation [34,35,36,37,38,39]. GO term analysis showed that only SLIT2 was related to axon development, forebrain development and neurogenesis (Figure 5h). To further validate METTL3 regulation of SLIT2 expression in an m6A−dependent manner, we performed qPCR, RIP−qPCR and MeRIP−qPCR in hNPCs (with or without ASV) (Figure 5i). The results showed that, along with METTL3 deficiency, the SLIT2 expression level, fold enrichment of METTL3 and m6A in SLIT2 were downregulated (Figure 5j–l). In addition, we found that recombinant human SLIT2 augmented the ratio of S phase in METTL3S/S hNPCs treated with ASV (Figure 5m). Overall, these data indicate that SLIT2 is the functional target of METTL3 in hNPCs.

3. Discussion

METTL3 plays essential roles in the cell differentiation, reprogramming, embryonic development and tumor progression [2,4,40,41,42]. ESCs are an excellent model for investigating the early development of the nervous system and the regulatory mechanisms [24,25,43]. Knockout of Mettl3 in mESCs fails to adequately terminate their naïve state, and blocks differentiation [44,45]. However, due to the failure of construction of the METTL3 knockout hESCs, the effect of METTL3 knockout on hESCs remains unclear. Here, we successfully construct METTL3-SMASh tagged hESCs. ASV treatment decreases the expression of METTL3 in METTL3-SMASh tagged hESCs, but does not affect the stem cell morphology and the expression levels of OCT4 and NANOG. OCT4 and NANOG are recognized as pivotal components of the core pluripotency circuitry [46,47,48]. OCT4 (also known as OCT3) is the foremost pluripotency factor, and is the first transcription factor identified as a regulator of pluripotency [49,50,51,52,53]. Niwa et al. have found that the precise level of OCT4 determines three distinct fates of ESCs [52]. An increase in OCT4 expression leads to differentiation into primitive endoderm and mesoderm [52]. Conversely, repression of OCT4 results in loss of pluripotency and dedifferentiation to trophectoderm [52]. ESCs can maintain pluripotency only when the levels of OCT4 expression remain normal. NANOG is a classic pluripotency-maintaining factor [54,55,56,57,58]. NANOG deficiency in ESCs leads to exit pluripotency and differentiated into extraembryonic endoderm [57]. Overexpressing NANOG in ESCs is sufficient for colonization and expansion of ESCs [58]. Our findings show that hESCs maintain their pluripotent state in the absence of METTL3 (Figure 1). These findings are consistent with previous observations of METTL3 knockdown in hESCs [44]. These phenomena indicate that METTL3 plays distinct roles in hESCs and mESCs. Our cell lines provide a valuable platform for investigating the impact of varying METTL3 levels in human embryonic development, for example CNS development, cardiac development and hematopoiesis. Additionally, these cell lines serve as a foundational resource for exploring the functions of METTL3 at various stages of human embryonic development, leveraging the reversibility of drug−induced protein degradation.
METTL3 has important roles in the mammal CNS system [8,59,60]. Research has shown that cortical−specific conditional knockout METTL3 in mice leads to an elevated population of intermediate progenitor cells (iPCs) and inhibits neuronal production [61]. The absence of METTL3 alters neurite enrichment of a subset of mRNAs and reduces the localization of select methylated RNAs in mouse hippocampal neurons [22]. In Xenopus laevis, knockdown of METTL3 results in anteriorization of neurulae and tailbud embryos, accompanied by the depletion of neural crest and neuronal cells [62]. Accumulated studies, however, have found that human neural development is not identical to the model animals; for example, PAX6 exhibits delayed expression in restricted mouse brain regions, in contrast to its uniform expression in early neuroepithelial cells in hESCs [43]. Our study indicates that METTL3 is essential for hNPC proliferation but not required for hNPC formation and differentiation (Figure 2 and Figure 3). These interesting findings suggest that the role of METTL3 in human neurodevelopment is species-specific and different from that of other model animals such as the mouse and Xenopus laevis.
METTL3 serves as the principal methyltransferase responsible for m6A modification, and thousands of studies have found that depletion of METTL3 apparently diminishes m6A signals [29,30,31]. Our MeRIP−seq analysis reveals that, concurrent with METTL3 degradation, numerous genes experience a loss of m6A peaks, while these m6A peaks exhibit a distinct RRACH consensus motif (Figure 4). Our results are consistent with established knowledge [42,63]. These observations imply that METTL3 plays a pivotal role as the primary methyltransferase in mediating m6A formation in hNPCs.
Our research reveals SLIT2 as a novel target of METTL3 in hNPCs (Figure 5). Previous studies have established the crucial involvement of SLIT2 in mouse axon guidance, hypothalamus development and neurogenesis [36,64,65,66]. Borrell et al. have demonstrated that the disruption of SLIT/ROBO signaling results in a reduction of ventricular zone (VZ) progenitors and a concurrent rise in iPCs [36]. Additionally, their work highlights the fact that ROBO receptors sustain the equilibrium of cortical progenitors by modulating the NOTCH pathway through controlling Hes1 transcription [36]. Romanov et al. have revealed that loss of SLIT2/ROBO signaling adversely affects both the generation and positioning of periventricular dopamine neurons during hypothalamus development [65]. These studies investigate the downstream of SLIT2/ROBO signaling in CNS development. Our results imply that METTL3 functions as an upstream regulator of SLIT2/ROBO signaling in hNPCs.
In summary, our study has constructed the METTL3−SMASh−tagged hESCs, enabling the modulation of protein dosage from mild reduction to complete knock out in hESCs. Furthermore, our study demonstrates that METTL3 does not affect neural differentiation and neuron differentiation of hESCs, but is required for the proliferation of hESC−derived hNPCs, and SLIT2 is the functional target of METTL3 in hNPC proliferation. Thus, our study constructs the METTL3−deficient hESCs, offers a platform to study the role of METTL3 in human embryonic development, and elucidates the function and mechanism of METTL3 in human CNS development.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Culture

We cultured the human embryonic stem cell lines H9 (Wi Cell) and the SMASh−tagged hESCs under feeder−free conditions on Matrigel (Corning, NY, USA) −coated plates in mTeSR1 medium (STEMCELL Technologies, VAN, Canada).

4.2. Construction of Genome Editing Vectors

The guide RNAs (gRNAs) for METTL3 were designed from https://cctop.cos.uni-heidelberg.de:8043 (accessed on 19 August 2020).
To create the SMASh donor vector, we PCR amplified the “PGK−Puro” sequence, the homologous recombination arms (HR arms) of METTL3, and the HA×3−SMASh DNA sequence. These fragments were then cloned into the pZERO vector (Tiangen, Beijing, China) using the Hieff Clone Plus Multi One−Step Cloning Kit (Yeasen, Shanghai, China).

4.3. Generation of SMASh Tagged hESCs

To construct SMASh tagged hESCs, electroporation was performed using the LONZA 4D−Nucleofector. The day before nucleofection, we added 10 μM ROCK inhibitor Y27632 (Selleck, Houston, TX, USA, S1049) to the medium. Subsequently, hESCs were digested using Accutase (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). A single nucleofection event utilized 10 μg pX330−sgRNA plasmid and 15 μg donor plasmid. All primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Information Table S2 (BioSune, Shanghai, China, Supplementary Information).
Puromycin (0.5 μg mL−1) was added between day 4 and day 8 after nucleofection, followed by an increase to 1 μg mL−1 for an additional 4 days. Two weeks after nucleofection, we selected 11 colonies for PCR and Western blot analysis.

4.4. Alkaline Phosphatase (AP) Staining

We conducted AP staining utilizing an Alkaline Phosphatase Staining Kit for Stem Cell (MKBio, Shanghai, China) in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines. The cells were rinsed twice with PBST, followed by fixation in fix solution at room temperature for 2–5 min. After washing three times with PBST, the cells were stained with staining buffer (Buffer A: Buffer B: Buffer C = 1:1:1) at room temperature for 5–15 min. Following three PBS washes, the cells were captured with a microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

4.5. Asunaprevir (ASV) Administration and Neural Progenitor Cell (NPC) Formation from hESCs

ASV (Selleck, Houston, TX, USA, S4935) was initially dissolved in DMSO to create a 100 mM stock solution. Before use, this stock solution was further diluted to 10 mM with DMEM/F12 and subsequently incorporated into the culture medium to reach a final concentration of 2 μM. In control groups, an equivalent concentration of DMSO (0.002%) was added.
The monolayer neural specification of hESCs was conducted as described previously [25,67]. Briefly, hESCs were transitioned to N2B27 medium, consisting of a 1:1 mixture of DMEM/F12 and neurobasal (both from Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), enriched with 0.5 × N2 (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 0.5 × B27 (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 1% Glutamax (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 1% NEAA (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 5 μg mL−1 insulin (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and 1 μg mL−1 heparin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), supplemented with 5 μM SB431542 (Selleck, Houston, TX, USA, S1067) and 5 μM dorsomorphin (Selleck, Houston, TX, USA, S5900) [68]. After 8 days of induction, the cells were passaged onto new 6−well plates in N2B27 medium. Subsequently, after 16 days, canonical neural rosettes emerged and were carefully isolated as neurospheres. The neurospheres were maintained in NPC medium, supplemented with 20 ng mL−1 bFGF and 20 ng mL−1 EGF, with regular medium changes every 2 days. After 5 days of culture, these neurospheres were dissociated into single cells using Accutase and designated as P0. A total of 2.5 × 106 NPCs from P0 were subjected to a proliferation assay. NPCs were passaged and counted every 6 days, resulting in the identification of P1 and P2.
EB neural specification was executed as described previously [43]. Briefly, the cells were digested with 0.5 mM EDTA. Then the cell aggregates were suspended in DMEM/F12 medium containing 20% KOSR (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 1% Glutamax, 1% NEAA, and 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. The culture medium was refreshed daily. After 4 days, the EBs were further cultured for 3 days in N2 medium, composed of DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 1% Glutamax, 1% NEAA, 1 × N2 and 2 μg mL−1 heparin. On day 7, the EBs were transferred to 10 cm plates in N2 medium plus 20% FBS, with subsequent medium changes every 2 days. After 14 days, rosette-like NPCs appeared and were resuspended in N2 medium.
Neuron spontaneous differentiation: hNPCs were dissociated into single cells and utilized for spontaneous differentiation. A total of 1 × 105 hNPCs were plated onto Matrigel-coated 24-well plates and maintained in N2B27 medium containing 20 ng mL−1 BDNF (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA, 45002), 20 ng mL−1 GDNF (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA, 45010), and 1 mM cAMP (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA, D0260). The medium was refreshed every 2 days. After a 14-day period, typical neuronal morphology become evident, and the neurons were subjected to immunostaining analysis.

4.6. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT−PCR)

We extracted total cellular RNA using RNAiso (TaKaRa, Kyoto, Japan) and performed reverse transcription using the PrimeScript RT reagent Kit (Perfect Real Time) (TaKaRa, Kyoto, Japan). Subsequently, qRT−PCR was conducted using SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Bio−Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and a CFX96 machine (Bio−Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). GAPDH served as the internal reference for normalizing the qRT−PCR outcomes from human samples. Data analysis involved the utilization of three replicates. All primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Information Table S1 (BioSune, Shanghai, China, Supplementary Information).

4.7. Western Blot Analysis

Western blot was conducted following previously established procedures [69]. For the detection of METTL3 and PAX6, cell lysis was performed on ice using 1 × loading buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Whole-cell extracts were resolved by electrophoresis on SDS-PAGE gel. The resulting samples were transferred onto PVDF membranes (Millipore, Boston, MA, USA). Afterward, the PVDF membranes were blocked with 3% BSA. They were then incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C for 12 h. Following five washes with TBST for 5 min each, the membranes were exposed to HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. Subsequent to five additional washes with TBST for 5 min each, the membranes were subjected to detection using ECL (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) and visualization with an Amersham image analysis system (Amersham Imager 600). The antibodies were utilized in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions for Western blot. Comprehensive antibody information is provided in Supplementary Information Table S3 (Supplementary Information).

4.8. Immunostaining Assay

Immunostaining was performed as described previously [24]. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at room temperature for 20 min. Following three washes with PBS, cells were permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X−100 (Sigma) and blocked with 10% donkey serum in PBS, and then incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C for 12 h. After three additional washes, the cells were treated with secondary antibodies and Hoechst 33342 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) at room temperature for 1 h. Immunostained samples were imaged using an SP-8 microscope (Leika). Comprehensive antibody information is provided in Supplementary Information Table S3 (Supplementary Information).

4.9. EdU Assay and Cell Cycle and Apoptosis Analyses

We conducted an EdU assay following the manufacturer’s recommendations, utilizing the Click−iT EdU Pacific Blue flow cytometry assay kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). We cultured 1 × 106 METTL3s/s hNPCs (with or without ASV) on 6−well plates in N2B27 medium containing 10 μM EdU for approximately 16 h. A negative control group was cultured without EdU. Subsequently, we dissociated these cells into single cells and fixed them in fixation buffer at room temperature for 20 min. Afterward, the cells were washed with PBS and permeabilized in perm/wash buffer at 4 °C for 10–15 min. After washing, we incubated the cells in PBS containing CuSO4, the fluorescent dye picolyl azide, and reaction buffer additive for 1 h at room temperature. Lastly, we analyzed the samples using a Beckman flow cytometer.
We performed cell cycle assays using a cell cycle detection kit (Keygen, Nanjing, China), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. METTL3s/s hNPCs, with and without ASV treatment, were digested to obtain single cells. Subsequently, 1 × 106 cells were fixed in 70% ethanol at 4 °C overnight. After washing, the cells were incubated with binding buffer, RNase and propidium iodide (PI) at 37 °C for 30 min. Then, these cells were analyzed with Beckman flow cytometer.
We conducted apoptosis analysis utilizing an Annexin V−FITC/PI cell apoptosis detection kit (Keygen, Nanjing, China), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 2 × 105 cells were incubated with binding buffer containing Annexin V-FITC and PI at room temperature for 5–15 min. Subsequently, we analyzed the samples utilizing the Beckman flow cytometer.

4.10. RNA Sequencing (RNA−Seq) and Methylated RNA Imunoprecipitation Sequencing (MeRIP−Seq) and MeRIP−qPCR

Total RNAs were extracted from METTL3s/s hNPCs (treated with or without ASV) using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA, 15596026). DNA digestion was performed after RNA extraction using DNaseI. The quality of the RNA was evaluated by measuring the A260/A280 ratio using a Nanodrop One C Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The integrity of the RNA was verified through 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. Quantification of the qualified RNAs were performed using Qubit3.0 with the Qubit RNA Broad Range Assay kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, NY, USA, Q10210).
For RNA−seq, 2 μg of total RNAs were used for the preparation of a stranded RNA-seq library using a KC Stranded mRNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (Wuhan Seqhealth, Wuhan, China, DR08402), following the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR products with the range of 200 to 500 bps were enriched, quantified and subsequently sequenced using the Novaseq 6000 sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with a PE150 model.
For MeRIP−seq, 50 μg total RNAs were utilized for polyadenylated (polyA) RNA enrichment by VAHTS mRNA Capture Beads (VAHTS, Nanjing, China, N401−01/02). 20mM ZnCl2 was added to mRNAs and incubated at 95 ℃ for 5min to 10min, allowing the RNA fragments of 100–200 nt. Subsequently, 10% of the RNA fragments was saved as “input”, while the remainder was employed for m6A immunoprecipitation (IP). The specific anti-m6A antibody (Synaptic Systems, German, 202203, 2.5 μg/IP) was applied for m6A IP. RNA samples from both the “input” and “IP” were prepared using TRIzol. The stranded RNA sequencing (MeRIP−seq) library was constructed using the KC−Digital Stranded mRNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (Wuhan Seqhealth, Wuhan, China, DR08502), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The kit minimized duplication bias in the PCR and sequencing steps, by employing the unique molecular identifier (UMI) of 8 random bases to label the preamplified cDNA molecules. Library products in the range of 200–500 bps were enriched, quantified and ultimately sequenced on the Novaseq 6000 sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with the PE150 model.
For MeRIP−qPCR, we initiated the procedure by employing total RNAs for polyA RNA enrichment using the Dynabeads mRNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA, 61006). Following this, we introduced 20 mM ZnCl2 to the mRNA and incubated it at 95 °C for 5 min to 10 min, allowing the RNA fragments of 100–200 nt. Subsequently, we preserved 10% RNA fragments as “input”, allocating 40% for m6A IP (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA, ab286164, 4 μg/IP), which we designated as “IP”. The remaining 40% underwent incubation with rabbit IgG as a negative control, labeled as “IgG”. We then processed the RNA samples from “input”, “IP” and “IgG” using RNAiso. The subsequent steps followed the same procedures outlined in the qRT−PCR protocol.

4.11. RNA Imunoprecipitation Sequencing (RIP−Seq) and RIP−qPCR

The RIP assay was conducted on METTL3s/s hNPCs by SeqHealth (Wuhan, China). The cells were treated with cell lysis buffer. A 10% portion of the sample was preserved and labeled as “input”, while 80% was used in immunoprecipitation reactions with METTL3 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA, ab195352, 10 μg/IP), designated as “IP”, and the remaining 10% was incubated with rabbit IgG (Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, CA, USA) as a negative control, referred to as “IgG”. RNA from the input and IP samples was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA, 15596026). The remaining steps were the same as those in the MeRIP-seq protocol.
For RIP−qPCR, the cells were treated with cell lysis buffer containing 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.0), 0.5% Nonidet P−40, 1 mM DTT, 2 μL protease inhibitor (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), and 0.5 μL RNase Out Recombinant Ribonuclease Inhibitor (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The 10% lysis sample was stored as “input”, while 40% was employed in immunoprecipitation reactions with METTL3 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA, ab195352, 4 μg/IP) and designated as “IP”, and another 40% was subjected to incubation with rabbit IgG (Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, CA, USA) as a negative control, and referred to as “IgG”. The subsequent steps followed the same procedures outlined in the MeRIP−qPCR protocol.

4.12. Total RNA-Seq Data Processing and Quantification

Initially, we employed cutadapt (V1.18) to eliminate adaptor sequences, low−quality bases and reads shorter than 50 bases. Subsequently, the processed clean data were aligned to the human reference genome (hg38) using HISAT2 (V2.1.0) with the parameters described in our previous study [70]. Following this, gene expression levels were quantified as FPKM using stringtie (V1.3.4d) with the parameter “−e−rf”. Genes with FPKM < 0.1 across all samples were excluded, and FPKM values of replicates were then averaged.

4.13. RIP-Seq Data Processing and Analysis

Initially, RIP−seq data (METTL3 and MeRIP) were processed using the same filtering steps as RNA−seq. Afterward, the sequenced reads were subjected to base calling and demultiplexing using standard Illumina software (Illumina NovaSeq 6000), following quality control. Bowtie2 [71] was employed for aligning the reads to the hg38 reference genome. Reads mapping to the same genomic positions with identical orientation were collapsed into single reads. Peaks representing regions of m6A/METTL3 enrichment were identified using the Macs2 [72], with the input genomic DNA serving as a background control (parameters: W = 200; G = 600; FDR cut−off of 0.01 applied). Binding profiles and heatmaps were generated using deepTools [73]. Gene ontology analysis was conducted using the DAVID Functional Annotation Tool.

4.14. Statistical Analysis

Typically, the results were expressed as the mean ± SD (standard deviation), computed with Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism 10.0 (San Diego, CA, USA), based on a minimum of three biological repeats. Significance levels among samples were assessed using unpaired t tests, and one−way ANOVA or two−way ANOVA. Statistically significant differences were defined as those with a p value < 0.05.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms242115535/s1.

Author Contributions

Y.Z., J.L., Y.W. and J.K. designed the overall study, including biological experiments and bioinformatics analysis. Y.Z., J.L. and Y.W. wrote the manuscript. Y.Z. and Q.Z. performed the biological experiments. J.L. and Y.L. performed data analyses of the RNA−seq, MeRIP−seq and RIP−seq. All authors discussed the study results and worked together on preparing and editing the manuscript. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Y.W. and J.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFA110040), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32000605, 32270591, 32070617, 31721003) and Supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M692440).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript and its Supplementary Information files. The RNA−seq, RIP−seq and MeRIP−seq data have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database under the data set identifier GSE242522.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

  1. Boker, J.A.; Shambaugh, M.E.; Polayes, D.; Matera, A.G.; Rottman, F.M. Purification and cDNA cloning of the AdoMet-binding subunit of the human mRNA (N6−adensine) −methyltransferase. RNA 1997, 3, 1233–1247. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mu, H.; Zhang, T.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Gao, J.; Li, J.; Yue, L.; Gao, D.; Shi, B.; Han, Y.; et al. METTL3−mediated mRNA N6−methyladenosine is required for oocyte and follicle development in mice. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zeng, C.; Huang, W.; Li, Y.; Weng, H. Roles of METTL3 in cancer: Mechanisms and therapeutic targeting. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2020, 13, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, Y.; Gao, M.; Zhu, F.; Li, X.; Yang, Y.; Yan, Q.; Jia, L.; Xie, L.; Chen, Z. METTL3 is essential for postnatal development of brown adipose tissue and energy expenditure in mice. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, T.; Hu, P.-S.; Zuo, Z.; Lin, J.-F.; Li, X.; Wu, Q.-N.; Chen, Z.-H.; Zeng, Z.-L.; Wang, F.; Zheng, J.; et al. METTL3 facilitates tumor progression via an m6A-IGF2BP2−dependent mechanism in colorectal carcinoma. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lee, H.; Bao, S.; Qian, Y.; Geula, S.; Leslie, J.; Zhang, C.; Hanna, J.H.; Ding, L. Stage−specific requirement for Mettl3−dependent m6A mRNA methylation during haematopoietic stem cell differentiation. Nature 2019, 21, 700–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, Z.; Wang, M.; Xie, D.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y.; Ma, D.; Li, W.; Zhou, Q.; Yang, Y.-G.; et al. METTL3−mediated N6−methyladenosine mRNA modification enhances long-term memory consolidation. Cell Res. 2018, 28, 1050–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.-C.; Huang, C.; Shen, H.; Sun, B.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Yang, Y.-G.; Shu, Q.; Yang, Y.; et al. m6A Regulates Neurogenesis and Neuronal Development by Modulating Histone Methyltransferase Ezh2. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2019, 17, 154–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tao, Y.; Zhang, S.-C. Neural Subtype Specification from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cell Stem Cell 2016, 19, 573–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bond, A.M.; Ming, G.-L.; Song, H. Adult Mammalian Neural Stem Cells and Neurogenesis: Five Decades Later. Cell Stem Cell 2015, 17, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Basu, A.; Mestres, I.; Sahu, S.K.; Tiwari, N.; Khongwir, B.; Baumgart, J.; Singh, A.; Calegari, F.; Tiwari, V.K. Phf21b imprints the spatiotemporal epigenetic switch essential for neural stem cell differentiation. Genes Dev. 2020, 34, 1190–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, W.; Xie, H.; Liu, X.; Xu, S.; Cheng, S.; Wang, Z.; Xie, T.; Zhang, Z.C.; Han, J. PQBP1 regulates striatum development through balancing striatal progenitor proliferation and differentiation. Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 112277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cai, Z.; Lu, Z.; Li, L.; Huang, R.; Hagelkruys, A.; Matthias, P.; Zhang, H.; et al. HDAC1 and HDAC2 Regulate Intermediate Progenitor Positioning to Safeguard Neocortical Development. Neuron 2019, 101, 1117–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xu, J.; Deng, X.; Gu, A.; Cai, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wen, W.; Xie, Y. Ccdc85c-Par3 condensates couple cell polarity with Notch to control neural progenitor proliferation. Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 112677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Carpentieri, J.A.; Di Cicco, A.; Lampic, M.; Andreau, D.; Del Maestro, L.; El Marjou, F.; Coquand, L.; Bahi-Buisson, N.; Brault, J.B.; Baffet, A.D. Endosomal trafficking defects alter neural progenitor proliferation and cause microcephaly. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Buchman, J.J.; Tseng, H.-C.; Zhou, Y.; Frank, C.L.; Xie, Z.; Tsai, L.-H. Cdk5rap2 Interacts with Pericentrin to Maintain the Neural Progenitor Pool in the Developing Neocortex. Neuron 2010, 66, 386–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, J.-F.; Zhang, Y.; Wilde, J.; Hansen, K.C.; Lai, F.; Niswander, L. Microcephaly disease gene Wdr62 regulates mitotic progression of embryonic neural stem cells and brain size. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Willsey, H.R.; Willsey, A.J.; Wang, B.; State, M.W. Genomics, convergent neuroscience and progress in understanding autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2022, 23, 323–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yoon, K.J.; Ringeling, F.R.; Vissers, C.; Jacob, F.; Pokrass, M.; Jimenez-Cyrus, D.; Su, Y.; Kim, N.S.; Zhu, Y.; Zheng, L.; et al. Temporal Control of Mammalian Cortical Neurogenesis by m6A Methylation. Cell 2017, 171, 877–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cao, Y.; Zhuang, Y.; Chen, J.; Xu, W.; Shou, Y.; Huang, X.; Shu, Q.; Li, X. Dynamic effects of Fto in regulating the proliferation and differentiation of adult neural stem cells of mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2020, 29, 727–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chambers, S.M.; Fasano, C.A.; Papapetrou, E.P.; Tomishima, M.; Sadelain, M.; Studer, L. Highly efficient neural conversion of human ES and iPS cells by dual inhibition of SMAD signaling. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Muñoz-Sanjuán, I.; Brivanlou, A.H. Neural induction, the default model and embryonic stem cells. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002, 3, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, W.; Sun, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, W.; Ambasudhan, R.; Xia, P.; Talantova, M.; Lin, T.; Kim, J.; Wang, X.; et al. Rapid induction and long−term self−renewal of primitive neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells by small molecule inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 8299–8304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Yao, J.; Chen, Q.; Zhong, X.; Wei, Y.; et al. Coordination of EZH2 and SOX2 specifies human neural fate decision. Cell Regen. 2021, 10, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhang, J.; Yao, J.; Ma, N.; Liang, Z.; Huang, W.; Huang, K.; et al. JMJD3 and UTX determine fidelity and lineage specification of human neural progenitor cells. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhu, W.; Zhang, B.; Li, M.; Mo, F.; Mi, T.; Wu, Y.; Teng, Z.; Zhou, Q.; Li, W.; Hu, B. Precisely controlling endogenous protein dosage in hPSCs and derivatives to model FOXG1 syndrome. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ying, Q.-L.; Stavridis, M.; Griffiths, D.; Li, M.; Smith, A. Conversion of embryonic stem cells into neuroectodermal precursors in adherent monoculture. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Adams, K.V.; Morshead, C.M. Neural stem cell heterogeneity in the mammalian forebrain. Prog. Neurobiol. 2018, 170, 2–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, Z.; Shi, Y.; Lu, M.; Song, M.; Yu, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Ren, J.; Yang, Y.-G.; Liu, G.-H.; et al. METTL3 counteracts premature aging via m6A−dependent stabilization of MIS12 mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, 11083–11096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, C.; Chen, L.; Peng, D.; Jiang, A.; He, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Xie, C.; Zhou, H.; Luo, X.; Liu, H.; et al. METTL3 and N6−Methyladenosine Promote Homologous Recombination-Mediated Repair of DSBs by Modulating DNA−RNA Hybrid Accumulation. Mol. Cell 2020, 79, 425–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Deng, S.; Zhang, J.; Su, J.; Zuo, Z.; Zeng, L.; Liu, K.; Zheng, Y.; Huang, X.; Bai, R.; Zhuang, L.; et al. RNA m6A regulates transcription via DNA demethylation and chromatin accessibility. Nat. Genet. 2022, 54, 1427–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wan, W.; Ao, X.; Chen, Q.; Yu, Y.; Ao, L.; Xing, W.; Guo, W.; Wu, X.; Pu, C.; Hu, X.; et al. METTL3/IGF2BP3 axis inhibits tumor immune surveillance by upregulating N6−methyladenosine modification of PD−L1 mRNA in breast cancer. Mol. Cancer 2022, 21, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, J.-N.; Wang, F.; Ke, J.; Li, Z.; Xu, C.-H.; Yang, Q.; Chen, X.; He, X.-Y.; He, Y.; Suo, X.-G.; et al. Inhibition of METTL3 attenuates renal injury and inflammation by alleviating TAB3 m6A modifications via IGF2BP2-dependent mechanisms. Sci. Transl. Med. 2022, 14, eabk2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rothberg, J.M.; Hartley, D.A.; Walther, Z.; Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. slit: An EGF−Homologous Locus of D. melanogaster Involved in the Development of the Embryonic Central Nervous System. Cell 1988, 55, 1047–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rothberg, J.M.; Jacobs, J.R.; Goodman, C.S.; Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. slit: An extracellular protein necessary for development of midline glia and commissural axon pathways contains both EGF and LRR domains. Genes Dev. 1990, 4, 2169–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Borrell, V.; Cárdenas, A.; Ciceri, G.; Galcerán, J.; Flames, N.; Pla, R.; Nóbrega-Pereira, S.; García-Frigola, C.; Peregrín, S.; Zhao, Z.; et al. Slit/Robo Signaling Modulates the Proliferation of Central Nervous System Progenitors. Neuron 2012, 76, 338–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ballard, M.S.; Zhu, A.; Iwai, N.; Stensrud, M.; Mapps, A.; Postiglione, M.P.; Knoblich, J.A.; Hinck, L. Mammary Stem Cell Self−Renewal Is Regulated by Slit2/Robo1 Signaling through SNAI1 and mINSC. Cell Rep. 2015, 13, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Biteau, B.; Jasper, H. Slit/Robo Signaling Regulates Cell Fate Decisions in the Intestinal Stem Cell Lineage of Drosophila. Cell Rep. 2014, 7, 1867–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhao, S.J.; Shen, Y.F.; Li, Q.; He, Y.J.; Zhang, Y.K.; Hu, L.P.; Jiang, Y.Q.; Xu, N.W.; Wang, Y.J.; Li, J.; et al. SLIT2/ROBO1 axis contributes to the Warburg effect in osteosarcoma through activation of SRC/ERK/c−MYC/PFKFB2 pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhao, F.; Xu, Y.; Gao, S.; Qin, L.; Austria, Q.; Siedlak, S.L.; Pajdzik, K.; Dai, Q.; He, C.; Wang, W.; et al. METTL3−dependent RNA m6A dysregulation contributes to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease through aberrant cell cycle events. Mol. Neurodegener. 2021, 16, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Xu, W.; Li, J.; He, C.; Wen, J.; Ma, H.; Rong, B.; Diao, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Wu, F.; et al. METTL3 regulates heterochromatin in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature 2021, 591, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Guo, W.; Xu, L.; You, M.; Zhang, Y.-C.; Sun, Z.; Cui, X.; Yu, G.; Qi, Z.; et al. METTL3−dependent m6A modification programs T follicular helper cell differentiation. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, X.; Huang, C.T.; Chen, J.; Pankratz, M.T.; Xi, J.; Li, J.; Yang, Y.; LaVaute, T.M.; Li, X.-J.; Ayala, M.; et al. Pax6 Is a Human Neuroectoderm Cell Fate Determinant. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 7, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Batista, P.J.; Molinie, B.; Wang, J.; Qu, K.; Zhang, J.; Li, L.; Bouley, D.M.; Lujan, E.; Haddad, B.; Daneshvar, K.; et al. m6A RNA Modification Controls Cell Fate Transition in Mammalian Embryonic Stem Cells. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 15, 707–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Geula, S.; Moshitch-Moshkovitz, S.; Dominissini, D.; Mansour, A.A.; Kol, N.; Salmon-Divon, M.; Hershkovitz, V.; Peer, E.; Mor, N.; Manor, Y.S.; et al. m6A mRNA methylation facilitates resolution of naïve pluripotency toward differentiation. Science 2015, 347, 1002–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Huang, G.; Ye, S.; Zhou, X.; Liu, D.; Ying, Q.-L. Molecular basis of embryonic stem cell self−renewal: From signaling pathways to pluripotency network. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2015, 72, 1741–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, M.; Belmonte, J.C.I. Ground rules of the pluripotency gene regulatory network. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2017, 18, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Boyer, L.A.; Lee, T.I.; Cole, M.F.; Johnstone, S.E.; Levine, S.S.; Zucker, J.P.; Guenther, M.G.; Kumar, R.M.; Murray, H.L.; Jenner, R.G.; et al. Core Transcriptional Regulatory Circuitry in Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Cell 2005, 122, 947–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hall, J.; Guo, G.; Wray, J.; Eyres, I.; Nichols, J.; Grotewold, L.; Morfopoulou, S.; Humphreys, P.; Mansfield, W.; Walker, R.; et al. Oct4 and LIF/Stat3 Additively Induce Krüppel Factors to Sustain Embryonic Stem Cell Self−Renewal. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5, 597–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pesce, M.; Schöler, H.R. Oct−4: Gatekeeper in the Beginnings of Mammalian Development. Stem Cells 2001, 19, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pesce, M.; Scholer, H.R. Oct−4 Control of totipotency and germline determination. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2000, 55, 452–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Niwa, H.; Miyazaki, J.; Smith, A.G. Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self−renewal of ES cells. Nat. Genet. 2000, 24, 372–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Botquin, V.; Hess, H.; Fuhrmann, G.; Anastassiadis, C.; Gross, M.K.; Vriend, G.; Schöler, H.R. New POU dimer configuration mediates antagonistic control of an osteopontin preimplantation enhancer by Oct−4 and Sox−2. Gene Develpoment 1998, 12, 2073–2090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Silva, J.; Nichols, J.; Theunissen, T.W.; Guo, G.; van Oosten, A.L.; Barrandon, O.; Wray, J.; Yamanaka, S.; Chambers, I.; Smith, A. Nanog Is the Gateway to the Pluripotent Ground State. Cell 2009, 138, 722–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chambers, I.; Silva, J.; Colby, D.; Nichols, J.; Nijmeijer, B.; Robertson, M.; Vrana, J.; Jones, K.; Grotewold, L.; Smith, A. Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 2007, 450, 1230–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Hatano, S.-Y.; Tada, M.; Kimura, H.; Yamaguchi, S.; Kono, T.; Nakano, T.; Suemori, H.; Nakatsuji, N.; Tada, T. Pluripotential competence of cells associated with Nanog activity. Mech. Dev. 2005, 122, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mitsui, K.; Tokuzawa, Y.; Itoh, H.; Segawa, K.; Murakami, M.; Takahashi, K.; Maruyama, M.; Maeda, M.; Yamanaka, S. The Homeoprotein Nanog Is Required for Maintenance of Pluripotency in Mouse Epiblast and ES Cells. Cell 2003, 113, 631–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chambers, I.; Colby, D.; Robertson, M.; Nichols, J.; Lee, S.; Tweedie, S.; Smith, A. Functional Expression Cloning of Nanog, a Pluripotency Sustaining Factor in Embryonic Stem Cells. Cell 2003, 113, 643–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Flamand, M.N.; Meyer, K.D. m6A and YTHDF proteins contribute to the localization of select neuronal mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, 4464–4483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kan, L.; Ott, S.; Joseph, B.; Park, E.S.; Dai, W.; Kleiner, R.E.; Claridge−Chang, A.; Lai, E.C. A neural m6A/Ythdf pathway is required for learning and memory in Drosophila. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Du, K.; Zhang, Z.; Zeng, Z.; Tang, J.; Lee, T.; Sun, T. Distinct roles of Fto and Mettl3 in controlling development of the cerebral cortex through transcriptional and translational regulations. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kim, H.; Jang, S. RNA m6A Methyltransferase Mettl3 Regulates Spatial Neural Patterning in Xenopus laevis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2021, 41, e0010421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Skuland, T.; Zhou, C.; Li, A.; Hashim, A.; Jermstad, I.; Khan, S.; Dalen, K.T.; Greggains, G.D.; et al. The RNA m6A landscape of mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2023, 30, 703–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, K.H.; Brose, K.; Arnott, D.; Kidd, T.; Goodman, C.S.; Henzel, W.; Tessier-Lavigne, M. Biochemical Purification of a Mammalian Slit Protein as a Positive Regulator of Sensory Axon Elongation and Branching. Cell 1999, 96, 771–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Romanov, R.A.; Tretiakov, E.O.; Kastriti, M.E.; Zupancic, M.; Häring, M.; Korchynska, S.; Popadin, K.; Benevento, M.; Rebernik, P.; Lallemend, F.; et al. Molecular design of hypothalamus development. Nature 2020, 582, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Sherchan, P.; Travis, Z.D.; Tang, J.; Zhang, J.H. The potential of Slit2 as a therapeutic target for central nervous system disorders. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2020, 24, 805–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Shi, Y.; Kirwan, P.; Livesey, F.J. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to cerebral cortex neurons and neural networks. Nat. Protoc. 2012, 7, 1836–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Su, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liao, B.; Zhong, X.; Chen, X.; Wang, H.; Guo, Y.; Shan, Y.; Wang, L.; Pan, G. Antagonism between the transcription factors NANOG and OTX2 specifies rostral or caudal cell fate during neural patterning transition. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 4445–4455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wu, Y.; Guo, X.; Han, T.; Feng, K.; Zhang, P.; Xu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Xia, Y.; Chen, Y.; Xi, J.; et al. Cmarr/miR−540−3p axis promotes cardiomyocyte maturation transition by orchestrating Dtna expression. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2022, 29, 481–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chen, Y.; Wu, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, K.; Wang, W.; Ye, Z.; Feng, K.; Yang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Kang, J.; et al. Cooperative regulation of Zhx1 and hnRNPA1 drives the cardiac progenitor−specific transcriptional activation during cardiomyocyte differentiation. Cell Death Discov. 2023, 9, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Langmead, B.; Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Zhang, Y.; Liu, T.; Meyer, C.A.; Eeckhoute, J.; Johnson, D.S.; Bernstein, B.E.; Nusbaum, C.; Myers, R.M.; Brown, M.; Li, W.; et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP−Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 2008, 9, R137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ramírez, F.; Ryan, D.P.; Grüning, B.; Bhardwaj, V.; Kilpert, F.; Richter, A.S.; Heyne, S.; Dündar, F.; Manke, T. deepTools2: A next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W160–W165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 24 15535 g001
Figure 1. Generation of METTL3s/s hESCs. (a) Schematic overview of generation of METTL3s/s hESCs and ASV induced endogenous METTL3 protein degradation. hESCs, human embryonic stem cells. (b) PCR genotyping to identify H9−METTL3s/s hESC colonies. Homozygous colonies highlighted in red. The marker is a 1 kb ladder. (c) Western blot analysis of H9−METTL3s/s hESCs after ASV treatment for 4 days. GAPDH was probed as an internal loading control. (d) Morphology and alkaline phosphatase (AP) staining of H9 hESCs, H9−METTL3s/s hESCs and H9−METTL3s/s hESCs after ASV treatment for 10 days. Scale bar, 500 μm and 1 mm. (e) Quantitative data representing the number of AP−positive colonies of H9 hESCs, H9−METTL3s/s hESCs and H9−METTL3s/s hESCs after ASV treatment for 10 days. (f) qRT−PCR analysis showing the expression levels of the pluripotent genes (NANOG and OCT4) in H9 hESCs, H9−METTL3s/s hESCs and H9−METTL3s/s hESCs after ASV treatment for 10 days. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3, two−way ANOVA).
Figure 1. Generation of METTL3s/s hESCs. (a) Schematic overview of generation of METTL3s/s hESCs and ASV induced endogenous METTL3 protein degradation. hESCs, human embryonic stem cells. (b) PCR genotyping to identify H9−METTL3s/s hESC colonies. Homozygous colonies highlighted in red. The marker is a 1 kb ladder. (c) Western blot analysis of H9−METTL3s/s hESCs after ASV treatment for 4 days. GAPDH was probed as an internal loading control. (d) Morphology and alkaline phosphatase (AP) staining of H9 hESCs, H9−METTL3s/s hESCs and H9−METTL3s/s hESCs after ASV treatment for 10 days. Scale bar, 500 μm and 1 mm. (e) Quantitative data representing the number of AP−positive colonies of H9 hESCs, H9−METTL3s/s hESCs and H9−METTL3s/s hESCs after ASV treatment for 10 days. (f) qRT−PCR analysis showing the expression levels of the pluripotent genes (NANOG and OCT4) in H9 hESCs, H9−METTL3s/s hESCs and H9−METTL3s/s hESCs after ASV treatment for 10 days. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3, two−way ANOVA).
Ijms 24 15535 g001
Ijms 24 15535 g002
Figure 2. NPC specification and neuron differentiation of H9−METTL3s/s hESCs. (a) Overview of the monolayer neural specification protocol for hESCs. hESCs were exposed to two SMAD inhibitors (5 μM SB431542 and 5 μM dorsomorphin) in the indicated defined medium for neural induction. The rosette−like hNPCs were harvested at day 16 (D16) and expanded as neurospheres. To initiate neuron differentiation, hNPCs were subsequently plated on Matrigel and maintained in the specified medium to induce spontaneous differentiation (refer to Section 4 for details). (b) qRT−PCR analysis showing the relative expression levels of the pluripotent genes (NANOG and OCT4) and the hNPC genes (PAX6 and SOX1) in H9−METTL3s/s hESCs and H9−METTL3s/s hESCs after ASV treatment at D0, D8 and D16 of neural specification. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 3, two−way ANOVA). (c) Western blot analysis of H9-METTL3s/s hESCs and H9−METTL3s/s hESCs after ASV treatment for METTL3 and PAX6 at D0, D8 and D16 of neural specification. GAPDH was probed as an internal loading control. The quantitative results are shown in Supplementary Figure S1b. (d) Immunostaining images depicting the distributions of SOX1 (green) and PAX6 (red) in H9−METTL3s/s hESCs and H9−METTL3s/s hESCs after ASV treatment at D16 of neural specification. Scale bar, 50 μm. (e) Immunostaining images of H9−METTL3s/s hNPCs and H9−METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment for MAP2 (green) and SOX2 (red) at D47 of neural specification. Scale bar, 50 μm. (f) Quantitative data regarding the percentage of SOX2+ or MAP2+ cells in H9−METTL3s/s hNPCs and H9−METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment at day 47 of neural differentiation. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 5, unpaired t test).
Figure 2. NPC specification and neuron differentiation of H9−METTL3s/s hESCs. (a) Overview of the monolayer neural specification protocol for hESCs. hESCs were exposed to two SMAD inhibitors (5 μM SB431542 and 5 μM dorsomorphin) in the indicated defined medium for neural induction. The rosette−like hNPCs were harvested at day 16 (D16) and expanded as neurospheres. To initiate neuron differentiation, hNPCs were subsequently plated on Matrigel and maintained in the specified medium to induce spontaneous differentiation (refer to Section 4 for details). (b) qRT−PCR analysis showing the relative expression levels of the pluripotent genes (NANOG and OCT4) and the hNPC genes (PAX6 and SOX1) in H9−METTL3s/s hESCs and H9−METTL3s/s hESCs after ASV treatment at D0, D8 and D16 of neural specification. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 3, two−way ANOVA). (c) Western blot analysis of H9-METTL3s/s hESCs and H9−METTL3s/s hESCs after ASV treatment for METTL3 and PAX6 at D0, D8 and D16 of neural specification. GAPDH was probed as an internal loading control. The quantitative results are shown in Supplementary Figure S1b. (d) Immunostaining images depicting the distributions of SOX1 (green) and PAX6 (red) in H9−METTL3s/s hESCs and H9−METTL3s/s hESCs after ASV treatment at D16 of neural specification. Scale bar, 50 μm. (e) Immunostaining images of H9−METTL3s/s hNPCs and H9−METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment for MAP2 (green) and SOX2 (red) at D47 of neural specification. Scale bar, 50 μm. (f) Quantitative data regarding the percentage of SOX2+ or MAP2+ cells in H9−METTL3s/s hNPCs and H9−METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment at day 47 of neural differentiation. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 5, unpaired t test).
Ijms 24 15535 g002
Ijms 24 15535 g003
Figure 3. METTL3 is essential for proliferation of hNPCs. (a) Proliferation analysis of METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment at different passages. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3, two−way ANOVA). (b,c) EdU incorporation assay of METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment at P0 (b) and P1 (c). Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3, unpaired t test). (d,e) Cell cycle assay of METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment at passage 0 (P0) (d) and passage 1 (P1) (e). Values represent mean ± SD (n = 3, two−way ANOVA). (f,g) Apoptosis assay in METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment at P0 and P1 (f). PI− and/or annexin V−positive cells were analyzed using FACS (g). Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3, two−way ANOVA).
Figure 3. METTL3 is essential for proliferation of hNPCs. (a) Proliferation analysis of METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment at different passages. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3, two−way ANOVA). (b,c) EdU incorporation assay of METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment at P0 (b) and P1 (c). Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3, unpaired t test). (d,e) Cell cycle assay of METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment at passage 0 (P0) (d) and passage 1 (P1) (e). Values represent mean ± SD (n = 3, two−way ANOVA). (f,g) Apoptosis assay in METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment at P0 and P1 (f). PI− and/or annexin V−positive cells were analyzed using FACS (g). Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3, two−way ANOVA).
Ijms 24 15535 g003
Ijms 24 15535 g004
Figure 4. METTL3 deficiency reduces m6A modification on hNPCs genes. (a) Metagene profiles illustrating the distribution of m6A signals along a normalized transcript, divided into three non-overlapping segments: 5′ UTR, CDS, and 3′ UTR in METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. (b) Pie chart depicting the distribution of m6A sites in four regions of H9-METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs post ASV treatment. (c) Identification of consensus motifs on m6A peaks identified in METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs following ASV treatment. (d) Gene Ontology (GO) analysis focusing on m6A downregulated genes in METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. (e) Genome browser snapshot displaying MeRIP-seq read density in exonic regions of representative hNPCs genes for METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment.
Figure 4. METTL3 deficiency reduces m6A modification on hNPCs genes. (a) Metagene profiles illustrating the distribution of m6A signals along a normalized transcript, divided into three non-overlapping segments: 5′ UTR, CDS, and 3′ UTR in METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. (b) Pie chart depicting the distribution of m6A sites in four regions of H9-METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs post ASV treatment. (c) Identification of consensus motifs on m6A peaks identified in METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs following ASV treatment. (d) Gene Ontology (GO) analysis focusing on m6A downregulated genes in METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. (e) Genome browser snapshot displaying MeRIP-seq read density in exonic regions of representative hNPCs genes for METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment.
Ijms 24 15535 g004
Ijms 24 15535 g005
Figure 5. SLIT2 is the functional target of METTL3 in hNPC proliferation. (a) Volcano plot depicting differential expression genes (DEG) in METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. (b) Heatmap illustrating downregulated genes in METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. (c) GO analysis focusing on downregulated genes in METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. (d) Pie chart displaying the distribution of METTL3 signals across four regions of METTL3s/s hNPCs. (e) Identification of consensus motifs within METTL3 peaks identified in METTL3s/s hNPCs. (f) Volcano plot showing DEG and m6A−modified genes in METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. (g) Venn diagram representing METTL3-binding transcripts, m6A downregulated genes and downregulated genes in METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. (h) Representation of GO terms related to biological process categories enriched in downregulated genes with RNA−seq. (i) Genome browser snapshot displaying RIP−seq and MeRIP−seq read density within exonic regions of SLIT2. (j) qRT−PCR analysis of the expression levels of SLIT2 in METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. METTL3s/s hNPCs serve as control. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3, unpaired t test). (k) RIP−qPCR analysis of the METTL3 enrichment level on SLIT2 in METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. METTL3s/s hNPCs serve as control. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3, unpaired t test). (l) MeRIP−qPCR analysis of the m6A enrichment level on SLIT2 in METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. METTL3s/s hNPCs serve as control. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3, unpaired t test). (m) Cell cycle assay comparing METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV and SLIT2 recombination protein treatment at passage 1 (P1). Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3, two−way ANOVA).
Figure 5. SLIT2 is the functional target of METTL3 in hNPC proliferation. (a) Volcano plot depicting differential expression genes (DEG) in METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. (b) Heatmap illustrating downregulated genes in METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. (c) GO analysis focusing on downregulated genes in METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. (d) Pie chart displaying the distribution of METTL3 signals across four regions of METTL3s/s hNPCs. (e) Identification of consensus motifs within METTL3 peaks identified in METTL3s/s hNPCs. (f) Volcano plot showing DEG and m6A−modified genes in METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. (g) Venn diagram representing METTL3-binding transcripts, m6A downregulated genes and downregulated genes in METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. (h) Representation of GO terms related to biological process categories enriched in downregulated genes with RNA−seq. (i) Genome browser snapshot displaying RIP−seq and MeRIP−seq read density within exonic regions of SLIT2. (j) qRT−PCR analysis of the expression levels of SLIT2 in METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. METTL3s/s hNPCs serve as control. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3, unpaired t test). (k) RIP−qPCR analysis of the METTL3 enrichment level on SLIT2 in METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. METTL3s/s hNPCs serve as control. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3, unpaired t test). (l) MeRIP−qPCR analysis of the m6A enrichment level on SLIT2 in METTL3s/s hNPCs and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment. METTL3s/s hNPCs serve as control. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3, unpaired t test). (m) Cell cycle assay comparing METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV treatment and METTL3s/s hNPCs after ASV and SLIT2 recombination protein treatment at passage 1 (P1). Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3, two−way ANOVA).
Ijms 24 15535 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, Y.; Li, J.; Lian, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Wu, Y.; Kang, J. METTL3-Dependent N6-Methyladenosine Modification Programs Human Neural Progenitor Cell Proliferation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15535. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242115535

AMA Style

Zhao Y, Li J, Lian Y, Zhou Q, Wu Y, Kang J. METTL3-Dependent N6-Methyladenosine Modification Programs Human Neural Progenitor Cell Proliferation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(21):15535. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242115535

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Yuan, Jianguo Li, Yilin Lian, Qian Zhou, Yukang Wu, and Jiuhong Kang. 2023. "METTL3-Dependent N6-Methyladenosine Modification Programs Human Neural Progenitor Cell Proliferation" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 21: 15535. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242115535

APA Style

Zhao, Y., Li, J., Lian, Y., Zhou, Q., Wu, Y., & Kang, J. (2023). METTL3-Dependent N6-Methyladenosine Modification Programs Human Neural Progenitor Cell Proliferation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(21), 15535. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242115535

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop