Next Article in Journal
The Assessment of the Efficacy of Imperatorin in Reducing Overactive Bladder Symptoms
Next Article in Special Issue
Intrinsic and Microenvironmental Drivers of Glioblastoma Invasion
Previous Article in Journal
The Warburg Effect Explained: Integration of Enhanced Glycolysis with Heterogeneous Mitochondria to Promote Cancer Cell Proliferation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Presence of Activated (Phosphorylated) STAT3 in Radiation Necrosis Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 21
10.3390/ijms242115792
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Role of UBE2C in Brain Cancer Invasion and Dissemination

by
Stefani Domentean
1,
Eunice Paisana
1,
Rita Cascão
1,† and
Claudia C. Faria
1,2,3,*,†
1
Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Edifício Egas Moniz, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
2
Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte (CHULN), Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
3
Clínica Universitária de Neurocirurgia, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(21), 15792; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242115792
Submission received: 17 September 2023 / Revised: 23 October 2023 / Accepted: 25 October 2023 / Published: 31 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Invasion and Metastasis in Brain Cancer)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Glioblastoma (GB) and brain metastases (BM) are the most common brain tumors in adults and are invariably associated with a dismal outcome. These highly malignant tumors share common features including increased invasion and migration of the primary or metastatic brain cancer cells, whose triggering mechanisms are largely unknown. Emerging evidence has suggested that the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C (UBE2C), essential for controlling cell cycle progression, is overexpressed in diverse malignancies, including brain cancer. This review highlights the crucial role of UBE2C in brain tumorigenesis and its association with higher proliferative phenotype and histopathological grade, with autophagy and apoptosis suppression, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), invasion, migration, and dissemination. High expression of UBE2C has been associated with patients’ poor prognosis and drug resistance. UBE2C has also been proven as a promising therapeutic target, despite the lack of specific inhibitors. Thus, there is a need to further explore the role of UBE2C in malignant brain cancer and to develop effective targeted therapies for patients with this deadly disease.

1. Introduction

The most common brain tumors in the adult population include glioblastoma (GB), a primary brain tumor arising from cells within the brain, and brain metastases (BM), secondary lesions that arise from systemic cancers that disseminate to the brain during disease progression. Even though brain tumors are rare, accounting for 3% of all cancer types, patients have increased mortality and severe disabilities [1,2]. Standard of care treatment includes neurosurgical resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. Nevertheless, primary and secondary brain tumors are challenging to treat since they may not be amenable to surgical resection due to their location in eloquent areas or to the number of lesions and due to the blood–brain barrier (BBB), which may be a limiting factor in the efficacy of systemic chemotherapies [2]. Furthermore, no new and more effective therapies have been found in the past years to treat brain tumors [3]. Recently, immunotherapy has shown promising results for patients with metastatic brain lesions from melanoma and lung cancer [4,5,6]. However, the overall survival of patients with malignant brain tumors, particularly GB and BM, remains poor despite decades of research and clinical trial development [3].
Glioblastoma is the most frequently diagnosed malignant primary brain tumor in adults. It is a grade 4 tumor according to the classification of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the most aggressive type of glioma [7]. Currently, treatment includes maximal safe surgical resection followed by radiation therapy and chemotherapy with temozolomide. Nonetheless, the median survival of treated patients is approximately 15 months, and they usually relapse in a short period of time with a poorer prognosis, exhibiting a progression-free survival of 1.5–6 months and an overall survival of 2–9 months. Therefore, despite all therapeutic developments, there are currently no effective therapies for GB [3,8].
Invasion is a main feature of GB through the infiltration of cancer cells in the brain parenchyma, leading to therapeutic resistance and tumor recurrence [9,10,11]. Glioma cells are histologically similar to glial progenitor cells that have proliferative, migratory, and dedifferentiation capacities, suggesting that mechanisms involved in the migration of neuroepithelial cells during embryonic development and regenerative processes are also involved in GB invasion [10,12]. This process comprises the detachment of cancer cells from the main tumor, degradation of the extracellular matrix, and migration. Studies have reported that the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a critical role in GB progression, particularly in migration and invasion [10,13]. Moreover, glioma stem cells (GSCs), a population that exhibits several characteristics of both neural progenitor and stem cells, have been described as responsible for tumor invasion, possibly through the WNT, TGF-β, HGF/MET, PI3K/AKT, and STAT3 signaling pathways [9]. Ephrin receptors, Rho GTPases, and CK2 have also been proposed as molecules that interfere with GB invasiveness [9]. However, the mechanisms responsible for GB invasion are largely unknown. Most therapeutic strategies are directed at the highly proliferative tumor mass, whereas there are no anti-invasion molecules approved so far for clinical purposes [11,14].
Another common brain tumor in the adult population is BM. BM arise from the dissemination of cancer cells from a systemic primary tumor to the brain and are estimated to be 10 times more frequent than primary brain tumors. Additionally, the incidence of BM is thought to be increasing, possibly as a result of the improvement in diagnostic methods and better treatment of systemic cancer [15,16]. Approximately 20–30% of cancer patients develop BM during disease progression, with brain metastatic disease being the main cause of morbidity and mortality [17]. The most common primary malignancies that disseminate to the brain include lung (40–50%), breast (15–20%), melanoma (5–10%), and gastrointestinal (4–6%) cancers [17]. At the time of BM diagnosis, about 37–50% of patients exhibit a single brain lesion, while 50–63% have multiple BM, making it more difficult to treat [17,18,19]. Standard of care treatment of BM includes surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Nonetheless, patients have a poor prognosis and about 60% develop local recurrence within 1 year [20,21]. Surgery is limited to patients with few symptomatic lesions in accessible brain locations and with a good Karnofsky performance status [15,18]. Chemotherapeutic efficacy in the treatment of BM has been difficult to determine. Most clinical trials of systemic treatments exclude BM patients, and response rates reveal the efficacy in the primary tumor but not the outcome in the brain lesions [22].
Dissemination is a complex multi-step process that comprises genetic, epigenetic, and biological alterations of cancer cells. This metastatic cascade starts with the migration and invasion of cancer cells into adjacent tissues, followed by intravasation into the bloodstream and colonization of a new secondary site [23]. Recently, it was shown that the underlying cause for local recurrence and consequent worse patient survival was the capacity of some brain metastatic cancer cells to undergo a reprogramming process and acquire features that allow the invasion of adjacent brain tissue [20]. Additionally, it has been reported that BM from different primary tumor origins share mutations in the PI3K/ATK/mTOR signaling pathway and mutations associated with sensitivity to PI3K, CDK, HER2/EGFR, and MAPK inhibitors [24]. These pathways are known to be associated with tumorigenesis, proliferation, apoptosis, EMT, invasion, metastasis, stem-like behavior, and drug resistance in metastatic cancer cells, including BM [16,25,26]. Moreover, MYC, YAP1, and MMP13 genes were amplified in BM in comparison with their corresponding primary lung tumors, suggesting that these genes may be driving BM [24]. Other genes were reported as contributing to BM development, namely p53, KRAS, DSC2, WNT–TCF, HB–EGF, COX2, BMP-2, src, serpins, and cathepsin-S [27,28,29,30,31,32].
Despite previous attempts to study the mechanisms that underlie the invasion and dissemination of cancer cells to the brain and within the brain, these remain poorly understood. Uncovering these mechanisms is an unmet medical need critical for the development of novel therapeutic approaches that can improve patients’ survival and quality of life.
The ubiquitin system has been gaining significant relevance in cancer research due to its role in several cellular processes. In the last years, growing data have been exhibiting the human ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C (UBE2C) as a relevant player in tumorigenesis and a valuable biomarker in several types of cancers. In this review, we aim to discuss the role of UBE2C in brain cancer invasion and dissemination and its potential therapeutic targeting in brain tumor patients.

2. UBE2C

2.1. Ubiquitin Proteasome System

Damaged proteins, either caused by intrinsic or extrinsic factors, affect different cell functions, and consequently cell viability. The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) is responsible for eradicating these damaged proteins and maintaining protein homeostasis. Additionally, the UPS controls the concentrations of cell cycle regulators according to the cell phase, regulating cell cycle progression [33,34].
Protein degradation starts with the ubiquitination of damaged proteins, an ATP-dependent process that requires three types of enzymes, namely ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1), the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2), and ubiquitin ligases (E3), which operate consecutively in a cascade. The E1 enzyme activates the ubiquitin molecule through ATP hydrolyzation followed by adenylation of the glycine residue present in the C-terminal of ubiquitin and its linkage to the cysteine active site of E1. Subsequently, ubiquitin is transferred to the E2 enzyme, allowing the conjugation between E2 and E3, which in turn recognizes and binds the target protein while catalyzing the ubiquitin transfer to the latter. These enzymes operate in a methodical manner to polyubiquitinate the substrates so that these can be recognized and degraded by the proteasome [33,34].
Dysregulation of the UPS leads to an accumulation of damaged proteins that have key roles in DNA damage repair, cellular differentiation, cell cycle control, apoptosis, and other vital functions. This dysregulation has been associated with several diseases, namely neurodegenerative disorders and different types of cancer, including brain tumors [35]. Interestingly, a high-throughput small interfering RNA (siRNA) screen in T98G glioma cells reported that 22% of the genes identified as being crucial for GB survival encoded for components of the proteasome subunits 20S and 26S [36]. Moreover, aberrant levels of different E2 and E3 enzymes have been reported in glioma, having either oncogenic or antitumoral effects [37,38,39,40]. On the other hand, altered levels of deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs), which enhance protein stability by cleaving the ubiquitin and thus reversing ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, can also affect crucial signaling pathways and consequently lead to malignancies. In particular, DUBs have been linked to the regulation of GSCs’ pluripotency and microenvironment, as well as radiation and chemotherapy resistance [41,42,43].

2.2. Physiological Role of UBE2C in Cell Cycle

The UBE2C gene (also known as UBCH10) is located at chromosome 20q13.12 and can generate 7 transcript variants, being the longest transcript translated into a protein composed of 179 amino acids with a total molecular weight of 19.65 kDa [44,45]. The UBE2C protein is a member of the E2 family and is responsible for the transfer of ubiquitin to the protein substrates targeting proteasome-mediated degradation [45]. The N-terminal of UBE2C is composed of the first 28 residues and allows protein recognition and conjugation, namely with the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). The E2 core domain contains a catalytic Cys114 in the active site that is responsible for the formation of an adduct with E1-activated ubiquitin through a thiol ester bond. Together with E3 ligases or independently, UBE2C then donates the ubiquitin to target proteins for proteasome degradation [44,45,46].
UBE2C is located in the nucleus and cytoplasm of cells, being scarcely expressed in normal tissues, at both RNA and protein levels [45]. UBE2C is involved in different steps of the cell cycle, controlling its progression (Figure 1). The APC/C is a multi-subunit complex that functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase and interacts with UBE2C, inducing the metaphase/anaphase transition and the exit from mitosis [45,47]. Along with APC/C, UBE2C degrades securin that normally forms an inhibitory complex with separase. Separase is then activated and degrades the cohesin rings that link the two sister chromatids together, leading to chromatid separation and anaphase onset [45,48].
Additionally, UBE2C promotes the inactivation of the mitotic cell cycle spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), necessary to guarantee the appropriate separation of the sister chromatids into two daughter cells, averting aneuploidy [45]. This is ensured by UBE2C-driven degradation of mitotic cyclin B, which forms a complex with cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1), inactivating the latter. Cdk1 inactivation allows the replacement of Cdc20 by Cdh1 in the APC/C-UBE2C complex, promoting the sequential ubiquitination and degradation of key regulators. This will lead to mitotic exit and progression to G1 and S phases. Once UBE2C has fulfilled its function, it is degraded via autoubiquitination in association with the APC/CCdh1 and, therefore, its expression is controlled through a positive autoregulatory feedback loop dependent on APC/C substrate concentrations that compete with UBE2C. UBE2C levels increase gradually over S and G2 phases when cyclin A inactivates APC/C, allowing the re-accumulation of UBE2C [44,45,49,50].
UBE2C overexpression triggers whole chromosome instability and consequent missegregation and aneuploidy [51]. Its accumulation also stimulates cell proliferation, suggesting that UBE2C overexpression may play an important role in tumorigenesis and tumor progression [45].

2.3. UBE2C and Systemic Cancer

The overexpression of UBE2C has been described in many human cancers, namely breast, lung, thyroid, endometrial, renal, prostate, pancreatic, esophageal, hepatocellular, gastrointestinal, and brain tumors [47,52,53,54]. The overexpression of this gene has been associated with tumor progression and worse prognosis. Human cancers with higher levels of UBE2C exhibit increased aggressiveness, low differentiation, and metastatic predisposition and are associated with reduced patient survival [45,47,52,54]. Table 1 presents the data from the most relevant papers regarding the role and clinical impact of UBE2C expression on different types of malignancies. These studies were chosen based on information on chemotherapeutic resistance, signaling pathways, and mechanisms that shed light onto possible therapeutic strategies.

2.3.1. Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer, with an 11.7% global incidence, and is the leading cause of cancer death in women [79,80]. Up to one-third of breast cancer patients develop BM. UBE2C overexpression has been shown to have a prognostic value in breast cancer [47,55]. Recently, high levels of this protein have been identified as an independent prognostic marker in breast cancer patients, correlated with poor prognosis, high tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastases, hormone receptor negativity, HER2 positivity, and stem-like features [56,57,81]. Invasive breast tumors seem to have a higher expression of UBE2C [82]. In contrast, UBE2C knockdown leads to inhibition of proliferation and invasion in breast cancer cells, as well as a decrease of p-AKT, p-mTOR, and hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α (HIF-1α) and an increase of phosphorylated phosphatase and p-PTEN levels. UBE2C is thought to promote breast cancer proliferation by activating the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway, a known key player in metastasis [58,83]. UBE2C is also associated with cell cycle-related biomarkers, such as p53, ki67, EGFR, and PI3K, and its overexpression reduces sensitivity to chemotherapy [59,60]. More recently, it has been reported that the circular RNA circ_0059457 is responsible for UBE2C-driven breast cancer cell migration, invasion, and metastasis through an miR-140-3p-dependent mechanism [84].

2.3.2. Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer, with a global incidence of 11.4%, and is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. The five-year survival for patients with lung cancer is 10–20% [80]. One of the main concerns in lung cancer is the high incidence of metastasis to the brain [85]. UBE2C was identified as an independent prognostic factor associated with primary tumor size, lymph node metastases, Tumor/Node/Metastasis (TNM) stage, overall survival, and disease-free survival in lung cancer patients [62,86]. Particularly, in non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC), UBE2C has a positive correlation with tumor grade, being overexpressed in poorly differentiated tumors [63,87]. The expression of UBE2C can be downregulated through the knockdown of MALAT1, leading to the inactivation of WNT, PI3K/AKT, and MAPK/ERK, thus inhibiting proliferation, migration, and invasion of lung cancer cells [64]. Additionally, UBE2C induces chemoresistance through the increased expression of the multi-drug resistance (MDR1) gene [63], ABCG2, and ERCC1 [65]. In NSCLC cells, it was shown that UBE2C levels directly correlate with p53 mutational status and inversely correlate with EGFR mutational status [66]. Moreover, UBE2C selectively represses autophagy, leading to enhanced cell proliferation and invasive tumor growth [88]. Recently, it has been reported that KrasG12D-induced lung tumorigenesis requires UBE2C expression, which couples with APC/C to promote ubiquitylation and degradation of DEP domain-containing mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) interacting protein (DEPTOR), leading to activation of mTOR signaling [67].

2.3.3. Other Neoplasms

UBE2C has been described as a promoter of migration and invasion of tumor cells in several other types of cancer [68,71,72,89,90]. In hepatocellular carcinoma, UBE2C upregulation is associated with tumor invasion, dedifferentiation, and poor prognosis [68]. On the other hand, the depletion of F-box protein 43 results in UBE2C downregulation, suppression of p53 proteasomal degradation, and inhibition of cell proliferation and invasion [91]. In hepatoblastoma clinical samples, high levels of UBE2C mRNA seem to increase distant metastasis and death rates. Moreover, the knockdown of UBE2C in the HuH6 hepatoblastoma cell line and in the HB-243 cell line from a patient-derived xenograft decreased cell viability by up to 44% and cell migration by 65% [92]. In osteosarcoma cells, UBE2C knockdown impairs invasion and migration [93]. This effect has also been demonstrated in renal, prostate, and gastric cancers [94,95,96]. Recently, Huang et al. proposed that patients with adrenocortical carcinoma with high UBE2C expression may present a worse prognosis by inducing self-renewal of adrenocortical stem cells [73].
An association between UBE2C and p53, a tumor suppressor protein involved in the G2/M checkpoint and apoptosis of cells with damaged DNA [97], is described in endometrial, hepatocellular, thyroid, and lung cancer cells, where UBE2C-induced p53 degradation promotes migration, invasion, and EMT [68,71,72,98].
The PI3K/AKT/mTOR/signaling pathway has been correlated with UBE2C levels in several cancers, including thyroid, gastric, and pancreatic cancer. In gastric and cervical cancer, UBE2C knockdown leads to increased apoptosis induced by cisplatin and reduced phosphorylation of ERK, AKT/PKB, and p38 [99,100]. In neck squamous cell carcinoma, UBE2C expression is correlated with an increase in HIF-1 α, leading to glycolysis initiation and migration [101]. Finally, the UBE2C protein network shows strong associations with cancer-related proteins involved in the formation and maintenance of the mitotic spindle, chromosome segregation, microtubule depolarization, centrosome integrity, and homologous recombination and repair of DNA in different cancers [52]. Recently, a strong association between UBE2C and stromal and immune score was described in clear renal cell carcinoma. The expression levels of UBE2C are significantly associated with extended levels of regulatory T cell infiltration, CD4+ memory T cells, and M0 macrophages. In addition, several immune checkpoint genes exhibit a positive correlation with UBE2C [74]. Other studies have reported a correlation between UBE2C and immune cell infiltration [61,69,72,73,102]. Specifically in hepatocellular carcinoma, UBE2C is positively correlated with infiltration of regulatory T cells and T follicular helper cells while presenting a negative correlation with macrophage infiltration [69]. On the other hand, in adrenocortical carcinoma, UBE2C expression is positively linked with T helper Th1 and Th2 cells and negatively correlated with regulatory T cells and M2 macrophage infiltration [73].

3. UBE2C and Brain Cancer Invasion and Dissemination

The role of UBE2C has been studied in brain tumors, including gliomas, meningiomas, and BM. UBE2C expression was analyzed in astrocytic tumors, and authors concluded that GB exhibits high levels of this protein compared with low-grade astrocytomas, indicating a correlation between UBE2C expression and glioma tumor grade. It was also shown that UBE2C overexpression is only found in cancer cells, and not in normal tissues [75,76,103,104]. Ma et al. described the impact of UBE2C expression on the outcome and overall survival of patients with GB, making it a potential biomarker [104]. Additionally, an association between UBE2C and the proliferative marker Ki-67 was described [103]. Furthermore, a functional interaction between UBE2C and p53 has been suggested in glioma cells, where p53 downregulation, possibly due to UBE2C-induced degradation, results in diminished apoptosis in these cells [77].
It has been shown that the Forkhead box transcription factor M1 (FoxM1) triggers UBE2C transcription by binding to its promoter regions and is associated with poor prognosis in gliomas [75]. FoxM1 has a key role in cell cycle progression, with a peak during S and G2/M phases, which temporally corresponds to a peak in UBE2C [105]. Interestingly, FoxM1 is upregulated in brain tumors, particularly GB and meningioma [75,106]. Upregulation of UBE2C is observed in GB tissues, mainly in the proneural subtype, characterized by neurogenesis-related gene expression and increased invasion [107,108]. The combined upregulation of UBE2C and aurora kinase B (AURKB), an important player in the cell cycle, is associated with a dismal outcome, therapeutic resistance, and reduced overall survival in glioma patients [76].
In meningiomas, UBE2C overexpression correlates with higher histological grade, increased proliferation, and poor prognosis [109]. When exploring UBE2C function in meningioma cells with different grades, it was reported that silencing this gene inhibits proliferation, migration, and invasion. Moreover, UBE2C knockdown induces apoptosis by increasing Bax and caspase-3 and by decreasing Bcl-2 levels [110]. It was also demonstrated that RIZ1, a tumor suppressor gene, is markedly decreased and regulates UBE2C in a c-Myc-dependent manner in malignant meningioma [110,111].
Recently, Paisana et al. reported the association of UBE2C and BM [78]. The authors have demonstrated that UBE2C is highly expressed in human BM from different primary tumors in comparison to normal tissues. In BM patients, high levels of UBE2C are associated with reduced survival, suggesting that it may be a useful clinical biomarker of prognosis in patients with brain metastatic disease. UBE2C overexpression increases migration and invasion of breast and lung cancer cells. In addition, mice orthotopically injected with UBE2C-overexpressing cancer cells develop increased leptomeningeal dissemination, an aggressive phenotype of brain metastatic disease [78]. Another recent study using single-cell RNA sequencing in human BM from diverse cancer types identified UBE2C as a signature gene in the proliferative molecular subgroup [112].
The effects of UBE2C dysregulation in cancer are highlighted in Figure 2.

4. UBE2C Inhibition as a Potential Therapeutic Target

The best approach to target the UPS in order to achieve better selectivity with less toxicity is through inhibition of the E2 enzymes or E3 ligases, which have been reported as dysregulated in several cancers. E2 enzymes are abnormally translated in a variety of cancers, being responsible for tumor progression and unfavorable biological and clinical characteristics, which emphasizes the relevance of UBE2C as a potential therapeutic target. Until now, UBE2C targeting has been limited to experimental studies, making the development of UBE2C inhibitors essential for patient care [113,114].
UBE2C knockdown using interference RNA inhibits proliferation and promotes activation of the tumor suppressor p53 and apoptosis in U251 glioma cells [77]. It was also observed that UBE2C knockdown suppresses glioma cell growth by 40% in comparison to control cells and induces autophagy through inactivation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway [75].
In breast cancer cells, UBE2C silencing inhibits ERK and AKT phosphorylation and increases the levels of phosphorylated PTEN, which acts as a negative regulator of the PI3K/AKT pathway [58]. UBE2C inhibition sensitizes breast cancer cells to treatment with radiation and doxorubicin (alkylating agent), as well as to anti-hormonal agents such as tamoxifen (estrogen receptor modulator) and letrozole (nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor) [60]. UBE2C depletion in triple-negative breast cancer cells decreases proliferation, which is substantially enhanced in the presence of paclitaxel, suggesting a possible new combination therapy [115]. Intriguingly, CDK4/6 inhibitors can suppress UBE2C expression in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells [116].
In ovarian cancer, UBE2C silencing decreases cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo and results in G2/M arrest, increased cell apoptosis, and reversed cisplatin resistance. In addition, cyclin B1, CDK1, and Bcl-2 levels are downregulated, while Bax expression is upregulated [117]. In gastric cancer cells, UBE2C depletion impairs the ERK1/2 signaling pathway in vitro, while decreasing tumor volume in vivo. Additionally, the ERK1/2 inhibitor U0126 reduces ERK1/2 phosphorylation and reverses the effect of UBE2C on cell proliferation, migration, and invasion [96]. Similar results were observed in melanoma cells, where in vivo UBE2C knockdown suppresses the growth of xenografted tumors [118]. In hepatocellular carcinoma, UBE2C downregulation increases the sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents including doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil (cellular thymidylate synthase inhibitor), and the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib [70]. UBE2C silencing also sensitizes colorectal cancer cell lines to bortezomib (proteasome blocker) and oxaliplatin (alkylating agent), inducing apoptosis [119]. In thyroid carcinoma cells, UBE2C knockdown decreases cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, promotes apoptosis, and reduces cisplatin resistance [72]. UBE2C depletion in adrenocortical carcinoma cells suppresses cell invasion and migration by EMT inhibition, DNA damage repair, and induction of apoptosis [73].
Interestingly, the manipulation of miRNAs, namely miR661-3p and miR-381-3p, has shown the ability to target UBE2C in NSCLC and prostate cancer cells, respectively, leading to reduced proliferation, invasion, and metastasis [120,121].
CCI-779, an mTOR inhibitor, significantly decreases UBE2C in prostate cancer cell lines. CCI-779 inhibits the recruitment of androgen receptor-coactivator to the UBE2C enhancers and, consequently, reduces the loading of RNA polymerase II and transcription. In addition, CCI-779 inhibits cell proliferation and invasion in vitro and decreases tumor growth in mouse xenografts [122]. Moreover, docetaxel (microtubule depolymerization inhibitor) treatment in UBE2C-depleted prostate cancer cells reduces the degradation rate of cyclin B1, suggesting less ability to recover from the mitotic arrest induced by docetaxel. Therefore, UBE2C seems to be a key player in the regulation of mitotic slippage and a mediator in docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer [123]. Treatment of cervical cancer cells with vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor that reduces PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling and UBE2C activation, reverses EMT through downregulation of N-cadherin and vimentin and upregulation of E-cadherin [124]. Recently, it has been shown that dactolisib (PI3K/mTOR inhibitor) effectively treats UBE2C-driven orthotopic mouse xenografts of breast and lung cancer BM. Interestingly, early treatment with oral dactolisib prevents leptomeningeal dissemination in vivo [78].
A study on cervical carcinoma analyzed the structure, binding energy, chemical properties and drug-like properties of UBE2C and identified 2,4-diimino-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazepan-6-one, a sulfuric acid compound with 5,6-diamino-2,4-pyrimidinediol (1:1) and 7-alpha-d-ribofuranosyl-2-aminopurine-5’-phosphate as possible inhibitors [125]. Nonetheless, these candidates need additional experimental testing to prove their ability to inhibit UBE2C for therapeutic purposes.
A novel in vitro biochemical assay that exploits the ability of UBE2C to ubiquitinate itself in particular conditions was developed to study the UBE2C ubiquitin-conjugating activity. This platform provides a rapid and sensitive time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based assay that might be used to identify UBE2C inhibitors and can be scalable into an automated high-throughput screening layout [113]. Furthermore, the recently established patient-derived models of BM, which replicate human metastatic disease, can be used as platforms for the preclinical evaluation of anticancer therapies [19]. Both strategies can be applied to identify and validate novel UBE2C inhibitors for the treatment of brain cancer patients.

5. Discussion (And Future Directions)

Despite being a rare condition, malignant brain tumors cause a dismal prognosis and reduced life expectancy. Invasion and dissemination of cancer cells into the brain are important features of aggressiveness in brain cancer that urgently need a better therapeutic intervention aiming to improve patient prognosis [126].
UBE2C is a key enzyme during the cell cycle and has been considered a proto-oncogene and a tumor biomarker. High expression of UBE2C is observed in several different types of cancer and correlates with histological grade, poor prognosis, resistance to therapy, and relapse. Moreover, there is evidence of the role of UBE2C in proliferation, EMT, invasion, and migration in several malignancies, including brain tumors.
Due to its characteristics, UBE2C has the potential to be used as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker, including in liquid biopsies from cancer patients. However, most studies reporting the role of UBE2C in brain tumors are relatively recent, meaning this is an understudied subject. Particularly, an in-depth focus on the relevance of UBE2C in the tumor microenvironment is lacking to understand the best clinical strategy in UBE2C-driven carcinogenesis.
UBE2C can also be considered a promising therapeutic target. Several reports have highlighted the interaction between UBE2C and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in driving tumor progression and metastases through a yet unknown mechanism. The evidence of efficacy from diverse PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in UBE2C downregulation and EMT reversion sheds light on possible novel therapeutic options. However, although genetic silencing and indirect inhibition have been successfully tested, there is still an unmet need to identify UBE2C-specific inhibitors with therapeutic efficacy. One of the most prominent challenges consists of the three-dimensional structure of E2 enzymes. The catalytic site of these enzymes is located in a region that unlikely allows specific interactions with small molecules with high affinity [34]. Moreover, the inhibition of the catalytic center can lead to the inhibition of other enzymes that bind ubiquitin. Another inhibitory strategy would be to prevent the binding of UBE2C to the APC/C complex, but the resolution of the APC/C-UBE2C complex is very low, making in silico drug screening a challenge. Lastly, the treatment of brain tumors implies the development of drugs that can cross the blood–brain barrier, which has been proven to be a demanding task.
In conclusion, despite the established relevance of UBE2C in cancer, its role in brain tumors should be further investigated to assess its potential value as a diagnostic and prognostic marker, as well as a potential therapeutic target.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: S.D., R.C. and C.C.F. Drafting manuscript: S.D. Revising and editing manuscript content: E.P., R.C. and C.C.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript and take responsibility for the integrity of the data analysis and interpretation of results.

Funding

This work is funded by National Funds through the FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P., under the scope of the project 2022.08774.PTDC and the fellowship 2023.03882.BD attributed to SD. In addition, the authors are grateful for the funding of Portugal Programa Gilead GÉNESE (Grant ID Number: 17859); Millennium bcp; Associação David Vaz and private donations.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Miranda-Filho, A.; Piñeros, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Deltour, I.; Bray, F. Cancers of the brain and CNS: Global patterns and trends in incidence. Neuro. Oncol. 2017, 19, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Miller, K.D.; Ostrom, Q.T.; Kruchko, C.; Patil, N.; Tihan, T.; Cioffi, G.; Fuchs, H.E.; Waite, K.A.; Jemal, A.; Siegel, R.L.; et al. Brain and other central nervous system tumor statistics, 2021. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 381–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Aldape, K.; Brindle, K.M.; Chesler, L.; Chopra, R.; Gajjar, A.; Gilbert, M.R.; Gottardo, N.; Gutmann, D.H.; Hargrave, D.; Holland, E.C.; et al. Challenges to curing primary brain tumours. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 16, 509–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kluger, H.M.; Chiang, V.; Mahajan, A.; Zito, C.R.; Sznol, M.; Tran, T.; Weiss, S.A.; Cohen, J.V.; Yu, J.; Hegde, U.; et al. Long-Term survival of patients with melanoma with active brain metastases treated with pembrolizumab on a phase II trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brastianos, P.K.; Kim, A.E.; Giobbie-Hurder, A.; Lee, E.Q.; Lin, N.U.; Overmoyer, B.; Wen, P.Y.; Nayak, L.; Cohen, J.V.; Dietrich, J.; et al. Pembrolizumab in brain metastases of diverse histologies: Phase 2 trial results. Nat. Med. 2023, 29, 1728–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, Y.; Deng, L.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Wu, Y.; Wang, L.; Bi, N. Efficacy and Safety of Combined Brain Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Brain Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin. Lung Cancer 2022, 23, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Louis, D.N.; Perry, A.; Wesseling, P.; Brat, D.J.; Cree, I.A.; Figarella-Branger, D.; Hawkins, C.; Ng, H.K.; Pfister, S.M.; Reifenberger, G.; et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of tumors of the central nervous system: A summary. Neuro. Oncol. 2021, 23, 1231–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Birzu, C.; French, P.; Caccese, M.; Cerretti, G.; Idbaih, A.; Zagonel, V.; Lombardi, G. Recurrent Glioblastoma: From Molecular Landscape to New Treatment Perspectives. Cancers 2021, 13, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. de Gooijer, M.C.; Navarro, M.G.; Bernards, R.; Wurdinger, T.; van Tellingen, O. An Experimenter’s Guide to Glioblastoma Invasion Pathways. Trends Mol. Med. 2018, 24, 763–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mehta, S.; Lo Cascio, C. Developmentally regulated signaling pathways in glioma invasion. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 385–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Manini, I.; Caponnetto, F.; Bartolini, A.; Ius, T.; Mariuzzi, L.; Di Loreto, C.; Beltrami, A.P.; Cesselli, D. Role of Microenvironment in Glioma Invasion: What We Learned from In Vitro Models. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vollmann-Zwerenz, A.; Leidgens, V.; Feliciello, G.; Klein, C.A.; Hau, P. Tumor Cell Invasion in Glioblastoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Iwadate, Y. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in glioblastoma progression. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 11, 1615–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Weller, M.; van den Bent, M.; Preusser, M.; Le Rhun, E.; Tonn, J.C.; Minniti, G.; Bendszus, M.; Balana, C.; Chinot, O.; Dirven, L.; et al. EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 18, 170–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Suh, J.H.; Kotecha, R.; Chao, S.T.; Ahluwalia, M.S.; Sahgal, A.; Chang, E.L. Current approaches to the management of brain metastases. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 17, 279–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Soffietti, R.; Ahluwalia, M.; Lin, N.; Rudà, R. Management of brain metastases according to molecular subtypes. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2020, 16, 557–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Achrol, A.S.; Rennert, R.C.; Anders, C.; Soffietti, R.; Ahluwalia, M.S.; Nayak, L.; Peters, S.; Arvold, N.D.; Harsh, G.R.; Steeg, P.S.; et al. Brain metastases. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2019, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ene, C.I.; Ferguson, S.D. Surgical Management of Brain Metastasis: Challenges and Nuances. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 847110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Faria, C.C.; Cascão, R.; Custódia, C.; Paisana, E.; Carvalho, T.; Pereira, P.; Roque, R.; Pimentel, J.; Miguéns, J.; Cortes-Ciriano, I.; et al. Patient-derived models of brain metastases recapitulate human disseminated disease. Cell Rep. Med. 2022, 3, 100623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dankner, M.; Caron, M.; Al-Saadi, T.; Yu, W.; Ouellet, V.; Ezzeddine, R.; Maritan, S.M.; Annis, M.G.; Le, P.U.; Nadaf, J.; et al. Invasive growth associated with cold-inducible RNA-binding protein expression drives recurrence of surgically resected brain metastases. Neuro. Oncol. 2021, 23, 1470–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Brastianos, P.K.; Curry, W.T.; Oh, K.S. Clinical Discussion and Review of the Management of Brain Metastases. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2013, 11, 1153–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Soffietti, R.; Abacioglu, U.; Baumert, B.; Combs, S.E.; Kinhult, S.; Kros, J.M.; Marosi, C.; Metellus, P.; Radbruch, A.; Freixa, S.S.V.; et al. Diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases from solid tumors: Guidelines from the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO). Neuro. Oncol. 2017, 19, 162–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Franchino, F.; Rudà, R.; Soffietti, R. Mechanisms and Therapy for Cancer Metastasis to the Brain. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Brastianos, P.K.; Carter, S.L.; Santagata, S.; Cahill, D.P.; Taylor-Weiner, A.; Jones, R.T.; Van Allen, E.M.; Lawrence, M.S.; Horowitz, P.M.; Cibulskis, K.; et al. Genomic Characterization of Brain Metastases Reveals Branched Evolution and Potential Therapeutic Targets. Cancer Discov. 2015, 5, 1164–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Juric, V.; Murphy, B. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in brain cancer: Current state and future directions. Cancer Drug Resist. 2020, 3, 48–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tehranian, C.; Fankhauser, L.; Harter, P.N.; Ratcliffe, C.D.; Zeiner, P.S.; Messmer, J.M.; Hoffmann, D.C.; Frey, K.; Westphal, D.; Ronellenfitsch, M.W.; et al. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway as a preventive target in melanoma brain metastasis. Neuro. Onc. 2021, 24, 213–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Saunus, J.M.; Quinn, M.C.; Patch, A.-M.; Pearson, J.V.; Bailey, P.J.; Nones, K.; Reed, A.E.M.; Miller, D.; Wilson, P.J.; Al-Ejeh, F.; et al. Integrated genomic and transcriptomic analysis of human brain metastases identifies alterations of potential clinical significance. J. Pathol. 2015, 237, 363–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Valiente, M.; Obenauf, A.C.; Jin, X.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, X.H.; Lee, D.J.; Chaft, J.E.; Kris, M.G.; Huse, J.T.; Brogi, E.; et al. Serpins Promote Cancer Cell Survival and Vascular Co-Option in Brain Metastasis. Cell 2014, 156, 1002–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sevenich, L.; Bowman, R.L.; Mason, S.D.; Quail, D.F.; Rapaport, F.; Elie, B.T.; Brogi, E.; Brastianos, P.K.; Hahn, W.C.; Holsinger, L.J.; et al. Analysis of tumour- and stroma-supplied proteolytic networks reveals a brain-metastasis-promoting role for cathepsin S. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16, 876–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nguyen, D.X.; Chiang, A.C.; Zhang, X.H.-F.; Kim, J.Y.; Kris, M.G.; Ladanyi, M.; Gerald, W.L.; Massagué, J. WNT/TCF Signaling through LEF1 and HOXB9 Mediates Lung Adenocarcinoma Metastasis. Cell 2009, 138, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bos, P.D.; Zhang, X.H.F.; Nadal, C.; Shu, W.; Gomis, R.R.; Nguyen, D.X.; Minn, A.J.; van de Vijver, M.J.; Gerald, W.L.; Foekens, J.A.; et al. Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to the brain. Nature 2009, 459, 1005–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhang, S.; Huang, W.-C.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, C.; Lowery, F.J.; Ding, Z.; Guo, H.; Wang, H.; Huang, S.; Sahin, A.A.; et al. Src Family Kinases as Novel Therapeutic Targets to Treat Breast Cancer Brain Metastases. Cancer Res 2013, 73, 5764–5774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Aliabadi, F.; Sohrabi, B.; Mostafavi, E.; Pazoki-Toroudi, H.; Webster, T.J. Ubiquitin–proteasome system and the role of its inhibitors in cancer therapy. Open Biol. 2021, 11, 200390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Eldridge, A.G.; O’Brien, T. Therapeutic strategies within the ubiquitin proteasome system. Cell Death Differ. 2010, 17, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rashid, F.; Niklison-Chirou, M.V. Proteasome inhibition—A new target for brain tumours. Cell Death Discov. 2019, 5, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Thaker, N.G.; Zhang, F.; McDonald, P.R.; Shun, T.Y.; Lewen, M.D.; Pollack, I.F.; Lazo, J.S. Identification of Survival Genes in Human Glioblastoma Cells by Small Interfering RNA Screening. Mol. Pharmacol. 2009, 76, 1246–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Maksoud, S. The Role of the Ubiquitin Proteasome System in Glioma: Analysis Emphasizing the Main Molecular Players and Therapeutic Strategies Identified in Glioblastoma Multiforme. Mol. Neurobiol. 2021, 58, 3252–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hu, L.; Li, X.; Liu, Q.; Xu, J.; Ge, H.; Wang, Z.; Wang, H.; Shi, C.; Xu, X.; Huang, J.; et al. UBE2S, a novel substrate of Akt1, associates with Ku70 and regulates DNA repair and glioblastoma multiforme resistance to chemotherapy. Oncogene 2017, 36, 1145–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pan, Z.; Bao, J.; Zhang, L.; Wei, S. UBE2D3 Activates SHP-2 Ubiquitination to Promote Glycolysis and Proliferation of Glioma via Regulating STAT3 Signaling Pathway. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 674286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, Y.; Gao, G.; Wei, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, J. UBE2T Promotes Temozolomide Resistance of Glioblastoma Through Regulating the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2023, 17, 1357–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jin, W.; Mao, X.; Qiu, G. Targeting Deubiquitinating Enzymes in Glioblastoma Multiforme: Expectations and Challenges. Med. Res. Rev. 2017, 37, 627–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Suresh, B.; Lee, J.; Kim, H.; Ramakrishna, S. Regulation of pluripotency and differentiation by deubiquitinating enzymes. Cell Death Differ. 2016, 23, 1257–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lee, J.-K.; Chang, N.; Yoon, Y.; Yang, H.; Cho, H.; Kim, E.; Shin, Y.; Kang, W.; Oh, Y.T.; Mun, G.I.; et al. USP1 targeting impedes GBM growth by inhibiting stem cell maintenance and radioresistance. Neuro. Oncol. 2016, 18, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xie, C.; Powell, C.; Yao, M.; Wu, J.; Dong, Q. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C: A potential cancer biomarker. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2014, 47, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hao, Z.; Zhang, H.; Cowell, J. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBE2C: Molecular biology, role in tumorigenesis, and potential as a biomarker. Tumor Biol. 2012, 33, 723–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, R.; Song, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, L.; Kang, C.; Zhang, Q. UBE2C induces EMT through Wnt/β-catenin and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways by regulating phosphorylation levels of Aurora-A. Int. J. Oncol. 2017, 50, 1116–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Presta, I.; Novellino, F.; Donato, A.; La Torre, D.; Palleria, C.; Russo, E.; Malara, N.; Donato, G. UbcH10 a Major Actor in Cancerogenesis and a Potential Tool for Diagnosis and Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Irniger, S. Cyclin destruction in mitosis: A crucial task of Cdc20. FEBS Lett. 2002, 532, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rape, M.; Kirschner, M.W. Autonomous regulation of the anaphase-promoting complex couples mitosis to S-phase entry. Nature 2004, 432, 588–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rape, M.; Reddy, S.K.; Kirschner, M.W. The Processivity of Multiubiquitination by the APC Determines the Order of Substrate Degradation. Cell 2006, 124, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. van Ree, J.H.; Jeganathan, K.B.; Malureanu, L.; van Deursen, J.M. Overexpression of the E2 ubiquitin–conjugating enzyme UbcH10 causes chromosome missegregation and tumor formation. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 188, 83–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Dastsooz, H.; Cereda, M.; Donna, D.; Oliviero, S. A comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of UBE2C in cancers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Huang, G.-Z.; Chen, Z.-Q.; Wu, J.; Shao, T.-R.; Zou, C.; Ai, Y.-L.; Lv, X.-Z. Pan-Cancer Analyses of the Tumor Microenvironment Reveal That Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzyme E2C Might Be a Potential Immunotherapy Target. J. Immunol. Res. 2021, 2021, 9250207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lin, S.; Qiu, L.; Liang, K.; Zhang, H.; Xian, M.; Chen, Z.; Wei, J.; Fu, S.; Gong, X.; Ding, K.; et al. KAT2A/E2F1 Promotes Cell Proliferation and Migration via Upregulating the Expression of UBE2C in Pan-Cancer. Genes 2022, 13, 1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Qin, T.; Huang, G.; Chi, L.; Sui, S.; Song, C.; Li, N.; Sun, S.; Li, N.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, Z.; et al. Exceptionally high UBE2C expression is a unique phenomenon in basal-like type breast cancer and is regulated by BRCA1. BioMedicine 2017, 95, 649–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kariri, Y.; Toss, M.S.; Alsaleem, M.; Elsharawy, K.A.; Joseph, C.; Mongan, N.P.; Green, A.R.; Rakha, E.A. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 2C (UBE2C) is a poor prognostic biomarker in invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2022, 192, 529–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hu, Y.; Liu, H.; Xiao, X.; Yu, Q.; Deng, R.; Hua, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, X. Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes Inhibit Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cell Stemness and Metastasis via an ALKBH5-Dependent Mechanism. Cancers 2022, 14, 6059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lu, Z.-N.; Song, J.; Sun, T.-H.; Sun, G. UBE2C affects breast cancer proliferation through the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Chin. Med, J. 2021, 134, 2465–2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, C.; Pan, Y.-H.; Shan, M.; Xu, M.; Bao, J.-L.; Zhao, L.-M. Knockdown of UbcH10 enhances the chemosensitivity of dual drug resistant breast cancer cells to epirubicin and docetaxel. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 4698–4712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rawat, A.; Gopal, G.; Selvaluxmy, G.; Rajkumar, T. Inhibition of ubiquitin conjugating enzyme UBE2C reduces proliferation and sensitizes breast cancer cells to radiation, doxorubicin, tamoxifen and letrozole. Cell. Oncol. 2013, 36, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zheng, X.; Ma, H.; Dong, Y.; Fang, M.; Wang, J.; Xiong, X.; Liang, J.; Han, M.; You, A.; Yin, Q.; et al. Immune-related biomarkers predict the prognosis and immune response of breast cancer based on bioinformatic analysis and machine learning. Funct. Integr. Genom. 2023, 23, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wang, Y.; Shi, F.; Tao, R.; Wu, J.; Gu, J.; Yang, R.; Wu, S. The Relationship Between UBE2C and AGGF1 Overexpression and Tumor Angiogenesis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Manag. Res. 2021, 13, 5919–5930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhao, L.; Jiang, L.; Wang, L.; He, J.; Yu, H.; Sun, G.; Chen, J.; Xiu, Q.; Li, B. UbcH10 expression provides a useful tool for the prognosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 138, 1951–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Dai, J.; Zhou, N.; Wu, R.; Du, J.; Miao, S.; Gong, K.; Yang, L.; Chen, W.; Li, X.; Li, C.; et al. LncRNA MALAT1 Regulating Lung Carcinoma Progression via the miR-491-5p/UBE2C Axis. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2021, 27, 610159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wu, Y.; Jin, D.; Wang, X.; Du, J.; Di, W.; An, J.; Shao, C.; Guo, J. UBE2C Induces Cisplatin Resistance via ZEB1/2-Dependent Upregulation of ABCG2 and ERCC1 in NSCLC Cells. J. Oncol. 2019, 2019, 8607859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Pallante, P.; Malapelle, U.; Berlingieri, M.T.; Bellevicine, C.; Sepe, R.; Federico, A.; Rocco, D.; Galgani, M.; Chiariotti, L.; Sanchez-Cespedes, M.; et al. UbcH10 overexpression in human lung carcinomas and its correlation with EGFR and p53 mutational status. Eur. J. Cancer 2013, 49, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, S.; You, X.; Zheng, Y.; Shen, Y.; Xiong, X.; Sun, Y. The UBE2C/CDH1/DEPTOR axis is an oncogene and tumor suppressor cascade in lung cancer cells. J. Clin. Investig. 2023, 133, e162434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhu, M.; Wu, M.; Bian, S.; Song, Q.; Xiao, M.; Huang, H.; You, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, C.; et al. DNA primase subunit 1 deteriorated progression of hepatocellular carcinoma by activating AKT/mTOR signaling and UBE2C-mediated P53 ubiquitination. Cell Biosci. 2021, 11, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Huang, R.; Liu, J.; Li, H.; Zheng, L.; Jin, H.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, W.; Su, J.; Wang, M.; Yang, K. Identification of Hub Genes and Their Correlation with Immune Infiltration Cells in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on GEO and TCGA Databases. Front. Genet. 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xiong, Y.; Lu, J.; Fang, Q.; Lu, Y.; Xie, C.; Wu, H.; Yin, Z. UBE2C functions as a potential oncogene by enhancing cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and drug resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Biosci. Rep. 2019, 39, BSR20182384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liu, Y.; Zhao, R.; Chi, S.; Zhang, W.; Xiao, C.; Zhou, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, H. UBE2C Is upregulated by estrogen and promotes epithelial–mesenchymal transition via p53 in endometrial cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 2020, 18, 204–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Xiang, C.; Yan, H.-C. Ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 C (UBE2C) may play a dual role involved in the progression of thyroid carcinoma. Cell Death Discov. 2022, 8, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Huang, R.; Guo, L.; Chen, C.; Xiang, Y.; Li, G.; Zheng, J.; Wu, Y.; Yuan, X.; Zhou, J.; Gao, W.; et al. System analysis identifies UBE2C as a novel oncogene target for adrenocortical carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0289418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Liu, Y.; Shi, Z.; Zheng, J.; Zheng, Z.; Sun, H.; Xuan, Z.; Bai, Y.; Fu, M.; Du, Y.; Shao, C. Establishment and validation of a novel anoikis-related prognostic signature of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1171883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Guo, L.; Ding, Z.; Huang, N.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, N.; Xia, Z. Forkhead Box M1 positively regulates UBE2C and protects glioma cells from autophagic death. Cell Cycle 2017, 16, 1705–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Alafate, W.; Zuo, J.; Deng, Z.; Guo, X.; Wu, W.; Zhang, W.; Xie, W.; Wang, M.; Wang, J. Combined elevation of AURKB and UBE2C predicts severe outcomes and therapy resistance in glioma. Pathol.–Res. Pr. 2019, 215, 152557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Jiang, L.; Bao, Y.; Luo, C.; Hu, G.; Huang, C.; Ding, X.; Sun, K.; Lu, Y. Knockdown of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C/UbcH10 expression by RNA interference inhibits glioma cell proliferation and enhances cell apoptosis in vitro. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 136, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Paisana, E.; Cascão, R.; Custódia, C.; Qin, N.; Picard, D.; Pauck, D.; Carvalho, T.; Ruivo, P.; Barreto, C.; Doutel, D.; et al. Cancer, UBE2C promotes leptomeningeal dissemination and is a therapeutic target in brain metastatic disease. Neuro. Oncol. Adv. 2023, 5, vdad048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Łukasiewicz, S.; Czeczelewski, M.; Forma, A.; Baj, J.; Sitarz, R.; Stanisławek, A. Breast Cancer—Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification, Prognostic Markers, and Current Treatment Strategies—An Updated Review. Cancers 2021, 13, 4287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Guo, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, X.; Hu, X. UBE2S and UBE2C confer a poor prognosis to breast cancer via downregulation of Numb. Front. Oncol. 2023, 13, 992233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Parris, T.Z.; Kovács, A.; Aziz, L.; Hajizadeh, S.; Nemes, S.; Semaan, M.; Forssell-Aronsson, E.; Karlsson, P.; Helou, K. Additive effect of the AZGP1, PIP, S100A8 and UBE2C molecular biomarkers improves outcome prediction in breast carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 134, 1617–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ersahin, T.; Tuncbag, N.; Cetin-Atalay, R. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR interactive pathway. Mol. Biosyst. 2015, 11, 1946–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Huang, L.; Zhang, G.; Han, L.; Bai, X.; Xi, Z.; Wang, F.; Han, G. Circ_0059457 Promotes Proliferation, Metastasis, Sphere Formation and Glycolysis in Breast Cancer Cells by Sponging miR-140-3p to Regulate UBE2C. Biochem. Genet. 2023, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Sperduto, P.W.; Yang, T.J.; Beal, K.; Pan, H.; Brown, P.D.; Bangdiwala, A.; Shanley, R.; Yeh, N.; Gaspar, L.E.; Braunstein, S.; et al. Estimating Survival in Patients With Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases. JAMA Oncol. 2017, 3, 827–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Guo, W.; Sun, S.; Guo, L.; Song, P.; Xue, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Z.; Qiu, B.; Tan, F.; et al. Elevated TOP2A and UBE2C expressions correlate with poor prognosis in patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma: A study based on immunohistochemical analysis and bioinformatics. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2020, 146, 821–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Perrotta, I.; Bruno, L.; Maltese, L.; Russo, E.; Donato, A.; Donato, G. Immunohistochemical Analysis of the Ubiquitin-conjugating Enzyme UbcH10 in Lung Cancer. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2012, 60, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Guo, J.; Wu, Y.; Du, J.; Yang, L.; Chen, W.; Gong, K.; Dai, J.; Miao, S.; Jin, D.; Xi, S. Deregulation of UBE2C-mediated autophagy repression aggravates NSCLC progression. Oncogenesis 2018, 7, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wang, Y.; Huang, F.; Liu, M.; Zhao, Q. UBE2C mRNA expression controlled by miR-300 and HuR determines its oncogenic role in gastric cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021, 534, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, X.; Yin, L.; Yang, L.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, S.; Yang, J.; Cui, H.; Wang, H. Silencing ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 2C inhibits proliferation and epithelial–mesenchymal transition in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. FEBS J. 2019, 286, 4889–4909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhou, H.; Zeng, C.; Liu, J.; Luo, H.; Huang, W. F-Box Protein 43, Stabilized by N6-Methyladenosine Methylation, Enhances Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Growth and Invasion via Promoting p53 Degradation in a Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme E2 C-Dependent Manner. Cancers 2023, 15, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Nousiainen, R.; Eloranta, K.; Isoaho, N.; Cairo, S.; Wilson, D.B.; Heikinheimo, M.; Pihlajoki, M. UBE2C expression is elevated in hepatoblastoma and correlates with inferior patient survival. Front. Genet. 2023, 14, 1170940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Wang, S.-T.; Li, D.-Z.; Li, J.-M.; Fang, J.; Li, H.-Z.; Tong, P.-J.; Liu, F.-C. Lentivirus-mediated RNA interference targeting UbcH10 reduces cell growth and invasion of human osteosarcoma cells via inhibition of Ki-67 and matrix metalloproteinases. Oncol. Lett. 2015, 9, 2171–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wu, X.; Long, X.; Ma, C.; Cheuk, Y.C.; Hu, M.; Hu, J.; Jiang, H. Overexpression of Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzyme E2C Is Associated with Worsened Prognosis in Prostate Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Liu, P.-F.; Chen, C.-F.; Shu, C.-W.; Chang, H.-M.; Lee, C.-H.; Liou, H.-H.; Ger, L.-P.; Chen, C.-L.; Kang, B.-H. UBE2C is a Potential Biomarker for Tumorigenesis and Prognosis in Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Yu, G.; Liu, L.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Bian, Y.; Ji, Y.; Zhou, X.; Chen, Y.; et al. UBE2C Is a potential biomarker of Intestinal-Type gastric cancer with chromosomal instability. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Taylor, W.R.; Stark, G.R. Regulation of the G2/M transition by p53. Oncogene 2001, 20, 1803–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhang, Z.; Liu, P.; Wang, J.; Gong, T.; Zhang, F.; Ma, J.; Han, N. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C regulates apoptosis-dependent tumor progression of non-small cell lung cancer via ERK pathway. Med. Oncol. 2015, 32, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yang, M.; Qu, Y.; Shi, R.; Wu, X.; Su, C.; Hu, Z.; Chang, Q.; Liu, S.; Pan, G.; Lei, M.; et al. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UbcH10 promotes gastric cancer growth and is a potential biomarker for gastric cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2016, 36, 779–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chiang, A.-J.; Li, C.-J.; Tsui, K.-H.; Chang, C.; Chang, Y.-C.I.; Chen, L.-W.; Chang, T.-H.; Sheu, J.J.-C. UBE2C Drives Human Cervical Cancer Progression and Is Positively Modulated by mTOR. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yang, Y.; Chang, Y.; Tsai, K.; Hung, M.; Kang, B. UBE2C triggers HIF -1α-glycolytic flux in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2022, 26, 3716–3725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Jiang, X.; Yuan, Y.; Tang, L.; Wang, J.; Liu, Q.; Zou, X.; Duan, L. Comprehensive Pan-Cancer Analysis of the Prognostic and Immunological Roles of the METTL3/lncRNA-SNHG1/miRNA-140-3p/UBE2C Axis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 765772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Jiang, L.; Huang, C.-G.; Lu, Y.-C.; Luo, C.; Hu, G.-H.; Liu, H.-M.; Chen, J.-X.; Han, H.-X. Expression of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C/UbcH10 in astrocytic tumors. Brain Res. 2008, 1201, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Ma, R.; Kang, X.; Zhang, G.; Fang, F.; DU, Y.; Lv, H. High expression of UBE2C is associated with the aggressive progression and poor outcome of malignant glioma. Oncol. Lett. 2016, 11, 2300–2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Nath, S.; Banerjee, T.; Sen, D.; Das, T.; Roychoudhury, S. Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Protein Cdc20 Transcriptionally Activates Expression of Ubiquitin Carrier Protein UbcH10. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 15666–15677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Kim, H.; Park, K.; Ryu, B.; Park, D.; Kong, D.; Chong, K.; Chae, Y.; Chung, Y.; Park, S.I.; Kang, S. Forkhead box M1 (FOXM1) transcription factor is a key oncogenic driver of aggressive human meningioma progression. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2020, 46, 125–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Vriend, J.; Klonisch, T. Genes of the Ubiquitin Proteasome System Qualify as Differential Markers in Malignant Glioma of Astrocytic and Oligodendroglial Origin. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2022, 43, 1425–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Talasila, K.M.; Røsland, G.V.; Hagland, H.R.; Eskilsson, E.; Flønes, I.H.; Fritah, S.; Azuaje, F.; Atai, N.; Harter, P.N.; Mittelbronn, M.; et al. The angiogenic switch leads to a metabolic shift in human glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncol. 2016, 19, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Jiang, L.; Wang, T.; Bao, Y.; Qian, J.; Wu, X.; Hu, G.; Lu, Y. A study of UbcH10 expression and its association with recurrence of meningiomas. J. Surg. Oncol. 2011, 106, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Cai, Z.; Zou, Y.; Hu, H.; Lu, C.; Sun, W.; Jiang, L.; Hu, G. RIZ1 negatively regulates ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C/UbcH10 via targeting c-Myc in meningioma. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2017, 9, 2645–2655. [Google Scholar]
  111. Liu, Z.Y.; Wang, J.Y.; Liu, H.H.; Ma, X.M.; Wang, C.L.; Zhang, X.P.; Tao, Y.Q.; Lu, Y.C.; Liao, J.C.; Hu, G.H. Retinoblastoma protein-interacting zinc-finger gene 1 (RIZ1) dysregulation in human malignant meningiomas. Oncogene 2013, 32, 1216–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Gonzalez, H.; Mei, W.; Robles, I.; Hagerling, C.; Allen, B.M.; Okholm, T.L.H.; Nanjaraj, A.; Verbeek, T.; Kalavacherla, S.; van Gogh, M.; et al. Cellular architecture of human brain metastases. Cell 2022, 185, 729–745.e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Cléroux, P.; Voisin, L.; Meloche, S. Development of a high-throughput assay to identify inhibitors of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBCH10. SLAS Discov. Adv. Sci. Drug Discov. 2022, 27, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Du, X.; Song, H.; Shen, N.; Hua, R.; Yang, G. The Molecular Basis of Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes (E2s) as a Potential Target for Cancer Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Elango, R.; Vishnubalaji, R.; Shaath, H.; Alajez, N.M. Molecular subtyping and functional validation of TTK, TPX2, UBE2C, and LRP8 in sensitivity of TNBC to paclitaxel. Mol. Ther.—Methods Clin. Dev. 2021, 20, 601–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Lin, C.-Y.; Yu, C.-J.; Liu, C.-Y.; Chao, T.-C.; Huang, C.-C.; Tseng, L.-M.; Lai, J.-I. CDK4/6 inhibitors downregulate the ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes UBE2C/S/T involved in the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway in ER + breast cancer. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2022, 24, 2120–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Li, J.; Zhi, X.; Shen, X.; Chen, C.; Yuan, L.; Dong, X.; Zhu, C.; Yao, L.; Chen, M. Depletion of UBE2C reduces ovarian cancer malignancy and reverses cisplatin resistance via downregulating CDK1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 523, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Liu, G.; Zhao, J.; Pan, B.; Ma, G.; Liu, L. UBE2C overexpression in melanoma and its essential role in G2/M transition. J. Cancer 2019, 10, 2176–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Bavi, P.; Uddin, S.; Ahmed, M.; Jehan, Z.; Bu, R.; Abubaker, J.; Sultana, M.; Al-Sanea, N.; Abduljabbar, A.; Ashari, L.H.; et al. Bortezomib Stabilizes Mitotic Cyclins and Prevents Cell Cycle Progression via Inhibition of UBE2C in Colorectal Carcinoma. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 178, 2109–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Lu, J.; Gu, X.; Liu, F.; Rui, Z.; Liu, M.; Zhao, L. Antitumor effects of hsa-miR661-3p on non-small cell lung cancer in vivo and in vitro. Oncol. Rep. 2019, 41, 2987–2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Hu, J.; Wu, X.; Yang, C.; Rashid, K.; Ma, C.; Hu, M.; Ding, Q.; Jiang, H. Anticancer effect of icaritin on prostate cancer via regulating miR-381-3p and its target gene UBE2C. Cancer Med. 2019, 8, 7833–7845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Wang, H.; Zhang, C.; Rorick, A.; Wu, D.; Chiu, M.; Thomas-Ahner, J.; Chen, Z.; Chen, H.; Clinton, S.K.; Chan, K.K.; et al. CCI-779 Inhibits Cell-Cycle G2–M Progression and Invasion of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer via Attenuation of UBE2C Transcription and mRNA Stability. Cancer Res 2011, 71, 4866–4876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Yu, B.; Liu, Y.; Luo, H.; Fu, J.; Li, Y.; Shao, C. Androgen receptor splicing variant 7 (ARV7) inhibits docetaxel sensitivity by inactivating the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 296, 100276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Pan, B.; Yin, S.; Peng, F.; Liu, C.; Liang, H.; Su, J.; Hsiao, W.W.; Cai, Y.; Luo, D.; Xia, C. Vorinostat targets UBE2C to reverse epithelial-mesenchymal transition and control cervical cancer growth through the ubiquitination pathway. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2021, 908, 174399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Sabitha, K.; Rajkumar, T. Identification of small molecule inhibitors against UBE2C by using docking studies. Bioinformation 2012, 8, 1047–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Bolteus, A.J.; Berens, M.E.; Pilkington, G.J. Migration and invasion in brain neoplasms. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2001, 1, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 15792 g001
Figure 1. UBE2C induces metaphase to anaphase transition during the cell cycle. UBE2C-induced degradation of cyclin B inactivates Cdk1, allowing the exchange of Cdc20 by Cdh1 in the APC/C-UBE2C complex, which becomes activated. The activated complex degrades securin, allowing separase to be activated and degrade the cohesin rings of sister chromatids. This leads to anaphase onset and mitotic exit.
Figure 1. UBE2C induces metaphase to anaphase transition during the cell cycle. UBE2C-induced degradation of cyclin B inactivates Cdk1, allowing the exchange of Cdc20 by Cdh1 in the APC/C-UBE2C complex, which becomes activated. The activated complex degrades securin, allowing separase to be activated and degrade the cohesin rings of sister chromatids. This leads to anaphase onset and mitotic exit.
Ijms 24 15792 g001
Ijms 24 15792 g002
Figure 2. Impact of UBE2C dysregulation in cancer cells. High UBE2C levels are associated with chromosome instability/aneuploidy, increased proliferation, invasion, and migration, EMT, reduced apoptosis, autophagy inhibition, stem-like properties, dissemination, and therapy resistance, leading to poor patient survival in several malignancies.
Figure 2. Impact of UBE2C dysregulation in cancer cells. High UBE2C levels are associated with chromosome instability/aneuploidy, increased proliferation, invasion, and migration, EMT, reduced apoptosis, autophagy inhibition, stem-like properties, dissemination, and therapy resistance, leading to poor patient survival in several malignancies.
Ijms 24 15792 g002
Table 1. Summary of UBE2C’s role and impact in different types of malignancies.
Table 1. Summary of UBE2C’s role and impact in different types of malignancies.
Malignancy TypeSynthesized OutcomesReferences
Breast cancerUBE2C overexpression is closely associated with high histological grade, lymphovascular invasion, larger tumors, HER2 positivity, early metastasis, increased mortality rates, and worse prognosis.
Higher UBE2C levels are positively correlated with N-cadherin, matrix metalloproteinases, and cell cycle-related biomarkers (such as p53, Ki67, PI3K, and EGFR) while being negatively related to E-cadherin.
ALKBH5 promotes breast cancer cell growth, stemness, and metastasis through the UBE2C/p53 axis.
UBE2C knockdown increases PTEN levels and decreases p-AKT, p-mTOR, and HIF-1α levels, declining proliferation and invasion ability through the impairment of the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway.
UBE2C knockdown sensitizes breast cancer cells to radiation and chemotherapy.
UBE2C is correlated with CTLA4 expression.		[55,56,57,58,59,60,61]
Lung cancerHigh UBE2C expression is associated with high histological grade, sex, TNM stage, age, angiogenesis, post-operative survival time, and poor prognosis in NSLCL.
UBE2C knockdown inhibited NSLCL cell proliferation and increased chemotherapeutical sensitivity.
UBE2C overexpression may play an important role in lung cancer EMT, invasion, migration, and metastasis.
UBE2C expression is correlated with the p53 and EGFR mutational status.
The UBE2C/CDH1/DEPTOR axis regulates cell cycle progression and autophagy in NSCLC.		[62,63,64,65,66,67]
Hepatocellular carcinomaUBE2C overexpression is associated with high histological grade, p53 mutation, and poor survival.
UBE2C expression is increased in sorafenib-resistant HepG2 cells.
UBE2C silencing represses proliferation and colony formation of MHCC97H cells and overexpression enhances aggressiveness.
UBE2C levels are positively associated with regulatory T cells and TFH infiltration and negatively correlated with infiltration of monocytes.
UBE2C depletion sensitizes cells to chemotherapeutical drugs.		[68,69,70]
Endometrial carcinomaUBE2C is upregulated in endometrial cancer cell lines and patients and is associated with high histological grade, worse subtypes, frequent recurrence, shorter overall survival, and poor outcome.
UBE2C knockdown upregulates E-cadherin and downregulates vimentin, leading to a reduction in proliferation, invasion, and migration in RL95-2 and Ishikawa cells.
UBE2C promotes EMT by negative p53 modulation.		[71]
Thyroid carcinomaUBE2C is strongly associated with immune response.
UBE2C knockdown decreases cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, promotes apoptosis, and reduces chemotherapeutic resistance.		[72]
Adrenocortical/ clear cell renal carcinomaUBE2C expression is correlated with advanced tumor stage, high histological grade, and poor prognosis in renal carcinoma.
UBE2C overexpression induces m6A methylation and promotes self-renewal of stem cells in adrenocortical carcinoma.
UBE2C knockdown reduces proliferation, invasion, and migration, diminishes DNA damage repair, and induces apoptosis through cell cycle and EMT inhibition in adrenocortical carcinoma.
UBE2C is strongly correlated with stromal score, immune score, and infiltration of M0 macrophages, regulatory T cells, and CD4+ memory T cells in clear cell renal carcinoma.		[73,74]
Brain tumorsUBE2C overexpression is associated with high histological grade, decreased overall survival, and poor prognosis in glioma.
UBE2C expression is related to FoxM1 and AURKB levels.
FoxM1 binds to the UBE2C promoter, inducing its transcription.
UBE2C silencing induces autophagy, inhibits cell viability, promotes cell apoptosis, and promotes the activation of p53 in glioma cells.
UBE2C knockdown inhibits the Akt-mTOR signaling pathway in glioma cells.
Enriched UBE2C expression is associated with resistance to temozolomide and radiotherapy in glioma.
UBE2C is highly expressed in brain metastasis from different origins and is associated with declined survival and leptomeningeal dissemination.
Dactolisib (PI3K/mTOR inhibitor) treats UBE2C-driven breast and lung cancer brain metastasis, and early treatment prevents leptomeningeal dissemination in vivo.		[75,76,77,78]
Abbreviations. UBE2C: ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, p53: tumor suppressor p53, Ki67: marker of proliferation Ki-67, PI3K: phosphoinositide 3-kinase, EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor, HIF-1α: hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha, NSCLC: non-small cell lung carcinomas, TNM: TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, AKT: AKT serine/threonine kinase, CTLA4: cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, EMT: epithelial–mesenchymal transition, TFH: T follicular helper cells, FoxM1: Forkhead box M1, AURKB: aurora kinase B, mTOR: mammalian target of rapamycin.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Domentean, S.; Paisana, E.; Cascão, R.; Faria, C.C. Role of UBE2C in Brain Cancer Invasion and Dissemination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15792. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242115792

AMA Style

Domentean S, Paisana E, Cascão R, Faria CC. Role of UBE2C in Brain Cancer Invasion and Dissemination. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(21):15792. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242115792

Chicago/Turabian Style

Domentean, Stefani, Eunice Paisana, Rita Cascão, and Claudia C. Faria. 2023. "Role of UBE2C in Brain Cancer Invasion and Dissemination" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 21: 15792. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242115792

APA Style

Domentean, S., Paisana, E., Cascão, R., & Faria, C. C. (2023). Role of UBE2C in Brain Cancer Invasion and Dissemination. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(21), 15792. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242115792

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop