Next Article in Journal
Discrimination between Complete versus Non-Complete Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy Using Ultrasensitive Mutation Analysis: A Proof-of-Concept Study in BRCA1-Driven Breast Cancer Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
Serum Biomarkers in Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Previous Article in Journal
Design, Characterization, and Biological Activities of Erythromycin-Loaded Nanodroplets to Counteract Infected Chronic Wounds Due to Streptococcus pyogenes
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Important Role of Endogenous Nerve Growth Factor Receptor in the Pathogenesis of Hypoxia-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension in Mice

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(3), 1868; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24031868
by Chiaki Goten 1, Soichiro Usui 1,*, Shin-ichiro Takashima 1, Oto Inoue 1, Kosei Yamaguchi 1, Daiki Hashimuko 1, Yusuke Takeda 1, Ayano Nomura 1, Kenji Sakata 1, Shuichi Kaneko 2 and Masayuki Takamura 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(3), 1868; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24031868
Submission received: 25 November 2022 / Revised: 30 December 2022 / Accepted: 11 January 2023 / Published: 18 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on Pulmonary Hypertension 4.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The Authors of the article entitled “Important Role of Endogenous Nerve Growth Factor Receptor in the Pathogenesis of Hypoxia-induced PH in Mice” have described an important role of Ngfr in hypoxia-induced PH. They have shown that the Ngfr gene deficiency enhances hypoxia-induced pulmonary vascular remodeling; and the gene expression of Ngfr and Ngfr positive cells were increased in hypoxic conditions in WT.  Furthermore, hypoxia-induced PH was ameliorated in Ngfr-/- mice transplanted with WT BM cells. These are interesting results. However, Ngfr has been shown to have dual role (proliferative and apoptotic) in cancer. Freund-Michel et al (Am J Respir Crit Care Med.  2015;192(3):342-55.) have shown increased expression of Ngfr in experimental models of PH as well as in human PH. Interestingly, anti-NGF blocking antibodies prevented and reversed PH in rats, accompanied by significantly reducing vascular inflammation and remodeling.  It would be worthwhile discussing theses differences.

Author Response

Reply)

 The reviewer raised an important issue. We have added the following in the revised manuscript.

 

Discussion

 Freund-Michel et al. reported that the administration of a neutralizing antibody to NGF, one low-affinity ligands of NGFR, suppressed hypoxia-induced PH in rats [14]. The authors showed that blockade of the NGF/NGFR axis suppressed the production of inflammatory cytokines in vascular smooth muscle cells, and proposed that NGF may mediate PH, These results are in contrast with our findings that the genetic deletion of NGFR promotes PH. This difference may be due to the fact that Freund-Michel et al. administered a neutralizing antibody for NGF to the hypoxia models, whereas we used a genetic deletion model of NGFR. Signaling through NGFR has different biological effects depending on where it can heterodimerize with other type of receptors (tropomyosine receptor kinase (Trk) A, B, and C; neurotensin receptor1, and 2; and sortilin) [15]. The co-expression of NGFR and Trks promotes cell survival, while the co-expression of NGFR and sortilin promotes cell death. The effects of the genetic deletion of NGFR on the activation of other types of receptors require further investigation.

(page 8, line 267 – page 9, line 284)

References

  1. Freund-Michel, V.; Cardoso Dos Santos, M.; Guignabert, C.; Montani, D.; Phan, C.; Coste, F.; Tu, L.; Dubois, M.; Girerd, B.; Courtois, A.; et al. Role of Nerve Growth Factor in Development and Persistence of Experimental Pulmonary Hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015, 192, 342-355, doi:10.1164/rccm.201410-1851OC.
  2. Bibel, M.; Barde, Y.A. Neurotrophins: key regulators of cell fate and cell shape in the vertebrate nervous system. Genes Dev 2000, 14, 2919-2937, doi:10.1101/gad.841400.

(page 14, line 521 – page 14, line 526)

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We thank the Reviewers for their careful review and constructive criticisms. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop