Next Article in Journal
GPR37 and Related Receptors: Disease Regulation
Next Article in Special Issue
Gut Microbiome and Small RNA Integrative-Omic Perspective of Meconium and Milk-FED Infant Stool Samples
Previous Article in Journal
Prolonged Piezo1 Activation Induces Cardiac Arrhythmia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Dose–Effect Relationship of Bifidobacterium longum in Relieving Loperamide Hydrochloride-Induced Constipation in Rats through Colon-Released Capsules
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 7
10.3390/ijms24076721
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Anti-Inflammatory, Barrier Maintenance, and Gut Microbiome Modulation Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 on DSS-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Mice

by
Qianjue Hu
1,2,
Leilei Yu
1,2,
Qixiao Zhai
1,2,3,
Jianxin Zhao
1,2,3 and
Fengwei Tian
1,2,3,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
2
School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
3
National Engineering Research Center for Functional Food, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(7), 6721; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076721
Submission received: 5 March 2023 / Revised: 24 March 2023 / Accepted: 29 March 2023 / Published: 4 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Probiotic: Interaction with the Gut Microbiota and the Molecular Mechanisms of the Beneficial Effects)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The use of probiotics has been considered as a new therapy option for ulcerative colitis (UC), and yeast has recently received widespread recommendation for human health. In this study, the probiotic characteristics of four yeast strains, Saccharomyces boulardii CNCMI-745, Kluyveromyces marxianus QHBYC4L2, Saccharomyces cerevisiae QHNLD8L1, and Debaryomyces hansenii QSCLS6L3, were evaluated in vitro; their ability to ameliorate dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis was investigated. Among these, S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 protected against colitis, which was reflected by increased body weight, colon length, histological injury relief, decreased gut inflammation markers, and intestinal barrier restoration. The abundance of the pathogenic bacteria Escherichia–Shigella and Enterococcaceae in mice with colitis decreased after S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 treatment. Moreover, S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 enriched beneficial bacteria Lactobacillus, Faecalibaculum, and Butyricimonas, enhanced carbon metabolism and fatty acid biosynthesis function, and increased short chain fatty acid (SCFAs) production. Taken together, our results indicate the great potential of S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 supplementation for the prevention and alleviation of UC.

1. Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), affects 6–8 million individuals worldwide [1]. UC is a recurrent and remitting mucosa inflammation that begins distally and can spread proximally to involve the whole colon [2]. The clinical symptoms of UC include bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, and fecal incontinence. Disordered microbiota may lead to the onset of UC by breaking the intestinal epithelial barrier and infiltrating inflammatory cytokines [3]. Once the intestinal barrier is compromised, increased intestinal permeability accelerates UC progression, and tight junction proteins (TJPs) are crucial for maintaining intestinal epithelial permeability. Inflammatory responses and damage mainly result from the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines by macrophages [4]. The use of 5-aminosalicylic acid, corticosteroids, and biologics are traditional therapeutic options for UC [5]; however, there is a pressing need to develop new and more efficient alternatives owing to the low effectiveness and significant adverse effects of current medications.
Probiotics contain live nonpathogenic microorganisms that meet the nutritional needs of the host and inhibit harmful microbial colonization when they are ingested in sufficient amounts [6]. Probiotics are used to treat diseases by modifying the microbial community, enhancing intestinal barrier integrity, and maintaining a balanced immune response [7]. Recent studies have shown that probiotics as biological agents can relieve UC [8,9]. However, research on UC treatment has primarily focused on bacteria. Unlike bacteria, certain yeasts are antibiotic resistant and do not share resistance genes with bacteria [10]. Yeasts may benefit the host by binding pathogens to the cell surface and producing accessible anti-inflammatory extracellular components [11], which meets the primary standards and prerequisites for probiotics [12]. Thus, yeast strains show great promise for the probiotic industry.
For decades, Saccharomyces boulardii has been the focus of most clinical and animal studies on yeast probiotics. As a model strain, S. boulardii CNCMI-745 has been utilized to prevent intestinal damage and inflammation in recent years [13]. Yeasts may possess potential probiotic characteristics; however, studies on their probiotic functions in human health are rare. Although several yeasts have shown promising effects in the treatment of colitis [14,15], it is still unknown whether other yeast strains have a therapeutic potential. Additionally, a few researchers have explored the mechanisms by which yeasts regulate the immune response in UC. Therefore, investigating the anti-inflammatory properties of yeasts is critical for the development of potential probiotics. This study aimed to further understand probiotic yeasts by examining the impact and action mechanism of several yeast strains on mice with dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis.

2. Results

2.1. In Vitro Probiotic Characteristics

We evaluated yeast viability under simulated stomach and small intestine conditions. Table 1 shows the survival rates of the different yeasts ranging from 76.92 to 82.93%. After treatment with simulated gastric fluid, S. boulardii CNCMI-745 exhibited the highest survival rate (89.08%), followed by Saccharomyces cerevisiae QHNLD8L1, Kluyveromyces marxianus QHBYC4L2, and Debaryomyces hansenii QSCLS6L3 (p < 0.05). The survival rates of these yeasts were moderately lower in the intestinal fluid after 4 h; S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 reached the highest rate at 82.93% (p < 0.05), suggesting that it was tolerant to the intestinal environment. The adhesion rates of the four yeast strains on HT-29 cells exceeded 10%, among which D. hansenii QSCLS6L3 had a relatively weaker adhesion ability than the other yeasts did (p < 0.05). Thus, these four yeast strains showed potential probiotic properties, including high gastrointestinal tolerance and adhesion capacity.

2.2. Effects of Yeast Strains on Tight Junction Protein Expression in Caco-2 Cells

To assay the modulation of DSS-induced responses by different yeasts, we added yeast strains (107 CFU/mL) to the Caco-2 cells model co-cultured with 2.5% DSS for 12 h. In our study, changes in TJPs in DSS-induced Caco-2 cells were detected after yeast intervention (Figure 1). Claudin-1 and Occludin relative expression levels were downregulated by DSS and were reversed by S. boulardii CNCMI-745 and S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 (p < 0.05). Additionally, S. boulardii CNCMI-745 significantly increased ZO-1’s relative expression, K. marxianus QHBYC4L2 significantly increased Occludin and ZO-1’s relative expressions (p < 0.05), and D. hansenii QSCLS6L3 had some upregulatory effects on these genes, but they were not significant (p > 0.05). Thus, we speculate that these yeasts may improve the barrier function in intestinal epithelial cells.

2.3. Effects of Yeast Strains on Symptoms of Mice with Colitis

Different yeasts have varying effects on colitis in mice, as confirmed by the changes in body weight, colon length, and the disease activity index (DAI) score. The weight loss rate on day seven in DSS induced-mice was 17.87 ± 5.60%, and the administration of S. boulardii CNCMI-745 and S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 significantly reduced the colitis symptoms, which are characterized by weight loss rates of 9.35 ± 3.50% and 11.09 ± 5.86%, respectively (p < 0.05) (Figure 2A). The DAI score of the DSS group was 3.73 ± 0.38, while that of S. boulardii CNCMI-745 group was 2.84 ± 0.36, with a decrease of 23.86%. K. marxianus QHBYC4L2 and S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 had DAI scores that were significantly reduced by 28.62% and 39.41%, respectively (p < 0.05) (Figure 2B). Colon shortening marks the emergence of inflammation. The colon length in the DSS group was 4.37 ± 0.32 cm. S. boulardii CNCMI-745, K. marxianus QHBYC4L2, and S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 significantly recovered DSS-induced colon shortening––the colon lengths of mice in the three groups were 1.21, 1.16, and 1.28 times greater than that in the DSS group, respectively (p < 0.05). However, the difference between the D. hansenii QSCLS6L3 group and the DSS group was not significant (p > 0.05) (Figure 2C,D).

2.4. Effects of Yeast Strains on Colonic Histological Injury

Histological damage was determined using Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining. The colonic tissue of DSS-induced mice was extensively ulcerated with mucosal epithelium loss, with an absence of crypts and severely infiltrated inflammatory cells (Figure 3A). The histological score of the DSS group was 10.25 times greater that of the control group, and S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 markedly reduced the histological scores (p < 0.05), showing a relatively intact mucosal epithelium, partially disappeared crypts, and less inflammatory infiltration. The pathological injury and histological scores were also decreased in other yeasts, but the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05) (Figure 3B).
Mucin glycoproteins in the secretory granules of goblet cells and the mucous layer of colonic epithelial cells were stained with Alcian Blue (AB). The mucus layer was severely disrupted by DSS, and the goblet cells and mucins were greatly reduced in the DSS group, with almost no blue coloration (Figure 3C). However, the mucin injury was significantly improved by the yeast treatment, with the exception of D. hansenii QSCLS6L3 treatment. The number of goblet cells in the S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 group was much higher than that in the DSS group (p < 0.05) (Figure 3D), indicating that S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 boosted goblet cell maturation and expanded mucin secretion more effectively than the other yeasts did.

2.5. Effect of Yeast Strains on Inflammatory Cytokines and Enzymes in Colitis Mice

The concentrations of inflammatory cytokines in the colon were measured to evaluate the inflammatory modulation by different yeasts. The levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β were increased, and that of IL-10 was decreased after DSS exposure in mice with colitis. Yeast administration, except for D. hansenii QSCLS6L, decreased the level of TNF-α significantly (p < 0.05) (Figure 4A). The level of IL-6 was reduced to some degree after yeast intervention; however, this reduction was not significant (p > 0.05) (Figure 4B). Additionally, IL-1β concentration in DSS-induced mice with colitis was significantly reduced by S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 (p < 0.05) (Figure 4C), and IL-10 concentrations were significantly increased by S. boulardii CNCMI-745 and S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 (p < 0.05) (Figure 4D). The levels of MPO in mice were upregulated nearly two-fold by DSS, which was reversed by S. boulardii CNCMI-745 and S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 (p < 0.05) (Figure 4E). In addition to D. hansenii QSCLS6L, yeast supplementation significantly downregulated the iNOS concentration (p < 0.05) (Figure 4F). COX-2 concentrations in mice with colitis increased significantly (p < 0.05), and the yeast treatment had no significant negative effect (p > 0.05) (Figure 4G). Overall, S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 showed a better inhibition ability than the other yeast strains did in terms of inflammatory regulation.

2.6. Effect of Yeast Strains on Tight Junction Protein in Colitis Mice

After DSS exposure, the expression levels of Claudin-1, Occludin, and ZO-1 were decreased significantly, and so were their concentrations, except for ZO-1 (p < 0.05). Both the concentration and expression levels of Claudin-1 increased after S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 treatment in mice with colitis (p < 0.05) (Figure 5A,D). Occludin concentration did not differ significantly between the DSS and tested strain groups (p > 0.05). However, the expression levels of Occludin in the K. marxianus QHBYC4L2 and S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 groups increased significantly (p < 0.05) (Figure 5B,E). Additionally, S. boulardii CNCMI-745 and S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 increased the expression levels of ZO-1 in DSS-induced mice, and S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 had a significantly higher ZO-1 concentration than that of the DSS group (p < 0.05) (Figure 5C,F). D. hansenii QSCLS6L3 did not significantly upregulate the concentrations or expression levels of these factors (p > 0.05). In general, S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 intervention improved the concentration and expression levels of TJPs, which may have helped to ameliorate colitis.

2.7. Effect of Yeast Strains on Fecal SCFAs in Colitis Mice

We measured the concentrations of fecal SCFAs (Figure 6A–F). The acetate and propionate concentrations were significantly lower in mice with colitis, but the differences in the other four SCFAs were not significant. The S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 treatment significantly upregulated the propionate and butyrate levels (p < 0.05). Although SCFAs in the feces of mice treated with K. marxianus QHBYC4L2 were increased, propionate was the only SCFAs that was increased significantly (p < 0.05). The valerate concentration was increased in the S. boulardii CNCMI-745 group significantly (p < 0.05), and all six SCFAs were unaffected by the D. hansenii QSCLS6L3 treatment significantly (p > 0.05), indicating that it had no preventive efficacy against colitis.

2.8. Effects of Yeast Strains on Gut Microbiota in Colitis Mice

According to α-diversity analysis, the gut microbiota of colitis mice showed a significantly lower observed index, which is closely related to microbial richness (p < 0.05) (Figure 7A). In addition, the Chao1 and Shannon index values, which reflect microbial diversity, were decreased significantly in the DSS group (p < 0.05). The treatments with yeasts, except for D. hansenii QSCLS6L3, increased the Chao1 index value (p < 0.05) (Figure 7B). S. boulardii CNCMI-745 and S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 also significantly increased the Shannon index value (p < 0.05) (Figure 7C). The β-diversity of gut microbiota was investigated using principal coordinate (PCoA) analysis. The mice in the DSS group had a significantly different gut microbial community from that of the control group, which was shifted to some extent by the yeast treatments, especially K. marxianus QHBYC4L2 and S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 (Figure 7D).
The dominant phyla were Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria. After DSS exposure, the relative abundances of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes decreased, whereas the relative abundance of Proteobacteria increased. However, they were differentially altered after the yeast interventions. S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 had the highest relative abundance of Firmicutes, followed by K. marxianus QHBYC4L2, S. boulardii CNCMI-745, and D. hansenii QSCLS6L3. Additionally, the Proteobacteria relative abundance was mostly decreased by K. marxianus QHBYC4L2, followed by S. boulardii CNCMI-745, S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1, and D. hansenii QSCLS6L3. However, there was no obvious change in the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes among the yeast-treated groups (Figure 7E).
To further reveal the microbes among groups, we evaluated the relative abundances of microorganisms at the genus level (Figure 7F) and screened 25 differential bacteria using the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) (Figure 8A). Notably, compared to the control group, Lactobacillus was significantly reduced after DSS induction and was subsequently increased by S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 (p < 0.05) (Figure 8B). Cecal microbiota in colitis mice was enriched with Escherichia–Shigella and Enterococcus. S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 and K. marxianus QHBYC4L2 significantly reversed these changes, whereas S. boulardii CNCMI-745 downregulated the relative abundance of Enterococcus (p < 0.05) (Figure 8C,D). Moreover, S. boulardii CNCMI-745 and K. marxianus QHBYC4L2 significantly increased the relative abundances of Parasutterella and Mucispirillum in mice with colitis, respectively (p < 0.05) (Figure 8E,F). Butyricimonas and Faecalibaculum were significantly enriched in S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 group (p < 0.05) (Figure 8G,H). Parabacteroides’ relative abundance was significantly increased by D. hansenii QSCLS6L3 (p < 0.05) (Figure 8I).
The interactions between different genera could help us to better recognize their role in DSS-induced colitis, as the gut microbiota interacts to maintain a dynamic balance. Correlation analysis between the 12 different genera showed that Lactobacillus was significantly negatively correlated with Escherichia–Shigella (p < 0.01) and Parabacteroides (p < 0.05). Moreover, Butyricimonas was significantly positive correlated with Faecalibaculum, Mucispirillum, and Sphingomonas (p < 0.01); Parasutterella was a significant negatively correlated with Sphingomonas (p < 0.01) (Figure 8J).

2.9. Correlation Analysis between Gut Microbiota and Colitis Indexes

A correlation analysis between 14 significantly different genera among the groups and 19 experimentally determined DSS biomarkers was conducted to demonstrate the effects of the microbiota on colitis (Figure 8K). Escherichia–Shigella, Enterococcus, and Parabacteroides’ relative abundances were negatively correlated with body weight and colon length and positively correlated with DAI, inflammatory cytokines, and enzyme concentrations (p < 0.01). Lactobacillus’ relative abundance was positively correlated with colon length and propionate and negatively correlated with DAI, inflammatory cytokines, and enzyme concentrations (p < 0.01). Notably, there was a significant positive correlation between the relative abundance of Parasutterella and Faecalibaculum and the levels of butyrate and IL-10 (p < 0.01). Butyricimonas and Mucispirillum’s relative abundances were positively correlated with acetate and butyrate (p < 0.05). In addition, Butyricimonas’ relative abundance was negatively correlated with TNF-α and MPO levels (p < 0.05). These correlation results demonstrated DSS was involved in the development of colitis, and the yeast intervention had protective effects against colitis, except in D. hansenii QSCLS6L3.

2.10. Functional Predictions of Gut Microbiota Modified by Yeast Strains in Colitis Mice

We conducted a PICRUSt analysis with the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway (level 3) to predict functional distinction in the gut microbiota among groups. The principal component analysis (PCoA) results showed that DSS induction significantly changed the function of the gut microbiota compared with that of the control group and was subsequently altered by the yeast intervention to some extent (Figure 9A). The gene expression of 21 pathways was downregulated, whereas that of 19 pathways was upregulated after DSS exposure (p < 0.05) (Figure 9B). Moreover, compared to the DSS group, 35, 22, and 17 pathways were enriched in S. boulardii CNCMI-745, K. marxianus QHBYC4L2, and S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1, respectively (p < 0.05) (Figure 9C). Additionally, the pathways involved in human papillomavirus infection and viral carcinogenesis were upregulated by D. hansenii QSCLS6L3 (p < 0.05) (Figure S1C).
The pathways in the S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1, S. boulardii CNCMI-745, K. marxianus QHBYC4L2, and DSS groups were selected for a further investigation. Compared to the DSS group, the genes related to pathways including fatty acid biosynthesis, porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism, neomycin, kanamycin, gentamicin biosynthesis, and carbon metabolism were significantly upregulated by S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1. Interestingly, the pathway involved in carbon metabolism was further diminished by the DSS treatment compared to that of the control group. In addition, the pathways involved in glycosaminoglycan degradation and other glycan degradation were more enriched in the S. boulardii CNCMI-745 and K. marxianus QHBYC4L2 groups compared to those in the DSS group (Figure S1A,B).

3. Discussion

Accumulating evidence points to the role of gut microbes in diseases [16,17], and the effectiveness of probiotics in preventing and relieving UC recurrence has been examined [18,19,20]. Most studies on probiotic microorganisms have been conducted in bacterial systems, but in recent years, some yeasts have also shown potential [21]. Yeasts have become model organisms for many biological activities, and yeasts with derivatives or by-products have attracted a lot of interest [22]. Recently, yeasts have been increasingly thought to have benefits for disease alleviation; however, yeast strains exhibit interspecific differences in phenotypic characteristics. S. boulardii CNCMI-745 relieves UC through multiple mechanisms, including alterations in the intestinal microbiota, epithelial barrier defects, and immunological effects [23,24]. In addition, it is a non-pathogenic yeast strain that is safe for consumption [25]. Based on these characteristics, S. boulardii CNCMI-745 has often been used as a positive control strain to evaluate the potential probiotic functions of yeast species. In our study, yeast intervention, particularly with S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1, effectively alleviated DSS-induced colitis, whereas D. hansenii QSCLS6L3 did not improve colitis in mice.
Gastrointestinal (GIT) tolerance and HT-29 cell adhesion properties are widely used in vitro to identify potential probiotic strains because they are related to strain survival and intestinal colonization [26]. Including S. boulardii CNCMI-745, all four yeast strains exhibited a high level of tolerance to simulated gastrointestinal juice (over 75%) and high intestinal adhesiveness (10–15%) (Table 1), which is consistent with previous research [27,28,29]. The ability of yeast strains to protect the intestinal barrier was investigated in vitro in a Caco-2 cell model stimulated with DSS. S. boulardii CNCMI-745 and S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 significantly increased the relative expression levels of Claudin-1 and Occludin (Figure 1). Similar to our results, S. cerevisiae I4 significantly upregulated these two genes in HT-29 cell monolayers [30]. Mu et al. showed that yeast metabolites promoted RAW264.7 macrophage proliferation and reduced NO production [10].
The role of different yeast strains in UC prevention remains unclear [31,32]. Hence, we evaluated the protective effects of these four yeast strains as interventional agents in mice with colitis. In agreement with previous results [33,34], mice administered 2.5% DSS showed clinical symptoms, such as weight loss, hematochezia, and colon shortening, which were effectively reversed by the yeast interventions, except for D. hansenii QSCLS6L3, to varying degrees (Figure 2). As demonstrated by H&E staining, epithelial structural damage, inflammatory cell infiltration, and crypt disappearance were reduced by these yeasts (Figure 3). Decreases in mucin and goblet cells are markers of IBD [35]. AB staining showed that mucin secretion and goblet cell numbers were improved, revealing that yeast therapy may delay the progression of colitis by inhibiting mucus disruption and goblet cell depletion (Figure 3). These macroscopic markers directly reflected the amelioration of colitis by the three yeast strains, S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 in particular.
Inflammation is a classic characteristic of IBD. Once the mucosal barrier is compromised, intestinal epithelial cells rapidly release pro-inflammatory cytokines, which cause enormous inflammation and tissue injury [36]. TNF-α can result in mucosal inflammation and activate the NF-κB pathway; meanwhile, NF-κB may stimulate the release of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 [37]. IL-10 is crucial for host infection because it limits the immune response to pathogens and inhibits pro-inflammatory cytokine production [38,39]. In our study, after DSS exposure, pro-inflammatory cytokine concentrations were higher and anti-inflammatory cytokine concentrations were lower. Yeast treatments, except for D. hansenii QSCLS6L3, could restore these changes in colitis (Figure 4). In particular, S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 could significantly decrease TNF-α and increase IL-10 concentrations, which was consistent with S. cerevisiae JKSP39 in previous reports [15]. MPO activity is a classic biomarker used to evaluate inflammation in colitis and reflects the degree of neutrophil infiltration [40]. INOS is produced in response to activation and stimulation by microorganisms, cytokines, and macrophages [41]. The overexpression of COX-2 in inflammatory cells may promote colitis progression [42]. The levels of these inflammatory enzymes were raised after DSS exposure. S. boulardii CNCMI-745 and S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 administration significantly inhibited the increase in MPO and iNOS activities (Figure 4), indicating that they promoted inflammatory remission in mice with DSS-induced colitis.
Inflammation may damage the intestinal barrier, and barrier dysfunction can result in severe bacterial inflammation. An appropriate intestinal barrier can limit antigen invasion and prevent abnormal immune reactions [43]. Thus, maintaining a tight and intact gut barrier is a major goal of IBD therapy. TJPs, such as transmembrane Claudins, Occludin, and intracellular ZO-1, are among the most important junction structures connecting intestinal epithelial cells [44]. In a previous study, some yeasts were reported to reduce gut barrier disruption by increasing the relative expression of Occludin and ZO-1, which relieved DSS-induced colitis [45]. Our results showed that the expression levels and concentrations of Claudin-1 and ZO-1 were increased by S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1, which were similar to those of the control group and even higher than those subjected to the S. boulardii CNCMI-745 treatment (Figure 5), suggesting that S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 may attenuate colitis by improving TJPs.
The gut microbiota protects the intestinal epithelium and mucosa and keeps pathogens out of the gastrointestinal tract. Thus, the pathogenesis of IBD may be largely influenced by gut microbes. The disruption of gut microbial composition may affect the mucosal environment and intestinal barrier, which in turn affects gut microbes themselves [46]. Our study demonstrated that DSS reduces gut flora diversity and alters gut flora composition, resulting in intestinal microecological disruption in mice. After DSS exposure, the microbiota species richness was significantly increased by yeasts other than D. hansenii QSCLS6L3. Moreover, K. marxianus QHBYC4L2 and S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 caused a certain degree of change in the gut microbiota toward that of the control group (Figure 7). Proteobacteria, a microbial indicator of gut flora imbalance [47], was enriched in the DSS group. After yeast intervention, the relative abundance of Proteobacteria decreased, and that of Firmicutes increased to some degree (Figure 7). Therefore, these yeasts reduced the microbiota structure imbalance, which is consistent with the results of a previous study [30].
The microbial community of DSS-induced mice was disrupted, as revealed by the increase in the relative abundances of Escherichia–Shigella and Enterococcus (Figure 8). As typical pathogenic bacteria, Escherchia–Shigella is commonly seen in patients with colitis and colorectal cancer; increased Enterococcus could exacerbate intestinal inflammation as well [48]. We discovered that Escherichia–Shigella and Enterococcus were negatively correlated with Occludin and positively correlated with pro-inflammatory factors. The predicted gut microbiota function results showed that DSS could alter gut microbiota function, specifically by lowering the metabolic rate in colitis mice (Figure 9). S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 restored the altered levels of these two genera and promoted the growth of Lactobacillus (Figure 8), which has been reported to reduce DSS-induced inflammation and damage to the colons of mice [49]. Our correlation results showed that Lactobacillus was negatively corrected with Escherchia–Shigella and pro-inflammatory factors and positively corrected with colon length in mice.
In addition, the S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 treatment significantly enhanced the growth of protective strains such as Butyricimonas (Figure 8), and the result was similar to the improvement of galangin against colitis by promoting Butyricimonas [50]. A previous study indicated that Butyricimonas’ relative abundance was lower in patients with CD than it was in healthy individuals [51]. Our analysis showed that Butyricimonas had a negative correlation with proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and MPO, indicating that it may be effective in the progression of colitis. S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 significantly increased the relative abundance of Faecalibaculum (Figure 8), a novel generation of potentially beneficial microorganisms that can produce SCFAs. According to a recent report, Faecalibaculum reduces inflammation by stimulating the development of Tregs in the colon, and a decrease in Faecalibaculum levels is associated with the emergence of colorectal cancer [52]. Hu et al. [53] demonstrated that VK2 ameliorates DSS-induced colitis and reduces intestinal microflora dysbiosis by increasing Faecalibaculum and promoting SCFA production. The increased number of Faecalibaculum genera motivated a rise in the level of Butyricimonas, corroborating our finding that Faecalibaculum had a positive correlation with Butyricimonas.
As the main fermentation products of non-digestible dietary polysaccharides produced by colonic microorganisms, SCFAs are considered to be regulators of intestinal function and inflammatory responses [54]. In this study, most SCFAs decreased after DSS exposure, and S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 increased propionate and butyrate levels, which agreed with the changes in the gut microbiota (Figure 6). Propionate activates GPR43 to promote Foxp3 expression and induces Treg proliferation, thereby enhancing IL-10 secretion [55]. Butyrate prevents mucosal inflammation by increasing the IL-10 levels, and its nutritional effects on epithelial cells are well understood [56]. Further analysis of the alterations in gut microbiota function revealed that fatty acid biosynthesis and carbon metabolism were enhanced after the S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 treatment (Figure 9). The levels of SCFAs, including acetate, propionate, and butyrate, were higher in mice treated with yeast-derived complex dietary polysaccharides, which promote gut immune regulation [57]. Polysaccharides and polypeptides of S. boulardii have also been reported to alleviate colitis by accelerating the growth of certain probiotics and generating microbial metabolite SCFAs [58]. In summary, S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 suppresses colitis development by limiting pathogen colonization and increasing the number of beneficial microorganisms that help to restore dysfunction.
In addition, the S. boulardii CNCMI-745 treatment significantly increased the relative abundance of Parasutterella (Figure 8), which contributes to bile acid metabolism. Parasutterella has a positive correlation with butyrate and IL-10, indicating that it can relieve colitis by altering the metabolic products of microbes. Mucispirillum, similar to Akkermansia, colonizes the mucus layers associated with gut inflammation and has a special system to manage oxidative stress in colitis [35,59]. K. marxianus QHBYC4L2 significantly upregulates Mucispirillum abundance (Figure 8), which is consistent with diosgenin-attenuated colitis caused by increasing Mucispirillum levels [60]. However, it has also been found that fructooligosaccharide alleviates gut inflammation and decreases Mucispirillum [39]. In addition, in terms of the functional prediction of intestinal flora, the pathways related to glycosaminoglycan degradation and other glycan degradations were enriched by K. marxianus QHBYC4L2 (Figure 9). Glycosaminoglycans are degraded by gut-colonizing microbes and the levels of it are reduced in individuals with IBD [61]. Hence, the role of Mucispirillum in colitis requires further investigation. D. hansenii QSCLS6L3 significantly upregulated Parabacteroides’ relative abundance, which was more abundant in IBD patients and in a mouse model [62] and worsened the colitis [63], confirming our findings. The differences in the dominant intestinal flora alterations and functional pathway modulation may explain the alleviative effects of selected yeast strains, especially S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1, on colitis.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Yeast Strains Isolation, Purification and Identification

K. marxianus QHBYC4L2, S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1, and D. hansenii QSCLS6L3 were isolated from fermented Chinese foods using a standard methodology described by Tikka et al. [64]. Serial dilutions were prepared and inoculated on yeast extract peptone dextrose (YPD) agar plates at 28 °C for 48 h. After incubation, colonies were selected based on morphology and sub-cultured on YPD agar plates for further purification. The commercial probiotic yeast S. boulardii CNCMI-745 isolated from BIOFLOR (BIOCODEX, Gentilly, France) under the same conditions was used as a positive control. Yeast strains were identified by amplification of the D1/D2 domain of 26S rDNA region using primers NL-1 (5′-GCATATCAATAAGCGGAGGAAAAG-3′) and NL-4 (5′-GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG-3′). Subsequently, amplicons were sent to GENEWIZ (Suzhou, China) for sequencing, and species were identified using National Library for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). All strains were prepared in YPD liquid medium at 108 CFU/mL. After three generations of activation, the medium was centrifuged (4 °C, 5000× g, 10 min) to obtain the sediment and frozen in 30% glycerol solution at −80 °C for following experiments.

4.2. Gastrointestinal Transit Tolerance Assay

To determine the GIT survival rate, each yeast strain was treated with simulated gastric fluid (3 g/L pepsin (1:10,000), pH 3.0, 3 h) and intestinal juice (1 g/L trypsin (1:250) and 3 g/L bile salt, pH 8.0, 4 h)) as previously described [9]. After centrifugation at 5000× g for 10 min (4 °C), the initial concentration of the yeasts reached 108 CFU/mL at 0 h. Strain viable numbers were tested by plate counting at 3 and 7 h.

4.3. Adhesion Ability Assay

The yeast adhesion capacity was evaluated using a modified method similar to that used by Meng et al. [30]. Human colon cell line HT-29 was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). HT-29 cells were inoculated with 105 cells/well in 12 well plates for 48 h. Yeast strains were suspended in a blank DMEM medium and prepared at 1 × 107 CFU/mL. After co-culturing with yeast for 4 h, HT-29 cells were washed to remove any unbound yeast. Finally, adherent yeasts were detected by plate counting to determine the CFU number after dilution.

4.4. DSS-Induced Injury in Caco-2 Cells

The relative expression of tight junction proteins was determined as described by Yu et al. [26]. Human colon cell line Caco-2 was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). Caco-2 cells were inoculated with 2 × 105 cells/well in 6 well plates for 48 h, and the cells were treated with DSS (2.5%) to initiate intestinal barrier damage. Meanwhile, 100 μL yeast strains (107 CFU/mL) were co-cultured with cells for 12 h. Treated Caco-2 cells were washed twice and separated from the culture plates.
Total RNA extraction and cDNA reverse transcription were performed using a FastPure Cell Total RNA Isolation Kit and an HiScript III RT SuperMix for qPCR, respectively (Vazyme Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China). RT-qPCR was conducted using a Fast SYBR Green Master Mix with a StepOne™ real-time PCR system with a BioRad-CFX384 machine (Bio-Rad Co., Ltd., Hercules, CA, USA). The primer sequences are listed in Table S1. The relative expression level of relative genes was calculated by 2−ΔΔCT.

4.5. Animal Experiment Design on Colitis

Six-week-old male SPF C57BL/6N mice (18–22 g) were supplied by Vital River Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All experimental procedures were approved by the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of Jiangnan University (approval number: JN. No 20211215c1100415[534]). Mice were housed under standard conditions (22~24 °C, 40~70% relative humidity, 12 h photoperiod) and given water and chow for one week before the experiments began.
Forty-eight mice were randomly divided into six groups (n = 8) after one week of adaptation. According to Table S2, the experimental period was two weeks in total; mice in the control and model groups orally received 200 µL of saline, while mice in the four yeast groups were gavaged with 200 µL of the corresponding yeast suspension, respectively. In the second week, mice in all groups were administered 2.5% (w/v) DSS in water, except for the control group.

4.6. Assessment of Colitis Symptoms

Body weight, stool consistency, occult blood, and DAI were recorded daily based on the scoring principles shown in Table S3 during DSS exposure [65]. The colon length of the mice was determined after euthanasia. Colon tissues (0.5 cm) were fixed in 4% (w/v) formalin solution, dehydrated in ethanol, embedded in paraffin, sliced, and stained with H&E. Colonic histological severity was scored from four perspectives: inflammatory condition, mucosal injury, crypt damage, and lesion degree [66]. The degree of colonic mucous layer injury was determined by a modified method of Steedman [67], and mucous epithelial thickness and goblet cell numbers were measured using AB staining.

4.7. Biochemical Assays

Colon tissues were homogenized with saline and centrifuged to collect the supernatant. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, and IL-1β were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (R&D Systems Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The concentrations of MPO, COX-2, iNOS, Claudin-1, Occludin, and ZO-1 were determined using mouse-specific ELISA kits (SenBeiJia Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China). Total protein content was determined using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Beyotime Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).

4.8. Tight Junction Protein Expression in Colon

Total RNA in the colon was extracted using Trizol reagent, and the following experimental procedures were performed as described in Section 4.4. Sequences of the primer are shown in Table S4.

4.9. Short-Chain Fatty Acid Measurement in Feces

The concentrations of SCFAs (acetate, propionate, butyrate, isobutyrate, valerate, and isovalerate) in feces were determined according to the previous method [40]. Samples (20 mg) were resuspended into 500 μL saturated NaCl solution, and then 20 μL sulfuric acid (10%) was added for acidification. SCFAs were extracted by adding 1000 μL diethyl ether. The mixture was centrifuged (12,000× g, 4 °C, 15 min), and the aqueous content was removed by adding 0.25 g Na2SO4. SCFAs were quantified by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) (Shimadzu Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) using the external standard method.

4.10. Gut Microbial and Bioinformatics Analysis

Sequencing of the gut microbiota composition was performed according to Chen et al. [68]. DNA was extracted using the FastDNA Spin Kit (MP Biomedicals, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA was amplified using primers 341F and 806R. PCR product purification, quantification, library generation, and sequencing on Illumina MiSeq were performed as previously described by Yan et al. [69].
Microbiota analysis of the raw sequencing data was performed using the QIIME2 pipeline. Briefly, the α-diversity, including the Observed, Chao1, and Shannon indices, was evaluated by species diversity and distributional uniformity among OTUs. PCoA analysis displayed β-diversity by Bray–Curtis distances. Microbiological markers were separated using the LEfSe method. The association network was analyzed using Spearman’s correlation coefficients. Functional pathway prediction of the microbiota was performed using PICRUSt analysis.

4.11. Statistical Analysis

SPSS26.0 and GraphPad Prism 9.0 were conducted for data analysis and plotting. All the ultimate results are represented as the mean ± SEM for each group. Significant differences were evaluated using ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our study demonstrated that the selected yeasts possessed a good GIT tolerance, adhesion ability, and intestinal barrier enhancement in vitro. Especially, S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 alleviated the DSS-induced colitis symptoms by a mechanism primarily including modulating the inflammatory factors, enhancing the gut barrier, regulating specific microbiota and strengthening their metabolic functions, and increasing SCFA production. S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 supplements could be a possible pathway for UC therapy, which offers a new direction to obtain more beneficial yeasts for human health. However, the effectiveness and safety of the yeast in human settings are required to conduct future experiments.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24076721/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.H.; methodology, Q.H. and L.Y.; software, Q.H. and Q.Z.; validation, L.Y., Q.Z. and F.T.; formal analysis, Q.H.; investigation, L.Y.; resources, Q.Z.; data curation, Q.H. and L.Y; writing—original draft preparation, Q.H.; writing—review and editing, Q.H. and Q.Z.; visualization, Q.H.; supervision, L.Y., Q.Z. and J.Z.; project administration, F.T.; funding acquisition, L.Y., Q.Z., J.Z. and F.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF1100203; 2022YFD2100704); Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BE2021623; BK20220155); National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1903205); the Key Scientific and Technological Research Projects in the Key Areas of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (2018AB010).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by Animal Welfare and Ethics Committee of Jiangnan University (protocol code JN. No20211215c1100415[534]).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are either shown in the manuscript and Supplementary Material or available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Coward, S.; Clement, F.; Benchimol, E.I.; Bernstein, C.N.; Avina-Zubieta, J.A.; Bitton, A.; Carroll, M.W.; Hazlewood, G.; Jacobson, K.; Jelinski, S.; et al. Past and Future Burden of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Based on Modeling of Population-Based Data. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 1345–1353.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Segal, J.P.; LeBlanc, J.F.; Hart, A.L. Ulcerative colitis: An update. Clin. Med. 2021, 21, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fu, R.R.; Wang, L.C.; Meng, Y.; Xue, W.Q.; Liang, J.J.; Peng, Z.M.; Meng, J.; Zhang, M. Apigenin remodels the gut microbiota to ameliorate ulcerative colitis. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 1062961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jin, C.; Liu, J.; Jin, R.; Yao, Y.; He, S.; Lei, M.; Peng, X. Linarin ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in C57BL/6J mice via the improvement of intestinal barrier, suppression of inflammatory responses and modulation of gut microbiota. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 10574–10586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, X.; Peng, X.; Rong, C.; Zhang, W. Acute pulmonary embolism following corticosteroid administration in acute severe ulcerative colitis with gastrointestinal bleeding: A case report. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 1018462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Banik, A.; Halder, S.K.; Ghosh, C.; Mondal, K.C. Fungal Probiotics: Opportunity, Challenge, and Prospects. In Recent Advancement in White Biotechnology through Fungi; Yadav, A., Singh, S., Mishra, S., Gupta, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 101–117. [Google Scholar]
  7. Stofilova, J.; Kvakova, M.; Kamlarova, A.; Hijova, E.; Bertkova, I.; Gulasova, Z. Probiotic-Based Intervention in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: Conventional and New Approaches. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, C.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, J.; Yu, L.; Tian, F.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W.; Zhai, Q. Identification of the key characteristics of Bifidobacterium longum strains for the alleviation of ulcerative colitis. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 3476–3492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, Y.; Sheng, Y.; Pan, Q.; Xue, Y.; Yu, L.; Tian, F.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhai, Q.; Chen, W. Identification of the key physiological characteristics of Lactobacillus plantarum strains for ulcerative colitis alleviation. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 1279–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mu, Z.; Yang, Y.; Xia, Y.; Wang, F.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Y.; Ai, L. Probiotic yeast BR14 ameliorates DSS-induced colitis by restoring the gut barrier and adjusting the intestinal microbiota. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 8386–8398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Generoso, S.V.; Viana, M.; Santos, R.; Martins, F.S.; Machado, J.A.N.; Arantes, R.M.E.; Nicoli, J.R.; Correia, M.I.T.D.; Cardoso, V.N. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain UFMG 905 protects against bacterial translocation, preserves gut barrier integrity and stimulates the immune system in a murine intestinal obstruction model. Arch. Microbiol. 2010, 192, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Saadat, Y.R.; Khosroushahi, A.Y.; Movassaghpour, A.A.; Talebi, M.; Gargari, B.P. Modulatory role of exopolysaccharides of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Pichia kudriavzevii as probiotic yeasts from dairy products in human colon cancer cells. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 64, 103675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhou, H.; Zhang, H.J.; Guan, L.; Zhang, Y.N.; Li, Y.; Sun, M.J. Mechanism and therapeutic effects of Saccharomyces boulardii on experimental colitis in mice. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018, 18, 5652–5662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Romanin, D.E.; Llopis, S.; Genoves, S.; Martorell, P.; Ramon, V.D.; Garrote, G.L.; Rumbo, M. Probiotic yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus CIDCA 8154 shows anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative stress properties in in vivo models. Benef. Microbes 2016, 7, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zeng, X.; Li, X.; Yue, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, H.; Gu, Y.; Jia, H.; He, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Yue, T. Ameliorative Effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae JKSP39 on Fusobacterium nucleatum and Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis Mouse Model. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 14179–14192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Varela-Trinidad, G.U.; Dominguez-Diaz, C.; Solorzano-Castanedo, K.; Iniguez-Gutierrez, L.; Hernandez-Flores, T.D.; Fafutis-Morris, M. Probiotics: Protecting Our Health from the Gut. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Marcela Arenas-Gomez, C.; Garcia-Gutierrez, E.; Escobar, J.S.; Cotter, P.D. Human gut homeostasis and regeneration: The role of the gut microbiota and its metabolites. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, Z.; Xu, S.; Zhang, W.; Wu, D.; Yang, G. Probiotic Escherichia coli NISSLE 1917 for inflammatory bowel disease applications. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 5914–5924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, F.; Wuri, G.N.; Fang, B.; Shi, M.X.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, L. Alleviative mechanism and effect of Bifidobacterium animalis A6 on dextran sodium sulfate-induced ulcerative colitis in mice. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 892–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Khan, I.; Wei, J.; Li, A.; Liu, Z.; Yang, P.; Jing, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhao, T.; Bai, Y.; Zha, L.; et al. Lactobacillus plantarum strains attenuated DSS-induced colitis in mice by modulating the gut microbiota and immune response. Int. Microbiol. 2022, 25, 587–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Das, N.; Mangala, L.R.; Mandal, S.K. Recent Advances on Efficacy of Probiotic Yeasts in Human Welfare: An Overview. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2022, 12, e9277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Staniszewski, A.; Kordowska-Wiater, M. Probiotic and Potentially Probiotic Yeasts-Characteristics and Food Application. Foods 2021, 10, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kazmierczak-Siedlecka, K.; Ruszkowski, J.; Fic, M.; Folwarski, M.; Makarewicz, W. Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745: A Non-bacterial Microorganism Used as Probiotic Agent in Supporting Treatment of Selected Diseases. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 1987–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sarwar, A.; Aziz, T.; Al-Dalali, S.; Zhang, J.; Din, J.U.; Chen, C.; Cao, Y.; Fatima, H.; Yang, Z. Characterization of synbiotic ice cream made with probiotic yeast Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 in combination with inulin. LWT 2021, 141, 110910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fernández-Pacheco, P.; Ramos Monge, I.M.; Fernández-González, M.; Poveda Colado, J.M.; Arévalo-Villena, M. Safety Evaluation of Yeasts With Probiotic Potential. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 659328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yu, P.; Ke, C.; Guo, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, B. Lactobacillus plantarum L15 Alleviates Colitis by Inhibiting LPS-Mediated NF-κB Activation and Ameliorates DSS-Induced Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 575173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Siesto, G.; Pietrafesa, R.; Infantino, V.; Thanh, C.; Pappalardo, I.; Romano, P.; Capece, A. In Vitro Study of Probiotic, Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities among Indigenous Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains. Foods 2022, 11, 1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ochangco, H.S.; Gamero, A.; Smith, I.M.; Christensen, J.E.; Jespersen, L.; Arneborg, N. In vitro investigation of Debaryomyces hansenii strains for potential probiotic properties. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 32, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cho, Y.-J.; Kim, D.-H.; Jeong, D.; Seo, K.-H.; Jeong, H.S.; Lee, H.G.; Kim, H. Characterization of yeasts isolated from kefir as a probiotic and its synergic interaction with the wine byproduct grape seed flour/extract. LWT 2018, 90, 535–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Meng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, P.; Yu, J.; Mu, G.; Li, X.; Tuo, Y. Saccharomyces cerevisiae I4 Showed Alleviating Effects on Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis of Balb/c Mice. Foods 2022, 11, 1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jain, U.; Heul, A.M.V.; Xiong, S.; Gregory, M.H.; Demers, E.G.; Kern, J.T.; Lai, C.-W.; Muegge, B.D.; Barisas, D.A.G.; Leal-Ekman, J.S.; et al. Debaryomyces is enriched in Crohn’s disease intestinal tissue and impairs healing in mice. Science 2021, 371, 1154–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chiaro, T.R.; Soto, R.; Stephens, W.Z.; Kubinak, J.L.; Petersen, C.; Gogokhia, L.; Bell, R.; Delgado, J.C.; Cox, J.; Voth, W.; et al. A member of the gut mycobiota modulates host purine metabolism exacerbating colitis in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaaf9044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shi, J.; Xie, Q.; Yue, Y.; Chen, Q.; Zhao, L.; Evivie, S.E.; Li, B.; Huo, G. Gut microbiota modulation and anti-inflammatory properties of mixed lactobacilli in dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis in mice. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 5130–5143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kangwan, N.; Pintha, K.; Khanaree, C.; Kongkarnka, S.; Chewonarin, T.; Suttajit, M. Anti-inflammatory effect of Perilla frutescens seed oil rich in omega-3 fatty acid on dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis in mice. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 16, 464–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Shao, X.; Sun, C.; Tang, X.; Zhang, X.; Han, D.; Liang, S.; Qu, R.; Hui, X.; Shan, Y.; Hu, L.; et al. Anti-Inflammatory and Intestinal Microbiota Modulation Properties of Jinxiang Garlic (Allium sativum L.) Polysaccharides toward Dextran Sodium Sulfate-Induced Colitis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 12295–12309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhao, N.; Yang, Y.; Chen, C.; Jing, T.; Hu, Y.; Xu, H.; Wang, S.; He, Y.; Liu, E.; Cui, J. Betaine supplementation alleviates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis via regulating the inflammatory response, enhancing the intestinal barrier, and altering gut microbiota. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 12814–12826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tak, P.P.; Firestein, G.S. NF-κB: A key role in inflammatory diseases. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 107, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fan, L.; Qi, Y.; Qu, S.; Chen, X.; Li, A.; Hendi, M.; Xu, C.; Wang, L.; Hou, T.; Si, J.; et al. B. adolescentis ameliorates chronic colitis by regulating Treg/Th2 response and gut microbiota remodeling. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1826746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liao, M.; Zhang, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Wu, Z.; Zhong, Z.; Zeng, X.; Zeng, Y.; Xiong, L.; Wen, Y.; Liu, R. Fructooligosaccharide supplementation alleviated the pathological immune response and prevented the impairment of intestinal barrier in DSS-induced acute colitis mice. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 9844–9854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Galecki, P.; Galecka, E.; Maes, M.; Chamielec, M.; Orzechowska, A.; Bobinska, K.; Lewinski, A.; Szemraj, J. The expression of genes encoding for COX-2, MPO, iNOS, and sPLA2-IIA in patients with recurrent depressive disorder. J. Affect. Disord. 2012, 138, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guo, X.; Yu, Q.; Fan, X. Effects of salidroside combined with iNOS shRNA on coagulation function and inflammatory factors in dextran sulfate sodium induced ulcerative colitis mice. Chin. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2021, 37, 988–992. [Google Scholar]
  42. Feng, A.W.; Gao, W.; Zhou, G.R.; Yu, R.; Li, N.; Huang, X.L.; Li, Q.R.; Li, J.S. Berberine ameliorates COX-2 expression in rat small intestinal mucosa partially through PPARγ pathway during acute endotoxemia. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2012, 12, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sommer, K.; Wiendl, M.; Mueller, T.M.; Heidbreder, K.; Voskens, C.; Neurath, M.F.; Zundler, S. Intestinal Mucosal Wound Healing and Barrier Integrity in IBD-Crosstalk and Trafficking of Cellular Players. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 643973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lee, S.H. Intestinal permeability regulation by tight junction: Implication on inflammatory bowel diseases. Intest. Res. 2015, 13, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Gao, H.; Li, Y.; Sun, J.; Xu, H.; Wang, M.; Zuo, X.; Fu, Q.; Guo, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, P.; et al. Saccharomyces boulardii Ameliorates Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Mice by Regulating NF-κB and Nrf2 Signaling Pathways. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 1622375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Guo, X.; Huang, C.; Xu, J.; Xu, H.M.; Liu, L.; Zhao, H.L.; Wang, J.Q.; Huang, W.Q.; Peng, W.; Chen, Y.; et al. Gut Microbiota Is a Potential Biomarker in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Front. Nutr. 2022, 8, 818902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shin, N.R.; Whon, T.W.; Bae, J.W. Proteobacteria: Microbial signature of dysbiosis in gut microbiota. Trends Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 496–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huang, Z.; Gong, L.; Jin, Y.; Stanton, C.; Ross, R.P.; Zhao, J.; Yang, B.; Chen, W. Different Effects of Different Lactobacillus acidophilus Strains on DSS-Induced Colitis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zong, M.; Chang, C.; Anjum, R.; Xu, H.; Guo, Y.; Pan, D.; Wu, Z. Multifunctional LPxTG-motif surface protein derived from Limosilactobacillus reuteri SH 23 in DSS-induced ulcerative colitis of mice. FASEB J. 2022, 36, e22421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hongzhuan, X.; Aiqun, O.; Shengyu, H.; Jiajun, S.; Xiaolu, J. Galangin protects against symptoms of dextran sodium sulfate-induced acute colitis by activating autophagy and modulating the gut microbiota. Nutrients 2020, 12, 347. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sun, Z.; Pei, W.; Guo, Y.; Wang, Z.; Shi, R.; Chen, X.; Zhao, X.; Chen, C.; Liu, J.; Tan, X.; et al. Gut Microbiota-Mediated NLRP12 Expression Drives the Attenuation of Dextran Sulphate Sodium-Induced Ulcerative Colitis by Qingchang Wenzhong Decoction. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2019, 2019, 9839474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Zagato, E.; Pozzi, C.; Bertocchi, A.; Schioppa, T.; Saccheri, F.; Guglietta, S.; Fosso, B.; Melocchi, L.; Nizzoli, G.; Troisi, J.; et al. Endogenous murine microbiota member Faecalibaculum rodentium and its human homologue protect from intestinal tumour growth. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 511–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hu, S.; Ma, Y.; Xiong, K.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Y.; Ma, A. Ameliorating Effects of Vitamin K2 on Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, L.; Liu, B.; Cao, J.; Zhang, H.; Tian, F.; Yu, L.; Chen, W.; Zhai, Q. Different effects of Bacillus coagulans vegetative cells and spore isolates on constipation-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis in mice. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 9645–9657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Smith, P.M.; Howitt, M.R.; Panikov, N.; Michaud, M.; Gallini, C.A.; Bohlooly-Y, M.; Glickman, J.N.; Garrett, W.S. The Microbial Metabolites, Short-Chain Fatty Acids, Regulate Colonic T-reg Cell Homeostasis. Science 2013, 341, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Yu, W.; Su, X.; Chen, W.; Tian, X.; Zhang, K.; Guo, G.; Zhou, L.; Zeng, T.; Han, B. Three types of gut bacteria collaborating to improve Kui Jie’an enema treat DSS-induced colitis in mice. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 113, 108751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gudi, R.; Suber, J.; Brown, R.; Johnson, B.M.; Vasu, C. Pretreatment with Yeast-Derived Complex Dietary Polysaccharides Suppresses Gut Inflammation, Alters the Microbiota Composition, and Increases Immune Regulatory Short-Chain Fatty Acid Production in C57BL/6 Mice. J. Nutr. 2020, 150, 1291–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Li, B.; Zhang, H.; Shi, L.; Li, R.; Luo, Y.; Deng, Y.; Li, S.; Li, R.; Liu, Z. Saccharomyces boulardii alleviates DSS-induced intestinal barrier dysfunction and inflammation in humanized mice. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 102–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Loy, A.; Pfann, C.; Steinberger, M.; Hanson, B.; Herp, S.; Brugiroux, S.; Gomes Neto, J.C.; Boekschoten, M.V.; Schwab, C.; Urich, T.; et al. Lifestyle and Horizontal Gene Transfer-Mediated Evolution of Mucispirillum schaedleri, a Core Member of the Murine Gut Microbiota. Msystems 2017, 2, e00171-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Yushu, H.; Ruilin, L.; Manying, X.; Jiayu, L.; Yanpeng, Y.; Fenyi, M.; Ruyi, J.; Ruolin, W.; Xiaoli, P. Orally administered diosgenin alleviates colitis in mice induced by dextran sulfate sodium through gut microbiota modulation and short-chain fatty acid generation. J. Med. Food 2022, 25, 261–271. [Google Scholar]
  61. Sharpton, T.; Lyalina, S.; Luong, J.; Pham, J.; Deal, E.M.; Armour, C.; Gaulke, C.; Sanjabi, S.; Pollard, K.S. Development of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is Linked to a Longitudinal Restructuring of the Gut Metagenome in Mice. Msystems 2017, 2, e00036-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Dziarski, R.; Park, S.Y.; Kashyap, D.R.; Dowd, S.E.; Gupta, D. Pglyrp-Regulated Gut Microflora Prevotella falsenii, Parabacteroides distasonis and Bacteroides eggerthii Enhance and Alistipes finegoldii Attenuates Colitis in Mice. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0146162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Peng, Y.; Yan, Y.; Wan, P.; Chen, D.; Ding, Y.; Ran, L.; Mi, J.; Lu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.; et al. Gut microbiota modulation and anti-inflammatory properties of anthocyanins from the fruits of Lycium ruthenicum Murray in dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis in mice. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019, 136, 96–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Tikka, C.; Osuru, H.P.; Atluri, N.; Raghavulu, P.C.V.; Yellapu, N.K.; Mannur, I.S.; Prasad, U.V.; Aluru, S.; Varma, K.N.; Bhaskar, M. Isolation and characterization of ethanol tolerant yeast strains. Bioinformation 2013, 9, 421–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Xia, Y.J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, G.Q.; Yang, Y.J.; Song, X.; Xiong, Z.Q.; Zhang, H.; Lai, P.; Wang, S.J.; Ai, L.Z. Lactobacillus plantarum AR113 alleviates DSS-induced colitis by regulating the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway and gut microbiota composition. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 67, 103854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Qian, K.; Chen, S.; Wang, J.; Sheng, K.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, M. A β-N-acetylhexosaminidase Amuc_2109 from Akkermansia muciniphila protects against dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice by enhancing intestinal barrier and modulating gut microbiota. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 2216–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Steedman, H. Alcian blue 8GS: A new stain for mucin. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 1950, 3, 477–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, Y.; Jin, Y.; Stanton, C.; Paul Ross, R.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Yang, B.; Chen, W. Alleviation effects of Bifidobacterium breve on DSS-induced colitis depends on intestinal tract barrier maintenance and gut microbiota modulation. Eur. J. Nutr. 2021, 60, 369–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yan, S.; Yang, B.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, J.; Stanton, C.; Ross, R.P.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W. A ropy exopolysaccharide producing strain Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum YS108R alleviates DSS-induced colitis by maintenance of the mucosal barrier and gut microbiota modulation. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 1595–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 24 06721 g001 550
Figure 1. Effect of yeasts on the relative expression of tight junction proteins in Caco-2 cells. (A) Claudin-1. (B) Occludin. (C) ZO-1. The results are presented as mean ± SEM. Values with different letters a–c represent significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Effect of yeasts on the relative expression of tight junction proteins in Caco-2 cells. (A) Claudin-1. (B) Occludin. (C) ZO-1. The results are presented as mean ± SEM. Values with different letters a–c represent significant differences at p < 0.05.
Ijms 24 06721 g001
Ijms 24 06721 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of yeast strains on colitis symptoms. (A) Body weight change (%). (B) Disease activity index (DAI) score. (C) Macroscopic photos of colonic tissues. (D) Colon length (cm). The results are presented as mean ± SEM. Values with different letters a–c represent significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Effect of yeast strains on colitis symptoms. (A) Body weight change (%). (B) Disease activity index (DAI) score. (C) Macroscopic photos of colonic tissues. (D) Colon length (cm). The results are presented as mean ± SEM. Values with different letters a–c represent significant differences at p < 0.05.
Ijms 24 06721 g002
Ijms 24 06721 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of yeasts on colon histological structure and intestinal mucosa. (A) Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained histological sections (magnification, ×20). (B) Histopathology scores. (C) Alcian Blue (AB) stained pathological section (magnification, ×20). (D) Goblet cell number. The results are presented as mean ± SEM. Values with different letters a–c represent significant differences at p < 0.05. The yellow arrows represent crypt structure destruction and inflammatory cell infiltration.
Figure 3. Effect of yeasts on colon histological structure and intestinal mucosa. (A) Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained histological sections (magnification, ×20). (B) Histopathology scores. (C) Alcian Blue (AB) stained pathological section (magnification, ×20). (D) Goblet cell number. The results are presented as mean ± SEM. Values with different letters a–c represent significant differences at p < 0.05. The yellow arrows represent crypt structure destruction and inflammatory cell infiltration.
Ijms 24 06721 g003
Ijms 24 06721 g004 550
Figure 4. Effect of yeasts on inflammatory cytokine and enzyme concentrations. (A) TNF-α. (B) IL-6. (C) IL-1β. (D) IL-10. (E) MPO. (F) iNOS. (G) COX-2. The results are presented as mean ± SEM. Values with different letters a–c represent significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Effect of yeasts on inflammatory cytokine and enzyme concentrations. (A) TNF-α. (B) IL-6. (C) IL-1β. (D) IL-10. (E) MPO. (F) iNOS. (G) COX-2. The results are presented as mean ± SEM. Values with different letters a–c represent significant differences at p < 0.05.
Ijms 24 06721 g004
Ijms 24 06721 g005 550
Figure 5. Effect of yeasts on intestinal barrier protection. (A–C) Relative expression levels of Claudin-1, Occludin, and ZO-1. (D–F) Concentrations of Claudin-1, Occludin, and ZO-1. The results are presented as mean ± SEM. Values with different letters a–c represent significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Effect of yeasts on intestinal barrier protection. (A–C) Relative expression levels of Claudin-1, Occludin, and ZO-1. (D–F) Concentrations of Claudin-1, Occludin, and ZO-1. The results are presented as mean ± SEM. Values with different letters a–c represent significant differences at p < 0.05.
Ijms 24 06721 g005
Ijms 24 06721 g006 550
Figure 6. Effect of yeasts on short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) concentrations. (A) Acetate. (B) Propionate. (C) Butyrate. (D) Isobutyrate. (E) Valerate. (F) Isovalerate. The results are presented as mean ± SEM. Values with different letters a–b represent significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Effect of yeasts on short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) concentrations. (A) Acetate. (B) Propionate. (C) Butyrate. (D) Isobutyrate. (E) Valerate. (F) Isovalerate. The results are presented as mean ± SEM. Values with different letters a–b represent significant differences at p < 0.05.
Ijms 24 06721 g006
Ijms 24 06721 g007 550
Figure 7. Effect of yeasts on gut microbiota diversity and phylum/genus level changes. (A–C) α-diversity analysis: Observed, Chao1 index, and Shannon indices. (D) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of β-diversity. (E) A pile-up histogram at the phylum level. (F) A pile-up histogram at the genus level. The results are presented as mean ± SEM. Values with different letters a–b represent significant differences at p < 0.05.
Figure 7. Effect of yeasts on gut microbiota diversity and phylum/genus level changes. (A–C) α-diversity analysis: Observed, Chao1 index, and Shannon indices. (D) Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) of β-diversity. (E) A pile-up histogram at the phylum level. (F) A pile-up histogram at the genus level. The results are presented as mean ± SEM. Values with different letters a–b represent significant differences at p < 0.05.
Ijms 24 06721 g007
Ijms 24 06721 g008a 550Ijms 24 06721 g008b 550
Figure 8. Effect of yeasts on dominant microorganisms. (A) Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) of the genus with a significant difference among groups at p < 0.05 and log LDA > 3.0. Genera with significant differences among groups are marked with the red stars. (B–I) Eight significant genera: Lactobacillus, Escherichia–Shigella, Enterococcus, Parasutterella, Mucispirillum, Butyricimonas, Faecalibaculum, and Parabacteroides. (J) Correlation analysis of 12 significantly different genes. (K) Correlation analysis between 19 DSS biomarkers and the 12 different genes. The results are presented as mean ± SEM. Values with different letters a–c represent significant differences at p < 0.05. *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001, ****: p < 0.0001.
Figure 8. Effect of yeasts on dominant microorganisms. (A) Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) of the genus with a significant difference among groups at p < 0.05 and log LDA > 3.0. Genera with significant differences among groups are marked with the red stars. (B–I) Eight significant genera: Lactobacillus, Escherichia–Shigella, Enterococcus, Parasutterella, Mucispirillum, Butyricimonas, Faecalibaculum, and Parabacteroides. (J) Correlation analysis of 12 significantly different genes. (K) Correlation analysis between 19 DSS biomarkers and the 12 different genes. The results are presented as mean ± SEM. Values with different letters a–c represent significant differences at p < 0.05. *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01, ***: p < 0.001, ****: p < 0.0001.
Ijms 24 06721 g008aIjms 24 06721 g008b
Ijms 24 06721 g009 550
Figure 9. Effects of yeast strains on gut microbial functions. (A) Principal component analysis (PCoA) of gut microbiota function prediction in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways at level 3. (B) Differences in predicted functions between the control and DSS groups. (C) Differences in predicted functions between S. cerevisiae QSCLS6L3 and DSS groups.
Figure 9. Effects of yeast strains on gut microbial functions. (A) Principal component analysis (PCoA) of gut microbiota function prediction in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways at level 3. (B) Differences in predicted functions between the control and DSS groups. (C) Differences in predicted functions between S. cerevisiae QSCLS6L3 and DSS groups.
Ijms 24 06721 g009
Table
Table 1. Survival and adhesion rates of yeast strains.
Table 1. Survival and adhesion rates of yeast strains.
StrainsSurvival Rate (%)Adhesion Rate (%)
Gastric JuiceIntestinal Juice
S. boulardii CNCMI-74589.08 ± 0.513 a78.30 ± 0.444 b13.79 ± 0.158 a
K. marxianus QHBYC4L286.52 ± 0.538 b79.86 ± 0.516 b12.69 ± 0.391 a
S. cerevisiae QHNLD8L187.15 ± 0.462 b82.93 ± 0.262 a13.93 ± 0.511 a
D. hansenii QSCLS6L384.29 ± 0.409 c76.92 ± 0.538 c10.46 ± 0.627 b
Letters a–c represent significant differences at p < 0.05.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, Q.; Yu, L.; Zhai, Q.; Zhao, J.; Tian, F. Anti-Inflammatory, Barrier Maintenance, and Gut Microbiome Modulation Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 on DSS-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 6721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076721

AMA Style

Hu Q, Yu L, Zhai Q, Zhao J, Tian F. Anti-Inflammatory, Barrier Maintenance, and Gut Microbiome Modulation Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 on DSS-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Mice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(7):6721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076721

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Qianjue, Leilei Yu, Qixiao Zhai, Jianxin Zhao, and Fengwei Tian. 2023. "Anti-Inflammatory, Barrier Maintenance, and Gut Microbiome Modulation Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 on DSS-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Mice" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 7: 6721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076721

APA Style

Hu, Q., Yu, L., Zhai, Q., Zhao, J., & Tian, F. (2023). Anti-Inflammatory, Barrier Maintenance, and Gut Microbiome Modulation Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae QHNLD8L1 on DSS-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Mice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(7), 6721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076721

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop