Next Article in Journal
Dickkopf-1 Acts as a Profibrotic Mediator in Progressive Chronic Kidney Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
Biomarkers for Pregnancy Latency Prediction after Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes–A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
The ACE rs1799752 Variant Is Associated with COVID-19 Severity but Is Independent of Serum ACE Activity in Hospitalized and Recovered Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Kisspeptin Suppresses Inflammasome-NLRP3 Activation and Pyroptosis Caused by Hypothyroidism at the Maternal-Fetal Interface of Rats
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biochemical Screening for Fetal Trisomy 21: Pathophysiology of Maternal Serum Markers and Involvement of the Placenta

by
Jean Guibourdenche
1,2,3,*,
Marie-Clémence Leguy
1,
Guillaume Pidoux
4,
Marylise Hebert-Schuster
2,
Christelle Laguillier
1,2,5,
Olivia Anselem
3,6,
Gilles Grangé
3,6,
Fidéline Bonnet
1,2 and
Vassilis Tsatsaris
2,3,6
1
Hormonologie CHU Cochin AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France
2
Faculté de Santé, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
3
FHU Préma, 75014 Paris, France
4
INSERM UMR-S1180, 75014 Paris, France
5
UMR-S1139, 75014 Paris, France
6
Maternité Port Royal CHU Cochin AP-HP, 75014 Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(8), 7669; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087669
Submission received: 27 March 2023 / Revised: 19 April 2023 / Accepted: 20 April 2023 / Published: 21 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Placental Related Disorders of Pregnancy 2.0.)

Abstract

:
It is now well established that maternal serum markers are often abnormal in fetal trisomy 21. Their determination is recommended for prenatal screening and pregnancy follow-up. However, mechanisms leading to abnormal maternal serum levels of such markers are still debated. Our objective was to help clinicians and scientists unravel the pathophysiology of these markers via a review of the main studies published in this field, both in vivo and in vitro, focusing on the six most widely used markers (hCG, its free subunit hCGβ, PAPP-A, AFP, uE3, and inhibin A) as well as cell-free feto–placental DNA. Analysis of the literature shows that mechanisms underlying each marker’s regulation are multiple and not necessarily directly linked with the supernumerary chromosome 21. The crucial involvement of the placenta is also highlighted, which could be defective in one or several of its functions (turnover and apoptosis, endocrine production, and feto–maternal exchanges and transfer). These defects were neither constant nor specific for trisomy 21, and might be more or less pronounced, reflecting a high variability in placental immaturity and alteration. This explains why maternal serum markers can lack both specificity and sensitivity, and are thus restricted to screening.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Trisomy 21, also called Down syndrome, is a chromosomal abnormality defined by the presence of a supernumerary chromosome 21 either completely or partially [1]. In 94% of cases, it is a free and homogeneous trisomy 21 affecting all cells and resulting from a meiotic nondisjunction. The clinical syndrome was described for the first time by Esquirol in 1833 and Down in 1886, and the association of this syndrome with the presence of an additional chromosome 21 was established by Gautier and Lejeune in 1956 [2]. Trisomy 21 phenotype is variable [3]. It associates constant mental retardation with anatomical malformations, some of them being detectable with fetal ultrasound scanning (e.g., heart disease, duodenal stenosis or atresia, etc.). Indication for prenatal screening of fetal trisomy 21 was initially only based on maternal age, as the risk of aneuploidy increases with age [4]. Since then, fetal ultrasound scanning for those fetal abnormalities during the second trimester of gestation and, presently, increased nuchal translucency (NT) during the first trimester of gestation has become a major component of prenatal screening [5,6].
Maternal serum markers (MSM) during the second trimester, i.e., human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and its free β subunit, alpha feto protein (AFP), unconjugated estriol (uE3), and inhibin A, were described as abnormal in trisomy 21 in the 1990s [7,8,9,10,11]. Indeed, hCG and inhA are increased by about two multiples of the median value (MoM), and AFP and uE3 are decreased by about 0.8 MoM in trisomy 21-affected pregnancies. First-trimester markers, i.e., a free β subunit of hCG (free hCGβ) and pregnancy-associated plasmatic protein A (PAPP-A) have also been described as abnormal [12,13]. The mean pattern in trisomy 21-affected pregnancies associates an increased NT by 2.5 MoM, an increased free hCGβ by 2.2 MoM, and a decreased PAPP-A by 0.5 MoM with a mean detection rate of 84% with a 5% false positive rate [14,15]. Over recent years, noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has spread widely. Indeed, the detection of cell-free feto–placental DNA in maternal blood is both far more sensitive and specific than MSM, with a detection rate of >99% and a false positive rate of <1% [16].
However, little is known about the mechanisms underlying these abnormal maternal serum profiles. Accordingly, we aim to unravel the physiology of these markers (PAPP-A, free hCGβ, hCG, AFP, uE3, inhA, and cell-free feto–placental DNA) and their regulation, focusing on the placenta and try to explain their abnormal variations in maternal serum in trisomy 21-affected pregnancies.

2. Soluble Markers

2.1. Markers of Placental Origin

From the beginning of pregnancy, as soon as the blastocyst, which will further differentiate into embryo and placenta, makes contact with the maternal uterine circulation, it starts producing markers that are soon detectable in the maternal bloodstream [17,18]. Therefore, many of these maternal serum markers, such as hCG, free hCGβ, inhibin A, and PAPP-A, are strictly of placental origin, as they are produced by the trophoblast, the specific placental tissue [19].

2.1.1. Human Chorionic Gonadotropin

The human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) hormone was discovered in 1920 [20]. It is a dimeric glycoprotein (MW 40–45 kDa) that belongs to the family of gonadotropins such as LH and FSH, or stimuli such as TSH produced by the pituitary gland [21]. It results from the non-covalent binding of a common α subunit and a specific ß subunit, forming a dimeric glycoprotein that acts on a receptor, the LH/CG-R [22,23] (Figure 1A). The α subunit (hCGα) is encoded by a single gene located on chromosome 6, comprising 92 amino acids and five disulfide bonds (MW 14.5 kDa), and two N glycan chains [24,25]. The β subunit (hCGβ) is specific and confers its biological specificity to each hormone. It is encoded by a cluster of genes located on chromosome 19 and subdivided into type I (ß6/7 CG), and type II (ß3/9 CG, ß5 CG, and ß8 CG) genes, the latest being predominantly expressed in the placenta [26,27]. Among gonadotropins, hCGβ is the longest β subunit (145 amino acids, MW 22 kDa) with six disulfide bonds, and the most glycosylated with two N glycans and four O glycans [25,28].
Glycosylation impacts hCG clearance and biological activity, and is likely to depend on the origin of the producing cells, i.e., pituitary cells, normal placental, and placental tumors [29,30,31,32]. The extravillous cytotrophoblast (EVCT) produces high levels of hyperglycosylated hCG that are likely to modulate trophoblastic invasion and angiogenesis while the syncytiotrophoblast (ST) is the principal placental source of hCG [33,34,35,36,37,38].
hCG production in vitro is regulated by factors that control trophoblast differentiation via cAMP: hormones (e.g., corticoids, progesterone, estradiol.), hCG itself, neuropeptides (e.g., CRH), growth factors and cytokines (e.g., EGF, TNFα), PPARγ, and oxygen [37,39]. In vivo, the secretory peak of hCG during the first trimester remains unexplained. Several hypotheses have been proposed: the stimulation of hCG by GnRH or the dominant presence of a truncated LHCGR in early pregnancy [40,41], and thereafter apoptosis of hCG-secreting trophoblast cells [42] or negative feedback on hCG synthesis [43]. Once produced, hCG may be truncated under the action of placental proteases, leading to unstable “nicked hCG”, which rapidly dissociates into hCGα and truncated hCGβ (hCGβn) [44]. During gestation, free hCGα levels rise in the maternal circulation in line with placental mass, while hCG and free hCGβ follow the same profile, peaking at around 10-12 WG (Figure 1A). A total of 80% of serum circulating hCG is metabolized by the maternal liver, whereas 20% is degraded and excreted by the kidneys [45]. The main final degradation product is the β core (hCG-βcf), a small 9 kDa fragment of hCG [46]. The clearance rate of hCG in serum is best described using a three-component exponential function, leading to a global half-life for hCG of between 24 and 36 h. The two free subunits have shorter half-lives of 2 h for the free α subunit and 4 h for the free β subunit [47].
hCG and its glycoforms are critical hormones during pregnancy, as they are involved in placental implantation and invasion, and regulate different fetal and maternal–placental functions [29,30,48,49]. hCG takes over from maternal pituitary LH during the first trimester of gestation, allowing the maintenance of the ovarian corpus luteum and its transformation into a gravid corpus luteum, producing 17αOH progesterone and progesterone [50]. In the placenta, hCG is produced by the extravillous trophoblast and the villous trophoblast (Figure 2). Its production is closely related to the development and turnover of the trophoblast, and mainly the ST (Figure 1B). It modulates the differentiation of the VCT into the ST, and therefore its production, in an autocrine loop [41,42,43]. hCG binds to a specific receptor (LHCGR) that also recognizes LH. The binding of hCG to LHCGR, which is coupled with G proteins, modulates steroidogenesis mainly via the cAMP/PKA but also via the inositol phosphate pathways [23,50,51,52]. LHCGR is present in the placenta in truncated form in the VCT and in long form in the ST. During pregnancy, only the dimeric form of hCG has significant biological activity, which is reduced in its truncated forms in hCGn [44]. The main function of hCG is to promote progesterone synthesis by the corpus luteum, maintaining the quiescence of the myometrium and pregnancy until the placenta itself ensures progesterone production. High levels of hCG also interact with the TSH receptor, enhancing maternal thyroid function [53,54]. At the maternal–placental interface, hyperglycosylated forms of hCG and free hCGβ exert paracrine actions by promoting invasion and angiogenesis in the uterine wall [55,56,57] and maternal immune tolerance [48,58,59].
hCG anomalies in the context of fetal trisomy 21 are both qualitative and quantitative. In trisomy 21, maternal hCG and free hCGβ levels rise concomitantly, with an increase in their truncated and hyperglycosylated forms [60,61]. The presence of an extra chromosome 21 cannot directly account for the over-expression of the genes coding for hCG because it is not located on chromosome 21. No extraplacental production of hCG has been demonstrated, but an abnormal modulation of transcription cannot be excluded [62,63]. In trophoblastic cell cultures, an increase in hCGβ transcripts and, to a lesser extent, in hCGα transcripts has been observed, and results either from transcriptional activation or from an increase in transcript stabilization. Serum hCG levels in trisomy 21-affected pregnancies are significantly higher than in normal pregnancies [7] and the chorionic expression of ß CG mRNA directly correlates with high serum hCG levels [64]. Chromosome 21 may bear one gene encoding for a transcription factor that induces the synthesis of hCGβ [65]. ß CG promoters may differ between trisomy 21-affected pregnancies and normal pregnancies. The sequence and amino acid composition of intact hCG remain unchanged [66], while levels of urinary β core are increased in trisomy 21-affected pregnancies, reflecting an increase in both hCG levels and catabolism [67].
Several studies have highlighted the hyperglycosylation of hCG in trisomy 21. Cole et al. described the presence of a hyperglycosylated hCG (H-hCG) which they named invasive trophoblast antigen (ITA), as it is also produced by undifferentiated invasive cytotrophoblasts in choriocarcinoma [25,68]. This H-hCG displays a greater number of tri-antennary N glycan chains and its O glycan chains are also larger. It may be secreted physiologically during normal pregnancy (particularly in the first trimester), but its levels are low and fall below 3% of total hCG thereafter. It has been suggested that the major source of this H-hCG in maternal blood during the first trimester could be endovascular EVCT [33] (Figure 2). H-hCG levels are often elevated in maternal serum in trisomy 21-affected pregnancies [56,61,68]. Trisomy 21 is likely to be associated with the abnormal glycosylation of hCG. Indeed, we have shown that the in vitro differentiation of VCT isolated from trisomic 21 placentae is defective and associated with abnormal glycosylation hCG features, leading to a highly acidic and less bioactive molecule [69,70]. In vivo analysis of maternal hCG circulating glycoforms confirms this abnormal glycosylation [71]. At least two enzymes involved in the glycosylation pathway may be affected: sialyl-transferase-1 and fucosyl-transferase-1. In trisomy 21-affected pregnancies, the synthesis and the expression of the mature receptor of hCG, LHCGR, are modified [64,69] and a soluble fraction of LHCGR may circulate in the maternal blood [72]. Taken together, these changes may lead to abnormal hCG signaling and the clearance of hCG, resulting in high maternal serum levels in trisomy 21.

2.1.2. Pregnancy-Associated Plasmatic Protein A

PAPP-A is not specific to pregnancy as it is also detectable in men and non-pregnant women, but at 100 to 1000-fold lower levels [73,74]. In maternal blood, 99% of PAPP-A circulates at very high levels as a heterotetrameric covalent complex (ht PAPP-A) with the precursor of eosinophil major basic protein (proMBP) [75,76] (Figure 3).
The human trophoblast synthesizes PAPP-A and its inhibitors, the precursor of eosinophil major basic protein (proMBP) and the stanniocalcin (STC): PAPP-A circulates in the maternal blood as an inactive complex with the proMBP. The dimeric PAPP-A is a protease expressed on the trophoblast membrane and involved in the invasion and modulation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) activity as it cleaves its binding protein (BP).
PAPP-A is a homodimeric glycoprotein of 1547 amino acids with 14 N and 7 O glycosylation sites [77]. It is secreted as a precursor encoded by a single gene located on chromosome 9. Besides hormonal proteins, several other proteins are secreted by the placenta and referred to as pregnancy-associated plasma proteins (PAPP) types A, B, C, D, or E [78], the most widely studied being type A (PAPP-A) also known as pappalysin-1. It may be detected in its monomeric or dimeric (d PAPP-A) forms in both reproductive tissues (ovaries, endometrium, etc.) and in non-reproductive tissues and organs such as kidneys [74,79,80]. During pregnancy, it forms an equimolar heterotetrameric covalent complex (2:2) of 500–700 kDa with a small glycoprotein of 222 amino acids, proMBP (38 kDa), encoded by a single gene located on chromosome 11 [75,76]. The glycan cup of proMBP is much larger than that of PAPP-A (38%), consisting essentially of O glycan. As proMBP can bind different molecules and is synthesized in excess, it also circulates in maternal serum linked to angiotensinogen or C3dg fraction of the complement [81]. During pregnancy, genes encoding for PAPP-A and proMBP are strongly expressed in the placenta. Transcripts can be detected in the trophoblast but also in the decidua, with mRNA content of PAPP-A and proMBP increasing until term [82,83,84,85]. PAPP-A is expressed by the EVCT and VCT, while proMBP tends to be preferentially expressed by the EVCT and decidua [86,87]. dPAPP-A is weakly expressed in the ST at term, and serum PAPP-A levels start to rise from 4 WG until the end of pregnancy in line with increasing ST mass and placental volume [88,89,90]. Serum concentrations of proMBP display a similar profile, with a significant increase during the first trimester [91]. Glycosylation of these molecules also varies during pregnancy, with a decrease in sialylation [92].
Neither the cellular functions of PAPP-A and proMBP nor their regulation are yet fully understood in the placenta [93,94]. PAPP-A is a metalloprotease belonging to the metzincin superfamily of zinc peptidases. It cleaves binding proteins of the family of insulin-like growth factors, mainly IGFBP-4 but also IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-5, in many tissues [74,93,94,95,96], modulating the bioavailability of IGF-I and IGF-II (Figure 3). Via the activity of IGFs, PAPP-A modulates both cell proliferation and differentiation, and, via its proteasic activity, it modulates invasion [97]. PAPP-A has endocrine effects on glucose metabolism and maternal adaptation to pregnancy via IGFs [98]. PAPP-A is only active in its dimeric form, dPAPP-A, which is expressed in the cytotrophoblast membrane. It is an enzyme that forms a complex with cell-surface heparin sulfate proteoglycans to interact with cells and the extracellular matrix. PAPP-A activity is inhibited by the binding to proMBP and stanniocalcin [99,100,101,102]. Its catabolism and its physiological functions during pregnancy remain a matter of debate. PAPP-A production and activity are likely to be modulated by AMPc, cytokines, growth factors, hormones, and its endogenous inhibitor stanniocalcin, in different tissues in vitro, in association with tissue injury and inflammation [74,80,93]. Progesterone may positively modulate PAPP-A production, promoting the proliferation of the trophoblast, whereas PPARγ inhibits PAPP-A expression [103,104].
In the context of fetal trisomy 21, maternal serum levels of PAPP-A are lower during the first trimester of pregnancy [105]. However, no significant decrease in placental PAPP-A mRNA levels has been noted in the context of trisomy 21 [106]. It is also observed in other types of aneuploidy (trisomies 13 and 18 in association with a small placental mass and in the Cornelia Delange syndrome) [107,108]. This decrease is temporary, as it disappears after the first trimester of pregnancy when the ST becomes the major source of PAPP-A production and when the placenta contributes markedly to proMBP levels (Figure 2) [88,91]. A sharp reduction in PAPP-A maternal serum levels during pregnancy is often associated with abortion or premature birth, reflecting defective trophoblastic invasion and placentation [109,110].

2.1.3. Inhibin A

The placenta, i.e., trophoblastic cells, mesenchymal cells, and endothelial cells, produces different amounts and types of growth factors [111,112]. These factors mainly act in an autocrine or paracrine manner, as they are involved in placental development [113]. A few of these markers have been measured in maternal blood for the screening of trisomy 21 angiogenic factors, such as placental growth factor (PlGF), which was more recently described as being decreased in trisomy 21-affected pregnancies [114,115]. However, the main growth factor measured in maternal screening for trisomy 21 is inhibin A, which belongs to the transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) superfamily as other inhibins (B, C, D, and E), activins, and follistatin [116,117]. Inhibins are heterodimeric glycoproteins, made up of a common α-subunit and a specific β-subunit (five isoforms βA, βB, βC, βD, and βE), which inhibit activin activity [118]. Activins (A, B, and AB) are homodimers or heterodimers composed of two inhibin β-subunits (βA or βB), which can be associated with a carrier, the monomeric glycoprotein follistatin. All these proteins constitute a heterogeneous pool of circulating dimeric glycoproteins ranging from 30 to 110 kDa. Human α-subunit results from the cleavage of a precursor, which is encoded by a single gene located on chromosome 2 [119,120]. It contains three N glycans and its production is up-regulated by cAMP. β subunits also result from proteolysis of precursors, after cleavage of the β–C terminal element of 13 kDA. βA and βB subunits are encoded by two genes located on chromosomes 7 and 2, respectively, and expressed in the placenta. The βA subunit has one N glycan, whereas the βB subunit is not glycosylated. Cysteine residues are crucial to the formation of the three-dimensional protein structure, which is characteristic of all the members of the TGFβ superfamily, and which is responsible for their biological activity. In vitro studies have suggested that, as for hCG, glycosylation is an important driver for both the assembly and function of inhibins and activins [121]. Inhibin A inhibits the action of activin A on its receptors, whereas follistatin regulates the bioavailability of activin A [122,123]. Inhibin A antagonizes the action of the mature dimeric activin A that acts mainly via the type II (ActRII) serine–threonine kinase receptor, inducing Smad signaling. The binding of inhibin A to ActRII is facilitated by a membrane proteoglycan, the betaglycan. In the placenta, ActRII and betaglycan are expressed in the ST and the endothelial cells in both the villi and the decidua [124]. Therefore, inhibin A in the placenta acts in an autocrine and paracrine way, modulating the actions of activin A on decidua cells, vascular endothelial cells, and trophoblast. The inhibin/activin/follistatin system is involved in the functional differentiation of the trophoblast in relation to estradiol and hCG [125]. Inhibin A is a potent antagonist of activin-mediated steroidogenesis and hCG production by the ST [126]. It may also be involved to a minor extent in triggering labor [124]. Activin A increases matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 2 expression and cell invasion in the human trophoblast, whereas inhibin A blocks this process [127].
Inhibins, activins, and follistatin are expressed in different tissues, i.e., brain, and breast, but mainly in reproductive tissues, i.e., testes, ovary, and placenta [118,123]. In a full-term placenta, activin A and inhibin A are found at high levels in the ST, as well as follistatin in smaller amounts. Indeed, the high inhibin A levels produced by the placenta increase during the second trimester to reach a peak in the third trimester [128,129,130,131]. Inhibin A seems to be produced by the ST rather than by the CT and its synthesis depends on the α subunit rather than on the βA subunit mRNA. Inhibin and activin production is regulated by numerous factors that act locally on trophoblast differentiation such as hCG, EGF, CRH, oxygen, AMPc, activin A itself, and cytokines.
Maternal serum inhibin A and activin A have been studied in normal and pathological pregnancies [132]. In normal pregnancy, inhibin A levels increase mainly during the third trimester, whereas inhibin B levels are hardly detectable [131]. Abnormal levels of inhibin A have been described in pathological pregnancies, with low levels being associated with miscarriage or trisomy 21 [11] and high levels being associated with preeclampsia [132,133]. Only inhibin A is used as a trisomy 21 serum marker during the second trimester, mainly because its measurement is simpler and more specific than those of activin A and follistatin. Van Lith was one of the first to report an association between elevated maternal serum inhibin A and trisomy 21-affected pregnancies in 1992 [116]. In cases of trisomy 21, inhibin A levels increase by around two-fold as hCG [11,134,135]. This increase seems to result from an increased trophoblastic synthesis since an up-regulation of inhibin α-subunit mRNA levels in placenta from trisomy 21-affected pregnancies has been demonstrated and associated with a higher placental concentration of inhibin A at the protein level [134]. Molecular forms of inhibin in trisomy 21 did not differ from normal pregnancies in the maternal serum in contrast with the placenta [136]. Interestingly, Kipp et al. compared potential regulators of the α-inhibin promoter between unaffected and trisomy 21-affected full-term placental tissues [137]. Their findings highlighted a reduced expression of WT1, an inhibin α-subunit repressor, which may explain the higher placental production and the elevated maternal serum levels of inhibin A. We showed in vitro that T21 villous mesenchymal cells secrete less activin A than non-affected mesenchymal cells [138]. Moreover, the use of recombinant activin A stimulates trisomic 21 trophoblast fusion, whereas follistatin and blocking activin A antibodies inhibit this fusion. These results suggest a putative role of activin A in ST formation and functional defects observed in trisomic 21 placentas.
Other markers measured in maternal serum come from the fetus, but some steps in their production, secretion or release into the maternal circulation require the cooperation of the placenta, and mainly the ST.

2.2. Markers of Fetal Origin: The Alpha-Fetoprotein

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is a glycoprotein that was discovered in 1956 by Bergstrand and belongs to the oncofetal proteins group [139,140]. It is one of the four members of the albumin superfamily, sharing a high degree of homology, as they derive from the same ancestral gene [141,142].
This glycoprotein (MW 67–74 kDa) is composed of a single chain of three domains and 590 amino acids with 15 disulfide bridges, which migrate in the alpha1 band [143]. It is encoded by a single gene located on the long arm of chromosome 4 [144]. It contains no more than 5% of glycans with several putative N and O glycosylation and phosphorylation sites, depending on the producing tissue [145]. During pregnancy, it is initially synthesized by the yolk sac until 13 WG and then by the fetal liver until the end of pregnancy (Figure 4) [146].
A small proportion of AFP is produced by both the digestive tract and the kidneys during the very early stages of pregnancy, and a transient production by the trophoblast has also been suggested [147,148]. AFP is the first alpha-globulin to appear in fetal blood during ontogenesis. Its level rises to reach a peak of 3 to 4 mg/mL at around 13–15 WG and then declines as fetal hepatic synthesis switches to albumin [149]. After delivery, its level in neonatal blood falls drastically during the first month of life to the undetectable level observed in children and adults [150]. In early pregnancy, AFP is likely to pass from the fetal circulation through the unkeratinized fetal skin into the amniotic fluid. Thereafter, fetal serum AFP is excreted by the immature fetal kidneys via the urine in amniotic fluid, peaking at around 14 WG at much lower levels (μg/mL) [151]. Then, renal AFP filtration decreases with kidney maturation and therefore its amniotic levels fall until the end of pregnancy. AFP reaches the maternal circulation through the membranes and placenta, explaining the high concentrations found in the intervillous space [152]. This transfer is very low, as maternal serum AFP levels are several hundred-fold lower (ng/mL) than those observed in amniotic fluid, reaching a plateau at about 32 WG. The mechanisms involved in this placental transfer are still unclear and may involve lectins [152,153,154]. The regulation of AFP production is also still poorly understood [140,155,156]. AFP is associated with the cell cycle and is synthesized during both the G and S phases of cell division [157]. Several transcription factors appear to be involved, such as the hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 (HNF1), nuclear factor 1(NF1), and the C enhancer binding protein(C/EBP). Some of them are specifically detected in the fetal liver such as Nkx2,8 and the fetal transcription factor (FTF) [158]. Because the HNF1/NF1 ratio varies during pregnancy, this may explain the decrease in fetal AFP synthesis. Activation of the “silencer” located between the enhancer and AFP promoter will also lead to an increase in albumin synthesis while AFP synthesis decreases [159]. The biological functions of AFP are still debated, but it is likely to play an important role at the fetal–maternal interface [140,156,160,161,162]. AFP is involved in many physiological processes, such as growth control, cellular proliferation [163], inflammation, immune modulation [164,165], and apoptosis [166]. Like albumin, its binding capacities allow it to modulate the bioavailability of endogenous ligands necessary for embryofetal development (e.g., fatty acids in neural tissue) or exogenous potentially toxic ligands (e.g., bilirubin, estrogens, heavy metals, retinoids) [167,168,169].
AFP levels in amniotic fluid and maternal serum can be abnormally increased in many fetal defects, making AFP and some of its glycosylated isoforms a sensitive but not specific marker of neural tube defects [162,170,171,172]. In trisomy 21, maternal serum AFP levels fall to about 0.8 MoM, and can therefore be used as a T21 biomarker during the second trimester [9,173].
However, several reports have suggested that this decrease in maternal serum levels of AFP could be detected during the first trimester of pregnancy [174]. A delay in renal maturation and AFP excretion into amniotic fluid has been discussed in trisomic 21 fetuses [175]. Decreased AFP production by the liver of trisomic 21 fetuses has been suspected by the study of AFP transcripts but has not been confirmed at the protein level [176,177]. AFP glycosylation is modified in trisomy 21 [178,179,180]. This modification may decrease its transfer across the membranes, leading to lower maternal serum levels in trisomy 21. The association of normal fetal hepatic AFP levels with increased placental AFP levels in trisomy 21 is in favor of reduced placental transfer [181]. It may also result from impaired villous vascularization or maturation in the context of aneuploidy.

2.3. Markers of Feto–Placental Origin: The Unconjugated Estriol

Finally, estriol (E3), a steroid hormone secreted by the placenta, which belongs to the estrogen hormones, such as estradiol (E2) and estrone (E1), can also be used as a maternal serum marker [181,182]. Unlike other tissues producing estrogens, the human placenta lacks cytochrome P450 17alpha-hydroxylase-17:20 lyase, which is required to convert progestins into androgens, the precursors of estrogens (Figure 5) [183,184,185,186,187]. Thus, the placenta participates in the enzymatic conversion of fetal 16α-OH-DHEA-S into E3, by sulphatase (STS), and aromatase activities [188,189]. Estrogen production is regulated by several hormones, i.e., hCG, calcitriol, insulin leptin, and cAMP, which are also involved in cytotrophoblast differentiation [189,190,191]. Estrogens diffuse into both the fetal and maternal compartments. E3 is detectable in maternal serum as early as 8 WG and its levels increase until the end of gestation [192,193]. Aside from pregnancy, E3 is produced at very low levels as a hepatic catabolite of estradiol. E3 mainly circulates in conjugated forms after the action of the maternal liver. Only 10% of circulating E3 is unconjugated (uE3) and likely to bind to the sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) [194]. The half-life of the unconjugated form is 20 min, with maternal renal and/or biliary excretion.
E3 functions are assimilated to those of E2 during pregnancy and act in an endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine manner involving estrogen nuclear receptors (ER): ERα (66 kDa) and ERβ (53 kDa) [195]. Cytotrophoblasts mainly express ERα while the ST mainly expresses ERβ. E3 interacts mainly with ERβ [196]. It is considered to be a weak estrogen for all the biological effects of E2, i.e., endometrial maturation, maternal metabolic adaptation to pregnancy inducing hepatic functions, pituitary growth, and proliferation of mammary epithelium in preparation for breastfeeding. E3 appears to be specifically involved in the angiogenesis and regulation of placental vascularization, designed to increase uteroplacental blood flow, trophoblast turnover, and therefore feto–placental exchanges [195,196,197,198]. Thus, during the third trimester of pregnancy, E3 is positively correlated with neonatal weight and size at birth and placental weight [199].
uE3 is the only steroid hormone that may be used in clinical practice for the maternal screening of T21, but its analytical determination is difficult, therefore restricting its use [17,200,201,202]. In trisomy 21, levels of uE3 are significantly reduced in maternal serum in the second trimester of gestation [10,202]. This decrease is also observed in the placenta, maternal urine, and amniotic fluid, since the end of the first trimester [203,204]. It correlates with a decrease in maternal serum levels and results from a lower production by the placenta. This seems not to be due to a decrease in the placental STS activity and aromatase activity but this has not been fully studied in trisomy 21. Interestingly, DHEA-S, an estrogens precursor specifically produced by the adrenal gland, is lowered in maternal serum, placental tissue, and fetal liver in trisomy 21, suggesting a potential adrenal dysfunction [205]. This hypothesis is supported by the lower DHEA levels observed in the serum of trisomic 21 adults [206].

3. Cellular Markers and Placenta

Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) is indicated for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 screening, especially for T21. It is based on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis in the maternal blood, but many different cells and feto–placental cellular components have been characterized in the maternal compartment [207,208].

3.1. Cellular Markers and Cell-Free Fetal DNA

The cross-placental trafficking of fetal cells and the release of placental fragments into maternal blood is a frequent phenomenon occurring throughout pregnancy. Different fetal cells may be detected, and the presence of fetal erythrocytes has been characterized in maternal serum [209,210]. They are likely to be released from endothelial capillaries inside placental villi either by accidental breakage of the villi or by vessel breaching. Schmorl was one of the first to describe the presence of placental trophoblastic cells in the lungs of women who had died from preeclampsia [211]. Villous trophoblast tissue fragments are physiologically deported into the intervillous space and thereafter into the maternal circulation by the shedding of syncytial knots [212]. This results from the normal apoptosis of the ST and turnover of the placental villi [213,214,215]. Trophoblast tissue fragments are increased in complicated pregnancies, particularly in preeclampsia, reflecting ST necrosis. EVCT, which invades the uterine wall, reaching the spiral arteries, may also contribute to endovascular trophoblast [216]. Placental components such as exosomes, cell-free DNA, and RNA, have been identified in maternal blood [217]. Cell-free feto–placental DNA is detectable at increasing levels in the maternal circulation since 5 WG but represents less than 20% of the total cell-free DNA circulating in maternal blood [218]. It consists of an altered DNA, mainly of placental origin, which disappears very quickly after delivery in contrast to fetal cells, which can survive several weeks or years post partum. Feto–placental DNA circulates mainly in cell-free form, whereas free feto–placental RNA is mostly encapsulated in large, sealed membrane particles. It mainly results from the placental physiological turnover with the release of syncytial knots in the maternal circulation, independently of placental size [213,219]. However, accidental breakage or necrosis, especially in complicated pregnancies, may contribute to their release. There is an apoptotic release from ST associated with cell-free DNA release but also with the release of exosomes and small membrane fragments (STBM) [214] An increased apoptotic process and syncytial necrosis in trisomy 21 has been suggested to explain the global increase of placental cellular components, such as cell-free feto–placental DNA, in maternal serum.
Increased levels of fetal cells and fetal DNA have been reported in aneuploidies, especially in trisomy 21, by the analysis of enriched fetal cells and PCR [215,218,219,220,221,222]. Moreover, seven miRNAs have been shown to be up-regulated in trisomic 21 placentas, three of them (miR-99a, miR-1125b, let-7c) being located on chromosome 21. They are likely to modulate different cell biological processes and genes involved in placental development (e.g., LEP, INHA) [223].

3.2. Placenta and Trophoblastic Villi in Trisomy 21

There is a defective placental development in trisomy 21 affecting trophoblast proliferation, invasion, and differentiation, vasculogenesis, and mesenchymal development (Figure 4). All these defects are likely to influence endocrine, transfer, and exchange placenta functions. Placentae in trisomy 21-affected pregnancies exhibit immature or dysmature villi (hypotrophic or hydropic) with mesenchymal dysplasia, stromal edema, hypovascularization, trophoblastic hypoplasia, intrastromal trophoblastic cysts, calcification, and fibrin deposits [224,225,226,227]. The persistence of a two-layered VCT is also observed, suggesting a delay in villous maturation. However, these lesions do not always affect the whole placenta and may evolve during pregnancy. In addition, they are not specific for trisomy 21, as they may also be observed in other types of aneuploidy [228]. This might explain why maternal serum markers are not always abnormal in trisomy 21, depending on the degree of placental injury, and why these markers can be abnormal in trisomy 18 and trisomy 13.
The formation of the ST is defective in trisomy 21. Gap junctions between VCT are likely to be affected by miRNAs that are up-regulated in trisomy 21. Thus, VCT aggregates but poorly fuses to form an ST expressing low levels of LHCGR [229,230,231]. This defective differentiation is associated with the production of an abnormally glycosylated hCG with decreased steroidogenic activity [69]. This weakly bioactive hCG and abnormal LHCGR expression could be involved in defective ST formation [64,70]. Fibroblasts isolated from the mesenchymal axis of trisomic 21 villi display low levels of activin A and increased levels of follistatin, participating in the decrease in VCT fusion. In addition, trophoblasts in trisomy 21 show an abnormal oxidative status, impairing both VCT fusion and differentiation. This status is determined by the balance between ROS production and their degradation by antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutases (SODs). The Cu, Zn-SOD (SOD-1) is encoded by a gene that is located on chromosome 21. In trisomy 21, there is indeed an increased expression and activity of SOD-1, resulting in abnormal oxidative status, and impairing ST formation [229,232]. This abnormal oxidative status can lead to increased apoptosis and necrosis of the ST [232,233].

4. Conclusions

Trisomy 21 is the main genetic cause of mental retardation. This aneuploidy is compatible with post-natal survival and associated with a wide spectrum of phenotypic features, some of them being detectable by fetal ultrasound scanning and being part of prenatal screening [1,3]. NIPS based on cfDNA analysis is now widely used as it has high performance (PPV ≥ 90% and NPV ≥ 99%) to screen for trisomy 21. It is also informative to screen for trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 even with lower performance compared to 21, leading to a global decrease in invasive procedures for karyotyping [16,207,234]. NIPS is likely to spread to other fetal chromosomopathies and monogenic diseases, and recent guidelines recommend offering NIPS to all pregnancies [235,236]. However, due to its current cost, NIPS is still used in many countries as a second-tier test following maternal serum screening methods.
The serum profiles observed in the case of fetal trisomy 21 are characterized at the end of the first trimester by decreased PAPP-A and increased free hCGβ levels; in the second trimester, it is characterized by a decrease in the AFP and uE3 levels and an increase in the hCG, free hCGβ and inhA levels [15,172] (Figure 6). These abnormal profiles are likely to be observed all through pregnancy even if not always discriminant at other stages [174,203,229]. This suggests that the molecular mechanisms underlying these abnormal serum levels are present all through pregnancy. In trisomy 21-affected pregnancies, the placenta is likely to be both immature and affected by increased oxidative stress and apoptosis [233]. However, maternal serum markers are mainly but neither consistently disrupted (in the case of fetal trisomy 21) nor specifically, as a decreased PAPP-A can be observed in trisomy 18 and an increased hCG can be observed in preeclampsia [110,237]. In addition, other placental markers have been described as abnormal in the case of fetal aneuploidy and have also been proposed in the screening of preeclampsia such as placental growth factor (PlGF) [238,239]. The molecular mechanisms underlying these abnormal serum levels are likely nonspecific to any of those diseases. Maternal serum biomarkers both reflect the alteration of the trophoblast and point out the key role of the placenta in prenatal screening.
The presence of an extra chromosome 21 has a potential impact on the overall genomic expression of the fetus and the placenta [240,241]. This could be mediated by exosomes and miRNAs that are abnormally expressed in trisomy 21 and involved in the regulation of transcription, glycosylation, and apoptosis in the trophoblast [242,243]. The trophoblast can thus be variably dysregulated in its differentiation and functions, explaining both the high frequency of early miscarriage in pregnancies affected by trisomy 21 and the abnormal marker pattern in maternal serum. Many diseases affecting trisomic 21 adults may result from biological disorders such as abnormal glycosylation, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction beginning in fetal life [244,245,246].

Author Contributions

J.G. and V.T. designed and wrote the article, and drew the figures. M.-C.L. wrote the chapter on hCG, G.P. wrote the chapter on inhibin A. M.H.-S., C.L., O.A. and G.G. contributed to reading and discussing certain chapters of the article. F.B. wrote the chapter on fetal DNA and the placenta and proofread the entire article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Roizen, N.; Patterson, D. Down’s syndrome. Lancet 2003, 361, 1281–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lejeune, J.; Turpin, R.; Gautier, M. Chromosomic diagnosis of mongolism. Arch. Fr. Pediatr. 1959, 16, 962–963. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Antonarakis, S.; Lyle, R.; Dermitzakis, E.; Reymond, A.; Deutsch, S. Chromosome 21 and Down syndrome: From genomics to pathophysiology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5, 725–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Penrose, L. The relative effects of paternal and maternal age in mongolism. J. Genet. 1933, 27, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Benn, P. Advances in prenatal screening for Down syndrome: I. General principles and second trimester testing. Clin. Chim. Acta 2002, 323, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Snijders, R.; Noble, P.; Sebire, N.; Souka, A.; Nicolaides, K. UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Fetal Medicine Foundation First Trimester Screening Group. Lancet 1998, 352, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bogart, M.; Pandian, M.; Jones, O. Abnormal maternal serum chorionic gonadotropin levels in pregnancies with fetal chromosome abnormalities. Prenat. Diagn. 1987, 7, 623–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Heyl, P.; Miller, W.; Canick, J. Maternal serum screening for aneuploid pregnancy by alpha-fetoprotein, hCG, and unconjugated estriol. Obs. Gynecol. 1990, 76, 1025–1031. [Google Scholar]
  9. Merkatz, I.; Nitowsky, H.; Macri, J.; Johnson, W. An association between low maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein and fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 1984, 148, 886–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Canick, J.; Knight, G.; Palomaki, G.; Haddow, J.; Cuckle, H.; Wald, N. Low second trimester maternal serum unconjugated oestriol in pregnancies with Down’s syndrome. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1988, 95, 330–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aitken, D.; Wallace, E.; Crossley, J.; Swanston, I.; van Pareren, Y.; van Maarle, M.; Groome, N.; Macri, J.; Connor, J. Dimeric inhibin A as a marker for Down’s syndrome in early pregnancy. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996, 334, 1231–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Muller, F.; Cuckle, H.; Teisner, B.; Grudzinskas, J. Serum PAPP–A levels are depressed in women with fetal Down syndrome in early pregnancy. Prenat. Diagn. 1993, 13, 633–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Macri, J.; Spencer, K.; Aitken, D.; Garver, K.; Buchanan, P.; Muller, F.; Boue, A. First–trimester free beta (hCG) screening for Down syndrome. Prenat. Diagn. 1993, 13, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Russo, M.; Blakemore, K. A historical and practical review of first trimester aneuploidy screening. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014, 19, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alldred, S.; Takwoingi, Y.; Guo, B.; Pennant, M.; Deeks, J.; Neilson, J.; Alfirevic, Z. First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down’s syndrome screening. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 3, CD012600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mackie, F.; Hemming, K.; Allen, S.; Morris, R.; Kilby, M. The accuracy of cell-free fetal DNA-based non-invasive prenatal testing in singleton pregnancies: A systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis. Br. J. Obs. Gynaecol. 2017, 124, 32–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ogren, L.; Talamantes, F. The Placenta as An Endocrine Organ: Polypeptides. Physiol. Reprod. 1994, 2, 945–975. [Google Scholar]
  18. Benirschke, K.; Kaufmann, P.; Baergen, R. Pathology of the Human Placenta, 5th ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  19. Guibourdenche, J.; Fournier, T.; Malassine, A.; Evain-Brion, D. Development and hormonal functions of the human placenta. Folia. Histochem. Cytobiol. 2009, 47, 35–40. [Google Scholar]
  20. Olszynko-Gryn, J. The demand for pregnancy testing: The Aschheim-Zondek reaction, diagnostic versatility, and laboratory services in 1930s Britain. Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 2013, 47, 233–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pierce, J.; Parsons, T. Glycoprotein hormones: Structure and function. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 1981, 50, 465–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ascoli, M.; Segaloff, D. On the structure of the luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor. Endocr. Rev. 1989, 10, 27–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Casarini, L.; Santi, D.; Brigante, G.; Simoni, M. Two hormones for one receptor: Evolution, biochemistry, actions and pathophysiology of LH and hCG. Endocr. Rev. 2018, 39, 549–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bahl, O.; Carisen, R.; Bellisario, R.; Swaminathan, N. Human chorionic gonadotrophin: Amino acid sequences of the α and β subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 1975, 250, 5247–5253. [Google Scholar]
  25. Elliott, M.; Kardana, A.; Lustbader, J.; Cole, L. Carbohydrate and peptide structure of the alpha- and the beta_subunits of human chorionic gonadotropin from normal and aberrant pregnancy and choriocarcinoma. Endocrine 1997, 7, 15–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Talmadge, K.; Boorstein, W.; Fiddes, J. The human genome contains seven genes for the beta-subunit of chorionic gonadotropin but only one gene for the beta-subunit of luteinizing hormone. DNA 1983, 2, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bo, M.; Boime, I. Identification of the transcriptionally active genes of the chorionic gonadotropin β gene cluster in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 3179–3184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Camperi, J.; Combes, A.; Guibourdenche, J.; Guillarme, D.; Pichon, V.; Fournier, T.; Vander Heyden, Y.; Mangelings, D.; Delaunay, N. An attempt to characterize the human Chorionic Gonadotropin protein by reversed phase liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry at the intact level. J. Pharm. Biomed. Ann. 2018, 161, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cole, L. hCG, five independent molecules. Clin. Chim. Acta 2012, 413, 48–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fournier, T.; Guibourdenche, J.; Evain-Brion, D. hCGs: Different sources of production, different glycoforms and functions. Placenta 2015, 36, S60–S65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Birken, D.; Maydelman, S.; Gowinowicz, M.; Pound, A.; Liu, Y.; Hartree, A. Isolation and characterization of human pituitary chorionic gonadotropin. Endocrinology 1996, 137, 1405–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stenman, U.; Alfthan, H.; Ranta, T.; Vartainen, E.; Jalkanen, J.; Seppata, M. Serum levels of human chorionic gonadotropin in nonpregnant women and men are modulated by gonadotropin-releasing hormone and sex steroids. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1987, 64, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guibourdenche, J.; Handschuh, K.; Tsatsaris, V.; Gerbaud, P.; Leguy, M.C.; Muller, F.; Evain Brion, D.; Fournier, T. Hyperglycosylated hCG is a marker of early human trophoblast invasion. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, E240–E244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Berndt, S.; Blacher, S.; Munaut, C.; Detilleux, J.; Perrier d’Hauterive, S.; Huhtaniemi, I.; Evain-Brion, D.; Noël, A.; Fournier, T.; Foidart, J.M. Hyperglycosylated human chorionic gonadotropin stimulates angiogenesis through TGF-β receptor activation. FASEB J. 2013, 7, 1309–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Butler, S.; Luttoo, J.; Freire, M.; Abban, T.; Borrelli, P.; Iles, R. Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the secretome of cultured embryos: Hyperglycosylated hCG and hCG-free beta subunit are potential markers for infertility management and treatment. Reprod. Sci. 2013, 220, 1038–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lopata, A.; Oliva, K.; Stanton, P.; Robertson, D. Analysis of chorionic gonadotropin-secreted by cultured human blastocysts. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 1997, 3, 517–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Muyan, M.; Boime, I. Secretion of chorionic gonadotropin from human trophoblasts. Placenta 1997, 18, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Handschuh, K.; Guibourdenche, J.; Tsatsaris, V.; Guesnon, M.; Laurendeau, I.; Evain-Brion, D.; Fournier, T. Human chorionic gonadotropin expression in human trophoblasts from early placenta: Comparative study between villous and extravillous trophoblastic cells. Placenta 2007, 28, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Merz, W. Biosynthesis of human chorionic gonadotropin: A review. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 1996, 135, 269–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gohar, J.; Mazor, M.; Leiberman, J. GnRH in pregnancy. Arch. Gynecol. Obs. 1996, 259, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Licht, P.; Cao, H.; Lei, Z.; Rao, C.; Merz, W. Novel self-regulation of human chorionic gonadotropin biosynthesis in term pregnancy human placenta. Endocrinology 1993, 133, 3014–3025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chard, T.; Iles, R.; Wathen, N. Why is there a peak of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) in early pregnancy? Hum. Reprod. 1995, 10, 1837–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Lei, Z.; Rao, C. Gonadotropin receptors in human fetoplacental unit: Implications for HCG as an intracrine, paracrine and endocrine regulator of human fetoplacental function. Troph. Res. 1992, 6, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cole, L. hCG physiology. Placenta 2013, 34, 1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Birken, S.; Kovalevskaya, G.; O’Connor, J. Metabolism of hCG and hLH to multiple urinary forms. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1996, 125, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mc Chesney, R.; Wilcox, A.; O’Connor, J.; Weinberg, C.; Baird, D.; Schlatterer, J.; Mc Connaughey, D.; Birken, S.; Canfield, R. Intact hCG, free hCG beta-subunit and hCG betacore fragment: Longitudinal patterns in urine during early pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. 2005, 20, 928–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Korhonen, J.; Alfthan, H.; Ylöstalo, P.; Vedhuis, J.; Stenman, U. Disappearance of human chorionic gonadotropin and its alpha- and beta-subunits after term pregnancy. Clin. Chem. 1997, 43, 2155–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nwabuobi, C.; Arlier, S.; Schatz, F.; Guzeloglu-Kayisli, O.; Lockwood, C.; Kayisli, U.A. hCG: Biological functions and clinical applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Perrier d’Hauterive, S.; Close, R.; Gridelet, V.; Mawet, M.; Nisolle, M.; Geenen, V. Human Chorionic Gonadotropin and Early Embryogenesis: Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tulchinsky, D.; Hobel, C. Plasma human chorionic gonadotropin, estrone, estradiol, estriol, progesterone, and 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone in human pregnancy. 3. Early normal pregnancy. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 1973, 117, 884–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Casarini, L.; Simoni, M. Recent advances in understanding gonadotropin signaling. Fac. Rev. 2021, 10, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Troppmann, B.; Kleinau, G.; Krause, G.; Gromoll, J. Structural and functional plasticity of the luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotrophin receptor. Hum. Reprod. Update 2013, 19, 583–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Glinoer, D.; de Nayer, P.; Bourdoux, P.; Lemone, M.; Robyn, C.; van Steirteghem, A.; Kinthaert, J.; Lejeune, B. Regulation of maternal thyroid during pregnancy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1990, 71, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Moleti, M.; Trimarchi, F.; Vermiglio, F. Thyroid physiology in pregnancy. Endocr. Pract. 2014, 20, 589–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zigmunt, M.; Herr, F.; Keller-Schoenwetter, S.; Kunzi-Rapp, K.; Munstedt, K.; Rao, C.V.; Lang, U.; Preissner, K. Characterization of human chorionic gonadotropin as a novel angiogenic factor. J. Clin. Endocrino. Metab. 2002, 87, 5290–5296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cole, L. Hyperglycosylated hCG. Placenta 2007, 28, 977–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lee, C.; Chiu, P.; Hautala, L.; Salo, T.; Yeung, W.; Stenman, U.; Koistinen, H. Human chorionic gonadotropin and its free β-subunit stimulate trophoblast invasion independent of LH/hCG receptor. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2013, 375, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tsampalas, M.; Gridelet, V.; Berndt, S.; Foidart, J.; Geenen, V.; Perrier d’Hauterive, S. Human chorionic gonadotropin: A hormone with immunological and angiogenic properties. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 85, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Schumacher, A.; Heinze, K.; Witte, J.; Poloski, E.; Linzke, N.; Woidacki, K.; Zenclussen, A. Human chorionic gonadotropin as a central regulator of pregnancy immune tolerance. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 2650–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rotmensch, S.; Liberati, M.; Kardana, A.; Copel, J.A.; Ben-Rafael, Z.; Cole, L. Nicked free beta-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin: A potential new marker for Down syndrome screening. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 1996, 174, 609–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cole, L.; Shahabi, S.; Oz, U.; Bahado-Singh, R.; Mahoney, M. Hyperglycosylated human chorionic gonadotropin (invasive trophoblast antigen) immunoassay: A new basis for gestational Down syndrome screening. Clin. Chem. 1999, 45, 2109–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Eldar-Gevar, T.; Hochberg, A.; deGroot, N.; Weinstein, D. High maternal serum chorionic gonadotropin level in Downs’ syndrome pregnancies is caused by elevation of both subunits messenger ribonucleic acid level in trophoblasts. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1995, 80, 3528–3531. [Google Scholar]
  63. Jauniaux, E.; Bao, S.; Eblen, A.; Li, X.; Lei, Z.M.; Meuris, S.; Rao, C. HCG concentration and receptor gene expression in placental tissue from trisomy 18 and 21. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2000, 6, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Banerjee, S.; Smallwood, A.; Chambers, A.; Papageorghiou, A.; Loosfelt, H.; Spencer, K.; Campbell, S.; Nicolaides, K. A link between high serum levels of human chorionic gonadotrophin and chorionic expression of its mature functional receptor (LHCGR) in Down’s syndrome pregnancies. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2005, 3, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Goshen, R. What factors regulate hCG production in Downs ‘syndrome pregnancies? Mol. Hum. Reprod. 1999, 5, 893–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Aldaz-Carroll, L.; Richon, S.; Dangles-Marie, V.; Cocquebert, M.; Fournier, T.; Troalen, F.; Stevens, D.; Guery, B.; Hersant, A.M.; Guibourdenche, J.; et al. Specific detection of type II human chorionic gonadotropin beta subunit produced by trophoblastic and neoplastic cells. Clin. Chim. Acta 2015, 444, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cuckle, H.; Iles, R.; Chard, T. Urinary beta-core human chorionic gonadotropin: A new approach to Down’s syndrome screening. Prenat. Diagn. 1994, 14, 953–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cole, L.; Omrani, A.; Cermik, D.; Singh, R.; Mahoney, M. Hyperglycosylated hCG, a potentiel alternative to hCG in Down syndrome screening. Prenat. Diagn. 1998, 18, 926–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Frendo, J.; Guibourdenche, J.; Pidoux, G.; Vidaud, M.; Luton, D.; Giovangrandi, Y.; Porquet, D.; Muller, F.; Evain-Brion, D. Trophoblast production of a weakly bioactive human chorionic gonadotropin in trisomy 21-affected pregnancy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 727–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Pidoux, G.; Gerbaud, P.; Marpeau, O.; Guibourdenche, J.; Ferreira, F.; Badet, J.; Evain-Brion, D.; Frendo, J. Human placental development is impaired by abnormal human chorionic gonadotropin signaling in trisomy 21 pregnancies. Endocrinology 2007, 148, 5403–5413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Brun, S.; Leguy, M.; Bruneel, A.; Fournier, T.; Anselem, O.; Guibourdenche, J. hCG in screening for aneuploidy: A possible role for its glycoforms? Placenta 2014, 35, 425–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chambers, A.; Mills, W.; Mercade, I.; Crovetto, F.; Crispi, F.; Bodi, L.R.; Pugia, M.; Pira, A.; Lasalvia, L.; Banerjee, S.; et al. The utility of circulating LHCGR as a predictor of Down’s syndrome in early pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014, 14, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lin, T.; Halbert, S.; Spellacy, W. Measurement of pregnancy-associated plasma proteins during gestation. J. Clin. Investig 1974, 54, 576–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Conover, C.A. Key questions and answers about pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 23, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Oxvig, C.; Sand, O.; Kristensen, T.; Gleich, G.J.; Sottrup-Jensen, L. Circulating human pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A is disulfide-bridged to the preform of eosinophil major basic protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 12243–12246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Oxvig, C.; Sand, O.; Kristensen, T.; Kristensen, L.; Sottrup-Jensen, L. Isolation and characterization of circulating complex between human pregnancy associated plasma protein A and proform of eosinophil major basic protein. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1994, 1201, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Kristensen, T.; Oxvig, C.; Sand, O.; Moller, N.; Sottrup-Jensen, L. Ammino acid sequence of human pregnancy associated plasma protein-A derived from cloned cDNA. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 1592–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Farr, M.; Strübe, J.; Geppert, H.; Kocourek, A.; Mahne, M.; Tschesche, H. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-E (PAPP-E). Biochem. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1493, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kirkegaard, I.; Uldberg, N.; Oxvig, C. Biology of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A in relation to prenatal diagnostics: An overview. Act. Obs. Gynecol. 2010, 89, 1118–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Monget, P.; Oxvig, C. PAPP-A and the IGF system. Ann. Endocrinol. 2016, 77, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Overpris, S.; Skov, L.; Glerup, S.; Pihl, K.; Christiansen, M.; Oxvig, C. Formation of high-molecular-weight angiotensinogen during pregnancy is a result of competing redox reactions with the proform of eosinophil major basic protein. Biochem. J. 2013, 449, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Overgaard, M.T.; Oxvig, C.; Christiansen, M.; Lawrence, J.B.; Conover, C.A.; Gleich, G.J.; Sottrup-Jensen, L.; Haaning, J. Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Levels of Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A and the Proform of Eosinophil Major Basic Protein: Expression in Human Reproductive and Nonreproductive Tissues. Biol. Reprod. 1999, 61, 1083–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Schindler, A.; Bordignon, P.; Bischof, P. Immunohistochemical localization of pregnancy associated plasma protein-A in decidua and trophoblast: Comparison with human chorionic gonadotrophin and fibrin. Placenta 1984, 5, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Lin, T.; Halbert, S. Placental localization of human pregnancy-associated plasma proteins. Science 1986, 193, 1249–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Bonno, M.; Oxvig, C.; Kephart, G.M.; Wagner, J.M.; Kristensen, T.; Sottrup-Jensen, L.; Gleich, G. Localization of pregnancy associated plasma protein-A and colocalization of pregnancy associated plasma protein-A messenger ribonucleic acid and eosinophil granule major basic protein messenger ribonucleic acid in placenta. La. Investig. 1994, 71, 560–566. [Google Scholar]
  86. Guibourdenche, J.; Frendo, J.; Pidoux, G.; Bertin, G.; Luton, D.; Muller, F.; Porquet, D.; Evain-Brion, D. Expression of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A(PAPP-A) during villous trophoblast differentiation in vitro. Placenta 2003, 24, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. D’Elia, P.; Marzioni, D.; Castellucci, M.; Locci, C.; Pala, A. Homodimeric pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A in normal human placenta of first and third trimester of pregnancy: Biochemical and morphological observations. Placenta 2012, 33, 942–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Folkersen, J.; Grudzinskas, J.; Hindersson, P.; Teisner, B.; Westergaard, J. Pregnancy associated plasma protein A: Circulating levels during normal pregnancy. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 1981, 139, 910–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Metzenbauer, M.; Hafner, E.; Hoefinger, D.; Schuchter, K.; Stangl, G.; Ogris, E.; Philipp, K. Three-dimensional ultrasound measurement of the placental volume in early pregnancy: Method and correlation with biochemical placenta parameters. Placenta 2001, 22, 602–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sahraravand, M.; Järvelä, I.; Laitinen, P.; Tekay, A.; Ryynänen, M. The secretion of PAPP-A, ADAM 12 and PP13 correlates with the size of the placenta for the first month of pregnancy. Placenta 2011, 32, 999–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Christiansen, M.; Oxvig, C.; Wagner, J.; Qin, Q.; Nguyen, T.; Overgaard, M.; Larsen, S.; Sottrup-Jensen, L.; Gleich, G.; Nogaard-Dedersen, B. The proform of eosinophil major basic protein: A new maternal serum marker for Down Syndrome. Prenat. Diagn. 1999, 19, 905–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bersinger, N.; Xin, W.; Birkhäuser, M. Glycosylation of pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) in normal and trisomic pregnancies: Studies with lectins. Troph. Res. 1999, 13, 493–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Oxvig, C.; Conover, C. The Stanniocalcin-PAPP-A-IGFBP-IGF Axis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2023, 31, dgad053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Judge, R.; Sridar, J.; Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Jain, R.; Wang, J.; Ouch, C.; Xu, J.; Mafi, A.; Nile, A.; Remarcik, C.; et al. Structure of the PAPP-ABP5 complex reveals mechanism of substrate recognition. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lawrence, J.; Oxvig, C.; Overgaard, M.; Sottrup-Jensen, L.; Gleich, G.; Hays, L.; Yates, J.; Conover, C. The insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-dependent IGF binding protein-4 protease secreted by human fibroblasts is pregnancy associated plasma protein -A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 3149–3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Yan, X.; Baxter, R.; Firth, S. Involvement of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A2 in insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-5 proteolysis during pregnancy: A potential mechanism for increasing IGF bioavailability. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, 1412–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Giuduce, L.; Conover, C.; Bale, L.; Faessen, G.; Ilg, K.; Sun, I.; Imani, B.; Suen, L.; Irwin, J.; Christiansen, M.; et al. Identification and regulation of the IGFBP-4 protease and its physiological inhibitor in human trophoblasts and endometrial stroma: Evidence for paracrin regulation of IGF-II bioavailability in the placental bed during human implantation. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 2359–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Rojas-Rodriguez, R.; Ziegler, R.; DeSouza, T.; Majid, S.; Madore, A.; Amir, N.; Pace, V.; Nachreiner, D.; Alfego, D.; Mathew, J.; et al. Papp-a mediated adipose tissue remodeling mitigates insulin resistance and protects against gestational diabetes in mice and humans. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020, 12, eaay4145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Overgaard, M.; Haaning, J.; Boldt, H.; Olsen, I.; Laursen, L.; Christiansen, M.; Gleich, G.; Sottrup-Jensen, L.; Conover, C.; Oxvig, C. Expression of recombinant human pregnancy associated plasma protein A and identification of the proform eosinophil major basic protein as its physiological inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 31128–311433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Weyer, K.; Glerup, S. Placental regulation of peptide hormone and growth factor activity by proMB. Biol. Reprod. 2011, 84, 1077–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Bishop, A.; Cartwright, J.; Whitley, G. Stanniocalcin-1 in the female reproductive system and pregnancy. Hum Reprod Update 2021, 27, 1098–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kobber, S.; Gajhede, M.; Mirza, O.A.; Kloverpris, S.; Kjaer, T.; Mikkelsen, J.; Boesen, T.; Oxvig, C. Structure of the proteolytic enzyme PAPP-A with the endogenous inhibitor stanniocalcin-2 reveals its inhibitory mechanism. Nat. Comm. 2022, 13, 6084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Handschuh, K.; Guibourdenche, J.; Guesnon, M.; Laurendeau, I.; Evain-Brion, D.; Fournier, T. Modulation of PAPP-A expression by PPARγ in human first trimester trophoblast. Placenta 2006, 27, S127–S134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Wang, J.; Liu, S.; Qin, H.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, X.; Yan, Q. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A up-regulated by progesterone promotes adhesion and proliferation of trophoblastic cells. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014, 7, 1427–1437. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Haddow, J.; Palomaki, G.; Knight, G.; Williams, J.; Miller, W.; Johnson, A. Screening of maternal serum for fetal Down’s syndrome in the first trimester. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 338, 955–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Brizot, M.; Hyette, J.; Mckie, A.; Bersinger, N.; Farzaneh, F.; Nicolaides, K. Gene expression of human pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A in placenta from trisomic pregnancies. Placenta 1996, 17, 33–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Tul, N.; Spencer, K.; Noble, P.; Chan, C.; Nicolaides, K. Screening for trisomy 18 by fetal nuchal translucency and maternal serum free beta-hCG and PAPP-A at 10–14 weeks of gestation. Prenat. Diagn. 1999, 19, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Aitken, D.; Ireland, M.; Berry, E.; Crossley, J.; Macri, J.; Burn, J.; Connor, J. Second trimester pregnancy associated plasma protein-A levels are reduced in Cornelia de Lange syndrome pregnancies. Prenat. Diagn. 1999, 19, 706–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Westergaard, J.; Sinosich, M.; Bugge, M.; Madsen, L.; Teisner, B.; Grudzinskas, J. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A in the prediction of early pregnancy failure. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 1983, 145, 67–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kaijomaa, M.; Rahkonen, L.; Ulander, V.; Hämäläinen, E.; Alfthan, H.; Markkanen, H.; Heinonen, S.; Stefanovic, V. Low maternal pregnancy-associated plasma protein A during the first trimester of pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obs. 2017, 136, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Petraglia, F.; Sawchenko, P.; Lim, A.T.; Rivier, J.; Vale, W. Localization, secretion, and action of inhibin in human placenta. Science 1987, 237, 187–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Petraglia, F. Inhibin, activin and follistatin in the human placenta--a new family of regulatory proteins. Placenta 1997, 18, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Adu-Gyamfi, E.; Ding, Y.; Wang, Y. Regulation of placentation by the transforming growth factor beta superfamily. Biol. Reprod. 2020, 102, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Debieve, F.; Moiset, A.; Thomas, K.; Pampfer, S.; Hubinont, C. Vascular endothelial growth factor and placenta growth factor concentrations in Down’s syndrome and control pregnancies. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2001, 8, 765–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Wald, N.; Bestwick, J.; George, L.; Huttly, W. Antenatal screening for Down syndrome using serum placental growth factor with the combined, quadruple, serum integrated and integrated tests. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Van Lith, J.; Pratt, J.; Beekhuis, J.; Mantingh, A. Second trimester maternal serum immunoreactive inhibin as a marker for fetal Down’s syndrome. Prenat. Diagn. 1992, 12, 801–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Makanji, Y.; Zhu, J.; Mishra, R.; Holmquist, C.; Wong, W.; Schwartz, N.; Mayo, K.; Woodruff, T. Inhibin at 90: From discovery to clinical application, a historical review. Endocr. Rev. 2014, 35, 747–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Namwanje, M.; Brown, C. Activins and Inhibins: Roles in Development, Physiology, and Disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2016, 8, a021881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Walton, K.; Makanji, Y.; Robertson, D.; Harrison, C. The synthesis and secretion of inhibins. Vitam. Horm. 2011, 85, 149–184. [Google Scholar]
  120. Barton, D.; Yang-Feng, T.; Mason, A.; Seeburg, P.; Francke, U. Mapping of genes for inhibin subunits alpha, beta A, and beta B on human and mouse chromosomes and studies of jsd mice. Genomics 1989, 5, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Makanji, Y.; Harrison, C.A.; Stanton, P.G.; Krishna, R.; Robertson, D. Inhibin A and B in vitro bioactivities are modified by their degree of glycosylation and their affinities to betaglycan. Endocrinology 2007, 148, 2309–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Cook, R.; Thompson, T.; Jardetzky, T.; Woodruff, T. Molecular biology of inhibin action. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2004, 22, 269–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Bloise, E.; Ciarmela, P.; Dela Cruz, C.; Luisi, S.; Petraglia, F.; Reis, F. Activin A in mammalian physiology. Physiol. Rev. 2019, 99, 739–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Schneider-Kolsky, M.; Manuelpillai, U.; Waldron, K.; Dole, A.; Wallace, E. The distribution of activin and activin receptors in gestational tissues across human pregnancy and during labour. Placenta 2002, 23, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Caniggia, I.; Lye, S.; Cross, J. Activin is a local regulator of human cytotrophoblast cell differentiation. Endocrinology 1997, 138, 3976–3986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Song, Y.; Keelan, J.; France, J. Activin-A stimulates, while transforming growth factor beta 1 inhibits, chorionic gonadotrophin production and aromatase activity in cultured human placental trophoblasts. Placenta 1996, 17, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Li, Y.; Klausen, C.; Zhu, H.; Leung, P.C. Activin A Increases Human Trophoblast Invasion by Inducing SNAIL-Mediated MMP2 Up-Regulation Through ALK4. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, E1415–E1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Watt, H.; Wald, N.; Huttly, W. The pattern of maternal serum inhibin-A concentrations in the second trimester of pregnancy. Prenat. Diagn. 1998, 18, 846–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Birdsall, M.; Ledger, W.; Groome, N.; Abdalla, H.; Muttukrishna, S. Inhibin A and activin A in the first trimester of human pregnancy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1997, 82, 1557–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. O’Connor, A.; McFarlane, J.; Hayward, S.; Yohkaichiya, T.; Groome, N.; de Kretser, D. Serum activin A and follistatin concentrations during human pregnancy: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Hum. Reprod. 1999, 14, 827–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Fowler, P.; Evans, L.; Groome, N.; Templeton, A.; Knight, P. A longitudinal study of maternal serum inhibin-A, inhibin-B, activin-A, activin-AB, pro-alphaC and follistatin during pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. 1998, 13, 3530–3536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Lambert-Messerlian, G.; Pinar, H.; Laprade, E.; Tantravahi, U.; Schneyer, A.; Canick, J. Inhibins and activins in human fetal abnormalities. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2004, 225, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Muttukrishna, S.; Knight, P.; Groome, N.; Redman, C.; Ledger, W. Activin A and inhibin A as possible endocrine markers for pre-eclampsia. Lancet 1997, 349, 1285–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Wald, N.; Densem, J.; George, L.; Muttukrishna, S.; Knight, P. Prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome using inibin-A as a serum marker. Prenat. Diagn. 1996, 16, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Dalgliesh, G.; Aitken, D.; Lyall, F.; Howatson, A.; Connor, J. Placental and maternal serum inhibin-A and activin-A levels in Down’s syndrome pregnancies. Placenta 2001, 22, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Thirunavukarasu, P.; Lambert-Messerlian, G.; Robertson, D.; Dawson, G.; Canick, J.; Wallace, E. Molecular weight forms of inhibin A, inhibin B and pro-alphaC in maternal serum, amniotic fluid and placental extracts of normal and Down syndrome pregnancies. Prenat. Diagn. 2002, 22, 1086–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kipp, J.; Lambert-Messerlian, G.; Eklund, E.; Rodriguez, G.; Demczuk, M.; Gundogan, F. Expression of transcription factors controlling alpha inhibin gene expression in placental tissues from pregnancies affected by fetal Down syndrome. Prenat. Diagn. 2012, 32, 302–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Gerbaud, P.; Pidoux, G.; Guibourdenche, J.; Pathirage, N.; Costa, J.; Badet, J.; Frendo, J.; Murthi, P.; Evain-Brion, D. Mesenchymal activin A reverses abnormal trisomy 21 trophoblast fusion and differentiation. Endocrinology 2011, 152, 5017–5028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Deutsch, H. Chemistry and biology of alpha-fetoprotein. Adv. Cancer Res. 1991, 56, 253–312. [Google Scholar]
  140. Terentiev, A.; Moldogazieva, N. Alpha-fetoprotein: A renaissance. Tumour Biol. 2013, 34, 2075–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Law, S.; Dugaiczyk, A. Homology between the primary structure of alpha-fetoprotein, deduced from a complete cDNA sequence, and serum albumin. Nature 1981, 291, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Mizejewski, G. Alpha-fetoprotein structure and function: Relevance to isoforms, epitopes, and conformational variants. Exp. Biol. Med. 2001, 226, 377–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Morinaga, T.; Sakai, M.; Wegmann, T.; Tamaoki, T. Primary structures of human alpha-fetoprotein and its mRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1983, 80, 4604–4608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Song, Y.; Naumova, A.; Liebhaber, S.; Cooke, N. Physical and meiotic mapping of the region of human chromosome 4q11-q13 encompassing the vitamin D binding protein DBP/Gc-globulin and albumin multigene cluster. Genome Res. 1999, 9, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Shimizu, K.; Katoh, H.; Yamashita, F.; Tanaka, M.; Tanikawa, K.; Taketa, K.; Satomura, S.; Matsuura, S. Comparison of carbohydrate structures of serum -fetoprotein by sequential glycosidase digestion and lectin affinity electrophoresis. Clin. Chim. Acta 1996, 254, 23–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Gitlin, D.; Boesman, M. Sites of serum alpha-fetoprotein synthesis in the human and in the rat. Clin. Investig. 1967, 46, 1010–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Lafuste, P.; Robert, B.; Mondon, F.; Danan, J.L.; Rossi, B.; Duc-Goiran, P.; Mignot, T.M.; Nunez, E.A.; Benassayag, C.; Ferré, F. Alpha-fetoprotein gene expression in early and full-term human trophoblast. Placenta 2002, 23, 600–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Duc-Goiran, P.; Mignot, T.; Robert, B.; Machavoine, F.; Mondon, F.; Hagneré, A.M.; Vacher-Lavenu, M.; Danan, J.; Vaiman, D.; Benassayag, C.; et al. Expression and localization of alpha-fetoprotein mRNA and protein in human early villous trophoblasts. Placenta 2006, 27, 812–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Gitlin, D. Sites of alpha-fetoprotein synthesis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1971, 285, 1436–1437. [Google Scholar]
  150. Ikonen, R.; Lindgren, J.; Niemi, E.; Sorto, A.; Seppälä, M.; Ruoslahti, E. Alpha fetoprotein levels in neonatal hyperbilirubinaemia. Acta Paediatr. Scand. 1980, 69, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Gordon, Y.; Ratky, S.; Leighton, P.; Kitau, M.; Chard, T. Amniotic fluid levels of fibrin(ogen) degradation fragment E and alpha-fetoprotein in normal pregnancy and with fetal neural tube defect. Br. J. Obs. Gynaecol. 1976, 83, 771–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Los, F.; De Bruijn, H.; van Beek Calkoen-Carpay, T.; Huisjes, H. AFP transport across the fetal membranes in the human. Prenat. Diagn. 1985, 5, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Brownbill, P.; Edwards, D.; Jones, C.; Mahendran, D.; Owen, D.; Sibley, C.; Johnson, R.; Swanson, P.; Nelson, D. Mechanisms of AFP transfer in the perfused human placental cotyledon from uncomplicated pregnancy. J. Clin. Investig. 1995, 96, 2220–2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Malek, A.; Sager, R.; Schneider, H. Transport of protein across the human placenta. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 1998, 40, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Newby, D.; Dalgliesh, G.; Lyall, F.; Aitken, D. Alphafetoprotein and alphafetoprotein receptor expression in the normal human placenta at term. Placenta 2005, 26, 190–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Chen, H.; Egan, J.; Chiu, J. Regulation and activities of alpha-fetoprotein. Clin. Rev. Eukar. Gene Expr. 1997, 7, 11–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Tsukada, Y.; Hirai, H. Alpha-Fetoprotein and albumin synthesis during the cell cycle. Ann. N. Y Acad. Sci. 1975, 259, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Kajiyama, Y.; Tian, J.; Locker, J. Regulation of alpha-fetoprotein expression by Nkx2.8. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22, 6122–6130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Kajiyama, Y.; Tian, J.; Locker, J. Characterization of distant enhancers and promoters in the albumin-alpha-fetoprotein locus during active and silenced expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 30122–30131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Mizejewski, G. Biological roles of alpha-fetoprotein during pregnancy and perinatal development. Exp. Biol. Med. 2004, 229, 439–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Rizzo, A.; Galgano, M.; Mutinati, M.; Sciorsci, R. Alpha-fetoprotein in animal reproduction. Res. Vet. Sci. 2019, 123, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Mizejewski, G. Physiology of alpha-fetoprotein as a biomarker for perinatal distress: Relevance to adverse pregnancy outcome. Exp. Biol. Med. 2007, 232, 993–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Toder, V.; Blank, M.; Gold-Gefter, L.; Nebel, L. The effect of alpha-fetoprotein on the growth of placental cells in vitro. Placenta 1983, 4, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Yachnin, S.; Getz, G.; Lusk, L.; Hsu, R. Lipid interactions with human alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). A study of the role of such interactions in the ability of human AFP to suppress lymphocyte transformation. Oncodev Biol. Med. 1980, 1, 273–285. [Google Scholar]
  165. Vranckx, R.; Savu, L.; Maya, M.; Nunez, E. Alpha-feotoprotein and transcortin behave as acute phase reactants in the maternal and fetal compartments of the inflammatory pregnant mouse. Endocrinology 1987, 120, 1782–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Laderoute, M.; Pilarski, L. The inhibition of apoptosis by alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and the role of AFP receptors in anti-cellular senescence. Anticancer Res. 1994, 14, 2429–2438. [Google Scholar]
  167. Uriel, J.; Bouillon, D.; Aussel, C.; Dupiers, M. Alpha-fetoprotein: The major high-affinity estrogen binder in rat uterine cytosols. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1976, 73, 1452145–1452146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Hsia, J.; Er, S.; Tan, C.; Estes, T.; Ruoslahti, E. Alpha-fetoprotein binding specificity for arachidonate, bilirubin, docosahexaenoate, and palmitate. A spin label study. J. Biol. Chem. 1980, 255, 4224–4227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Wu, J.; Monir-Vaghefi, S.; Clayton, F. Human alpha-fetoprotein and albumin: Differences in zinc binding. Clin. Physiol. Biochem. 1987, 5, 85–94. [Google Scholar]
  170. Lorber, J.; Stewart, C.; Ward, A. Alpha-fetoprotein in antenatal diagnosis of anencephaly and spina bifida. Lancet 1973, 1, 1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Leighton, P.; Kitau, M.; Chard, T.; Gordon, Y.; Leek, A. Levels of alpha-fetoprotein in maternal blood as a screening test for fetal neural-tube defect. Lancet 1975, 2, 1012–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Lu, S.; Huang, J.; Zhang, L.; Hu, W. The diagnostic accuracy of maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein variants (AFP-L2 and AFP-L3) in predicting fetal open neural tube defects and abdominal wall defects. Clin. Chim. Acta 2020, 507, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Alldred, S.; Deeks, J.; Guo, B.; Neilson, J.; Alfirevic, Z. Second trimester serum tests for Down’s Syndrome screening. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 6, CD009925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Huang, T.; Dennis, A.; Meschino, W.S.; Rashid, S.; Mak-Tam, E.; Cuckle, H. First trimester screening for Down syndrome using nuchal translucency, maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, free-β human chorionic gonadotrophin, placental growth factor, and α-fetoprotein. Prenat. Diagn. 2015, 35, 709–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Gulbis, B.; Gervy, C.; Jauniaux, E. Amniotic fluid biochemistry in second-trimester trisomic pregnancies: Relationships to fetal organ maturation and dysfunction. Early Hum. Dev. 1998, 52, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Kronquist, K.; Dreazen, E.; Keener, S.; Nicholas, T.; Crandall, B. Reduced fetal hepatic alpha-fetoprotein levels in down’s syndrome. Prenat. Diagn. 1990, 10, 739–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Brizot, M.; Mckie, A.; von Kaisenberg, C.; Farzaneh, F.; Nicolaides, K. Fetal hepatic alpha-fetoprotein mRNA expression in fetuses with trisomy 21 and 18 at 12–15 weeks gestation. Early Hum. Dev. 1996, 44, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Los, F.; Janse, H.; Brandenburg, H.; de Vrij, R.; de Bruijn Henk, W. Concanavalin A variants of alpha-fetoprotein in first trimester fetuses with trisomy 21 and with normal karyotypes. Gynecol. Obs. Investig. 1995, 9, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Yamamoto, R.; Azuma, M.; Kishida, T.; Yamada, H.; Satomura, S.; Fujimoto, S. Total alpha-fetoprotein and Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive alpha-fetoprotein in fetal chromosomal abnormalities. BJOG 2001, 108, 1154–1158. [Google Scholar]
  180. Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Ning, W.; Zhang, W.; Li, L.; Wang, X.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, H. Diagnostic value of maternal alpha-fetoprotein variants in second-trimester biochemical screening for trisomy 21 and 18. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 13605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Newby, D.; Aitken, D.; Crossley, J.; Howatson, A.; Macri, J.; Connor, J. Biochemical markers of trisomy 21 and the pathophysiology of Down’s syndrome pregnancies. Prenat. Diagn. 1997, 17, 941–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Diczfalusy, E.; Magnusson, A. Estriol in blood. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1960, 20, 1633–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Siiteri, P.; MacDonald, P. Placental estrogen biosynthesis during human pregnancy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1966, 26, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Villee, C. Placenta and fetal tissues: A biphasic system for the synthesis of steroids. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 1969, 104, 406–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Albrecht, E.; Pepe, G. Placental steroid hormone biosynthesis in primate pregnancy. Endocr. Rev. 1990, 11, 124–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Pasqualini, J. Enzymes involved in the formation and transformation of steroid hormones in the fetal and placental compartments. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2005, 97, 401–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Morel, Y.; Roucher, F.; Plotton, I.; Goursaud, C.; Tardy, V.; Mallet, D. Evolution of steroids during pregnancy: Maternal, placental and fetal synthesis. Ann. Endocrinol. 2016, 77, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Warren, J.; French, A. Distribution of steroid sulfatase in human tissues. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1965, 25, 278–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Harada, N.; Yoshimura, N.; Honda, S. Unique regulation of expression of human aromatase in the placenta. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2003, 86, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Chatuphonprasert, W.; Jarukamjorn, K.; Ellinger, I. Physiology and Pathophysiology of Steroid Biosynthesis, Transport and Metabolism in the Human Placenta. Front. Pharm. 2018, 9, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Mendelson, C.; Kamat, A. Mechanisms in the regulation of aromatase in developing ovary and placenta. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007, 106, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. De Hertogh, R.; Thomas, K.; Bietlot, Y.; Vanderheyden, I.; Ferin, J. Plasma levels of unconjugated estrone, estradiol and estriol and of HCS throughout pregnancy in normal women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1975, 40, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Kuijper, E.; Ket, J.; Caanen, M.; Lambalk, C. Reproductive hormone concentrations in pregnancy and neonates: A systematic review. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2013, 27, 33–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Moutsatsou, V.; Oakey, R. Oestriol binding to plasma proteins. J. Steroid Biochem. 1988, 29, 319–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Hewitt, S.; Korach, K. Estrogen Receptors: New Directions in the New Millennium. Endocr. Rev. 2018, 39, 664–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Kim, S.; Park, M.; Lee, Y.; Joo, J.; An, B. Interaction of steroid receptor coactivators and estrogen receptors in the human placenta. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2016, 56, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Charles, S.; Julian, C.; Vargas, E.; Moore, L. Higher estrogen levels during pregnancy in Andean than European residents of high altitude suggest differences in aromatase activity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 99, 2908–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Berkane, N.; Liere, P.; Lefevre, G.; Alfaidy, N.; Nahed, R.; Vincent, J.; Oudinet, J.; Pianos, A.; Cambourg, A.; Rozenberg, P.; et al. Abnormal steroidogenesis and aromatase activity in preeclampsia. Placenta 2018, 69, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Mucci, L.; Lagiou, P.; Tamimi, R.; Hsieh, C.; Adami, H.; Trichopoulos, D. Pregnancy estriol, estradiol, progesterone and prolactin in relation to birth weight and other birth size variables (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2003, 14, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Falah, N.; Torday, J.; Quinney, S.K.; Haas, D. Estriol review: Clinical applications and potential biomedical importance. Clin. Res. Trials 2015, 1, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Lupo, V.; Miodovnik, M.; Hertzberg, V. Daily variation of serum unconjugated estriol and estetrol in normal pregnancy. Am. J. Perinatol. 1985, 2, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Huang, X.; Spink, D.; Schneider, E.; Ling, H.; Rai, A.; Rosano, T.; Chen, B.; Cao, Z. Measurement of unconjugated estriol in serum by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and assessment of the accuracy of chemiluminescent immunoassays. Clin. Chem. 2014, 60, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Crandall, B.; Hanson, F.; Keener, S.; Matsumoto, M.; Miller, W. Maternal serum screening for alpha-fetoprotein, unconjugated estriol, and human chorionic gonadotropin between 11 and 15 weeks of pregnancy to detect fetal chromosome abnormalities. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 1993, 168, 1864–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Spencer, K.; Muller, F.; Aitken, D. Biochemical markers of trisomy 21 in amniotic fluid. Prenat. Diagn. 1997, 17, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Newby, D.; Aitken, D.; Howatson, A.; Connor, J. Placental synthesis of oestriol in Down’s syndrome pregnancies. Placenta 2000, 21, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Landt, J.; Ball, S.; Holland, A.; Hon, J.; Owen, A.; Treppner, P.; Herbert, J. Age-related changes in plasma dehydroepiandrosterone levels in adults with Down’s syndrome and the risk of dementia. J. Neuroendocr. 2011, 23, 450–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Pang, Y.; Wang, C.; Tang, J.; Zhu, J. Clinical application of noninvasive prenatal testing in the detection of fetal chromosomal diseases. Mol. Cytogenet. 2021, 14, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Vossaert, L.; Chakchouk, I.; Zemet, R.; Van den Veyver, I. Overview and recent developments in cell-based non invasive prenatal testing. Prenat. Diagn. 2021, 41, 1202–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Walknowska, J.; Conte, F.; Grumbach, M. Practical and theoretical implications of fetal-maternal lymphocyte transfer. Lancet 1969, 1, 1119–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Herzenberg, L.; Bianchi, D.; Schröder, J.; Cann, H.; Iverson, G. Fetal cells in the blood of pregnant women: Detection and enrichment by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1979, 76, 1453–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Lapaire, O.; Holzgreve, W.; Oosterwijk, J.; Brinkhaus, R.; Bianchi, D. George Schmorl: On trophoblasts in the maternal circulation. Placenta 2007, 28, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Burton, G. Deportation of syncytial sprouts from the term human placenta. Placenta 2011, 32, 96–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Huppertz, B.; Kadyrov, M.; Kingdom, J. Apoptosis and its role in the trophoblast. Am. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2006, 195, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Mayhew, T. Turnover of human villous trophoblast in normal pregnancy: What do we know and what do we need to know? Placenta 2014, 35, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Weiner, C.; Weiss, M.; Zhou, H.; Syngelaki, A.; Nicolaides, K.; Dong, Y. Detection of Embryonic Trisomy 21 in the First Trimester Using Maternal Plasma Cell-Free RNA. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Oudejans, C.; Tjoa, M.; Westerman, B.; Mulders, M.; Van Wijk, I.; Van Vugt, J. Circulating trophoblast in maternal blood. Prenat. Diagn. 2003, 23, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Jin, J.; Menon, R. Placental exosomes: A proxy to understand pregnancy complications. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2018, 79, e12788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Taglauer, E.; Wilkins-Haug, L.; Bianchi, D. Cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal circulation as an indication of placental health and disease. Placenta 2014, 35, S64–S68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Wataganara, T.; Chen, A.; LeShane, E.; Sullivan, L.; Borgatta, L.; Bianchi, D.; Johnson, K. Changes of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma after elective termination of pregnancy. Clin. Chem. 2005, 51, 217–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Wright, A.; Zhou, Y.; Weier, J.; Caceres, E.; Kapidzic, M.; Tabata, T.; Kahn, M.; Nash, C.; Fisher, S. Trisomy 21 is associated with variable defects in cytotrophoblast differentiation along the invasive pathway. Am. J. Med. Gene 2004, 130A, 354–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Bianchi, D.; Williams, J.; Sullivan, L.; Hanson, F.; Klinger, K.; Shuber, A. PCR quantitation of fetal cells in maternal blood in normal and aneuploid pregnancies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1997, 61, 822–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Gil, M.; Accurti, V.; Santacruz, B.; Plana, M.; Nicolaides, K.H. Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: Updated meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obs. Gynecol. 2017, 50, 302–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Svobodová, I.; Korabečná, M.; Calda, P.; Břešťák, M.; Pazourková, E.; Pospíšilová, S.; Krkavcová, M.; Novotná, M.; Hořínek, A. Differentially expressed miRNAs in trisomy 21 placentas. Prenat. Diagn. 2016, 36, 775–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Qureshi, F.; Jacques, S.; Johnson, M.; Hume, R.; Jr Kramer, R.; Yaron, Y.; Evans, M. Trisomy 21 placentas: Histopathological and immunohistochemical findings using proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Fetal Diagn. 1997, 12, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Qureshi, F.; Jacques, S. Placental mesenchymal dysplasia in trisomy 21. Eur. J. Obs. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 247, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Jauniaux, E.; Hustin, J. Chromosomally abnormal early ongoing pregnancies: Correlation of ultrasound and placental histological findings. Hum. Pathol. 1998, 29, 1195–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Roberts, L.; Sebire, N.; Fowler, D.; Nicolaides, K. Histomorphological features of chorionic villi at 10–14 weeks of gestation in trisomic and chromosomally normal pregnancies. Placenta 2000, 21, 678–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Chen, C. Placental abnormalities and preeclampsia in trisomy 13 pregnancies. Taiwan. J. Obs. Gynecol. 2009, 48, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Frendo, J.; Vidaud, M.; Guibourdenche, J.; Luton, D.; Muller, F.; Bellet, D.; Giovagrandi, Y.; Tarrade, A.; Porquet, D.; Blot, D.; et al. Defect of villous cytotrophoblast differentiation into syncytiotrophoblast in Down syndrom. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000, 85, 3700–3707. [Google Scholar]
  230. Massin, N.; Frendo, J.L.; Guibourdenche, J.; Luton, D.; Giovagrandi, Y.; Muller, F.; Vidaud, M.; Evain-Brion, D. Defect of syncytiotrophoblast formation and human choriogonadotropin expression in Down’s syndrome. Placenta 2001, 22, S93–S97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Pidoux, G.; Guibourdenche, J.; Frendo, J.; Gerbaud, P.; Conti, M.; Luton, D.; Muller, F.; Evain-Brion, D. Impact of trisomy 21 on human trophoblast behaviour and function. Placenta 2004, 25, S79–S84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Frendo, J.; Therond, P.; Bird, T.; Massin, N.; Muller, F.; Guibourdenche, J.; Luton, D.; Vidaud, M.; Anderson, W.; Evain-Brion, D. Overexpression of copper zinc superoxide dismutase impairs trophoblast cell fusion and differentiation. Endocrinology 2001, 142, 3638–3648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Pidoux, G.; Gerbaud, P.; Cocquebert, M.; Segon, N.; Badet, J.; Fournier, T.; Guibourdenche, J.; Evain-Brion, D. Human trophoblast fusion and differentiation: Lessons from trisomy 21 placenta. Placenta 2012, 33, S81–S86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Okmen, F.; Ekici, H.; Hortu, I.; Imamoglu, M.; Arican, D.; Akın, H.; Sagol, S. Comparison of indications and results of prenatal invasive diagnostic tests before and after the implementation of the use of cell-free fetal DNA: A tertiary referral center experience. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2020, 37, 2019–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Gullo, G.; Scaglione, M.; Buzzaccarini, G.; Laganà, A.S.; Basile, G.; Chiantera, V.; Cucinella, G.; Zaami, S. Cell-free fetal DNA and non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of chomosomopathies and pediatric monogenic diseases: A critical appraisal and medicolegal remarks. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, e146–e148. [Google Scholar]
  236. Rose, N.; Barrie, E.; Malinowski, J.; Jenkins, G.; McClain, M.; LaGrave, D.; Leung, M.; ACMG Professional Practice and Guidelines Committee. Systematic evidence-based review: The application of noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA in general-risk pregnancies. Genet. Med. 2022, 24, 1379–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Barjaktarovic, M.; Korevaar, T.; Jaddoe, V.; de Rijke, Y.; Peeters, R.; Steegers, E. Human chorionic gonadotropin and risk of pre-eclampsia: Prospective population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 54, 477–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Guibourdenche, J.; Leguy, M.C.; Tsatsaris, V. Biology and markers of preeclampsia. Ann. Biol. Clin. 2013, 71, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Noël, L.; Guy, G.; Jones, S.; Forenc, K.; Buck, E.; Papageorghiou, A.; Thilaganathan, B. Routine first-trimester combined screening for pre-eclampsia: Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A or placental growth factor? Ultrasound Obs. Gynecol. 2021, 58, 540–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Hervé, B.; Coussement, A.; Gilbert, T.; Dumont, F.; Jacques, S.; Cuisset, L.; Chicard, M.; Hizem, S.; Bourdoncle, P.; Letourneur, F.; et al. Aneuploidy: The impact of chromosome imbalance on nuclear organization and overall genome expression. Clin. Genet. 2016, 90, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Krivega, M.; Storchova, Z. Consequences of trisomy syndromes—21 and beyond. Trends Genet. 2023, 39, 172–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Lim, J.; Han, Y.; Kim, H.; Kim, M.; Park, S.; Cho, Y.; Ryu, H. Integrative analyses of genes and microRNA expressions in human trisomy 21 placentas. BMC Med. Genom. 2018, 11, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Ghafourian, M.; Mahdavi, R.; Jonoush, Z.; Sadeghj, M.; Ghadiri, N.; Farzaneh, M.; Salehi, A. The implications of exosomes in pregnancy: Emerging as new diagnostic markers and therapeutics targets. Cell. Commun. Signal. 2022, 20, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Adams, A.; Guedj, F.; Bianchi, D. Placental development and function in trisomy 21 and mouse models of Down syndrome: Clues for studying mechanisms underlying atypical development. Placenta 2020, 89, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Ganguly, B.; Kadam, N. Triplication of HSA21 on alterations in structure and function of mitochondria. Mitochondrion 2022, 65, 88–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Tan, K.; Lee, H.; Cheah, P.; Ling, K. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Down Syndrome: From Pathology to Therapy. Neuroscience 2023, 511, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure and secretion of hCG in vivo (A) and in vitro (B). hCG is a dimeric glycoprotein composed of a common α subunit (hCGα), and a specific ß subunit (hCGβ). The secretion of hCG and its free ß subunit in maternal blood increase during the first trimester of gestation, and decrease thereafter; the secretion of its free α subunit increases all through pregnancy in line with placental mass (A). In vitro and vivo, the morphological differentiation of the villous cytotrophoblasts (VCT) into a syncytiotrophoblast (ST) is mainly associated with functional differentiation, as assessed by the increasing production of hCG and its subunits (B).
Figure 1. Structure and secretion of hCG in vivo (A) and in vitro (B). hCG is a dimeric glycoprotein composed of a common α subunit (hCGα), and a specific ß subunit (hCGβ). The secretion of hCG and its free ß subunit in maternal blood increase during the first trimester of gestation, and decrease thereafter; the secretion of its free α subunit increases all through pregnancy in line with placental mass (A). In vitro and vivo, the morphological differentiation of the villous cytotrophoblasts (VCT) into a syncytiotrophoblast (ST) is mainly associated with functional differentiation, as assessed by the increasing production of hCG and its subunits (B).
Ijms 24 07669 g001
Figure 2. Human placental definitive villi and trophoblastic tissue. From the end of the first trimester of gestation, the human placenta is composed of two types of villi: the anchoring villi with extravillous cytotrophoblasts (EVCT) that proliferate, migrate, and invade the maternal uterine wall to reach the spiral artery; the floating villi composed of villous cytotrophoblasts (VCT), aggregating and fusing to form the syncytiotrophoblast (ST) on the borders of floating villi in contact with maternal blood as from 10 to 12 WG. EVCT is likely to be the major source of maternal serum markers in early pregnancy, whereas ST becomes the major source at the end of the first trimester of gestation.
Figure 2. Human placental definitive villi and trophoblastic tissue. From the end of the first trimester of gestation, the human placenta is composed of two types of villi: the anchoring villi with extravillous cytotrophoblasts (EVCT) that proliferate, migrate, and invade the maternal uterine wall to reach the spiral artery; the floating villi composed of villous cytotrophoblasts (VCT), aggregating and fusing to form the syncytiotrophoblast (ST) on the borders of floating villi in contact with maternal blood as from 10 to 12 WG. EVCT is likely to be the major source of maternal serum markers in early pregnancy, whereas ST becomes the major source at the end of the first trimester of gestation.
Ijms 24 07669 g002
Figure 3. Structure and main functions of pregnancy-associated plasmatic protein A (PAPP-A).
Figure 3. Structure and main functions of pregnancy-associated plasmatic protein A (PAPP-A).
Ijms 24 07669 g003
Figure 4. Synthesis and secretion of alpha feto protein (AFP) during pregnancy. AFP is mainly synthetized by the fetal liver and secreted in fetal blood. It is then excreted by the immature fetal kidneys via urine in amniotic fluid, peaking at around 14 WG. Thereafter, renal AFP filtration decreases with kidney maturation and therefore its amniotic levels fall until the end of pregnancy. AFP reaches the maternal circulation through the membranes and placenta. This transfer, which may involve lectins, is very low and reaches a plateau at about 32 WG.
Figure 4. Synthesis and secretion of alpha feto protein (AFP) during pregnancy. AFP is mainly synthetized by the fetal liver and secreted in fetal blood. It is then excreted by the immature fetal kidneys via urine in amniotic fluid, peaking at around 14 WG. Thereafter, renal AFP filtration decreases with kidney maturation and therefore its amniotic levels fall until the end of pregnancy. AFP reaches the maternal circulation through the membranes and placenta. This transfer, which may involve lectins, is very low and reaches a plateau at about 32 WG.
Ijms 24 07669 g004
Figure 5. Synthesis and secretion of estriol during pregnancy. The human placenta lacks cytochrome P450 17alpha-hydroxylase-17:20 lyase, which is required to convert progestins into androgens (a). Thus, the placenta participates in the enzymatic conversion of fetal 16α-OH-DHEA-S, DHEA-S (b), and the maternal DHEA-S (b’) into E3, by sulfatase (STS), and aromatase activities (c). Estrogens diffuse into both the fetal and maternal compartments (d). estriol (E3), estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), dehydroepiandrostenedione (DHEA), sulfate of dehydroepiandrostenedione (SDHEA), delta 4 androstenedione (Δ4A).
Figure 5. Synthesis and secretion of estriol during pregnancy. The human placenta lacks cytochrome P450 17alpha-hydroxylase-17:20 lyase, which is required to convert progestins into androgens (a). Thus, the placenta participates in the enzymatic conversion of fetal 16α-OH-DHEA-S, DHEA-S (b), and the maternal DHEA-S (b’) into E3, by sulfatase (STS), and aromatase activities (c). Estrogens diffuse into both the fetal and maternal compartments (d). estriol (E3), estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), dehydroepiandrostenedione (DHEA), sulfate of dehydroepiandrostenedione (SDHEA), delta 4 androstenedione (Δ4A).
Ijms 24 07669 g005
Figure 6. Physiopathology of maternal serum markers in trisomy 21-affected pregnancies. The human placenta releases soluble markers into the maternal blood as well as cells and cell-free DNA. Soluble markers can be of fetal origin, such as the alpha feto protein (AFP), of feto–placental origin, such as the unconjugated estriol (uE3), or of placental origin, such as the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and its free beta subunit (hCGβ), the pregnancy-associated plasmatic protein A (PAPP-A), and the inhibin A (inhibin A). In trisomy 21-affected pregnancies, both placental and fetal functions are disrupted, leading to the decrease (↓) or the increase (↑) of their concentrations in maternal blood.
Figure 6. Physiopathology of maternal serum markers in trisomy 21-affected pregnancies. The human placenta releases soluble markers into the maternal blood as well as cells and cell-free DNA. Soluble markers can be of fetal origin, such as the alpha feto protein (AFP), of feto–placental origin, such as the unconjugated estriol (uE3), or of placental origin, such as the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and its free beta subunit (hCGβ), the pregnancy-associated plasmatic protein A (PAPP-A), and the inhibin A (inhibin A). In trisomy 21-affected pregnancies, both placental and fetal functions are disrupted, leading to the decrease (↓) or the increase (↑) of their concentrations in maternal blood.
Ijms 24 07669 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guibourdenche, J.; Leguy, M.-C.; Pidoux, G.; Hebert-Schuster, M.; Laguillier, C.; Anselem, O.; Grangé, G.; Bonnet, F.; Tsatsaris, V. Biochemical Screening for Fetal Trisomy 21: Pathophysiology of Maternal Serum Markers and Involvement of the Placenta. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7669. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087669

AMA Style

Guibourdenche J, Leguy M-C, Pidoux G, Hebert-Schuster M, Laguillier C, Anselem O, Grangé G, Bonnet F, Tsatsaris V. Biochemical Screening for Fetal Trisomy 21: Pathophysiology of Maternal Serum Markers and Involvement of the Placenta. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(8):7669. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087669

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guibourdenche, Jean, Marie-Clémence Leguy, Guillaume Pidoux, Marylise Hebert-Schuster, Christelle Laguillier, Olivia Anselem, Gilles Grangé, Fidéline Bonnet, and Vassilis Tsatsaris. 2023. "Biochemical Screening for Fetal Trisomy 21: Pathophysiology of Maternal Serum Markers and Involvement of the Placenta" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 8: 7669. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087669

APA Style

Guibourdenche, J., Leguy, M. -C., Pidoux, G., Hebert-Schuster, M., Laguillier, C., Anselem, O., Grangé, G., Bonnet, F., & Tsatsaris, V. (2023). Biochemical Screening for Fetal Trisomy 21: Pathophysiology of Maternal Serum Markers and Involvement of the Placenta. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(8), 7669. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24087669

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop