Next Article in Journal
Gene Expression Profiling in Coeliac Disease Confirmed the Key Role of the Immune System and Revealed a Molecular Overlap with Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of the Endocannabinoid System in Binge Eating Disorder
Previous Article in Journal
Therapeutic Lymphangiogenesis Is a Promising Strategy for Secondary Lymphedema
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Cannabinoid Receptor 2 (CB2) Low Lipophilicity Agonists Produce Distinct cAMP and Arrestin Signalling Kinetics without Bias
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Anti-Tumorigenic Role of Cannabinoid Receptor 2 in Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(9), 7773; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24097773
by Jennifer Ana Iden 1, Bitya Raphael-Mizrahi 1, Aaron Naim 1, Albert Kolomansky 2, Tamar Liron 1, Drorit Neumann 2, Marilena Vered 3,4 and Yankel Gabet 1,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(9), 7773; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24097773
Submission received: 3 April 2023 / Revised: 17 April 2023 / Accepted: 23 April 2023 / Published: 24 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Advances on Cannabinoid and Endocannabinoid Research 2.0)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript is well-written, and the experiments were designed scientifically. Also, current results provide a valuable mechanistic approach that can be used in further studies. But it will also be better if authors provide answers to the questions below;

In figure 1A

 

The authors should revise the figure to a horizontal orientation.

 

In figure 1C

 

It is not clear what the picture stands for (which part of the skin) and ulceration.

 

Authors should avoid making deductions in the results section. They should discuss in the discussion section their hypothesis-related experimental results.

 

Authors should provide mathematical results in terms of numbers and statistical values in the results section.

 

 

In Figure 4C, D and E

 

Authors should put asterisks to somewhere else make it easier for readers.

 

 

Authors should provide a reference for their induction of the tumor model

 

Authors should provide a reference for their histopathological scoring.

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

1.The authors state that the data was collected from both male and female mice. Can they clarify if the data obtained from figure 2 to figure 7 was combining both the genders?

 

 

2.Did the authors observe any significant differences between the two genders with papilloma development and the immune profile? 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop