Infrared Spectroscopy in Gynecological Oncology: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnostic Potentials and Challenges
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Cervical Cancer
4. Endometrial Cancer
5. Ovarian Cancer
6. Breast Cancer
7. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhou, Y.; Jiang, G.; Wang, W.; Wei, R.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Wei, J.; Ma, D.; Li, F.; Xi, L. A Novel Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probe TMTP1-PEG4-ICG for in Vivo Tumor Imaging. Bioconjugate Chem. 2018, 29, 4119–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, K.-Y.; Lee, W.-L. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy as a Cancer Screening and Diagnostic Tool: A Review and Prospects. Cancers 2020, 12, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Balan, V.; Mihai, C.-T.; Cojocaru, F.-D.; Uritu, C.-M.; Dodi, G.; Botezat, D.; Gardikiotis, I. Vibrational Spectroscopy Fingerprinting in Medicine: From Molecular to Clinical Practice. Materials 2019, 12, 2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kontsek, E.; Pesti, A.; Björnstedt, M.; Üveges, T.; Szabó, E.; Garay, T.; Gordon, P.; Gergely, S.; Kiss, A. Mid-Infrared Imaging Is Able to Characterize and Separate Cancer Cell Lines. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2020, 26, 2401–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shi, L.; Alfano, R.R. (Eds.) Deep Imaging in Tissue and Biomedical Materials: Using Linear and Nonlinear Optical Methods, 1st ed.; Jenny Stanford Publishing Singapore: Singapore, 2017; ISBN 978-1-315-20655-4. [Google Scholar]
- Wood, B.R.; Chiriboga, L.; Yee, H.; Quinn, M.A.; McNaughton, D.; Diem, M. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectral Mapping of the Cervical Transformation Zone, and Dysplastic Squamous Epithelium. Gynecol. Oncol. 2004, 93, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Diem, M.; Lee, O.; Roberts, G.M. Vibrational Studies, Normal-Coordinate Analysis, and Infrared VCD of Alanylalanine in the Amide III Spectral Region. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 548–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohenford, M.A.; Godwin, T.A.; Cahn, F.; Bhandare, P.; Caputo, T.A.; Rigas, B. Infrared Spectroscopy of Normal and Abnormal Cervical Smears: Evaluation by Principal Component Analysis. Gynecol. Oncol. 1997, 66, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.; Zheng, Q.; Wang, P.; Li, Y.; Chen, G. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy study on normal and malignant tissues of cervix. Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi 2006, 26, 1833–1837. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Whelan, D.R.; Bambery, K.R.; Heraud, P.; Tobin, M.J.; Diem, M.; McNaughton, D.; Wood, B.R. Monitoring the Reversible B to A-like Transition of DNA in Eukaryotic Cells Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, 5439–5448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, P.T.; Wong, R.K.; Caputo, T.A.; Godwin, T.A.; Rigas, B. Infrared Spectroscopy of Exfoliated Human Cervical Cells: Evidence of Extensive Structural Changes during Carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 10988–10992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schubert, J.M.; Bird, B.; Papamarkakis, K.; Miljković, M.; Bedrossian, K.; Laver, N.; Diem, M. Spectral Cytopathology of Cervical Samples: Detecting Cellular Abnormalities in Cytologically Normal Cells. Lab. Investig. 2010, 90, 1068–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wood, B.R.; Quinn, M.A.; Burden, F.R.; McNaughton, D. An Investigation into FTIR Spectroscopy as a Biodiagnostic Tool for Cervical Cancer. Biospectroscopy 1998, 2, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishna, C.M.; Sockalingum, G.D.; Bhat, R.A.; Venteo, L.; Kushtagi, P.; Pluot, M.; Manfait, M. FTIR and Raman Microspectroscopy of Normal, Benign, and Malignant Formalin-Fixed Ovarian Tissues. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 387, 1649–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiriboga, L.; Xie, P.; Vigorita, V.; Zarou, D.; Zakim, D.; Diem, M. Infrared Spectroscopy of Human Tissue. II. A Comparative Study of Spectra of Biopsies of Cervical Squamous Epithelium and of Exfoliated Cervical Cells. Biospectroscopy 1998, 4, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wood, B.R.; Quinn, M.A.; Tait, B.; Ashdown, M.; Hislop, T.; Romeo, M.; McNaughton, D. FTIR Microspectroscopic Study of Cell Types and Potential Confounding Variables in Screening for Cervical Malignancies. Biospectroscopy 1998, 4, 75–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiriboga, L.; Xie, P.; Yee, H.; Vigorita, V.; Zarou, D.; Zakim, D.; Diem, M. Infrared Spectroscopy of Human Tissue. I. Differentiation and Maturation of Epithelial Cells in the Human Cervix. Biospectroscopy 1998, 4, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mabwa, D.; Gajjar, K.; Furniss, D.; Schiemer, R.; Crane, R.; Fallaize, C.; Martin-Hirsch, P.L.; Martin, F.L.; Kypraios, T.; Seddon, A.B.; et al. Mid-Infrared Spectral Classification of Endometrial Cancer Compared to Benign Controls in Serum or Plasma Samples. Analyst 2021, 146, 5631–5642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodriguez, A.C.; Blanchard, Z.; Maurer, K.A.; Gertz, J. Estrogen Signaling in Endometrial Cancer: A Key Oncogenic Pathway with Several Open Questions. Horm. Cancer 2019, 10, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, S.E.; Cheung, K.T.; Patel, I.I.; Trevisan, J.; Stringfellow, H.F.; Ashton, K.M.; Wood, N.J.; Keating, P.J.; Martin-Hirsch, P.L.; Martin, F.L. Infrared Spectroscopy with Multivariate Analysis to Interrogate Endometrial Tissue: A Novel and Objective Diagnostic Approach. Br. J. Cancer 2011, 104, 790–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Depciuch, J.; Barnaś, E.; Skręt-Magierło, J.; Skręt, A.; Kaznowska, E.; Łach, K.; Jakubczyk, P.; Cebulski, J. Spectroscopic Evaluation of Carcinogenesis in Endometrial Cancer. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barnas, E.; Skret-Magierlo, J.; Skret, A.; Kaznowska, E.; Depciuch, J.; Szmuc, K.; Łach, K.; Krawczyk-Marć, I.; Cebulski, J. Simultaneous FTIR and Raman Spectroscopy in Endometrial Atypical Hyperplasia and Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zorn, K.K.; Bonome, T.; Gangi, L.; Chandramouli, G.V.R.; Awtrey, C.S.; Gardner, G.J.; Barrett, J.C.; Boyd, J.; Birrer, M.J. Gene Expression Profiles of Serous, Endometrioid, and Clear Cell Subtypes of Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 6422–6430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Silverberg, S.G. Problems in the Differential Diagnosis of Endometrial Hyperplasia and Carcinoma. Mod. Pathol. 2000, 13, 309–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paraskevaidi, M.; Morais, C.L.M.; Ashton, K.M.; Stringfellow, H.F.; McVey, R.J.; Ryan, N.A.J.; O’Flynn, H.; Sivalingam, V.N.; Kitson, S.J.; MacKintosh, M.L.; et al. Detecting Endometrial Cancer by Blood Spectroscopy: A Diagnostic Cross-Sectional Study. Cancers 2020, 12, 1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paraskevaidi, M.; Morais, C.L.M.; Raglan, O.; Lima, K.M.G.; Paraskevaidis, E.; Martin-Hirsch, P.L.; Kyrgiou, M.; Martin, F.L. Aluminium Foil as an Alternative Substrate for the Spectroscopic Interrogation of Endometrial Cancer. J. Biophotonics 2018, 11, e201700372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ramirez, C.A.M.; Stringfellow, H.; Naik, R.; Crosbie, E.J.; Paraskevaidi, M.; Rehman, I.U.; Martin-Hirsch, P. Infrared Spectroscopy of Urine for the Non-Invasive Detection of Endometrial Cancer. Cancers 2022, 14, 5015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paraskevaidi, M.; Morais, C.L.M.; Lima, K.M.G.; Ashton, K.M.; Stringfellow, H.F.; Martin-Hirsch, P.L.; Martin, F.L. Potential of Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy as a Non-Invasive Diagnostic Test in Urine for Endometrial or Ovarian Cancer. Analyst 2018, 143, 3156–3163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mattila, A.L.; Saario, I.; Viinikka, L.; Ylikorkala, O.; Perheentupa, J. Urinary Epidermal Growth Factor Concentrations in Various Human Malignancies. Br. J. Cancer 1988, 57, 139–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Njoku, K.; Chiasserini, D.; Jones, E.R.; Barr, C.E.; O’Flynn, H.; Whetton, A.D.; Crosbie, E.J. Urinary Biomarkers and Their Potential for the Non-Invasive Detection of Endometrial Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 559016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grayson, K.; Gregory, E.; Khan, G.; Guinn, B.-A. Urine Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer—Are We There Yet? Biomark. Cancer 2019, 11, 1179299X19830977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruskin, R.; Srivastava, A.; McMeekin, D.S.; Ramesh, R.; Moxley, K. Liquid Gold: Urinary Exosomes as a Potential Source of Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2016, 143, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Langenbeck, U.; Baum, F.; Mench-Hoinowski, A.; Luthe, H.; Behbehani, A.W. Predicting the Phenylalanine Blood Concentration from Urine Analyses. An Approach to Noninvasive Monitoring of Patients with Phenylketonuria. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2005, 28, 855–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kido, J.; Mitsubuchi, H.; Itoh, F.; Yoshida, T.; Matsumoto, S.; Sakamoto, R.; Endo, F.; Nakamura, K. Advanced Endometrial Cancer in Phenylketonuria. Med. Sci. Case Rep. 2016, 3, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leeman, M.; Choi, J.; Hansson, S.; Storm, M.U.; Nilsson, L. Proteins and Antibodies in Serum, Plasma, and Whole Blood-Size Characterization Using Asymmetrical Flow Field-Flow Fractionation (AF4). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2018, 410, 4867–4873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Seebacher, V.; Polterauer, S.; Grimm, C.; Husslein, H.; Leipold, H.; Hefler-Frischmuth, K.; Tempfer, C.; Reinthaller, A.; Hefler, L. The Prognostic Value of Plasma Fibrinogen Levels in Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Multi-Centre Trial. Br. J. Cancer 2010, 102, 952–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, X. Preoperative CA125 and Fibrinogen in Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Risk Model for Predicting Lymphovascular Space Invasion. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2017, 28, e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Coburn, S.B.; Bray, F.; Sherman, M.E.; Trabert, B. International Patterns and Trends in Ovarian Cancer Incidence, Overall and by Histologic Subtype: Ovarian Cancer Trends. Int. J. Cancer 2017, 140, 2451–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmood, R.D.; Morgan, R.D.; Edmondson, R.J.; Clamp, A.R.; Jayson, G.C. First-Line Management of Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2020, 22, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mutch, D.G.; Prat, J. 2014 FIGO Staging for Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Peritoneal Cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2014, 133, 401–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehrotra, R.; Tyagi, G.; Jangir, D.K.; Dawar, R.; Gupta, N. Analysis of Ovarian Tumor Pathology by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Ovarian Res. 2010, 3, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Theophilou, G.; Lima, K.M.G.; Martin-Hirsch, P.L.; Stringfellow, H.F.; Martin, F.L. ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy Coupled with Chemometric Analysis Discriminates Normal, Borderline and Malignant Ovarian Tissue: Classifying Subtypes of Human Cancer. Analyst 2016, 141, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grzelak, M.M.; Wróbel, P.M.; Lankosz, M.; Stęgowski, Z.; Chmura, Ł.; Adamek, D.; Hesse, B.; Castillo-Michel, H. Diagnosis of Ovarian Tumour Tissues by SR-FTIR Spectroscopy: A Pilot Study. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018, 203, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, L.; Bi, X.; Sun, H.; Liu, S.; Yu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Weng, S.; Yang, L.; Bao, Y.; Wu, J.; et al. Characterization of Ovarian Cancer Cells and Tissues by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Ovarian Res. 2018, 11, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zendehdel, R.; Masoudi-Nejad, A.; Mohammadzadeh, J.; Shirazi, F.H. Cisplatin Resistant Patterns in Ovarian Cell Line Using FTIR and Principle Component Analysis. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2012, 11, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Gajjar, K.; Trevisan, J.; Owens, G.; Keating, P.J.; Wood, N.J.; Stringfellow, H.F.; Martin-Hirsch, P.L.; Martin, F.L. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy Coupled with a Classification Machine for the Analysis of Blood Plasma or Serum: A Novel Diagnostic Approach for Ovarian Cancer. Analyst 2013, 138, 3917–3926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Owens, G.L.; Gajjar, K.; Trevisan, J.; Fogarty, S.W.; Taylor, S.E.; Da Gama-Rose, B.; Martin-Hirsch, P.L.; Martin, F.L. Vibrational Biospectroscopy Coupled with Multivariate Analysis Extracts Potentially Diagnostic Features in Blood Plasma/Serum of Ovarian Cancer Patients. J. Biophotonics 2014, 7, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lima, K.M.G.; Gajjar, K.B.; Martin-Hirsch, P.L.; Martin, F.L. Segregation of Ovarian Cancer Stage Exploiting Spectral Biomarkers Derived from Blood Plasma or Serum Analysis: ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy Coupled with Variable Selection Methods. Biotechnol. Prog. 2015, 31, 832–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Harper, S.; Lynch, J.; Meersman, S.C.; Breen, N.; Davis, W.W.; Reichman, M.C. Trends in Area-Socioeconomic and Race-Ethnic Disparities in Breast Cancer Incidence, Stage at Diagnosis, Screening, Mortality, and Survival among Women Ages 50 Years and over (1987–2005). Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2009, 18, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Markouizou, A.; Anastassopoulou, J.; Kolovou, P.; Theophanides, T.; Tsekeris, P. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy in the Study of Discrimination of Lobular Breast Cancers. Cancer Diagn. Progn. 2022, 2, 750–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Backhaus, J.; Mueller, R.; Formanski, N.; Szlama, N.; Meerpohl, H.-G.; Eidt, M.; Bugert, P. Diagnosis of Breast Cancer with Infrared Spectroscopy from Serum Samples. Vib. Spectrosc. 2010, 52, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pabico, L.J.; Jaron, J.N.; Mosqueda, M.E.; Wu, J.J.; Tiongco, R.E.; Albano, P.M. Diagnostic Efficiency of Serum-Based Infrared Spectroscopy in Detecting Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Lab. Med. 2023, 54, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghimire, H.; Garlapati, C.; Janssen, E.A.M.; Krishnamurti, U.; Qin, G.; Aneja, R.; Perera, A.G.U. Protein Conformational Changes in Breast Cancer Sera Using Infrared Spectroscopic Analysis. Cancers 2020, 12, 1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Faria, R.A.; Leal, L.B.; Thebit, M.M.; Pereira, S.W.A.; Serafim, N.R.; Barauna, V.G.; da Chagas E Silva Carvalho, L.F.; Sartório, C.L.; Gouvea, S.A. Potential Role of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy as a Screening Approach for Breast Cancer. Appl. Spectrosc. 2023, 77, 405–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, K.; Shen, J.; Xu, W.; Yue, K.; Zhu, L.; Niu, Y.; Wu, Q.; Pan, W. Application of Serum Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Machine Learning in Rapid Screening of Breast Cancer and Lung Cancer. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2023, 2023, 4533108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y.; Liu, H.; Wu, C.; Paraskevaidi, M.; Deng, Y.; Shi, W.; Yuan, Y.; Feng, R.; Martin, F.L.; Pang, W. Diagnostic Segregation of Human Breast Tumours Using Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy Coupled with Multivariate Analysis: Classifying Cancer Subtypes. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021, 255, 119694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pal, U.M.; Gk, A.V.; Gogoi, G.; Rila, S.; Shroff, S.; Am, G.; Borah, P.; Varma, M.; Kurpad, V.; Baruah, D.; et al. Towards a Portable Platform Integrated With Multispectral Noncontact Probes for Delineating Normal and Breast Cancer Tissue Based on Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2020, 14, 879–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, J.; Cheng, H.; Lv, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zheng, X.; Wu, G.; Tang, J.; Ma, X.; Yue, X. Use of FT-IR Spectroscopy Combined with SVM as a Screening Tool to Identify Invasive Ductal Carcinoma in Breast Cancer. Optik 2020, 204, 164225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naz, F.; Groom, A.G.; Mohiuddin, M.; Sengupta, A.; Burnell, M.J.; Daigle-Maloney, T.; Michael, J.C.R.; Graham, S.; Beydaghyan, G.; Morrell, C.B.; et al. Impact of Breast Density on Classification of Infrared Spectroscopy for Breath-Based Breast Cancer Screening. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 41, e13558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferguson, D.; Henderson, A.; McInnes, E.F.; Lind, R.; Wildenhain, J.; Gardner, P. Infrared Micro-Spectroscopy Coupled with Multivariate and Machine Learning Techniques for Cancer Classification in Tissue: A Comparison of Classification Method, Performance, and Pre-Processing Technique. Analyst 2022, 147, 3709–3722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rinne, N.; Christie, E.L.; Ardasheva, A.; Kwok, C.H.; Demchenko, N.; Low, C.; Tralau-Stewart, C.; Fotopoulou, C.; Cunnea, P. Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, Therapeutic Treatment Options for Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Drug Resist. 2021, 4, 573–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chakraborty, P.; Xiong, X.; Banerjee Mustafi, S.; Saha, S.; Dhanasekaran, D.; Mandal, N.; McMeekin, S.; Bhattacharya, R.; Mukherjee, P. Role of Cystathionine Beta Synthase in Lipid Metabolism in Ovarian Cancer. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 37367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ghezelayagh, T.S.; Pennington, K.P.; Norquist, B.M.; Khasnavis, N.; Radke, M.R.; Kilgore, M.R.; Garcia, R.L.; Lee, M.; Katz, R.; Leslie, K.K.; et al. Characterizing TP53 Mutations in Ovarian Carcinomas with and without Concurrent BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations. Gynecol. Oncol. 2021, 160, 786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, C.; Liu, N. Noncoding RNAs in the Glycolysis of Ovarian Cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 855488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, J.; Yang, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, S.; Dai, Y. Metabolic Reprogramming and Interventions in Endometrial Carcinoma. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 161, 114526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nero, C.; Ciccarone, F.; Pietragalla, A.; Scambia, G. PTEN and Gynecological Cancers. Cancers 2019, 11, 1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wavenumber (cm−1) | Biomolecule Association | Diagnostic Significance | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
1650, 1655 | Amide I (Protein secondary structure, α-helical) | Indicates protein structure variations linked to cancer progression | [6] |
1665 | Amide I (Protein secondary structure, random coils) | Linked to changes in protein structure in cancer cells | [6] |
1635 | Amide I (Protein secondary structure, β-pleated) | Associated with specific structural changes in proteins | [6] |
1544 | Amide II (Protein linkage) | Reflects protein interaction changes in cancer | [7] |
1450 | Methyl/methylene bending (Proteins) | Indicates changes in lipid metabolism in cancer cells | [7] |
1400 | Carboxylate stretching (Proteins and Lipids) | Reflects alterations in cell metabolism linked to cancer | [7] |
1305 | Amide III (Protein tertiary structure) | Associated with protein conformation changes in cancer | [7] |
1735 | Ester carbonyl (Lipids) | Indicates lipid changes, often linked to cancerous alterations | [7] |
3000–2800 | CH stretching (Lipids) | Reflects significant lipid metabolism variations in cancer cells | [7] |
1244, 1225 | Phosphodiester bonds (Nucleic acids) | Key in identifying DNA structural variations between A-DNA and B-DNA | [8] |
1080, 1150, 1055 | C–O stretching (Glycogen) | Glycogen content changes indicative of cancerous transformations | [9] |
970 | New band emergence in cancerous cells | Indicates significant molecular changes associated with cancer | [9] |
Wavenumber (cm−1) | Biomolecule Association | Diagnostic Significance | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
1735 | Ester carbonyl (Lipids) | Prominent in certain aggressive cancer types, reflecting cell membrane alterations | [20] |
Amide I/II regions | Structural proteins | Greater variations observed in endometrial cancers, crucial for distinguishing tumor subtypes | [20] |
3000–2800 | CH stretching (Lipids) | Indicates lipid metabolism variations significant in cancer diagnosis | [20] |
1066, 1080 | C–O stretching in serine, threonine, tyrosine | Shift from hyperplasia to carcinoma shows significant biochemical changes | [21] |
1485 | Phenyl groups | Associated with phenylalanine metabolism changes, potential cancer biomarker | [22] |
810–520 | Broad band for phenyl groups | Indicative of metabolic alterations in endometrial cancer | [22] |
Wavenumber (cm−1) | Biomolecule Association | Diagnostic Significance | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
3000–2800 | C-H stretching (Lipids) | Indicates lipid content; higher levels in normal tissues compared to malignant tissues | [9] |
1800–1700 | Phospholipids | Used to assess tumor lipid profiles, varying between benign and malignant tissues | [9] |
1700–1500 | Amide I and II (Proteins) | Key protein bands differ significantly between benign, borderline, and malignant tissues | [9] |
1200–900 | Nucleic acids | Variations indicate changes in DNA/RNA structures between normal and cancerous tissues | [9] |
2925/2958 | Lipid saturation levels | Helps differentiate levels of lipid saturation between normal and malignant cells | [9] |
3013/2958 | Lipid unsaturation levels | Indicates unsaturation levels, differs in cancerous versus normal ovarian tissues | [9] |
1454/1400 | Protein and lipid ratios | Lower ratios in malignant cells/tissues indicate changes in protein–lipid interactions | [44] |
Wavenumber (cm−1) | Biomolecule Association | Diagnostic Significance | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
685–1250 | General spectral region | Identified as the most effective discriminator between healthy and breast cancer sera | [51] |
1250–1306 | Nucleic acids | Significant spectral changes associated with DNA and RNA alterations in breast cancer | [52] |
1541–1656 | Amide I and II (Proteins) | Discriminatory capabilities in the amide regions, notable N-H bends in breast cancer | [53] |
2800–3100 | CH stretching (Lipids) | CH region analysis used to cluster spectral data, showing differences in lipid content | [51] |
1300–1770 | Protein, C–C, and C–H deformation | Region used to analyze protein content differences in breast cancer versus healthy tissues | [51] |
650–1200 | C–O, P–O, and aromatic ring absorption | Effective for predicting breast cancer presence through spectral analysis | [51] |
1511, 1502, 1515 | Amide II (Proteins) | Significant variances in amide II vibrations between cancerous and non-cancerous samples | [54] |
1318.59–1401.03 | Lipids and phospholipids | Identified significant spectral differences in the absorption of key chemical bonds | [55] |
1492.15–1583.27 | C=C, C=O, C=N | Regions showing spectral differences in protein molecules, indicative of cancer presence | [55] |
1597.25–1721.64 | N–H, O–H | Key regions in distinguishing breast cancer from normal samples in spectral analysis | [55] |
850–800 | DNA structures | Changes in membrane and DNA structures detected, useful for early cancer detection | [50] |
1172 | vC–O–C bonds | Reflects glycosylation processes in membrane proteins and DNA, marker for cancer progression | [50] |
810 | Z-DNA | Shift in absorption band indicative of an irreversible stage in grade III cancer | [50] |
Wavenumber (cm−1) | Biomolecule Association | Diagnostic Significance | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|
850–800 | DNA structures | Changes in membrane and DNA structures detected, useful for early cancer detection | [50] |
1172 | vC–O–C bonds | Reflects glycosylation processes in membrane proteins and DNA, marker for cancer progression | [50] |
810 | Z-DNA | Shift in absorption band indicative of an irreversible stage in grade III cancer | [50] |
685–1250 | General spectral region | Identified as the most effective discriminator between healthy and breast-cancer sera | [51] |
2800–3100 | CH stretching (Lipids) | CH region analysis used to cluster spectral data, showing differences in lipid content | [51] |
1300–1770 | Protein, C–C, and C–H deformation | Region used to analyze protein content differences in breast-cancer versus healthy tissues | [51] |
650–1200 | C–O, P–O, and aromatic ring absorption | Effective for predicting breast cancer presence through spectral analysis | [51] |
1250-1306 | Nucleic acids | Significant spectral changes associated with DNA and RNA alterations in breast cancer | [52] |
1541–1656 | Amide I and II (Proteins) | Discriminatory capabilities in the amide regions, notable N-H bends in breast cancer | [53] |
1511, 1502, 1515 | Amide II (Proteins) | Significant variances in amide II vibrations between cancerous and non-cancerous samples | [54] |
1318.59–1401.03 | Lipids and phospholipids | Identified significant spectral differences in the absorption of key chemical bonds | [55] |
1492.15–1583.27 | C=C, C=O, C=N | Regions showing spectral differences in protein molecules, indicative of cancer presence | [55] |
1597.25–1721.64 | N–H, O–H | Key regions in distinguishing breast-cancer from normal samples in spectral analysis | [55] |
1597.25–1721.64 | N–H, O–H | Key regions in distinguishing breast-cancer from normal samples in spectral analysis | [55] |
Disease | Study Population | Year | Major Findings | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cervical Cancer | Exfoliated cervical cells from 156 females, of whom 136 were healthy, 12 had cervical cancer, and 8 had dysplasia. | 1991 | In malignant samples: (i) significant changes in the intensity of the glycogen bands at 1025 cm−1 and 1047 cm−1, the bands at 1082 cm−1 and 1244 cm−1, the C–O stretching band at 1155 cm−1, and the band at 1303 cm−1; (ii) significant shifts of the peaks normally appearing at 1082 cm−1, 1155 cm−1, and 1244 cm−1; and (iii) an additional band at 970 cm−1. | [11] |
Cervical samples from 436 females. | 1997 | The sensitivity of FTIR for cervical cancer detection was 79%, specificity was 77%, positive predictive value was 15%, and negative predictive value was 98.6%. | [8] | |
Exfoliated cervical cells from 272 patients. | 1996 | The PCA score plot indicated broad clustering of the visually categorized spectra. | [13] | |
Five patients with HSIL and five patients with LSIL. | 2004 | The amide I and II area (1740–1470 cm−1) were crucial for identifying anatomical and histological characteristics. | [6] | |
A total of 35 cervical tissues, including 17 squamous cell carcinoma of cervical samples, 5 adenocarcinoma of cervical samples, and 13 normal cervical samples. | 2006 | The three different types of tissues showed significant variations in relative absorbance ratios at 1080, 1238, 1314, 1339, 1397, 1454, 1541, 1647, 2854, 2873, 2926, and 2958 cm−1. | [9] | |
Seventeen patient samples: five normal, five LSIL encompassing HPV, two normal with history of abnormality, three normal hrHPV−, one normal hrHPV+ and one LSIL hrHPV+. | 2010 | SCP differentiated cytopathological diagnoses between 12 distinct cervical samples with good specificity and sensitivity. SCP also found two samples with anomalous spectral changes. They had a benign cytopathological diagnosis but a history of abnormal cervical cytology. The spectrum alterations found in the morphologically normal cells are most likely the result of an HPV infection. SCP correctly discriminated these samples according to their HPV status. | [12] | |
Endometrial cancer | A total of 126 blood samples were collected from 31 endometrial plasma cancer patients, 32 endometrial plasma control, 30 endometrial serum cancer patients, and 33 endometrial serum control patients, prior to surgery. | 2021 | KNN of plasma samples (with spectral data spanning from 1430 cm−1 to 900 cm−1) achieved a sensitivity, specificity, and MCC of 0.865 ± 0.043, 0.865 ± 0.023, and 0.762 ± 0.034. LDA of serum samples (in the same wavenumber range) showed a sensitivity, specificity, and MCC of 0.899 ± 0.023, 0.763 ± 0.048, and 0.664 ± 0.067. SVM on plasma (with spectral data ranging from 1800 cm−1 to 900 cm−1) resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, and MCC of 0.993 ± 0.010, 0.815 ± 0.000, and 0.815 ± 0.010. QDA of serum had the highest sensitivity, specificity, and MCC in the same wavenumber range, with values of 0.852 ± 0.023, 0.700 ± 0.162, and 0.557 ± 0.012. | [18] |
Tissue was taken from 76 women undergoing a hysterectomy, of whom 36 had endometrial cancer. | 2011 | The score plot of the LDA showed significant overlap between the three groups. However, drawing a line perpendicular to LD1, at the point of origin, allowed for around 80% separation between benign and malignant spectra. | [20] | |
Five groups: control (17 tissues); atrophic endometrium (12 tissues); complex atypical hyperplasia (8 tissues); endometrial polyp (6 tissues); endometrioid adenocarcinoma (16 tissues). | 2021 | Raman spectroscopy is more effective than FTIR spectroscopy in assessing the development of carcinogenesis in endometrial cancer. | [21] | |
Tissue samples were collected from 45 patients: 16 of them had endometrial cancer, 12 had atypical hyperplasia, and 17 were normal. | 2020 | PCA analysis of the FTIR data revealed that only the spectra of cancer tissues were similar to one another and could be separated from the other analyzed samples. It was impossible to identify the spectra of atypical hyperplasia from normal tissues. HCA analysis of the FTIR data revealed only a resemblance between practically all cancer tissues. However, control and atypical hyperplasia samples did not form comparable groups. | [22] | |
Blood plasma and serum samples from women with endometrial cancer (n = 70) and healthy controls (n = 15). | 2020 | PCA and SVM models of both serum and plasma samples showed a sensitivity of 100%. | [25] | |
Blood plasma samples of women with endometrial cancer (n = 342), its precursor lesion atypical hyperplasia (n = 68), and healthy controls (n = 242, total n = 652). | 2020 | Blood-based IR could diagnose type I endometrial cancer with 87% sensitivity and 78% specificity. It was most accurate for type I endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia, with sensitivity of 91% and 100%, and specificity of 81% and 88%, respectively. | [26] | |
Urinary samples of patients with endometrial cancer (n = 109) and benign gynecological disorders (n = 110). | 2022 | Urine spectroscopy discriminated endometrial cancer from benign gynecological lesions with 98% sensitivity and 97% specificity. | [27] | |
Urine samples were collected from women with endometrial (n = 10) and ovarian cancer (n = 10), as well as healthy persons (n = 10). | 2018 | Multivariate data analysis resulted in high levels of accuracy for both endometrial (sensitivity: 95%, specificity: 100%, accuracy: 95%) and ovarian cancer (sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 96.3%, accuracy: 100%). | [28] | |
Urinary samples of patients with endometrial cancer (n = 109) and benign gynecological disorders (n = 110). | 2022 | Urine spectroscopy discriminated endometrial cancer from benign gynecological lesions with 98% sensitivity and 97% specificity. | [27] | |
Ovarian cancer | A total of 24 ovarian tissue specimens comprising 8 normal, 10 benign and 6 malignant tissues were recruited. | 2007 | Cluster analysis of second-derivative FTIR spectra in the combined spectral bands of 1540–1680 and 1720–1780 cm−1 revealed two distinct clusters, corresponding to malignant and normal + benign tissues. The cluster corresponding to normal + benign tissues generated nonoverlapping subclusters for normal and benign tissues with lower heterogeneity levels. | [14] |
Tissue samples of 12 cases of ovarian cancer. | 2010 | There were significant spectral discrepancies between normal and malignant ovarian tissues. Changes in frequency and intensity were detected in the spectrum area of protein, nucleic acid, and lipid vibrational modes. | [41] | |
There were 35 histologically benign ovarian samples, 30 with borderline ovarian tumors, and 106 with epithelial carcinoma included. | 2016 | PCA revealed clear segregation between benign, borderline, and malignant tumors, as well as segregation between different histological tumor subtypes. | [42] | |
Eight samples representing various forms of ovarian tumors were examined. | 2018 | Changes in chemical composition of phosphate groups and lipids might be able to differentiate between borderline and malignant ovarian tumors. In instances of cancer, there was an elevated concentration of lipids and other groups, including DNA. A rise in protein content was noted in the case of initial tumors. | [43] | |
Normal and cancerous tissue samples from 12 ovarian cancer patients. | 2018 | Specific alterations included a reduction in the quantity of lipids and nucleic acids in malignant cells. Certain cancer cells also showed changes in the content and shape of proteins. In normal cells and tissues, the ban-intensity ratio of 1454/1400 cm−1 was greater, but in cancerous cells and tissues, it was lower. | [44] | |
FTIR spectra of types of A2780, A2780-CP and C13 cell lines. | 2012 | The spectrum of the cisplatin resistance pattern was typified by a shift toward the high wavenumbers of CH2 stretching vibration and a conformational change in the secondary structure of proteins. Using two PCs, PCA accurately identified 96% of all spectra, providing a satisfactory separation for depicting the range of spectra from resistant and sensitive cell lines. | [45] | |
Thirty ovarian cancer patients, thirty endometrial cancer cases, and thirty non-cancer controls provided plasma and serum samples. | 2013 | While endometrial cancer was recognized with a relatively good accuracy (up to 81.7%), classification findings for ovarian cancer were exceptional (up to 96.7%). | [46] | |
Blood samples taken from 30 patients with ovarian cancer and 30 healthy controls. | 2014 | SVM of blood plasma’s Raman spectra were classified with 74% diagnostic accuracy. The same classifier demonstrated 93.3% accuracy for the blood plasma’s IR spectra. | [47] | |
A total of 30 plasma samples and 30 serum samples were taken from a total of 30 individuals with different stages of ovarian cancer. | 2015 | A GA-LDA model with 33 wavenumbers was used to obtain 100% sensitivity and specificity for differentiating between stage I and stages II–IV. Using 29 wavenumbers via GA-LDA, the sensitivity and specificity scores for the serous vs. non-serous categories were up to 94%. Using 42 wavenumbers via GA-LDA, the sensitivity and specificity provided 100% accuracy for the ≤60 years and >60 years categories. Using several wavenumbers, the sensitivity and specificity findings for blood samples showed reasonably good accuracy (up to 91.6% for stage I vs. stages II–IV, 93.0% for serous vs. non-serous, and 96.0% for ≤60 years vs. >60 years). | [48] | |
Breast cancer | A total of 196 patients with breast cancer. | 2010 | Unsupervised cluster analysis was able to obtain 98% sensitivity and 95% specificity. ANN revealed a 92% sensitivity and a 100% specificity. | [51] |
A total of 20 individuals were included: 10 healthy controls and 10 patients with breast cancer. | 2020 | The ratio of the α-helix to the β-pleated sheet in proteins had 90% sensitivity and specificity. Similarly, the amide II and III ratio (I1556/I1295) demonstrated 100% and 80% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. | [53] | |
Blood plasma of breast cancer patients and healthy controls. | 2023 | ATR-FTIR spectroscopy achieved 97% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 97% ROC curve, and 94% prediction accuracy in differentiating between breast cancer patients and healthy controls. | [54] | |
Serum samples of 98 breast cancer patients and 158 healthy controls. | 2023 | With 100% prediction accuracy on test set samples, the prediction model trained using the KNN architecture exhibits the highest performance. | [55] | |
Tissue sections were obtained from seven people with breast fibroadenoma, seven patients with breast cancer, and seven patients with normal breast tissue. | 2021 | 2D-PCA-LDA showed clear clustering of both groups. | [56] | |
Ten samples of deparaffinized breast biopsy tissue were used; five samples were cancerous and five were normal. | 2020 | There was a statistically significant difference in normalized detected voltage between cancer and normal tissues at 935 and 1060 nm, with p-values of 0.0038 and 0.0022, respectively. Furthermore, the volume fraction contrast (N/C) of lipid (∼1.28) indicates that normal tissue has greater lipid levels than malignant tissue. | [57] | |
Serum samples from 41 non-IDC patients, 74 IDC patients, and 114 healthy people. | 2020 | With an accuracy of 95.7%, sensitivity of 91.7%, and specificity of 100%, the polynomial kernel produced the best results. | [58] | |
Alveolar breath samples of 111 people in total (71 positive and 40 control) were included. | 2023 | Using IR-CRDS to classify alveolar breath could be a potential method for breast cancer screening that is independent of breast density. | [59] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Delrue, C.; De Bruyne, S.; Oyaert, M.; Delanghe, J.R.; Moresco, R.N.; Speeckaert, R.; Speeckaert, M.M. Infrared Spectroscopy in Gynecological Oncology: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnostic Potentials and Challenges. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5996. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25115996
Delrue C, De Bruyne S, Oyaert M, Delanghe JR, Moresco RN, Speeckaert R, Speeckaert MM. Infrared Spectroscopy in Gynecological Oncology: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnostic Potentials and Challenges. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(11):5996. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25115996
Chicago/Turabian StyleDelrue, Charlotte, Sander De Bruyne, Matthijs Oyaert, Joris R. Delanghe, Rafael Noal Moresco, Reinhart Speeckaert, and Marijn M. Speeckaert. 2024. "Infrared Spectroscopy in Gynecological Oncology: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnostic Potentials and Challenges" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 11: 5996. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25115996
APA StyleDelrue, C., De Bruyne, S., Oyaert, M., Delanghe, J. R., Moresco, R. N., Speeckaert, R., & Speeckaert, M. M. (2024). Infrared Spectroscopy in Gynecological Oncology: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnostic Potentials and Challenges. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(11), 5996. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25115996