Next Article in Journal
Host Cells Upregulate Phosphate Transporter PIT1 to Inhibit Ehrlichia chaffeensis Intracellular Growth
Previous Article in Journal
Nucleic Acids-Based Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis and Novel Molecules to Treat the Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 14
10.3390/ijms25147894
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Cobalt-Catalyzed Reduction of Aldehydes to Alcohols via the Hydroboration Reaction

by
Dariusz Lewandowski
and
Grzegorz Hreczycho
*
Faculty of Chemistry, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego St. 8, 61-614 Poznan, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(14), 7894; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147894
Submission received: 27 June 2024 / Revised: 10 July 2024 / Accepted: 17 July 2024 / Published: 19 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transition Metal Catalysis: From Synthesis to Late-Stage Functionalization of Aromatics and Heterocycles)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A method for the reduction of aldehydes with pinacolborane catalyzed by pincer cobalt complexes based on a triazine backbone is developed in this paper. The presented methodology allows for the transformation of several aldehydes bearing a wide range of electron-withdrawing and electron-donating groups under mild conditions. The presented procedure allows for the direct one-step hydrolysis of the obtained intermediates to the corresponding primary alcohols. A plausible reaction mechanism is proposed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Alcohols represent one of the major groups of organic chemistry compounds and receive constant attention from both academia and industry. Due to their properties, they are crucial reagents used in chemistry, with applications from solvents to highly specialized drugs or materials [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Each year sees numerous articles devoted to methods for the synthesis and functionalization of alcohols being published [7,8,9,10,11,12].
One of the most important methods for obtaining alcohols is the reduction of carbonyl compounds (aldehydes, ketones) [13]. The most commonly used for this purpose are highly reactive and dangerous hydrides [14] or hydrogen gas [15,16,17,18], which exhibit low selectivity and require much attention being paid to storage and handling (Figure 1a). With this in mind, several alternative reduction methods based on transfer hydrogenation [19,20] (Figure 1b) or hydroelementation [21,22,23] reactions of carbonyl compounds have been developed, employing much safer reagents (formic acid, isopropanol, silanes, and pinacolborane). In the case of hydroelementation, this reaction leads to intermediate silyl ethers or borate esters, which, upon hydrolysis, yield the corresponding alcohol. In this context, methods based on pinacolborane hydroboration reactions appear to be of particular interest, which, unlike hydrosilylation reactions, most often do not require the use of expensive precious metal catalysts [24].
Although the hydroboration of aldehydes and their subsequent hydrolysis to primary alcohols are known to occur without a catalyst, this process has some limitations [25]. In particular, it requires elevated temperatures or long reaction times and the elimination of the solvents, which leads to low conversion for most solid substrates. For this reason, in the scientific literature, there are many examples utilizing catalysts based on main- or transition-group elements [21,23,26].
Several s-block metals have proven to be effective catalysts for aldehyde hydroboration reactions (Figure 1c) [21,23]. Unfortunately, the catalysis with LiHBEt3 [27], nBuLi [28], or NaH [29] involves highly reactive and hazardous compounds, while the catalysis with NaOH [30], tBuONa [31], or CH3MgI [32] may lead to side reactions, resulting in low process selectivity. In the case of transition metals, there are known examples using heterogeneous catalysis based on Ti [33], Fe [34], and Co [35,36], as well as homogeneous catalysis based on Ti [37], Mn [38], Fe [39], Ni [40], Cu [41], and Zn [42] (Figure 1d). Regarding cobalt catalysts, recent comprehensive research concerning the use of SNS cobalt complexes in the hydroboration reaction of aldehydes has been published [43]. However, to maintain the selectivity of the reactions toward the formyl group, they must be carried out in deuterated benzene; otherwise, the authors observed a partial reduction of the acyl group. There are also reports on the use of Co(IMes)2Cl [44] and Co(acac)3 [45] complexes, but both of these systems also catalyze the reduction reaction of ketones, preventing the selective reduction of the formyl group for multifunctional compounds.
With this in mind, and encouraged by our previous research on the use of pincer cobalt complexes in catalysis [46,47,48,49,50], we decided to investigate the possibility of using them in aldehyde reduction reactions. The decision to choose pincer complexes was dictated by their high air and thermal stability as well as their catalytic activity in many chemical transformations [51,52]. We have demonstrated their high catalytic activity in the hydroboration reactions of silylacetylenes [53], alkenes [54], and allenes [55], as well as in the reduction reaction of ketones with diphenylsilane [56]. Moreover, a great advantage of the discussed triazine backbone-based ligands is their straightforward synthesis from readily available precursors. Herein, we present a method that allows for the reduction of aldehydes with pinacolborane under mild conditions and showing high tolerance to substrate functional groups (Figure 1e).

2. Results and Discussion

First, according to the synthetic protocol developed by the Kempe group [57,58], we synthesized a series of pincer cobalt complexes based on a triazine backbone (Figure 2), which we then tested in a model reduction reaction of 4-methylbenzaldehyde with pinacolborane.
The initial results show the catalytic activity of the obtained precatalysts in the aldehyde hydroboration reaction (Table 1). Among the tested complexes, the highest activity was shown by precatalyst D, which led to full conversion in the reaction carried out at 35 °C for 60 min. Control experiments without a catalyst, with cobalt (II) chloride, or with ligands showed minor conversions, confirming that the obtained complexes are fully responsible for the catalytic activity.
With optimal conditions, we decided to apply them in the reduction of various aldehydes, omitting the isolation of borate esters by performing hydrolysis to the corresponding alcohols using SiO2 (Figure 3). The reaction with benzaldehyde (1a) proceeded smoothly, resulting in benzyl alcohol in a quantitative yield. In the case of reactions with aromatic aldehydes with electron-donating groups (1b–1d) at both para and meta positions, we observed high catalytic activity of the designed system. In the case of halogen-substituted aromatic aldehydes (1e–1h), we observed very good conversions, although for 2-fluorobenzaldehyde and 4-bromobenzaldehyde, we had to increase the amount of catalyst to 2 mol%. Interestingly, for the strongly deactivating nitro group in the para or meta position (1i,1j), we observed smooth conversions to the corresponding alcohols. However, for some of the more challenging aldehydes with electron-withdrawing groups (1k, 1m, 1o), as well as for 4-vinylbenzaldehyde (1l) or thiophene-2-carboxaldehyde (1n), we had to increase the amount of catalyst to 5 mol%. In the reaction with cinnamaldehyde (1p), this system allowed its conversion to cinnamyl alcohol. Similarly, the reaction of (E)-oct-2-enal (1s) yielded a selective reduction with retention of the conjugated double bond. In the case of reactions with aliphatic aldehydes (1r, 1t), the reduction proceeded smoothly, producing products with high yields. Importantly, the presented examples demonstrate the high functional group tolerance of the developed method, permitting the selective reduction of the formyl group in the presence of other reactive functional groups (nitro, nitrile, vinyl) without any side reactions. Moreover, the developed method allows for the precise reduction of the formyl group in substituted esters and ketones while preserving their carbonyl group. This selectivity allows the developed procedure to be used as a powerful tool for reducing the formyl group in complex molecules, increasing its application potential.
To confirm the utility of the presented method for the reduction of aldehydes, we performed comparative tests under the developed conditions with and without a catalyst (Table 2). In each of the carried-out reactions, the addition of a catalyst proved to be crucial for achieving high conversion rates. This indicates the applicability of the developed method, particularly for substrates that are sensitive to high temperatures or which require the use of a solvent.
The presented system complements our previously developed method for the reduction of ketones with diphenylsilane (Figure 4) [56]. Interestingly, in the case of the hydrosilylation-based reduction presented there, the developed system only allowed the reduction of ketones and showed no catalytic activity in the reduction of the formyl group. By contrast, we observed the opposite reactivity in the case of the hydroboration-based reaction presented here, in which it is the ketones that are not reduced.
Based on our previous studies and literature reports [47,48,53,54,55,56,59,60], we assume that the reaction follows a Co(I)/Co(III) mechanism (Figure 5). In the first step, the cobalt precatalyst is activated by pinacolborane, resulting in the active form of the Co(I) catalyst. It then undergoes oxidative addition, resulting in a Co(III) molecule, into which the aldehyde is inserted. In the next step, the product is released by means of reductive elimination with simultaneous Co(I) regeneration. Alternatively, reductive elimination can be replaced by transmetallation with a pinacolborane molecule, resulting in the formation of the product and the regeneration of Co(III).

3. Materials and Methods

Air- and moisture-sensitive reactions were carried out under an argon atmosphere using standard Schlenk techniques or a glove box. Solvents used for all experiments were purchased from Honeywell (Charlotte, NC, USA) or Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) (Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA), dried over calcium hydride (CaH2), and purified by means of distillation. Toluene was additionally dried over sodium. Ligands and Co complexes were prepared in accordance with previously reported methods [61] using reagents purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Merck) or ABCR GmBH (Karlsruhe, Germany). Pinacolborane and aldehydes were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, dried over calcium hydride, and purified by means of distillation. The progress of reactions (conversion of aldehyde) was monitored via GC chromatography using Agilent 8860 GC and Agilent 5977B GC/MSD with the Agilent 8860 GC System (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The structures of products were determined by means of NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The 1H NMR (400 MHz), 13C NMR (101 MHz), and 31P NMR (162 MHz) spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III HD NanoBay spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA), using chloroform-d1 (CDCl3) as a solvent. Deuterated solvents were purchased from Deutero GmbH (Kastellaun, Germany) (CDCl3 99.6 atom% D) or Sigma Aldrich (Merck) (CDCl3 99.8 atom% D) and were used as received.

General Procedure for the Synthesis of Compounds (1a–1t)

To a 12 mL vial equipped with a magnetic stirring bar, precatalyst E (0.01 eq. for 1a-1e, 1h–1j, 1r, 1t or 0.02 eq. for 1f, 1g, 1s or 0.05 eq. for 1k–1p), toluene (170 μL), the corresponding aldehyde (0.3 mmol, 1.0 eq.), and pinacolborane (0.45 mmol, 1.4 eq.) were added under an inert gas atmosphere (glove box). A reference sample was taken. Subsequently, the reaction mixture was stirred at 35 °C for 60 min, and the progress of the reaction was monitored by GC or GC/MS. After the reaction was completed, the volatiles were evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue mixture was subjected to column chromatography using silica gel and hexane/ethyl acetate (1:1, v/v) as an eluent, which was then evaporated under reduced pressure giving the desired product. The products were identified by means of 1H and 13C spectroscopies and mass spectrometry.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have developed a catalytic method for the reduction of aldehydes to the corresponding alcohols under mild conditions utilizing cobalt pincer complexes based on a triazine backbone. Aldehydes possessing a wide range of electron-withdrawing and electron-donating groups were reduced. The presented protocol demonstrates high tolerance to the functional groups of the substrates, allowing for the selective reduction of the formyl group in the presence of other reactive functional groups. Moreover, the simple work-up of the reaction is a significant advantage of the presented method, with one-pot hydrolysis of the intermediate to the corresponding alcohols. Based on our earlier studies, we also present a possible reaction mechanism.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/25/14/7894/s1. References [61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Methodology, D.L., G.H.; synthesis of ligands and complexes, D.L.; synthesis of products, D.L.; formal analysis D.L.; writing—original draft preparation D.L.; visualization, D.L.; supervision, G.H.; funding acquisition, G.H.; all authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a National Science Centre Grant, grant number UMO-2018/30/E/ST5/00045. Dariusz Lewandowski is a recipient of a scholarship from the Adam Mickiewicz University Foundation in Poznań for the 2023/2024 academic year.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files: Table S1 and S2, Figures S1–S38).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Iroegbu, A.O.; Hlangothi, S.P. Furfuryl Alcohol a Versatile, Eco-Sustainable Compound in Perspective. Chem. Africa 2019, 2, 223–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. An, X.; Xiao, J. Fluorinated Alcohols: Magic Reaction Medium and Promoters for Organic Synthesis. Chem. Rec. 2020, 20, 142–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tang, S.; Baker, G.A.; Zhao, H. Ether- and Alcohol-Functionalized Task-Specific Ionic Liquids: Attractive Properties and Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 4030–4066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Magano, J.; Dunetz, J.R. Large-Scale Carbonyl Reductions in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2012, 16, 1156–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zada, B.; Chen, M.; Chen, C.; Yan, L.; Xu, Q.; Li, W.; Guo, Q.; Fu, Y. Recent Advances in Catalytic Production of Sugar Alcohols and Their Applications. Sci. China Chem. 2017, 60, 853–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rafique, A.; Mahmood Zia, K.; Zuber, M.; Tabasum, S.; Rehman, S. Chitosan Functionalized Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) for Prospects Biomedical and Industrial Applications: A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 87, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Crouch, R.D. Synthetic Communications Reviews: Recent Advances in Silyl Protection of Alcohols. Synth. Commun. 2013, 43, 2265–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chelucci, G. Metal-Catalyzed Dehydrogenative Synthesis of Pyrroles and Indoles from Alcohols. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 331, 37–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Du, S.; Zhou, A.X.; Yang, R.; Song, X.R.; Xiao, Q. Recent Advances in the Direct Transformation of Propargylic Alcohols to Allenes. Org. Chem. Front. 2021, 8, 6760–6782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dryzhakov, M.; Richmond, E.; Moran, J. Recent Advances in Direct Catalytic Dehydrative Substitution of Alcohols. Synthesis 2016, 48, 935–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hatano, M.; Ishihara, K. Recent Progress in the Catalytic Synthesis of Tertiary Alcohols from Ketones with Organometallic Reagents. Synthesis 2008, 2008, 1647–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, B.S.; Ribeiro de Souza, F.Z. Enzymatic Synthesis of Enantiopure Alcohols: Current State and Perspectives. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 2102–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Greeves, N. Reduction of C=O to CHOH by Metal Hydrides. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1991; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hajos, A. Complex Hydrides and Related Reducing Agents in Organic Synthesis; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kotha, S.S.; Sharma, N.; Sekar, G. An Efficient, Stable and Reusable Palladium Nanocatalyst: Chemoselective Reduction of Aldehydes with Molecular Hydrogen in Water. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 1694–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, X.; Corcoran, C.; Yang, S.; Xiao, J. A Versatile Iridium Catalyst for Aldehyde ReductioninW Ater. ChemSusChem 2008, 1, 71–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tan, X.; Wang, G.; Zhu, Z.; Ren, C.; Zhou, J.; Lv, H.; Zhang, X.; Chung, L.W.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, X. Hydrogenation of Aldehydes Catalyzed by an Available Ruthenium Complex. Org. Lett. 2016, 18, 1518–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mazza, S.; Scopelliti, R.; Hu, X. Chemoselective Hydrogenation and Transfer Hydrogenation of Aldehydes Catalyzed by Iron(II) PONOP Pincer Complexes. Organometallics 2015, 34, 1538–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, D.; Astruc, D. The Golden Age of Transfer Hydrogenation. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 6621–6686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Luo, R.; Qiu, X.; Liu, J.T.; Yang, J.K.; Tang, W. Iridium-Catalyzed Highly Efficient Chemoselective Reduction of Aldehydes in Water Using Formic Acid as the Hydrogen Source. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 3296–3301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kuciński, K.; Hreczycho, G. Hydrosilylation and Hydroboration in a Sustainable Manner: From Earth-Abundant Catalysts to Catalyst-Free Solutions. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 5210–5224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Royo, B. Recent Advances in Catalytic Hydrosilylation of Carbonyl Groups Mediated by Well-Defined First-Row Late Transition Metals, 1st ed.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 72, ISBN 9780128171172. [Google Scholar]
  23. Shegavi, M.L.; Bose, S.K. Recent Advances in the Catalytic Hydroboration of Carbonyl Compounds. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 3307–3336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ojima, I.; Kogure, T. Reduction of Carbonyl Compounds via Hydrosilylation. 4. Highly Regioselective Reductions of α,α-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds. Organometallics 1982, 1, 1390–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Stachowiak, H.; Kaźmierczak, J.; Kuciński, K.; Hreczycho, G. Catalyst-Free and Solvent-Free Hydroboration of Aldehydes. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 1738–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Geier, S.J.; Vogels, C.M.; Melanson, J.A.; Westcott, S.A. The Transition Metal-Catalysed Hydroboration Reaction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 8877–8922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kuciński, K.; Hreczycho, G. Lithium Triethylborohydride as Catalyst for Solvent-Free Hydroboration of Aldehydes and Ketones. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 1912–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhu, Z.; Wu, X.; Xu, X.; Wu, Z.; Xue, M.; Yao, Y.; Shen, Q.; Bao, X. N-Butyllithium Catalyzed Selective Hydroboration of Aldehydes and Ketones. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 10677–10683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shin, W.K.; Kim, H.; Jaladi, A.K.; An, D.K. Catalytic Hydroboration of Aldehydes and Ketones with Sodium Hydride: Application to Chemoselective Reduction of Aldehydes over Ketones. Tetrahedron 2018, 74, 6310–6315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, Y.; Shan, C.; Ying, J.; Su, J.; Zhu, J.; Liu, L.L.; Zhao, Y. Catalytic Hydroboration of Aldehydes, Ketones, Alkynes and Alkenes Initiated by NaOH. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 4169–4175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Query, I.P.; Squier, P.A.; Larson, E.M.; Isley, N.A.; Clark, T.B. Alkoxide-Catalyzed Reduction of Ketones with Pinacolborane. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 6452–6456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, W.; Lu, K.; Qin, Y.; Yao, W.; Yuan, D.; Pullarkat, S.A.; Xu, L.; Ma, M. Grignard Reagents-Catalyzed Hydroboration of Aldehydes and Ketones. Tetrahedron 2020, 76, 131145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huang, Z.; Liu, D.; Camacho-Bunquin, J.; Zhang, G.; Yang, D.; López-Encarnación, J.M.; Xu, Y.; Ferrandon, M.S.; Niklas, J.; Poluektov, O.G.; et al. Supported Single-Site Ti(IV) on a Metal-Organic Framework for the Hydroboration of Carbonyl Compounds. Organometallics 2017, 36, 3921–3930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, G.; Cheng, J.; Davis, K.; Bonifacio, M.G.; Zajaczkowski, C. Practical and Selective Hydroboration of Aldehydes and Ketones in Air Catalysed by an Iron(Ii) Coordination Polymer. Green Chem. 2019, 21, 1114–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wu, J.; Zeng, H.; Cheng, J.; Zheng, S.; Golen, J.A.; Manke, D.R.; Zhang, G. Cobalt(II) Coordination Polymer as a Precatalyst for Selective Hydroboration of Aldehydes, Ketones, and Imines. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 9442–9448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, T.; Manna, K.; Lin, W. Metal-Organic Frameworks Stabilize Solution-Inaccessible Cobalt Catalysts for Highly Efficient Broad-Scope Organic Transformations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 3241–3249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Oluyadi, A.A.; Ma, S.; Muhoro, C.N. Titanocene(II)-Catalyzed Hydroboration of Carbonyl Compounds. Organometallics 2013, 32, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, G.; Zeng, H.; Wu, J.; Yin, Z.; Zheng, S.; Fettinger, J.C. Highly Selective Hydroboration of Alkenes, Ketones and Aldehydes Catalyzed by a Well-Defined Manganese Complex. Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 14581–14584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Das, U.K.; Higman, C.S.; Gabidullin, B.; Hein, J.E.; Tom Baker, R. Efficient and Selective Iron-Complex-Catalyzed Hydroboration of Aldehydes. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 1076–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. King, A.E.; Stieber, S.C.E.; Henson, N.J.; Kozimor, S.A.; Scott, B.L.; Smythe, N.C.; Sutton, A.D.; Gordon, J.C. Ni(Bpy)(Cod): A Convenient Entryway into the Efficient Hydroboration of Ketones, Aldehydes, and Imines. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 2016, 1635–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bagherzadeh, S.; Mankad, N.P. Extremely Efficient Hydroboration of Ketones and Aldehydes by Copper Carbene Catalysis. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 3844–3846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kumar, G.S.; Harinath, A.; Narvariya, R.; Panda, T.K. Homoleptic Zinc-Catalyzed Hydroboration of Aldehydes and Ketones in the Presence of HBpin. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 2020, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ataie, S.; Dudra, S.L.; Johnson, E.R.; Baker, R.T. Selective Cobalt(II)-SNS Dithiolate Complex-Catalyzed Bifunctional Hydroboration of Aldehydes: Kinetics and Mechanistic Studies. ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 10076–10084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Verma, P.K.; Sethulekshmi, A.; Geetharani, K. Markovnikov-Selective Co(I)-Catalyzed Hydroboration of Vinylarenes and Carbonyl Compounds. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 7840–7845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tamang, S.R.; Bedi, D.; Shafiei-Haghighi, S.; Smith, C.R.; Crawford, C.; Findlater, M. Cobalt-Catalyzed Hydroboration of Alkenes, Aldehydes, and Ketones. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 6695–6700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Broniarz, K.; Hreczycho, G. Access to Unsaturated Organogermanes via (De)Hydrosilylation Mediated by Cobalt Complexes. Org. Lett. 2023, 25, 6528–6533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Szafoni, E.; Kuciński, K.; Hreczycho, G. Cobalt-Catalyzed Synthesis of Silyl Ethers via Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling between Alcohols and Hydrosilanes. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2022, 15, 757–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Szafoni, E.; Kuciński, K.; Hreczycho, G. Cobalt-Catalyzed Dehydrogenative Cross-Coupling Reaction: Selective Access to Dihydrosiloxanes, Hydrosiloxanes and Functionalized Silsesquioxanes. J. Catal. 2023, 423, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Stachowiak, H.; Kuciński, K.; Kallmeier, F.; Kempe, R.; Hreczycho, G. Cobalt-Catalyzed Dehydrogenative C−H Silylation of Alkynylsilanes. Chem. Eur. J. 2022, 28, e202103629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Stachowiak-Dłużyńska, H.; Kuciński, K.; Wyrzykiewicz, B.; Kempe, R.; Hreczycho, G. Co-Catalyzed Selective Syn-Hydrosilylation of Internal Alkynes. ChemCatChem 2023, 15, e202300592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Junge, K.; Papa, V.; Beller, M. Cobalt–Pincer Complexes in Catalysis. Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 122–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Peris, E.; Crabtree, R.H. Key Factors in Pincer Ligand Design. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 1959–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lewandowski, D.; Cytlak, T.; Kempe, R.; Hreczycho, G. Ligand-Controlled Cobalt-Catalyzed Formation of Carbon–Boron Bonds: Hydroboration vs C–H/B–H Dehydrocoupling. J. Catal. 2022, 413, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lewandowski, D.; Hreczycho, G. Cobalt Pincer-Type Complexes Demonstrating Unique Selectivity for the Hydroboration Reaction of Olefins under Mild Conditions. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2023, 10, 3656–3663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lewandowski, D.; Hreczycho, G. Selective Hydrosilylation and Hydroboration of Allenes Catalyzed by Cobalt-Pincer Complexes. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2024, 366, 2775–2783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Stachowiak-Dłużyńska, H.; Hreczycho, G. Co-Catalyzed Hydrosilylation of Ketones under Base-Free Conditions: A Convenient Route to Silyl Ethers or Secondary Alcohols. ChemCatChem 2023, 15, e202300781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rösler, S.; Ertl, M.; Irrgang, T.; Kempe, R. Cobalt-Catalyzed Alkylation of Aromatic Amines by Alcohols. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 15046–15050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Rösler, S.; Obenauf, J.; Kempe, R. A Highly Active and Easily Accessible Cobalt Catalyst for Selective Hydrogenation of C=O Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 7998–8001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Lee, B.; Pabst, T.P.; Hierlmeier, G.; Chirik, P.J. Exploring the Effect of Pincer Rigidity on Oxidative Addition Reactions with Cobalt(I) Complexes. Organometallics 2023, 42, 708–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Shimada, S.; Batsanov, A.S.; Howard, J.A.K.; Marder, T.B. Formation of Aryl- and Benzylboronate Esters by Rhodium-Catalyzed C-H Bond Functionalization with Pinacolborane. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2168–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Deibl, N.; Kempe, R. General and Mild Cobalt-Catalyzed C-Alkylation of Unactivated Amides and Esters with Alcohols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 10786–10789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sharma, P.K.; Nielsen, P. New Ruthenium-Based Protocol for Cleavage of Terminal Olefins to Primary Alcohols: Improved Synthesis of a Bicyclic Nucleoside. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5742–5745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shaikh, N.S.; Junge, K.; Beller, M. A Convenient and General Iron-Catalyzed Hydrosilylation of Aldehydes. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5429–5432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, R.; Tang, Y.; Xu, M.; Meng, C.; Li, F. Transfer Hydrogenation of Aldehydes and Ketones with Isopropanol under Neutral Conditions Catalyzed by a Metal-Ligand Bifunctional Catalyst [Cp∗Ir(2,2-BpyO)(H2O)]. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 2274–2281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Griffin, P.R.; Kamenecka, T.M.; Doebelin, C.; Chang, M.R. RORγ Modulators; WO 2018/52903; World Intellectual Property Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  66. Aboo, A.H.; Bennett, E.L.; Deeprose, M.; Robertson, C.M.; Iggo, J.A.; Xiao, J. Methanol as Hydrogen Source: Transfer Hydrogenation of Aromatic Aldehydes with a Rhodacycle. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 11805–11808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Zanon, J.; Klapars, A.; Buchwald, S.L. Copper-Catalyzed Domino Halide Exchange-Cyanation of Aryl Bromides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 2890–2891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Denmark, S.E.; Butler, C.R. Vinylation of Aryl Bromides Using an Inexpensive Vinylpolysiloxane. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Talwar, D.; Wu, X.; Saidi, O.; Salguero, N.P.; Xiao, J. Versatile Iridicycle Catalysts for Highly Efficient and Chemoselective Transfer Hydrogenation of Carbonyl Compounds in Water. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 12835–12842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Doni, E.; O’Sullivan, S.; Murphy, J.A. Metal-Free Reductive Cleavage of Benzylic Esters and Ethers: Fragmentations Result from Single and Double Electron Transfers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2239–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 25 07894 g001
Figure 1. Various methods for the aldehyde reduction.
Figure 1. Various methods for the aldehyde reduction.
Ijms 25 07894 g001
Ijms 25 07894 g002
Figure 2. Procedure for the synthesis of pincer cobalt complexes.
Figure 2. Procedure for the synthesis of pincer cobalt complexes.
Ijms 25 07894 g002
Ijms 25 07894 g003
Figure 3. Reduction of aldehydes. a Conversion of aldehyde determined by GC with n-dodecane as the internal standard—the isolated yields are in parentheses; b 2 mol% cat. D; c 5 mol% cat. D.
Figure 3. Reduction of aldehydes. a Conversion of aldehyde determined by GC with n-dodecane as the internal standard—the isolated yields are in parentheses; b 2 mol% cat. D; c 5 mol% cat. D.
Ijms 25 07894 g003
Ijms 25 07894 g004
Figure 4. Comparison of cobalt PNP traizine-based methods for the reduction of cabonyl compounds using hydroelementation reactions.
Figure 4. Comparison of cobalt PNP traizine-based methods for the reduction of cabonyl compounds using hydroelementation reactions.
Ijms 25 07894 g004
Ijms 25 07894 g005
Figure 5. Proposed catalytic cycle.
Figure 5. Proposed catalytic cycle.
Ijms 25 07894 g005
Table 1. Optimization for the cobalt-catalyzed reduction of aldehydes.
Table 1. Optimization for the cobalt-catalyzed reduction of aldehydes.
Ijms 25 07894 i001
No.CatalystTimeTemperatureConversion of Aldehyde 1
1precat. A10 min25 °C15%
2precat. A30 min25 °C21%
3precat. A30 min35 °C54%
4precat. A60 min35 °C72%
5precat. B60 min35 °C32%
6precat. C60 min35 °C17%
7precat. D60 min35 °C99%
8-60 min35 °C11%
9CoCl260 min35 °C14%
10ligand A 60 min35 °C0%
11ligand B60 min35 °C2%
12ligand C60 min35 °C3%
13ligand D60 min35 °C3%
1 Conversion of aldehyde determined by GC with n-dodecane as the internal standard.
Table 2. Comparison of aldehyde reduction under catalytic and catalyst-free conditions.
Table 2. Comparison of aldehyde reduction under catalytic and catalyst-free conditions.
AldehydeConversion in Catalyst-Free Conditions 1Conversion with Addition of Catalyst 2
Ijms 25 07894 i00211%99%
Ijms 25 07894 i0032%95%
Ijms 25 07894 i00410%99%
Ijms 25 07894 i005<1%93% 3
Ijms 25 07894 i0066%97%
Ijms 25 07894 i0072%98%
Ijms 25 07894 i0082%85% 3
Ijms 25 07894 i0098%97% 4
1 Aldehyde/borane ratio of 1:1.5, 35 °C, 60 min, toluene; 2 Aldehyde/borane ratio of 1:1.4, 1 mol% cat. D, 35 °C, 60 min, toluene; 3 5 mol% cat. D; 4 2 mol% cat. D.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lewandowski, D.; Hreczycho, G. Cobalt-Catalyzed Reduction of Aldehydes to Alcohols via the Hydroboration Reaction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7894. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147894

AMA Style

Lewandowski D, Hreczycho G. Cobalt-Catalyzed Reduction of Aldehydes to Alcohols via the Hydroboration Reaction. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(14):7894. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147894

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lewandowski, Dariusz, and Grzegorz Hreczycho. 2024. "Cobalt-Catalyzed Reduction of Aldehydes to Alcohols via the Hydroboration Reaction" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 14: 7894. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147894

APA Style

Lewandowski, D., & Hreczycho, G. (2024). Cobalt-Catalyzed Reduction of Aldehydes to Alcohols via the Hydroboration Reaction. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(14), 7894. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25147894

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop