Next Article in Journal
A Comprehensive Examination of the Role of Epigenetic Factors in Multiple Sclerosis
Previous Article in Journal
Citrus Flavanone Effects on the Nrf2-Keap1/GSK3/NF-κB/NLRP3 Regulation and Corticotroph-Stress Hormone Loop in the Old Pituitary
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chlorogenic Acid and Cinnamaldehyde in Combination Inhibit Metastatic Traits and Induce Apoptosis via Akt Downregulation in Breast Cancer Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 16
10.3390/ijms25168920
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhancing Selectivity and Inhibitory Effects of Chemotherapy Drugs Against Myelogenous Leukemia Cells with Lippia alba Essential Oil Enriched in Citral

by
Wendy Lorena Quintero-García
1,2,
Denerieth Ximena Espinel-Mesa
1,2,
Erika Marcela Moreno
2,
Elena Stashenko
3,
Ana Cecilia Mesa-Arango
1 and
Liliana Torcoroma García
2,*
1
Corporación Académica Ciencias Básicas Biomédicas, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín 050010, Colombia
2
Facultad de Ciencias Médicas y de la Salud, Departamento de Postgrado en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Universidad de Santander, Bucaramanga 680006, Colombia
3
National Research Center for the Agroindustrialization of Aromatic and Medicinal Tropical Species (CENIVAM), Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga 680002, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(16), 8920; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168920
Submission received: 30 July 2024 / Revised: 13 August 2024 / Accepted: 14 August 2024 / Published: 16 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Investigation of Natural Products as Sources of Bioactive Molecules)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is one of the most lethal cancers, lacking a definitive curative therapy due to essential constraints related to the toxicity and efficacy of conventional treatments. This study explores the co-adjuvant potential of Lippia alba essential oils (EO) for enhancing the effectiveness and selectivity of two chemotherapy agents (cytarabine and clofarabine) against AML cells. EO derived from L. alba citral chemotype were produced using optimized and standardized environmental and extraction protocols. Rational fractionation techniques were employed to yield bioactive terpene-enriched fractions, guided by relative chemical composition and cytotoxic analysis. Pharmacological interactions were established between these fractions and cytarabine and clofarabine. The study comprehensively evaluated the cytotoxic, genotoxic, oxidative stress, and cell death phenotypes induced by therapies across AML (DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+) cells. The fraction rich in citral (F2) exhibited synergistic pharmacological interactions with the studied chemotherapies, intensifying their selective cytotoxic, genotoxic, and pro-oxidant effects. This shift favored transitioning from necrosis to a programmed cell death phenotype (apoptotic). The F2-clofarabine combination demonstrated remarkable synergistic anti-leukemic performance while preserving cell integrity in healthy cells. The observed selective antiproliferative effects may be attributed to the potential dual prooxidant/antioxidant behavior of citral in L. alba EO.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous and aggressive neoplasm, representing the second leading cause of cancer-related death in children and adolescents aged 2–19 years old [1]. AML progression and mortality risks are primarily associated with delays in diagnosis and treatment, poor health conditions that prevent standard intensive treatment, multi-drug resistance infections, and various socio-economic barriers [2]. Currently, to achieve rapid remission and control leukocytosis, a 7-day continuous infusion of cytarabine (100 or 200 mg/m2/day IV), combined with anthracycline treatment (12 mg/m2/day IV) on days 1 and 3, is used as induction chemotherapy (the “7 + 3” regimen). However, this regimen can require adjustments in patients who, due to their age or weakness, cannot tolerate it because of its high toxicity and low selectivity [3,4]. Despite intensive conventional chemotherapy for AML, complete remission is achieved only in 60 to 80% of younger adults and 40 to 60% of older individuals (aged >60 years) [5], with approximately 50% of cases experiencing cancer recurrence. Additionally, treatment-related mortality in AML is significant, with rates ranging from 19% for patients under 65 years old [3] to 14% for older individuals [4]. Consequently, a significant proportion of patients succumb to this disease, with a five-year overall survival rate of less than 60% in those younger than 14 years old and less than 15% in persons aged 65 years or older [6].
The significant constraints caused by the non-specific cytotoxicity of chemotherapy lead to severe toxicity, inflammatory responses, and systemic immunosuppression. Consequently, clinicians may need to prescribe lower doses, which increase the risks of inactivation and resistance, or resort to higher, toxic doses that increase the risk of a second neoplasm, high toxicity in healthy organs, and death [7]. Novel strategies should address leukemia’s complex pathogenesis and chemotherapy’s limitations. Due to their mechanisms of action on multiple cellular targets, including potentiation of programmed cell death (PCD) mechanisms, inhibition of proliferative pathways, and modulation of molecules and cells involved in persistent inflammatory and oxidative states, phytoderivatives appear to be feasible complementary approaches to conventional cytotoxic drugs.
Plant-extracted terpenes or their synthetic derivatives (such as paclitaxel and docetaxel) have become established standard therapies for prostate, lung, ovarian, and breast cancer [8,9]. Additionally, selective and broad-spectrum anti-tumoral properties have been described from preclinical and clinical studies for terpenes like citral [10,11,12]. These properties are associated with the selective induction of oxidative stress in tumor cells by increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) through their reaction with intracellular nucleophiles and depleting reduced glutathione (GSH) tab levels [10]. Consequently, citral triggers intrinsic apoptosis pathways through p53 phosphorylation, upregulation of Bax, downregulation of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, mitochondrial membrane depolarization, externalization of phosphatidylserine (PS), caspase-3 cleavage, and DNA degradation [11,13]. Furthermore, it induces cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase [14]. Remarkably, these cytotoxic effects of citral are highly selective for tumoral cells, with minimal antiproliferative or harmful actions on healthy cells [11]. In non-tumoral cells, this terpene exhibits immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and cytoprotective properties [15,16]. The antioxidant behavior of citral is attributed to its C-H aldehyde reaction with oxygen radicals [17]. Consistently, citral is a GRAS (generally recognized as safe) compound extensively employed as a flavor additive in foods, beverages, and perfumes [18].
Oxidative stress has emerged as a promising mechanism for selectively inducing tumor cell death. This phenomenon is based on the significant difference in the basal levels of ROS between normal cells and malignant cells, with normal cells having much lower levels [19]. This difference is influenced by the hypoxic environment, the high metabolic activity of tumor cells due to their constant proliferation, and the inferior performance of their antioxidant defense systems [20]. This study hypothesizes that because tumor cells survive at the threshold of elevated ROS levels, inducing oxidative stress can potentially lead to their death [19]. Therefore, using dual-nature agents (prooxidants/antioxidants) that selectively induce oxidative stress in malignant tissue beyond their tolerance while acting as cytoprotectants (antioxidants) on healthy cells holds promise when combined with chemotherapeutic agents [20].
This study aims to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapeutics (cytarabine and clofarabine) while minimizing nonspecific cytotoxicity in non-tumoral cells. To achieve this, the cytotoxic and antiproliferative properties of Lippia alba (Miller) N.E. Brown (Verbenaceae) essential oils (EO) isolated from the citral chemotypes were assessed on AML (DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+) and healthy (Vero and J774A.1) cells. L. alba is an aromatic shrub that grows wild in the Colombian Andean Mountains [11]. For reproducibility, EO were obtained under standardized agricultural and production parameters [11]. Additionally, the oils were fractionated to obtain terpene-enrichment fractions guided by correlation analysis of bioactivity (antiproliferative and selective effects) relative to the chemical composition obtained by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). Pharmacological interactions between EO and fractions with cytarabine and clofarabine were explored. The cell death phenotype induced by the treatments was assessed through cell morphology, mitochondrial membrane potential, oxidative stress, antioxidant defense systems, caspase activation, and PS externalization assays.

2. Results

2.1. Chemical Composition of L. alba EO and Fractions

Table 1 presents the relative chemical composition and the linear retention indices obtained through Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of the five EO (EOCit1 to EOCit5) and the citral-rich fraction (F2) isolated from the citral chemotypes of L. alba under standardized (planting, collecting, and extraction of vegetal material) conditions. Neral and geranial terpenes, the primary constituents of citral, were identified as the major compounds in oils and the F2 fraction.

2.2. Cytotoxic Activity of L. alba EO and Its Fraction

All the EO extracted from the citral chemotype of L. alba (EOCit1 to EOCit5) exhibited significant anti-proliferative activity (p < 0.0001) against AML (DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+) cells. However, EOCit2 demonstrated the highest anti-tumoral and selective performance (Figure 1). Based on these results, further rational fractioning using reduced-pressure fractional distillation of the citral chemotype EO resulted in a fraction enriched in citral terpene (F2). This fraction was predominantly composed of citral, comprising 72%, as a racemic mixture of neral (~40%) and geranial (~32%). In antiproliferative assays, F2 exhibited significant inhibitory effects on the growth of the tumor cell line (Figure 1). Additionally, F2 maintained low cytotoxicity in Vero and J774A.1 cells (Figure 1).

2.3. Pharmacological Interactions between Terpenes and Chemotherapeutics

Because F2 demonstrated the most effective selective inhibitory effects on AML cells, this fraction was selected as the fixed compound for the pharmacological interaction matrix with cytarabine or clofarabine. This matrix was constructed using each compound’s previously defined inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50) values (Figure 1). The drug interaction data were visualized as graphs through isobolograms, plotting each combination’s mean Fractional Inhibitory Concentration (FIC) (Figure 2). On DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+ cells, the highest antiproliferative performance was demonstrated by combined therapies using the IC50 of chemotherapies plus twice the IC50 of F2 [1X (IC50) cytarabine/clofarabine + 2X (IC50) F2]. This mixture reduced the individual IC50 values by 8-fold for both drugs. Notably, a cytoprotective effect against the toxic impact of these drugs on non-tumoral cells was observed when F2 was added to cytarabine or clofarabine. Specifically, growth cell inhibition was undetectable in Vero cells, and minimal in murine macrophages (8% with cytarabine and 21% with clofarabine) after 24 h of treatment (Figure 2).

2.4. Morphological Changes and Oxidative Stress Triggered by Treatments

AML cells (DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+) treated with cytarabine displayed diminished cytoplasmic volume, karyopyknosis (as observed with the Giemsa stain), partial loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (depletion of yellow-stain cells marked with the JC-1 probe), and DNA fragmentation (TUNEL-positive cells). This cytotoxic effect was non-selective since Vero cells presented detachment, total loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (green-stained cells in JC-1) and reduced cytoplasmic volume (Figure 3). Interestingly, when F2 was added to cytarabine, a significant reduction in the detrimental impact of this drug on Vero cells was observed, resulting in the restoration of cell adhesion and mitochondrial membrane potential (Figure 3).
On the other hand, DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+ and Vero cells treated with clofarabine exhibited cell edema and loss of cell membrane integrity. However, combined therapy of this drug with F2 shifted the morphology from necrotic to programmed cell death (PCD) morphology in AML cells. For instance, DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+ cells treated with F2-clofarabine displayed reduced cytoplasmic volume, chromatin condensation, nuclear fragmentation, and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, suggesting the activation of a possible apoptotic cell death mechanism. In contrast, adding F2 to clofarabine exhibited a cytoprotective effect in non-tumoral cells. Consequently, Vero cells treated with this combined therapy demonstrated a significant decrease in mitochondrial oxidative stress (reduction in levels of MitoSOX™ Red fluorescence), preservation of DNA integrity (TUNEL negative), cell adherence, and maintained mitochondrial membrane potential (orange and yellow stain in cells) (Figure 3).

2.5. Genotoxicity on Tumoral and Vero Cells

On DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+ cells, cytarabine exhibited moderate genotoxicity, causing type 1 damage (at a lower level) in approximately 50% of the cells. However, when combined with the citral-enriched fraction (F2), this genotoxic action significantly intensified in leukemia cells. For instance, while AML cells treated with cytarabine alone showed 0% maximal damage to the genome (type 4), adding F2 triggered 26.2% of this type of genotoxicity. Conversely, in Vero cells, F2 with cytarabine mitigated the DNA damage caused by this chemotherapy, reducing type 3 damage threefold (from 21.4 ± 3.0 to 7.8 ± 2.8) and resulting in minimal injury in 92% of the treated cells (damage level types 1 and 2) (Figure 4).
On DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+ cells, the combination of clofarabine with F2 potentiated the genotoxic capability of this drug on AML cells, increasing the type 3 DNA toxicity more than twofold (59% vs. 23% with clofarabine alone). Conversely, in Vero cells, the addition of F2 to clofarabine effectively protected the integrity of the genetic material, with cells presenting only the lowest levels of damage (types 1 and 2) and no detectable type 3 genome damage (compared with 9.6% with clofarabine alone) (Figure 4).

2.6. Annexin V/SYTOX Green Assay and Multicaspase Activation

Annexin V/SYTOX Green assays revealed PS externalization in 93% of AML cells treated with F2-cytarabine at 48 h, persisting until 72 h. This was significantly higher than the 75% PS labeling observed in cells treated with cytarabine alone, demonstrating that the addition of F2 enhanced its apoptotic effect while maintaining minimal levels of necrosis (0.46% with cytarabine vs. 0.09% mixture) (Figure 5A). Over 99% of AML cells consistently exhibited caspase activation, with 75% undergoing cell death following this activation (Figure 5B).
The cytoprotective effect of the citral-rich fraction F2 on non-tumor cells was confirmed. In Annexin V/SYTOX Green assays, Vero cells treated with F2-cytarabine doubled their viability (24.3% with cytarabine vs. 58.5% with the mixture), and J774A.1 cells increased their viability from 35.8% to 51.5% (Figure 5A). In these macrophages, the cell death phenotype was characterized by PS externalization in 40% of the cells (indicating apoptosis), with only 2% showing necrosis. However, the death of these macrophages associated with caspase activation was significantly reduced when F2 was added to the drug (27.6% in the mixture vs. 99% with cytarabine alone) (Figure 5B).
Annexin V/SYTOX Green assays in tumor cells (DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+) showed that F2-clofarabine therapy induced predominantly apoptotic cell death, reaching 99% death at 72 h, with caspase activation (Figure 5A). This was superior to the 90% PS externalization and 87% death associated with caspase activation observed in AML cells treated with clofarabine alone while maintaining the same necrosis values (0.34%) (Figure 5). In J774A.1 macrophages, the combined therapy showed improved viability rates, increasing from 3.6% with individual treatment to 7% after the combined therapy at 72 h. The death phenotype in these cells was characterized by PS externalization in 85% of the cells, with 8% showing signs of necrosis (Figure 5A), reaffirming that these cells are more sensitive to the treatment, as shown in Figure 2. In contrast, in Vero cells treated with F2-clofarabine, caspase activation was observed in only 2%, like the individual treatment with clofarabine, with a slight increase of necrosis (0.15% with clofarabine vs. 2.3% with the combination) (Figure 5A).

2.7. Antioxidant Systems

The addition of F2 to cytarabine induced a significant increase in antioxidant defense systems in macrophage cells: total superoxide dismutase or SOD-T (196 U/mL for cytarabine vs. 537 U/mL for the mixture), total glutathione or GSH-T (2.3 µmol/109, cytarabine vs. 6.8 µmol/109 for the mixture), and reduced glutathione or GSH (1.6 µmol/109 for cytarabine vs. 3.2 µmol/109 for the mixture) (Figure 6). However, this antioxidant effect of the combined therapy (cytarabine-F2) was not selective and was also observed in leukemic cells (SOD-T: 153 U/mL with cytarabine vs. 353 U/mL with the mixture; GSH-T: 1.4 µmol/109 with cytarabine vs. 2.3 µmol/109 with the mixture; GSH: 1.3 µmol/109 with cytarabine vs. 1.7 µmol/109 with the mixture).
In contrast, the addition of F2 to clofarabine specifically induced oxidative stress in AML cells. Thus, the combined therapy significantly impaired the antioxidant systems [GSH-T (2.6 µmol/109 with clofarabine vs. 1.4 µmol/109 with the mixture) and GSH (2.5 µmol/109 with clofarabine vs. 0.2 µmol/109 with the mixture)], while increasing the pro-oxidant oxidized glutathione (GSSG) levels up to 28 times (0.05 µmol/109 with clofarabine and untreated control vs. 1.4 µmol/109 with the mixture). Interestingly, the pro-oxidant activity of F2-clofarabine therapy was exclusive to tumoral cells. Thus, this mixture significantly potentiated antioxidant defenses in healthy J774A.1 macrophages: SOD-T (211 U/mL with clofarabine vs. 562 U/mL with the mixture), GSH-T (0.7 µmol/109 with clofarabine vs. 5.6 µmol/109 with the mixture), and GSH (0.6 µmol/109 with clofarabine vs. 2.1 µmol/109 with the mixture) (Figure 6).

3. Discussion

Conventional treatment of leukemias relies on monotherapies or combined chemotherapies using cytotoxic agents such as cytarabine and clofarabine. Currently, clinical applications of these drugs face significant challenges due to high rates of cancer resistance, particularly in AML. This resistance is characterized by patients surviving 28 days after therapy initiation but either failing to achieve complete remission or experiencing relapse within 1 year of achieving it [3,4]. Notably, after induction therapy with the “7 + 3” regimen, there have been reports of elevated relapse rates, ranging from 50% for patients under 60 years old to 80–90%, for older individuals [21]. Moreover, chemotherapy administration raises critical concerns related to severe toxic side effects, including fatigue, neuropathies, and organic dysfunction in the gastrointestinal, respiratory, and cardiac systems [4,22]. Additionally, these chemotherapeutic compounds exhibit low permeability and penetration into cell membranes, necessitating the use of high-dose regimens associated with severe toxicity and relapses [8]. In pursuing more efficient and less toxic cancer therapies, combining two or more agents with diverse pharmacological (co-adjuvant) properties has become a significant strategy [23,24,25,26]. Combining natural compounds, such as terpenes derived from medicinal plants, with oncological drugs could enhance their permeability and cytotoxic effects on neoplastic cells, allowing for lower doses and reducing nonspecific toxicity [23,24]. Furthermore, due to their complex composition, EO can potentially enhance the antiproliferative effects of chemotherapies through multi-target effects on cellular pathways. These targets include metabolites, receptors, enzymes, ion channels, transporters, nucleic acids, ribosomes, and proteins [27]. Combining therapies with distinct properties in cancer, such as the CHOP-R regimen, has extensively demonstrated excellent benefits, resulting in increased complete remission rates and five-year overall survival [28]. Likewise, a clinical study showed an improved response rate after 12 weeks of treatment in patients with advanced and metastatic breast cancer who received a curcumin regimen in combination with paclitaxel, compared with paclitaxel monotherapy [29].
This study explored complementary therapies based on L. alba EO and its citral-rich fraction as potential complementary agents to cytarabine and clofarabine chemotherapies against AML. In leukemia cells, these drugs exhibited superior antiproliferative performance (IC50 ranging from 0.63 to 1.1 µg/mL) compared with EO or the fraction. However, these conventional drugs were also highly toxic against non-tumoral cells (CC50 ranging from 0.1 to 19.7 µg/mL). Regarding the inhibitory effect of the studied phytotherapy on tumoral cells, good activity was achieved by a fraction derived from L. alba EO enriched in citral (F2), with IC50 values of 14.7 µg/mL. Notably, lower IC50 values (p > 0.05) were reported for the F2 fraction compared with those observed from whole oils isolated from the citral chemotype (IC50 > 20 µg/mL for EOCit 1 to 5) (Figure 1).
When F2 is combined with chemotherapeutic agents, this compound potentiates these medicines’ selective inhibitory effect on leukemia cells (Figure 2). Thus, in DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+ (AML) cells, F2 demonstrated an obvious synergistic behavior in combined therapy with cytarabine (∑FIC = 0.49 ± 0.15) and clofarabine (∑FIC = 0.54 ± 0.08), enhancing their anti-tumoral effects by eight times. Considering the low permeability of these medicines (primarily cytarabine) through the membrane (low lipophilicity), these synergistic interactions could be attributed to a possible increase in drug permeability at the cell membrane level [30]. Thus, the lipophilic nature and low molecular weight of citral could contribute to increasing the membrane permeability for chemotherapeutic agents [26]. These effects might also be responsible for increased mitochondrial membrane permeability and subsequent loss of its potential, leading to the release of cytochrome c into the cytosol. Coherently, in DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+ cells, the combined therapy of chemotherapeutics with F2 potentiated the ability of the drugs to induce PCD mechanisms rather than necrosis. This shift in the cytotoxic mechanism of chemotherapeutics on tumoral cells depended on oxidative stress induction by increasing mitochondrial ROS, particularly mitochondrial superoxide. This observation was supported by the intensification of MitoSOXTM Red levels and the depletion of mitochondrial membrane potential (Figure 3). In this regard, Navarra et al. (2015) also observed that the interaction induced by adding citral (from bergamot EO) to doxorubicin therapy caused an increase in ROS levels, leading to alterations in mitochondrial membrane potential and the release of cytochrome c, as well as the activation of tumor suppressor genes and PCD pathways in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells [31]. Similarly, Fang et al. (2017) described how citral increased cytoplasmic ROS activity by pirarubicin, potentiating the in vivo inhibitory effects on colorectal cancer cells [26].
In this study, chemotherapies were the most cytotoxic treatments on non-tumoral cells (Vero and J774A.1). The CC50 values for Vero cells ranged from 0.1 µg/mL (cytarabine) to 4.7 µg/mL (clofarabine). For murine macrophages, they ranged from 12.9 µg/mL (cytarabine) to 19.7 µg/mL (clofarabine). Thus, cytarabine was the least selective compound (SI: 0.09). In contrast, F2 demonstrated a significantly lower cytotoxic effect on non-tumoral cells, especially on Vero cells (CC50 = 74 µg/mL), while J774A.1 cells were considerably more susceptible to its inhibitory growth cell effect (CC50 = 35 µg/mL). However, combined with the studied chemotherapeutics, this fraction demonstrated a cytoprotective effect on non-tumoral cells, consistent with the results from inhibitory growth cell and morphology assays. These analyses revealed that the addition of F2 to both cytarabine and clofarabine restored cell membrane, DNA, and mitochondrial membrane potential integrity while controlling oxidative stress (Figure 3).
Considering the results, the potential pro-oxidant effect of both F2-cytarabine and F2-clofarabine was assessed through antioxidant defense system assays. These analyses revealed that adding F2 to cytarabine had an antioxidant effect, as evidenced by increased SOD-T, GSH-T, and GSH levels in leukemic cells and murine macrophages. Notably, this non-selective antioxidant activity may undermine the antitumor efficacy of chemotherapy, such as simultaneous antioxidant activity, which has been linked to resistance and deleterious effectiveness of antitumor treatments [32].
Conversely, the pro-oxidant effect observed by the MitoSOXTM Red assay when combining F2 with clofarabine was consistent with the results obtained from the antioxidant systems analysis. Specifically, in AML cells treated with F2-clofarabine, there was a significant depletion of antioxidant GSH-T and GSH, accompanied by a strong increase in GSSG. Remarkably, this combined therapy demonstrated dual behavior, acting as a selective antioxidant in J774A.1 macrophage cells. These results align with those previously described by Oien et al. (2016), who found that the selective antiproliferative effect of citral against tumor cells was based on its capability to trigger selective oxidative stress, leveraging the specific vulnerability of these cells to pro-oxidant agents [33]. This susceptibility is due to their elevated levels of basal ROS, associated with their high metabolic rate, excessive proliferation, deficient antioxidant defenses, and mitochondrial dysfunction [20]. Therefore, the overproduction of these free radicals leads to a loss of homeostasis, causing tumor cells to reach their oxidative stress threshold earlier than healthy cells, ultimately inducing selective cell death [34]. Thus, combination regimens involving dual pro-oxidant/antioxidant agents, such as citral, can exhibit cytoprotective (antioxidant) effects on healthy cells. This property can mitigate the side effects of chemotherapy with clofarabine, providing a protective advantage to normal cells.
The citral-rich fraction isolated from L. alba EO (F2) also potentiated the genotoxic effect of chemotherapeutic agents on DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+ (Figure 4), while enhancing their selective performance (protecting non-tumoral cells). The combined chemotherapies with F2 also favored an apoptotic phenotype in tumoral cells. These included cytoplasmic blistering, cell shrinkage, nuclear chromatin condensation and fragmentation (confirmed by TUNEL-positive assays), apoptotic body formation, and caspase activation (confirmed by flow cytometry) (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5). This shift in the AML cell death phenotype could have a favorable effect on alleviating the unwanted side effects of chemotherapy, especially those related to necrotic cell death, such as the severe inflammatory response in normal organs.
Similar apoptotic effects were reported by Garcia et al. (2017) in K562 cells treated with EO isolated from L. alba citral chemotype, composed of high percentages of citral (ranging from 50 to 85%) [11]. The antitumoral action of citral mediated by PCD mechanisms was also described in mammary, gastric, hepatic, ovarian, and hematological carcinogenic cells [13,35,36,37]. This activity was attributed to the caspase-3 activator effect of the α, β-unsaturated chemical group present in citral [38], as well as an increase in Bax and a reduction in Bcl-2 and NF-κB, resulting in the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential [37]. In this regard, a synergistic antiproliferative and selective activity of the citral-doxorubicin mixture was observed on Burkitt’s lymphoma cells, which was associated with an intensification of the apoptotic stimulus (elevated levels of the pro-apoptotic protein Bak and diminished expression of the anti-apoptotic agent Bcl-xL) [25].
Combined therapies of conventional chemotherapeutics and natural compounds, like F2, promise to improve leukemia treatments. These therapies can enhance the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs while minimizing non-specific cytotoxicity. The observed effects of the combined therapies on tumor cells were attributed to altered mitochondrial function, oxidative stress induction, and activation of PCD pathways. These findings contribute to the ongoing efforts to develop more efficient and less toxic therapies against AML.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Cultures

Selectivity index assays were assessed on Vero (ATCC-CCL 81) and J774A.1 (ATCC TIB-67) cells, cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Gibco, CA, USA), pH 7.2, supplemented with 10% inactive Fetal Bovine Fetal Serum (iFBS) (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 1000 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cytotoxicity assays were performed on AML [DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+] [39] cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI-1640) (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and supplemented under the same conditions described above for non-tumor cells. All cells were grown at 37 °C with 95% humidity and 5% CO2. [DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+] cells are myeloid progenitors, with EVI1 oncogene [ecotropic virus insertion site 1] overexpression [39], which were modified for autonomous growth by the autologous, non-secretable expression of Monocytic Granulocytic Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) directed to the endoplasmic reticulum [40].

4.2. Chemotherapeutics

Cytarabine (50 mg/mL) and clofarabine (1 mg/mL) were kindly donated by Empresa Social del Estado—Hospital Universitario de Santander (ESE-HUS). The working solutions (100 µg/mL for both chemotherapeutics) were diluted in DMEM (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) or RPMI-1640 (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for the assays on non-tumoral and tumoral cells, respectively.

4.3. Plant Material

The citral chemotypes of L. alba (Mill) N. E. Brown (Verbenaceae) plants were grown in the National Research Center for Agroindustrialization of Aromatic Medical and Tropical species (CENIVAM, in Spanish), in Bucaramanga (Santander), Colombia, at 7°8′26″ N 73°7′10″ W, at 960 m above sea level altitude, under standardized environmental and production conditions [11]. Prof. Jorge Luis Fernández Alonso officially identified the plant specimens using the conventional taxonomic approach described by Moldenke (1971) [41]. This identification was based on shared superficial morphological characteristics of the plant (leaves, fruits, inflorescences, stems, and branches) by comparison with previously collected samples and identification guides. The vouchers were deposited at the Colombian National Herbarium (Universidad Nacional de Colombia) under Herbarium Code COL512077.

4.4. Isolation and Chemical Characterization of Essential Oils and Fraction

EO were extracted from 100 g of mature and young leaves in 0.5 L of water, which were submitted to distillation by microwave-assisted hydrodistillation (MWHD) technique as previously described [11]. Alternatively, the fraction (F2) isolation procedure was performed from EO extracted by steam distillation technique and then subjected to reduced-pressure fractional distillation in a B/R Instruments (Easton, MD, USA) 800 High-Efficiency Micro Distillation device, as described in [16].

4.5. Cytotoxic Activity on Vero and J774A.1 Cells

Vero (3 × 104 cells/mL) and J774A.1 (1.5 × 104 cells/mL) were incubated in 96-well flat-bottom plates at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and 95% humidity for 24 h until a confluent monolayer was formed. Then, the cells were treated with different concentrations of the therapies (from 11.1 to 300 μg/mL for essential oils and the fraction; or from 0.04 to 5 μg/mL for chemotherapeutics) and incubated under the same conditions described above for 24 h. After that, the cell proliferation reagent WST-1 (Roche Applied Sciences, Mannheim, Germany) was added, and cells were re-incubated for 2 h, after which the optical density (OD) was determined spectrophotometrically at a wavelength of 450 nm using a Multiskan Sky Microplate Absorbance Reader (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The percentage inhibition was calculated as described previously [16]. The results were reported as CC50.

4.6. Antiproliferative Activity on AML Cells

DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+ cells (3 × 104 cells/mL) were seeded in 96-well flat-bottom plates and incubated for two hours at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and 95% humidity. Subsequently, the different concentrations of EO or the enriched fraction (3.7 to 150 μg/mL) and chemotherapeutics (0.02 to 22.5 μg/mL) were added and incubated under the same conditions for 24 h. The cell proliferation reagent WST-1 (Roche Applied Sciences, Mannheim, Germany) was used to determine cell inhibition, as described above. The results were reported as IC50.

4.7. Pharmacological Interaction between F2 Fraction and Chemotherapeutics

A matrix of pharmacological interactions between the F2 fraction and the reference chemotherapeutics was performed on DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+ cells, using the matrix suggested by Fivelman et al. (2004) [42]. In the matrix, the IC50 values determined for F2, and chemotherapeutics were used as fixed values for the interactions (Table 2). Then, the inhibitory percentage was evaluated on Vero and J774A.1 cells. The susceptibility assessment was carried out following the protocol above-mentioned for in vitro antiproliferative activity. The results were expressed using the fixed isobologram method [43]. Fractional Inhibitory Concentration (FIC) was calculated to evaluate susceptibility using Equation (1):
FIC = (compound IC50 in combination)/(compound IC50 alone).
The sum of FIC (ΣFIC) was defined in Equation (2)
ΣFIC = (FIC F2) + (FIC chemotherapy)
In this manner, synergistic: X ¯ ΣFIC < 1; antagonistic: X ¯ ΣFIC > 1; and additive: X ¯ ΣFIC = 1 interactions were defined [43].

4.8. Cell Death Analysis

Cell death tracking was performed by optical and fluorescence microscopy (Fluorescence microscopy, Nikon Eclipse Ni, Tokyo, Japan) on 4 × 104 cells/mL of Vero and DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+ cells seeded in 96-well flat-bottom plates. The cells were incubated under the same conditions as before mentioned for antiproliferative assays. Morphological changes triggered by the most synergic mixtures between the fraction and chemotherapeutic agents (2X IC50 F2 + IC50 chemotherapy) were analyzed using Giemsa dye (IHR Diagnostic, COL). DNA fragmentation was examined using a TUNEL assay (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, CA, USA). For mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), cells were stained with 5 μM of MitoProbe™ JC-1 Assay (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and incubated at 37 °C for 20 min (529 nm/590 nm excitation/emission wavelength). Superoxide production was evaluated using 4 μM of MitoSOX™ Red (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and incubating the cells for 30 min at 37°C (510 nm/580 nm excitation/emission wavelength). Controls were provided by untreated cells (negative) and by cultures treated with Carbonyl Cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) (positive) by the manufacturer’s instruction.
A Muse Multicaspase (Cytek) kit and an Annexin V/Dead with SYTOX Green (Molecular probes, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) kit were used to determine the cell death phenotype, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cells treated for 48 h with the different studied therapies (individual and combined) were washed and suspended in 1X caspase buffer. Then, Muse Multicaspase Reagent Working was added and incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and 95% humidity for 30 min. After incubation, Muse Caspase 7-Aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD) Working Solution was incubated at room temperature for 5 min. Cells were analyzed using a Muse Flow Cytometer (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).
PS externalization was determined using a recombinant Annexin V conjugated to the Orange Fluorescent phycobiliprotein R-PE and SYTOX™ Green nucleic acid stain for necrotic cells. Cells treated for 48 h were suspended in 1X Annexin-Binding Buffer. Next, R-PE Annexin V and SYTOX® Green Stain were added and incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2, and 95% humidity. Finally, the samples were analyzed using a Guava easyCyte Flow Cytometer (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).

4.9. Effect on Antioxidant Systems

J774A.1 and DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+ cells were arranged in 12-well plates and exposed for 24 h to the different compounds (IC50 of individual and 2X IC50 F2 + IC50 chemotherapy of combined therapies). SOD-T activity was determined using a T-SOD Activity Assay Kit (MyBioSource, CA, USA); and total (GSH-T), reduced (GSH), and oxidized (GSSG) Glutathione by a GSH-T Kit (MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA). All determinations were made following the manufacturer’s instructions for sonicated cells.

4.10. Genomic Damage

Vero and tumoral (3 × 104 cells/mL) cells were treated for 24 h with F2 or chemotherapeutics (CC50 or IC50, respectively). The best pharmacological interactions (2X IC50 F2 + IC50 chemotherapy) were centrifuged, and the pellet was mixed with low-melting-point agarose (0.5%) to be added to slides previously treated with agarose 1.5%. After that, those slides were immersed in lysis buffer for 2 h and washed with alkaline buffer for 15 min. The electrophoretic run was carried out at 25 V for 40 min. Once the run was over, slides were immersed in a neutralization buffer and stained with DAPI (1 µg/mL, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). DNA migration as an indicator of damage to the genome was determined by visual scoring, considering the length of the comet’s tail as previously described [44].

4.11. Data Analysis

Xlfit™ 5.5.0.5 statistical software (IDBS, Boston, MA, USA) was used to calculate CC50 and IC50 by sigmoidal regression and to analyze the pharmacological interactions. To determine the statistically significant differences in the genotoxicity test, growth inhibition, and measurement of antioxidant systems, an ANOVA test was conducted in GraphPad Prism 9.5.1 (GraphPad Software Inc., Boston, MA, USA). Dunnett’s test performed multiple comparison analyses at a 95% confidence level. These experiments were assessed in triplicate in three independent trials, and measurement data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. This study was approved by the ethics committees of Universidad de Santander and Universidad Industrial de Santander, Agreement 010-VII May 15 and 16, 2017.

Author Contributions

W.L.Q.-G.: Writing—original draft, Investigation, Formal analysis; D.X.E.-M.: Investigation; E.M.M.: Investigation; E.S.: Investigation, Methodology; A.C.M.-A.: Investigation; L.T.G.: Writing—review and editing, Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors thank funding from the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Innovation, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Industry, Commerce, and Tourism, and ICETEX, Programme Ecosistema Científico—Colombia Científica, from the Francisco José de Caldas Fund, Grant RC-FP44842-212-2018.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The necessary data can be requested from the correspondence author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Empresa Social del Estado—Hospital Universitario de Santander, for donating the chemotherapeutics. We thank Jose Arteaga, from Medical School, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, who kindly provided the DA-3ER/GM/EVI1+ cells.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Ferlay, J.; Colombet, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Parkin, D.M.; Piñeros, M.; Znaor, A.; Bray, F. Cancer Statistics for the Year 2020: An Overview. Int. J. Cancer 2021, 149, 778–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Winer, E.S. Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2020, 34, 449–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kayal, S.; Sengar, M.; Jain, H.; Bonda, A.; George, B.; Kulkarni, U.P.; Balasubramanian, P.; Bhurani, D.; Ahmed, R.; Biswajit, D.; et al. Induction Related Mortality in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Multivariate Model of Predictive Score from the Indian Acute Leukemia Research Database (INwARD) of the Hematology Cancer Consortium (HCC). Blood 2019, 134 (Suppl. S1), 2615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Walter, R.B.; Othus, M.; Borthakur, G.; Ravandi, F.; Cortes, J.E.; Pierce, S.A.; Appelbaum, F.R.; Kantarjian, H.A.; Estey, E.H. Prediction of Early Death After Induction Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Pretreatment Risk Scores: A Novel Paradigm for Treatment Assignment. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 4417–4424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Döhner, H.; Estey, E.; Grimwade, D.; Amadori, S.; Appelbaum, F.R.; Büchner, T.; Dombret, H.; Ebert, B.L.; Fenaux, P.; Larson, R.A.; et al. Diagnosis and Management of AML in Adults: 2017 ELN Recommendations from an International Expert Panel. Blood 2017, 129, 424–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gamis, A.S.; Alonzo, T.A.; Meshinchi, S.; Sung, L.; Gerbing, R.B.; Raimondi, S.C.; Hirsch, B.A.; Kahwash, S.B.; Heerema-McKenney, A.; Winter, L.; et al. Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Children and Adolescents with De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia Improves Event-Free Survival by Reducing Relapse Risk: Results From the Randomized Phase III Children’s Oncology Group Trial AAML0531. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 3021–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Steegmann, J.L.; Baccarani, M.; Breccia, M.; Casado, L.F.; García-Gutiérrez, V.; Hochhaus, A.; Kim, D.-W.; Kim, T.D.; Khoury, H.J.; Le Coutre, P.; et al. European LeukemiaNet Recommendations for the Management and Avoidance of Adverse Events of Treatment in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia. Leukemia 2016, 30, 1648–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Wong, Y.K.; Sun, X.; Chen, Y.; Wang, L.; Yang, L.; Lu, L.; Shen, H.-M.; Huang, D. Docetaxel Enhances Lysosomal Function through TFEB Activation. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, J.J.; Ho, J.Y.; Lee, H.W.; Baik, M.W.; Kim, O.; Choi, Y.J.; Hur, S.Y. Inhibition of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase (PI3K) Signaling Synergistically Potentiates Antitumor Efficacy of Paclitaxel and Overcomes Paclitaxel-Mediated Resistance in Cervical Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sheikh, B.Y.; Sarker, M.M.R.; Kamarudin, M.N.A.; Mohan, G. Antiproliferative and Apoptosis-Inducing Effects of Citral via P53 and ROS-Induced Mitochondrial-Mediated Apoptosis in Human Colorectal HCT116 and HT29 Cell Lines. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 96, 834–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. García, L.T.; Leal, A.F.; Moreno, É.M.; Stashenko, E.E.; Arteaga, H.J. Differential Anti-Proliferative Effect on K562 Leukemia Cells of Lippia alba (Verbenaceae) Essential Oils Produced under Diverse Growing, Collection and Extraction Conditions. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 96, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Klauser, A.-L.; Hirschfeld, M.; Ritter, A.; Rücker, G.; Jäger, M.; Gundarova, J.; Weiss, D.; Juhasz-Böss, I.; Berner, K.; Erbes, T.; et al. Anticarcinogenic Effects of Odorant Substances Citral, Citrathal R and Cyclovertal on Breast Cancer in Vitro. Breast Cancer Targets Ther. 2021, 13, 659–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kapur, A.; Felder, M.; Fass, L.; Kaur, J.; Czarnecki, A.; Rathi, K.; Zeng, S.; Osowski, K.K.; Howell, C.; Xiong, M.P.; et al. Modulation of Oxidative Stress and Subsequent Induction of Apoptosis and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Allows Citral to Decrease Cancer Cell Proliferation. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nigjeh, S.E.; Yeap, S.K.; Nordin, N.; Kamalideghan, B.; Ky, H.; Rosli, R. Citral Induced Apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 Spheroid Cells. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Espinel-Mesa, D.X.; González Rugeles, C.I.; Mantilla Hernández, J.C.; Stashenko, E.E.; Villegas-Lanau, C.A.; Quimbaya Ramírez, J.J.; García Sánchez, L.T. Immunomodulation and Antioxidant Activities as Possible Trypanocidal and Cardioprotective Mechanisms of Major Terpenes from Lippia alba Essential Oils in an Experimental Model of Chronic Chagas Disease. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Quintero, W.L.; Moreno, E.M.; Pinto, S.M.L.; Sanabria, S.M.; Stashenko, E.; García, L.T. Immunomodulatory, Trypanocide, and Antioxidant Properties of Essential Oil Fractions of Lippia alba (Verbenaceae). BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2021, 21, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Baschieri, A.; Ajvazi, M.D.; Tonfack, J.L.F.; Valgimigli, L.; Amorati, R. Explaining the Antioxidant Activity of Some Common Non-Phenolic Components of Essential Oils. Food Chem. 2017, 232, 656–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Food and Drug Administration. Food and Drugs. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm (accessed on 8 July 2024).
  19. Moon, D.-O.; Kim, M.-O.; Choi, Y.H.; Hyun, J.W.; Chang, W.Y.; Kim, G.-Y. Butein Induces G2/M Phase Arrest and Apoptosis in Human Hepatoma Cancer Cells through ROS Generation. Cancer Lett. 2010, 288, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Arfin, S.; Jha, N.K.; Jha, S.K.; Kesari, K.K.; Ruokolainen, J.; Roychoudhury, S.; Rathi, B.; Kumar, D. Oxidative Stress in Cancer Cell Metabolism. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Schlenk, R.F.; Müller-Tidow, C.; Benner, A.; Kieser, M. Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Any Progress? Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2017, 29, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Crossnohere, N.L.; Richardson, D.R.; Reinhart, C.; O’Donoghue, B.; Love, S.M.; Smith, B.D.; Bridges, J.F.P. Side Effects from Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treatment: Results from a National Survey. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2019, 35, 1965–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chamberlin, S.R.; Blucher, A.; Wu, G.; Shinto, L.; Choonoo, G.; Kulesz-Martin, M.; McWeeney, S. Natural Product Target Network Reveals Potential for Cancer Combination Therapies. Front. Pharmacol. 2019, 10, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pezzani, R.; Salehi, B.; Vitalini, S.; Iriti, M.; Zuñiga, F.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Martorell, M.; Martins, N. Synergistic Effects of Plant Derivatives and Conventional Chemotherapeutic Agents: An Update on the Cancer Perspective. Medicina 2019, 55, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dangkong, D.; Limpanasithikul, W. Effect of Citral on the Cytotoxicity of Doxorubicin in Human B-Lymphoma Cells. Pharm. Biol. 2015, 53, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Yu, S.; Liu, Z.; Fan, Z.; Chen, X.; Wu, Y.; Pan, X.; Li, X.; et al. Combination Treatment of Citral Potentiates the Efficacy of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemoperfusion with Pirarubicin for Colorectal Cancer. Mol. Pharm. 2017, 14, 3588–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Imming, P.; Sinning, C.; Meyer, A. Drugs, Their Targets and the Nature and Number of Drug Targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 821–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Linschoten, M.; Kamphuis, J.A.M.; van Rhenen, A.; Bosman, L.P.; Cramer, M.J.; Doevendans, P.A.; Teske, A.J.; Asselbergs, F.W. Cardiovascular Adverse Events in Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated with First-Line Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone (CHOP) or CHOP with Rituximab (R-CHOP): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Lancet Haematol. 2020, 7, e295–e308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Saghatelyan, T.; Tananyan, A.; Janoyan, N.; Tadevosyan, A.; Petrosyan, H.; Hovhannisyan, A.; Hayrapetyan, L.; Arustamyan, M.; Arnhold, J.; Rotmann, A.-R.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Curcumin in Combination with Paclitaxel in Patients with Advanced, Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Comparative, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Phytomedicine 2020, 70, 153218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Novotny, L.; Rauko, P. Cytarabine Conjugates with Biologically Active Molecules and Their Potential Anticancer Activity. Neoplasma 2009, 56, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Navarra, M.; Ferlazzo, N.; Cirmi, S.; Trapasso, E.; Bramanti, P.; Lombardo, G.E.; Minciullo, P.L.; Calapai, G.; Gangemi, S. Effects of Bergamot Essential Oil and Its Extractive Fractions on SH-SY5Y Human Neuroblastoma Cell Growth. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2015, 67, 1042–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Weniger, M.A.; Rizzatti, E.G.; Pérez-Galán, P.; Liu, D.; Wang, Q.; Munson, P.J.; Raghavachari, N.; White, T.; Tweito, M.M.; Dunleavy, K.; et al. Treatment-Induced Oxidative Stress and Cellular Antioxidant Capacity Determine Response to Bortezomib in Mantle Cell Lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 5101–5112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Oien, D.B.; Chien, J.; Cheng, N. Regulation of Chemo-Sensitivity in Ovarian Cancer via a Stroma Dependent Glutathione Pathway. Transl. Cancer Res. 2016, 5 (Suupl. S3), S514–S519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. NavaneethaKrishnan, S.; Rosales, J.L.; Lee, K.-Y. ROS-Mediated Cancer Cell Killing through Dietary Phytochemicals. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2019, 2019, 9051542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Dudai, N.; Weinstein, Y.; Krup, M.; Rabinski, T.; Ofir, R. Citral Is a New Inducer of Caspase-3 in Tumor Cell Lines. Planta Med. 2005, 71, 484–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nordin, N.; Yeap, S.K.; Rahman, H.S.; Zamberi, N.R.; Abu, N.; Mohamad, N.E.; How, C.W.; Masarudin, M.J.; Abdullah, R.; Alitheen, N.B. In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Anticancer Effects of Citral Nanostructured Lipid Carrier on MDA MBA-231 Human Breast Cancer Cells. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sharma, S.; Habib, S.; Sahu, D.; Gupta, J. Chemical Properties and Therapeutic Potential of Citral, a Monoterpene Isolated from Lemongrass. Med. Chem. 2020, 17, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chaimovitsh, D.; Rogovoy, O.; Altshuler, O.; Belausov, E.; Abu-Abied, M.; Rubin, B.; Sadot, E.; Dudai, N. The Relative Effect of Citral on Mitotic Microtubules in Wheat Roots and BY2 Cells. Plant Biol. 2012, 14, 354–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Arteaga, H.J.; Mohamed, A.J.; Christensson, B.; Mahdy, E.; Gahrton, G.; Smith, C.I.E.; Dilber, M.S. Genetically Modified Autoactivated Cells Expressing Intracellular Forms of GM-CSF as a Model for Regulated Administration of Cytokines. Scand. J. Immunol. 2005, 62, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Cardona, M.E.; Simonson, O.E.; Oprea, I.I.; Moreno, P.M.D.; Silva-Lara, M.F.; Mohamed, A.J.; Christensson, B.; Gahrton, G.; Dilber, M.S.; Smith, C.I.E.; et al. A Murine Model of Acute Myeloid Leukemia with EVI1 Overexpression and Autocrine Stimulation by an Intracellular Form of GM-CSF in DA-3 Cells. Leuk. Lymphoma 2016, 57, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Moldenke, H. A Fifth Summary of the Verbenaceae, Avicenniaceae, Stilbaceae, Dicrastylidaceae, Symphoremaceae, Nyctanthaceae, and Eriocaulaceae of the World as to Valid Taxa, Geographic Distribution, and Synonymy; William Paterson College of New Jersey: Wayne, NJ, USA, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  42. Fivelman, Q.L.; Adagu, I.S.; Warhurst, D.C. Modified Fixed-Ratio Isobologram Method for Studying In Vitro Interactions between Atovaquone and Proguanil or Dihydroartemisinin against Drug-Resistant Strains of Plasmodium falciparum. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 4097–4102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chou, T.-C.; Talalay, P. Quantitative Analysis of Dose-Effect Relationships: The Combined Effects of Multiple Drugs or Enzyme Inhibitors. Adv. Enzyme Regul. 1984, 22, 27–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Collins, A.R. The Comet Assay for DNA Damage and Repair: Principles, Applications, and Limitations. Mol. Biotechnol. 2004, 26, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 25 08920 g001
Figure 1. Antiproliferative and cytotoxic activity. EOCit1-EOCit5: EO from citral chemotype of L. alba; F2: citral-rich fraction; IC50: inhibitory concentration 50; CC50: cytotoxic concentration 50; SD: standard deviation; SI: selectivity index (CC50/IC50), ***: p < 0.0001.
Figure 1. Antiproliferative and cytotoxic activity. EOCit1-EOCit5: EO from citral chemotype of L. alba; F2: citral-rich fraction; IC50: inhibitory concentration 50; CC50: cytotoxic concentration 50; SD: standard deviation; SI: selectivity index (CC50/IC50), ***: p < 0.0001.
Ijms 25 08920 g001
Ijms 25 08920 g002
Figure 2. Isobolograms of pharmacological interactions and inhibition percentages between F2 and chemotherapies. Cytarabine (A); Clofarabine (B). FIC: fractional inhibitory concentration; F2: citral-rich fraction, ↓: decrease.
Figure 2. Isobolograms of pharmacological interactions and inhibition percentages between F2 and chemotherapies. Cytarabine (A); Clofarabine (B). FIC: fractional inhibitory concentration; F2: citral-rich fraction, ↓: decrease.
Ijms 25 08920 g002
Ijms 25 08920 g003
Figure 3. Morphology of cells treated with the studied therapies. Cyt: cytarabine; Clof: clofarabine; F2: citral-rich fraction. IC50: Inhibitory Concentration 50; CC50: Cytotoxic Concentration 50; C. Pos: cells treated with carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone; C. Neg: untreated cells.
Figure 3. Morphology of cells treated with the studied therapies. Cyt: cytarabine; Clof: clofarabine; F2: citral-rich fraction. IC50: Inhibitory Concentration 50; CC50: Cytotoxic Concentration 50; C. Pos: cells treated with carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone; C. Neg: untreated cells.
Ijms 25 08920 g003
Ijms 25 08920 g004
Figure 4. Genotoxicity by comet assay. Cyt: cytarabine; Clof: clofarabine; F2: citral-rich fraction; IC50: inhibitory concentration 50; CC50: cytotoxic concentration 50.
Figure 4. Genotoxicity by comet assay. Cyt: cytarabine; Clof: clofarabine; F2: citral-rich fraction; IC50: inhibitory concentration 50; CC50: cytotoxic concentration 50.
Ijms 25 08920 g004
Ijms 25 08920 g005
Figure 5. Flow cytometry analysis. (A). Annexin V/SYTOX Green; (B). Multicaspases activation. F2: citral-rich fraction; positive control: cells treated with DMSO (for Annexin V/SYTOX Green) or Carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (for multicaspases); negative control: untreated cells. Analysis acquired from 5000 events.
Figure 5. Flow cytometry analysis. (A). Annexin V/SYTOX Green; (B). Multicaspases activation. F2: citral-rich fraction; positive control: cells treated with DMSO (for Annexin V/SYTOX Green) or Carbonyl cyanide 3-chlorophenylhydrazone (for multicaspases); negative control: untreated cells. Analysis acquired from 5000 events.
Ijms 25 08920 g005
Ijms 25 08920 g006
Figure 6. Antioxidant systems. SD: standard deviation; SOD-T: total superoxide dismutase; GSH-T: total glutathione (GSH); GSSG: oxidized glutathione; GSH: reduced GSH; ns: not significant; F2: citral-rich fraction; Cyt: cytarabine; Clof: clofarabine; **: p < 0.001; ***: p < 0.0001.
Figure 6. Antioxidant systems. SD: standard deviation; SOD-T: total superoxide dismutase; GSH-T: total glutathione (GSH); GSSG: oxidized glutathione; GSH: reduced GSH; ns: not significant; F2: citral-rich fraction; Cyt: cytarabine; Clof: clofarabine; **: p < 0.001; ***: p < 0.0001.
Ijms 25 08920 g006
Table 1. Relative chemical composition and linear retention indices (LRI) by GC-MS of L. alba essential oils (EO) and its citral-rich fraction (F2).
Table 1. Relative chemical composition and linear retention indices (LRI) by GC-MS of L. alba essential oils (EO) and its citral-rich fraction (F2).
CompoundLRIRelative Quantity (%)
DB-5MSDB-WAXCitral Chemotype
EOCit1–5F2
6-Methyl-5-hepten-2-one98612413.3-
Limonene103411056.6-
Linalool110014531.90.2
Citronellal115413811.1-
Nerol123117080.82.0
Neral1248158921.531.5
Geraniol125217555.67.9
Geranial1275164328.740.1
Geranyl Acetate137916621.5-
β-Elemene139714963.0-
trans-β-Caryophyllene1436150612.19.8
α-Guaiene144714981.81.6
α-Humulene147115802.71.2
Germacrene D148615522.60.4
Bicyclosesquiphellandrene14961624-0.3
α-Bulnesene151516271.4-
Caryophyllene oxide160019092.31.0
DB-5MS: LRI experimentally determined in DB-5MS (60 m) column; DB-WAX: LRI experimentally determined in DB-WAX (60 m) column; EOCit1-EOCit5: EO from citral chemotype of L. alba. The compounds in bold are the terpenes of greatest interest, as they constitute the majority of the essential oil and the enriched fraction.
Table 2. Interaction matrix.
Table 2. Interaction matrix.
Combination ID NumberF2Cytarabine/Clofarabine
(IC50)(μg/mL)(IC50)(μg/mL)
10.00.08X8.8/5.0
2½X7.44X4.4/2.5
31X14.72X2.2/1.3
42X29.41X1.1/0.63
54X58.8½X0.55/0.32
68X117.60.00.0/0.0
IC50: Inhibitory Concentration 50; X: number of times; the most synergistic mixture is in bold.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Quintero-García, W.L.; Espinel-Mesa, D.X.; Moreno, E.M.; Stashenko, E.; Mesa-Arango, A.C.; García, L.T. Enhancing Selectivity and Inhibitory Effects of Chemotherapy Drugs Against Myelogenous Leukemia Cells with Lippia alba Essential Oil Enriched in Citral. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168920

AMA Style

Quintero-García WL, Espinel-Mesa DX, Moreno EM, Stashenko E, Mesa-Arango AC, García LT. Enhancing Selectivity and Inhibitory Effects of Chemotherapy Drugs Against Myelogenous Leukemia Cells with Lippia alba Essential Oil Enriched in Citral. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(16):8920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168920

Chicago/Turabian Style

Quintero-García, Wendy Lorena, Denerieth Ximena Espinel-Mesa, Erika Marcela Moreno, Elena Stashenko, Ana Cecilia Mesa-Arango, and Liliana Torcoroma García. 2024. "Enhancing Selectivity and Inhibitory Effects of Chemotherapy Drugs Against Myelogenous Leukemia Cells with Lippia alba Essential Oil Enriched in Citral" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 16: 8920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168920

APA Style

Quintero-García, W. L., Espinel-Mesa, D. X., Moreno, E. M., Stashenko, E., Mesa-Arango, A. C., & García, L. T. (2024). Enhancing Selectivity and Inhibitory Effects of Chemotherapy Drugs Against Myelogenous Leukemia Cells with Lippia alba Essential Oil Enriched in Citral. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(16), 8920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168920

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop