Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Retinol Ointment on Rabbit Skin (Oryctolagus cuniculus) Ion Transport—An In Vitro Study
Previous Article in Journal
Docetaxel-Induced Cell Death Is Regulated by a Fatty Acid-Binding Protein 12-Slug-Survivin Pathway in Prostate Cancer Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Removal of Hazardous Organic Dyes from Liquid Wastes Using Advanced Nanomaterials

by
Francisco Jose Alguacil
*,
Manuel Alonso
and
Jose Ignacio Robla
Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Metalurgicas (CSIC), Avda. Gregorio del Amo 8, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(17), 9671; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179671
Submission received: 5 August 2024 / Revised: 14 August 2024 / Accepted: 21 August 2024 / Published: 6 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Nanoscience)

Abstract

:
The presence of organic dyes in aqueous environments is extremely hazardous to life due to the toxicity of these compounds. Thus, its removal from these various aquatic media is of the utmost importance, and several technologies are constantly being tested to meet this goal. Among these technologies, various types of degradation and adsorption techniques are typically used, and of the various types of materials used within these technologies, nanomaterials are constantly being developed and investigated, likely due to the various properties that these nanomaterials have. This work reviewed recent developments (in 2023) about the use of these nanomaterials in the treatment of solutions contaminated with these toxic organic dyes.

1. Introduction

Organic dyes are chemicals that are commonly used in the textile industry to add color to various products. Therefore, the effluents produced by this industry contain variable concentrations of these harmful dyes, and their removal from these effluents is essential for avoiding environmental issues. Low amounts of dyes, i.e., below 1 ppm, can clearly be seen in some waterbodies, where they can block the penetration of sunlight and inhibit photosynthesis in aquatic plants. Thus, effluents from the textile industry not only change the color of those waterbodies but also affect the habitats of living organisms by decreasing or even preventing sunlight penetration and water re-oxygenation capacity, disrupting aquatic life. In some cases, dyes can contaminate drinking water and thus pose a serious threat to human life due to the carcinogenic nature of some dyes. In addition, continuous contact with these dyes leads to several health problems, such as headache, confusion, vomiting, high blood pressure, shortness of breath, allergic reactions, mental disorders, kidney dysfunction, and damage to the reproductive system, liver, brain, central nervous system, and others [1,2,3,4].
Many types of materials are currently being used to remove these dyes; among them, nanomaterials are gaining considerable attention due to their inherent properties. The importance of the removal of these dyes and the use of nanomaterials for their removal is reflected in several recent reviews about this matter. Table 1 summarizes the different classes of nanomaterials recently reviewed (in 2023). Moreover, the importance of these investigations is highlighted by the publication of additional reviews at the beginning of 2024 (date of this revision). The latest progress in Bi5O7I-based heterojunctions was reviewed in [5], providing important information about three main areas: synthesis approaches, characterizations, and their applications in the removal of dyes. Another publication reviewed [6] the synthesis methods, physicochemical properties, and different applications of ferric tungstate (FeWO4) as smart multifunctional nanomaterials for various water pollutants, including organic dyes; the uses of carbon quantum dots (CQDs) in the degradation of various dyes, as well as the difficulties that still exist and the opportunities that lie ahead, have also been reviewed [7].
Methylene blue dye is commonly used as the standard to investigate some removal procedures, and consequently, a publication reviewed the principles of photodegradation and explored the application of polymer-supported nanomaterials in the removal of this harmful dye [8]. One review paper [9] focused on the usage of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and conducting polymer (CP: polyaniline and polythiophene)-based nanocomposites for environmental remediation, which also included organic dyes as toxic pollutants. The use of MoS2-based nanomaterials for the removal of organic dyes from solutions through adsorption and photocatalytic processes is of interest and has thus been the goal of another recent review [10], as well as the use of nanoparticles to tackle the issue of the photocatalytic degradation and removal of organic dye pollutants from different aquatic environments [11]. It is worth noting that third-generation catalysts, comprising photocatalysts spread on inert solid substrates, such as Ce/TiO2 and Al/ZnO, are the latest developments in materials based on nanoparticles.
There are several subclasses of this type of nanomaterials, and they mainly remove organic dyes from the effluents by two types of processes or mechanisms: adsorption and/or (photo)catalysis.
The present work reviewed the most recent literature (papers published in 2023) on the removal of organic dyes from liquid effluents using nanomaterials. This review classified the investigation considering the types of dyes involved in the literature (anionic and cationic) and nanomaterials used for the treatment of both anionic and cationic dyes (a comprehensive list of the reviewed organic dyes is included in the Supplementary Materials).
Table 1. Recent reviews (from 2023) on the use of nanomaterials for the removal of organic dyes from solutions.
Table 1. Recent reviews (from 2023) on the use of nanomaterials for the removal of organic dyes from solutions.
NanomaterialReference
Heteropolyacids supported on nanocatalysts
Nanomaterials
Bi-based nanocompounds
Graphitic carbon nitride
Sr-based nanomaterials
Nano-metal oxide-activated carbon
TiO2-based nanomaterials
Nanoparticle-hybridized polyaniline
Metal ferrite-based nanomaterials
Metal sulfide-based nanostructures
Polymeric nanocomposite membranes
Metals and metal oxides in pure form
Graphene-based nanomaterials
Cellulose-based nanocompounds
Biomass-synthesized metallic nanoparticles
Nanozymes
2D MXene-based adsorbents
Ba-TiO3 nanomaterials
Gum-based nanomaterials
Chitosan-based nanomaterials
Carbon-based nanomaterials
[12]
[13,14,15,16,17,18,19]
[20,21,22]
[23,24]
[25]
[26]
[27,28,29,30]
[31]
[32]
[33,34]
[35,36]
[37,38,39,40,41]
[42,43]
[44,45,46]
[47]
[48,49,50,51]
[52,53,54]
[55]
[56]
[57]
[58,59]

2. Nanomaterials and Anionic Organic Dyes

2.1. Adsorption of Anionic Dyes on Nanomaterials

The adsorption methodology has received much attention due to its cost-efectiveness, high efficiency, and simplicity. For this reason, in recent years, the design and construction of new adsorbents with high adsorption and removal properties is increasing. Porous metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are one of these adsorbents that have been considered for the removal of hazardous substances due to their remarkable chemical stability in the solvent, their specific surface area, pore channel size, type and number of adsorption sites, electrostatic interaction with adsorbates, and π–π interactions between benzene rings of MOF and aromatic rings of dyes and organic compounds (further comments included in the Supplementary Materials).
Computational investigation was used to study the performance of TiO2 in the uptake of Acid Yellow 36 and Acid Orange 6 dyes on (1 1 0) surface of the oxide [60]. The results of these simulations indicated that Acid Yellow 36 was more reactive and had a greater adsorption uptake than Acid Orange 6.
Gelatin-bearing semi-IPN hydrogels containing different concentrations of itaconic acid-based protic ionic liquids (PILs) were prepared to remove Reactive Red 21 and Reactive Blue 19 from water [61]. When the hydrogels contained zero or low PILs concentrations, the adsorption uptake was maximum, being the best-performing hydrogel composition (GelITA1) tested in real wastewater (cotton samples were impregnated with both dyes, and the resulting wastewater was used in the experimentation) with an average 75% removal efficiency of the dyes. Maximum dye uptakes were 106 mg/g and 147 mg/g for Reactive Red 21 and Reactive Blue 19, respectively.
ZnO/C nanocomposites were fabricated at temperatures in the 500–700 °C range. Among all the composites, the ZnO/C-700 sample was the nanomaterial with better adsorption characteristics for the removal of Congo Red from solutions [62]. The maximum upload was near 47 mg/g.
A sol-gel procedure was used to form MgO nanoparticles, which have been used to adsorb Reactive Red 21 [63], with a maximum adsorption loading of 385 mg/g at a pH range of 5–9, and 20 min of contact time. Dye-bearing MgO nanoparticles were regenerated at 500 °C for two hours and re-used with reasonable efficiency (pink color appeared in the solution after the sixth cycle, increasing in color within the seventh cycle). These MgO nanoparticles presented a 98% dye removal from a real textile wastewater (formed as in [61]).
CuFe-LDH/g-C3N4 (CFL/CN) nanocomposites were prepared and investigated to remove Alizarin Red S, and the results were compared with the derived from the use of CFL/CN nanoadsorbent [64]. Sono-CFL/CN nanoadsorbent was more effective (near 96%) on the removal of the dye in comparison to hydro-CFL/CN nanomaterial (53%). Maximum dye uptake was in the 65–75 mg/g range, which was dependent on the technology used to remove the dye. Sono-CFL/CN lost its initial adsorption capacity under continuous use (Table 2).
A nanostructured composite based on superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs), coated with hydroxyapatite (HAp), has proven to be a good adsorbent against the presence of Congo Red in aqueous solutions [65]. Amongst the various formulations, the composite containing 35 wt% of SPION was selected to adsorb the organic dye. The results concluded that the best efficiency on the removal of the dye were achieved when 0.10 g of SPION/HAp treated 50 mL of a solution containing 50 mg/L of the dye at pH 0 and a contact time of four hours. The maximum Congo Red adsorption uptake using the SPION/HAp adsorbent was determined to be 158.98 mg/g. The composite can be separated from the solution using magnets.
An ion gelation procedure was used to fabricate chitosan nanoparticles, which were used on the removal of anionic dyes (Reactive Yellow 145, Reactive Blue 19, and Reactive Red 195) from solutions [66]. The utilization of polyaluminum chloride (PAC) (80 mg/L) and chitosan nanoparticles (150 mL/L) at pH = 6.6 produced the maximum (92%) color removal efficiency. Thus, with the use of chitosan nanoparticles, the amount of PAC needed to increase the color removal efficiency was reduced. Furthermore, the effect of chitosan nanoparticles on the adsorption of the dyes revealed that the Langmuir type II isotherm equation was followed, with a maximum adsorption capacity of 1100 mg/g.
Reference [67] investigated the production of amorphous biochar from breadfruit leaves, a product that has been used to remove Congo Red from solutions. The average size of the char was 190 nm; however, after the adsorption of the dye, the average size increased to 460 nm. The adsorption of Congo Red was studied under different dye concentrations (5–50 mg/L), reaction times (30 min–four hours), pH (6–9), and char dosages (0.5–2 g/100 mL). RSM-BBD design results showed maximum removal efficiency (99.96%) at pH 6.37, dye concentration of 45 mg/L, time 105 min, and biochar dosage of 1.92 g. Adsorption data fitted well to the Langmuir Type-II isotherm, with a maximum upload of almost 18 mg/g.
Another nanobiomaterial was used in the next study. A nanobiosorbent was fabricated via microwave crosslinking of nanosilica gel with banana peels nanobiochar (BPNB) and chitosan hydrogel (Chit Hgel) to produce BPNB-NSiO2-Chit Hgel nanobiosorbent (22.48–26.23 nm) [68]. The influence of nanobiosorbent dosage (1–50 mg), pH (2–12), reaction time (1–45 min), dye concentration (5–100 mg/L), temperature (15–60 °C), and interfering salts on the adsorption of Congo Red was investigated. Maximum dye uptake was about 58 mg/g. Removal of the dye (92.8–95.0%) from tap, sea, and wastewater can be accomplished.
Zinc ferrite (ZnFe2O4, BET surface area 85.88 m2/g) and copper ferrite (CuFe2O4, BET surface area 41.81 m2/g) nanoparticles were formed, and used as adsorbents, in the removal of Alizarin Yellow R, Thiazole Yellow G, Congo Red, and Methyl Orange from industrial wastewater [69]. The use of acidic pH values favored the removal of the dyes, the maximum monolayer adsorption capacities being higher when using zinc ferrite than when using copper ferrite (Table 3).
In this work [70], multifunctional Fe3O4@N-C (nitrogen-doped carbon) nanocomposites with hollow porous core–shell structure were formed by different procedures. These included i) a hydrothermal method, ii) polymer coating, iii) thermal annealing process in nitrogen and iv) etching step in HCl medium. Fe3O4@N-C nanocomposites etched by HCl for different lengths of time, especially Fe3O4@N-C-3 (30 min of etching time) nanocomposites, adsorbed Methyl Orange (98.7% after 100 min).
Sodium alginate/gellan gum and polyethyleneimine were utilized to fabricate a material with 3D hierarchical porous architecture and used in the removal of Congo Red from waters [71]. The aerogel showed an adsorption uptake of 3 g/g, selectively separate Congo Red in the presence of other dyes from binary systems: Congo Red plus Amaranth (anionic dye), Safranine T (cationic dye), Methyl Orange (anionic dye) or Rhodamine B (cationic dye). From single-dye solutions, the affinity of the aerogel from the dyes followed the given order: Congo Red > Rhodamine B > Methyl Orange > Amaranth > Safranine T. After three cycles, the adsorption capacity decreased by 14.8%, maintaining an adsorption capacity of approximately 0.5 g/g (0.65 g/g in the first cycle).
The same dye as above, Congo Red, was removed from the solution using green pea peel biochar (GPBC) and zinc oxide green pea peel biochar nanocomposite (ZnO/GPBC, particle size 14.58 nm) [72]. The experimental conditions used in the investigation were as follows: dye concentration (50–250 mg/L), GPBC and ZnO/GPBC dosage (50–250 mg/100 mL), pH (2−12), temperature (20–60 °C) and time (0–90 min). The results showed that ZnO/GPBC was more effective at removing the dye than GPPBC (98% versus 90%, respectively) under the optimized conditions. The monolayer adsorption capacities were 114.94 mg/g and 62.11 mg/g for ZnO/GPBC and GPBC, respectively. In both cases, there was a decrease in the dye removal capacity with the number of cycles: ZnO/GPBC (98.4% in the first cycle against 88.8% in the fifth cycle), GPBC (90.4% first cycle versus 76.2% fifth cycle).
The next two references also used Congo Red as target to investigate the benefits of using their respective nanomaterials. The removal of Congo Red from mimic wastewater was used to evaluate the properties of different composition ratios of CMC-nZVI (nano zero-valent iron coated with carboxymethyl cellulose) [73]. At an initial dye concentration of 500 mg/L, the increase in CMC contents favored the decolorization process. The removal efficiency was near 100% at the CMC:Fe2+ ratio of 0.004 within 10 s after the addition of CMC-nZVI to the dye solution, whereas the optimal decolorization rate (90%, with an uptake capacity of near 8 g/g) was observed when the iron concentration was 1 g/L. The above results were attributable to the break of the chromophore group (-N[dbnd]N-), responsible for the color of the dye, to N–H bonds.
F-Ln (Ln = Ce, Pr and Nd) nanosheets, provided by surface acetate groups, were prepared through a hydrothermal synthetic methodology at room temperature and pressure, and used in the adsorption of Congo Red and Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 anionic dyes [74]. The maximum Langmuir adsorption capacities for the respective two dyes were 4334 mg/g and 2827 mg/g. Both dyes were loaded onto the adsorbent via its exchange with the surface acetates groups of the F–Ce nanosheets. Furthermore, these nanosheets presented a salt tolerance in saturated NaCl medium or elevated concentrations of NaO4, K2CO3 and NaNO3 in the solutions.

2.2. (Photo)-Catalytic Degradation of Anionic Dyes Using Nanomaterials

Another useful methodology to remove organic dyes from effluents is (photo)-catalytic degradation; that is, at the same time in which the dye is removed from the effluent, it is destroyed or degraded by this methodology. Commonly used methods of synthesizing photocatalytic nanomaterials are solution-based, thermal-based, vapor-phase, transport processes and microwave-assisted methods. Complexing agents, polymerizing agents and surfactants enable more intricate control of these properties through slowing seed nuclei formation. Nanoparticles have been effectively used in catalytic applications, and the size of the particles is one of the vital factors versus bulk counterpart. CuO nanoparticles has low band gap energy, which makes it preferable material in photocatalytic reactions (further comments included in the Supplementary Materials).
By means of Moringa stenopetala seed extract, copper oxide nanoparticles (average particle size 6.6 nm) were formed and used to degrade Congo Red and Alizarin Red S [75]. After two hours of exposure to irradiation and varying experimental conditions, Congo Red degraded by nearly 98%, whereas the degradation of Alizarin Red S reached 95%. The continuous use of the catalyst for five cycles was also investigated, and in both cases, the adsorbent lost its effectiveness after each cycle.
Under a chemical precipitation procedure, zinc oxide (ZnO), copper ferrite (CuFe2O4) and a zinc oxide–copper ferrite binary composite were prepared, followed by the formation of a ternary composite (ZnO-CuFe2O4-CNTs) (CNTS: carbon nanotubes) [76]. These compounds were used to search the photocatalytic degradation of Congo Red under sunlight exposure, reaching 82% dye degradation in two hours. The ZnO-CuFe2O4-CNTs nanocomposite had better degradation efficiency than the pure oxides and their binary composite.
Another commonly investigated dye, as being Methyl Orange, was used in the next three references. Bi2O3-NiO heterojunction was formed from the respective Ni(II) and Bi(III) nitrates and used to degrade Methyl Orange under visible-light exposure [77]. The photocatalytic degradation of the dye reached rates of 46% (nickel oxide), 67% (bismuth oxide) and 100% (mixed nickel-bismuth oxide). Transfer of positive holes and electrons and the separation being the responsible for the better activity of the mixed oxides heterojunction, which apparently can be recycled several times, as written in the published Abstract, However, these data did not appear in the publication.
Bi2WO6 nanomaterials, containing a chelating agent (EDTA), were used to degrade Methyl Orange and Congo Red in the presence of NaBH4, being the catalytic efficiency of Bi2WO6 surpassed by that of the EDTA-Bi2WO6. This catalyst could be recycled up to five times without undergoing a significant loss in activity [78].
Carbohydrate-conjugated Ag, Au and Ag-Au alloy biocompatible nanoparticles (14.5, 11.7 and 16.3 nm respective average particle size) had been fabricated through bio-reduction of the metal salts in the presence of Lobaria retigera (high altitude lichen) [79]. These nanoparticles acted as catalysts for the degradation of Methyl Orange.
In order to control its characteristics, β-cyclodextrin and honey were used as surfactants during the synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles, which were coupled with silver to form ZnO-xAg, ZnO-C-xAg and ZnO-H-xAg binary structures with typical crystalline sizes of 9.38 nm [80]. The photodegradation of Bromophenol Blue showed increased photoactivity upon modification with cyclodextrin, honey, and silver nanoparticles. Dye photodegradation was near 100% by the use of ZnO-H-3Ag (3 wt% silver).
Ti3C2 MXene and its nitrogen-doped derivative (N-Ti3C2 MXene) were used in the removal of Methyl Orange from waters [81]. The results indicated that the catalytic efficiency of N-Ti3C2 MXene increased nearly ten times in comparison with the corresponding of the Ti3C2 MXene nanomaterial. N-Ti3C2 1:8 MXene composition performed best, since the degradation of a 20 mg/L dye solution reached more than 98% after twenty minutes of UV lamp irradiation. The effectiveness of this material was attributable to the presence of more abundant surface functional groups, improving the charge transfer efficiency and enhancing the electrical conductivity of the catalyst.
Ag/Mn–ZnO nanomaterial (4–5 nm) was used to remove Methyl Orange and Alizarin Red S from solutions; both dyes degraded by nearly 70% after 100 min of reaction time [82]. However, and in the case of Alizarin Red S, the nanomaterial did not maintain its degradation efficiency under continuous use (five cycles).
Two-dimensional borate anions B4O5(OH)42− intercalated layered double hydroxide (ZnGa-BLDH) nanosheets (5–6 nm) were investigated in the photodegradation removal of Congo Red from an aqueous environment [83].
The aqueous extract of Ulva lactuca and ZnO nanopowders were used to fabricate ZnO@C nanocomposites, material that was investigated to degrade Congo Red under UV and visible light exposure [84]. This nanocomposite degraded the dye better than the pristine zinc oxide nanopowder.
Undoped TiO2 and Fe-doped TiO2 materials, prepared via sol-gel and precipitation procedure, were used as photocatalysts to remove Methyl Orange under UV-A and visible-light irradiations [85]. The photocatalytic experiments revealed an increase in the photocatalytic activity of 0.5 wt% Fe-doped TiO2 composition, and only under UV-A light, compared to the rest of the prepared nanomaterials. This increase was due to the efficient charge separation of electrons and holes.
Another nanobiomaterial was used in the next reference to degrade the well-known Methyl Orange dye. Iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs), composed of amorphous FeOOH and FeII/III-polyphenol complexes with extracts of the plant Camellia sinensis, were used to remove Methyl Orange from solutions [86]. The nanoparticles, as heterogeneous-Fenton catalysts, were used for the removal of the dye. The best results were obtained at pH values around 3.
Graphene oxide nanosheets-yttrium oxide (Y2O3)–silicon oxide (SiO2) ternary nanostructures were fabricated to investigate its photo-degradation activity against the presence (20 ppm) of Methyl Orange in aqueous solutions [87]. The photo-degradation of the dye improved from 1.17% for Y2O3/SiO2 nanostructures to 52% when the concentration of the graphene oxide nanosheets reached 15 wt% and 45 min of reaction time.
Pristine Fe2O3, 1 wt% metal (Ag, Co, and Cu)-doped Fe2O3 nanoparticles (NPs) were fabricated using a hydrothermal and wet impregnation method [88]. The nanoparticles were employed as photosensitizers for the degradation of Reactive Red and Orange II dyes under sunlight irradiation. The synthesized 1 wt% Ag–Fe2O3 (AgF) NPs had the best catalytic properties, compared with pristine Fe2O3 and CoF and CuF, in degrading (98.32%) both dyes within 120 min of reaction time.
The photocatalytic properties of polymeric g-C3N4 layers coated with various dosages of erbium oxide nanoparticles were investigated through the oxidation of Orange G under visible-light exposure. The nanoparticles maintained their activity above 95% for up to three cycles of reusability [89].
ZnO-ZnS-CdO-CdS quaternary core–shell nanocomposites (NCs) were fabricated using Ricinus communis as a stabilizing agent and hydrazine hydrate as a reducing agent [90]. The nanocatalysts were used in the degradation of Congo Red and Methyl Red dyes, being active both in the degradation of single or a mixture of the dyes.
The removal of Congo Red, under UV light in the presence of H2O2, and the photocatalytic activity of copper oxide nanoparticles (CuONPs, 25–90 nm size) were investigated [91]. The UV light decomposed H2O2 with the formation of ·OH radicals, which improved the degradation of the dye. This degradation occurred by reaction of the dye with the radicals, though other reactions of the dye with, i.e., a positive hole (h+vb), contribute to the elimination of this harmful compound.
A one-step laser technology was used to fabricate doped boron and boron and nitrogen co-doped, which highly reduced graphene oxide and multiwalled carbon nanotubes/Ni oxide and Ni hydroxide nanohybrid layers [92]. These materials were employed to investigate their properties regarding the photocatalytic removal of Methyl Orange. The best photocatalytic activities resulted for boron and nitrogen co-doped materials formed by the use of H3BO3 and urea as boron and nitrogen precursors, respectively; however, the degradation efficiency failed after continuous use: 80% in the first cycle and 3% in the third cycle.
A direct thermal polymerization procedure was utilized in the fabrication of 1D/2D g-C3N5/g-C3N4 heterojunction (1D/2D-N5/N4) used in the removal of Methyl Orange from wastewater [93]. One-dimensional/two-dimensional-N5/N4 had one-dimensional g-C3N5 nanorods and two-dimensional g-C3N4 nanosheets. The photocatalytic degradation of the dye reached a rate of 99.6%, maintaining 92.20% after five cycles.
Attapulgite (ATP) mineral nanomaterials grafted with magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles, with a further modification with polyethyleneimine (PEI), served in the fabrication of functionalized magnetic attapulgite composites (ATP-Fe3O4-PEI), which was utilized for the removal of Congo Red from wastewater [94]. The removal of the dye by means of the nanocomposite was attributed to a catalytic degradation process. However, without photoirradiation and the presence of oxidants in the solution, the system formed H2O2 and hydroxyl radicals (·OH) to catalytically degraded dye molecules. Moreover, the removal of the dye was further increased by adsorption on the composite material through electrostatic attraction, hydrogen bonds, and π–π interaction. Under two removal tests, the removal rate of the dye exceeded 95%, corresponding to a removal capacity of 943.77 mg/g, at pH 3 and 25 °C. This composite presented removal effectiveness and uptake capacity exceeding 82% and 799 mg/g, respectively, after four cycles.
The efficiency of Mn-20wt% Ni and Mn-30wt% Ni particle powders in relation to the degradation of Reactive Black 5 as function of different experimental variables was investigated [95]. Mn-20wt% Ni particles presented better degradation efficiency and faster rate of reaction than Mn-30wt% Ni material.
The metal-assisted chemical etching (MACE) technique was used to produce SiNWs-NiNPs/NiONPs [96]; these nanoparticles were used in the photocatalytic assisted degradation of Methyl Orange from an aqueous solution. The degradation of 20 ppm of the dye had an efficiency of 66.5% after three hours and under UV exposure.
A manganese oxide (MnO2)/silicon carbide (SiC) nanostructure-doped polystyrene (PS)–polycarbonate (PC) blend was used to investigate its ability to degrade Methyl Orange [97]. The results indicated that the use of PS–PC/MnO2–SiC nanocomposites under UV exposure removed the dye color with an efficiency of approximately 54% within 90 min, and using the 5.2 wt% MnO2/SiC NPs formulation.
Carbon dots with diameters of 4.9 ± 1.5 nm and 4.1 ± 1.2 nm were fabricated from nitric and sulfuric acids, respectively, and Ilex paraguariensis as raw material [98]. These dots were used to fabricate magnetite-containing nanocomposites, which were nanocomposites utilized to investigate the photocatalytic degradation of Methyl Orange. At pH 6.2, 8.5 ppm dye concentration and 100 ppm nanomaterials doses, all the above nanocompounds presented catalytic activity, allowing the removal of up to 98% dye under visible irradiation (400 nm) and seven hours of reaction.
Ionic liquids (ILs) were also used to formulate nanostructures to degrade dyes. Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (IL) surfactant-assisted hierarchical TiO2 heterojunction was doped with europium to form a nanostructure with crystallite sizes in the 4–10 nm range [99]. Further, Congo Red dye was photocatalytic degraded within the above materials in the presence of UV light, increasing the degradation rate with the reaction time. After 75 min, the efficiency of the dye degradation reached 97%; it was also concluded that the degradation is dependent on the dispersion of the nanomaterials.
Multifunctional surface-modified CuO nanomaterials were used for the degradation of AR88 dye. At pH 11, the nanomaterial degraded by approximately 95% of the dye under UV exposure, and utilizing a 1 g/L nanomaterial dose [100].
Zinc oxide/copper oxide nanocomposites (ZnO/CuO NCs) presenting various proportions of binary oxides were investigated for their degradation of Congo Red [101]. Experiments carried out on dye-bearing water and real textile wastewater under visible light irradiation by a 0.5 M ZnO:0.5 M CuO nanocomposite showed both acting as catalysts by tuning the doping concentration of copper oxide in ZnO.
Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-polycarbonate (PC)/antimony oxide (Sb2O3)-graphene oxide (GO) nanocomposites films were fabricated [102]. These nanomaterials were used in the photodegradation of a 20 ppm Methyl Orange solution. This degradation was due to a rise in electron–hole pairs and a reduction in fix replication.
This reference investigated a ceramic-based nanomaterial catalyst (a reduced graphene oxide-ZnS, rGO-ZnS) for the oxidative photocatalytic degradation of Naphtol Blue Black dye solution under exposure to sunlight [103]. The dye was degraded (93.7%) under exposure to direct solar light.
A SiO2/g-C3N4 photocatalyst was fabricated, fixing the amount of SiO2 and varying the concentration of graphitic carbon nitride in the ratio (1:x, where x = 1, 2, 3); these nanocomposites were used to investigate their photocatalytic properties to degrade Auramine O and Xylenol Orange dyes [104]. The results showed that SCN2 (x = 2) nanocomposite improved the photocatalytic activity under visible light exposure with degradation efficiencies of 70% and 84.6% for the respective above dyes; these results are attributable to the large surface area and the electron–hole separation rate that the nanocomposites presented.
Bismuth oxychloride (BiOCl) nanoplatelets and lignin-based biochar were used as precursors to fabricate composites formed by bismuth oxyhalide nanoparticles, and the simultaneous photocatalytic and adsorptive efficiency of the Biochar–BiOCl (%BC-BiOCl) composites on the removal of Methyl Orange was investigated [105]. Maximum dye removal and degradation (100%) was reached under the following experimental conditions: composite dose of 1.39 g/L, initial dye concentration of 41.8 mg/L, pH of 3.15, and one hour of reaction under light exposure. Similarly to other nanomaterials, there was a loss in efficiency after various cycles; in this case, the efficiency dropped from 99% in the first cycle to 63% in the fifth cycle (1 g/L of 15BCPC dosage, 30 mg/L initial dye concentration at pH 5).
1-hexyl-3-methyl-2-(2-oxo-ethyl)-3H-imidazol-1-ium bromide (HMIB) ionic liquid embedded on CdO-TiO2 (HMIB-CT) hybrid nanomaterial was used in the removal of Tripan Blue dye from solutions [106]. Complete dye removal under natural sun beam irradiation, required for photocatalytic activity, was accomplished at pH 7 and one hour of reaction time.
After the formation of the magnetic photocatalyst Scendesmus sp./Fe3O4/TiO2, its sonophotocatalytic properties with respect to the degradation of the Red195 dye were investigated [107]. At a pH of 5, photocatalyst dosage of 100 mg, initial dye concentration of 100 mg/L, ultrasound power of 38 W, and an exposure time of 20 min, the maximum Red195 removal efficiency (100%) resulted. After five cycles of recycling, the degradation efficiency remained above 95%. Experiments on scavenging indicated that electrons (h+) and OH groups were necessary to act as decomposition reagents.

2.3. Remarks to the Use of Nanomaterials in the Removal of Anionic Dyes from Solutions

While Section 2.1 and Section 2.2 showed that two approaches are being used by scientists to remove anionic dyes from solutions—adsorption or (photo)-catalysis—Table 4 summarizes the various anionic dyes object of these investigations. From the number of references, it is clear that the (photo)-catalytic degradation of organic dyes is the methodology of preference compared to the use of adsorption–elution in achieving this environmental task. In any case, it is difficult to compare results due to the various experimental conditions used in each reference. Using (photo)-catalysis, the degradation of the dye occurs within a few minutes or hours (see Table 5), whereas in the case of adsorption procedures, dye uptakes vary from a few mg/g to the g/g order (see text and also next Table 10).
From the above, just one reference, [69], utilized real industrial wastewater in the investigation; also, this table shows that Congo Red and Methyl Orange are the most investigated anionic dyes.

3. Nanomaterials and Cationic Dyes

3.1. Adsorption of Cationic Dyes on Nanomaterials

Obviously, adsorption is a useful methodology in removing cationic dyes from effluents, though some of the characteristics of the adsorbent used here must be different from the adsorbents used in Section 2.1, due to the different characteristics (charge sign of the active group) of cationic dyes with respect to anionic dyes. Thus, it is somewhat expected that in these cases, cationic dyes will be removed from the effluent at pH values higher than the value of the isoelectric point presented by the given adsorbent.
Two different processes (Calix-MNPs and Calix-Si-MNPs) were used to modify magnetite nanoparticles with p-sulfonatocalix [13]arene and were used for the removal of Crystal Violet from aqueous solution [108]. Calix-Si-MNPs showed a better adsorption capacity than Calix-MNPs, attributable to the modification on the surface of magnetite nanoparticles through a spacer. The nanoadsorbent can be recovered using a magnet; however, there was a considerable loss of capacity for up to four cycles of adsorption (pH 7)-desorption (water plus acetone).
In this work [109], amorphous and crystalline products based on Zr, Mg, and Mn were fabricated through the Pechini sol–gel procedure and used to remove Basic Fuchsin dye from solutions. Samples were fabricated before calcination was amorphous, whereas the samples calcined at 500 °C or 700 °C presented mean diameters of 45.16 nm and 76.28 nm, respectively. Table 6 shows that increasing the temperature of calcination the dye uptake onto the nanomaterials decreased. Maximum dye uptake varied in the 93–240 mg/g concentration range.
Succinic anhydride modifying the surface of native cellulose nanocrystals was used to adsorb Golden Yellow and Methylene Blue. No data about the desorption step were given in the work [110].
Bionanocomposites formed of chitosan grafted by various monomers, such as acrylamide, acrylic acid, 4-styrene sulfonic acid, and hybrid nanoparticles of graphene oxide/titanium dioxide nanoparticles (GO@TiO2-NPs), were fabricated and used in the adsorption of Basic-Red 46 [111]. The removal of the dye from the aqueous solution followed the pseudo second-order kinetics and Langmuir isotherm models, with maximum upload in the 43–79 mg/g range.
Food industry waste hazelnut shells were used as precursors to prepare, via impregnation with ZnCl2 followed by chemical activation with KOH, porous carbon materials to be used as adsorbents of a Methylene Blue wastewater [112]. The Fusso effect, which can reduce the size of the dye molecules, increased the adsorption properties of the carbon. The material showed a dye uptake of 694.03 mg/g, which can be increased to 882.46 mg/g in 0.1 M NaCl medium.
Calcium silicate nanopowders were fabricated from marble sawing dust and silica fume using a microwave irradiation-assisted route [113]. These nanomaterials were investigated in the removal of Malachite Green from solutions in the pH 2–12 range, with best results yielded (near 100% removal) at a pH of 12. Adsorption data fitted well with the linear form of the Freundlich isotherm. Dye desorption was investigated by the use of acetone; after continuous adsorption–desorption cycles, it was shown that after six cycles, the adsorption efficiency decreased from 100% (first cycle) to 78% (sixth cycle). This decrease is attributable to the decrease in the number of the surface-active sites after continuous use.
Under the polyol process, FePt nanoparticles with a size of less than 2 nm were uniformly distributed over the surface of hexagonal boron nitride nanosheets. These materials were used in the adsorption of Methylene Blue, Methylene Violet and Brilliant Green [114]. The removal of the dyes from the solution depended on the composition of the nanomaterial used in the experimentation and the annealing temperature (Table 7). However, no data about the desorption step were provided in the published manuscript.
A nanomanufacturing process, which included the treatment of α-chitin nanocrystals (ChNCs) by electron-beam irradiation, EBI-induced ChNCs, with nano-sized and rod-like morphology with tunable lengths averaging 259–608 nm and uniform widths of 12–16 nm, was developed [115]. The anionic groups presented in the nanomaterials reacted with Toluidine Blue O dye via electrostatic attraction, forming hydrogels, which were self-supporting after centrifugation. No desorption data were included in the manuscript.
Nano-sized polylactic acid was decorated on the surface of graphene oxide to investigate it performance in the removal of Methylene Blue from an aqueous solution [116]. Optimum adsorption parameters were as follows: adsorbent dosage of 0.5 g/L, pH 4, reaction time of two hours, and 45°C. Data were fitted with the Langmuir isotherm with maximum uptakes in the 104–224 mg/g range. Experimental results showed that the loading capacity of the polylactic acid-graphene oxide nanoadsorbent increased by approximately 70% in comparison with that of sulfur oxide. The nanoadsorbent presented a loss of near 27% adsorption efficiency after five cycles.
Using the co-precipitation method, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) with sizes of 13.6 ± 1.9 nm were synthesized [117]. Further, the surface of SPIONs was modified by polyvinyl alcohol, chitosan, and graphene oxide, and the modified nanomaterials were used to adsorb Methylene Blue. Removal efficiency at pH 7 reached near 87% after 13 days, and the highest dye-loading capacity was 3.6 mg/g, while the highest loading amount achieved was 36.4 mg/g. The cumulative desorption capacity of the adsorbent at pH 3.8 was at its maximum at almost 90% after 30 days.
The next two references investigated the removal of Methylene Blue dye. Tin oxide nanorods and SnO2/MoO3 nanocomposite were fabricated via the use of the leaf extract of Magnifera indica, the presence of polyphenols in the extract facilitated the reduction in the precursor metal salt to the corresponding oxide [118]. The catalytic properties of the above materials were investigated on the degradation of Methylene Blue. The photocatalytic efficiency of the mixture of oxides improved to 73% as compared to that of SnO2 (69.0%).
In [119], Zn-modified biochar obtained from zinc carbonate and Jerusalem artichokes straw was used to explore its effect on the adsorption of Methylene Blue. Compared with the original biochar, the specific surface area (1037.17 m2/g) of the Zn-modified biochar by pyrolysis at 800 °C (Zn-BC 800) increased by approximately 22 times. The adsorption of Methylene Blue with Zn-BC 800 followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. At 45 °C, Zn-BC 800 had a maximum adsorption loading of 477.13 mg/g. Hydrogen bond and π–π interaction were the main factors responsible for the dye adsorption onto Zn-BC 800. The adsorbent lost its initial dye uptake of near 420 mg/g until 350 mg/g in the fifth cycle; in these series of experiments, anhydrous ethanol and distilled water were used as eluent.
Yellow phosphorus slag was used to develop a SiO2 matrix material, which was loaded with MgO, and then the formed composite was investigated as adsorbent of Malachite Green dye [120]. These investigations demonstrated that when using this composite, a maximum dye adsorption rate of 97.72% was reached, with a dye uptake of 115.64 mg/g; experimental data responded well to the Freundlich isotherm. In this case, 0.1 M sodium chloride medium was utilized to desorb the loaded dye, and after four cycles of continuous use, there was a slight decrease in the adsorption efficiency.

3.2. Nanomaterials—Forming Membranes for the Removal of Cationic Dyes

Membrane-separation technology is also employed for the treatment of effluents generated by textile dyeing processes. During the filtering process, the micropores included in the membrane filter effectively separate the organic compounds from the effluent by utilizing selective membrane permeability, which can be increased by the use of selective chemicals towards prefereed dye(s).
A ZIF-67/SA@PVDF (ZSA3@PVDF) mixed matrix membrane had been produced by incorporating silicon aerogel (SA) and zeolitic imidazolate framework material 67 (ZIF-67) nanoparticles in a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane [121]. By the use of this membrane, the Methylene Blue removal rate exceeded 99% when filtrating 100 mL of a 5 mg/L dye solution. The continuous use of the membrane showed that its removal efficiency was maintained above 98% after three cycles of the dynamic adsorption process.

3.3. (Photo)-Catalytic Degradation of Cationic Dyes Using Nanomaterials

Pure Fe2O3 (FO with 46 nm particle size) and a series of 5%, 10% and 15% Ni-doped Fe2O3 (5-NFO, 10-NFO and 15-NFO) nanoparticles (19 nm particle size) were synthesized to investigate the effect of nickel concentration on the photocatalytic activity on Methylene Blue degradation [122]. The highest dye degradation had been obtained using 10-NFO nanoparticles and 100 min of reaction time. The optimal concentration of 10-NFO accelerated the photoreduction of the dye due to the photocatalyst characteristics to trap electrons.
Pristine Fe2O3 hematite and Nb-doped Fe2O3 nanostructures with different doping concentrations of 5%, 10%, and 15% of niobium were used to investigate the degradation of Methylene Blue [123]. After 100 min of exposure to visible light, the highest level of dye degradation was attained by 10%-NFO composition. The photocatalytic properties of doped Fe2O3 were attributed to a decrease in band gap energy.
Mn4(P2O7)3 nanoflakes were synthesized and used to remove Methylene Blue from water [124]. The electrostatic interaction between the negatively charged group of the nanoflakes and dye cationic molecules determined the adsorption process; further, the dye was degraded via a heterogeneous catalytic process performed at basic pH in the presence of H2O2 and reactive oxygen species production. After 30 min and using an initial dye concentration of 40 mg/L, the degradation rate reached 99.2%.
Rhodamine B was degraded by a photocatalytic process under direct sunlight by the use of sol-immobilization synthesized monometallic (Pd and Au) and bimetallic (Pd-Au) hybrid nanomaterials supported on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) [125]. Bimetallic Au-Pd-rGO composites had better catalytic efficiencies than mono-metals-rGO nanomaterials. Under the best formulation (Au0.75-Pd0.25/rGO), the degradation efficiency reached 98%, whereas the nanocomposite can be used for five cycles, maintaining 89% of its activity.
The degradation of Methylene Blue and Rhodamine B has been investigated using cadmium sulfide nanoparticles (CdSNPs, average size less than 20 nm) encapsulated by natural extract [126]. These nanoparticles were synthesized via green chemical reduction route that uses natural stabilizers such as rice water, papaya fruit extracts and precursors such as cadmium chloride, cadmium nitrate, and cadmium sulfur.
Cerium-doped cobalt-magnesium ferrites Co0.7Mg0.3CexFe2xO4 were prepared and used to investigate their potential as degrading agents against Methylene Blue [127]. The nanocomposite with x = 0.1 presented a degradation efficiency of near 95.5% in one hour, with free radicals O2·−and OH. acting as the active species to promote dye degradation, which produced CO2 and water as final products. This material presented a near constant recyclability efficiency after five cycles (95.5–94.8%).
The next investigation used ZnO–NPs from the milky sap of Calotropis procera parts to degrade Malachite Green and Methylene Blue under UV-light exposure [128]. The degradation efficiency reached 85.3% (Malachite Green) and 86.3% (Methylene Blue), in both cases increasing the efficiency from pH 4 to pH 10.
A soft nanocomposite hydrogel, comprising a pyrene-based chiral amphipath with an amino acid (l-phenylalanine) core with pendant oligo-oxyethylene hydrophilic chains and sulfur oxide, was used in the degradation of Methylene Blue and Rhodamine B [129]. Experimental results indicated that the removal efficiency was better in the case of Methylene Blue than Rhodamine B.
Montmorillonite K30 nanosheets were decorated with Carrisa edulis fruit extract capped spherical shape Co3O4 nanoparticles (size of 11.25 nm) to degrade methylthioninium chloride (Methylene Blue) [130]. Attributable to the generation of OH and O2 radicals, the 20% loaded Co3O4 on MK30 nanocomposites had the best photocatalytic performance (near 98%) on exposure to visible light.
0.2CoFe2O4/0.8TiO2-5%La nanocomposite was prepared by a co-precipitation and hydrothermal process, to be used as a high-activity photocatalyst for the degradation of Methylene Blue under visible light irradiation [131]. This dye was degraded by 99% after 50 min of exposure time to the light.
Pure phased rare earth-doped ZnO nanoparticles were fabricated for the degradation of Malachite Green and Crystal Violet [132]. For these dyes, the maximum degradation efficiency was near 98% when dysprosium doped ZnO nanoparticles were used to degrade the dyes. A tailored band gap and the presence of defects, which helped in the creation of a reactive species, was the main factor responsible for the dyes’ degradation.
Ionic mesoporous organosilica (IMOS) forming a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-linked bis-imidazolium chloride framework was prepared for the selective recovery of tungstate ions from wastewater and its further use as a photocatalyst against the presence of Rhodamine B in waters [133]. Under column experiments, a maximum recovery of tungstate ions (123 mg/g) was reached using a bed height of 3 cm and a flow rate of 3 mL/min. The use of this W(VI)-immobilized IMOS (W-IMOS), oxidized Rhodamine B through successive adsorption (30%) in the dark and caused photocatalytic degradation (66%) under UV-vis light irradiation.
Nanomaterials containing the SrMoO4/g-C3N4 heterostructure were synthesized in a single step by the sonochemical method at controlled temperatures; further, these nanomaterials were used to degrade some cationic dyes [134]. The results of the photocatalytic investigations showed that the insertion of CN promoted photocatalytic degradation of Methylene Blue (99.58%), Rhodamine B (100%) and Crystal Violet (98.65%).
Two nanocomposites were prepared with varying compositions of ZnO and acid-activated kaolinite for use as photocatalysts to degrade Methylene Blue [135]. The ZK-30 nanocomposite (30 wt% ZnO) removed 98% of the dye from an aqueous solution of pH 10. The recyclability experiments about the continuous use of the nanocomposites showed 80–99% dye removal for up to three consecutive photocatalytic cycles.
N/p-type nanomaterials loaded on the surface of cellulose nanoparticles had been used to fabricate hybrid nanomaterials to be utilized in the photocatalytic degradation of Methylene Blue and Rhodamine B dyes [136]. In single-dye solutions, the degradation efficiency reached 95% for Methylene Blue and 47.4% in the case of Rhodamine B dye, whereas in a mixed dye solution, the degradation reached 53% and 89.8% for Rhodamine B and Methylene Blue, respectively.
Titanium dioxide nanoparticles were prepared by a sol-gel process and calcined for 2 h at temperatures in the 300 °C–600 °C range [137]. The increase in the calcination temperature produced an increase in the size of the nanoparticles. The photodegradation performance of these nanoparticles was investigated in the removal of 10 ppm Methylene Blue from water, showing the nanomaterial calcined at 400 °C the best efficiency (near 95%) over the other nanoparticles examined in this work.
The tannic acid coating method was utilized to synthesize Ag nanoparticles-loaded ultralong hydroxyapatite (HAP). The nanowires were employed as building blocks together with chitosan (CS) to fabricate highly porous flow-through reactors (Ag@HAP/CS) for continuous catalytic reduction of Methylene Blue [138]. These nanomaterials presented efficiencies of near 99% at high fluxes, i.e., 2000 L/m2·h, and using a very low concentration of NaBH4 i.e., dye:NaBH4 relationship of 1.
Pseudobrookite (Fe2TiO5) was fabricated and used in the photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B [139]. The degradation process was associated with the adsorption of protons and the formation of an electron–hole pair. The nanomaterial thermally treated under nitrogen atmosphere presented better catalytic activity than those fabricated in air.
Reference [140] described the use of natural cotton substrates and the in situ mineralization of β-FeOOH nanorods as precursors in the synthesis of an inorganic–organic compound semiconductor nanomaterials (Cot-FeOOH). These materials had photocatalytic activity (98%) for Rhodamine B dye under visible light irradiation and in the presence of hydrogen peroxide.
Fe3O4 nanoparticles with a size of 350 ± 50 nm were synthesized by a solvothermal method. Then, the nanoparticles were coated with a shell made of 3-aminophenol-formaldehyde (APF) resin to prevent agglomeration, and further, core–shell Fe3O4@APF nanospheres were produced by polycondensation within 10 min [141]. The magnetic Fe3O4@APF@Ag nanomaterials catalyzed the reduction via the use of sodium borohydride, of Rhodamine B and Methylene Blue dyes, with conversion of these chemicals above 90% within 3 min of reaction time and a slight decrease in the reduction efficiency after seven cycles.
Ag2O nanoparticles, with cubic structure and crystalline diameter of 18.5 nm, were prepared and used in the photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B [142]. The exposure of an aqueous solution containing the dye to UV-visible light during one hour produced a 76% reduction in the compound. The main factors responsible in the degradation process were the reactions with super oxide radical (O2) and the hydroxyl radical (OH).
Nanoparticles (average size of 1.87 nm) composed of Fe3O4/Mn3O4/CuO were used as a nanocatalyst in the degradation of Methylene Blue under ultrasonic conditions [143]. The degradation of the dye was investigated under various experimental conditions, with the optimal conditions as follows: temperature of 28°C, 0.03 g/L initial dye concentration, 1.0 g/L nanoparticles dosage, 5 mM of H2O2, and 60 kHz. A maximum 95.04% dye degradation using these nanoparticles was reached after 150 min.
Using attapulgite (ATP) as carrier, Fe3O4 and g-C3N4 were grafted onto ATP, and the surface was then modified with polyethyleneimine (PEI) to produce photocatalyst ATP-Fe3O4-g-C3N4-PEI, which was used in the treatment of a Malachite Green-bearing wastewater [144]. Electron paramagnetic resonance analysis confirmed that the nanocomposite generated hydroxyl radicals (·OH) and superoxide radicals (·O2), which degraded the dye. Under the action of H+, ·O2, and ·OH, a removal rate of 98% was reached at pH 3. Recyclability experiments showed that there was a continuous degradation of the photocatalyst from the first (98% dye removal efficiency) to the fourth (65% dye removal efficiency) cycle.
The controlled synthesis of bismuth with various morphologies—nanoparticles (20–50 nm), nanorods (diameter of 20 nm and length 1 µm), nanocubes (150–200 nm) and micro-spheres (10 µm)—has been investigated [145]. The degradation efficiency, after 90 min of exposure to visible-light irradiation, against the presence of Rhodamine B in solutions was 99.9%, 98.9%, 97% and 68.3% for the above morphologies, respectively. The catalytic activity of the same morphologies increased with the decrease in pH value, maintaining a removal rate of 73.5% after forty cycles. Remarkably, this is a work that investigates the reusability of these adsorbents for a number of cycles as high as 40, when the ordinary number rarely exceeded five cycles.
Superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized via an electrochemical procedure were used as a catalyst for the oxidation of Rhodamine B in a photo-Fenton-like process [146]. The rate of color removal was 85% after 12 min at dye concentration of 2 mg/L, H2O2 concentration of 0.18 mM, and Fe3O4 concentration of 0.2 g/L. In addition, electrochemically synthesized superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles showed that the catalyst activity decreased from 85% in the first cycle to 78% in the fifth cycle.
Methylene Blue was the target to remove in the next few references. Silver chromate/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites (Ag2CrO4/rGO NCs) with a narrow dissemination size were used for the removal of Methylene Blue [147]. The photodegradation of the dye was carried out under solar light irradiation. Experimental results indicated removal efficiencies of near 92% after one hour of irradiation, a result that compared well with the results reached by pure Ag2CrO4 (46%) and rGO (30%) nanomaterials. The nanocomposites maintained their efficiency to degrade for up to five cycles.
The spherical shaped monoclinic structures, ZnO (24.9 nm) and CuO (17.0 nm) nanoparticles and ZnO/CuO (22.6 nm) nanocomposites were synthesized using extract of Musa acuminate fruit peel as the stabilizing and capping agent [148]. Degradation investigations on Methylene Blue had been carried out using these nanomaterials under a visible light source. ZnO, CuO, and ZnO/CuO showed degradation efficiencies of 57%, 50%, and 90%, respectively.
Polypyrrole (Ppy)-In2O3 nanoparticles hybrids were fabricated to leverage its superoxide radical decomposition for Methylene Blue degradation [149].
The nanoemulsion procedure was utilized to synthesize BixSn6−2xSy (0.33 ≤ x≤ 2.95) photocatalysts with morphological structures that changed from nanowhiskers to quantum dots [150]. Particularly, BiSn4S4.5 formulation, photodegraded Methylene Blue in the shortest time under UV-visible light (Table 8).
Copper oxide (CuO) was used to dope tin oxide (SnO2) in order to yield a heterostructured photocatalyst, which was used in the degradation of Methylene Blue [151]. The oxide mixture degraded the dye with 90% efficiency in three hours, which improved the results derived with the use of SnO2.
Black titanium dioxide (BTO) nanoparticles were formed, using pulsed laser irradiation in liquids, from de-ionized water, isopropyl alcohol, and 1:1 mixtures of water and alcohol [152]. Photocatalytic degradation of Methylene Blue was improved at neutral pH values of the solution. This degradation occurred via reaction of the dye with ·OH, O2·−and ·OOH radicals to produce CO2 and water. The efficiency decay for every adsorbent was approximately 10% after continuous use (three cycles), though for the four adsorbents tested, only BTOWA degraded the dye at 54% in the first cycle.
With Ag-manganese oxide, with plasmon-enhanced photocatalytic activity, the photodegradation of Crystal Violet dye was formed. Manganese oxide was prepared by an acidic precipitation method using potassium permanganate, manganese acetate, and nitric acid as precursors. Silver nanoparticles were deposited on the manganese oxide using leaf extracts of Calotropis gigantean [153]. The deposition of silver increased the photocatalytic activity of the manganese oxide from 68 to 95%. By the use of 10% Ag-OMS, near 100, 95, and 75% efficiencies in the photodegradation of 50, 100, and 150 mg/L dye concentrations were observed in 90, 120, and 120 min, respectively. After three cycles of activity, the efficiency to degrade the dye was maintained above 90%.
Pristine and carboxylic acid (CXA)-modified MIL-53 (Al) nanostructures were used to investigate its performance on the adsorption of Rhodamine B and Methylene Blue from solutions [154]. The incorporation of the acidic function to MIL-53 (Al) produced an increase in the adsorption capacity, though Rhodamine B was adsorbed better than Methylene Blue due to its higher adsorption energy.
Cellulose acetate/polycaprolactone (CA/PCL)-based nanocomposites with manganese tungstate (MnWO4) nanoparticles were formed and used, under a UV light source, on Crystal Violet photocatalytic degradation [155]. The photocatalytic efficacy of the CA/PCL/MnWO4 nanocomposites was higher than that of the individual components.
Two-dimensionally layered molybdenum disulphide/boron nitrate/reduced graphene oxide (MoS2by/BN/rGO) ternary nanocomposites was formed by sonication assisted hydrothermal procedure, and its potential to treat water contaminated with Methylene Blue was investigated [156]. The nanocomposite ability to degrade the dye reached 98% after 45 min, with a ten percent loss of effectiveness, with respect to the first cycle, in the seventh cycle. The presence of superoxide radicals (·O2) and hydroxyl radicals (·OH) were responsible for the degradation process.
TiO2 nanotubes were annealed in the 400–900 °C temperatures range to yield different nanomaterials and marked as TiO2 ST-NT, moreover, part of these nanopowders were decorated with Fe3O4 nanoparticles to form TiO2 ST-NT@Fe3O4NPs [157]. These nanocompounds were investigated for the photocatalytic decomposition of Methylene Blue under UV light. The best photocatalytic activity of TiO2 ST-NT and TiO2 ST-NT@Fe3O4NPs was obtained at annealing temperatures of 600 and 700 °C, respectively.
Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) photocatalysts were prepared using mixtures of urea and thiourea, as precursors, by varying calcination temperatures ranging from 500 to 650 °C for three hours in air medium, and used to remove Rhodamine B from liquid solutions [158]. The results showed that Rhodamine B removal by g-C3N4 formed at 600 °C was near 95% within three hours of visible LED light irradiation
NiMn2O4 nanoparticles were prepared through a PEG-assisted hydrothermal method. This Ni4 nanosphere was used as a visible light photocatalyst for the degradation of Methylene Blue and Rhodamine B dyes [159]. Under optimized conditions and 210 min, the degradation rates of the two dyes were 68 and 80.7%, respectively, whereas under five cycles of continuous use, the efficiency was maintained above 95% for both dyes.
Zinc oxide nanoparticles with spherical (40–100 nm) and rod (200 nm) shapes were fabricated using the extract from Scallion peel and used to remove Methylene Blue presented in a mimic wastewater [160]. UV and visible light irradiation were used to degrade the dye. Experimental results showed that UV light was more effective (10 min) than visible light (30 min) to eliminate the dye from the solution.
Z-scheme V2O5/g-C3N4 photocatalytic composites were synthesized and used to degrade Methylene Blue [161]. This investigation showed that the optimum composite formulation had a 90% efficiency in the degradation of the dye, a result that was approximately 6.18-fold higher than that of pristine GCN catalyst. After five cycles of continuous use, the GVO2 heterostructure showed a decrease in its degradation efficiency (from 90% in the first cycle to 80% in the fifth cycle).
Zn- and Fe-co-doped TiO2 photocatalyst were fabricated by the sol-gel method at room temperature, presenting the tetragonal anatase phase of TiO2 in all synthesized nanoparticles [162]. Also, the presence of spherical nanoparticles in ZFT_2.5 photocatalyst with diameters ranging from 8 to 20 nm was shown. The photocatalyst ZFT_2.5 was investigated for the photocatalytic degradation of a mixture of three cationic dyes (Rhodamine B, Malachite Green and Methylene Blue) under exposure to visible light. Experimental results indicated that the above dyes degraded with 90.57%, 91.54% and 88.39%, respectively.
Graphite oxide and carbon quantum dots (CQDs) were added to polyacrylonitrile nanofibers to investigate its performance, under visible light irradiation, on the photocatalytic degradation of Methylene Blue. Quantitative degradation efficiency for the dye was found after 25 min, showing the nanocomposite had better efficiency than the pristine precursors [163].
A green procedure was used to create MgO NPs using Manilkara zapota as a bio source; further, activated carbon/magnesium oxide (AC/MgO) photocatalyst was blended through a solution evaporation procedure [164]. This photocatalyst was used for the photodegradation of Rhodamine B using a UV–visible spectrophotometer. The dye can be degraded (99%) under simulated solar irradiation.
Cadmium-doped ZnO nanocomposites was prepared to investigate its performance on the photocatalytic degradation of Methylene Blue [165]. Cadmium doping in ZnO nanostructure acted as an electron scavenger, stopping electron–hole (e/h+) pairs from recombination on the surface of ZnO and increasing charge transfer.
Having as a target the removal of the same dye as in the previous reference, pure and TiO2-doped MnO2 spherical nanoparticles were made using a sol-gel technique. These nanoparticles’ photocatalytic degradation, under visible light exposure, of Methylene Blue was investigated [166]. However, the use of the titanium-bearing nanomaterial only produced, after 120 min, a little improvement over the use of MnO2. The utilization of both nanomaterials under continuous cycles indicated that there was a continuous loss of the activity after five cycles, being more evident in the case of MnO2 than in the TiO2-MnO2 material.
Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (spherical shape) were formed, using leaf extracts of a sausage tree (Kigelia Africana), and evaluated for the photocatalytic degradation of Toluidine Blue [167]. This nanomaterial removed the dye with a 99.6% efficiency within one hour and under a UV–visible source.
A MoS2/FeMoO4 composite was formed by introducing MoS2 (which actuates as an inorganic promoter) into MIL-53(Fe)-derived PMS-activator [168]. The prepared MoS2/FeMoO4 activated peroxymonosulfate (PMS) reached 99.7% of Rhodamine B degradation after 20 min. Fe(II) and sulfur vacancies were both responsible as the main active sites on catalyst surface, where sulfur vacancies can promote adsorption and electron migration between PMS and MoS2/FeMoO4 to boost peroxide bond activation.
Rough copper oxide with a nanostructural morphology and located on the surface of a copper sheet was formed by an electrochemical anodic oxidation procedure; these nanostructures were used in the degradation of Rhodamine 6G under the irradiation of visible light [169].
Silver-doped borophene and the corresponding zero-dimensional boron were constructed [170]. They were used to investigate its performance on the photocatalytic degradation, under UV–visible irradiation, of Rhodamine B. The dye completely degraded after 120 min, though a small but continuous decrease in the efficiency after the second and third cycles was shown.
The same dye (Rhodamine B) as in the previous reference was photocatalytically degraded by the action of Bi2O3@Zn-MOF hybrid nanomaterials, which were synthesized by supporting Zn-based metal-organic framework (Zn-MOF) through a hydrothermal process [171]. A catalytic efficiency of 97% was reached after 90 min of exposure to visible light irradiation. The generation of free radicals (·O2 and ·OH) was responsible for the decomposition of the dye into CO2 and water. The nanocomposite could be reused three times, though the degradation efficiency decreased to 78%.
MnS2/MnO2-CC heterostructure dual-functional catalysts formed of ultrathin nanosheets were prepared by a two-step electrodeposition method for used in the degradation of Methylene Blue [172]. The dye removal efficiency of the heterostructural catalyst with a better kinetic rate (0.0226) can reach 97.76%, which is much higher than that of the MnOx-CC catalyst (72.10%).
Based on biopolymer pomelo peels (PP) and metal-oxide catalyst manganese oxide (MnOx), an adsorption-enhanced catalyst (MnOx-PP) was constructed for catalytic Methylene Blue oxidative degradation [173]. The dye was adsorbed onto the biopolymer, and then the continuous generation of active substances (O2· and OH·) degraded it via an oxidative process of the adsorbed dye molecules. Methylene Blue was degraded at a 99.5% rate at 25°C and one hour, with a slight (5%) but continuous dynamic degradation efficiency during 72 h based on the self-built continuous single-pass dye purification device.

3.4. Remarks on the Use of Nanomaterials in the Removal of Cationic Dyes from Solutions

In the case of cationic dyes, the use of (photo)-catalysis methodology surpasses the utilization of adsorption–elution processes to remove these harmful dyes. A new approach, the formulation of nanomaterials bearing mixed matrix membranes, has been developed for the removal of cationic dyes (Methylene Blue) from a simulated wastewater. Like in the case of anionic dyes, it is extremely subjective, independently of the used methodology, to compare one nanomaterial to another due to the various experimental conditions used in the works. In the case of (photo)-catalytic approaches, times to degrade the very same dye vary from 10 min to 3 h (Methylene Blue) or 12 min to 3 h (Rhodamine B), whereas in the case of adsorption processing, the dye uptakes also show a variety of numbers. Table 9 shows a list of dyes used in various investigations. In the case of cationic dyes, Methylene Blue is the dye most investigated using any removal methodology. Table 10 summarizes some results about efficiencies found in the removal of Methylene Blue or Rhodamine B using the (photo)-catalytic approach; it can be seen that efficiencies in the removal of these dyes ranged from a few minutes to hours. It is also worth noticing here that despite the good removal characteristics of the different nanomaterials, very few show significant stability under continuous use. Also, none of these investigations used real wastewater.
Table 9. Summary of methodologies and cationic dyes used in the investigations.
Table 9. Summary of methodologies and cationic dyes used in the investigations.
MethodologyCationic DyeReference
AdsorptionCrystal Violet
Basic Fuchsin
Golden Yellow, Methylene Blue
Basic Red 114
Malachite Green
Methylene Blue, Methylene Violet, Brilliant Green
Toluidine Blue O
Rhodamine B
[108]
[109]
[110,111,114,116,117,118,119]
[111]
[113,120]
[114]

[115]
[118]
MembranesMethylene Blue[121]
(Photo)-catalysisMethylene Blue



Rhodamine B


Malachite Green
Crystal Violet
Toluidine B
Rhodamine 6G
[122,123,124,126,127,128,129,130,131,134,135,136,137,138,141,143,147,148,149,150,151,152,154,156,157,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,172,173]
[125,126,127,133,134,139,140,141,142,145,146,158,159,162,165,166,170,171]
[126,132,144,162]
[132,134,153,155]
[167]
[170]
Table 10. (Photo)-catalytic removal of Methylene Blue and Rhodamine B.
Table 10. (Photo)-catalytic removal of Methylene Blue and Rhodamine B.
DyeNanomaterialEfficiency-TimeReference
Methylene Blue








Rhodamine B
Mn4(P2O7)
Ce-Co,Fe ferrites
La-Co,Fe,Ti composite
Fe3O4@APF@Ag
Mixed Fe,Mn,Cu oxides
AgCrO4-rGO
CuO-SnO2
NiMn2O4
CO-CQ dots

Fe3O4@APF@Ag
AgO nanoparticles
Fe3O4 nanoparticles
g-C3N4
NiMn2O4
Mo,Fe-sulfur-oxide
99%-30 min
95%-1 h
99%-50 min
90%-3 min
95%-2.5 h
92%-1 h
90%-3 h
68%-3.5 h
100%-25 min

90%-3 min
76%-1 h
85%-12 min
95%-3 h
81%-3.5 h
99.7%-20 min
[124]
[127]
[131]
[141]
[143]
[147]
[151]
[159]
[163]

[141]
[142]
[146]
[158]
[159]
[168]

4. Nanomaterials for the Removal of Anionic and Cationic Dyes

Different from the previous sections, in which nanomaterials were developed to remove anionic or cationic dyes, some scientists developed nanomaterials to be applied on the removal of both anionic and cationic dyes from solutions. This section reviews the performance of such nanomaterials with double use.

4.1. Adsorption of Anionic and Cationic Dyes on Nanomaterials

The performance of black liquor-based aerogels with carbon nanostructures (BL-CN) against dye uptake was compared with that of carbon nanostructure aerogels (CN) without the presence of black liquors [174]. Experimental results concluded that BL-CN aerogels presented better adsorption loadings of Methylene Blue and Brilliant Blue than those produced by CN-based aerogels: 256 mg/g (CN) versus 307 mg/g (BL-CN) for Methylene Blue, and 7 mg/g (CN) to 61 mg/g (BL-CN) for Brilliant Blue. BL-CN materials from pulping of RS with alkaline reagents (NaOH and KOH–NH4OH) were the basis for the best Methylene Blue adsorbents, whereas best Brilliant Blue uptakes were obtained with BL-CN adsorbents from sulfite reagent.
Next, reference [175] investigated the performance of biological graphene hydrogel (BGH) formed by Shewanella putrefaciens CN32 on the removal of Methyl Orange and Methylene Blue. Using BGHs and 24 h of reaction time, removal efficiencies reached near 93% and 91% for the respective anionic and cationic dye, increasing the efficiency with respect to the use of non-graphene materials. There are no data about the recyclability of the nanomaterial.
Carbon dots/silica nanoaggregates for dye adsorption were synthesized via a hydrothermal reaction of N-doped carbon dots with (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane. With experimental data fitted to the Langmuir isotherm model, these nanoaggregates presented adsorption uptakes of 1327 mg/g for Alizarin Red S and 4091 mg/g for Malachite Green [176].
The next reference, [177], presented a machine learning investigation about the adsorption of organic dyes onto nanozeolites to conclude which variables influenced their uptake from wastewater. Four ML algorithms (random forest, light gradient boosting, eXtreme gradient boosting, and artificial neutral network) were tested as regression models, with XGB presenting the best usefulness in terms of prediction of the adsorption uptake of nanozeolite from a relatively small dataset. The data concluded that cationic dye (Crystal Violet and Acridrine Orange) uptake (about 12 mg/g) is much better than that of anionic dyes (less than 0.5 mg/g) with these nanoadsorbents.
Cellulose was obtained from coconut husk fiber via an alkali–acid hydrolysis procedure with formation of nano-crystalline cellulose (NCC), presenting spherical shape with diameters below 40 nm [178]. NCC was investigated for its adsorption capacity against various dyes, with removal efficiencies near 91% for Methylene Blue and 90% for Congo Red at all pH values, with the adsorption of Crystal Violet reaching a maximum at pH 9, and Methyl Red at pH 5.
Spirulina-mediated titanium oxide nanoparticles (STONPs) were fabricated and used to investigate their performance on the removal of Methyl Orange and Malachite Green [179]. Methyl Orange was best removed from the solution at pH 4, whereas the pH value for maximum Malachite Green removal was 12. The maximum uptake using the Langmuir isotherm model was 272.5 mg/g and 209.6 mg/g for the respective dyes. There was a continuous and important loss of removal efficiency after five cycles

4.2. Nanomaterials—Forming Membranes for the Removal of Anionic and Cationic Dyes

As one can see from the next references, the use of these membranes on the removal of solutions containing anionic and cationic dyes is finding widespread use in comparison with the use of these membranes in the case of single cationic or anionic dye-bearing solutions.
An MXene nanocomposite functionalized with a zwitterion (Z-MXene) was fabricated to be used as nanofiller in the development of self-cleaning permeable membranes [180]. The presence of functional groups and negative charge on the nanocomposite surface improved the separation of Congo Red and Methylene Blue by near 275 and 400%, respectively; at the same time, a high water flux was maintained. The composite membrane is chemically stable in the presence of corrosive (2 M HCl) and oxidative (NaOCl) media.
A polyacrylonitrile (PAN) electrospun membrane was constructed as a scaffold to incorporate nanomaterial adsorbents in a layer-by-layer hierarchical structure [181]. Two different nanomaterials were incorporated: a positively charged metal–organic framework as MIL-101(Cr), and negatively charged functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes; these were used to remove anionic (Methyl Orange and Rose Bengal) and cationic (Methylene Blue) dyes. Operating at 0.04 bar, removal efficiencies of the membrane incorporating MIL-101(Cr) were 5% (Methyl Orange) and 99% (Rose Bengal) from an iso-propylic alcohol medium. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)-based membrane showed 90% removal of Methylene Blue also in the same alcoholic medium, and operating at 0.07 bar.
Graphene oxide–copper oxide (GO–CuO) nanomaterial was incorporated into cellulose-acetate (CA) and poly-ether sulfone (PES) blend polymer by using a phase-inversion process to fabricate thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes, which were used on the removal of Methylene Blue, Rhodamine B, Methyl Orange and Congo Red [182]. In equilibrium conditions, the composite membrane removed 92%, 89%, 59% and 68% of the above respective dyes; thus, the TFN membrane seemed to be more effective to remove cationic dyes than anionic ones. The membrane was also used on the purification of a textile industry effluent sample (with no mention of the dyes contained in it), and all physico-chemical properties of the sample showed a decrease in their values when compared to the respective ones of the laboratory synthetic effluent.
Heterojunctions formed by UiO-66-NH2 and carbon quantum dots (CQDs) to investigate their synergetic advantages as nanofillers in thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes for dye removal were utilized [183]. Compared to the pristine thin-film composite membranes, the optimal TFN membranes embedded with 0.2 wt% UiO-66-NH2/CQD improved pure water permeability by 89.7% and higher rejection of dyes of different charges and molecular weights (Methylene Blue, Methyl Blue, Methyl Orange and Direct Red 23). Moreover, the decrease in water flux caused by dye adsorption during the long-term filtration process can be recovered by 92–99% via photocatalytic degradation of the embedded dyes within 10 min.

4.3. (Photo)-Catalytic Degradation of Anionic and Cationic Dyes Using Nanomaterials

A mesoporous rod-shaped ZnO/CuO/CeO2 n-p-n heterojunction via a two-step co-precipitation technique was formed to investigate its use in the degradation of Crystal Violet and Methyl Orange [184]. Under sunlight, the degradation efficiencies were 96% (Crystal Violet) and 88% (Methyl Orange) after 90 min of irradiation. The ultimate oxidizing species that degraded the dyes were O2 and •OH over photocatalyst under sunlight illumination. Also, the recycling experiments showed that the nanomaterial maintained its activity after three cycles.
Lanthanum- and neodymium-substituted cobalt–strontium (Co–Sr) spinel ferrite (Co0.5Sr0.5RExFe2-xO4, x = 0.00 and 0.06) catalysts were synthesized and used to degrade Congo Red and Rhodamine B dyes from an aqueous solution mixture [185]. It was determined that the energy bandgap ranged from 2.91 to 2.52 eV. The formulation in which x= 0.06 presented the greatest degradation rates for both dyes, being the ferrite containing Nd3+, which was the species that presented the highest rates of all (Table 11).
α-Fe2O3 was built at the nanometer (nanofibers) level via an electrospinning procedure to yield a nanomaterial with advanced characteristics to be used as photocatalysts to degrade Rhodamine B and Methyl Orange dyes [186]. The nanofibers fabricated from FeCl3·6H2O presented the best photocatalytic degradation, under visible-light irradiation, against the presence of both dyes in solution. The iron source is key to yielding a photocatalyst with the best degradation properties.
A solvothermal method was used to form mesoporous TiO2, and (1–3 wt%) Cu-doped mesoporous TiO2 membrane. Using artificial light source exposure, the effectiveness of the above materials on the degradation of Congo Red and Methylene Blue was investigated [187]. Cu-doping shifted the light absorption of mesoporous TiO2 from the ultraviolet to the visible region. Additionally, 3 wt% Cu-doped mesoporousTiO2 photocatalyst showed lower band gap energy (2.6 eV) than TiO2 (3.2 eV), thus allowing the use of solar energy, and the exposure was shifted towards the visible region. Congo Red was degraded a 61% using mesoporous TiO2 material, whereas the degradation reached 99% under the use of 3 wt% Cu-doped mesoporous TiO2 material and pH of 5. In both cases, the light exposure time was 50 min. In the case of Methylene Blue, maximum degradation (95%) occurred at a pH value of 9.
In [188], the usage of Au/WO3 composite as a photocatalyst for the degradation of dyes under solar light irradiation was investigated. Au/WO3 nanocomposites (nanoplatelets and pseudospheres) were synthesized using an acid precipitation method followed by an impregnation/reduction at room temperature. The derived composites were formed with gold nanoparticles of 7 nm in size, whereas W(VI) was reduced to the W(V) oxidation state, and favoring the presence of oxygen vacancies and the presence of a surface plasmon resonance effect at 540 nm. At pH 5, the degradation produced with these Au/WO3 photocatalysts was highly efficient on cationic dyes (Methylene Blue and Rhodamine B) rather than in Methyl Orange (anionic dye). Au/WO3-forming pseudosphere was the most efficient degrading material of cationic dyes (near quantitative degradation at 60 min and 90 min for Rhodamine B and Methylene Blue, respectively). In the case of Methyl Orange, the gold–tungsten oxide was useless at alkaline pH values at degrading the dye, but at acidic pH values, the degradation of the dye reached 80%.
Chitosan-capped silver nanoparticle (Ag NPs-CS) adsorbents to remediate dye pollution were photochemically formed under direct sunlight [189]. An aqueous Ag NPs-CS (100 μg/mL) degraded more than 95% of a mixed dye solution (25 mg/mL) containing equal volumes of Rhodamine B, Methylene Blue and Methyl Orange.
ZnO and Ag/ZnO nanocomposites were fabricated from Basella alba aqueous leaf extract. The Ag/ZnO nanocomposite showed degradation properties against the presence of Rhodamine B, Methylene Blue, and Methyl Orange, with degradation efficiencies of 88%, 90%, and 92% for the respective dyes [190].
Copper-based organic–inorganic hybrid nanoflowers (Cu-hNFs) were obtained from Tornabea scutellifera lichen extract as the organic component [191]. Catalytic activity was shown against Methylene Blue (maximum degradation effectiveness at pH 7.4) and Brillant Blue (best removed at pH 5). Both dyes degraded via a Fenton-like process.
α-MoO3 nanoparticles synthesized by chemical co-precipitation were used as photocatalysts on the degradation of Methyl Orange and Methylene Blue under visible light exposure. Maximum degradation efficiencies reached 73% (anionic dye) and 95% (cationic dye) after 90 min [192].
Three commercially available ZnO powders were used for the tribocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B, Methyl Violet, Methyl Blue and Methyl Orange dyes [193]. The removal of Rhodamine B reached near 99% efficiency after two hours, whereas after five hours of reaction time, the catalytic efficiencies in the removal of the separate dyes, followed the next order: Methyl Violet (99%) > Methyl Orange (85%) > Methyl Blue (55%). In the process, h+, ·O2 and ·OH were generated, these radicals being responsible for the degradation of the respective dyes.
Bimetallic oxides were formed after the calcination of nanomaterials derived from metal–organic frameworks. When Mn(M)-BTC nanomaterials were doped with Cu2+, Fe2+, Ce3+ or trimesic acid (H3BTC), several derivatives were formed, including material containing Cu2+, the nanomaterial that presented the best degradation efficiency of several dyes: Methylene Blue, Rhodamine 6G, Eosin Y and Gentian Violet. In all these cases, the degradation efficiency was above 95% [194].
Semiconductor heterojunction systems of C-modified Zn-doped TiO2 composite nanomaterials with nanofiber structures (150–200 nm diameter) were synthesized by electrospinning and hydrothermal methods [195]. Against the presence of Methylene Blue, Methyl Orange, Rhodamine B and Malachite Green, the composite nanofiber film had photocatalytic activity for all dyes attributable to the large specific surface area, small size effect and synergistic effects of multiple heterojunctions and dopant atom. The removal efficiency followed the Malachite Green > Methylene Blue > Methyl Orange > Rhodamine B order, with Methyl Orange efficiently removed in just 15 min.
Hybrid multifunctional nanoplexes composed of ZnS semiconductor quantum dots (ZnS QDs) chemically biofunctionalized with ε-poly-L-lysine (ɛPL) and coupled with magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MION, Fe3O4) stabilized by carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) were fabricated [196]. These nanoplexes were used to investigate its photocatalytic activity in the presence of Methylene Blue, Methyl Orange, Congo Red, and Rhodamine dyes. Degradation occurred via oxidation of the dyes by ·O2and ·OH radicals, and also by the oxidation of dyes by holes:
Z n S Q D ( h V B + ) + d y e d e g r a d a t i o n b y p r o d u c t s
In this investigation [197], ZnO nanoparticles (average size 15–30 nm) were synthesized by biosynthesis using dried Peumus boldus leaves. The photocatalytic activity of these nanomaterials indicated that the quantitative degradation of Methylene Blue is possible in three hours, 92% in the case of Methyl Orange in the same time, and 100% degradation of Rhodamine B in 30 min.
n-type semiconductor ZnO was coupled to a p-type semiconductor CuO to form a p–n heterojunction. Further, the active surface of the heterojunction was increased by the addition of a SiO2-aerogel [198]. By the application of ultrasound, aerogel particles were better distributed, and at the same time, the number of active sites was increased. CuO-ZnO/SA(P= 200) formulation (1 g/L) photocatalytically degraded 20 mg/L of each dye at pH 8: 95.4% in the case of Methylene Blue, whereas Methyl Orange degraded by 56.1% and Congo Red by 71.3%. In the case of Methylene Blue, there was a continuous loss of efficiency after four cycles: 90.6% in the first cycle versus 78% in the fourth one.
Several materials, such as graphene oxide, magnetite-(FeO·Fe2O3), and hematite-(α-Fe2O3)-decorated graphene oxide, were investigated as integrated photocatalyst adsorbents (IPCAs) in the oxidation of Methylene Blue, Crystal Violet and Tartrazine Yellow [199]. The cationic dyes showed maximum degradation, whereas the anionic dye presented acceptable removal rates when iron-decorated nanomaterials were used. In these cases, the efficiency order was as follows: graphene oxide-αFe2O3>graphene oxide-Fe3O4>graphene oxide. All the nanomaterials maintained their photocatalytic activity for five cycles, with dye removal in the 86–95% range.
Zinc selenide nanomaterials, produced from waste peels of orange and potato using the hydrothermal method, were utilized as photocatalysts to degrade Methylene Blue and Congo Red using sunlight [200]. Citrate in orange peel-mediated synthesis helped to form particle sizes of 1.85 nm and a surface area of 17.078 m2/g, resulting in an increase in surface-active sites. These nanomaterials had a degradation efficiency of 97.16% and 93.61% for Methylene Blue and Congo Red, respectively.
Magnetic SiO2 (MagSiO2@PDA@MnO2) were synthesized using magnetic, monodisperse-porous SiO2 (MagSiO2) as the starting material [201]. MagSiO2@PDA@MnO2 material was used to remove Rhodamine B, Methyl Orange and Methylene Blue, with the removal of the dyes attributable both to physical adsorption and degradation via peroxymonosulfate activation. Removal efficiency had the following sequence: Ethylene Blue>Rhodamine B>Methyl Orange sequence. The dye removal rate showed that the degradation occurred via physical adsorption and peroxymonosulfate oxidation. After five cycles, there was a small decrease in the dye removal efficiencies, probably due a decrease in the manganese content of the material.
Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) were synthesized from Echinophora platyloba plant extract, which acted as both a reducing agent and capping agent in the synthesis of the nanoparticles [202]. It was found that pH played a key role in determining particle sizes, which can be tuned from 15 nm to 53 nm when the pH decreased from 10 to 7. AgNPs (15 nm) showed remarkable catalytic performance in the degradation of different individual azo dyes (i.e., Methylene Blue (90.1%), Congo Red (80.1%), Rhodamine B (87.2%), Methyl Red (80.3%), Bromocresol Blue (92.5%) and Imido Black (79.8%)), as well as their mixture. It was found that 79.2% of the mixture of dyes was decomposed in eleven minutes, following a pseudo-first order kinetic model.
A sunlight-active n–n heterojunction of TiO2-coupled-CdS (TiO2-CdS) was prepared using a seed extract of Sapindus mukorossi and investigated in the removal of Rhodamine B and Congo Red [203]. The nanocomposite presented degradations of 93% and 95% for the respective dyes under the following experimental conditions: 25 mg/L dyes concentration, 15 mg of nanocomposite dosage, neutral pH and five hours of reaction time. Under continuous use (eight cycles of dye uptake and degradation), there was a continuous but slight efficiency loss in the treatment of both dyes, better displayed in the case of Rhodamine B than in Congo Red.
A solvothermal procedure converted electrical furnace slag into a steel slag nanocomposite (average particle size 34.8 nm), which were supported by H2O2 for Fenton and photo-Fenton-like degradation of various dyes in both suspension and spin-coated modes [204]. Using Methylene Blue and based on the optimum dye removal conditions (30 mg/L dye concentration, pH 11, 1.59 mL/L H2O2 concentration, 58.1 mg/L nanocomposite dosage, and one hour), five cycles were carried out for suspension and spin-coated modes. In the fifth cycle, resulting data showed that 92.89% of dye degraded for suspension mode and 88.21% for spin-coated mode. At pH 7 and 30 mg/L of each dye, the photodegradation efficiency of Methylene Blue, Methyl Red, Rhodamine B, Congo Red, Acid Blue 25, and Methyl Orange depended largely on the type of dye, with cationic dyes removed more efficiently than anionic ones (Table 12).
Different heterogeneous photocatalysts composed of highly reduced graphene oxide (HRG) and vanadium oxide (VOx)-based nanocomposites (HRG-VOx) were formed (nanorods, nanosheets and urchins), and their photocatalytic activities to photodegrade Methylene Blue and Methyl Orange were investigated [205]. Among all the morphologies, nanocomposites consisting of urchin-shaped VOx nanoparticles (HRG-VOx-U) demonstrated superior photocatalytic properties towards the degradation of the dyes (99.1% for Methylene Blue after 45 min, and 97.2% for Methyl Orange after 35 min). After three cycles and under UV-light irradiation, there was a continuous loss in the efficiency of Methylene Blue degradation.
A supramolecular material (3–4 nm average particle diameter) formed by the hybridization of hydrophilic hydrazide-pillar[12]arene, as surface-modifier, and silver nanoparticles was used in the reduction of Methylene Blue, Rhodamine B, Rhodamine 6G, and Methyl Orange [206]. After five cycles of continuous use, the degradation efficiency was maintained almost constant in the case of Rhodamine B and Methyl Orange dyes, but suffered a continuous loss in the case of Rhodamine 6G (most notably) and Methylene Blue.
ZnO nanoparticles (10 nm), as a photocatalyst material, were used to degrade Remazol Brilliant Blue R and Brilliant Green [207]. Zinc acetate, sodium hydroxide, polyvinylpyrrolidone and ethylene glycol at 197 °C formed the nanoparticles. After 90 min of reaction time, 500 ppm of ZnO degraded 73% and 51% of the respective dyes.
MgO–ZnO (MZ) nanocomposite (nanoplates with 35–100 nm of thickness) was prepared by a co-precipitation procedure with enhanced photodegradation properties under natural sunlight exposure [208]. Both cationic and anionic dyes were used in the degradation experiments, and it was found that both types of dyes completely degraded after 20 min of sunlight exposure. After five cycles of use, Rhodamine B, Methyl Orange, and Methylene Blue presented variations in their degradation efficiency: 96–91%, 91–85% and 98–92%, respectively.
Another nanomaterial with photodegradation properties under sunlight exposure, to degrade cationic and anionic dyes, was used in the next investigation [209]. In this case, the material was a ZnO/CuO nanocomposite with ZnO and CuO nanoparticles, and the cationic dyes were Methylene Blue and Rhodamine B, whereas Methyl Orange was the anionic dye used in the investigation. ZnO and CuO nanoparticles were synthesized by a biosynthesis procedure using Ficus benghalensis leaf extract, whereas the nanocomposite was fabricated by the mortar pestle crushing/milling method. As was somewhat expected, the efficiency of the nanocomposite in degrading the three dyes was higher than that yielded by the use of the single oxides. Using the nanocomposite for three hours and under sunlight exposure, Methylene Blue degraded by about 99%, compared to 80% forf Rhodamine B and 67% for Methyl Orange.
Potato-on-rod-like Z-scheme plasmon Ag2CrO4–Ag2Mo2O7 heterojunction nano-photocatalyst was synthesized by a precipitation method to photodegrade different organic dyes under artificial sunlight [210]. Under the best experimental conditions of a 0.1 g dose of (3:1) nanophotocatalyst, 10 mg/L dye concentration and 90 min of exposure to light, the above nanophotocatalyst formulation exhibited the greatest efficiency in the photodegradation of 2-Naphthol Orange (97.8%), Rhodamine B (99.7%), Crystal Violet (98.9%), and Methyl Orange (56.1%). In the case of 2-Naphtol Orange, the 3:1 catalyst formulation showed an acceptable reusability, since the dye adsorption ranged from 97.8% (1st cycle) to 95.7% in the fourth cycle.
A one-step hydrothermal procedure was used to form Bi2O2.33//Bi2O3@ECNF (electrospun carbon nanofibers), which combines both adsorption and photocatalytic performance. The nanocomposite removed 95% of Methyl Orange and 83% of Rhodamine B after 2 and 3 h, respectively. Both h+ and ·OH were the main active species in the photocatalytic process under light exposure [211].

4.4. Remarks on the Use of Nanomaterials in the Removal of Anionic and Cationic Dyes from Solutions

At first glance, the uses of these nanomaterials have an advantage over the utilization of nanomaterials with a single use in that they have a broad scope, since they are useful in the removal of anionic as well as cationic dyes from solutions. However, they present somewhat the same negative characteristics as the others, especially regarding their stability under continuous cycles, according to the data shown in the published manuscripts, because in many of the reviewed references, the authors did not mention this issue regarding their respective investigated nanomaterial. As in previous cases, comparison between the different nanomaterials is subjective due to the different experimental conditions, and in this case, another variable must be considered: the different mixtures of dyes used in the investigations. As was previously performed, Table 13 summarizes the methodologies used to remove the mixture of anionic and cationic dyes.
As an example of what it is mentioned above, using the same mixture (Methylene Blue, Rhodamine B and Methyl Orange) of dyes, the results in [208] indicate that complete degradation of the dyes occurred after 20 min, against efficiencies of 99% (Methylene Blue), 80% (Rhodamine B) or 67% (Methyl Orange) in 3 h declared in [202]. These last results hardly compared with data from [197], in which it is demonstrated that Rhodamine B was completely eliminated after 30 min. Another mixture of dyes (Methylene Blue and Methyl Orange) shows the same disparity in results, since 90 min is needed to remove 95% and 75% of the respective cationic and anionic dye [192], and 45 min (99% Methylene Blue) or 35 min (97% Methyl Orange) as concluded in [205].

5. Conclusions

This review emphasized the importance that the removal of organic dyes from solutions has in the scientific community; in this removal, two approaches are followed—adsorption or catalytic-photocatalytic degradation of the dye—while the use of nanomaterials also has widespread use.
In the case of adsorption methodology, all the references reviewed but two fitted its experimental data to the Langmuir isotherm model; the two exceptions are references [113,120], which fitted their data to the Freundlich isotherm. However, these nanomaterials performed quite differently in the removal of both cationic and anionic dyes, and of the very same dye, as the results in Table 14 demonstrate in the case of the adsorption of Congo Red and Methylene Blue. In the case of anionic dyes, maximum loadings vary from a few mg/g to the g/g magnitude order, and in the case of Methylene Blue, the tendency is the same. These variations can be generalized to other dyes.
With these results, it is amazing that some authors expressed their data as 8300 mg/g instead of the more logical 8.3 g/g form.
In the utilization of (photo)-catalytic methodology, the results have the same tendency as those shown in Table 14 and commented on in Section 2.3 (Table 5), Section 3.4 (Table 10) and in the text of Section 4.4. The efficient removal of a given anionic or cationic dye is reached after minutes or several hours depending of the nanomaterial used. In the opinion of the present authors, other considerations (see below) may be taking into account prior selection of one or another nanomaterial for each specific use or the methodology used to carry out this removal.
However, there is no systematic information about how the adsorption of dye molecules are related to the surface properties of nanomaterials, such as porosity, surface characteristics, etc.
A point to consider is the tendency that some authors provided data with little scientific sense, as is exemplified with the values of the thermodynamic data calculated from selected references (Table 15).
As is seen, values are given with three to four decimal places, which does not correspond with the accuracy of the methodology used to calculate such numbers; the responsibility for publishing such values is not only of the authors but also of the respective reviewers (and Editors) who allow this.
Since the removal of dyes from solutions is of utmost interest, future trends may be focused on the following: (i) the development of more stable nanomaterials to be used after cycles (a general rule observed in this review is that there is a loss of efficiency with continuous cycles). (ii) Investigations of the use of nanomaterials on real dye-bearing wastes (in this review, just only two, [69,182], references used industrial wastewater in their investigation). (iii) The use of dynamic conditions (columns) in the removal of dyes. (iv) Reliable knowledge about the easiness and costs of fabricating nanomaterials on greater scales than the laboratory one. All the above will be key points in understanding the performance of nanomaterials in the selected technology under long-term use.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25179671/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.J.A.; methodology, F.J.A.; investigation, F.J.A., M.A. and J.I.R.; writing-original draft preparation, F.J.A.; writing-review and editing, F.J.A., M.A. and J.I.R.; funding acquisition, J.I.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This manuscript was funded by the Spanish Scientific Research Council (CSIC) by grant number 202250E019.

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge CSIC for support. Also, we acknowledge support with the publication fee by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI). Special thanks to M.I. Maher for English revision.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ismail, M.; Akhtar, K.; Khan, M.I.; Kamal, T.; Khan, M.A.; Asiri, A.M.; Seo, J.; Khan, S.B. Pollution, toxicity and carcinogenicity of organic dyes and their catalytic bio-remediation. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019, 25, 3645–3663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hanafi, M.F.; Norzahir Sapawe, N. A review on the water problem associate with organic pollutants derived from phenol, methyl orange, and remazol brilliant blue dyes. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 31, A141–A150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mohammadnejad, M.; Alizadeh, S. MnFe2O4-NH2-HKUST-1, MOF magnetic composite, as a novel sorbent for efficient dye removal: Fabrication, characterization and isotherm studies. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 9048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Periyasamy, A.P. Recent advances in the remediation of textile-dye-containing wastewater: Prioritizing human health and sustainable wastewater treatment. Sustainability 2024, 16, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jabbar, Z.H.; Graimed, B.H.; Ammar, S.H.; Taofeeq, H.; Alsunbuli, M.M.B.; Al-Jubouri, S.M.; Abbar, A.H.; M-Ridha, M.J.; Taher, A.G. A critical review describes wastewater photocatalytic detoxification over Bi5O7I-based heterojunction photocatalysts: Characterizations, mechanism insight, and DFT calculations. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 112241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Haruna, M.S.; Oladapo, B.H.; Mustapha, S.; Scholartica, C.E.; Tijani, J.O.; Abdulkareem, A.S. A review of iron-tungstate nanomaterials: Synthesis methods, physicochemical properties, environmental fate and application for wastewater treatment. Sustain. Chem. Environ. 2024, 5, 100074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ikram, Z.; Azmat, E.; Perviaz, M. Degradation efficiency of organic dyes on CQDs as photocatalysts: A review. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 10017–10029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Muzammal, S.; Ahmad, A.; Sheraz, M.; Kim, J.; Ali, S.; Hanif, M.B.; Hussain, I.; Pandiaraj, S.; Alodhayb, A.; Javed, M.S.; et al. Polymer-supported nanomaterials for photodegradation: Unraveling the methylene blue menace. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2024, 22, 100547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tundwal, A.; Kumar, H.; Binoj, B.J.; Sharma, R.; Kumari, R.; Yadav, A.; Kumar, G.; Dhayal, A.; Yadav, A.; Singh, D.; et al. Conducting polymers and carbon nanotubes in the field of environmental remediation: Sustainable developments. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 500, 215533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Thayil, R.; Gandi, S.; Parne, S.R.; Kathirvelu, V. Recent advances and perspectives of molybdenum disulfide and molybdenum disulfide based nanocomposites for adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes: A review. J. Mater. Sci. 2024, 59, 3225–3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lanjwani, M.F.; Tuzen, M.; Khuhawar, M.Y.; Saleh, T.A. Trends in photocatalytic degradation of organic dye pollutants using nanoparticles: A review. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2024, 159, 111613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Afshari, M.; Varma, R.S.; Saghanezhad, S.J. Catalytic applications of heteropoly acid-supported nanomaterials in synthetic transformations and environmental remediation. Comments Inorg. Chem. 2023, 43, 129–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ansari, A.A.; Shamim, M.A.; Khan, A.M.; Anwar, K.; Wani, A.A. Nanomaterials as a cutting edge in the removal of toxic contaminants from water. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 295, 127092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bhattu, M.; Singh, J. Recent advances in nanomaterials based sustainable approaches for mitigation of emerging organic pollutants. Chemosphere 2023, 321, 138072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mathew, A.T.; Saravanakumar, M.P. Remediation of endocrine disrupting compounds and organic dye pollutants through biosorbents in a circular bioeconomy: Prospects and constraints. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2023, F272, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Orimolade, B.O.; Idris, A.O.; Akanji, S.P.; Adekola, F.A.; Azizi, S.; Maaza, M.; Mamba, B. Solar-light-responsive nanomaterials for the photoelectrocatalytic degradation of stubborn pollutants. Coatings 2023, 13, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rajabi, M.; Keihankhadiv, S.S.; Tyagi, I.; Karri, R.R.; Chaudhary, M.; Mubarak, N.M.; Chaudhary, S.; Kumar, P.; Singh, P. Comparison and interpretation of isotherm models for the adsorption of dyes, proteins, antibiotics, pesticides and heavy metal ions on different nanomaterials and non-nano materials—A comprehensive review. J. Nano. Chem. 2023, 13, 43–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Monteiro Lívia, G.; Figueiredo Marco, A.G. Technology roadmap: Nanomaterials applied to the tertiary treatment of industrial wastewater contaminated by synthetic organic dyes. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2023, 101, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ponce, S.; Murillo, H.A.; Alexis, F.; Alvarez-Barreto, J.; Mora, J.R. Green synthesis of nanoparticles mediated by deep eutectic solvents and their applications in water treatment. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aswini, R.; Padmanaban, A.; Vigneshwaran, S.; Valdes, H.; Arunachalam, S.V. A review on versatile nano-photocatalysts for environmental remediation: Carbon-decorated bismuth-based nanomaterials. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2023, 35, 100991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Oladipo, A.A.; Mustafa, F.S. Bismuth-based nanostructured photocatalysts for the remediation of antibiotics and organic dyes. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2023, 14, 291–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Linghu, X.; Shu, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Z.; Shan, D.; Wang, B. Hydro/solvothermally synthesized bismuth tungstate nanocatalysts for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of dyes, antibiotics, and bacteria in wastewater: A review. J. Water Proc. Eng. 2023, 54, 103994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bairamis, F.; Rapti, I.; Konstantinou, I. g-C3N4 based Z-scheme photocatalysts for environmental pollutants removal. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2023, 40, 100749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Umekar, M.S.; Bhusari, G.S.; Bhoyar, T.; Devthade, V.; Kapgate, B.P.; Potbhare, A.P.; Chaudhary, R.G.; Abdala, A.A. Graphitic carbon nitride-based photocatalysts for environmental remediation of organic pollutants. Curr. Nanosci. 2023, 19, 148–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bashir, M.; Batool, M.; Arif, N.; Tayyab, M.; Zeng, Y.-J.; Nadeem, Z.M. Strontium-based nanomaterials for the removal of organic/inorganic contaminants from water: A review. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023, 492, 215286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bichave, M.S.; Kature, A.Y.; Koranne, S.V.; Shinde, R.S.; Gongle, A.S.; Choudhari, V.P.; Topare, N.S.; Raut-Jadhav, S.; Bokil, S.A. Nano-metal oxides-activated carbons for dyes removal: A review. Mater. Today Proc. 2023, 77, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brillas, E.; Garcia-Segura, S. Recent progress of applied TiO2 photoelectrocatalysis for the degradation of organic pollutants in wastewaters. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kanakaraju, D.; Chandrasekaran, A. Recent advances in TiO2/ZnS-based binary and ternary photocatalysts for the degradation of organic pollutants. Sci. Total. Environ. 2023, 868, 161525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Puri, N.; Gupta, A. Water remediation using titanium and zinc oxide nanomaterials through disinfection and photo catalysis process: A review. Environ. Res. 2023, 227, 115786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Arun, J.; Nachiappan, S.; Rangarajan, G.; Alagappan, R.P.; Gopinath, K.P.; Lichtfouse, E. Synthesis and application of titanium dioxide photocatalysis for energy, decontamination and viral disinfection: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2023, 21, 339–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fan, Y.; Bai, Z.; Ge, Q.; Jiang, N.; Liu, M.; Cong, H.; Zhang, Y. Synergetic photodegradation via inorganic–organic hybridization strategies: A review on preparations and applications of nanoparticle-hybridized polyaniline photocatalysts. J. Polym. Res. 2023, 30, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Farhan, A.; Arshad, J.; Rashid, E.U.; Ahmad, H.; Nawaz, S.; Munawar, J.; Zdarta, J.; Jesionowski, T.; Bilal, M. Metal ferrites-based nanocomposites and nanohybrids for photocatalytic water treatment and electrocatalytic water splitting. Chemosphere 2023, 310, 136835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gusain, R.; Kumar, N.; Ray, S.S. Applications of MoS2 nanostructures in wastewater treatment. Springer Ser. Mater. Sci. 2023, 332, 351–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gadore, V.; Mishra, S.R.; Ahmaruzzaman, M.d. Metal sulphides and their heterojunctions for photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes-a comprehensive review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 90410–90457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hani, U. Comprehensive review of polymeric nanocomposite membranes application for water treatment. Alex. Eng. J. 2023, 72, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Suresh, R.; Rajendran, S.; Gnanasekaran, L.; Show, P.L.; Chen, W.-H.; Soto-Moscoso, M. Modified poly(vinylidene fluoride) nanomembranes for dye removal from water–a review. Chemosphere 2023, 322, 138152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hosny, N.M.; Gomaa, I.; Elmahgary, M.G. Adsorption of polluted dyes from water by transition metal oxides: A review. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2023, 15, 100395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Saharan, P.; Kumar, V.; Kaushal, I.; Mittal, A.; Shukla, S.K.; Kumar, D.; Sharma, A.K.; Om, H. A comprehensive review on the metal-based green valorized nanocomposite for the remediation of emerging colored organic waste. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 45677–45700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shanaah, H.H.; Alzaimoor, E.F.H.; Rashdan, S.; Abdalhafith, A.A.; Kamel, A.H. Photocatalytic degradation and adsorptive removal of emerging organic pesticides using metal oxide and their composites: Recent trends and future perspectives. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Umar, E.; Ikram, M.; Haider, J.; Nabgan, W.; Imran, M.; Nazir, G. A state-of-art review of the metal oxide-based nanomaterials effect on photocatalytic degradation of malachite green dyes and a bibliometric analysis. Glob. Chall. 2023, 7, 2300001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ali, J.; Bibi, S.; Jatoi, W.B.; Tuzen, M.; Jakhrani, M.A.; Feng, X.; Saleh, T.A. Green synthesized zinc oxide nanostructures and their applications in dye-sensitized solar cells and photocatalysis: A review. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 36, 106840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Leão, M.B.; Bordin, J.R.; de Matos, C.F. Specific surface area versus adsorptive capacity: An application view of 3D graphene-based materials for the removal of emerging water pollutants. Water Air Soil. Pollut. 2023, 234, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ojha, A.; Samriti; Thakur, S.; Prakash, J. Graphene family nanomaterials as emerging sole layered nanomaterials for wastewater treatment: Recent developments, potential hazards, prevention and future prospects. Environ. Adv. 2023, 13, 100402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Prasad, C.; Madkhali, N.; Jeong, S.-G.; Malkappa, K.; Choi, H.Y.; Govinda, V. Recent advances in the hybridization of cellulose and semiconductors: Design, fabrication and emerging multidimensional applications: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 233, 123551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, W.; Wu, H.; Shao, Y.; Han, X.; Zhou, M.; Gu, P.; Li, Z. Preparation methods of cellulose nanocrystal and its application in treatment of environmental pollution: A mini-review. Colloids Interface Sci. Commun. 2023, 53, 100707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, S.; He, G.; Huang, J. Self-assembly on natural cellulose: Towards high-efficient catalysts. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 63, 101655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shahid-ul-Islam; Bairagi, S.; Kamali, M.R. Review on green biomass-synthesized metallic nanoparticles and composites and their photocatalytic water purification applications: Progress and perspectives. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2023, 14, 100460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Singh, R.; Umapathi, A.; Patel, G.; Patra, C.; Malik, U.; Bhargava, S.K.; Daima, H.K. Nanozyme-based pollutant sensing and environmental treatment: Trends, challenges, and perspectives. Sci. Total. Environ. 2023, 854, 158771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Suresh, R.; Rajendran, S.; Khoo, K.S.; Soto-Moscoso, M. Enzyme immobilized nanomaterials: An electrochemical bio-sensing and biocatalytic degradation properties toward organic pollutants. Top. Catal. 2023, 66, 691–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, M.; Zhu, P.; Liu, S.; Chen, Y.; Liang, D.; Liu, Y.; Chen, W.; Du, L.; Wu, C. Application of nanozymes in environmental monitoring, management, and protection. Biosensors 2023, 13, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, T.; Liu, X.; Zeng, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhang, P.; Feng, B.; Tian, K.; Qing, T. Efficient and recyclable degradation of organic dye pollutants by CeO2@ZIF-8 nanozyme-based non-photocatalytic system. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 316, 120643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Solangi, N.H.; Karri, R.R.; Mubarak, N.M.; Mazari, S.A.; Jatoi, A.S.; Koduru, J.R. Emerging 2D MXene-based adsorbents for hazardous pollutants removal. Desalination 2023, 549, 116314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chinnasamy, C.; Perumal, N.; Choubey, A.; Rajendran, S. Recent advancements in MXene-based nanocomposites as photocatalysts for hazardous pollutant degradation-a review. Environ. Res. 2023, 233, 116459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Massoumılari, Ş.; Velioǧlu, S. Can MXene be the effective nanomaterial family for the membrane and adsorption technologies to reach a sustainable green world? ACS Omega 2023, 8, 29859–29909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhang, Q.; Jia, Y.; Wu, W.; Pei, C.; Zhu, G.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Fan, W.; Wu, Z. Review on strategies toward efficient piezocatalysis of BaTiO3 nanomaterials for wastewater treatment through harvesting vibration energy. Nano Energy 2023, 113, 108507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ahmadian, M.; Derakhshankhah, H.; Jaymand, M. Biosorptive removal of organic dyes using natural gums-based materials: A comprehensive review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2023, 124, 102–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chelu, M.; Musuc, A.M.; Popa, M.; Calderon Moreno, J.M. Chitosan hydrogels for water purification applications. Gels 2023, 9, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ingrassia, E.B.; Lemos, E.S.; Escudero, L.B. Treatment of textile wastewater using carbon-based nanomaterials as adsorbents: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 91649–91675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Jha, S.; Gaur, R.; Shahabuddin, S.; Tyagi, I. Biochar as sustainable alternative and green adsorbent for the remediation of noxious pollutants: A comprehensive review. Toxics 2023, 11, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Amrhar, O.; Lee, H.-S.; Lgaz, H.; Berisha, A.; Ebenso, E.E.; Cho, Y. Computational insights into the adsorption mechanisms of anionic dyes on the rutile TiO2 (1 1 0) surface: Combining SCC-DFT tight binding with quantum chemical and molecular dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 377, 121554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Aydin Urucu, O.; Deniz, S.; Kahraman, N.; Çakmakçi, E. Itaconic acid-derived reactive protic ionic liquid (PIL)-containing superabsorbent green hydrogel adsorbent for the removal of anionic textile dyes. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 36, 106867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chen, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Z.; Qiu, E.; Liu, Q.; Regulacio, M.D.; Lin, C.; Yang, D.-P. Hydrophilic ZnO/C nanocomposites with superior adsorption, photocatalytic, and photo-enhanced antibacterial properties for synergistic water purification. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 648, 535–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Deniz, S. Efficient and environmentally friendly removal of azo textile dye using a low-cost adsorbent: Kinetic and reuse studies with application to textile effluent. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 35, 106433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Eizi, R.; Bastami, T.R.; Mahmoudi, V.; Ayati, A.; Babaei, H. Facile ultrasound-assisted synthesis of CuFe-Layered double hydroxides/g-C3N4 nanocomposite for alizarin red S sono-sorption. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2023, 145, 104844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hai, D.T.; Phuong, N.T.; Cong, P.X.; Nam, N.H.; Thu, L.P.; Trang, N.T.T.; Thom, N.T.; Nam, P.T.; Osial, M.; Thanh, D.T.M. Hydroxyapatite/superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles nanocomposite for Congo Red adsorption. Desalination Water Treat. 2023, 298, 184–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Karyab, H.; Ghasemi, M.; Ghotbinia, F.; Nazeri, N. Efficiency of chitosan nanoparticle with polyaluminum chloride in dye removal from aqueous solutions: Optimization through response surface methodology (RSM) and central composite design (CCD). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 249, 125977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Laxmi Deepak Bhatlu, M.; Athira, P.S.; Jayan, N.; Barik, D.; Dennison, M.S. Preparation of breadfruit leaf biochar for the application of Congo Red dye removal from aqueous solution and optimization of factors by RSM-BBD. Adsorp. Sci. Technol. 2023, 2023, 7369027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mahmoud, M.E.; Moneim El-Ghanam, A.; Saad, S.R. Fast and efficient adsorptive capture of Congo red and Erythromycin pollutants by a novel nanobiosorbent from crosslinked nanosilica with nanobiochar and chitosan. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2023, 158, 111557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Patil, D.J.; Behera, S.N. Synthesizing nanoparticles of zinc and copper ferrites and examining their potential to remove various organic dyes through comparative studies of kinetics, isotherms, and thermodynamics. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2023, 195, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Qi, C.; Zhao, M.; Fang, T.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, P.; Xie, A.; Shen, Y. Multifunctional hollow porous Fe3O4@N-C nanocomposites as anodes of lithium-ion battery, adsorbents and surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrates. Molecules 2023, 28, 5183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Qin, Z.; Dong, K.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Mo, L.; Xiao, S. Noval green sodium alginate/gellan gum aerogel with 3D hierarchical porous structure for highly efficient and selective removal of Congo red from water. Biores. Technol. 2023, 370, 128576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Rubangakene, N.O.; Elwardany, A.; Fujii, M.; Sekiguchi, H.; Elkady, M.; Shokry, H. Biosorption of Congo Red dye from aqueous solutions using pristine biochar and ZnO biochar from green pea peels. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2023, 189, 636–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Vuong, N.-M.-T.; Nguyen, P.-T.; Nguyen, T.K.O.; Nguyen, D.B.; Tran, T.-M.-D.; Oanh, L.T.K.; Nguyen, T.-B.; Pham, T.-T.; Lin, K.-Y.A.; Bui, X.-T. Application of nano zero-valent iron particles coated by carboxymethyl cellulose for removal of Congo red dye in aqueous solution. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2023, 8, 100469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhu, R.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, P.; Jia, Y.; Cheng, Q.; Wu, W.; Li, J. Two-dimensional acetate-based light lanthanide fluoride nanomaterials: An ultrahigh adsorption capacity and salt-tolerance endowed by surface acetates exchange. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 621, 156842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Aaga, G.F.; Anshebo, S.T. Green synthesis of highly efficient and stable copper oxide nanoparticles using an aqueous seed extract of Moringa stenopetala for sunlight-assisted catalytic degradation of Congo red and Alizarin red S. Heliyon 2023, 9, e16067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Afaq, M.; Basha, B.; Warsi, M.F.; Shahid, M.; Alrowaili, Z.A.; Al-Buriahi, M.S.; Yousaf, S. Fabrication of ZnO-CuFe2O4-CNTs ternary nanocomposite for harmful organic effluents degradation by sunlight irradiation. Mater. Sci. Eng. B Solid State Mater. Adv. Technol. 2023, 292, 116444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ashfaq, M.; Ali, A.; Abbood, N.K.; Panchal, S.; Akram, N.; Saeed, M.; Doshi, O.P.; Ali, F.; Muhammad, S.; Sameeh, M.Y.; et al. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of the Bi2O3-NiO heterojunction for the degradation of methyl orange under irradiation of sunlight. Water 2023, 15, 3182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Barhoi, A.; Khan, A.A.; Mahto, B.; Bisoyi, A.; Hussain, S. Chelating agent-assisted-Bi2WO6 nanostructured materials for electron transfer-driven ultrafast catalytic reduction of organic and inorganic contaminants. ChemNanoMat 2023, 9, e202300181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Borah, D.; Mishra, V.; Debnath, R.; Ghosh, K.; Gogoi, D.; Rout, J.; Pandey, P.; Ghosh, N.N.; Bhattacharjee, C.R. Facile green synthesis of highly stable, water dispersible carbohydrate conjugated Ag, Au and Ag-Au biocompatible nanoparticles: Catalytic and antimicrobial activity. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 37, 107096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chabalala, M.B.; Zikalala, S.A.a; Ndlovu, L.; Mamba, G.; Mamba, B.; Nxumalo, E.N. A green synthetic approach for the morphological control of ZnO-Ag using β-cyclodextrin and honey for photocatalytic degradation of bromophenol blue. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2023, 197, 307–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cui, L.; Wen, J.; Deng, Q.; Du, X.; Tang, T.; Li, M.; Xiao, J.; Jiang, L.; Hu, G.; Cao, X.; et al. Improving the photocatalytic activity of Ti3C2 MXene by surface modification of N doped. Materials 2023, 16, 2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Dilawar, S.; Albalawi, K.; Khan, A.U.; Tahir, K.; Zaki, M.E.A.; Musad, S.E.A.; Almarhoon, Z.M.; Althagafi, T.M.; El-Zahhar, A.A.; El-Bialy, E. Rapid photodegradation of toxic organic compounds and photo inhibition of bacteria in the presence of novel hydrothermally synthesized Ag/Mn–ZnO nanomaterial. Environ. Res. 2023, 231, 116093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ding, W.; Luo, J.-X.; Gu, Q.; Liu, Z.-H. Ultrathin 2D ZnGa-borate-LDH nanosheets for boosting dye-sensitized photocatalytic coupled reaction of H2 production with pollutant degradation. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 657, 130575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Dumbrava, A.; Matei, C.; Diacon, A.; Moscalu, F.; Berger, D. Novel ZnO-biochar nanocomposites obtained by hydrothermal method in extracts of Ulva lactuca collected from Black Sea. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 10003–10013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. El Mragui, A.; Aadnan, I.; Zegaoui, O.; Esteves da Silva, J.C.G. Physico-chemical characterization and photocatalytic activity assessment under UV-A and visible-light irradiation of iron-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Arab. J. Chem. 2023, 16, 105331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Franco, R.T.; Silva, A.L.; Licea, Y.E.; Alzamora, M.; Sánchez, D.R.; Carvalho, N.M.F. Effect of Camellia sinensis origin and heat treatment in the iron oxides nanomaterials composition and Fenton degradation of methyl orange. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2023, 34, 694–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hadi, A. Synthesis and characteristics of Y2O3/SiO2/GO hybrid nanoceramics for photo-degradation of organic dyes. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2023, 55, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Huang-Mu, L.; Devanesan, S.; Farhat, K.; Kim, W.; Sivarasan, G. Improving the efficiency of metal ions doped Fe2O3 nanoparticles: Photocatalyst for removal of organic dye from aqueous media. Chemosphere 2023, 337, 139229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Jayaprakash, K.; Sivasamy, A. Polymeric graphitic carbon nitride layers decorated with erbium oxide and enhanced photocatalytic performance under visible light irradiation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 52561–52575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Khan, Y.; Sharafat, U.; Gul, S.; Khan, M.I.; Ismail, M.; Khan, M.A.; Younus, R.; Khan, S.B. Novel in situ synthesis of quaternary core-shell metallic sulfide nanocomposites for degradation of organic dyes and hydrogen production. Green Process. Synth. 2023, 12, 20228128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Latif, S.; Abdulaziz, F.; Alanazi, A.M.; Alsehli, A.H.; Alsowayigh, M.M.; Alanazi, A.A. Effect of H2O2@CuONPs in the UV light-induced removal of organic pollutant Congo Red dye: Investigation into mechanism with additional biomedical study. Molecules 2023, 28, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Lebière, P.G.; Ivan, R.; Pérez del Pino, A.; Logofatu, C.; Negrila, C.; György, E. Boron and nitrogen co-doped carbon-based nanomaterials/nickel oxide/hydroxide hybrids for sunlight induced photocatalytic water cleaning. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 676, 132159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Liu, S.; Bu, Y.; Cheng, S.; Tao, Y.; Hong, W. Preparation of g-C3N5/g-C3N4 heterojunction for methyl orange photocatalytic degradation: Mechanism analysis. J. Water Proc. Eng. 2023, 54, 104019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ma, A.; Liao, X.; Qian, H.; Liu, J.; Liu, H.; Ren, S. An attapulgite composite with high degradation performance for Congo red without using oxidants and photoexcitation. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2023, 296, 116628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Mbarek, W.B.; Al Harbi, M.; Hammami, B.; Khitouni, M.; Escoda, L.; Suñol, J.-J. Nanostructured Mn–Ni powders produced by high-energy ball-milling for water decontamination from RB5 dye. Crystals 2023, 13, 879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Medina, M.J.B.; Bueno, J.J.P.; Rodríguez, C.H.; Pérez, A.X.M.; López, M.L.M.; Chacón, J.G.B.; López, C.M.; Robles, M.R.G.; Oza, G. Heterogeneous photocatalysis using electroless deposition of Ni/NiO nanoparticles on silicon nanowires for the degradation of methyl orange. Curr. Nanosci. 2023, 19, 432–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Meteab, M.H.; Hashim, A.; Rabee, B.H. Synthesis and tailoring the morphological, optical, electronic and photodegradation characteristics of PS–PC/MnO2–SiC quaternary nanostructures. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2023, 55, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Monje, D.S.; Mercado, D.F.; Mesa, G.A.P.; Valencia, G.C. Carbon dots decorated magnetite nanocomposite obtained using yerba mate useful for remediation of textile wastewater through a photo-Fenton treatment: Ilex paraguariensis as a platform of environmental interest—Part 2. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 3070–3087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Nirmal Rajeev, Y.; Maria Magdalane, C.; Hepsibha, S.; Ramalingam, G.; Arjun Kumar, B.; Bhushan Kumar, L.; Sambasivam, S. Europium decorated hierarchical TiO2 heterojunction nanostructure with enhanced UV light photocatalytic activity for degradation of toxic industrial effluent. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2023, 157, 111339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Pandith, A.; Jayaprakash, G.K.; ALOthman, Z.A. Surface-modified CuO nanoparticles for photocatalysis and highly efficient energy storage devices. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 43320–43330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ramaraj, B.R.; Mahalingam, U.; Ramasamy, P.; Pearce, J.M.; Mayandi, J.; Mahalingam, A. Environmental remediation of real textile dyeing wastewater under visible light and inactivation of pathogenic bacteria using ZnO/CuO nano-needles. Phys. Status Solidi A 2023, 220, 2200607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Sabur, D.A.; Hashim, A.; Habeeb, M.A. Fabrication and exploration the structural and optical properties of Sb2O3-GO nanostructures doped PMMA-PC for photodegradation of pollutants dyes. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2023, 55, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sathya Priya, B.; Aruchamy, K.; Oh, T.H.; Avula, B.; Hasan, I.; Shanthi, M. Synthesis of solar light active reduced graphene oxide-ZnS nanomaterial for photocatalytic degradation and antibacterial applications. Micromachines 2023, 14, 1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Shoran, S.; Sharma, A.; Chaudhary, S. Visible light enhanced photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants with SiO2/g-C3N4 nanocomposite for environmental applications. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 98732–98746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Singh, A.K.; Giannakoudakis, D.A.; Arkas, M.; Triantafyllidis, K.S.; Nair, V. Composites of lignin-based biochar with BiOCl for photocatalytic water treatment: RSM studies for process optimization. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sudhalakshmi, J.; Rajathi, K. Fabrication of eco-friendly hybrid active imidazole based ionic liquid embedded cadmium oxide-TiO2 catalyst for photoelectrocatalytic and hydrophobic properties. Asian J. Chem. 2023, 35, 1827–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zamani, W.; Rastgar, S.; Hedayati, A. Capability of TiO2 and Fe3O4 nanoparticles loaded onto Algae (Scendesmus sp.) as a novel bio-magnetic photocatalyst to degration of Red195 dye in the sonophotocatalytic treatment process under ultrasonic/UVA irradiation. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 18182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Alka; Kumar, S.; Kumari, P. Sulfonatocalix [6]arene-decorated magnetite nanomaterials for the removal of organic pollutants from wáter. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 20, 4467–4482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Al-Wasidi, A.S.; Khairy, M.; Abdulkhair, B.Y.; Abdelrahman, E.A. Efficient disposal of basic fuchsin dye from aqueous media using ZrO2/MgMn2O4/Mg(Mg0.333Mn1.333)O4 as a novel and facilely synthesized nanocomposite. Inorganics 2023, 11, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Aziz, T.; Farid, A.; Chinnam, S.; Haq, F.; Kiran, M.; Wani, A.; Alothman, Z.A.; Aljuwayid, A.M.; Habila, M.A.; Akhtar, M.S. Synthesis, characterization and adsorption behavior of modified cellulose nanocrystals towards different cationic dyes. Chemosphere 2023, 321, 137999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. El-Aziz, M.E.A.; Youssef, A.M.; Kamal, K.H.; Kelnar, I.; Kamel, S. Preparation and performance of bionanocomposites based on grafted chitosan, GO and TiO2-NPs for removal of lead ions and Basic-red 46. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 305, 120571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Guo, F.; Guo, S.; Niu, Y.; Qiu, G.; Guo, Y.; Li, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, J. Efficient removal of methylene blue via two-step modification hazelnut shell biochar: Process intensification, kinetics and thermodynamics. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2023, 125, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hashem, A.A.; Mahmoud, S.A.; Geioushy, R.A.; Fouad, O.A. Adsorption of malachite green dye over synthesized calcium silicate nanopowders from waste materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2023, 295, 116605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Konopatsky, A.S.; Kalinina, V.V.; Savchenko, A.S.; Leybo, D.V.; Sukhanova, E.V.; Baidyshev, V.S.; Popov, Z.I.; Bondarev, A.V.; Polčák, J.; Shtansky, D.V. Structure, magnetic and adsorption properties of novel FePt/h-BN heteromaterials. Nano Res. 2023, 16, 1473–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Lee, H.; Heo, M.H.; Jeong, H.; Kim, S.Y.; Yuk, J.S.; Park, S.H.; Shin, J. Water-redispersible and high-yield α-chitin nanocrystals isolated using electron-beam irradiation as adsorbents to remove heavy metals and dye. Nanoscale 2023, 15, 10990–11004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Nouri, A.; Ang, W.L.; Mahmoudi, E.; Chua, S.F.; Mohammad, A.W.; Benamor, A.; Ba-Abbad, M.M.; Leo, C.P. Decoration of polylactic acid on graphene oxide for efficient adsorption of methylene blue and tetracycline. Chemosphere 2023, 322, 138219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Quach, T.P.T.; Doan, L. Surface modifications of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles with polyvinyl alcohol, chitosan, and graphene oxide as Methylene Blue adsorbents. Coatings 2023, 13, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Salahshoori, I.; Jorabchi, M.N.; Ghasemi, S.; Mirnezami, S.M.S.; Nobre, M.A.L.; Khonakdar, H.A. Assessing cationic dye adsorption mechanisms on MIL-53 (Al) nanostructured MOF materials using quantum chemical and molecular simulations: Toward environmentally sustainable wastewater treatment. J. Water Proc. Eng. 2023, 55, 104081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Wang, L.; Xue, G.; Ye, T.; Li, J.; Liu, C.; Liu, J.; Ma, P. Zn-modified biochar preparation from solvent free in-situ pyrolysis and its removal of methylene blue. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2023, 140, 110438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Wang, M.; Jiao, Y.; Li, N.; Su, Y. Synthesis of a SiO2-MgO composite material derived from yellow phosphorus slag with excellent malachite green adsorption activity. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 969, 172344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhu, K.; Mohammed, S.; Tang, H.; Xie, Z.; Fang, S.; Liu, S. ZIF-67/SA@PVDF ultrafiltration membrane with simultaneous adsorption and catalytic oxidation for dyes. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Alenad, A.M.; Waheed, M.S.; Aman, S.; Ahmad, N.; Khan, A.R.; Khosa, R.Y.; Ansari, M.Z.; Khan, S.A.; Farid, H.M.T.; Taha, T.A.M. Visible light driven Ni doped hematite for photocatalytic reduction of noxious methylene blue. Mater. Res. Bull. 2023, 165, 112306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Algarni, S.A.; Aman, S.; Ahmad, N.; Khan, S.A.; Farid, H.M.T.; Taha, T.A.M. Processing of Nb doped hematite for visible light photocatalytic reduction of noxious methylene blue. Optik 2023, 287, 171097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Alizadeh, N.; Salimi, A. Simultaneous adsorption and catalytic degradation of methylene blue dye over recyclable Mn4(P2O7)3 nanoflakes: Mechanism and efficiency. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2023, 20, 100806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Al-nayili, A.; Khayoon, H.A.; Alshamsi, H.A.; Cata Saady, N.M. A novel bimetallic (Au-Pd)-decorated reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite enhanced Rhodamine B photocatalytic degradation under solar irradiation. Mater. Today Sustain. 2023, 24, 100512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Bandaru, S.G.; Yathapu, S.; Sathiraju, A.; Ganghishetti, B.; Mangalarapu, T.B.; Singh, A.K. Photoluminescence and photocatalytic studies of rice water and papaya fruit extract-encapsulated cadmium sulfide nanoparticles. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 2023, 60, 183–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Basfer, N.M.; Al-Harbi, N. Structural, optical and photocatalytic activity of Ce3+ doped Co–Mg nanoparticles for wastewater treatment applications. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2023, 35, 102436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Bhatti, M.A.; Tahira, A.; Hullio, A.A.; Aftab, U.; Nafady, A.; Vigolo, B.; Ibupoto, Z.H. Oxygenated terminals of milky sap of Calotropis procera transformed 1D ZnO structure to 0D nanoparticles for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of malachite green and methylene blue. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2023, 34, 929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Biswakarma, D.; Dey, N.; Bhattacharya, S. Hydrogel nanocomposite towards optical sensing of spermine in biomedical and real-life food samples and remediation of toxic dyes from wastewater. Langmuir 2023, 39, 11610–11620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Chellapandi, T.; Roopan, S.M.; Madhumitha, G. Interfacial charge transfer of Carrisa edulis fruit extract capped Co3O4 nanoparticles on the surface of MK30: An efficient photocatalytic removal of methylthioninium chloride and tetracycline organic pollutants. Environ. Res. 2023, 219, 115052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Dang, H.T.M.; Nguyen, M.T.T.; Tran, L.T.; Tran, H.V.; Huynh, C. Synthesis and photocatalytic activity of a lanthanum doped CoFe2O4/TiO2 nanocomposite for photodegradation of methylene blue organic dye. J. Chem. Res. 2023, 47, 17475198221151152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Dhiman, P.; Rana, G.; Kumar, A.; Dawi, E.A.; Sharma, G. Rare earth doped ZnO nanoparticles as spintronics and photo catalyst for degradation of pollutants. Molecules 2023, 28, 2838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Dinker, M.K.; Raut, S.S.; Kulkarni, P.S. Application of ionic mesoporous silica in selective recovery of tungstate ions through column adsorption and subsequent photocatalytic degradation of an organic dye. Environ. Sci. Nano 2023, 10, 1883–1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Dos Santos, D.F.; Santiago, A.G.; Teodoro, M.D.; Motta, F.V.; Bomio, M.R.D. Investigation of the photocatalytic and optical properties of the SrMoO4/g-C3N4 heterostructure obtained via sonochemical synthesis with temperature control. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 325, 116396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ehsan, M.d.F.; Barai, H.R.; Islam, M.d.M.; Susan, M.d.A.B.H.; Joo, S.W.; Miran, M.S. ZnO nanocomposites supported by acid-activated kaolinite as photocatalysts for the enhanced photodegradation of an organic dye. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 36, 106563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. El-Shafai, N.M.; Masoud, M.S.; Ramadan, M.S.; El-Mehasseb, I. Engineering design of n/p-type nano heterojunctions loaded on cotton cellulose nanocrystal surface: Removal of pollutants and supercapacitors applications. J. Energy Storage 2023, 58, 106341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Gadge, A.S.; Janbandhu, S.Y.; Sukhadeve, G.K.; Kumar, R.; Gajbhiye, C.D.; Gedam, R.S. TiO2 nanoparticles for Methylene Blue dye degradation: Effect of calcination temperature. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2023, 12, 086004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Huang, P.; Fang, W.; Yang, L.; Sun, Y.; Yang, H.; Chen, X.-Z.; Zeng, H. Ultralong hydroxyapatite nanowires-based flow-through reactor with high loading of silver nanoparticles for fast continuous catalytic reduction of organic dyes and disinfection of wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 475, 146305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ivanov, K.V.; Noskov, A.V.; Alekseeva, O.V.; Agafonov, A.V. Effect of annealing conditions on the physicochemical and photocatalytic properties of a nanopowder based on Fe2TiO5. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 299, 127493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Jiang, J.; Liang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhao, J.; Hu, J.; Wang, M. In situ mineralization of akageneite (β-FeOOH) on cotton for water purification via Fenton-like reaction. Fibers Polym. 2023, 24, 1641–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Jiang, W.; Xu, Q.; Bu, F.; Wei, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, Y. Fabrication of Fe3O4@APF magnetic nanospheres with tunable core–shell structure: An effective carrier and reducing agent for Ag nanoparticles. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2023, 33, 2562–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Karthik, P.; Ravichandran, S.; Sasikala, V.; Prakash, N.; Mukkannan, A.; Rajesh, J. Effective photodegradation of organic water pollutants by the facile synthesis of Ag2O nanoparticles. Surf. Interfaces 2023, 40, 103088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kaya, M.T.; Calimli, M.H.; Nas, M.S. Degradation of methylene blue with a novel Fe3O4/Mn3O4/CuO nanomaterial under sonocatalytic conditions. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2023, 49, 2549–2568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ma, A.; Qian, H.; Liu, H.; Ren, S. Degradation of malachite green by g-C3N4-modified magnetic attapulgite composites under visible-light conditions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 96360–96375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Ma, D.; Pan, S.; Tan, M.; He, G.; Zhao, J. Shape-controlled synthesis of varied bismuth nanostructures and their size-dependent photocatalytic removal of organic dyes under visible light irradiation. Opt. Mater. 2023, 145, 114433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Magomedova, A.; Isaev, A.; Orudzhev, F.; Alikhanov, N.; Emirov, R.; Rabadanov, M.; Mingshan, Z. Electrochemical synthesis of superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles for the photo-Fenton oxidation of Rhodamine B. ChemistrySelect 2023, 8, e202301694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Malathy, A.; Manikandan, V.; Devanesan, S.; Farhat, K.; Priyadharsan, A.; Ragavendran, C.; Ragupathy, S.; Ranjith, R.; Sivakumar, S. Development of biohybrid Ag2CrO4/rGO based nanocomposites with stable flotation properties as enhanced photocatalyst for sewage treatment and antibiotic-conjugated for antibacterial evaluation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 244, 125303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Maru, M.T.; Gonfa, B.A.; Zelekew, O.A.; Fakrudeen, S.P.; Ananda Murthy, H.C.; Bekele, E.T.; Sabir, F.K. Effect of Musa acuminata peel extract on synthesis of ZnO/CuO nanocomposites for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2023, 16, 2232383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Munusamy, S.; Venkatesan, R.; Divya, S.; Gnanamoorthy, G.; Narayanan, V.; Vivekananthan, V.; Ansar, S.; Oh, T.-H.; Kim, S.-C. Electrochemical and photochemical characteristics of organic dyes and biological molecules at conducting polymer-modified electrodes of indium oxide-polypyrrole nanohybrids. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2023, 297, 116761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Negem, M.; Miller, D.; Irvine, J.; Heakal, F.E.-T. Water/oil nanoemulsion-based synthesis of BixSn6-2xSy (0.33≤×≤2.95) semiconductor QDs for efficient photocatalytic degradation of MB dye. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 58998–59012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Perumal, V.; Uthrakumar, R.; Chinnathambi, M.; Inmozhi, C.; Robert, R.; Rajasaravanan, M.E.; Raja, A.; Kaviyarasu, K. Electron-hole recombination effect of SnO2–CuO nanocomposite for improving methylene blue photocatalytic activity in wastewater treatment under visible light. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2023, 35, 102388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Raveendran Nair, P.; Rosa Santiago Ramirez, C.; Angel Gracia Pinilla, M.; Krishnan, B.; Avellaneda Avellaneda, D.; Fabian Cienfuegos Pelaes, R. Black titanium dioxide nanocolloids by laser irradiation in liquids for visible light photo-catalytic/electrochemical applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 623, 157096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Saeed, M.; Pecho, R.D.C.; Panchal, S.; Alhag, S.K.; Al-Shuraym, L.A.; Al Syaad, K.M.; Bhutta, U.H. Synthesis of Ag-OMS catalyst for sunlight-assisted photodegradation of Crystal Violet dye. Water 2023, 15, 2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Saif, N.; Tariq, A.; Intisar, A.; Batool, Z.; Arshad, M.; ur Rehman, A.; Kousar, R. Green synthesis of SnO2 nanorods and Mo–SnO2 nanocomposite for efficient sunlight driven organic dye photodegradation in aqueous solution. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 305, 127920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Sasikala, V.; Karthik, P.; Ravichandran, S.; Prakash, N.; Rajesh, J.; Mukkannan, A. Effective removal of organic dyes using novel MnWO4 incorporated CA/PCL nanocomposite membranes. Surf. Interfaces 2023, 40, 103008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Selvaraj, S.; Natesan, K.; Bhargav, P.B.; Nafis, A. Revolutionizing water treatment: Exploring the efficacy of MoS2/BN/rGO ternary nanocomposite in organic dye treated water for OER and HER applications. J. Water Proc. Eng. 2023, 54, 104033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Sepúlveda, M.; Saldan, I.; Mahnaz, A.; Cicmancova, V.; Michalicka, J.; Hromadko, L.; Bulánek, R.; Sopha, H.; Macak, J.M. Magnetically guidable single TiO2 nanotube photocatalyst: Structure and photocatalytic properties. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 6764–6771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Sewnet, A.; Alemayehu, E.; Abebe, M.; Mani, D.; Thomas, S.; Kalarikkal, N.; Lennartz, B. Single-step synthesis of graphitic carbon nitride nanomaterials by directly calcining the mixture of urea and thiourea: Application for Rhodamine B (RhB) dye degradation. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Shahanas, T.; Harichandran, G. PEG mediated NiMn2O4 nanomaterials as a nano catalyst for peroxidase mimetic activity and photocatalytic degradation. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2023, 303, 123212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Soltani, S.; Gacem, A.; Choudhary, N.; Yadav, V.K.; Alsaeedi, H.; Modi, S.; Patel, A.; Khan, S.H.; Cabral-Pinto, M.M.S.; Yadav, K.K.; et al. Scallion peel mediated synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles and their applications as nano fertilizer and photocatalyst for removal of organic pollutants from wastewater. Water 2023, 15, 1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Suganthi, S.; Vignesh, S.; Raj, V.; Manoharadas, S.; Pandiaraj, S.; Kim, H. Synergistic influence of vanadium pentoxide-coupled graphitic carbon nitride composite for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutant: Stability and involved Z-scheme mechanism. Environ. Res. 2023, 231, 116288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Sukhadeve, G.K.; Gedam, R.S. Visible light assisted photocatalytic degradation of mixture of reactive ternary dye solution by Zn–Fe co-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Chemosphere 2023, 341, 139990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Syed, N.; Feng, Y.; Fahad, R.; Huang, J.; Mahar, F.K. Carbon-based composite nanofibers for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye under visible light. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2023, 34, 2286–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Tahir, M.Y.; Sillanpaa, M.; Almutairi, T.M.; Mohammed, A.A.A.; Ali, S. Excellent photocatalytic and antibacterial activities of bio-activated carbon decorated magnesium oxide nanoparticles. Chemosphere 2023, 312, 137327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Thambidurai, R.; Gobi, G.; Chandrasekar, M.; Uthrakumar, R.; Inmozhi, C.; Kaviyarasu, K. ZnO nanocomposites containing Cd are synthesized with high photodegradation potential for wastewater treatment. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2023, 35, 102915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Thambidurai, R.; Gobi, G.; Uthrakumar, R.; Inmozhi, C.; Kaviyarasu, K. Characterizations of MnO2 doped TiO2 nanostructures and effective degradation of methylene blue dye under visible light irradiation. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostructures 2023, 18, 869–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Venkatesan, D.; Umasankar, S.; Mangesh, V.L.; Krishnan, P.; Tamizhdurai, P.; Kumaran, R.; Baskaralingam, P. Removal of Toluidine blue in water using green synthesized nanomaterials. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2023, 45, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Wang, Q.; Lu, J.; Yu, M.; Li, H.; Lin, X.; Nie, J.; Lan, N.; Wang, Z. Sulfur vacancy rich MoS2/FeMoO4 composites derived from MIL-53(Fe) as PMS activator for efficient elimination of dye: Nonradical 1O2 dominated mechanism. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 333, 121990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Wu, H.; Yang, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhou, H.; Qin, S.; Pan, J.; Li, C. Preparation of CuO nanosheet array thin film with controlled morphology for SERS and photocatalysis. New J. Chem. 2023, 47, 6602–6611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Yang, M.; Jin, H.; Gui, R. Ag+-doped boron quantum dots with enhanced stability and fluorescence enabling versatile practicality in visual detection, sensing, imaging and photocatalytic degradation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 639, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Zhang, Q.; Wang, D.; Yu, R.; Luo, L.; Li, W.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, Y. Excellent photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B over Bi2O3supported on Zn-MOF nanocomposites under visible light. Green Proc. Synth. 2023, 12, 20228123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Zhao, W.K.; Ma, Z.Q.; Zheng, J.Y.; Han, C.B.; Zhou, K.L.; Hao, M.Y.; Fang, D.C.; Xia, Y.; Yan, H. Dual-functional MnS2/MnO2 heterostructure catalyst for efficient acidic hydrogen evolution reaction and assisted degradation of organic wastewater. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 87, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Zheng, J.Y.; He, J.; Han, C.B.; Huang, G.; Sun, B.C.; Zhao, W.K.; Wang, Y.; Sun, L.; Si, J.; Yan, H. Adsorption-enhanced catalytic oxidation for long-lasting dynamic degradation of organic dyes by porous manganese-based biopolymeric catalyst. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 237, 124152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Basta, A.H.; Lotfy, V.F. Sustainable development of pulping by-product for limiting its pollution risk and production new aerogel-based carbon nanostructures for dyes adsorption. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 428, 139275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Hua, Z.; Tang, L.; Wu, M.; Fu, J. Graphene hydrogel improves S. putrefaciens’ biological treatment of dye wastewater: Impacts of extracellular electron transfer and function of c-type cytochromes. Environ. Res. 2023, 236, 116739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Li, X.-Y.; Wang, W.-R.; Xue, R.-C.; Chen, P.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Yu, L.-P. Carbon dots/silica nanoaggregates for highly efficient adsorption of alizarin red S and malachite green dyes. New J. Chem. 2023, 47, 8965–8973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Oviedo, L.R.; Oviedo, V.R.; Dalla Nora, L.D.; da Silva, W.L. Adsorption of organic dyes onto nanozeolites: A machine learning study. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 315, 123712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Poornachandhra, C.; Jayabalakrishnan, R.M.; Balasubramanian, G.; Lakshmanan, A.; Selvakumar, S.; Maheswari, M.; John, J.E. Coconut husk fiber: A low-cost bioresource for the synthesis of high-value nanocellulose. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2023, 13, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Sharma, A.; Mittal, R.; Sharma, P.; Pal, K.; Mona, S. Sustainable approach for adsorptive removal of cationic and anionic dyes by titanium oxide nanoparticles synthesized biogenically using algal extract of Spirulina. Nanotechnology 2023, 34, 485301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Kallem, P.; Elashwah, N.; Bharath, G.; Hegab, H.M.; Hasan, S.W.; Banat, F. Zwitterion-grafted 2D MXene (Ti3C2TX) nanocomposite membranes with improved water permeability and self-cleaning properties. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023, 6, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Lim, J.H.X.; Goh, K.; Ng, D.Y.F.; Chew, J.; Wang, R. Layer-by-layer hierarchically structured nanofibrous membrane scaffolds incorporating metal-organic framework and carbon nanotube adsorbents for high-performance versatile organic solvent recovery. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 404, 136925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Natesan, G.; Rajappan, K. GO–CuO nanocomposites assimilated into CA–PES polymer membrane in adsorptive removal of organic dyes from wastewater. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 42658–42678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Zhao, D.L.; Jin, H.; Zhao, Q.; Xu, Y.; Shen, L.; Lin, H.; Chung, T.-S. Smart integration of MOFs and CQDs to fabricate defect-free and self-cleaning TFN membranes for dye removal. J. Membr. Sci. 2023, 679, 121706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Aadil, M.; Kousar, T.; Hussain, M.; Somaily, H.H.; Abdulla, A.K.; Muhammad, E.R.; Al-Abbad, E.A.; Salam, M.A.; Albukhari, S.M.; Baamer, D.F.; et al. Generation of mesoporous n-p-n (ZnO–CuO–CeO2) heterojunction for highly efficient photodegradation of micro-organic pollutants. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 4846–4854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Ahmad, I.; Safdar, M.; Yasmin, N.; Iftikhar, A.; Kalsoom, A.; Khalid, S.; Shams, Z.E.; Mirza, M. Rare earth ions (La3+,Nd3+) substituted cobalt–strontium spinel ferrites for photocatalytic degradation of textile dyes. Water Pract. Technol. 2023, 18, 1742–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Alp, E.; Borazan, İ. The production of highly efficient visible-light-driven electrospun α-Fe2O3 photocatalyst through modifying iron source material for wastewater treatment applications. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2023, 70, 1510–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Bibi, S.; Shah, S.S.; Muhammad, F.; Siddiq, M.; Kiran, L.; Aldossari, S.A.; Sheikh Salek Mushab, M.; Sarwar, S. Cu-doped mesoporous TiO2 photocatalyst for efficient degradation of organic dye via visible light photocatalysis. Chemosphere 2023, 339, 139583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Desseigne, M.; Chevallier, V.; Madigou, V.; Coulet, M.-V.; Heintz, O.; Ait Ahsaine, H.; Arab, M. Plasmonic photocatalysts based on Au nanoparticles and WO3 for visible light-induced photocatalytic activity. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Devendrapandi, G.; Padmanaban, D.; Thanikasalam, R.; Panneerselvam, A.; Palraj, R.; Rajabathar, J.R.; Rajendiran, N.; Balu, R.; Oh, T.H.; Ramasundaram, S. Direct sunlight induced room temperature synthesis of anticancer and catalytic silver nanoparticles by shrimp shell waste derived chitosan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 252, 126205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Elumalai, G.; Maruthai, J.; Jayaraman, K.; Ramachandran, K.; Mathiyalagan, K. Basella alba leaves-assisted eco-fabrication of Ag/ZnO nanocomposites for anti-bactericidal activity and catalytic degradation of anthropogenic pollutants. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2023, 46, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Koca, F.D.; Muhy, H.M.; Halici, M.G. Synthesis of hybrid Cu nanoflowers by using Tornabea scutellifera lichen extract, and evaluation of their dye degredation, and antioxidant activities. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2023, 160, 394–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Kumar, A.; Rawat, R.K.; Chauhan, P. Hierarchical α-MoO3: A versatile eco-friendly material for humidity-assisted ammonia sensing and efficient catalytic activity in wastewater treatment. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 676, 132147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Lei, H.; Cui, X.; Jia, X.; Qi, J.; Wang, Z.; Chen, W. Enhanced tribocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants by ZnO nanoparticles of high crystallinity. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Long, L.; Xu, K.; Bing Tan, K.; Cai, D.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, S.-F.; Zhan, G. Highly active Mn-Cu bimetallic oxide catalyst assembled as 3D-printed monolithic agitating paddles for advanced oxidation process. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2023, 266, 118278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Lu, Y.; Qin, X.; Hong, J. Synergistic effects of multiple heterojunctions and dopant atom for enhancing the photocatalytic activity of C-modified Zn-doped TiO2 nanofiber film. Coatings 2023, 13, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Mansur, A.A.P.; Custódio, D.A.C.; Dorneles, E.M.S.; Coura, F.M.; Carvalho, I.C.; Lage, A.P.; Mansur, H.S. Nanoplexes of ZnS quantum dot-poly-L-lysine/iron oxide nanoparticle-carboxymethylcellulose for photocatalytic degradation of dyes and antibacterial activity in wastewater treatment. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 231, 123363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Maro, C.A.G.; Gálvez, H.E.G.; Olivas, O.J.N.; Morales, M.L.; Hernández, D.V.; Flores, H.G.; Carmona, V.M.O.; Chinchillas, M.J.C. Peumus boldus used in the synthesis of ZnO semiconductor nanoparticles and their evaluation in organic contaminants. Materials 2023, 16, 4344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Najafidoust, A.; Haghighi, M.; Abbasi Asl, E.; Bananifard, H. Sono-precipitation dispersion of CuO-doped ZnO nanostructures over SiO2-aerogel for photo-removal of methylene blue, congo red and methyl orange from wastewater. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2023, 131, 346–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Nascimento Júnior, W.J.; de Aguiar, G.H.; Landers, R.; Vieira, M.G.A.; Motta Sobrinho, M.A. Potential of the main magnetic iron oxides synthesized over graphene oxide in integrated adsorption and photocatalysis of inorganic and organic emergent contaminants. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 671, 131647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Nayak, R.R.; Gupta, T.; Chauhan, R.P. Organic waste peel–assisted synthesis of ZnSe nanoparticles for solar-driven photocatalytic degradation of cationic and anionic dye. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 88167–88179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Özcan, S.; Süngü Akdoğan, Ç.Z.; Polat, M.; Kip, Ç.; Tuncel, A. A new multimodal magnetic nanozyme and a reusable peroxymonosulfate oxidation catalyst: Manganese oxide coated-monodisperse-porous and magnetic core-shell microspheres. Chemosphere 2023, 341, 140034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Rahmatian, N.; Abbasi, S.; Tavakkoli Yaraki, M.; Abbasi, N. Echinophora platyloba extract-mediated green synthesis of silver nanoparticles: Fine-tuning the size towards enhanced catalytic and antibacterial properties. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 391, 123327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Rani, M.; Keshu; Shanker, U. Efficient visible light photocatalytic organic colorants elimination performance induced by biosynthesized titanium dioxide coupled cadmium sulfide nanostructures. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 20, 5491–5508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Safo, K.; Noby, H.; Mitsuhara, M.; Naragino, H.; El-Shazly, A.H. H2O2 assisted steel slag nanocomposite for degradation of organic pollutant in an advanced oxidation process for suspension and Spin-Coated mode. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2023, 20, 100836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Shaik, M.R.; Aldhuwayhi, F.N.; Al-Mohaimeed, A.M.; Hatshan, M.R.; Kuniyil, M.; Adil, S.F.; Khan, M. Morphology controlled deposition of vanadium oxide (VOx) nanoparticles on the surface of highly reduced graphene oxide for the photocatalytic degradation of hazardous organic dyes. Materials 2023, 16, 6340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Song, C.-L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.-N.; Zhang, G.; Yang, Y.-W. Hydrazide–pillar [5]arene-mediated silver nanoparticles for highly efficient reductive degradation of organic dyes. Supramol. Mater. 2023, 2, 100035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Torres-Torres, K.; Nash-Montes, V.I.; Luciano-Velázquez, J.; Bailón-Ruiz, S.J. Photocatalysis degradation of Remazol Brilliant Blue R and Brilliant Green by zinc-based nanomaterials. MRS Adv. 2023, 8, 392–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Stanley, R.; Balu, S.K.; Alphas, J.J.; Manisha Vidyavathy, S. Super-efficient photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue, methyl orange and rhodamine B dyes using low-cost ZnO–MgO nanocomposite under natural sunlight and its bactericidal activity. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2023, 49, 2583–2602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Yadav, S.; Rani, N.; Saini, K. Coupling ZnO with CuO for efficient organic pollutant removal. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 71984–72008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Yousefi, F.; Haghighi, M.; Shabani, M. Potato-on-rod like of Z-scheme plasmon Ag2CrO4-Ag2Mo2O7 heterojunction nanophotocatalyst with high stability and accelerated photo-degradation evolution of organic contaminants. Environ. Res. 2023, 236, 116853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Zhao, S.-Z.; Yang, Y.; Lu, R.; Wang, Y.; Huang, H.-L.; Hu, Y.-D.; Rodriguez, R.D.; Chen, J.-J. Bi2O3/Bi2O2.33@ECNF: A recyclable material for efficient adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 674, 131912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 2. Percentage of reusability of SONO-CFL/CN nanomaterial.
Table 2. Percentage of reusability of SONO-CFL/CN nanomaterial.
CycleAdsorptionSono-Sorption
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
78.4
60.4
59.9
57.4
96.2
87.6
76.5
74.7
Experimental conditions: 0.02 g adsorbent/50 mL solution. Time: 30 min. Temperature: 25 °C. Initial dye concentration: 20 mg/L. pH: 2.0 ± 0–5. From [64].
Table 3. Dye uptake (mg/g) using zinc or copper ferrites in nanoparticulated form.
Table 3. Dye uptake (mg/g) using zinc or copper ferrites in nanoparticulated form.
NanoparticleAlizarin Red SThiazol Yellog GCongo RedMethyl Orange
ZnFe2O4
CuFe2O4
54.6
46.4
37.0
30.1
29.8
21.9
26.8
20.8
From [69].
Table 4. Summary of the use of nanomaterials in the removal of anionic dyes.
Table 4. Summary of the use of nanomaterials in the removal of anionic dyes.
MethodologyAnionic DyeReference
AdsorptionAcid Yellow 36, Acid Orange 6
Reactive Red 21, Reactive Blue 19
Congo Red
Alizarin Red S
Reactive Yellow 145, Reactive Red 195
a Various (industrial wastewater)
Methyl Orange
Congo Red, Brilliant Blue G-250
[60]
[60]
[61,63,106]
[62,64,65,67,68,71,72,73,74]
[66]
[69]
[70]
[74]
(Photo)-catalysisCongo Red, Alizarin Red S
Methyl Orange

Brilliant Blue
Reactive Red, Orange II
Orange G
Congo Red,Methyl Red
Reactive Black 5
AR88
Napthol Blue Black
Auramine O, Xylenol Orange
Tripan Blue
Red 195
[74,75,78,82,83,84,90,91,94,99,101]
[77,78,79,81,82,85,86,87,92,93,96,97,98,102,105]
[80]
[88]
[89]
[90]
[95]
[100]
[103]
[104]
[106]
[107]
a Alizarin Yellow R, Thiazole Yellow G, Congo Red, and Methyl Orange.
Table 5. Some efficiencies in the removal of anionic dyes using (photo)-catalysis.
Table 5. Some efficiencies in the removal of anionic dyes using (photo)-catalysis.
DyeNanomaterialEfficiency/TimeReference
Congo Red


Methyl Orange




Reactive Red
Orange II
Tripan Blue
Cu oxide nanoparticles
ZnO-CuFe2O4-CNTs
Eu-TiO2
N-Ti3C2MXene
Y2O3-SiO2
Various nanomaterials
Carbon dots
Biochar-BiOCl
Ag-Fe2O3
Ag-Fe2O3
Cd,Ti oxides-Ionic liquid
93%/2 h
82%/2 h
97%/75 min
98%/20 min
52%/45 min
67%/3 h
98%/7 h
100%/1 h
98%/2 h
98%/2 h
100%/1 h
[75]
[76]
[99]
[81]
[87]
[95]
[98]
[105]
[88]
[88]
[106]
Table 6. Influence of the calcination temperature on Basic Fuchsin uptake.
Table 6. Influence of the calcination temperature on Basic Fuchsin uptake.
Temperature, °CDye Uptake, mg/g
No calcination
500
700
239.8
178.4
93.2
From [109].
Table 7. Efficiency in the removal of Methylene Blue, Methylene Violet and Brilliant Green, after 24 h, with different FePt/h-BN heteromaterials.
Table 7. Efficiency in the removal of Methylene Blue, Methylene Violet and Brilliant Green, after 24 h, with different FePt/h-BN heteromaterials.
SampleMethylene BlueMethylene VioletBrilliant Green
Boron nitride
as-synthesized FPB
FPB annealed at 500 °C
FPB annealed at 700 °C
100
74.3
77.5
66.4
100
80
71.7
79.9
41.7
100
100
100
From [114].
Table 8. Percentage of degradation, under UV-visible light, of Methylene Blue using various BixSn6-2xSy formulations.
Table 8. Percentage of degradation, under UV-visible light, of Methylene Blue using various BixSn6-2xSy formulations.
Material0 h10 min0.25 h1 h3 h
SnS
Bi0.3Sn5.34S5.8
BiSn4S5.5
0
0
0
no data
no data
100
68
43
100
86
50
100
93
82
100
From [150].
Table 11. Percentages of dyes degradation using various Co0.5Sr0.5RExFe2-xO4 formulations.
Table 11. Percentages of dyes degradation using various Co0.5Sr0.5RExFe2-xO4 formulations.
NanomaterialCongo RedRhodamine B
Co0.5Sr0.5Fe2O4
Co0.5Sr0.5La0.06Fe1.94O4
Co0.5Sr0.5Nd0.06Fe1.94O4
73
81
90
45
67
85
Time: One hour. From [185].
Table 12. Efficiency in the removal of dyes with the steel slag nanocomposite.
Table 12. Efficiency in the removal of dyes with the steel slag nanocomposite.
Dye% Efficiency
Methylene Blue
Methyl Red
Rhodamine B
Congo Red
Acid Blue 25
Methyl Orange
85.8
74.5
70.5
58.7
45.2
40.4
Time: one hour. Neutral pH. From [204].
Table 13. Summary of methodologies and anionic and cationic dyes used in the investigations.
Table 13. Summary of methodologies and anionic and cationic dyes used in the investigations.
MethodologyDyesReference
AdsorptionMethylene Blue, Brilliant Blue
Methyl Orange, Methylene Blue
Alizarin Red S, Malachite Green
Crystal Violet, Acridine Orange
MB, CR, CV, MR
Methyl Orange, Malachite Green
[174]
[175]
[176]
[177]
[178]
[179]

Membranes
Congo Red, Methylene Blue


MO, RB, MB
MB, RhB, MO, CR
MB, MeB, MO
[180]


[181]
[182]
[183]
(Photo)-catalysis
Crystal Violet, Methyl Orange
Congo Red, Rhodamine B
Rhodamine B, Methyl Orange
Congo Red, Methylene Blue
MB, RhB, MO
Methylene Blue, Methyl Orange
Methylene Blue, Brilliant Blue
RhB, MV, MeB, MO
MB, RhB, EY, GV
MB, MO, RhB, MG
MB, MO, CR, RhB
MB, MO, CR
MB, CV, TY
MB, CR, RhB, MeR
MB, MeR, RhB, CR, AB25, MO
MB, RhB, Rh6G, MO
RBBR, BG
NO, RhB, CV, MO
Methyl Orange, Rhodamine B

[184]
[185,203]
[186]
[187,200]
[188,189,197,201,208,209]
[190,192,205]
[191]
[193]
[194]
[195]
[196]
[198]
[199]
[202]
[204]
[206]
[207]
[210]
[211]
AB25: Acid Blue 25. BG: Brilliant Green. CR: Congo Red. CV: Crystal Violet. EY: Eosin Y. GV: Gentian Violet. MB: Methylene Blue. MeB: Methyl Blue. MeR: Methyl Red. MG: Malachite Green. MO: Methyl Orange MR: Methyl Red. MV. Methyl Violet. NO: Napthol Orange. RBBR: Ramazol Brillian Blue R. RhB: Rhodamine B. Rh6G: Rhodamine 6G. RS: Rose Bengal. TY: Tartarzine yellow.
Table 14. Some maximum capacities of dyes on nanomaterials.
Table 14. Some maximum capacities of dyes on nanomaterials.
Congo Red, mg/gReferenceMethylene Blue, mg/gReference
17.8
47.4
57.8
3017
4334
8300
[67]
[62]
[68]
[71]
[74]
[73]
5.78
36.4
332
477
736
[129]
[177]
[116]
[119]
[112]
Table 15. Some strange thermodynamic values taken from the literature.
Table 15. Some strange thermodynamic values taken from the literature.
ΔH◦, kJ/molΔS◦Reference
−3.1689
54.996
3.568
7.09731
−0.0112 J/K·mol
0.283 kJ/K·mol
0.0278 kJ/K·mol
40.4502 J/K·mol
[112]
[116]
[119]
[179]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alguacil, F.J.; Alonso, M.; Robla, J.I. Removal of Hazardous Organic Dyes from Liquid Wastes Using Advanced Nanomaterials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 9671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179671

AMA Style

Alguacil FJ, Alonso M, Robla JI. Removal of Hazardous Organic Dyes from Liquid Wastes Using Advanced Nanomaterials. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(17):9671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179671

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alguacil, Francisco Jose, Manuel Alonso, and Jose Ignacio Robla. 2024. "Removal of Hazardous Organic Dyes from Liquid Wastes Using Advanced Nanomaterials" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 17: 9671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179671

APA Style

Alguacil, F. J., Alonso, M., & Robla, J. I. (2024). Removal of Hazardous Organic Dyes from Liquid Wastes Using Advanced Nanomaterials. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(17), 9671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25179671

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop