Next Article in Journal
The Oral Microbiota, Microbial Metabolites, and Immuno-Inflammatory Mechanisms in Cardiovascular Disease
Previous Article in Journal
De Novo RB1 Germline Variant in Retinoblastoma with Two Subsequent Independent Neoplasms: Case Report and Literature Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Contrast Relative Humidity Response of Diverse Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) Genotypes: Deep Study Using RNAseq Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “Advances in the Physiology of Primary and Secondary Plant Metabolism Under Abiotic and Biotic Stress”

by
Natalia Zagoskina
K.A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 127276 Moscow, Russia
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(22), 12339; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212339
Submission received: 5 November 2024 / Accepted: 13 November 2024 / Published: 17 November 2024
One of the most relevant areas of biology is the study of plant adaptation processes to the action of various stress factors of abiotic and biotic nature, which is reflected in the works of molecular biologists, geneticists, microbiologists, plant physiologists, and biochemists, as well as biotechnologists [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Considerable attention is paid to assessing the effects of temperature conditions (especially high temperatures), light exposure (intensity, duration, qualitative composition), UV radiation, drought, ozone, heavy metals, soil salinization, pathogens, and other influences [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. All of them have a significant and often negative impact on the ecology, including the vital activity and productivity of plants. In the case of agricultural crops of industrial use, this is accompanied by significant losses in their productivity and the quality of the substances obtained. We must not forget that plants make a significant contribution to the preservation of a comfortable environment for the vital activity of various organisms and are also producers of both primary (amino acids, carbohydrates, lipids, etc.) and secondary (polyphenols, terpenoids, alkaloids, etc.) metabolites for food and medicinal use [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. All these compounds are important and necessary for the health of the world’s population, which requires studying the peculiarities of their formation, including under stress conditions [28,29,30,31,32].
This Special Issue presents two reviews and eleven original research papers with great scientific potential. Each article reflects new and original innovative approaches to assessing the effects of various stress factors on plants, demonstrating the development of this scientific field through the successful use of not only classical physiological, biochemical, and genetic methods but also the most modern molecular biological and metabolomic approaches.
Oxygen is important and necessary for the vital activity of plants [33,34,35,36]. Only under certain conditions can they exist in conditions of its deficiency or even complete absence [37,38,39,40]. In a review by Yemelyanov et al. [41] various aspects of plant adaptation to oxygen deficiency are considered, paying great attention to their metabolomics. The latest achievements in the field of the specificity of plant metabolic profiles during the lack of oxygen, native hypoxia, and reoxygenation are presented. The issues of oxidative stress metabolism are considered. It is noted that in the study of metabolites and/or metabolic pathways specific to the processes of hypoxia and/or anoxia, in addition to the already traditional metabolic subspecies, a discipline such as fluxomics should be distinguished, which allows quantifying metabolic flows.
The unique secondary metabolites of plants synthesized in all plant cells include various polyphenols [42,43,44,45]. Their functional role is associated with the processes of photosynthesis, respiration, hormonal regulation, resistance, and stress adaptation [46]. They are extremely diverse in chemical properties and biological activity, and their composition and content depend on the species of plants and the growing and environmental conditions. The presented review provides information on various classes of polyphenols, their structure, properties, antioxidant activity, and biosynthesis, including molecular genetic aspects (genes, transfactors, etc.), the effect of various abiotic factors (light, UV radiation, temperature, heavy metals) on their accumulation and composition, as well as metabolic regulation. Information is provided on plant polyphenols as important and necessary components of functional nutrition and pharmaceutically valuable substances for public health. Proposals on promising areas of research and development in the field of plant polyphenols are presented.
One of the important areas of biological research is the study of the plants’ adaptation mechanisms to stress, as well as the search for factors and/or regulators that contribute to reducing their negative effects [47,48,49,50]. In this case, not only classical physiological and biochemical research methods are used, but also molecular genetics and metabolomic methods [51,52,53,54]. Various abiotic and biotic factors, as well as substances synthesized directly in plant cells, can act as regulators of stress reactions [55,56,57,58,59,60]. These include extracellular polysaccharides (EPSs) isolated from the submerged cultures of twenty basidiomycete strains assigned to thirteen species and eight genera [61]. The treatment of wheat seedlings with EPS preparations improved their growth, increased the activity of antioxidant enzymes (peroxidase, superoxide dismutase), and influenced the level of lipid peroxidation and accumulation of polyphenols. All this indicates the phytostimulating activity of EPSs (extracellular metabolites produced in the xylotrophic basidiomycete cultures) and the possibility of their successful use as stress-protective compounds.
Original data are presented on the role of anthraquinone parietin in maintaining the viability of lichen Xanthoria parietina during dehydration [62]. In its absence, there was an increase in lipid peroxidation and a decrease in membrane stability during thalli drying, which is not typical for its accumulation. Highly pigmented lichens had thicker cell walls and higher water retention capacity relative to thalli with low pigmentation levels. All this indicates the important role of such a secondary metabolic compound as parietin in the resistance of X. parietina to dehydration.
Essential oils (Eos), which are successfully used in medicine, food, cosmetics, the perfume industry, and agriculture, are of great interest [63,64,65,66,67]. The regulation of their accumulation in plants, including under stressful conditions (different humidity levels, elevated temperatures), was studied in Anethum graveolens plants grown under control conditions or treated with cytokinin (6-benzylaminopurine) [68]. A change in the morphology of leaf plates, the inhibition of flowering, an increase in the content of Eos and its main components α-fellandren and p-cymen in leaves, and limonene in the umbrellas and fruits of plants were noted. At the same time, the increased accumulation of Eos in dill leaves was longer with sufficient moisture. On the contrary, under conditions of heat and water deficiency, the effect of cytokinin treatment on the accumulation of Eos in leaves was short-lived and did not manifest itself on umbellets and fruits. All this indicates a change in the adaptive properties of A. graveolens after treatment, prolonging the “youth” of vegetative organs and the ability to biosynthesize Eos under conditions of sufficient moisture.
Chitosan is one of the exogenous bioelicitors that protect plants from stress [69,70,71,72]. To a large extent, its effectiveness is associated with the activation of the secondary metabolites’ accumulation, including phenolic compounds. On plants Salvia abrotanoides Karel and S. yangii. The effects of chitosan and water stress were studied by HPLC and transcriptomics to predict the patterns of phenolic flavonoids and the accumulation of terpenoid components [73]. It was shown that the use of bioelicitor on leaves at doses of 100 and 200 mg/L under conditions of good watering and moderate stress increased the content of hydroxyl cryptotanshinone (OH-CT) and cryptotanshinone (CT) as the main terpenoid components in both species. Under these conditions, there were changes in the activity of some genes in their biosynthesis (DXS2, HMGR, KSL). The thesis is put forward that the action of chitosan can lead to various effects in the adaptation of plants to a stressor, depending on the method of processing and concentration, as well as the conditions of their growth and species specificity.
Another actively developing area in the field of physiology and biochemistry of stress reactions of plants is the assessment of their adaptation to the heavy metals’ action [17,54,74,75,76]. These studies are especially important in connection with significant changes in the ecology of the environment, which requires the development of systems for its protection [77,78]. Using Nicotiana tabacum plants, the long-term impact of copper sulfate on their physiological state, copper content, activity of antioxidant enzymes, accumulation of polyphenols, and tissue lignification during 40 days of cultivation was studied [79]. Changes in metabolic activity under the stress of this metal were more pronounced in the axial organs of plants (roots, stems) and were associated with the composition and amount of phenolic compounds and lignin. The increases in the amounts of ferulic, cinnamic, and p-coumaric acids in root tissues in response to an excess of copper can be considered markers of the lignification process [80]. Analysis of the individual components of the phenolic complex and their distribution in the axial organs of N. tabacum indicate that prolonged exposure to copper led to specific changes in the spectrum of phenolic compounds and the amount of lignin.
The study of the separate and complex effects of various concentrations of aluminum (0 mM, 0.4 mM, and 1 mM) and calcium (0.8 mM and 5.6 mM) was carried out on tea plants (Camellia sinensis), evaluating root growth, amino acid and phenolic compound content, and gene expression [81]. According to the data obtained, calcium had a stressful effect on plants, inhibited root growth, and led to metabolic disorders, mainly reducing the content of most amino acids and organic acids in roots, stems, and leaves. According to literature data, the reaction of plants to the action of calcium depends on its concentration, duration of exposure, type of crop, and growing conditions [82,83]. Under the action of aluminum, root growth increased, as did the accumulation of valuable metabolites of a phenolic nature, and this effect depended on the concentration of the metal. In general, calcium stress caused severe growth inhibition and metabolic disorders in C. sinensis, which could have been prevented by the action of aluminum, especially with regard to the preservation of root tips and the accumulation of secondary metabolites.
The regulation of plant metabolism is important for maintaining the viability of plants under the influence of biotic stress factors, which has been studied by the example of the action of gall-forming insects (Caillardia azurea, Asiodiplosis noxia, Caillardia robusta, Aceria haloxylonis) on Haloxylon aphyllum and H. persicum. [84]. Under conditions of biotic stress, changes in almost all anatomical structures of shoots were noted, which were less pronounced in H. persicum than in H. aphyllum. At the same time, the biosynthesis of fatty acids and γ-tocopherol was activated in H. aphyllum, whereas H. persicum also contains dialkyl esters, carbohydrates and their derivatives, aromatic acids, phytosterols, polyphenols, and terpenoids. All this indicates a more pronounced modulation of metabolic pathways in H. persicum, which plays a crucial role in increasing its survival and growth under biotic stress. The need for research into the interaction of insects and plants, as well as the study of the impact of gall formers on their metabolism and resistance, has been reported in the literature [85,86].
Of particular interest is the work performed on Nicotiana tabacum transgenic plants overexpressing the choline oxidase gene from Arthrobacter globiformis to assess the effect of salt stress [87]. The biochemical, cytological, and molecular biological characteristics of transgenic and wild-type (WT) plant leaves were determined. An important effect was the correction of the rate of transgenic codA line development under salt exposure, the restoration of the plastid structural organization, accompanied by an increase in the amount of chlorophylls, and the regulation of concomitant systems of primary and secondary metabolism. All these data once again confirm the value of using transgenic plants as model systems for studying adaptation to stress [88,89].
Another area of research presented in this Special Issue is the study of the morphometric characteristics and genetic variability of the ISSR marker in Rhodiola rosea from various ecological and geographical zones of the Altai Republic. The plants were harvested in undisturbed territories as well as after grazing, that is, under conditions of anthropogenic impact [90]. The variability of morphometric characteristics of living pubescent female plants of the R. rosea was assessed, and a comparative analysis of genetic variability in cenopopulations was carried out. Based on the data obtained, the authors conclude that it is necessary to protect the R. rosea gene pool in the Altai Republic under anthropogenic stress. The impact of anthropogenic factors on various plant communities is one of the environmental problems, and the study of these issues has important fundamental and practical significance [91,92]. The material on the temporal and geographical dynamics of potato virus Y (PVY) diversity in Russia is also original [93]. This viral pathogen of potato has several genetic variants and geographic distributions that can be influenced by environmental factors, aphid vectors, and reservoir plants [94,95]. The PVY populations transmitted by aphids to potato plants in various climatic zones of Russia, namely the Moscow and Astrakhan regions, were studied. At the same time, a significantly greater diversity of PVY isolates was found in the Astrakhan region, where winters are shorter and milder and summers are warmer compared to the Moscow region. Data on their specific types are provided. All these recombinants were composed of the genome sections derived from PVY types O and N, but no full-length sequences of such types were present.
In conclusion, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the authors for their interest and trust during the submission, review, and acceptance of articles for publication. The contribution of the administrative staff, editors, and all other employees of the International Journal of Molecular Sciences is also important; their prompt and responsible work, as well as assistance in resolving various issues, contributed to the preparation of this Special Issue. Thanks to this common work, we can gain new knowledge in this interesting and exciting area of research, as well as come closer to understanding the mechanisms of plant adaptation to stress effects of various natures.

Funding

This research was supported by the assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation No 122042600086-7 (IPP RAS).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Anderson, J.T.; Song, B.H. Plant adaptation to climate change—Where are we? J. Syst. Evol. 2020, 58, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ali, S.; Mehmood, A.; Khan, N. Uptake, translocation, and consequences of nanomaterials on plant growth and stress adaptation. J. Nanomater. 2021, 2021, 6677616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hou, Z.; Shi, F.; Ge, S.; Tao, J.; Ren, L.; Wu, H.; Zong, S. Comparative transcriptome analysis of the newly discovered insect vector of the pine wood nematode in China, revealing putative genes related to host plant adaptation. BMC Genom. 2021, 22, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ibrahimova, U.; Kumari, P.; Yadav, S.; Rastogi, A.; Antala, M.; Suleymanova, Z.; Zivcak, M.; Arif, M.T.-U.; Hussain, S.; Abdelhamid, M.; et al. Progress in understanding salt stress response in plants using biotechnological tools. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 329, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Siddiqui, M.N.; Léon, J.; Naz, A.A.; Ballvora, A. Genetics and genomics of root system variation in adaptation to drought stress in cereal crops. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 1007–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ghosh, U.K.; Islam, M.N.; Siddiqui, M.N.; Cao, X.; Khan, M.A.R. Proline, a multifaceted signalling molecule in plant responses to abiotic stress: Understanding the physiological mechanisms. Plant Biol. 2022, 24, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Paz-Ares, J.; Puga, M.I.; Rojas-Triana, M.; Martinez-Hevia, I.; Diaz, S.; Poza-Carrión, C.; Minambres, M.; Leyva, A. Plant adaptation to low phosphorus availability: Core signaling, crosstalks, and applied implications. Mol. Plant 2022, 15, 104–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Raza, A. Metabolomics: A systems biology approach for enhancing heat stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2022, 41, 741–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Feng, H.; Tan, J.; Deng, Z. Decoding plant adaptation: Deubiquitinating enzymes UBP12 and UBP13 in hormone signaling, light response, and developmental processes. J. Exp. Bot. 2024, 75, 721–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Renziehausen, T.; Frings, S.; Schmidt-Schippers, R. ‘Against all floods’: Plant adaptation to flooding stress and combined abiotic stresses. Plant J. 2024, 117, 1836–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Moore, C.E.; Meacham-Hensold, K.; Lemonnier, P.; Slattery, R.A.; Benjamin, C.; Bernacchi, C.J.; Lawson, T.; Cavanagh, A.P. The effect of increasing temperature on crop photosynthesis: From enzymes to ecosystems. J. Exp. Bot. 2021, 72, 2822–2844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Roeber, V.M.; Bajaj, I.; Rohde, M.; Schmülling, T.; Cortleven, A. Light acts as a stressor and influences abiotic and biotic stress responses in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 645–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Freitas, T.R.; Santos, J.A.; Silva, A.P.; Fraga, H. Influence of climate change on chestnut trees: A Review. Plants 2021, 10, 1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ferreyra, M.L.F.; Serra, P.; Casati, P. Recent advances on the roles of flavonoids as plant protective molecules after UV and high light exposure. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 173, 736–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gorshkov, V.; Tsers, I. Plant susceptible responses: The underestimated side of plant–pathogen interactions. Biol. Rev. 2022, 97, 45–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Balasubramaniam, T.; Shen, G.; Esmaeili, N.; Zhang, H. Plants’ response mechanisms to salinity stress. Plants 2023, 12, 2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Goncharuk, E.A.; Zagoskina, N.V. Heavy metals, their phytotoxicity, and the role of phenolic antioxidants in plant stress responses with focus on cadmium: Review. Molecules 2023, 28, 3921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guo, C.; Wang, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, Z.; Xie, B.; Xu, L.; Zhang, R. Plant defense mechanisms against ozone stress: Insights from secondary metabolism. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2024, 217, 105553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Clemente-Suárez, V.J.; Mielgo-Ayuso, J.; Martín-Rodríguez, A.; Ramos-Campo, D.J.; Redondo-Flórez, L.; Tornero-Aguilera, J.F. The burden of carbohydrates in health and disease. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kirui, A.; Zhao, W.; Deligey, F.; Yang, H.; Kang, X.; Mentink-Vigier, F.; Wang, T. Carbohydrate-aromatic interface and molecular architecture of lignocellulose. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Parikh, P.; Semba, R.; Manary, M.; Swaminathan, S.; Udomkesmalee, E.; Bos, R.; Poh, B.K.; Rojroongwasinkul, N.; Geurts, J.; Sekartini, R.; et al. Animal source foods, rich in essential amino acids, are important for linear growth and development of young children in low-and middle-income countries. Matern. Child Nutr. 2022, 18, e13264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shahidi, F.; Hossain, A. Role of lipids in food flavor generation. Molecules 2022, 27, 5014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shi, M.; Gu, J.; Wu, H.; Rauf, A.; Emran, T.B.; Khan, Z.; Mitra, S.; Aljoham, A.S.M.; Alhumaydhi, F.A.; Al-Awthan, Y.S.; et al. Phytochemicals, nutrition, metabolism, bioavailability, and health benefits in lettuce—A comprehensive review. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Indriyani, N.N.; Anshori, J.A.; Permadi, N.; Nurjanah, S.; Julaeha, E. Bioactive components and their activities from different parts of Citrus aurantifolia (christm.) Swingle for food development. Foods 2023, 12, 2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Casado, N.; Casado-Hidalgo, G.; González-Gómez, L.; Morante-Zarcero, S.; Sierra, I. Insight into the impact of food processing and culinary preparations on the stability and content of plant alkaloids considered as natural food contaminants. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shkembi, B.; Huppertz, T. Glycemic responses of milk and plant-based drinks: Food matrix effects. Foods 2023, 12, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. César, A.P.; Lopes, F.E.; Azevedo, F.F.; Pinto, Y.O.; Andrade, C.R.; Mesquita, F.P.; Gabrielly, O.; Silva, G.O.; Freitas, C.D.T.; Souza, P.F. Antioxidant peptides from plants: A review. Phytochem. Rev. 2024, 23, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Singh, P.; Kumar, V.; Sharma, J.; Saini, S.; Sharma, P.; Kumar, S.; Sinhmar, Y.; Kumar, D.; Sharma, A. Silicon supplementation alleviates the salinity stress in wheat plants by enhancing the plant water status, photosynthetic pigments, proline content and antioxidant enzyme activities. Plants 2022, 11, 2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Iqbal, I.; Wilairatana, P.; Saqib, F.; Nasir, B.; Wahid, M.; Latif, M.F.; Igbar, A.; Naz, R.; Mubarak, M.S. Plant polyphenols and their potential benefits on cardiovascular health: A review. Molecules 2023, 28, 6403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Priya, P.; Patil, M.; Pandey, P.; Singh, A.; Babu, V.S.; Senthil-Kumar, M. Stress combinations and their interactions in plants database: A one-stop resource on combined stress responses in plants. Plant J. 2023, 116, 1097–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Salam, U.; Ullah, S.; Tang, Z.H.; Elateeq, A.A.; Khan, Y.; Khan, J.; Khan, A.; Ali, S. Plant metabolomics: An overview of the role of primary and secondary metabolites against different environmental stress factors. Life 2023, 13, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jan, S.; Rustgi, S.; Barmukh, R.; Shikari, A.B.; Leske, B.; Bekuma, A.; Sharma, D.; Ma, W.U.; Kumar, U.; Bohra, A.; et al. Advances and opportunities in unraveling cold-tolerance mechanisms in the world’s primary staple food crops. Plant Genome 2024, 17, e20402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Considine, M.J.; Foyer, C.H. Oxygen and reactive oxygen species-dependent regulation of plant growth and development. Plant Physiol. 2021, 186, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mansoor, S.; Wani, O.A.; Lone, J.K.; Manhas, S.; Kour, N.; Alam, P.; Ahmad, A.; Ahmad, P. Reactive oxygen species in plants: From source to sink. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mattila, H.; Mishra, S.; Tyystjärvi, T.; Tyystjärvi, E. Singlet oxygen production by photosystem II is caused by misses of the oxygen evolving complex. New Phytol. 2023, 237, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Parab, A.; Dawda, H.; Mukundan, U. A review of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plants. J. Adv. Sci. Res. 2023, 14, 552969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lenton, T.M.; Dahl, T.W.; Daines, S.J.; Mills, B.J.W.; Ozaki, K.; Saltzman, M.R.; Porada, P. Earliest land plants created modern levels of atmospheric oxygen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 9704–9709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pucciariello, C.; Perata, P. The oxidative paradox in low oxygen stress in plants. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zahra, N.; Hafeez, M.B.; Shaukat, K.; Wahid, A.; Hussain, S.; Naseer, R.; Raza, A.; Iqbal, S.; Farooq, M. Hypoxia and anoxia stress: Plant responses and tolerance mechanisms. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2021, 207, 249–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jethva, J.; Schmidt, R.R.; Sauter, M.; Selinski, J. Try or die: Dynamics of plant respiration and how to survive low oxygen conditions. Plants 2022, 11, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yemelyanov, V.V.; Puzanskiy, R.K.; Shishova, M.F. Plant life with and without oxygen: A metabolomics approach. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yao, T.; Feng, K.; Xie, M.; Barros, J.; Tschaplinski, T.J.; Tuskan, G.A.; Muchero, W.; Chen, J.G. Phylogenetic occurrence of the phenylpropanoid pathway and lignin biosynthesis in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 704697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, S.; Wang, X.; Cheng, Y.; Gao, H.; Chen, X. A review of classification, biosynthesis, biological activities and potential applications of flavonoids. Molecules 2023, 28, 4982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Duta-Bratu, C.G.; Nitulescu, G.M.; Mihai, D.P.; Olaru, O. Resveratrol and other natural oligomeric stilbenoid compounds and their therapeutic applications. Plants 2023, 12, 2935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sangiorgio, P.; Errico, S.; Verardi, A.; Moliterni, S.; Tamasi, G.; Rossi, C.; Balducchi, R. Bioactive lignans from flaxseed: Biological properties and patented recovery technologies. Nutraceuticals 2023, 3, 58–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zagoskina, N.V.; Zubova, M.Y.; Nechaeva, T.L.; Kazantseva, V.V.; Goncharuk, E.A.; Katanskaya, V.M.; Baranova, E.N.; Aksenova, M.A. Polyphenols in plants: Structure, biosynthesis, abiotic stress regulation, and practical applications (Review). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Teixeira, W.F.; Soares, L.H.; Fagan, E.B.; da Costa Mello, S.; Reichardt, K.; Dourado-Neto, D. Amino acids as stress reducers in soybean plant growth under different water-deficit conditions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 39, 905–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Trovato, M.; Funck, D.; Forlani, G.; Okumoto, S.; Amir, R. Amino acids in plants: Regulation and functions in development and stress defense. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 772810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pramanik, B.; Sar, P.; Bharti, R.; Gupta, R.K.; Purkayastha, S.; Sinha, S.; Chattaraj, S.; Mitra, D. Multifactorial role of nanoparticles in alleviating environmental stresses for sustainable crop production and protection. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 201, 107831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cherevatskaya, M.; Cherepanov, I.; Kalganova, N.; Erofeeva, N.; Romanovskaya, E.; Frolov, A.; Bilova, T.; Moiseev, S.; Wessjohann, L.A. Sydnone imines as a new class of promising plant growth and stress tolerance modulators—A first experimental structure–activity overview. Stresses 2024, 4, 133–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Johnson, R.; Puthur, J.T. Seed priming as a cost effective technique for developing plants with cross tolerance to salinity stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 162, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Seleiman, M.F.; Al-Suhaibani, N.; Ali, N.; Akmal, M.; Alotaibi, M.; Refay, Y.; Dindaroglu, T.; Abdul-Wajid, H.H.; Battaglia, M.L. Drought stress impacts on plants and different approaches to alleviate its adverse effects. Plants 2021, 10, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Wahab, A.; Abdi, G.; Saleem, M.H.; Ali, B.; Ullah, S.; Shah, W.; Mumtaz, S.; Yasin, G.; Muresan, C.C.; Marc, R.A. Plants’ physio-biochemical and phyto-hormonal responses to alleviate the adverse effects of drought stress: A comprehensive review. Plants 2022, 11, 1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mashabela, M.D.; Masamba, P.; Kappo, A.P. Applications of metabolomics for the elucidation of abiotic stress tolerance in plants: A special focus on osmotic stress and heavy metal toxicity. Plants 2023, 12, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, S.M.; Zheng, H.X.; Zhang, X.S.; Sui, N. Cytokinins as central regulators during plant growth and stress response. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mittler, R.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Fichman, Y.; Van Breusegem, F. Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 663–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kaya, C.; Ugurlar, F.; Ashraf, M.; Ahmad, P. Salicylic acid interacts with other plant growth regulators and signal molecules in response to stressful environments in plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 196, 431–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Knieper, M.; Viehhauser, A.; Dietz, K.J. Oxylipins and reactive carbonyls as regulators of the plant redox and reactive oxygen species network under stress. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zahid, G.; Iftikhar, S.; Shimira, F.; Ahmad, H.M.; Kaçar, Y.A. An overview and recent progress of plant growth regulators (PGRs) in the mitigation of abiotic stresses in fruits: A review. Sci. Hortic. 2023, 309, 111621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sharma, P.; Thakur, N.; Mann, N.A.; Umar, A. Melatonin as plant growth regulator in sustainable agriculture. Sci. Hortic. 2024, 323, 112421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tsivileva, O.; Shaternikov, A.; Evseeva, N. Basidiomycetes polysaccharides regulate growth and antioxidant defense system in wheat. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Daminova, A.G.; Leksin, I.Y.; Khabibrakhmanova, V.R.; Gurjanov, O.P.; Galeeva, E.I.; Trifonova, T.V.; Khamatgalimov, A.R.; Beckett, R.P.; Minibayeva, F.V. The roles of the anthraquinone parietin in the tolerance to desiccation of the lichen Xanthoria parietina: Physiology and anatomy of the pale and bright-orange thalli. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Baptista-Silva, S.; Borges, S.; Ramos, O.L.; Pintado, M.; Sarmento, B. The progress of essential oils as potential therapeutic agents: A review. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2020, 32, 279–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ni, Z.J.; Wang, X.; Shen, Y.; Thakur, K.; Han, J.; Zhang, J.G.; Hu, F.; Wey, Z.-J.; Wei, Z.J. Recent updates on the chemistry, bioactivities, mode of action, and industrial applications of plant essential oils. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 110, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Afkar, S. Assessment of chemical compositions and antibacterial activity of the essential oil of Mentha piperita in response to salicylic acid. Nat. Prod. Res. 2024, 38, 3562–3573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Assadpour, E.; Can Karaça, A.; Fasamanesh, M.; Mahdavi, S.A.; Shariat-Alavi, M.; Feng, J.; Kharazmi, H.S.; Rehman, A.; Jafari, S.M. Application of essential oils as natural biopesticides; recent advances. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 64, 6477–6497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, J.; Zhang, M.; Bhandari, B.; Wang, M. Basic sensory properties of essential oils from aromatic plants and their applications: A critical review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 64, 6990–7003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shirokova, A.V.; Dmitriev, L.B.; Belopukhov, S.L.; Dmitrieva, V.L.; Danilova, I.L.; Kharchenko, V.A.; Pekhova, O.A.; Myagkih, E.F.; Tsitsilin, A.N.; Gulevich, A.A.; et al. The accumulation of volatile compounds and the change in the morphology of the leaf wax cover accompanied the “anti-aging” effect in Anethum graveolens L. plants sprayed with 6-benzylaminopurine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Chaski, C.; Polyzos, N.; Tzortzakis, N.; Petropoulos, S.A. Sustainable agriculture systems in vegetable production using chitin and chitosan as plant biostimulants. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Balusamy, S.R.; Rahimi, S.; Sukweenadhi, J.; Sunderraj, S.; Shanmugam, R.; Thangavelu, L.; Mijakovac, I.; Perumalsamy, H. Chitosan, chitosan nanoparticles and modified chitosan biomaterials, a potential tool to combat salinity stress in plants. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 284, 119189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Stasińska-Jakubas, M.; Hawrylak-Nowak, B. Protective, biostimulating, and eliciting effects of chitosan and its derivatives on crop plants. Molecules 2022, 27, 2801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Chandrasekaran, M.; Paramasivan, M. Chitosan derivatives act as a bio-stimulants in plants: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 271, 132720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Khodadadi, F.; Ahmadi, F.S.; Talebi, M.; Matkowski, A.; Szumny, A.; Afshari, M.; Rahimmalek, M. Metabolic and transcriptomic approaches of chitosan and water stress on polyphenolic and terpenoid components and gene expression in Salvia abrotanoides (Karl.) and S. yangii. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Kosakivska, I.V.; Babenko, L.M.; Romanenko, K.O.; Korotka, I.Y.; Potters, G. Molecular mechanisms of plant adaptive responses to heavy metals stress. Cell Biol. Int. 2021, 45, 258–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Thakur, M.; Praveen, S.; Divte, P.R.; Mitra, R.; Kumar, M.; Gupta, C.K.; Kalidindi, U.; Bansal, R.; Roy, S.; Anand, A.; et al. Metal tolerance in plants: Molecular and physicochemical interface determines the “not so heavy effect” of heavy metals. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 131957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ahmad, Z.; Khan, S.M.; Page, S.E.; Balzter, H.; Ullah, A.; Ali, S.; Jehangir, S.; Ejaz, U.; Afza, R.; Razzaq, A.; et al. Environmental sustainability and resilience in a polluted ecosystem via phytoremediation of heavy metals and plant physiological adaptations. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 385, 135733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cai, Z.; Yang, X. Research on restoration of heavy metal contaminated farmland based on restoration ecological compensation mechanism. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chen, R.; Chen, Y.; Lyulyov, O.; Pimonenko, T. Interplay of urbanization and ecological environment: Coordinated development and drivers. Land 2023, 12, 1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tugbaeva, A.S.; Ermoshin, A.A.; Kiseleva, I.S. Biochemical responses to the long-term impact of copper sulfate (CuSO4) in tobacco plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sarath, G.; Baird, L.M.; Vogel, K.P.; Mitchell, R.B. Internode structure and cell wall composition in maturing tillers of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 2985–2992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, H.; Song, Y.; Fan, Z.; Ruan, J.; Hu, J.; Zhang, Q. Aluminum supplementation mediates the changes in tea plant growth and metabolism in response to calcium stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Shabbir, R.; Javed, T.; Hussain, S.; Ahmar, S.; Naz, M.; Zafar, H.; Pandey, S.; Chauhan, J.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Pinghua, C. Calcium homeostasis and potential roles in combatting environmental stresses in plants. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 148, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Xu, T.; Niu, J.; Jiang, Z. Sensing mechanisms: Calcium signaling mediated abiotic stress in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 925863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Terletskaya, N.V.; Mamirova, A.; Ashimuly, K.; Vibe, Y.P.; Krekova, Y.A. Anatomical and metabolome features of Haloxylon aphyllum and Haloxylon persicum elucidate the resilience against gall-forming insects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 4738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Noe, S.M.; Niinemets, Ü. Impact of gall-forming insects on global BVOC emissions and climate: A perspective. Front. For. Glob. Chang. 2020, 3, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Arriola, Í.A.; Costa, E.C.; de Oliveira, D.C.; Isaias, R.M.D.S. Soil–plant–gall relationships: From gall development to ecological patterns. Biol. Rev. 2024, 99, 1948–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Raldugina, G.N.; Bogoutdinova, L.R.; Shelepova, O.V.; Kondrateva, V.V.; Platonova, E.V.; Nechaeva, T.L.; Kazantseva, V.V.; Lapshin, P.V.; Rostovtseva, H.I.; Aniskina, T.S.; et al. Heterologous codA gene expression leads to mitigation of salt stress effects and modulates developmental processes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Feng, M.; Yu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Fu, Z.; Xu, L.; Guo, J. ScMT10, a metallothionein-like gene from sugarcane, enhances freezing tolerance in Nicotiana tabacum transgenic plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2022, 194, 104750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Charfeddine, M.; Chiab, N.; Charfeddine, S.; Ferjani, A.; Gargouri-Bouzid, R. Heat, drought, and combined stress effect on transgenic potato plants overexpressing the StERF94 transcription factor. J. Plant Res. 2023, 136, 549–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Dorogina, O.V.; Kuban, I.N.; Achimova, A.A.; Williams, N.; Lashchinskiy, N.N.; Zhmud, E.V. Morphometric characteristics and genetic ISSR marker variability in Rhodiola rosea L. (Crassulaceae) in different ecological and geographic conditions in the Altai Republic. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Spicer, M.E.; Radhamoni, H.V.N.; Duguid, M.C.; Queenborough, S.A.; Comita, L.S. Herbaceous plant diversity in forest ecosystems: Patterns, mechanisms, and threats. Plant Ecol. 2022, 223, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Winkler, J.; Vaverková, M.D.; Havel, L. Anthropogenic life strategy of plants. Anthr. Rev. 2023, 10, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Samarskaya, V.O.; Ryabov, E.V.; Gryzunov, N.; Spechenkova, N.; Kuznetsova, M.; Ilina, I.; Suprunova, T.; Taliansky, M.E.; Ivanov, P.A.; Kalinina, N.O. The temporal and geographical dynamics of potato virus Y diversity in Russia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Gao, F.; Kawakubo, S.; Ho, S.Y.; Ohshima, K. The evolutionary history and global spatio-temporal dynamics of potato virus Y. Virus Evol. 2020, 6, veaa056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Dupuis, B.; Nkuriyingoma, P.; Ballmer, T. Economic impact of potato virus Y (PVY) in Europe. Potato Res. 2024, 67, 55–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zagoskina, N. Special Issue “Advances in the Physiology of Primary and Secondary Plant Metabolism Under Abiotic and Biotic Stress”. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 12339. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212339

AMA Style

Zagoskina N. Special Issue “Advances in the Physiology of Primary and Secondary Plant Metabolism Under Abiotic and Biotic Stress”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(22):12339. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212339

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zagoskina, Natalia. 2024. "Special Issue “Advances in the Physiology of Primary and Secondary Plant Metabolism Under Abiotic and Biotic Stress”" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 22: 12339. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212339

APA Style

Zagoskina, N. (2024). Special Issue “Advances in the Physiology of Primary and Secondary Plant Metabolism Under Abiotic and Biotic Stress”. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(22), 12339. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212339

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop