Next Article in Journal
Structural Characterization and Antidepressant-like Effects of Polygonum sibiricum Polysaccharides on Regulating Microglial Polarization in Chronic Unpredictable Mild Stress-Induced Zebrafish
Previous Article in Journal
Persistence of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Stem-like Populations under Simultaneous In Vitro Treatment with Curcumin, Fludarabine, and Ibrutinib: Implications for Therapy Resistance
Previous Article in Special Issue
microRNAs: Key Regulators in Plant Responses to Abiotic and Biotic Stresses via Endogenous and Cross-Kingdom Mechanisms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 4
10.3390/ijms25042004
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Profile Analysis of Sugars Will Eventually Be Exported Transporter (SWEET) Genes in Zantedeschia elliottiana and Their Responsiveness to Pectobacterium carotovora subspecies Carotovora (Pcc) Infection

by
Ziwei Li
1,2,†,
Yanbing Guo
2,†,
Shoulin Jin
3 and
Hongzhi Wu
2,*
1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
2
College of Horticulture and Landscape, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
3
College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(4), 2004; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042004
Submission received: 11 January 2024 / Revised: 2 February 2024 / Accepted: 4 February 2024 / Published: 7 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biotic and Abiotic Stress Effects on Plant Structure and Physiology 2023)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
SWEET, sugars will eventually be exported transporter, is a novel class of sugar transporter proteins that can transport sugars across membranes down a concentration gradient. It plays a key role in plant photosynthetic assimilates, phloem loading, nectar secretion from nectar glands, seed grouting, pollen development, pathogen interactions, and adversity regulation, and has received widespread attention in recent years. To date, systematic analysis of the SWEET family in Zantedeschia has not been documented, although the genome has been reported in Zantedeschia elliottiana. In this study, 19 ZeSWEET genes were genome-wide identified in Z. elliottiana, and unevenly located in 10 chromosomes. They were further clustered into four clades by a phylogenetic tree, and almost every clade has its own unique motifs. Synthetic analysis confirmed two pairs of segmental duplication events of ZeSWEET genes. Heatmaps of tissue-specific and Pectobacterium carotovora subsp. Carotovora (Pcc) infection showed that ZeSWEET genes had different expression patterns, so SWEETs may play widely varying roles in development and stress tolerance in Zantedeschia. Moreover, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis revealed that some of the ZeSWEETs responded to Pcc infection, among which eight genes were significantly upregulated and six genes were significantly downregulated, revealing their potential functions in response to Pcc infection. The promoter sequences of ZeSWEETs contained 51 different types of the 1380 cis-regulatory elements, and each ZeSWEET gene contained at least two phytohormone responsive elements and one stress response element. In addition, a subcellular localization study indicated that ZeSWEET07 and ZeSWEET18 were found to be localized to the plasma membrane. These findings provide insights into the characteristics of SWEET genes and contribute to future studies on the functional characteristics of ZeSWEET genes, and then improve Pcc infection tolerance in Zantedeschia through molecular breeding.

1. Introduction

As one of three families of sugar transporters that have been identified in plants, sugars will eventually be exported transporter (SWEET) proteins are membrane-localized unidirectional transporters that transport sugar in an energy-independent manner to the cell membrane. They have a wider range of substrate types and are ubiquitous in plants, animals, and prokaryotes [1]. The SWEET protein family members are featured by the MtN3/Saliva motif (PF03083) and seven transmembrane helices (TMHs) [2]. In general, the SWEET genes are clustered into four clades. Genes which belong to the same clade have similar structures and functions. The primary function is to transport hexose sugars including fructose and glucose in Clade I and Clade II [3,4], transport sucrose efficiently in Clade III [5,6], and export fructose located on tonoplast membrane in Clade IV [3].
The SWEETs gene family was initially identified in Arabidopsis thaliana [3]. To date, with a large number of plant genomes sequenced, the systematic genome-wide identification of SWEET genes has been reported in many crops, vegetables, fruits, and flowers, such as Oryza sativa [7], Zea mays [8], Glycine max [9], Brassica oleracea [10], Solanum lycopersicum [11], Solanum tuberosum [12], Cucumis sativus [13], Musa acuminate [14], Malus domestica [15], Litchi chinensis [16], Vitis vinifera [17], Rosa chinensis [18], Dendrobium chrysotoxum [19], Hemerocallis fulva [20], and Petunia axillaris [21]. Previous studies have shown that SWEET genes are involved in multiple physiological processes related to phloem loading [22,23,24,25], nectar secretion [6], pollen/flower development [26,27,28], seed/fruit development [29,30,31,32,33,34], senescence [35,36,37], modulating gibberellins response [38,39], and abiotic stress response [40,41,42,43]. Furthermore, the SWEET genes play a crucial role in plant–pathogen interactions and have been shown to be targets of extracellular pathogens [3]. The induction of SWEET genes upon pathogen infection has also been reported in A. thaliana [44], Oryza sativa [45,46,47,48,49,50], Lotus japonicus [51], Gossypium spp. [52], Medicago truncatula [53,54], B. oleracea [10], Ipomoea batatas [55], S. lycopersicum [56], Manihot esculenta Crantza [57], and V. vinifera [17]. For example, the overexpression of IbSWEET10 increases tolerance to Fusarium oxysporum infection in I. batatas [55]. AtSWEET4/15/17 [4], SISWEET15 [56], and VvSWEET4 [17] were shown to be associated with resistance to Botrytis cinerea. In Citrus reticulata, the overexpression of CsSWEET1 could promote the propagation of citrus canker [58]. In rice, the knockout/overexpression of OsSWEET13 could modify bacterial blight resistance and susceptibility [59].
Although the SWEET genes have been demonstrated to play crucial roles in plant growth and plant–pathogen interactions, they have not been studied in Zantedeschia, especially the chromosome-level genome of Zantedeschia elliottiana that has been recently resolved [60]. Zantedeschia is an herbaceous perennial bulb flower, belonging to the genus Zantedeschia in the family Araceae, which is native to the swampy, woodland edge, or mountainous regions of southern Africa [61]. It is an economically important horticultural crop widely used in flower arrangement, pot production, flower baskets, garden use, and landscaping for its attractive appearance and long postharvest life with ornamental value. The genus Zantedeschia consists of eight species in two sections: section Zantedeschia including two species (Z. aethiopica Spreng. and Z. odorata Perry.) with a rhizomatous storage organ and white flower, which are evergreen, and section Aestivae including six species (Z. rehmannii Engl., Z. jucunda Letty., Z. elliottiana Engl., Z. pentlandii Wittm., Z. valida Singh., and Z. albomaculata Baill) with a tuberous storage organ and colorful flower, which are winter-dormant [61,62]. Z. aethiopica in section Zantedeschia has a strong tolerance to bacterial soft rot [63]. However, the colored Zantedeschia species or hybrids in section Aestivae easily contract soft rot caused by Pectobacterium carotovora subsp. Carotovora (Pcc) [64,65]. Pcc is a rod-shaped, flagellated, parthenogenetic, anaerobic Gram-negative bacterium, of which the growth temperature is 4–36 °C, the optimum is 25–30 °C, and the lethal is 50 °C [66]. It is intolerant to dryness and sunlight, although commonly found in soil and water, and can only survive for about 15 days when left alone in the soil separate from the host [66]. The bacteria can infect any part of the calla lily plant under favorable conditions, especially during the stress period with high temperature, high relative humidity, high nitrogen content, and high moisture of the soil [65]. The pathogen can cause water-soaked spots in the early stage of infestation of Zantedeschia. With the rapid expansion of the spots, the virus may cause discoloration and depression, which will eventually lead to the plant rotting and even dying, greatly hindering the development of their industry and leading to substantial economic loss [65,66]. Therefore, it is urgent to breed new varieties of Zantedeschia that are resistant to soft rot disease. In this study, we have conducted the first genome-wide analysis of SWEET genes in Z. elliottiana, named ZeSWEET genes, and analyzed their chromosomal distribution, gene structure, motif composition, phylogenetic relationships, cis-regulatory elements, tissue-specific expression patterns, and expression in response to Pcc infection. The present study provides insights for future research on ZeSWEET genes associated with growth and development, and the response of SWEET genes in Zantedeschia to Pcc infection. Our results provide a solid foundation for the deep mining of genetic variations and potential genes involved in genes resistant to bacterial sot rot in Zantedeschia spp. and pave the way for efficiently breeding new Zantedeschia cultivars by a molecular breeding strategy.

2. Results

2.1. Genome-Wide Identification of SWEET Family Genes in Z. elliottiana

Based on the sequenced genomes of Z. elliottiana and combined with the homology search and conservative domain analysis, 19 non-redundant ZeSWEET genes were confirmed. We designated them ZeSWEET1–ZeSWEET19 according to chromosomal location in this study for convenience. As shown in Figure 1, a total of 19 ZeSWEETs were unevenly distributed on 10 chromosomes. Among them, Chr14 contained the most ZeSWEET genes (four genes, accounting for 21.1%), Chr01 and Chr12 contained three ZeSWEET genes, Chr09 and Chr10 contained two ZeSWEET genes, while Chr04, Chr08, Chr13, and Chr16 contained only one ZeSWEET gene.
The ZeSWEET proteins were 97 (ZeSWEET12) to 870 (ZeSWEET17) amino acid residues long, with molecular masses between 10.77 (ZeSWEET12) and 96.94 kDa (ZeSWEET17), and the theoretical isoelectric points ranged from 6.52 (ZeSWEET17) to 9.85 (ZeSWEET02) (Table 1). Except for ZeSWEET17, the theoretical isoelectric points of the ZeSWEET proteins were greater than seven; thus, it was presumed that most ZeSWEET proteins were basic proteins. The instability index varied from 28.13 (ZeSWEET14) to 58.41 (ZeSWEET16), revealing that ZeSWEET proteins included stable and unstable proteins. The grand average of hydropathicity of four ZeSWEET proteins was less than zero, and others were greater than zero. So, it can be suggested that they have both hydrophobic and hydrophilic proteins. These results indicate that the basic properties of the proteins encoded by members of the calla lily ZeSWEET gene family were highly variable; therefore, these genes may play different functional roles in different biological processes.

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis of SWEET Family Genes in Z. elliottiana

To define the evolutionary relationships among the ZeSWEET and other plant species, a phylogenetic tree was constructed by aligning 19 ZeSWEET protein sequences, 17 AtSWEET protein sequences, and 21 OsSWEET protein sequences. According to this phylogenetic tree (Figure 2), all SWEET proteins can be clustered into four clades, as previously reported for A. thaliana and O. sativa [7,8]. Clade I contains four ZeSWEET proteins (ZeSWEET04/07/13/17), clade II contains eleven (ZeSWEET01/02/03/05/06/08/09/10/11/12/16), clade III contains only three (ZeSWEET14/18/19), and the remaining one belongs to clade IV (ZeSWEET15). These results indicate that SWEET proteins are relatively conserved in plant evolution.

2.3. Gene Structure and Conserved Motif Analysis of SWEET Family Genes in Z. elliottiana

Structures and components of genes can render their sophistication and diversity of corresponded functions. For a deeper understanding the functional and structural characteristics of ZeSWEET, we used MEME (v.5.5.5) to analyze the motifs of each member.
A total of 19 amino acid motifs were identified in 19 ZeSWEET (Figure 3); ZeSWEET12 had the fewest amino acid sequences with two motifs, while ZeSWEET19 had the most with eleven; other genes contained three–ten motifs, five motifs (motifs 1/2/3/5/7) of which were present in all genes (except ZeSWEET04/05/06/08/10/11/12/16, which do not have them all), and all in the same order. Motif 18 was discovered only in Clade I, Motifs 9/11/14 were discovered only in Clade II, and Motif 6 was discovered only in Clade III, while Motif 8 was only not discovered in Clade II, and Motif 12 was only not discovered in Clade Ⅳ.

2.4. Promoter Region Analysis of SWEET Family Genes in Z. elliottiana

Promoter is a sequence of DNA that RNA polymerase recognizes and binds to in order to initiate transcription of a gene, usually located upstream of the gene. Upstream of the core promoter, there are usually specific DNA sequences, known as cis-acting elements, to which transcription factors bind to activate or repress gene transcription.
To further understand the transcriptional regulation and potential functions of ZeSWEETs, the cis-regulatory elements in the 2000 bp sequences upstream of the translation start sites were determined and analyzed. A total of 51 different types of the 1380 cis-regulatory elements were annotated (Figure 4). The promoters of the 19 ZeSWEETs contained at least 38 cis-elements (ZeSWEET19), while ZeSWEET07 contained the most (122 cis-elements). These elements are classified into five categories, comprising core elements (CAAT-box, TATA-box), light response (elements involved in light responsiveness, light response element), growth and development regulation elements (seed-specific regulation, meristem expression, circadian control, and endosperm expression), stress response (low temperature, drought, wound, anaerobic induction, defense, and stress), and hormone response (auxin, abscisic acid, gibberellic acid, jasmonic acid, and salicylic acid). The most frequent elements were light response elements. Similarly, elements related to cell cycle regulation, endosperm-specific negative expression, maximal elicitor-mediated activation, and differentiation of the palisade mesophyll cells were only present in Clade II, and the element related to the protein binding site was only present in Clade III. Meanwhile, elements related to defense and stress responsiveness were absent from Clade III, and the element related to salicylic acid responsiveness was absent from Clade IV. Elements related to abscisic acid responsiveness, gibberellin responsiveness, anaerobic induction, drought inducibility elements, and low-temperature responsiveness occurred randomly in all clades. These data indicate that ZeSWEET clades may have specialization, and further analysis is necessary to understand the function of each SWEET gene.
Among the plant hormone response elements, a total of one hundred and seventy-three cis-acting elements were associated, and every ZeSWEET contained at least two hormone response elements. Eight elements of the TCA-element involved in salicylic acid response were detected in seven ZeSWEETs, ten elements of the TGA-element involved in auxin response were identified in eight ZeSWEETs, forty-five elements of the ABRE involved in ABA response were identified in the promoter regions of sixteen ZeSWEET members, and eighty-four elements of the CGTCA-motif and TGACG-motif involved in methyl jasmonate response were identified in all ZeSWEETs. Among the plant growth and development regulation elements, a total of fifty-nine cis-acting elements were associated, and every ZeSWEET contained at least one growth and development regulation element. Thirteen elements of CAT-box involved in meristem expression were identified in eight ZeSWEETs. These results suggest that the ZeSWEET genes might be broadly involved in growth and development, and hormone crosstalk in Zantedeschia. Among the plant stress response elements, a total of eighty-six cis-acting elements were associated, and every ZeSWEET contained at least one stress response element. Thirteen elements of LTR involved in low temperature responsiveness were identified in nine ZeSWEETs, ten elements of TC-rich repeats involved in defense and stress responsiveness were identified in nine ZeSWEETs, twenty-seven elements of MBS involved in drought inducibility were identified in fourteen ZeSWEETs, and twenty-eight elements of ARE involved in anaerobic induction were identified in fourteen ZeSWEETs. These data suggest that ZeSWEETs may be involved in the response to environmental stress through a complex mechanism, and each ZeSWEET gene can be induced by different environmental stresses.

2.5. Snyteny Analysis of SWEET Family Genes in Z. elliottiana

Gene duplication is the basis for the divergence of homologous gene functions and the main reason for the generation of new functional genes, which is an important driver of genome and species evolution [67]. In the present study, none pair of ZeSWEET genes was identified as a tandem duplication and two pairs of segmental duplication events were identified, comprising ZeSWEET03/05 and ZeSWEET14/18 (Figure 5).
Orthologs between species in a conserved order are known as syntenic, yet divergence between species can alter the species number and location of species genes [68]. Thus, syntenic analysis can reflect evolutionary relationships between species, reveal conserved core genes, and help explain trait differences caused by chromosomal variation. In this research, the syntenic relationships of the ZeSWEET family were analyzed by constructing five intergenomic collinear maps with A. konjac, C. esculenta, P. stratiotes, P. pedatisecta, and S. polyrhiza. There were 10, 10, 15, 11, and 12 pairs of homologous genes between Z. elliottiana with A. konjac, C. esculenta, P. stratiotes, P. pedatisecta, and S. polyrhiza, respectively (Figure 6). The results indicate that compared to A. konjac, C. esculenta, and P. pedatisecta, Z. elliottiana, P. stratiotes, and S. polyrhiza had higher homology, and Z. elliottiana was more closely related to the phylogeny and evolution of P. stratiotes.

2.6. Expression Profiles of SWEET Family Genes in Different Tissues in Z. elliottiana

To understand the roles of ZeSWEETs during plant growth and development, expression patterns of the 19 ZeSWEETs in different tissues were extracted, and 17 of 19 genes were detected (Figure 7). None of the genes were expressed in all tissues, but ZeSWEET06/09 were not expressed in any of the tissues, suggesting that they may be expressed in highly specific tissues or under specific conditions. Seventeen expressed genes can be broadly classified into three categories based on their expression profiles. Category I, genes are expressed only in one tissue and marginally or not present in others: ZeSWEET02/11/12 were only expressed in the stamen, ZeSWEET08 in the style, ZeSWEET in the bulb, and ZeSWEET16 in the spathe. Category II, genes are expressed only in a few tissues and marginally or not present in others: ZeSWEET03 was only expressed in the root and stamen, ZeSWEET04 in the pistil and bulb, ZeSWEET05 in the style, spathe, and pistil, ZeSWEET14 in the stamen and pistil, ZeSWEET18/19 in the root and stamen. Category III, genes are only not expressed in one tissue and are more or less expressed in all others: ZeSWEET01/15 were only not expressed in the leaf, ZeSWEET07/17 not in the root, ZeSWEET13 not in the pistil. Furthermore, except for individual genes, gene expression patterns in the same clade showed similarity. The genes of Clade I and Clade IV are expressed to a greater or lesser extent in almost all tissues; this suggests that they may be extensively involved in the growth and development of the calla lily. The genes of Clade II and Clade III are expressed only in individual tissues; this suggests that they are only involved in the growth and development of one part of the calla lily. In summary, these results suggest that all ZeSWEETs have varied expression in different tissues, which may contribute to the functional diversity of ZeSWEETs.

2.7. Expression Analysis of SWEET Family Genes after Pcc Infection in Z. elliottiana

To explore the possible roles of ZeSWEETs in a biotic stress response, the expression patterns of ZeSWEETs were analyzed by using the RNA-seq data of Z. elliottiana after Pcc infection, and 14 of 19 genes were detected (Figure 8). In general terms, 14 expressed genes can be classified into three categories based on their expression profiles. Category I, genes were significantly induced, and expression was consistently increased; includes ZeSWEET07/08/13. Category II, gene was induced and then repressed, with an increase in expression followed by a decrease; includes ZeSWEET01/02/03/04/14/17. Category III, gene was clearly repressed, and expression was consistently reduced; includes ZeSWEET05/15/16/18/19. However, the expressed genes had varied expression patterns even if they belong to the same clade. The genes of Clade I and Clade IV expressed approximate consistency; Clade I was induced and Clade IV was repressed. The genes of Clade II and Clade III were expressed variously. These results suggest that the ZeSWEET genes are sensitive to Pcc infestation and that there may be a interacting mechanism.
In order to better understand the response of ZeSWEET genes to Pcc stress, qRT-PCR was used to inspect the expression of individual genes for various times after Pcc infection, and 14 genes were found with detectable expression (Figure 9). Included among these, 6 of 14 genes were downregulated, while 8 of 14 were upregulated. Interestingly, the upward adjustments were not the same for the eight upregulated genes: ZeSWEET03/04/08/13/14/17 showed the highest level of expression at 12 h, ZeSWEET02 at 24 h, and ZeSWEET07 at 36 h. In summary, ZeSWEET genes were induced or repressed by Pcc infection, indicating their indispensable regulation role in adapting the biotic stresses of Zantedeschia.

2.8. Subcellular Localization of SWEET Family Genes

The interior of a cell can be further divided into distinct cellular regions or organelles, known as subcellular. Mature proteins must be inside specific subcellular organelles to perform stable biological functions. Based on the WoLF PSORT (https://wolfpsort.hgc.jp/, accessed on 19 November 2023) projected analysis, subcellular localizations of the ZeSWEET06 were predicted on the cell wall, and ZeSWEET07/10/12/17/19 were on the chloroplast, while other ZeSWEETs were on the plasma membrane (Table 1). To validate the predictions, ZeSWEET07 and ZeSWEET18 were heterologously and transiently expressed in tobacco leaf epidermal cells as translational GFP fusion proteins, and both proteins were found to be localized to the plasma membrane (Figure 10). These results indicate that ZeSWEETs may have a membrane protein function.

3. Discussion

3.1. The Characteristics of Zantedeschia SWEETS

Soluble sugars have important roles in the regulation of plant metabolism, and growth and developmental processes [69,70,71]. The transport of soluble sugars between different cells, tissues, and organs is facilitated by different types of sugar transporter proteins (STs), which are the most central functional proteins in sugar transport and metabolism [71]. Depending on their substrate specificity, the major STs in plants are classified into three types: sucrose transporters (SUT/SUCs), monosaccharide transporters (MSTs), and sugars will eventually be exported transporters (SWEETs) [72,73,74,75].
The SWEET proteins were screened from unidentified membrane protein genes in the Arabidopsis Membrane Protein Database by the Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) method [4]. They are a class of bi-directional sugar transport proteins that are not dependent on pH, and are present in a wide range of organisms, including protozoa, postbiotics, fungi, bacteria, archaea, higher eukaryotes, mammals, and higher vascular plants, demonstrating their importance in cellular organisms [1,7].
With the rapid development of sequencing technologies, SWEET gene families have been reported for a wide range of plants; the number of reported SWEET genes varies from 17 to 108, with 17 in Arabidopsis [4], 17 in grapevine [17], 21 in rice [7], and 108 in wheat [74]. In the current study, 19 ZeSWEET genes were identified in the Z. elliottiana genome, and they were clustered into four clades (Clades I to IV), which was consistent with the results for Arabidopsis [4]. Almost every clade has its own unique motif, although these were widely present in all members. These results implied that, while SWEET genes transport sugar, the substrates may differ between each clade.

3.2. The Functions of Zantedeschia SWEETS

As a family of sugar transporter protein genes newly discovered in recent years, SWEETs are highly homologous in sequence and structurally conserved, and function as bi-directional transporters of sugars [75]. They promote the diffusion of sucrose across the cell membrane down the concentration gradient into the extracellular body on cellular efflux, and also act as low-affinity glucose transporter proteins to regulate the uptake of glucose across the cell membrane [75]. They thereby exercise their functions, such as pollen development [26], nectar production [6], plant seed growth and development [29], plant senescence [35,36,37], abiotic stresses [14,40,41,42,43], ion transport [22,23,24,25], interactions with pathogenic bacteria, and reciprocal symbiosis with microorganisms [4]. In recent years, some other functions of SWEET in plants have been discovered: MtSWEET1b was induced to be expressed during the reciprocal symbiosis between alfalfa and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal to provide glucose to the AM [53], and AtSWEET13 and AtSWEET14 can transport gibberellins [4].
In this paper, the expression patterns of ZeSWEET genes were variations. ZeSWEET02/11/12 were substantially expressed in the stamen, and ZeSWEET10 in the bulb. On the contrary, ZeSWEET13 was unexpressed in the pistil, and ZeSWEET17 in the root. The changes in expression during organ development also suggest that different ZeSWEET genes function at different stages of organ development. Moreover, expression of ZeSWEET06/09 was undetectable in any tissues/organs. This suggests that they may be expressed in highly specific tissues and/or under specific conditions.

3.3. The Promoters of Zantedeschia SWEETS

Growth and development in higher plants are the result of orderly gene expression in time and space. The regulation of plant gene expression is influenced by a variety of internal and external environments and is a multilevel regulatory system. Among these regulatory systems, transcriptional regulation of gene expression is a key aspect, and the regulation of promoters plays a very important role in the transcription process. Therefore, the study of the functional sequence of promoters has great significance for understanding gene expression regulation. In 1961, Monod and Jacob discovered promoters for the first time [76], and since then, molecular biologists have been studying the structure and functions of promoters. Promoters are indispensable components of exogenous expression vectors, which can drive the high-level expression of target proteins in recipient cells.
In this study, a wide variety of cis-acting elements have been identified in the promoters of ZeSWEET genes, and they are associated with growth and development regulation, light response, stress response, and hormone response, suggesting that ZeSWEETs are involved in complex signaling pathway regulation. The promoter sequences of ZeSWEETs contained cis-regulatory elements for nine types of phytohormone responsive and six types of environmental factors, including ABRE, CGTCA and TGACG motifs, GARE motif, P-box, TATC-box, TCA-element, TGA-element, ARE, GC-motif, LTR, MBS, and TC-rich repeats. Among these phytohormone responsive elements, the promoter region of ZeSWEET18 contained the greatest number of components with 18, while ZeSWEET02 contained the fewest with two. These results suggest that the ZeSWEET genes might be broadly involved in phytohormone responsive in Zantedeschia. Among the plant stress response elements, each ZeSWEET gene contained at least one cis-element (except ZeSWEET02), and nearly all genes contained ARE. These data suggest that ZeSWEETs may be involved in the response to environmental stress through a complex mechanism, and that each ZeSWEET gene can be induced by different environmental stresses.

3.4. The Response of Zantedeschia SWEETS after Pcc Interaction

An increasing body of evidence points to the fact that during the co-evolution of plants and pathogens, plant pathogens have evolved complex mechanisms to hijack plant developmentally regulated sugars for transport to themselves to sustain growth and reproduction [4]. SWEET genes are targeted by extracellular pathogens, and these causative organisms alter SWEET gene expression to obtain sugars needed for growth. For instance, VvSWEET4 is a glucose transporter protein localized in the plasma membrane in grapevine, and oxidative burst and widespread cell death triggered by necrotrophic fungal infections can regulate VvSWEET4 to promote sugar acquisition from plant cells [17]. AtSWEET2 is a sugar transporter protein localized to the vesicle membrane that resists Pythium infection by limiting root nitrogen fixation [44]. MeSWEET10 can be induced by TAL20Xam668 from Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis secreted, which increases the non-specific transport of sugars, leading to an increase in sugar content in the cellular interstitial space, and thus increasing plant susceptibility [57]. OsSWEET11 can interact with leaf blight bacterium (Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae), and this molecular interactive mechanism increases sugar efflux, which is ultimately utilized by pathogens [29]. GhSWEET10 can interact with Xanthomonas citri subsp. malvacearum, and silencing it significantly reduces the susceptibility of cotton to this pathogen [52].
In this study, ZeSWEET genes respond differently after Pcc infestation, 14 of 19 genes with detectable expression. Among them, ZeSWEET03/07/08/13 were significantly induced, and ZeSWEET03/04/08/13/14/17 showed the highest level of expression at 12 h, and ZeSWEET01/02 at 24 h. On the contrary, ZeSWEET05/15/16/18/19 were significantly suppressed, and ZeSWEET15/16 show the lowest level of expression at 36 h, and ZeSWEET18 at 24 h. These results suggest that ZeSWEET may be involved in the interaction of the calla lily and Pcc. As to how they interact and which genes are involved in the interaction, this is to be studied in the next step.

3.5. The Prospects of Zantedeschia ZeSWEETs Research

This study provides a detailed investigation of the 19 SWEET genes which were identified for the first time in Zantedeschia, and it also raises a number of questions. For example, it examines whether Motif 6 is necessary for sucrose transport, since it was specifically present in Clade III. In addition, it is still unknown what type of sugar is transported by ZeSWEET members in different clades and the roles they play in responding to phytohormones. Thus, in future, with respect to ZeSWEETs in biotic and abiotic stresses, as well as plant growth and development, deep functional validation research by combining the transcriptome and metabolome is required to provide valuable insights to aid plant engineering strategies for developing crops resistance to adverse stress conditions. This early work on SWEETs in Zantedeschia will fundamentally assist in further molecular function characterizations and will help during explorations of genetic innovation.
As everyone knows, soft rot is a severe disease in Zantedeschia spp., especially all hybrids of section Aestivae, which are infected in varying degrees [63,64,65]. The breeding strategy of new calla lily varieties naturally revolves around this worldwide problem, which is to product a wide range of flower colors and high resistance to soft rot. At present, the strategy is mainly based on traditional breeding, i.e., crossbreeding [77]. Unfortunately, the plastomes and genomes of Z. aethiopica and cultivars of the section Aestivae were demonstrated to be incompatible to such a high degree that hybrids were chlorophyll deficient (albino) and could only survive heterotrophically [77,78], limiting the introgression of resistance genes from Z. aethiopica into section Aestivae. Compared with traditional breeding, transgenic breeding has incomparable advantages, mainly in breaking the barrier of reproductive isolation between species, bringing new genetic resources to species; targeting the traits of ornamental plants, making breeding more purposeful; and shortening the breeding cycle and time. Consequently, the most convenient and quickest way to investigate calla lily resistance is to find genes associated with soft rot. However, no successful disease-resistant transgenic varieties of section Aestivae have been reported currently in both domestic and foreign countries.
In our study, the RNA-seq data and qRT-PCR were used to explore the expression of ZeSWEET genes for various times after Pcc infection, and 14 of 19 genes were detected (Figure 8). Included among these, 6 of 14 genes were downregulated, while 8 of 14 were upregulated. Among the eight up-regulated genes, ZeSWEET03/04/08/13/14/17 showed the highest level of expression at 12 h. These results suggest that ZeSWEET may be involved in Pcc infection in Zantedeschia, thus providing a potential genetic resource and research directions for molecular breeding for disease resistance in the calla lily.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Stress Treatments

Z. elliottiana was planted in the base of College of Horticulture and Landscaping, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China (geospatial coordinates: 102.83945, 24.88627). The Z. elliottiana seedlings (with 2 leaves) under similar growth conditions were transplanted into square plastic flowerpots (10 cm long × 10 cm wide × 12 cm high, one plants per pot) containing peat and perlite (6:4 ratio) and placed in a light incubator at 22 °C, under 75% relative humidity and day and night cycles of 10/14 h. Three-month-old seedlings with 5–6 leaves were selected for the stress treatment experiments. To investigate the Pectobacterium pathogen responses of Z. elliottiana plants, the treatment group plants were inoculated with 10 µL of Pcc suspension (108 CFU/mL, OD600 = 0.1) and distilled water as a control. They were placed in a 28 °C incubator and leaves were collected at 0, 12, 24, and 36 h after treatment, respectively. The harvested samples were instantly frozen in liquid nitrogen and were kept at −80 °C until RNA extraction.

4.2. Identification of the SWEET Gene Family in Z. elliottiana

The genomic and annotative data for Z. elliottiana was obtained from Figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22656112, accessed on 18 November 2023), and the candidate sequences of the SWEET genes of A. thaliana were downloaded from TAIR (https://www.arabidopsis.org/index.jsp, accessed on 18 November 2023). The hidden Markov model (HMM) profile of the SWEET (PF03083) gene family was obtained from Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org, accessed on 18 November 2023). We used both the hidden Markov model (HMM) with default parameters and BLAST searches to search separately for SWEET genes in the Z. elliottiana with the “trusted cutoff and E-value < 0.01” as the threshold. SWEETs from Z. elliottiana were validated by conducting a BLAST search using SWEETs from Arabidopsis as queries. Then, the results of the two methods were intersected to obtain the candidate sequences, whose conserved domains were further identified by the Pfam database (http://pfam-legacy.xfam.org/null, accessed on 18 November 2023) and the Conserved Domain Database (CDD) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi/, accessed on 18 November 2023). Sequences without a SWEET domain were removed. Nineteen ZeSWEET proteins in Z. elliottiana were finally obtained. Physicochemical characteristics and the subcellular localization of the ZeSWEET proteins were respectively predicted by the ProtParam tool (http://web.expasy.org/protparam, accessed on 19 November 2023) and WoLF PSORT II (https://wolfpsort.hgc.jp/, accessed on 19 November 2023).

4.3. Phylogenetic Analysis of SWEET Family Members

The homologous sequence alignment of the SWEET protein sequences in A. thaliana, O. sativa, and Z. elliottiana (Table S1) were conducted using MAFFT (v.7.471) with default settings [79]. Among them, the data for O. sativa were obtained from NCBI (accessed on 19 November 2023). Based on the results of sequence alignment, a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed by MEGA7.0 with 1000 bootstrap replicates [80]. In addition, it was prepared (annotated and modified) by EvolVIEW v2.0 (https://www.evolgenius.info/evolview-v2/, accessed on 21 November 2023) [81].

4.4. Conserved Motifs, Conserved Domains, and Gene Structures Analysis

MEME software (v.5.5.5) (https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme, accessed on 21 November 2023) was used to analyze the conserved motifs of ZeSWEET proteins. CDD (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd/, accessed on 21 November 2023) was used to identify the conserved domains of ZeSWEET proteins. The Gene Structure View (Anvanced) belonging to TBtools software (v.2.028) [82] was used to visualize the conserved motifs, conserved domains, and gene structures of ZeSWEET proteins and genes.

4.5. Chromosomal Localization and Colinear Analysis

The information on location for each ZeSWEET gene was obtained from the GFF genome annotation of Z. elliottiana. The chromosomal positions of ZeSWEETs were visualized using TBtools (v.2.028) [82].
One Step MCScanX from TBtools was used to identify the pattern of gene duplication with default parameters (E-value cut-off < 1 × 10−10 and Num of BlastHits with 5) and was used to analyze SWEET genes in Z. elliottiana vs. itself and Z. elliottiana vs. Colcasia esculenta/Pistia stratiotes/Spirodela polyrhiza/Amorphophallus konjac/Pinellia pedatisecta, Colcasia esculenta, respectively. The download sites of genomic and annotative files have been listed in Table S2. The results were visualized using TBtools (v.2.028) [82].

4.6. Promoter Cis-Regulatory Element Analysis

The 2000 bp genomic DNA sequences upstream of the translation start sites of the ZeSWEET genes were searched for 5′ regulatory sequences using PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 22 November 2023) to identify cis-acting elements. The prediction results of cis-acting elements were illustrated by TBtools (v.2.028) [82].

4.7. RNA-Seq Data Analysis

To explore the expression patterns of ZeSWEET genes in different tissues of Z. elliottiana, the transcriptome data, which include root, stem, leaf, style, stamen, spathe, pistil, and bulb, were downloaded from the NCBI SRA database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/, accessed on 23 November 2023) [60]. The raw data have been listed in Table S3. The expression levels of ZeSWEET genes in different tissues were examined according to FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads), and the heatmap was drawn using TBtools (v.2.028) [82].
To investigate the ZeSWEETs expression profiles in response to Pcc stress (the stress experimental could be seen in Section 4.1), the transcriptome data was obtained from our laboratory (unpublished). The differentially expressed ZeSWEETs with over 2-fold changes in the transcriptome data were screened, Heatmaps of these ZeSWEETs were visualized using TBtools (v.2.028) with log 2-based FPKM values [82].

4.8. RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR Analysis

Total RNA of leaves inoculated with Pcc and control subjects was extracted using the Polysaccharide and Polyphenol Plant Rapid RNA Isolation Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, then the DNA in total RNA was removed with DNase I (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). The concentration and purity were checked using the NanoDrop2000 spectrophotometer. First-strand cDNA synthesis with reverse transcriptase (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol using 1 μg of RNA template. The expression analysis was conducted using FastKing One Step qRT-PCR Kit (SYBR) (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) and software (v.2.4.1) (Applied Biosystems, Leuven, Belgium). The actin gene was used as a reference in all experiments. Primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Table S4. All reactions were performed in triplicate, and fold change was calculated using the formula 2−ΔΔCt. Finally, the data were analyzed via DPS v.9.01 (Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China) and Microsoft Office Excel v.2019 (Microsoft, Redmond, MA, USA), and Duncan’s test was employed to compare significant differences between treatments, and all data were the mean ± standard error of three biological and three technical replicates.

4.9. Subcellular Localization of ZeSWEET07 and ZeSWEET18

The ZeSWEET07 and ZeSWEET18 CDS sequence were cloned into the pEGOEP35S-H-GFP vector to generate pEGOEP35S-H-ZeSWEET07-GFP and pEGOEP35S-H-ZeSWEET18-GFP. The recombined plasmids were used to transform Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 and were injected into leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana (4 weeks old). The infection solution was prepared with sterile water containing containing 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM 2-Morpholinoethanesulfonic Acid (MES), and 0.1 mM Acetosyringone (AS), to an OD600 of 1.0. Two days after inoculation, the GFP fluorescence of these N. benthamiana leaves were observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Nikon A1 HD25, Tokyo, Japan) at 488 nm for GFP. The relevant primers are provided in Table S5.

5. Conclusions

In this study, a total of 19 SWEET genes were identified in Z. elliottiana and were found to be distributed on ten chromosomes. They were clustered into four clades by phylogenetic analysis; each clade has its own specific motifs except for Clade Ⅳ, and the same branch had similar conserved motifs and gene structures. In the upstream sequence of the ZeSWEETs promoter, cis-acting elements related to light responsiveness, hormones, stress, and development were identified. The expression of ZeSWEETs is tissue-specific, which suggests the function diversity of these genes. Based on transcriptome data, the expression patterns of all the ZeSWEETs in Pcc infection indicate that they may be involved in Pcc stress signaling pathway regulation. Furthermore, qRT-PCR analysis showed that the expression of eight ZeSWEET genes increased and six ZeSWEET genes repressed when plants were exposed to Pcc infection. Overall, the results from this study provide a basic understanding of the ZeSWEET genes, facilitate unraveling the potential candidate ZeSWEET genes involved in the response to soft rot, provide valuable information to facilitate the breeding of soft rot-resistant cultivars in the calla lily, and provide a platform for the identification and comprehensive functional characterization of SWEET gene families from other Araceae plants.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25042004/s1.

Author Contributions

Z.L. and Y.G. contributed equally to this work; H.W. and Z.L. completed the conceptualization; Z.L. and Y.G. performed the experiments; Z.L., Y.G. and S.J. analyzed the data; Y.G. and S.J. contributed to the visualization; Z.L. and Y.G. wrote the manuscript; and H.W. revised the manuscript; project administration, H.W.; funding acquisition, H.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 32160723, 31960610).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gautam, T.; Dutta, M.; Jaiswal, V.; Zinta, G.; Gahlaut, V.; Kumar, S. Emerging Roles of SWEET Sugar Transporters in Plant Development and Abiotic Stress Responses. Cells 2022, 11, 1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Xuan, Y.H.; Hu, Y.B.; Chen, L.Q.; Sosso, D.; Ducat, D.C.; Hou, B.H.; Frommer, W.B. Functional role of oligomerization for bacterial and plant SWEET sugar transporter family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E3685–E3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Eom, J.S.; Chen, L.Q.; Sosso, D.; Julius, B.T.; Lin, I.W.; Qu, X.Q.; Braun, D.M.; Frommer, W.B. SWEETs, transporters for intracellular and intercellular sugar translocation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015, 25, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chen, L.Q.; Hou, B.H.; Lalonde, S.; Takanaga, H.; Hartung, M.L.; Qu, X.Q.; Guo, W.J.; Kim, J.G.; Underwood, W.; Chaudhuri, B.; et al. Sugar transporters for intercellular exchange and nutrition of pathogens. Nature 2010, 468, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, L.Q.; Qu, X.Q.; Hou, B.H.; Sosso, D.; Osorio, S.; Fernie, A.R.; Frommer, W.B. Sucrose efflux mediated by SWEET proteins as a key step for phloem transport. Science 2012, 335, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lin, I.W.; Sosso, D.; Chen, L.-Q.; Gase, K.; Kim, S.-G.; Kessler, D.; Klinkenberg, P.M.; Gorder, M.K.; Hou, B.-H.; Qu, X.-Q.; et al. Nectar secretion requires sucrose phosphate synthases and the sugar transporter SWEET9. Nature 2014, 508, 546–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yuan, M.; Wang, S.P. Rice MtN3/Saliva/SWEET family genes and their homologs in cellular organisms. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 665–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhu, J.; Zhou, L.; Li, T.; Ruan, Y.; Zhang, A.; Dong, X.; Zhu, Y.; Li, C.; Fan, J. Genome-Wide Investigation and Characterization of SWEET Gene Family with Focus on Their Evolution and Expression during Hormone and Abiotic Stress Response in Maize. Genes 2022, 13, 1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Patil, G.; Valliyodan, B.; Deshmukh, R.; Prince, S.; Nicander, B.; Zhao, M.; Sonah, H.; Song, L.; Lin, L.; Chaudhary, J.; et al. Soybean (Glycine max) SWEET gene family: Insights through comparative genomics, transcriptome profiling and whole genome re-sequence analysis. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, W.; Wang, S.; Yu, F.; Tang, J.; Shan, X.; Bao, K.; Yu, L.; Wang, H.; Fei, Z.; Li, J. Genome-wide characterization and expression profiling of SWEET genes in cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) reveal their roles in chilling and clubroot disease responses. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Feng, C.Y.; Han, J.X.; Han, X.X.; Jiang, J. Genome-wide identification, phylogeny, and expression analysis of the SWEET gene family in tomato. Gene 2015, 573, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Manck-Goetzenberger, J.; Requena, N. Arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis induces a major transcriptional reprogramming of the potato SWEET sugar transporter family. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hu, L.P.; Zhang, F.; Song, S.H.; Tang, X.W.; Xu, H.; Liu, G.M.; Wang, Y.G.; He, H.J. Genome-wide identification, characterization, and expression analysis of the SWEET gene family in cucumber. J. Integr. Agric. 2017, 16, 1486–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Miao, H.; Sun, P.; Liu, Q.; Miao, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, K.; Hu, W.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; et al. Genome-wide analyses of SWEET family proteins reveal involvement in fruit development and abiotic/biotic stress responses in banana. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wei, X.; Liu, F.; Chen, C.; Ma, F.; Li, M. The Malus domestica sugar transporter gene family: Identifications based on genome and expression profiling related to the accumulation of fruit sugars. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Xie, H.; Wang, D.; Qin, Y.; Ma, A.; Zhao, J. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of sweet gene family in Litchi chinensis reveal the involvement of Lcsweet2a/3b in early seed development. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chong, J.; Piron, M.C.; Meyer, S.; Merdinoglu, D.; Bertsch, C.; Mestre, P. The SWEET family of sugar transporters in grapevine: VvSWEET4 is involved in the interaction with Botrytis cinerea. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 6589–6601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Song, X.; Kou, Y.; Duan, M.; Feng, B.; Yu, X.; Jia, R.; Zhao, X.; Ge, H.; Yang, S. Genome-Wide Identification of the Rose SWEET Gene Family and Their Different Expression Profiles in Cold Response between Two Rose Species. Plants 2023, 12, 1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, G.Q.; Zhang, D.; Liu, X.D.; Xu, X.Y.; Sun, W.H.; Yu, X.; Zhu, X.; Wang, Z.W.; Zhao, X.; et al. Chromosome-scale assembly of the Dendrobium chrysotoxum genome enhances the understanding of orchid evolution. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, D.M.; Chen, Y.; Liu, X.; Ni, D.A.; Bai, L.; Qin, Q.P. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the SWEET gene family in daylily (Hemerocallis fulva) and functional analysis of HfSWEET17 in response to cold stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Iftikhar, J.; Lyu, M.; Liu, Z.; Mehmood, N.; Munir, N.; Ahmed, M.A.A.; Batool, W.; Aslam, M.M.; Yuan, Y.; Wu, B. Petunia axillaris Sugar and Hormone Dynamics and the Expression Profiles of SUT/SUC and SWEET Sweet Sugar Transporters during Flower Development in Petunia axillaris. Plants 2020, 9, 1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, C.; Tian, Z.; Li, J. AtSWEET4, a hexose facilitator, mediates sugar transport to axial sinks and affects plant development. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bezrutczyk, M.; Hartwig, T.; Horschman, M.; Char, S.N.; Yang, J.; Yang, B.; Frommer, W.B.; Sosso, D. Impaired phloem loading in Zmsweet13a,b,c sucrose transporter triple knock-out mutants in Zea mays. New Phytol. 2018, 218, 594–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Abelenda, J.A.; Bergonzi, S.; Oortwijn, M.; Sonnewald, S.; Du, M.; Visser, R.; Sonnewald, U.; Bachem, C. Source-Sink Regulation Is Mediated by Interaction of an FT Homolog with a SWEET Protein in Potato. Curr. Biol. 2019, 29, 1178–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Yao, X.; Wang, J.; Feng, S.; Sun, L.; Ma, S.; Xu, K.; Chen, L.Q.; Sui, X. Hexose transporter CsSWEET7a in cucumber mediates phloem unloading in companion cells for fruit development. Plant Physiol. 2021, 186, 640–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Salts, Y.; Sobolev, I.; Chmelnitsky, I.; Shabtai, S.; Barg, R. Genomic structure and expression of Lestd1, a seven-transmembranedomain proteon-encoding gene specially expressed in tomato pollen. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 2005, 53, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Andres, F.; Kinoshita, A.; Kalluri, N.; Fernandez, V.; Falavigna, V.S.; Cruz, T.M.D.; Jang, S.; Chiba, Y.; Seo, M.; Mettler-Altmann, T.; et al. The sugar transporter SWEET10 acts downstream of FLOWERING LOCUS T during floral transition of Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Liu, W.X.; Peng, B.; Song, A.P.; Jiang, J.F.; Chen, F.D. Sugar transporter, CmSWEET17, promotes bud outgrowth in Chrysanthemum morifolium. Genes 2020, 11, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ma, L.; Zhang, D.; Miao, Q.; Yang, J.; Xuan, Y.; Hu, Y. Essential Role of Sugar Transporter OsSWEET11 During the Early Stage of Rice Grain Filling. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 863–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wang, S.; Liu, S.; Wang, J.; Yokosho, K.; Zhou, B.; Yu, Y.-C.; Liu, Z.; Frommer, W.B.; Ma, J.F.; Chen, L.-Q.; et al. Simultaneous changes in seed size, oil content and protein content driven by selection of SWEET homologues during soybean domestication. Nat. Sci. Rev. 2020, 7, 1776–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Lopez-Coria, M.; Sanchez-Sanchez, T.; Martinez-Marcelo, V.H.; Aguilera-Alvarado, G.P.; Flores-Barrera, M.; King-Diaz, B.; Sanchez-Nieto, S. SWEET Transporters for the Nourishment of Embryonic Tissues during Maize Germination. Genes 2019, 10, 780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, X.; Feng, C.; Wang, M.; Li, T.; Liu, X.; Jiang, J. Plasma membrane-localized SlSWEET7a and SlSWEET14 regulate sugar transport and storage in tomato fruits. Hortic. Res. 2021, 8, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lin, Q.H.; Zhong, Q.Z.; Zhang, Z.H. Identification and functional analysis of SWEET gene family in Averrhoa carambola L. fruits during ripening. PeerJ 2021, 9, e11404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shammai, A.; Petreikov, M.; Yeselson, Y.; Faigenboim, A.; Moy-Komemi, M.; Cohen, S.; Cohen, D.; Besaulov, E.; Efrati, A.; Houminer, N.; et al. Natural genetic variation for expression of a SWEET transporter among wild species of Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) determines the hexose composition of ripening tomato fruit. Plant J. 2018, 96, 343–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhou, Y.; Liu, L.; Huang, W.; Yuan, M.; Zhou, F.; Li, X.; Lin, Y. Overexpression of OsSWEET5 in rice causes growth retardation and precocious senescence. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e94210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Matallana-Ramirez, L.P.; Rauf, M.; Farage-Barhom, S.; Dortay, H.; Xue, G.P.; Droge-Laser, W.; Lers, A.; Balazadeh, S.; MuellerRoeber, B. NAC transcription factor ORE1 and senescence-induced BIFUNCTIONAL NUCLEASE1 (BFN1) constitute a regulatory cascade in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 1438–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ni, J.; Li, J.; Zhu, R.; Zhang, M.; Qi, K.; Zhang, S.; Wu, J. Overexpression of sugar transporter gene PbSWEET4 of pear causes sugar reduce and early senescence in leaves. Gene 2020, 743, 144582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kanno, Y.; Oikawa, T.; Chiba, Y.; Ishimaru, Y.; Shimizu, T.; Sano, N.; Koshiba, T.; Kamiya, Y.; Ueda, M.; Seo, M. AtSWEET13 and AtSWEET14 regulate gibberellin-mediated physiological processes. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Morii, M.; Sugihara, A.; Takehara, S.; Kanno, Y.; Kawai, K.; Hobo, T.; Hattori, M.; Yoshimura, H.; Seo, M.; Ueguchi-Tanaka, M. The dual function of OsSWEET3a as a gibberellin and glucose transporter Is important for young shoot development in Rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020, 61, 1935–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xuan, C.; Lan, G.; Si, F.; Zeng, Z.; Wang, C.; Yadav, V.; Wei, C.; Zhang, X. Systematic Genome-Wide Study and Expression Analysis of SWEET Gene Family: Sugar Transporter Family Contributes to Biotic and Abiotic Stimuli in Watermelon. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fang, T.; Rao, Y.; Wang, M.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xiong, P.; Zeng, L. Characterization of the SWEET Gene Family in Longan (Dimocarpus longan) and the Role of in Cold Tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. LeHir, R.; Spinner, L.; Klemens, P.A.W.; Chakraborti, D.; deMarco, F.; Vilaine, F.; Wolff, N.; Lemoine, R.; Porcheron, B.; Gery, C.; et al. Disruption of the sugar transporters AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 affects vascular development and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 1687–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mathan, J.; Singh, A.; Ranjan, A. Sucrose transport in response to drought and salt stress involves ABA-mediated induction of OsSWEET13 and OsSWEET15 in rice. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 171, 620–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, H.Y.; Huh, J.H.; Yu, Y.C.; Ho, L.H.; Chen, L.Q.; Tholl, D.; Frommer, W.B.; Guo, W.J. The Arabidopsis vacuolar sugar transporter SWEET2 limits carbon sequestration from roots and restricts Pythium infection. Plant J. 2015, 83, 1046–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chu, Z.; Yuan, M.; Yao, J.; Ge, X.; Yuan, B.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; Fu, B.; Li, Z.; Bennetzen, J.L.; et al. Promoter mutations of an essential gene for pollen development result in disease resistance in rice. Gene Dev. 2006, 20, 1250–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Antony, G.; Zhou, J.; Huang, S.; Li, T.; Liu, B.; White, F.F.; Yang, B. Rice xa13 recessive resistance to bacterial blight is defeated by induction of the disease susceptibility gene Os-11N3. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 3864–3876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hutin, M.; Sabot, F.; Ghesquiere, A.; Koebnik, R.; Szurek, B. A knowledge-based molecular screen uncovers a broad-spectrum OsSWEET14 resistance allele to bacterial blight from wild rice. Plant J. 2015, 84, 694–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Liu, Q.; Yuan, M.; Zhou, Y.; Li, X.; Xiao, J.; Wang, S. A paralog of the MtN3/saliva family recessively confers race-specific resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 1958–1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gao, Y.; Zhang, C.; Han, X.; Wang, Z.Y.; Ma, L.; Yuan, P.; Wu, J.N.; Zhu, X.F.; Liu, J.M.; Li, D.P.; et al. Inhibition of OsSWEET11 function in mesophyll cells improves resistance of rice to sheath blight disease. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2018, 19, 2149–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kim, P.; Xue, C.Y.; Song, H.D.; Gao, Y.; Feng, L.; Li, Y.; Xuan, Y.H. Tissue-specific activation of DOF11 promotes rice resistance to sheath blight disease and increases grain weight via activation of SWEET14. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 19, 409–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Sugiyama, A.; Saida, Y.; Yoshimizu, M.; Takanashi, K.; Sosso, D.; Frommer, W.B.; Yazaki, K. Molecular characterization of LjSWEET3, a sugar transporter in nodules of Lotus japonicus. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cox, K.L.; Meng, F.; Wilkins, K.E.; Li, F.; Wang, P.; Booher, N.J.; Carpenter, S.C.D.; Chen, L.Q.; Zheng, H.; Gao, X.; et al. TAL effector driven induction of a SWEET gene confers susceptibility to bacterial blight of cotton. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kryvoruchko, I.S.; Sinharoy, S.; Torres-Jerez, I.; Sosso, D.; Pislariu, C.I.; Guan, D.; Murray, J.; Benedito, V.A.; Frommer, W.B.; Udvardi, M.K. MtSWEET11, a nodule-specific sucrose transporter of Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 554–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. An, J.; Zeng, T.; Ji, C.; deGraaf, S.; Zheng, Z.; Xiao, T.T.; Deng, X.; Xiao, S.; Bisseling, T.; Limpens, E.; et al. A Medicago truncatula SWEET transporter implicated in arbuscule maintenance during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol. 2019, 224, 396–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Zhai, H.; Liu, Q.C.; He, S.Z. The plasma membrane-localized sucrose transporter IbSWEET10 contributes to the resistance of sweet potato to Fusarium oxysporum. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Asai, Y.; Kobayashi, Y.; Kobayashi, I. Increased expression of the tomato SISWEET15 gene during grey mold infection and the possible involvement of the sugar efflux to apoplasm in the disease susceptibility. Plant Pathol. Microbiol. 2015, 7, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cohn, M.; Bart, R.S.; Shybut, M.; Dahlbeck, D.; Gomez, M.; Morbitzer, R.; Hou, B.; Frommer, W.B.; Lahaye, T.; Staskawicz, B.J. Xanthomonas axonopodis virulence is promoted by a transcription activator-like effectormediated induction of a SWEET sugar transporter in cassava. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2014, 27, 1186–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hu, Y.; Zhang, J.L.; Jia, H.; Sosso, D.; Li, T.; Frommer, W.B.; Yang, B.; White, F.F.; Wang, N.; Jones, J.B. Lateral organ boundaries 1 is a disease susceptibility gene for citrus bacterial canker disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E521–E529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Xu, Z.Y.; Xu, X.M.; Gong, Q.; Li, Z.Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Yang, Y.Y.; Ma, W.X.; Liu, L.Y.; Zhu, B.; et al. Engineering Broad-Spectrum Bacterial Blight Resistance by Simultaneously Disrupting Variable TALE-Binding Elements of Multiple Susceptibility Genes in Rice. Mol. Plant 2019, 12, 1434–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, Y.; Yang, T.; Wang, D.; Gou, R.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Zheng, Y.; Gao, D.; Chen, L.; Zhang, X.; et al. Chromosome level genome assembly of colored calla lily (Zantedeschia elliottiana). Sci. Data 2023, 10, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Letty, C. The Genus Zantedeschia. Bothalia 1973, 11, 5–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yao, J.L.; Rowland, R.; Cohen, D.; Rowl, R. Karyotype studies in the genus Zantedeschia (Araceae). S. Afr. J. Bot. 1994, 60, 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Snijder, R.C.; Cho, H.-R.; Hendriks, M.M.; Lindhout, P.; van Tuyl, J.M. Genetic variation in Zantedeschia spp. (Araceae) for resistance to soft rot caused by Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora. Euphytica 2004, 135, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Snijder, R.C.; Tuyl, J.M.V. Evaluation of tests to determine resistance of Zantedeschia spp. (Araceae) to soft rot caused by Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2002, 108, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wright, P.J. A soft rot of calla (Zantedeschia spp.) caused by Erwinia carotovora subspecies carotovora. N. Z. J. Crop Hort. 1998, 26, 331–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Singh, Y. Contributions to the Systematics of the Genus Zantedeschia Spreng (Araceae); University of Pretoria Press: Pretoria, South Africa, 1996; Volume 169. [Google Scholar]
  67. Magadum, S.; Banerjee, U.; Murugan, P.; Gangapur, D.; Ravikesavanet, R. Gene duplication as a major force in evolution. J. Genet. 2013, 92, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. McCouch, S.R. Genomics and synteny. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125, 152–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Moore, B.d.; Sheen, J. Plant sugar sensing and signaling—A complex reality. Trends Plant Sci. 1999, 4, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Aoki, N.; Hirose, T.; Scofield, G.N.; Whitfeld, P.R.; Furbank, R.T. The sucrose transporter gene family in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lemoine, R.; LaCamera, S.; Atanassova, R.; Dédaldéchamp, F.; Allario, T.; Pourtau, N.; Bonnemain, J.L.; Laloi, M.; Coutos-Thévenot, P.; Maurousset, L.; et al. Source-to sink transport of sugar and regulation by environmental factors. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sauer, N. Molecular physiology of higher plant sucrose transporters. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 2309–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Srivastava, A.C.; Ganesan, S.; Ismail, I.O.; Ayre, B.G. Functional characterization of the Arabidopsis AtSUC2 sucrose/H+ symporter by tissue-specific complementation reveals an essential role in phloem loading but not in long-distance transport. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Gautam, T.; Saripalli, G.; Gahlaut, V.; Kumar, A.; Sharma, P.K.; Balyan, H.S.; Gupta, P.K. Further studies on sugar transporter (SWEET) genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 2327–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ji, J.; Yang, L.; Fang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhuang, M.; Lv, H.; Wang, Y. Plant SWEET Family of Sugar Transporters: Structure, Evolution and Biological Functions. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jacob, F.; Monod, J. Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1961, 3, 318–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yao, J.L.; Cohen, D.; Rowland, R.E. Interspecific albino and variegated hybrids in the genus Zantedeschia. Plant Sci. 1995, 109, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yao, J.L.; Cohen, D.; Rowland, R.E. Plastid DNA inheritance and plastome-genome incompatibility in interspecific hybrids of Zantedeschia (Araceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 1994, 88, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Katoh, K.; Rozewicki, J.; Yamada, K.D. MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief. Bioinform. 2019, 20, 1160–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, H.; Gao, S.; Lercher, M.J.; Hu, S.; Chen, W.H. EvolView, an online tool for visualizing, annotating and managing phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, W569–W572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chen, C.J.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.H.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 25 02004 g001
Figure 1. Distribution of ZeSWEET genes on the ten Z. elliottiana chromosomes. The bars represent chromosomes. The chromosome numbers are displayed on the left side, and the gene names are displayed on the right side. Each gene location is shown on the line. Detailed chromosomal location information is listed in Table 1.
Figure 1. Distribution of ZeSWEET genes on the ten Z. elliottiana chromosomes. The bars represent chromosomes. The chromosome numbers are displayed on the left side, and the gene names are displayed on the right side. Each gene location is shown on the line. Detailed chromosomal location information is listed in Table 1.
Ijms 25 02004 g001
Ijms 25 02004 g002
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree for SWEET proteins of Z. elliottiana, O. sativa, and A. thaliana. Multiple sequence alignment of the SWEET domains was performed using MAFFT, and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 7.0 with the maximum likelihood method with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The tree was divided into four clades, designated I, II, III, and IV. Different colors represent the four different clades: violet, Clade I; green, Clade II; red, Clade III; and blue, Clade IV. The blue triangle, green circles, and red star represent the 21 OsSWEETs in O. sativa, 17 AtSWEETs in A. thaliana, and 19 ZeSWEETs in Z. elliottiana, respectively.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree for SWEET proteins of Z. elliottiana, O. sativa, and A. thaliana. Multiple sequence alignment of the SWEET domains was performed using MAFFT, and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 7.0 with the maximum likelihood method with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The tree was divided into four clades, designated I, II, III, and IV. Different colors represent the four different clades: violet, Clade I; green, Clade II; red, Clade III; and blue, Clade IV. The blue triangle, green circles, and red star represent the 21 OsSWEETs in O. sativa, 17 AtSWEETs in A. thaliana, and 19 ZeSWEETs in Z. elliottiana, respectively.
Ijms 25 02004 g002
Ijms 25 02004 g003
Figure 3. Phylogenetic relationship, gene structure, and conserved motif analysis of the ZeSWEET genes. (A) Phylogenetic tree of 19 ZeSWEET proteins. (B) Distributions of conserved motifs in ZeSWEET proteins. Nineteen putative motifs are indicated in different colored boxes. (C) The domain composition of ZeSWEETs. Green rectangles represent the MtN3/saliva domain and yellow rectangles represent the PQ-loop domain. (D) Exon-intron structure. Yellow boxes, green boxes, and black lines indicate the untranslated region, coding sequence, and gene length, respectively.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic relationship, gene structure, and conserved motif analysis of the ZeSWEET genes. (A) Phylogenetic tree of 19 ZeSWEET proteins. (B) Distributions of conserved motifs in ZeSWEET proteins. Nineteen putative motifs are indicated in different colored boxes. (C) The domain composition of ZeSWEETs. Green rectangles represent the MtN3/saliva domain and yellow rectangles represent the PQ-loop domain. (D) Exon-intron structure. Yellow boxes, green boxes, and black lines indicate the untranslated region, coding sequence, and gene length, respectively.
Ijms 25 02004 g003
Ijms 25 02004 g004
Figure 4. Cis-acting elements in the ZeSWEET gene family. Numbers of different elements in the promoter region of the ZeSWEET genes, as indicated by different color intensities and numbers in the grid.
Figure 4. Cis-acting elements in the ZeSWEET gene family. Numbers of different elements in the promoter region of the ZeSWEET genes, as indicated by different color intensities and numbers in the grid.
Ijms 25 02004 g004
Ijms 25 02004 g005
Figure 5. Gene duplication of the ZeSWEET genes. Red curves linking ZeSWEET genes indicate duplicated gene pairs in the Z. elliottiana SWEET family.
Figure 5. Gene duplication of the ZeSWEET genes. Red curves linking ZeSWEET genes indicate duplicated gene pairs in the Z. elliottiana SWEET family.
Ijms 25 02004 g005
Ijms 25 02004 g006
Figure 6. The collinearity relationship between the Z. elliottiana and other species. The collinear relationships between the Z. elliottiana, A. konjac, C. esculenta, P. stratiotes, P. pedatisecta, and S. polyrhiza genomes are shown on the chromosome maps. The gray line represents the collinearity between all members, and the red line represents the collinearity between the members of the SWEET family.
Figure 6. The collinearity relationship between the Z. elliottiana and other species. The collinear relationships between the Z. elliottiana, A. konjac, C. esculenta, P. stratiotes, P. pedatisecta, and S. polyrhiza genomes are shown on the chromosome maps. The gray line represents the collinearity between all members, and the red line represents the collinearity between the members of the SWEET family.
Ijms 25 02004 g006
Ijms 25 02004 g007
Figure 7. Expression patterns of ZeSWEET genes in different tissues analyzed by RNA-Seq. Red represents induced expression, green represents repressed expression, and gray indicates no expression (the same applies to Figure 8).
Figure 7. Expression patterns of ZeSWEET genes in different tissues analyzed by RNA-Seq. Red represents induced expression, green represents repressed expression, and gray indicates no expression (the same applies to Figure 8).
Ijms 25 02004 g007
Ijms 25 02004 g008
Figure 8. Expression patterns of ZeSWEET genes after Pcc infection analyzed by RNA-Seq. CK, control subjects. H, hours after Pcc infection (the same applies to Figure 9).
Figure 8. Expression patterns of ZeSWEET genes after Pcc infection analyzed by RNA-Seq. CK, control subjects. H, hours after Pcc infection (the same applies to Figure 9).
Ijms 25 02004 g008
Ijms 25 02004 g009
Figure 9. Expression levels of ZeSWEET genes in Zantedeschia leaves inoculated with Pcc via qRT-PCP. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations of three technical replicates derived from one bulked biological replicate. A Dunca’s multiple range test was used to calculate the significance level of the data at p < 0.05. Means denoted by the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 9. Expression levels of ZeSWEET genes in Zantedeschia leaves inoculated with Pcc via qRT-PCP. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations of three technical replicates derived from one bulked biological replicate. A Dunca’s multiple range test was used to calculate the significance level of the data at p < 0.05. Means denoted by the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05.
Ijms 25 02004 g009
Ijms 25 02004 g010
Figure 10. Subcellular localization of ZeSWEET proteins in tobacco leaves. From left to right are superposed photos of CK/ZeSWEET GFP green fluorescent protein, chloroplast spontaneous auto-fluorescence, bright field and merge (Scale bar = 50 μm).
Figure 10. Subcellular localization of ZeSWEET proteins in tobacco leaves. From left to right are superposed photos of CK/ZeSWEET GFP green fluorescent protein, chloroplast spontaneous auto-fluorescence, bright field and merge (Scale bar = 50 μm).
Ijms 25 02004 g010
Table 1. Characterization of ZeSWEETs in Z. elliottiana.
Table 1. Characterization of ZeSWEETs in Z. elliottiana.
Gene IDLocationProtein Length/aaMolecular Weight/kupIInstability IndexAliphatic IndexGrand Average of HydropathicitySubcellular Localization
Zh01G133200.1Chr01:61359146-61361011(+)24726,961.279.1129.9116.80.728Plasma membrane
Zh01G134700.1Chr01:61772271-61776799(−)25929,001.379.8555.36109.110.469Plasma membrane
Zh01G158500.1Chr01:66829835-66832087(−)25528,279.799.1837.63121.140.685Plasma membrane
Zh04G140500.1Chr04:50012720-50025486(−)22824,378.089.3132.11108.640.685Plasma membrane
Zh08G102900.1Chr08:20417532-20420150(+)23726,661.019.5353.33125.70.603Plasma membrane
Zh09G140200.1Chr09:61898091-61905886(+)37743,255.659.6235.2981.19−0.324Cell Wall
Zh09G204800.1Chr09:75242560-75244590(−)23325,963.948.8643.4130.520.95Chloroplast
Zh10G037900.1Chr10:6326732-6327316(+)19420,842.978.6342.12127.110.881Plasma membrane
Zh10G038000.1Chr10:6337021-6337770(+)24926,936.279.2135.67123.250.808Plasma membrane
Zh11G186300.1Chr11:55237827-55252030(−)31334,379.468.6452.6385.4−0.1Chloroplast
Zh12G056300.1Chr12:9955947-9961152(−)17818,862.068.538.8101.910.471Plasma membrane
Zh12G056400.1Chr12:9961220-9961513(−)9710,767.919.2136.43121.650.601Chloroplast
Zh12G077000.1Chr12:14389758-14395284(+)35938,947.298.9754.01108.940.806Plasma membrane
Zh13G136500.1Chr13:47312228-47314257(+)28631,299.199.0828.13116.920.553Plasma membrane
Zh14G035600.1Chr14:47312228-47314257(+)24927,862.748.944.49112.290.574Plasma membrane
Zh14G134100.1Chr14:23829044-23830197(−)25027,103.469.1658.4187−0.03Plasma membrane
Zh14G142500.1Chr14:25381422-25404514(−)87096,943.956.5250.4489.94−0.098Chloroplast
Zh14G221800.1Chr14:66140958-66143326(−)29733,004.099.1735.95114.610.582Plasma membrane
Zh16G155400.1Chr16:51874529-51916952(−)56062,646.77.257.698.950.137Chloroplast
Note: pI, theoretical isoelectric point.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Z.; Guo, Y.; Jin, S.; Wu, H. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Profile Analysis of Sugars Will Eventually Be Exported Transporter (SWEET) Genes in Zantedeschia elliottiana and Their Responsiveness to Pectobacterium carotovora subspecies Carotovora (Pcc) Infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 2004. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042004

AMA Style

Li Z, Guo Y, Jin S, Wu H. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Profile Analysis of Sugars Will Eventually Be Exported Transporter (SWEET) Genes in Zantedeschia elliottiana and Their Responsiveness to Pectobacterium carotovora subspecies Carotovora (Pcc) Infection. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(4):2004. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Ziwei, Yanbing Guo, Shoulin Jin, and Hongzhi Wu. 2024. "Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Profile Analysis of Sugars Will Eventually Be Exported Transporter (SWEET) Genes in Zantedeschia elliottiana and Their Responsiveness to Pectobacterium carotovora subspecies Carotovora (Pcc) Infection" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 4: 2004. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042004

APA Style

Li, Z., Guo, Y., Jin, S., & Wu, H. (2024). Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Profile Analysis of Sugars Will Eventually Be Exported Transporter (SWEET) Genes in Zantedeschia elliottiana and Their Responsiveness to Pectobacterium carotovora subspecies Carotovora (Pcc) Infection. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(4), 2004. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042004

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop