Next Article in Journal
Pyrimidine Schiff Bases: Synthesis, Structural Characterization and Recent Studies on Biological Activities
Next Article in Special Issue
Bacteriophages—Dangerous Viruses Acting Incognito or Underestimated Saviors in the Fight against Bacteria?
Previous Article in Journal
Cloning and Characterization of Chitin Deacetylase from Euphausia superba
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biological Function of Prophage-Related Gene Cluster ΔVpaChn25_RS25055VpaChn25_0714 of Vibrio parahaemolyticus CHN25
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Obolenskvirus Phages Brutus and Scipio: Biology, Evolution, and Phage-Host Interaction

by
Peter V. Evseev
1,2,3,*,†,
Mikhail M. Shneider
1,†,
Lyubov V. Kolupaeva
2,
Anastasia A. Kasimova
2,4,
Olga Y. Timoshina
1,
Andrey V. Perepelov
4,
Anna M. Shpirt
4,
Andrey A. Shelenkov
5,
Yulia V. Mikhailova
5,
Natalia E. Suzina
6,
Yuriy A. Knirel
4,
Konstantin A. Miroshnikov
1 and
Anastasia V. Popova
2,*
1
Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russia
2
State Research Center for Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, City District Serpukhov, Moscow Region, 142279 Obolensk, Russia
3
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 117997 Moscow, Russia
4
N. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
5
Central Scientific Research Institute of Epidemiology, 111123 Moscow, Russia
6
Skryabin Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms, Federal Research Center “Pushchino Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences”, Moscow Region, 142290 Pushchino, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(4), 2074; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042074
Submission received: 29 December 2023 / Revised: 1 February 2024 / Accepted: 6 February 2024 / Published: 8 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bacteriophage—Molecular Studies 5.0)

Abstract

:
Two novel virulent phages of the genus Obolenskvirus infecting Acinetobacter baumannii, a significant nosocomial pathogen, have been isolated and studied. Phages Brutus and Scipio were able to infect A. baumannii strains belonging to the K116 and K82 capsular types, respectively. The biological properties and genomic organization of the phages were characterized. Comparative genomic, phylogenetic, and pangenomic analyses were performed to investigate the relationship of Brutus and Scipio to other bacterial viruses and to trace the possible origin and evolutionary history of these phages and other representatives of the genus Obolenskvirus. The investigation of enzymatic activity of the tailspike depolymerase encoded in the genome of phage Scipio, the first reported virus infecting A. baumannii of the K82 capsular type, was performed. The study of new representatives of the genus Obolenskvirus and mechanisms of action of depolymerases encoded in their genomes expands knowledge about the diversity of viruses within this taxonomic group and strategies of Obolenskvirus–host bacteria interaction.

1. Introduction

The ability of bacterial viruses (bacteriophages or phages) to kill bacteria attracted the attention of researchers very soon after the discovery of phages by Frederick W. Twort in 1915 and Félix d’Hérelle in 1917 [1,2,3]. Phage therapy has important advantages, including low intrinsic toxicity, minimal disruption of normal microbiota, and the lack of cross-resistance with antibiotics [4]. The spread of antibiotic resistance and advances in molecular biology and virology have brought renewed attention to bacteriophage treatment in recent decades. Phage therapy could provide an effective treatment of nosocomial infections and would be a solution to the problems caused by the global spread of antimicrobial resistance [5].
Over the past few decades, Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged as one of the most troublesome nosocomial pathogens [6]. A. baumannii causes a wide range of hospital-acquired infections including respiratory tract, bloodstream, skin and soft tissue, urinary tract, and central nervous system infections and can be associated with high morbidity and mortality rates [6,7]. As a member of the «ESKAPE» (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) group of pathogens, A. baumannii effectively escapes the effects of antibacterial drugs [8,9]. In this regard, the use of virulent bacteriophages, which are highly specific to their targets, is a promising approach to controlling the spread of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii strains.
In this work, we present a characterization of two novel phages, Brutus and Scipio, isolated on A. baumannii strains belonging to K116 and K82 capsular types, respectively. The phages are closely related to the viruses assigned to the genus Obolenskvirus. This genus is one of the largest groups of A. baumannii phages, which currently comprises more than thirty phages, with genomes deposited in NCBI GenBank [10]. The genomes of each Obolenskvirus phage encode one tailspike depolymerase that determines specificity to a certain A. baumannii K type. To date, the enzymatic activity of only one representative of the genus Obolenskvirus has been established—that of the K91(40)-specific phage AP22 [11]. Herein, the first characterization of the mechanism of action of a K82-specific enzyme encoded in the Scipio genome was made.
The thorough examination of Brutus and Scipio genomes, and the genomes of other Obolenskvirus phages, revealed that these viruses share similarities in genome organization and composition but also have differences in terms of their evolutionary history. Some of those differences most likely illustrate the theory of the modular evolution of phages and underline the role of horizontal transfer in phage evolution. Furthermore, some genomic features can be explained by their relatedness to phages that are capable of a temperate lifestyle. These observations are supported by proteomic phylogeny and pangenomic analysis. The analysis of core protein phylogeny and calculations of intergenomic similarity enable the suggestion of taxonomic updates that can better correspond to the genomic data.

2. Results

2.1. Phage Morphological Characteristics and Infection Parameters

Bacteriophages Brutus and Scipio were isolated from sewage samples collected, in 2018, from the Moscow region, in Russia, from lawns of A. baumannii MAR15-3273 and A. baumannii LUH5534, respectively. The structure of K82 capsular polysaccharide (CPS) produced by A. baumannii LUH5534 was established earlier [12]. The capsule biosynthesis gene cluster identified in the A. baumannii MAR15-3273 genome was found to be identical to the previously described locus of A. baumannii MAR-303 assigned to KL116 (GenBank accession number MK399425.1) [13]. On the host bacterial lawns, both phages form clear plaques with haloes (Figure 1A), indicating the presence of the depolymerizing activity of certain phage structures toward corresponding CPSs.
Phage particles’ morphology was examined by transmission electron microscopy. Brutus and Scipio were found to have icosahedral heads of 58.7 ± 3.4 nm and 59.3 ± 1.9 nm in diameter and contractile tails of about 93.2 ± 1.4 nm and 92.9 ± 1.8 nm in length with distinguishable tailspikes, respectively (Figure 1B). Interestingly, both phages also have a short, thin neck between the head and the tail and what are presumed to be collar structures, which are visible in some electron micrographs.
The infection process for both phages was investigated by estimating adsorption efficiency (Figure 1C) and one-step growth experiments (Figure 1D). It was shown that more than 85% of Scipio and almost 80% of Brutus phage particles adsorbed to the host cells within 5 min and exhibited adsorption constants of 1.9 × 10−9 mL/min and 1.5 × 10−9 mL/min for A. baumannii LUH5534 and A. baumannii MAR15-3273 host cells for a period of 5 min, respectively. The latent periods for Scipio and Brutus were 10 and 15 min, and the burst sizes were approximately 45.5 ± 3.7 and 75.0 ± 5.3 particles per infected cell, respectively (Figure 1D).

2.2. General Genome Features

Acinetobacter phages Brutus and Scipio have double-stranded DNA genomes of 44,931 and 44,602 base pairs (bp), respectively. The GC content of the genomes is 37.40% for Brutus and 37.60% for Scipio (Figure 2), which are close to typical values of A. baumannii strains (38–40%), probably indicating intensive horizontal gene exchange with host and/or a long history of host–parasite relations. The Brutus genome contains 91 predicted open-reading frames (ORFs) and the Scipio genome encodes 84 ORFs. No tRNA genes were found in the genomes. Consistent with the GC skew, counting from the 5′ end of the terminase gene module, the genomes include large blocks of packaging, virion and lysis genes oriented in the forward direction, blocks of about a dozen genes, including DNA recombination protein and DNA exonuclease, oriented in the reverse direction, and blocks of about 30 genes, including the replication genes, oriented in the forward direction again. The coding density of Brutus is 93.9% and that of Scipio is 92.7%. Codon usage is strongly biased toward A/T rich codons and the amino acids leucin (8.1% Brutus, 8.0% Scipio), lysine (7.8% Brutus, 7.6% Scipio), and isoleucine (7.3% Brutus, 6.9% Scipio), which are preferentially coded by A/T rich codons or A/T triplets only. Unlike other genes, the predicted genes of replication protein located upstream of DNA helicase contain short, direct, and repetitive sequences of nine to about twenty bp long in the middle of replication protein genes, suggesting the possible location of the origin of replication in the central part of the predicted genes of the replication protein, reminiscent of Escherichia phage λ [14], T4 [15], and plasmids [16]. According to the results of functional annotations (Section 4.5), including BLAST and HHpred searches, 56% of Brutus and 49% of Scipio predicted proteins did not show essential similarity to functionally characterized proteins and have been annotated as hypothetical proteins.

2.3. Search for Related Phages

To find all closely related phage genomes, genomic sequences of Brutus and Scipio and 19,460 Caudoviricetes phage sequences contained in the NCBI Genome database were used for calculations of the average nucleotide identity (ANI) (Supplementary Table S1). A sequence search employing amino acid sequences of major capsid proteins (MCPs) and a large subunit of terminase (TLS) on the NCBI nr/nt databases was used to find possible unidentified phage genomes. The searches revealed thirty closely related genomes: twenty-eight genomes (including Brutus and Scipio) characterized as Acinetobacter phages and mainly classified as phages of the genus Obolenskvirus, one genome labeled Myoviridae sp. isolate ct6H824, and one presumed to be a phage genome (assembly HumMal, Ma_F259_Contig_623), which was found among human gut metagenomic sequences (Table 1). In addition, several Klebsiella phages and metagenomic phage sequences demonstrated some degree of similarity to MCP or TLS sequences but did not show a significant degree of ANI, as was seen with the 30 genomes mentioned above. Eight Acinetobacter phages, labeled Obolenskvirus by the NCBI Taxonomy classification, were classified as Obolenskvirus phages by the International Committee in Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV).
Clusterization performed with VIRIDIC, the tool recommended by the ICTV for intergenomic comparison and taxonomic assignment, confirmed the closeness of 30 of the genomes mentioned above (Figure 3A). Phylogenomic analysis carried out using ViP proteomic (Figure 3B) indicated that phages Brutus and Scipio belong to two distinct groups of Acinetobacter phages, but the VIRIDIC calculations showed difficulties in consistent clustering, indicating that some phages possess a high level of intergenomic similarity to phages of different VIRIDIC clusters and ViP proteomic branches. This can be a consequence of intensive genetic exchanges. In the following discussion, the group of 30 phages listed in Table 1 constituting a large cluster with intergenomic similarity of 19.3% and above in the VIRIDIC clustered heatmap (Figure 3A) and a large clade in the ViP proteomic tree (Figure 3B) will be referred to as the “Obolenskvirus–like group of phages” (OLG phages).
All OLG phages are characterized by a similar organization of genomes (Figure 4), a genome size of 42–46 kbp, and a moderately low GC content of 37–39%. Almost all OLG genomes encode about 80–90 ORFs; the only exception is an unverified and unannotated genomic sequence labeled “Acinetobacter phage PBAB08”, in which a Glimmer prediction found 110 ORFs, most of which were shorter than in other OLG phage genomes. Acinetobacter phage phiAC-1 infects Acinetobacter soli strain KZ-1 and other isolated published phages infect A. baumannii strains (references are presented in Table 1). All of these phages demonstrated lytic activity, and no signs of the ability to lysogenize the host were shown, although Obolenskvirus AbP2 (Acinetobacter phage ϕAbP2) was originally described as a member of the subfamily Peduovirinae, mainly on the basis of limited phylogenetic analysis.

2.4. Functional Genome Content

Genomes of the phages Brutus and Scipio contain four distinct blocks of genes, assigned according to their functions to structural (morphogenetical), replication, lysis, and packaging modules. In turn, the morphogenetic module consists of two distinguishable parts of capsid and tail genes (Figure 2). This kind of genome organization, as well as the list of genes contained, is common for many different Caudoviricetes phages, including the Obolenskvirus phages.
AlphaFold2 (AlphaFold, AF2) [31] modeling showed the HK97-like major capsid proteins of Brutus and Scipio, featuring all the Duplodnaviriaviruses (Figure 5A). MCPs of these two phages are identical only in 34.6% of amino acid residues but possess a very similar structure; the structural alignment of AF2 causes an RMSD (root-mean-square deviation) of 0.697 Å. The scaffolding protein (SP), removed in the mature capsid of Caudoviricetes viruses, is encoded by the 5′ part of the MCP gene; the length of the SP is about 40–50 amino acids. Some bacteriophages contain MCPs with a more complicated structural architecture than phage HK97 and include additional domains, e.g., phage ϕ29 [32] and Crassvirales phages [33]. Analysis of Obolenskvirus MCPs indicated that they all had no such domains. Interestingly, the gene located upstream of the MCP gene encodes the capsid stabilizing protein. AF2 modeling and HHpred comparisons pointed to the similarity of this protein to this ϕ29 capsid fiber protein and other phage capsid proteins also named minor capsid and decoration proteins.
The packaging genomic modules of Brutus and Scipio contain genes of small and large terminase subunits (TSS and TLS). The TLS of phage Brutus (433 aa) is very similar to the TLS of phage AP22 (ab. 99% amino acid identity, 433 aa) but shares only 20% identity with the TLS of phage Scipio (474 aa). An HHpred search showed the closer proximity of the TLS nuclease domains of Brutus to the Pfam family PF17288 (Terminase_3) and that of phage Scipio to the Pfam family PF17289 (Terminase_6).
The lysis block of Brutus, Scipio, and other OLG phage genomes does not contain annotations for all members of the holin/lysozyme (also known as endolysin)/spanin lysis system, typically participating in Caudoviricetes viral particle release [35,36]. While the holin and endolysin genes can be easily found by homology and HMM search, the spanin component has not been predicted in any of the Obolenskvirus genomes. The existence of an orphan gene, located between the holin end lysozyme genes and encoding a transmembrane domain-containing protein, however, suggests that it may function as a spanin. Additionally, there are additional possible ORFs hypothetically involving alternate start codons. It appears to be difficult, now, to characterize the lysis module bioinformatically.
The tail module accounts for about a third of the Brutus and Scipio genomes. They are very similar in their gene content and contain 17 (Brutus) and 16 (Scipio) genes with predicted functions encoding structural and morphogenetic proteins and several orphan genes. The organization of the tail module is typical of myoviruses, including the presence of the tail sheath protein, and this is shared by all members of the Obolenskvirus group. According to AlphaFold predictions, the tail sheath proteins of Brutus and Scipio, which often have a multidomain structure, contain two domains in addition to the conserved part [37]. This structural architecture appears to be preserved for all Obolenskvirus-like phages.
Another third of Brutus, Scipio, and other OLG phage genomes contain different genes that are presumably involved in various processes, including replication and nucleic acid manipulations. The replication apparatus does not contain phage-encoded DNA polymerase but includes a predicted origin-specific replication protein, which is presumably responsible for the initiation of replication and DNA helicase, which is involved in replication. As with other phages [38], the nucleotide sequence of the replication protein contains repeats that may be related to the replication origin. Interestingly, Brutus and Scipio genomes encode S-adenosyl-methionine-dependent methyltransferase, which is likely to be involved in the protection of phage DNA from bacterial phage resistance mechanisms, as well as a putative immune protein that prevents superinfection of the infected cell.

2.5. Genome Architecture and Pangenome Analysis

Pangenomic analysis of OLG phages revealed 11 single-copy genes (SCGs) that were shared by all the group members used to construct phylogeny based on the concatenated sequences (Figure 6). The list of these proteins included baseplate hub proteins, baseplate stabilizing proteins, baseplate wedge proteins, capsid assembly proteins, head–tail connectors, hypothetical proteins (Brutus_gp83), tail proteins (Brutus_gp27), tail sheath initiator proteins, tail sheath proteins, tail tube initiators, and tail tube proteins. However, the low level of similarity of such a conserved protein as MCP in evolution-related phages, which are close in lifestyle and genome organization, raises questions about the commonality of recent evolutionary history and the origin of some OLG proteins, as well as the appropriateness of using an approach that includes the concatenation of sequences of individual marker genes and proteins encoded by them for the purpose of evolutionary analysis.
Phylogenetic analysis using sequences of major capsid protein, large subunits of terminase, lysozyme (endolysin), and tape measure proteins (TMPs) showed inconsistencies in the topologies of these phylogenies (Figure 7) concerning the order and composition of clades. Phages belonging to the same clade of one tree are often placed in different clades of another tree. In three trees, phages Brutus and Scipio belong to different clusters (MCP, TLS, lysozyme) but are grouped closely in the TMP tree. According to genetic distances, most clades contain very similar sequences but have different phages for different trees. This may indicate fast changes in sequences, which can be related to horizontal gene transfer (HGT) between the phages. The distribution of gene clusters, which is quite variable within the clades of the SCG-based tree, can also indicate intense gene transfers, as well as the complex origin of OLG genes.
To reveal the homologs of the Obolenskvirus-like group of phages MCPs and TLSs, a BLAST search using NCBI nr/nt and the GenBank Phage database was conducted (E-value < 10−5). The results of the search indicated the absence of homologs of these proteins in sequenced genomes of Acinetobacter baumannii. The closest homologs of the MCP and TLS of OLG phages were found in the genomes of Acinetobacter larvae strain BRTC-1 and some unclassified Acinetobacter strains. The MCP and TLS genes in those genomes belong to prophage regions. The phylogenetic analysis conducted using sequences from different viral and bacterial taxa, representing the closest groups of homologous sequences found with BLAST, showed that all MCP OLG sequences share a monophyletic branch close to two Acinetobacter bacterial prophage MCPs (Figure 8A). Unlike the MCP tree, the TLS phylogeny places OLS sequences in a polyphyletic group (Figure 8B). The branch, containing most of the OLG TLS sequences, is adjacent to the branch including Acinetobacter bacterial prophage TLS sequences, but the remaining part of Obolenskvirus-like group TLS sequences is positioned in two distinct clades neighboring bacterial non-Acinetobacter sequences and viral sequences from phages not infecting Acinetobacter strains.
The closest phages, found with a BLAST search using Brutus and Scipio MCP and TLS sequences, represent different classified and unclassified, presumably temperate, phages. The genomes of these phages encode integrase and other genes responsible for the temperate lifestyle and often share similarities with OLG phages in the context of genome organization. They are Gofduovirus phages (Edwardsiella phage GF-2 and phage Edno5), miscellaneous Klebsiella phages (GZ7, ST512-KPC3phi13.5, Klebsiella phage ST11-VIM1phi8.3, Mulock), the Psychrobacter phage pOW20-A, etc. Homologs of integrases encoded in the genomes of these phages were not found in OLG phage genomes. According to the HHpred search, several transcriptional regulators (Brutus gp63 and gp64 and Scipio gp54, gp55, gp60) positioned in the module responsible for replication and DNA manipulation show a clear resemblance with phage repressors and antirepressors participating in the lysogeny decision. A thorough HHpred search, however, could not detect the OLG protein similar to known integrases. These results may indicate the loss of the integrase gene and the transition to a lytic lifestyle in the ancestors of Obolenskvirus-like phages. One might hypothesize that the temperate ancestors of Obolenskvirus-like phages changed their lifestyle after switching the host to A. baumannii, as suggested by the presence of related prophages in genomes of other Acinetobacter bacteria and the relatedness of OLG phages and conserved proteins to temperate phages infecting other Gammaproteobacteria and their proteins.

2.6. Receptor-Binding Proteins

The first step in phage-host interaction, adsorption, initiates the infection process and is the main determinant of phage host range [39,40]. This step is defined by a specific interaction between bacterial cell surface structures that act as receptors and phage receptor-binding proteins (RBPs), namely the tailspike and/or tail fiber proteins. In tailed capsular-specific A. baumannii phages, host specificity is usually related to tailspike proteins (TSPs) or structural depolymerases degrading capsular polysaccharides (CPSs) of a certain composition and structure [41,42,43,44,45,46]. Phage adsorption in Gram-negative bacteria can also engage O-antigen oligo/polysaccharides and other bacterial surface structures [47,48]. Although most RBPs are made of tail fiber proteins (TFPs) and TSPs composed of homotrimeric complexes, other proteins, such as tail needle and baseplate proteins, may also participate in the adsorption step [48,49,50].
The structural modules of the Brutus and Scipio genomes contain gene-encoding TSPs (Brutus_gp46 and Scipio_gp39) and TFPs (Brutus_gp45 and Scipio_gp38), indicating the complex adsorption apparatus of the phages. Analysis of Brutus and Scipio putative RBPs was conducted using sequence comparisons, HHpred, and DALI searches. The analysis indicated an average level of similarity (67% pairwise identity) of Brutus and Scipio TFPs, which contain a carbohydrate-binding domain (CBD domain). The CBD domains are located in the C-terminal parts of proteins, in regions corresponding to about 180–283 aa (Brutus) and 180–276 aa (Scipio). The significant difference in the amino acid composition of the CBD domains of the phages may be due to the different structures of their receptors.
The amino acid identity of Brutus and Scipio TSPs was as low as 31%. Both TFP and TSP sequences of the two phages are remarkably similar in the N-part of corresponding proteins. The N-termini of TFPs and TSPs are usually involved in binding to the phage particle; thus, they were quite conservative within the same taxonomic group. The receptor-binding (depolymerase) domains are located in the remaining part of proteins and are responsible for specific recognition of certain bacterial surface structures [51].
According to the HHpred searches, the enzymatic domains of Brutus and Scipio TSPs are located in the central part of the proteins, in regions of about 120–500 aa for Brutus and 130–450 aa for Scipio. Interestingly, the BLAST search using the GenBank Bacterial database found the closest homologs of the TSPs in several A. baumannii genomes, while close homologs of TFPs were found in the genomes of other representatives of the genus Acinetobacter. These findings might illustrate possible lateral transfers of RPB modules with the participation of bacterial hosts [52].
It is noteworthy that Obolenskvirus Brutus and previously described Friunavirus vB_AbaP_APK116 [43] are able to infect A. baumannii bacterial hosts, both belonging to the K116 capsular type. This means that TSPs encoded in the phage genomes can specifically recognize and degrade the CPS of the same K116 structure. TSP Brutus_gp46 is very similar to TSP APK116_gp43 at the amino acid level (the coverage obtained to an E-value of 0.0 was 88%, with an identity of 80.46%). Thus, it can be assumed that the mechanism of the enzymatic activities of these TSPs is most likely the same.

2.7. The Mechanism of Enzymatic Activity of TSP Scipio_gp39

Phage Scipio is the first bacterial virus encoding tailspike depolymerase specific to the K82 CPS of A. baumannii to be described. The structure of A. baumannii LUH5534, belonging to the K82 capsular type, was already established [12]. To elucidate the mechanism of the depolymerase action, the purified K82 CPS of A. baumannii LUH5534 was cleaved with recombinant protein Scipio_gp39.
The resulting products of cleavage were fractionated by gel permeation chromatography to isolate oligosaccharide 1 (OS1) and a small amount of intact polysaccharide. The structure of the oligosaccharide was established by one- and two-dimensional 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy and was confirmed by high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HR ESI-MS). The 13C NMR spectrum of the OS1 contained signals of four anomeric atoms of three linked monosaccharides (β-D-Galp (unit B), α-D-GlcpNAc (unit C), and β-D-Galp4,6Pyr (unit D) at δ 95.6–106.1 and one monosaccharide at the reducing end GalpNAc (unit A) at δ 92.6 and 96.5 (for α- and β-anomer, Aα, and Aβ, respectively) (Figure S3).
The positive ion HR ESI mass spectrum showed a [M + H]+ peak of C31H50O23 at m/z 819.2872 (calculated value 819.2872), a [M + NH4]+ peak at m/z 836.3136 (calculated value 836.3143), a [M + Na]+ peak at m/z 841.2692 (calculated value 841.2697), and a [M + K]+ peak at m/z 857.2427 (calculated value 857.2436) (Figure S4).
It can be concluded that oligosaccharide 1 was a tetrasaccharide, as shown in Figure 9.
The data obtained show that TSP Scipio_gp39 is a glycosidase that cleaves, specifically, the A. baumannii K82 CPS by the hydrolytic mechanism by the linkage between the repeating K units.

3. Discussion

In this work, the biological properties and genomic organization of two novel Obolenskvirus phages, Brutus and Scipio, were characterized. Phage Scipio is the first reported A. baumannii virus infecting the A. baumannii strain of the K82 capsular type. Thus, it was of particular interest to establish the mechanism of enzymatic activity of the tailspike depolymerase encoded in the phage genome. An analysis of the oligosaccharide product obtained by the degradation of the K82 CPS by the recombinant TSP Scipio_gp39 showed that the enzyme was a specific glycosidase cleaving the CPS by the hydrolytic mechanism to yield a monomer of the K repeating unit. Phage Brutus is capable of infecting the A. baumannii strain with a K116 CPS structure, like the previously described Friunavirus vB_AbaP_116 [43], which is confirmed by the similarity of TSPs Brutus_gp46 and APK116_gp43 at the amino acid level.
Comparative genomic, phylogenetic, and pangenomic analyses were performed to clarify the taxonomic position of the phages within OLG viruses and trace their possible origin and evolutionary history.
It is generally known that bacteriophages exhibit two distinct lifestyles: temperate and virulent [53]. Temperate phages are capable of entering a latent phase of infection within a host cell (lysogenic cycle), integrating their genome into the host chromosome (like phages λ [54] and P2 [55]) or existing as a circular (like phage P1 [56]) or a linear plasmid (like phage N15 [57]) in a bacterium. Virulent (lytic) phages (like T7 or T4 [58]) are characterized by a rapid infection accompanied by replication, progeny release, and bacterial lysis (lytic cycle). Temperate phages can also enter into the lytic cycle in certain circumstances, e.g., through being induced [59]. The lifestyle and genomics of phages are interconnected since the maintenance of lysogeny requires additional genes encoding components of the lysogenic apparatus, such as integrases (site-specific tyrosine recombinases), excisionases, and transcription regulators responsible for the lysogeny decision [60]. Temperate phages can be more prone to genetic exchanges [53] that can be related to recombinases encoded in their genomes [61]. Extensive gene exchange results in genetic mosaicism, and this is especially pronounced for temperate phages [53,54,62,63]. Genetic mosaicism manifests itself by a different evolutionary history of different genes and genetic modules, which can be seen from the different topologies of corresponding phylogenetic trees.
Phages Brutus and Scipio, like other Obolenskvirus phages, exhibit a strictly virulent lifestyle, and their genomes seem to not contain integrase or excisionase. The results of phylogenetic analyses performed in this study, however, indicate relationships between OLG phages and temperate phages that infect representatives of the genus Acinetobacter. These results enable speculation as to the origin of OLG phages from temperate phages infecting bacteria other than A. baumannii, and the loss of the ability to lysogenize the host might accompany host switching. The hypothesis of the origin of Obolenskvirus phages from temperate phages is supported by other indirect evidence. Like lambdoid phages, OLG phages do not encode their own DNA polymerase, seeming to use the host’s DNA polymerase. Genomes of Obolenskviruses encode a putative immunity protein, which supposedly participates in superinfection exclusion. This type of protein is especially useful for temperate phages [64]. The phylogenetic analysis of key proteins indicated a pervasive genetic mosaicism accompanying the evolution of OLG phages. The latest observations do not only apply to temperate phages but they are especially pronounced in this type of phage.
Phylogenetic analysis using sequences of major capsid protein and a large subunit of terminase showed the different evolutionary history of these proteins but, in both trees, the phages Brutus and Scipio were placed in different clusters. In the MCP tree, OLG phages form a monophyletic branch that diverges from the common ancestor of OLG phages and prophages of Gammaproteobacteria. This branch includes two distinct clusters, “Brutus-like” and “Scipio-like” phages. In the TLS tree, OLG phages are polyphyletic and are interspersed with various temperate phages. The incontinence of phylogenies of key proteins raises the previously discussed question of the correspondence between whole-proteome phylogeny and the true evolutionary history of phages and of the correspondences between taxonomy based on whole-proteome phylogeny and this history. The classification of OLG phages, including Brutus and Scipio, is also hampered by the results of calculations of intergenomic similarity, which mostly fail to achieve the common 70% genus threshold. To avoid the potential for spurious delineation of new taxa containing related and biologically similar phages, it would appear appropriate to lower the genus threshold and assign phages Brutus and Scipio to the genus Obolenskvirus, together with other OLG-like phages analyzed in this study.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Phage Isolation, Propagation, and Purification

Bacteriophages Brutus and Scipio were isolated from sewage samples collected in the Moscow region, in 2018, from bacterial lawns of A. baumannii strains MAR15-3273 and LUH5534, belonging to K116 and K82 capsular types, respectively. The samples were cleared by low-speed centrifugation (7000× g for 30 min), the supernatants were supplemented with LB medium and then incubated for 16–18 h, in the presence of growing A. baumannii strains belonging to different capsular types, at 37 °C, with shaking, and then chloroform was added. Bacterial debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 7000× g for 30 min, followed by filtration of the supernatants through 0.45 µm pore membrane filters (Merck Millipore, Cork, Ireland); the purified filtrates were then concentrated by ultracentrifugation at 85,000× g (Beckman SW50.1 Ti rotor, Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, 530 USA) at 4 °C for 2 h. The spot test method, as well as the plaque assay [65], was used to screen for the presence of lytic phage activity in the resulting concentrated preparations. The plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C and examined for zones of lysis or plaque formation.
Single plaques formed on the lawns of sensitive A. baumannii strains LUH5534 and MAR15-3273 were identified in the SM buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgSO4, and 100 mM NaCl) and were replated three times in order to obtain pure phage stock.
The phages Brutus and Scipio were propagated using a liquid culture of A. baumannii host strains MAR15-3273 and LUH5534 (OD600 of 0.3), respectively, at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1.
Phage particles were precipitated by PEG 8000 (at a final concentration of 10% and 500 mM NaCl). The final purification was executed by cesium chloride density-gradient centrifugation at 100,000× g (Beckman SW50.1 Ti rotor, Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA) for 24 h [66].

4.2. Phage Adsorption and One-Step Growth Experiments

For an adsorption assay, exponentially grown A. baumannii host cells LUH5534 and MAR15-3273 were mixed with the phages Scipio and Brutus (MOI = 0.001), respectively, and incubated at room temperature. A volume of 100 µL of the samples was taken after 0, 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 15 min, and then mixed with 850 µL of SM buffer supplemented with 50 µL of chloroform. After centrifugation, the supernatants were titrated for further determination of unabsorbed phages using the plaque assay method [65] at different time intervals. The adsorption constant was calculated according to a study by Adams [65] for a period of 5 min.
For the one-step growth experiments, 20 mL of host bacterial cells (OD600 ~ 0.3) was harvested by centrifugation (7000× g for 10 min at 4 °C) and resuspended in 1 mL LB broth. Bacterial cells were infected with the phages at an MOI of 0.01. The bacteriophages were allowed to adsorb for 5 min at 37 °C. Then, the mixtures were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 3 min to remove unabsorbed phage particles, and the pellets were resuspended in 20 mL of LB broth. Samples were taken at 5 and 10 min intervals during 1 h of incubation at 37 °C and immediately titrated.
The procedures were repeated three times.

4.3. Electron Microscopy

For negative staining, specimens were placed onto grids coated with formvar film and then, after drying, treated with a 0.3% aqueous solution of uranyl acetate (pH 4.0). The specimen samples were examined with a JEM-1400 (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) transmission electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 80 kV.

4.4. Phage DNA Isolation and Sequencing

Phage DNA was obtained from concentrated and purified high titer phage stock using a standard phenol-chloroform method [66], with previous incubation of the sample in 0.5% SDS and 50 µg/mL proteinase K at 65 °C for 20 min. The MiSeq platform and a Nextera DNA library preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) were used for phage genome sequencing. The reads were prepared for assembly by Q15 filtering, quality trimming at the end of the reads, the removal of library adapter sequences, the removal of A/T stretches, and the exclusion of short reads (less than 60 bp). Raw sequence reads were deposited under BioProject PRJNA1070562. The generated reads were assembled de novo into a single contig using SPAdes v. 3.12 [67] with default parameters.

4.5. Phage Genome Annotation and Analysis

Open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted using Prodigal 2.6.1 [68], GeneMarkS 4.3 [69], and Glimmer 3.02 [70], and curated manually to ensure fidelity. Gene functions were assigned to ORFs using a BLAST [71] search in the NCBI databases (http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed 17 May 2023) and custom phage databases InterPro [72] and HHpred [73], with a similarity criterion of HHpred probability of 95% and higher, using databases PDBmmCIF70, SCOPe70, ECOD, Pfam-A, and UniProt_Swiss_Prot_viral70. The functional assignment of some proteins was performed using structural prediction with AlphaFold 2.2 [31], and subsequent structural comparison was achieved using the DALI server [74]. tRNA coding regions were checked with ARAGORN [75]. The resulting genomes were visualized using Geneious Prime, version 2023.1 (Biomatters, Inc., Auckland, New Zealand). Annotated genomes of phages Brutus and Scipio have been deposited in the NCBI GenBank under accession numbers ON036882 and ON036883, respectively.
The genetic maps were visualized using Geneious Prime, CGView [76], and Clinker [77]. Phage genomes were downloaded from the NCBI GenBank database. Comparisons between the phage genomes were performed and visualized using Clinker, applying the default settings for the estimation of similarities among genomic loci. An average nucleotide identity search was conducted using orthoANI [78], with default settings, and the NCBI Genome database containing Caudoviricetes sequences. Pairwise nucleotide similarities among the phage genomes and the corresponding clustered heatmap were computed using orthoANIu and VIRIDIC [79], with default settings being used. Codon usage was estimated with Geneious Prime and GC skew and CG content were assessed and visualized with CGView. The phylogenomic tree was inferred using the Genome-BLAST Distance. Pangenome analysis was conducted using Anvi’o workflow and commands “anvi-gen-contigs-database”, “anvi-script-gen-genomes-file”, “anvi-gen-genomes-storage”, “anvi-pan-genome”, “anvi-display-pan”, “anvi-compute-genome-similarity”, “anvi-get-sequences-for-gene-clusters”, “trimal-gt 0.50”, and “iqtree-s-m WAG, -bb1000” [80].

4.6. Phylogenetic Analysis

Protein sequence alignments were obtained using MAFFT 7.48 with default settings, using the L-INS-i algorithm [81]. The terminase phylogenetic tree was constructed using the RAxML-NG 1.1.0 [82] built-in raxmlGUI 2.0.10 graphical user interface [83], applying “--bs-metric tbe--tree rand{10}--bs-trees 1000” settings. The best amino acid substitution models were estimated using ModelTest-NG [84]. The robustness of the tree was assessed using a bootstrap analysis employing 10 starting trees and 1000 bootstrap replicants before calculating the transfer bootstrap expectation (TBE) values. The trees were visualized using the iTOL server [85].

4.7. Protein Analysis and Structure Prediction

All monomer protein structures were modeled using AlphaFold 2.2, with full databases and the command line parameter “-monomer”, and the best-ranked structures were selected for further analysis. Protein complexes were modeled using AlphaFold 2.2 with command line parameter “-multimer” [86]. Protein structures were superimposed and visualized using Pymol 2.5.4 (Schrödinger Inc., New York, NY, USA). The robustness of structural alignments was assessed using root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), calculated using Pymol. Structure comparison was performed using the DALI server, with default settings. Structural similarity was evaluated with the DALI Z-score, and a structural similarity matrix was obtained using the DALI server. Phylogenetic trees based on structural similarity were obtained using the built-in DALI tools. The functional assignment of protein domains was performed through BLASTP, HHpred, and DALI searches.

4.8. Cloning, Expression, and Purification of the Recombinant TSP

The phage DNA sequence corresponding to the TSP Scipio_gp39 lacking N-terminal domain was amplified using PCR with the primers 5′-ataggatccaacaacggcatgtcttatgag-3′ and 5′-ataaagcttaaactattgcagaagtagcac-3′ and then cloned into pTSL plasmid [87]. Expression vectors were transformed into chemically competent Escherichia coli B834 (DE3) cells. Protein expression was performed in an LB medium supplemented with ampicillin at 100 µg/mL. Transformed cells were grown at 37 °C until the optical density reached a value of 0.6 at 600 nm. The medium was cooled to a temperature of 18 °C, followed by expression induction by the addition of isopro-pyl-1-thio-β-d-galactopyranoside (IPTG) to a final concentration of 1.0 mM before further incubation for 8 h at 18 °C. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4000× g for 20 min at 4 °C. Then, the cell pellet was resuspended in buffer A (20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 0.4 M NaCl) and sonicated (Virsonic, VirTis, NY, USA). The lysate was cleared by centrifugation at 13,000× g for 25 min and then loaded into 5 mL Ni2+-charged GE HisTrap columns (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA) equilibrated with buffer A. The proteins were eluted by a 0–200 mM imidazole step gradient in buffer A. His-tag and SlyD digestion was realized by incubation with tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease at a protease/protein ratio of 1/100 (wt/wt) overnight, with simultaneous dialysis against 10 mM Tris pH 8.0 containing 1.0 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. Each cleaved protein was loaded onto a 5 mL SourceQ 15 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA) column and eluted with a linear gradient of 0–600 mM NaCl in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). Protein-containing fractions were combined and concentrated using Sartorius ultrafiltration devices (Sartorius AG, Gottingen, Germany), with a molecular weight cutoff of 50 kDa.

4.9. Isolation of the K82 Capsular Polysaccharide

The A. baumannii strain LUH5534 (K82) was cultivated in 2TY (16 g Bacto tryptone, 10 g Bacto yeast extract, 5 g NaCl) media overnight at 37 °C. Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000× g for 20 min, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, suspended in aqueous 70% acetone, precipitated, and dried in air.
A sample of CPS (K82) was isolated using a phenol water extraction protocol [88]. Dried A. baumannii cells were incubated with 45% aqueous phenol for 60 min at 70 °C. The extract was cooled and dialyzed. Insoluble contaminations were removed by centrifugation at 12,000× g for 20 min. Aqueous 50% CCl3CO2H was added to a CPS solution in water at 4 °C; the precipitate was removed by centrifugation and the supernatant was dialyzed with distilled water and freeze-dried. CPS preparation was heated with 2% HOAc at 100 °C for 2 h. Then, a lipid precipitate was removed by centrifugation at 12,000× g for 20 min. Purified CPS samples were isolated from the supernatant by gel permeation chromatography on an XK 26 mm (width) × 70 cm (height) column (gel layer, 560 mm) (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA) of Sephadex G-50 Superfine (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) in a 0.05 M pyridinium acetate buffer (pH 4.5).

4.10. Depolymerisation of the K82 CPS by Recombinant Tailspike Depolymerase

Purified K82 CPS was solubilized in a 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 buffer, and 200–500 μg of recombinant TSP was added for digestion. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C. CPS digestion products were fractionated by gel permeation chromatography on an XK 16 mm × 100 cm column (gel layer, 800 mm) (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA) of Fractogel TSK HW-40S (Toyo Soda, Tokyo, Japan) in 1% acetic acid.

4.11. NMR Spectroscopy

A sample of purified K82 CPS was deuterium exchanged and examined as a solution in 99.95% D2O on a Bruker Avance II 600 MHz spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Sodium 3-trimethylsilylpropanoate-2,2,3,3-d4H 0, δC −1.6) was used as an internal reference for calibration. Two-dimensional 1H-1H correlation spectroscopy (COSY), 1H-1H total correlation spectroscopy (TOCSY), 1H-1H rotating-frame nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (ROESY), 1H-13C heteronuclear single-quantum coherence (HSQC), and 1H-13C heteronuclear multiple-bond correlation (HMBC) experiments were performed using standard Bruker software (Bruker TopSpin 3.6.0 program). The Bruker TopSpin 2.1 program was used to acquire and process the NMR data. A spin lock time of 60 ms and mixing time of 200 ms were used in 1H-1H TOCSY and 1H-1H ROESY experiments, respectively. A 1H-13C HMBC experiment was recorded, with a 60 ms delay for the evolution of long-range couplings, to optimize the spectrum for coupling constant JH,C 8 Hz.

4.12. Mass Spectroscopy

High-resolution electrospray ionisation (HR ESI) mass spectrometry was performed in positive ion mode using a maXis instrument (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). An oligosaccharide sample (~50 ng L−1) was dissolved in a 1:1 (v/v) water–acetonitrile mixture and injected, with a syringe, at a flow rate of 3 μL min−1. Capillary entrance voltage was set at –4500 V (positive ion mode) or 4000 V (negative ion mode). The interface temperature was set at 180 °C or 200 °C. Nitrogen was used as a drying and nebulizing gas. Mass spectra were acquired within the range of m/z 50 to m/z 3000. Internal or external calibration was carried out with ESI Calibrant Solution (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25042074/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.V.E. and A.V.P. (Anastasia V. Popova); methodology, P.V.E., M.M.S., L.V.K., A.A.K., O.Y.T., A.V.P. (Andrey V. Perepelov), A.M.S., Y.V.M., A.A.S., N.E.S. and A.V.P. (Anastasia V. Popova); software, P.V.E. and A.A.S.; formal analysis, P.V.E. and A.V.P. (Anastasia V. Popova); investigation, M.M.S., L.V.K., A.A.K., O.Y.T., A.V.P. (Andrey V. Perepelov), A.M.S. and A.V.P. (Anastasia V. Popova); resources, K.A.M., Y.A.K. and A.V.P. (Anastasia V. Popova); data curation, P.V.E., A.A.K., Y.A.K. and A.V.P. (Anastasia V. Popova); writing—original draft preparation, P.V.E., A.A.K. and A.V.P. (Anastasia V. Popova); writing—review and editing, P.V.E., K.A.M., M.M.S., Y.A.K. and A.V.P. (Anastasia V. Popova); visualization, P.V.E., L.V.K., A.A.K. and A.V.P. (Anastasia V. Popova); project administration, A.V.P. (Anastasia V. Popova); funding acquisition, A.V.P. (Anastasia V. Popova). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation [Grant No. 20-75-10113].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Annotated genomes of A. baumannii phages Brutus and Scipio were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers ON036882 and ON036883, respectively. Raw sequence reads were deposited under BioProject PRJNA1070562.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mikhail Edelshtein, Johanna Kenyon, and Ruth Hall for providing A. baumannii strains.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. D’Herelle, F. On an invisible microbe antagonistic toward dysenteric bacilli: Brief Note by Mr. F. D’Herelle, Presented by Mr. Roux. 1917. Res. Microbiol. 2007, 158, 553–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wittebole, X.; De Roock, S.; Opal, S.M. A historical overview of bacteriophage therapy as an alternative to antibiotics for the treatment of bacterial pathogens. Virulence 2014, 5, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Summers, W.C. In the beginning…2. Bacteriophage 2011, 1, 50–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Loc-Carrillo, C.; Abedon, S.T. Pros and cons of phage therapy. Bacteriophage 2011, 1, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wu, N.; Zhu, T. Potential of therapeutic bacteriophages in nosocomial infection management. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 638094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ayoub Moubareck, C.; Hammoudi Halat, D. Insights into Acinetobacter baumannii: A review of microbiological, virulence, and resistance traits in a threatening nosocomial pathogen. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Roy, S.; Chowdhury, G.; Mukhopadhyay, A.K.; Dutta, S.; Basu, S. Convergence of biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii infection. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 793615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tan, Y.; Su, J.; Fu, M.; Zhang, H.; Zeng, H. Recent advances in phage-based therapeutics for multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Bioengineering 2022, 10, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, C.-R.; Lee, J.H.; Park, M.; Park, K.S.; Bae, I.K.; Kim, Y.B.; Cha, C.-J.; Jeong, B.C.; Lee, S.H. Biology of Acinetobacter baumannii: Pathogenesis, antibiotic resistance mechanisms, and prospective treatment options. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Oliveira, H.; Domingues, R.; Evans, B.; Sutton, J.M.; Adriaenssens, E.M.; Turner, D. Genomic diversity of bacteriophages infecting the genus Acinetobacter. Viruses 2022, 14, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Knirel, Y.A.; Shneider, M.M.; Popova, A.V.; Kasimova, A.A.; Senchenkova, S.N.; Shashkov, A.S.; Chizhov, A.O. Mechanisms of Acinetobacter baumannii capsular polysaccharide cleavage by phage depolymerases. Biochemistry 2020, 85, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kasimova, A.A.; Kenyon, J.J.; Arbatsky, N.P.; Shashkov, A.S.; Popova, A.V.; Knirel, Y.A.; Hall, R.M. Structure of the K82 capsular polysaccharide from Acinetobacter baumannii LUH5534 containing a D-galactose 4,6-pyruvic acid acetal. Biochemistry 2018, 83, 831–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Shashkov, A.S.; Cahill, S.M.; Arbatsky, N.P.; Westacott, A.C.; Kasimova, A.A.; Shneider, M.M.; Popova, A.V.; Shagin, D.A.; Shelenkov, A.A.; Mikhailova, Y.V.; et al. Acinetobacter baumannii K116 capsular polysaccharide structure is a hybrid of the K14 and revised K37 structures. Carbohydr. Res. 2019, 484, 107774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tsurimoto, T.; Matsubara, K. Purified bacteriophage lambda O protein binds to four repeating sequences at the lambda replication origin. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981, 9, 1789–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kreuzer, K.N.; Brister, J.R. Initiation of bacteriophage T4 DNA replication and replication fork dynamics: A review in the virology journal series on bacteriophage T4 and its relatives. Virol. J. 2010, 7, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Filutowicz, M.; Rakowski, S.A. Regulatory implications of protein assemblies at the gamma origin of plasmid R6K—A review. Gene 1998, 223, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jiang, L.; Tan, J.; Hao, Y.; Wang, Q.; Yan, X.; Wang, D.; Tuo, L.; Wei, Z.; Huang, G. Isolation and characterization of a novel myophage Abp9 against pandrug resistant Acinetobacater baumannii. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 506068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, L.; Huang, S.; Jiang, L.; Tan, J.; Yan, X.; Gou, C.; Chen, X.; Xiang, L.; Wang, D.; Huang, G.; et al. Characterisation and sequencing of the novel phage Abp95, which is effective against multi-genotypes of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhu, Y.; Han, K.; Chen, L.; Luo, S.; Fan, H.; Tong, Y. Biological characterization and genomic analysis of Acinetobacter baumannii phage BUCT628. Arch. Virol. 2022, 167, 1471–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Han, K.; Zhu, Y.; Li, F.; Li, M.; An, X.; Song, L.; Fan, H.; Tong, Y. Genomic analysis of Acinetobacter phage BUCT629, a newly isolated member of the genus Obolenskvirus. Arch. Virol. 2022, 167, 1197–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Evseev, P.; Gornostal, E.; Shneider, M.; Mikhaylova, Y.; Shelenkov, A.; Popova, A.; Miroshnikov, K. A novel Acinetobacter phage Cato: Lytic myovirus containing tailspike depolymerase. In Proceedings of the 2022 Ural-Siberian Conference on Computational Technologies in Cognitive Science, Genomics and Biomedicine (CSGB), Novosibirsk, Russia, 7–8 July 2022; pp. 110–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cha, K.; Oh, H.K.; Jang, J.Y.; Jo, Y.; Kim, W.K.; Ha, G.U.; Ko, K.S.; Myung, H. Characterization of two novel bacteriophages infecting multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii and evaluation of their therapeutic efficacy in vivo. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, J.H.; Oh, C.; Choresca, C.H.; Shin, S.P.; Han, J.E.; Jun, J.W.; Heo, S.-J.; Kang, D.-H.; Park, S.C. Complete genome sequence of bacteriophage phiAC-1 infecting Acinetobacter soli strain KZ-1. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 13131–13132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, C.; Li, P.; Zhu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Gao, M.; Yuan, X.; Niu, W.; Liu, H.; Fan, H.; Qin, Y.; et al. Identification of a novel Acinetobacter baumannii phage-derived depolymerase and its therapeutic application in mice. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wintachai, P.; Voravuthikunchai, S.P. Characterization of novel lytic Myoviridae phage infecting multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and synergistic antimicrobial efficacy between phage and sacha inchi oil. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Peng, F.; Mi, Z.; Huang, Y.; Yuan, X.; Niu, W.; Wang, Y.; Hua, Y.; Fan, H.; Bai, C.; Tong, Y. Characterization, sequencing and comparative genomic analysis of vB_AbaM-IME-AB2, a novel lytic bacteriophage that infects multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates. BMC Microbiol. 2014, 14, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yang, Z.; Liu, X.; Shi, Y.; Yin, S.; Shen, W.; Chen, J.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; You, B.; Gong, Y.; et al. Characterization and genome annotation of a newly detected bacteriophage infecting multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Arch. Virol. 2019, 164, 1527–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Popova, A.V.; Zhilenkov, E.L.; Myakinina, V.P.; Krasilnikova, V.M.; Volozhantsev, N.V. Isolation and characterization of wide host range lytic bacteriophage AP22 infecting Acinetobacter baumannii. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2012, 332, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Guo, Z.; Huang, H.; Wu, X.; Hao, Y.; Sun, Y. Complete genome sequence of lytic bacteriophage LZ35 Infecting Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. Genome Announc. 2016, 4, e01104-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhou, W.; Feng, Y.; Zong, Z. Two new lytic bacteriophages of the Myoviridae family against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jumper, J.; Evans, R.; Pritzel, A.; Green, T.; Figurnov, M.; Ronneberger, O.; Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Bates, R.; Žídek, A.; Potapenko, A.; et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 2021, 596, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xu, J.; Wang, D.; Gui, M.; Xiang, Y. Structural assembly of the tailed bacteriophage Φ29. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Evseev, P.; Gutnik, D.; Shneider, M.; Miroshnikov, K. Use of an integrated approach involving AlphaFold predictions for the evolutionary taxonomy of Duplodnaviria viruses. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Duda, R.L.; Hempel, J.; Michel, H.; Shabanowitz, J.; Hunt, D.; Hendrix, R.W. Structural tduring bacteriophage HK97 Head Assembly. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 247, 618–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Young, R. Phage lysis: Do we have the hole story yet? Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2013, 16, 790–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zheng, Y.; Struck, D.K.; Dankenbring, C.A.; Young, R. Evolutionary dominance of holin lysis systems derives from superior genetic malleability. Microbiol. Read. Engl. 2008, 154, 1710–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Evseev, P.; Shneider, M.; Miroshnikov, K. Evolution of phage tail sheath protein. Viruses 2022, 14, 1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Narajczyk, M.; Barańska, S.; Węgrzyn, A.; Węgrzyn, G. Switch from θ to σ replication of bacteriophage λ DNA: Factors involved in the process and a model for its regulation. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2007, 278, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bertozzi Silva, J.; Storms, Z.; Sauvageau, D. Host receptors for bacteriophage adsorption. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2016, 363, fnw002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Leprince, A.; Mahillon, J. Phage adsorption to gram-positive bacteria. Viruses 2023, 15, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Oliveira, H.; Costa, A.R.; Konstantinides, N.; Ferreira, A.; Akturk, E.; Sillankorva, S.; Nemec, A.; Shneider, M.; Dötsch, A.; Azeredo, J. Ability of phages to infect Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii complex species through acquisition of different pectate lyase depolymerase domains. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 19, 5060–5077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lee, I.-M.; Tu, I.-F.; Yang, F.-L.; Ko, T.-P.; Liao, J.-H.; Lin, N.-T.; Wu, C.-Y.; Ren, C.-T.; Wang, A.H.-J.; Chang, C.-M.; et al. Structural basis for fragmenting the exopolysaccharide of Acinetobacter baumannii by bacteriophage ΦAB6 tailspike protein. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Popova, A.V.; Shneider, M.M.; Arbatsky, N.P.; Kasimova, A.A.; Senchenkova, S.N.; Shashkov, A.S.; Dmitrenok, A.S.; Chizhov, A.O.; Mikhailova, Y.V.; Shagin, D.A.; et al. Specific interaction of novel Friunavirus phages encoding tailspike depolymerases with corresponding Acinetobacter baumannii capsular types. J. Virol. 2021, 95, e01714-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kasimova, A.A.; Arbatsky, N.P.; Timoshina, O.Y.; Shneider, M.M.; Shashkov, A.S.; Chizhov, A.O.; Popova, A.V.; Hall, R.M.; Kenyon, J.J.; Knirel, Y.A. The K26 capsular polysaccharide from Acinetobacter baumannii KZ-1098: Structure and cleavage by a specific phage depolymerase. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 191, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shchurova, A.S.; Shneider, M.M.; Arbatsky, N.P.; Shashkov, A.S.; Chizhov, A.O.; Skryabin, Y.P.; Mikhaylova, Y.V.; Sokolova, O.S.; Shelenkov, A.A.; Miroshnikov, K.A.; et al. Novel Acinetobacter baumannii myovirus TaPaz encoding two tailspike depolymerases: Characterization and host-recognition strategy. Viruses 2021, 13, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Timoshina, O.Y.; Kasimova, A.A.; Shneider, M.M.; Matyuta, I.O.; Nikolaeva, A.Y.; Evseev, P.V.; Arbatsky, N.P.; Shashkov, A.S.; Chizhov, A.O.; Shelenkov, A.A.; et al. Friunavirus phage-encoded depolymerases specific to different capsular types of Acinetobacter baumannii. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kenyon, J.J.; Hall, R.M. Variation in the complex carbohydrate biosynthesis loci of Acinetobacter baumannii Genomes. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ge, H.; Hu, M.; Zhao, G.; Du, Y.; Xu, N.; Chen, X.; Jiao, X. The “Fighting Wisdom and Bravery” of tailed phage and host in the process of adsorption. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 230, 126344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Klumpp, J.; Dunne, M.; Loessner, M.J. A perfect fit: Bacteriophage receptor-binding proteins for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2023, 71, 102240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sun, L.; You, J.; Li, D.; Zhang, Z.; Qin, X.; Pang, W.; Li, P.; Han, Q.; Li, Y.; Huang, Z.; et al. Variants of a putative baseplate wedge protein extend the host range of Pseudomonas phage K8. Microbiome 2023, 11, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Latka, A.; Maciejewska, B.; Majkowska-Skrobek, G.; Briers, Y.; Drulis-Kawa, Z. Bacteriophage-encoded virion-associated enzymes to overcome the carbohydrate barriers during the infection process. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 3103–3119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Stummeyer, K.; Schwarzer, D.; Claus, H.; Vogel, U.; Gerardy-Schahn, R.; Mühlenhoff, M. Evolution of bacteriophages infecting encapsulated bacteria: Lessons from Escherichia coli K1-specific phages. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 60, 1123–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Moura de Sousa, J.A.; Pfeifer, E.; Touchon, M.; Rocha, E.P.C. Causes and consequences of bacteriophage diversification via genetic exchanges across lifestyles and bacterial taxa. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021, 38, 2497–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Botstein, D. A Theory of modular evolution for bacteriophages. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1980, 354, 484–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Christie, G.E.; Calendar, R. Bacteriophage P2. Bacteriophage 2016, 6, e1145782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Łobocka, M.B.; Rose, D.J.; Plunkett, G.; Rusin, M.; Samojedny, A.; Lehnherr, H.; Yarmolinsky, M.B.; Blattner, F.R. Genome of bacteriophage P1. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 7032–7068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ravin, N.V. N15: The linear phage-plasmid. Plasmid 2011, 65, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hobbs, Z.; Abedon, S.T. Diversity of phage infection types and associated terminology: The problem with ‘Lytic or Lysogenic’. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2016, 363, fnw047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gummalla, V.S.; Zhang, Y.; Liao, Y.-T.; Wu, V.C.H. The role of temperate phages in bacterial pathogenicity. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Brady, A.; Felipe-Ruiz, A.; Gallego del Sol, F.; Marina, A.; Quiles-Puchalt, N.; Penadés, J.R. Molecular basis of lysis–lysogeny decisions in gram-positive phages. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 75, 563–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. De Paepe, M.; Hutinet, G.; Son, O.; Amarir-Bouhram, J.; Schbath, S.; Petit, M.-A. Temperate phages acquire DNA from defective prophages by relaxed homologous recombination: The role of Rad52-like recombinases. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Juhala, R.J.; Ford, M.E.; Duda, R.L.; Youlton, A.; Hatfull, G.F.; Hendrix, R.W. Genomic sequences of bacteriophages HK97 and HK022: Pervasive genetic mosaicism in the lambdoid bacteriophages. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 299, 27–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hendrix, R.W.; Lawrence, J.G.; Hatfull, G.F.; Casjens, S. The origins and ongoing evolution of viruses. Trends Microbiol. 2000, 8, 504–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Bondy-Denomy, J.; Qian, J.; Westra, E.R.; Buckling, A.; Guttman, D.S.; Davidson, A.R.; Maxwell, K.L. Prophages mediate defense against phage infection through diverse mechanisms. ISME J. 2016, 10, 2854–2866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Adams, M.H. Bacteriophages; Interscience Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1959. [Google Scholar]
  66. Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E.F.; Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A laboratory Manual, 2nd ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 1989; ISBN 0-87969-309-6. [Google Scholar]
  67. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. J. Comput. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Hyatt, D.; Chen, G.-L.; LoCascio, P.F.; Land, M.L.; Larimer, F.W.; Hauser, L.J. Prodigal: Prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 2010, 11, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Besemer, J.; Lomsadze, A.; Borodovsky, M. GeneMarkS: A self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, 2607–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Delcher, A.L.; Bratke, K.A.; Powers, E.C.; Salzberg, S.L. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 673–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mitchell, A.L.; Attwood, T.K.; Babbitt, P.C.; Blum, M.; Bork, P.; Bridge, A.; Brown, S.D.; Chang, H.-Y.; El-Gebali, S.; Fraser, M.I.; et al. InterPro in 2019: Improving coverage, classification and access to protein sequence annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D351–D360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gabler, F.; Nam, S.-Z.; Till, S.; Mirdita, M.; Steinegger, M.; Söding, J.; Lupas, A.N.; Alva, V. Protein sequence analysis using the MPI bioinformatics toolkit. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2020, 72, e108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Holm, L. Dali server: Structural unification of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, W210–W215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Laslett, D.; Canback, B. ARAGORN, a Program to Detect tRNA Genes and tmRNA Genes in Nucleotide Sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Grant, J.R.; Stothard, P. The CGView server: A comparative genomics tool for circular genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, W181–W184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Gilchrist, C.L.M.; Chooi, Y.-H. Clinker & Clustermap. Js: Automatic generation of gene cluster comparison figures. Bioinformatics 2021, 37, 2473–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lee, I.; Ouk Kim, Y.; Park, S.-C.; Chun, J. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 1100–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Moraru, C.; Varsani, A.; Kropinski, A.M. VIRIDIC—A novel tool to calculate the intergenomic similarities of prokaryote-infecting viruses. Viruses 2020, 12, 1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Eren, A.M.; Esen, Ö.C.; Quince, C.; Vineis, J.H.; Morrison, H.G.; Sogin, M.L.; Delmont, T.O. Anvi’o: An advanced analysis and visualization platform for ’omics data. PeerJ 2015, 3, e1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kozlov, A.M.; Darriba, D.; Flouri, T.; Morel, B.; Stamatakis, A. RAxML-NG: A fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 2019, 35, 4453–4455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Edler, D.; Klein, J.; Antonelli, A.; Silvestro, D. raxmlGUI 2.0: A graphical interface and toolkit for phylogenetic analyses using RAxML. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2021, 12, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Darriba, D.; Posada, D.; Kozlov, A.M.; Stamatakis, A.; Morel, B.; Flouri, T. ModelTest-NG: A new and scalable tool for the selection of DNA and protein evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020, 37, 291–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W293–W296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Evans, R.; O’Neill, M.; Pritzel, A.; Antropova, N.; Senior, A.; Green, T.; Žídek, A.; Bates, R.; Blackwell, S.; Yim, J.; et al. Protein Complex Prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. Biorxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Taylor, N.M.I.; Prokhorov, N.S.; Guerrero-Ferreira, R.C.; Shneider, M.M.; Browning, C.; Goldie, K.N.; Stahlberg, H.; Leiman, P.G. Structure of the T4 baseplate and its function in triggering sheath contraction. Nature 2016, 533, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Westphal, O.; Jann, K. Bacterial lipopolysaccharides extraction with phenol-water and further applications of the procedure. Methods Carbohydr. Chem. 1965, 5, 83–91. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (A) Brutus and Scipio plaques with opaque haloes on A. baumannii MAR15-3273 (K116 capsular type) and A. baumannii LUH5534 (K82 capsular type), respectively, after 18–24 h incubation of plates at 37 °C. (B) Transmission electron micrographs of the phage particles. Staining with 1% uranyl acetate. The scale bar is 100 nm. (C) Adsorption assay of phages Brutus and Scipio on A. baumannii MAR15-3273 and A. baumannii LUH5534, respectively. (D) One-step growth curves of phages Brutus and Scipio on A. baumannii MAR15-3273 and A. baumannii LUH5534, respectively, with an indication of estimated burst sizes (BS) and latent periods (L). The results are the means and standard deviations from three independent experiments. PFUs: plaque-forming units.
Figure 1. (A) Brutus and Scipio plaques with opaque haloes on A. baumannii MAR15-3273 (K116 capsular type) and A. baumannii LUH5534 (K82 capsular type), respectively, after 18–24 h incubation of plates at 37 °C. (B) Transmission electron micrographs of the phage particles. Staining with 1% uranyl acetate. The scale bar is 100 nm. (C) Adsorption assay of phages Brutus and Scipio on A. baumannii MAR15-3273 and A. baumannii LUH5534, respectively. (D) One-step growth curves of phages Brutus and Scipio on A. baumannii MAR15-3273 and A. baumannii LUH5534, respectively, with an indication of estimated burst sizes (BS) and latent periods (L). The results are the means and standard deviations from three independent experiments. PFUs: plaque-forming units.
Ijms 25 02074 g001
Figure 2. (A) Functional assignment of predicted genes in the genomes of phages Brutus and Scipio. (B) Circular genome maps of phages Brutus and Scipio. Circles from the inside outwards; circles with numbers inside; position in the genome; black: % GC content plotted around the average 37.40% (Brutus) and 37.60% (Scipio); olive/purple: GC skew. (C) Genetic map of phages Brutus and Scipio. Arrows indicate the direction of transcription. The scale bar indicates the length of the nucleotide sequence. Gene functions are shown in labels and legends.
Figure 2. (A) Functional assignment of predicted genes in the genomes of phages Brutus and Scipio. (B) Circular genome maps of phages Brutus and Scipio. Circles from the inside outwards; circles with numbers inside; position in the genome; black: % GC content plotted around the average 37.40% (Brutus) and 37.60% (Scipio); olive/purple: GC skew. (C) Genetic map of phages Brutus and Scipio. Arrows indicate the direction of transcription. The scale bar indicates the length of the nucleotide sequence. Gene functions are shown in labels and legends.
Ijms 25 02074 g002
Figure 3. (A) Clustered heatmap based on the intergenomic similarity of phages Brutus and Scipio and related phages found with ANI calculations and a BLASTP search. The original VIRIDIC heatmap is shown in Figure S1. (B) Fragment of the “proteomic tree” inferred using the ViPtree server. A larger fragment of the original ViPtree using all reference genomes is shown in Figure S2. The group of phages referred to as “Obolenskvirus–like phages” is outlined in orange.
Figure 3. (A) Clustered heatmap based on the intergenomic similarity of phages Brutus and Scipio and related phages found with ANI calculations and a BLASTP search. The original VIRIDIC heatmap is shown in Figure S1. (B) Fragment of the “proteomic tree” inferred using the ViPtree server. A larger fragment of the original ViPtree using all reference genomes is shown in Figure S2. The group of phages referred to as “Obolenskvirus–like phages” is outlined in orange.
Ijms 25 02074 g003aIjms 25 02074 g003b
Figure 4. Genetic maps of ten Obolenskvirus-like phages comparing phage coding sequences (CDSs). Homologous proteins are assigned a unique colour and are linked by gray lanes showing the percentage of amino acid identity. The identity is represented by the intensity of gray, with darker shades of gray indicating a higher level of identity, according to the scale bar. Gene functions are shown in labels. Arrows indicate the direction of transcription. The scale bar 2.5 kb shows the genomic size.
Figure 4. Genetic maps of ten Obolenskvirus-like phages comparing phage coding sequences (CDSs). Homologous proteins are assigned a unique colour and are linked by gray lanes showing the percentage of amino acid identity. The identity is represented by the intensity of gray, with darker shades of gray indicating a higher level of identity, according to the scale bar. Gene functions are shown in labels. Arrows indicate the direction of transcription. The scale bar 2.5 kb shows the genomic size.
Ijms 25 02074 g004
Figure 5. (A) A diagram of major capsid protein (MCP) in the mature HK97 capsid (PDB ID: 1OHG) and its common features, colored as indicated in the figure (according to Duda et al. [34]). (B) AlphaFold 2 models of MCPs of the phages Brutus and Scipio, superimposed onto the HK97 MCP.
Figure 5. (A) A diagram of major capsid protein (MCP) in the mature HK97 capsid (PDB ID: 1OHG) and its common features, colored as indicated in the figure (according to Duda et al. [34]). (B) AlphaFold 2 models of MCPs of the phages Brutus and Scipio, superimposed onto the HK97 MCP.
Ijms 25 02074 g005
Figure 6. Pangenome analysis of the Obolenskvirus-like group of phages using 29 phage genomes. Genomes are organized according to their position in the phylogenomic tree based on 11 single-copy genes (SCGs). Gene clusters are shown as segments of radial layers, where the gene clusters present in genomes are colored in intense colors and the clusters absent in genomes are colored in pale shades. The more intense colors on the ANI heatmap indicate higher ANI values. The radial layer marked with a * shows the number of genes in the gene clusters; the width of the radial layer marked with ** represents the functional homogeneity index. HumMal 623 is an abbreviation of assembly HumMal Ma_F259_Contig_623; isolate ct6H824 is an abbreviation of Myoviridae sp. isolate ct6H824.
Figure 6. Pangenome analysis of the Obolenskvirus-like group of phages using 29 phage genomes. Genomes are organized according to their position in the phylogenomic tree based on 11 single-copy genes (SCGs). Gene clusters are shown as segments of radial layers, where the gene clusters present in genomes are colored in intense colors and the clusters absent in genomes are colored in pale shades. The more intense colors on the ANI heatmap indicate higher ANI values. The radial layer marked with a * shows the number of genes in the gene clusters; the width of the radial layer marked with ** represents the functional homogeneity index. HumMal 623 is an abbreviation of assembly HumMal Ma_F259_Contig_623; isolate ct6H824 is an abbreviation of Myoviridae sp. isolate ct6H824.
Ijms 25 02074 g006
Figure 7. Best-scoring phylogenetic trees based on amino acid sequences of MCP, TLS, lysozyme, and TMP. HumMal 623 is an abbreviation of assembly HumMal Ma_F259_Contig_623 and isolate ct6H824 is an abbreviation of Myoviridae sp. isolate ct6H824. The trees were rooted to Myoviridae sp. isolate ct6H824. Identical phages are indicated with colored lines.
Figure 7. Best-scoring phylogenetic trees based on amino acid sequences of MCP, TLS, lysozyme, and TMP. HumMal 623 is an abbreviation of assembly HumMal Ma_F259_Contig_623 and isolate ct6H824 is an abbreviation of Myoviridae sp. isolate ct6H824. The trees were rooted to Myoviridae sp. isolate ct6H824. Identical phages are indicated with colored lines.
Ijms 25 02074 g007
Figure 8. (A) Best-scoring ML phylogenetic tree constructed using amino acid sequences of major capsid proteins found in phage and bacterial genomes using Brutus and Scipio MCPs. (B) Best-scoring ML phylogenetic tree constructed using amino acid sequences of the large subunit of terminase found in phage and bacterial genomes using Brutus and Scipio TLSs. Bacillus phage SPP1 was used as an outgroup. Taxonomy is shown to the right of the organism’s (phage’s) name. The numbers near the tree branches indicate the TBE values. The total number of bootstrap trees was 1000. The scale bar shows 0.5 estimated substitutions per site.
Figure 8. (A) Best-scoring ML phylogenetic tree constructed using amino acid sequences of major capsid proteins found in phage and bacterial genomes using Brutus and Scipio MCPs. (B) Best-scoring ML phylogenetic tree constructed using amino acid sequences of the large subunit of terminase found in phage and bacterial genomes using Brutus and Scipio TLSs. Bacillus phage SPP1 was used as an outgroup. Taxonomy is shown to the right of the organism’s (phage’s) name. The numbers near the tree branches indicate the TBE values. The total number of bootstrap trees was 1000. The scale bar shows 0.5 estimated substitutions per site.
Ijms 25 02074 g008aIjms 25 02074 g008b
Figure 9. Cleavage of the K82 CPS of A. baumannii LUH5534 with Scipio_gp39 giving rise to oligosaccharide 1 (OS1) corresponding to the monomer of the K unit.
Figure 9. Cleavage of the K82 CPS of A. baumannii LUH5534 with Scipio_gp39 giving rise to oligosaccharide 1 (OS1) corresponding to the monomer of the K unit.
Ijms 25 02074 g009
Table 1. List of phages closely related to Acinetobacter phages Brutus and Scipio. Classified and approved by the ICTV (as of June 2023), Obolenskvirus phages (colored orange) are named according to the ICTV taxonomy.
Table 1. List of phages closely related to Acinetobacter phages Brutus and Scipio. Classified and approved by the ICTV (as of June 2023), Obolenskvirus phages (colored orange) are named according to the ICTV taxonomy.
#PhageNCBI AccessionSequence Length, b.p.% GCORF #Reference
1Acinetobacter phage Abp9MN166083.144,82037.70%88[17]
2Acinetobacter phage Abp95MZ618622.143,17637.80%84[18]
3Acinetobacter phage ArborON237674.145,04137.40%85
4Acinetobacter phage Bphi-R1888MN516422.144,59037.90%83
5Acinetobacter phage Bphi-R2919MN516421.144,22737.80%82
9Acinetobacter phage BrutusON036882.144,93137.40%91
7Acinetobacter phage BUCT628MZ593728.144,93537.50%86[19]
8Acinetobacter phage BUCT629MZ712044.146,32537.60%88[20]
9Acinetobacter phage CatoOM471864.145,18837.40%87[21]
10Acinetobacter phage PBAB08MG366114.142,31238.60%110[22]
11Acinetobacter phage phiAC-1NC_028995.143,21638.50%82[23]
12Acinetobacter phage ScipioON036883.144,60237.60%84
13Acinetobacter phage SHION480525.144,18037.60%91
14Acinetobacter phage vB_AbaM_BP10OP585104.144,44337.30%90
15Acinetobacter phage vB_AbaM_IME284MH853787.143,55738.30%86
16Acinetobacter phage vB_AbaM_IME285MH853786.145,06337.90%84[24]
17Acinetobacter phage vB_AbaM_IME512MH853788.146,49937.60%91
18Acinetobacter phage vB_AbM_WUPSUOL743187.144,24137.20%82[25]
19Acinetobacter phage YMC11/12/R1215KP861231.144,86637.60%85
20Acinetobacter phage YMC11/12/R2315NC_028855.144,84637.60%86
21Assembly HumMal, Ma_F259_Contig_623CYGL01000085.145,31737.80%83
22Myoviridae sp. isolate ct6H824BK017052.142,12637.70%85
23Obolenskvirus AB1NC_042028.145,15937.70%85[26]
24Obolenskvirus AB2NC_041857.143,66537.50%82[26]
25Obolenskvirus AbC62NC_024785.144,84437.60%85
26Obolenskvirus AbP2NC_041998.145,37337.80%87[27]
27Obolenskvirus AP22NC_017984.146,38737.70%91[28]
28Obolenskvirus LZ35NC_031117.144,88537.90%82[29]
29Obolenskvirus WCHABP1NC_041966.145,88837.60%92[30]
30Obolenskvirus WCHABP12NC_041924.145,41537.60%93[30]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Evseev, P.V.; Shneider, M.M.; Kolupaeva, L.V.; Kasimova, A.A.; Timoshina, O.Y.; Perepelov, A.V.; Shpirt, A.M.; Shelenkov, A.A.; Mikhailova, Y.V.; Suzina, N.E.; et al. New Obolenskvirus Phages Brutus and Scipio: Biology, Evolution, and Phage-Host Interaction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 2074. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042074

AMA Style

Evseev PV, Shneider MM, Kolupaeva LV, Kasimova AA, Timoshina OY, Perepelov AV, Shpirt AM, Shelenkov AA, Mikhailova YV, Suzina NE, et al. New Obolenskvirus Phages Brutus and Scipio: Biology, Evolution, and Phage-Host Interaction. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(4):2074. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042074

Chicago/Turabian Style

Evseev, Peter V., Mikhail M. Shneider, Lyubov V. Kolupaeva, Anastasia A. Kasimova, Olga Y. Timoshina, Andrey V. Perepelov, Anna M. Shpirt, Andrey A. Shelenkov, Yulia V. Mikhailova, Natalia E. Suzina, and et al. 2024. "New Obolenskvirus Phages Brutus and Scipio: Biology, Evolution, and Phage-Host Interaction" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 4: 2074. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042074

APA Style

Evseev, P. V., Shneider, M. M., Kolupaeva, L. V., Kasimova, A. A., Timoshina, O. Y., Perepelov, A. V., Shpirt, A. M., Shelenkov, A. A., Mikhailova, Y. V., Suzina, N. E., Knirel, Y. A., Miroshnikov, K. A., & Popova, A. V. (2024). New Obolenskvirus Phages Brutus and Scipio: Biology, Evolution, and Phage-Host Interaction. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(4), 2074. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042074

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop