Next Article in Journal
Antibiotic Combination to Effectively Postpone or Inhibit the In Vitro Induction and Selection of Levofloxacin-Resistant Mutants in Elizabethkingia anophelis
Previous Article in Journal
Serum Lipocalin-2 Levels as a Biomarker in Pre- and Post-Pubertal Klinefelter Syndrome Patients: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pharmacological Inhibition of the Asparaginyl Endopeptidase (AEP) in an Alzheimer’s Disease Model Improves the Survival and Efficacy of Transplanted Neural Stem Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Comorbidity Genes of Alzheimer’s Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Associated with Memory and Cognitive Function

by
Seong Beom Cho
Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, Gachon University, 38-13, Dokgeom-ro 3 Street, Namdon-gu, Incheon 21565, Republic of Korea
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(4), 2211; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042211
Submission received: 2 January 2024 / Revised: 2 February 2024 / Accepted: 10 February 2024 / Published: 12 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Alzheimer’s Disease: From Molecular Basis to Therapy 2.0)

Abstract

:
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are comorbidities that result from the sharing of common genes. The molecular background of comorbidities can provide clues for the development of treatment and management strategies. Here, the common genes involved in the development of the two diseases and in memory and cognitive function are reviewed. Network clustering based on protein–protein interaction network identified tightly connected gene clusters that have an impact on memory and cognition among the comorbidity genes of AD and T2DM. Genes with functional implications were intensively reviewed and relevant evidence summarized. Gene information will be useful in the discovery of biomarkers and the identification of tentative therapeutic targets for AD and T2DM.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by memory and cognitive impairment. The main pathology of AD is the accumulation of beta-amyloid (Aβ), which is believed to cause the main symptoms of the disease [1]. Clearing Aβ or tau proteins that are alleged to induce AD has been the main strategy in the development of therapeutic agents; however, the results of clinical studies have been unsatisfactory, and there has been no definite treatment discovered for AD [2]. This may be due to the fact that the accumulation of Aβ and tau proteins has not always been correlated with clinical outcomes.
It is well known that type 2 diabetes (T2DM) co-occurs with AD [3]. There is significant evidence that the two diseases develop concomitantly, and the comorbidity relationship is based on the shared molecular mechanisms between AD and T2DM [4]. Moreover, genes involved in comorbidity can be a valuable resource for drug repurposing [4,5]. Therefore, it is desirable that the identification of comorbidity genes for AD and T2DM provides clues for further development of AD drugs or management strategies.
In this review, disease genes gathered from previous studies were used and protein–protein interaction network-based clustering (Markov clustering algorithm) was applied for the identification of comorbidity genes of AD and T2DM that are related to memory and cognitive function. For this purpose, genes involved in memory and cognitive functions were also collected, and the intersections of these genes and the comorbidity genes were applied to the clustering.

2. Biological Mechanisms of Alzheimer’s Disease and Type 2 Diabetes

Further, in the enrichment analysis of 7763 gene ontology (GO) biological processes (GOBPs), 2857 statistically significant terms were identified (Table 1 and Table S2), with “RESPONSE_TO_OXYGEN_CONTAINING_COMPOUND” being the most significant one (odds ratio = 16.06, p = 1.97 × 10−301). Additionally, “REGULATION_OF_CELL_DEATH” was among the most highly ranked GOBPs (odds ratio = 11.97, p = 5.53 × 10−222).
ORA with KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathway analysis revealed that 77 of the 173 enriched KEGG pathways were significant (Table S3). Signaling-related pathways ranked at the top (Table 2). “PATHWAYS_IN_CANCER” was the most significant pathway in the results and included several different pathways.

3. Gene Clusters of Common Genes That Are Associated with AD, T2DM, and Memory Function

Among the 1381 common genes of AD and T2DM, 361 genes overlapped with the memory-associated genes in the DisGeNet database (Table S1). Using the information on protein interactions in the STRING database, Markov clustering of the interaction network was performed using the default parameters, and 93 clusters with different numbers of genes ranging from 1 to 13 were obtained. Table S4 lists these clusters and their associated proteins. The cluster numbers were determined according to the average local clustering coefficient of the network-based clustering method. Therefore, the first cluster (Cluster 1) had the highest average local clustering coefficient, indicating tighter connections between the proteins within the cluster compared to the other clusters.

3.1. Cluster 1 (CL1)

CL1 included 13 genes (Figure 1). PI3K and PDGF-related genes were frequent in this cluster.
PI3K is a well-known enzyme involved in various cellular functions, including apoptosis, glucose uptake, and neuroprotection [6]. Many PI3K family members (PI3K subtypes) function in the Akt and mTOR pathway [6,7]. In AD, the PI3K pathway is inhibited by Aβ, which has been linked to increased apoptosis of neurons [8]. Moreover, the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway is involved in tau phosphorylation, dysregulated insulin signaling, suppression of autophagy through the activation of mTOR, and altered responses to oxidative stress in patients with AD [8,9]. PI3K plays a role in glucose uptake by muscle and adipose cells [10], and abnormal PI3K signaling causes insulin resistance in animal models [11]. The PI3K-related pathways, including Akt and mTOR, are associated with neuronal development and brain memory function [12,13,14]. PI3K subtypes PIK3CA, PIK3CB, PIK3CD, PIK3CG, and PIK3R1 were all included in CL1.
PIK3CA was a hub gene in CL1; it is predicted to be involved in the immune-related phenomena of AD development [15]. In an AD zebrafish model, 20S-protopanaxatriol (PPT) facilitated neurogenesis of neural stem cells (NSCs) and reduced NSC apoptosis and cell cycle arrest by Aβ (which might hinder PIK3CA and PPT binding) [16]. Bioinformatics analysis of molecular docking and identification of network modules revealed that PIK3CA was one of the target genes for Byu dMar 25 (BM25), a molecule known to have therapeutic potential in AD [17]. When frog skin peptide, which is a stimulant of insulin release, was administered to a T2DM mouse model, the expression of Pik3ca (the mouse ortholog) increased in skeletal muscles [18,19]. PIK3CB has been associated with insulin resistance and hepatic glucose production according to promoter variants [20,21,22]. The expression of PIK3CB is downregulated in patients with AD and linked to the apoptosis and axon guidance pathways [23]. PIK3CB is also genetically associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) showing abnormalities in temporal lesions that modulate memory function [24]. PIK3CD mRNA in peripheral leukocytes is upregulated in patients with gestational diabetes, whereas in patients with T2DM treated with sitagliptin it is downregulated [25,26]. Similar to PIK3CB, PIK3CD is also genetically associated with MCI [24]. PIK3R1 is well known for its relationship with T2DM and insulin resistance [27,28]. Mutations in PIK3R1 cause SHORT (short stature, hyperextensibility of joints and/or inguinal hernia, ocular depression, Rieger anomaly, and teething delay) syndrome and accompanying T2DM [29,30,31]. Moreover, the analysis of exome sequencing data from over 10,000 subjects in the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project showed evidence of a functional variant of PIK3R1 [32]. Coexpression network analysis has revealed that PIK3R1 is one of the core immune genes involved in AD and that it is associated with Aβ and tau protein pathology [33].
CL1 included two PDGF-related proteins, PDGFB and PDGFRB. PDGF is associated with vascular complications in T2DM [34] and cell death caused by Alzheimer-associated neuronal thread protein [35]. PDGFB and PDGFRB are also involved in vascular complications of T2DM [36,37]. In AD, PDGFRB activation has a mitogenic effect that is blocked by Aβ, preventing the neuroprotective effects of PDGF-BB [38]. Mutations in these two genes cause brain calcifications [39,40], which can be observed in patients with AD [41].

3.2. Cluster 2 (CL2)

In CL2, P53 acted as a hub gene by showing the strongest connectivity (Figure 1). P53 has a neuroprotective effect by repressing BACE1 and thus the Aβ production cascade. Interestingly, Aβ may also repress P53 expression in AD [42]. Moreover, MCI is affected by conformational changes in P53 [16,43]. It is well known that cancer and AD have an inverse correlation in incidence, and the underlying molecular mechanisms seem to involve P53 and related genes [44,45]. Phosphorylated forms, genetic variations, and unfolded P53 have been proposed as biomarkers for AD [44,46,47]. P53-related novel mechanisms, including mitochondrial dysfunction and overexpression of CDK5 in AD and other neurodegenerative diseases, have also been proposed as biomarkers [46,48]. In previous studies, genetic variants of P53 have also been associated with T2DM [49,50,51]. Therefore, P53 has been identified as one of the hub genes involved in the pathogenesis of AD and T2DM [52]. Notably, P53 also regulates pancreatic cell survival and glucose homeostasis [53].
BRCA1 plays a role in repairing DNAs under stress, including the stresses caused by ultraviolet light and reactive oxygen species, and failures of this mechanism in neurons may be related to AD [54,55]. Downregulation of BRCA1 and other DNA repair genes has been observed in patients with clinically evident AD [56]. BRCA1 depletion was shown to impair cognitive function in mice [57]. In addition, abnormal accumulation of P53 occurs in AD and other tauopathies [58,59], and may be caused by hypomethylation of the promoter region of P53 [60]. BRCA1 is known to interact with acetyl coenzyme A (CoA) carboxylase α (ACCA), which results in lipogenesis [61]. Hypermethylation of BRCA1 was observed in patients with T2DM [62].
S100B is well known for its role in AD. S100B is involved in gliosis and inflammatory reactions and suppresses the neurodegeneration of cholinergic neurons in mouse models of AD [63,64]. Additionally, S100B is associated with memory and cognition. The inhibition of IL-1, for example, decreases levels of S100B, leading to an alleviation of cognitive deficits and tau production [65]. Neutralization of S100B in a rat sepsis model increased cognitive performance scores [66], and pharmaceutical suppression of S100B reduced gliosis and neuronal loss [67]. Furthermore, it has been shown that S100B and the receptor for advanced glycation products (RAGE) affect learning and memory impairment by interacting with IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α [68]. Serum S100B levels were positively correlated with cognitive performance tests in a healthy elderly population [69]. In contrast, they also showed a positive correlation with AD severity [70]. S100B is also associated with the pathophysiology of T2DM. In a mouse model, S100B induced beta cell apoptosis [71]. Serum S100B levels were elevated in patients with T2DM with peripheral neuropathy [72], and S100B levels correlated with cognitive performance in patients with T2DM [73]. In the coronary arterioles of a mouse model, S100B suppressed the vasodilatation effect of acetylcholine [74].
DNMT1 is an enzyme that catalyzes the transfer of methyl groups to DNA CpG sites, and previous research in animal models has shown that aberrant DNMT1 expression is associated with memory impairment [75,76,77,78]. In a high methionine-induced AD rat model, DNMT1 was downregulated and tyrosine receptor kinase-induced memory impairment was observed [79,80]. In humans, DNMT1 has been associated with both AD [81,82,83,84], and T2DM, and increased DNMT1 expression has been observed in beta islet cells from patients with T2DM [85]. IL-6, which is a major inflammatory mediator, induces insulin resistance and reduces DNMT1 protein levels in endothelial cells [86]. In CL2, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) was not directly connected to P53 but linked to it via DNMT1.
In diabetic mice, NF-kB inhibition improves vascular function and increases cleaved PARP1 [87,88]. The role of PARP1 in T2DM was discovered through the modulation of PARP1 by diverse inhibitors. PARP1 inhibition reduces cardiac ischemia and inflammation in diabetic rats [89] and prolongs the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans under hyperglycemic conditions, probably via TCF7L2 [90]. PARP1 is associated with the vascular complications of T2DM, and has treatment potential for this condition [91,92,93,94]. Angiotensin II-treated heart muscles of diabetic mice showed elevated PARP1 activity, cardiac hypertrophy, and inflammation, conditions which were reversed by PARP1 inhibition [91]. Mendelian randomization identified a causal relationship between genetic variants of PARP1 and obstructive coronary arterial disease in patients with T2DM [92]. When bromocriptine is used for the treatment of prolactinomas, it controls glucose and lipid profiles in diabetic rats, leading to changes in p-AKT followed by changes in Nf1 and PARP1 [93]. Cholesterol-induced lipotoxicity, which is related to beta cell dysfunction in obese patients with T2DM, has been shown to be controlled by the inhibition of PARP1 by GLP-1 administration [94].

3.3. Cluster 3 (CL3)

CL3 contained well-known AD-associated genes whose relatedness to T2DM has been less reported (Figure 1). Amyloid precursor protein (APP) is probably the most frequently studied molecule in AD research. Therefore, only APP studies related to memory or cognitive impairment were included in this review. For this purpose, a PubMed search was performed using “APP gene and Alzheimer’s disease and brain memory” as the keywords; the results included many studies on APP and their impact on memory function. JNK inhibition, for example, was shown to eliminate memory impairment and long-term potentiation deficits in a mouse model of AD in which APP phosphorylation was inhibited [95]. CRTC1 is a CREB coactivator whose expression is suppressed by APP [96]. When all-trans retinoic acid was administered to APP/PS1 transgenic mice, improved spatial learning and memory were observed compared to the control group, together with downregulation of CDK5 (a major kinase for APP and tau phosphorylation) [97]. According to a mouse model, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 (LRP6) is involved in memory deficits via Wnt signaling, and the downregulation of this process is linked to the phosphorylation of APP and increased production of Aβ [98]. Additionally, APP haploinsufficiency prevented memory deficits in familial British dementia mouse models [99], and PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1) was associated with memory impairment induced by APP [100]. Moreover, increased APP intracellular domain (AICD) production in hippocampal neurons has been shown to disrupt spatial memory [101]. Meanwhile, the role of APP in T2DM pathophysiology remains unclear, given that there is limited molecular evidence. However, it has been suggested that APP is the main regulator of insulin secretion in pancreatic islets [102]. Moreover, BACE2 (β-site APP-cleaving enzyme 2), a protease that is related to AD, is associated with insulin secretion in pancreatic islet cells [103]. BACE2 (β-site APP-cleaving enzyme 2) is a protease that is expressed in the brain and pancreas. In a mouse model overexpressing Islet Amyloid Polypeptide (IAPP), impaired glucose tolerance was observed. However, crossing this model with BACE2-deficient mice resulted in a significant improvement in glucose tolerance [104]. Imbalances in the production or removal of IAPP can lead to the rapid formation of cytotoxic amyloid fibrils. BACE2 is involved in processing IAPP in both the pancreas and the brain [105]. It has been reported that the overexpression of BACE2 increases the production of reactive oxygen species and decreases glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS), while the repression of BACE2 reverses this condition [103]. The therapeutic potential of BACE2 is currently under investigation [104,106,107].
Human APOE is a glycoprotein that is composed of 299 amino acids [108]. It is expressed in astrocytes and microglia and forms lipoprotein particles with cholesterol and its transporter [109]. APOE has a main role in redistributing cholesterol and other lipids [110]. APOE is a well-known AD biomarker. Moreover, the functional relationship between APOE and memory has been reported in many studies. When a proteomic analysis was applied to an AD mouse model, APOE was found to be differentially expressed in the hippocampus, which is related to memory function [111]. APOE is a transcriptional regulator of APP [112,113,114], and is involved in various biological pathways, such as the PGC-1alpha/sirtuin 3 axis, which alters mitochondrial function and, eventually, memory performance [115]. Multi-omics data analysis has revealed APOE haplotype-specific molecular alterations at both gene and protein expression levels [116]. The APOE4 genotype induces an increase in unsaturated fatty acids and the accumulation of lipid droplets [117], and single-cell sequencing of postmortem human samples identified that some signaling pathways of cholesterol metabolism were altered in APOE4 carriers, resulting in reduced myelination [118]. The effects of APOE on brain function were confirmed using clinical data and imaging analyses. Using functional MRI analyses, APOE4 carriers performing moderate or severe working memory tasks showed less brain activation than non-APOE4 carriers [119]; APOE4 carriers also showed worse CA1 apical neuropil atrophy and episodic memory function [120]. APOE genotypes were found to be related to lower memory testing scores in patients with amnestic MCI and AD [121], lower memory performance in the normal elderly population [122], and reduced white matter connectivity [123], and gray matter volume [124]. APOE is associated with cardiovascular complications in patients with T2DM [125,126]. In particular, atherosclerosis and nephropathy are the most frequently reported complications associated with APOE genotypes [127,128,129,130,131,132]. As is well known, the APOE gene is a strong biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). APOE4 significantly increases the risk of AD, while APOE2 has a protective effect compared to APOE3 [133]. This indicates differential effects and multiple pathways for amyloid pathology. APOE is reported to be associated with tau pathology and decreasing efficiency in lipid transport, synaptic integrity and plasticity, glucose metabolism, and cerebrovascular function [134,135]. Recently, the risk associated with APOE4 has been known to be stratified according to ethnic groups, with the Hispanic population exhibiting the lowest level of risk associated with APOE4 [136]. Mechanistically, APOE has been associated with insulin resistance in the muscles of mouse models [137], islet amyloidosis [138], and adipocyte enlargement in atherosclerosis [139].
Clusterin (CLU) is a core protein in CL3; it is concurrently linked to APP and APOE. Studies of CLU gene variants and plasma protein levels have consistently revealed that CLU is associated with AD [140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147]. Molecular biology studies have identified the role of CLU in the pathophysiology of AD. In a CLU knockout mouse model, amyloid plaques were sparse in the cerebral parenchyma but prevalent in cerebral vessels, indicating that Aβ clearance had shifted to perivascular drainage [148]. CLU affects the lysosome pathway and Aβ processing in stem cell-derived neurons [149]. Additionally, overexpression of CLU in astrocytes ameliorates amyloid accumulation and gliosis [150]. It has also been found that the C allele of CLU is expressed at higher levels than other allelic variants and that C allele expression leads to exacerbation of inflammation and to an eventual inhibition of oligodendrocyte progenitor cell proliferation and myelination [151]. CLU is also associated with memory function. In a young population, working memory performance differed between CLU genotypes [152], and methylation around SNPs rs9331888 and rs9331896 in the CLU gene was associated with episodic verbal memory in patients with schizophrenia [153]. In patients with AD, delayed word recall test scores significantly correlated with rs11136000, one of the CLU gene SNPs [154]. Interestingly, the reduced episodic memory function that is associated with some CLU genotypes is attenuated by physical activity [155]. CLU protein levels increase in exercised mice, increasing memory performance and reducing brain inflammation [156].

4. Clusters of Cognitive Function-Associated Genes

Cognition-related genes were downloaded from the DisGeNet website and used for PPI network analysis. In total, 308 genes were at the intersection of AD, T2DM, and memory function genes and were applied to the STRING database for a new round of analysis (Table S1). In total, 61 clusters were identified using the Markov clustering algorithm. Table S5 contains the list of the clusters and their proteins. As in Section 3, these clusters were sorted according to the average local clustering coefficient.

4.1. Cluster 1

Cluster 1 contained 10 tightly interconnected genes (Figure 2). EP300 was the hub gene of the cluster. Mutational studies have shown that EP300 is associated with cognitive function. Mutations in EP300 have been reported in patients with Rubinstein–Taybi syndrome, which is characterized by cognitive impairment [157,158]. Fragile X syndrome protein (FMRP) is associated with EP300, and the loss of FMRP increases EP300 and HDAC1 levels in adult NSCs, resulting in age-related NSC depletion and cognitive impairment in mouse models [159]. EP300 expression is not activated when PS1 is mutated, and EP300 is involved in histone acetylation of PS1 and BACE1, which are key genes in AD pathogenesis [160]. It has been reported that EP300 and IL-17A are activated in SH-SY5Y cells and that inhibition of EP300 improves cognitive impairment [161]. Elevated EP300 activity is associated with an aberrant accumulation of immature autophagy markers, and blocking EP300 increases autophagy flux, reduces tau production, and decreases tau propagation [162]. In T2DM, overactivation of EP300 has also been identified; it is related to muscle atrophy by autophagy inhibition [163].
FOXO1 is a transcription factor involved in gluconeogenesis via insulin signaling [164]. Therefore, FOXO1 is closely linked to T2DM. Previous studies have reported that FOXO1 is involved in various mechanisms that cause beta cell dysfunction, including oxidative stress and cytokine induction [165,166]. Autophagy and FOXO1 are associated with beta cell viability, apoptosis, and insulin resistance [167]. Furthermore, FOXO1 is considered a potential therapeutic target for T2DM [168]. Reduced insulin receptor and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor signaling decreased Aβ toxicity in a rodent model, which might have been induced by FOXOs, especially by FOXO1 and FOXO3 [169]. FOXO1 is involved in the autophagy of neurons [170], and the rs7981045 SNP variant of FOXO1 is associated with poor responses to acetylcholine esterase inhibitor treatment in patients with AD [171]. MiR-181a is a specific miRNA associated with cognitive function in pentylenetetrazol-induced epileptic rats [172], and miR-181a expression is reduced in APP-/PS1- mice. MiR-181a has a protective effect against Aβ accumulation, but this effect is suppressed by FOXO1 [173]. When blood miRNA profiling was used to build a model for predicting the conversion from MCI to AD, FOXO1 was one of the four hub genes revealed by a network-based meta-analysis of microRNA expression quantitative trait loci target genes (involving expression variations) [174].
Notch1 is a transmembrane receptor that interacts with APP [175]. The proteolytic cleavage of Notch1 is affected by PS1 and Rac1 [176], and alterations to this process caused by gamma secretase may cause AD [177]. Furthermore, Notch1 affects neuronal progenitor cell differentiation [178]. It has been observed that elevated transcription of the intracellular domain of Notch1 restores the self-renewal activity of murine neuronal progenitor cells induced by PSEN1 mutations [178,179,180]. In addition, folic acid was shown to stimulate hippocampal neurogenesis in adult rat brains after ischemic injury [179], and Notch1 expression is reduced in the subventricular zone of ischemic aged brains of rats [180]. Downstream signaling of Notch1 is mediated by HES-1 and Hey-1, which bind to the insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE), a protein involved in the proteolytic cleavage of Aβ protein [181]. Moreover, IDE levels decreased when the intracellular domain of Notch was transfected into cell lines expressing human APP. In humans, immunohistochemistry identified Notch1 accumulation in the brain tissue of patients with sporadic AD [182]. Notch1 signaling is associated with cognitive function in AD [183], and several agents, including a hormone (melatonin) and a variety of chemicals (such as asiatic acid, risperidone, and valproic acid), affect cognitive function via Notch1 [184,185,186]. In diabetic rats and high glucose induced HepG2 cells, Notch1 is downregulated. When an inhibitor of miR-363 was applied to HepG2 cells, glucose consumption and uptake increased while lipid droplet accumulation decreased [187]. Additionally, salsalate is an anti-inflammatory drug with an antidiabetic effect, and its protective effect is diminished by the suppression of Notch1 [188].

4.2. Cluster 2

In cluster 2, JAK2 was an obvious hub gene linked to all the other genes in the cluster (Figure 2). JAK2 is associated with Aβ-induced hepatic insulin resistance. When Aβ is injected into the peritoneum of AD mouse models, it activates the hepatic Jak2/STAT3/SOCS-1 pathway, resulting in elevated fasting glucose and impaired insulin tolerance and hepatic insulin signaling [189]. When SH2B1 was knocked down, insulin expression and glucose-stimulated insulin levels decreased, and the reverse phenomena were observed with the overexpression of SH2B1 in rat beta cells [190]. Egr2 represses the expression of SOCS-1 and the phosphorylation of JAK2 and STAT3 in HepG2 cells following palmitate treatment, and Egr2 upregulation induces insulin resistance in HepG2 cells [191]. A high-fat diet is known to induce lipotoxicity in islet beta cells, which is associated with reduced PDX-1 expression, while the glucagon receptor agonist liraglutide induces the expression of PDX-1, JAK2, and STAT3, restoring insulin capacity and increasing the number of islet beta cells [192]. The antidiabetic effects of bromocriptine and the renoprotective effects of baricitinib, together with recombinant anti-IL-6 receptor proteins, were found to be associated with JAK2 inhibition [93,193,194]. IL-3 activates JAK2 and STAT3 in microglia, and this activation is associated with AD [195]. Inhibition of JAK2/STAT3 induced loss of spatial working memory through reduced levels of choline esterase and desensitization of the acetylcholine receptor [196]. Beta-amyloid downregulated IGF-1 expression by inhibiting the JAK2/STAT5 pathway in the adult rabbit hippocampus [197], and JAK2 inhibitors decreased PGE2 release and microglial phagocytosis [198]. When BDNF/TrkB activity is repressed, the JAK2/STAT3 axis activates, resulting in upregulation of C/EBPβ. This process is associated with increased δ-secretase and APP levels and tau fragmentation [199]. The JAK2/STAT3 cascade plays a crucial role in astrocyte reactivity, a hallmark of AD pathology [200].
IRS2 mediates the activation of the PI3K/Akt and MAPK pathways in insulin target tissues, and IRS2 knockout induces insulin resistance and beta cell degeneration [201]. Furthermore, IRS2 is involved in the autocrine regulation of insulin gene expression in beta cells [202]. In addition, beta cell survival is regulated by IRS2 expression and calcium ions [203], and the calmodulin-dependent kinase 4 (CaMKK)/CREB/IRS2 cascade stimulates beta cell survival in mice [204]. Calcineurin/NFAT signaling controls glucose-induced IRS2 expression in rat beta cells [205]. Notably, IRS2 mediates hepatic gluconeogenesis suppression through HIF2α- and VEGF-induced inhibition effects on glucose tolerance [206]. Prolyl hydroxylase domain-containing protein isoforms, including Phd1, Phd2, and Phd3, regulate the anabolic effect of insulin, and deletion of hepatic Phd3 improves insulin sensitivity by increasing Irs2 transcription and Akt activation [207]. IRS2 is closely associated with amyloid pathology in AD. In mice with amyloid overexpression, deletion of Irs2 reduced Aβ deposition by increasing clearance [208]. This finding was replicated in another study showing that the beneficial effect of Irs2 deletion was associated with IGF1 signaling alterations in AD mice [209]. Moreover, premature death of AD mice was prevented by Irs2 deletion [209]. In contrast, decreased levels of IRS1 and IRS2 have been observed in the neurons of AD patients with aberrant IGF1R distributions [210]. Pathological changes in IGF1, IRS1, and IRS2 seemed to precede amyloid accumulation in an AD mouse model [211]. Recently, IRS2 was shown to play a predominant role in the brain insulin/IGF1 signaling pathway [212], and abscisic acid was found to affect hippocampal BDNF, TNFα, and IRS2, showing protective effects against AD [213].
IL-6R, which has a tight connection with JAK2, was a hub gene of Cluster 2. In the Chinese Han population, IL-6R gene polymorphisms have been associated with the onset of sporadic AD [214]. In contrast, Asp homozygotes of functional polymorphisms in IL-6R (Asp358Ala) were associated with higher cognitive performance [215]. Moreover, an IL-6R-responsive gene signature increased in the presence of IL-6R variant rs2228145, indicating the functional implications of IL-6R [216]. Additionally, the Asp358Ala variant of rs2228145 and elevated soluble IL-6R levels were associated with lower scores in modified preclinical Alzheimer’s cognitive composite and Montreal cognitive assessment [217]. When tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6R receptor, was administered to streptozotocin-induced AD mice, learning and spatial memory significantly improved [218]. In a human study, genetic variants of IL-6R were associated with the development of T2DM [219,220,221]. Inhibition of IL-6R by miR-22 augmented the viability of pancreatic cells and reduced the expression of apoptosis-related proteins [222].

4.3. Cluster 3

In Cluster 3, purinergic receptors were tightly connected (Figure 2). Purinergic receptors are involved in ATP-mediated signaling pathways [223]. There are three subtypes: P1, P2X, and P2Y. These receptors play different roles in a variety of biological processes, and Cluster 3 contains all types of P2RXs (P2RX1–P2RX7), which are ligand-gated ion channel receptors [223]. P2RX4 appears to be a hub gene of this cluster; however, few studies have reported an association between P2RX4 and AD or T2DM. Microglial P2XR4 regulates cathepsin B activity and promotes ApoE degradation, and deletion of P2XR4 recovers spatial memory impairment in mouse models [224]. OXYS rats, an advanced AD murine model, showed increased expression of p2xr4 [225]. Aβ fragment 1-42-induced neuronal death in rodents is enhanced by upregulation of P2XR4 expression [226]. Not a single study reporting a relationship between P2XR4 and T2DM was found.
Among the P2RXs, P2RX7 is the most frequently studied receptor. P2RX7 knockout mice show rapid postprandial hyperglycemia and increased beta cell apoptosis [227]. Additionally, the fibroblasts of patients with T2DM show increased expression of P2XR7 and accompanying cellular responses, such as enhanced fibronectin and IL-6 secretion, as well as activation of apoptosis [228]. The genetic variant rs1718119 of P2XR7 is associated with insulin sensitivity and secretion [229], increased beta cell function, and the release of IL-1Ra in patients with T2DM [230]. P2XR7 is associated with ATP-mediated pathophysiology of AD. In rats, when ATP is administered to primary microglia, P2XR7 mediates the stimulation of superoxide production, and microglia-induced cortical cell death occurs [231]. P2XR7 is also involved in the secretion of cytokines in microglia [232], and the activation of microglia by Aβ is accomplished by the upregulation of P2XR7, as observed in a transgenic mouse model of AD [233]. Furthermore, protein expression of P2XR7 in postmortem human brain samples has also been observed; it modulated the NLRP3 inflammasome pathway [234]. P2XR7 activation is associated with neuronal autophagy and cognitive and memory impairment after traumatic brain injury [235]. In tau transgenic mice, P2XR7 induces exosome secretion by microglia, and blockade of P2XR7 reversed cognitive deficits in the Y-maze, prepulse inhibition, and contextual fear conditioning tests [236].
VSNL1 is located at the periphery of the P2 receptor network in this cluster; however, its role as a biomarker of AD is well known. Visinin-like protein 1 (VILIP-1) is encoded by the VSNL1 gene; it acts as a neuronal calcium sensor protein and is involved in intracellular neuronal signaling [237]. VILIP-1 enhances tau protein hyperphosphorylation in P12 cells [238]. The VSNL1 SNP variant rs4038131 is associated with psychotic symptoms in patients with AD, who are more prone to rapid cognitive decline [239]. VILIP-1 levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have been shown to predict AD [240,241,242,243]. In addition, VILIP-1 levels predict the cognitive decline rates of patients with AD (measured by clinical dementia ratings and other scores) [243]. VILIP-1 levels in the CSF also help discriminate between patients with AD and patients with Lewy bodies, which are difficult to diagnose based on clinical symptoms [242], and these levels also have a predictive power for the differential diagnosis of AD and MCI, especially in conjunction with conventional biomarkers such as p-tau181 and Aβ(1-42) [241]. This finding was replicated in a meta-analysis of the association between VILIP-1 levels in CSF and AD [240]. While VSNL1 and VILIP-1 have implications in the pathophysiology of AD, relatively few connections have been found between VSNL1 and T2DM. VILIP-1 expression, for example, has an impact on the secretion of cyclic AMP (cAMP) and insulin in MIN6 cells and mouse islets [244]. Genetic fine mapping of quantitative expression traits using islet cell transcriptomics data revealed that VSNL1 is a candidate T2DM risk gene [245]. However, no clinical studies have found an association between VSNL1 and T2DM development, which should be investigated in future studies.

5. Discussion

The DisGeNet database is a collection of disease genes determined by experimental evidence, derived from molecular biology experiments and genetic association tests. The primary goal of the DisGeNet database is to provide information on disease genes that have already been validated. Therefore, we can identify genes associated with comorbidity directly through a simple intersection of disease genes from two diseases. However, the information from the database does not directly identify novel disease genes. Nevertheless, it can be valuable for predicting novel disease genes, especially through bioinformatic analysis. The primary goal of this review was to identify genes and clusters associated with AD, T2DM, and brain functions (memory and cognition) because genes involved in multiple diseases are more likely to be associated with diseases. By doing this, researchers can obtain more reliable targets for future research on AD biomarkers or drug development, specifically for addressing memory loss or cognition failure.
Since the number of disease genes associated with AD and T2DM is high, there is a possibility that the intersection of these two disease gene groups occurs randomly. To rule out this possibility, a statistical test based on random sampling was performed. Two sets of genes, each having the same number of AD and T2DM genes, were sampled from the pool of 43,161 human genes. The number of common genes was determined, and this process was repeated 100,000 times. No instance of a higher number of overlapped genes was observed for AD and T2DM by random chance (Supplementary Figure S1). This result indicates that the common genes between AD and T2DM cannot be obtained by random chance alone (permutation p value < 1 × 10−5). Additionally, over-representation analysis yielded highly significant results, indicating the biological significance of these genes in both AD and T2DM.
In this review, over-representation analysis with KEGG and GOBPs was applied to reveal the functional implications of common genes in AD and T2DM. Since these genes are associated with both diseases, they are highly likely to have functional implications. As anticipated, there were numerous highly significant results. The over-representation test assesses whether input genes have a greater number of genes in a gene set than would be randomly expected. The biological implication of significant enrichment is that input genes have functional genes associated with a specific biological process of the gene set. Although the statistical test uses the hypergeometric distribution, the significant results indicate that random sampling of the same number of input genes from the total amount of human genes does not yield more genes from the gene set. In this review, the enrichment test showed many highly significant results, indicating that the common genes in AD, T2DM, and memory (or cognition) have functional meaning, rather than being chosen by random chance.
The primary goal of this review was to identify clustered genes previously known to be associated with AD, T2DM, and memory/cognition based on the results of PPI network-based clustering. Considering the PPI network provides information on protein interactions determined by the physical properties of the proteins, genes in the same clusters are highly likely to be involved in the pathophysiology of related diseases. Given this, genes with relevant evidence guarantee functional relatedness to AD and T2DM, although the main focus can be on AD. Thus, in this review, listing the evidence related to the genes of the same cluster was the primary goal. The functional enrichment test of the STRING database supported this hypothesis. When the functional enrichment test was applied to the clusters from the STRING database, there were significant results that explained the functional characteristics of the cluster. This information can be applied to future research. For example, Cluster 1 (CL1) of common genes from AD, T2DM, and memory genes showed significant enrichment of the gene ontology biological process (GOBP) termed ‘Cardiac Ventricle Formation’ (false discovery rate < 0.05, Table S6). If a drug expresses activity on the genes of the GOBP term, it can be applied for repurposing research. Although additional information and considerations are necessary, the cluster information would be a useful starting point. Likewise, this review performed enumeration of relevant evidence of the cluster genes to ensure their usability, instead of summarizing individual molecular biologic evidence.

6. Conclusions

In this study, the genes related to AD and T2DM comorbidity were reviewed. Common comorbidity genes and genes affecting memory and cognition were used for PPI-based network clustering, and tightly connected gene clusters were thus obtained. Since common genes were detected with respect to different phenotypes, they were unlikely to be a randomly identified group. Moreover, instead of using comorbidity genes directly, the memory and cognition gene subset was used in analysis; therefore, the genes of the clusters are most likely involved in the pathophysiology of AD. Although the overall impact of the cluster genes on the entire genetic network of AD brain cells should be assessed for an accurate estimation of their roles in AD, these genes provide valuable guidelines for future research.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25042211/s1. References [246,247] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Funding

This research was funded by Gil hospital (grant number: FRD2021-18).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Guo, T.; Zhang, D.; Zeng, Y.; Huang, T.Y.; Xu, H.; Zhao, Y. Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 2020, 15, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, Y.; Chen, H.; Li, R.; Sterling, K.; Song, W. Amyloid β-based therapy for Alzheimer’s disease: Challenges, successes and future. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Barbagallo, M. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer’s disease. World J. Diabetes 2014, 5, 889–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Karki, R.; Kodamullil, A.T.; Hofmann-Apitius, M. Comorbidity Analysis between Alzheimer’s Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) Based on Shared Pathways and the Role of T2DM Drugs. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017, 60, 721–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Diogo, D.; Tian, C.; Franklin, C.S.; Alanne-Kinnunen, M.; March, M.; Spencer, C.C.A.; Vangjeli, C.; Weale, M.E.; Mattsson, H.; Kilpeläinen, E.; et al. Phenome-wide association studies across large population cohorts support drug target validation. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hemmings, B.A.; Restuccia, D.F. PI3K-PKB/Akt Pathway. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4, a011189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jean, S.; Kiger, A.A. Classes of phosphoinositide 3-kinases at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2014, 127, 923–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Razani, E.; Pourbagheri-Sigaroodi, A.; Safaroghli-Azar, A.; Zoghi, A.; Shanaki-Bavarsad, M.; Bashash, D. The PI3K/Akt signaling axis in Alzheimer’s disease: A valuable target to stimulate or suppress? Cell Stress Chaperones 2021, 26, 871–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Curtis, D.; Bandyopadhyay, S. Mini-review: Role of the PI3K/Akt pathway and tyrosine phosphatases in Alzheimer’s disease susceptibility. Ann. Hum. Genet. 2020, 85, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Maffei, A.; Lembo, G.; Carnevale, D. PI3Kinases in Diabetes Mellitus and Its Related Complications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 4098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Luo, J.; Sobkiw, C.L.; Hirshman, M.F.; Logsdon, M.N.; Li, T.Q.; Goodyear, L.J.; Cantley, L.C. Loss of class IA PI3K signaling in muscle leads to impaired muscle growth, insulin response, and hyperlipidemia. Cell Metab. 2006, 3, 355–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Giese, K.P.; Mizuno, K. The roles of protein kinases in learning and memory. Learn. Mem. 2013, 20, 540–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bockaert, J.; Marin, P.; Yan, M.; Li, L.; Mao, B.; Li, H.; Li, S.Y.T.; Mruk, D.; Silvestrini, B.; Lian, Q.; et al. mTOR in Brain Physiology and Pathologies. Physiol. Rev. 2015, 95, 1157–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dyer, A.H.; Vahdatpour, C.; Sanfeliu, A.; Tropea, D. The role of Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) in brain development, maturation and neuroplasticity. Neuroscience 2016, 325, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, H.; Jia, J. Immune-Related Hub Genes and the Competitive Endogenous RNA Network in Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2020, 77, 1255–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Q.; Yang, X.; Liu, J.; Song, J.; Zhang, S.; Chen, L.; Zhang, M. 20 S-Protopanaxatriol improves cognitive function of Alzheimer’s disease by promoting endogenous neurogenesis. Food Funct. 2023, 14, 4191–4203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Du, Y.; Guo, J.; Zhou, Y.; Yan, S.; Xu, B.; Wang, Y.; Lu, D.; Ma, Z.; Chen, Q.; Tang, Q.; et al. Revealing the Mechanisms of Byu dMar 25 in the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease through Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking, and In Vivo Experiment. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 25066–25080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Owolabi, B.O.; Ojo, O.O.; Srinivasan, D.K.; Conlon, J.M.; Flatt, P.R.; Abdel-Wahab, Y.H.A. Glucoregulatory, endocrine and morphological effects of [P5K]hymenochirin-1B in mice with diet-induced glucose intolerance and insulin resistance. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2016, 389, 769–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Musale, V.; Moffett, R.C.; Conlon, J.M.; Flatt, P.R.; Abdel-Wahab, Y.H. Beneficial actions of the [A14K] analog of the frog skin peptide PGLa-AM1 in mice with obesity and degenerative diabetes: A mechanistic study. Peptides 2020, 136, 170472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Le Stunff, C.; Dechartres, A.; Mariot, V.; Lotton, C.; Trainor, C.; Del Giudice, E.M.; Meyre, D.; Bieche, I.; Laurendeau, I.; Froguel, P.; et al. Association Analysis Indicates That a Variant GATA-Binding Site in the PIK3CB Promoter Is a Cis-Acting Expression Quantitative Trait Locus for This Gene and Attenuates Insulin Resistance in Obese Children. Diabetes 2008, 57, 494–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Clément, K.; Le Stunff, C.; Meirhaeghe, A.; Dechartres, A.; Ferrieres, J.; Basdevant, A.; Boitard, C.; Amouyel, P.; Bougnères, P. In obese and non-obese adults, the cis-regulatory rs361072 promoter variant of PIK3CB is associated with insulin resistance not with type 2 diabetes. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2009, 96, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ribel-Madsen, R.; Poulsen, P.; Holmkvist, J.; Mortensen, B.; Grarup, N.; Friedrichsen, M.; Jørgensen, T.; Lauritzen, T.; Wojtaszewski, J.F.; Pedersen, O.; et al. Impact of rs361072 in the Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase p110β Gene on Whole-Body Glucose Metabolism and Subunit Protein Expression in Skeletal Muscle. Diabetes 2010, 59, 1108–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhou, Z.; Bai, J.; Zhong, S.; Zhang, R.; Kang, K.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, C.; Zhao, M. Downregulation of PIK3CB Involved in Alzheimer’s Disease via Apoptosis, Axon Guidance, and FoxO Signaling Pathway. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 2022, 1260161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Su, F.; Shu, H.; Ye, Q.; Wang, Z.; Xie, C.; Yuan, B.; Zhang, Z.; Bai, F. Brain insulin resistance deteriorates cognition by altering the topological features of brain networks. NeuroImage: Clin. 2017, 13, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wójcik, M.; Mac-Marcjanek, K.; Woźniak, L.A.; Nadel, I.; Lewiński, A.; Cypryk, K. Związek podwyższonej ekspresji leukocytarnej kinazy 3-fosfatydyloinozytolu delta z cukrzycą ciążową (GDM). Endokrynol. Polska 2014, 65, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ma, R.; Deng, X.-L.; Aleteng, Q.-Q.; Li, L.; Zhu, J. Genome-Wide Transcriptome Analysis in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Treated by Sitagliptin. Diabetes, Metab. Syndr. Obesity: Targets Ther. 2022, 15, 1761–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Malodobra, M.; Pilecka, A.; Gworys, B.; Adamiec, R. Single nucleotide polymorphisms within functional regions of genes implicated in insulin action and association with the insulin resistant phenotype. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2010, 349, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kaneko, K.; Ueki, K.; Takahashi, N.; Hashimoto, S.; Okamoto, M.; Awazawa, M.; Okazaki, Y.; Ohsugi, M.; Inabe, K.; Umehara, T.; et al. Class IA Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase in Pancreatic β Cells Controls Insulin Secretion by Multiple Mechanisms. Cell Metab. 2010, 12, 619–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, Y.; Ji, B.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, M.; Ban, B. SHORT syndrome in two Chinese girls: A case report and review of the literature. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2020, 8, e1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Masunaga, Y.; Fujisawa, Y.; Muramatsu, M.; Ono, H.; Inoue, T.; Fukami, M.; Kagami, M.; Saitsu, H.; Ogata, T. Insulin resistant diabetes mellitus in SHORT syndrome: Case report and literature review. Endocr. J. 2021, 68, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chung, B.; Gibson, W. Autosomal dominant PIK3R1 mutations cause SHORT syndrome. Clin. Genet. 2013, 85, 228–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Curtis, D.; Bakaya, K.; Sharma, L.; Bandyopadhyay, S. Weighted burden analysis of exome-sequenced late-onset Alzheimer’s cases and controls provides further evidence for a role for PSEN1 and suggests involvement of the PI3K/Akt/GSK-3β and WNT signalling pathways. Ann. Hum. Genet. 2020, 84, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qian, X.-H.; Liu, X.-L.; Chen, S.-D.; Tang, H.-D. Identification of Immune Hub Genes Associated with Braak Stages in Alzheimer’s Disease and Their Correlation of Immune Infiltration. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022, 14, 887168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shen, S.; Wang, F.; Fernandez, A.; Hu, W. Role of platelet-derived growth factor in type II diabetes mellitus and its complications. Diabetes Vasc. Dis. Res. 2020, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. de la Monte, S.M.; Wands, J.R. Alzheimer-associated neuronal thread protein mediated cell death is linked to impaired insulin signaling. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2004, 6, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yeboah, J.; Sane, D.C.; Crouse, J.R.; Herrington, D.M.; Bowden, D.W. Low Plasma Levels of FGF-2 and PDGF-BB Are Associated with Cardiovascular Events in Type II Diabetes Mellitus (Diabetes Heart Study). Dis. Markers 2007, 23, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bessa, S.S.-E.; Hussein, T.A.; Morad, M.A.; Amer, A.M. Urinary Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-BB as an Early Marker of Nephropathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: An Egyptian Study. Ren. Fail. 2012, 34, 670–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Liu, H.; Saffi, G.T.; Vasefi, M.S.; Choi, Y.; Kruk, J.S.; Ahmed, N.; Gondora, N.; Mielke, J.; Leonenko, Z.; Beazely, M.A. Amyloid-β Inhibits PDGFβ Receptor Activation and Prevents PDGF-BBInduced Neuroprotection. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2018, 15, 618–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Keller, A.; Westenberger, A.; Sobrido, M.J.; García-Murias, M.; Domingo, A.; Sears, R.L.; Lemos, R.R.; Ordoñez-Ugalde, A.; Nicolas, G.; Cunha, J.E.G.d.; et al. Mutations in the gene encoding PDGF-B cause brain calcifications in humans and mice. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 1077–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Arts, F.A.; Velghe, A.I.; Stevens, M.; Renauld, J.; Essaghir, A.; Demoulin, J. Idiopathic basal ganglia calcification-associated PDGFRB mutations impair the receptor signalling. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2014, 19, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tsolaki, E.; Csincsik, L.; Xue, J.; Lengyel, I.; Bertazzo, S. Nuclear and cellular, micro and nano calcification in Alzheimer’s disease patients and correlation to phosphorylated Tau. Acta Biomater. 2022, 143, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Abate, G.; Frisoni, G.B.; Bourdon, J.-C.; Piccirella, S.; Memo, M.; Uberti, D. The pleiotropic role of p53 in functional/dysfunctional neurons: Focus on pathogenesis and diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 2020, 12, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Buizza, L.; Cenini, G.; Lanni, C.; Ferrari-Toninelli, G.; Prandelli, C.; Govoni, S.; Buoso, E.; Racchi, M.; Barcikowska, M.; Styczynska, M.; et al. Conformational Altered p53 as an Early Marker of Oxidative Stress in Alzheimer’s Disease. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e29789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Rosas, I.; Martínez, C.; Coto, E.; Clarimón, J.; Lleó, A.; Illán-Gala, I.; Dols-Icardo, O.; Borroni, B.; Almeida, M.R.; van der Zee, J.; et al. Genetic variation in APOE, GRN, and TP53 are phenotype modifiers in frontotemporal dementia. Neurobiol. Aging 2020, 99, 99.e15–99.e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lanni, C.; Masi, M.; Racchi, M.; Govoni, S. Cancer and Alzheimer’s disease inverse relationship: An age-associated diverging derailment of shared pathways. Mol. Psychiatry 2020, 26, 280–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kaźmierczak, A.; Czapski, G.A.; Adamczyk, A.; Gajkowska, B.; Strosznajder, J.B. A novel mechanism of non-Aβ component of Alzheimer’s disease amyloid (NAC) neurotoxicity. Interplay between p53 protein and cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5). Neurochem. Int. 2011, 58, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Amor-Gutiérrez, O.; Costa-Rama, E.; Arce-Varas, N.; Martínez-Rodríguez, C.; Novelli, A.; Fernández-Sánchez, M.T.; Costa-García, A. Competitive electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of unfolded p53 protein in blood as biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease. Anal. Chim. Acta 2019, 1093, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dai, C.-Q.; Luo, T.-T.; Luo, S.-C.; Wang, J.-Q.; Wang, S.-M.; Bai, Y.-H.; Yang, Y.-L.; Wang, Y.-Y. p53 and mitochondrial dysfunction: Novel insight of neurodegenerative diseases. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2016, 48, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Qu, L.; He, B.; Pan, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, C.; Tang, Z.; Bao, Q.; Tian, F.; Wang, S. Association between polymorphisms in RAPGEF1, TP53, NRF1 and type 2 diabetes in Chinese Han population. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2011, 91, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guo, D.; Fang, L.; Yu, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, Y.; Guo, W. Different Roles of TP53 Codon 72 Polymorphism in Type 2 Diabetes and Its Complications: Evidence from a Case-Control Study on a Chinese Han Population. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2021, 14, 4259–4268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Burgdorf, K.S.; Grarup, N.; Justesen, J.M.; Harder, M.N.; Witte, D.R.; Jørgensen, T.; Sandbæk, A.; Lauritzen, T.; Madsbad, S.; Hansen, T.; et al. Studies of the Association of Arg72Pro of Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 with Type 2 Diabetes in a Combined Analysis of 55,521 Europeans. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e15813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yuan, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Q.; Wang, J. The common genes involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease and type 2 diabetes and their implication for drug repositioning. Neuropharmacology 2023, 223, 109327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kung, C.-P.; E Murphy, M. The role of the p53 tumor suppressor in metabolism and diabetes. J. Endocrinol. 2016, 231, R61–R75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nakanishi, A.; Minami, A.; Kitagishi, Y.; Ogura, Y.; Matsuda, S. BRCA1 and p53 Tumor Suppressor Molecules in Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 2879–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wezyk, M.; Zekanowski, C. Role of BRCA1 in Neuronal Death in Alzheimer’s Disease. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2018, 9, 870–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Silva, A.R.T.; Santos, A.C.F.; Farfel, J.M.; Grinberg, L.T.; Ferretti, R.E.L.; Campos, A.H.J.F.M.; Cunha, I.W.; Begnami, M.D.; Rocha, R.M.; Carraro, D.M.; et al. Repair of Oxidative DNA Damage, Cell-Cycle Regulation and Neuronal Death May Influence the Clinical Manifestation of Alzheimer’s Disease. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e99897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Suberbielle, E.; Djukic, B.; Evans, M.; Kim, D.H.; Taneja, P.; Wang, X.; Finucane, M.; Knox, J.; Ho, K.; Devidze, N.; et al. DNA repair factor BRCA1 depletion occurs in Alzheimer brains and impairs cognitive function in mice. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nakamura, M.; Kaneko, S.; Dickson, D.W.; Kusaka, H. Aberrant Accumulation of BRCA1 in Alzheimer Disease and Other Tauopathies. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2019, 79, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kurihara, M.; Mano, T.; Saito, Y.; Murayama, S.; Toda, T.; Iwata, A. Colocalization of BRCA1 with Tau Aggregates in Human Tauopathies. Brain Sci. 2019, 10, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mano, T.; Nagata, K.; Nonaka, T.; Tarutani, A.; Imamura, T.; Hashimoto, T.; Bannai, T.; Koshi-Mano, K.; Tsuchida, T.; Ohtomo, R.; et al. Neuron-specific methylome analysis reveals epigenetic regulation and tau-related dysfunction of BRCA1 in Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E9645–E9654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Brunet, J.; Vazquez-Martin, A.; Colomer, R.; Graña-Suarez, B.; Martin-Castillo, B.; Menendez, J.A. BRCA1 and acetyl-CoA carboxylase: The metabolic syndrome of breast cancer. Mol. Carcinog. 2007, 47, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Karachanak-Yankova, S.; Dimova, R.; Nikolova, D.; Nesheva, D.; Koprinarova, M.; Maslyankov, S.; Tafradjiska, R.; Gateva, P.; Velizarova, M.; Hammoudeh, Z.; et al. Epigenetic alterations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Balk. J. Med. Genet. 2015, 18, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mori, T.; Asano, T.; Town, T. Targeting S100B in Cerebral Ischemia and in Alzheimer’s Disease. Cardiovasc. Psychiatry Neurol. 2010, 2010, 687067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Serbinek, D.; Ullrich, C.; Pirchl, M.; Hochstrasser, T.; Schmidt-Kastner, R.; Humpel, C. S100b Counteracts Neurodegeneration of Rat Cholinergic Neurons in Brain Slices after Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation. Cardiovasc. Psychiatry Neurol. 2010, 2010, 106123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kitazawa, M.; Cheng, D.; Tsukamoto, M.R.; Koike, M.A.; Wes, P.D.; Vasilevko, V.; Cribbs, D.H.; LaFerla, F.M. Blocking IL-1 Signaling Rescues Cognition, Attenuates Tau Pathology, and Restores Neuronal β-Catenin Pathway Function in an Alzheimer’s Disease Model. J. Immunol. 2011, 187, 6539–6549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Rocha, M.; Vieira, A.; Michels, M.; Borges, H.; Goulart, A.; Fernandes, F.; Dominguini, D.; Ritter, C.; Dal-Pizzol, F. Effects of S100B neutralization on the long-term cognitive impairment and neuroinflammatory response in an animal model of sepsis. Neurochem. Int. 2020, 142, 104906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cirillo, C.; Capoccia, E.; Iuvone, T.; Cuomo, R.; Sarnelli, G.; Steardo, L.; Esposito, G. S100B Inhibitor Pentamidine Attenuates Reactive Gliosis and Reduces Neuronal Loss in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 508342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Leclerc, E.; Sturchler, E.; Vetter, S.W. The S100B/RAGE Axis in Alzheimer’s Disease. Cardiovasc. Psychiatry Neurol. 2010, 2010, 539581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Lam, V.; Albrecht, M.A.; Takechi, R.; Giles, C.; James, A.P.; Foster, J.K.; Mamo, J.C.L. The Serum Concentration of the Calcium Binding Protein S100B is Positively Associated with Cognitive Performance in Older Adults. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2013, 5, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chaves, M.L.; Camozzato, A.L.; Ferreira, E.D.; Piazenski, I.; Kochhann, R.; Dall’Igna, O.; Mazzini, G.S.; O Souza, D.; Portela, L.V. Serum levels of S100B and NSE proteins in Alzheimer’s disease patients. J. Neuroinflamm. 2010, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lee, B.W.; Chae, H.Y.; Kwon, S.J.; Park, S.Y.; Ihm, J.; Ihm, S.H. RAGE ligands induce apoptotic cell death of pancreatic beta-cells via oxidative stress. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2010, 26, 813–818. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Afarideh, M.; Esteghamati, V.Z.; Ganji, M.; Heidari, B.; Esteghamati, S.; Lavasani, S.; Ahmadi, M.; Tafakhori, A.; Nakhjavani, M.; Esteghamati, A. Associations of Serum S100B and S100P with the Presence and Classification of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Case-Cohort Study. Can. J. Diabetes 2019, 43, 336–344.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yu, H.; Li, H.; Liu, X.; Du, X.; Deng, B. Levels of serum S100B are associated with cognitive dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Aging 2020, 12, 4193–4203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gao, X.; Zhang, H.; Schmidt, A.M.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Z.H.; Dai, D.P.; Ding, F.H.; Pan, W.Q.; Fang, Y.H.; Zhang, Q.; et al. AGE/RAGE produces endothelial dysfunction in coronary arterioles in Type 2 diabetic mice. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2008, 295, H491–H498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kesner, R.P.; Hui, X.; Sommer, T.; Wright, C.; Barrera, V.R.; Fanselow, M.S. The role of postnatal neurogenesis in supporting remote memory and spatial metric processing. Hippocampus 2014, 24, 1663–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Benoit, J.D.; Rakic, P.; Frick, K.M. Prenatal stress induces spatial memory deficits and epigenetic changes in the hippocampus indicative of heterochromatin formation and reduced gene expression. Behav. Brain Res. 2015, 281, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Feng, J.; Zhou, Y.; Campbell, S.L.; Le, T.; Li, E.; Sweatt, J.D.; Silva, A.J.; Fan, G. Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a maintain DNA methylation and regulate synaptic function in adult forebrain neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 2010, 13, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mitchnick, K.A.; Creighton, S.; O’Hara, M.; Kalisch, B.E.; Winters, B.D. Differential contributions of de novo and maintenance DNA methyltransferases to object memory processing in the rat hippocampus and perirhinal cortex—A double dissociation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2014, 41, 773–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pi, T.; Wei, S.; Jiang, Y.; Shi, J.-S. High Methionine Diet-Induced Alzheimer’s Disease like Symptoms Are Accompanied by 5-Methylcytosine Elevated Levels in the Brain. Behav. Neurol. 2021, 2021, 6683318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Duan, S.; Li, C.; Gao, Y.; Meng, P.; Ji, S.; Xu, Y.; Mao, Y.; Wang, H.; Tian, J. The tyrosine kinase inhibitor LPM4870108 impairs learning and memory and induces transcriptomic and gene-specific DNA methylation changes in rats. Arch. Toxicol. 2022, 96, 845–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Tannorella, P.; Stoccoro, A.; Tognoni, G.; Petrozzi, L.; Salluzzo, M.G.; Ragalmuto, A.; Siciliano, G.; Haslberger, A.; Bosco, P.; Bonuccelli, U.; et al. Methylation analysis of multiple genes in blood DNA of Alzheimer’s disease and healthy individuals. Neurosci. Lett. 2015, 600, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Wang, S.-C.; Oelze, B.; Schumacher, A. Age-Specific Epigenetic Drift in Late-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Pezzi, J.C.; Ens, C.M.B.; Borba, E.M.; Schumacher-Schuh, A.F.; de Andrade, F.M.; Chaves, M.L.F.; Fiegenbaum, M.; Camozzato, A.L. DNA methyltransferase haplotype is associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 2014, 579, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Mastroeni, D.; Grover, A.; Delvaux, E.; Whiteside, C.; Coleman, P.D.; Rogers, J. Epigenetic changes in Alzheimer’s disease: Decrements in DNA methylation. Neurobiol. Aging 2010, 31, 2025–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Yang, B.T.; Dayeh, T.A.; Volkov, P.A.; Kirkpatrick, C.L.; Malmgren, S.; Jing, X.; Renström, E.; Wollheim, C.B.; Nitert, M.D.; Ling, C. Increased DNA Methylation and Decreased Expression of PDX-1 in Pancreatic Islets from Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Mol. Endocrinol. 2012, 26, 1203–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Balakrishnan, A.; Guruprasad, K.P.; Satyamoorthy, K.; Joshi, M.B. Interleukin-6 determines protein stabilization of DNA methyltransferases and alters DNA promoter methylation of genes associated with insulin signaling and angiogenesis. Mod. Pathol. 2018, 98, 1143–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Kassan, M.; Choi, S.-K.; Galán, M.; Bishop, A.; Umezawa, K.; Trebak, M.; Belmadani, S.; Matrougui, K. Enhanced NF-κB Activity Impairs Vascular Function Through PARP-1–, SP-1–, and COX-2–Dependent Mechanisms in Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes 2013, 62, 2078–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kassan, M.; Choi, S.-K.; Galán, M.; Trebak, M.; Belmadani, S.; Matrougui, K. Nuclear factor kappa B inhibition improves conductance artery function in type 2 diabetic mice. Diabetes/Metabolism Res. Rev. 2015, 31, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zakaria, E.M.; El-Bassossy, H.M.; El-Maraghy, N.N.; Ahmed, A.F.; Ali, A.A. PARP-1 inhibition alleviates diabetic cardiac complications in experimental animals. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 791, 444–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Xia, Q.; Lu, S.; Ostrovsky, J.; E McCormack, S.; Falk, M.J.; A Grant, S.F. PARP-1 Inhibition Rescues Short Lifespan in Hyperglycemic C. Elegans and Improves GLP-1 Secretion in Human Cells. Aging Dis. 2018, 9, 17–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Waldman, M.; Nudelman, V.; Shainberg, A.; Abraham, N.G.; Kornwoski, R.; Aravot, D.; Arad, M.; Hochhauser, E. PARP-1 inhibition protects the diabetic heart through activation of SIRT1-PGC-1α axis. Exp. Cell Res. 2018, 373, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Cui, N.-H.; Yang, J.-M.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.-B. Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Activity and Coronary Artery Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2020, 40, 2516–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Reda, E.; Hassaneen, S.; El-Abhar, H.S. Novel Trajectories of Bromocriptine Antidiabetic Action: Leptin-IL-6/ JAK2/p-STAT3/SOCS3, p-IR/p-AKT/GLUT4, PPAR-γ/Adiponectin, Nrf2/PARP-1, and GLP-1. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Li, R.; Sun, X.; Li, P.; Li, W.; Zhao, L.; Zhu, L.; Zhu, S. GLP-1-Induced AMPK Activation Inhibits PARP-1 and Promotes LXR-Mediated ABCA1 Expression to Protect Pancreatic β-Cells Against Cholesterol-Induced Toxicity Through Cholesterol Efflux. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 646113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sclip, A.; Antoniou, X.; Colombo, A.; Camici, G.G.; Pozzi, L.; Cardinetti, D.; Feligioni, M.; Veglianese, P.; Bahlmann, F.H.; Cervo, L.; et al. c-Jun N-terminal Kinase Regulates Soluble Aβ Oligomers and Cognitive Impairment in AD Mouse Model*. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 43871–43880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. España, J.; Valero, J.; Miñano-Molina, A.J.; Masgrau, R.; Martín, E.; Guardia-Laguarta, C.; Lleó, A.; Giménez-Llort, L.; Rodríguez-Alvarez, J.; Saura, C.A. β-Amyloid Disrupts Activity-Dependent Gene Transcription Required for Memory through the CREB Coactivator CRTC1. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 9402–9410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ding, Y.; Qiao, A.; Wang, Z.; Goodwin, J.S.; Lee, E.-S.; Block, M.L.; Allsbrook, M.; McDonald, M.P.; Fan, G.-H. Retinoic Acid Attenuates β-Amyloid Deposition and Rescues Memory Deficits in an Alzheimer’s Disease Transgenic Mouse Model. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28, 11622–11634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Liu, C.-C.; Tsai, C.-W.; Deak, F.; Rogers, J.; Penuliar, M.; Sung, Y.M.; Maher, J.N.; Fu, Y.; Li, X.; Xu, H.; et al. Deficiency in LRP6-Mediated Wnt Signaling Contributes to Synaptic Abnormalities and Amyloid Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuron 2014, 84, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Tamayev, R.; D’Adamio, L. Memory Deficits of British Dementia Knock-In Mice Are Prevented by Aβ-Precursor Protein Haploinsufficiency. J. Neurosci. 2012, 32, 5481–5485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Du, F.; Yu, Q.; Yan, S.; Hu, G.; Lue, L.-F.; Walker, D.G.; Wu, L.; Yan, S.F.; Tieu, K.; Yan, S.S. PINK1 signalling rescues amyloid pathology and mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2017, 140, 3233–3251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Pousinha, P.A.; Mouska, X.; Bianchi, D.; Temido-Ferreira, M.; Rajão-Saraiva, J.; Gomes, R.; Fernandez, S.P.; Salgueiro-Pereira, A.R.; Gandin, C.; Raymond, E.F.; et al. The Amyloid Precursor Protein C-Terminal Domain Alters CA1 Neuron Firing, Modifying Hippocampus Oscillations and Impairing Spatial Memory Encoding. Cell Rep. 2019, 29, 317–331.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Tu, Z.; Keller, M.P.; Zhang, C.; Rabaglia, M.E.; Greenawalt, D.M.; Yang, X.; Wang, I.-M.; Dai, H.; Bruss, M.D.; Lum, P.Y.; et al. Integrative Analysis of a Cross-Loci Regulation Network Identifies App as a Gene Regulating Insulin Secretion from Pancreatic Islets. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1003107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Casini, P.; Cadavez, L.; Visa, M.; Montane, J.; Novials, A.; Alcarraz-Vizán, G.; Servitja, J.-M. Inhibition of BACE2 counteracts hIAPP-induced insulin secretory defects in pancreatic β-cells. FASEB J. 2014, 29, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Southan, C. BACE2 as a new diabetes target: A patent review (2010–2012). Expert. Opin. Ther. Pat. 2013, 23, 649–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Rulifson, I.C.; Cao, P.; Miao, L.; Kopecky, D.; Huang, L.; White, R.D.; Samayoa, K.; Gardner, J.; Wu, X.; Chen, K.; et al. Identification of Human Islet Amyloid Polypeptide as a BACE2 Substrate. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Probst, G.; Xu, Y.Z. Small-molecule BACE1 inhibitors: A patent literature review (2006–2011). Expert. Opin. Ther. Pat. 2012, 22, 511–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Rombouts, F.; Kusakabe, K.I.; Hsiao, C.C.; Gijsen, H.J.M. Small-molecule BACE1 inhibitors: A patent literature review (2011 to 2020). Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2021, 31, 25–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Xu, Q.; Bernardo, A.; Walker, D.; Kanegawa, T.; Mahley, R.W.; Huang, Y. Profile and Regulation of Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) Expression in the CNS in Mice with Targeting of Green Fluorescent Protein Gene to the ApoE Locus. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26, 4985–4994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Kang, S.S.; Ebbert, M.T.W.; Baker, K.E.; Cook, C.; Wang, X.; Sens, J.P.; Kocher, J.-P.; Petrucelli, L.; Fryer, J.D. Microglial translational profiling reveals a convergent APOE pathway from aging, amyloid, and tau. J. Exp. Med. 2018, 215, 2235–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Wahrle, S.E.; Jiang, H.; Parsadanian, M.; Legleiter, J.; Han, X.; Fryer, J.D.; Kowalewski, T.; Holtzman, D.M. ABCA1 Is Required for Normal Central Nervous System ApoE Levels and for Lipidation of Astrocyte-secreted apoE. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 40987–40993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Neuner, S.M.; Wilmott, L.A.; Hoffmann, B.R.; Mozhui, K.; Kaczorowski, C.C. Hippocampal proteomics defines pathways associated with memory decline and resilience in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. Behav. Brain Res. 2017, 322, 288–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Lee, L.C.; Goh, M.Q.L.; Koo, E.H. Transcriptional regulation of APP by apoE: To boldly go where no isoform has gone before. BioEssays 2017, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Gezen-Ak, D.; Atasoy, I.L.; Candaş, E.; Alaylıoğlu, M.; Dursun, E. The Transcriptional Regulatory Properties of Amyloid Beta 1–42 may Include Regulation of Genes Related to Neurodegeneration. NeuroMol. Med. 2018, 20, 363–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Meyer, K.; Feldman, H.M.; Lu, T.; Drake, D.; Lim, E.T.; Ling, K.-H.; Bishop, N.A.; Pan, Y.; Seo, J.; Lin, Y.-T.; et al. REST and Neural Gene Network Dysregulation in iPSC Models of Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell Rep. 2019, 26, 1112–1127.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Yin, J.; Nielsen, M.; Carcione, T.; Li, S.; Shi, J. Apolipoprotein E regulates mitochondrial function through the PGC-1α-sirtuin 3 pathway. Aging 2019, 11, 11148–11156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Madrid, L.; Moreno-Grau, S.; Ahmad, S.; González-Pérez, A.; de Rojas, I.; Xia, R.; Adami, P.V.M.; García-González, P.; Kleineidam, L.; Yang, Q.; et al. Multiomics integrative analysis identifies APOE allele-specific blood biomarkers associated to Alzheimer’s disease etiopathogenesis. Aging 2021, 13, 9277–9329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Sienski, G.; Narayan, P.; Bonner, J.M.; Kory, N.; Boland, S.; Arczewska, A.A.; Ralvenius, W.T.; Akay, L.; Lockshin, E.; He, L.; et al. APOE4 disrupts intracellular lipid homeostasis in human iPSC-derived glia. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Blanchard, J.W.; Akay, L.A.; Davila-Velderrain, J.; von Maydell, D.; Mathys, H.; Davidson, S.M.; Effenberger, A.; Chen, C.-Y.; Maner-Smith, K.; Hajjar, I.; et al. APOE4 impairs myelination via cholesterol dysregulation in oligodendrocytes. Nature 2022, 611, 769–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Chen, C.-C.; Wu, D.; Chi, N.-F.; Chen, P.-C.; Liao, Y.-P.; Chiu, H.-W.; Hu, C.-J. Effects of the Apolipoprotein E ε4 Allele on Functional MRI during n-Back Working Memory Tasks in Healthy Middle-Aged Adults. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2012, 34, 1197–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Kerchner, G.A.; Berdnik, D.; Shen, J.C.; Bernstein, J.D.; Fenesy, M.C.; Deutsch, G.K.; Wyss-Coray, T.; Rutt, B.K. APOE ε4 worsens hippocampal CA1 apical neuropil atrophy and episodic memory. Neurology 2014, 82, 691–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Mikos, A.E.; Piryatinsky, I.; Tremont, G.; Malloy, P.F. The APOE ε4 Allele Is Associated with Increased Frontally Mediated Neurobehavioral Symptoms in Amnestic MCI. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 2013, 27, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Luck, T.; Then, F.S.; Luppa, M.; Schroeter, M.L.; Arélin, K.; Burkhardt, R.; Thiery, J.; Löffler, M.; Villringer, A.; Riedel-Heller, S.G. Association of the apolipoprotein E genotype with memory performance and executive functioning in cognitively intact elderly. Neuropsychology 2015, 29, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Chang, P.; Li, X.; Ma, C.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Z.; Chen, K.; Ai, L.; Chang, J.; Zhang, Z. The Effects of an APOE Promoter Polymorphism on Human White Matter Connectivity during Non-Demented Aging. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2016, 55, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Salvadó, G.; Ferreira, D.; Operto, G.; Cacciaglia, R.; Falcon, C.; Minguillon, C.; Groot, C.; van der Flier, W.M.; Barkhof, F.; Scheltens, P.; et al. The protective gene dose effect of the APOEε2 allele on gray matter volume in cognitively unimpaired individuals. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2021, 18, 1383–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. El-Lebedy, D.; Raslan, H.M.; Mohammed, A.M. Apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism and risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2016, 15, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Liu, S.; Liu, J.; Weng, R.; Gu, X.; Zhong, Z. Apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism and the risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2019, 19, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ma, S.-W.; Benzie, I.F.; Yeung, V.T. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and its renal complications in relation to apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism. Transl. Res. 2008, 152, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Perron, P.; Brisson, D.; Santuré, M.; Blackburn, P.; Bergeron, J.; Vohl, M.C.; Després, J.P.; Gaudet, D. Apolipoprotein E and lipoprotein lipase gene polymorphisms interaction on the atherogenic combined expression of hypertriglyceridemia and hyperapobetalipoproteinemia phenotypes. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2007, 30, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Guangda, X.; Linshuang, Z.; Jie, H.; Ling, Y.; Huijuan, X. Apo e4 allele is associated with endothelium-dependent arterial dilation in women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2006, 72, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Monastiriotis, C.; Papanas, N.; Trypsianis, G.; Karanikola, K.; Veletza, S.; Maltezos, E. The ε4 Allele of the APOE Gene Is Associated With More Severe Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Angiology 2012, 64, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Lumsden, A.L.; Mulugeta, A.; Zhou, A.; Hyppönen, E. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype-associated disease risks: A phenome-wide, registry-based, case-control study utilising the UK Biobank. EBioMedicine 2020, 59, 102954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Gao, C.; Fu, X.; Chu, Q.; Li, J.; Shu, G. Relationship Between the ApoE Gene Polymorphism and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Complications. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomarkers 2021, 25, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Raulin, A.-C.; Doss, S.V.; Trottier, Z.A.; Ikezu, T.C.; Bu, G.; Liu, C.-C. ApoE in Alzheimer’s disease: Pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies. Mol. Neurodegener. 2022, 17, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Yamazaki, Y.; Zhao, N.; Caulfield, T.R.; Liu, C.-C.; Bu, G. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: Pathobiology and targeting strategies. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019, 15, 501–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Husain, M.A.; Laurent, B.; Plourde, M. APOE and Alzheimer’s Disease: From Lipid Transport to Physiopathology and Therapeutics. Front. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 630502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Belloy, M.E.; Andrews, S.J.; Le Guen, Y.; Cuccaro, M.; Farrer, L.A.; Napolioni, V.; Greicius, M.D. APOE Genotype and Alzheimer Disease Risk Across Age, Sex, and Population Ancestry. JAMA Neurol. 2023, 80, 1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kawashima, Y.; Chen, J.; Sun, H.; Lann, D.; Hajjar, R.J.; Yakar, S.; LeRoith, D. Apolipoprotein E deficiency abrogates insulin resistance in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 2009, 52, 1434–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Guan, J.; Zhao, H.-L.; Sui, Y.; He, L.; Lee, H.-M.; Lai, F.M.; Tong, P.C.; Chan, J.C. Histopathological Correlations of Islet Amyloidosis with Apolipoprotein E Polymorphisms in Type 2 Diabetic Chinese Patients. Pancreas 2013, 42, 1129–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Tomono, Y.; Iwai, M.; Inaba, S.; Mogi, M.; Horiuchi, M. Blockade of AT1 Receptor Improves Adipocyte Differentiation in Atherosclerotic and Diabetic Models. Am. J. Hypertens. 2008, 21, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Jun, G.; Naj, A.C.; Beecham, G.W.; Wang, L.S.; Buros, J.; Gallins, P.J.; Buxbaum, J.D.; Ertekin-Taner, N.; Fallin, M.D.; Friedland, R.; et al. Meta-analysis Confirms CR1, CLU, and PICALM as Alzheimer Disease Risk Loci and Reveals Interactions with APOE Genotypes. Arch. Neurol. 2010, 67, 1473–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Thambisetty, M.; Simmons, A.; Velayudhan, L.; Hye, A.; Campbell, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wahlund, L.-O.; Westman, E.; Kinsey, A.; Güntert, A.; et al. Association of Plasma Clusterin Concentration with Severity, Pathology, and Progression in Alzheimer Disease. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2010, 67, 739–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Carrasquillo, M.M.; Belbin, O.; Hunter, T.A.; Ma, L.; Bisceglio, G.D.; Zou, F.; Crook, J.E.; Pankratz, V.S.; Dickson, D.W.; Graff-Radford, N.R.; et al. Replication of CLU, CR1, and PICALM Associations with Alzheimer Disease. Arch. Neurol. 2010, 67, 961–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Corneveaux, J.J.; Myers, A.J.; Allen, A.N.; Pruzin, J.J.; Ramirez, M.; Engel, A.; Nalls, M.A.; Chen, K.; Lee, W.; Chewning, K.; et al. Association of CR1, CLU and PICALM with Alzheimer’s disease in a cohort of clinically characterized and neuropathologically verified individuals. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19, 3295–3301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Lambert, J.-C.; Heath, S.; Even, G.; Campion, D.; Sleegers, K.; Hiltunen, M.; Combarros, O.; Zelenika, D.; Bullido, M.J.; Tavernier, B.; et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and CR1 associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41, 1094–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Xing, Y.-Y.; Yu, J.-T.; Cui, W.-Z.; Zhong, X.-L.; Wu, Z.-C.; Zhang, Q.; Tan, L. Blood Clusterin Levels, rs9331888 Polymorphism, and the Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2012, 29, 515–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Schrijvers, E.M.; Koudstaal, P.J.; Hofman, A.; Breteler, M.M. Plasma Clusterin and the Risk of Alzheimer Disease. JAMA 2011, 305, 1322–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Schjeide, B.-M.M.; Schnack, C.; Lambert, J.-C.; Lill, C.M.; Kirchheiner, J.; Tumani, H.; Otto, M.; Tanzi, R.E.; Lehrach, H.; Amouyel, P.; et al. The Role of Clusterin, Complement Receptor 1, and Phosphatidylinositol Binding Clathrin Assembly Protein in Alzheimer Disease Risk and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Levels. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2011, 68, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Wojtas, A.M.; Kang, S.S.; Olley, B.M.; Gatherer, M.; Shinohara, M.; Lozano, P.A.; Liu, C.-C.; Kurti, A.; Baker, K.E.; Dickson, D.W.; et al. Loss of clusterin shifts amyloid deposition to the cerebrovasculature via disruption of perivascular drainage pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E6962–E6971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Robbins, J.P.; Perfect, L.; Ribe, E.M.; Maresca, M.; Dangla-Valls, A.; Foster, E.M.; Killick, R.; Nowosiad, P.; Reid, M.J.; Polit, L.D.; et al. Clusterin Is Required for β-Amyloid Toxicity in Human iPSC-Derived Neurons. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Wojtas, A.M.; Sens, J.P.; Kang, S.S.; Baker, K.E.; Berry, T.J.; Kurti, A.; Daughrity, L.; Jansen-West, K.R.; Dickson, D.W.; Petrucelli, L.; et al. Astrocyte-derived clusterin suppresses amyloid formation in vivo. Mol. Neurodegener. 2020, 15, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Liu, Z.; Chao, J.; Wang, C.; Sun, G.; Roeth, D.; Liu, W.; Chen, X.; Li, L.; Tian, E.; Feng, L.; et al. Astrocytic response mediated by the CLU risk allele inhibits OPC proliferation and myelination in a human iPSC model. Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 112841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Stevens, B.W.; DiBattista, A.M.; Rebeck, G.W.; Green, A.E. A gene−brain−cognition pathway for the effect of an Alzheimer׳s risk gene on working memory in young adults. Neuropsychologia 2014, 61, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Alfimova, M.; Kondratyev, N.; Golov, A.; Golimbet, V. Relationship between Alzheimer’s disease-associated SNPs within the CLU gene, local DNA methylation and episodic verbal memory in healthy and schizophrenia subjects. Psychiatry Res. 2018, 272, 380–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Chen, L.H.; Mak, T.S.H.; Fan, Y.; Ho, D.T.Y.; Sham, P.C.; Chu, L.W.; Song, Y.-Q. Associations between CLU polymorphisms and memory performance: The role of serum lipids in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2020, 129, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ferencz, B.; Laukka, E.J.; Welmer, A.-K.; Kalpouzos, G.; Angleman, S.; Keller, L.; Graff, C.; Lövdén, M.; Bäckman, L. The benefits of staying active in old age: Physical activity counteracts the negative influence of PICALM, BIN1, and CLU risk alleles on episodic memory functioning. Psychol. Aging 2014, 29, 440–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. De Miguel, Z.; Khoury, N.; Betley, M.J.; Lehallier, B.; Willoughby, D.; Olsson, N.; Yang, A.C.; Hahn, O.; Lu, N.; Vest, R.T.; et al. Exercise plasma boosts memory and dampens brain inflammation via clusterin. Nature 2021, 600, 494–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Bartsch, O.; Labonté, J.; Albrecht, B.; Wieczorek, D.; Lechno, S.; Zechner, U.; Haaf, T. Two patients with EP300 mutations and facial dysmorphism different from the classic Rubinstein–Taybi syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A 2009, 152A, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Van Gils, J.; Magdinier, F.; Fergelot, P.; Lacombe, D. Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome: A Model of Epigenetic Disorder. Genes 2021, 12, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Li, Y.; Stockton, M.E.; Eisinger, B.E.; Zhao, Y.; Miller, J.L.; Bhuiyan, I.; Gao, Y.; Wu, Z.; Peng, J.; Zhao, X. Reducing histone acetylation rescues cognitive deficits in a mouse model of Fragile X syndrome. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Lu, X.; Deng, Y.; Yu, D.; Cao, H.; Wang, L.; Liu, L.; Yu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, X.; Yu, G. Histone Acetyltransferase p300 Mediates Histone Acetylation of PS1 and BACE1 in a Cellular Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e103067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Chen, A.; Tan, B.; Cheng, Y. P300 Inhibition Improves Cell Apoptosis and Cognition Impairment Induced by Sevoflurane Through Regulating IL-17A Activation. World Neurosurg. 2021, 154, e566–e571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Chen, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Tang, Y.; Mok, S.-A.; Tsai, R.M.; Rojas, J.C.; Karydas, A.; Miller, B.L.; Boxer, A.L.; et al. Promoting tau secretion and propagation by hyperactive p300/CBP via autophagy-lysosomal pathway in tauopathy. Mol. Neurodegener. 2020, 15, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Fan, Z.; Wu, J.; Chen, Q.-N.; Lyu, A.-K.; Chen, J.-L.; Sun, Y.; Lyu, Q.; Zhao, Y.-X.; Guo, A.; Liao, Z.-Y.; et al. Type 2 diabetes-induced overactivation of P300 contributes to skeletal muscle atrophy by inhibiting autophagic flux. Life Sci. 2020, 258, 118243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Long, H.-Z.; Cheng, Y.; Zhou, Z.-W.; Luo, H.-Y.; Wen, D.-D.; Gao, L.-C. PI3K/AKT Signal Pathway: A Target of Natural Products in the Prevention and Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 648636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Talchai, C.; Lin, H.V.; Kitamura, T.; Accili, D. Genetic and biochemical pathways of β-cell failure in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2009, 11, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Kitamura, T. The role of FOXO1 in β-cell failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2013, 9, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Li, X.; Wan, T.; Li, Y. Role of FoxO1 in regulating autophagy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (Review). Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Benchoula, K.; Arya, A.; Parhar, I.S.; Hwa, W.E. FoxO1 signaling as a therapeutic target for type 2 diabetes and obesity. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 891, 173758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Moll, L.; Schubert, M. The Role of Insulin and Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1/FoxO-Mediated Transcription for the Pathogenesis of Obesity-Associated Dementia. Curr. Gerontol. Geriatr. Res. 2012, 2012, 384094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Xu, P.; Das, M.; Reilly, J.; Davis, R.J. JNK regulates FoxO-dependent autophagy in neurons. Genes Dev. 2011, 25, 310–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Paroni, G.; Seripa, D.; D’Onofrio, G.; Gravina, C.; Urbano, M.; Fontana, A.; Cascavilla, L.; Pilotto, A.; Greco, A.; Pellegrini, F. FOXO1 locus and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in elderly patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Clin. Interv. Aging 2014, 9, 1783–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Huang, Y.; Liu, X.; Liao, Y.; Luo, C.; Zou, D.; Wei, X.; Huang, Q.; Wu, Y. MiR-181a influences the cognitive function of epileptic rats induced by pentylenetetrazol. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 12861–12868. [Google Scholar]
  173. Wu, Q.; Yuan, X.; Bai, J.; Han, R.; Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Xiu, R. MicroRNA-181a protects against pericyte apoptosis via directly targeting FOXO1: Implication for ameliorated cognitive deficits in APP/PS1 mice. Aging 2019, 11, 6120–6133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Shigemizu, D.; Akiyama, S.; Higaki, S.; Sugimoto, T.; Sakurai, T.; Boroevich, K.A.; Sharma, A.; Tsunoda, T.; Ochiya, T.; Niida, S.; et al. Prognosis prediction model for conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease created by integrative analysis of multi-omics data. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 2020, 12, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Oh, S.Y.; Ellenstein, A.; Chen, C.-D.; Hinman, J.D.; Berg, E.A.; Costello, C.E.; Yamin, R.; Neve, R.L.; Abraham, C.R. Amyloid precursor protein interacts with notch receptors. J. Neurosci. Res. 2005, 82, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Boo, J.H.; Sohn, J.H.; Kim, J.E.; Song, H.; Mook-Jung, I. Rac1 changes the substrate specificity of γ-secretase between amyloid precursor protein and Notch1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 372, 913–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Woo, H.-N.; Park, J.-S.; Gwon, A.-R.; Arumugam, T.V.; Jo, D.-G. Alzheimer’s disease and Notch signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 390, 1093–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Veeraraghavalu, K.; Choi, S.H.; Zhang, X.; Sisodia, S.S. Presenilin 1 Mutants Impair the Self-Renewal and Differentiation of Adult Murine Subventricular Zone-Neuronal Progenitors via Cell-Autonomous Mechanisms Involving Notch Signaling. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30, 6903–6915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Zhang, X.; Huang, G.; Liu, H.; Chang, H.; Wilson, J.X. Folic acid enhances Notch signaling, hippocampal neurogenesis, and cognitive function in a rat model of cerebral ischemia. Nutr. Neurosci. 2012, 15, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Sun, F.; Mao, X.; Xie, L.; Ding, M.; Shao, B.; Jin, K. Notch1 signaling modulates neuronal progenitor activity in the subventricular zone in response to aging and focal ischemia. Aging Cell 2013, 12, 978–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Leal, M.C.; Surace, E.I.; Holgado, M.P.; Ferrari, C.C.; Tarelli, R.; Pitossi, F.; Wisniewski, T.; Castaño, E.M.; Morelli, L. Notch signaling proteins HES-1 and Hey-1 bind to insulin degrading enzyme (IDE) proximal promoter and repress its transcription and activity: Implications for cellular Aβ metabolism. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Cell Res. 2012, 1823, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Brai, E.; Raio, N.A.; Alberi, L. Notch1 hallmarks fibrillary depositions in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2016, 4, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Kapoor, A.; Nation, D.A. Role of Notch signaling in neurovascular aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 116, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Zhang, S.; Wang, P.; Ren, L.; Hu, C.; Bi, J. Protective effect of melatonin on soluble Aβ1–42-induced memory impairment, astrogliosis, and synaptic dysfunction via the Musashi1/Notch1/Hes1 signaling pathway in the rat hippocampus. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 2016, 8, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Sirichoat, A.; Chaijaroonkhanarak, W.; Prachaney, P.; Pannangrong, W.; Leksomboon, R.; Chaichun, A.; Wigmore, P.; Welbat, J.U. Effects of Asiatic Acid on Spatial Working Memory and Cell Proliferation in the Adult Rat Hippocampus. Nutrients 2015, 7, 8413–8423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Xue, F.; Chen, Y.-C.; Zhou, C.-H.; Wang, Y.; Cai, M.; Yan, W.-J.; Wu, R.; Wang, H.-N.; Peng, Z.-W. Risperidone ameliorates cognitive deficits, promotes hippocampal proliferation, and enhances Notch signaling in a murine model of schizophrenia. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2017, 163, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Peng, Y.; Wang, P.; He, X.; Hong, M.; Liu, F. Micro ribonucleic acid-363 regulates the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/threonine protein kinase axis by targeting NOTCH1 and forkhead box C2, leading to hepatic glucose and lipids metabolism disorder in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Diabetes Investig. 2021, 13, 236–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Han, F.; Li, X.; Yang, J.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.; Yang, S.; Chang, B.; Chen, L.; Chang, B. Salsalate Prevents β-Cell Dedifferentiation in OLETF Rats with Type 2 Diabetes through Notch1 Pathway. Aging Dis. 2019, 10, 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, B.; Deng, B.; Zhang, F.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y.; Le, Y.; Zhai, Q. Amyloid-β Induces Hepatic Insulin Resistance In Vivo via JAK2. Diabetes 2013, 62, 1159–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Chen, Z.; Morris, D.L.; Jiang, L.; Liu, Y.; Rui, L. SH2B1 in β-cells promotes insulin expression and glucose metabolism in mice. Mol. Endocrinol. 2014, 28, 696–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Lu, L.; Ye, X.; Yao, Q.; Lu, A.; Zhao, Z.; Ding, Y.; Meng, C.; Yu, W.; Du, Y.; Cheng, J. Egr2 enhances insulin resistance via JAK2/STAT3/SOCS-1 pathway in HepG2 cells treated with palmitate. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2018, 260, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Hao, T.; Zhang, H.; Li, S.; Tian, H. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist ameliorates the insulin resistance function of islet β cells via the activation of PDX-1/JAK signaling transduction in C57/BL6 mice with high-fat diet-induced diabetes. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2017, 39, 1029–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Tuttle, K.R.; Brosius, F.C.; Adler, S.G.; Kretzler, M.; Mehta, R.L.; Tumlin, J.A.; Tanaka, Y.; Haneda, M.; Liu, J.; Silk, M.E.; et al. JAK1/JAK2 inhibition by baricitinib in diabetic kidney disease: Results from a Phase 2 randomized controlled clinical trial. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2018, 33, 1950–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Zhang, N.; Zheng, Q.; Wang, Y.; Lin, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, R.; Yan, M.; Chen, X.; Yang, J.; Chen, X. Renoprotective Effect of the Recombinant Anti-IL-6R Fusion Proteins by Inhibiting JAK2/STAT3 Signaling Pathway in Diabetic Nephropathy. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 681424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Bright, J.J.; Natarajan, C.; Sriram, S.; Muthian, G. Signaling through JAK2-STAT5 pathway is essential for IL-3-induced activation of microglia. Glia 2003, 45, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Chiba, T.; Yamada, M.; Sasabe, J.; Terashita, K.; Shimoda, M.; Matsuoka, M.; Aiso, S. Amyloid-β causes memory impairment by disturbing the JAK2/STAT3 axis in hippocampal neurons. Mol. Psychiatry 2008, 14, 206–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Marwarha, G.; Prasanthi, J.R.; Schommer, J.; Dasari, B.; Ghribi, O. Molecular interplay between leptin, insulin-like growth factor-1, and β-amyloid in organotypic slices from rabbit hippocampus. Mol. Neurodegener. 2011, 6, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. He, G.-L.; Luo, Z.; Shen, T.-T.; Li, P.; Yang, J.; Luo, X.; Chen, C.-H.; Gao, P.; Yang, X.-S. Inhibition of STAT3- and MAPK-dependent PGE2 synthesis ameliorates phagocytosis of fibrillar β-amyloid peptide (1-42) via EP2 receptor in EMF-stimulated N9 microglial cells. J. Neuroinflamm. 2016, 13, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Wang, Z.-H.; Xiang, J.; Liu, X.; Yu, S.P.; Manfredsson, F.P.; Sandoval, I.M.; Wu, S.; Wang, J.-Z.; Ye, K. Deficiency in BDNF/TrkB Neurotrophic Activity Stimulates δ-Secretase by Upregulating C/EBPβ in Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell Rep. 2019, 28, 655–669.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Ceyzériat, K.; Ben Haim, L.; Denizot, A.; Pommier, D.; Matos, M.; Guillemaud, O.; Palomares, M.-A.; Abjean, L.; Petit, F.; Gipchtein, P.; et al. Modulation of astrocyte reactivity improves functional deficits in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2018, 6, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Oliveira, J.M.; Rebuffat, S.A.; Gasa, R.; Gomis, R. Targeting type 2 diabetes: Lessons from a knockout model of insulin receptor substrate 2. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2014, 92, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Muller, D.; Huang, G.C.; Amiel, S.; Jones, P.M.; Persaud, S.J. Identification of Insulin Signaling Elements in Human β-Cells. Diabetes 2006, 55, 2835–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Lingohr, M.K.; Briaud, I.; Dickson, L.M.; McCuaig, J.F.; Alárcon, C.; Wicksteed, B.L.; Rhodes, C.J. Specific Regulation of IRS-2 Expression by Glucose in Rat Primary Pancreatic Islet β-Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 15884–15892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Liu, B.; Barbosa-Sampaio, H.; Jones, P.M.; Persaud, S.J.; Muller, D.S. The CaMK4/CREB/IRS-2 Cascade Stimulates Proliferation and Inhibits Apoptosis of β-Cells. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e45711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Demozay, D.; Tsunekawa, S.; Briaud, I.; Shah, R.; Rhodes, C.J. Specific Glucose-Induced Control of Insulin Receptor Substrate-2 Expression Is Mediated via Ca2+-Dependent Calcineurin/NFAT Signaling in Primary Pancreatic Islet β-Cells. Diabetes 2011, 60, 2892–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Wei, K.; Piecewicz, S.M.; McGinnis, L.M.; Taniguchi, C.M.; Wiegand, S.J.; Anderson, K.; Chan, C.W.-M.; Mulligan, K.X.; Kuo, D.; Yuan, J.; et al. A liver Hif-2α–Irs2 pathway sensitizes hepatic insulin signaling and is modulated by Vegf inhibition. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 1331–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Taniguchi, C.M.; Finger, E.C.; Krieg, A.J.; Wu, C.; Diep, A.N.; LaGory, E.L.; Wei, K.; McGinnis, L.M.; Yuan, J.; Kuo, C.J.; et al. Cross-talk between hypoxia and insulin signaling through Phd3 regulates hepatic glucose and lipid metabolism and ameliorates diabetes. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 1325–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Killick, R.; Scales, G.; Leroy, K.; Causevic, M.; Hooper, C.; Irvine, E.E.; I Choudhury, A.; Drinkwater, L.; Kerr, F.; Al-Qassab, H.; et al. Deletion of Irs2 reduces amyloid deposition and rescues behavioural deficits in APP transgenic mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 386, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Freude, S.; Hettich, M.M.; Schumann, C.; Stöhr, O.; Koch, L.; Köhler, C.; Udelhoven, M.; Leeser, U.; Müller, M.; Kubota, N.; et al. Neuronal IGF-1 resistance reduces Aβ accumulation and protects against premature death in a model of Alzheimer’s disease. FASEB J. 2009, 23, 3315–3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Moloney, A.M.; Griffin, R.J.; Timmons, S.; O’connor, R.; Ravid, R.; O’neill, C. Defects in IGF-1 receptor, insulin receptor and IRS-1/2 in Alzheimer’s disease indicate possible resistance to IGF-1 and insulin signalling. Neurobiol. Aging 2010, 31, 224–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Chua, L.-M.; Lim, M.-L.; Chong, P.-R.; Hu, Z.P.; Cheung, N.S.; Wong, B.-S. Impaired Neuronal Insulin Signaling Precedes Aβ42 Accumulation in Female AβPPsw/PS1ΔE9 Mice. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2012, 29, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Ochiai, T.; Sano, T.; Nagayama, T.; Kubota, N.; Kadowaki, T.; Wakabayashi, T.; Iwatsubo, T. Differential involvement of insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 and IRS-2 in brain insulin signaling is associated with the effects on amyloid pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2021, 159, 105510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Alves-Borba, L.; Espinosa-Fernández, V.; Canseco-Rodríguez, A.; Sánchez-Pérez, A.M. ABA Supplementation Rescues IRS2 and BDNF mRNA Levels in a Triple-Transgenic Mice Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. Rep. 2023, 7, 1007–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Wang, M.; Song, H.; Jia, J. Interleukin-6 receptor gene polymorphisms were associated with sporadic Alzheimer’s disease in Chinese Han. Brain Res. 2010, 1327, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Sasayama, D.; Hori, H.; Teraishi, T.; Hattori, K.; Ota, M.; Matsuo, J.; Kawamoto, Y.; Kinoshita, Y.; Amano, N.; Kunugi, H. Association of cognitive performance with interleukin-6 receptor Asp358Ala polymorphism in healthy adults. J. Neural Transm. 2011, 119, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Haddick, P.C.; Larson, J.L.; Rathore, N.; Bhangale, T.R.; Phung, Q.T.; Srinivasan, K.; Hansen, D.V.; Lill, J.R.; Pericak-Vance, M.A.; Haines, J.; et al. A Common Variant of IL-6R is Associated with Elevated IL-6 Pathway Activity in Alzheimer’s Disease Brains. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017, 56, 1037–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Quillen, D.; Hughes, T.M.; Craft, S.; Howard, T.; Register, T.; Suerken, C.; Hawkins, G.A.; Milligan, C. Levels of Soluble Interleukin 6 Receptor and Asp358Ala Are Associated With Cognitive Performance and Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers. Neurol.-Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2023, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Elcioğlu, H.K.; Aslan, E.; Ahmad, S.; Alan, S.; Salva, E.; Elcioglu, H.; Kabasakal, L. Tocilizumab’s effect on cognitive deficits induced by intracerebroventricular administration of streptozotocin in Alzheimer’s model. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2016, 420, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Qi, L.; Rifai, N.; Hu, F.B. Interleukin-6 Receptor Gene Variations, Plasma Interleukin-6 Levels, and Type 2 Diabetes in U.S. Women. Diabetes 2007, 56, 3075–3081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Wang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Chu, W.; Hale, T.; Cooper, J.J.; Elbein, S.C. Molecular Screening and Association Analyses of the Interleukin 6 Receptor Gene Variants with Type 2 Diabetes, Diabetic Nephropathy, and Insulin Sensitivity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 1123–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Hamid, Y.H.; Urhammer, S.A.; Jensen, D.P.; Glümer, C.; Borch-Johnsen, K.; Jørgensen, T.; Hansen, T.; Pedersen, O. Variation in the Interleukin-6 Receptor Gene Associates with Type 2 Diabetes in Danish Whites. Diabetes 2004, 53, 3342–3345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Wu, X.; Yu, T.; Ji, N.; Huang, Y.; Gao, L.; Shi, W.; Yan, Y.; Li, H.; Ma, L.; Wu, K.; et al. IL6R inhibits viability and apoptosis of pancreatic beta-cells in type 2 diabetes mellitus via regulation by miR-22 of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obesity: Targets Ther. 2019, 12, 1645–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Burnstock, G. Purine and purinergic receptors. Brain Neurosci. Adv. 2018, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Hua, J.; de Paco, E.G.; Linck, N.; Maurice, T.; Desrumaux, C.; Manoury, B.; Rassendren, F.; Ulmann, L. Microglial P2X4 receptors promote ApoE degradation and contribute to memory deficits in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2023, 80, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Stefanova, N.A.; Maksimova, K.Y.; Rudnitskaya, E.A.; Muraleva, N.A.; Kolosova, N.G. Association of cerebrovascular dysfunction with the development of Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology in OXYS rats. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Varma, R.; Chai, Y.; Troncoso, J.; Gu, J.; Xing, H.; Stojilkovic, S.S.; Mattson, M.P.; Haughey, N.J. Amyloid-β Induces a Caspase-mediated Cleavage of P2X4 to Promote Purinotoxicity. NeuroMol. Med. 2009, 11, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Glas, R.; Sauter, N.S.; Schulthess, F.T.; Shu, L.; Oberholzer, J.; Maedler, K. Purinergic P2X7 receptors regulate secretion of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and beta cell function and survival. Diabetologia 2009, 52, 1579–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Solini, A.; Chiozzi, P.; Morelli, A.; Adinolfi, E.; Rizzo, R.; Baricordi, O.R.; Di Virgilio, F. Enhanced P2X7 Activity in Human Fibroblasts From Diabetic Patients. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2004, 24, 1240–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Todd, J.N.; Poon, W.; Lyssenko, V.; Groop, L.; Nichols, B.; Wilmot, M.; Robson, S.; Enjyoji, K.; Herman, M.A.; Hu, C.; et al. Variation in Glucose Homeostasis Traits Associated with P2RX7 Polymorphisms in Mice and Humans. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, E688–E696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Uresti-Rivera, E.E.; García-Jacobo, R.E.; Méndez-Cabañas, J.A.; Gaytan-Medina, L.E.; Cortez-Espinosa, N.; Portales-Pérez, D.P.; González-Amaro, R.; Enciso-Moreno, J.A.; García-Hernández, M.H. The presence of the 1068 G>A variant of P2X7 receptors is associated to an increase in IL-1Ra levels, insulin secretion and pancreatic β-cell function but not with glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients. Gene 2018, 652, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Parvathenani, L.K.; Tertyshnikova, S.; Greco, C.R.; Roberts, S.B.; Robertson, B.; Posmantur, R. P2X7 Mediates Superoxide Production in Primary Microglia and Is Up-regulated in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 13309–13317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Rampe, D.; Wang, L.; Ringheim, G.E. P2X7 receptor modulation of β-amyloid- and LPS-induced cytokine secretion from human macrophages and microglia. J. Neuroimmunol. 2004, 147, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Sanz, J.M.; Chiozzi, P.; Ferrari, D.; Colaianna, M.; Idzko, M.; Falzoni, S.; Fellin, R.; Trabace, L.; Di Virgilio, F. Activation of Microglia by Amyloid β Requires P2X7 Receptor Expression. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 4378–4385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Beltran-Lobo, P.; Hughes, M.M.; Troakes, C.; Croft, C.L.; Rupawala, H.; Jutzi, D.; Ruepp, M.-D.; Jimenez-Sanchez, M.; Perkinton, M.S.; Kassiou, M.; et al. P2X7R influences tau aggregate burden in human tauopathies and shows distinct signalling in microglia and astrocytes. Brain Behav. Immun. 2023, 114, 414–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Sun, L.; Gao, J.; Zhao, M.; Cui, J.; Li, Y.; Yang, X.; Jing, X.; Wu, Z. A novel cognitive impairment mechanism that astrocytic p-connexin 43 promotes neuronic autophagy via activation of P2X7R and down-regulation of GLT-1 expression in the hippocampus following traumatic brain injury in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 2015, 291, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Ruan, Z.; Delpech, J.-C.; Kalavai, S.V.; Van Enoo, A.A.; Hu, J.; Ikezu, S.; Ikezu, T. P2RX7 inhibitor suppresses exosome secretion and disease phenotype in P301S tau transgenic mice. Mol. Neurodegener. 2020, 15, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Groblewska, M.; Muszyński, P.; Wojtulewska-Supron, A.; Kulczyńska-Przybik, A.; Mroczko, B. The Role of Visinin-Like Protein-1 in the Pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2015, 47, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Schnurra, I.; Bernstein, H.-G.; Riederer, P.; Braunewell, K.-H. The Neuronal Calcium Sensor Protein VILIP-1 Is Associated with Amyloid Plaques and Extracellular Tangles in Alzheimer’s Disease and Promotes Cell Death and Tau Phosphorylation in Vitro: A Link between Calcium Sensors and Alzheimer’s Disease? Neurobiol. Dis. 2001, 8, 900–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Hollingworth, P.; Sweet, R.; Sims, R.; Harold, D.; Russo, G.; Abraham, R.; Stretton, A.; Jones, N.; Gerrish, A.; Chapman, J.; et al. Genome-wide association study of Alzheimer’s disease with psychotic symptoms. Mol. Psychiatry 2011, 17, 1316–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Hu, X.; Yang, Y.; Gong, D. A meta-analysis of cerebrospinal fluid visinin-like protein-1 in alzheimer’s disease patients relative to healthy controls and mild cognitive impairment patients. Neurosciences 2017, 22, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Leko, M.B.; Borovečki, F.; Dejanović, N.; Hof, P.R.; Šimić, G. Predictive Value of Cerebrospinal Fluid Visinin-Like Protein-1 Levels for Alzheimer’s Disease Early Detection and Differential Diagnosis in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2016, 50, 765–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Mroczko, B.; Groblewska, M.; Zboch, M.; Muszyński, P.; Zajkowska, A.; Borawska, R.; Szmitkowski, M.; Kornhuber, J.; Lewczuk, P. Evaluation of Visinin-Like Protein 1 Concentrations in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment as a Dynamic Biomarker of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2014, 43, 1031–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Tarawneh, R.; Lee, J.-M.; Ladenson, J.; Morris, J.; Holtzman, D. CSF VILIP-1 predicts rates of cognitive decline in early Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2012, 78, 709–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Dai, F.F.; Zhang, Y.; Kang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Gaisano, H.Y.; Braunewell, K.-H.; Chan, C.B.; Wheeler, M.B. The Neuronal Ca2+ Sensor Protein Visinin-like Protein-1 Is Expressed in Pancreatic Islets and Regulates Insulin Secretion. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 21942–21953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Atla, G.; Cuenca-Ardura, M.; Beucher, A.; Crouch, D.J.M.; Garcia-Hurtado, J.; Moran, I.; Irimia, M.; Prasad, R.B.; Gloyn, A.L.; Marselli, L.; et al. Genetic regulation of RNA splicing in human pancreatic islets. Genome Biol. 2022, 23, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Maleki, F.; Ovens, K.; Hogan, D.J.; Kusalik, A.J. Gene set analysis: Challenges, opportunities, and future research. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Brohée, S.; van Helden, J. Evaluation of clustering algorithms for protein-protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinf. 2006, 7, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The result of network clustering with common genes of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), type 2 diabetes, and memory-associated genes: (a) total result; (b) in Cluster 1, PIK3C genes constitute hub proteins of the cluster; (c) TP53 is the hub protein of Cluster 2; (d) APP, well known for its roles in AD, is the hub gene of Cluster 3. Nodes with the same colors indicate the same clusters.
Figure 1. The result of network clustering with common genes of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), type 2 diabetes, and memory-associated genes: (a) total result; (b) in Cluster 1, PIK3C genes constitute hub proteins of the cluster; (c) TP53 is the hub protein of Cluster 2; (d) APP, well known for its roles in AD, is the hub gene of Cluster 3. Nodes with the same colors indicate the same clusters.
Ijms 25 02211 g001
Figure 2. Network-based clustering of common genes of Alzheimer’s disease, type 2 diabetes, and cognition-associated genes. In (a), several clusters were distinctly detected. In Cluster 1 (b), Cluster 2 (c), and Cluster 3 (d), EP300, JAK2, and P2RX4 were hub proteins, respectively.
Figure 2. Network-based clustering of common genes of Alzheimer’s disease, type 2 diabetes, and cognition-associated genes. In (a), several clusters were distinctly detected. In Cluster 1 (b), Cluster 2 (c), and Cluster 3 (d), EP300, JAK2, and P2RX4 were hub proteins, respectively.
Ijms 25 02211 g002
Table 1. Over-representation analysis result with gene ontology.
Table 1. Over-representation analysis result with gene ontology.
GOBP 1 Odds Ratiop Value
RESPONSE TO OXYGEN CONTAINING COMPOUND16.061.97 × 10−301
POSITIVE REGULATION OF MULTICELLULAR ORGANISMAL PROCESS13.6161.24 × 10−240
RESPONSE TO ENDOGENOUS STIMULUS12.812.40 × 10−234
CELLULAR RESPONSE TO OXYGEN CONTAINING COMPOUND15.043.76 × 10−224
POSITIVE REGULATION OF SIGNALING11.701.76 × 10−222
REGULATION OF TRANSPORT11.533.81 × 10−222
REGULATION OF CELL DEATH11.975.53 × 10−222
APOPTOTIC PROCESS10.911.28 × 10−219
HOMEOSTATIC PROCESS11.631.17 × 10−216
REGULATION OF CELL POPULATION PROLIFERATION11.116.84 × 10−212
1 GOBP; Gene Ontology Biological Process.
Table 2. Over-representation analysis result with KEGG pathways.
Table 2. Over-representation analysis result with KEGG pathways.
KEGG 1 PathwayOdds Ratiop Value
PATHWAYS IN CANCER21.629.22 × 10−41
NEUROTROPHIN SIGNALING PATHWAY36.629.14 × 10−32
LEISHMANIA INFECTION59.332.17 × 10−30
TOLL-LIKE RECEPTOR SIGNALING PATHWAY41.261.18 × 10−29
CYTOKINE–CYTOKINE–RECEPTOR INTERACTION18.451.46 × 10−28
FOCAL ADHESION22.042.64 × 10−27
MAPK SIGNALING PATHWAY17.613.42 × 10−27
COLORECTAL CANCER59.671.10 × 10−26
APOPTOSIS42.631.43 × 10−26
PROSTATE CANCER41.362.49 × 10−26
1 KEGG; Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cho, S.B. Comorbidity Genes of Alzheimer’s Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Associated with Memory and Cognitive Function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 2211. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042211

AMA Style

Cho SB. Comorbidity Genes of Alzheimer’s Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Associated with Memory and Cognitive Function. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(4):2211. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042211

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cho, Seong Beom. 2024. "Comorbidity Genes of Alzheimer’s Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Associated with Memory and Cognitive Function" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 4: 2211. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042211

APA Style

Cho, S. B. (2024). Comorbidity Genes of Alzheimer’s Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Associated with Memory and Cognitive Function. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(4), 2211. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25042211

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop