Next Article in Journal
Special Issue “Neurobiology of Protein Synuclein”
Next Article in Special Issue
OsCAMTA3 Negatively Regulates Disease Resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae by Associating with OsCAMTAPL in Rice
Previous Article in Journal
Navigating the Nexus: HIV and Breast Cancer—A Critical Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Regulation of Disease-Resistance Genes against CWMV Infection by NbHAG1-Mediated H3K36ac
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Constitutive Overexpression of an NB-ARC Gene from Wild Chinese Vitis quinquangularis in Arabidopsis thaliana Enhances Resistance to Phytopathogenic Oomycete and Bacteria

1
Forest and Fruit Tree Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
2
Shanghai Key Labs of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(6), 3221; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063221
Submission received: 7 February 2024 / Revised: 28 February 2024 / Accepted: 1 March 2024 / Published: 12 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research in Plant-Fungi Interactions)

Abstract

:
Resistance (R) genes were used to recognize pathogen effectors directly or indirectly in plants and activate defense signal pathways. Most of these R proteins consist of a nucleotide-binding adaptor (NB-ARC) domain, a leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain and some also have a coiled-coil (CC) structure. In this study, we cloned a gene which encodes the CC-NB-ARC-LRR R protein (VqCNL) from Chinese wild grapevine Vitis. quinquangularis accession ‘Dan-2’. The transcript of VqCNL was obviously induced by inoculation with Plasmopara viticola and the salicylic acid (SA) treatment. The results of sequence analysis showed that the VqCNL gene contained a CC domain at the N-terminus, along with an NB-ARC and an LRR domain at the C-terminus. We transferred this gene into wildtype Arabidopsis and treated transgenic lines with Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (Hpa) and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst DC3000); the results demonstrated that VqCNL promotes broad spectrum resistance to pathogens. Furthermore, qPCR analysis displayed that VqCNL may display a significant function in disease resistance via activating SA signaling pathways. In general, these conclusions primarily demonstrated that VqCNL enhances the disease resistance level in plants and contributes to future research of the R gene identification for grape breeding biotechnology.

1. Introduction

Exposed to multiple environmental stresses like extreme temperatures, drought, insects and pathogen infections in their lifetime, plants can generate various adaptive mechanisms to avoid or tolerate environmental changes during their entire life cycle [1,2]. In the process of response to biotic stresses, physical and chemical barriers are the first line of defense against pathogens. Furthermore, there are also inducible molecular defense strategies in plants which play important roles for plant growth and development. These defense barriers include a complex immune system called innate immunity that protects plants from pathogens [3]. In the presence of pathogen infection, cell membrane proteins of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and activate a basic immune response called PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) [4]. To suppress the PTI response, pathogens have evolved specialized secretory systems that transport effectors into plant cells. These toxic effectors are recognized by the polymorphic intracellular receptor complex named nucleoside binding/leucine-rich repetitive sequences (NB-LRR). In order to overcome these pathogen effectors, plants have developed resistance (R) proteins that directly or indirectly recognize pathogen effectors and activate the second defense line called effect-triggered immunity (ETI) [5,6,7]. ETI can trigger a series of robust defense reactions, including the production of pathogen-related proteins 1, reactive oxygen species (ROS) burst, plant antitoxins and hypersensitive response (HR). HR is a type of programmed cell death (PCD) that reduces the proliferation of attacking pathogens [8,9]. Playing a significant role in the process of plant disease resistance, R proteins can recognize pathogen effectors and activate disease resistance response. Therefore, revealing the mechanism of interaction between R protein and pathogen effector will help develop new methods for controlling and preventing pathogen invasion.
In 1992, the first R gene was cloned and published. After that, the number of functional R genes increased gradually. Identified from maize, Hm1, which encodes a disease resistance enzyme, controls race-specific resistance to the fungus Cochliobolus carbonum [10]. Following the cloning of Hm1, gene Pto and Cf-9 were cloned from tomato, genes N from Nicotiana tabacum, and RPS2 from Arabidopsis thaliana [11,12,13,14]. From then on, the cloning of hundreds of R genes has been published. A total of 314 R genes had been cloned and studied [15]. These disease resistance genes affect the resistance of related pathogens which can be located inside or outside plant cells, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, oomycetes, even nematodes and insects. Although there are great differences between these pathogens and their pathogenic molecules, most of the resistance proteins that play a role in recognition can be classified according to their conserved domains. NBS-LRR is a class of intracellular receptor proteins with nucleotide binding sites and leucine-rich repeats [16]. Multiple conserved subdomains of NB-ARC like Walker A, Walker B, P-loop, GLPL, MHD and RNBS-A–D were characterized in R proteins. Based on the structural analysis and molecular functions of the NB-ARC domain, it might display the function of a molecular switch to regulate multiple disease resistant signaling pathways throughout conformational changes [17,18,19,20,21].
The NBS domain was widely used for the identification and classification of plant resistance genes, and contains conserved motifs. According to phylogenetic studies of the structural difference at the N-terminal of the NBS domain, NBS-LRR proteins were mainly divided into two categories in plants: the TNL type and the non-TNL type [22]. TIR-NB-ARC-LRR or TNL proteins mean those that contain a Toll and human interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain. A common class of these proteins is that they contain a conversed coiled-coil (CC) structure at the N-terminal. The structure of the CC domain consists of multiple α-helices which form around other subdomains to form a super-coil. Like the TIR domain, the CC domain displays functions of recognizing connected effectors to trigger a series of downstream signaling responses [23,24]. The Arabidopsis RPM1 protein is a typical CC-NBS-LRR protein which is involved in indirect intracellular recognition of the P. syringae effectors (AvrRpm1) to activate resistance responses [25]. The CC domain of NRG1 from Arabidopsis belongs to CNL proteins which have been proved to independently induce a defense response [26]. CC-NB-LRR proteins in the plant may form cytoplasmic transduction–transcriptional regulatory processors that regulate the defense response by activating the expression of defense-related genes. The N-termini of the CC and TIR domains are supposed to mediate downstream immune responses and display key roles in the cell death signaling pathways [17].
Grapevine has been planted worldwide and recognized as one of the high economic value fruit crops. Nevertheless, the cultivated planted grape species is vulnerable to a variety of pathogens, threatening substantial reductions in production and quality. Downy mildew (DM), one of the most serious diseases to V. vinifera, caused by the oomycete called Plasmopara viticola, is documented to attack grapevine leaves, employing haustoria to infiltrate through the stomata [27]. Pinpointing the genes that encode NB-ARC-LRR proteins capable of conferring resistance to P. viticola is essential for deepening research into grapevine—P. viticola dynamics and for generating novel resistance methods to combat downy mildew. China is a major origin of grapes, and some of the wild species found in the country have been proved highly resistant to the pathogen. Therefore, Chinese wild grape varieties have the potential to provide a plentiful resource to further understand the molecular mechanisms of grape P. viticola interaction [28].
The Chinese wild grapevine species Vitis quinquangularis ‘Dan-2’ has been demonstrated to exhibit a relatively high level of resistance to multiple microorganisms, and particularly P. viticola [29]. Nevertheless, little research has been identified and functionally characterized on NB-ARC-LRR genes’ involvement in DM resistance in Chinese wild Vitis species. Thus, to enhance comprehension of the defense mechanisms against P. viticola, we previously employed various analytical methods to explore the resistance characteristics in Chinese wild grapevine upon inoculation with P. viticola [30]. Within the set of genes activated in response to the pathogen, one was identified as potentially encoding a CC-NBS-LRR domain protein. The current study extracted the full-length coding sequence of this gene, designated as VqCNL, and conducted a functional characterization via its constitutive heterologous expression in Arabidopsis.

2. Results

2.1. Cloning and Sequence Analysis of VqCNL

The VqCNL gene cDNA fragment, sourced from V. quinquangularis ‘Dan-2’, was identified to harbor an open reading frame (ORF) spanning 2697 base pairs. This ORF is responsible for the production of a protein comprising 898 amino acids, with a calculated molecular weight of approximately 102.8 KDa and an isoelectric point (pI) of 7.06. Upon conducting a BLAST analysis, it was established that the VqCNL gene is situated on chromosome 15. The structural analysis further predicted the presence of an Rx-CC_like domain within the amino acid sequence range of 11 to 123, an NB-ARC domain extending from residues 154 to 421 and a Leucine-Rich Repeat (LRR) domain spanning from residues 513 to 830 (Figure 1). Additionally, the sequence is characterized by the presence of several conserved motifs, including the P-loop, GFPL, NBS-A, NBS-B, NBS-C, NBS-D and Walker-B motifs, embedded within the predicted protein structure (Figure 2). These findings suggest a complex and potentially significant functional role for VqCNL in the molecular mechanisms of the plant, as evidenced by its diverse domain architecture and conserved motifs.

2.2. VqCNL Expression Following Downy Mildew Inoculation and SA Treatment

To confirm whether the CC-NBS-LRR gene is associated with DM resistance or not, Chinese wild V. quinquangularis ‘Dan-2’ was challenged with P. viticola. The expression levels of VqCNL experienced a significant increase following inoculation with P. viticola, a finding that was robustly confirmed in this study. Moreover, our investigation revealed that the transcription levels of VqCNL were markedly elevated after exposure to downy mildew (DM) at four distinct time points (12, 24, 48 and 72 h post-inoculation). Notably, the expression of VqCNL reached its zenith at 24 h post-inoculation before demonstrating a gradual decline in the subsequent measurements. We also conducted the experiment to detect whether VqCNL was responsive to treatment with SA hormone. The gene expression analysis of VqCNL revealed a significant upsurge in its activity following treatment with salicylic acid (SA), peaking at 6 h after the treatment. This heightened expression level began to wane by 48 h post-treatment (Figure 3). This pattern underscores the responsive nature of the gene to pathogenic attack and highlights its potential role in the plant immune response mechanism.

2.3. Continuous Expression of VqCNL in Arabidopsis Leads to Increased Resistance against Downy Mildew

To delve deeper into the defensive functions of VqCNL, its entire coding sequence was fused with the constitutive 35S promoter. The T3 progeny exhibited a dwarfed stature along with the small phenotype (Figure 4A). As a result, three T3 homozygous transgenic lines (L1, L2 and L3) with a normal phenotype and the strongest resistance response to Hpa were chosen to use for further study. Compared to wildtype (WT) Arabidopsis, three chosen transgenic lines demonstrated a slight disease symptom after Hpa infection (Figure 5A). To determine if the enhanced resistance stemmed from the suppression of spore proliferation, we employed a colony counting method to evaluate the growth of Hpa on leaves for study. The results, as depicted in Figure 5D, revealed a significant decrease in the number of spores in the transgenic samples (L1, L2 and L3) in comparison to wildtype (WT) plants after Hpa infection.
To examine the impact of heterologous overexpression of VqCNL on cell mortality, trypan blue staining was applied to infected leaves. The findings revealed extensive areas of cell death in the transgenic leaves, in contrast to the minimal cell death observed in the wildtype plants (Figure 5B). Furthermore, quantitative detection of H2O2 demonstrated that levels of H2O2 in three T3 homozygous transgenic lines were higher than that of wildtype plants following challenge with the related pathogen (Figure 4). To detect the deposition of callose after inoculation with oomycete pathogens, infected leaves were chosen and stained with aniline blue. The results showed that, compared with wildtype plants, the amount of callus formation observed in transgenic plants showed a significant enhancement. Further quantitative detection indicates that transgenic plants accumulate more calluses than wildtype plants following pathogen infection.

2.4. Expression of Defense-Related Genes

Salicylic acid (SA)-dependent defense mechanisms are crucially involved in enhancing plant resilience against Hpa infections, underlining the pivotal role these pathways play in the plant’s innate immune response. As the key genes of the SA signaling pathway, the expression of AtNPR1 and AtEDS1 was tested at different time points after inoculation. Both genes exhibited a significantly higher expression level in transgenic lines than that of the wildtype plants before pathogen inoculation. In the transgenic lines, the expression levels of AtNPR1 and AtEDS1 peaked at 96 hpi. However, the wildtype displayed different trends and had an observably lower expression level than transgenic lines. Moreover, the expression levels of the nonexpresser of pathogenesis-related protein 1 (NPR1) were assessed using quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) from 0 to 120 h post-inoculation (hpi) with Hpa, to investigate the link between plant resistance enhancement against this pathogen and the activation of such a defense-associated gene. The results demonstrated that NPR1 expression was significantly increased (two-fold) over that of wildtype plants at 72 hpi, but showed a reduction at the time points that followed (Figure 4C).

2.5. Constitutive Expression of VqCNL in Arabidopsis Enhances Resistance to Pst DC3000

A conserved domain, PLN03210, was found within the VqCNL amino acid sequence, which is associated with resistance to P. syringae [31]. Under this circumstance, we therefore speculated that VqCNL might have an effect on improving resistance to bacterial infection of plants. To verify this association, three chosen transgenic lines, alongside wildtype plants, were exposed to Pst DC3000, with an evaluation of disease symptoms conducted post-inoculation. Severe symptoms with yellowing leaves and spreading macerations were detected 5 dpi of wildtype plants. However, in the three transgenic lines examined, symptoms observed at 5 days post-inoculation (dpi) were less severe compared to those in the wildtype. To assess the impact of heterologous VqCNL expression on cell death, infected leaves underwent staining with trypan blue. The results showed that large clusters of dead cells came into existence in transgenic leaves and few dead cells could be seen in wildtype plants (Figure 6A). As a common experimental method, the colony counting method was employed to evaluate the proliferation of Pst DC3000 in infected leaves, aiming to ascertain if the observed increase in resistance stemmed from the suppression of bacterial growth.
As displayed in Figure 6B, the bacterial count was lower in the transgenic lines (L1, L2 and L3) relative to wildtype plants post-infection. The expression levels of the important resistance gene NPR1 were monitored at various intervals following Pst DC3000 inoculation to investigate the signaling pathways contributing to the resistance in transgenic A. thaliana. At the same time, this upsurge in PR1 expression was significantly pronounced, showing a 2–3-fold increase when compared to the expression levels in wildtype plants, reaching a peak at 72h and then decreasing gradually (Figure 6C).

2.6. Transient Expression of VqCNL Enhances Tobacco Resistance to Phytophthora capsici

In order to investigate the role of VqCNL in plant disease resistance, we used an Agrobacterium-mediated transient transformation method to overexpress VqCNL gene in tobacco leaves aged 4–6 weeks. The recombinant PHB-eGFP vector was used as the control group and inoculated with P. capsici two days after injection to detect its disease resistance. Under UV light irradiation, the inoculated detached leaves showed obvious disease spots. P. capsici grew slower in transgenic tobacco leaves and the average disease spot diameter was significantly smaller than that of eGFP transgenic tobacco leaves (Figure 7). These results indicate that overexpression of the VqCNL gene can improve plant resistance to egg-borne pathogens.

3. Discussion

Based on our previous report of wild Chinese V. quinquangularis ‘Dan-2’ analysis, our research pinpointed a gene believed to be responsible for encoding a CC-NB-ARC-LRR domain, showing a marked increase in activity post-inoculation. In the current research, we extracted the ORF sequence of the gene, now referred to as VqCNL, and achieved its continuous expression in Arabidopsis. The responses of these transgenic lines to oomycete and bacterial infections were assessed to explain their involvement in response to pathogen attack.
Regulation of gene expression encompasses both transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. Notably, a significant elevation in the expression levels of various NB-ARC-LRR genes has been documented in plants that are infected with pathogens [32,33,34,35,36]. These genes also have been found to be associated with the monitoring of pathogenic microorganisms [37]. In our research, the VqCNL gene was tested to be expressed at extremely high levels in Chinese wild V. quinquangularis ‘Dan-2’ leaves following challenge with the causal agent of P. viticola. Besides, we also found that the expression of the VqCNL gene was upregulated in grape leaves treated with exogenous SA. Our findings, following the application of this phytohormone, show a high level of congruence with previous studies conducted on Arabidopsis [37,38]. Considering SA’s pivotal role in initiating local defense actions and systemic resistance, our results reveal that VqCNL plays a role in bolstering plant disease resistance, operating through the SA signaling pathways. Plenty of research has proved that heterologous overexpression of R genes can give rise to plant development retardation and cause related defense activations such as unprompted cell death and a dwarfed phenotype. Scientists speculated that the continuous expression of R genes in transgenic plants may cause the over-activation of the ETI reaction [37,39,40,41]. In line with previous reports, our observations revealed that some of our independently developed transgenic T3 Arabidopsis lines exhibited characteristics such as stunted growth, diminutive yellow leaves, and mortality at the seedling stage. These outcomes imply that the expression of VqCNL, driven by the constitutive 35S promoter in these transgenic lines, may trigger overly active defense responses and toxic phenotypes in the plants, warranting further investigation into the underlying mechanism.
A number of results indicate that overexpression of R genes causes constitutive SA accumulation, upregulation of PR gene expression and an active defense response to enhance disease resistance of plants [42,43,44,45]. In our research, heterogeneous expression of VqCNL in Arabidopsis improved the disease resistance of transgenic plants to Hpa. Compared to wildtype plants, the transcript level of NPR1 observed a two-fold increase in expression at 72 hpi in genetically modified plants, and these levels remained higher over the time course. These results make clear that heterogeneous expression of VqCNL in Arabidopsis activates defense responses after pathogen inoculation; for example, the overexpression in tomato of Prf and Pto genes confirmed this effect, as well as Cf-9 gene overexpression in tobacco [43,46,47]. We also found that VqCNL transgenic Arabidopsis lines showed broad-spectrum enhanced disease resistance, compared with wildtype plants, to improve the resistance to both the oomycete species Hpa and the bacterial Pst DC3000. As has been observed previously, the transcriptional level of AtRPP8 increased rapidly after SA hormone spraying or Hpa infection in response to different stresses [38]. Similarly, previous studies showed that the overexpression of VaRGA1 was first rapidly increased and then decreased slowly after inoculation with Hpa, and enhanced disease resistance compared to in wildtype plants [33,34].
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) mainly exist in the form of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide anions (O2−) which play an important role in plant resistance to various pathogens [48,49]. In our results, Arabidopsis lines genetically modified with VqCNL exhibited a quicker and more substantial accumulation than that of wildtype plants following inoculation with Hpa and Pst DC3000. It is assumed that this kind of sharp ROS accumulation may directly cause toxicity to the pathogen and lead to increased HR, leading to the death of host cells and prevent the transmission of pathogens [9,50,51]. As a matter of fact, high concentrations of ROS can cause oxidative stress and lead to cell death in plants. In addition, the overexpression of multiple R genes in plants has also been found to cause HR-like cell death [52,53]. In this study, we found that the expression of VqCNL gene in Arabidopsis increased HR-like cell death after Pst DC3000 inoculation, indicating that the oxidative burst by infection may activate HR-like cell death and enhance the plant’s immune resistance to pathogens; while it is still possible that the oxidative burst detected in constitutive overexpression lines of Arabidopsis may activate additional changes to promote plants’ immunity, including the activation of genes expression related to downstream defense.
Along with ROS, the accumulation of callose is widely found in higher plants and plays an important regulatory role in their life activities. Plants respond to multiple biotic and abiotic environmental stresses through the synthesis and degradation of callose, which works as a physical barrier of plants’ immunity [54,55,56]. The previous research demonstrated that overexpression of the Pto gene in tomato increased callose deposition and significantly restricted the growth of pathogenic bacteria [43]. Similarly, as a resistance plant to fungus, the pmr4 Arabidopsis mutants have been proved to resist penetration of pathogens by the accumulation of callose [57,58]. The results showed that a large accumulation of callose was produced in transgenic Arabidopsis, significantly more than in wildtype. As a matter of fact, callose biosynthesis has been shown to be caused by the production of ROS [55]. Since the ROS accumulation level was found to be higher in the Arabidopsis transgenic lines than that of wildtype plants, it leads to the speculation that this could contribute to the increased callose deposition in these lines. Nevertheless, further research is still needed to find determinants responsible for callose production in VqCNL transgenic lines in response to pathogen invasion.
The screening and identification of functional proteins and finding protein interactions can provide key scientific knowledge for further revealing the molecular mechanism of disease resistance proteins in regulating plant immunity. However, previous studies demonstrated that proteins containing the special domains in grape are highly conserved and act as a key factor in post-transcription regulation of genes and stress response regulation of plants [55,59]. For example, in Arabidopsis, a bHLH84 gene which contains the structural domain of Helix–Loop–Helix changes the disease resistance of plants by directly interacting with the disease-resistant gene AtRPS4 [41]. In addition, AtbHLH33 (SPCH) plays a key role by regulating the brassinolide pathway during the stomatal differentiation stage [60,61]. In future work, the method of VqCNL transmitting disease resistance signals and affecting plant defense response by regulating the expression of related genes in the signaling pathway still needs further study.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Processing Methods

Chinese wild V. quinquangularis ‘Dan-2’, as the experimental materials, were obtained from the greenhouse with appropriate humidity and temperature. The grape plants were inoculated at the pre-bloom growth stage, which is a critical period for grape development and also a stage highly susceptible to pathogen infection. Grape leaves were gathered from the greenhouse and quickly frozen with liquid nitrogen. Arabidopsis wildtype seedlings were planted at 20 °C temperatures, with 50% relative humidity, and lighting condition was suitable by providing cool white, fluorescent bulbs.
The pathogen selected for this study was Plasmopara viticola, the causative agent of downy mildew in grapes. Pathogen cultures were grown in a controlled environment to ensure virulence. Plants were inoculated under sterile conditions to prevent contamination. A spore suspension of P. viticola was prepared at a concentration of 1 × 105 spores/mL. For the inoculated group, each plant was gently sprayed with the spore suspension until runoff. Control plants were sprayed with sterile water. Starting from six hours post-inoculation, samples were collected at 12, 24, 48, 72 and 120 h for detailed analysis. A total of 20 plants were used, divided equally into control and experimental groups.

4.2. RNA Extraction and First-Strand cDNA Synthesis

RNA kit production from Omega company was used to extract grape and Arabidopsis total RNA as previously described [62]. Grape leaves’ RNA was extracted from sprayed leaves following inoculation with P. viticola. Treated by sterile distilled water, leaves as controls were obtained at the same time points. Using the PrimerScript™II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis kit, first strand cDNA was produced from 500 ng of total RNA (Transgen Biotech, Beijing, China).

4.3. Cloning of the VqCNL Gene and Sequence Analysis

The cDNA fragment of VqCNL was successfully amplified with the aid of gene-specific primers (refer to Table S1) and Taq DNA polymerase supplied by Qingke Bio. Inc., Shanghai, China. Following amplification, the PCR product underwent cloning into the pLB vector provided by Tiangen Bio Inc., Beijing, China, and its sequence was verified through sequencing conducted by SunnyBio, Shanghai, China, to ensure its correct identity. Analysis of the VqCNL nucleotide sequence was performed using the BLASTX tools available on the NCBI website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST (accessed on 9 September 2023)), while predictions about its chromosomal location within the grape genome were made using the Genoscope Genome Browser (http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/blat-server/cgi-bin/vitis/webBlat (accessed on 9 September 2023)). Further, the protein’s amino acid sequence and its conserved domains were identified using the SMART website (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/smart/changemode.pl (accessed on 9 September 2023)). This included deducing the presence of CC, NB-ARC, and LRR domains, which were then compared and aligned with sequences of closely related proteins. Protein structure of VqCNL was predicted by SWWISS-MODEL website (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/ (accessed on 9 September 2023)) [63].

4.4. Quantitative Real-Time PCR to Test the VqCNL Expression Profile

Primers for quantitative real-time PCR reactions in this part can be found in Supplementary Table S1. Bio-Rad IQ5 real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used for reaction performance. Each reaction contained 20 µL volume of 1.0 µL cDNA template, 0.8 µL primers, SYBR Taq 10 µL and 8.2 µL sterile water. The reactions were carried out using specified thermal conditions: an initial 30 s at 94 °C, then 45 cycles consisting of 5 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 58 °C and 30 s at 60 °C. Additionally, a melting curve analysis was performed through a program of 40 cycles, starting at 95 °C for 15 s and gradually increasing from 60 °C to 95 °C. For reference in the study, the grape Actin1 (GenBank Accession No. AY680701) and Arabidopsis thaliana Actin1 (TAIR: AT2G37620) genes were utilized. All reactions were carried out using three biological replicates, as well as three technical replicates.

4.5. Construction of the Heterologous Expression Vector and Generation of Transgenic Plants

To construct the 35S::VqCNL heterologous expression vector, the VqCNL coding sequence was fused into the pHB-eGFP vector, downstream of the CaMV 35S promoter, using gene-specific primers. Following the verification of the sequence in the resulting recombinant plasmid, it was electroporated into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101. Subsequently, this plasmid, now designated as pHB-VqCNL-eGFP, facilitated the genetic modification of wildtype Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) in line with established protocols [64]. From this, transgenic lines L1, L2 and L3, which exhibited the most pronounced expression increase upon Hpa induction, were selected to breed T3 generation homozygous plants for further studies.

4.6. Pathogens Inoculation of Hpa and PstDC3000

The Arabidopsis downy mildew was caused by Hpa and the inoculation of this experiment was performed following the previously described method [38]. Seeds from both transgenic and wildtype Arabidopsis thaliana were uniformly sown in each pot. Approximately 3–4 weeks later, once the plants developed four leaves, a solution for treating Arabidopsis downy mildew was uniformly applied across the foliage. Subsequently, any excess liquid on the leaves was carefully wiped off. After that, the plants were put in a greenhouse and cultured at an appropriate condition for 7 days. Five days after inoculation (dpi), assessments of spore counts and histochemical studies were undertaken. Similarly, evaluations of the area of leaf necrosis and the proliferation of spores were statistically analyzed at 5 dpi.
Pst DC3000 was cultured on Luria Bertani (LB) medium which included 50 μg/mL Rif until reached an OD600 of 0.4. After that, bacteria were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in suspension liquid at room temperature. Arabidopsis plants were immersed in a cell solution with 0.05% Silwet L-77 for a duration of 15 min, after which they were transferred to a plant incubator set to optimal humidity levels, awaiting the emergence of disease symptoms [65]. Leaves manifesting infection were harvested at various intervals (0, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h post-inoculation) for subsequent analyses. To assess the bacterial population, leaves from distinct lines were sterilized at 2 days post-inoculation. Leaf segments measuring 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 were cut out, blended into the cell mixture, and the resultant solution was methodically diluted using sterile water. A volume of 100 μL of this dilution was spread on culture media, and the dishes were then cultivated on a shaker at 28 °C for 48 h.

4.7. Trypan Blue Staining, Peroxide Assay and Callose Accumulation

Six weeks Arabidopsis rosette leaves were harvested at 12 hpi from four tested lines (wildtype and L1, L2 and L3). Trypan blue solution which included 30 mg trypan blue, 20 mL ethanol, 10 mL lactic acid, 10 mL phenol and 10 mL water was prepared in advance. Leaves were first submerged in boiling water for two minutes and then allowed to sit at room temperature for thirty minutes to absorb the stain. After staining, the leaves were clarified at 25 °C throughout the night and subsequently conserved in a solution of 70% glycerol. A compound microscope was used to examine the stained leaves [66,67,68]. Three independent experiments were performed.
The assessment of H2O2 production in Arabidopsis was conducted using diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining. Rosette leaves from both wildtype and the L1, L2, and L3 transgenic lines were gathered at 24 h post-inoculation (hpi) and subjected to staining through a 10 min vacuum infiltration in a 2 mM DAB solution, prepared in 20 mM phosphate buffer at pH 6.0. This was followed by a 1.5 h incubation at room temperature. Afterwards, the leaves were placed in a 95% ethyl alcohol solution and incubated in a water bath at 80 °C for 20 min to clear the chlorophyll. Samples preserved in distilled water were subsequently photographed for analysis [69].
To evaluate callose deposition in transgenic Arabidopsis strains, six rosette leaves each from the wildtype and transgenic lines L1, L2, and L3 were harvested at 3 days post-inoculation (dpi) and soaked overnight in a mixture of acetic acid and ethanol in a 1:3 ratio. After soaking, the leaves were thoroughly rinsed multiple times with 150 mM K2HPO4. Following the rinse, the leaves underwent staining for one hour in a solution of 150 mM K2HPO4 and 0.01% aniline blue, before being preserved in 50% glycerol [70]. The detection of callose deposits was then performed under a Zeiss fluorescent microscope (Leica, Weztlar, Germany) equipped with the necessary filters for fluorescence observation [71].

4.8. Instantaneous Expression Transformation of Tobacco

In the experiment, Nicotiana benthamiana seeds were vernalized at 4 °C for one week and planted in the substrate until seedlings emerged, and then transferred to an incubator for cultivation for 4–6 weeks. After the tobacco leaves expanded and grew, they were prepared for instantaneous transformation analysis. The oat culture medium was used to inoculate the Phytophthora capsica for 5–7 days at room temperature. A punch with a diameter of 7 mm was used to punch the medium. The mycelial surface of the bacterial disk was placed tightly against the back of the tobacco leaf. After sealing the culture dish and incubating it in dark conditions for 2–3 days, the phenotype was observed, photos taken and the size of the lesion recorded. Three repeated experiments were conducted and more than 6 tobacco leaves were used in each replicate.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

All experimental procedures were independently repeated three times, utilizing three biological replicates for each. The outcomes are displayed as mean values and standard errors, analyzed through the SigmaPlot 10 software. To further validate the statistical significance of the observed differences between experimental groups, paired t-tests were carried out using the SPSS Statistics 17.0 software (IBM China Company, Shenzhen, China).

5. Conclusions

At present, there are few reports on R genes with broad-spectrum resistance, which cause the restricted development of molecular breeding. While several reports have found that constitutive overexpression of NBS-LRR genes can enhance the SA signaling pathway and improve the expression of defense-related genes to activate plants’ broad-spectrum immune resistance. In conclusion, our results preliminarily demonstrated functions of the VqCNL gene to both confirm resistance to both oomycete and bacterial pathogens in plants via upregulation of defense-related genes, and activate the SA signaling regulation pathway. Our research also made some contribution to identifying and characterizing NBS-LRR type genes with broad-spectrum resistance function. Furthermore, detailed mechanisms of eliciting downstream defense responses need to be further investigated. Future studies will focus on the investigation of possible interactions between P. viticola effector proteins and the VqCNL gene. This will supply useful information on the molecular mechanism with the high level of downy mildew resistance displayed in Chinese wild V. quinquangularis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25063221/s1.

Author Contributions

X.Y. conceived and designed the experiments. X.Y. and A.J. performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools and wrote the manuscript. Q.Z. and P.S. analyzed the data. X.Y. and X.X. provided guidance for the entire study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Shanghai Agriculture Applied Technology Development Program, China (Grant No. 2022-02-08-00-12-F01131); China Agriculture Research System (CARS-29); National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31801830); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M632120).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Mishra, S.; Phukan, U.J.; Tripathi, V.; Singh, D.K.; Luqman, S.; Shukla, R.K. PsAP2 an AP2/ERF family transcription factor from Papaver somniferum enhances abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Mol. Biol. 2015, 89, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schmidt, F.; Marnef, A.; Cheung, M.K.; Wilson, I.; Hancock, J.; Staiger, D.; Ladomery, M. A proteomic analysis of oligo(dT)-bound mRNP containing oxidative stress-induced Arabidopsis thaliana RNA-binding proteins ATGRP7 and ATGRP8. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 37, 839–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Spoel, S.H.; Dong, X. How do plants achieve immunity? Defence without specialized immune cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 12, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tintor, N.; Paauw, M.; Rep, M.; Takken, F.L. The root-invading pathogen Fusarium oxysporum targets pattern-triggered immunity using both cytoplasmic and apoplastic effectors. New Phytol. 2020, 227, 1479–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mantelin, S.; Peng, H.C.; Li, B.; Atamian, H.S.; Takken, F.L.; Kaloshian, I. The receptor-like kinase SlSERK1 is required for Mi-1-mediated resistance to potato aphids in tomato. Plant J. 2011, 67, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cui, H.; Tsuda, K.; Parker, J.E. Effector-triggered immunity: From pathogen perception to robust defense. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2015, 66, 487–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. DeYoung, B.J.; Innes, R.W. Plant NBS-LRR proteins in pathogen sensing and host defense. Nat. Immunol. 2006, 7, 1243–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hanif, M.; Rahman, M.U.; Gao, M.; Yang, J.; Ahmad, B.; Yan, X.; Wang, X. Heterologous expression of the grapevine JAZ7 gene in Arabidopsis confers enhanced resistance to powdery mildew but not to Botrytis cinerea. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Torres, M.A.; Jones, J.D.; Dangl, J.L. Reactive oxygen species signaling in response to pathogens. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Johal, G.S.; Briggs, S.P. Reductase activity encoded by the HM1 disease resistance gene in maize. Science 1992, 258, 985–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Martin, G.B.; Brommonschenkel, S.H.; Chunwongse, J.; Frary, A.; Ganal, M.W.; Spivey, R.; Wu, T.; Earle, E.D.; Tanksley, S.D. Map-based cloning of a protein kinase gene conferring disease resistance in tomato. Science 1993, 262, 1432–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jones, D.A.; Thomas, C.M.; Hammond-Kosack, K.E.; Balint-Kurti, P.J.; Jones, J.D. Isolation of the tomato Cf-9 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum by transposon tagging. Science 1994, 266, 789–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Whitham, S.; Dinesh-Kumar, S.; Choi, D.; Hehl, R.; Corr, C.; Baker, B. The product of the tobacco mosaic virus resistance gene N: Similarity to toll and the interleukin-1 receptor. Cell 1994, 78, 1101–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bent, A.F.; Kunkel, B.N.; Dahlbeck, D.; Brown, K.L.; Schmidt, R.; Giraudat, J.; Leung, J.; Staskawicz, B.J. RPS2 of Arabidopsis thaliana: A leucine-rich repeat class of plant disease resistance genes. Science 1994, 265, 1856–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kourelis, J.; Van Der Hoorn, R.A. Defended to the nines: 25 years of resistance gene cloning identifies nine mechanisms for R protein function. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Van Ooijen, G.; Mayr, G.; Albrecht, M.; Cornelissen, B.J.; Takken, F.L. Transcomplementation, but not physical association of the CC-NB-ARC and LRR domains of tomato R protein Mi-1.2 is altered by mutations in the ARC2 subdomain. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2008, 1, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wen, Z.; Yao, L.; Wan, R.; Li, Z.; Liu, C.; Wang, X.J. Ectopic expression in Arabidopsis thaliana of an NB-ARC encoding putative disease resistance gene from wild Chinese Vitis pseudoreticulata enhances resistance to phytopathogenic fungi and bacteria. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bentham, A.; Burdett, H.; Anderson, P.A.; Williams, S.J.; Kobe, B. Animal NLRs provide structural insights into plant NLR function. Ann. Bot. 2017, 119, 698–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hu, L.; Wu, Y.; Wu, D.; Rao, W.; Guo, J.; Ma, Y.; Wang, Z.; Shangguan, X.; Wang, H.; Xu, C. The coiled-coil and nucleotide binding domains of BROWN PLANTHOPPER RESISTANCE14 function in signaling and resistance against planthopper in rice. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 3157–3185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Takken, F.L.; Albrecht, M.; Tameling, W.I. Resistance proteins: Molecular switches of plant defence. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Collier, S.M.; Moffett, P. NB-LRRs work a “bait and switch” on pathogens. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hulbert, S.H.; Webb, C.A.; Smith, S.M.; Sun, Q. Resistance gene complexes: Evolution and utilization. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2001, 39, 285–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gruber, M.; Söding, J.; Lupas, A.N. Comparative analysis of coiled-coil prediction methods. J. Struct. Biol. 2006, 155, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rairdan, G.J.; Collier, S.M.; Sacco, M.A.; Baldwin, T.T.; Boettrich, T.; Moffett, P. The coiled-coil and nucleotide binding domains of the potato Rx disease resistance protein function in pathogen recognition and signaling. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 739–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mackey, D.; Holt, B.F.; Wiig, A.; Dangl, J.L. RIN4 interacts with Pseudomonas syringae type III effector molecules and is required for RPM1-mediated resistance in Arabidopsis. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2002, 108, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Collier, S.M.; Hamel, L.-P.; Moffett, P. Cell death mediated by the N-terminal domains of a unique and highly conserved class of NB-LRR protein. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2011, 24, 918–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Devi, P.A.; Prakasam, V. Histopathological studies for powdery and downy mildew pathogens of grapevine. Plant Dis. Res. 2014, 29, 33–35. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ma, H.; Xiang, G.; Li, Z.; Wang, Y.; Dou, M.; Su, L.; Yin, X.; Liu, R.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y. Grapevine Vp PR 10.1 functions in resistance to Plasmopara viticola through triggering a cell death-like defence response by interacting with Vp VDAC 3. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 1488–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. He, P.C.; Wang, G.Y. Investigation and Study on the Resistance of Wild Grape Species to Downy Mildew in China. Hortic. Plant J. 1986, 1, 90–97. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang, Y.Y.; Zhang, J.X.; Wang, Y.J. Screening the RAPD markers linked to the gene resistant to downy mildew in Chinese wild species of Vitis. J. Fruit. Sci. 2008, 6, 816–820. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kim, S.H.; Kwon, S.I.; Saha, D.; Anyanwu, N.C.; Gassmann, W. Resistance to the Pseudomonas syringae effector HopA1 is governed by the TIR-NBS-LRR protein RPS6 and is enhanced by mutations in SRFR1. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 1723–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wan, H.; Yuan, W.; Ye, Q.; Wang, R.; Ruan, M.; Li, Z.; Zhou, G.; Yao, Z.; Zhao, J.; Liu, S. Analysis of TIR- and non-TIR-NBS-LRR disease resistance gene analogous in pepper: Characterization, genetic variation, functional divergence and expression patterns. BMC Genom. 2012, 13, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, L.; Lu, J. Overexpression of pathogen-induced grapevine TIR-NB-LRR gene VaRGA1 enhances disease resistance and drought and salt tolerance in Nicotiana benthamiana. Protoplasma 2017, 254, 957–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tian, S.; Yin, X.; Fu, P.; Wu, W.; Lu, J. Ectopic expression of grapevine gene VaRGA1 in Arabidopsis improves resistance to downy mildew and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 but increases susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 21, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, J.; Zheng, H.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, X.; Qin, H.; Dong, L.; Wang, D. Coexpression network analysis of the genes regulated by two types of resistance responses to powdery mildew in wheat. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Preeti, A.; Gulshan, K.; Vishal, A.; Singh, A. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of NBS-encoding genes in Malus× domestica and expansion of NBS genes family in Rosaceae. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e107987. [Google Scholar]
  37. Nandety, R.S.; Caplan, J.L.; Cavanaugh, K.; Perroud, B.; Wroblewski, T.; Michelmore, R.W.; Meyers, B.C. The role of TIR-NBS and TIR-X proteins in plant basal defense responses. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 1459–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mohr, T.J.; Mammarella, N.D.; Hoff, T.; Woffenden, B.J.; Jelesko, J.G.; McDowell, J.M. The Arabidopsis downy mildew resistance gene RPP8 is induced by pathogens and salicylic acid and is regulated by W box cis elements. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2010, 23, 1303–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shirano, Y.; Kachroo, P.; Shah, J.; Klessig, D.F. A gain-of-function mutation in an Arabidopsis Toll Interleukin1 Receptor–Nucleotide Binding Site–Leucine-Rich Repeat type R gene triggers defense responses and results in enhanced disease resistance. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 3149–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Heil, M.; Baldwin, I.T. Fitness costs of induced resistance: Emerging experimental support for a slippery concept. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xu, F.; Kapos, P.; Cheng, Y.T.; Li, M.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X. NLR-associating transcription factor bHLH84 and its paralogs function redundantly in plant immunity. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Stokes, T.L.; Kunkel, B.N.; Richards, E. Epigenetic variation in Arabidopsis disease resistance. Genes. Dev. 2002, 16, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tang, X.; Xie, M.; Kim, Y.J.; Zhou, J.; Klessig, D.F.; Martin, G.B. Overexpression of Pto activates defense responses and confers broad resistance. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 15–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kim, S.; Ahn, I.-P.; Park, C.-H.; Park, S.-G.; Park, S.-Y.; Jwa, N.-S.; Lee, Y.-H. Molecular characterization of the cDNA encoding an acidic isoform of PR-1 protein in rice. Mol. Cells 2001, 11, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Keller, H.; Pamboukdjian, N.; Ponchet, M.; Poupet, A.; Delon, R.; Verrier, J.-L.; Roby, D.; Ricci, P. Pathogen-induced elicitin production in transgenic tobacco generates a hypersensitive response and nonspecific disease resistance. Plant Cell 1999, 11, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Oldroyd, G.E.; Staskawicz, B. Genetically engineered broad-spectrum disease resistance in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 10300–10305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wulff, B.B.; Kruijt, M.; Collins, P.L.; Thomas, C.M.; Ludwig, A.A.; De Wit, P.J.; Jones, J.D. Gene shuffling-generated and natural variants of the tomato resistance gene Cf-9 exhibit different auto-necrosis-inducing activities in Nicotiana species. Plant J. 2004, 40, 942–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mittler, R.; Vanderauwera, S.; Gollery, M.; Breusegem, F.V. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sugimoto, M.; Oono, Y.; Gusev, O.; Matsumoto, T.; Yazawa, T.; Levinskikh, M.A.; Sychev, V.N.; Bingham, G.E.; Wheeler, R.; Hummerick, M. Genome-wide expression analysis of reactive oxygen species gene network in Mizuna plants grown in long-term spaceflight. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lamb, C.; Dixon, R.A. The Oxidative Burst in Plant Disease Resistance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1997, 48, 251–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Heath, M.C. Hypersensitive response-related death. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 44, 321–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Weaver, L.M.; Swiderski, M.R.; Li, Y.; Jones, J.D.G. The Arabidopsis thaliana TIR-NB-LRR R-protein, RPP1A; protein localization and constitutive activation of defence by truncated alleles in tobacco and Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2010, 47, 829–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yan, Z.; Stephan, D.; Swiderski, M.; Jones, J.D.G. Expression of RPS4 in tobacco induces an AvrRps4-independent HR that requires EDS1, SGT1 and HSP90. Plant J. 2004, 40, 213–224. [Google Scholar]
  54. Luna, E.; Pastor, V.; Robert, J.; Flors, V.; Mauch-Mani, B.; Ton, J. Callose Deposition: A Multifaceted Plant Defense Response. Mol. Plant 2011, 24, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Jones, J.; Dangl, J. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Mithoe, S.C.; Ludwig, C.; Pel, M.J.; Cucinotta, M.; Casartelli, A.; Mbengue, M.; Sklenar, J.; Derbyshire, P.; Robatzek, S.; Pieterse, C.M. Attenuation of pattern recognition receptor signaling is mediated by a MAP kinase kinase kinase. EMBO Rep. 2016, 17, 441–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jacobs, A.K.; Lipka, V.; Burton, R.A.; Panstruga, R.; Strizhov, N.; Paul, S.-L.; Geoffrey, B.F. An Arabidopsis Callose Synthase, GSL5, Is Required for Wound and Papillary Callose Formation. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 2503–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ellinger, D.; Naumann, M.; Falter, C.; Zwikowics, C.; Jamrow, T.; Manisseri, C.; Somerville, S.C.; Voigt, C.A. Elevated Early Callose Deposition Results in Complete Penetration Resistance to Powdery Mildew in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161, 1433–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, P.; Su, L.; Gao, H.; Jiang, X.; Wu, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Ren, F. Genome-Wide Characterization of bHLH Genes in Grape and Analysis of their Potential Relevance to Abiotic Stress Tolerance and Secondary Metabolite Biosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kanaoka, M.M.; Pillitteri, L.J.; Fujii, H.; Yoshida, Y.; Bogenschutz, N.L.; Takabayashi, J.; Zhu, J.K.; Torii, K.U. SCREAM/ICE1 and SCREAM2 specify three cell-state transitional steps leading to arabidopsis stomatal differentiation. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 1775–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Marcos, A.D.; Houbaert, A.; Triviño, M.; Delgado, D.; Mena, M. A Mutation in the bHLH Domain of the SPCH Transcription Factor Uncovers a BR-Dependent Mechanism for Stomatal Development. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Guo, C.; Guo, R.; Xu, X.; Gao, M.; Wang, X. Evolution and expression analysis of the grape (Vitis vinifera L.) WRKY gene family. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 1513–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Marco, B.; Stefan, B.; Andrew, W.; Konstantin, A.; Gabriel, S.; Tobias, S.; Florian, K.; Gallo, C.T.; Martino, B.; Lorenza, B. SWISS-MODEL: Modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 252–258. [Google Scholar]
  64. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16, 735–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pablo, T.; Jeffery, L.D. A high-throughput method for quantifying growth of phytopathogenic bacteria in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2002, 28, 475–481. [Google Scholar]
  66. Koch, E.; Slusarenko, A. Arabidopsis 1s Susceptible to lnfection by a Downy Mildew Fungus. Plant Cell 1990, 2, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Frye, C.A.; Innes, R.W. An Arabidopsis mutant with enhanced resistance to powdery mildew. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 947–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Van Wees, S. Phenotypic analysis of Arabidopsis mutants: Trypan blue stain for fungi, oomycetes, and dead plant cells. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2008, 2008, pdb.prot4982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Dunand, C.; Crèvecoeur, M.; Penel, C. Distribution of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide in Arabidopsis root and their influence on root development: Possible interaction with peroxidases. New Phytol. 2007, 174, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Schenk, S.T.; Schikora, A. Staining of callose depositions in root and leaf tissues. Bio-Protocol 2015, 5, e1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hong, Z.; Delauney, A.J.; Verma, D.P.S. A cell plate–specific callose synthase and its interaction with phragmoplastin. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 755–768. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Sequence analysis of VqCNL. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of RX-CC like, NB-ARC and LRR domains from VqCNL, AtRPP8, AtRPP13, AtRPM1, AtZAR1, VvRGA and VaRGA. (B) Schematic map of the chromosomal location of VqCNL, as well as the significant conserved motifs and domains in the deduced VqCNL amino acid sequence.
Figure 1. Sequence analysis of VqCNL. (A) Multiple sequence alignment of RX-CC like, NB-ARC and LRR domains from VqCNL, AtRPP8, AtRPP13, AtRPM1, AtZAR1, VvRGA and VaRGA. (B) Schematic map of the chromosomal location of VqCNL, as well as the significant conserved motifs and domains in the deduced VqCNL amino acid sequence.
Ijms 25 03221 g001
Figure 2. (A) Multiple amino acid alignment of the VqCNL NB-ARC domain with other related proteins (AT1G12220, AT1G12280, AT3G03600 and AT3G07040). (B) indicates phylogenetic tree analysis of VqCNL in V. quinquangularis ‘Dan-2’ with other related VqCNL proteins in plants. The tree was generated by Clustal W method of the MegAlign program. (C) indicates structure model of the NB-ARC domain of VqCNL in SWWISS-MODEL.
Figure 2. (A) Multiple amino acid alignment of the VqCNL NB-ARC domain with other related proteins (AT1G12220, AT1G12280, AT3G03600 and AT3G07040). (B) indicates phylogenetic tree analysis of VqCNL in V. quinquangularis ‘Dan-2’ with other related VqCNL proteins in plants. The tree was generated by Clustal W method of the MegAlign program. (C) indicates structure model of the NB-ARC domain of VqCNL in SWWISS-MODEL.
Ijms 25 03221 g002
Figure 3. Expression patterns of VqCNL in V. quinquangularis ‘Dan-2’ following P. viticola and SA treatments. Asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference (Student’s t test, * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01).
Figure 3. Expression patterns of VqCNL in V. quinquangularis ‘Dan-2’ following P. viticola and SA treatments. Asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference (Student’s t test, * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01).
Ijms 25 03221 g003
Figure 4. Overexpression of VqCNL in Arabidopsis enhances resistance to Hpa. (A) Transgenic Arabidopsis plants showed a dwarfed phenotype. Histochemical staining was performed to detect cell death with Aniline blue. (B) Biological statistics on the number of callose loci were assessed. Three independent experiments were conducted. (C) Expression profiles of defense-related genes NPR1, EDS1, PDF1.2 and LOX3 at different time points after inoculating with Hpa in transgenic plants. Asterisks denote a statistically significant difference (Student’s t-test, * p < 0.05) between the treated plants and their wildtype counterparts. The black scale bars = 10 mm. The white scale bars = 0.5 mm.
Figure 4. Overexpression of VqCNL in Arabidopsis enhances resistance to Hpa. (A) Transgenic Arabidopsis plants showed a dwarfed phenotype. Histochemical staining was performed to detect cell death with Aniline blue. (B) Biological statistics on the number of callose loci were assessed. Three independent experiments were conducted. (C) Expression profiles of defense-related genes NPR1, EDS1, PDF1.2 and LOX3 at different time points after inoculating with Hpa in transgenic plants. Asterisks denote a statistically significant difference (Student’s t-test, * p < 0.05) between the treated plants and their wildtype counterparts. The black scale bars = 10 mm. The white scale bars = 0.5 mm.
Ijms 25 03221 g004
Figure 5. The response of VqCNL transgenic Arabidopsis lines to Hpa. (A) Wildtype and transgenic lines (GFP, L1, L2 and L3) 7 days post-inoculation (dpi) with Hpa. (B,C) Histochemical staining was performed to detect cell death, H2O2 accumulation and callose accumulation at 5 dpi with (B) trypan blue and (C) diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining, respectively. (D) Biological statistics regarding the spore count per gram were evaluated at 5 dpi. Three independent experiments were conducted. Asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference (Student’s t test, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 5. The response of VqCNL transgenic Arabidopsis lines to Hpa. (A) Wildtype and transgenic lines (GFP, L1, L2 and L3) 7 days post-inoculation (dpi) with Hpa. (B,C) Histochemical staining was performed to detect cell death, H2O2 accumulation and callose accumulation at 5 dpi with (B) trypan blue and (C) diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining, respectively. (D) Biological statistics regarding the spore count per gram were evaluated at 5 dpi. Three independent experiments were conducted. Asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference (Student’s t test, ** p < 0.01).
Ijms 25 03221 g005
Figure 6. Overexpression of VqCNL in Arabidopsis improves resistance to Pst DC3000. (A) The phenotype of transgenic plants following Pst DC3000 treatment 5 dpi. (B) trypan blue staining was conducted for the cell death detection at 4 dpi. (C) Biological statistics of the bacterial number per gram was carried out 2 dpi. The data display average values ± standard deviation (SD) derived from three separate experiments. Asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference (Student’s t test, * p < 0.05).
Figure 6. Overexpression of VqCNL in Arabidopsis improves resistance to Pst DC3000. (A) The phenotype of transgenic plants following Pst DC3000 treatment 5 dpi. (B) trypan blue staining was conducted for the cell death detection at 4 dpi. (C) Biological statistics of the bacterial number per gram was carried out 2 dpi. The data display average values ± standard deviation (SD) derived from three separate experiments. Asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference (Student’s t test, * p < 0.05).
Ijms 25 03221 g006
Figure 7. VqCNL enhanced resistance to P. capsi. (A) indicates images of typical symptoms of VqCNL and GFP which were introduced into N. benthamiana through transient expression. Leaves were collected at 48 h after inoculation with P. capsica. (B) indicates quantification of lesion size in (A). The error bars denote standard errors based on three biological replicates. Asterisks signify significant deviations from GFP (** p < 0.01, t test).
Figure 7. VqCNL enhanced resistance to P. capsi. (A) indicates images of typical symptoms of VqCNL and GFP which were introduced into N. benthamiana through transient expression. Leaves were collected at 48 h after inoculation with P. capsica. (B) indicates quantification of lesion size in (A). The error bars denote standard errors based on three biological replicates. Asterisks signify significant deviations from GFP (** p < 0.01, t test).
Ijms 25 03221 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yin, X.; Zha, Q.; Sun, P.; Xi, X.; Jiang, A. Constitutive Overexpression of an NB-ARC Gene from Wild Chinese Vitis quinquangularis in Arabidopsis thaliana Enhances Resistance to Phytopathogenic Oomycete and Bacteria. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3221. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063221

AMA Style

Yin X, Zha Q, Sun P, Xi X, Jiang A. Constitutive Overexpression of an NB-ARC Gene from Wild Chinese Vitis quinquangularis in Arabidopsis thaliana Enhances Resistance to Phytopathogenic Oomycete and Bacteria. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(6):3221. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063221

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yin, Xiangjing, Qian Zha, Pengpeng Sun, Xiaojun Xi, and Aili Jiang. 2024. "Constitutive Overexpression of an NB-ARC Gene from Wild Chinese Vitis quinquangularis in Arabidopsis thaliana Enhances Resistance to Phytopathogenic Oomycete and Bacteria" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 6: 3221. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063221

APA Style

Yin, X., Zha, Q., Sun, P., Xi, X., & Jiang, A. (2024). Constitutive Overexpression of an NB-ARC Gene from Wild Chinese Vitis quinquangularis in Arabidopsis thaliana Enhances Resistance to Phytopathogenic Oomycete and Bacteria. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(6), 3221. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25063221

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop