Next Article in Journal
Immunological Signatures in Blood and Urine in 80 Individuals Hospitalized during the Initial Phase of COVID-19 Pandemic with Quantified Nicotine Exposure
Previous Article in Journal
Vitamin D Supplementation in Neonatal and Infant MIS-C Following COVID-19 Infection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Functional Consequences of CFTR Interactions in Cystic Fibrosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Beyond Borders of the Cell: How Extracellular Vesicles Shape COVID-19 for People with Cystic Fibrosis

by
Ewelina D. Hejenkowska
,
Hayrettin Yavuz
and
Agnieszka Swiatecka-Urban
*
Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(7), 3713; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073713
Submission received: 21 February 2024 / Revised: 23 March 2024 / Accepted: 25 March 2024 / Published: 27 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cystic Fibrosis and CFTR Interactions 2.0)

Abstract

:
The interaction between extracellular vesicles (EVs) and SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19, especially in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) is insufficiently studied. EVs are small membrane-bound particles involved in cell–cell communications in different physiological and pathological conditions, including inflammation and infection. The CF airway cells release EVs that differ from those released by healthy cells and may play an intriguing role in regulating the inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2. On the one hand, EVs may activate neutrophils and exacerbate inflammation. On the other hand, EVs may block IL-6, a pro-inflammatory cytokine associated with severe COVID-19, and protect PwCF from adverse outcomes. EVs are regulated by TGF-β signaling, essential in different disease states, including COVID-19. Here, we review the knowledge, identify the gaps in understanding, and suggest future research directions to elucidate the role of EVs in PwCF during COVID-19.

1. Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected over 773 million individuals, and it resulted in the deaths of more than 6.9 million people between December 2019 and 2023 [1,2]. The enveloped positive-sense single-stranded RNA severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 is the cause of COVID-19 [3]. The spike (S) glycoprotein homotrimer on the SARS-CoV-2 envelope interacts with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) on the surface of the host airway epithelial cells [4,5]. Human proteases such as transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2), mosaic serine protease (TMPRSS13), and human airway trypsin-like protease (TMPRSS11D) activate each S monomer upon binding to ACE2 and cleave them into S1 and S2 subunits [3,4,6,7,8,9]. In particular, the S1 subunit’s receptor binding domain (RBD) binds to the human ACE2 [3]. Hence, these cells are the port of entry for SARS-CoV-2 [10]. It has been demonstrated by in vitro and in vivo experiments that downregulating ACE2 expression decreases SARS-CoV-2 infection [11]. Additionally, it was found that transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1) decreases ACE2 protein abundance through the microRNA-mediated mechanism and may decrease RBD binding to ACE2 [12]. ACE2 plays a crucial anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic role by converting angiotensin (Ang) I to Ang 1–9 and Ang II to Ang 1–7 [10]. Although the lower density of the cell surface of ACE2 may hinder entry of the viral particle, it may also increase inflammation and fibrosis because of the decreased conversion of Ang I and Ang II. Accordingly, the lower cell surface density of ACE2 is associated with increased Ang II levels and may contribute to acute lung injury and fibrosis during COVID-19 [13,14,15].
People with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) often experience severe respiratory illness aggravated by bacterial and viral infections [16]. It has been proposed that PwCF may have a milder course of the disease and may be less susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection than the general population if they do not suffer from pre-existing severe lung illness [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Attention to universal infectious precautions, self-distancing, and certain medications were thought to be responsible for less severe COVID-19 in PwCF [20,23]. For instance, azithromycin, which is frequently used to treat bacterial infections in PwCF, may reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity; however, it did not prevent symptoms of COVID-19 in the non-CF population when compared to a placebo [22,24]. CFTR modulators, a new class of drugs increasing CFTR function in PwCF, decreased SARS-CoV-2 replication in a primary CF airway cell model [25]. CFTR modulators were also associated with a significant decrease in hospitalization of PwCF requiring oxygen, and it was concluded that having lower lung function is linked to more severe outcomes in COVID-19 [26]. Other investigators found a higher incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in PwCF despite reports of less severe COVID-19 in this population [27,28]. Another study suggested that CFTR may facilitate the virus replication because IOWH-032, a small molecule CFTR inhibitor, suppressed SARS-CoV-2 replication [29]. IOWH-032 is a synthetic extracellular CFTR inhibitor that entered a phase II clinical trial in 2013 to treat diarrhea but has not progressed to clinical development. It was later found to have a potentiating effect on human CFTR [30]. Based on the newer information that IOWH-032 is an ortholog-specific CFTR inhibitor and potentiator, it cannot be concluded that CFTR aids in SARS-CoV-2 replication. Overall, the studies discussed above do not offer a consensus on whether CFTR dysfunction or CF-directed therapies modify the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or the severity of COVID-19 in PwCF. It is unknown whether CFTR modulators or CFTR expression or function influence the SARS-CoV-2 viral load.
Some mechanistic cues about the role of CFTR in SARS-CoV-2 infection have been provided by the following studies. First, CFTR was shown to colocalize with the SARS-CoV-2 receptor, ACE2, in several types of epithelial cells, including those in the respiratory tract [31]. Second, the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid was proposed to downregulate CFTR expression [32]. These findings suggest that the nucleocapsid-dependent loss of CFTR function may result from ACE2 interaction with CFTR, thus initiating a CF-like phenotype and inducing an inflammatory response similar to one experienced by PwCF. It was shown that the S-protein may cause host cell inflammation through TLR2-dependent activation of the NF-κB pathway [33]. Thus, ACE2’s anti-inflammatory properties may counteract the S-protein-induced inflammation. Indeed, non-CF and CF airway epithelial cells show varying levels of ACE2 in studies, with opposing results suggesting other factors contributing to the infection rate and severity of COVID-19 [12,25,31,34,35,36]. In recent years, several studies have examined the role of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in host–pathogen interactions and host cell communications in the pathogenesis of tissue inflammation and fibrosis in different disease states, including chronic respiratory diseases, SARS-CoV-2 infection, and CF pathogenesis [37,38,39,40]. Respiratory viruses use the host EVs to modulate their transmission. Rhinoviruses induce the release of EVs from airway epithelial cells that stimulate viral receptor expression on monocytes and turn uninfected cells into more permissive ones [41,42]. The influenza H5N1 virus induces the release of EVs from infected cells that trigger inflammation [43]. We review the present knowledge of how SARS-CoV-2 influences the release and content of host EVs and how the EVs modulate COVID-19 severity in PwCF.

2. The Origin and Role of Extracellular Vesicles (EVs)

EVs are lipid bilayer-enclosed nanoparticles released into the extracellular space by living cells, including prokaryotes [44,45]. In 1945, Chargaff discovered a sediment with the capability of shortening clotting, and a year later Chargaff and West discovered that this fraction—later identified as EVs—had a high potential of clotting [46,47]. In 1967, Peter Wolf discovered particles distinguishable from platelets by electron microscopy, described as ‘platelet dust’ [48]. In 1971, it was demonstrated that EVs had cargo such as contractile proteins, and in 1989, it was shown that EVs were enzymatically active [49,50]. Until the 1990s, EVs were described as “trash cans/garbage bins” [51,52]. In 1996, Raposo et al. suggested that EVs play a role in antigen presentation in vivo, and they proved that EVs are biologically functional [53,54].
Various nomenclatures have been used for nanoparticles based on their origin, cargo, and size. Based on the diameter, particles smaller than 200 nm in diameter are described as small EVs, while particles larger than 200 nm in diameter are described as large EVs [44]. Based on the cellular origin, larger-sized particles originating from the plasma membrane are called microvesicles, smaller-sized particles originating from the endosomal system are called exosomes, and larger-sized particles originating from the plasma membrane are called ectosomes. There are many other subgroups of EVs such as large oncosomes, apoptotic bodies, migrasomes, and exosome-like vesicles [44,55]. All of these are considered subgroups of EVs, and “EV” is currently used as the generic term, according to the minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles (MISEV 2023) guidelines [44,56,57].
Each EV subtype has specific membrane markers that provide information about its origin and are important for identification and detection, e.g., markers of exosomes are tetraspanins (CD9, CD63, CD81), markers of microvesicles are Annexin A1, selectins, and integrins, and markers of apoptotic bodies formed by cellular blebbing from the cell in the apoptosis process are Caspase 3 and Annexin V [55].
EVs can be isolated from almost all body fluids including urine, blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) [58]. EVs play an essential role in intercellular communication and carry a cargo of proteins, lipids, and genetic material such as DNA, mRNA, and microRNA derived from parental cells [59,60]. The protein cargo of EVs is related to the cellular origin and the mechanism of biogenesis. For example, EVs originating from the endolysosomal compartment are enriched in major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC Class II) and tetraspanins, while EVs originating from the plasma membrane are enriched in integrins, glycoprotein 1-b, and P-selectin. Apoptotic bodies contain apoptosis-associated proteins such as histones [61,62]. Furthermore, EVs provide intercellular communication between donor and recipient cells by releasing them and taking them up [63]. Furthermore, they are involved in both physiological and pathological processes such as inflammation, immune response, antigen presentation, and cancer development by delivering cargo to recipient cells [64,65].

3. The Role of EVs in the Pathogenesis of Inflammation

EVs are known to play a role in local and systemic inflammation [39]. EVs originating from the lung epithelial and endothelial cells, alveolar macrophages, and neutrophils play a role in the pathogenesis of chronic respiratory diseases [37,66,67,68]. During infections, such as those caused by SARS-CoV-2, alveolar macrophages are believed to be the primary source of EVs in BALF [69]. In cancer, EVs may contain high levels of TGF-β1, along with other molecules like mRNAs and proteins linked to TGF-β signaling [70]. The cell–cell communications mediated by EVs can intensify the inflammatory response and cellular damage [70,71]. EVs have been shown to modulate the host response to different viruses, including SARS-CoV-2 [72,73]. For example, breast milk-derived EVs are able to inhibit HIV-1 infection of monocyte-derived dendritic cells and block viral transfer to CD4+ T cells [74]. EVs have been shown to decrease COVID-19 severity. Blocking pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 and upregulating the anti-inflammatory IL-10 reduces viral replication and decreases the systemic inflammation associated with COVID-19 [72,75,76]. However, little is known about the role of EVs in PwCF with COVID-19. Therefore, it is important to review the current literature on EVs in PwCF with COVID-19 to identify the potential mechanisms and implications of EV-mediated interactions between the virus and the host, gain a deeper understanding of their function, identify the knowledge gaps, and suggest future research directions.

4. The Role of EVs in the Pathogenesis of CF

EVs may play an important role in the pathogenesis of chronic lung disease, including CF [68]. In the CF patient’s airway, EVs produced by epithelial cells differ from those generated by healthy cells in their protein content. For example, EVs derived from CFBE41o-, a human bronchial epithelial cell line from a CF patient, showed a significant increase in proteins associated with acute inflammation and infection, such as vascular cell adhesion protein 1 (VCAM1) and S100 calcium-binding protein A12 (S100A12) [38]. In PwCF, BALF-derived EVs were enriched in grancalcin and histones [77]. These findings may influence neutrophils, driving their recruitment [78,79,80]. Recently, it was demonstrated that CF-derived EVs may activate neutrophils, causing the release of Caspase-1 and Interleukin (IL)-1 [81]. As shown in Table 1, research has advanced our understanding of EVs’ cargo in PwCF. Still, studies have yet to investigate how EVs influence the recruitment and activation of neutrophils. Many CFTR mutations cause CF and present with variable severity, and the cargo and effects of EVs likely differ among PwCF. Therefore, further studies are necessary to comprehend this diversity and what it means for COVID-19 prevention and therapeutic strategies in this patient population.
The breakdown of neutrophil-derived serine proteases, IL-6, was suggested as a cause of less severe COVID-19 in PwCF [23]. EVs released from airway cells in PwCF may block IL-6-induced synthesis of acute phase proteins, resulting in less inflammation and less severe COVID-19. Indeed, it has been shown that higher expression of IL-6 is seen in severe cases of COVID-19 [85]. However, other studies showed that SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in people with chronic kidney disease is promoted by pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IFN-γ [86]. Patients with chronic kidney disease who were either infected with or vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 had higher levels of IL-6 and IFN-γ, compared to healthy unvaccinated individuals [86]. Thus, EVs might block IL-6, which stops IL-6-induced synthesis of acute phase proteins. This could serve as a protective measure and potentially decrease the severity of COVID-19 (Figure 1) [86]. Although this study examined only patients with kidney disease, it may be possible that EV-induced blockage of IL-6 arises in PwCF infected with SARS-CoV-2, since inflammation is central to the pathogenesis of CF and chronic kidney disease [87,88].

5. EVs As Mediators of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Several studies have been conducted to determine the role of EVs in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. In these studies, SARS-CoV-2 caused the release of EVs from several types of host cells, including platelets [89], lung epithelial cells A549 [90], and Vero E6 cells [91]. Detection of EVs and their cargo in serum may serve as a prognostic indicator of the severity of COVID-19 [92,93]. Numerous molecules implicated in the immunological response, inflammation, and activation of the coagulation and complement pathways were discovered through proteomic analysis of patient-derived circulating EVs, causing multi-organ dysfunctions linked to COVID-19 [94]. It is still unclear how activating the inflammatory, complement, and coagulation pathways during COVID-19 contributes to the disease progression and severity in PwCF. The number of EVs increases during respiratory viral infection in PwCF [95]. According to a recent study, EVs secreted by various SARS-CoV-2-infected cells contain large amounts of live virus particles [91]. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 could evade neutralizing antibodies through EV-mediated cell-to-cell transmission. It has also been reported that EVs play an immunomodulatory role in the recovery from COVID-19 by regulating the functions of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes [96]. EVs from COVID-19 patients were shown to have ACE2 receptors on their surface, and by contesting with the cellular ACE2’s binding site, these vesicles can function as decoys preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in vivo [97]. Engineered soluble ACE2-loaded EVs are therapeutically effective against SARS-CoV-2 infection in mice [98]. Several studies focused on the presence of ACE2 in EVs, given that ACE2 is essential for the fusion of SARS-CoV-2 virus particles with the host cell membrane. It was shown that ACE2 was transferred between different cell types via EVs [99]. However, more research is needed to understand the cell–cell transfer of ACE2 via EVs to understand how this process modulates the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. EVs can also play a dual role in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. Similar to CF pathogenesis, neutrophils are activated upon SARS-CoV-2 viral infection [100]. EVs could activate neutrophils, which might also trigger the release of serine proteases, which are believed to result in less severe COVID-19 by breaking down IL-6 [23,36]. However, it was shown that higher levels of IL-6 in SARS-CoV-2-infected people may lead to an improved seroconversion rate [86].

6. The Role of EVs in TGF-β Signaling

During SARS-CoV-2 infection, TGF-β signaling plays a crucial role and is particularly prominent in the chronic immune response observed in severe COVID-19 cases [101]. Locally produced TGF-β may contribute to pulmonary fibrosis during the later stages of the immune response [101,102,103,104]. Additionally, in PwCF who are homozygous for the most common cftr gene mutation F508del, the TGF-β gene has been confirmed as a modifier of lung disease severity. Specifically, certain polymorphisms linked to elevated TGF-β1 expression are associated with more severe lung disease and may impact up to 40% of F508del homozygous patients [105,106,107]. TGF-β signaling induces the secretion of EVs from cancer cells, where the vesicles evoke endothelial barrier instability by facilitating the endothelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) [108]. Oral squamous cell carcinoma cells that were exposed to TGF-β demonstrated increased release of EVs and altered content, compared to EVs released from untreated cells. The EVs released from cells undergoing EMT after TGF-β treatment demonstrated a lower expression of endothelial cell markers and an increased expression of mesenchymal cell markers [108]. The role of EVs in lung fibrosis is largely unexplored. However, one study suggested that a higher content of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) in EVs released from fibroblasts upon TGFβ stimulation could contribute to immune suppression and fibrogenesis [109].

7. Conclusions

In summary, EVs play a significant role in SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis, with their number increasing during infection and potentially carrying live virus particles [38]. EVs modulate the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in PwCF by modifying cytokines expression (Figure 1). EVs can modulate the immune response, acting as decoys to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection by contesting with cellular ACE2 receptors, and engineered ACE2-loaded EVs are effective against SARS-CoV-2 infection in mice. TGF-β-induced EVs from cancer cells play a critical role in vascular destabilization. These EVs, secreted during EMT, target endothelial cells and contribute to immune suppression and fibrogenesis. Inflammation is a significant component of CF pathogenesis and SARS-CoV-2 infection [110]. The content of EVs in PwCF and SARS-CoV-2 infection is summarized in Figure 1. For instance, EVs derived from the sputum of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 have been found to express high levels of specific immune-related proteins, which correlate strongly with the expression of the SARS-CoV-2 N protein [111].

8. Knowledge Gaps and Future Directions

Currently, there are no specific treatments for COVID-19 in PwCF, and it is unclear whether the CFTR-directed therapy has any effect. Future research should focus on helping to personalize therapy and reduce the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections in this vulnerable population. EVs released by cells in PwCF contain proteins that may impact neutrophil recruitment and activation, potentially resulting in less severe COVID-19 by inhibiting IL-6-induced acute phase mediators. More research is needed to elucidate how the EVs influence neutrophil recruitment and activation. More research is also needed to understand how specific cftr gene mutations and disease severity influence the EV’s cargo, affecting COVID-19 severity among PwCF.

Author Contributions

E.D.H. and H.Y. writing—original draft preparation; A.S.-U. writing—review and editing, supervision, and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by National Institutes of Health grants R01HL144539, 5U2CDK129500, 5TL1DK132771 and P50DK096373-11 (to A.S.-U.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. WHO. Number of COVID-19 Cases Reported to WHO. 2023. Available online: https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/cases?n=c (accessed on 10 January 2023).
  2. Zhu, N.; Zhang, D.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Yang, B.; Song, J.; Zhao, X.; Huang, B.; Shi, W.; Lu, R.; et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jackson, C.B.; Farzan, M.; Chen, B.; Choe, H. Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, M.Y.; Zhao, R.; Gao, L.J.; Gao, X.F.; Wang, D.P.; Cao, J.M. SARS-CoV-2: Structure, Biology, and Structure-Based Therapeutics Development. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 587269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lan, J.; Ge, J.; Yu, J.; Shan, S.; Zhou, H.; Fan, S.; Zhang, Q.; Shi, X.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, L.; et al. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature 2020, 581, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280.e278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Shang, J.; Wan, Y.; Luo, C.; Ye, G.; Geng, Q.; Auerbach, A.; Li, F. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 11727–11734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Iwata-Yoshikawa, N.; Okamura, T.; Shimizu, Y.; Hasegawa, H.; Takeda, M.; Nagata, N. TMPRSS2 Contributes to Virus Spread and Immunopathology in the Airways of Murine Models after Coronavirus Infection. J. Virol. 2019, 93, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Takeda, M. Proteolytic activation of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Microbiol. Immunol. 2022, 66, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ziegler, C.G.K.; Allon, S.J.; Nyquist, S.K.; Mbano, I.M.; Miao, V.N.; Tzouanas, C.N.; Cao, Y.; Yousif, A.S.; Bals, J.; Hauser, B.M.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Receptor ACE2 Is an Interferon-Stimulated Gene in Human Airway Epithelial Cells and Is Detected in Specific Cell Subsets across Tissues. Cell 2020, 181, 1016–1035.e1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brevini, T.; Maes, M.; Webb, G.J.; John, B.V.; Fuchs, C.D.; Buescher, G.; Wang, L.; Griffiths, C.; Brown, M.L.; Scott, W.E.; et al. FXR inhibition may protect from SARS-CoV-2 infection by reducing ACE2. Nature 2023, 615, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hejenkowska, E.D.; Mitash, N.; Donovan, J.E.; Chandra, A.; Bertrand, C.; De Santi, C.; Greene, C.M.; Mu, F.; Swiatecka-Urban, A. TGF-β1 Inhibition of ACE2 Mediated by miRNA Uncovers Novel Mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 Pathogenesis. J. Innate Immun. 2023, 15, 629–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kuba, K.; Imai, Y.; Penninger, J.M. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in lung diseases. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2006, 6, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Triposkiadis, F.; Starling, R.C.; Xanthopoulos, A.; Butler, J.; Boudoulas, H. The Counter Regulatory Axis of the Lung Renin-Angiotensin System in Severe COVID-19: Pathophysiology and Clinical Implications. Heart Lung Circ. 2021, 30, 786–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ni, W.; Yang, X.; Yang, D.; Bao, J.; Li, R.; Xiao, Y.; Hou, C.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Yang, D.; et al. Role of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in COVID-19. Crit. Care 2020, 24, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. de Dios Caballero, J.; Vida, R.; Cobo, M.; Máiz, L.; Suárez, L.; Galeano, J.; Baquero, F.; Cantón, R.; Del Campo, R. Individual Patterns of Complexity in Cystic Fibrosis Lung Microbiota, Including Predator Bacteria, over a 1-Year Period. mBio 2017, 8, e00959-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cosgriff, R.; Ahern, S.; Bell, S.C.; Brownlee, K.; Burgel, P.R.; Byrnes, C.; Corvol, H.; Cheng, S.Y.; Elbert, A.; Faro, A.; et al. A multinational report to characterise SARS-CoV-2 infection in people with cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2020, 19, 355–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Poli, P.; Timpano, S.; Goffredo, M.; Padoan, R.; Badolato, R. Asymptomatic case of COVID-19 in an infant with cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2020, 19, e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Jaudszus, A.; Pavlova, M.; Rasche, M.; Baier, M.; Moeser, A.; Lorenz, M. One year monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 prevalence in a German cohort of patients with cystic fibrosis. BMC Pulm. Med. 2022, 22, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Bain, R.; Cosgriff, R.; Zampoli, M.; Elbert, A.; Burgel, P.R.; Carr, S.B.; Castaños, C.; Colombo, C.; Corvol, H.; Faro, A.; et al. Clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children with cystic fibrosis: An international observational study. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2021, 20, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Colombo, C.; Burgel, P.R.; Gartner, S.; van Koningsbruggen-Rietschel, S.; Naehrlich, L.; Sermet-Gaudelus, I.; Southern, K.W. Impact of COVID-19 on people with cystic fibrosis. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, e35–e36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bezzerri, V.; Lucca, F.; Volpi, S.; Cipolli, M. Does cystic fibrosis constitute an advantage in COVID-19 infection? Ital. J. Pediatr. 2020, 46, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. McGreal, E.P.; Davies, P.L.; Powell, W.; Rose-John, S.; Spiller, O.B.; Doull, I.; Jones, S.A.; Kotecha, S. Inactivation of IL-6 and soluble IL-6 receptor by neutrophil derived serine proteases in cystic fibrosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1802, 649–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Oldenburg, C.E.; Pinsky, B.A.; Brogdon, J.; Chen, C.; Ruder, K.; Zhong, L.; Nyatigo, F.; Cook, C.A.; Hinterwirth, A.; Lebas, E.; et al. Effect of Oral Azithromycin vs. Placebo on COVID-19 Symptoms in Outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2021, 326, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lotti, V.; Merigo, F.; Lagni, A.; Di Clemente, A.; Ligozzi, M.; Bernardi, P.; Rossini, G.; Concia, E.; Plebani, R.; Romano, M.; et al. CFTR Modulation Reduces SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells. Cells 2022, 11, 1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Carr, S.B.; McClenaghan, E.; Elbert, A.; Faro, A.; Cosgriff, R.; Abdrakhmanov, O.; Brownlee, K.; Burgel, P.-R.; Byrnes, C.A.; Cheng, S.Y.; et al. Factors associated with clinical progression to severe COVID-19 in people with cystic fibrosis: A global observational study. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2022, 21, e221–e231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Naehrlich, L.; Orenti, A.; Dunlevy, F.; Kasmi, I.; Harutyunyan, S.; Pfleger, A.; Keegan, S.; Daneau, G.; Petrova, G.; Tješić-Drinković, D.; et al. Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 in people with cystic fibrosis in Europe between February and June 2020. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2021, 20, 566–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Marques, L.S.; Boschiero, M.N.; Sansone, N.M.S.; Brienze, L.R.; Marson, F.A.L. Epidemiological Profile of Hospitalized Patients with Cystic Fibrosis in Brazil Due to Severe Acute Respiratory Infection during the COVID-19 Pandemic and a Systematic Review of Worldwide COVID-19 in Those with Cystic Fibrosis. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lagni, A.; Lotti, V.; Diani, E.; Rossini, G.; Concia, E.; Sorio, C.; Gibellini, D. CFTR Inhibitors Display In Vitro Antiviral Activity against SARS-CoV-2. Cells 2023, 12, 776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cui, G.; Khazanov, N.; Stauffer, B.B.; Infield, D.T.; Imhoff, B.R.; Senderowitz, H.; McCarty, N.A. Potentiators exert distinct effects on human, murine, and Xenopus CFTR. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2016, 311, L192–L207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bezzerri, V.; Gentili, V.; Api, M.; Finotti, A.; Papi, C.; Tamanini, A.; Boni, C.; Baldisseri, E.; Olioso, D.; Duca, M.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 viral entry and replication is impaired in Cystic Fibrosis airways due to ACE2 downregulation. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, L.; Guan, W.-J.; Qiu, Z.-E.; Xu, J.-B.; Bai, X.; Hou, X.-C.; Sun, J.; Qu, S.; Huang, Z.-X.; Lei, T.-L.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein triggers hyperinflammation via protein-protein interaction-mediated intracellular Cl accumulation in respiratory epithelium. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2022, 7, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Khan, S.; Shafiei, M.S.; Longoria, C.; Schoggins, J.W.; Savani, R.C.; Zaki, H. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein induces inflammation via TLR2-dependent activation of the NF-κB pathway. eLife 2021, 10, e68563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, Q.; Langenbach, S.; Li, M.; Xia, Y.C.; Gao, X.; Gartner, M.J.; Pharo, E.A.; Williams, S.M.; Todd, S.; Clarke, N.; et al. ACE2 Expression in Organotypic Human Airway Epithelial Cultures and Airway Biopsies. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 813087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hou, Y.J.; Okuda, K.; Edwards, C.E.; Martinez, D.R.; Asakura, T.; Dinnon, K.H., 3rd; Kato, T.; Lee, R.E.; Yount, B.L.; Mascenik, T.M.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Genetics Reveals a Variable Infection Gradient in the Respiratory Tract. Cell 2020, 182, 429–446.e414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Stanton, B.A.; Hampton, T.H.; Ashare, A. SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) and cystic fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2020, 319, L408–L415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xia, X.; Yuan, P.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cao, W.; Zheng, J.C. Emerging roles of extracellular vesicles in COVID-19, a double-edged sword? Immunology 2021, 163, 416–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Useckaite, Z.; Ward, M.P.; Trappe, A.; Reilly, R.; Lennon, J.; Davage, H.; Matallanas, D.; Cassidy, H.; Dillon, E.T.; Brennan, K.; et al. Increased extracellular vesicles mediate inflammatory signalling in cystic fibrosis. Thorax 2020, 75, 449–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ohayon, L.; Zhang, X.; Dutta, P. The role of extracellular vesicles in regulating local and systemic inflammation in cardiovascular disease. Pharmacol. Res. 2021, 170, 105692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Moulin, C.; Crupi, M.J.F.; Ilkow, C.S.; Bell, J.C.; Boulton, S. Extracellular Vesicles and Viruses: Two Intertwined Entities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Miura, T.A. Respiratory epithelial cells as master communicators during viral infections. Curr. Clin. Microbiol. Rep. 2019, 6, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, X.; Zhu, L.; Lizarraga, R.; Chen, Y. Human Airway Epithelial Cells Direct Significant Rhinovirus Replication in Monocytic Cells by Enhancing ICAM1 Expression. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2017, 57, 216–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Maemura, T.; Fukuyama, S.; Kawaoka, Y. High Levels of miR-483-3p Are Present in Serum Exosomes Upon Infection of Mice With Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Welsh, J.A.; Goberdhan, D.C.I.; O’Driscoll, L.; Buzas, E.I.; Blenkiron, C.; Bussolati, B.; Cai, H.; Di Vizio, D.; Driedonks, T.A.P.; Erdbrügger, U.; et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles (MISEV2023): From basic to advanced approaches. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2024, 13, e12404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Stathatos, I.; Koumandou, V.L. Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Extracellular Vesicle Proteins and Their Targeting Signals. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chargaff, E. Cell Structure and the Problem of Blood Coagulation. J. Biol. Chem. 1945, 160, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chargaff, E.; West, R. The biological significance of the thromboplastic protein of blood. J. Biol. Chem. 1946, 166, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wolf, P. The Nature and Significance of Platelet Products in Human Plasma. Br. J. Haematol. 1967, 13, 269–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Crawford, N. The Presence of Contractile Proteins in Platelet Microparticles Isolated from Human and Animal Platelet-free Plasma. Br. J. Haematol. 1971, 21, 53–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Johnstone, R.M.; Bianchini, A.; Teng, K. Reticulocyte maturation and exosome release: Transferrin receptor containing exosomes shows multiple plasma membrane functions. Blood 1989, 74, 1844–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Johnstone, R.M. Maturation of reticulocytes: Formation of exosomes as a mechanism for shedding membrane proteins. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1992, 70, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rashed, M.H.; Bayraktar, E.; Helal, G.K.; Abd-Ellah, M.F.; Amero, P.; Chavez-Reyes, A.; Rodriguez-Aguayo, C. Exosomes: From Garbage Bins to Promising Therapeutic Targets. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Raposo, G.; Nijman, H.W.; Stoorvogel, W.; Liejendekker, R.; Harding, C.V.; Melief, C.J.; Geuze, H.J. B lymphocytes secrete antigen-presenting vesicles. J. Exp. Med. 1996, 183, 1161–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Couch, Y.; Buzàs, E.I.; Di Vizio, D.; Gho, Y.S.; Harrison, P.; Hill, A.F.; Lötvall, J.; Raposo, G.; Stahl, P.D.; Théry, C.; et al. A brief history of nearly EV-erything—The rise and rise of extracellular vesicles. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2021, 10, e12144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Asleh, K.; Dery, V.; Taylor, C.; Davey, M.; Djeungoue-Petga, M.-A.; Ouellette, R.J. Extracellular vesicle-based liquid biopsy biomarkers and their application in precision immuno-oncology. Biomark. Res. 2023, 11, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. György, B.; Szabó, T.G.; Pásztói, M.; Pál, Z.; Misják, P.; Aradi, B.; László, V.; Pállinger, É.; Pap, E.; Kittel, Á.; et al. Membrane vesicles, current state-of-the-art: Emerging role of extracellular vesicles. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2011, 68, 2667–2688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Yáñez-Mó, M.; Siljander, P.R.M.; Andreu, Z.; Bedina Zavec, A.; Borràs, F.E.; Buzas, E.I.; Buzas, K.; Casal, E.; Cappello, F.; Carvalho, J.; et al. Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2015, 4, 27066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Neven, K.Y.; Nawrot, T.S.; Bollati, V. Extracellular Vesicles: How the External and Internal Environment Can Shape Cell-To-Cell Communication. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2017, 4, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Wang, T.; Huang, G.; Yi, Z.; Dai, S.; Zhuang, W.; Guo, S. Advances in extracellular vesicle-based combination therapies for spinal cord injury. Neural Regen. Res. 2024, 19, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Battistelli, M.; Falcieri, E. Apoptotic Bodies: Particular Extracellular Vesicles Involved in Intercellular Communication. Biology 2020, 9, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zaborowski, M.P.; Balaj, L.; Breakefield, X.O.; Lai, C.P. Extracellular Vesicles: Composition, Biological Relevance, and Methods of Study. BioScience 2015, 65, 783–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Théry, C.; Boussac, M.; Véron, P.; Ricciardi-Castagnoli, P.; Raposo, G.A.; Garin, J.M.; Amigorena, S. Proteomic Analysis of Dendritic Cell-Derived Exosomes: A Secreted Subcellular Compartment Distinct from Apoptotic Vesicles1. J. Immunol. 2001, 166, 7309–7318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. El Andaloussi, S.; Mäger, I.; Breakefield, X.O.; Wood, M.J.A. Extracellular vesicles: Biology and emerging therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2013, 12, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. van Niel, G.; Carter, D.R.F.; Clayton, A.; Lambert, D.W.; Raposo, G.; Vader, P. Challenges and directions in studying cell–cell communication by extracellular vesicles. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 369–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Buzas, E.I. The roles of extracellular vesicles in the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2023, 23, 236–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Di Gioia, S.; Daniello, V.; Conese, M. Extracellular Vesicles’ Role in the Pathophysiology and as Biomarkers in Cystic Fibrosis and COPD. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 24, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Moon, H.G.; Cao, Y.; Yang, J.; Lee, J.H.; Choi, H.S.; Jin, Y. Lung epithelial cell-derived extracellular vesicles activate macrophage-mediated inflammatory responses via ROCK1 pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2015, 6, e2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Trappe, A.; Donnelly, S.C.; McNally, P.; Coppinger, J.A. Role of extracellular vesicles in chronic lung disease. Thorax 2021, 76, 1047–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Lee, H.; Zhang, D.; Laskin, D.L.; Jin, Y. Functional Evidence of Pulmonary Extracellular Vesicles in Infectious and Noninfectious Lung Inflammation. J. Immunol. 2018, 201, 1500–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Rodrigues-Junior, D.M.; Tsirigoti, C.; Lim, S.K.; Heldin, C.-H.; Moustakas, A. Extracellular Vesicles and Transforming Growth Factor β Signaling in Cancer. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 10, 849938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, L.; Wei, W.; Ai, X.; Kilic, E.; Hermann, D.M.; Venkataramani, V.; Bähr, M.; Doeppner, T.R. Extracellular vesicles from hypoxia-preconditioned microglia promote angiogenesis and repress apoptosis in stroke mice via the TGF-β/Smad2/3 pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Leyfman, Y.; Gohring, G.; Joshi, M.; Menon, G.P.; Van de Kieft, A.; Rivero, T.D.; Bellio, M.A.; Mitrani, M.I. Extracellular vesicles: A promising therapy against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mol. Ther. 2023, 31, 1196–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Dogrammatzis, C.; Waisner, H.; Kalamvoki, M. Cloaked Viruses and Viral Factors in Cutting Edge Exosome-Based Therapies. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Näslund, T.I.; Paquin-Proulx, D.; Paredes, P.T.; Vallhov, H.; Sandberg, J.K.; Gabrielsson, S. Exosomes from breast milk inhibit HIV-1 infection of dendritic cells and subsequent viral transfer to CD4+ T cells. AIDS 2014, 28, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Caobi, A.; Nair, M.; Raymond, A.D. Extracellular Vesicles in the Pathogenesis of Viral Infections in Humans. Viruses 2020, 12, 1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Johnson, B.L.; Midura, E.F.; Prakash, P.S.; Rice, T.C.; Kunz, N.; Kalies, K.; Caldwell, C.C. Neutrophil derived microparticles increase mortality and the counter-inflammatory response in a murine model of sepsis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)—Mol. Basis Dis. 2017, 1863, 2554–2563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Rollet-Cohen, V.; Bourderioux, M.; Lipecka, J.; Chhuon, C.; Jung, V.A.; Mesbahi, M.; Nguyen-Khoa, T.; Guérin-Pfyffer, S.; Schmitt, A.; Edelman, A.; et al. Comparative proteomics of respiratory exosomes in cystic fibrosis, primary ciliary dyskinesia and asthma. J. Proteom. 2018, 185, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Cui, A.; Xiang, M.; Xu, M.; Lu, P.; Wang, S.; Zou, Y.; Qiao, K.; Jin, C.; Li, Y.; Lu, M.; et al. VCAM-1-mediated neutrophil infiltration exacerbates ambient fine particle-induced lung injury. Toxicol. Lett. 2019, 302, 60–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Meijer, B.; Gearry, R.B.; Day, A.S. The role of S100A12 as a systemic marker of inflammation. Int. J. Inflam. 2012, 2012, 907078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Boyhan, A.; Casimir, C.M.; French, J.K.; Teahan, C.G.; Segal, A.W. Molecular cloning and characterization of grancalcin, a novel EF-hand calcium-binding protein abundant in neutrophils and monocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 2928–2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Forrest, O.A.; Dobosh, B.; Ingersoll, S.A.; Rao, S.; Rojas, A.; Laval, J.; Alvarez, J.A.; Brown, M.R.; Tangpricha, V.; Tirouvanziam, R. Neutrophil-derived extracellular vesicles promote feed-forward inflammasome signaling in cystic fibrosis airways. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2022, 112, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Shaba, E.; Landi, C.; Carleo, A.; Vantaggiato, L.; Paccagnini, E.; Gentile, M.; Bianchi, L.; Lupetti, P.; Bargagli, E.; Prasse, A.; et al. Proteome Characterization of BALF Extracellular Vesicles in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Unveiling Undercover Molecular Pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Palviainen, M.; Saari, H.; Kärkkäinen, O.; Pekkinen, J.; Auriola, S.; Yliperttula, M.; Puhka, M.; Hanhineva, K.; Siljander, P.R.M. Metabolic signature of extracellular vesicles depends on the cell culture conditions. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2019, 8, 1596669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Kaur, G.; Maremanda, K.P.; Campos, M.; Chand, H.S.; Li, F.; Hirani, N.; Haseeb, M.A.; Li, D.; Rahman, I. Distinct Exosomal miRNA Profiles from BALF and Lung Tissue of COPD and IPF Patients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Krishnamachary, B.; Cook, C.; Kumar, A.; Spikes, L.; Chalise, P.; Dhillon, N.K. Extracellular vesicle-mediated endothelial apoptosis and EV-associated proteins correlate with COVID-19 disease severity. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2021, 10, e12117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Yadav, B.; Prasad, N.; Kushwaha, R.S.; Patel, M.R.; Bhadauria, D.; Kaul, A. Higher pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IFN-γ are associated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-specific seroconversion in renal allograft recipients. Transplant. Infect. Dis. 2023, 25, e14133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Rose, V.D. Mechanisms and markers of airway inflammation in cystic fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J. 2002, 19, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Graterol Torres, F.; Molina, M.; Soler-Majoral, J.; Romero-González, G.; Rodríguez Chitiva, N.; Troya-Saborido, M.; Socias Rullan, G.; Burgos, E.; Paúl Martínez, J.; Urrutia Jou, M.; et al. Evolving Concepts on Inflammatory Biomarkers and Malnutrition in Chronic Kidney Disease. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Puhm, F.; Allaeys, I.; Lacasse, E.; Dubuc, I.; Galipeau, Y.; Zaid, Y.; Khalki, L.; Belleannée, C.; Durocher, Y.; Brisson, A.R.; et al. Platelet activation by SARS-CoV-2 implicates the release of active tissue factor by infected cells. Blood Adv. 2022, 6, 3593–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Kwon, Y.; Nukala, S.B.; Srivastava, S.; Miyamoto, H.; Ismail, N.I.; Jousma, J.; Rehman, J.; Ong, S.-B.; Lee, W.H.; Ong, S.-G. Detection of viral RNA fragments in human iPSC cardiomyocytes following treatment with extracellular vesicles from SARS-CoV-2 coding sequence overexpressing lung epithelial cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2020, 11, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Xia, B.; Pan, X.; Luo, R.-H.; Shen, X.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Zuo, X.; Wu, Y.; Guo, Y.; Xiao, G.; et al. Extracellular vesicles mediate antibody-resistant transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Cell Discov. 2023, 9, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hernández-Díazcouder, A.; Díaz-Godínez, C.; Carrero, J.C. Extracellular vesicles in COVID-19 prognosis, treatment, and vaccination: An update. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 107, 2131–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Mackman, N.; Antoniak, S.; Wolberg, A.S.; Kasthuri, R.; Key, N.S. Coagulation Abnormalities and Thrombosis in Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 and Other Pandemic Viruses. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2020, 40, 2033–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Barberis, E.; Vanella, V.V.; Falasca, M.; Caneapero, V.; Cappellano, G.; Raineri, D.; Ghirimoldi, M.; De Giorgis, V.; Puricelli, C.; Vaschetto, R.; et al. Circulating Exosomes Are Strongly Involved in SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 632290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Gunasekaran, M.; Bansal, S.; Ravichandran, R.; Sharma, M.; Perincheri, S.; Rodriguez, F.; Hachem, R.; Fisher, C.E.; Limaye, A.P.; Omar, A.; et al. Respiratory viral infection in lung transplantation induces exosomes that trigger chronic rejection. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2020, 39, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. George, M.S.; Sanchez, J.; Rollings, C.; Fear, D.; Irving, P.; Sinclair, L.V.; Schurich, A. Extracellular vesicles in COVID-19 convalescence can regulate T cell metabolism and function. iScience 2023, 26, 107280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. El-Shennawy, L.; Hoffmann, A.D.; Dashzeveg, N.K.; McAndrews, K.M.; Mehl, P.J.; Cornish, D.; Yu, Z.; Tokars, V.L.; Nicolaescu, V.; Tomatsidou, A.; et al. Circulating ACE2-expressing extracellular vesicles block broad strains of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Kim, H.K.; Cho, J.; Kim, E.; Kim, J.; Yang, J.-S.; Kim, K.-C.; Lee, J.-Y.; Shin, Y.; Palomera, L.F.; Park, J.; et al. Engineered small extracellular vesicles displaying ACE2 variants on the surface protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2022, 11, e12179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Wang, J.; Chen, S.; Bihl, J. Exosome-Mediated Transfer of ACE2 (Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2) from Endothelial Progenitor Cells Promotes Survival and Function of Endothelial Cell. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2020, 2020, 4213541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, J.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020, 395, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ferreira-Gomes, M.; Kruglov, A.; Durek, P.; Heinrich, F.; Tizian, C.; Heinz, G.A.; Pascual-Reguant, A.; Du, W.; Mothes, R.; Fan, C.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 in severe COVID-19 induces a TGF-β-dominated chronic immune response that does not target itself. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Chu, H.W.; Trudeau, J.B.; Balzar, S.; Wenzel, S.E. Peripheral blood and airway tissue expression of transforming growth factor beta by neutrophils in asthmatic subjects and normal control subjects. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2000, 106, 1115–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Saxena, V.; Lienesch, D.W.; Zhou, M.; Bommireddy, R.; Azhar, M.; Doetschman, T.; Singh, R.R. Dual roles of immunoregulatory cytokine TGF-beta in the pathogenesis of autoimmunity-mediated organ damage. J. Immunol. 2008, 180, 1903–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Yu, X.; Buttgereit, A.; Lelios, I.; Utz, S.G.; Cansever, D.; Becher, B.; Greter, M. The Cytokine TGF-β Promotes the Development and Homeostasis of Alveolar Macrophages. Immunity 2017, 47, 903–912.e904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Drumm, M.L.; Konstan, M.W.; Schluchter, M.D.; Handler, A.; Pace, R.; Zou, F.; Zariwala, M.; Fargo, D.; Xu, A.; Dunn, J.M.; et al. Genetic modifiers of lung disease in cystic fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353, 1443–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Brazova, J.; Sismova, K.; Vavrova, V.; Bartosova, J.; Macek, M., Jr.; Lauschman, H.; Sediva, A. Polymorphisms of TGF-beta1 in cystic fibrosis patients. Clin. Immunol. 2006, 121, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Trojan, T.; Alejandre Alcazar, M.A.; Fink, G.; Thomassen, J.C.; Maessenhausen, M.V.; Rietschel, E.; Schneider, P.M.; van Koningsbruggen-Rietschel, S. The effect of TGF-β1 polymorphisms on pulmonary disease progression in patients with cystic fibrosis. BMC Pulm. Med. 2022, 22, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Kobayashi, M.; Fujiwara, K.; Takahashi, K.; Yoshioka, Y.; Ochiya, T.; Podyma-Inoue, K.A.; Watabe, T. Transforming growth factor-β-induced secretion of extracellular vesicles from oral cancer cells evokes endothelial barrier instability via endothelial-mesenchymal transition. Inflamm. Regen. 2022, 42, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Kang, J.H.; Jung, M.Y.; Choudhury, M.; Leof, E.B. Transforming growth factor beta induces fibroblasts to express and release the immunomodulatory protein PD-L1 into extracellular vesicles. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 2213–2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lotti, V.; Lagni, A.; Diani, E.; Sorio, C.; Gibellini, D. Crosslink between SARS-CoV-2 replication and cystic fibrosis hallmarks. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1162470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Sun, R.; Cai, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Bai, G.; Zhu, A.; Kong, P.; Sun, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liao, W.; et al. Proteomic profiling of single extracellular vesicles reveals colocalization of SARS-CoV-2 with a CD81/integrin-rich EV subpopulation in sputum from COVID-19 severe patients. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1052141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Diagram of EVs’ cargo under different conditions. During SARS-CoV-2 infection, the EVs’ cargo may include ACE2 and, in some instances, fully viable virus particles. This can trigger immune responses, inflammation, coagulation, and regulation of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. During the pathogenesis of CF, the cargo is enriched with proteins such as S100A12, grancalcin, VCAM1, and histones. These proteins can activate neutrophils, leading to the release of Caspase-1, IL-1, and serine proteases, which may facilitate the breakage of IL-6. During inflammation, the cargo may include TGF-β ligand, which, when released, can lead to the upregulated expression of miR-136-3p and miR-369-5p, resulting in the downregulation of the ACE2 receptor. These three conditions can interact and influence the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in PwCF. Created with BioRender.
Figure 1. Diagram of EVs’ cargo under different conditions. During SARS-CoV-2 infection, the EVs’ cargo may include ACE2 and, in some instances, fully viable virus particles. This can trigger immune responses, inflammation, coagulation, and regulation of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. During the pathogenesis of CF, the cargo is enriched with proteins such as S100A12, grancalcin, VCAM1, and histones. These proteins can activate neutrophils, leading to the release of Caspase-1, IL-1, and serine proteases, which may facilitate the breakage of IL-6. During inflammation, the cargo may include TGF-β ligand, which, when released, can lead to the upregulated expression of miR-136-3p and miR-369-5p, resulting in the downregulation of the ACE2 receptor. These three conditions can interact and influence the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in PwCF. Created with BioRender.
Ijms 25 03713 g001
Table 1. The content of EVs isolated from the CF models of human airway cells or BALF in PwCF and controls without CF.
Table 1. The content of EVs isolated from the CF models of human airway cells or BALF in PwCF and controls without CF.
ControlsPwCF
BALF: HSP70; HSP90 [82]BALF: HSP70; HSP90 [82]
BALF: MHC-I MHC-II [82]BALF: MHC-I MHC-II [82]
Cells: Metabolites [83]
BALF: miR-122-5p; miR-423-5p; miR-375-3p;
miR-200a-3p; miR-200b-3p; miR-141-3p [82,84]
Cells: VCAM1 [38]
Cells: S100A12 [38]
BALF: Grancalcin [77]
BALF: Histones [77]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hejenkowska, E.D.; Yavuz, H.; Swiatecka-Urban, A. Beyond Borders of the Cell: How Extracellular Vesicles Shape COVID-19 for People with Cystic Fibrosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073713

AMA Style

Hejenkowska ED, Yavuz H, Swiatecka-Urban A. Beyond Borders of the Cell: How Extracellular Vesicles Shape COVID-19 for People with Cystic Fibrosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(7):3713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073713

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hejenkowska, Ewelina D., Hayrettin Yavuz, and Agnieszka Swiatecka-Urban. 2024. "Beyond Borders of the Cell: How Extracellular Vesicles Shape COVID-19 for People with Cystic Fibrosis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 7: 3713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073713

APA Style

Hejenkowska, E. D., Yavuz, H., & Swiatecka-Urban, A. (2024). Beyond Borders of the Cell: How Extracellular Vesicles Shape COVID-19 for People with Cystic Fibrosis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(7), 3713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073713

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop