Next Article in Journal
Bis{µ-(2,2′-bipyridine-1κ2N,N′)-(6,6′-dicarbonyl-1κ2O,O′:2κO′)bis(N,N-diethylthioureato-2κS)}(acetato-1κO)(µ-acetato-1κO:2-κO′)(methanol-2κO)thoriumnickel
Previous Article in Journal
Crystal Structure of 5-Nitro-4-(4-methoxyphenoxy)phthalonitrile
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Short Note

2-((Diphenylmethylene)amino)ethyl N-(Cyclohexyl)carbamate

Department of Chemistry, 6040 USA Drive South, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36608, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molbank 2025, 2025(1), M1947; https://doi.org/10.3390/M1947
Submission received: 16 December 2024 / Revised: 2 January 2025 / Accepted: 4 January 2025 / Published: 6 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Organic Synthesis and Biosynthesis)

Abstract

:
Lipid-like nanoparticles (LLNPs) have been shown to be an effective encapsulation and delivery tool for therapeutic molecules. While the preclinical development of lipid nanoparticle formulations has been of paramount importance, next-generation LLNPs present an opportunity of enhanced biocompatibility. With the change in amido functionality as part of the core backbone, our target, carbamate functionality within the LLNP core scaffold, was realized upon reaction of a protected amino alcohol onto the isocyanate generated in situ via a Curtius rearrangement. The single-step assembly of carbamate functionality starting from cyclohexane carboxylic acid in the presence of diphenylphosphoryl azide (DPPA) exceeds the metrics set forth for the rapid installment and enhanced biodegradability of next-generation lipid-like nanoparticles.

1. Introduction

What can arguably be considered one of the most revolutionary platforms for the delivery of therapeutic molecules is lipid-like nanoparticles (LLNPs) [1]. Composed of two structural motifs, a core backbone covalently linked to hydrophilic tendrils, they, in combination, determine the functionality and performance in drug delivery [2].
The long chains serve to both encapsulate and protect the drug while targeting specific cells or tissues because of the mimicking properties of the lipid-based materials employed. Furthermore, the size, which can be engineered and ranges from twenty to two hundred nanometers, is small enough to enter cells but large enough to avoid renal clearance. Collectively, the delivery mechanism serves as a powerful tool for drug delivery, as recently witnessed with the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines [1].
Among the core backbones employed, 1,3,5-benzene tricarboxylic acid (trimesic acid) has garnered significant interest due to its unique structural and chemical properties. As a rigid, aromatic, and symmetrically trifunctional molecule, 1,3,5-benzene tricarboxylic acid serves as a versatile backbone for constructing LLNPs with precise and enhanced functional properties [3].
The incorporation of a cyclic trifunctionalized core scaffold (Figure 1) offers several advantages in nanoparticle design especially when considering biodegradability. The three carboxylic acid derivatives provide a robust foundation for chemical modifications, enabling the conjugation of diverse lipid-like arms through amide, ester, or carbamate linkages [4,5].

2. Background

By virtue of the D3h point group, TT3’s assembly exploits symmetry-driven uniformity (Scheme 1). The LLNP can be prepared in not 15 but 5 functional group transformations, making this system an ideal candidate for studies focusing on next-generation core backbones. The tricarboxamide functionality stemming from the benzene core bound to dodecyl chains using aminopropyl linkers witnessed TT3’s successful role with the delivery of mRNA molecules encoding human factor IX [6], CRISPR–Cas9 [7], and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigens [8].
The key synthetic step in TT3’s assembly involves a reductive amination of the deprotected BOC-amines with dodecylaldehyde in the presence of sodium triacetoxyborohydride [6]. Formation of the protected amines began with the conversion of trimesic acid to the corresponding thionyl chloride. Once generated, this intermediate efficiently yielded the protected triscarboxamide upon condensation with a BOC-protected 1,3-propanediamine.
When focusing on biodegradability, however, an area yet to be explored using the core backbone found with TT3 is changes to the carboxylic acid derivative. As stated above, a key metric with nanoparticle design is not only drug delivery but biodegradation; hence, our focus was to explore the assembly of TT3 analogs bearing not amide but carbamate functionality. The change in functionality offers a clear advantage when considering biodegradability, which for this system would occur via hydrolysis or enzymatic action [4].

3. Results and Discussion

In order to achieve our goals of (1) assembling a series of carboxylic acid derivatives and (2) using a unified platform starting from carboxylic acid functionality, we elected to explore the Curtius rearrangement using, as our model system, benzoic acid. The Curtius rearrangement is a well-established transformation used to convert carboxylic acids via their acyl azide to isocyanates [9]. What is unique and addresses both of our goals is that upon changing the reaction workup, the isocyanates yield carbamates when treated with an alcohol, and urea when trapped with an amine. Both transformation and model system are ideal as the core backbone of TT3 bears amide functionality bound to an aromatic scaffold.
Scheme 2 and Scheme 3 offer a summary of the results obtained when working with our model system, benzoic acid, as part of the course we offered in the Spring term 2024. While pleased in the outcome as it relates to product formation and use of t-butyl alcohol and ethanol as trapping agents, the yields, interestingly, matched the experience of the nine students involved in the research project (CURE) and very much aligned with the highs and lows often witnessed when conducting research [10].
While encouraged with the formation of carbamate functionality when working with an excess of trapping agent (Scheme 2), changes to nucleophile (benzyl amine (top bracket)), temperature (amide formation (middle bracket)), and equivalency (stoichiometric quantities of the trapping agent (bottom bracket)) resulted in, unfortunately, no observable product formation (Scheme 3).
What is important to note is that for each of the systems explored in Scheme 3, stoichiometric, not excessive quantities of trapping agent were employed. Furthermore, as the focus of this study was the installment of carbamate functionality and not the scope, we elected to change benzoic acid to the less reactive cyclohexane carboxylic acid (Scheme 4).
We were pleased to see that reaction of cyclohexane carboxylic acid with diphenylphosphoryl azide (DPPA) in the presence of triethylamine resulted in the formation of carbamate 1 when trapped with stoichiometric quantities of the Schiff base 2-((diphenylmethylene)amino)ethanol [11,12].
This result, unoptimized, was important for several reasons. First, the Schiff base derived from 2-aminoethanol would serve as the ideal platform from which condensation of alkyl aldehydes in the presence of sodium triacetoxyborohydride would furnish the lipophilic residues present in TT3. Second, while we feel that use of 1) commercially available phenyl isocyanate with stoichiometric quantities of the Schiff base or 2) excess quantities of the Schiff base when working with benzoic acid and DPPA would result in the desired product formation, both would detract from the overarching goal of a unified, efficient, and atom-economic assembly of next-generation LLNPs bearing carbamate functionality. Third, the one-step installment of carbamate functionality, which avoids the need to work with the far more labile acyl azide, reduces the number of synthetic steps by half when compared to how the amide functionality is installed with TT3; hence, this provides an opportunity to explore next-generation lipid-like nanoparticles using the Curtius rearrangement as the key step in furnishing enhanced biodegradable functionality as part of the core backbone. And fourth, of the two dozen lipids and lipid derivatives used for mRNA delivery, about half utilize cyclic scaffolds (aryl, cyclohexyl, and piperazine) [2]. While unsuccessful with the aryl scaffolds, the opportunity to build off of cyclohexyl derivatives keeping with the metrics of symmetry and the use of a core backbone covalently linked to hydrophilic tendrils, as outlined above, exists. Be it cyclohexane 1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid or Kemp’s triacid (cis,cis-1,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid), which offer the opportunity to study host–guest chemistry, the strategy of diversifying the carboxylic acid functionality using the Curtius rearrangement is viable, as documented herein, with the assembly of a carbamate derivative using, as the starting material, cyclohexane carboxylic acid.

4. Materials and Methods

All spectra were obtained as solutions in CDCl3 having the following field strength: 1H NMR (500 MHz) and 13C NMR (125 MHz). The NMR that generated the spectra was a JEOL ECA-500 spectrometer (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) using JEOL DeltaTM Version 6.1.0 (MAC) software. Chemical shifts were reported in parts per million (ppm). Chemical shifts were referenced to δ 7.27 (1H NMR) and δ 77.00 (13C NMR). Infrared spectra were reported in wavenumbers (cm−1) and recorded using a JASCO FT/IR-4100 (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). For the synthetic procedures performed, all hazardous materials were handled while wearing protective gloves, protective clothing, eye protection, and face protection, and conducted in the hood. Additional considerations consisted of the following: TLC analyses were performed on flexible aluminum backed TLC plates with a fluorescent indicator. Detection was conducted by UV absorption (254 nm) followed by charring with 10% KMnO4 in water. Solutions were concentrated in vacuo using a rotary evaporator, and the residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel column (70–230 mesh, 60 Å)) followed by recrystallization (ethyl acetate and hexanes (1:1)). The HRMS data were generated at the University of South Alabama Mass Spectrometry Core Facility. The chemicals used for the synthetic procedure (cyclohexane carboxylic acid, diphenylphosphoryl azide, triethylamine, acetonitrile, ethyl acetate, hexanes) were reagent-grade or better. While DPPA is both commercially available and avoids the need to work with the far more labile acyl azide, the phophoryl azide is hazardous and should be handled, as would be the case with all hazardous materials, while wearing protective gloves, protective clothing, eye protection, and face protection. The Schiff base 2-((diphenylmethylene)amino)ethanol was prepared upon condensation benzophenone with 2-aminoethanol and used as is [11].

5. Experimental Process

2-((Diphenylmethylene)amino)ethyl N-(Cyclohexyl)carbamate (1)

Cyclohexane carboxylic acid (562 mg, 4.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) was added to a 50 mL round-bottomed flask (RBF) equipped with a magnetic stir bar and water-jacketed condenser. The carboxylic acid was then dissolved in acetonitrile (15 mL). After adding triethylamine (0.62 mL, 1.0 equiv.) and diphenylphosphoryl azide (1.2 g, 1.0 equiv.) at room temperature, the Schiff base 2-((diphenylmethylene)amino)ethanol (1.0 g, 1.0 equiv.) was added in one portion to the reaction mixture. After placing the setup under a blanket of argon, the reaction was allowed to warm to an external temperature of 80 °C and stirred overnight. Upon cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo and chromatographed (TLC; SiO2, 1:4 EtOAc:hexanes, Rf = 0.28). The column chromatography (SiO2) gradient system increased in polarity using the following EtOAc/hexanes mixture, all representing three column equivalents: 1:8, 1:4, 1:2. The residue was then recrystallized (1:1 EtOAc/hexanes) resulting in 76 mg (5% yield) of a white, needle-like crystalline solid (mp 126.5–127 °C). Access to all the spectra acquired can be found within the Supplementary Materials.
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3); δ 7.62–7.60 (m, 2H), 7.48–7.31 (m, 6H), 7.17–7.15 (m 2H), 4.58 (br s, 1H, CH(cyclohexyl)), 4.34 (t, 2H, J = 5.0 Hz), 3.58 (t, 2H, J = 5.0 Hz), 3.46 (br s, NH), 1.92–1.90 (m, 2H), 1.70–1.57 (m, 3H + H2O), 1.35–1.26 (m, 2H), 1.18–1.07 (m, 3H). 13C NMR (CDCl3); δ 169.9, 155.7, 130.1, 128.6, 128.5, 128.5, 128.0, 127.8, 64.8, 53.0, 49.7, 33.4, 25.5, 24.8. IR (thin film); 3326, 3056, 2931, 2854, 1699, 1531 cm−1. HRMS (LC-MS/MS) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C22H26N2O2 351.2066; found 351.2062.

6. Conclusions

As molecular structure impacts function, our focus on the development of effective tools of encapsulation and delivery of therapeutic molecules has shifted toward the installment of carbamate functionality. Pairing this carboxylic acid derivative with existing alkyl chain motifs raises the biodegradability of the drug carrier. Furthermore, as the number of synthetic steps needed to install this functionality as part of the core backbone is half that currently used, the novel approach using the Curtius rearrangement as the key step streamlines the assembly of these next-generation lipid-like nanoparticles.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online: 1H NMR, 13C NMR, HMQC, HETCOR, IR, and HRMS data of 2-((diphenylmethylene)amino)ethyl N-(cyclohexyl)carbamate (1).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.N.B., M.H.M., A.M.A., M.R.G., H.N.L., O.E.M., J.M.-P., K.V.R. and D.C.F.; methodology, B.N.B., M.H.M. and D.C.F.; validation, B.N.B., M.H.M. and D.C.F.; writing—original draft, D.C.F.; writing—review and editing, B.N.B., M.H.M. and D.C.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Office of Undergraduate Research, Honors College, and Department of Chemistry at the University of South Alabama.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the support from the Department of Chemistry, College of Arts & Sciences, University Honors College, the Office of Undergraduate Research, and the University of South Alabama Foundation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Verma, M.; Ozer, I.; Xie, W.; Gallagher, R.; Teixeira, A.; Choy, M. The Landscape for Lipid-Nanoparticle-Based Genomic Medicines. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2023, 22, 349–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hou, X.; Zaks, T.; Langer, R.; Dong, Y. Lipid Nanoparticles for mRNA Delivery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6, 1078–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Aljuaid, N.; Tully, M.; Seitsonen, J.; Ruokolainen, J.; Hamley, I.W. Benzene Tricarboxamide Derivatives with Lipid and Ethylene Glycol Chains Self-assemble into Distinct Nanostructures Driven by Molecular Packing. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 8360–8363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Couture-Senécal, J.; Tilstra, G.; Khan, O.F. Engineering Ionizable Lipids for Rapid Biodegradation Balances mRNA Vaccine Efficacy and Tolerability. bioRxiv 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fernández-Fariña, S.; Martínez-Calvo, M.; Romero, M.J.; Seco, J.M.; Zaragoza, G.; Pedrido, R.; González-Noya, A. Hydrolysis of a Carbamate Triggered by Coordination of Metal Ions. Dalton Trans. 2022, 51, 10198–10209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, B.; Yu, X.; Wang, Z.; Xu, F.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, S.; Liu, X.; Ma, X.; Zheng, M.; Yang, Z.; et al. An Orthogonal Array Optimization of Lipid-like Nanoparticles for mRNA Delivery in Vivo. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 8099–8107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jiang, C.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Y.; Wang, W.; Yu, W.; Yang, L.; et al. A Non-viral CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery System for Therapeutically Targeting HBV DNA and PCSK9 in Vivo. Cell Res. 2017, 27, 440–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zeng, C.; Zhu, L.; Yang, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Li, W.; Liu, X.; Liu, T.; Li, Y.; et al. Leveraging mRNA Sequences and Nanoparticles to Deliver SARS-CoV-2 Antigens in Vivo. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2004452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Curtius, T. Ueber Stickstoffwasserstoffsäure (Azoimid) und einige ihrer Salze. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1890, 23, 3023–3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Marmande, M.; Baxter, B.; Zeller, M.; Forbes, D. N,N′-Dibenzylethylenediammonium Dichloride. Acta Crystallogr. 2024, 80, 1130–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Trost, B.M.; Osipov, M.; Dong, G. Synthesis of the Aminocyclitol Core of Jogyamycin via an Enantioselective Pd-Catalyzed Trimethylenemethane (TMM) Cycloaddition. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 3938–3942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. While We Prepared the Schiff Base 2-((Diphenylmethylene)amino)ethanol, the Material Is Commercially Available. Available online: https://product.birdotech.com/product/AC874816.html (accessed on 2 January 2025).
Figure 1. N1,N3,N5-Tris(3-(didodecylamino)propyl)benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxamide (TT3).
Figure 1. N1,N3,N5-Tris(3-(didodecylamino)propyl)benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxamide (TT3).
Molbank 2025 m1947 g001
Scheme 1. Synthesis of TT3.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of TT3.
Molbank 2025 m1947 sch001
Scheme 2. Formation of t-butyl and ethyl carbamates.
Scheme 2. Formation of t-butyl and ethyl carbamates.
Molbank 2025 m1947 sch002
Scheme 3. Unsuccessful attempts in formation of urea, amide, and carbamate functionality.
Scheme 3. Unsuccessful attempts in formation of urea, amide, and carbamate functionality.
Molbank 2025 m1947 sch003
Scheme 4. Formation of carbamate 1.
Scheme 4. Formation of carbamate 1.
Molbank 2025 m1947 sch004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baxter, B.N.; Marmande, M.H.; Albers, A.M.; Gangasani, M.R.; Le, H.N.; Molokhia, O.E.; Monteiro-Pai, J.; Ransom, K.V.; Forbes, D.C. 2-((Diphenylmethylene)amino)ethyl N-(Cyclohexyl)carbamate. Molbank 2025, 2025, M1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/M1947

AMA Style

Baxter BN, Marmande MH, Albers AM, Gangasani MR, Le HN, Molokhia OE, Monteiro-Pai J, Ransom KV, Forbes DC. 2-((Diphenylmethylene)amino)ethyl N-(Cyclohexyl)carbamate. Molbank. 2025; 2025(1):M1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/M1947

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baxter, Bailey N., Mary Helene Marmande, Alyssa M. Albers, Manisha R. Gangasani, Hao N. Le, Omar E. Molokhia, Juanita Monteiro-Pai, Kyndall V. Ransom, and David C. Forbes. 2025. "2-((Diphenylmethylene)amino)ethyl N-(Cyclohexyl)carbamate" Molbank 2025, no. 1: M1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/M1947

APA Style

Baxter, B. N., Marmande, M. H., Albers, A. M., Gangasani, M. R., Le, H. N., Molokhia, O. E., Monteiro-Pai, J., Ransom, K. V., & Forbes, D. C. (2025). 2-((Diphenylmethylene)amino)ethyl N-(Cyclohexyl)carbamate. Molbank, 2025(1), M1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/M1947

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop