Next Article in Journal
Building Intelligent Communication Systems for Handicapped Aphasiacs
Next Article in Special Issue
A Macroporous TiO2 Oxygen Sensor Fabricated Using Anodic Aluminium Oxide as an Etching Mask
Previous Article in Journal
Infiltration Route Analysis Using Thermal Observation Devices (TOD) and Optimization Techniques in a GIS Environment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gas Sensors Based on Semiconducting Metal Oxide One-Dimensional Nanostructures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Binary Fingerprints at Fluctuation-Enhanced Sensing

1
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3128, USA
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3123, USA
3
Signal Processing, Inc., 13619 Valley Oak Circle, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2010, 10(1), 361-373; https://doi.org/10.3390/s100100361
Submission received: 8 December 2009 / Revised: 23 December 2009 / Accepted: 28 December 2009 / Published: 5 January 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal-Oxide Based Nanosensors)

Abstract

:
We have developed a simple way to generate binary patterns based on spectral slopes in different frequency ranges at fluctuation-enhanced sensing. Such patterns can be considered as binary “fingerprints” of odors. The method has experimentally been demonstrated with a commercial semiconducting metal oxide (Taguchi) sensor exposed to bacterial odors (Escherichia coli and Anthrax-surrogate Bacillus subtilis) and processing their stochastic signals. With a single Taguchi sensor, the situations of empty chamber, tryptic soy agar (TSA) medium, or TSA with bacteria could be distinguished with 100% reproducibility. The bacterium numbers were in the range of 2.5 × 104–106. To illustrate the relevance for ultra-low power consumption, we show that this new type of signal processing and pattern recognition task can be implemented by a simple analog circuitry and a few logic gates with total power consumption in the microWatts range.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Bacterium detection and identification has an important role in medical, agricultural, environmental, defense, etc. applications. Analyzing their odor [1,2] has good prospects because of high speed, low cost, wide availability, good sensitivity and selectivity, while solid-state electronic noses [37] can be applied.
Recently, we have carried out an experimental study [8] with commercial Taguchi sensors to test the shape of the power density spectrum of the stochastic component of their signal as a pattern to recognize bacteria. The power density spectrum S(f) of the spontaneous fluctuations of the sensor signal is one of the easiest and natural tools for Fluctuation-Enhanced Sensing (FES) of chemicals [920]. While it is reasonably simple to generate it from the measured data, it contains significant sensing information and it has been shown to enhance sensitivity by a factor of 300, or more [14,16]. It is also relatively straightforward to construct a theory to explain its behavior [1820].
In the present paper, we show a new method to generate binary patterns from measured spectra, an ultra-low power implementation of such a system including a simple Boolean logic circuit as a microprocessor-free pattern recognizer, see Sections 2, 3 and 6, respectively.
In order to demonstrate the feasibility of the method and the nature of binary patterns, we conducted relevant experimental tests/evaluations where we have used some of the spectra published in paper [8] and spectra from new measurements.

2. Binary Patterns for Low Power Consumption

To achieve ultra-low power consumption, we must avoid the usage of microprocessors and extensive data processing. The sensor signal must be processed in the simplest possible way, presumably with analog circuitry, and the pattern recognition must be a deterministic process based on a few simple logic decisions.
Let us make the following notations: αn (local slope) is the average local slope of the power density spectrum S(f) in the n-th frequency sub-band and β = ∑ αn / N is the average of αn over the entire measurement band, see Figure 1 as an illustration for logarithmically equidistant sub-band boundaries. The boundaries of sub-bands can be equidistant or any convenient settings. These quantities can easily be generated by a low number of operational amplifiers and filters, see Figures 2 and 3.
The deviation Δn of the local slope is defined for each sub-band as the difference between αn and β in the following equation:
α n β = Δ n
The sign σn of the local deviation Δn will be binary bit related to that sub-band:
σ n = signum ( Δ n )
The quantity σn is a binary pattern that indicates if αn is larger or smaller than β in the n-th sub-band of the spectrum. The advantage of the quantity σn is that it provides a single bit information about the spectral pattern. In the case of N non-overlapping frequency bands, the σn (n = 1,...,N) quantities represent N bit information obtained from a single sensor. Then a simple, deterministic, fast and low-power pattern recognizer can easily be constructed by applying a Boolean logic rule to identify/distinguish the particular spectral patterns with their relevant set of the σn bits.
All these tasks can be realized without the use of power hungry devices such as microprocessors, other types of sequential logic, or analog-digital converters. In Section 3, we show a simple realization with analog circuitry of power consumption in the microWatt range and in Section 7, based on experimental patterns, a Boolean pattern recognition logic in the nanoWatt/picoWatt regime, see also Section 8.

3. An Ultra-Low-Power Realization of the Scheme

The proposed system for ultra-low-power consumption, see Figure 2, includes three major parts: Sensor, Analog circuits to generate the binary patterns and a Boolean Logic circuit. The system described here uses equidistant sub-band boundaries: uniform bandwidths with non-overlapping sub-bands.
In Figure 3, the outline of the Analog Unit is shown. The preamplifier amplifies the stochastic component of sensor signal. The spectral slope estimator is the combination of a small number of amplifiers, filters and rectifiers. The binary patterns are generated by a set of comparators.
A simple realization of the analog electronics to estimate the local slope αn and global slope β can be seen in the Spectral slope estimator part of Figure 3. In this realization, for fingerprints of N bit resolution, we will need N + 1 sub-bands. To obtain the local slope αn of each sub-band, first we rectify and then smooth the noise by a low-pass filter at the output of each band-pass filter in order to estimate the mean-square amplitude U n 2 ( t ) there. Then we estimate the average slope in the frequency band {(fnfn–1) /2; (fn + fn+1) /2} as:
α n = U n 2 ( t ) U n 1 2 ( t ) ( f n f n 1 ) 2
To estimate αn from the mean-square voltages, see Equation 4, differential amplifiers are used, see Figure 3. To obtain the magnitude of β = N−1αn the αn values obtained above are averaged with an adder with amplification of 1/N. Finally, the comparators compare the magnitude of αn and β and generate the bit σn for all sub-bands. The Boolean logic circuit will identify the pattern of bits σn (n = 1,...,N).

4. Experiments with Bacteria and Heated Semiconducting Metal Oxide Sensors

To demonstrate the feasibility of the new method, the number of bits required for the identification, the simplicity, and the low power consumption of such a system, we carried out experiments with bacteria and commercial Taguchi sensors. Note, commercial Taguchi sensors must be heated thus they consume a lot of power, however, nanoparticle film alternatives are often much more sensitive and do not need heating during sensing [21,22].
Thus, whenever the new method described in this paper is to be used for ultra-low power applications, nanoparticle sensors or similar room-temperature devices will be needed to fully utilize the low power consumption of the electronics.

4.1. Sample Preparation

Here we briefly summarize the sample preparation steps. For more details, see [8]. As Gram negative pathogenic vegetative bacterium surrogate, mid-log phase cultures of E. coli K12 MG1655 (E. coli Genetic Resources at Yale CGSC, New Haven, NE) were grown in Luria Bertani (LB) medium [23] at 37 °C. The cells were harvested at 2,880 g for 9 minutes and resuspended in 5% Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBST, pH 7.4) to 109 CFU/milliLiter concentration. Aliquots (100 μL) of the E. coli cell suspension were spread in appropriate dilution on Difco Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) plates (Becton Dickinson Co., Sparks, MD), and incubated overnight at 37 °C [23].
As Gram positive (Anthrax) surrogate, 50 mg of lyophilized Bacillus atrophaeus (aka Bacillus globigii, BG) (U.S. Army Edgewood Proving Ground, Edgewood, MD) was resuspended in 5 mL of sterile deionized water and centrifuged at 2,880 g for 9 min to remove traces of the culture medium. The supernatant was aspired and the pellet was resuspended in 10 mL of sterile deionized water. Aliquots (100 μL) of the stock Bacillus subtilis were spread in appropriate dilution on TSA plates and incubated overnight at 30 °C [23].
As reference, sterile TSA plates containing identical (27 mL) amounts of the medium without bacteria were also prepared.

4.2. Experimental Setup [8]

The data shown below were measured on a single commercial Taguchi sensor SP32 (Figaro Inc.) after the new sensor was preheated (“burned-in”) in laboratory air for several days with the nominal heating voltage until its stochastic signal component (resistance fluctuations) developed a stable power density spectrum Sr(f). In addition, to enhance the sensitivity and selectivity of the sensor, the Sampling-and-hold (SH) method, see [8,10], was used. At the SH protocol the sensor is heated for a short time, and then the heating (and gas flow) is turned off and, after the sensor has cooled down, the measurement is done [8,10].
The measurement system [8] is shown in Figure 4. The sensor and the sample were in a grounded stainless steel sensor chamber of one Liter volume. The sample in a Petri-dish was located 5 cm below the sensor. A DC bias through the sensor converted its resistance fluctuations into voltage fluctuations that were amplified by a low-noise preamplifier and their power density spectra were evaluated by a dynamic signal analyzer in the frequency range of 100 Hz–100 kHz. The voltage spectra were transformed back to power density spectra Sr(f) of the fluctuations of sensor resistance [810].

4.3. Types of Samples

The situations tested in these experiments were: empty chamber; TSA; TSA + E. coli at different bacterium numbers; TSA + Anthrax-surrogate; finally TSA + E. coli + Anthrax-surrogate. Here empty means no sample; TSA represents the culture medium: tryptic soy agar; E. coli means the harmless laboratory strain MG1655 as a surrogate for the pathogenic vegetative bacteria Escherichia coli; and Anthrax stands for the Anthrax-surrogate bacterium, the spore forming Bacillus subtilis. The samples with maximal bacterium number had one million bacteria.
Between different sample measurements, the chamber was flushed by synthetic air for 3 minutes. To see the reproducibility of the spectra, the measurements with each sample were repeated at least twice.

5. Binary Pattern Extracted from Experiments

In the figures below, for the sake of better visibility of the differences by the naked eye, the normalized power density spectrum γ(f) is used:
γ ( f ) = f × S r ( f ) R s 2    
where Rs is the actual sensor resistance. Note, for the binary patter generation describe in Section 2, both the original and the normalized spectra yield the same result.
For simplicity, we measured the average slopes in six sub-bands with logarithmically equidistant width by fittings of the γ(f) plotted as a log-log plot by Origin software. The sub-bands were 100−333 Hz for bit B1, 0.333–1 kHz for bit B2, 1−3.3 kHz for bit B3, 3.3−10 kHz for bit B4, 10−33 kHz for bit B5 and 33–100 kHz for bit B6. The binary pattern used for driving the logic circuit is found to have the following characteristics:
  • Good reproducibility: Examples are shown in Figures 58: measurement data obtained with independently prepared samples at different dates. The spectra in Figures 57 yield identical patterns shown in Figure 8.
  • Inability to differentiate between the two types of bacteria: the applied sensor and the simple 6 bit pattern generation we used for these tests were unable to differentiate between the two bacteria, while they were able to differentiate between all the other cases (empty, TSA, bacteria). This fact originates from the particular settings of pattern generation because the differences between spectra with different bacteria could be distinguished by naked eye. However, we find this situation satisfactory because our goal was not to present a fully featured/optimized system but to show how much can be achieved with just a simple, ad-hoc, demo version of a 6 bits system.
  • Robustness against variations of the bacterium number, see Figure 9. This characteristic was unexpected with Taguchi sensors, which are nonlinear devices, but it could be expected with linear sensors. The most probable reason why we still experienced this property with our sensor is the linear response of nonlinear systems against small perturbations; a situation relevant for Taguchi sensors.
The measurement conditions to test the impact of bacterium numbers were as follows. Six different bacterium numbers of E. coli were used: 2.5 × 104, 5 × 104, 105, 2.5 × 105, 5 × 105 and 106. The normalized power density spectra and the binary patterns are shown in Figures 9 and 10, respectively.
The binary pattern in Figure 10 can also identify three conditions: empty, TSA and TSA + bacteria (E. coli). When the bacterium number decreases from 106 to 2.5 × 104, the bits remained the same except bit B5 (relevant to sub-band 10 k∼33 kHz). As a consequence, bit B5 should not be used in the Boolean logic for pattern recognition, except perhaps as extra information about the bacterium number. However, the rest of the bits provide sufficient information to identify the different types of samples: empty, TSA and TSA + bacteria (E. coli).

6. Boolean Logic Circuit for Pattern Recognition with Ultra-Low Power Need

The obtained bit patterns are shown in Table 1. As we have shown above bit B5 is not robust against variations in the bacterium number thus we can consider it as an invalid bit unless we want to use that for the indication of bacterium number of E. coli. Thus a simple 5-bits Boolean logic circuit driven by pattern bits 1–4 and 6 can identify the different situations. The Boolean logic circuit in Figure 11 has a two-bits output where only 3 of the four possible states are used to display the recognized pattern: empty, TSA, or TSA + bacteria (either E. coli or Anthrax).
The output of the Boolean logic at the different situations is shown in Table 2. The output 1,0 is not shown because it is invalid.
From Table 1 and Table 2, the following Boolean logic equations can be extracted:
Bit   1 =   B 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 ¯
Bit   2 = B 1 B 2 B 3 B 4 ¯ B 6
The Boolean logic circuit to realize Equations 5, 6 is shown in Figure 11.
When this Boolean logic circuit is realized by CMOS logic gates, its static power consumption is in the nano/picoWatt regime. In addition, this circuit consumes some extra power for a short time (nanosecond) while it switches when the situation of agents change. Due to the rarity of such events, the power consumption in the Binary logic is basically due to the leakage current of transistors. At practical situations, these powers required by the logic circuitry are negligible.

7. Power Consumption of the Whole Sensing System

As a result of avoiding digital computation and using analog processing with the simple logic decisions instead, the main advantage of our system is its simplicity and ultra low power consumption. The analog circuits dominate the power consumption of this system and that is relatively small due to the low-frequency operation (<100 kHz). In [24] a more sophisticated analog circuitry for a different sensing approach is shown, including a wireless unit (known to be power hungry), with only 3 μW total power dissipation. Thus we can safely claim that the power dissipation of our analog circuitry is in the μW range or below. In comparison, a laptop computer based pattern recognizer, which would be able to run the same task, would dissipate around 20−50 Watts.

8. Summary

In this work we have reported an exploratory study to generate and test highly distinguishable and robust types of binary patterns from power density spectra obtained at fluctuation-enhanced sensing of bacterial odors. We have shown a way how these binary patterns can be generated by an analog circuitry of ultra-low power consumption and used to drive a Boolean logic based pattern recognizer with negligible power consumption. We demonstrated these findings by single-sensor experiments recognizing bacteria with 100% success rate and zero false alarm rates.
Concerning an important question asked by a Referee about discriminating gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, the answer is that this method is sensing the odor of the bacteria. If these sets represent some characteristic odor components then classification can be possible. Otherwise, the only way is to teach the system (construct the binary logic) to recognize each specific bacterium.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Army Research Office under contract W911NF-08-C-0031.

References

  1. Chanda, S. Implications of aerobiology in respiratory allergy. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med 1996, 3, 157–164. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lacey, J.; Dutkiewicz, J. Bioaerosols and occupational lung disease. J. Aerosol. Sci 1994, 25, 1371–1404. [Google Scholar]
  3. Eklov, T.; Lundstrom, I. Distributed sensor system for quantification of individual components in a multiple gas mixture. Anal. Chem 1999, 71, 3544–3550. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gardner, J.W.; Bartlett, P.N. Electronic Noses: Principles and Applications; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  5. Searle, G.E.; Gardner, J.W.; Chappell, M.J.; Godfrey, K.R.; Michael, J.C. System identification of electronic nose data from cyanobacteria experiments. IEEE Sensors J 2002, 2, 218–229. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ampuero, S.; Bosset, J.O. The electronic nose applied to dairy products: a review. Sens. Actuat. B 2003, 94, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  7. Persaud, K.C. Medical applications of odor-sensing devices. New Technol 2005, 4, 50–56. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chang, H.C.; Kish, L.B.; King, M.D.; Kwan, C. Fluctuation-enhanced sensing of bacterium odors. Sens. Actuat. B 2009, 142, 429–434. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kish, L.B.; Vajtai, R.; Granqvist, C.G. Extracting information from noise spectra of chemical sensors: single sensor electronic noses and tongues. Sens. Actuat. B 2000, 71, 55. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kish, L.B.; Granqvist, C.G.; Vajtai, R. Sampling-and-hold chemical sensing by noise measurements for electronic nose applications. Swedish patent 990409-5,. 1999. [Google Scholar]
  11. Solis, J.L.; Kish, L.B.; Vajtai, R.; Granqvist, C.G.; Olsson, J.; Schnurer, J.; Lantto, V. Nanocrystalline tungsten oxide thick films with high sensitivity to H2S at room temperature. Sens. Actuat. B 2001, 77, 316–321. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kish, L.B.; Smulko, J.; Heszler, P.; Granqvist, C.G. On the sensitivity, selectivity, sensory information and optimal size of resistive chemical sensors. Nanotechnol. Percept 2007, 3, 43–52. [Google Scholar]
  13. Smulko, J.M.; Kish, L.B. Higher-order statistics for fluctuation-enhanced gas-sensing. Sensor Mater 2004, 16, 291–299. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kish, L.B.; Li, Y.; Solis, J.L.; Marlow, W.H.; Vajtai, R.; Granqvist, C.G.; Lantto, V.; Smulko, J.M.; Schmera, G. Detecting harmful gases using fluctuation-enhanced sensing. IEEE Sensors J 2005, 5, 671–676. [Google Scholar]
  15. Solis, J.L.; Seeton, G.E.; Li, Y.; Kish, L.B. Fluctuation-enhanced multiple-gas sensing. IEEE Sensors J 2005, 5, 1338–1345. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ederth, J.; Smulko, J.M.; Kish, L.B.; Heszler, P.; Granqvist, C.G. Comparison of classical and fluctuation-enhanced gas sensing with PdxWO3 nanoparticle films. Sens. Actuat. B 2006, 113, 310–315. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kwan, C.; Schmera, G.; Smulko, J.; Kish, L.B.; Heszler, P.; Granqvist, C.G. Advanced agent identification at fluctuation-enhanced sensing. IEEE Sensors J 2008, 8, 706–713. [Google Scholar]
  18. Schmera, G.; Kwan, C.; Ajayan, P.; Vajtai, R.; Kish, L.B. Fluctuation-enhanced sensing: Status and perspectives. IEEE Sensors J 2008, 8, 714–719. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gomri, S.; Seguin, J.L.; Aguir, K. Modelling on oxygen chemisorption induced noise in metallic oxide gas sensors. Sens. Actuat. B 2005, 107, 722–729. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gomri, S.; Seguin, J.L.; Guerin, J.; Aguir, K. Adsorption–desorption noise in gas sensors: Modelling using langmuir and wolkenstein models for adsorption. Sens. Actuat. B 2006, 114, 451–459. [Google Scholar]
  21. Solis, J.L.; Hoel, A.; Kish, L.B.; Granqvist, C.G.; Saukko, S.; Lantto, V. Gas-sensing properties of nanocrystalline WO3 films made by advanced reactive gas deposition. J. Am. Ceram. Soc 2001, 84, 1504–1508. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hoel, A.; Ederth, J.; Kopniczky, J.; Heszler, P.; Kish, L.B.; Olsson, E.; Granqvist, C.G. Conduction invasion noise in nanoparticle WO3/Au thin-film devices for gas sensing application. Smart. Mater. Struct 2002, 11, 640–644. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E.F.; Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring, New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  24. Roger, C.L. Ultra-Low power analog circuits for spike feature extraction and detection from extracellular neural recordings, a dissertation presented to the graduate school of the University of Florida in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy, university of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 2007.
Figure 1. Illustration of αn and β for logarithmically equidistant sub-band boundaries. S(f) is the power density spectrum of the fluctuations of the sensor signal.
Figure 1. Illustration of αn and β for logarithmically equidistant sub-band boundaries. S(f) is the power density spectrum of the fluctuations of the sensor signal.
Sensors 10 00361f1
Figure 2. Major building blocks of the low-power sensing system.
Figure 2. Major building blocks of the low-power sensing system.
Sensors 10 00361f2
Figure 3. Details of the Analog Unit of the sensing system with 6 bit resolution shown in Figure 2, see the text for explanation.
Figure 3. Details of the Analog Unit of the sensing system with 6 bit resolution shown in Figure 2, see the text for explanation.
Sensors 10 00361f3
Figure 4. Outline of the experimental setup.
Figure 4. Outline of the experimental setup.
Sensors 10 00361f4
Figure 5. Normalized power density spectra of the resistance fluctuations of the sensor SP32 measured in the sampling-and-hold [8,10] working mode. Each sample had one million bacteria. The alias “Anthrax” stands for Anthrax surrogate Bacillus subtilis.
Figure 5. Normalized power density spectra of the resistance fluctuations of the sensor SP32 measured in the sampling-and-hold [8,10] working mode. Each sample had one million bacteria. The alias “Anthrax” stands for Anthrax surrogate Bacillus subtilis.
Sensors 10 00361f5
Figure 6. Reproducibility of the experimental data shown in Figures 5 with new samples.
Figure 6. Reproducibility of the experimental data shown in Figures 5 with new samples.
Sensors 10 00361f6
Figure 7. Reproducibility of the experimental data shown in Figures 56 with new samples.
Figure 7. Reproducibility of the experimental data shown in Figures 56 with new samples.
Sensors 10 00361f7
Figure 8. The spectra in Figures 57 yield the same 6-bits pattern.
Figure 8. The spectra in Figures 57 yield the same 6-bits pattern.
Sensors 10 00361f8
Figure 9. Variations of the normalized power density spectrum at different bacterium numbers.
Figure 9. Variations of the normalized power density spectrum at different bacterium numbers.
Sensors 10 00361f9
Figure 10. Variations of the binary pattern at different bacterium numbers. Bit B5 is not reliable therefore that bit should not be used for pattern recognition, see the Boolean logic in Section 6.
Figure 10. Variations of the binary pattern at different bacterium numbers. Bit B5 is not reliable therefore that bit should not be used for pattern recognition, see the Boolean logic in Section 6.
Sensors 10 00361f10
Figure 11. The Boolean logic circuit to realize the binary pattern recognition for the sampling-and-hold sensor SP32.
Figure 11. The Boolean logic circuit to realize the binary pattern recognition for the sampling-and-hold sensor SP32.
Sensors 10 00361f11
Table 1. The logic input of the Boolean logic circuit generated from Figure 10. Zero stands for σn = −1 and 1 stands for σn = 1.
Table 1. The logic input of the Boolean logic circuit generated from Figure 10. Zero stands for σn = −1 and 1 stands for σn = 1.
Bit B1Bit B2Bit B3Bit B4Bit B5Bit B6
Empty0111N/AN/A
TSA1000N/A0
TSA+bacteria1000N/A1
Table 2. The output of the Boolean logic circuit at the different situations.
Table 2. The output of the Boolean logic circuit at the different situations.
Output of Binary logic
Bit 1Bit 2
Empty00
TSA10
TSA+ Bacteria11

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, H.-C.; Kish, L.B.; King, M.D.; Kwan, C. Binary Fingerprints at Fluctuation-Enhanced Sensing. Sensors 2010, 10, 361-373. https://doi.org/10.3390/s100100361

AMA Style

Chang H-C, Kish LB, King MD, Kwan C. Binary Fingerprints at Fluctuation-Enhanced Sensing. Sensors. 2010; 10(1):361-373. https://doi.org/10.3390/s100100361

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Hung-Chih, Laszlo B. Kish, Maria D. King, and Chiman Kwan. 2010. "Binary Fingerprints at Fluctuation-Enhanced Sensing" Sensors 10, no. 1: 361-373. https://doi.org/10.3390/s100100361

APA Style

Chang, H. -C., Kish, L. B., King, M. D., & Kwan, C. (2010). Binary Fingerprints at Fluctuation-Enhanced Sensing. Sensors, 10(1), 361-373. https://doi.org/10.3390/s100100361

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop