Next Article in Journal
Ceramic MEMS Designed for Wireless Pressure Monitoring in the Industrial Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Fusion of a Variable Baseline System and a Range Finder
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/s120100297
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Modulation Techniques for Biomedical Implanted Devices and Their Challenges

by
Mahammad A. Hannan
*,
Saad M. Abbas
,
Salina A. Samad
and
Aini Hussain
Department of Electrical, Electronic & Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi Selangor, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2012, 12(1), 297-319; https://doi.org/10.3390/s120100297
Submission received: 22 November 2011 / Revised: 15 December 2011 / Accepted: 15 December 2011 / Published: 28 December 2011
(This article belongs to the Section Biosensors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

: Implanted medical devices are very important electronic devices because of their usefulness in monitoring and diagnosis, safety and comfort for patients. Since 1950s, remarkable efforts have been undertaken for the development of bio-medical implanted and wireless telemetry bio-devices. Issues such as design of suitable modulation methods, use of power and monitoring devices, transfer energy from external to internal parts with high efficiency and high data rates and low power consumption all play an important role in the development of implantable devices. This paper provides a comprehensive survey on various modulation and demodulation techniques such as amplitude shift keying (ASK), frequency shift keying (FSK) and phase shift keying (PSK) of the existing wireless implanted devices. The details of specifications, including carrier frequency, CMOS size, data rate, power consumption and supply, chip area and application of the various modulation schemes of the implanted devices are investigated and summarized in the tables along with the corresponding key references. Current challenges and problems of the typical modulation applications of these technologies are illustrated with a brief suggestions and discussion for the progress of implanted device research in the future. It is observed that the prime requisites for the good quality of the implanted devices and their reliability are the energy transformation, data rate, CMOS size, power consumption and operation frequency. This review will hopefully lead to increasing efforts towards the development of low powered, high efficient, high data rate and reliable implanted devices.

1. Introduction

Biomedical implantable devices have been available for more than sixty years. The first transistorized biomedical implanted device was designed and developed by Earl Bakken in 1957 for the cardiac pacemaker [1]. Investigations on implanted devices have been focused of the most important issues of biomedical implants, which are patient safety and comfort [2]. This can be achieved by reducing the power consumption and ensuring efficient energy transfer to the implanted devices [3]. Therefore, wireless energy transfer is an important issue for implanted devices [4].

Implanted medical devices are electronic devices that monitor and diagnose the electromyography (EMG), electrocardiogram (ECG), electroretiuogram (ERG) and electrooculography (EOG) of the patient and send current to various parts of a patient body. In general, the implanted device consists of two parts: the internal part located underneath the body skin and an external part. i.e., controller [5,6]. The external part is used for powering the combination and sending data to the outside world. Implantable devices are self-operating devices which adjust their operation depending upon the patient’s condition. These devices do not rely on external sources of power. Thus, low power consumption and high data rate are the main requirements for medical implant devices [7]. In order to minimize cost, patient trauma and risk associated with the repeated surgeries, it is necessary to increase the lifetime of implanted batteries by conserving energy at every stage of a device’s operation. Thus, in order to consume the power during monitoring and diagnosis, implanted devices powered by RF signals through inductive coupling links are used to reduce the complexity of the system [8].

There are many methods to conserve power and reduce the interference on nearby electronics by choosing the suitable modulation and suitable design of the modulator and demodulator. Details of the modulation and demodulation of wireless telemetry and implanted devices such as amplitude shift keying (ASK), frequency shift keying (FSK) and phase shift keying (PSK) have been discussed in many reviews. However, still there are many drawbacks with the communication systems of the existing designed and developed devices. There are a lot of papers in the field of wireless low power electronics, such as optical biomedical sensing [9], cochlear implants [10] biomedical wireless sensor networks [11], intelligent biomedical devices [12] and body sensors [13]. This paper provides a detailed review of the literature concerning the design of low power transmitters for different forms of digital bandpass modulations used in implanted devices covering the period from 2000 to 2011. The purpose of this review is to discuss and classify all the types of digital modulation used in wireless telemetry bio-devices and biomedical implanted devices to provide a good background on the challenges and problems that are being faced and to develop appropriate solutions.

2. Systems Overview

In general, wireless telemetry bio-devices and biomedical implanted devices mainly consist of two parts: an external one, located outside the human body and an internal part, located inside the human body. The external part is used to supply power and transmit the data to the internal part through an inductive coupling link as well as monitor the data from the human body [14,15]. Details of the data transmission between the parts are shown in Figure 1.

2.1. Power Supply Technologies

The power supply technologies used in the aforesaid devices can be classified according to the applications of the implanted devices. Generally, the implanted devices can be powered by batteries such as in the case of pacemakers, cochlear implants, retinal prosthesis, brain implants, etc. However, the limited lifetime of the implanted batteries lead to many challenges to improve their longevity. The wireless telemetry bio-devices can also be powered by radio frequency (RF) signals, transmitting power from the external part to the internal part through an inductive coupling coil and then converted into AC and DC voltage [16]. Another source of harvested energy is used to power the implanted devices such as knee implants that use the vibration of piezoelectric materials [17] or body motion [18].

2.2. Wireless Communication Technologies for Implanted Devices

The biomedical implanted devices can communicate with the exterior world by up-link, and using inductive wireless coupling or UHF links to transmit data from the body which is saved in sensors [19]. Most bio-devices are bi-directional systems with transmitted RF signal carriers either swallowed or surgically implanted in a patient. The communication between the two parts is possible even through different media such as biological tissues like fat, muscle, blood, bone, etc. [20,21]. The classification types of the most common passive and active wireless communications are shown in Figure 2.

2.3. Characteristics of the Implantable Devices

There are several characteristics that are shared by most biomedical implantable devices as follows:

  • Low Power Consumption: low power consumption is the main requirement for medical implant devices where the large dissipation in power increases the possibility to damage the soft tissues in the human body. Changing or charging batteries can be inconvenient, difficult, costly and even risky for the patient; all implantable medical devices need to consume as little energy as possible.

  • High Reliability: A failure of an implantable medical device can result on inconvenience, pain, damage or even death for the patient. Maintenance is also costly and risky. Thus, reliability for the implanted devices must be very high.

  • Low Voltage Signals: Most of the natural signals are inside the human bodies as well as the output of the transducers are in the V or mV range, which requires special care in sensing and amplifying.

  • Low Frequencies: The natural frequency span of biological signals varies from a fraction of a hertz to several kilohertz, However, most of the implantable devices are powered by low-frequency (<1 MHz signal) magnetically coupled coils (often modulated to include the data telemetry). Nowadays, the designers design the bio-implanted devices to operate in the medical implant communications service (MICS) band.

  • Small Size: Implantable devices need to be as small as possible, so as to be less invasive to the human body. This does not always means that the silicon area should be as small as possible, because increasing the silicon area to minimize external components can reduce overall size. In addition the use of some methods such as auto-zeroing techniques, FPGA methods, and artificial intelligence methods can help minimize the overall size.

3. Modulation Techniques

Digital modulation techniques impress the digital signal onto a carrier signal for data transmission. A sequence of digital data is used to alter the parameter of a high frequency called carrier signal. Thus, signal transmission takes place by modulating different parameters like amplitude, phase and frequency of the signal. Modulation techniques provide high data rate transmission, data security, quality signal, simple architecture, low power consumption, good performance over a fading communication channel, increased channel capability, greater accuracy in the presence of noise and distortion, etc. [22]. However, there are a number of tradeoffs in the digital modulation like hard to design complex structured, disadvantages of analog counterparts and bandwidth size. The main criteria for choosing the kind of modulation schemes are based on power, bandwidth and system efficiencies [23,24]. Figure 3 shows the most common modulation used in biomedical devices.

Modulation schemes are chosen or designed according to the channel characteristics in order to optimize their performance. Channels can be classified as additive white Gaussian noise channels (AWGN), band limited channels and fading channels. The AWGN channel is a universal channel model for analyzing modulation schemes by adding the white Gaussian noise to the signal passing through the channel. The band limited channel is limited when it is smaller than the signal bandwidth. The fading channel happens when the amplitude and phase change rapidly over a short period of time.

4. ASK Modulation and Demodulation

The amplitude shift keying (ASK) or on/off keying (OOK) is the simplest digital modulation used in wireless telemetry bio-devices and biomedical implanted devices [25]. In these types of modulation, no carrier is used during the transmission which minimizes the power consumption of the modulator [26]. The principle of ASK transmission is explained in [27] as shown in Figure 4 and as follows:

S ASK   ( t ) = b ( t ) × c ( t )
b ( t ) = { E b   …   …   …   …   .   .   binary   1 0   …   …   …   .   .   binary   0
c ( t ) = 2 E b T b   cos ( ω c   t )
where b(t) is the binary message, c(t) is the carrier signal, Eb is the bit energy and Tb is the bit duration.

In general ASK modulation is used in the implanted part for its simplicity and low power consumption. However, it has a number of limitations for high-bandwidth data transmission, high order filters with sharp cut off frequencies and large capacitors cannot be easily integrated for low-frequency RF applications [28]. There are two methods of ASK demodulation: coherent and non-coherent detection, however, most designers have used the non-coherent method due its simplicity and low power consumption [29]. The coherent method uses carrier phase information for detection. This method uses a product detector and a phase-locked beat frequency oscillator for detection. In non-coherent methods no carrier phase is used for detection based on filtering signal energy within allocated spectra and envelope detectors. The performance degradation of the non-coherent method is about 1–3 dB when compared to coherent detection, depending on Eb/N0.

Summaries in terms of frequency, data rate, power, size and application of ASK modulator for various telemetric wireless and implanted devices are shown in Table A1.

4.1. ASK Modulation for Neural Implants

An electronic ASK demodulator subsystem has been developed by Yu and Najafi using a power-on-reset block, op/am E class, low drop-out regulator and hybrid charge redistribution ADC with 10-bit resolution [30]. However, its implementation suffers from inaccurate synchronization of the clock and data signals. Djemouai designed a ASK demodulator by using a current edge detector circuit and two current mode comparators to stimulate the nerves and muscles or to measure and sense physiological signals [31]. This demodulator can process the input current with a very smal modulation depth and is converted into voltage pulses to control the state of the ouput stage. However, the size of the demodulator is one of the issues. A new CMOS current mode ASK demodulator used to extract and detect digital data of current signals with very small modulation depth of 250 kHz and distinct levels of amplitude variation of 4 μA to 4.5 μA has been reported [22]. To solve the aforementioned problems, Yu and Basirullah [32] proposed an integrated low power clock and data recovery circuit without DLLs for neural recording microsystem. The circuit employs a ASK modulation scheme and pulse position modulation (PPM) with modulation index m = 1 to facilitate clock recovery and reduce power dissipation. Recently, a novel low power ASK-PPM receiver was designed using inductive peaking, clock and data recovery circuit with multiple charge pumps to boost up the gain and facilitate the time-to-voltage conversion [33]. In this system, the required voltage reference is generated adaptively to cover a large range of data rates.

4.2. ASK Modulation for Cochlear Implants

The electronic system of the modulator and demodulator is replaced by a NAND gate, diode and RC with CMOS transistor to control the carrier signal for cochlear prostheses [34]. This system used five inverters in order to satisfy the constraint of integration and to generate an oscillation operated carrier frequency of 20 MHz. Recently, Yan et al. [35] proposed a monostable circuit for low-power CMOS ASK system with clock and data recovery for cochlear implants integrated under 0.18 μm CMOS technology. Pulse width modulation (PWM) signals with delay-locked loops (DLL) are used to recover and resynchronize the clock and data of the system [36]. However, the expense of increased area and overhead power are problems in this system.

4.3. ASK Modulation for Complex Implants

Gunnar tested an ASK modulator with 200 Kbps carrier frequency to achieve high small-signal bandwidth with low power levels and this unit worked better for complex implants such as stimulating electrode arrays or visual implants [37]. A high performance and low power consumption unit without capacitor and resistor and with clock recovery circuit of 10 MHz carrier frequency, 0.35 μm CMOS, 2 Mbps data rate and less than 84 μw ASK demodulator was developed for complex implants [29]. The wireless receiver of the ASK demodulator consisted of a current source, a class AB operational amplifiers with common source, a track and latch stage and a Schmitt trigger. To reduce the CMOS size, Li and Zhang [38] developed a novel mixed-signal interface for bio-telemetry complex implantable systemd consisting of a digital processing circuit and analog front-end. The system included power amplifier, ASK demodulator, clock extraction and power recovery without passive elements, i.e., capacitor and resistor. The CMOS size is reduced to 0.18 μm, which is less than that of other complex implant systems and in addition, the power supply is only 1.8 V.

4.4. ASK Modulation for Wireless Telemetry and Endoscopic Implants

In wireless capsule endoscopic systems, the data transmission from inside to outside the human body is high to achieve high quality medical images, so for quality internal biomedical imaging, Han et al. [39] proposed a pseudo differential stacked class-A power amplifier based on phase lock loop (PLL) and RF conversion circuit. In the system, a 20 MHz, 0.25 μm CMOS, 1 Mbps data rate, 3.62 mm2 chip area of 3.17 mA power consumption ASK modulator is used to generate the low frequency carrier by a voltage controlled oscillator and convert the low frequency ASK signal into the 2.4 GHz industrial scientific and medical (ISM) band. However, the sizes of the demodulators are still not up to the level needed. Therefore, after a detailed review of the demodulators like CMOS current mode [40], wireless capsule endoscopic application [39], neuro-stimulus chip for retinal prosthetics, neuromuscular, cochlear devices [36,41–44] and nano-mechanics based C-reactive protein detection [45], Gong et al. [46] proposed a self-sampling demodulator without passive elements consisting of a pulse shaper, voltage scalar, level contractor and self-sampler. Again in 2009, Liang et al. [47] designed an ASK demodulator for wireless telemetry biomedical applications, which supports data rates up to 300 kbps and detects envelopes with a modulation index of 1% or more. The circuit design includes a single-to-differential OTA, a current mode full-wave rectifier, a log-domain peak detector, a variable-gain amplifier and a comparator.

4.5. ASK Modulation for General Implant Applications

To reduce the size of the implanted devices, a low-efficient RF induced capacitor-less, i.e., C-less ASK demodulator was developed to regulate the stable output voltage. The detailed characteristics of the proposed demodulator are shown in [28]. In order to further reduce the size of implantable devices, Lee et al. [48,49] developed C-less and R-less without trigger envelope detectors. These demodulators improve the noise margin and also reduce the quantity of transistors. Huang et al. [50] also designed a ASK demodulator without passive elements and with only 15 CMOS transistors. The demodulator has a high bandwidth of 300 MHz for lower ISM band frequencies, which is enough for almost all kinds of biomedical implantations. Gong et al. [51] developed their previous work [46] further, providing the ability of working over a small modulation index without any passive elements using a self- sampling scheme to reduce the chip area and cost as well as to receive higher efficiency. Kao et al. [52] designed an ASK demodulator based on a maximum modulation index up to 2.86% and a 50% maximum modulation rate. The size of the CMOS is comparatively smaller in this general category of biomedical implants. The modulation index and rate are designed as:

Modulation Index = V H − ( − V L ) V H + ( − V L ) × 100 %
Modulation Rate = Data Rate Operated Carrier × 100 %
where VH and VL represent the maximum and minimum amplitudes of the modulated signal wave form in which the modulation index increases the efficiency of the system and reduces the size. Data rate is the rate at which information is being transferred and operating carrier is the suitable operating frequency in the modulation rate or signaling speeds that contributes to transfer data rate with high efficiency.

To reduce the power consumption in medical implanted devices an ASK demodulator without using any passive elements has been designed [53]. It consists of a rectifier, an envelope detector, digital shaper and load driver. In general, non-coherent ASK modulators are sensitive to the carrier frequency and modulation index. To avoid this disadvantage, a new circuit based comparator is designed in an ASK demodulator including a full wave rectifier, a voltage reference and a small capacitor to filter the high frequency components and a signal formatter circuit [54].

5. FSK Modulation and Demodulation

FSK is one of earliest and most suitable modulation techniques for digital modulation. The principle of FSK modulation is to send binary data with two different frequencies and the resultant modulated signal is regarded as amplitude modulation (AM) of different carrier frequencies. There are two types of FSK modulation: i.e., non-coherent or discontinuous and coherent FSK modulation [55]. In the non-coherent types of FSK modulation different frequencies is represented by binary 1 and 0 as follows:

S 1   ( t ) = A   cos   ( 2 π f 1   t + ϕ 1 ) ,   kT ≤ t ≤   ( k + 1 ) T ,   for   1 S 2   ( t ) = A   cos ( 2 π f 2   t + ϕ 2 ) ,   kT ≤ t ≤   ( k + 1 ) T ,   for   0
where ϕ1 and ϕ2 are initial phases at t = 0 and they are not the same in general. T is the bit period of the binary data. This type can be generated by switching the modulator output line between two different oscillators. However, in the coherent types of FSK modulation, the two coherent signals have the same initial phase ϕ at t = 0 as follows:
S 1   ( t ) = A   cos ( 2 π f 1   t + ϕ ) ,   kT ≤ t ≤   ( k + 1 ) T ,   for   1 S 2   ( t ) = A   cos ( 2 π f 2   t + ϕ ) ,   kT ≤ t ≤   ( k + 1 ) T ,   for   0

In this section, a detailed summary of FSK modulation in terms of frequency, data rate, power, sizes and applications of various telemetric wireless and implanted devices is listed in Table A2.

5.1. FSK Modulation for Biological Implants

It is usually necessary for a nurse to be near a patient all the time for monitoring and watching the patient’s condition. To avoid this situation, a new kind of low cost monitoring system is developed [56] that consists of a transmitter and receiver. The transmitter is located near the patient or can be attached to him and the receiver located in the monitoring room to be watched and monitored by the physician and the nurses. The multi-signal of the system is modulated by analog FM modulation and FSK carrier frequencies at 447 MHz. However, the system suffers from interfacing between the signals and noise. To address the above issues, a low-power FSK modulator and demodulator for biological signals can be used to reduce the noise. The transmitter side of the system can also be used a four stage differential ring VCO with tone frequency located at 402–405 MHz carrier frequency.

5.2. FSK Modulation for General Implants

Much research has been focused on various types of biomedical implant devices. In this regards, Ghovanloo and Najafi [57] developed an FSK protocol and compared it with the ASK protocol. The developed high rate data transfer protocol receives the serial bit from the input clock, extracted from 2 MHz to 20 MHz FSK carrier signal. The extracted FSK signal is as follows:

f ( t ) = f 0   ( t )   sin ( 2 π f 0   t + ϕ ) + f 1   ( t )   sin ( 2 π f 1   t + ϕ )

A novel 4-FSK demodulator technique was used to improve the bit error rate (BER) performance and to increase the decision accuracy of the system by generating additional zero-crossing using a modified ZIFZCO with clocks [58]. However, this device has relative high power consumption. Ghovanloo and Najafi [59] further developed this work in [57] using the same carrier frequency to reduce the power consumption and chip area. The demodulator circuit of the system is developed with a data rate to carrier frequency ratio up to 67% to require a much lesser power consumption of 0.38 mW. Again, Ghovanloo and Najafi [60] developed a three FSK demodulator circuit with data-rate up to carrier-frequency ratio up to 67% in 5–10 MHz. This novel method was used to send data inductively to a wireless biomedical implant with 4 Mbps data rates. The power consumption and the chip area of the implanted devices are comparatively less than that of the previous system.

CMOS technology is very popular for designing an effective modulator. Accordingly, Sodagar and and Najafi [61] reviewed many of the implanted circuits and devices that used standard CMOS technologies. Tekin et al. [62] have developed a low power FSK modulator/demodulator for an MICS band transceiver to reduce the CMOS size and chip area. Wend et al. [63] developed two different types of demodulators such as an analogue FSK (AFSK) and a digital FSK (DFSK) for general implanted devices. The AFSK consists of a signal balance mixer and a comparator, however, the DFSK consists of only one block. Both demodulators are implemented in 0.18 μm CMOS technology with a power supply of 1 V. The AFSK demodulator occupies a chip area of 0.016 mm2 and the data rate is 2.5 Mbps. The DFSK occupies a chip area of 0.004 mm2 and the data rate is up to 5 Mbps. The power consumption of ASFK and DFSK demodulators are 0.47 mW and 0.022 mW, respectively.

5.3. FSK Modulation for Physiological Implants

To monitor the various physiological parameters inside the human body, the transmitter unit sends the sensor data outside the human body as explained by Zhu et al. [64]. This paper proposed a new low-power (FSK) modulator for biomedical sensors. The new circuit integrates the modulation functionality into the oscillator itself by using the data signal to control the oscillation frequency, and the circuit can generate a tunable carrier frequency for different data signals. The author compared his work with another works such as Mohseni et al. [65], which provided one silicon chip which combines single-channel and multi channel with lower dissipation. Harrison et al. [66] developed a prototype integrated circuit for wireless neural recording from 100-channel microelectrode. Haider et al. [67] proposed a system consisting of a FSK generator block and data generator used for low-voltage and low-power operation. However, Zhu et al. [64] developed a FSK modulator for biomedical sensor circuits that has better properties for physiological implants.

6. PSK Modulation and Demodulation

Phase shift keying (PSK) constitutes a large class of digital modulation techniques. In the last decades PSK modulation has been widely used in wireless communication for biomedical modulation techniques. This review includes the important research which has used PSK modulation in biomedical applications. In PSK modulation, correlated or matched filter implementation of the coherent detector are compared with a reference signal. The reference signal is generated by the carrier recovery circuit, which is synchronous to the received signal in terms of frequency and phase. However, the differential coherent demodulator is non-coherent in the sense that phase coherent reference signals are not required, which is used to overcome the adversary effect of the random phase in the received signal. The most common digital schemes appropriate for biomedical data transmission are briefly described as PSK, binary PSK (BPSK), differential PSK (DPSK), quadrature PSK (QPSK), differential quadrature PSK (DQPSK), offset quadrature PSK (OQPSK) and quasi-coherent PSK (QCPSK) in [68,69], as shown in Table A3.

6.1. PSK Modulation for Various Stimulator Implants

A stimulator is an agent that excites some functional activity of the human body. Accordingly, Hu and Sawan [70] developed a fully integrated neuromuscular stimulator with a BPSK demodulator using COSTAS loop topology. The demodulator consists of comparator, multipliers, loop filters, VCO and 90° phase shifter. The BPSK demodulator can be modified as a QPSK demodulator to get double the data transfer rate. These types of demodulators are complex in function. To reduce the complexity of the system and to achieve low power and high data rate transmission, Lu and Sawan [71] designed a system with two modulators and two demodulators using OQPSK modulation. The circuit was integrated in 0.18 μm CMOS technology and operated with 13.56 MHz carrier frequency to achieve 8 Mbps data rates, i.e., very fast transmission. The power consumption of the modulators and demodulators is relative low. The BPSK modulation was also used to transmit data and power from the external part to the implant and the load shift keying (LSK) modulation is used to transmit the received data from the implant to the external part [72]. The implanted device consists of a BPSK demodulator that functions as a brain stimulator-based PLL. Lee et al. [73] proposed a bio-device for transcutaneous wireless telemetry using the near-field inductive coupling technique with round-wire coils for a cardiac micro stimulator. PSK modulation is used to decode the transmission data.

6.2. PSK Modulation for General Implants

To reduce the size and power consumption, Hu and Sawan [74] further developed their previous work keeping the same parameters in [70] but using BPSK modulation for general body implants. The BPSK demodulators in [70,71] were further developed by Deng et al. [75] using QPSK modulation and modified COSTAS loop technology. The program was simulated using same carrier frequency of 13.56 MHz with a data rate of 4 Mbps, i.e., faster data transmission. Again, a BPSK demodulator is designed using a phase frequency detector based PLL for robust performance [76]. Two different circuit implementationa for demodulator with a carrier frequency of 13.56 MHz are used in this system.

6.3. PSK Modulation for Neural Implants

Most implantable devices use an inductive coupling link to transmit both power and data between coils using the same carrier frequency. The system circuit configuration is complex. Zhou et al. [77] separated the power and data, then transmitted them with different frequencies using DPSK modulation employing two transmitters and two receivers. The system power is transmitted with 1 MHz carrier frequency and the data is transmitted with 20 MHz carrier frequency. This method made the system simpler by reducing the circuit complexity. However, the as-developed system is big in size and has higher power consumption compared with other systems. The model of the system is as follows:

ω 1 = 1 L 1   C 1   and   ω 2 = 1 L 2   C 2   when   k = 0
ω 1 = 1 L 1   C 1 + L 2   C 2   and   ω 2 = ∞   when   k = 1
where ω1 and ω2 are frequency components of the two resonant tanks, respectively. L1 and L2 are the inductances and C1 and C2 are the capacitances of a linearized model coupling between two resonant tanks, respectively. K is the coupling coefficient between coils that results in frequencies splitting away from their original values. When k ≠ 0, both resonant tanks will contain frequency components ω1 and ω2. However, no interference is present at k = 0, i.e., the power and data resonant tanks remain at their original frequencies. When k = 1, the upper frequency shifts to infinity. Again, when L1 >> L2 and ω1 ≈ ω2, the frequency of the power resonant tank is hardly affected due to the small amount of interference from the data transmitter.

A non-coherent PSK receiver without PLL was developed by using a band pass sampling theory for neural implants [78]. Zhou et al. [79] further developed his prior system [77] using a DPSK modulation in the analog domain to cancel the interference signal for a dual-band. This system is able to cancel 12 dB interferences signals without using complex filters. The system still suffered from high power consumption. In general, wireless powered signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the received signal is high for the short-range in neural implants. To overcome this situation, Gong et al. [80] proposed a quasi-coherent PSK (QCPSK) demodulator employing a direct carrier processing to extract the timing signals.

In order to eliminate the power interference in the data receiver in neural implants, a fully integrated DPSK is used for high density biomedical implants through dual-band telemetry [81]. The carrier frequency of the power and data rate are separated within a minimum sampling rate which results in reduced chip area and makes it possible for all blocks to be implemented in one chip. This system suffers from relatively high power consumption. Power consumption is an essential key in biomedical implantable devices. To achieve reduced power consumption, a BPSK demodulator based on a digital-analog hybrid COSTAS loop and a digital multiplier is proposed in [82]. The digital multiplier is used in place of an analog multiplier to reduce the power consumption.

6.4. PSK Modulation for Complex Implants

Complex implants are very sensitive to data transmission problems. In this regard, a new fully digital BPSK demodulator and load shift keying (LSK) has been used in complex implanted devices to reduce the power consumption and increase the data transmission rate [83]. The back telemetry technique is used in this work and verified through simulation and measurement. The obtained results show that the system improves the data transmission rate compared to conventional bi-level back telemetry. Furthermore, Xu et al. [84] improved their previous work in [83] by using a fully digital BPSK demodulator based on digital PLL and a multi level LSK modulator to generate the incoming BPSK signal data for complex implants with higher data rate back telemetry.

Retinal and cochlear complex implants require high speed data transfer. A novel BPSK data demodulator and clock recovery circuit based on noncoherence is developed in [85,86] in which the developed circuit works with the outstanding data-to-carrier-frequency ratio of 100%. The demodulator powered the implanted device with high data rate and low power consumption, as can be seen in Table A3. The demodulator is implemented in a 0.18 μm CMOS process with 10–20 MHz carrier frequency. The power consumption is only 119–310 μW with this 10–20 Mbps data rate, which are a lower power consumption and higher data rate compared to the previous work.

The analysis, investigation and experimental measurements for high data rates have been developed using FPGA/CLPC programming [87]. The n-PSK demodulator was programmed with VHDL to generate digital binary quadrature and eight PSK signals. In this system the carrier frequency was chosen to be 135 kHz operated by inductively coupled RF power and a modified hybrid class E and F power amplifier was used to simulate the system. Asgarian and Sodagar [88] proposed his further designed modulator based on QPSK using FPGA/CPLD for implantable telemetry applications. The local clock oscillator is used at 25.175 MHZ with a carrier frequency of 12.5 MHZ. This proposed design has low power consumption and is small in size, which makes it suitable for biomedical applications. To improve the high data rate transmission and reduced the system complexity, Asgarian and Sodagar [89] proposed a phase-silence-shift keying (PSSK) modulation. PSSK modulation needs double the bandwidth of PSK modulation.

7. Current Challenges and Problems

Biomedical device technology has been recently used for medical applications in the human body by monitoring or recording many signals such as EMG, ECG, EOG and ERG and monitoring or diagnosing the current conditions of implantable devices such as retinal implants, cochlear implants, pacemakers, brain implants and for wireless capsule endoscopy. Two of the most important issues for biomedical implants are patients’ safety and comfort. These can be achieved by reducing the power consumption, switching losses, choosing suitable modulation and carrier frequency according to a MICS table and by increasing the efficient energy transfer capabilities, for example, using near-field wireless energy transfer that results in electromagnetic fields that would not heat the tissues. However, for example, heating of pacemaker leads is the major problem undermining magnetic resonance imaging. Therefore, hundreds of patients with a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter face safety and reliability issues [90,91]. Typically a wireless biomedical devices consists of two parts, the external part that transmits RF signals to the internal part through an inductive coupling downlink using variety of modulated signals such as ASK, FSK, PSK (BPSK, QPSK, DBPSK, DQPSK, OQPSK), and it must transmit with high efficiency and low power consumption. Thus, an aim of research into implantable biomedical devices is to develop such devices with low power consumption, efficient energy transfer, the highest data rate, efficient power amplifiers, small size and low-cost, so many parameters need to be considered, as discussed in the following sections.

7.1. Adopting the Proper Method to Choose the Suitable Modulation Used for the Wireless Telemetry

Adopting aproper method to choose the suitable modulation to be used for the wireless telemetry depends on the nature and type of the implanted device. Some implanted devices such as brain, retinal, cochlear implants, and wireless capsule endoscopy require high data rate transmission [35,38,39]. Thus, the advantages and disadvantages of the suitable modulations used in biomedical devices and biotelemetry systems need to be focused. For example, the BPSK modulation offers a practical circuit implementation by transmitting 1-bit binary data by the influence of shifted carrier frequency, which does not change the phase carrier of the sine wave. However, there is a change in the carrier phase to a negative sine wave for 0-bit. Thus, the BPSK is only able to modulate 1-bit/symbol, which may not provide a high enough data rate due to the bandwidth limitations and and the demodulator power consumption [27]. These problems can be solved by techniques offering high data rates like QPSK and n-PSK modulation. However, these suffer from complicated structures and high power consumption, as explained in Section 6. The FSK is general uses two signals with different frequencies to represent binary 1 and 0. These modulations offer high date rates and suffered from complications and size issues [22,26] as explained in Section 6. The PSK and FSK are used for implanted devices which need high data rates such as retinal and cochlear implants. We have seen that ASK modulation is more suitable than FSK and PSK for implant devices and telemetry systems within a short range. Thus, modulation with simple hardware implementation and small in size, fast and reliable transmission, less power consumption and constant RF signal would be the best choice for a wireless telemetry system.

7.2. Suitable Carrier Frequency

The carrier frequency is very important in designing implanted devices and biotelemetry systems. Most of the implantable devices are powered by low frequency, less than 1 MHz, however, the standard safety levels with respect to human body exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields is 3 kHz–30 GHz [4]. The standards frequencies according to the MICS are specified between the frequencies of 402–405 MHz, which involves a number of allowable frequencies such as 27 MHz. The second standard is the ISM standard dealing with 13.56 MHz band. The RFID standard deals with 125–135 kHz for low frequency bands. The low and high frequencies between 3 kHz–30 MHz are widely used in transcutaneous wireless due to its ability penetrate water and skin over a short range.

7.3. Suitable Power and Class Amplifier

The power amplifier plays an important role in low and high frequency bands to amplify the signal to a certain coupling coil which transmits the power and data to the implantable devices. Thus, an implant system needs a highly efficient power amplifier. The suitable class of amplifier is very important to transmit a stable RF signal with high efficiency compared to these conventional amplifiers such as class A, B, C [92]. In general, class E and F amplifiers have the same properties and are widely used in implantable devices and telemetry systems. The E class amplifier requires only one active device within kHz to several MHz, in which shifting resonance frequency decreases the output power transmission. Thus, an automatic frequency correction circuit is needed for high rates of data transmission. However, F class amplifiers require at least two active devices, which increases the power consumption and size. The frequency is limited in low frequencies due to its switching losses. Thus, higher frequencies and inductively coupled system are suitable for better response and comparatively efficient even in the case of frequency shifting.

7.4. Coils Used in the Wireless Telemetry System

The wireless inductive coupling use the magnetic field to transfer data and power from the external part to the internal part. In general, RF short-range communication transmits a low power irradiated from the reader coil antenna to offer fixed sinusoidal carrier amplitude that provides a stable wireless transfer power. The bio-device system is composed by a primary coil integrated and isolated inside the human body and a secondary coil located outside the body. In most cases, the primary coil is tuned in series resonance to provide a low impedance load for driving the transmitter coil, whereas the secondary coil is almost invariably in parallel. Thus, to have better power transfer efficiency of inductive coupling link both sides of the link are tuned at the same resonant frequency and the stability of the RF signal need to provide a high readability at the implant device in terms of the distances from the reader coil.

7.5. Size of the Implanted Devices

Implantable devices need to be as small as possible, so as to be less invasive for the human body. The batteries in biomedical implants have several problems such as limited life time, chemical side effects and being large in size. Researchers are trying to eliminate the use of batteries from implanted devices in the human body and have proposed various solutions to power implantable devices such as using inductive coupling link, power harvesting with piezoelectric material and body motion. The silicon area should be as small as possible to minimize external components that can reduce the overall size of implantable devices. Reducing the complexity of the electronic block circuits and the number of the passive elements such as capacitors and resistors would help to reduce the size of the implanted devices. This can be achieved by developing techniques and methods such as auto-zero technique [93], FPGA methods [86] and artificial intelligence methods [94].

7.6. Low-Cost and Simplest Design

In the 1950s, when the first biomedical implantable devices was implanted, the focus was on scientific success, and the economic aspectd were not important at that time. However, with the increasing use of the biomedical implantable devices, the economy of the implantable devices is very important. in addition to safety and comfort for the patient. Thus, low-cost and simple designs became an important factor and challenges for the designers.

8. Conclusions and Suggestions

This article outlines the various modulation techniques and their suitability for wireless data transmission for bio-medical implanted devices. The different modulation schemes show different types of bandwidth data transmission and frequencies. The ASK modulation is based on on/off keying, multiplication of the binary message and the carrier signal used for low power consumption, while the FSK mode is the most suitable digital modulation, which sends binary data with two different frequencies and the resultant modulated signal is represented by binary 1 and 0. PSK is the largest class of digital modulation applied in complex bio-medical implanted devices by coupling inductive link to transmit both power and data between coils using the same carrier frequency. The review investigated and observed that the quality of the implanted devices and their reliability depends on the modulation scheme in terms of data transmission, operating frequency and power consumption. The main challenges in existing biomedical devices are the data transfer rated, suitable modulation and carrier frequency for wireless transmission, size, cost and design. Highly efficient systems with minimum error, and enhanced encoding of information to protect the data acquired from the human body must be designed. Thus, choosing a suitable modulating technique is very important to achieve high data transfer rates according to the implanted applications. This study explained the existing implantable biomedical devices, their characteristics, challenges and problems in aiming to develop low power consumption, efficient energy transfer, highest data rate, efficient power amplifiers, small size and low-cost, reliable future biomedical implantable devices and their modulation techniques. To achieve the aforesaid aims, advanced techniques like artificial intelligence can be use to provide a stable RF signal and offers flexibility for updating the data to the implanted devices using automatic frequency control programs. This research will lead the increasing need to develop new and improved implanted and wireless telemetry devices.

References

  1. Rhees, D.J. From Frankenstein to the Pacemaker: A Profile of the Bakken Museum. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag 2009, 28, 78–84. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yekeh, K.; Kohno, R. Wireless Communications for Body Implanted Medical Devices. Proceedings of the IEEE Asia-Pasific Microwave Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, 11–14 December 2007.
  3. Madal, S.; Sarpeshkar, R. Power-Efficient Impedance-Modulation Wireless Data Links for Biomedical Implants. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circ. Syst 2008, 2, 301–315. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lazzi, G. Thermal Effects of Bio-Implants. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag 2005, 24, 75–81. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kathuroju, P.K.; Jampana, N. Effect of Low Frequency Pulsed DC on Human Skin In Vivo: Resistance Studies in Reverse Lontophoresis. Sens. Transduc. J 2009, 104, 47–57. [Google Scholar]
  6. Asgarian, F.; Sodagar, A.M. A Low-Power Non Coherent BPSK Demodulator and Clock Recovery Circuit for High-Data-Rate Biomedical Applications. Proceedings of the IEEE 31st Annual International Conference on EMBS, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2–6 September 2009; pp. 4840–4843.
  7. Miranda, H.; Gilja, V.; Chestek, C.A.; Shenoy, K.V.; Meng, T.H. HermesD: A high-Rate Long-Range Wireless Transmission System for Simultaneous Multichannel Neural Recording Applications. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circ. Syst 2010, 4, 181–191. [Google Scholar]
  8. Atluri, S.; Ghovanloo, M. Incorporating Back Telemetry in a Full-Wave CMOS Rectifier for RFID and Biomedical Applications. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, New Orleans, LA, USA, 27–30 May 2007.
  9. Soria, S.; Berneschi, S.; Brenci, M.; Cosi, F.; Nunzi Conti, G.; Pelli, S.; Righini, G.C. Optical Microspherical Resonators for Biomedical Sensing. Sensors 2011, 11, 785–805. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bhoir, D.V.; Panse, M. Advances in Cochlear Implant Implementation. Int. J. Recent Trend. Eng 2009, 2, 57–59. [Google Scholar]
  11. Otal, B.; Alonso, L.; Verikoukis, C. Energy Efficiency Analysis of a Distributed Queuing Medium Access Control Protocol for Biomedical Wireless Sensor Networks in Saturation Conditions. Sensors 2011, 11, 1277–1296. [Google Scholar]
  12. Verma, N.; Lee, K.H.; Shoeb, A. Data-Driven Approaches for Computation in Intelligent Biomedical Devices: A Case Study of EEG Monitoring for Chronic Seizure Detection. J. Low Power Electron. Appl 2011, 1, 150–174. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen, C.-A.; Chen, S.-L.; Huang, H.-Y.; Luo, C.-H. An Asynchronous Multi-Sensor Micro Control Unit for Wireless Body Sensor Networks (WBSNs). Sensors 2011, 11, 7022–7036. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kopparthi, S.; Ajmera, P.K. Power Delivery for Remotely Located Microsystems. Proceedings of the IEEE Region-5 International Conference on Technical and Leadership Workshop, Norman, OK, USA, 2–4 April 2004; pp. 31–39.
  15. Ma, Q.; Haider, M.R.; Song, Y.; Islam, S.K. Power-Oscillator Based High Efficiency Inductive Power-Link for Transcutaneous Power Transmission. Proceedings of the IEEE 53rd International Conference on Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Seattel, WA, USA, 1–4 August 2010; pp. 537–540.
  16. Si, P.; Hu, A.P.; Malpas, S.; Budgett, D. A Frequency Control Method for Regulating Wireless Power to Implantable Devices. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circ. Syst 2008, 2, 22–29. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen, H.; Liu, M.; Chen, J.; Wang, Z. Power Harvesting Using PZT Ceramics Embedded in Orthopedic Implants. IEEE Trans. Ultras. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2009, 56, 2010–2014. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zeng, H.; Zhao, Y. Sensing Movement: Microsensors for Body Motion Measurement. Sensors 2011, 11, 638–660. [Google Scholar]
  19. Baporikar, V.; Karmore, S. Wireless Sensor Network for Brain Computer Interface. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Sci. Tech 2009, 8, 75–79. [Google Scholar]
  20. Inoue, K.; Shiba, K.; Shu, E.; Koshiji, K.; Tsukahara, K.; Ohu-mi, T.; Masuzawa, T.; Tatsumi, E.; Taenaka, Y.; Takano, H. Transcutaneous Optical Telemetry System Investigation on Deviation Characteristics. Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Chicago, IL, USA, 30 October–2 November 1997; pp. 2235–2237.
  21. DeHennis, A.D.; Wise, K.D. A Wireless Microsystem for the Remote Sensing of Pressure, Temperature, and Relative Humidity. J. Microelectromech. Syst 2005, 14, 12–22. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ziemer, R.E.; Tranter, W.H. Principles of Communications Systems, Modulation, and Noise; John Wily & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  23. Klaus, F. RFID Handbook: Fundamentals and Applications in Contactless Smart Cards and Identification, 2nd ed; Wiley & Sons: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zierhofer, C.M.; Hochmair-Desoyer, I.J.; Hochmair, E.S. Electronic Design of a Cochlear Implantant for Multi-Channel High Rate Pulsatle Stimulation Strategies. IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng 1995, 3, 112–116. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cho, J.-H.; Min, K.-W.; Kim, S. An ASK Modulator and Antenna Driver for 13.56 MHz RFID Readers and NFC Devices. IEICE Trans. Commun 2006, 89, 598–600. [Google Scholar]
  26. Xiong, F. M-Ary Amplitude Shift Keying OFDM System. IEEE Trans. Commun 2003, 51, 1638–1642. [Google Scholar]
  27. Taub, H.; Schilling, D.L. Principle of Communication System; McGraw-Hill Companies: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang, C.-C.; Hsueh, Y.-H.; Chio, U.F.; Hsiao, Y.-T. A C-Less ASK Demodulator Implantable Neural Interfacing. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Circuits and Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 23–26 May 2004; pp. 57–60.
  29. Li, H.; Li, W. A High-Performance ASK Demodulator for Wireless Recovery System. Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Communications, Shanghai, China, 21–25 September 2007; pp. 1204–1207.
  30. Yu, H; Najafi, K. Low-Power Interface Circuits for Bio-Implantable Microsystems. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Solid-State Circuit, San Francisco, CA, USA, 10–12 February 2003; pp. 194–487.
  31. Djemouai, A.; Sawan, M. New CMOS Current-Mode Amplitude Shift Keying Demodulator (ASKD) Dedicated for Implantable Electronic Devices. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 23–26 May 2004; pp. 441–444.
  32. Yu, H.; Basirullah, R. A Low Power ASK Clock and Data Recovery Circuit for Wireless Implantable Electronics. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Custom Integrated Circuits, San Jose, CA, USA, 10–13 September 2006; pp. 249–252.
  33. Yu, H.; Li, Y.; Jiang, L.; Ji, Z. A 31 μw ASK Clock and Data Recovery Circuit for Wireless Implantable System. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communications Systems, Chengdu, China, 6–8 December 2010; pp. 1–4.
  34. Naghmouchi, F.; Ghorbel, M.; Hamida, A.B.; Samet, M. CMOS ASK System Modulation Dedicated to Cochler Prosthesis. Proceedings of the IEEE 1st International Conference on Control, Communication and Signal Processing, Hammamet, Tunisia, 21–24 March 2004.
  35. Yan, H.; Wu, D.-C.; Liu, Y.; Wang, D.-H.; Hou, C.-H. A Low-Power CMOS ASK Clock and Data Recovery Circuit for Cochlear Implants. Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology, Shanghai, China, 1–4 November 2010.
  36. Liu, W.; Vichienchom, K.; Clements, M.; DeMarco, S.C.; Hughes, C.; McGucken, E.; Humayun, M.S.; De Juan, E.; Weiland, J.D.; Greenberg, R. A Neuro-Stimulus Chip with Telemetry Unit for Retinal Prosthetic Device. IEEE J. Solid State Circuits 2000, 35, 1487–1497. [Google Scholar]
  37. Gudnason, G. A Low-Power ASK Demodulator for Inductively Coupled Implantable Electronics. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Solid-State Circuit, Stockholm, Sweden, 19–21 September 2000; pp. 385–388.
  38. Li, H.; Zhang, Y. Low Power Wireless Receiver in CMOS Mixed-Signal for Bio-Telemetry Implantable System. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electron Devices and Solid-State Circuits, Hong Kong, 8–10 December 2008; pp. 1–4.
  39. Han, S.; Chi, B.; Wang, Z. 8.0-mW 1-Mbps ASK Transmitter for Wireless Capsule Endoscope Applications. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit, San Francisco, CA, USA, 11–13 June 2006; pp. 4–9.
  40. Djemouai, A.; Sawan, M. Integrated ASK Demodulator Dedicated to Implantable Electronic Devices. Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Cairo, Egypt, 27–30 December 2003; pp. 80–83.
  41. Gudnason, G.; Bruun, E.; Haugland, M. A Chip for an Implantable Neural Stimulator. Analog Integr. Circ. Sign. Process 1999, 22, 81–89. [Google Scholar]
  42. Yu, H.; Najafi, K. Circuitry for a Wireless Microsystem for Neural Recording Microprobes. Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Istanbul, Turkey, 25–28 October 2001; pp. 761–764.
  43. Dong, M.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Z.; Li, D. A Neurostimulus Chip with Telemetry Unit for Cochlear Implant. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, Singapore, 1–3 December 2004; pp. 9–12.
  44. Lee, S.-Y.; Lee, S.-C. An Implantable Wireless Bidirectional Communication Microstimulator for Neuromuscular Stimulation. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst 2005, 52, 2526–2538. [Google Scholar]
  45. Chen, C.-H.; Hwang, R.-Z.; Huang, L.-S.; Lin, S.; Chen, H.-C.; Yang, Y.-C.; Lin, Y.-T.; Yu, S.-A.; Wang, Y.-H.; Chou, N.-K.; Lu, S.-S. A Wireless Bio-MEMS Sensor for C-Reactive Protein Detection Based on Nanomechanics. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng 2009, 30, 462–470. [Google Scholar]
  46. Gong, C.-S.A.; Wu, C.-L.; Ho, S.-Y.; Chen, T.-Y.; Huang, J.-C.; Su, C.-W.; Su, C.-H.; Chang, Y.; Cheng, K.-H.; Lo, Y.-L.; Shiue, M.-T. Design of Self-Sampling Based ASK Demodulator for Implantable Microsystem. Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Electronic Circuits and Systems, Nice, France, 10–13 December 2006; pp. 33–36.
  47. Liang, B.; Yang, Z.; Liu, W. An ASK Demodulator for Data Telemetry in Biomedical Application. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 3–6 September 2009; pp. 1561–1564.
  48. Lee, T.-J.; Lee, C.-L.; Ciou, Y.-J.; Huang, C.-C.; Wang, C.-C. C-Less and R-Less Low-Frequency ASK Demodulator for Wireless Implantable Devices. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Circuits, Singapore, 26–28 September 2007; pp. 604–607.
  49. Lee, T.-J.; Lee, C.-L.; Ciou, Y.-J.; Huang, C.-C.; Wang, C.-C. All-MOS ASK Demodulator for Low-Frequency Applications. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst 2008, 55, 474–478. [Google Scholar]
  50. Huang, C.-C.; Chen, C.-C; Wang, C.-C. R-Less and C-Less Self-Sampled ASK Demodulator for Lower ISM Band Applications. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Single on Chip (SoC) Design, Busan, Korea, 24–25 November 2008; pp. 281–284.
  51. Gong, C.-S.A.; Yao, K.-W.; Chen, T.-Y.; Chang, Y.; Su, C.-H. Truly Low-Cost High-Efficiency ASK Demodulator Based on Self-Sampling Scheme for Bio-Implantable Applications. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst 2008, 55, 1464–1477. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kao, C.-H.; Tang, K.-T. Wireless Power and Data Transmission with ASK Demodulator and Power Regulator for a Biomedical Implantable SOC. Proceedings of the IEEE Life Science Systems and Applications Workshop, Lissa Bethesda, MD, USA, 9–10 April 2009; pp. 179–182.
  53. Wang, C.-C.; Chen, C.-L.; Kuo, R.-C.; Shmilovitz, D. Self-Sampled All-MOS ASK Demodulator for Lower ISM Band Applications. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst 2010, 57, 265–269. [Google Scholar]
  54. Daoud, D.; Ghorbel, M.; Ben, H.A.; Tomas, J. Fully Integrated CMOS Data and Clock Recovery for Wireless Biomedical Implants. Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals and Devicesm, Sousse, Tunisia, 22–25 March 2011; pp. 1–4.
  55. Xiong, F. Digital Phase Modulation and Demodulation. In Encyclopedia of Telecommunications; Proakis, J., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  56. Lee, H.-K.; Park, D.-C. Bio-Medical FM-FM-FSK Radio Telemetry System for Multi-Signal Transmission. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Chicago, IL, USA, 23–28 July 2000; pp. 1553–1555.
  57. Ghovanloo, M.; Najafi, K. A High-Rate Frequency Shift Keying Demodulator Chip for Wireless Biomedical Implants. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Bangkok, Thailand, 25–28 May 2003; pp. 45–48.
  58. Chen, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Lau, J. A CMOS 2- and 4-FSK Demodulator for Direct-Conversion Radio Paging Receivers. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communication Circuit and System, Chengdu, China, 29 June–1 July 2002; pp. 1289–1292.
  59. Ghovanloo, M.; Najafi, K. Fully Integrated Wideband High-Current Rectifiers for Inductively Powered Devices. IEEE J. Solid State Circ 2004, 39, 1976–1984. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ghovanloo, M.; Najafi, K. A Wideband Frequency-Shift Keying Wireless Link for Inductively Powered Biomedical Implants. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst 2004, 51, 2374–2383. [Google Scholar]
  61. Sodagar, A.M.; Najafi, K. Wireless Interfaces for Implantable Biomedical Microsystems. Proceedings of the 49th IEEE International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 6–9 August 2006; pp. 265–269.
  62. Tekin, A.; Yuce, M.R.; Shabani, J.; Liu, W. A Low-Power FSK Modulator/Demodulator for an MICS Band Transceiver. Proceedings of the IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium, San Diego, CA, USA, 17–19 January 2006; pp. 159–162.
  63. Wend, R.-M.; Li, S.-Y.; Wang, J.-C. Low Power Frequency-Shift Keying Demodulators for Biomedical Implants. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Electron Devices and Solid-State Circuits, Tainan, Taiwan, 17–19 January 2006; pp. 1079–1082.
  64. Zhu, K.; Haider, M.R.; Yuan, S.; Islam, S.K. A Sub-1 μA Low-Power FSK Modulator for Biomedical Sensor Circuits. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium, Lixouri, Greece, 5–7 July 2010; pp. 265–268.
  65. Mohseni, P.; Najafi, K.; Eliades, S.J.; Wang, X. Wireless Multichannel Biopotential Recording Using an Integrated FM Telemetry Circuit. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehab. Eng 2005, 13, 263–271. [Google Scholar]
  66. Harrison, R.R.; Watkins, P.T.; Kier, R.J.; Lovejoy, R.O.; Black, D.J.; Greger, B.; Solzbacher, F. A Low-Power Integrated Circuit for a Wireless 100-Electrode Neural Recording System. IEEE J. Solid State Circ 2007, 42, 123–133. [Google Scholar]
  67. Haider, M.R.; Mostafa, S.; Islam, S.K. A Low-Power Sensor Read-Out Circuit with FSK Telemetry for Inductively-Powered Implant System. Proceedings of the IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Knoxville, TN, USA, 10–13 August 2008; pp. 450–453.
  68. El-Gabaly, A.; Jackson, B.R.; Saavedra, C.E. An L-Band Direct Digital QPSK Modulation in CMOS. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Signals, Systems and Electronics, Montreal, QC, Canada, 30 July–2 August 2007; pp. 563–566.
  69. Sonkusale, S.; Luo, Z. A Complete Data and Power Telemetry System Utilizing BPSK and LSK Signalling for Biomedical Implants. Proceedings of the 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Vacouver, BC, Canada, 20–24 August 2008; pp. 3216–3219.
  70. Hu, Y.; Sawan, M. A Fully-Integrated Low-Power BPSK Based Wireless Inductive Link for Implantable Medical Devices. Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and System, Hiroshima, Japan, 25–28 July 2004; pp. 8–25.
  71. Lu, Z.; Sawan, M. An 8 Mbps Data Rate Transmission by Inductive Link Dedicated to Implantable Devices. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, Seattle, WA, USA, 18–21 May 2008; pp. 3057–3060.
  72. Xu, W.; Luo, W.; Sonkusale, S. Fullly Digital BPSK Demodulator and Multi Level LSK Back Telemetry for Biomedical Implant Transceivers. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. II 2009, 56, 714–718. [Google Scholar]
  73. Lee, S.-Y.; Cheng, C.-J.; Liang, M.-C. A Low-Power Bidirectional Telemetry Device with a Near-Field Charging Feature for a Cardiac Microstimulator. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circ. Syst 2011, 5, 357–367. [Google Scholar]
  74. Hu, Y.; Sawan, M. A Fully Integrated Low-Power BPSK Demodulator for Implantable Medical Devices. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst 2005, 52, 2552–2562. [Google Scholar]
  75. Deng, S.; Hu, Y.; Sawan, M. A High Data Rate QPSK Demodulator for Inductively Powered Electronics Implants. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Kos, Greece, 21–24 May 2006.
  76. Luo, Z.; Sonkusale, S. A Novel BPSK Demodulator for Biological Implants. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Part I 2008, 55, 1478–1484. [Google Scholar]
  77. Zhou, M.; Liu, W.; Wang, G.; Sivaprakasam, M.; Yuce, M.R.; Weiland, J.D.; Humayun, M.S. A Transcutaneous Data Telemetry System Tolerant to Power Telemetry Interference. Proceedings of the 28th IEEE International Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, New York, NY, USA, 30 August–3 September 2006; pp. 5884–5887.
  78. Zhou, M.; Liu, W. A Non-Coherent PSK Receiver with Interference-Canceling for Transcutaneous Neural Implants. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Solid-State Circuit, San Francisco, CA, USA, 11–15 February 2007; pp. 156–593.
  79. Zhou, M.; Yuce, M.R.; Liu, W. A Non-Coherent DPSK Data Receiver with Interference Cancellation for Dual-Band Transcutaneous Telemetries. IEEE J. Sold State Circ 2008, 43, 2003–2012. [Google Scholar]
  80. Gong, C.-S.A.; Yao, K.-W.; Shiue, M.-T.; Lin, P.-Y.; Huang, C.-N. A Miniaturized PSK Demodulation Device fo Short-Range Wireless Neural Prosthetic Systems. Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engneering, Shanghai, China, 16–18 May 2008; pp. 1565–1568.
  81. Kim, J.; Chae, M.S.; Wu, L.; Liu, W. A Fully Integrated DPSK Demodulator for High Density Biomedical Implants. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, Baltimore, USA, 20–22 November 2008; pp. 93–96.
  82. Li, C.P.; Wu, Z.H.; Li, B. A New Integrated Low-Power BPSK Demodulator for Wireless Implantable Neural Recording System. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electron Devices and Solid-State Circuits, Hong Kong, 15–17 December 2010; pp. 1–4.
  83. Sonkusale, S.; Luo, Z. A Wireless Data and Power Telemetry System Using Novel BPSK Demodulator for Non-Destructive Evaluation of Structures. Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE Sensors Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, 28–31 October 2007; pp. 300–303.
  84. Xu, W.; Luo, Z.; Sonkusale, S. Biomedical Implant Transceiver with Novel Multi Level LSK Back Telemetry and Fully Digital BPSK Demodulation. Proceedings of 2009 IEEE 35th Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference, Cambridge, MA, USA, 3–5 April 2009.
  85. Elamary, G.; Chester, G.; Neasham, J. An Analysis of Wireless Inductive Coupling for High Data Rate Biomedical Telemetry Using a New VHDL n-PSK Modulator. Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Electronics Circuits and Systems, Yasmine Hammamet, Tunisia, 13–16 December 2009; pp. 211–214.
  86. Elamary, G.; Chester, G.; Neasham, J. A Simple Digital VHDL QPSK Modulator Designed Using CPLD/FPGAs for Biomedical Devices Applications. Proceedings of the World Congress on Biomedical Engineering, London, UK, 1–3 July 2009.
  87. Kim, D.K.; Lee, H.S. Phase-Silence-Shift-Keying for Power-Efficient Modulator. IEICE Trans. Commun 2009, E92-B, 2324–2326. [Google Scholar]
  88. Asgarian, F.; Sodagar, A.M. A High-Data-Rate Low-Power BPSK Demodulator and Clock Recovery Circuit for Implantable Biomedical Devices. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Neural Engineering, Antalya, Turkey, 29 April–2 May 2009.
  89. Asgarian, F.; Sodagar, A.M. A Carrier-Frequency-Independent BPSK Demodulator with 100% Data-Rate-to-Carrier-Frequency Ratio. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, Paphos, Cyprus, 3–5 November 2010; pp. 29–32.
  90. Baikoussis, N.G.; Apostolakis, E.; Papakonstantinou, N.A.; Sarantitis, I.; Dougenis, D. Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Implanted Cardiac Prostheses and Metallic Cardiovascular Electronic Devices. Ann. Thorac Surg 2011, 91, 2006–2011. [Google Scholar]
  91. Baikoussis, N.G.; Karanikolas, M.; Siminelakis, S.; Matsagas, M.; Papadopoulos, G. Baseline Cerebral Oximetry Values in Cardiac and Vascular Surgery Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. J. Cardiothorac. Surg 2010, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  92. He, X. Fully Integrated Transceiver Design in SOI Process. Ph.D. Thesis,. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  93. Maymandi-Nejad, M.; Sachdev, M. A Novel Auto-Zero Technique for a Bio-Implantable Blood Pressure Monitoring Device. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, London, UK, 29 November–1 December 2006; pp. 194–197.
  94. Ershadi, M.H.; Poudeh, M.B.; Eshtehardiha, S. Fuzzy Logic Controller Based Genetic Algorithm on the Step-Down Converter. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Smart Manufacturing Application, Goyang-si, Korea, 9–11 April 2008; pp. 324–328.

Appendix

Table
Table A1. ASK modulations used in telemetric wireless and implanted devices.
Table A1. ASK modulations used in telemetric wireless and implanted devices.
TechniqueCarrier (MHZ)CMOS (μm)Data Rate (Mbps)Power consumptionPower Supply (V)Chip area (mm2)ApplicationsYear [ref]
ASK-0.8-0.47–1.963 mW-4.82Neural system2003 [30]
ASK2500.18--1.8-Phyiological signal2004 [31]
ASK10.60.004–0.01870 μW2.7-Neural System2006 [32]
ASK1.50.250.007–0.04531 μW2.5-Neural System2010 [33]
ASK200.350.0010.062 μW--Cochlear implant2004 [34]
ASK100.180.50029.52 μW--Cochlear Implants2010 [35]
ASK100.50.20060 μW3.3-Complex implants2000 [37]
ASK100.352<84 μW3.3-Complex implants2006 [29]
ASK100.1812.75 mW1.8-Complex implants2008 [38]
ASK200.2513.17 mA2.53.62Endoscope system2006 [39]
ASK0.2500.18--1.8-Nerves system2004 [40]
ASK20.1810.5 mW1.2-Wireless sensor2006 [46]
ASK40.180.3001 mW1.85.04Telemetry Applications2009 [47]
ASK20.350.01010.234 mW3.2-3.4-General2004 [28]
ASK20.35-1.01 mW3.30.0030General2007 [48]
ASK2o.350.2501.01 mW3.30.0030General2008 [49]
ASK3000.3510.58 μW2.5–2.83.2General2008 [50]
ASK20.1810.336 mW--General2008 [51]
ASK20.181o.396 mW1.83.6e-3General2009 [52]
ASK13.560.351.20.306 mW-3.2General2010 [53]
ASK100.351-3–4.2-General2011 [54]
Table
Table A2. FSK modulations used in telemetric wireless and implanted devices.
Table A2. FSK modulations used in telemetric wireless and implanted devices.
TechniqueOperated Carrier (MHZ)CMOS Technology (μm)Data Rate (Mbps)Power consumptionPower SupplyChip area (mm2)ApplicationsYear [Ref]
FSK447---Low battery-ECG2000 [56]
FSK2–201.510.55 mW50.67General2002 [57]
FSK-0.35-3 mW30.78General2002 [58]
FSK2–201.520.5 mW50.41General2003 [59]
FSK5–101.540.38 mW50.29General2004 [60]
FSK402–4050.18-33.41 μA1.5-Biological signal2006 [62]
AFSK22/50.182.50.47 mW10.016General2007 [63]
DFSK5/100.1850.022 mW10.004General2007 [63]
FSK6.4590.35450 kbps–Mbps0.02 mW2.50.003Physiological sensors2010 [64]
FSK88–1081.50.001-1.50.21Physiological sensors2005 [65]
FSK4330.50.3300.550–1.2 mW3.30.39Physiological sensors2007 [66]
FSK0.5360.50.2500.431 mW3-Physiological sensors2008 [67]
Table
Table A3. PSK modulations used in telemetric wireless and implanted devices.
Table A3. PSK modulations used in telemetric wireless and implanted devices.
TechniqueOperated Carrier (MHZ)CMOS Technology (μm)Data Rate (Mbps)Power consumptionPower SupplyChip area (mm2)ApplicationsYear [ref]
BPSK13.560.181.120.414 mW1.8400 × 370Neuromuscular stimulator2004 [70]
OQPSK13.560.188-1.8-Neuromuscular stimulator2008 [71 ]
BPSK13.560.50.1–1.695 mW3.30.1Brain stimulator2008 [72]
PSK0.2500.3560 bpm31.5 μW51.5 × 1.6Cardiac stimulator2011 [73]
BPSK13.560.181.510.610 mW1.80.19General2005 [74]
QPSK13.560.1840.75 mW1.8-General2006 [75]
BPSK13.560.50.0203 mW-1General2008 [76]
DPSK20-1–26 mW--Neural System2006 [77]
PSKMulti frequency0.351–26.2 mW-2.6 × 1.7Neural System2007 [78]
DPSK200.351–26.2 mW-2.6 × 1.7Neural System2008 [79]
QCPSK-0.180.8000.059 mW1.8–3.30.005Neural prosthesis2008 [80]
DPSK220.3548.4 mW-1.4 × 1Neural Implants2008 [81]
BPSK100.352485.4 μW3.30.17Neural System2010 [82]
BPSK–LSK13.560.50.8002.3 mW--Complex System2008 [83]
BPSK–LSK13.560.5-2.3 mW1.65–3.3536 × 546 μm2Complex System2009 [84]
BPSK100.1820310 μW1.8-Complex System2009 [85]
BPSK100.1810119 μW1.8-visual prostheses2010 [86]
Sensors 12 00297f1 1024
Figure 1. Architecture for data and power transmission system.
Figure 1. Architecture for data and power transmission system.
Sensors 12 00297f1 1024
Sensors 12 00297f2 1024
Figure 2. Communication technologies for wireless telemetry.
Figure 2. Communication technologies for wireless telemetry.
Sensors 12 00297f2 1024
Sensors 12 00297f3 1024
Figure 3. Modulation techniques used in biomedical devices.
Figure 3. Modulation techniques used in biomedical devices.
Sensors 12 00297f3 1024
Sensors 12 00297f4 1024
Figure 4. Principle of ASK modulation.
Figure 4. Principle of ASK modulation.
Sensors 12 00297f4 1024

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hannan, M.A.; Abbas, S.M.; Samad, S.A.; Hussain, A. Modulation Techniques for Biomedical Implanted Devices and Their Challenges. Sensors 2012, 12, 297-319. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120100297

AMA Style

Hannan MA, Abbas SM, Samad SA, Hussain A. Modulation Techniques for Biomedical Implanted Devices and Their Challenges. Sensors. 2012; 12(1):297-319. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120100297

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hannan, Mahammad A., Saad M. Abbas, Salina A. Samad, and Aini Hussain. 2012. "Modulation Techniques for Biomedical Implanted Devices and Their Challenges" Sensors 12, no. 1: 297-319. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120100297

APA Style

Hannan, M. A., Abbas, S. M., Samad, S. A., & Hussain, A. (2012). Modulation Techniques for Biomedical Implanted Devices and Their Challenges. Sensors, 12(1), 297-319. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120100297

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop