Next Article in Journal
Automatic Recognition of Aggressive Behavior in Pigs Using a Kinect Depth Sensor
Previous Article in Journal
Tracking Architecture Based on Dual-Filter with State Feedback and Its Application in Ultra-Tight GPS/INS Integration
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multi-Mode Electromagnetic Ultrasonic Lamb Wave Tomography Imaging for Variable-Depth Defects in Metal Plates

State Key Lab of Power Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2016, 16(5), 628; https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050628
Submission received: 24 March 2016 / Revised: 26 April 2016 / Accepted: 27 April 2016 / Published: 2 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)

Abstract

:
This paper proposes a new cross-hole tomography imaging (CTI) method for variable-depth defects in metal plates based on multi-mode electromagnetic ultrasonic Lamb waves (LWs). The dispersion characteristics determine that different modes of LWs are sensitive to different thicknesses of metal plates. In this work, the sensitivities to thickness variation of A0- and S0-mode LWs are theoretically studied. The principles and procedures for the cooperation of A0- and S0-mode LW CTI are proposed. Moreover, the experimental LW imaging system on an aluminum plate with a variable-depth defect is set up, based on A0- and S0-mode EMAT (electromagnetic acoustic transducer) arrays. For comparison, the traditional single-mode LW CTI method is used in the same experimental platform. The imaging results show that the computed thickness distribution by the proposed multi-mode method more accurately reflects the actual thickness variation of the defect, while neither the S0 nor the A0 single-mode method was able to distinguish thickness variation in the defect region. Moreover, the quantification of the defect’s thickness variation is more accurate with the multi-mode method. Therefore, theoretical and practical results prove that the variable-depth defect in metal plates can be successfully quantified and visualized by the proposed multi-mode electromagnetic ultrasonic LW CTI method.

1. Introduction

The dispersion and multi-mode characteristics of ultrasonic Lamb waves (LW) indicate that the group velocity of a particular mode of LW varies with the product of frequency and waveguide thickness (frequency–thickness product, FTP) [1,2]. Based on the dispersion characteristics, the cross-hole tomography imaging (CTI) method utilizes the time-of-flight (TOF) to reconstruct the thickness distribution of the defect area so as to obtain the image of the defect [3,4,5]. The concerned imaging area is divided into M × N meshes, and the transmitters and receivers are respectively arranged along the two sides of the imaging area. When some LW rays pass through the meshes with defects, the group velocities will change with the area thickness, and this leads to the changes in the TOF of the LW rays. The distribution of the slowness (the reciprocal of the group velocity) can be calculated by solving:
T i = j = 1 n L i j S j   ( i = 1 , 2 , ... , m )
where Lij is the length of the i-th LW ray in the j-th mesh, Ti is the TOF of the i-th LW ray, Sj is the slowness of the j-th mesh, m is the total number of LW rays, and n is the total number of meshes.
Each particular mode of LW has different through-thickness displacement values, and each is sensitive to different depths of defects [6]. The majority of CTI research is focused on image reconstruction for fixed-depth defects, but the imaging for variable-depth defects suffers relatively poor quality, and the depth variation can hardly be reconstructed. The relationship between detecting signals and the depths of defects has been studied [7,8,9,10], but the research objects had different defects of different depths, as opposed to varying depths within a single defect. Endoh demonstrated a photoacoustic microscope (PAM) to detect metal planes with titled or variable-depth subsurface defects [11], while the detecting accuracy was limited because the image of the defect was not constructed.
Related research about multi-mode LW CTI is mostly confined to comparing the imaging quality of different experimental methods using different modes of LWs, and only one particular mode of LW is applied in each imaging experiment. A continuous wavelet transform method was used in Ho’s work to analyze multi-mode LW propagation [12]. However, at present, there is nearly no practical multi-mode LW CTI method for variable-depth defects.
This work attempts to define the sensitivity of multi-mode LWs in terms of working frequency and waveguide thickness, to explore the variation pattern of the defined sensitivity, and to propose a novel multi-mode electromagnetic LW CTI method for variable-depth defects in metal plates.

2. LW’s Sensitivity to Thickness

To be clear, in the near and local range of a given defect, the thickness of the area outside the defect is defined as the “fundamental thickness” in this work. Figure 1a illustrates a typical circular defect with variable depth in an aluminium plate. According to the above definition, the fundamental thickness of Part 1 is d0, and the fundamental thickness of Part 2 is d1.
Based on the dispersion characteristics of LWs, higher-order LWs can hardly propagate through the defect area where the FTP is relatively small. Therefore, only A0- and S0-mode LWs are applied in the CTI in this work, and the working points are selected at the relatively small FTP area in order to avoid the interference of multi-mode LWs.
According to the dispersion equations of LWs [13], the dispersion curves of a LW’s group velocity in the small FTP area (less than 3000 Hz*m) of an aluminium plate are calculated and shown in Figure 1b, where the longitudinal wave velocity and transverse wave velocity are respectively evaluated as 6300 m/s and 3300 m/s. The working point Ac is the demarcation of an A0-mode LW’s group velocity monotonicity varying with the FTP. The group velocities of working points on the left side of Ac will get bigger as the FTP grows, and those on the right side of Ac will get smaller as the FTP grows. Therefore, in this work, the working point Ac is defined as the cut-off working point of an A0-mode LW, and the corresponding FTP xa is defined as the cut-off FTP of an A0-mode LW. In a similar way, the working point Sc in Figure 1b is defined as the cut-off working point of an S0-mode LW, and the corresponding FTP xs is defined as the cut-off FTP of an S0-mode LW.
In this work, the LW’s sensitivity to thickness Ssen(f, d) at a given working point is defined as the rate of change of a LW’s theoretical slowness of thickness variation. Therefore, the sensitivity of a particular mode of LW Ssen(f, d) can be expressed as the absolute partial derivative of a LW’s theoretical slowness Sj of its fundamental thickness d:
S s e n ( f , d ) = | S j _ t h e ( f , d ) d |
where Sj_the(f, d) is the theoretical slowness of a particular mode of LW. Since the sensitivity of each mode of LW will vary in fundamental thickness, relatively high sensitivity at a given fundamental thickness can hardly be guaranteed if only one single-mode LW is applied in the CTI. Therefore, by the complementation of a multi-mode LW, there will almost always be at least one mode of LW that is relatively highly sensitive to different fundamental thicknesses so as to greatly improve the imaging quality of a variable-depth defect by the multi-mode LW CTI method.
On the basis of dispersion curves in Figure 1b, the definition of slowness in Equation (1) and the definition of a LW’s sensitivity in Equation (2), the variation curves of A0- and S0-mode LW sensitivity Ssen(f, d) varying in fundamental thickness at different working frequencies can be respectively calculated and illustrated as the two-dimensional distribution in the frequency–thickness plane, as shown in Figure 2. In consideration of a LW’s high attenuation due to a higher frequency, as well as its poor recognition of defects due to a lower frequency, the working frequencies in this work are selected as 100 kHz to 1000 kHz. Different values of sensitivity Ssen(f, d) are expressed as different contour lines in Figure 2, and the difference values between adjacent contour lines are the same.
As illustrated in Figure 2a, the sensitivity of an A0-mode LW decreases as the fundamental thickness or working frequency increases. The dotted line represents the FTP that is equal to the cut-off FTP of the A0-mode LW xa, and the working area should be at the lower left part of the dotted line. For a given working frequency, the sensitivity is relatively high when the fundamental thickness is relatively small. Figure 2b illustrates that the sensitivity of an S0-mode LW increases as the fundamental thickness or working frequency increases and when the FTP is less than the cut-off FTP of an S0-mode LW. The dotted line represents the FTP that is equal to the cut-off FTP of an S0-mode LW xs, and the working area should be at the lower left part of the dotted line. For a given working frequency, the sensitivity is relatively high when the fundamental thickness is relatively large.
The sensitivity of an S0-mode LW decreases near the point Sc (cut-off FTP) because the derivative of group velocity curve almost reaches zero. Furthermore, the cut-off curve fd = xs is defined according to the cut-off FTP. In theoretical research, the cut-off FTP can be decreased to less than the FTP of point Sc so as to prevent the working area of the S0-mode LW from falling into the near neighbor of Sc. In practical detection and imaging for defects, the working area of an S0-mode LW nearly never reaches close to the near neighbor of Sc, because the thickness of the defect area is always smaller than the thickness of the healthy area. Therefore, the potential poor sensitivity of an S0-mode LW near the neighbor of Sc can be theoretically and practically avoided.
The sensitivity value of a corresponding selected contour line is defined as the sensitivity threshold STH in this work, for both A0-mode and S0-mode LWs. Further, the area in which Ssen(f, d) is greater than STH is defined as the sensitive area. Therefore, the A0-mode LW is more sensitive to thickness variation when the thickness is relatively small, and the S0-mode LW is more sensitive when the thickness is relatively large. This lays the theoretical foundation for the cooperation principle and method of multi-mode LW CTI for variable-depth defects.

3. Principles and Procedures of Multi-Mode LW CTI

On the basis of the A0-mode and S0-mode LWs’ sensitivity to FTP, the cooperation principles for multi-mode LW CTI are provided as:
(1)
The FTP of an A0-mode LW and an S0-mode LW should be respectively less than xa and xs, which are respectively the cut-off FTP of an A0-mode LW and an S0-mode LW, in order to preserve the monotonicity of the LW group velocity.
(2)
Based on the sensitivity threshold STH, the working areas of an A0-mode LW and S0-mode LW should be respectively located in their own sensitive areas to increase the imaging sensitivity.
(3)
An A0-mode LW should be mainly applied in a small-thickness situation, and an S0-mode LW should be mainly applied in a large-thickness situation, according to the investigation results of LW’s sensitivity to thickness.
(4)
The working areas of an A0-mode LW and an S0-mode LW at their own working frequencies should partially overlap each other in order to guarantee that, for a given thickness, at least one mode of LW is sensitive. Specifically, the upper limit thickness of an A0-mode LW working area should be greater than the lower limit thickness of an S0-mode LW working area.
The determination of working parameters and operating points of an A0-mode LW and S0-mode LW is significantly important for their cooperation and thus multi-mode LW CTI. Figure 3 illustrates the principles and methods for determining the working parameters of an A0-mode LW and an S0-mode LW.
The procedures for working parameter and operating point determination are as follows:
(1)
Set the sensitivity thresholds STH respectively for the A0-mode and S0-mode LWs.
(2)
Locate the curve fd = xs in Figure 3a, which is the sensitivity distribution of the S0-mode LW. The working area of the S0-mode LW should be at the lower left part of the curve.
(3)
Locate the straight line d = d0 in Figure 3a, where d0 is the thickness of the healthy area. The working area of the S0-mode LW should be confined to the left part of the straight line. Because the S0-mode LW is more sensitive when the thickness is relatively large, the thickness of the healthy area (known quantity) should be figured on the sensitivity distribution plane of the S0-mode LW, and the working areas of the S0-mode LW should firstly be determined.
(4)
Calculate the intersection point coordinates (d0, fs) of the curve fd = xs and the straight line d = d0, and take fs as the working frequency of the S0-mode LW. If the working frequency of the S0-mode LW is bigger than fs, then the working area will not cover the thickness of the healthy area, and, if the working frequency is smaller than fs, the sensitive thickness range that the S0-mode LW covers greatly decreases. Therefore, fs at the intersection point is almost the perfect working frequency of the S0-mode LW.
(5)
Locate the contour line Ssen(f, d) = STH in Figure 3a, and the working area of the S0-mode LW should be confined to the upper right part of the contour line, which is the sensitive area of the the S0-mode LW.
(6)
Calculate the intersection point coordinates (dL, fs) of the straight line f = fs and the contour line Ssen(f, d) = STH to obtain the lower limit dL, and the working area of the thickness of the S0-mode LW at working frequency fs is [dL, d0]. The sensitive-thickness range of the S0-mode LW is maximized by the method proposed above.
(7)
Set the overlapping width dZ(dZ > 0) of the A0-mode and S0-mode LWs working areas in Figure 3b to obtain the working area of the thickness of the A0-mode LW [0, dL + dZ]. The overlapping width is to ensure that the sensitive working thickness by the cooperation of the A0-mode and S0-mode LWs can completely cover the thickness of the variable-depth defect area.
(8)
Locate the curve fd = xa in Figure 3b. The working area of the A0-mode LW should be confined to the lower left part of the curve, which is the cut-off FTP of the A0-mode LW
(9)
Calculate the intersection point coordinates (dL + dZ, fa1) of the curve fd = xa and the straight line d = dL + dZ.
(10)
Locate the contour line Ssen(f, d) = STH in Figure 3b, and the working area of the A0-mode LW should be confined to the lower left part of the contour line, which is the sensitive area of the the A0-mode LW.
(11)
Calculate the intersection point coordinates (dL + dZ, fa2) of the contour line Ssen(f, d) = STH and the straight line d = dL + dZ.
(12)
Select the smallest of fa1 and fa2 as the working frequency fa of the A0-mode LW. If the contour line Ssen(f, d) = STH is under the curve fd = xa, fa2 is selected as the working frequency fa. Otherwise, if the contour line Ssen(f, d) = STH is above the curve fd = xa, fa1 is selected as the working frequency fa. This is to maximize the sensitive working thickness of the A0-mode LW to be [0, dL + dZ].
After the determination of working parameters and operating points of the A0-mode LW and S0-mode LW, the procedures of multi-mode LW CTI can be concluded:
(1)
Calculate the working frequencies and working areas of the A0-mode and S0-mode LWs based on the proposed cooperation principles.
(2)
Respectively implement the single A0-mode and single S0-mode LWs to detect the defect area and obtain the TOF.
(3)
Conduct the CTI respectively based on the A0-mode and S0-mode LWs using the TOF.
(4)
Conduct data fusion of CTI results from the A0-mode and S0-mode LWs.
The CTI results of the single A0-mode and single S0-mode LWs are respectively obtained based on the above working parameters, and the data fusion of CTI results from the A0-mode and S0-mode LWs is to be conducted. For a certain imaging mesh, its thickness, calculated from single A0-mode LW CTI, is displayed as da, and its thickness, calculated from single S0-mode LW CTI, is displayed as ds. According to the working parameters and operating points of the A0-mode and S0-mode LWs, the sensitive thickness range of the A0-mode LW is [0, dL + dZ], and the sensitive thickness range of the S0-mode LW is [dL, d0].
(1)
In the condition of da∈[0, dL + dZ] and ds∈[dL, d0], or in the condition of da∉[0, dL + dZ] and ds∉[dL, d0], the mesh thickness after fusion is dadd = 0.5da + 0.5ds. In this situation, da is in the sensitive thickness range of the A0-mode LW, and ds is in the sensitive thickness range of the S0-mode LW (or neither da nor ds is in the corresponding sensitive thickness range), which means the calculated thicknesses are both expected ones, so the weighted average value is selected as the final thickness of the mesh.
(2)
In the condition of da∈[0, dL + dZ] and ds∉[dL, d0], the mesh thickness after fusion is dadd = da. In this situation, only da is in the sensitive thickness range of the A0-mode LW, but ds is not in the sensitive thickness range of the S0-mode LW, so the calculated thickness ds should not be considered. That means the mesh thickness is in the sensitive thickness range of the A0-mode LW [0, dL + dZ]; therefore, da is selected as the final thickness of the mesh.
(3)
In the condition of da∉[0, dL + dZ] and ds∈[dL, d0], the mesh thickness after fusion is dadd = ds. In this situation, only ds is in the sensitive thickness range of the S0-mode LW, but da is not in the sensitive thickness range of the A0-mode LW, so the calculated thickness da should not be considered. That means the mesh thickness is in the sensitive thickness range of the S0-mode LW [dL, d0]; therefore, ds is selected as the final thickness of the mesh.

4. Experiments and Results

The multi-mode LW CTI method was implemented on a 3-mm thick aluminum plate with a variable-depth defect. Figure 4a illustrates the schematic diagram of the experimental system. The contra-flexure coils (CFC) were applied as the transmitting and receiving coils for the transmitters and receivers to separately stimulate and receive near-pure single A0-mode and S0-mode LWs [14]. The pure single-mode EMAT was realized by the configuration of the distance l between the two adjacent annular wires along the radial direction, which is supposed to be half of the wavelength of the desired mode of LW. The transmitters were excited by the power amplifier, which was controlled by the principal computer. The LW were converted into electrical signals by the receivers. Then, the detected signals were amplified and filtered by the signal conditioner and subsequently collected by the DAQ card. The collected data were finally sent to the principal computer to be analyzed for LW CTI.
The 600 mm × 600 mm imaging area in the aluminum plate was divided into 120 × 120 meshes, as shown in Figure 4b. The variable-depth defect was composed of two parts: Part 1 is located at (310 mm, 350 mm), the diameter D1 is 120 mm, and the depth d01 is 1 mm; Part 2 is located at (300 mm, 350 mm), the diameter D2 is 60 mm, and the depth d02 is 2 mm. It can be seen that the fundamental thickness of Part 1 is 3 mm, and the fundamental thickness of Part 2 is 2 mm.
Based on the proposed principles and procedures of LW CTI, the calculated working frequencies of the A0-mode and S0-mode LWs were respectively 270 kHz and 700 kHz. Table 1 illustrates the structure parameters of the single A0-mode EMAT and the single S0-mode EMAT. For each single-mode LW detection, 14 transmitters and 14 receivers were respectively located at the two sides of the imaging area.
Firstly, one of the A0-mode transmitters stimulated the pure A0-mode LW in the aluminum plate, all 14 A0-mode receivers received the pure A0-mode LW, and the 14 TOF were extracted by the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) method. Similar procedures were conducted for all 14 A0-mode transmitters, so there were a total of 196 (14 × 14) groups of TOF extracted from the single A0-mode LW detection experiment. Secondly, the S0-mode transmitters and receivers were implemented in the detection experiment, and the procedures were similar. Fourteen S0-mode transmitters respectively stimulated the pure S0-mode LW in the aluminum plate, and the 14 S0-mode receivers received the pure S0-mode LW. Thus, there were also a total of 196 (14 × 14) groups of TOF extracted from the single S0-mode LW detection experiment.
The 196 groups of TOF extracted from the A0-mode LW detection, and the 196 groups of TOF extracted from the S0-mode LW detection were respectively implemented in the simultaneous iterative reconstruction technique to reconstruct the defect image, in which the solution threshold was set as 0.05%, and the relaxation parameter was 0.1. The thickness distribution results of single A0-mode and single S0-mode LW CTI are respectively shown in Figure 5a,b.
As illustrated in Figure 5a, the reconstruction image and profile of Part 2 of the variable-depth defect are relatively clear when the single A0-mode LW is applied. However, many artifacts appear in the image, and the profile of Part 1 is nearly submerged by the artifacts. When the single S0-mode LW is applied, the reconstruction image and profile of Part 1 of the variable-depth defect are relatively clear. However, the image of Part 2 is seriously distorted, its profile severely blurred. Therefore, the reconstruction image and profile of the variable-depth defect suffer relatively low quality when only the single-mode LW is implemented in the CTI.
On the basis of the proposed data fusion principles and methods, the thickness distributions from the single A0-mode and single S0-mode LW CTI were fused, as illustrated in Figure 5c. The reconstruction images and profiles of both Part 1 and Part 2 of the variable-depth defect are relatively clear, and the artifacts are greatly reduced. Additionally, the fused thickness distribution from the multi-mode LW CTI is closer to the actual shape and profile of the variable-depth defect.
The thickness distribution curves at y = 350 mm were respectively extracted from Figure 5a–c, and the results are respectively shown in Figure 6a–c.
It can be seen that, when the single A0-mode LW is applied, the thickness distribution curve of Part 2 fits the actual thickness curve quite well, but that of Part 1 suffers poor fitting. Figure 6b indicates that when the single S0-mode LW is applied, the thickness distribution curve of Part 1 fits the actual thickness curve well, but that of Part 2 can hardly reflect the actual thickness curve.
The thickness distribution curve extracted from the multi-mode LW CTI shows an obvious ladder shape, as illustrated in Figure 6c. The calculated thickness distribution curve displays a relatively higher degree of fitting for the actual thickness curves of both Part 1 and Part 2.
Therefore, the proposed multi-mode LW CTI method is proven to be able to accurately quantify and visualize variable-depth defects in metal plates.

5. Conclusions

This work proposes a novel multi-mode electromagnetic ultrasonic LW CTI method for variable-depth defects in metal plates. The dispersion characteristics of LWs indicate that different modes of LWs are sensitive to different thicknesses of metal plates, and the sensitivity of a given mode of LWs varies with the thickness. Moreover, the single-mode LW CTI method has here been shown to suffer low resolution when it is used in variable-depth situations. The sensitivities of A0-mode and S0-mode LWs on thickness variation were theoretically studied and demonstrated on a frequency–thickness plane. Related results show that, for certain working frequencies, A0-mode LW is more sensitive to thickness variation on small thickness areas, and S0-mode LW is more sensitive on large thickness areas. Based on the above theoretical results, the principles and procedures for the cooperation of A0- and S0-mode LW CTI are proposed. Additionally, the experimental platform for multi-mode LW CTI on an aluminum plate with a variable-depth defect was set up in this work to verify the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed imaging method. Results show that the defect imaging obtained by the multi-mode LW CTI method more accurately reflects the actual thickness variation, while neither S0 nor A0 single-mode method was able to distinguish thickness variation in the defect region. Theoretical and practical results prove that the proposed multi-mode LW CTI method can more accurately quantify and visualize variable-depth defects in metal plates.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 51277101), the Royal Society-NSFC International Exchanges Award (No. IE150600), the Royal Academy of Engineering Newton Research Collaboration Program (No. NRCP/1415/91) and the Royal Academy of Engineering Distinguished Visiting Fellowship program (No. DVF1415/2/17).

Author Contributions

Wei Zhao contributed to the conception of the reported research and helped revise the manuscript. Songling Huang contributed significantly to the procedure and the design of the proposed multi-mode LW CTI method and helped revise the manuscript. Yu Zhang contributed significantly to the designing, the performing as well as the result analysis of the experiments, and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. Shen Wang helped design the experiments and perform the analysis with constructive discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, F.C.; Meng, G.; Ye, L.; Lu, Y.; Kageyama, K. Dispersion analysis of Lamb waves and damage detection for aluminum structures using ridge in the time-scale domain. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2009, 20, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Baid, H.; Schaal, C.; Samajder, H.; Mal, A. Dispersion of Lamb waves in a honeycomb composite sandwich panel. Ultrasonics 2015, 56, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. McKeon, J.C.P.; Hinders, M.K. Parallel projection and crosshole Lamb wave contact scanning tomography. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1999, 106, 2568–2577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Malyarenko, E.V.; Hinders, M.K. Fan beam and double crosshole Lamb wave tomography for mapping flaws in aging aircraft structures. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 108, 1631–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Prasad, S.M.; Balasubramaniam, K.; Krishnamurthy, C.V. Structural health monitoring of composite structures using Lamb wave tomography. Smart Mater. Struct. 2004, 13, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Leonard, K.R.; Hinders, M.K. Multi-mode Lamb wave tomography with arrival time sorting. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2005, 117, 2028–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Oyadiji, S.O.; Feroz, T. Applications of PZT sensors and finite element analysis in defect detection in bars. In Proceedings of the 2nd International workshop on Structural health monitoring, Stanford, CA, USA, 8–10 September 1999; pp. 1048–1057.
  8. Sposito, G.; Cawley, P.; Nagy, P.B. Crack profile reconstruction by means of potential drop measurements. Rev. Prog. Quant. Nondestruct. Eval. 2007, 894, 733–740. [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu, Z.H.; Zhang, Y.N.; He, C.F.; Wu, B. Defect detection in helical and central wires of steel strands using advanced ultrasonic guided wave technique with new type magnetostrictive transducers. In Proceedings of IEEE 2008 Ultrasonics Symposium, Beijing, China, 2–5 November 2008; pp. 832–835.
  10. Miller, C.A.; Hinders, M.K. Classification of flaw severity using pattern recognition for guided wave-based structural health monitoring. Ultrasonics 2014, 54, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Endoh, H.; Miyamoto, K.; Hiwatashi, Y.; Hoshimiya, T. Observation of tilted or wedge-shaped subsurface defects and their nondestructive evaluation by photoacoustic microscopy. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 42, 3052–3053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ho, K.S.; Billson, D.R.; Hutchins, D.A. Ultrasonic Lamb wave tomography using scanned EMATs and wavelet processing. Nondestr. Test. Eval. 2007, 22, 19–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Alleyne, D.N.; Cawley, P. Optimization of Lamb wave inspection techniques. NDT E Int. 1992, 25, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Huang, S.L.; Wei, Z.; Zhao, W.; Wang, S. A new omni-directional EMAT for ultrasonic Lamb wave tomography imaging of metallic plate defects. Sensors 2014, 14, 3458–3476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Research object in an aluminium plate. (a) A typical circular defect with variable depth and (b) the dispersion curves of a Lamb wave (LW)’s group velocity in the aluminium plate.
Figure 1. Research object in an aluminium plate. (a) A typical circular defect with variable depth and (b) the dispersion curves of a Lamb wave (LW)’s group velocity in the aluminium plate.
Sensors 16 00628 g001
Figure 2. Two-dimensional distribution of sensitivity Ssen(f, d) on the frequency–thickness plane. (a) A0-mode LW and (b) S0-mode LW.
Figure 2. Two-dimensional distribution of sensitivity Ssen(f, d) on the frequency–thickness plane. (a) A0-mode LW and (b) S0-mode LW.
Sensors 16 00628 g002
Figure 3. Principles for determining the working parameters. (a) S0-mode LW working parameters and (b) A0-mode LW working parameters.
Figure 3. Principles for determining the working parameters. (a) S0-mode LW working parameters and (b) A0-mode LW working parameters.
Sensors 16 00628 g003
Figure 4. Experimental platform for multi-mode LW cross-hole tomography imaging (CTI). (a) Schematic diagram of the experimental system and (b) location parameters of the experiment.
Figure 4. Experimental platform for multi-mode LW cross-hole tomography imaging (CTI). (a) Schematic diagram of the experimental system and (b) location parameters of the experiment.
Sensors 16 00628 g004
Figure 5. Thickness distribution results of LW CTI. (a) Single A0-mode LW CTI; (b) single S0-mode LW CTI; and (c) multi-mode LW CTI.
Figure 5. Thickness distribution results of LW CTI. (a) Single A0-mode LW CTI; (b) single S0-mode LW CTI; and (c) multi-mode LW CTI.
Sensors 16 00628 g005aSensors 16 00628 g005b
Figure 6. Thickness distribution curves at y = 350 mm from LW CTI. (a) Single A0-mode LW CTI; (b) single S0-mode LW CTI; and (c) multi-mode LW CTI.
Figure 6. Thickness distribution curves at y = 350 mm from LW CTI. (a) Single A0-mode LW CTI; (b) single S0-mode LW CTI; and (c) multi-mode LW CTI.
Sensors 16 00628 g006aSensors 16 00628 g006b
Table 1. Structure parameters of single A0-mode EMAT and single S0-mode EMAT.
Table 1. Structure parameters of single A0-mode EMAT and single S0-mode EMAT.
Structure ParametersA0 Mode EMATS0 Mode EMAT
Working frequency (kHz)270700
l (mm)4.23.6
Outer diameter of the coil (mm)37.832.4
Inner diameter of the coil (mm)12.610.8
Number of windings2424

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhao, W. Multi-Mode Electromagnetic Ultrasonic Lamb Wave Tomography Imaging for Variable-Depth Defects in Metal Plates. Sensors 2016, 16, 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050628

AMA Style

Huang S, Zhang Y, Wang S, Zhao W. Multi-Mode Electromagnetic Ultrasonic Lamb Wave Tomography Imaging for Variable-Depth Defects in Metal Plates. Sensors. 2016; 16(5):628. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050628

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Songling, Yu Zhang, Shen Wang, and Wei Zhao. 2016. "Multi-Mode Electromagnetic Ultrasonic Lamb Wave Tomography Imaging for Variable-Depth Defects in Metal Plates" Sensors 16, no. 5: 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050628

APA Style

Huang, S., Zhang, Y., Wang, S., & Zhao, W. (2016). Multi-Mode Electromagnetic Ultrasonic Lamb Wave Tomography Imaging for Variable-Depth Defects in Metal Plates. Sensors, 16(5), 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050628

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop