Next Article in Journal
A Nonlinear Framework of Delayed Particle Smoothing Method for Vehicle Localization under Non-Gaussian Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Comparisons of Satellite Data, Signals, and Measurements between the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System and the Global Positioning System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Planar Position Sensor Based on Mono Sensing Electrode and Hybrid-Frequency Excitation

College of Engineering, ZheJiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2016, 16(5), 691; https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050691
Submission received: 6 March 2016 / Revised: 7 May 2016 / Accepted: 9 May 2016 / Published: 13 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)

Abstract

:
A new way of measuring planar position for micrometric and sub-micrometric applications is presented with a mono sensing electrode and hybrid-frequency excitation. The sensing theory and operation principle are described and summarized, and a printed circuit board (PCB) sensor prototype is built and tested. It is shown by the experimental results that a very simple structure and geometric relationship are achieved. Meanwhile, displacement sensitivity on an order of 1.50 mV per micron and measurement repeatability better than 0.002 mm are easily fulfilled for a square zone of 256 mm2, making it a valuable alternative measurement device candidate for flexible and low-cost planar position detection.

1. Introduction

Micrometric and sub-micrometric positioning measurement plays an important role in precision metrology and manufacturing applications [1,2]. Their uses include linear positioning measurement, planar positioning measurement, and space positioning measurement, etc. [3,4]. Hence many types of sensor devices have emerged, such as laser interferometers, grating scales, and capacitive transducers [5,6,7]. However, most of them were originally designed for single dimension measurement, for instance, in a linear positioning mechanism or in a rotary servo motor. To perform an inspection in the 2D plane, the accumulation of single dimension sensors is inevitable in most cases, which leads to complicated structures and cumbersome size. Particularly, due to the orthogonal deviation of assembly, such combined apparatus can easily introduce Abbe and cumulative errors into the measurement results [8], so alternative methods of measuring planar position continue to be an open field of research of high interest [9]. Among these methods, planar gratings, optical image processing, and capacitive coupling strategies can serve as a relevant options, both for theoretical research and for technological applications. For example, in [10], two planar gratings were diagonally mounted on a planar moving stage for detecting planar position and deflection on the nanoscale. In [11,12], laser speckle patterns and diffuse-reflectivity images are analyzed for measuring 2D displacement with high dynamics, and in [13], a capacitive transducer utilizing eight sensing electrodes was developed for the detection of planar displacements. However, most planar grating devices involve high costs, despite their high resolution, and the existing capacitive coupling methods generally need to solve complex capacitance signals generated by multiple sensing electrodes. For the growing demand of absolute position measurement in the 2D plane, sensor devices of micrometric and sub-micrometric resolution with simple structures and low-cost have not been experimentally demonstrated.
This paper introduces a new approach to absolute planar position detection by employing a mono sensing electrode and a hybrid-frequency excitation scheme. The physical theory and operation principle are described and summarized. In addition, experiments are carried out with a PCB sensor prototype, to verify the feasibility and to demonstrate the advantages.

2. Theory and Principle

The proposed sensor design measures planar position by reading the amplitudes and phasors of dual AC voltage signals with different frequency. Figure 1 shows the basic structure of the new design. In order to establish an absolute measurement reference, a stator substrate is symmetrically divided into four quadrants designated as Q1–4 by the coordinate system Osxy. In each quadrant, a square emission electrode is assigned with sides Ws, and all four of the quadrant electrodes are isolated from each other by a clearance of δ to ensure electric isolation. On the mover substrate, a mono sensing electrode with sides Wm is arranged, meeting the condition that Wm is less than Ws. During position inspection, the mover is maintained to be parallel and aligned with the stator by a steady air gap d, while the mono sensing electrode concurrently covers the four emission electrodes.
For the synchronous perception of x-axis position and y-axis position, Figure 2a demonstrates a hybrid-frequency excitation circuit for the four quadrant electrodes, in which AC voltage sources E1 and E2 are introduced with different frequencies f1 and f2, and analog inverters IV1, IV2 are utilized in conjunction with four analog adders Add1–4. Figure 2b shows a signal processing circuit for the reading of planar position, where mono-sensing signal Us, coupled from the Q1–4 electrodes, is firstly buffered by a high input-impedance amplifier Amp1. Then the harmonic components of frequency f1 and frequency f2, Uf1 and Uf2, are extracted by band-pass filters Bp1 and Bp2, respectively. Hence dual DC outputs Ux and Uy, indicating the mover’s planar coordinates (x,y) in coordinate system Osxy, are derived through an amplitude demodulation module.
To summarize the operation principle, Figure 3 illustrates an equivalent circuit of the capacitive coupling process; in which C1–4 sequentially indicates the capacitors formed by the mono sensing electrode and the four emission electrodes located in Q1–4. Ri stands for the input resistance of Amp1, Ci stands for its input capacitance. Given time functions of E1 and E2 as:
{ e 1 ( t ) = u e sin ( 2 π f 1 t ) e 2 ( t ) = u e sin ( 2 π f 2 t )
The harmonic component Uf1 can be solved in vector form as:
U f 1 = u e k a k f 1 ( C 1 + C 4 C 2 C 3 ) ( 1 + ( 2 π f 1 R i C t o t a l ) 2 ) C t o t a l ( 1 + j 1 2 π f 1 R i C t o t a l )
where Ctotal means the sum of C1–4 and Ci, ka indicates the gain of Amp1, and kf1 stand for the attenuation of Bp1, respectively. Similarly, Uf2 can be deduced as:
U f 2 = u e k a k f 2 ( C 1 + C 2 C 3 C 4 ) ( 1 + ( 2 π f 2 R i C t o t a l ) 2 ) C t o t a l ( 1 + j 1 2 π f 2 R i C t o t a l )
Considering the high input-impedance of Amp1 and the common excitation frequency for a capacitive transducer, the imaginary parts of Equations (2) and (3) are far less than their real parts. In the case of 109 Ω for Ri, 100 kHz for f1,2, and 1 pF for Ctotal, imaginary part will be only 0.16% of the real part for both Uf1 and Uf2. Consequently, Equations (2) and (3) are approximated as:
{ U f 1 u e k a k f 1 ( C 1 + C 4 C 2 C 3 ) C t o t a l U f 2 u e k a k f 2 ( C 1 + C 2 C 3 C 4 ) C t o t a l
It is evident in Equation (4) that Uf1 is an amplitude modulated signal of capacitance pairs C1,4 and C2,3, while Uf2 is the amplitude modulated result of C1,2 and C3,4. According to the geometries declared in Figure 1, Equation (4) is furtherly reduced by replacing C1–4 with the Ideal Plate Capacitance Formula, hence expressed as:
{ U f 1 = 2 u e k a k f 1 ( w m δ ) + d C i ( w m δ ) ε 0 x U f 2 = 2 u e k a k f 2 ( w m δ ) + d C i ( w m δ ) ε 0 y
where ε0 represents the permittivity of the air gap d. Therefore, Uf1 and Uf2 behave as two linear functions of planar coordinates (x, y), since the remaining parameters can be treated as constants for a specific sensor device. Accordingly, the planar positon of the mover can be determined by deriving the amplitudes of Uf1 and Uf2 and by judging their in-phase or reversed-phase status versus E1 and E2, respectively. Such a function is performed by an amplitude demodulated module, which belongs to the previously mentioned signal processing circuit, as shown in Figure 2b.
To sum up, we can synthesize the expressions of amplitude demodulated outputs Uf1 and Uf2 as follows:
{ U x = 2 u e k a k f 1 k d ( w m δ ) + d C i ( w m δ ) ε 0 x U y = 2 u e k a k f 2 k d ( w m δ ) + d C i ( w m δ ) ε 0 y
where kd indicates the gain of amplitude demodulated module.
As for the effective measurement range, it is determined by the basic theory of capacitive coupling, of which the mono sensing electrode must cover the four quadrants’ electrodes concurrently. It implies that the transition of mono sensing electrode is restricted by:
{ | x | w m δ 2 | y | w m δ 2
In fact, to reduce fringing effects, a smaller measurement range is much preferred in practice compared with the maximum margin as defined in Equation (7).

3. Prototype and Experimental Setup

To verify the feasibility and to demonstrate the advantages of the new sensor design, a laboratory prototype was built with a PCB stator, aluminum mono sensing electrode, and an accessory board for sensing signal processing. On the PCB stator, four emission electrodes are arranged with sides of 30 mm and 0.2 mm clearance to each other. On the mover assembly, a mono sensing electrode with 18 mm side-length is fixed together with the accessory board on a Bakelite frame. Figure 4 shows a photograph of the sensor prototype.
The configuration of the test bench for our experimental investigations is shown in Figure 5. It mainly consists of a XY stage for operating the mover assembly, a function generator to supply E1 and E2, an oscilloscope to probe the signals, a digital multimeter for origin searching, and a motion controller for automatic planar scanning. The XY stage (M-531.DD1, Physik Instrumente, Karlsruhe, Germany) and the PCB stator are mounted on a vibration isolator table (T1220Q, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA). The XY stage has a motion resolution of 0.0001 mm and a positioning accuracy of 0.00025 mm. Moreover, the motion controller (Physik Instrumente C-884.4D) is capable of synchronous signal acquisition during scanning operation. Before experimental inspection, the planar scanning area is programmed to be a square zone of 256 mm2, scanning speed is set to 20 mm/s, sampling interval for Ux and Uy is set as 0.25 mm, and the origin for planar scanning operation is positioned by searching the zero output locations of Ux and Uy in x-axis direction and in y-axis direction. The hybrid-frequency excitation sources of E1 and E2 are adjusted to 100 kHz and 950 kHz with the same amplitude of 5 Vpp, and the air gap is adjusted to 1 mm.

4. Results and Discussion

Figure 6 shows the scanning result of Ux. Figure 7 demonstrates the nonlinear deviation of Ux for the reading of x-coordinate. From Figure 6 and Figure 7, we observe the following:
  • The peak-to-peak value of Ux is about 24.7139 V, thus the displacement sensitivity for the x-axis position is about 1.54 mV per micron. The variation of Ux is almost linearly related to the x-axis position, however, a nonlinear deviation with a level of 0.0087 mm to −0.0058 mm exists in Ux, which is approximately 0.11% of the full measurement range in the x-axis direction.
  • To evaluate the independence of Ux with respect to the transition that occurs in the y-axis direction, for each scanning position in the x-axis, the outputs of Ux at all the 65 positions of the y-axis, as shown in Figure 6, are adopted for the calculation of the uncertainty of x-coordinate readings. The utilized method is the standard deviation and the result is presented in Figure 8, where the maximum value is 0.0009 mm. It indicates that the transition of the mover in the y-axis direction merely affects the measurement result of the x-coordinate.
Figure 9 gives the scanning result of Uy. Accordingly, Figure 10 illustrates the nonlinear deviation of Uy for the reading of the y-coordinate. From Figure 9 and Figure 10, we observe the following:
  • The peak-to-peak value of Uy is 24.0039 V, thus the displacement sensitivity for the y-axis position is about 1.50 mV per micron. The variation of Uy is basically linear with respect to the y-axis position. A nonlinear deviation with a level of 0.066 mm to −0.037 mm exists in Uy, which is approximately 0.82% of the full measurement range in the y-axis direction.
  • Similarly, to evaluate the independence of Uy, for each scanning position in the y-axis, the outputs of Uy at all the 65 positions of the x-axis, as shown in Figure 9, are adopted for the calculation of the uncertainty of the y-coordinate readings. The result is presented in Figure 11, where the maximum value is 0.0012 mm. Thus the transition in the x-axis direction displays no evident influence on the measurement results of the y-coordinate.
  • Even though the displacement sensitivity and readings uncertainty show no significant differences between the two measurement directions, the nonlinear deviation suffers a sharp rise for the y-coordinate readings compared with the response of the x-axis. Considering the same signal processing circuit, such a diversity could be caused by the different excitation frequencies assigned for x-axis position sensing and for y-axis position sensing, namely the 100 kHz and the 950 kHz.
Finally, the experiment procedure including five repetitive scanning sequences is performed, and the obtained data is adopted to assess the repeatability for planar position measurement by calculating the standard deviation of the x-coordinate readings and y-coordinate readings at each of the scanning points. Figure 12a shows the repetitive error distribution of the x-coordinate readings, where the peak value is 0.0012 mm and the average in the full square zone is 0.0004 mm. Figure 12b presents the repetitive error distribution of the y-coordinate readings, in which the peak is 0.0018 mm and the average is 0.0007 mm.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the newly developed sensor design is capable of satisfying the requirements of micrometric planar position measurement in the millimeter range. On the other hand, reading quality may be further enhanced by reducing the measurement range or by improving the dynamic properties of the interface electronics.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, a new capacitive planar position sensor design is proposed. Its operation principle is summarized, and the general performance is investigated using a laboratory built PCB prototype. Based on the experimental results, the implemented mono sensing electrode and the hybrid-frequency excitation strategy are proved to be an effective method for the simplification of sensor structure and for the suppression of cross interference in 2D position measurement. Within a square zone of 256 mm2, the prototype achieves a displacement sensitivity of about 1.50 mV per micron and measurement repeatability better than 0.002 mm. In addition, due to the large dimensions and the strong coupling signal; the mono sensing electrode can be mounted separately from the accessory board. Thus we suggest that this research provides a valuable alternative solution for flexible and low-cost planar position detection applications on the micrometric and sub-micrometric scale.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 51105343, and in part by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China under Grant LQ12E05004.

Author Contributions

Hongxiang Yu wrote the paper and designed the idea; Yu Zhang designed the experiments; Mengfeng Shen performed the experiments; Hongli Zhang and Zhao Gao analyzed the data; Dongyun Wang contributed to the proof reading.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
PCBPrinted circuit board
2DTwo dimension
ACAlternative current
DCDirect current

References

  1. Gao, W.; Kim, S.W.; Bosse, H.; Haitjema, H.; Chen, Y.L.; Lu, X.D.; Knapp, W.; Weckenmann, A.; Estler, W.T.; Kunzmann, H. Measurement technologies for precision positioning. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 2015, 64, 773–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, P.; Takamura, T.; Takahashi, S.; Takamasu, K.; Sato, O.; Osawa, S.; Takatsuji, T. Development of high-precision micro-coordinate measuring machine: Multi-probe measurement system for measuring yaw and straightness motion error of XY linear stage. Precis. Eng. 2011, 35, 424–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mariko, K.; Kaoru, M. Calibration of linear encoders with sub-nanometer uncertainty using an optical-zooming laser interferometer. Precis. Eng. 2014, 38, 769–774. [Google Scholar]
  4. Huang, W.S.; Liu, C.W.; Hsu, P.L.; Yeh, S.S. Precision Control and Compensation of Servomotors and Machine Tools via the Disturbance Observer. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electr. 2010, 57, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shirinzadeh, B.; Teoh, P.L.; Tian, Y.; Dalvand, M.M.; Zhong, Y.; Liaw, H.C. Laser interferometry-based guidance methodology for high precision positioning of mechanisms and robots. Robot. Comsput. Integr. Manuf. 2010, 26, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Brown, D.; Friedrich, D.; Bruckner, F.; Carbone, L.; Schnabel, R.; Freise, A. Invariance of waveguide grating mirrors to lateral displacement phase Shifts. Opt. Lett. 2013, 38, 1844–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Smith, P.T.; Vallance, R.R.; Marsh, E. Correcting capacitive displacement measurement in metrology applications with cylindrical artefacts. Precis. Eng. 2005, 29, 324–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Meyer, H.U. An integrated capacitive position sensor. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 1996, 45, 521–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, C.H.; Cheng, C.H. Development of a grating based multi-degree-of freedom laser linear encoder using diffracted light. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2012, 181, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Y.M.; Yuan, M.Q.; Cao, J.R.; Cui, J.W.; Tan, J.B. Use of Two Planar Gratings to Measure 3-DOF Displacements of Planar Moving Stage. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2015, 64, 163–169. [Google Scholar]
  11. Thurner, T.; Zechner, C. Phase-based algorithm for 2D displacement estimation of laser speckle patterns. In Proceedings of the IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings, Victoria, BC, Canada, 12–15 May 2008; pp. 2173–2178.
  12. Ioan, A.I.; Mihai, A.; Guillaume, J.L. High Dynamics and Precision Optical Measurement Using a Position Sensitive Detector (PSD) in Reflection-Mode: Application to 2D Object Tracking over a Smart Surface. Sensors 2012, 12, 16771–16784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yu, J.P.; Wang, W.; Lu, K.Q.; Mei, D.Q.; Chen, Z.C. A planar capacitive sensor for 2D long-range displacement measurement. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. C 2013, 14, 252–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of the proposed planar position measurement method.
Figure 1. Schematic of the proposed planar position measurement method.
Sensors 16 00691 g001
Figure 2. Electronics circuit scheme. (a) Driving circuit for the four quadrant electrodes; (b) Signal processing circuit for the mono sensing electrode.
Figure 2. Electronics circuit scheme. (a) Driving circuit for the four quadrant electrodes; (b) Signal processing circuit for the mono sensing electrode.
Sensors 16 00691 g002
Figure 3. Equivalent circuit of the capacitive coupling process.
Figure 3. Equivalent circuit of the capacitive coupling process.
Sensors 16 00691 g003
Figure 4. Photograph of PCB sensor prototype.
Figure 4. Photograph of PCB sensor prototype.
Sensors 16 00691 g004
Figure 5. Configuration of the test bench.
Figure 5. Configuration of the test bench.
Sensors 16 00691 g005
Figure 6. Scanning result of Ux.
Figure 6. Scanning result of Ux.
Sensors 16 00691 g006
Figure 7. Nonlinear deviations of Ux.
Figure 7. Nonlinear deviations of Ux.
Sensors 16 00691 g007
Figure 8. Uncertainty of x-coordinate readings.
Figure 8. Uncertainty of x-coordinate readings.
Sensors 16 00691 g008
Figure 9. Scanning result of Uy.
Figure 9. Scanning result of Uy.
Sensors 16 00691 g009
Figure 10. Nonlinear deviations of Uy.
Figure 10. Nonlinear deviations of Uy.
Sensors 16 00691 g010
Figure 11. Uncertainty of the y-coordinate readings.
Figure 11. Uncertainty of the y-coordinate readings.
Sensors 16 00691 g011
Figure 12. Measurement repeatability. (a) Repetitive error of the x-coordinate readings; (b) Repetitive error of the y-coordinate readings.
Figure 12. Measurement repeatability. (a) Repetitive error of the x-coordinate readings; (b) Repetitive error of the y-coordinate readings.
Sensors 16 00691 g012

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, M.; Zhang, H.; Gao, Z.; Wang, D. Planar Position Sensor Based on Mono Sensing Electrode and Hybrid-Frequency Excitation. Sensors 2016, 16, 691. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050691

AMA Style

Yu H, Zhang Y, Shen M, Zhang H, Gao Z, Wang D. Planar Position Sensor Based on Mono Sensing Electrode and Hybrid-Frequency Excitation. Sensors. 2016; 16(5):691. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050691

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Hongxiang, Yu Zhang, Mengfeng Shen, Hongli Zhang, Zhao Gao, and Dongyun Wang. 2016. "Planar Position Sensor Based on Mono Sensing Electrode and Hybrid-Frequency Excitation" Sensors 16, no. 5: 691. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050691

APA Style

Yu, H., Zhang, Y., Shen, M., Zhang, H., Gao, Z., & Wang, D. (2016). Planar Position Sensor Based on Mono Sensing Electrode and Hybrid-Frequency Excitation. Sensors, 16(5), 691. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16050691

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop