Next Article in Journal
Fusing Bluetooth Beacon Data with Wi-Fi Radiomaps for Improved Indoor Localization
Previous Article in Journal
Integrating Statistical Machine Learning in a Semantic Sensor Web for Proactive Monitoring and Control
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 17
Issue 4
10.3390/s17040811
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Detecting Electron Transport of Amino Acids by Using Conductance Measurement

by
Wei-Qiong Li
1,
Bing Huang
1,
Miao-Ling Huang
1,
Lin-Lu Peng
1,
Ze-Wen Hong
1,
Ju-Fang Zheng
1,
Wen-Bo Chen
2,
Jian-Feng Li
3 and
Xiao-Shun Zhou
1,*
1
Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Advanced Catalysis Materials, Institute of Physical Chemistry, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China
2
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Materials Protection and Advanced Materials in Electric Power, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 200090, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2017, 17(4), 811; https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040811
Submission received: 27 February 2017 / Revised: 5 April 2017 / Accepted: 6 April 2017 / Published: 10 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Sensors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The single molecular conductance of amino acids was measured by a scanning tunneling microscope (STM) break junction. Conductance measurement of alanine gives out two conductance values at 10−1.85 G0 (1095 nS) and 10−3.7 G0 (15.5 nS), while similar conductance values are also observed for aspartic acid and glutamic acid, which have one more carboxylic acid group compared with alanine. This may show that the backbone of NH2–C–COOH is the primary means of electron transport in the molecular junction of aspartic acid and glutamic acid. However, NH2–C–COOH is not the primary means of electron transport in the methionine junction, which may be caused by the strong interaction of the Au–SMe (methyl sulfide) bond for the methionine junction. The current work reveals the important role of the anchoring group in the electron transport in different amino acids junctions.

1. Introduction

Understanding the electron transport of biomolecules, including peptides, DNA, and RNA, has received much attention for its relation to daily life activities and potential applications in molecular devices [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Such electron transport has been proved to play an important role in the function of metabolic cycles, enzymatic processes, photosynthesis, DNA damage, and so on [1,3,7,8,9].
Much attention has been paid to the electron transport of peptides, which join electron acceptors and donors with each other and can contribute to the redox reaction between them [3]. Electrochemical methods or scanning tunneling microscopes (STMs) have been used to explore the electron transport properties of peptides, as well as the effect of length, hydrogen bonding, molecular dipole moment, electric field, metal ion binding, and pH on the electrical characterization of peptides [1,3,10,11,12]. Moreover, peptides are formed by amino acid through peptide bonds [2], and the electron transport property of amino acid should have an impact on peptides. Thus, it is also important to study the electron transport of amino acid, which would be helpful in further understanding electron transport behavior in peptides. The tunneling current of amino acid molecules between two electrodes has been measured [13,14], but there is less report on the direct conductance measurement of amino acids junctions [15].
The break junction approach has been demonstrated to be an efficient method to measure the electron transport of molecular junctions [16,17,18,19,20,21]. In this article, we measure the conductance of amino acids by using an STM break junction [17,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Amino acids with different kinds of anchoring groups, including l-alanine, l-methionine, l-aspartic acid, and l-glutamic acid, were measured and compared. Especially, the influence of anchoring groups in electron transport will be discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

l-methionine, l-aspartic acid, and l-glutamic acid were purchased from Alfa-Aesar, and l-alanine was purchased from Aladdin. Those molecular structures are shown in Figure 1. Au(111) and mechanically cut Au wire were used as the substrate and tip, respectively. Au(111) electrode was annealed by butane flame before each experiment, which was followed by cooling to room temperature under pure N2. The electrode was immersed into an aqueous solution containing 0.1 mM target molecule and washed with ultrapure water (18.2 ΩM cm).
Conductance measurement was carried out using a scanning tunneling microscope break junction (STM-BJ) on the modified Nanoscope IIIa STM (Veeco, Plainview, NY, USA) [28,29]. The STM tip was continually controlled to approach and withdraw the substrate at a constant bias of 100 mV, while the tip current was recorded during the withdrawing progress. The tip withdrawing and current recording speed were 20 nm/s and 20 kHz, respectively. The current curves were treated by the logarithm and binning, and a conductance histogram was constructed. More details can be seen in our previous reports [30,31,32,33].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Amino Acid Only with Anchoring Groups of Amine and Carboxylic Acid

We firstly measured the single molecular conductance of alanine, which has only two anchoring groups: amine and carboxylic acid. The conductance value of alanine is shown in Figure 2. Conductance steps around 10−0.85 G0 (10947 nS), 10−1.85 G0 (1095 nS), and 10−3.7 G0 (15.5 nS) can be seen in Figure 2a, while the same values can also been observed in the conductance histogram (Figure 2b). The peak at 10−0.85 G0 has a much larger conductance value, and such large conductance values can also be found in the literature. This peak might be explained by the conductance of atomic contact influenced by an adsorbed molecule [34,35] or an electrode/π/electrode junction [36,37,38]. Since there is no aromatic ring in the current molecular system, the formation of an electrode/π/electrode junction can be ruled out. Thus, this conductance value can be attributed to the conductance of atomic contact influenced by an adsorbed molecule. The adsorption of O (with Ag) or CO (with Au) can also cause a similar conductance value with respect to Ag [39,40] and Au [41], respectively. However, the exact reason for this peak needs further experiment and calculation. We will not discuss this value since it can be seen in the other systems. The two sets’ conductance values of 10−1.85 G0 (1095 nS) and 10−3.7 G0 (15.5 nS) can be attributed to the different contacting configurations between the anchoring group and the electrode [42]. More than 90% of traces show the plateaus, while around 10% of curves have high and low conductance steps in the same conductance trace.
By comparing the conductance values of 2093 nS and 581 nS reported using a conductance screening tool for molecules [15], it may be stated that the different conductance values in the current study may be attributed to the different measurement methods and statistical methods for the histogram. Moreover, the current study was carried out under ambience in air, while an aqueous solution was used for the conductance measurement in the literature [15]. A solvent can also influence the work function of the electrode and change its Fermi energy [43,44], which would alter the conductance value of single molecular junctions. This may cause the difference in the results between the literature and the current study.

3.2. Amino Acid with Additional Carboxylic Acid Anchoring Group Besides Amine and Carboxylic Acid

It is also interesting how the electron transport of the molecular junction would change if there were another carboxylic acid in the molecule chain. Thus, the amino acid of aspartic acid and glutamic acid were also studied. Aspartic acid has one more carboxylic acid than alanine, while glutamic acid has one more –CH2 unit than aspartic acid. It is expected that these molecular junctions would have many contacting configurations between molecule and electrode, since those molecules have one more carboxylic acid group than does alanine.
The conductance measurement of aspartic acid is shown in Figure 3a,c, and conductance values of 10−1.85 G0 (1095 nS) and 10−3.7 G0 (15.5 nS) can be found. This shows that the main contacting configuration between aspartic acid and Au is the same as that for alanine and Au, since similar conductance histograms are found for alanine and aspartic acid. In other words, the aspartic acid junction should have the same electron transport as that of alanine junction, and the backbone of NH2–C–COOH, not NH2–C–C–COOH, is the primary means of electron transport for aspartic acid–Au junctions.
We also carried out an experiment on glutamic acid. Interestingly, 10−1.85 G0 (1095 nS) and 10−3.7 G0 (15.5 nS) were also found for this amino acid (Figure 3b,d). This result further demonstrates that such amino acids contact the electrode through the backbone of NH2–C–COOH. The configuration of the two carboxylic acid groups binding to both ends of the electrode is not favored. The chain of NH2–C–COOH is the main configuration for the formation of junctions with aspartic acid and glutamic acid.

3.3. Amino Acid with Methyl Sulfide (–SMe) Anchoring Groups Besides Amine and Carboxylic Acid

Now, we focus on the amino acid with additional methyl sulfide linker to explore the binding site of the molecular junction. Methionine was chosen for its methyl sulfide group, which can bind to the Au electrode [45].
A conductance value at 10−3 G0 (77.5 nS) was found for methionine, while no peaks at 10−1.85 G0 (1095 nS) and 10−3.7 G0 (15.5 nS) were observed (Figure 4). These conductance values together with other amino acids are summarized in Table 1. The difference between methionine and other amino acids may be caused by the strong interaction of Au–(SMe) in methionine. The breaking force for Au–(SMe) is 0.7 nN, while 0.6 nN is found for Au–(NH2) and Au–(COOH) [46,47], which shows that the Au–(SMe) bond is stronger than the other two. Comparing the different breaking forces among Au–(SMe), Au–(NH2), and Au–(COOH), it is favorable to form Au–(SMe) contact during the self-assembly monolayer. Thus, the formation of single molecular junctions may be between Au–(SMe) and Au–(NH2) or between Au–(SMe) and Au–(COOH), and fewer junctions are formed between Au–amine and Au–carboxylic acid. The current result with no conductance peak at 10−1.85 G0 (1095 nS) or at 10−3.7 G0 (15.5 nS) also supports this suspecting. Furthermore, the conductance of methionine (77.5 nS) is lower than the high value of alanine, aspartic acid, and glutamic acid (1095 ns). This may be caused by the longer electron transport (MeS–C–C–NH2 or MeS–C–C–C–COOH) for methionine compared to that for the other amino acid (NH2–C–COOH).

4. Conclusions

We have measured the single molecular conductance of amino acids, including alanine, methionine, aspartic acid, and glutamic acid. The results show that those amine acids with only anchoring groups of amine and carboxylic acid bind to the electrode through the backbone of NH2–C–COOH. For a strong interaction between Au–(SMe) bond, NH2–C–COOH is not the primary means of electron transport in the methionine junction. The current work shows the important role of the anchoring group in electron transport in the amino acid junctions.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21573198 and 21273204), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LR15B030002), Shanghai Pujiang Program (15PJ1402600), and the Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning, and Open Research Project of State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces of Xiamen University (201612).

Author Contribution

W.-Q.L., B.H., M.-L.H. and Z.-W.H. carried out the experiments, L.-L.P., W.-B.C. and J.-F.L. contributed to the analyzed the results, X.-S.Z., W.-Q.L. and J.-F.Z. conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the results, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

All the authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Scullion, L.; Doneux, T.; Bouffier, L.; Fernig, D.G.; Higgins, S.J.; Bethell, D.; Nichols, R.J. Large conductance changes in peptide single molecule junctions controlled by ph. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 8361–8368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Di Ventra, M.; Taniguchi, M. Decoding DNA, rna and peptides with quantum tunnelling. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shah, A.; Adhikari, B.; Martic, S.; Munir, A.; Shahzad, S.; Ahmad, K.; Kraatz, H.-B. Electron transfer in peptides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 1015–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Guo, C.L.; Wang, K.; Zerah-Harush, E.; Hamill, J.; Wang, B.; Dubi, Y.; Xu, B.Q. Molecular rectifier composed of DNA with high rectification ratio enabled by intercalation. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 484–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cardamone, D.M.; Kirczenow, G. Single-molecule device prototypes for protein-based nanoelectronics: Negative differential resistance and current rectification in oligopeptides. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 165403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sharma, V.K.; Jelen, F.; Trnkova, L. Functionalized solid electrodes for electrochemical biosensing of purine nucleobases and their analogues: A review. Sensors 2015, 15, 1564–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hennig, D.; Neißner, C.; Velarde, M.G.; Ebeling, W. Effect of anharmonicity on charge transport in hydrogen-bonded systems. Phys. Rev. B 2006, 73, 024306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schlag, E.W.; Sheu, S.-Y.; Yang, D.-Y.; Selzle, H.L.; Lin, S.H. Distal charge transport in peptides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3196–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mitchell, P. Chemiosmotic coupling in oxidative and photosynthetic phosphorylation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1807, 1507–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sek, S.; Misicka, A.; Swiatek, K.; Maicka, E. Conductance of α-helical peptides trapped within molecular junctions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 19671–19677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kitagawa, K.; Morita, T.; Kimura, S. A helical molecule that exhibits two lengths in response to an applied potential. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6330–6333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Xiao, X.Y.; Xu, B.Q.; Tao, N.J. Changes in the conductance of single peptide molecules upon metal-ion binding. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6148–6152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhao, Y.; Ashcroft, B.; Zhang, P.; Liu, H.; Sen, S.; Song, W.; Im, J.; Gyarfas, B.; Manna, S.; Biswas, S.; et al. Single-molecule spectroscopy of amino acids and peptides by recognition tunnelling. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 466–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ohshiro, T.; Tsutsui, M.; Yokota, K.; Furuhashi, M.; Taniguchi, M.; Kawai, T. Detection of post-translational modifications in single peptides using electron tunnelling currents. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 835–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hihath, J.; Tao, N. Rapid measurement of single-molecule conductance. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 265204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Arroyo, C.R.; Frisenda, R.; Moth-Poulsen, K.; Seldenthuis, J.S.; Bjornholm, T.; van der Zant, H.S.J. Quantum interference effects at room temperature in opv-based single-molecule junctions. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Xu, B.Q.; Tao, N.J. Measurement of single-molecule resistance by repeated formation of molecular junctions. Science 2003, 301, 1221–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Perrin, M.L.; Verzijl, C.J.O.; Martin, C.A.; Shaikh, A.J.; Eelkema, R.; van EschJan, H.; van Ruitenbeek, J.M.; Thijssen, J.M.; van der Zant, H.S.J.; Dulic, D. Large tunable image-charge effects in single-molecule junctions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 282–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zheng, J.-T.; Yan, R.-W.; Tian, J.-H.; Liu, J.-Y.; Pei, L.-Q.; Wu, D.-Y.; Dai, K.; Yang, Y.; Jin, S.; Hong, W.; et al. Electrochemically assisted mechanically controllable break junction studies on the stacking configurations of oligo(phenylene ethynylene)s molecular junctions. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 200, 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tian, J.H.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, X.S.; Schollhorn, B.; Maisonhaute, E.; Chen, Z.B.; Yang, F.Z.; Chen, Y.; Amatore, C.; Mao, B.W.; et al. Electrochemically assisted fabrication of metal atomic wires and molecular junctions by mcbj and stm-bj methods. ChemPhysChem 2010, 11, 2745–2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tsutsui, M.; Taniguchi, M. Single molecule electronics and devices. Sensors 2012, 12, 7259–7298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sedghi, G.; Garcia-Suarez, V.M.; Esdaile, L.J.; Anderson, H.L.; Lambert, C.J.; Martin, S.; Bethell, D.; Higgins, S.J.; Elliott, M.; Bennett, N.; et al. Long-range electron tunnelling in oligo-porphyrin molecular wires. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 517–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Venkataraman, L.; Klare, J.E.; Nuckolls, C.; Hybertsen, M.S.; Steigerwald, M.L. Dependence of single-molecule junction conductance on molecular conformation. Nature 2006, 442, 904–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhou, X.S.; Liu, L.; Fortgang, P.; Lefevre, A.-S.; Serra-Muns, A.; Raouafi, N.; Amatore, C.; Mao, B.W.; Maisonhaute, E.; Schollhorn, B. Do molecular conductances correlate with electrochemical rate constants? Experimental insights. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7509–7516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rascón-Ramos, H.; Artés, J.M.; Li, Y.; Hihath, J. Binding configurations and intramolecular strain in single-molecule devices. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, L.; Gong, Z.L.; Li, S.Y.; Hong, W.J.; Zhong, Y.W.; Wang, D.; Wan, L.J. Molecular conductance through a quadruple-hydrogen-bond-bridged supramolecular junction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 12393–12397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yang, Y.; Liu, J.Y.; Yan, R.W.; Wu, D.Y.; Tian, Z.Q. Mechanism and characterization of electron transport through metal/molecule/metal junctions. Chem. J. Chin. Univ.-Chin. 2015, 36, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhou, X.S.; Liang, J.H.; Chen, Z.B.; Mao, B.W. An electrochemical jump-to-contact stm-break junction approach to construct single molecular junctions with different metallic electrodes. Electrochem. Commun. 2011, 13, 407–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, Z.B.; Hong, Z.W.; Li, D.F.; Wang, Y.H.; Zheng, J.F.; Shao, Y.; Zhou, X.S. The conductance of pyridine-based molecules measured in ambient air and electrolyte solution: Effect of surrounding. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2015, 10, 2931–2938. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chen, L.; Wang, Y.H.; He, B.; Nie, H.; Hu, R.; Huang, F.; Qin, A.; Zhou, X.S.; Zhao, Z.; Tang, B.Z. Multichannel conductance of folded single-molecule wires aided by through-space conjugation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 4231–4235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hong, Z.W.; Aissa, M.A.B.; Peng, L.L.; Xie, H.; Chen, D.L.; Zheng, J.F.; Shao, Y.; Zhou, X.S.; Raouafi, N.; Niu, Z.J. Quantum interference effect of single-molecule conductance influenced by insertion of different alkyl length. Electrochem. Commun. 2016, 68, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mao, J.C.; Peng, L.L.; Li, W.Q.; Chen, F.; Wang, H.g.; Shao, Y.; Zhou, X.S.; Zhao, X.Q.; Xie, H.; Niu, Z.J. Influence of molecular structure on contact interaction between thiophene anchoring group and au electrode. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 1472–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, F.; Peng, L.L.; Hong, Z.W.; Mao, J.C.; Zheng, J.F.; Shao, Y.; Niu, Z.J.; Zhou, X.S. Comparative study on single-molecule junctions of alkane- and benzene-based molecules with carboxylic acid/aldehyde as the anchoring groups. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, C.Z.; He, H.X.; Bogozi, A.; Bunch, J.S.; Tao, N.J. Molecular detection based on conductance quantization of nanowires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 76, 1333–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, Y.; Demir, F.; Kaneko, S.; Fujii, S.; Nishino, T.; Saffarzadeh, A.; Kirczenow, G.; Kiguchi, M. Electrical conductance and structure of copper atomic junctions in the presence of water molecules. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 32436–32442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Afsari, S.; Li, Z.; Borguet, E. Orientation-controlled single-molecule junctions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 9771–9774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Komoto, Y.; Fujii, S.; Nishino, T.; Kiguchi, M. High electronic couplings of single mesitylene molecular junctions. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 2431–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kiguchi, M. Electrical conductance of single c60 and benzene molecules bridging between pt electrode. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 073301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, T.; Vázquez, H.; Hybertsen, M.S.; Venkataraman, L. Conductance of molecular junctions formed with silver electrodes. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 3358–3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Aradhya, S.V.; Frei, M.; Halbritter, A.; Venkataraman, L. Correlating structure, conductance, and mechanics of silver atomic-scale contacts. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 3706–3712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Den Boer, D.; Coenen, M.J.J.; van der Maas, M.; Peters, T.P.J.; Shklyarevskii, O.I.; Elemans, J.A.A.W.; Rowan, A.E.; Speller, S. Electron transport through co studied by gold break-junctions in nonpolar liquids. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 15412–15416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, F.; Li, X.L.; Hihath, J.; Huang, Z.F.; Tao, N.J. Effect of anchoring groups on single-molecule conductance: Comparative study of thiol-, amine-, and carboxylic-acid-terminated molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15874–15881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Fatemi, V.; Kamenetska, M.; Neaton, J.B.; Venkataraman, L. Environmental control of single-molecule junction transport. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1988–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kotiuga, M.; Darancet, P.; Arroyo, C.R.; Venkataraman, L.; Neaton, J.B. Adsorption-induced solvent-based electrostatic gating of charge transport through molecular junctions. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 4498–4503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Batra, A.; Darancet, P.; Chen, Q.; Meisner, J.S.; Widawsky, J.R.; Neaton, J.B.; Nuckolls, C.; Venkataraman, L. Tuning rectification in single-molecular diodes. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 6233–6237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Frei, M.; Aradhya, S.V.; Hybertsen, M.S.; Venkataraman, L. Linker dependent bond rupture force measurements in single-molecule junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 4003–4006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ahn, S.; Aradhya, S.V.; Klausen, R.S.; Capozzi, B.; Roy, X.; Steigerwald, M.L.; Nuckolls, C.; Venkataraman, L. Electronic transport and mechanical stability of carboxyl linked single-molecule junctions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 13841–13845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sensors 17 00811 g001 550
Figure 1. Molecular structures of alanine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, and methionine.
Figure 1. Molecular structures of alanine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, and methionine.
Sensors 17 00811 g001
Sensors 17 00811 g002 550
Figure 2. Typical conductance (a) curves and (b) histogram of alanine (from 1000 curves) contacting with Au electrode at a bias of 100 mV.
Figure 2. Typical conductance (a) curves and (b) histogram of alanine (from 1000 curves) contacting with Au electrode at a bias of 100 mV.
Sensors 17 00811 g002
Sensors 17 00811 g003 550
Figure 3. Typical conductance curves for (a) aspartic acid and (b) glutamic acid. Conductance histograms of (c) aspartic acid (from 1380 curves) and (d) glutamic acid (from 3000 curves) using Au as electrode.
Figure 3. Typical conductance curves for (a) aspartic acid and (b) glutamic acid. Conductance histograms of (c) aspartic acid (from 1380 curves) and (d) glutamic acid (from 3000 curves) using Au as electrode.
Sensors 17 00811 g003
Sensors 17 00811 g004 550
Figure 4. Typical conductance (a) curves and (b) histogram of methionine (from 1150 curves) contacting with Au electrode.
Figure 4. Typical conductance (a) curves and (b) histogram of methionine (from 1150 curves) contacting with Au electrode.
Sensors 17 00811 g004
Table
Table 1. Summary of single molecular conductance of alanine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, and methionine.
Table 1. Summary of single molecular conductance of alanine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, and methionine.
MoleculesConductance (nS)
Alanine1095, 15.5
Aspartic acid1095, 15.5
Glutamic acid1095, 15.5
Methionine77.5

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, W.-Q.; Huang, B.; Huang, M.-L.; Peng, L.-L.; Hong, Z.-W.; Zheng, J.-F.; Chen, W.-B.; Li, J.-F.; Zhou, X.-S. Detecting Electron Transport of Amino Acids by Using Conductance Measurement. Sensors 2017, 17, 811. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040811

AMA Style

Li W-Q, Huang B, Huang M-L, Peng L-L, Hong Z-W, Zheng J-F, Chen W-B, Li J-F, Zhou X-S. Detecting Electron Transport of Amino Acids by Using Conductance Measurement. Sensors. 2017; 17(4):811. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040811

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Wei-Qiong, Bing Huang, Miao-Ling Huang, Lin-Lu Peng, Ze-Wen Hong, Ju-Fang Zheng, Wen-Bo Chen, Jian-Feng Li, and Xiao-Shun Zhou. 2017. "Detecting Electron Transport of Amino Acids by Using Conductance Measurement" Sensors 17, no. 4: 811. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040811

APA Style

Li, W. -Q., Huang, B., Huang, M. -L., Peng, L. -L., Hong, Z. -W., Zheng, J. -F., Chen, W. -B., Li, J. -F., & Zhou, X. -S. (2017). Detecting Electron Transport of Amino Acids by Using Conductance Measurement. Sensors, 17(4), 811. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040811

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop