Next Article in Journal
Unsupervised Machine Learning for Advanced Tolerance Monitoring of Wire Electrical Discharge Machining of Disc Turbine Fir-Tree Slots
Next Article in Special Issue
Electrochemical DNA Sensor Based on Carbon Black—Poly(Neutral Red) Composite for Detection of Oxidative DNA Damage
Previous Article in Journal
A Simulation Study Using Terrestrial LiDAR Point Cloud Data to Quantify Spectral Variability of a Broad-Leaved Forest Canopy
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Proton Transport in Gating Current in a Voltage Gated Ion Channel, as Shown by Quantum Calculations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 18
Issue 10
10.3390/s18103358
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Construction of Multiple Switchable Sensors and Logic Gates Based on Carboxylated Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes/Poly(N,N-Diethylacrylamide)

by
Xuemei Wu
1,†,
Xiaoqing Bai
2,†,
Yang Ma
1,†,
Jie Wei
1,
Juan Peng
3,
Keren Shi
4 and
Huiqin Yao
2,*
1
College of Pharmacy, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China
2
School of Basic Medical Sciences, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China
3
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
4
State Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Coal Utilization and Green Chemical Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Sensors 2018, 18(10), 3358; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18103358
Submission received: 3 September 2018 / Revised: 2 October 2018 / Accepted: 4 October 2018 / Published: 8 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membrane-Based Biosensing)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this work, binary hydrogel films based on carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes/poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide) (c-MWCNTs/PDEA) were successfully polymerized and assembled on a glassy carbon (GC) electrode surface. The electroactive drug probes matrine and sophoridine in solution showed reversible thermal-, salt-, methanol- and pH-responsive switchable cyclic voltammetric (CV) behaviors at the film electrodes. The control experiments showed that the pH-responsive property of the system could be ascribed to the drug components of the solutions, whereas the thermal-, salt- and methanol-sensitive behaviors were attributed to the PDEA constituent of the films. The CV signals particularly, of matrine and sophoridine were significantly amplified by the electrocatalysis of c-MWCNTs in the films at 1.02 V and 0.91 V, respectively. Moreover, the addition of esterase, urease, ethyl butyrate, and urea to the solution also changed the pH of the system, and produced similar CV peaks as with dilution by HCl or NaOH. Based on these experiments, a 6-input/5-output logic gate system and 2-to-1 encoder were successfully constructed. The present system may lead to the development of novel types of molecular computing systems.

1. Introduction

Molecular logic gates can carry out different computations at the molecular level, and the working mechanism or principle is similar to silicon processors [1,2,3,4]. Molecular logic gates, a type of logic gates system, can use biological materials or biomolecules such as enzymes, DNA, or proteins to establish basic or -simple molecular devices and equipment [3,4,5,6,7]. For example, Liu’s group successfully established 4-input/7-output biomolecular logic gates, and provided a new method to construct complex biomolecular logic gate system based on bio-electrocatalysis of natural DNA [8]. An adjustable electrocatalysis was constructed on the basis of multiple responsive interface poly (N-isopropylacrylamide co-N,N’-dimethylaminoethylmethacrylate) (P(NiPAAm-DMEM) films while the immobilization of glucose oxidase (GOD) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) on the surface of pyrolytic graphite (PG) electrodes was also used to construct logic gates by Liu and coworkers [9]. Because of their huge potential in different areas, including disease diagnosis, sensing, and drug release [10,11,12], the molecular logic gate system has attracted ever increasing attention.
In previous reports, the widely used probe compounds were ferrocene and its derivatives including ferrocene carboxylic acid, ferrocenylmethanol, ferrocene dicarboxylate, potassium ferrocyanide, and hydroquinone [1,13,14,15,16]. For example, Hu’s group [17] studied the switchable behaviors of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAA)-GOD film using ferrocene carboxylic acid as an electroactive probe. The permeability of the reduced graphene oxide/poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (rGO/PNIPAA) dual structure film was investigated by using ferrocene dicarboxylate as a molecular probe, and established a 4-input enabled OR (EnOR) logic gate system [18]. However, drug molecules are becoming increasingly popular probes in the field of electrochemistry and medical research, because some drug molecules with electroactivity can be used to investigate the properties of film systems in vitro or used as target drugs to treat diseases in vivo. Matrine and sophoridine are quinolizidine alkaloids isolated from traditional Chinese medicine such as Sophora flavescens, Sophora subprostrata, or Sophora alopecuroides, which are tetracyclic quinolizine compounds with a molecular skeleton and can be regarded as a combination of two quinolizine rings [19,20]. In recent years, it has been discovered that the alkaloids of S. flavescens exhibit anti-arrhythmic, anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrosis, anti-tumor, and numerous other significant pharmacological activities, and various formulations have been widely used in clinical practice [21,22,23,24]. Therefore, in the present work, we used matrine and sophoridine as target drug molecule probes to study the switching properties of the binary carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes/poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide) (c-MWCNTs/PDEA) film system. The electrochemical signals of matrine and sophoridine were amplified by means of electrocatalysis, and the 6-input/5-output logic gate systems were constructed. Currently, the logic gate system has become a research hotspot [3] and its applications for clinical drugs are expected in future clinical diagnosis and treatment research.
PDEA hydrogel films were synthesized on glassy carbon (GC) electrodes by cross-linking radical polymerization in this system. PDEA is a widely investigated sensitive polymer, its temperature and salt sensitivity have been reported in previous literature [25,26,27]. However, its methanol sensitivity, especially combined with its temperature and sulfate concentration sensitive on–off property has never been reported by the cyclic voltammetry (CV) method. This inspired us to increase the complexity of the logical gate system by increasing the number of outside stimuli. In the present work, the electroactive drug molecules, matrine and sophoridine, showed CV on–off behaviors at c-MWCNTs/PDEA-film electrodes upon external stimuli of pH, temperature, sulfate concentration, and methanol proportion. A logic gate system and 2-to-1 encoder were further constructed. This may open up the possibility of applying electroactive drug molecular probes in electrochemical biosensors or other devices based on multiple responsive electrocatalysis.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Reagents

N,N’-methylenethyl butyrateisacrylamide (BIS), urease (E.C. 3.5.1.5, type III, 39, 290 units g−1), esterase (17,000 units g−1), and N,N,N’,N’-tetramethylenediamine (TEMED) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (Beijing, China) and used without further purification. Matrine and sophoridine were purchased from Ningxia Zijinghua Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Yinchuan, China). Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were obtained from Shenzhen Nanotech Port Co. Ltd. (Shenzhen, China). N,N-diethylacrylamide (DEA) was purchased from TCI (Shanghai, China). Sodium persulfate (Na2S2O8) was purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Sodium sulfate (Na2SO4), sodium nitrate (NaNO3), potassium nitrate (KNO3), sodium chloride (NaCl), and magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) were purchased from Tianjin Haiguang Chemical Plant (Tianjin, China). All of the other reagents were of analytical grade. All solutions contained 0.15 M NaCl, and the pH was adjusted using dilute HCl or NaOH. All solutions were prepared with water purified twice by ion exchange and distillation.

2.2. Preparation of Poly(N,N-Diethylacrylamide) Hydrogel Films

The typical pre-gel solution containing 0.4 mg mL−1 Na2S2O8 initiator, 1.5 mg mL−1 BIS cross-linker, 0.46 mg mL−1 TEMED accelerator, and 0.5 M DEA monomer, was freshly prepared every time and the air removed with N2 before being cast. After about 8 min, the PDEA gel was formed on the surface of the glassy carbon (GC) electrode. During the whole polymerization process, the N2 atmosphere was maintained in the bottle. The formed PDEA-film electrode was then immersed in water for 20 min to remove the unreacted reagents.

2.3. Apparatus and Procedures

A CHI 660E electrochemical workstation (CH Instruments, Beijing, China) was used for electrochemical measurements using a typical three-electrode cell with a platinum flake as the counter electrode, a saturated calomel electrode as the reference, and the GC electrode with films as the working electrode.
The pH measurements were performed using a PHS-3C pH meter (Shanghai Precision & Scientific Instruments, Shanghai, China). The temperature of solutions in the cell was controlled by a DK-S14 thermostatic bath (Shanghai Jinghong Experimental Equipment Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) with the precision of ±0.5 °C. The Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded at a resolution of 4 cm−1 with a Spectrum Two FTIR spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Shanghai, China). The secondary distilled water used in the experiment was purified by the SZ-97 Automatic Pure water distiller (Shanghai Yarong Biochemical Instruments Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China). The thickness of PDEA films was estimated with a Stereo Discovery V12 stereomicroscope equipped with an AxioCam digital camera (Zeiss) (Tongzhoutongde (Beijing) instrument and meter co. LTD, China). The surface scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the films was obtained with a JSM 7500F scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at an acceleration voltage of 10.0 kV. After being treated with different pHs, temperature, Na2SO4 and methanol, the GC disks were immediately placed into liquid nitrogen to freeze the composite film structure. Afterward, they were placed in an ALPHA 1-2 lyophilizer (Beijing Bomaihang Equipment Co. Ltd., Beijing, China) for 24 h to remove all of the water from the samples. Before SEM imaging, the sample surface was coated with a thin gold film with an SBC-12 sputtering coater (KYKY Technology Development Ltd., Beijing, China). The surface morphology of c-MWCNTs was investigated via transmission electron microscopy (TEM, H-7650 Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of Poly(N,N-Diethylacrylamide) (PDEA) Films

Poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide) (PDEA) hydrogel films were polymerized on a GC electrode by radical cross-linking mainly according to previous reports in the literature [25,28] with certain modifications (as described in Section 2.2). A comparison with the commercial pure DEA sample by IR spectroscopy confirmed the formation of PDEA (Figure S1). The characteristic C=C stretching band at 1610 cm−1 observed for DEA monomers was not detected for PDEA, indicating that the DEA monomers were polymerized to PDEA, which was similar to the literature findings [28].
Matrine, an electroactive drug, was used to characterize PDEA film electrodes through cyclic voltammetry (CV) experiments. An obvious oxidation peak at around 1.02 V, which was the same as the literature [29], was observed at the bare GC electrodes due to electrochemical oxidation of matrine (Figure 1A, curve a). For PDEA film electrodes, the electrochemical oxidation peak current (Ipa) of matrine slightly decreased, and the peak potential shifted positively because the formation of the films hindered the drug from reaching the electrode surface to a certain degree (Figure 1A, curve b), indicating that PDEA hydrogel films had been successfully constructed on the surface of the GC electrode. Sophoridine is an isomer of matrine [30], since they have similar chemical structures (Figure S2). As shown in Figure 1B, sophoridine showed a similar electrochemical behavior to matrine. The electrochemical oxidation peak of sophoridine appeared at about 0.91 V, implying that sophoridine could also be used as an electroactive drug molecule to investigate the switching properties of films. In the following studies, matrine and sophoridine were used as typical molecule probes to study the multiple stimuli-responsive binary films.

3.2. pH Responsive Behaviors of Poly(N,N-Diethylacrylamide) Films

The pH-sensitive property of PDEA film electrodes was demonstrated by the CV responses of matrine and sophoridine. From pH 9.0 to 4.0 at 25 °C, the Ipa of matrine and sophoridine decreased drastically with decrease of pH (Figure 2A,B). If the Ipa in NaCl solutions at pH 9.0 was set as the “on” state, whereas that at pH 4.0 as the “off” state, the CV response could be switched between the “on” and “off” state by switching the film electrode in the solutions between 9.0 and 4.0. This pH-dependent switchable CV behavior of the system could be repeated several times with good reversibility (Figure 2C,D). The response time of the on-off transitions was greatly influenced by the thickness of the PDEA hydrogel films. The average thickness of the films in water estimated by stereomicroscopy was 410 ± 30 μm at pH 9.0 and 25 °C. The response time increased with the thickness of PDEA hydrogel films (data not shown), implying that the diffusion of the drug molecules through the films to theelectrode surface for electron exchange became more difficult when the hydrogel films become thicker. In addition, oxidation peak currents of the drug molecules showed a linear relationship with the square root of scan rates from 0.05 to 1.0 V s–1 at pH 9.0 and 25 °C, suggesting diffusion-controlled behavior of the drug molecules.
The probable changes of structure and the average thickness of PDEA films at different pHs of solution were investigated by SEM (Figure S3) and stereomicroscopy (Table 1). The results showed that PDEA films have a similar network structure and surface morphology at pH 4.0 and 9.0 (Figure S3A,B). The PDEA component carries no charge regardless of the surrounding pH. In addition, the average thickness of the films at pH 9.0 (410 µm) estimated by stereomicroscopy was nearly the same as that at pH 4.0 (405 µm) (Table 1). In the control experiments, matrine and sophoridine demonstrated pH-sensitive CV properties at the bare GC electrode. When the pH increased from pH 4.0 to 9.0, the Ipa of matrine and sophoridine increased correspondingly (Figure S4A,B). Thus, the main mechanism was attributed to the property of matrine and sophoridine, which are alkaloid drugs with pKa value of about 7.80−8.20 [31,32]. Their structure contains a tertiary amine nitrogen atom (1N), and an amide structure (2N) which has alkalinity. Amides cannot hydrolyze easily, so its main basicity is derived from 1N. The nitrogen atom in solution can provide lone pair electrons, and so the solutions become alkaline. When the pH decreased to 4.0, matrine was present in the form of a nitrogen cationic radical, which cannot transfer electrons to the electrode. As the amount of matrine in molecular form decreased, the oxidation peaks also decreased or even disappeared. When the pH increased to 9.0, matrine existed as a moleculer form, and the Ipa increased. In addition, the effect of the solution pH on the peak potentials was investigated (Figure S4). The oxidation peak potentials Epa hardly shift with increasing pH 4.0–9.0, which means that the voltammetric behaviors of matrine and sophoridine are not a proton transfer process, just an electron transfer process between the drugs and the GC electrode under the experimental conditions.
To verify the electron transfer mechanism between matrine and the electrodes, the electrochemical behavior of oxymatrine was further studied. The structures of oxymatrine and matrine are similar (Figure 3). No oxidation peak exists in the same potential window on the bare electrode in NaCl solutions at pH 9.0 (Figure S5), indicating that the electron transfer mechanism of matrine shown in Figure 3 is correct.
The pH of the solution can be controlled by in situ enzymatic catalysis [33,34,35]. The hydrolysis reaction of ethyl butyrate and urea was catalyzed by esterase (Est) and urease (Ur). For example, the film was immersed into the pH 6.5 NaCl solution containing esterase, urease, and matrine (Figure 2E, curve b). After the addition of ethyl butyrate, the pH of the solution began to decrease because of the production of butyric acid, and eventually reached 4.0. CV testing showed a small electrocatalytic oxidation peak (Figure 2E, curve c). Then urea was added, and the ammonia produced under urease catalysis caused an increase of pH. CV scanning was performed again, and the Ipa was markedly enhanced (Figure 2E, curve a). By adding ethyl butyrate and urea alternately to the enzyme solution of esterase and urease, the switchable behavior could be repeated many times between 4.0 and 9.0 (Figure 2F).

3.3. Temperature-Responsive Behaviors of Poly(N,N-Diethylacrylamide) Films

The CV responses of matrine and sophoridine at the PDEA-film electrode were extremely sensitive to ambient temperature, with a lower critical phase transition temperature (LCST) of about 32 °C (Figure 4A,B), which was similar to that found in the literature [25,36]. When the solution temperature was below 32 °C, the Ipa values of matrine and sophoridine on PDEA-film electrode were extremely large in NaCl solutions at pH 9.0, but the CV peak current considerably decreased when the temperature exceeded 32 °C. The temperatures at 25 °C and 40 °C were selected to study the thermal-sensitive switching behavior of the film system: the film was at the “on” state at 25 °C and the “off” state at 40 °C. The temperature sensitive properties of PDEA hydrogel could be repeated many times, and the response time was about 3–6 min (Figure 4C,D). In the control experiments, the peak currents of matrine and sophoridine at the bare electrode showed no obvious change (Figure S6), and thus confirmed that the temperature sensitive property of this system mainly depends on the PDEA hydrogel films.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) also supported the structural changes of PDEA films with temperature. After being immersed in NaCl solutions with pH 9.0 at different temperatures, the films showed a network structure with numerous microsized pores and channels at 25 °C (Figure 5, panel a), whereas they displayed a compact and smooth surface at 40 °C (Figure 5, panel c). The structure change with temperature was further verified by the change of films thickness with temperature in water. The average film thickness estimated by stereomicroscopy at 40 °C became 276 µm, much smaller than that at 25 °C (410 µm) (Table 1).

3.4. Na2SO4-Responsive Behaviors of Poly(N,N-Diethylacrylamide) Films

The CV responses of matrine and sophoridine at PDEA-film electrodes were also sensitive to the salt concentration in solution. When the testing solution contained no Na2SO4 at 25 °C, matrine and sophoridine showed relatively large oxidation peaks, and the films were at the “on” state. When the solution contained 0.35 M Na2SO4 under the same conditions, the matrine and sophoridine oxidation peaks were undetectable, and the films were at the “off” state. The Na2SO4-sensitive switching behaviors of matrine and sophoridine were also reversible. The “on” and “off” states of the system could be repeated several times (Figure 6C,D). For the control experiments, the peak currents of the drug probes at the bare electrode showed no distinct change in solutions containing 0 and 0.35 M Na2SO4 (Figure S7). That is, the Na2SO4-sensitive CV behaviors of matrine and sophoridine also should be ascribed to the PDEA component in the films.
Other types of salts, such as MgSO4, NaNO3, and NaCl, can also cause the phase transition of PDEA film and the CV switchable behavior of drug probes (Figure S8). The main difference between these salts was their different critical phase change concentration (SO42− (0.20 M) < Cl− (0.54 M) < NO3− (0.95 M). Na2SO4, NaCl, and NaNO3 contain the same cationic Na+ but different anions. The result is consistent with previous work [28]. The main difference is that this salt sensitivity can be used as an input signal to construct a logic gate system of drug molecules. According to the above test results, we selected Na2SO4 as the representative salt to discuss the sensitivity of the PDEA films. Na2SO4 caused the phase transition of the PDEA film, which was essentially the same as the temperature-induced phase change [37,38]. When the Na2SO4 concentration was lower than the critical concentration, PDEA exhibited a loose linear structure in which drugs easily diffused, resulting in increased CV response. When the Na2SO4 concentration became higher than its critical concentration, the hydrogen bonds between PDEA and water molecules considerably weakened, leading to a dense globular structure and preventing the drug molecules from reaching the electrode surface for electron exchange. The structural changes caused by the salt concentration can be further demonstrated by SEM (Figure 5, panel a and b) and stereomicroscopy (Table 1). The average thickness of PDEA films was 207 µm in the presence of 0.35 M Na2SO4, much smaller than 410 µm in the absence of Na2SO4 (Table 1).

3.5. Methanol-Responsive Behaviors of Poly(N,N-Diethylacrylamide) Films

The CV response of matrine and sophoridine on the PDEA electrode is also sensitive to the fraction of methanol in the mixture of water. When the content of methanol was lower than 20%, the CV responses of the drug molecular probes were very large and the peak currents were basically the same, indicating that the methanol content had little effect on the CV response. However, the CV peak current decreased to the minimum value at 10 µA when the content of methanol was between 20% and 30%. The behavior is reversible and can be repeated over several cycles (Figure 7C,D). When the content of methanol continues to increase, the CV response signals of the drug probes will increase with the increasing methanol content (Figure 7A,B). The switchable behavior is reversible and can be repeated over several cycles (Figure 7C,D), and only a very small decrease of Ipa is observed with the increase of cycles, although the reason for the decrease is not yet clear.
In the control experiments, the oxidation peak currents of matrine and sophoridine at the bare electrode showed no significant difference between the solution containing 0% and 20% methanol (Figure S9). We assumed that this is related to the structure change of PDEA. In previous literature, it was reported [39,40,41] that due to the inability of the tertiary amide groups in PDEA structures to form intramolecular hydrogen bonds, a compact spherical structure could not be formed, unlike PNIPAM which has a secondary amide group, which can form both intramolecular hydrogen bonds and extramolecular hydrogen bonds. Therefore, PNIPAM has a coil-to-globule-to-coil transition in water/methanol solutions of different proportions. This was further demonstrated by electrochemical signal testing (Figure 7). When the methanol fraction reaches 20%, the oxidation peak current heights of matrine and sophoridine decrease to 4.2 µA and 4.1 µA on the PNIPAM film electrode, respectively. However, their oxidation peak current heights merely reach 10 µA and 8.5 µA on PDEA film electrode, respectively. Meanwhile, we compared PDEA surface with PNIPAM using SEM (Figure S10). We found that the pore diameter of PNIPAM was much smaller than PDEA after 20% methanol treatment, which further supported the view that PDEA cannot form a compact spherical structure. The structural changes caused by the methanol fraction could be further demonstrated by stereomicroscopy (Table 1). The average thickness of PDEA films was 328 µm in the presence of 20% methanol. The result proves that PDEA hydrogel was not fully contracted (Table 1).

3.6. Electrocatalysis by Carboxylated Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes

In the logic gate system, adding an input is relatively easy, but adding an output signal is difficult. Even so, people are still working in this direction, because the logic gate with more output has a faster processing speed and stronger processing capacity, which can solve more complex practical problems. To increase the complexity of the logic gate circuit in this experiment, we used electrocatalytic amplification to increase the oxidation peak current of the drug probes and the number of threshold values.
Due to their unique properties and potential applications, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have become a hot topic worldwide. CNTs are divided into MWCNTs and single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs). MWCNTs consist of cylindrical graphene sheets of nanometer-scale diameters [42,43,44], which show unique properties, such as high electrical conductivity [45,46,47], high chemical stability [48,49], and extremely high mechanical strength and modulus [44,46]. However, their application is limited by the poor dispersion of MWCNTs. Hence, we prepared carboxylated multiwalled carbon nanotubes (c-MWCNTs) with good dispersion. The preparation methods and characterization are described in Supplementary materials. c-MWCNTs are often constructed on the electrode surface and used as electrochemical sensors to determine compounds. For example, Heidarimoghadam’s group [50] developed a novel method for quantifying furosemide in biological fluids based on the electro-reduction of Zn(II)–furosemide complex at a GC electrode modified with c-MWCNTs. The sensor was used for quantifying furosemide in drug and biological fluid samples. Bhawna and coworkers [51] explored an improved amperometric glutamate biosensor fabricated by immobilization of glutamate oxidase onto a hybrid of c-MWCNTs and gold nanoparticles attached onto a gold electrode through chitosan film, which showed remarkably enhanced sensitivity and selectivity for glutamate.
In our work, we constructed c-MWCNTs as the catalytic layer and PDEA as the outside stimulus response layer. Electrocatalytic amplification enables higher oxidation peak currents, which can increase the sensor’s threshold and the complexity of the logic gate. Through continuous testing, the optimum concentration of c-MWCNTs in combination with drug probes was 5 mg mL−1 (Figure 8A). The Ipa of matrine at c-MWCNTs/PDEA-film electrode increased considerably in comparison with the PDEA-film electrode (Figure 8A, curves a and f). The effective area of the electrode surface can be increased because of the large specific surface area of c-MWCNTs. The electron transfer between the electroactive molecules and electrode can be greatly promoted by c-MWCNTs due to its excellent conductivity. In addition, the coverage of c-MWCNTs on the electrode surface can also improve the porosity of the films. The linear range of the calibration curve for matrine is from 1.50 to 13.10 mM (Figure 8B, Inset) and could be expressed by the equation I(MT) (µA) = 2.895 + 4.040·c(MT) (mM) (R = 0.995), the detection limit is 2.01 × 10−4 M (S/N = 3). Similarly, the oxidation peak current of sophoridine is also proportional to its concentration range of 5.40–18.70 mM in solution, and the linear equation is I(SR) (µA) = 3.642 + 3.681·c(SR) (mM), (R = 0.996) and the detection limit is 1.98 × 10−4 M (S/N = 3). To examine the repeatability of the system, five c-MWCNTs/PDEA film electrodes were fabricated independently under the same conditions, and each of the five sensors was used to detect 10.00 mM matrine and sophoridine by repeated elution and determination in triplicate. The relative standard deviations (RSD) are 4.5% and 4.8%, respectively, suggesting that the system has good repeatability.

3.7. Switchable Electrocatalysis Controlled by pH, Temperature, SO42− Concentration and Methanol

Matrine and sophoridine exhibited pH-, temperature-, SO42−- and methanol-sensitive CV behavior on the c-MWCNTs/PDEA electrodes (Figure 9). For example, at pH 9.0 and 25 °C, when the c-MWCNTs/PDEA-film electrode was placed in the solution containing matrine without SO42− and methanol, a large CV catalytic oxidation wave was observed (Figure 9A, curve a). However, when the same c-MWCNTs/PDEA film was placed in the same solution at 40 °C, the electrocatalytic response became extremely small (Figure 9A, curve c) because the film was turned “off” for matrine at 40 °C, leading to the disruption of catalytic reactions. Therefore, the electrocatalytic oxidation of matrine can be switched “on–off” states by regulating the temperature of the solution between 25 °C and 40 °C. This temperature-sensitive and controllable electrocatalysis is reversible and can be repeated many times (Figure S11B). In addition, the CV oxidation peak current ratio, Ipa25/Ipa40, could be amplified by electrocatalysis, where Ipa25 and Ipa40 represented CV oxidation peak currents at 25 °C and 40 °C for the same c-MWCNTs/PDEA films, respectively. At the PDEA-film electrode in NaCl supporting solutions containing 0.010 M matrine, the Ipa25/Ipa40 ratio was about 8.3, whereas the ratio increased to about 15 at the c-MWCNTs/PDEA-film electrode. The electrocatalysis of matrine for the system can be modulated by SO42− concentration. This electrocatalytic behavior was at the “on” state in NaCl solutions containing matrine without SO42− at 25 °C (Figure 9A, curve a). By contrast, the system was turned “off” when the SO42− concentration was 0.35 M (Figure 9A, curve b). SO42−-triggered electrocatalysis of matrine can also be switched between the “on” and “off” states repeatedly and reversibly (Figure S11C). The electrocatalysis of matrine can be modulated by pH, but the regulation mechanism is different from the temperature and SO42−. Temperature and SO42− primarily affected the PDEA part of the binary c-MWCNTs/PDEA structure, whereas pH primarily affected the existing forms of the drug probes, causing them to exist as either molecules or ions. For example, matrine exists as a molecule at pH 9.0; when the c-MWCNTs/PDEA-film electrode was placed in the solution containing 0.010 M matrine without SO42− at 25 °C, a large CV catalytic oxidation wave appeared (Figure 9A, curve a). However, at pH 4.0, the electrocatalytic response became extremely small (Figure 9A, curve e). pH-triggered electrocatalysis of matrine could also be switched between the “on” and “off” states repeatedly and reversibly (Figure S11A). The effect of methanol is the most special. The presence of methanol can actually make the Ipa height of the drug probes change at the PDEA film electrode, however, when the fraction of methanol is 25%, the peak current cannot reach the minimum point, that is, the PDEA film cannot be completely closed. In other words, when the solution contains no methanol, matrine showed a large oxidation peak current, however, when the methanol proportion increased to 20%, the peak currents decreased to 30 µA and 28 µA, respectively (Figure 9A,B, curve b), and this behavior could be repeated over many cycles (Figure S11D). The temperature-, salt- and methanol- sensitive behavior of the film electrodes mainly depends on the morphological changes and swelling, which have good reproducibility and were demonstrated by SEM and stereomicroscopy results (Figure 5 and Table 1). However, the structure change of the films with pH is less possible for our system.

3.8. Establishment of a 6-Input/5-Output Logic Gate

The foundation of advanced and more complicated molecular logic devices is composed of basic or simple binary logic gates. A 6-input/5-output logic gate was developed on the basis of the above experimental results. The definitions of the six inputs are described in Table 2. The Ipa absolute values of matrine and sophoridine at the c-MWCNTs/PDEA-film electrodes within five different ranges were divided into five outputs with four thresholds (35, 25, 15, and 5 μA) according to different mechanisms. The 64 possible combinations of the six inputs and corresponding outputs are listed in Table S1, and the corresponding diagram is presented in Figure 10A. The Output A (Ipa ≥ 35 µA), of which input combinations were (011011), (111011), and (101011), was at the “1” state, and Outputs B, C, D, and E were at the “0” state. In these three cases, the films not only assumed a swollen structure but also the inner layer of the GC electrode contained c-MWCNTs. The electrocatalysis of drug probes by c-MWCNTs thus resulted in the largest CV response. The Output B (35 µA < Ipa ≤ 25 µA), which input combinations were (101001), (011001)and (111001), was at the “1” state, and Outputs A, C, D, and E were at the “0” state. When the methanol content was 20%, PDEA was not completely closed. c-MWCNTs would catalyze matrine and sophoridine to increase the oxidation peak current. With input combinations of (011010), (111010), and (101010), Output C (25 µA < Ipa ≤ 15 µA) was at the “1” state, while Outputs A, B, D, and E were at the “0” state. In these three cases, the PDEA films also assumed a swollen structure, but the inner layer of the GC electrode did not contain c-MWCNTs. Electrocatalysis is almost impossible in this situation, but the drugs were still able to diffuse through the films and easily transfer electrons to the electrode, thus resulting in a mid-range CV response. With input combinations of (011000), (111000), or (101000), Output D (15 µA < Ipa ≤ 5 µA) was at the “1” state, while Outputs A, B, C, and E were at the “0” state. When the solution contains 20% methanol and there is no c-MWCNTs layer assembled in the film electrode, PDEA hydrogel films cannot completely close and drug molecules can partially penetrate to the electrode surface and generate electrochemical signals. Output E (Ipa < 5 µA) was at “1” state in the remaining 52 combinations, while Outputs A, B, C, and D were at the “0” state. Under these conditions, the PDEA films changed into a compact structure, the drug molecular probes hardly diffused through the films to reach the electrode surface, or the drugs were present in the form of a nitrogen cationic radical, or both of these things happened at the same time, leading to an extremely small CV signal. The response characteristics and thresholds of each output are summarized in Table 3. The symbolic representation of the 6-input/5-output logic gate is visualized in Figure 10B, which shows the combination of OR, NOT, INHIBIT, AND, and IMP (IMPLICATION) gates [2,10,52].

3.9. Fabrication of a 2-to-1 Encoder

An encoder is a logic device that can compress information. Thus, the function of the 2-to-1 encoder is to compress 2 inputs into 1 output [53]. Herein, to establish the 2-to-1 encoder, pH (Input A) and c-MWCNTs/PDEA binary electrode (Input F) were chosen as the two inputs, and one of the CV peak currents at 1.02 V or 0.91 V (Output C) was selected as the single output in the 0.010 M drug probe solution with no SO42− and methanol at 25 °C. Output C in the above logic gate system was selected as the sole output, so that these definitions were consistent with those in the above logic gate system. For this device, if the input was set at (1,0), Output C would be at the “1” state at PDEA film electrodes in NaCl solutions at pH 9.0, the presence of the drug in the pH 9.0 solution is molecular, which would lead to a CV response larger than the threshold of 15 µA. If the input changed to (0,1), however, Output C would be at the “0” state because neither matrine nor sophoridine can exist in molecular form. The truth table of this simple 2-to-1 encoder is presented in Figure 11 accompanied with the schematic representation. It should be understood that for all of the non-explicitly defined input combinations such as (0,0) and (1,1), the corresponding outputs are treated as irrelevant [53].

4. Conclusions

The multi-responsive c-MWCNTs/PDEA films were successfully prepared on GC electrodes through combination of c-MWCNT inner layers and PDEA hydrogel surface layers. The films exhibited reversible pH-, temperature-, SO42− and methanol dependent CV on–off behavior toward the drug molecules matrine and sophoridine. This multi-triggered switchable behavior can be used to achieve the multiple controllable electrochemical oxidation of matrine and sophoridine catalyzed by c-MWCNTs. Although numerous studies have reported on multi-signal controlled electrochemistry [54,55,56], this unique system includes the following points: (1) The combination of the c-MWCNTs/PDEA dual structure film and drug molecular eletrocatalysis was used to construct a logic gate network and device for the first time; (2) Works on multi-switchable electrocatalysis of drugs, especially those used in traditional Chinese medicine, have been extremely limited to date; (3) The complexity of the logical gate system was increased by increasing the input of the stimulus, which was divided into five different CV oxidation peaks ranges according to different mechanisms; (4) The methanol sensitive property of PDEA hydrogel films was investigated by the CV method. Because the PDEA hydrogel films could not be closed completely upon external stimuli of methanol, the drug molecules still could be catalyzed by the c-MWCNTs inner layer. This work presents several potential applications and some bold predictions. Although the current work is still in the preliminary research stage, it does reflect the progress of a logic gate network. The multi-sensitive interface was coupled with electrocatalysis so that the logic gate system could be developed, thereby providing a novel approach to solve certain problems, such as biomedical diagnosis, the design of novel drug sensors, and molecular devices in the future.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/10/3358/s1, Figure S1. Fourier-transform infrared spectrum (FTIR) of (a) N,N-diethylacrylamide (DEA) and (b) poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide) (PDEA). Figure S2. Chemical structure of (a) matrine (MT) and (b) sophoridine (SR) on GC electrode. Figure S3. Top-view SEM of PDEA films on glassy carbon electrode surface in NaCl solutions with (A) pH 4.0 and (B) pH 9.0. Figure S4. CVs of Ipa for 0.01 M (A) matrine and (B) sophoridine at 0.05 V s−1 for bare GC electrode in pH (a) 4.0, (b) 5.0, (c) 6.0, (d) 7.0, (e) 8.0 and (f) 9.0 NaCl solutions. Effects of different pH on the oxidation peak current and oxidation peak potential of (C) matrine and (D) sophoridine. Figure S5. CVs of Ipa for 0.01 M (a) matrine and (b) oxymatrine at 0.05 V s−1 in pH 9.0 NaCl solutions at bare GC electrode. Figure S6. CVs of Ipa for 0.01 M (A) matrine and (B) sophoridine at 0.05 V s−1 and 25 °C in pH 9.0 NaCl solutions at (a) 25 and (b) 40 C on bare GC electrodes. Figure S7. CVs of Ipa for 0.01 M (A) matrine and (B) sophoridine at 0.05 V s−1 and 25 °C in pH 9.0 NaCl solutions containing (a) 0 and (b) 0.35 M on bare GC electrodes. Figure S8. Dependence of the catalytic oxidation peak current (Ipa) of 0.01 M sophoridine at 0.05 V s−1 and 25 °C for PDEA films in NaCl solutions with pH 9.0 containing (a) Na2SO4, (b) MgSO4, (c) NaCl, and (d) NaNO3. Figure S9. CVs of Ipa for 0.01 M (A) matrine and (B) sophoridine at 0.05 V s−1 and 25 °C in pH 9.0 NaCl solutions containing (a) 0% and (b) 20% methanol on bare GC electrodes. Figure S10. Top-view scanning electron micrographs SEM of (a) PDEA and (b) PNIPAM hydrogel films on GC electrode surface in NaCl solutions containing 20% methanol. Figure S11. Dependence of cyclic voltammetry catalytic oxidation peak currents (Ipa) for c-MWCNTs/PDEA films at 0.05 V s−1 in solutions containing 0.01 M matrine when the system was switched between (A) pH 4.0 and 9.0 at 25 °C, (B) 25 and 40 °C at pH 9.0, (C) 0 M and 0.35 M Na2SO4 at pH 9.0 and at 25 °C and (D) 0% and 20% methanol at pH 9.0 and at 25 ºC. Figure S12. Fourier-transform infrared spectrum (FTIR) of (a) c-MWCNTs and (b) MWCNTs samples. Figure S13. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of (a) MWCNTs and (b) c-MWCNTs. Table S1. Truth table.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.B. and J.W.; Data curation, K.S.; Formal analysis, X.W. and Y.M.; Investigation, X.W. and K.S.; Methodology, J.P.; Writing—original draft, X.W.; Writing—review and editing, H.Y.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully appreciate the Financial support from the Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia (NZ17052), the West China Top Class Discipline Project in Basic Medical Sciences, College students’ innovation experiment of Ningxia (NXCX2016121) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 21665021 and 21765016).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lian, W.; Liang, J.; Shen, L.; Jin, Y.; Liu, H. Enzymatic logic calculation systems based on solid-state electrochemiluminescence and molecularly imprinted polymer film electrodes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 100, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Erbas-Cakmak, S.; Kolemen, S.; Sedgwick, A.C.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; James, T.D.; Yoon, J.; Akkaya, E.U. Molecular logic gates: The past, present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 2228–2248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Katz, E.; Poghossian, A.; Schoning, M.J. Enzyme-based logic gates and circuits-analytical applications and interfacing with electronics. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2017, 409, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liang, J.; Li, M.; Lu, L.; Yao, H.; Liu, H. An enzymatic calculation system based on electrochemiluminescence and fluorescence of luminol and cyclic voltammetry of ferrocene methanol. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 118, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fu, T.; Lyu, Y.; Liu, H.; Peng, R.; Zhang, X.; Ye, M.; Tan, W. DNA-based dynamic reaction networks. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2018, 43, 547–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Willner, I.; Shlyahovsky, B.; Zayats, M.; Willner, B. DNAzymes for sensing, nanobiotechnology and logic gate applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1153–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, J.; Katz, E. Digital biosensors with built-in logic for biomedical applications—Biosensors based on a biocomputing concept. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 398, 1591–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yang, T.; Fu, J.; Zheng, S.; Yao, H.; Jin, Y.; Lu, Y.; Liu, H. Biomolecular logic devices based on stimuli-responsive PNIPAM-DNA film electrodes and bioelectrocatalysis of natural DNA with Ru(bpy)32+ as mediator. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 108, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yu, X.; Lian, W.; Zhang, J.; Liu, H. Multi-input and -output logic circuits based on bioelectrocatalysis with horseradish peroxidase and glucose oxidase immobilized in multi-responsive copolymer films on electrodes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 80, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Chen, J.H.; Pan, J.F.; Chen, S. Label-free and enzyme-free platform with visible output for constructing versatile logic gates using caged G-quadruplex as the signal transducer. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Mailloux, S.; Halamek, J.; Katz, E. A model system for targeted drug release triggered by biomolecular signals logically processed through enzyme logic networks. Analyst 2014, 139, 982–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Privman, M.; Tam, T.K.; Bocharova, V.; Halamek, J.; Wang, J.; Katz, E. Responsive interface switchable by logically processed physiological signals: toward “smart” actuators for signal amplification and drug delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 1620–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liang, J.; Yu, X.; Yang, T.; Li, M.; Shen, L.; Jin, Y.; Liu, H. A complicated biocomputing system based on multi-responsive P(NIPAM-co-APBA) copolymer film electrodes and electrocatalysis of NADH. Phy. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 22472–22481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, L.; Gao, X.; Yang, L.; Yu, P.; Mao, L. Photodecomposition of ferrocenedicarboxylic acid in methanol to form an electroactive infinite coordination polymer and its application in bioelectrochemistry. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 8120–8124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Núnez-Bajo, E.; Blanco-López, M.C.; Costa-García, A.; FernándezAbedul, M.T. Integration of gold-sputtered electrofluidic paper on wire-included analytical platforms for glucose biosensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 91, 824–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lounasvuori, M.M.; Rosillo-Lopez, M.; Salzmann, C.G.; Caruana, D.J.; Holt, K.B. Electrochemical characterisation of graphene nanoflakes with functionalised edges. Faraday Discuss. 2014, 172, 293–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Liang, Y.; Song, S.; Yao, H.; Hu, N. Triply switchable bioelectrocatalysis based on poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogel films with immobilized glucose oxidase. Electrochim. Acta 2011, 56, 5166–5173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, L.; Lian, W.; Yao, H.; Liu, H. Multiple-stimuli responsive bioelectrocatalysis based on reduced graphene oxide/poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) composite films and its application in the fabrication of logic gates. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 5168–5176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Teramoto, H.; Yamauchi, T.; Terado, Y.; Odagiri, S.; Sasak, S.; Higashiyama, K. Synthesis of a piperidinone scaffold as an analgesic through kappa-opioid receptor: structure-activity relationship study of matrine alkaloids. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2016, 64, 410–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wu, L.; Wang, G.; Liu, S.; Wei, J.; Zhang, S.; Li, M.; Zhou, G.; Wang, L. Synthesis and biological evaluation of matrine derivatives containing benzo-alpha-pyrone structure as potent anti-lung cancer agents. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35918–35926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zou, Y.; Li, Q.; Liu, D.; Li, J.; Cai, Q.; Li, C.; Zhao, Q.; Xu, W. Therapeutic effects of matrine derivate MASM in mice with collagen-induced arthritis and on fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2454–2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Luo, T.; Zou, Q.; He, Y.; Wang, H.; Li, N.; Zeng, X. Matrine inhibits mouse sperm function by reducing sperm [Ca2+]i and phospho-ERK1/2. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 35, 374–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, J.; Cui, H. Antitumor effects of matrine on cancer stem like cells isolated from the human liver cancer SMMC-7721 cell line. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 1777–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, J.; Su, K.; Shi, W.; Wang, Y.; Hu, P.; Wang, Y.; Wei, L.; Xiang, J.; Yang, F. Matrine inhibits the adhesion and migration of BCG823 gastric cancer cells by affecting the structure and function of the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP). Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2013, 34, 1084–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Yao, H.; Lin, L.; Wang, P.; Liu, H. Thermo- and sulfate-controllable bioelectrocatalysis of glucose based on horseradish peroxidase and glucose oxidase embedded in poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide) hydrogel films. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2014, 173, 2005–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liu, D.; Liu, H.; Hu, N. pH-, sugar-, and temperature-sensitive electrochemical switch amplified by enzymatic reaction and controlled by logic gates based on semi-interpenetrating polymer networks. J. Phys. Chem. B 2012, 116, 1700–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, P.; Liu, S.; Liu, H. Multiple stimuli-switchable bioelectrocatalysis under physiological conditions based on copolymer films with entrapped enzyme. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 6653–6661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yao, H.; Hu, N. Triply responsive films in bioelectrocatalysis with a binary architecture: Combined layer-by-layer assembly and hydrogel polymerization. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 6691–6699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhang, H.; Xiong, H.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Ma, X.; Yang, H. Electrochemical behavior and determination of matrine by the reduced graphene oxide-nafion modified glassy carbon electrode. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2015, 10, 6348–6358. [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu, Z.; He, D.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Zhu, C.; Dong, L.; Zhang, X.; Xing, Y.; Wang, C.; Qiao, H.; et al. Neuroprotective effect of early and short-time applying sophoridine in pMCAO rat brain: Down-regulated TRAF6 and up-regulated p-ERK1/2 expression, ameliorated brain infaction and edema. Brain Res. Bull. 2012, 88, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gong, S.; Su, X.; Bo, T.; Zhang, X.; Liu, H.; Li, K. Determination of dissociation constants of ten alkaloids by capillary zone electrophoresis. J. Sep. Sci. 2003, 26, 549–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huo, Z.; Wan, Q.; Chen, L. Synthesis and evaluation of porous polymethylsilsesquioxane microspheres as low silanol activity chromatographic stationary phase for basic compound separation. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1553, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Amir, L.; Tam, T.K.; Pita, M.; Meijler, M.M.; Alfonta, L.; Katz, E. Biofuel cell controlled by enzyme logic systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 131, 826–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Katz, E.; Pita, M. Biofuel cells controlled by logically processed biochemical signals: towards physiologically regulated bioelectronic devices. Chemistry 2009, 15, 12554–12564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhou, J.; Tam, T.K.; Pita, M.; Ornatska, M.; Minko, S.; Katz, E. Bioelectrocatalytic system coupled with enzyme-based biocomputing ensembles performing boolean logic operations: approaching “smart” physiologically controlled biointerfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2008, 1, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Termuhlen, F.; Kuckling, D.; Schonhoff, M. Isothermal titration calorimetry to probe the coil-to-globule transition of thermoresponsive polymers. J. Phys. Chem. B 2017, 121, 8611–8618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Chen, Y.; Liu, M.; Bian, F.; Wang, B.; Chen, S.; Jin, S. The effect of NaCl on the conformational behavior of acenaphthylene labeled poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide) in dilute aqueous solution. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2006, 207, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Panayiotou, M.; Freitag, R. Influence of the synthesis conditions and ionic additives on the swelling behaviour of thermo-responsive polyalkylacrylamide hydrogels. Polymer 2005, 46, 6777–6785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, B.; Wang, J.; Ru, G.; Liu, C.; Feng, J. Phase transition and preferential alcohol adsorption of poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide) gel in water/alcohol mixtures. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 1126–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Maeda, Y.; Nakamura, T.; Ikeda, I. Change in solvation of poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide) during phase transition in aqueous solutions as observed by IR spectroscop. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 10172–10177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Maeda, Y.; Yamabe, M. A unique phase behavior of random copolymer of N-isopropylacrylamide and N,N-diethylacrylamide in water. Polymer 2009, 50, 519–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sipa, K.; Brycht, M.; Leniart, A.; Urbaniak, P.; Nosal-Wiercinska, A.; Palecz, B.; Skrzypek, S. β-Cyclodextrins incorporated multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified electrode for the voltammetric determination of the pesticide dichlorophen. Talanta 2018, 176, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, F.; Dukovic, G.; Brus, L.E.; Heinz, T.F. The optical resonances in carbon nanotubes arise from excitons. Science 2005, 308, 838–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Capek, I. Dispersions, novel nanomaterial sensors and nanoconjugates based on carbon nanotubes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 150, 63–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sahoo, M.; Ramaprabhu, S. Enhanced electrochemical performance by unfolding a few wings of graphene nanoribbons of multiwalled carbon nanotubes as an anode material for Li ion battery applications. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 13379–13386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Perets, Y.; Aleksandrovych, L.; Melnychenko, M.; Lazarenko, O.; Vovchenko, L.; Matzui, L. The electrical properties of hybrid composites based on multiwall carbon nanotubes with graphite nanoplatelets. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 406–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wang, M.; Zhang, K.; Dai, X.; Li, Y.; Guo, J.; Liu, H.; Li, G.; Tan, Y.; Zeng, J.; Guo, Z. Enhanced electrical conductivity and piezoresistive sensing in multi-wall carbon nanotubes/polydimethylsiloxane nanocomposites via the construction of a self-segregated structure. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 11017–11026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Sun, B.; Liu, J.; Cao, A.; Song, W.; Wang, D. Interfacial synthesis of ordered and stable covalent organic framework on amino-functionalized carbon nanotube with enhanced electrochemical performance. Chem. Comm. 2017, 53, 6303–6306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Puertolas, J.A.; Kurtz, S.M. Evaluation of carbon nanotubes and graphene as reinforcements for UHMWPE-based composites in arthroplastic applications: A review. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2014, 39, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Heidarimoghadam, R.; Farmany, A. Rapid determination of furosemide in drug and blood plasma of wrestlers by a carboxyl-MWCNT sensor. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2016, 58, 1242–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Batra, B.; Pundir, C.S. An amperometric glutamate biosensor based on immobilization of glutamate oxidase onto carboxylated multiwalled carbon nanotubes/gold nanoparticles/chitosan composite film modified Au electrode. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 47, 496–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Badeau, B.A.; Comerford, M.P.; Arakawa, C.K.; Shadish, J.A.; DeForest, C.A. Engineered modular biomaterial logic gates for environmentally triggered therapeutic delivery. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Liu, S.; Li, M.; Yu, X.; Li, C.Z.; Liu, H. Biomacromolecular logic gate, encoder/decoder and keypad lock based on DNA damage with electrochemiluminescence and electrochemical signals as outputs. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 13185–13188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Song, S.; Hu, N. pH-controllable bioelectrocatalysis based on “on−off” switching redox property of electroactive probes for spin-assembled layer-by-layer films containing branched poly(ethyleneimine). J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 3648–3654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Song, S.; Hu, N. Dual-switchable bioelectrocatalysis synergistically controlled by pH and perchlorate concentration based on poly(4-vinylpyridine) films. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010, 114, 11689–11695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhou, J.; Wang, G.; Hu, J.; Lu, X.; Li, J. Temperature, ionic strength and pH induced electrochemical switching of smart polymer interfaces. Chem. Commun. 2006, 4820–4822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sensors 18 03358 g001 550
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammetry responses (CVs) of 0.010 M (A) matrine and (B) sophoridine at 0.05 V s−1 and 25 °C in NaCl supporting electrolyte solutions at (a) bare glassy carbon (GC) electrode and (b) poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide (PDEA) film electrodes.
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammetry responses (CVs) of 0.010 M (A) matrine and (B) sophoridine at 0.05 V s−1 and 25 °C in NaCl supporting electrolyte solutions at (a) bare glassy carbon (GC) electrode and (b) poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide (PDEA) film electrodes.
Sensors 18 03358 g001
Sensors 18 03358 g002 550
Figure 2. CVs of 0.010 M (A) matrine and (B) sophoridine at 0.05 V s–1 and 25 °C for PDEA films in NaCl solutions at pH (a) 4.0, (b) 5.0, (c) 6.0, (d) 7.0, (e) 8.0, and (f) 9.0; Variations of Ipa of 0.010 M (C) matrine and (D) sophoridine at pH 9.0 and 4.0. (E) The oxidation peak current (Ipa) of 0.010 M matrine in NaCl solutions containing esterase and urease with pH 6.5 (curve b) after subsequent 30 min reaction on adding 6 mM urea (curve a) and after 10 min reaction on adding 10 mM ethyl butyrate (EB) (curve c). (F) Dependence of Ipa on the alternate addition of EB and urea solutions for the same PDEA films.
Figure 2. CVs of 0.010 M (A) matrine and (B) sophoridine at 0.05 V s–1 and 25 °C for PDEA films in NaCl solutions at pH (a) 4.0, (b) 5.0, (c) 6.0, (d) 7.0, (e) 8.0, and (f) 9.0; Variations of Ipa of 0.010 M (C) matrine and (D) sophoridine at pH 9.0 and 4.0. (E) The oxidation peak current (Ipa) of 0.010 M matrine in NaCl solutions containing esterase and urease with pH 6.5 (curve b) after subsequent 30 min reaction on adding 6 mM urea (curve a) and after 10 min reaction on adding 10 mM ethyl butyrate (EB) (curve c). (F) Dependence of Ipa on the alternate addition of EB and urea solutions for the same PDEA films.
Sensors 18 03358 g002
Sensors 18 03358 g003 550
Figure 3. Oxidation mechanism of matrine (MT) on the GC electrode.
Figure 3. Oxidation mechanism of matrine (MT) on the GC electrode.
Sensors 18 03358 g003
Sensors 18 03358 g004a 550Sensors 18 03358 g004b 550
Figure 4. CVs of 0.010 M (A) matrine and (B) sophoridine for PDEA films at 0.05 V s–1 in NaCl solution with pH 9.0 containing no Na2SO4 at different temperatures: (a) 25 °C, (b) 27 °C, (c) 29 °C, (d) 31 °C, (e) 33 °C, (f) 35 °C, (g) 37 °C, (h) 39 °C, and (i) 40 °C. Variations of Ipa of 0.010 M (C) matrine and (D) sophoridine for PDEA films at 0.05 V s–1 in NaCl solutions with pH 9.0 at 25 °C and 40 °C.
Figure 4. CVs of 0.010 M (A) matrine and (B) sophoridine for PDEA films at 0.05 V s–1 in NaCl solution with pH 9.0 containing no Na2SO4 at different temperatures: (a) 25 °C, (b) 27 °C, (c) 29 °C, (d) 31 °C, (e) 33 °C, (f) 35 °C, (g) 37 °C, (h) 39 °C, and (i) 40 °C. Variations of Ipa of 0.010 M (C) matrine and (D) sophoridine for PDEA films at 0.05 V s–1 in NaCl solutions with pH 9.0 at 25 °C and 40 °C.
Sensors 18 03358 g004aSensors 18 03358 g004b
Sensors 18 03358 g005 550
Figure 5. Top-view scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of PDEA hydrogel films on the GC electrode surface in NaCl solutions with pH 9.0 (a) containing no Na2SO4 and methanol at 25 °C, (b) containing 0.35 M Na2SO4 but no methanol at 25 °C, (c) containing no Na2SO4 and methanol at 40 °C, and (d) containing 20% methanol at 25 °C.
Figure 5. Top-view scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of PDEA hydrogel films on the GC electrode surface in NaCl solutions with pH 9.0 (a) containing no Na2SO4 and methanol at 25 °C, (b) containing 0.35 M Na2SO4 but no methanol at 25 °C, (c) containing no Na2SO4 and methanol at 40 °C, and (d) containing 20% methanol at 25 °C.
Sensors 18 03358 g005
Sensors 18 03358 g006 550
Figure 6. CVs of 0.010 M (A) matrine and (B) sophoridine for PDEA films at 0.05 V s–11 and 25 °C in NaCl solutions with pH 9.0 containing (a) 0 M, (b) 0.05 M, (c) 0.10 M, (d) 0.15 M, (e) 0.20 M, (f) 0.25 M, (g) 0.30 M and (h) 0.35 M Na2SO4. Variations of Ipa of (C) 0.010 M matrine and (D) 0.010 M sophoridine for PDEA films at 0.05 V s–1 and 25 °C in NaCl solutions with pH 9.0 containing 0 M and 0.35 M of Na2SO4.
Figure 6. CVs of 0.010 M (A) matrine and (B) sophoridine for PDEA films at 0.05 V s–11 and 25 °C in NaCl solutions with pH 9.0 containing (a) 0 M, (b) 0.05 M, (c) 0.10 M, (d) 0.15 M, (e) 0.20 M, (f) 0.25 M, (g) 0.30 M and (h) 0.35 M Na2SO4. Variations of Ipa of (C) 0.010 M matrine and (D) 0.010 M sophoridine for PDEA films at 0.05 V s–1 and 25 °C in NaCl solutions with pH 9.0 containing 0 M and 0.35 M of Na2SO4.
Sensors 18 03358 g006
Sensors 18 03358 g007 550
Figure 7. Influence of methanol volume fraction in water/methanol mixture solvent on CV Ipa of 0.010 M (A) matrine and (B) sophoridine at 0.05 V s−1 in pH 9.0 solutions for PDEA and poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) PNIPAM films at 25 °C. Variations of Ipa of (C) 0.010 M matrine and (D) sophoridine for PDEA films at 0.05 V s−1 and 25 °C in NaCl solutions with pH 9.0 containing 0% and 20% methanol.
Figure 7. Influence of methanol volume fraction in water/methanol mixture solvent on CV Ipa of 0.010 M (A) matrine and (B) sophoridine at 0.05 V s−1 in pH 9.0 solutions for PDEA and poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) PNIPAM films at 25 °C. Variations of Ipa of (C) 0.010 M matrine and (D) sophoridine for PDEA films at 0.05 V s−1 and 25 °C in NaCl solutions with pH 9.0 containing 0% and 20% methanol.
Sensors 18 03358 g007
Sensors 18 03358 g008 550
Figure 8. (A) CV catalytic oxidation peak currents (Ipa) of 0.010 M matrine at 0.05 V s−1 and 25 °C for PDEA films in NaCl solutions with pH 9.0 containing (a) 0, (b) 1, (c) 2, (d) 3, (e) 4 and (f) 5 mg mL−1 of c-MWCNTs. (Inset: The relationship between Ipa and concentration of c-MWCNTs). (B) Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) response of c-MWCNTs/PDEA on a GC electrode to the additions of matrine concentration from (a) 0 mM to (i) 13.1 mM (Each incremental concentration is 1.5 mM) in NaCl solutions with pH 9.0 (Inset: The relationship between the Ipa and matrine concentration).
Figure 8. (A) CV catalytic oxidation peak currents (Ipa) of 0.010 M matrine at 0.05 V s−1 and 25 °C for PDEA films in NaCl solutions with pH 9.0 containing (a) 0, (b) 1, (c) 2, (d) 3, (e) 4 and (f) 5 mg mL−1 of c-MWCNTs. (Inset: The relationship between Ipa and concentration of c-MWCNTs). (B) Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) response of c-MWCNTs/PDEA on a GC electrode to the additions of matrine concentration from (a) 0 mM to (i) 13.1 mM (Each incremental concentration is 1.5 mM) in NaCl solutions with pH 9.0 (Inset: The relationship between the Ipa and matrine concentration).
Sensors 18 03358 g008
Sensors 18 03358 g009 550
Figure 9. CV catalytic oxidation peak currents (Ipa) of 0.010 M (A) matrine and (B) sophoridine at 0.05 V s−1 for c-MWCNTs/PDEA films (a) in NaCl solution with pH 9.0 at 25 °C in the absence of Na2SO4 and methanol, (b) in NaCl solution with pH 9.0 at 25 °C containing 20% methanol but no Na2SO4, (c) in NaCl solution with pH 9.0 at 25 °C containing 0.35 M Na2SO4 but no methanol, (d) in NaCl solution with pH 9.0 at 40 °C in the absence of Na2SO4 and methanol, and (e) in NaCl solution with pH 4.0 at 25 °C containing no Na2SO4 and methanol.
Figure 9. CV catalytic oxidation peak currents (Ipa) of 0.010 M (A) matrine and (B) sophoridine at 0.05 V s−1 for c-MWCNTs/PDEA films (a) in NaCl solution with pH 9.0 at 25 °C in the absence of Na2SO4 and methanol, (b) in NaCl solution with pH 9.0 at 25 °C containing 20% methanol but no Na2SO4, (c) in NaCl solution with pH 9.0 at 25 °C containing 0.35 M Na2SO4 but no methanol, (d) in NaCl solution with pH 9.0 at 40 °C in the absence of Na2SO4 and methanol, and (e) in NaCl solution with pH 4.0 at 25 °C containing no Na2SO4 and methanol.
Sensors 18 03358 g009
Sensors 18 03358 g010 550
Figure 10. (A) Catalytic oxidation peak currents (Ipa) of 0.010 M matrine and sophoridine for the c-MWCNTs/PDEA films at 0.05 V s−1 in the solution as the output with all possible 64 combinations of 6 inputs. The threshold is marked by dashed lines. (B) The symbolic representation of the logic gate circuit.
Figure 10. (A) Catalytic oxidation peak currents (Ipa) of 0.010 M matrine and sophoridine for the c-MWCNTs/PDEA films at 0.05 V s−1 in the solution as the output with all possible 64 combinations of 6 inputs. The threshold is marked by dashed lines. (B) The symbolic representation of the logic gate circuit.
Sensors 18 03358 g010
Sensors 18 03358 g011 550
Figure 11. (a) Schematic representations and (b) truth tables of 2-to-1 encoder.
Figure 11. (a) Schematic representations and (b) truth tables of 2-to-1 encoder.
Sensors 18 03358 g011
Table
Table 1. Average thickness of poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide (PDEA) films estimated by stereomicroscopy under different conditions.
Table 1. Average thickness of poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide (PDEA) films estimated by stereomicroscopy under different conditions.
Measurement ConditionsAverage Thickness/µm
pH 9.0 and 25 °C410 ± 30
pH 4.0 and 25 °C405 ± 8
pH 9.0 and 40 °C276 ± 15
pH 9.0 and 25 °C containing 0.35 M Na2SO4207 ± 20
pH 9.0 and 25 °C containing 20% methanol328 ± 18
Table
Table 2. Definition of the six inputs for the system.
Table 2. Definition of the six inputs for the system.
InputDefinitionThe “1” StateThe “0” State
ApH9.05.0
BUrease and urea6 mM urea0 mM urea
CTemperature25 °C40 °C
DNa2SO40.35 M0 M
EMethanol0%20%
FElectrode Typec-MWCNTs/PDEAPDEA
Table
Table 3. A summary of the characteristics and thresholds of the output signals.
Table 3. A summary of the characteristics and thresholds of the output signals.
OutputsPDEA StatesDrug StatesMethanol FractionElectrode Type
Output A
(Ipa ≥ 35 µA)		No phase transitionmolecule0%c-MWCNTs/PDEA electrode
Output B
(35 µA < Ipa ≤ 25 µA)		No phase transitionmolecule20%c-MWCNTs/PDEA electrode
Output C
(25 µA < Ipa ≤ 15 µA)		No phase transitionmolecule0%PDEA electrode
Output D
(15 µA < Ipa ≤ 5 µA)		No phase transitionmolecule20%PDEA electrode
Output E
(Ipa < 5 µA)		The phase transition of PDEA was appeared or drugs were present in the form of nitrogen cationic radical or both of these things happen at the same time

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, X.; Bai, X.; Ma, Y.; Wei, J.; Peng, J.; Shi, K.; Yao, H. Construction of Multiple Switchable Sensors and Logic Gates Based on Carboxylated Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes/Poly(N,N-Diethylacrylamide). Sensors 2018, 18, 3358. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18103358

AMA Style

Wu X, Bai X, Ma Y, Wei J, Peng J, Shi K, Yao H. Construction of Multiple Switchable Sensors and Logic Gates Based on Carboxylated Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes/Poly(N,N-Diethylacrylamide). Sensors. 2018; 18(10):3358. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18103358

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Xuemei, Xiaoqing Bai, Yang Ma, Jie Wei, Juan Peng, Keren Shi, and Huiqin Yao. 2018. "Construction of Multiple Switchable Sensors and Logic Gates Based on Carboxylated Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes/Poly(N,N-Diethylacrylamide)" Sensors 18, no. 10: 3358. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18103358

APA Style

Wu, X., Bai, X., Ma, Y., Wei, J., Peng, J., Shi, K., & Yao, H. (2018). Construction of Multiple Switchable Sensors and Logic Gates Based on Carboxylated Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes/Poly(N,N-Diethylacrylamide). Sensors, 18(10), 3358. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18103358

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop