Next Article in Journal
Template-Based Step Detection with Inertial Measurement Units
Next Article in Special Issue
Disposable Voltammetric Immunosensors Integrated with Microfluidic Platforms for Biomedical, Agricultural and Food Analyses: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Cutting Forces Measurement for Milling Process by Using Working Tables with Integrated PVDF Thin-Film Sensors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Indium Nitrite (InN)-Based Ultrasensitive and Selective Ammonia Sensor Using an External Silicone Oil Filter for Medical Application
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 18
Issue 11
10.3390/s18114032
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Detection of Alpha-Fetoprotein in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patient Plasma with Graphene Field-Effect Transistor

by
Dae Hoon Kim
1,
Hong Gi Oh
1,
Woo Hwan Park
1,
Dong Cheol Jeon
1,
Ki Moo Lim
1,
Hyung Jin Kim
2,
Byoung Kuk Jang
3 and
Kwang Soup Song
1,*
1
Department of Medical IT Convergence Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi, Gyeongbuk 39177, Korea
2
Biomedical IT Convergence Center, Gumi Electronics and Information Technology Research Institute, Gumi, Gyeongbuk 39171, Korea
3
Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu 41931, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2018, 18(11), 4032; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18114032
Submission received: 31 August 2018 / Revised: 29 October 2018 / Accepted: 9 November 2018 / Published: 19 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biosensors for the Detection of Biomarkers)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The detection of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in plasma is important in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in humans. We developed a biosensor to detect AFP in HCC patient plasma and in a phosphate buffer saline (PBS) solution using a graphene field-effect transistor (G-FET). The G-FET was functionalized with 1-pyrenebutyric acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (PBASE) for immobilization of an anti-AFP antibody. AFP was detected by assessing the shift in the voltage of the Dirac point (ΔVDirac) after binding of AFP to the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET channel surface. This anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET biosensor was able to detect AFP at a concentration of 0.1 ng mL−1 in PBS, and the detection sensitivity was 16.91 mV. In HCC patient plasma, the biosensor was able to detect AFP at a concentration of 12.9 ng mL−1, with a detection sensitivity of 5.68 mV. The sensitivity (ΔVDirac) depended on the concentration of AFP in either PBS or HCC patient plasma. These data suggest that G-FET biosensors could have practical applications in diagnostics.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most deadly cancer in the world [1]. Only 43% of patients are diagnosed at an early stage, and the five-year survival rate is just 31% [2]. However, most patients with early-stage liver cancer appear healthy, and show no awareness of symptoms [3]. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), with a molecular weight of approximately 70 kDa, is a well-known HCC biomarker [4]. The concentration of AFP is less than 10 ng mL−1 in healthy human serum, but increases significantly in the serum of HCC patients [5]. Detection of AFP is therefore important in the early stage diagnosis of HCC [5]. The methods most commonly used to detect AFP in HCC patients are radio- and fluorescent-immunoassays [6,7,8]. However, these methods require expensive reagents and are complicated to conduct. Hence, a simple, inexpensive, and highly sensitive detection method is required to detect AFP in the clinic.
Field-effect transistors (FETs) are promising, label-free, biosensing devices capable of detecting biomarkers [9,10,11]. FETs provide a number of potential advantages such as size, fast response, high reliability, low output impedance, portability, and low cost of mass production [12,13]. A number of studies have confirmed the high sensitivity and stability for detecting of AFP using field-effect transistors (FETs) on silicon [14,15] and electrochemical methods on carbon [16,17]. However, in these studies, AFP was diluted in PBS or purchased human serum, do not realize the detection of AFP in HCC patient plasma.
Graphene is a single atom thick, sp2-hybridized, carbon material. Graphene is a zero band gap semiconductor in which the conduction band and valence band are connected at the K-point. The transfer characteristics of graphene exhibit distinctive ambipolar behavior. Single-layer graphene has an extremely high carrier mobility (>20,000 cm2 V−1 s−1) and a large carrier concentration (~1012 cm−2) [18]. Due to its electrical properties, graphene is an ideal candidate for the fabrication of biosensors. Graphene field-effect transistors (G-FETs) have been developed to detect different types of biomarkers such as DNA, glucose, enzymes, and immunoglobulin E [19,20,21,22]. The G-FETs have been studied for the quantitative detection of various cancer markers using immunoassay methods [23,24,25]. However, the detection of AFP using G-FETs has not been reported yet.
In this study, the detection of AFP in human plasma of HCC patient was achieved using a G-FET biosensor for the first time. The G-FET was modified with 1-pyrenebutyric acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (PBASE) to allow for immobilization of an anti-AFP antibody. The structure of the immobilized antibody was observed by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The selectivity of the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET was evaluated using human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The detection of AFP was characterized in phosphate buffer solution saline (PBS) solution and human plasma from HCC patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The monoclonal anti-alpha-fetoprotein (anti-AFP), AFP, hCG, and CEA were purchased from Antibody Center (Seongnam, Korea). The human plasmas of HCC patients were provided at Keimyung University school of Medicine (Daegu, Korea). The concentration of AFP in each HCC patient plasma was verified at Keimyung University school of Medicine and HCC patient plasma were used without any purification process. PBASE and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Seoul, Korea). Large-sized graphene on a PET substrate was purchased from MCK Tech (Ansan, Korea). Ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ·cm) was used for the preparation of all solutions. PBS was made in the laboratory and was prepared using 137 mM NaCl, 8.1 mM Na2HPO4·12H2O, 2.7 mM KCl, and 1.5 mM KH2PO4. 0.01 × PBS (pH 7.4) was prepared by diluting 1 × PBS with ultrapure water. Antigens and antibodies were diluted in 1 × PBS.

2.2. Fabrication and Modification of G-FET

Gold (Au) was evaporated in a vacuum chamber (5.0 × 10−6 torr) to form the drain and source electrodes on the graphene sheet using a thermal evaporator and the thickness of the Au was 10 nm (Alpha-step). The gate channel size was 5 mm in width and 500 μm in length. For applying bias to the electrodes, a silver paste was used for wire bonding. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was used for the passivation of source and drain electrodes from the electrolyte. The reaction chamber was made of a 15 mL conical tube coated with PDMS. Ag/AgCl reference electrode was used as the gate electrode.
The G-FET was immersed in a mixture of 5 mM PBASE in dry dimethylformamide (DMF) solution for 2 h to achieve non-covalent modification of the channel surface, followed by rinsing with DMF [26]. After modification, a solution of anti-AFP (50 μg mL−1) was dropped to immobilize anti-AFP on the channel surface and it was placed in a constant temperature and humidity chamber for 9 h. Then, the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET was washed three times with 0.01 × PBS. Non-specific adsorption was blocked by the addition of a BSA solution (1 wt %) for 60 min. Then, the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET was washed three times with 0.01 × PBS. The anti-AFP-immobilized graphene was evaluated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS; monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source, 1486.6 eV, beam diameter 400 μm) and atomic force microscopy (AFM; AFM5300E, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

2.3. Detection of AFP

The transfer characteristics of the G-FET were measured using a digital source meter (Keithley 2400, Keithley, Cleveland, OH, USA). The drain-source voltage (VDS) was fixed at 0.05 V and the gate-source voltage (VGS) was swept from 0.1 to 0.9 V. After the antigen–antibody reaction, the characteristic of the drain-source current (IDS) on the G-FET was evaluated in 0.01 × PBS (pH 7.4) solution. The sensitivity was evaluated by assessing the shift in voltage of the Dirac point (ΔVDirac) after specific binding of the antibody to the antigen. The voltage of Dirac point was defined as the minimum current value in the IDS-VGS characteristics of the G-FET. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Keimyung University school of Medicine (IRB No. 2017-09-038-001).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Functionalization

We used a non-covalent method to immobilize the antibody on the graphene surface. PBASE allows the binding of functional groups to graphene without disrupting the carbon atomic structure [27,28]. PBASE contains an aromatic pyrenyl group which physically interacts through π–π interaction with graphene sheet and a succinimidyl ester group which covalently reacts with the amino group on the anti-AFP by an amide bond [20]. A schematic diagram of the modification steps for G-FET is shown in Figure 1.
AFM measurements were performed to examine the height of the PBASE modification and the change in the surface morphology following anti-AFP immobilization. In order to compare changes in the z-value of the PBASE-modified graphene with that of the antibody modified graphene, the roughness of substrates was evaluated at root mean square (Rq) value. Figure 2 shows that the Rq value of pristine graphene was 2.22 nm. After PBASE-modification, the Rq value was 3.10 nm, whereas the Rq value of the anti-AFP-immobilized graphene increased to 9.26 nm. This increase in Rq value suggests that the anti-AFP antibody was successfully immobilized on the PBASE-modified surface [29]. Figure 2d shows the high-resolution XPS of the N 1s spectra on the graphene surface. After modification with PBASE, there was an increase in the characteristic N 1s peak at 402.03 eV [30,31]. After antibody immobilization on the graphene surface, the N 1s peak was significantly increased due to the presence of amine groups in the protein.

3.2. The Characteristic of G-FET Biosensor

The G-FET was characterized by measuring the drain-source current (IDS), gate-source current (IGS), and gate-source voltage (VGS) in 0.01 × PBS (pH 7.4). The device characteristics (IDS-VDS, IGS-VGS, and IDS-VGS) of the G-FET are shown in Figure 3a,b. For IDS-VGS and IGS-VGS, the VDS was fixed at 0.05 V and VGS was swept from 0.0 V to 0.9 V. The gate leakage current of G-FET was 0.3 μA. For IDS-VDS, the VDS was swept from 0 V to 0.1 V and the IDS increased depending on the VGS in the n-channel region. The transfer and output characteristics of the G-FET in the electrolyte solution were typical of graphene FETs. The G-FET was stably worked in PBS solution without redox reaction. The intrinsic properties of the graphene did not change in an electrolyte solution. Due to the functionalization with PBASE, the Dirac point (VDirac) of G-FET was shifted in the positive direction from 0.39 to 0.51 V, as shown in Figure 3c. This increase in the VDirac value suggests that PBASE with its 16 π electrons creates new scattering channels for electrons, and enhance the electronic properties of G-FET [32]. The VDirac of the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET was shifted a further 11.2 mV, as shown in Figure 3c, because the isoelectric point (pI) of the anti-AFP antibody is less than pH 6.0 since the anti-AFP antibody is negatively charged in 0.01 × PBS (pH 7.4) [33]. The negative charge of the anti-AFP antibody accumulates the hole density on the channel of G-FET and VDirac of G-FET was increased.

3.3. The Detection of AFP

The G-FET was characterized in 0.01 × PBS (pH 7.4). The pI of AFP is 4.9, and so AFP is negatively charged in 0.01 × PBS (pH 7.4) [34]. The anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET is sensitive to AFP at low ionic strengths because charge detection is most sensitive when the screening of positive counter ions is minimized in the electrolyte. The anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET was immersed in an AFP solution (10 ng mL−1 in 1 × PBS) for 2 h and washed three times with 0.01 × PBS. Following this, the VDirac of the anti-AFP-G-FET bound to AFP showed a positive shift of 43.57 mV as compared to the anti-AFP-G-FET alone, as shown in Figure 4a. The IDS-VGS characteristics according to the AFP concentration in PBS were shown in Figure S1 (Supporting Information). Upon binding of the anti-AFP antibody to AFP, the hole density is increased by the enhanced negative charge. Consequently, there is a positive shift in VDirac.
We approximate that each AFP binding to the anti-AFP antibody on the channel surface contains an intrinsic negative charge, which directly affects the channel surface without any neutralization by counter ions in the buffer solution. Because the Debye length of the buffer solution is 7.5 nm and the length of the anti-AFP antibody is 4 nm, the ΔVDirac depended on the concentration of AFP in PBS, as shown in Figure 4b. G-FET could detect AFP at concentrations as low as 0.1 ng mL−1 in PBS. When the AFP concentration was above 50 ng mL−1, the sensitivity of G-FET decreased, indicating that saturation had occurred. Generally, detection of AFP in the early stages of HCC patients requires the ability to detect AFP at levels below 10 ng mL−1. Therefore, G-FET shows the possibility as an AFP sensor. If we change the X-axis to logarithmic scale, the G-FET sensitivity is linear relative to the AFP concentration in PBS (Figure S2, Supporting Information).
The equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) for the anti-AFP and AFP interaction, with different values of VDirac at the corresponding AFP concentration, was evaluated for the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET. The binding of AFP to the anti-AFP antibody on the graphene channel can be described by the Langmuir equation [29]:
ΔVDirac = (ΔVDirac,max·CAFP)/(KD + CAFP),
where ΔVDirac,max is the saturated change in VDirac and CAFP is the concentration of AFP. From the fitted curve shown in Figure 4b, the dissociation constant (KD) was estimated to be 4.64 × 10−11 M. Compared with the reported binding affinity from a general characterization of the binding between AFP and the anti-AFP antibody (10−7–10−9 M) [35,36,37,38], our data indicate that the anti-AFP antibody immobilized on the G-FET biosensor has a high affinity for AFP.
The selectivity of the G-FET biosensor was assessed using other proteins, including hCG and CEA. hCG is a hormone produced by the placenta after implantation and has been found in some cancerous tumors [39]. CEA is known as a marker of cancer of the digestive system and has been shown to be increased in levels in various cancers such as colon, stomach, and pancreas, etc. [40]. The anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET was immersed in hCG or CEA solutions for 2 h and then washed three times with 0.01 × PBS. In each case, the concentration of hCG and CEA was 1 μg mL−1. For hCG, the ΔVDirac of the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET was −7.6 μV, whereas the ΔVDirac of the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET was −5.7 mV for CEA. Although the selectivity of the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET was assessed using high concentrations of hCG and CEA, the ΔVDirac of G-FET was comparable for the AFP. These data demonstrate the practical potential of G-FET for the diagnostic detection of AFP.
The anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET biosensor was then assessed by determining its ability to detect AFP in human plasma from HCC patients. Seven samples were used to evaluate the sensitivity of G-FET, where the concentrations of AFP HCC patient plasma were 2.8, 12.6, 44.9, 75.6, 294.5, 434.2 and 784.9 ng mL−1. The process and conditions used for the detection of AFP in HCC patient plasma were the same as those used for the detection of AFP in PBS. However, we applied an additional washing step to remove any non-specifically adsorbed HCC patient plasma proteins from the channel surface of the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET. The anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET was immersed in human plasma derived from HCC patients for 2 h, and then washed five times with a buffer solution. After binding had occurred, G-FET measurements were made in 0.01 × PBS (pH 7.4). The anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET was able to function in 0.01 × PBS after binding of the AFP from HCC patient plasma. The VDirac of the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET bound to AFP showed a positive shift, as compared with the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET alone, as shown in Figure 5a. The IDS-VGS characteristics according to the AFP concentration in HCC patient plasma were show in Figure S3 (Supporting Information). The G-FET gave values of 5.68, 28.2, 50.86, 73.36, 90.31 and 103.21 mV at AFP concentrations of 12.6, 44.9, 75.6, 294.5, 434.2 and 784.9 ng mL−1 in HCC patient plasma, respectively, as shown in Figure 5b. If AFP concentration is converted into the semi-log scale, the ΔVDirac values were increased linearly depending on the concentration of AFP in HCC patients plasma, (Figure S4, Supporting Information). Unfortunately, G-FET could not detect AFP when the AFP concentration was 2.8 ng mL−1 in HCC patient plasma. The most likely reason for the lower AFP sensitivity in HCC patient plasma is that the anti-AFP-AFP binding interaction may have been disrupted by the additional washing process required to analyze HCC patient plasma.

4. Conclusions

We successfully detected AFP in human plasma from HCC patients using G-FET. PBASE was employed to functionalize the G-FET and this was successfully confirmed through XPS, and AFM. A BSA blocking process was used to avoid nonspecific interactions on the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET biosensor. Before the detection of AFP in HCC patient plasma, a quantitative analysis of the ability to detect AFP in PBS was performed and the lowest concentration of AFP which could be detected by the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET in PBS was found to be 0.1 ng mL−1. The ability to detect AFP in HCC patient plasma was assessed using six samples, with the result that the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET could detect AFP at 12.6 ng mL−1. These data demonstrate that our G-FET system is able to quantitatively detect AFP in HCC patient plasma. Furthermore, antibody immobilized G-FETs have a wide potential as biosensors for early and point-of-care medical diagnosis of tumor markers.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/11/4032/s1. Figure S1: The IDS-VGS characteristics of G-FET before and after binding to each concentration of AFP (0.1, 1, 10, 50, 100 and 250 ng mL−1) in PBS on the anti-AFP-immobilized channel surface, Figure S2: The sensitivity of the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET for AFP detection in PBS into semi-log scale, Figure S3: The IDS-VGS characteristics of G-FET before and after binding to each concentration of AFP (12.6, 44.9, 75.6, 294.5, 434.2, and 784.9 ng mL−1) in human plasma of HCC patient on the anti-AFP-immobilized channel surface, Figure S4: The sensitivity of the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET for AFP detection in human plasma from HCC patients into semi-log scale.

Author Contributions

The manuscript was conceived by all authors. D.H.K. performed experiments and prepared an original draft with K.S.S., H.G.O., W.H.P., D.C.J., K.M.L. and H.J.K. prepared materials and analyzed experimental results. B.K.J. prepared the plasmas of hepatocarcinoma patients. The manuscript was edited by D.H.K. and K.S.S.

Funding

K.S.S. acknowledges the support from the MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the Global IT Talent support program (IITP-2017-0-01811) supervised by the IITP (Institute for Information and Communication Technology Promotion) and by a grant (the core project-03) from Gumi Core Components and Materials Technology Development Program of the Gumi Regional Government, 2016.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yang, J.D.; Roberts, L.R. Hepatocellular carcinoma: A global view. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2010, 7, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liver Cancer: Statistics. Available online: https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/liver-cancer/statistics (accessed on 1 October 2018).
  3. Ferlay, J.; Shin, H.R.; Bray, F.; Forman, D.; Mathers, C.; Parkin, D.M. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 127, 2893–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Maeng, J.-H.; Lee, B.-C.; Ko, Y.-J.; Cho, W.; Ahn, Y.; Cho, N.-G.; Lee, S.-H.; Hwang, S.Y. A novel microfluidic biosensor based on an electrical detection system for alpha-fetoprotein. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2008, 23, 1319–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Horn, K.D.; Wax, P.; Schneider, S.M.; Martin, T.G.; Nine, J.S.; Moraca, M.A.; Virji, M.A.; Aronica, P.A.; Rao, K.N. Biomarkers of liver regeneration allow early prediction of hepatic recovery after acute necrosis. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1999, 112, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lockhart, D.J.; Winzeler, E.A. Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays. Nature 2000, 405, 827–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mor, G.; Visintin, I.; Lai, Y.; Zhao, H.; Schwartz, P.; Rutherford, T.; Yue, L.; Bray-Ward, P.; Ward, D.C. Serum protein markers for early detection of ovarian cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 7677–7682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Kelly, L.S.; Birken, S.; Puett, D. Determination of hyperglycosylated human chorionic gonadotropin produced by malignant gestational trophoblastic neoplasias and male germ cell tumors using a lectin-based immunoassay and surface plasmon resonance. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2007, 260, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Zhang, G.-J.; Ning, Y. Silicon nanowire biosensor and its applications in disease diagnostics: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 749, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Song, K.-S.; Zhang, G.-J.; Nakamura, Y.; Furukawa, K.; Hiraki, T.; Yang, J.-H.; Funatsu, T.; Ohdomari, I.; Kawarada, H. Label-free DNA sensors using ultrasensitive diamond field-effect transistors in solution. Phys. Rev. E 2006, 74, 041919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Song, K.-S.; Nakamura, Y.; Sasaki, Y.; Degawa, M.; Yang, J.-H.; Kawarada, H. pH-sensitive diamond field-effect transistors (FETs) with directly aminated channel surface. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 573, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sakata, T.; Miyahara, Y. DNA sequencing based on intrinsic molecular charges. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2225–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Uno, T.; Tabata, H.; Kawai, T. Peptide-nucleic acid-modified ion-sensitive field-effect transistor-based biosensor for direct detection of DNA hybridization. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cheng, S.; Hotani, K.; Hideshima, S.; Kuroiwa, S.; Nakanishi, T.; Hashimoto, M.; Mori, Y.; Osaka, T. Field effect transistor biosensor using antigen binding fragment for detecting tumor marker in human serum. Materials 2014, 7, 2490–2500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhu, K.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhou, F.; Feng, K.; Dou, H.; Wang, T. Simultaneous detection of α-fetoprotein and carcinoembryonic antigen based on Si nanowire field-effect Transistors. Sensors 2015, 15, 19225–19236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Du, D.; Zou, Z.; Shin, Y.; Wang, J.; Wu, H.; Engelhard, M.H.; Liu, J.; Aksay, I.A.; Lin, Y. Sensitive immunosensor for cancer biomarker based on dual signal amplification strategy of graphene sheets and multienzyme functionalized carbon nanospheres. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 2989–2995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Niu, Y.; Yang, T.; Ma, S.; Peng, F.; Yi, M.; Wan, M.; Mao, C.; Shen, J. Label-free immunosensor based on hyperbranched polyester for specific detection of α-fetoprotein. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 92, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bolotin, K.I.; Sikes, K.; Jiang, Z.; Klima, M.; Fudenberg, G.; Hone, J.; Kim, P.; Stormer, H. Ultrahigh electron mobility in suspended graphene. Solid State Commun. 2008, 146, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Xu, G.; Abbott, J.; Qin, L.; Yeung, K.Y.; Song, Y.; Yoon, H.; Kong, J.; Ham, D. Electrophoretic and field-effect graphene for all-electrical DNA array technology. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Huang, Y.; Dong, X.; Shi, Y.; Li, C.M.; Li, L.-J.; Chen, P. Nanoelectronic biosensors based on CVD grown graphene. Nanoscale 2010, 2, 1485–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ohno, Y.; Maehashi, K.; Matsumoto, K. Chemical and biological sensing applications based on graphene field-effect transistors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 26, 1727–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ohno, Y.; Maehashi, K.; Yamashiro, Y.; Matsumoto, K. Electrolyte-gated graphene field-effect transistors for detecting pH and protein adsorption. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3318–3322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Haslam, C.; Damiati, S.; Whitley, T.; Davey, P.; Ifeachor, E.; Awan, S.A. Label-Free Sensors Based on Graphene Field-Effect Transistors for the Detection of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Cancer Risk Biomarker. Diagnostics 2018, 8, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gao, N.; Gao, T.; Yang, X.; Dai, X.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, A.; Lieber, C.M. Specific detection of biomolecules in physiological solutions using graphene transistor biosensors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 14633–14638. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  25. Kuila, T.; Bose, S.; Khanra, P.; Mishra, A.K.; Kim, N.H.; Lee, J.H. Recent advances in graphene-based biosensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 4637–4648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhou, L.; Mao, H.; Wu, C.; Tang, L.; Wu, Z.; Sun, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, H.; Jia, C.; Jin, Q. Label-free graphene biosensor targeting cancer molecules based on non-covalent modification. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 87, 701–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chen, R.J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, D.; Dai, H. Noncovalent sidewall functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes for protein immobilization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3838–3839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Georgakilas, V.; Otyepka, M.; Bourlinos, A.B.; Chandra, V.; Kim, N.; Kemp, K.C.; Hobza, P.; Zboril, R.; Kim, K.S. Functionalization of graphene: Covalent and non-covalent approaches, derivatives and applications. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 6156–6214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hideshima, S.; Sato, R.; Kuroiwa, S.; Osaka, T. Fabrication of stable antibody-modified field effect transistors using electrical activation of Schiff base cross-linkages for tumor marker detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 26, 2419–2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Liu, Y.; Yuan, L.; Yang, M.; Zheng, Y.; Li, L.; Gao, L.; Nerngchamnong, N.; Nai, C.T.; Sangeeth, C.S.; Feng, Y.P. Giant enhancement in vertical conductivity of stacked CVD graphene sheets by self-assembled molecular layers. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Kim, D.-M.; Moon, J.-M.; Lee, W.-C.; Yoon, J.-H.; Choi, C.S.; Shim, Y.-B. A potentiometric non-enzymatic glucose sensor using a molecularly imprinted layer bonded on a conducting polymer. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 91, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kim, J.-W.; Kotagiri, N.; Kim, J.-H.; Deaton, R. In situ fluorescence microscopy visualization and characterization of nanometer-scale carbon nanotubes labeled with 1-pyrenebutanoic acid, succinimidyl ester. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 213110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qiang, Z.; Yuan, R.; Chai, Y.; Wang, N.; Zhuo, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X. A new potentiometric immunosensor for determination of α-fetoprotein based on improved gelatin–silver complex film. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51, 3763–3768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lin, Y.-M.; Dimitrakopoulos, C.; Jenkins, K.A.; Farmer, D.B.; Chiu, H.-Y.; Grill, A.; Avouris, P. 100-GHz transistors from wafer-scale epitaxial graphene. Science 2010, 327, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Schwierz, F. Graphene transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hideshima, S.; Sato, R.; Inoue, S.; Kuroiwa, S.; Osaka, T. Detection of tumor marker in blood serum using antibody-modified field effect transistor with optimized BSA blocking. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 161, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kanevsky, V.Y.; Pozdnyakova, L.; Aksenova, O.; Severin, S.; Katukov, V.Y.; Severin, E. Isolation and characterization of AFP-binding proteins from tumor and fetal human tissues. IUBMB Life 1997, 41, 1143–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Daigo, K.; Sugita, S.; Mochizuki, Y.; Iwanari, H.; Hiraishi, K.; Miyano, K.; Kodama, T.; Hamakubo, T. A simple hybridoma screening method for high-affinity monoclonal antibodies using the signal ratio obtained from time-resolved fluorescence assay. Anal. Biochem. 2006, 351, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Huang, C.-J.; Lin, H.-I.; Shiesh, S.-C.; Lee, G.-B. An integrated microfluidic system for rapid screening of alpha-fetoprotein-specific aptamers. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 35, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Palomaki, G.E.; Lambert-Messerlian, G. Down syndrome screening: Suitability of a WHO 5 standardized total hCG assay. Clin. Biochem. 2014, 47, 629–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sensors 18 04032 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of AFP detection using G-FET and modification process.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of AFP detection using G-FET and modification process.
Sensors 18 04032 g001
Sensors 18 04032 g002 550
Figure 2. 3D AFM images of (a) pristine graphene; (b) PBASE-modified graphene; (c) anti-AFP-immobilized graphene; (d) high-resolution XPS N1s spectra of pristine, PBASE-modified, and anti-AFP-immobilized graphenes.
Figure 2. 3D AFM images of (a) pristine graphene; (b) PBASE-modified graphene; (c) anti-AFP-immobilized graphene; (d) high-resolution XPS N1s spectra of pristine, PBASE-modified, and anti-AFP-immobilized graphenes.
Sensors 18 04032 g002
Sensors 18 04032 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) IDS-VGS and IGS-VGS transfer characteristic of G-FET; (b) IDS-VDS curves of G-FET; (c) VDirac for pristine, PBASE-modified, and anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET.
Figure 3. (a) IDS-VGS and IGS-VGS transfer characteristic of G-FET; (b) IDS-VDS curves of G-FET; (c) VDirac for pristine, PBASE-modified, and anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET.
Sensors 18 04032 g003
Sensors 18 04032 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) the IDS-VGS characteristics of G-FET before and after binding to AFP (10 ng mL−1 in PBS) on the anti-AFP-immobilized channel surface; (b) sensitivity of the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET for AFP detection in PBS; (c) selectivity of the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET for AFP compared with hCG and CEA.
Figure 4. (a) the IDS-VGS characteristics of G-FET before and after binding to AFP (10 ng mL−1 in PBS) on the anti-AFP-immobilized channel surface; (b) sensitivity of the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET for AFP detection in PBS; (c) selectivity of the anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET for AFP compared with hCG and CEA.
Sensors 18 04032 g004
Sensors 18 04032 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) the IDS-VGS characteristics of G-FET before and after binding with AFP (75.6 ng mL−1 in human plasma of HCC patients) on the anti-AFP-immobilized channel surface; (b) the sensitivity of anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET for detecting AFP in human plasma from HCC patients.
Figure 5. (a) the IDS-VGS characteristics of G-FET before and after binding with AFP (75.6 ng mL−1 in human plasma of HCC patients) on the anti-AFP-immobilized channel surface; (b) the sensitivity of anti-AFP-immobilized G-FET for detecting AFP in human plasma from HCC patients.
Sensors 18 04032 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, D.H.; Oh, H.G.; Park, W.H.; Jeon, D.C.; Lim, K.M.; Kim, H.J.; Jang, B.K.; Song, K.S. Detection of Alpha-Fetoprotein in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patient Plasma with Graphene Field-Effect Transistor. Sensors 2018, 18, 4032. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18114032

AMA Style

Kim DH, Oh HG, Park WH, Jeon DC, Lim KM, Kim HJ, Jang BK, Song KS. Detection of Alpha-Fetoprotein in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patient Plasma with Graphene Field-Effect Transistor. Sensors. 2018; 18(11):4032. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18114032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Dae Hoon, Hong Gi Oh, Woo Hwan Park, Dong Cheol Jeon, Ki Moo Lim, Hyung Jin Kim, Byoung Kuk Jang, and Kwang Soup Song. 2018. "Detection of Alpha-Fetoprotein in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patient Plasma with Graphene Field-Effect Transistor" Sensors 18, no. 11: 4032. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18114032

APA Style

Kim, D. H., Oh, H. G., Park, W. H., Jeon, D. C., Lim, K. M., Kim, H. J., Jang, B. K., & Song, K. S. (2018). Detection of Alpha-Fetoprotein in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patient Plasma with Graphene Field-Effect Transistor. Sensors, 18(11), 4032. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18114032

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop