Next Article in Journal
Extraction and Research of Crop Feature Points Based on Computer Vision
Next Article in Special Issue
Olfaction, Vision, and Semantics for Mobile Robots. Results of the IRO Project
Previous Article in Journal
Smart Cupboard for Assessing Memory in Home Environment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fingerprinting of Nitroaromatic Explosives Realized by Aphen-functionalized Titanium Dioxide
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tuning the Polarity of MoTe2 FETs by Varying the Channel Thickness for Gas-Sensing Applications

1
School of Engineering and Applied Science, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
2
Department of Physics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA
3
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2019, 19(11), 2551; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19112551
Submission received: 2 April 2019 / Revised: 30 May 2019 / Accepted: 1 June 2019 / Published: 4 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gas Sensors and Smart Sensing Systems)

Abstract

:
In this study, electrical characteristics of MoTe2 field-effect transistors (FETs) are investigated as a function of channel thickness. The conductivity type in FETs, fabricated from exfoliated MoTe2 crystals, switched from p-type to ambipolar to n-type conduction with increasing MoTe2 channel thickness from 10.6 nm to 56.7 nm. This change in flake-thickness-dependent conducting behavior of MoTe2 FETs can be attributed to modulation of the Schottky barrier height and related bandgap alignment. Change in polarity as a function of channel thickness variation is also used for ammonia (NH3) sensing, which confirms the p- and n-type behavior of MoTe2 devices.

1. Introduction

Since the discovery of graphene in 2004 [1], the two-dimensional (2D) layered materials have attracted significant attention for device applications owing to their unique physical properties and promising applications in nanoelectronic devices and circuits [1,2,3,4,5]. Due to lack of bandgap structure, graphene-based transistors are difficult to switch off, which is critical for electronic devices [6]. This limitation in graphene led researchers towards layered semiconductor transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), which are now seen as promising candidates for next-generation transistors due to their large variety of bandgap values [7,8], high charge-carrier mobility [9,10], and high on/off current ratio (~106) [11]. Transition metal dichalcogenide (TMDC) compounds consists of one layer of transition-metal sheet (Mo and W) sandwiched between two sheets of chalcogenide elements (S, Se, and Te). Weak van der Waals interactions between the layers facilitate exfoliation of TMDCs crystals down to a single layer [3].
Among all TMDCs, MoTe2 is the only material which can be grown in two phases: semiconducting (2H-phase) and metallic (1T’-phase). The theoretical bandgap for bulk and single-layer MoTe2 in the semiconducting phase (2H) is 0.81 eV (indirect) and 1.13 eV (direct), respectively [12,13,14,15]. The bandgap of MoTe2 is close to that of Si (1.1eV), making it an attractive candidate for optoelectronic devices with a range spreading from visible to near-infrared [1,11,16]. Recent literatures show that p- and n-type carrier injection can be obtained by work-function engineering of the contact metals [17]. The high work function of Pt and low work function of Ti metal contact can strengthen the p- and n-type conducting behavior [17]. It has been demonstrated that the field-effect transistor (FET) polarity can be electrostatically altered by dual top gate geometry [18]. The ambipolar behavior of MoTe2 changing to n-type upon exposure to UV light for 2 h has also been reported [19]. It was also observed that unipolar p-type behavior of MoTe2 flakes with Ti/Au metal contact and environmental oxygen can tune the device from ambipolar to unipolar p-type [11]. 2D layered nanomaterials are advantageous for gas-sensing applications due to their high surface-to-volume ratio, which facilitates surface reactions [20,21,22,23]. For chemiresistive-type FET gas sensors, electrical resistivity or conductivity are altered upon adsorption of target molecules on the surface of 2D nanomaterials [19,24,25]. It is a well-known fact that NH3 acts as an electron donor (n-type doping), resulting in an increase of resistance for p-type semiconductors based on the charge-transfer mechanism [26].
In this study, we demonstrate that the change in polarity of MoTe2 is a function of channel thickness. From our measurements, we observed that MoTe2 FETs showed p-type, ambipolar, and n-type polarity with increasing flake thickness. MoTe2 is intrinsically p-doped, but can also exhibit an ambipolar behavior [27]. To date, no clear evidence about unipolar n-type behavior of MoTe2 FETs has been reported. From our experimental results of thin (~5.6–12 nm), medium (~12–45 nm), and thick (>45 nm) channel devices from tellurium tetrachloride (TeCl4)-based transport-agent devices showed, p-, ambipolar-, and n-type conducting behavior, respectively. In this study we also highlighted the effect of channel thickness on gas-sensing application of MoTe2 devices, which has not been mentioned in early literature [19]. The NH3 gas-sensing results of MoTe2 FETs further confirms the change in polarity as a function of flake thickness. No additional fabrication steps are required to obtain unipolar p- or n-type FETs. This electrical property of MoTe2 can provide guidance to obtain p-type, ambipolar, and n-type devices, merely by tuning the channel thickness.

2. Materials and Methods

In this work, MoTe2 flakes were exfoliated from bulk crystals grown by a chemical vapor transport (CVT) method. MoTe2 (2H-phase) crystal was prepared by mixing powders of MoTe2 and a small amount (ca 5 mg/cm3) of transport agent (TeCl4), vacuum sealed in quartz ampoule for 140 h, and placed inside a furnace with temperature gradient. The temperature of MoTe2 charge was maintained at 800 °C (hot zone), and the opposite end of ampoule was at 710 °C (cold zone). The ampoule was slowly cooled after seven days of growth [28]. The schematic diagram of the setup used for MoTe2 crystal growth and an image of bulk crystal after CVT growth is shown in Figure 1a,b respectively. This method is known to produce pure 2H-phase of MoTe2, as verified by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) [29], and Raman spectroscopy (Figure 1c).
Different thickness of flakes ranging from 5.6 nm to 60 nm were obtained from CVT-grown bulk MoTe2 crystal, and transferred onto SiO2/Si substrate by mechanical exfoliation (Supplementary Figure S1). The thickness of the SiO2 layer was 285 nm. The blank SiO2/Si substrate was patterned with design having numbers, symbols, and alphabets using photolithography. For fabrication steps involving photolithography, a bi-layer stack of positive photoresists LOR 3A and Microposit SPR 220.3 was used. LOR 3A was spin-coated at 4000 revolutions per minute (rpm), followed by a soft bake at 115 °C for 2 min. Next, Microposit SPR 220.3 was spin coated at 4000 rpm for 45 s and soft baked at 115 °C for 2 min. The samples were then exposed to UV illumination using mask-aligner (MA6 SUSS Microtec) and developed in Microposit CD 26A for 30 s, followed by a rinse in deionized water. Metal deposition in all fabrication steps was performed using an e-beam evaporator (Denton Infinity 22), and a lift-off process was performed by immersing the devices in remover 1165 at 80 °C for 30 min. These pattern marks were used for locating the desired MoTe2 flakes after mechanical exfoliation. Prior to exfoliation, the patterned substrate was ultrasonically cleaned in acetone, iso-propanol (IPA), and deionized water (DIW), followed by oxygen plasma cleaning to remove the adsorbates from the surface [30]. Under the Olympus optical microscope, successful transfer of few layers of MoTe2 flakes on SiO2/Si substrate was mapped out to pre-fabricated marking points for a source/drain contact pattern. Fabrication steps shown in Supplementary Figure S2, was also used for patterning the source/drain metal contact of MoTe2 devices. After fabrication, the devices were thermally annealed in a vacuum environment at 350 °C for 5 min to reduce the contact resistance between metal and MoTe2 flake. Further, atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to confirm the exact channel thickness and verify uniformity, absence of folds and cracks on the MoTe2 flake under investigation.
After exfoliation, back-gate FET measurement was done using a Lakeshore probe station. The schematic of the back-gate FET connection is shown in Figure 2a. The silicon of substrate was used as a back-gate electrode and the SiO2 layer acted as the gate dielectric in the back-gate FET measurement. These devices were characterized by output (Figure 2b) and transfer (Figure 2c) curves using back-gate FET measurement at room temperature. After the back-gate FET measurement, the devices were verified by NH3 gas sensing for n- and p-type conducting behavior for the thick and thin channel. The gas sensing was performed by exposing 100 ppm of NH3 concentration diluted with N2 as carrying gas. N2 gas is used to dilute NH3 to the desired concentration at room temperature. We used N2 as diluting gas due to its better recovery when compared with air environment. The gas sensing performance of the device was evaluated by applying 5 V between source and drain, and ground to the back-gate electrode.

3. Results

The flake-thickness scaling effect on MoTe2 so far has gained less attention for the use in electronics compared with their thin counterparts. In this study, we have examined the conducting behavior of MoTe2 FETs prepared using a TeCl4 transport agent by CVT method. Using Raman spectroscopy with 532 nm laser source, we identified the lattice vibrational modes of mechanically exfoliated 2H-MoTe2 flakes. The Raman spectra in Figure 1c exhibits characteristic A1g at 170 cm−1, E12g at 235 cm−1, and B2g at ≈288 cm−1 modes (the latter is active only in thin layers), which is in good agreement with studies reported in the literatures [31]. This verifies the 2H-phase of MoTe2 and good crystalline quality used in FETs. Inset in Figure 1c shows the optical image of 4.6 nm fabricated MoTe2 FET. Optical imaging technique has been popular in the rough estimate of flake thickness [32].
To understand the channel-thickness effect of FET transport characteristics, we measured the output (drain current (Ids) vs. drain voltage, (Vds)) and transfer (Ids vs. back-gate voltage (Vbg)) characteristics using Lakeshore probe station. The schematic diagram of circuit connection for back-gate FET measurement is shown in Figure 2a. In Figure 2b, the output characteristics of the 10.6 nm MoTe2 FET shows an increase in conduction as gate voltage decreases from +40 V to –40 V, showing that the majority of carriers are holes, since the channel is entering the ON state with a negative gate voltage. Contrarily, the output characteristic of the 56.7 nm MoTe2 device, shown in Figure 2c, shows that the majority of carriers in the channel are electrons (ON state with positive gate voltage) as gate voltage decreases from +40 V to –40 V. Clearly, p-type and n-type transport behavior is observed for 10.6 nm vs. 56.7 nm MoTe2 FETs, respectively. The nonlinear behavior of the output curve in Figure 2b,c can be attributed to a small Schottky barrier at the metal/semiconductor junction due to difference between the work function of Ti (4.33 eV) and the electron affinity of MoTe2 (4.3 ± 0.1 eV) [17,33].
We further studied the transfer behavior of the FETs at Vds = 2 V. The transfer characteristic results showed that thick, medium, and thin channel are n-type, ambipolar, and p-type, respectively. The gate leakage current (Igs) measured in the pA range (negligible). The maximum on/off current ratio obtained was ~1 × 104, which increases with decreasing channel thickness. Figure 3 shows transfer curves for varying channel thickness for different metal contacts. Multiple devices with various metal contact (Ti/Au, Cr/Au, and Pd/Au), were fabricated which reproduced similar transfer characteristic as a function of MoTe2 channel thickness [34]. The metal work functions (ϕm) of Ti, Cr, and Pd are 4.3 eV, 4.8 eV, and 5.1 eV, respectively. At least 10 devices from each metal type were fabricated and tested to reproduce the transfer curves to verify the change in polarity based on channel thickness. From transfer curves, we observed that MoTe2 FETs showed p-type behavior for very thin channels, ≈5–15 nm and ambipolar behavior for medium channel thicknesses, from ≈15 to 50 nm. For channels thicker than ≈50 nm, FETs showed n-type unipolar behavior. Previous studies on TMDC (such as WSe2, MoS2, and MoTe2) have presented the effect of channel thickness on various transport properties in FETs [35,36,37,38] , but a wide range of channel thickness (~5–60 nm) and its effect on polarity of MoTe2 devices has not been highlighted until now.
In reference to n-type conducting behavior, the n-type doping has been observed in TMDCs when TeCl4 is used as the transport agent in CVT growth [39] and during post-growth chloride molecular doping of TMDC compounds [40]. In this work, we assume that the Cl doping is playing a dominant role for n-type behavior in thick channel devices. In thin-channel FETs, conductivity switches to p-type, indicating the diminishing of Cl doping. We attribute it to the increase in surface defects and adsorbates in ultra-thin layers, which is also exemplified in atomically thin MoS2 FETs [35]. In addition to the possible effect of reduced MoTe2 channel thickness on n-type doping efficiency, we also speculate that the polarity switching from n- to p-type in thinner layers may be caused by the modulation of Schottky barrier height (SBH) and corresponding band alignment and band-bending at the metal/MoTe2 interface. The effective barrier height for Ti, Cr, and Pd contacts are 41.1, 40.3, and 10.2 meV, respectively [41,42].
We also investigated the field-effect carrier mobility (µFE) of fabricated devices extracted from the transfer curve of Figure 3a and MoTe2 devices with Ti/Au as metal contact. Mobility, µFE of the back-gated MoTe2 FETs is defined as follows:
µFE = (dIds/dVbg) {L/(W COX Vds)}
where COX (=ε0·εr/d) is silicon oxide capacitance per unit area, d is the oxide thickness, ε0 and εr are the relative permittivity of free space and the relative permittivity of SiO2, respectively, L and W are the channel length and width, respectively, Vds is the drain-source voltage, and (dIds/dVbg) is the inverse slope of transfer characteristic in the linear region of the ON state. The mobility increases with increasing channel thickness, as shown in Figure 4. A thicker channel has higher mobility compared with thinner MoTe2 devices. The influence of channel thickness in MoTe2 devices can be associated to Coulomb scattering and quantum confinement, as reported in early literatures [43,44]. Coulomb interactions weaken the scattering of carriers, resulting in higher mobility for thicker FETs compared with thinner counterparts, which was also demonstrated for both MoTe2 [35] and MoS2 [45] FETs.
To further confirm the change in polarity of FET devices, their response in the presence of gas molecules was measured. Figure 5 shows the gas-sensing setup used for NH3 sensing in this work. Nitrogen (N2) as diluting gas is connected to MFC2 and mixed with NH3 target gas (connected to MFC1). Both MFC1 and MFC2 are mixed in MFC mixer for the required concentration. The output of MFC1 and MFC2 is connected to MFC mixer for the required concentration of NH3 to flow in the gas-sensing stainless steel chamber for measurement. The MFC mixer is also connected to a pressure controller used to vent out extra gases. The MoTe2 device is packaged on ceramic chip carrier (inlet of Figure 5) and placed inside the stainless steel chamber, and a source/drain is connected to probes of a National Instrument (NI) for data collection. The gas sensing data from the NI instrument is analyzed using LabView program by transient curve.
The schematic of NH3 sensing on n- and p-type is shown in Figure 6a–c. Figure 6a shows the schematic of process flow for NH3 gas sensing. We selected NH3 as the target gas since it is a strong electron donor and will produce opposite behavior in n-type (Figure 6b) and p-type (Figure 6c) devices. When NH3 is adsorbed on the n-type MoTe2 (Figure 6b) surface, an increase in current is observed due increase in electron charge carriers on the MoTe2 surface. When NH3 gas is switched off, NH3 molecules are desorbed from the surface and the current value of pristine-state MoTe2 surface is obtained. Similarly, when NH3 is adsorbed on the p-type MoTe2 surface, a decrease in current value is seen, due to a decrease in hole-charge carriers on the MoTe2 surface, as shown in Figure 6b. A single pulse of 100 ppm concentration of NH3 was introduced to the MoTe2 devices, and the current response of devices was measured.
Figure 7a,b shows the gas-sensing response of 100 ppm NH3 of 60 nm and 6.1 nm MoTe2 flakes. We were able to detect the NH3 concentration as low as 1 ppm for thin MoTe2 channels. We couldn’t go below 1 ppm due to a limitation of the mass-flow controller. The lowest concentration detected by thicker channel devices was 100 ppm. Hence, for comparison purpose of n- and p-type MoTe2 devices, 100 ppm NH3 sensing was used in this work. The thick (60 nm), n-type MoTe2 FET showed an expected increase in current, and the thin, p-type MoTe2 FET showed a corresponding decrease in current. The response is calculated using Equation (2) for Figure 7.
Response (%) = [(Igas − Ibaseline)/Ibaseline] × 100
where, Igas and Ibaseline are currents when NH3 is on and the baseline current, as shown in Figure 6b,c. This experiment verifies the change in polarity in MoTe2 flakes due to variation in channel thickness. Thin flakes show higher sensitivity (~12 %) compared with thick flakes (~5%) due to high surface-to-volume ratio. The current values of NH3 sensing by thin and thick MoTe2 flakes is shown in Supplementary Figure S3. The low value of sensitivity and baseline drift in devices can be due to the limitations of the custom-built gas-sensing setup. In this work, we showed that electrical properties of MoTe2 are dependent on flake thickness, which is also verified by NH3 sensing of thin and thick flakes. No extra fabrication steps are required to obtain the n- or p-type conduction behavior in MoTe2 FETs. We predict that with further experiments and modifications in our gas-sensing setup, a similar change in polarity of MoTe2 device as function of channel thickness can also be shown for NH3 sensing in an air environment.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we demonstrated a simple and effective way to fabricate p-type, ambipolar, and n-type MoTe2 FETs just by tuning the channel thickness. FETs were fabricated from mechanically exfoliated flake from CVT-grown single-crystal 2H-MoTe2. The electrical properties of devices prepared from 2H-MoTe2 flakes were examined for varying thickness (~5–60 nm) using the output and transfer curves. FETs showed polarity switching from n-type through ambipolar to p-type with decreasing channel thickness from 60 nm to ~5.6 nm. The n-type transfer behavior in thick-channel MoTe2 FET is attributed to chlorine doping from the TeCl4 transport agent used in CVT growth of bulk crystals. The switching of polarity by thinning the FET channel may be associated with the increasing role of surface states in ultra-thin layers, which can influence charge-carrier concentration by modulating the Schottky barrier height between metal and semiconductor interface. This study also showed the NH3 gas-sensing application of p- and n-type MoTe2 devices, indicating the change in polarity due to channel thickness.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/19/11/2551/s1, Figure S1, Process steps for plasma–assisted mechanical exfoliation; Figure S2, Process steps showing fabrication of source/drain contacts on exfoliated samples; Figure S3, Transient curve (current-time) of (a) 60 nm and (b) 6.1 nm MoTe2 flakes for NH3 sensing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, A.R. and K.D.; writing-original draft, A.R.; Writing-review & editing, M.A.H.K.; supervision, M.P., M.E.Z.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Albert Davydov and Sergiy Krylyuk in National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST) for providing MoTe2 crystal and equipment for measurement.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Radisavljevic, B.; Radenovic, A.; Brivio, J.; Giacometti, V.; Kis, A. Single-layer MoS2 Transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kim, K.S.; Zhao, Y.; Jang, H.; Lee, S.Y.; Kim, J.M.; Kim, K.S.; Ahn, J.-H.; Kim, P.; Choi, J.-Y.; Hong, B.H. Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes. Nature 2009, 457, 706–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lopez-Sanchez, O.; Lembke, D.; Kayci, M.; Radenovic, A.; Kis, A. Ultrasensitive photodetectors based on monolayer MoS2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yin, Z.; Li, H.; Jiang, L.; Shi, Y.; Sun, Y.; Lu, G.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhang, H. Single-layer MoS2 phototransistors. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Meric, L.; Han, M.Y.; Young, A.F.; Ozyilmaz, B.; Kim, P.; Shepard, K.L. Current saturation in zero-bandgap, top-gated graphene field-effect transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 654–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tang, Q.; Zhou, Z. Graphene-analogous low-dimensional materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2013, 58, 1244–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fiori, G.; Bonaccorso, F.; Iannaccone, G.; Palacios, T.; Neumaier, D.; Seabaugh, A.; Banerjee, S.K.; Colombo, L. Electronics based on two-dimensional materials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 768–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Strait, J.H.; Nene, P.; Rana, F. High Intrinsic Mobility and Ultrafast Carrier Dynamics in Multilayer Metal-Dichalcogenide MoS2. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 90, 245402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bao, W.Z.; Cai, X.H.; Kim, D.; Sridhara, K.; Fuhrer, M.S. High Intrinsic Mobility and Ultrafast Carrier Ambipolar MoS2 Field-Effect Transistors: Substrate and Dielectric Effects. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 042104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pradhan, N.R.; Rhodes, D.; Feng, S.M.; Xin, Y.; Memaran, S.; Moon, B.-H.; Terrones, H.; Terrones, M.; Balica, L. Field- Effect Transistors Based on Few- Layered alpha-MoTe2. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 5911–5920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ding, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ni, J.; Shi, L.; Shi, S.; Tang, W. First principles study of structural, vibrational and electronic properties of graphene-like MX2 (M = Mo, Nb, W, Ta; X = S, Se, Te) monolayers. Phys. B 2011, 406, 2254–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ataca, C.; Sahin, H.; Ciraci, S. Stable, Single-Layer MX2 Transition-Metal Oxides and Dichalcogenides in a Honeycomb-Like Structure. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 8983–8999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ma, Y.; Dai, Y.; Guo, M.; Niu, C.; Lu, J.; Huang, B. Electronic and magnetic properties of perfect, vacancy-doped, and nonmetal adsorbed MoSe2, MoTe2 and WS2 monolayers. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 15546–15553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kuiri, M.; Chakraborty, B.; Paul, A.; Das, S.; Sood, A.K.; Das, A. Enhancing photoresponsivity using MoTe2-graphene vertical heterostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 108, 063506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, H.-M.; Lee, D.-Y.; Choi, M.S.; Qu, D.; Liu, X.; Ra, C.-H.; Yoo, W.J. Metal-Semiconductor Barrier Modulation for High Photoresponse in Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Field Effect Transistors. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nakaharai, S.; Yamamoto, M.; Ueno, K.; Tsukagoshi, K. Carrier Polarity Control in α-MoTe2 Schottky Junctions Based on Weak Fermi-Level Pinning. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 14732–14739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Resta, G.V.; Sutar, S.; Balaji, Y.; Lin, D.; Raghavn, P.; Radu, I.; Catthoor, F.; Thean, A.; Gaillardon, P.-E.; Micheli, G. Polarity control in WSe2 double-gate transistors. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Feng, Z.; Xie, Y.; Wu, E.; Yu, Y.; Zheng, S.; Zhang, R.; Chen, X.; Sun, C.; Zhang, H.; Liu, J.; et al. Enhanced Sensitivity of MoTe2 Chemical Sensor through Light Illumination. Micromachines 2017, 8, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ping, J.; Fan, Z.; Sindoro, M.; Ying, Y.; Zhang, H. Recent advances in sensing applications of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets and their composits. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1605817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, S.; Jiang, C.; Wei, S.-H. Gas sensing in 2D materials. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2017, 4, 021304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Choi, S.J.; Kim, I.D. Recent developments in 2D Nanomaterials for Chemiresistive-Type Gas Sensors. Electron. Mater. Lett. 2018, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, X.; Ma, T.; Pinna, N.; Zhang, J. Two-dimensional layered nanostructured materials for gas-sensing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cho, B.; Hahm, M.G.; Choi, M.; Yoon, J.; Kim, A.R.; Lee, Y.-L.; Park, S.-G.; Kwon, J.-D.; Kim, C.S.; Song, M.; et al. Charge-transfer based gas sensing using atomic-layer MoS2. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liu, B.; Chen, L.; Liu, G.; Abbas, A.N.; Fathi, M.; Zhou, C. High-performance chemical sensing using Schottky-contacted chemical. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 5304–5314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Late, D.J.; Huang, Y.-K.; Liu, B.; Acharya, J.; Shirodkar, S.N.; Luo, J.; Yan, A.; Charles, D.; Waghmare, U.V.; Dravid, V.P.; et al. Sensing behavior of atomically thin-layered MoS2 transistors. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 4879–4891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lezama, I.G.; Ubaldini, A.; Longobardi, M.; Giannini, E.; Renner, C.; Kuzmenko, A.B.; Morpurgo, A.F. Indirect-to-direct band-gap crossover in few-layer MoTe2. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 2336–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Singh-Miller, N.E.; Marzari, N.N. Surface energies, work functions, and surface relaxations of low index metallic surfaces from first principles. Phys. Rev. B. Condens. Matter 2009, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Oliver, S.M.; Beams, R.; Krylyuk, S.; Kalish, I.; Singh, A.K.; Bruma, A.; Tavazza, F.; Joshi, J.; Stone, I.R.; Stranick, S.J.; et al. The structural phases and vibrational properties of Mo1−xWxTe2 alloys. 2D Mater. 2017, 4, 045008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Huang, Y.; Sutter, E.; Shi, N.N.; Zheng, J.; Yang, T.; Englund, D.; Gao, H.-J.; Sutter, P. Reliable exfoliation of large-area high-quality flakes of graphene and other two–dimensional materials. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 10612–10620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Benameur, M.M.; Radisavljevic, B.; Heron, J.S.; Sahoo, S.; Berger, H.; Kis, A. Visibility of dichalcogenide nanolayers. Nanotechnology 2011, 22, 125706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Golasa, K.; Grzeszczyk, M.; Molas, M.R.; Zinkiewicz, M.; Bala, L.; Nogajewski, K.; Potemski, M.; Wysmolek, A.; Babinski, A. Resonant quenching of Raman scattering due to out-of-plane A1g/A’1 modes in few-layer MoTe2. Nanophotonics 2017, 6, 1281–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shimada, T.; Shuchi, S.F.; Parkinson, A.B. Work function of photothreshold of layered metal dichalcogenides. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 33 Pt 1, 2696–2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rani, A.; DiCamillo, K.; Krylyuk, S.; Debnath, R.; Taheri, P.; Pranajape, M.; Korman, C.E.; Zaghloul, M.E.; Davydov, A.V. Control of Polarity in Multilayer MoTe2 Field-Effect Transistors by Channel Thickness. In Proceedings of the Low-Dimensional Materials and Devices 2018, San Diego, CA, USA, 11 September 2018; Volume 10725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hyunjin, J.; Gwanmu, L.; Min-Kyu, J.; Yoojoo, Y.; Hojoon, Y.; Ji-Hoon, P.; Dongseok, S.; Chu, S.L. Thickness-dependent carrier mobility of ambipolar MoTe2: Interplay between interface trap and Coulomb scattering. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 110, 183501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Perello, J.D.; Chae, H.S.; Song, S.; Lee, H.Y. High-performance n-type black phosphorous transistors with type control via thickness and contact- metal engineering. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kwon, J.; Lee, Y.J.; Yu, J.Y.; Lee, H.C.; Cui, X.; Hone, J.; Lee, H.G. Thickness-dependent Schottky barrier height of MoS2 field-effect transistors. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 6151–6157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cai, Y.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, W.Y. Layer-dependent band alignment and work function of few-layer phosphorene. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Legma, J.B.; Vacquier, G.; Casalot, A. Chemical vapour transport of molybdenum and tungsten diselenides by various transport agents. J. Cryst. Growth 1993, 130, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, L.; Majumdar, K.; Liu, H.; Du, Y.; Wu, H.; Hatzistergos, M.; Hung, P.; Tieckelmann, R.; Tsai, W.; Hobbs, C.; et al. Chloride Molecular Doping Technique on 2D Materials: WS2 and MoS2. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 6275–6280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Townsend, N.J.; Amit, I.; Cracium, M.F.; Russo, S. Sum 20 meV Schottky barriers in metal/MoTe2 Junctions. 2D Mater. 2018, 5, 025023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Attena, J.J.; Uijttewaal, M.A.; Wijs, G.A.; Groot, R.A. Work Function Anisotropy and surface stability of half-metallic CrO2. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 165109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, Y.; Stradins, P.; Huai, S.H. Van der Waals metal-semiconductor junction: Weak Fermi level pinning enables effective tuning of Schottky barrier. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1600069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kim, C.; Moon, I.; Lee, D.; Choi, M.S.; Ahmed, F.; Nam, S.; Cho, Y.; Shin, H.-J.; Park, S.; Yoo, W.J. Fermi level pinning at electrical metal contacts of monolayer molybdenum dichalcogenides. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 1588–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, S.-L.; Wakabayashi, K.; Xu, Y.; Nakaharai, S.; Komatsu, K.; Li, W.-W.; Lin, Y.-F.; Aparecido-Ferreira, A.; Tsukagoshi, K. Thickness-dependent interfacial Coulomb scattering in atomically thin field-effect transistors. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 3546–3552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the two-zone electric furnace used for the growth of 2H-MoTe2 crystal using TeCl4 as transport agent; (b) As-synthesized bulk of MoTe2 crystals after growth; (c) Raman spectra of MoTe2 flakes of different thickness exfoliated from bulk MoTe2 single crystals grown by chemical vapor transport (CVT) with TeCl4 transport agent. Inset shows plane-view optical image of FET device with a 4.6 nm thick channel.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the two-zone electric furnace used for the growth of 2H-MoTe2 crystal using TeCl4 as transport agent; (b) As-synthesized bulk of MoTe2 crystals after growth; (c) Raman spectra of MoTe2 flakes of different thickness exfoliated from bulk MoTe2 single crystals grown by chemical vapor transport (CVT) with TeCl4 transport agent. Inset shows plane-view optical image of FET device with a 4.6 nm thick channel.
Sensors 19 02551 g001
Figure 2. (a) Schematic of back-gate field-effect transistor (FET) connection. Output characteristics of MoTe2 FETs under different back-gate voltages, Vbg. FETs with channel thickness of (b) 10.6 nm and (c) 56.7 nm showing p- and n-type conductivity, respectively.
Figure 2. (a) Schematic of back-gate field-effect transistor (FET) connection. Output characteristics of MoTe2 FETs under different back-gate voltages, Vbg. FETs with channel thickness of (b) 10.6 nm and (c) 56.7 nm showing p- and n-type conductivity, respectively.
Sensors 19 02551 g002
Figure 3. Transfer characteristics at Vds = 2V of TeCl4-grown and MoTe2 FETs with different channel thickness for (a) Ti/Au; (b) Cr/Au, and (c) Pd/Au.
Figure 3. Transfer characteristics at Vds = 2V of TeCl4-grown and MoTe2 FETs with different channel thickness for (a) Ti/Au; (b) Cr/Au, and (c) Pd/Au.
Sensors 19 02551 g003
Figure 4. Field-effect mobility of electrons and holes vs. channel thickness for MoTe2 FETs. Encircled pairs of data points correspond to the ambipolar devices that exhibit ambipolar conductivity.
Figure 4. Field-effect mobility of electrons and holes vs. channel thickness for MoTe2 FETs. Encircled pairs of data points correspond to the ambipolar devices that exhibit ambipolar conductivity.
Sensors 19 02551 g004
Figure 5. Schematic of gas-sensing setup.
Figure 5. Schematic of gas-sensing setup.
Sensors 19 02551 g005
Figure 6. (a) Mechanism of NH3 sensing. Schematic showing current–time curve of NH3 sensing by (b) n-type and (c) p-type MoTe2 surface.
Figure 6. (a) Mechanism of NH3 sensing. Schematic showing current–time curve of NH3 sensing by (b) n-type and (c) p-type MoTe2 surface.
Sensors 19 02551 g006
Figure 7. Response to 100 ppm NH3 in air of (a) 60 nm and (b) 6.1 nm thick MoTe2 devices, confirming n- and p-type conductivity, respectively. Note much faster recovery time for the thin flakes.
Figure 7. Response to 100 ppm NH3 in air of (a) 60 nm and (b) 6.1 nm thick MoTe2 devices, confirming n- and p-type conductivity, respectively. Note much faster recovery time for the thin flakes.
Sensors 19 02551 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rani, A.; DiCamillo, K.; Khan, M.A.H.; Paranjape, M.; Zaghloul, M.E. Tuning the Polarity of MoTe2 FETs by Varying the Channel Thickness for Gas-Sensing Applications. Sensors 2019, 19, 2551. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19112551

AMA Style

Rani A, DiCamillo K, Khan MAH, Paranjape M, Zaghloul ME. Tuning the Polarity of MoTe2 FETs by Varying the Channel Thickness for Gas-Sensing Applications. Sensors. 2019; 19(11):2551. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19112551

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rani, Asha, Kyle DiCamillo, Md Ashfaque Hossain Khan, Makarand Paranjape, and Mona E. Zaghloul. 2019. "Tuning the Polarity of MoTe2 FETs by Varying the Channel Thickness for Gas-Sensing Applications" Sensors 19, no. 11: 2551. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19112551

APA Style

Rani, A., DiCamillo, K., Khan, M. A. H., Paranjape, M., & Zaghloul, M. E. (2019). Tuning the Polarity of MoTe2 FETs by Varying the Channel Thickness for Gas-Sensing Applications. Sensors, 19(11), 2551. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19112551

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop