3-D Image-Driven Morphological Crop Analysis: A Novel Method for Detection of Sunflower Broomrape Initial Subsoil Parasitism
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Image Acquisition and Analysis
2.2. Plant Segmentation and Parameter Extraction
2.3. Minirhizotron Experiments
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. O. Cumana Parasitism Dynamics: Minirhizotron Experiments
3.2. 3-D Reconstruction and Internode Estimation
3.3. Morphological Analysis for O. Cumana Detection
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lati, R.N.; Filin, S.; Eizenberg, H. Plant growth parameter estimation from sparse 3D reconstruction based on highly-textured feature points. Precis. Agric. 2013, 14, 586–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ephrath, J.E.; Eizenberg, H. Quantification of the dynamics of Orobanche cumana and Phelipanche aegyptiaca parasitism in confectionery sunflower. Weed Res. 2010, 50, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cochavi, A.; Achdari, G.; Smirnov, Y.; Rubin, B.; Eizenberg, H. Egyptian broomrape (Phelipanche aegyptiaca) management in carrot under field conditions. Weed Technol. 2015, 29, 519–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aly, R.; Goldwasser, Y.; Eizenberg, H.; Hershenhorn, J.; Golan, S.; Kleifeld, Y. Broomrape (Orobanche cumana) control in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) with imazapic. Weed Technol. 2009, 15, 306–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aly, R. Conventional and biotechnological approaches for control of parasitic weeds. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2007, 43, 304–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eizenberg, H.; Hershenhorn, J.; Achdari, G.; Ephrath, J.E. A thermal time model for predicting parasitism of Orobanche cumana in irrigated sunflower-field validation. Field Crop. Res. 2012, 137, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eizenberg, H.; Aly, R.; Cohen, Y. Technologies for smart chemical control of broomrape (Orobanche spp. and Phelipanche spp.). Weed Sci. 2012, 60, 316–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bajwa, A.A.; Mahajan, G.; Chauhan, B.S. Nonconventional weed management strategies for modern agriculture. Weed Sci. 2015, 63, 723–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eizenberg, H.; Hershenhorn, J.; Ephrath, J.H.; Kanampiu, F. Chemical control. In Parasitic Orobanchaceae; Joel, D.M., Gressel, J., Musselman, L.J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 415–432. [Google Scholar]
- Cochavi, A.; Rapaport, T.; Gendler, T.; Karnieli, A.; Eizenberg, H.; Rachmilevitch, S.; Ephrath, J.E. Recognition of orobanche cumana below-ground parasitism through physiological and hyper spectral measurements in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ortiz-Bustos, C.M.; Pérez-Bueno, M.L.; Barón, M.; Molinero-Ruiz, L. Fluorescence imaging in the red and far-Rrd region during growth of sunflower plantlets. diagnosis of the early infection by the parasite Orobanche cumana. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaivivatrakul, S.; Tang, L.; Dailey, M.N.; Nakarmi, A.D. Automatic morphological trait characterization for corn plants via 3D holographic reconstruction. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2014, 109, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rose, C.J.; Paulus, S.; Kuhlmann, H. Accuracy analysis of a multi-view stereo approach for phenotyping of tomato plants at the organ level. Sensors 2015, 15, 9651–9665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paproki, A.; Sirault, X.; Berry, S.; Furbank, R.; Fripp, J. A novel mesh processing based technique for 3D plant analysis. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paulus, S.; Dupuis, J.; Mahlein, A.-K.; Kuhlmann, H. Surface feature based classification of plant organs from 3D laserscanned point clouds for plant phenotyping. BMC Bioinform. 2013, 14, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCormick, R.F.; Truong, S.K.; Mullet, J.E. 3D sorghum reconstructions from depth images identify QTL regulating shoot architecture. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 823–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.T.; Slaughter, C.D.; Max, N.; Maloof, N.J.; Sinha, N. Structured light-based 3D reconstruction system for plants. Sensors 2015, 15, 18587–18612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salas Fernandez, M.G.; Bao, Y.; Tang, L.; Schnable, P.S. A high-throughput, field-based phenotyping technology for tall biomass crops. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 2008–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Piron, A.; Leemans, V.; Lebeau, F.; Destain, M.F. Improving in-row weed detection in multispectral stereoscopic images. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2009, 69, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Telem, G.; Filin, S. Photogrammetric modeling of the relative orientation in underwater environments. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2013, 86, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosoi, F.; Omasa, K. Voxel-based 3-D modeling of individual trees for estimating leaf area density using high-resolution portable scanning lidar. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2006, 44, 3610–3618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elnashef, B.; Filin, S.; Lati, R.N. Tensor-based classification and segmentation of three-dimensional point clouds for organ-level plant phenotyping and growth analysis. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 156, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eizenberg, H.; Shtienberg, D.; Silberbush, M.; Ephrath, J.E. A new method for in-situ monitoring of the underground development of Orobanche cumana in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) with a mini-rhizotron. Ann. Bot. 2005, 96, 1137–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McMaster, G.S.; Wilhelm, W.W. Growing degree-days: One equation, two interpretations. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1997, 87, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simmons, A.M.; Yeargan, K.V.; Godfrey, L.D. Ovipositional sites of the potato leafhopper (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) on vegetative stage soybean plants. Environ. Entomol. 1985, 14, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peteinatos, G.G.; Weis, M.; Andújar, D.; Rueda Ayala, V.; Gerhards, R. Potential use of ground-based sensor technologies for weed detection. Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hatfield, J.L.; Prueger, J.H. Temperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development. Weather Clim. Extrem. 2015, 10, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, R.; Dai, M.; Wu, X.; Li, M.; Liu, X. Suppression of the root-knot nematode [Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White) Chitwood] on tomato by dual inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Mycorrhiza 2012, 22, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yamamoto, K.; Guo, W.; Ninomiya, S. Node detection and internode length estimation of tomato seedlings based on image analysis and machine learning. Sensors 2016, 16, 1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brichet, N.; Fournier, C.; Turc, O.; Strauss, O.; Artzet, S.; Pradal, C.; Welcker, C.; Tardieu, F.; Cabrera-Bosquet, L. A robot-assisted imaging pipeline for tracking the growths of maize ear and silks in a high-throughput phenotyping platform. Plant Methods 2017, 13, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surov, T.; Aviv, D.; Aly, R.; Joel, D.M.; Goldman-Guez, T.; Gressel, J. Generation of transgenic asulam-resistant potatoes to facilitate eradication of parasitic broomrapes (Orobanche spp.), with the sul gene as the selectable marker. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1998, 96, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, S.; Evans, R.R.; Dahmer, M.L.; Singh, B.K.; Shaner, D.L. Imidazolinone-tolerant crops: History, current status and future. Pest Manag. Sci. 2005, 61, 246–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y. LiDAR: An important tool for next-generation phenotyping technology of high potential for plant phenomics? Comput. Electron. Agric. 2015, 119, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, D.S.; McCallum, J.D. Mapping straw yield using on-combine light detection and ranging (lidar). Int. J. Remote Sens. 2013, 34, 6121–6134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Grift, T.E. A LIDAR-based crop height measurement system for Miscanthus giganteus. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2012, 85, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fricke, T.; Wachendorf, M. Combining ultrasonic sward height and spectral signatures to assess the biomass of legume-grass swards. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2013, 99, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pittman, J.J.; Arnall, D.B.; Interrante, S.M.; Moffet, C.A.; Butler, T.J. Estimation of biomass and canopy height in Bermudagrass, Alfalfa, and wheat using ultrasonic, laser, and spectral sensors. Sensors 2015, 15, 2920–2943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paulus, S.; Dupuis, J.; Riedel, S.; Kuhlmann, H. Automated analysis of barley organs using 3D laser scanning: An approach for high throughput phenotyping. Sensors 2014, 14, 12670–12686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, T.; Chapman, S.C.; Holland, E.; Rebetzke, G.J.; Guo, Y.; Zheng, B. Dynamic quantification of canopy structure to characterize early plant vigour in wheat genotypes. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 4523–4534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Paulus, S.; Schumann, H.; Kuhlmann, H.; Léon, J. High-precision laser scanning system for capturing 3D plant architecture and analysing growth of cereal plants. Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 121, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.T.; Slaughter, D.C.; Maloof, J.N.; Sinha, N. Plant phenotyping using multi-view stereo vision with structured lights. In Proceedings of the Autonomous Air and Ground Sensing Systems for Agricultural Optimization and Phenotyping (SPIE 9866), Baltimore, MD, USA, 17–21 April 2016; p. 986608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oveisi, M.; Yousefi, A.R.; Gonzalez-Andujar, J.L. Spatial distribution and temporal stability of crenate broomrape (Orobanche crenata Forsk) in faba bean (Vicia faba L.): A long-term study at two localities. Crop Prot. 2010, 29, 717–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jay, S.; Rabatel, G.; Hadoux, X.; Moura, D.; Gorretta, N. In-field crop row phenotyping from 3D modeling performed using structure from motion. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2015, 110, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Li, C.; Paterson, A.H. High throughput phenotyping of cotton plant height using depth images under field conditions. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2016, 130, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kise, M.; Zhang, Q. Development of a stereovision sensing system for 3D crop row structure mapping and tractor guidance. Biosyst. Eng. 2008, 101, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andújar, D.; Fernández-Quintanilla, C.; Dorado, J. Matching the best viewing angle in depth cameras for biomass estimation based on poplar seedling geometry. Sensors 2015, 15, 12999–13011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakarmi, A.D.; Tang, L. Automatic inter-plant spacing sensing at early growth stages using a 3D vision sensor. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2012, 82, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Parameter | Estimate | SE |
---|---|---|
a | 6.62 | 0.42 |
x0 | 1000.18 | 34.69 |
b | −6.37 | 1.17 |
R2 | 0.98 | |
p | <0.0001 | |
RMSE | 0.32 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lati, R.N.; Filin, S.; Elnashef, B.; Eizenberg, H. 3-D Image-Driven Morphological Crop Analysis: A Novel Method for Detection of Sunflower Broomrape Initial Subsoil Parasitism. Sensors 2019, 19, 1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19071569
Lati RN, Filin S, Elnashef B, Eizenberg H. 3-D Image-Driven Morphological Crop Analysis: A Novel Method for Detection of Sunflower Broomrape Initial Subsoil Parasitism. Sensors. 2019; 19(7):1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19071569
Chicago/Turabian StyleLati, Ran Nisim, Sagi Filin, Bashar Elnashef, and Hanan Eizenberg. 2019. "3-D Image-Driven Morphological Crop Analysis: A Novel Method for Detection of Sunflower Broomrape Initial Subsoil Parasitism" Sensors 19, no. 7: 1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19071569
APA StyleLati, R. N., Filin, S., Elnashef, B., & Eizenberg, H. (2019). 3-D Image-Driven Morphological Crop Analysis: A Novel Method for Detection of Sunflower Broomrape Initial Subsoil Parasitism. Sensors, 19(7), 1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19071569