Next Article in Journal
A Machine Learning Approach for an Improved Inertial Navigation System Solution
Next Article in Special Issue
Specifying Inputs for the Computational Structure of a Surgical System via Optical Method and DLT Algorithm Based on In Vitro Experiments on Cardiovascular Tissue in Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery
Previous Article in Journal
An Image Registration Method Based on Correlation Matching of Dominant Scatters for Distributed Array ISAR
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optical Fibre Sensor for Capillary Refill Time and Contact Pressure Measurements under the Foot
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Experimental Investigation of Vibration Analysis on Implant Stability for a Novel Implant Design

Sensors 2022, 22(4), 1685; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041685
by Shouxun Lu 1,*, Benjamin Steven Vien 1, Matthias Russ 2,3, Mark Fitzgerald 2,3 and Wing Kong Chiu 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sensors 2022, 22(4), 1685; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041685
Submission received: 11 January 2022 / Revised: 15 February 2022 / Accepted: 17 February 2022 / Published: 21 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Medical Sensors)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please check the attached pdf file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This article is interesting; however, the authors need to take in consideration the following suggestions before accepting it:

  • The introduction needs to be improved by discussing current articles because only a few new articles have been included in it.
  • The quality of figures needs to be increased, also the size of labels needs to be increased.
  • It is important to justify the selected feature (energy) in your work, why do not other features such as variance, RMS, etc have been tested?.
  • The authors need to explain better the experimental setup, or how were obtained the signals, i.e., sampling frequency, etc.
  • The authors do not compare their results with other methods proposed in the literature recently in order to validate or show that their contribution is important in the subject.
  • The conclusion needs to be improved, adding quantitative results not only qualitative results. In addition, it is important to mention, what is the next with the investigation?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This paper presents an xperimental study on the vibration analysis of a novel implant design. This is a interesting paper but it is lack of the theoretical background. I strongly recommend the authors to include this part.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

My questions have been well answered in the authors' responses. Also, the manuscript quality is improved with a more detailed background introduction and references, with the help of the other reviewers. Therefore, I decided to recommend the manuscript publishing on Sensors. 

Author Response

We wish to thank the reviewers for their comments on our manuscript “Experimental Investigation of Vibration Analysis On Implant Stability For a Novel Implant Design”. Thank you for the thorough and critical review, the thoughtful comments, and the constructive suggestions, which help to improve this manuscript.

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors must justify analytically or experimentally the use of energy as a feature in your proposal and it is superior to other features. In addition, it is mandatory that the authors provide a comparison with other proposals in order to observe the advantages and disadvantages of their proposal.

Author Response

Please see the attachment. Thank you.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop