Next Article in Journal
IoT-Based Systems for Soil Nutrients Assessment in Horticulture
Previous Article in Journal
Wide-Range Humidity–Temperature Hybrid Flexible Sensor Based on Strontium Titanate and Poly 3,4 Ethylenedioxythiophene Polystyrene Sulfonate for Wearable 3D-Printed Mask Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sensitivity Enhancement of Resistive Ethanol Gas Sensor by Optimized Sputtered-Assisted CuO Decoration of ZnO Nanorods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Self-Associated 1,8-Naphthalimide as a Selective Fluorescent Chemosensor for Detection of High pH in Aqueous Solutions and Their Hg2+ Contamination

1
Faculty of Medicine, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, 1407 Sofia, Bulgaria
2
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut 71516, Egypt
3
Department of Textile, Leather and Fuels, University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 1756 Sofia, Bulgaria
4
Institute of Optical Materials and Technologies “Acad. J. Malinowski”, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2023, 23(1), 399; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010399
Submission received: 22 November 2022 / Revised: 21 December 2022 / Accepted: 26 December 2022 / Published: 30 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemiresistive Sensors: Materials and Applications)

Abstract

:
A novel diamino triazine based 1,8-naphthalimide (NI-DAT) has been designed and synthesized. Its photophysical properties have been investigated in different solvents and its sensory capability evaluated. The fluorescence emission of NI-DAT is significantly impacted by the solvent polarity due to its inherent intramolecular charge transfer character. Moreover, the fluorescence emission quenched at higher pH as a result of photo-induced electron transfer (PET) from triazine moiety to 1,8-naphthalimide after cleaving hydrogen bonds in the self-associated dimers. Furthermore, the new chemosensor exhibited a good selectivity and sensitivity towards Hg2+ among all the used various cations and anions in the aqueous solution of ethanol (5:1, v/v, pH = 7.2, Tampon buffer). NI-DAT emission at 540 nm was quenched remarkably only by Hg2+, even in the presence of other cations or anions as interfering analytes. Job’s plot revealed a 2:1 stoichiometric ratio for NI-DAT/Hg2+ complex, respectively.

1. Introduction

Mercury and its compounds are involved in several important industries such as pharmaceuticals, paints, agricultural chemicals, measuring instruments, chlor-alkali industry, etc. [1]. However, mercury is one of the most toxic heavy metals that threaten the human health and environment. All chemical forms of Hg2+ are chronically toxic to humans, especially inorganic derivatives exhibit extremely severe toxicity that leads to a variety of diseases and organs damage [2]. Some organomercurials, particularly low molecular-weight alkyl compounds, are reported to be highly toxic due to their strong affinity to bind with enzymes and proteins leading to mostly irreversible cell dysfunction [3]; nervous system damages [4,5], endocrine disorders [6], as well as failure of the immune [7] and digestive systems [8]. Hence, there is a growing interest in providing new reliable selective and sensitive methods to detect mercury in biological and environmental systems.
Many traditional analytical techniques have recently been applied for detection of mercury ions, namely atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) [9], inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [10], ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometry (UV-vis) [11], surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) [12], surface plasmon resonance (SPR) [13], and electrochemical method [14,15,16]. These techniques ensure the sensitivity, selectivity, and precision of Hg2+ detection. However, most of them require sophisticated equipment, complicated and lengthy procedures, and they are also unsuitable for real-time and on-site detections.
Nowadays there has been a growing interest in developing fluorescent compounds for sensory biological or environmental applications because they are easy to be synthesized, highly sensitive and inexpensive [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Moreover, the ongoing development of confocal microscopy and optical imaging technologies facilitate the utilization of theses fluorescent probes for biological imaging [28,29]. A common mechanism for detecting the presence of Hg2+ relies on the fluorescence quenching caused by the spin orbital coupling of Hg2+ and the fluorescent molecules [30]. Hence, many of the reported fluorescent probes for the Hg2+ determination were designed on the basis of fluorescence emission quenching mechanism [31,32,33].
Different fluorophores in fluorescent chemosensors, such as fluorescein, rhodamine, 1,8-naphthalimides, coumarin, boron-dipyrromethene (BODIPY), pyrene, and anthracene, have been reported in the literature to be suitable for sensors making [34,35,36,37,38]. Most of the scientists’ attention has been attracted by 1,8-aphthalimides as optical sensors due to their light stability, high emission quantum yield, large Stokes shifts, and considerable dependence of their absorption and emission on the surrounding environment [39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. Some fluorescent chemosensors for detecting Hg2+ have recently been reported. However, most of them have the disadvantage of being insoluble in aqueous media, of low sensitivity, selectivity, and obtained by complicated synthetic procedures [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61].
2,4-Diamino-1,3,5-triazines (DATs) are well-known to have a potential chemotherapeutic activity especially for treating malignant neoplasms-leukemia, melanoma, and breast cancer [62,63,64]. Furthermore, due to the high nitrogen content they have a good affinity for complexing with metals [65]. Besides, diaminotriazines are well-known to have a donor–acceptor–donor (DAD) feature facilitating self-associations in solutions, presumably by forming hydrogen-bonded dimers or higher-order aggregates [66,67,68].
Herein, we report on the synthesis of a new 1,8-naphthalimide modified with 4,6-diamino-1,3,5-triazine and on its capacity to detect various cations and anions based on its photophysical properties in various solvents of different polarity. The influence of pH in H2O:ethanol (5:1, v/v, pH = 7.2, Tampon buffer) solutions has been investigated as well.

2. Materials and Methods

All used fine chemicals and solvents were of spectroscopic grade purity. 1H spectrum was recorded on a Bruker Avance II + 600 spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Rheinstetten, Germany) operating at 600.13 MHz using DMSO-d6 as a solvent at 25 °C. Absorption and emission spectra were recorded on a Varian Cary 5000 UV-Vis-NIR Spectrophotometer and a “Cary Eclipse” fluorometer (Agilent Technologies Deutschland GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany), respectively, using quartz cuvettes (Hellma, Munich, Germany). Origin pro 8 software was used for processing the absorption and emission data. The reaction was monitored on a TLC (Fluka F60 254 20 × 20; 0.2 mm) with a 4:1 toluene:methanol solution as an eluent. TLC plates were investigated under UV light. Melting points were measured using a Hinotek-X4 micro melting point apparatus (Hinotek, Ningbo, China). All 2D structures were drawn using Chem3D ultra 9.0 (Chem Office 2008) program. A detailed description of the adopted computational protocol for the DFT calculations is given as Supplementary Information.

2.1. Synthesis of 4-Nitroacenaphthene (2)

A solution of acenapthene (10 g, 66 mmol) in dichloromethane (50 mL) was added to a 250 mL two-necked flask and cooled to 5 °C. Then, 12 mL nitric acid (48%) were added dropwise over 30 min. The mixture was stirred vigorously for 4 h. The resulting precipitate was filtered and dried. Yield: 95%, mp 101–103 °C (lit. 101 °C) [69,70].

2.2. Synthesis of 4-Nitro-1,8-naphthalic anhydride (4)

4-Nitroacenaphthene (10 g, 50 mmol) were added to glacial acetic acid (100 mL) in a three-necked flask and heated to 95 °C. Then, sodium bichromate (58 g, 0.2 mol) were added in portions. The reaction temperature was kept 95 °C through the addition. After stirring for 4 h at 95 °C, the reaction mixture was poured into cold water (0.5 L) and the resulting precipitate was filtered off, washed with water, and dried. The crude product was treated with 150 mL aqueous NaOH (5%), filtration, and then the pH of the filtrate was adjusted to 4 using conc. HCl. The resulting precipitate was filtered, washed with water, and dried to give 3, which was dehydrated by heating at 130 °C for 10 h to give 4. Yield: 70%, mp 230–233 °C (lit. 233 °C) [70].

2.3. Synthesis of 4-Amino-1,8-naphthalic anhydride (5)

To an emulsion of 4 (1 g, 4 mmol) in ethanol (25 mL), a solution of stannous chloride (6.2 mg, 24 mmol) in 8 mL concentrated hydrochloric acid (8 mL) was added dropwisely at room temperature. Then, the reaction was refluxed for 10 h. After cooling, the hydrochloric acid was neutralized using an aqueous solution of Na2CO3 (10%). The formed precipitate was collected by filtration, washed with water, and dried. Yield: 60%, mp 352–357 °C (lit. 358 °C) [71].

2.4. Synthesis of 4-Amino-N-(2-dimethylaminoethyl)-1,8-naphthalimide (6)

To a solution of 4-amino-1,8-naphthalic anhydride (0.5 g, 2.3 mmol) in ethanol (25 mL), N,N-dimethylethylenediamine (0.5 mL, 4.2 mmol) was added dropwise with stirring, then refluxed for 6 h. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure to yield the final product. Yield: 98%, mp 226–230 (lit. 223–225) [72].

2.5. Synthesis of 4-(4,6-Diamino-1,3,5-triazin-2′-ylamino)-N-(2-dimethylaminoethyl)-1,8-naphthalimide NI-DAT

4-Amino-N-(2-dimethylaminoethyl)-1,8-naphthalimide (0.28 g, 1 mmole) and 2-chloro-4,6-diamino-1,3,5-triazine (0.15 g, 1 mmole) were refluxed in ethanol (25 mL) till reaction completion (6 h) which was confirmed by TLC. The pure product was obtained after filtration and washing with ethanol. Yield 85 %, 0.33 g, mp 235–239 °C.
FT-IR (KBr) cm−1: 3360, 3220 (νNH2) 3100 (νCH (Aromatic)); 2922, 2857 (νCH (Aliphatic)); 1698, 1622 (νC = O). 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO) δ 10.30 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 2H (dimer NH2), 9.78 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H, dimer ArH), 9.33 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 2H, dimer NH2), 9.15 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H, dimer ArH), 8.62–8.57 (m, 1H, monomer ArH), 8.55 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, dimer ArH), 8.42 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H, monomer ArH), 8.34 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H, dimer ArH), 8.17 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H, monomer ArH), 8.10 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H, dimer ArH), 7.67–7.60 (m, 1H, monomer ArH), 7.60–7.54 (m, 1H, monomer ArH), 7.43 (s, 1H, monomer > NH), 7.38 (s, 2H, dimer > NH), 6.86–6.74 (m, 8H, 4 dimer NH2 & 4 monomer NH2), 4.23 (d, J = 27.7 Hz, 6H, 4 dimer CH2 & 2 monomer CH2), 3.95–3.74 (m, 6H, 4 dimer CH2 & 2 monomer CH2), 3.05 (s, 6H, 2 monomer CH3), 3.03 (s, 12H, 4 dimer CH3).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Design and Synthesis of NI-DAT

4-(4,6-diamino-1,3,5-triazin-2′-ylamino)-N-(2-dimethylaminoethyl)-1,8-naphthal-imide NI-DAT was prepared according to Scheme 1, presenting the nucleophilic substitution of 2-chloro-4,6-diaminotriazine by a 4-amino-N-(2-dimethylaminoethyl)-1,8-naphthalimide. The chemical structure of NI-DAT was confirmed by IR, NMR absorption, and emission spectra. 1H-NMR spectrum, (see the Supplementary Information), confirms the formation of a stable self-associated dimer of the compound. The design of NI-DAT is based on appending 4,6-diaminotriazine, a well-known chelating moiety, to 4-amino-1,8-naphthalimide, whose photophysical properties are influenced by various stimuli. Moreover, the donor-acceptor-donor feature of DAT that leads to self-associations in solutions (presumably by forming hydrogen-bonded dimers I–III, Figure 1), blocks PET triggering in the system that can be retrieved by stimuli able to separate the probe molecules of their dimers.

3.2. Photophysical Characteristics

Table 1 presents the photophysical characteristics of NI-DAT in solvents of different polarity: absorption (λA) and emission maxima (λF), Stokes shifts (νAνF), and quantum yield of florescence (ΦF) using fluorescein as a standard (Φst = 0.79 in ethanol). The fluorescence quantum yield was calculated on the basis of the absorption and fluorescence spectra of NI-DAT by Equation (1).
Φ F = Φ s t S u S s t A s t A u n u 2 n s t 2
where ΦF is the emission quantum yield of the sample; Φst is the emission quantum yield of fluorescein as standard (Φst = 0.79 in ethanol), Ast and Au represent the absorbance of the standard and sample at the excitation wavelength (λex. = 450 nm), respectively; while Sst and Su are the integrated emission band areas of the standard and sample, respectively, and nst and nu are the solvent refractive index of the standard and sample; subscripts u and s refer to the unknown (sample) and standard, respectively. Stokes shifts were calculated using Equation (2).
v A v F = ( 1 λ A 1 λ F ) × 10 7
As shown in Figure 2, the new NI-DAT has an emission band centered at 500–540 nm which is a mirror image of the corresponding absorption band centered at 417–440 nm. The observed bathochromic shift of the absorption and emission maxima upon increasing the solvent polarity (Figure 2 and Figure 3) was ascribed to the charge transfer as a result of dipole-dipole interactions of the solvents with 1,8-naphthalimide chromophore system. That fact is in good accordance with the characteristics of the reported 1,8-naphthalimide containing compounds [73,74,75,76]. The red-shifts of the emission were higher than their absorption counterparts due to the large difference in the dipole moments in the excited and ground states.

3.3. Impact of the Medium pH

To investigate the effect of pH of the medium on the photophysical properties, the absorption and emission spectra of NI-DAT have been measured at different pH of the water/ethanol (5:1, v/v) solution. As shown in Figure 4, the absorption spectrum didn’t change by varying the pH. On the other hand, the fluorescence emission quenched at higher pH due to the deprotonation of NH2 at pKa = 12.1 which was calculated using the Henderson–Hasselbach Equation (3).
p H = p K a + log ( I m a x I ) ( I I m i n )  
where Imax and Imin are maximum and minimum fluorescence intensity, respectively; I is the fluorescence intensity at the given pH value.
At lower pH, the inclusion of nitrogen atoms (imine nitrogen of triazine moiety) in the hydrogen bonding of the dimer assembly, shown in Figure 1, blocks PET to 1,8-naphthalimide and hence opens fluorescence emission like the related reported 1,8-naphthalimides analogs [77,78,79,80,81]. In contrast, the probe responds to higher pH by an on-off response due to the deprotonation of NH2 and concomitant switching of PET, Scheme 2.
As Figure 4B shows, PET blocking of the probe at neutral pH can be exploited for further sensory applications of cations and/or anions detection. Coordination with a specific cation may lead to breaking the dimer assemblies giving a selective on-off PET response induced by the recovery of PET to naphthalimide moiety.

3.4. Sensory Applications towards Cations and Anions

The sensor ability of NI-DAT towards cations and anions has been investigated by recording the absorption and emission spectra in the presence of cations or anions. Several cations, including Cu2+, Co2+, Hg2+, Zn2+, Ni2+, Pb2+, Sn2+, Sr2+, Ba2+, Mg2+, Fe3+, and Al3+ (as nitrate salts), and different anions, including CN, S2−, HPO42−, H2PO4−, F, S2O52−, SO42−, NO2, CO32−, and CH3COO (as sodium salts), have been used in the study. Moreover, the experiments have been performed using aqueous solution of NI-DAT (5:1 water:ethanol) in the presence of a Tampon buffer to keep a constant pH (7.4) and the variations in the spectra due only to the coordination with the added analyte. As shown in Figure 5, among all the used cations, only Hg2+ affected the emission of the probe where it quenched its emission (EQ = 77%). This emission quenching (EQ) has been ascribed to the coordination of Hg2+ with NH2 groups switching the PET to 1,8-naphthalimide from triazine nitrogens. On the other hand, none of the cations under study significantly affected the absorption spectrum, which confirms that NH- group, attached directly to 1,8-naphthalimide, does not participate in the coordination with Hg2+.
The stoichiometric ratio of Hg2+ and the probe in their complex was determined using Job’s plot analysis by plotting (F0 − F) (1 − X), where F and F0 are the emissions of the probe in the absence and presence of Hg2+, respectively, against the molar ratio of Hg2+ (X = [Hg2+]/([NI-DAT] + [Hg2+]). As shown in Figure 6, the stoichiometric ratio was found to be 2:1 for the complexion of NI-DAT and Hg2+, respectively.
Furthermore, the selectivity of the new chemosensor to Hg2+ response has been examined by measuring the emission spectrum of the probe in the presence of 5 equivalents of both Hg2+ and the interfering cation or anion. As shown in Figure 7, the emission response of the probe toward the presence of Hg2+ was not affected by the coexistence of any of the interfering cations or anions under the study.
The sensitivity of NI-DAT to detect Hg2+ has been estimated from the titration plot of the emission at 540 nm against the concentration of Hg2+, shown in Figure 8, using the formula of the limit of detection (LOD) = 3σ/b, where σ is the slandered deviation of the emission of the probe recorded at 540 after repeating the measurements 10 times, and b is the slop of the titration plot. The found LOD was found to be 2 × 10−7 M.

3.5. Computational Studies on the Structure of NI-DAT and Its Hg2+ and Mg2+ Complexes

The titled compound NI-DAT was investigated theoretically by means of DFT calculations. A full geometry optimization of the sensor molecule was performed at B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory in the gas phase (ε = 1.0). The gas phase optimized structure of the low-energy isomer of NI-DAT is visualized in Figure S3A. The coordination mode between the sensor molecule and Hg2+ ions was probed computationally by modeling a ligand/metal architecture from simplified ligand model–2,4,6-triamino-1,3,5-triazine (TAT). TAT was also used in modeling H-bonded dimeric structures, and the intermolecular NH…N distances were measured to be 2.02 Å (Figure S3B).
The stoichiometry proposed for the binding between NI-DAT and Hg2+ is 2:1 (Figure 5, Job’s plot experiment). Our complex was modeled by placing Hg2+ spatially close to one of the endocyclic N atoms of TAT for a complex with 2:1 (TAT:metal) stoichiometry. It is known that Hg2+ is hydrated by a first solvation shell of six water molecules [82]. Thus, the TAT:metal complex was modeled with a six coordinate octahedral geometry with four water molecules at the metal cation. Figure 9A depicts the simplified model TAT complexing Hg2+ as a monodentate ligand at 2:1 stoichiometry.
In the 2:1 complexes, each model ligand is coordinated to the metal cation via a single nitrogen bridging atom. The metal cation has a six-coordinate octahedral geometry. Each water molecule is bound to two amino groups (one from each of the two ligands).
The Gibbs energies of the complex formation reaction 2TAT + [Hg(H2O)6]2+ → TAT@[Hg(H2O)4]2+@TAT + 2H2O are given in Table 2. The results for the Gibbs energy of the complex formation reaction with Hg2+ indicate spontaneous and energy-favorable complex formation processes in the gas phase and in water environment.
In addition, possible complexes formed as a result of the complexation of hexahydrated Mg2+ cations, [Mg(H2O)6]2+, with TAT model system were modeled. The positive value (11.9 kcal mol−1) for the Gibbs energy of the complex formation reaction with hydrated magnesium ions in water indicates non-spontaneous and energy-unfavorable complex formation processes. Magnesium ion coordinates six water molecules more strongly than mixed ligand (TAT)/water molecules. The results obtained for the complexation of hydrated Hg2+ and Mg2+ cations with a simplified NI-DAT model are consistent with the experimental data and outline a difference in the complexation behavior of metal cations from the ligand.

3.6. Comparison between NI-DAT and Some of the Reported Sensors for Detecting Hg2+

A comparison between the NI-DAT chemosensor and some of the reported sensors for detecting Hg2+ is shown in Table 3. NI-DAT can be considered as a good candidate for detecting Hg2+ due to its good solubility in water and low limit of detection.

4. Conclusions

The present work reporting on a simple appending of 2,4-diaminotriazine to 4-amino-1,8-naphthalimide has demonstrated that NI-DAT is able to form in aqueous solution stable self-associated dimers by hydrogen bonding. This hydrogen bonding enhances the emission of the probe by blocking PET from triazine moiety to 1,8-naphthalimide. At higher pH, the hydrogen bonding does not occur due to NH2 deprotonation. Hence, the PET is retrieved, and the emission quenched. Moreover, Hg2+ selectively and sensitively quenches the fluorescence emission of the probe solution due to its binding to the probe through NH2 groups that detach the probe molecules from their dimers. The stoichiometric ratio of NI-DAT/Hg2+ complex was found to be 2:1, respectively. The coordination behavior of the studied sensor molecule towards metal ions is supplemented with computational (DFT) data and possible structures of Hg2+ and Mg2+ complexes in water solutions are proposed.

Supplementary Materials

The NMR and IR spectra of NI-DAT can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/s23010399/s1, Figure S1. 1H-NMR of NI-DAT; Figure S2. FTIR spectrum of NI-DAT; Figure S3. B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) optimized structure of (A) NI-DAT and (B) dimer of TAT. References [83,84,85,86,87,88,89] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

I.G.: Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing—Original Draft, Supervision; D.S.: Investigation, Methodology, Visualization Writing—Review, Editing; A.I.S.: Conceptualization, Writing—Original Draft, Investigation, Visualization, Editing; S.A.: Computational Calculations. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Science Fund, Ministry of Education and Science of Bulgaria, grant number KΠ-06-H49/2.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge the Ministry of Higher Education of Egypt for the full scholarship granted to Awad I. Said.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Jasinski, S.M. The Materials Flow of Mercury in the United States; U.S. Bureau of Mines Information Circular 9412; U.S. Department of the Interior: Washington, DC, USA, 1994. Available online: https://pubs.usgs.gov/usbmic/ic-9412/mercury.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2022).
  2. Dock, L.; Vather, M. Metal toxicology. In General and Applied Toxicology; Ballantyne, B., Mars, C.T., Syversen, T., Eds.; Macmillan: London, UK, 2000; pp. 2049–2078. [Google Scholar]
  3. Stacchiotti, A.; Morandini, F.; Bettoni, F.; Schena, I.; Lavazza, A.; Grigolato, P.G.; Apostoli, P.; Rezzani, R.; Aleo, M.F. Stress proteins and oxidative damage in a renal derived cell line exposed to inorganic mercury and lead. Toxicology 2009, 264, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kim, B.M.; Choi, A.L.; Ha, E.H.; Pedersen, L.; Nielsen, F.; Weihe, P.; Hong, Y.C.; Budtz-Jørgensen, E.; Grandjean, P. Effect of hemoglobin adjustment on the precision of mercury concentrations in maternal and cord blood. Environ. Res. 2014, 132, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Azevedo, B.F.; Furieri, L.B.; Peçanha, F.M.; Wiggers, G.A.; Vassallo, P.F.; Simões, M.R.; Fiorim, J.; de Batista, P.R.; Fioresi, M.; Rossoni, L.; et al. Toxic effects of mercury on the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 2012, 949048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Rice, K.M.; Walker, E.M., Jr.; Wu, M.; Gillette, C.; Blough, E.R. Environmental mercury and its toxic effects. J. Prev. Med. Public Health 2014, 47, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hui, L.L.; Chan, M.H.M.; Lam, H.S.; Chan, P.H.Y.; Kwok, K.M.; Chan, I.H.S.; Li, A.M.; Fok, T.F. Impact of fetal and childhood mercury exposure on immune status in children. Environ. Res. 2016, 144, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vallant, B.; Kadnar, R.; Goessler, W. Development of a new HPLC method for the determination of inorganic and methylmercury in biological samples with ICP-MS detection. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2007, 22, 322–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tseng, C.M.; de Diego, A.; Martin, F.M.; Amouroux, D.; Donard, O.F.X. Rapid determination of inorganic mercury and methylmercury in biological reference materials by hydride generation, cryofocusing, atomic absorption spectrometry after open focused microwave-assisted alkaline digestion. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 1997, 12, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Y.; Chen, C.; Li, B.; Sun, J.; Wang, J.; Gao, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Chai, Z. Elimination efficiency of different reagents for the memory effect of mercury using ICP-MS. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2006, 21, 94–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tan, J.; Yan, X.P. 2,1,3-Benzoxadiazole-based selective chromogenic chemosensor for rapid naked-eye detection of Hg2+ and Cu2+. Talanta 2008, 76, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sarfo, D.K.; Sivanesan, A.; Emad, L.I.; Ayoko, G.A. Rapid detection of mercury contamination in water by surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 21567–21575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Prakashan, V.P.; George, G.; Sanu, M.S.; Sajna, M.S.; Saritha, A.C.; Sudarsanakumar, C.; Biju, P.R.; Joseph, C.; Unnikrishnan, N.V. Investigations on SPR induced Cu@Ag core shell doped SiO2-TiO2-ZrO2 fiber optic sensor for mercury detection. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 507, 144957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pérez-Marín, L.; Otazo-Sánchez, E.; Macedo-Miranda, G.; Avila-Pérez, P.; Alonso Chamaro, J.; López-Valdivia, H. Mercury(II) ion-selective electrode. Study of 1,3-diphenylthiourea as ionophore. Analyst 2000, 125, 1787–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yantasee, W.; Lin, Y.; Zemanian, T.S.; Fryxell, G.E. Voltammetric detection of lead(II) and mercury(II) using a carbon paste electrode modified with thiol self-assembled monolayer on mesoporous silica (SAMMS). Analyst 2003, 128, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Caballero, A.; Lloveras, V.; Curiel, D.; Tárrage, A.; Espinosa, A.; Garcia, R.; Vidal-Gancedo, J.; Rovira, C.; Wurst, K.; Molina, P.; et al. Electroactive thiazole derivatives capped with ferrocenyl units showing charge-transfer transition and selective ion-sensing properties: A combined experimental and theoretical study. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 825–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Grabchev, I.; Chovelon, J.-M.; Nedelcheva, A. Green fluorescence poly(amidoamine) dendrimer functionalized with 1,8-naphthalimide units as potential sensor for metal cations. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2006, 183, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Grabchev, I.; Bosch, P.; McKenna, M.; Nedelcheva, A. Synthesis and spectral properties of new green fluorescent poly(propyleneimine) dendrimers modified with 1,8-naphthalimide as sensors for metal cations. Polymer 2007, 48, 6755–6762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Grabchev, I.; Bosch, P.; McKenna, M.; Staneva, D. A new colorimetric and fluorimetric sensor for metal cations based on poly(propylene amine) dendrimer modified with 1,8-naphthalimide. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2008, 201, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Said, A.; Georgiev, N.; Bojinov, V. Sensor activity and logic behavior of dihydroxyphenylhydrazone derivative as a chemosensor for Cu2+ determination in alkaline aqueous solutions. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2015, 311, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Said, A.; Georgiev, N.; Bojinov, V. Synthesis of a single 1,8-naphthalimide fluorophore as a molecular logic lab for simultaneously detecting of Fe3+, Hg2+ and Cu2+. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2018, 196, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Said, A.; Georgiev, N.; Bojinov, V. Low Molecular Weight Probe for Selective Sensing of PH and Cu2+ Working as Three INHIBIT Based Digital Comparator. J. Fluoresc. 2022, 32, 405–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Said, A.I.; Georgiev, N.I.; Hamdan, S.A.; Bojinov, V.B. A chemosensoring molecular lab for various analytes and its ability to execute a molecular logical digital comparator. J. Fluoresc. 2019, 29, 1431–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Said, A.; Georgiev, N.; Bojinov, V. The simplest molecular chemosensor for detecting higher pHs, Cu2+ and S2- in aqueous environment and executing various logic gates. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2019, 371, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, J.; Zhou, C.; Zhang, H.; Hou, Y.; Pan, Q.; Sun, J.; Li, X. A novel colorimetric and “turn-on” fluorescent sensor for selective detection of Cu2+. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 104176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ding, H.; Li, C.; Zhang, H.; Lin, N.; Ren, W.; Li, S.; Liu, W.; Xiong, Z.; Xia, B.; Wang, C. A simple fluorescent sensor for highly sensitive detection of UO22+. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2022; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, D.; Zhu, L.; Jiang, Q.; Ge, X.; Fang, Y.; Peng, J.; Liu, Y. Real-time and rapid prediction of TVB-N of livestock and poultry meat at three depths for freshness evaluation using a portable fluorescent film sensor. Food Chem. 2023, 400, 134041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, D.; Kim, J.; Park, Y.I.; Lee, N.; Hyeon, T. Recent development of inorganic nanoparticles for biomedical imaging. ACS Cent. Sci. 2018, 4, 324–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Georgiev, N.; Said, A.; Toshkova, R.; Tzoneva, R.; Bojinov, V. A novel water-soluble perylenetetracarboxylic diimide as a fluorescent pH probe: Chemosensing, biocompatibility and cell imaging. Dyes Pigm. 2019, 160, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. McClure, D.S. Spin-orbit interaction in aromatic molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 1952, 20, 682–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dong, M.; Tang, J.; Lv, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, T.; Bian, J.; Li, C. A dual-function fluorescent probe for Hg (II) and Cu (II) ions with two mutually independent sensing pathways and its logic gate behavior. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2020, 226, 117645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gharami, S.; Aich, K.; Ghosh, P.; Patra, L.; Murmu, N.; Mondal, T.K. A fluorescent “ON-OFF-ON” switch for the selective and sequential detection of Hg2+ and I with applications in imaging using human AGS gastric cancer cells. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lee, S.W.; Lee, S.Y.; Lee, S.H. Self-assembly of pyrene boronic acid-based chemodosimeters for highly efficient mercury(II) ion detection. Tetrahedron Lett. 2019, 60, 151048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Grabchev, I.; Qian, X.; Bojinov, V.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, W. Synthesis and photophysical properties of 1,8-naphthalimide-labelled PAMAM as PET sensors of protons and of transition metal ions. Polymer 2002, 43, 5731–5736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Grabchev, I.; Soumillion, J.-P.; Muls, B.; Ivanova, G. Poly(amidoamine) dendrimer peripherally modified with 4-N,N-dimethylaminoethyleneamino-1,8-naphthalimide as a sensor of metal cations and protons. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2004, 3, 1032–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Veale, E.B.; Gunnlaugsson, T. Fluorescent sensors for ions based on organic structures. Annu. Rep. Prog. Chem. Sect. B Org. Chem. 2010, 106, 376–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Raveendran, A.V.; Sankeerthana, P.A.; Jayaraj, A.; Swamy, P.C.A. Recent developments on BODIPY based chemosensors for the detection of group IIB metal ions. Results Chem. 2022, 4, 100297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mukherjee, S.; Thilagar, P. Molecular flexibility tuned emission in “V” shaped naphthalimides: Hg(ii) detection and aggregation-induced emission enhancement (AIEE). Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 7292–7294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sali, S.; Grabchev, I.; Chovelov, J.-M.; Ivanova, G. Selective sensors for Zn2+ cations based on new green fluorescent poly(amidoamine) dendrimers peripherally modified with 1,8-naphthalimides. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2006, 65, 591–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Meher, N.; Panda, S.; Kumar, S.; Iyer, P.K. Aldehyde group driven aggregation-induced enhanced emission in naphthalimides and its application for ultradetection of hydrazine on multiple platforms. Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 3978–3985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Said, A.I.; Georgiev, N.I.; Bojinov, V.B. A novel dual naked eye colorimetric and fluorescent pH chemosensor and its ability to execute three INHIBIT based digital comparator. Dyes Pigm. 2022, 205, 110489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Duke, R.M.; Veale, E.B.; Pfeffer, F.M.; Kruger, P.E.; Gunnlaugsson, T. Colorimetric and fluorescent anion sensors: An overview of recent developments in the use of 1,8-naphthalimide based chemosensors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3936–3953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Grabchev, I.; Dumas, S.; Chovelon, J.-M.; Nedelcheva, A. First generation poly(propyleneimine) dendrimers functionalised with 1,8-naphthalimide units as fluorescence sensors for metal cations and protons. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 2113–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; Xu, H. A new naphthalimide-picolinohydrazide derived fluorescent “turn-on” probe for hypersensitive detection of Al3+ ions and applications of real water analysis and bio-imaging. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2022, 275, 121193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Said, A.; Georgiev, N.; Bojinov, V. A fluorescent bichromophoric “off-on-off” pH probe as a molecular logic device (half-subtractor and digital comparator) operating by controlled PET and ICT processes. Dyes Pigm. 2019, 162, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Staneva, D.; Manov, H.; Yordanova, S.; Stoyanov, S.; Grabchev, I. Synthesis, spectral properties and antimicrobial activity of a new cationic water-soluble pH-dependent poly(propylene imine) dendrimer modified with 1,8-naphthalimides. J. Lumin. 2020, 35, 947–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Staneva, D.; Said, A.I.; Vasileva-Tonkova, E.; Grabchev, I. Enhanced photodynamic efficacy using 1,8-naphthalimides: Potential application in antibacterial photodynamic therapy. Molecules 2022, 27, 5743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Geraghty, C.; Wynne, C.; Elmes, R.B.P. 1,8-Naphthalimide based fluorescent sensors for enzymes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 437, 213713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nie, W.; Yang, J.; Wu, J.; Hu, L. Synthesis and photophysical properties of vice-like 1,8-naphthalimide fluorescent sensor for sensitive detection of Mn2+ and Zn2+. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2022, 430, 113951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, X.-F.; Ma, Q.-J.; Wei, X.-J.; Hou, Y.-M. Xin Zhu, A selective fluorescent sensor for Hg2+ based on covalently immobilized naphthalimide derivative. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 183, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jia, Y.M.; Fang, Y.Y.; Li, Y.; He, L.T.; Fan, W.H.; Fen, W.; Yang, Y.Y.; Liao, J.L.; Liu, N.; Yuan, L.H. Pillar[5]arenes bearing phosphine oxide pendents as Hg2+ selective receptors. Talanta 2014, 125, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, Z.Q.; Wang, X.H.; Chen, X.; Yang, W.J.; Wu, Y.J.; Fu, F.F. Specifically and visually detect methyl-mercury and ethyl-mercury in fish sample based on DNA-templated alloy Ag-Au Nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 5489–5495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lee, C.G.; Kang, S.; Oh, J.Y.; Eom, M.S.; Oh, J.S.; Kim, M.G.; Lee, W.S.; Hong, S.K.; Han, M.S. A colorimetric and fluorescent chemosensor for detection of Hg2+ using counterion exchange of cationic polydiacetylene. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017, 58, 4340–4343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ratner, N.; Mandler, D. Electrochemical detection of low concentrations of mercury in water using gold nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2015, 7, 5148–5155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, M.; Sun, Y.; Dong, L.; Feng, Q.C.; Xu, H.; Zang, S.Q. Colorimetric recognition of Cu2+ and fluorescent detection of Hg2+ in aqueous media by a dual chemosensor derived from rhodamine B dye with a NS2 receptor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 226, 332–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ziarani, G.M.; Roshankar, S.; Mohajer, F.; Badiei, A.; Sillanpää, M. The synthesis of SBA-Pr-N-Is-Bu-SO3H as a new Hg2+ Fluorescent sensor. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022, 146, 110100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liang, J.-L.; Chen, Q.-N.; Zhang, J.-X.; Lian, W.-Q.; Qiu, Y.-X.; Xie, H.-Y.; Liu, W.-T.; Xie, W.-T.; Xu, W.-Q. A novel triazene-based cadmium metal–organic framework as a selective fluorescent sensor for Hg2+. Polyhedron 2022, 224, 116014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ziarani, G.M.; Roshankar, S.; Mohajer, F.; Badiei, A.; Karimi-Maleh, H.; Gaikwad, S.V. Molecular docking and optical sensor studies based on 2,4-diamino pyrimidine-5-carbonitriles for detection of Hg2+. Environ. Res. 2022, 212, 113245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dhanapal Jothi, D.; Sathiyanarayanan Kulathu Iyer, S.K. Recognition of Hg2+ ion in an organic semi-aqueous medium by a new napthalimide based fluorescent probe and its bioimaging applications. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022, 143, 109735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Qi, Y.; Li, Y.; Nan, T.; Li, H.; Tang, J.; Liu, S.; Wang, Y. A novel fluorescent probe with large Stokes shift for the detection of Ag+ and Hg2+. Opt. Mater. 2022, 123, 111929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, X.-H.; Han, X.-F.; Wu, W.-N.; Wang, Y.; Fan, Y.-C.; Zhao, X.-L.; Xu, Z.-H. Simple thiosemicarbazone “switch” sensing of Hg2+ and biothiols in pure aqueous solutions and application to imaging in lysosomes. J. Mol. Struct. 2022, 1250, 131811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hu, Z.; Ma, T.; Chen, Z.; Ye, Z.Q.; Zhang, G.L.; Lou, Y.J.; Yu, Y.P. Solid-Phase Synthesis and Antitumor Evaluation of 2,4-Diamino-6-aryl-1,3,5-triazines. J. Comb. Chem. 2009, 11, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sączewski, F.; Bułakowska, A.; Bednarski, P.; Grunert, R. Synthesis, structure and anticancer activity of novel 2,4-diamino-1,3,5-triazine derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 41, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sączewski, F.; Bułakowska, A. Synthesis, structure and anticancer activity of novel alkenyl-1,3,5-triazine derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 41, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Busto, N.; Valladolid, J.; Aliende, C.; Jalon, F.A.; Manzano, B.R.; Rodriguez, A.M.; Gaspar, J.F.; Martins, C.; Biver, T.; Espino, G.; et al. Preparation of organometallic ruthenium-arene-diaminotriazine complexes as binding agents to DNA. Chem. Asian J. 2012, 7, 788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Beijer, F.H.; Sijbesma, R.P.; Vekemans, J.A.J.M.; Meijer, E.W.; Kooijman, H.; Spek, A.L. Hydrogen-Bonded Complexes of Diaminopyridines and Diaminotriazines:  Opposite Effect of Acylation on Complex Stabilities. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 6371–6380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Laliberte´, D.; Maris, T.; Wuest, J.D. Molecular Tectonics. Porous Hydrogen-Bonded Networks Built from Derivatives of Pentaerythrityl Tetraphenyl Ether. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 1776–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Maly, K.E.; Dauphin, C.; Wuest, J.D. Self-assembly of columnar mesophases from diaminotriazines. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 4695–4700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Khosravi, A.; Moradian, S.; Gharanjig, K.; Afshar, T.F. Synthesis and spectroscopic studies of some naphthalimide based disperse azo dyestuffs for the dyeing of polyester fibres. Dyes Pigm. 2006, 69, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Okazaki, M.; Suhara, Y.; Fujiyama, M. Studies on Derivatives of 4-Aminonaphthalimide (II). Yuki Gosei Kagaku Kyokaishi J. Synth. Org. Chem. Jpn. 1956, 14, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dong, M.; Wang, Y.W.; Peng, Y. Highly Selective Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensing for Hg2+ and Au3+, Respectively, in Aqueous Media. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5310–5313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chen, L.; Sun, W.; Li, J.; Liu, Z.; Ma, Z.; Zhang, W.; Du, L.; Xu, W.; Fang, H.; Li, M. The first ratiometric fluorescent probes for aminopeptidase N cell imaging. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 378–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Middleton, R.; Parrick, J.; Clarke, E.D.; Wardman, P. Synthesis and fluorescence of N-substituted-1,8-naphthalimides. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1986, 23, 849–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jolley, E.A.; Hardebeck, L.K.E.; Ren, Y.; Adams, M.S.; Lewis, M.; Znosko, B.M. The effects of varying the substituent and DNA sequence on the stability of 4-substituted DNA-naphthalimide complexes. Biophys. Chem. 2018, 239, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Duke, R.M.; Gunnlaugsson, T. 3-Urea-1,8-naphthalimides are good chemosensors: A highly selective dual colorimetric and fluorescent ICT based anion sensor for fluoride. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 1503–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Panchenko, P.A.; Fedorov, Y.V.; Fedorova, O.A.; Jonusauskas, G. Comparative analysis of the PET and ICT sensor properties of 1,8-naphthalimides containing aza-15-crown-5 ether moiety. Dyes Pigm. 2013, 98, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Murphy, S.A.; Phelan, C.A.; Veale, E.B.; Kotova, O.; Comby, S.; Gunnlaugsson, T. Fluorescent 4-amino-1,8-naphthalimide Tröger’s bases (TBNaps) possessing (orthogonal) ‘α-amino acids’, esters and di-peptides and their solvent dependent photophysical properties. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2021, 19, 6817–6833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Mohan, B.; Noushija, M.K.; Shanmugaraju, S. Amino-1,8-naphthalimide-based fluorescent chemosensors for Zn(II) ion. Tetrahedron Lett. 2022, 109, 154155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, Z.; Niu, C.; Zeng, G.; Liu, Y.; Gao, P.; Huang, G.; Mao, Y. A novel fluorescence ratiometric pH sensor based on covalently immobilized piperazinyl-1,8-napthalimide and benzothioxanthene. Sens. Actuators B 2006, 114, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Xie, J.; Chen, Y.; Yang, W.; Xu, D.; Zhang, K. Water soluble 1,8-naphthalimide fluorescent pH probes and their application to bioimagings. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2011, 223, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhou, L.; Jin, Z.; Fan, X.; Yao, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, W.; Qian, J. Synthesis of 1,8-naphthalimide-based fluorescent nano-probes and their application in pH detection. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2018, 29, 1500–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Sobolev, O.; Cuello, G.J.; Román-Ross, G.; Skipper, N.T.; Charlet, L. Hydration of Hg2+ in aqueous solution studied by neutron diffraction with isotopic substitution. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 5123–5125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G.A.; et al. Gaussian 09; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  84. Becke, A.D. Density-functional Thermochemistry. III. The Role of Exact Exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R.G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti Correlation-Energy Formula into a Functional of the Electron Density. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Hehre, W.J.; Lathan, W.A. Self-Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XIV. An Extended Gaussian-Type Basis for Molecular Orbital Studies of Organic Molecules. Inclusion of Second Row Elements. J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 56, 5255–5257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Clark, T.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Spitznagel, G.W.; Schleyer, P.V.R. Efficient Diffuse Function-Augmented Basis Sets for Anion Calculations. III. The 3-21+G Basis Set for First-Row Elements, Li–F. J. Comput. Chem. 1983, 4, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Cancès, E.; Mennucci, B.; Tomasi, J. A New Integral Equation Formalism for the Polarizable Continuum Model: Theoretical Background and Applications to Isotropic and Anisotropic Dielectrics. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 3032–3041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Schrödinger, L.; DeLano, W. PyMOL. 2020. Available online: http://www.pymol.org/pymol (accessed on 5 June 2022).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of NI-DAT.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of NI-DAT.
Sensors 23 00399 sch001
Figure 1. Hydrogen bonding motifs formed by self-assembling dimers of DAT residues.
Figure 1. Hydrogen bonding motifs formed by self-assembling dimers of DAT residues.
Sensors 23 00399 g001
Figure 2. (A) Absorption spectra, (B) emission spectra, and (C) Normalized absorption and emission spectra of NI-DAT in various solvents. λex. = 450 nm.
Figure 2. (A) Absorption spectra, (B) emission spectra, and (C) Normalized absorption and emission spectra of NI-DAT in various solvents. λex. = 450 nm.
Sensors 23 00399 g002
Figure 3. Dependence of absorption (green triangles) and fluorescence (blue triangles) maxima of NI-DAT on the dielectric constant: 1—Dioxane; 2—Tetrahydrofuran; 3—Ethanol; 4—Acetonitrile; 5—N,N-dimethylformamide; 6—Dimethyl sulfoxide; 7—Water.
Figure 3. Dependence of absorption (green triangles) and fluorescence (blue triangles) maxima of NI-DAT on the dielectric constant: 1—Dioxane; 2—Tetrahydrofuran; 3—Ethanol; 4—Acetonitrile; 5—N,N-dimethylformamide; 6—Dimethyl sulfoxide; 7—Water.
Sensors 23 00399 g003
Scheme 2. Proposed PET mechanism at different pH.
Scheme 2. Proposed PET mechanism at different pH.
Sensors 23 00399 sch002
Figure 4. Influence of pH on (A) the absorption spectrum (B) the emission spectrum and on the emission at 535 nm (inset) of NI-DAT, (c = 10−5 M), λex. = 450 nm.
Figure 4. Influence of pH on (A) the absorption spectrum (B) the emission spectrum and on the emission at 535 nm (inset) of NI-DAT, (c = 10−5 M), λex. = 450 nm.
Sensors 23 00399 g004
Figure 5. Influence of cations and anions on (A) the absorption spectrum and (B) the emission spectrum, and (C) the emission at 540 nm of NI-DAT, c = 10−5 M, λex. = 450 nm.
Figure 5. Influence of cations and anions on (A) the absorption spectrum and (B) the emission spectrum, and (C) the emission at 540 nm of NI-DAT, c = 10−5 M, λex. = 450 nm.
Sensors 23 00399 g005
Figure 6. (A) Job’s plot and (B) suggested structure of probe/Hg2+ complex.
Figure 6. (A) Job’s plot and (B) suggested structure of probe/Hg2+ complex.
Sensors 23 00399 g006
Figure 7. Influence of the interfering cations and anions on (A) the emission spectrum and (B) emission at 540 nm of NI-DAT, c = 10−5 M, λex. = 450 nm.
Figure 7. Influence of the interfering cations and anions on (A) the emission spectrum and (B) emission at 540 nm of NI-DAT, c = 10−5 M, λex. = 450 nm.
Sensors 23 00399 g007aSensors 23 00399 g007b
Figure 8. Effect of Hg2+ concentration on the emission at 540 nm of NI-DAT, c = 10−5 M, λex. = 450 nm.
Figure 8. Effect of Hg2+ concentration on the emission at 540 nm of NI-DAT, c = 10−5 M, λex. = 450 nm.
Sensors 23 00399 g008
Figure 9. TAT-hydrated metal complexes at 2:1 stoichiometry: (A) TAT-hydrated Hg2+ complex and (B) TAT-hydrated Mg2+ complex.
Figure 9. TAT-hydrated metal complexes at 2:1 stoichiometry: (A) TAT-hydrated Hg2+ complex and (B) TAT-hydrated Mg2+ complex.
Sensors 23 00399 g009
Table 1. Photophysical characterization of NI-DAT in various organic solvents.
Table 1. Photophysical characterization of NI-DAT in various organic solvents.
Dielectric Constant (25 °C)λA
nm
ε
(mol−1 L cm−1)
λF
nm
νAνF
cm−1
ΦF
Water 78.35 436522454044170.359
DMSO 47.1 440499352536800.783
N,N-dimethylformamide37.5435587951836830.828
Acetonitrile36.71419586951343730.717
Ethanol 24.5 437730452237260.604
Tetrahydrofuran 7.58 424691850537830.874
Dioxane2.25417584550039810.542
Table 2. Gibbs energies for the complex formation reactions with hydrated Hg2+ and Mg2+ cations in the gas phase (ΔG1) and in water environment (ΔG78), in kcal mol−1.
Table 2. Gibbs energies for the complex formation reactions with hydrated Hg2+ and Mg2+ cations in the gas phase (ΔG1) and in water environment (ΔG78), in kcal mol−1.
ReactionΔG1ΔG78
2TAT + [Hg(H2O)6]2+ → TAT@ [Hg(H2O)4]2+@TAT + 2H2O−44.1−13.6
2TAT + [Mg(H2O)6]2+ → TAT@ [Mg(H2O)4]2+@TAT + 2H2O−22.911.9
Table 3. Comparsion of some fluorescent chemosensors for Hg2+ detection.
Table 3. Comparsion of some fluorescent chemosensors for Hg2+ detection.
Ref.SensorSolventLOD
10−6 M
[50]Sensors 23 00399 i001water 2.0
[51]Sensors 23 00399 i002C2H5OH/H2O (3/2)2.4
[52]DNA-templated alloy Ag-Au nanoparticles-5
[53]Cationic polydiacetylene-8.3
[54] Gold Nanoparticles 1
[55]Sensors 23 00399 i003 Ethanol/water (4:1) 2.4
[56]Sensors 23 00399 i004 EtOH/H2O (5:95) 2.5
[57] porous triazene-based Cd-MOF DMF
Unstable in water
0.22
[58]Sensors 23 00399 i005Ethanol149
[59]Sensors 23 00399 i006 ACN: H2O (8:2) 0.003
[60]Sensors 23 00399 i007 EtOH 6
[61]Sensors 23 00399 i008water0.5
Current workSensors 23 00399 i009water/ethanol 5:10.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Said, A.I.; Staneva, D.; Angelova, S.; Grabchev, I. Self-Associated 1,8-Naphthalimide as a Selective Fluorescent Chemosensor for Detection of High pH in Aqueous Solutions and Their Hg2+ Contamination. Sensors 2023, 23, 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010399

AMA Style

Said AI, Staneva D, Angelova S, Grabchev I. Self-Associated 1,8-Naphthalimide as a Selective Fluorescent Chemosensor for Detection of High pH in Aqueous Solutions and Their Hg2+ Contamination. Sensors. 2023; 23(1):399. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010399

Chicago/Turabian Style

Said, Awad I., Desislava Staneva, Silvia Angelova, and Ivo Grabchev. 2023. "Self-Associated 1,8-Naphthalimide as a Selective Fluorescent Chemosensor for Detection of High pH in Aqueous Solutions and Their Hg2+ Contamination" Sensors 23, no. 1: 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010399

APA Style

Said, A. I., Staneva, D., Angelova, S., & Grabchev, I. (2023). Self-Associated 1,8-Naphthalimide as a Selective Fluorescent Chemosensor for Detection of High pH in Aqueous Solutions and Their Hg2+ Contamination. Sensors, 23(1), 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010399

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop