Next Article in Journal
A Novel Data-Driven Fault Detection Method Based on Stable Kernel Representation for Dynamic Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
Scaled-Model Radar Cross-Section Measurement: The Influence of the Scattered Field under Gaussian Beam Illumination—A Theoretical Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
LLM Adaptive PID Control for B5G Truck Platooning Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Determination of Sugars and Acids in Grape Must Using Miniaturized Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Metasurface-Assisted Terahertz Sensing

1
School of Microelectronics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200000, China
2
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Chips and Systems for Intelligent Connected Vehicle, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2023, 23(13), 5902; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23135902
Submission received: 5 June 2023 / Revised: 20 June 2023 / Accepted: 22 June 2023 / Published: 25 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Terahertz, Mid-Infrared, and Near-Infrared Sensing)

Abstract

:
Terahertz (THz) waves, which fall between microwaves and infrared bands, possess intriguing electromagnetic properties of non-ionizing radiation, low photon energy, being highly sensitive to weak resonances, and non-polar material penetrability. Therefore, THz waves are extremely suitable for sensing and detecting chemical, pharmaceutical, and biological molecules. However, the relatively long wavelength of THz waves (30~3000 μm) compared to the size of analytes (1~100 nm for biomolecules, <10 μm for microorganisms) constrains the development of THz-based sensors. To circumvent this problem, metasurface technology, by engineering subwavelength periodic resonators, has gained a great deal of attention to enhance the resonance response of THz waves. Those metasurface-based THz sensors exhibit high sensitivity for label-free sensing, making them appealing for a variety of applications in security, medical applications, and detection. The performance of metasurface-based THz sensors is controlled by geometric structure and material parameters. The operating mechanism is divided into two main categories, passive and active. To have a profound understanding of these metasurface-assisted THz sensing technologies, we review and categorize those THz sensors, based on their operating mechanisms, including resonators for frequency shift sensing, nanogaps for enhanced field confinement, chirality for handedness detection, and active elements (such as graphene and MEMS) for advanced tunable sensing. This comprehensive review can serve as a guideline for future metasurfaces design to assist THz sensing and detection.

1. Introduction

The terahertz (THz) band defined at 0.1~10 THz bridges the microwave and infrared spectra [1]. In the past years, the THz spectrum was also known as the “THz gap” due to the lack of effective sources, as well as modulation and detection devices operating at ambient temperature [2,3]. The development of THz technology is largely restricted, especially compared with the vast advancement of microwave and optical technologies. Only recently, a series of efficient ambient temperature THz wave generators and detectors were developed to fill this gap. Furthermore, the invention and commercialization of terahertz time–domain spectroscopy (THz–TDS) opens the pathway for exploring THz applications [4].
The unique position of the THz band provides it with inherent electronics and photonics properties, enabling the THz radiation to realize special features that are elusive for other spectral bands [5]. Therefore, THz waves can be used in a variety of fields, such as medicine, biology, telecommunications, security, and many more. The THz wave has some fascinating characteristics, including fingerprint spectroscopy, non-ionization, high penetration, low photon energy, and molecular signatures, which make it a suitable stimulus source for sensing applications [6], complementing or enhancing conventional X-ray solutions. Different from conventional medical diagnosis approaches, the non-ionizing feature of THz waves enables nondestructive biological tissue detection that is extremely desired for healthcare and biodetection [7]. Besides, the THz frequency is closely correlated with the vibrational frequencies of numerous biomolecules, making it highly sensitive to weak resonance between molecules, such as hydrogen bonds, Van der Waals forces, and non-bonding (hydrophobic) interactions that are not discerned by traditional mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy [6]. These characteristics allow new approaches for matter detection and new methods for distinguishing biomolecules, such as proteins, DNA, or RNA. The low photon energy and sensitive water absorption support THz waves to detect cancer cells [8,9,10] and other diseases, such as otitis media. In addition, THz waves can penetrate non-polar materials, such as paper, plastic, and textile materials [11,12] to exhibit optic transparency. This transparency in relation to non-polar bonds combined with the non-ionizing feature enables THz waves suitable for security imaging and detection of biological objects. THz spectroscopy has been demonstrated as a powerful tool for substance detection [13]. The above-mentioned characteristics of THz waves largely illustrate their extensive application fields [14,15,16], especially for label-free [17] and non-contact modalities for sensing and biodetection.
The wavelength of THz waves is approximately from 30 μm to 3000 μm, which is relatively long compared with infrared radiation [18]. This long wavelength results in low spatial resolution and unreliability when measuring substances with dimensions significantly less than the micrometer scale. The typical size of microorganisms is approximately less than 10 μm, and the range of biomolecules is from 1 nm to 100 nm. Hence, there is a distinct difference between the size of analytes and the wavelength of THz waves. These samples exhibit negligible responses to THz radiation, making the testing unattainable with classic technology.
Metamaterials as advanced emerging technologies open a new channel to solve the restriction of THz sensing. Metamaterials, using artificially designed structures to resonantly couple with the electromagnetic fields, exhibit effective electric (represented by electric permittivity ε) and/or magnetic (represented by magnetic permeability μ) responses not found in nature [19,20,21,22]. Metamaterials usually consist of periodic subwavelength metal or dielectric structures (meta-atoms), with electromagnetic properties primarily determined by their geometries, sizes, and orientations. Dozens of compelling studies in the electromagnetic field have been reported, such as invisibility cloaks [23] and meta-lenses [24,25]. As the two-dimensional counterpart of bulk metamaterials, metasurfaces effectively avoid the inherent drawbacks of bulky size and fabrication complexities, especially for higher-frequency range. Moreover, metasurfaces can achieve sub-wavelength spatial resolution for enhancing THz detection sensitivity. Metasurfaces also have given rise to unprecedented wavefront manipulating, for instance, planar lenses [24,26], ultrathin invisibility cloaks [23,27], and holograms [28,29].
Generally, THz sensing has two main approaches, one is measuring the resonant frequency shift from THz devices originating from the changed ambient refractive index around the metasurface, and the other is measuring the change in the absorption peak in the spectrum due to the existence of the analyte. The THz meta-atom usually consists of a patterned structure with precisely designed geometry, such as splits, to generate strong local field confinement under external excitation. Hence, THz metasurfaces can assist sensors to capture and even amplify small changes generated by weak interaction between the electromagnetic excitation and analyte. The resonant frequency, including single- and multi-resonance modes of THz metasurfaces, is used as a reference to present the sensitivity of sensors. THz metasurfaces have innate resonance frequencies determined by the unique geometry of meta-atoms. These devices present redshift or blueshift when they are deposited with analyte samples. The shift of resonant frequency characterizes the sensitivity of THz sensors.
The associated reviews mainly focused on introducing various applications of THz technology in biodetection [30,31] or discussing different metasurface-based molecules in biomedical sensing and imaging [7,32], and most of them focused on the optical spectrum [33]. This review summarizes recent metasurfaces-assisted THz sensors based on their sensing mechanism, which are classified in Figure 1. Based on the composed material of metasurfaces, sensing strategies are divided into two parts, that is, THz metasurfaces with passive components and active components. Section 2 contains various THz metasurface-assisted sensors, which are analyzed by their working mechanisms, principles, and modes of sensing in detail. Some common structures and characteristics of THz metasurfaces are emphasized from resonator patterns in relation to chiral properties. Finally, a brief conclusion is presented in Section 3.

2. Metasurface-Assisted THz Sensing

There are some crucial characteristics for clearly explaining the performance of a sensor, such as figure of merit (FOM), quality factor (Q-factor), and sensitivity. The FOM of a sensor reflects its selectivity, defined as the normalization of the sensitivity to the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the resonant dip, that is F = S / F W H M . The Q-factor is a measurement of the resonance sharpness, and it is defined as Q-factor =   λ / F W H M , where λ is the resonant wavelength [34]. Metasurface-based THz devices completely contribute to improving the sensitivity of THz sensing. Conventionally, there are two definitions of the sensitivity, S . One is frequency sensitivity S = f / Δ n , where f is the frequency shift of the resonance peak, and Δ n is the bulk refractive index (RI) variation, usually expressed as function of refractive index units (RIU). The other is intensity frequency S = I / Δ n , where I is the change in resonant intensity [35]. In following discussion, the first definition is decisive measurement. The two factors are the main reasons that affect sensors’ performance, but they are not the only ones. Based on the study of detected analytes, the operating mechanisms of metasurface-based devices are extended to adaptation for THz sensing. To achieve various sensing abilities, conventional passive sensing metasurfaces are equipped with refined geometry shapes, such as nanogaps and chiralities. Active components are incorporated with metasurfaces, enabling the tunability of THz sensing. Various THz sensors with different sensing mechanisms are discussed in this section, from passive to active.
To realize the sensing function of a metasurface, each meta-atom requires the optimization of constituent materials, geometric parameters, resonant modes, and so on. The interaction between meta-atoms and incident waves is decided by the integrated metasurface layout. In the design process, many electromagnetic responses can be taken into consideration, such as amplitude ( E ), phase distraction ( φ ), polarization state ( p ), effective nonlinear coefficient ( χ ), working wavelength range ( λ ), and local position ( x , y ). This process can be conceptually described as a system of equations [36]:
m e t a s u r f a c e t ; λ ; I ; φ ; p ; σ ; l = E x ; y ; t ; λ φ x ; y ; t ; λ p x ; y ; t ; λ
where; tenability ( t ), efficiency ( I ), spin angular momentum (SAM) ( σ ), orbital angular momentum (OAM) ( l ), etc., are desired optical properties. Various mechanisms correspond to different decisive parameters.

2.1. Resonant Structure for Frequency Shift Sensing

Typically, a meta-atom engineered with a metal split can be viewed as an inductive-capacitive (LC) equivalent circuit, forming LC resonance, which is excited by incident electromagnetic waves [37]. The resonant frequency f of the LC circuit is determined by the inductor and the capacitor as f = 1 / 2 π L C , where C and L are the capacitance and inductance, respectively. The analyte deposited on the structure leads to a frequency shift by changing the capacitance. THz metasurface biosensors are widely applied in detecting biomolecules or microorganisms, such as proteins, antibiotics, and viruses.
In 2013, Park et al. applied the single split-ring-resonator (SRR) to detect fungi and bacteria, as shown in Figure 2a [38]. An obvious resonant frequency shift was observed following the deposition of microorganisms. This label-free sensing of higher sensitivity was more appealing than conventional culture-based detection methods, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Afterward, Yoon et al. [39] exposed samples of other microorganisms, such as molds and yeasts, to similar LC resonant metasurface structures (Figure 2b). They utilized a syringe pump to inject a microbial solution into the fluid channel, enabling the identification of the microorganism type, which is based on its intrinsic properties at an early stage, without complex fluorescent labeling and culturing procedures. The above single-split SRR designs had only one resonance peak of the transmission curve. In 2015, Hu et al. studied THz SRR transmission responses in different polarization directions [40]. For a THz wave incident to the split with parallel polarization, only one resonant peak was generated, while vertical wave polarization provides two resonant peaks. They proposed the equivalent circuit model of SRR high-frequency resonance for the first time, and they also used the SRR to detect 93# and 97# gasoline. In 2015, Xie et al. [41] demonstrated the application of THz biosensors in the field of antibiotic detection, as shown in Figure 2c. The sensitivity was significantly increased due to the THz near-field enhancement caused by the square-shaped metallic extraordinary optical transmission (EOT) structure. This method opens up new application directions for metasurface-based THz biosensors. The above studies show the wide detection of microorganisms, gasoline, and antibiotics through THz metasurface biosensors. The following works have further improved their sensitivity by modifying the resonator structures or materials. Ekmekci proposed a novel THz sensor design, which is based on double-sided SRR (DSRR) topology. It had a smaller electrical size and a higher sensitivity of resonance frequency compared to conventional SRR structures [42]. The basic DSRR sensor topology was to realize different types of sensor functions, depending on the properties of the interlayer medium. Based on the typical SRR structure, Aghadjani et al. added a thin-layer dielectric on top of the metallic ring, forming a hybrid Fano-resonant metallic microstructure array–insulator-metal configuration [43]. The sensitivity was increased by three times compared to the most advanced metamaterial sensor platforms. In 2020, Chen et al. proposed a structure consisting of four SRRs and Cross (FSRRC) [44] by rotating the SRR around the direction of the middle gap. Furthermore, when the symmetrical structure was changed to the asymmetrical one, the latter caused Fano resonance [45], resulting in two new resonant peaks and making it more sensitive. In 2022, Niu et al. applied an innovated structure, which achieved ultra-sensitive detection of the virus SARS-CoV-2. As shown in Figure 2d, a circular SRR, possessing three splits, greatly improved the sensitivity by increasing the number of gaps and realizing precise virus detection. Except the in-plane SRRs, the vertical SRRs out-of-plane also offer strong plasmon resonance with high Q-factor and low Ohmic losses [46]. In 2021, Li et al. manufactured a vertical SRR utilizing three-dimensional printing technology [47]. The maximum value of the Q-factor occurring in the absorption peak at 0.797 THz is 152.9.

2.2. Nanogap Enhanced Sensing

Generally, it is hard to trap and detect microorganisms (less than 10 μm) or biomolecules (nano-level) due to their small scales. To improve the sensitivity of LC-resonant meta-atoms for THz sensing, nanogap splits are proposed. A larger capacitance and a stronger field confinement are generated around the nanogap, enhancing sensitivity. Analytes deposited on the nanogap tune the effective dielectric constants of the capacitance, resulting in a resonant frequency shift.
In 2015, Park H.-R. et al. experimentally demonstrated the detection of 1-nm-thick dielectric overlayers using tightly confined THz waves [49], as shown in Figure 3a. The THz waves were squeezed inside sub-10 nm metallic gaps to detect refractive index changes caused by a thin dielectric overlayer. The measurement indicated that it was possible to detect even sub-1-nm dielectric overlayers. Besides refractive index sensing, the THz nanogap platform was also utilized for surface-enhanced THz absorption. Based on these findings, detecting such thin dielectric overlayers using the significant field enhancement at nanoscale gaps has potential applications in various fields. In 2017, Park S. J. et al. demonstrated the use of a nanogap–metasurface-based THz sensor for virus detection [50]. They applied SRRs (Figure 3b) with various gap widths (Figure 3c) for the highly sensitive detection of viruses. Two types of viruses, PRD1 and MS2, were tested on the metasurface at low densities. This sensing test indicated that reducing the gap width increased sensitivity by up to 13 times. In the same year, Shukla et al. proposed a biosensor [51] with nanogaps formed by graphene and hexagonal boron nitride for DNA sequencing. This graphene–hBN heterostructure served as a useful nanodevice for sensing applications, which may promote the development of nanodevice DNA sensors [52]. In 2021, Chen changed the structure size of the FSRRC to the nanometer level for transmission detection [53]. Two frequency signatures make it ideal for the accurate identification of small pathogens, such as viruses. In 2023, Ji et al. presented a highly sensitive method for detecting viruses using gold nanogaps filled with Al2O3 [54]. They demonstrated that the resonant frequency of these gaps changes significantly when target viruses are deposited on them, allowing for low-virus-density detection. Therefore, SRR engineered with nanogaps of appropriate geometry size increased sensitivity in virus detection. However, in terms of fabrication, nanogap sensors confront the difficulties of lithography technology in practical applications [55]. Recently, atomic layer deposition (ALD) technology [56], capable of solving the challenge, has been developed for fabricating nanogaps with a width of less than 1 nm.

2.3. Chirality for Polarization Sensing

Chirality refers to the non-superposability of an object on its mirror image. A chiral object and its mirror image are called enantiomers, as shown in Figure 4a [57]. Since structural enantiomers are very different in properties, the chiral phenomenon plays a key role in chemical, biological, and physiological processing, making chirality a useful tool for identifying molecules in pharmaceutics, toxicology, and stereochemistry [58]. Chiral substances exhibit different refractive indices to asymmetric electromagnetic fields excited by different circularly polarized waves. The refractive index is usually a complex number, in which the imaginary parts of the left and right circularly polarized (LCP and RCP) excitations are different and lead to different absorption rates. This circular dichroism (CD) phenomenon and optical rotatory dispersion (ORD), which are also called optical activity, are manifested by a difference in intensity and phase responses between LCP and RCP light illuminations through the chiral medium [59]. This is because linearly polarized light can be regarded as a superposition of orthogonal LCP and RCP waves. A different real part of the refractive index produces a phase difference of these two orthogonal circularly polarized waves, which rotates the linearly polarized wave. The modulation of circularly polarized light is achieved by the Pancharatnam–Berry (PB) phase [60].
Utilizing chirality for sensing has been demonstrated in the visible light spectrum, providing selectivity for molecules with handedness [61,62,63]. The development of THz technology brings chirality to a lower frequency. Circular dichroic spectroscopy and optical rotation spectroscopy have been widely used to identify the special arrangement of substances in biological [64], chemical [65], and physical processes [66]. Effective detection of the substances’ structure has important applications in the microscopic field. However, the chirality and electromagnetic responses of most natural chiral media are very weak. Thus, chiral metamaterials and chiral metasurfaces have been proposed, enhancing the optical rotation and circular dichroism responses to orders of magnitude higher, thus meeting more needs in different fields.
In 2020, a three-dimensional chiral structure, consisting of graphene, dielectric, and metal in the THz region was proposed, as shown in Figure 4c [67]. This biosensor device had a good sensing characteristic in chiral biomolecules (collagens). In the same year, a double-layer chiral metasurface was designed by Zhang et al. [68]. The special symmetric geometry of each meta-atom, with its adjacent cells, provided a strong chiral electromagnetic response, leading to a strong polarization conversion. Moreover, compared with the traditional THz transmitted resonance sensing for film thickness, polarization sensing was characterized by polarization elliptical angle (PEA) and polarization rotation angle (PRA), with a better Q-factor and FOM. The chiral metasurface and its polarization sensing method provide new methods for high-efficiency THz polarization manipulation and high-sensitive sensing by using THz polarization spectroscopy. In the next year, they demonstrated accurate measurement of chiral enantiomers of three amino acid aqueous solutions [64]. Shi et al. [69] demonstrated a THz all-dielectric metasurface with crescent cylinder arrays for chiral drug sensing, as shown in Figure 4b. It was able to monitor the concentrations of ibuprofen solutions, and the maximum sensitivity reached 60.42 GHz/mg. Furthermore, the metasurface successfully distinguished different chiral molecules, such as (R)-(−)-ibuprofen and (S)-(+)-ibuprofen, in the 5 µL trace amounts of samples. Zheng et al. proposed an all-silicon chiral metasurface for highly efficient circular polarization differential transmittance in the THz band [70]. Many potential applications in photon-spin selective devices were found, such as circularly polarized light detectors and chiral sensors. In 2022, Zhang et al. reported a spatial symmetry-breaking chiral THz metamaterial structure with stacked layers of L-shape arranged gold disks as the periodic meta-atom [71]. The device realized label-free detection of proline in biological samples and label-free enantio-discrimination of chiral molecules.
Figure 4. Chirality structures for polarization and handedness sensing at THz frequencies. (a) Schematic of chiral molecules. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [57]. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. (b) A schematic illustration of the THz chiral metasurface sensing experiment. Reprinted from Ref. [69]. (c) A periodic bi-layer three-dimensional THz graphene metasurface with a chiral structure. Reprinted from Ref. [61].
Figure 4. Chirality structures for polarization and handedness sensing at THz frequencies. (a) Schematic of chiral molecules. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [57]. Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society. (b) A schematic illustration of the THz chiral metasurface sensing experiment. Reprinted from Ref. [69]. (c) A periodic bi-layer three-dimensional THz graphene metasurface with a chiral structure. Reprinted from Ref. [61].
Sensors 23 05902 g004

2.4. A Metasurface with Active Components for THz Sensing

Conventional metasurfaces with fixed structures limit the functionality of THz wavefront modulation. Once the metasurface is fabricated, it manipulates THz waves in a static pre-defined manner. The lack of tunability restricts the passive metasurface detection to no more than two different samples. Quasi-static inspection in previous research was barely adapted to a complex environment. In addition, it is difficult to satisfy the advanced requirements for high intelligence and a self-regulated system in future applications. Tunable metasurfaces incorporated with active materials or MEMS structures realize dynamic manipulation by adjusting the material properties or the meta-atoms’ geometry under external excitations [72]. Metasurfaces with active components have been studied by researchers in recent years, such as phase-change material (GST and VO2) [73,74], active electronics (diodes) [75,76], two-dimensional material (graphene) [77], perovskites, and MEMS [78]. The function of active metasufaces that have high flexibility for manipulating electromagnetic waves is tunable and even reconfigurable. The concept of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs) composed of versatile active metasurfaces has been proposed and researched in many areas, such as secure satellite transmission networks [79,80,81,82]. Especially, graphene and MEMS are suitable for metasurface-based THz sensing due to their tunable characteristics, effectively functioning on the THz band, leading to a research hotspot in the biodetection field during the decade. The THz biosensors exhibit optimal performance by tuning active components, and they can even distinguish two analytes in the same structure.

2.4.1. Graphene-Based THz Sensing

The advancement of biodetection is necessary for preventing the spread of disease and providing effective medical treatment. Owing to the presence of π-electrons, graphene has a great affinity for biomolecules and shows excellent potential for sensing small and organic macromolecules [83]. Thus, graphene stands out from massive active materials due to its bio-friendly and tunable conductivity. The THz metasurface with a graphene element exhibits a kind of inoffensive detection for the human body in medical diagnosis [84,85]. Graphene is an ultrathin two-dimensional material consisting of a monolayer carbon atom. This special atomic structure grants graphene excellent mechanical and electromagnetic properties. The surface conductivity of graphene is artificially modulated by applying bias voltage or chemical doping to change its carrier concentration [86]. The theoretical model of graphene’s surface conductivity σ g is established by the Kubo formula [87], including intra-band and inter-band carrier transition in the entire electromagnetic spectrum. According to the Pauli Exclusion Principle [88], due to the photon energy being less than E f , the intra-band part becomes dominant, and the inter-band, consequently, is neglected in the THz regime. Thus, the surface conductivity of graphene σ g is described by the Drude-like model [89] as:
σ g = i e 2 E f π 2 ω + i / τ
where; e is the electron charge, ω is the angular frequency of the incident wave, is the reduced Planck’s constant, τ is the relaxation time of graphene, and E f is the Fermi energy of graphene. It indicates that the surface conductivity of graphene can be modulated by the Fermi level. Meanwhile, graphene is an excellent candidate for replacing conventional metal structures due to its local surface plasmon resonance in the THz regime. The external excitation is applied to graphene to tune the Fermi level, and the surface conductivity of graphene is subsequently affected. Traditionally, chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is a predominant method to prepare graphene flakes [90]. However, it is inevitably affected by impurities, defects, and disorders. CVD-graphene is usually p-doped, so the initial Fermi level E f slightly deviates from the Dirac point and is in the valence band [91], namely, the initial Fermi level of CVD-graphene is quite close to the Dirac point. An extremely weak excitation can change the initial Fermi level from the valence band to the Dirac point, exhibiting excellent traits as an ultra-sensitive biosensor.
It is simple to create a large frequency shift or an apparent amplitude change for graphene-based plasmonic devices. Initially, the typical SRR structures [92,93] of graphene-based metasurfaces were designed to sense the frequency shift. In 2021, Amin et al. presented a chiral graphene plasmonic metasurface to detect various viruses by the reflected polarization state of analytes in the THz spectrum [94]. A diagonally symmetrical L-shaped graphene split ring was chosen as the chiral resonant element to detect analytes with different refractive indices, as illuminated in Figure 5a. Compared with no graphene, the structure with graphene induced stronger interaction between the target biomolecules and the metasurface. Three viruses, including H1N1, H5N2, and H9N2, were measured, exhibiting different polarization ellipse orientations of −3°, 36°, and 48° for H9N2 (left handed), H1N1 (right handed), and H5N2 (right handed), respectively, at 1.364 THz.
Owing to the high security, reliability, and sensitivity of graphene-based metasurfaces, a series of graphene-based THz sensors were investigated [95,96,97,98]. In 2022, Hu et al. presented an original structure of the metasurface sensor, consisting of six layers, as shown in Figure 5b [99]. The absorption peaks of the proposed sensor depended on the thickness of the air layer. There was a good linear relationship between the absorption peak and dielectric parameters of the analyte. When the impedance of the air layer was matched with the equivalent impedance of the proposed sensor, the performance of absorption was the best for sensing. By adjusting the Fermi level of the full structure, the optimal sensitivity was 0.45 THz / RIU in the range of 0.1~2 THz for the analyte placed at the air layer (Figure 5c).
Except for using the bare patterned graphene for THz sensing, a metal–graphene hybrid THz metasurface was also presented by Sun et al. [100]. Compared with the bare metal metasurface, introducing graphene improved the sensitivity of metasurface sensors to a great extent. The proposed metal–graphene hybrid metasurface (MGHM) shown in Figure 5d consisted of a classical plasmon-induced transparency (PIT) metal metasurface with monolayer graphene for detecting nortriptyline. The PIT resonator was a classical structure to modulate the transmitted THz waves using the Fermi level and is capable of generating the PIT phenomenon for sensing (Figure 5e) [101,102,103]. Thus, the evaluation criteria of sensitivity were to calculate the value of T , which was defined by the difference between the peak and the valley of the transmission spectrum. Because the field confine was magnified by the strong interaction between graphene and PIT, the experimental results of T reached 55.3% of MGHM, which was enhanced 3.4-fold with 1 ng nortriptyline analyte compared with the metal metasurface, and the minimum detection limit was extended down to 0.1 ng. Similarly, Yan et al. proposed a metal–graphene hybrid metasurface [104]. The proposed sensor added perovskites to the graphene structure, making the Fermi level of graphene p-doped closer to the Dirac point, namely, the proposed structure had an ultra-high sensitivity, operating in the THz band. Then, sericin deposited on the hybrid metasurface moved the valence band to the Dirac point with a low concentration. The metal component of the biosensor possessed the characteristic of electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT). This EIT-like metasurface detected sericin with a detection limit of 780 pg/mL.
Figure 5. Graphene-based metasurfaces for THz sensing. (a) Spectrum-free (monochromatic) polarization state sensitive biosensing with linearly x-polarized electric field impinges on dispersion-engineered chiral LSPR metasurface and three different reflected signals of the left (R1)- and right (R3) handed elliptical and linearly y-polarized (R2) waves. Reprinted from Ref. [94]. (b) Layered structure diagram of the graphene-based THz metasurface sensor and (c) the absorption spectra corresponding to the Fermi level ( E f ) from 0 to 1.0 eV. Reprinted from Ref. [99]. (d) Schematic of THz transmitted detection on MGHM sensor and (e) the corresponding simulated transmission spectra with different Fermi levels of graphene. Reprinted from Ref. [100].
Figure 5. Graphene-based metasurfaces for THz sensing. (a) Spectrum-free (monochromatic) polarization state sensitive biosensing with linearly x-polarized electric field impinges on dispersion-engineered chiral LSPR metasurface and three different reflected signals of the left (R1)- and right (R3) handed elliptical and linearly y-polarized (R2) waves. Reprinted from Ref. [94]. (b) Layered structure diagram of the graphene-based THz metasurface sensor and (c) the absorption spectra corresponding to the Fermi level ( E f ) from 0 to 1.0 eV. Reprinted from Ref. [99]. (d) Schematic of THz transmitted detection on MGHM sensor and (e) the corresponding simulated transmission spectra with different Fermi levels of graphene. Reprinted from Ref. [100].
Sensors 23 05902 g005

2.4.2. MEMS-Based THz Sensing

Advanced MEMS technology is applied for sensing [105]. It is greatly conducive to realizing mechanical manipulation on a nano-scale with high-speed and enhanced flexibility. The micro-fabrication processes, based on photolithography, provide high precision for MEMS-based modulation [106]. Two tunable mechanisms are principally studied in the field of MEMS-based metasurfaces and are presented in the following subsection. One involves utilizing the difference in the thermal expansion coefficient of bi-materials to bend the cantilevers after the release process in fabrication, and the other is modulating the geometrical dimension of MEMS-based devices actuated by the electrostatic force. MEMS-based sensors have been demonstrated in optical sensing [107]. Besides, a myriad of MEMS-based metasurfaces used in the THz range has been deeply studied in the past decade.
In 2013, Alves et al. first presented a structure of a MEMS-based absorber incorporated with two cantilevers, as shown in Figure 6a [108]. The cantilever produced an angular displacement, measuring the responsivity of the MEMS-based sensors. The angular deformation of the sensor changed with increased temperature (Figure 6b), and the maximum measured value was 1.2 deg/μW at 3.8 THz. The proposed MEMS metasurface demonstrated potential for sensing. However, the bi-material cantilever had inherent angular deflection caused by the residual stress after MEMS fabrication. To solve the problem, Alves et al. subsequently introduced one additional cantilever on each side of the structure to compensate for the stress [109]. The self-leveling sensor eliminated the undesirable effect. Then in 2022, to overcome the single and narrowband response of the sensors, Ozpinar designed a novel structure in ref. [110], which was a fractal metasurface absorber actuated by MEMS thermomechanical bi-material microcantilevers. The unit cell consisted of triangular sectional fractal metasurfaces, shown in Figure 6e, resulting in penta-band absorption at 1.1 THz, 3.4 THz, 4.9 THz, 5.9 THz, and 7.8 THz, respectively. All five absorption peaks were more than 95%, up to 45 ° , corresponding to five bandwidths of 35.5 GHz, 114.0 GHz, 131.9 GHz, 146.1 GHz, and 264.2 GHz, respectively. This enabled THz sensors to cover broadband response.
In 2021, Zhong et al. [111] presented a structure of a MEMS-based tunable terahertz metamaterial (TTM) composed of an inner triadius and outer electric split-ring resonator (eSRR) structures, as shown in Figure 6c. It was similar to ref. [48], but the height of the inner triadius was not fixed. Meanwhile, Yang et al., from the same group, also published a similar structure [112], consisting of two concentric split-ring resonators (SRRs), as shown in Figure 6f. The attractive point was that the height h between SRRs and the substrate was precisely regulated by MEMS technology in these two structures. Based on the electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) of TTM, the peak of resonant absorption resulted in a big shift with the change in ambient refractive index. The Q-factor value of resonances were 66.01 for Zhong and 50.69 for Yang, corresponding to sensitivities of 0.379 THz/RIU and 0.54 THz/RIU, respectively. Although the Q-factor of Zhong was higher than that of Yang, the calculated value of sensitivity was inverse because the structure of the latter could induce dipole resonance coupling with LC resonance, leading to the enhancement of the field response. These researches proved the practicability of MEMS-based sensors with high sensitivity, reliability, and security for THz sensing.

2.5. Non-Typical Metasurface for THz Sensing

In addition to the metasurface-assisted THz sensing mechanisms discussed above, the emerging metasurface tunable method through microfluid [113] also indicates a high potential. In 2021, Fan et al. utilized ferromagnetic nanofluid combined with a chiral metasurface to enhance chirality detection sensitivity based on the magneto-optical effect for sensing nanoparticles [114]. In 2022, Mu et al. experimentally demonstrated that the deposition of liquid silver nanoparticles on a THz metasurface enhanced the local electric field and augmented the substance detection sensitivity by two orders of magnitude [115].
Furthermore, except for the abovementioned structural innovated method, a selective substrate is an alternative approach for effective THz sensing. Tao et al. found that using a high dielectric constant substrate, such as gallium arsenide and high-resistance Si, induced a frequency shift of 19.3% (3.9% for a general substrate) [116]. This result indicates that adjusting the substrate material is another promising technique for improving sensor performance.

3. Conclusions

In conclusion, this review provides a comprehensive investigation of metasurface-assisted THz sensors, including their structure characteristics, working principles, potential applications, and corresponding sensing performances. Additionally, representives of the sensing performances are summarized in Table 1. The metasurfaces were categorized and analyzed according to the THz sensing mechanisms, which mainly depend on using various resonator structures with diverse geometries, dimensions, and materials to realize different sensing applications, such as in medical applications and security. Compared with conventional sensors, the unique characteristics of the metasurface provide unparalleled facilitation in superior sensitivity, greater stability, and label-free safety. Experiments and numerical simulations of the aforementioned studies demonstrated excellent sensing performance. In particular, active metasurfaces based on graphene or MEMS technology have great flexibility and compatibility in detection, and the performance of sensing can be tuned to the maximum value under a low concentration of the analyte. Metasurfacce-based THz sensors have significant potency in microorganism sensing and cancer detection with a nondestructive and non-contact way, which will drive bio-detection to be more secure in the future. Additionally, the relevant manufacturing technologies, such as atomic layer lithography, are rapidly evolving to hold the promise of fabricating mass sensors. Hence, further investigation of metasurface-based THz sensing will lead to technological breakthroughs in the multidisciplinary scientific area, contributing to the advancement of sensing, as well as biodetection industries.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, Q.W., Y.C. and J.M.; writing—review and editing, F.Y.; supervision, N.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baxter, J.B.; Guglietta, G.W. Terahertz spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 4342–4368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tonouchi, M. Cutting-edge terahertz technology. Nat. Photonics 2007, 1, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Williams, G.P. Filling the THz gap—High power sources and applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2006, 69, 301–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. O’Hara, J.F.; Withayachumnankul, W.; Al-Naib, I. A Review on Thin-film Sensing with Terahertz Waves. J. Infrared Millim. Terahertz Waves 2012, 33, 245–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, X.; Zhao, X.; Yang, K.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Fu, W.; Luo, Y. Biomedical Applications of Terahertz Spectroscopy and Imaging. Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 810–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Beruete, M.; Jáuregui-López, I. Terahertz Sensing Based on Metasurfaces. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 8, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Zhang, S.; Wong, C.L.; Zeng, S.; Bi, R.; Tai, K.; Dholakia, K.; Olivo, M. Metasurfaces for biomedical applications: Imaging and sensing from a nanophotonics perspective. Nanophotonics 2020, 10, 259–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lindley-Hatcher, H.; Stantchev, R.I.; Chen, X.; Hernandez-Serrano, A.I.; Hardwicke, J.; Pickwell-MacPherson, E. Real time THz imaging—Opportunities and challenges for skin cancer detection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021, 118, 5259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oh, S.J.; Kang, J.; Maeng, I.; Suh, J.-S.; Huh, Y.-M.; Haam, S.; Son, J.-H. Nanoparticle-enabled terahertz imaging for cancer diagnosis. Opt. Express 2009, 17, 3469–3475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Vafapour, Z.; Keshavarz, A.; Ghahraloud, H. The potential of terahertz sensing for cancer diagnosis. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chan, W.L.; Deibel, J.; Mittleman, D.M. Imaging with terahertz radiation. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2007, 70, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wallace, V.P.; MacPherson, E.; Zeitler, J.A.; Reid, C. Three-dimensional imaging of optically opaque materials using nonionizing terahertz radiation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2008, 25, 3120–3133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Yang, L.; Guo, T.; Zhang, X.; Cao, S.; Ding, X. Toxic chemical compound detection by terahertz spectroscopy: A review. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2018, 37, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Corsi, C.; Sizov, F. THz and Security Applications: Detectors, Sources and Associated Electronics for THz Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee, D.K.; Kang, J.H.; Lee, J.S.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, C.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, T.; Son, J.H.; Park, Q.H.; Seo, M. Highly sensitive and selective sugar detection by terahertz nano-antennas. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Mathanker, S.K.; Weckler, P.R.; Wang, N. Terahertz (THz) applications in food and agriculture: A review. Trans. ASABE 2013, 56, 1213–1226. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lou, J.; Jiao, Y.; Yang, R.; Huang, Y.; Xu, X.; Zhang, L.; Ma, Z.; Yu, Y.; Peng, W.; Yuan, Y.; et al. Calibration-free, high-precision, and robust terahertz ultrafast metasurfaces for monitoring gastric cancers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2209218119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hajati, Y. Tunable broadband multiresonance graphene terahertz sensor. Opt. Mater. 2020, 101, 9725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, H.T.; Taylor, A.J.; Yu, N. A review of metasurfaces: Physics and applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2016, 79, 076401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Chen, Z.; Guo, B.; Yang, Y.; Cheng, C. Metamaterials-based enhanced energy harvesting: A review. Phys. B 2014, 438, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cui, T.J.; Liu, S.; Zhang, L. Information metamaterials and metasurfaces. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 3644–3668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, S. AI empowered metasurfaces. Light Sci. Appl. 2020, 9, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Orazbayev, B.; Mohammadi Estakhri, N.; Alù, A.; Beruete, M. Experimental Demonstration of Metasurface-Based Ultrathin Carpet Cloaks for Millimeter Waves. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2017, 5, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Arbabi, E.; Arbabi, A.; Kamali, S.M.; Horie, Y.; Faraji-Dana, M.; Faraon, A. MEMS-tunable dielectric metasurface lens. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Xue, C.; Lou, Q.; Chen, Z.N. Broadband Double-Layered Huygens’ Metasurface Lens Antenna for 5G Millimeter-Wave Systems. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2020, 68, 1468–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kitayama, D.; Hama, Y.; Goto, K.; Miyachi, K.; Motegi, T.; Kagaya, O. Transparent dynamic metasurface for a visually unaffected reconfigurable intelligent surface: Controlling transmission/reflection and making a window into an RF lens. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 29292–29307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Holloway, C.L.; Kuester, E.F.; Gordon, J.A.; O’Hara, J.; Booth, J.; Smith, D.R. An overview of the theory and applications of metasurfaces: The two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2012, 54, 10–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zheng, G.; Muhlenbernd, H.; Kenney, M.; Li, G.; Zentgraf, T.; Zhang, S. Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 308–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, L.; Jun Cui, T.; Ji, W.; Liu, S.; Ding, J.; Wan, X.; Bo Li, Y.; Jiang, M.; Qiu, C.W.; Zhang, S. Electromagnetic reprogrammable coding-metasurface holograms. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Akter, N.; Hasan, M.M.; Pala, N. A Review of THz Technologies for Rapid Sensing and Detection of Viruses including SARS-CoV-2. Biosensors 2021, 11, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ma, Z.; Li, P.; Chen, S.; Wu, X. Optical generation of strong-field terahertz radiation and its application in nonlinear terahertz metasurfaces. Nanophotonics 2022, 11, 1847–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tittl, A.; John-Herpin, A.; Leitis, A.; Arvelo, E.R.; Altug, H. Metasurface-based molecular biosensing aided by artificial intelligence. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 14810–14822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lee, G.; Yu, E.-S.; Ryu, Y.-S.; Seo, M. The perspectives of broadband metasurfaces and photo-electric tweezer applications. Nanophotonics 2022, 11, 1783–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mayte, G.-C.; Juan, G.-P.L.; Luis, P.A.; Sharvina, S.; Serge, R.; Agustín, M. Electrodeposited Negative Index Metamaterials with Visible and Near Infrared Response. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2020, 8, 2000865. [Google Scholar]
  35. Krause, R.; Chávez-Cervantes, M.; Aeschlimann, S.; Forti, S.; Fabbri, F.; Rossi, A.; Coletti, C.; Cacho, C.; Zhang, Y.; Majchrzak, P.E.; et al. Ultrafast Charge Separation in Bilayer WS2/Graphene Heterostructure Revealed by Time- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy. Front. Phys. 2021, 9, 668149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yao, J.; Lin, R.; Chen, M.K.; Tsai, D.P. Integrated-resonant metadevices: A review. Adv. Photonics 2023, 5, 24001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, H.-T.; Padilla, W.J.; Averitt, R.D.; Gossard, A.C.; Highstrete, C.; Lee, M.; O’Hara, J.F.; Taylor, A.J. Electromagnetic metamaterials for terahertz applications. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2008, 1, 42–50. [Google Scholar]
  38. Park, S.J.; Hong, J.T.; Choi, S.J.; Kim, H.S.; Park, W.K.; Han, S.T.; Park, J.Y.; Lee, S.; Kim, D.S.; Ahn, Y.H. Detection of microorganisms using terahertz metamaterials. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yoon, S.A.; Cha, S.H.; Jun, S.W.; Park, S.J.; Park, J.Y.; Lee, S.; Kim, H.S.; Ahn, Y.H. Identifying different types of microorganisms with terahertz spectroscopy. Biomed. Opt. Express 2020, 11, 406–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hu, F.; Zhang, L.; Xu, X.; Wang, Y.e.; Zou, T.; Zhang, W. Study on split-ring-resonator based terahertz sensor and its application to the identification of product oil. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2015, 47, 2867–2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xie, L.; Gao, W.; Shu, J.; Ying, Y.; Kono, J. Extraordinary sensitivity enhancement by metasurfaces in terahertz detection of antibiotics. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Ekmekci, E.; Turhan-Sayan, G. Multi-functional metamaterial sensor based on a broad-side coupled SRR topology with a multi-layer substrate. Appl. Phys. A 2012, 110, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Aghadjani, M.; Lan, F.; Mazumder, P. Fano-resonance based metamaterial THz sensor. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO), Cork, Ireland, 23–26 July 2018. [Google Scholar]
  44. Chen, K.; Ruan, C.; Cao, Y. SRRs and Cross Combine Asymmetric Metamaterials Promising for THz Sensor. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology (ICMMT), Shanghai, China, 20–23 September 2020; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  45. Singh, R.; Al-Naib, I.A.; Koch, M.; Zhang, W. Sharp Fano resonances in THz metamaterials. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 6312–6319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Liang, Y.; Koshelev, K.; Zhang, F.; Lin, H.; Lin, S.; Wu, J.; Jia, B.; Kivshar, Y. Bound States in the Continuum in Anisotropic Plasmonic Metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 2020, 20, 6351–6356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Li, S.; Zhang, L.; Chen, X. 3D-printed terahertz metamaterial absorber based on vertical split-ring resonator. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 130, 56276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Niu, Q.; Zhang, R.; Yang, Y. High Sensitivity and Label-Free Detection of the SARS-CoV-2 S1 Protein Using a Terahertz Meta-Biosensor. Front. Phys. 2022, 10, 859924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Park, H.-R.; Chen, X.; Nguyen, N.-C.; Peraire, J.; Oh, S.-H. Nanogap-enhanced terahertz sensing of 1 nm thick (λ/106) dielectric films. ACS Photonics 2015, 2, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Park, S.; Cha, S.; Shin, G.; Ahn, Y. Sensing viruses using terahertz nano-gap metamaterials. Biomed. Opt. Express 2017, 8, 3551–3558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Shukla, V.; Jena, N.K.; Grigoriev, A.; Ahuja, R. Prospects of Graphene-hBN Heterostructure Nanogap for DNA Sequencing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 39945–39952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zwolak, M.; Di Ventra, M. Electronic signature of DNA nucleotides via transverse transport. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 421–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Chen, K.; Ruan, C.; Cao, Y. Nano Gap Metamaterials promising for Virus Detection. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology (ICMMT), Nanjing, China, 23–26 May 2021; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  54. Ji, G.; Kim, H.S.; Cha, S.H.; Lee, H.-T.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, S.W.; Ahn, K.J.; Kim, K.-H.; Ahn, Y.H.; Park, H.-R. Terahertz virus-sized gold nanogap sensor. Nanophotonics 2023, 12, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vieu, C.; Carcenac, F.; Pepin, A.; Chen, Y.; Mejias, M.; Lebib, A.; Manin-Ferlazzo, L.; Couraud, L.; Launois, H. Electron beam lithography: Resolution limits and applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2000, 164, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Park, H.-R.; Namgung, S.; Chen, X.; Oh, S.-H. High-density metallic nanogap arrays for the sensitive detection of single-walled carbon nanotube thin films. Faraday Discuss. 2015, 178, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Liu, M.; Zhang, L.; Wang, T. Supramolecular Chirality in Self-Assembled Systems. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 7304–7397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Fitos, I.; Visy, J.; Simonyi, M. Species-dependency in chiral-drug recognition of serum albumin studied by chromatographic methods. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 2002, 54, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shi, T.; Deng, Z.L.; Geng, G.; Zeng, X.; Zeng, Y.; Hu, G.; Overvig, A.; Li, J.; Qiu, C.W.; Alu, A.; et al. Planar chiral metasurfaces with maximal and tunable chiroptical response driven by bound states in the continuum. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hu, J.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Liu, Y.-h.; Shao, L.-y. A Review on Metasurface: From Principle to Smart Metadevices. Front. Phys. 2021, 8, 586087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Huang, Y.; Xie, X.; Pu, M.; Guo, Y.; Xu, M.; Ma, X.; Li, X.; Luo, X. Dual-Functional Metasurface toward Giant Linear and Circular Dichroism. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2020, 8, 201902061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ji, R.; Wang, S.-W.; Liu, X.; Guo, H.; Lu, W. Hybrid Helix Metamaterials for Giant and Ultrawide Circular Dichroism. ACS Photonics 2016, 3, 2368–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, W.; Coppens, Z.J.; Besteiro, L.V.; Wang, W.; Govorov, A.O.; Valentine, J. Circularly polarized light detection with hot electrons in chiral plasmonic metamaterials. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Zhang, Z.; Zhong, C.; Fan, F.; Liu, G.; Chang, S. Terahertz polarization and chirality sensing for amino acid solution based on chiral metasurface sensor. Sens. Actuators B 2021, 330, 129315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cheng, J.; Le Saux, G.; Gao, J.; Buffeteau, T.; Battie, Y.; Barois, P.; Ponsinet, V.; Delville, M.H.; Ersen, O.; Pouget, E.; et al. GoldHelix: Gold Nanoparticles Forming 3D Helical Superstructures with Controlled Morphology and Strong Chiroptical Property. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 3806–3818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Govorov, A.O.; Fan, Z.; Hernandez, P.; Slocik, J.M.; Naik, R.R. Theory of circular dichroism of nanomaterials comprising chiral molecules and nanocrystals: Plasmon enhancement, dipole interactions, and dielectric effects. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1374–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Asgari, S.; Granpayeh, N.; Fabritius, T. Controllable terahertz cross-shaped three-dimensional graphene intrinsically chiral metastructure and its biosensing application. Opt. Commun. 2020, 474, 126080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, Z.-Y.; Fan, F.; Li, T.-F.; Ji, Y.-Y.; Chang, S.-J. Terahertz polarization conversion and sensing with double-layer chiral metasurface. Chin. Phys. B 2020, 29, ab9294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Shi, W.; Fan, F.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, T.; Li, S.; Wang, X.; Chang, S. Terahertz Sensing for R/S Chiral Ibuprofen via All-Dielectric Metasurface with Higher-Order Resonance. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 8892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zheng, C.; Li, J.; Wang, S.; Li, J.; Li, M.; Zhao, H.; Hao, X.; Zang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, J. Optically tunable all-silicon chiral metasurface in terahertz band. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021, 118, 39992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhang, M.; Hao, D.; Wang, S.; Li, R.; Wang, S.; Ma, Y.; Moro, R.; Ma, L. Chiral biosensing using terahertz twisted chiral metamaterial. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 14651–14660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Meng, C.; Thrane, P.C.V.; Ding, F.; Gjessing, J.; Thomaschewski, M.; Wu, C.; Dirdal, C.; Bozhevolnyi, S.I. Dynamic piezoelectric MEMS-based optical metasurfaces. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, abg5639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Duan, X.; White, S.T.; Cui, Y.; Neubrech, F.; Gao, Y.; Haglund, R.F.; Liu, N. Reconfigurable Multistate Optical Systems Enabled by VO2 Phase Transitions. ACS Photonics 2020, 7, 2958–2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Choi, C.; Lee, S.Y.; Mun, S.E.; Lee, G.Y.; Sung, J.; Yun, H.; Yang, J.H.; Kim, H.O.; Hwang, C.Y.; Lee, B. Metasurface with Nanostructured Ge2Sb2Te5 as a Platform for Broadband-Operating Wavefront Switch. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wu, R.Y.; Zhang, L.; Bao, L.; Wu, L.W.; Ma, Q.; Bai, G.D.; Wu, H.T.; Cui, T.J. Digital Metasurface with Phase Code and Reflection–Transmission Amplitude Code for Flexible Full-Space Electromagnetic Manipulations. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2019, 7, 1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wang, H.L.; Ma, H.F.; Chen, M.; Sun, S.; Cui, T.J. A Reconfigurable Multifunctional Metasurface for Full-Space Control of Electromagnetic Waves. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Yatooshi, T.; Ishikawa, A.; Tsuruta, K. Terahertz wavefront control by tunable metasurface made of graphene ribbons. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107, 7824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Pitchappa, P.; Kumar, A.; Singh, R.; Lee, C.; Wang, N. Terahertz MEMS metadevices. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2021, 31, ac1eed. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lin, Z.; Niu, H.; An, K.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, G.; Chatzinotas, S.; Hu, Y. Refracting RIS-Aided Hybrid Satellite-Terrestrial Relay Networks: Joint Beamforming Design and Optimization. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2022, 58, 3717–3724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, Y.; Lin, Z.; Niu, H.; An, K.; Hu, Y.; Li, D.; Zheng, G.; Al-Dhahir, N. Secure Satellite Transmission With Active Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface. IEEE Commun. Lett. 2022, 26, 3029–3033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Niu, H.; Lin, Z.; An, K.; Wang, J.; Zheng, G.; Al-Dhahir, N.; Wong, K.-K. Active RIS Assisted Rate-Splitting Multiple Access Network: Spectral and Energy Efficiency Tradeoff. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2023, 41, 1452–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Niu, H.; Lin, Z.; Chu, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Xiao, P.; Nguyen, H.X.; Lee, I.; Al-Dhahir, N. Joint Beamforming Design for Secure RIS-Assisted IoT Networks. IEEE Internet Things J. 2023, 10, 1628–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Farid, S.; Meshik, X.; Choi, M.; Mukherjee, S.; Lan, Y.; Parikh, D.; Poduri, S.; Baterdene, U.; Huang, C.E.; Wang, Y.Y.; et al. Detection of Interferon gamma using graphene and aptamer based FET-like electrochemical biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 71, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Patel, S.; Parmar, J.; Sorathiya, V.; Zakaria, R.; Nguyen, T.K.; Dhasarathan, V. Graphene-Based Plasmonic Absorber for Biosensing Applications Using Gold Split Ring Resonator Metasurfaces. J. Light. Technol. 2021, 39, 5617–5624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Patel, S.K.; Parmar, J.; Trivedi, H.; Zakaria, R.; Nguyen, T.K.; Dhasarathan, V. Highly Sensitive Graphene-Based Refractive Index Biosensor Using Gold Metasurface Array. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2020, 32, 681–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dash, S.; Psomas, C.; Krikidis, I.; Akyildiz, I.F.; Pitsillides, A. Active Control of THz Waves in Wireless Environments Using Graphene-Based RIS. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2022, 70, 8785–8797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Cheng, Y.; Zhao, H.; Li, C. Broadband tunable terahertz metasurface absorber based on complementary-wheel-shaped graphene. Opt. Mater. 2020, 109, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Cheng, J.; Fan, F.; Chang, S. Recent Progress on Graphene-Functionalized Metasurfaces for Tunable Phase and Polarization Control. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Zhang, Z.; Yan, X.; Liang, L.; Wei, D.; Wang, M.; Wang, Y.; Yao, J. The novel hybrid metal-graphene metasurfaces for broadband focusing and beam-steering in farfield at the terahertz frequencies. Carbon 2018, 132, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, Q.; Cong, L.; Singh, R.; Xu, N.; Cao, W.; Zhang, X.; Tian, Z.; Du, L.; Han, J.; Zhang, W. Monolayer graphene sensing enabled by the strong Fano-resonant metasurface. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 17278–17284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yao, H.; Yan, X.; Yang, M.; Yang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Li, A.; Wang, M.; Wei, D.; Tian, Z.; Liang, L. Frequency-dependent ultrasensitive terahertz dynamic modulation at the Dirac point on graphene-based metal and all-dielectric metamaterials. Carbon 2021, 184, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Parmar, J.; Patel, S.K. Tunable and highly sensitive graphene-based biosensor with circle/split ring resonator metasurface for sensing hemoglobin/urine biomolecules. Phys. B 2022, 624, 413399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Patel, S.K.; Parmar, J.; Kosta, Y.P.; Charola, S.; Zakaria, R.B.; Nguyen, T.K.; Dhasarathan, V. Graphene-Based Highly Sensitive Refractive Index Biosensors Using C-Shaped Metasurface. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 6359–6366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Amin, M.; Siddiqui, O.; Abutarboush, H.; Farhat, M.; Ramzan, R. A THz graphene metasurface for polarization selective virus sensing. Carbon 2021, 176, 580–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hamouleh-Alipour, A.; Mir, A.; Farmani, A. Analytical Modeling and Design of a Graphene Metasurface Sensor for Thermo-Optical Detection of Terahertz Plasmons. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 4525–4532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Islam, M.S.; Sultana, J.; Biabanifard, M.; Vafapour, Z.; Nine, M.J.; Dinovitser, A.; Cordeiro, C.M.B.; Ng, B.W.H.; Abbott, D. Tunable localized surface plasmon graphene metasurface for multiband superabsorption and terahertz sensing. Carbon 2020, 158, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Tan, C.; Wang, S.; Li, S.; Liu, X.; Wei, J.; Zhang, G.; Ye, H. Cancer Diagnosis Using Terahertz-Graphene-Metasurface-Based Biosensor with Dual-Resonance Response. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhou, R.; Wang, C.; Huang, Y.; Huang, K.; Wang, Y.; Xu, W.; Xie, L.; Ying, Y. Label-free terahertz microfluidic biosensor for sensitive DNA detection using graphene-metasurface hybrid structures. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 188, 113336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Hu, H.; Qi, B.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Huang, X. A graphene-based THz metasurface sensor with air-spaced structure. Front. Phys. 2022, 10, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Sun, K.; Li, J.; Ge, L.; Zhong, K.; Wang, Y.; Xu, D.; Yang, X.; Fu, W.; Yao, J. Graphene-enhanced hybrid terahertz metasurface sensor for ultrasensitive nortriptyline sensing and detection. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 35749–35758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Cui, W.; Li, C.; Ma, H.; Xu, H.; Yi, Z.; Ren, X.; Cao, X.; He, Z.; Liu, Z. Excellent sensing based on dual-plasmon induced transparency in graphene metasurface. Phys. E 2021, 134, 114850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. He, Z.; Li, L.; Ma, H.; Pu, L.; Xu, H.; Yi, Z.; Cao, X.; Cui, W. Graphene-based metasurface sensing applications in terahertz band. Results Phys. 2021, 21, 103795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Wang, Y.; Chang, B.; Xue, J.; Cao, X.; Xu, H.; He, H.; Cui, W.; He, Z. Sensing and slow light applications based on graphene metasurface in terahertz. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2022, 123, 108881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Yan, X.; Li, T.; Ma, G.; Gao, J.; Wang, T.; Yao, H.; Yang, M.; Liang, L.; Li, J.; Li, J.; et al. Ultra-sensitive Dirac-point-based biosensing on terahertz metasurfaces comprising patterned graphene and perovskites. Photonics Res. 2022, 10, 444225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Khoshnoud, F.; Silva, C.W.d. Recent advances in MEMS sensor technology-mechanical applications. IEEE Instrum. Meas. Mag. 2012, 15, 14–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Astorino, M.D.; Fastampa, R.; Frezza, F.; Maiolo, L.; Marrani, M.; Missori, M.; Muzi, M.; Tedeschi, N.; Veroli, A. Polarization-maintaining reflection-mode THz time-domain spectroscopy of a polyimide based ultra-thin narrow-band metamaterial absorber. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Qin, J.; Jiang, S.; Wang, Z.; Cheng, X.; Li, B.; Shi, Y.; Tsai, D.P.; Liu, A.Q.; Huang, W.; Zhu, W. Metasurface Micro/Nano-Optical Sensors: Principles and Applications. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 11598–11618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Alves, F.; Grbovic, D.; Kearney, B.; Lavrik, N.V.; Karunasiri, G. Bi-material terahertz sensors using metamaterial structures. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 13256–13271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Yang, T.; Sadwick, L.P.; Alves, F.; Karunasiri, G.; Grbovic, D. MEMS THz sensors using metasurface structures. In Proceedings of the Terahertz, RF, Millimeter, and Submillimeter-Wave Technology and Applications XI, San Francisco, CA, USA, 27 January–1 February 2018. [Google Scholar]
  110. Ozpinar, H.; Aksimsek, S. Fractal interwoven resonator based penta-band metamaterial absorbers for THz sensing and imaging. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 19758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Zhong, J.; Xu, X.; Lin, Y.S. Tunable Terahertz Metamaterial with Electromagnetically Induced Transparency Characteristic for Sensing Application. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Yang, J.; Lin, Y.S. Design of Tunable Terahertz Metamaterial Sensor with Single- and Dual-Resonance Characteristic. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Shih, K.; Pitchappa, P.; Manjappa, M.; Ho, C.P.; Singh, R.; Lee, C. Microfluidic metamaterial sensor: Selective trapping and remote sensing of microparticles. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 121, 3492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Fan, F.; Zhong, C.; Zhang, Z.; Li, S.; Chang, S. Terahertz chiral sensing and magneto-optical enhancement for ferromagnetic nanofluids in the chiral metasurface. Nanoscale Adv. 2021, 3, 4790–4798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Mu, T.; Ye, Y.; Dai, Z.; Zhao, R.; Yang, M.; Ren, X. Silver nanoparticles-integrated terahertz metasurface for enhancing sensor sensitivity. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 41101–41109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Tao, H.; Strikwerda, A.C.; Liu, M.; Mondia, J.P.; Ekmekci, E.; Fan, K.; Kaplan, D.L.; Padilla, W.J.; Zhang, X.; Averitt, R.D.; et al. Performance enhancement of terahertz metamaterials on ultrathin substrates for sensing applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 3367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A schematic illustration of various metasurface-assisted THz sensors.
Figure 1. A schematic illustration of various metasurface-assisted THz sensors.
Sensors 23 05902 g001
Figure 2. Resonant structures for frequency shift sensing. (a) Schematic and SEM image (bottom) of the THz metamaterial for microorganism sensing. Reprinted from Ref. [38]. (b) THz metasurface sensing for liquids containing low-density microorganisms. Reprinted from Ref. [39]. (c) Schematic and SEM images of the metasurface structure deposited with kanamycin sulfate molecules on top. Reprinted from Ref. [41]. (d) A schematic illustration of the proposed three-split-ring (TSR) resonator with a magnification of the gap area. Reprinted from Ref. [48].2.2. Nanogap Enhanced Sensing.
Figure 2. Resonant structures for frequency shift sensing. (a) Schematic and SEM image (bottom) of the THz metamaterial for microorganism sensing. Reprinted from Ref. [38]. (b) THz metasurface sensing for liquids containing low-density microorganisms. Reprinted from Ref. [39]. (c) Schematic and SEM images of the metasurface structure deposited with kanamycin sulfate molecules on top. Reprinted from Ref. [41]. (d) A schematic illustration of the proposed three-split-ring (TSR) resonator with a magnification of the gap area. Reprinted from Ref. [48].2.2. Nanogap Enhanced Sensing.
Sensors 23 05902 g002
Figure 3. Resonant structures with nanogaps for local field enhanced sensing. (a) Schematic of an ALD-deposited ultrathin Al2O3 layer on an annular gap array, with an enlarged view of the nanogap portion. Reprinted from Ref.. (b) THz nanogap metasurface for viruses sensing and (c) SEM image of viruses deposited on the nanogap (width of 200 nm) metasurface sensor. Reprinted from Ref.
Figure 3. Resonant structures with nanogaps for local field enhanced sensing. (a) Schematic of an ALD-deposited ultrathin Al2O3 layer on an annular gap array, with an enlarged view of the nanogap portion. Reprinted from Ref.. (b) THz nanogap metasurface for viruses sensing and (c) SEM image of viruses deposited on the nanogap (width of 200 nm) metasurface sensor. Reprinted from Ref.
Sensors 23 05902 g003
Figure 6. MEMS-based metasurfaces for THz sensing. (a) A THz bi-material sensor with metamaterial absorber fabricated on a Si substrate and the schematic of amplified cantilever and (b) its three-dimensional optical profile. Reprinted from Ref. [108]. (c) A schematic illustration of a MEMS-based tunable THz metasurface, which is controlled by different deriving voltages, as well as (d) its elevating height as a function of the driving voltages. Reprinted from Ref. [111]. (e) A FMMA-based sensor. Reprinted from Ref. [110]. (f) The unit cell structure of a MEMS-based tunable THz metasurface. Reprinted from Ref. [112].
Figure 6. MEMS-based metasurfaces for THz sensing. (a) A THz bi-material sensor with metamaterial absorber fabricated on a Si substrate and the schematic of amplified cantilever and (b) its three-dimensional optical profile. Reprinted from Ref. [108]. (c) A schematic illustration of a MEMS-based tunable THz metasurface, which is controlled by different deriving voltages, as well as (d) its elevating height as a function of the driving voltages. Reprinted from Ref. [111]. (e) A FMMA-based sensor. Reprinted from Ref. [110]. (f) The unit cell structure of a MEMS-based tunable THz metasurface. Reprinted from Ref. [112].
Sensors 23 05902 g006
Table 1. Sensing performance comparisons of various mechanisms based on THz metasurfaces.
Table 1. Sensing performance comparisons of various mechanisms based on THz metasurfaces.
Sensing Mechanism n a f / I (GHz) S (GHz/RIU) FOM Q-FactorAnalyteConcentrationRef.
SRR1.37924.320.12165.58Penicillia 0.090   μ m 2 [38]
Nanogap-40---Al2O31 nm thick[49]
3.48/3.8360/6924.20/24.38--Virus 4   μ m 2 [50]
Chirality1.15144 (CD)960--Collagen1.5 nm thick[67]
-181.25---Ibuprofen0.3 mg/mL ×10[69]
Graphene2.00.203 (0.377)203
(377)
1.81 (1.57)8.21 (6.05)--[99]
-42---Nortriptyline1 ng[100]
MEMS1.4216037971.3372.47--[111]
1.154 (112)540 (1120)57.4 (44.7)50.7 (40.0)--[112]
Microfluid1.6170283.3--Polystyrene particle-[113]
n a is the refractive index of analyte.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Q.; Chen, Y.; Mao, J.; Yang, F.; Wang, N. Metasurface-Assisted Terahertz Sensing. Sensors 2023, 23, 5902. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23135902

AMA Style

Wang Q, Chen Y, Mao J, Yang F, Wang N. Metasurface-Assisted Terahertz Sensing. Sensors. 2023; 23(13):5902. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23135902

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Qian, Yuzi Chen, Jinxian Mao, Fengyuan Yang, and Nan Wang. 2023. "Metasurface-Assisted Terahertz Sensing" Sensors 23, no. 13: 5902. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23135902

APA Style

Wang, Q., Chen, Y., Mao, J., Yang, F., & Wang, N. (2023). Metasurface-Assisted Terahertz Sensing. Sensors, 23(13), 5902. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23135902

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop