Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensors for Analysis of Pharmaceuticals and Biomarkers
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Fluorescent Signal Source and Working Mechanism of MI-RFL Sensor
2.1. Fluorescent Signal Source
2.1.1. Fluorescent Dyes
2.1.2. Quantum Dots
2.1.3. Upconversion Nanoparticles
2.1.4. Metal Nanoclusters
2.2. Working Mechanism of MI-RFL Sensor
2.2.1. FRET
2.2.2. IFE
2.2.3. PET
2.2.4. Other Mechanisms
3. New Techniques and Strategies for the Preparation of MIPs
3.1. Surface Imprinting Technology
3.2. Nanoimprinting Technology
3.3. Dummy Imprinting Strategy
3.4. Multi-Template Imprinting Strategy
3.5. Stimulus-Response Imprinting Strategy
4. Types of Fluorescence Emission from the MI-RFL Sensor
5. Application of MI-RFL Sensors in Analysis of Pharmaceuticals and Biomarkers
5.1. Pharmaceutical Analysis
5.1.1. Detection of Veterinary Drug Residues
- Antibiotics
- 2.
- Hormones
5.1.2. Detection of Pesticide Residues
- Insecticides
- 2.
- Herbicides
- 3.
- Bactericides
5.1.3. Pharmaceuticals for Human Use
- Natural Organic Compounds and TCM
- 2.
- Synthetic Pharmaceuticals
5.2. Biomarkers Analysis
5.2.1. Proteins
5.2.2. Nucleotides
5.2.3. Amino Acids
6. Application of MI-RFL Sensors for POCT
6.1. Test Strips
6.2. Smartphones
6.3. Microfluidic Chips
7. Conclusions and Prospects
- (1)
- Sensor construction and optimization: The application of MI-RFL sensors in pharmaceuticals and biomarkers detection depends on their efficient, sensitive, and selective performance, and the optimization of the construction process is critical to achieve these performances. The construction process of MI-RFL sensor mainly includes the selection of fluorescence signal sources and the preparation of MIPs.
- (i)
- Selection of fluorescence source: Although traditional fluorescent dyes and nanomaterials have been widely used, issues such as stability, spectral overlap, toxicity, and cost still need to be addressed. Cyanine dyes have excellent photostability, wide spectral range, and tunable fluorescence characteristics. Meanwhile, the relatively high quantum yield of cyanine dyes helps to improve the detection sensitivity of the sensor. These advantages make it potential for application in the field of MI-RFL sensors [129,130]. Therefore, the development of fluorescent dyes, such as cyanine dyes, and new fluorescent materials, such as BU-MOFs, and the optimization of their optical properties through surface modification, doping, and recombination become an important direction of future research. At the same time, the integration strategy of multiple fluorescence sources is also expected to achieve effective cooperation between different sources and improve the detection accuracy.
- (ii)
- Selection of reaction mechanism: In practical applications, the appropriate reaction mechanism should be selected according to the specific detection requirements and the nature of the target molecules. For drugs or biomarkers with specific structures and properties, mechanisms such as FRET, PET, and ICT can be selected to achieve highly selective and responsive detection by designing specific fluorescent probes and receptors. In the pursuit of rapid detection, the IFE mechanism is more advantageous because it does not require a complex energy transfer process and can respond to the target faster. For high sensitivity detection requirements, PET and AIE mechanisms may perform better, which achieve significant fluorescence changes at low concentrations [131]. Furthermore, the combination of multiple reaction mechanisms and sensor design strategies can improve the performance and applicability of the sensors. In the future, with deepening understanding of different reaction mechanisms, reaction mechanisms can be precisely selected and designed to further improve the performance of MI-RFL sensors [132].
- (iii)
- Preparation of MIPs: The MIPs preparation process was optimized, including the selection of template molecules, polymerization conditions of functional monomers, type and dosage of cross-linking agents, and others, which could significantly improve the performance of the sensor. In addition, the introduction of dummy templates, multi-template strategies, and new imprinting methods, such as electrochemical imprinting and light-controlled imprinting, also provide the possibility to further improve the performance of sensors. The application of theoretical calculations during the preparation of imprinted materials will be an important research direction. For example, Chi et al. [133] used density functional theory (DFT) to calculate the binding energy and molecular electrostatic potential of template molecules and functional monomer complexes and fabricated an MI-RFL sensor with excellent performance for the detection of mycotoxins in food under the guidance of theoretical calculations. This example shows that by simulating the interaction between template molecules and functional monomers, the optimal polymerization conditions can be determined. Then the performance of MI-RFL sensors can be effectively improved. In the future, theoretical computing will also have broad application prospects in the field of pharmaceuticals and biomarkers, providing strong technical support for accurate detection, precise diagnosis, and treatment.
- (2)
- Introduction of new functional materials: The introduction of new functional materials, such as MOFs, covalent organic framework (COFs), and hydrogen-bonded organic framework (HOFs) can bring higher sensitivity and selectivity to MI-RFL sensors. These materials have unique physicochemical properties, such as high specific surface area, tunable pore size, and excellent chemical stability, which can significantly enhance the performance of the sensors. Currently, MOFs are widely used in the construction of MI-RFL sensors, while COFs are relatively less used. This is because COFs have some problems, such as their strong π–π stacking interactions, which lead to quenching effects, and their synthesis is difficult and requires strict reaction conditions, while there are also problems in stability and compatibility in practical application scenarios [134,135]. HOFs are still in their infancy, and their applications are limited. On the one hand, due to the late start of their research, people’s understanding of their physicochemical properties and application potential is not comprehensive. On the other hand, HOFs are ordered porous materials formed by intermolecular hydrogen bonding assembly. Their structural stability is easily affected by surrounding factors, and they face many technical difficulties in achieving high selectivity for specific analytes, which is the main reason why their development lags far behind other porous materials such as MOFs and COFs [136,137]. In the future, with the deepening of research on MOFs, COFs, and HOFs, these materials will play a greater role in the fields of biosensing, environmental monitoring, and drug delivery.
- (3)
- Currently, the research on dual-emission MI-RFL sensors is relatively mature, while the research on triple-emission ratiometric fluorescence sensors is still insufficient but has great potential. PIMix and PIMod, as an ideal construction strategy, effectively enhance the sensor performance by optimizing the material ratios and surface modification. However, the triple-emission technology also faces the problems of complicated preparation process, high cost, and stability issues, such as fluorescence intensity attenuation of multiple emission peaks and shifting of emission peaks, which need to be solved by subsequent research. In the future, it is expected that the triple-emission ratiometric fluorescent sensors will be further developed in the field of pharmaceuticals and biomarkers analysis.
- (4)
- At present, the application and research of MI-RFL sensors in the field of green imprinting technology is in the embryonic stage but has shown great potential and broad prospects to lead the trend of greening chemical sensors in the future. Green imprinting technology not only runs through the entire life cycle of MI-RFL sensors from design, preparation, to use, but also aims to significantly reduce chemical waste, lower energy consumption, and significantly improve the environmental friendliness of the sensors through environmentally friendly and sustainable strategies.
- (5)
- In the field of pharmaceuticals and biomarkers analysis, MI-RFL sensors, although showing advantages such as high selectivity and sensitivity, still face many challenges. The main challenges include improving the sensor’s immunity to interference in complex samples, optimizing the material preparation process to ensure reproducibility, and overcoming the difficulty of template molecule removal. In addition, there is a need to further improve the selectivity and sensitivity of MI-RFL sensors for detecting trace residues in complex matrices, as well as to effectively overcome the interference caused by matrix effects, to enhance their ability to detect target molecules at low concentrations. Therefore, future technological innovation will be the key, including the introduction of new functional materials, optimization of the sensor structure, simplification of the sample pre-treatment process, and realization of multi-component simultaneous detection and so on, which will promote the wide application of MI-RFL sensors in the field of pharmaceutical analysis.
- (6)
- Current MI-RFL sensors have been closely integrated with POCT technology to achieve more convenient and visualized on-site detection. Through the integration with smartphones, test strips, microfluidic paper chips, and other technologies, the sensor can perform rapid and accurate testing directly on-site, which greatly improves testing efficiency and convenience. In the future, with the continuous progress of machine learning and theoretical calculation technologies, MI-RFL sensors are expected to achieve deep integration with these advanced technologies on the existing basis to further improve the detection accuracy and intelligence. This will provide more efficient and accurate solutions for medical and healthcare, environmental monitoring, and other fields.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Husain Khan, A.; Abdul Aziz, H.; Palaniandy, P.; Naushad, M.; Cevik, E.; Zahmatkesh, S. Pharmaceutical Residues in the Ecosystem: Antibiotic Resistance, Health Impacts, and Removal Techniques. Chemosphere 2023, 339, 139647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Agrebi, N.; Traynor, K.; Wilmart, O.; Tosi, S.; Leinartz, L.; Danneels, E.; de Graaf, D.C.; Saegerman, C. Pesticide and Veterinary Drug Residues in Belgian Beeswax: Occurrence, Toxicity, and Risk to Honey Bees. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 745, 141036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gosho, M.; Nagashima, K.; Sato, Y. Study Designs and Statistical Analyses for Biomarker Research. Sensors 2012, 12, 8966–8986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kraus, V.B. Biomarkers as Drug Development Tools: Discovery, Validation, Qualification and Use. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol 2018, 14, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowalska, M.; Woźniak, M.; Kijek, M.; Mitrosz, P.; Szakiel, J.; Turek, P. Management of Validation of HPLC Method for Determination of Acetylsalicylic Acid Impurities in A New Pharmaceutical Product. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orlandini, S.; Hancu, G.; Szabó, Z.-I.; Modroiu, A.; Papp, L.-A.; Gotti, R.; Furlanetto, S. New Trends in the Quality Control of Enantiomeric Drugs: Quality by Design-Compliant Development of Chiral Capillary Electrophoresis Methods. Molecules 2022, 27, 7058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saravanakumar, K.; Park, S.; Sathiyaseelan, A.; Kim, K.-N.; Cho, S.-H.; Mariadoss, A.V.A.; Wang, M.-H. Metabolite Profiling of Methanolic Extract of Gardenia jaminoides by LC-MS/MS and GC-MS and Its Anti-Diabetic, and Anti-Oxidant Activities. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lionetto, L.; Ulivieri, M.; Capi, M.; De Bernardini, D.; Fazio, F.; Petrucca, A.; Pomes, L.M.; De Luca, O.; Gentile, G.; Casolla, B.; et al. Increased Kynurenine-To-Tryptophan Ratio in the Serum of Patients Infected with SARS-CoV2: An Observational Cohort Study. BBA-Mol. Basis Dis. 2021, 1867, 166042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, C.; Dougan, T.J.; Walt, D.R. High-Throughput, High-Multiplex Digital Protein Detection with Attomolar Sensitivity. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 1025–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barik, B.; Mohapatra, S. Selective Visual Detection of Histamine and Ascorbic Acid through the Rapid Gel-Sol Transition of Luminescent Alginate Hydrogel. Sens. Actuators B 2022, 367, 132128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Liu, M.; Wang, Z.; Li, S.; Deng, Y.; He, N. Point-Of-Care Diagnostics for Infectious Diseases: From Methods to Devices. Nano Today 2021, 37, 101092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fernandes, R.S.; de Oliveira Silva, J.; Gomes, K.B.; Azevedo, R.B.; Townsend, D.M.; de Paula Sabino, A.; Branco de Barros, A.L. Recent Advances in Point of Care Testing for COVID-19 Detection. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 153, 113538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- You, J.; Liu, H.; Zhang, R.; Pan, Q.; Sun, A.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, X. Development and Application of Tricolor Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensor Based on Molecularly Imprinted Nanoparticles for Visual Detection of Dibutyl Phthalate in Seawater and Fish Samples. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 848, 157675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Tang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, F.; Zeng, B. Kill Two Birds with One Stone: Selective and Fast Removal and Sensitive Determination of Oxytetracycline Using Surface Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Based on Ionic Liquid and ATRP Polymerization. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 434, 128907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, X.; Yu, S.; Wang, J.; Yu, J.; Arabi, M.; Fu, L.; Li, B.; Li, J.; Chen, L. Fluorescent Nanosensor Designing via Hybrid of Carbon Dots and Post-Imprinted Polymers for the Detection of Ovalbumin. Talanta 2020, 211, 120727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, L.; Zhao, L. A Novel Nanocomposite Optosensing Sensor Based on Porous Molecularly Imprinted Polymer and Dual Emission Quantum Dots for Visual and High Selective Detection of Bovine Serum Albumin. Colloids Surf. A 2022, 632, 127843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, S.; Zhao, P.; Wu, X.; Chen, Y.; Tang, K.; Zhou, S.; Fu, J.; Lei, H.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Z. A Dual-Emission Ratiometric Fluorescence Capillary Imprinted Sensor Based on Metal-Organic Frameworks for Sensitive Detection of L-Tyrosine. Sens. Actuators B 2022, 367, 132058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, J.; Ji, W.; Yu, J.; Cheng, J.; Huang, Y.; Arabi, M.; Zhou, N.; Li, B.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, L.; et al. A Triple-Emission Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensor Based on Carbon Dots-Au Nanoclusters Nanocomposite for Detection of Tetracycline. Sens. Actuators B 2023, 384, 133636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Pan, M.; Yu, X.; Xu, L. The Recent Advances of Fluorescent Sensors Based on Molecularly Imprinted Fluorescent Nanoparticles for Pharmaceutical Analysis. Curr. Med. Sci. 2020, 40, 407–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, Y.; Sun, D.; Yu, J.; Qi, J.; Zhang, Z.; Song, Z.; Wang, X.; Liu, H.; Chen, L.; Li, J. Recent Advances in Molecular Imprinting-Based Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensors. Sci. Sin. Chim. 2023, 53, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Wang, X.; Lu, W.; Wu, X.; Li, J. Molecular Imprinting: Perspectives and Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 2137–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, L.; Xu, S.; Li, J. Recent Advances In Molecular Imprinting Technology: Current Status, Challenges and Highlighted Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 2922–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, H.; Xu, S. Visualizing BPA by Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensor Based on Dual Emission Nanoparticles. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 92, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, J.; Sun, D. Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescence Nanosensors. Langmuir 2022, 38, 13305–13312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, H.; Yu, C.; Xu, S. A Dual Reference Ion-Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescence Probe for Simultaneous Detection of Silver (I) and Lead (II). Sens. Actuators B 2019, 288, 691–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arslan, T.; Guney, O. Ratiometric Sensor Based on Imprinted Quantum Dots-Cationic Dye Nanohybrids for Selective Sensing of dsDNA. Anal. Biochem. 2020, 591, 113540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Tang, K.; Zhou, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Z. Bimetallic Nanozyme Triple-Emission Fluorescence Intelligent Sensing Platform-Integrated Molecular Imprinting for Ultrasensitive Visual Detection of Triclosan. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2023, 302, 123103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, L.; Ga, L.; Ai, J. Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensing with Logical Operation: Theory, Design and Applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 213, 114456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Feng, L.; Hou, J.; Lv, X.; Ning, J.; Ge, G.; Wang, K.; Cui, J.; Yang, L. A Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensor for Highly Selective Detection of Human Carboxylesterase 2 and Its Application in Living Cells. Sens. Actuators B 2014, 205, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, M.; Kaczmarek, A.M.; Van Hecke, K. Ratiometric Thermometers Based on Rhodamine b and Fluorescein Dye-Incorporated (Nano) Cyclodextrin Metal-Organic Frameworks. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 14367–14379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, L.; Huang, C.; Emery, B.P.; Sedgwick, A.C.; Bull, S.D.; He, X.P.; Tian, H.; Yoon, J.; Sessler, J.L.; James, T.D. Forster Resonance Energy Transfer (Fret)-Based Small-Molecule Sensors and Imaging Agents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 5110–5139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chu, B.; Yu, Z.; Meng, L.; Xu, N. A Magnetic Molecular Imprinting-Based Fluorescence Probe for Sensitive and Selective Detection of 2,4-D Herbicide. Luminescence 2023, 39, e4662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mohanta, D.; Chakraborty, P. Nanoscale Matter and Principles for Sensing and Labeling Applications, 1st ed.; Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.: Singapore, 2024; pp. 20–23. ISBN 978-981-99-7847-2. [Google Scholar]
- Shao, K.; Guo, L.; Zhong, Y.; Zhang, L.; Lu, Z.; Wang, D. Carbon Quantum Dots for Rapid and Ratiometric Fluorescence Determination of Hypochlorite. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024, 7, 8645–8654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- An, Y.; Bi, A.; Cheng, Z.; Du, Y.; Gao, T.; Grimm, J.; He, S.; Jiang, X.; Jokerst, J.V.; Kim, T. Fluorescent Imaging in Medicinal Chemistry, 1st ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 56–57. ISBN 978-3-030-46706-7. [Google Scholar]
- You, J.; Hao, G.; Gan, X.; Chen, R.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, A.; Liu, H.; Shi, X. Extreme Gradient Boosting-Enhanced Molecularly Imprinted Fluorescence Nanosensor for Rapid Identification and Visual Detection of Deltamethrin in Seawater and Aquatic Products. Sens. Actuators B 2024, 405, 135355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, R.; Lai, M.; Zhu, M.; Liang, H.; Zhou, Q.; Li, R.; Zhang, W.; Ye, H. A Functional Ratio Fluorescence Sensor Platform Based on the Graphene/Mn-ZnS Quantum Dots Loaded with Molecularly Imprinted Polymer for Selective and Visual Detection Sinapic Acid. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021, 244, 118845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, X.; Wang, T.; Wang, W.; Zhou, Z.; Yan, Y. A Tailored Molecular Imprinting Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensor Based on Red/Blue Carbon Dots for Ultrasensitive Tetracycline Detection. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 72, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Mao, Y.; Song, T.; Zhao, X.; Song, Z.; Wang, W. Ratiometric Fluorescence Probe Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Encapsulating N, S, B Doped Carbon Nanodots from Waste Clematis Chinensis Osbeck for Sensing Furazolidone. Carbon 2023, 213, 118213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, S.; Zhang, K.; Zhu, L.; Tang, D. Zif-8-Assisted Nayf4:Yb,Tm@Zno Converter with Exonuclease Iii-Powered Dna Walker for Near-Infrared Light Responsive Biosensor. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 1470–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, S.; Long, Z.; Lu, Y.; Chen, J. Fluorescence Detection of Carbofuran in Aqueous Extracts Based on Dual-Emission SiO2@Y2O3:(Eu3+,Tb3+)@MIP Core-Shell Structural Nanoparticles. Luminescence 2022, 37, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Chen, W. Sub-Nanometre Sized Metal Clusters: From Synthetic Challenges to the Unique Property Discoveries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3594–3623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Chen, B.; Rogach, A.L. Synthesis, Optical Properties and Applications of Light-Emitting Copper Nanoclusters. Nanoscale Horiz. 2017, 2, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pirot, S.M.; Omer, K.M. Surface Imprinted Polymer on Dual Emitting MOF Functionalized with Blue Copper Nanoclusters and Yellow Carbon Dots as A Highly Specific Ratiometric Fluorescence Probe for Ascorbic Acid. Microchem. J. 2022, 182, 107921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Lu, H.; Xu, S. The Construction of Dual-Emissive Ratiometric Fluorescent Probes Based on Fluorescent Nanoparticles for the Detection of Metal Ions and Small Molecules. Analyst 2024, 149, 304–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Förster, T. Zwischenmolekulare Energiewanderung und Fluoreszenz. Ann. Der Phys. 1984, 437, 55–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, G.; Song, F.; Xiong, X.; Peng, X. Fluorescent Nanosensors Based on Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (Fret). Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 11228–11245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Cui, X.; Xiao, M.; Miao, J.; Zhao, B.; Lin, Z. An Fret-Ict-Based Ratiometric Fluorescent and Colorimetric Probe for pH Monitoring in Lysosomes and Water. Dye. Pigment. 2021, 193, 109481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, Y.; Jin, H.; Bu, X.; Gui, R. Magnetic and Fluorescent Nanohybrids with Surface Imprinting Silica as A Dual-Functional Sensing Platform for Ratiometric Fluorescence Detection of Phycoerythrin. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 11483–11492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Yu, Y.; Wang, J. Inner Filter Effect-Based Fluorescent Sensing Systems: A Review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 999, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Cao, X.; Li, H.; Guan, F.; Guo, J.; Shen, F.; Luo, Y.; Sun, C.; Zhang, L. Sensitive Fluorescent Detection of Melamine in Raw Milk Based on the Inner Filter Effect of Au Nanoparticles on the Fluorescence of CdTe Quantum Dots. Food Chem. 2012, 135, 1894–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Fang, G.; Wang, S. A Signal-Amplified Ratiometric Fluorescence Biomimetic Sensor Based on the Synergistic Effect of IFE and AE for the Visual Smart Monitoring of Oxytetracycline. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 433, 134499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Fang, G.; Wang, S. Smartphone-Integrated Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensor for Selective and Visual Detection of Doxycycline in Lake Water and Foodstuff. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 1062–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Georgiev, N.I.; Dimitrova, M.D.; Todorova, Y.D.; Bojinov, V.B. Synthesis, Chemosensing Properties and Logic Behaviour of a Novel Ratiometric 1,8-Naphthalimide Probe Based on ICT and PET. Dye. Pigment. 2016, 131, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, G.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, X.; Li, J.; Yang, X. Environmentally Friendly Ratiometric Fluorescent Microfluidic Paper Chip for Rapid Detection of Difenoconazole. Sci. Sin. Chim. 2020, 50, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, X.; Wu, C.; Li, F.; Zhang, M. Fast and Visual Detection of Biogenic Amines and Food Freshness Based on ICT-Induced Ratiometric Fluorescent Probes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2212980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Kang, M.; Tan, H.; Song, N.; Li, M.; Xiao, P.; Yan, D.; Zhang, L.; Wang, D.; Tang, B.Z. The Fast-Growing Field of Photo-Driven Theranostics Based on Aggregation-Induced Emission. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 1983–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, C.; Luo, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, C.; Zhou, T.; Deng, J. pH-Regulated H4Tcpe@Eu/Amp Icp Sensor Array and Its Fingerprinting on Test Papers: Toward Point-Of-Use Systematic Analysis of Environmental Antibiotics. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 9183–9192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Yang, Q.; Wang, X.; Arabi, M.; Peng, H.; Li, J.; Xiong, H.; Chen, L. Facile Approach to the Synthesis of Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescence Nanosensor for the Visual Detection of Folic Acid. Food Chem. 2020, 319, 126575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arabi, M.; Ostovan, A.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Choo, J.; Chen, L. Molecular Imprinting: Green Perspectives and Strategies. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2100543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, J.; Fu, J.; Yang, Q.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Chen, L. Thermosensitive Molecularly Imprinted Core-Shell Cdte Quantum Dots as a Ratiometric Fluorescence Nanosensor for Phycocyanin Recognition and Detection in Seawater. Analyst 2018, 143, 3570–3578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, R.; Kang, S.; Li, J.; Lu, L.; Luo, X.; Wu, L. Comparison and Recent Progress of Molecular Imprinting Technology and Dummy Template Molecular Imprinting Technology. Anal. Methods 2021, 13, 4538–4556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, Z.; Xiang, C.; Tian, X.; Xu, X. Facile Synthesis of Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensor for Ciguatoxin p-Ctx-3c Detection in Fish. Foods 2022, 11, 3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, P.; Fu, H.; Bai, Z.; Feng, X.; Qi, J.; Song, X.; Hu, X.; Chen, L. A Dummy Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescence Nanosensor for the Sensitive Detection of Guanidyl-Microcystins in Environmental Water. Analyst 2023, 148, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shen, R.; Yu, Y.; Lan, R. Progress in Application of Dual/Multi-Template Molecularly Imprinted Polymers. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2021, 49, e21205–e21215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, K.; Chen, H.; Zhou, Q.; Yan, Z.; Su, Z.; Li, K. A Facile One Step Solvothermal Controllable Synthesis of FeS2 Quantum Dots with Multiple Color Emission for the Visual Detection of Aconitine. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2020, 240, 118563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alaei, H.S.; Tehrani, M.S.; Husain, S.W.; Panahi, H.A.; Mehramizi, A. Photo-Regulated Ultraselective Extraction of Azatioprine Using a Novel Photoresponsive Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Conjugated Hyperbranched Polymers Based Magnetic Nano-Particles. Polymer 2018, 148, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, K.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhou, Q.; Lei, H.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Z. Smartphone-Integrated Tri-Color Fluorescence Sensing Platform Based on Acid-Sensitive Fluorescence Imprinted Polymers for Dual-Mode Visual Intelligent Detection of Ibuprofen, Chloramphenicol and Florfenicol. Anal. Chim. Acta 2023, 1260, 341174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gui, R.; Jin, H.; Bu, X.; Fu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Q. Recent Advances in Dual-Emission Ratiometric Fluorescence Probes for Chemo/Biosensing and Bioimaging of Biomarkers. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 383, 82–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, H.; Wei, D.; Zheng, R.; Xu, S. Post-Imprinting Modification Based on Multilevel Mesoporous Silica for Highly Sensitive Molecularly Imprinted Fluorescent Sensors. Analyst 2019, 144, 6283–6290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, X.; Song, J.; Yung, B.C.; Huang, X.; Xiong, Y.; Chen, X. Ratiometric Optical Nanoprobes Enable Accurate Molecular Detection and Imaging. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 2873–2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Tian, Y.; Tan, L.; Wang, N.; Qiao, Y.; Wang, J. A Double-Emission Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensor Based on Carbon Quantum Dots and Fluorescein Isothiocyanate for Visual Detection of p-Nitroaniline. Mikrochim. Acta 2024, 191, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Z.; Zhang, W.; Wang, S.; Han, Y.; Feng, D.; Ma, Y.; Deng, B.; Chen, Z.; Mao, J.; Xu, F.; et al. A Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensor Based on Molecularly Imprinted Multilevel Mesoporous Silica for Highly Sensitive Detection of Imidacloprid. Dye. Pigment. 2023, 208, 110775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.; You, J.; You, Z.; Dong, F.; Du, S.; Zhang, L. Profuse Color-Evolution-Based Fluorescent Test Paper Sensor for Rapid and Visual Monitoring of Endogenous Cu2+ in Human Urine. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 99, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, Q.; Li, C.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Arabi, M.; Peng, H.; Xiong, H.; Chen, L. Rational Construction of A Triple Emission Molecular Imprinting Sensor for Accurate Naked-Eye Detection of Folic Acid. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 6529–6536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wen, Y.; Sun, D.; Fu, X.; Jin, Y.; Yu, J.; Xu, L.; Song, Z.; Chen, L.; Li, J. Molecular Imprinting-Based Ratiometric Fluorescence Nanosensor and Kit for Rapid and Visual Detection of Folic Acid. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024, 7, 9565–9575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, J.; Zhou, S.; Zhao, P.; Wu, X.; Tang, S.; Chen, S.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Z. A Dual-Response Ratiometric Fluorescence Imprinted Sensor Based on Metal-Organic Frameworks for Ultrasensitive Visual Detection of 4-Nitrophenol in Environments. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 198, 113848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Ma, X.; Li, B.; Zhao, J.; Qi, J.; Hao, G.; Jianhui, R.; Yang, X. Fluorescence Detection Of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid by Ratiometric Fluorescence Imaging on Paper-Based Microfluidic Chips. Analyst 2020, 145, 963–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, B.; Zhao, W.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y.; Ma, Z.; Yan, Y.; Meng, M. Enhanced Molecularly Imprinted Fluorescent Test Strip for Rapid and Visual Detection of Norfloxacin via A Smartphone. Molecules 2024, 29, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, J.; Yu, J.; Zhao, X.; Chen, X.; Zhu, C.; Cao, X.; Huang, Y.; Li, B.; Wu, Y.; Chen, L.; et al. Molecular Imprinting-Based Triple-Emission Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensor with Aggregation-Induced Emission Effect for Visual Detection of Doxycycline. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 470, 134218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Sha, T.; Liu, D.; Liao, B.; Li, K. Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescence Detection of Tetracycline Based on Its Fluorescence Enhancement Effect Caused by Tungsten Trioxide Quantum Dots. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2023, 290, 122248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Jiang, M.; Chen, L.; Niu, N. Construction of Ratiometric Fluorescence MIPs Probe for Selective Detection of Tetracycline Based on Passion Fruit Peel Carbon Dots and Europium. Mikrochim. Acta 2021, 188, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, X.; Chen, H. Ratiometric Fluorescence Molecularly Imprinted Sensor Based on Dual-Emission Quantum Dots Hybrid for Determination of Tetracycline. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019, 411, 5809–5816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, W.; Kuai, M.; Wu, C.; Yang, W.; Cao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, T.; Cao, Y.; Wang, B.; Xu, W. Dual-Emission Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensors Based on Silica, Molecularly Imprinted Polymers and Carbon Quantum Dots for High-Sensitivity and High-Selectivity Detection of Sulfadiazine. Polym. Int. 2023, 73, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Si, H.; Liu, T.; Yang, W. Preparation and Recognition Performance of Ratio-Fluorescent Probe Based on Sulfadiazine Imprinted Polymers. Chin. J. Anal. Lab. 2022, 41, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Tang, S.; Zhao, P.; Tang, K.; Chen, Y.; Fu, J.; Zhou, S.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Z. One-Pot Synthesis of Ternary-Emission Molecularly Imprinted Fluorescence Sensor Based on Metal-Organic Framework for Visual Detection of Chloramphenicol. Food Chem. 2023, 402, 134256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, N.; Majid, A.; Wang, K.; Tan, L.; Li, H.; Wang, J. Composite Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensor Based on Carbon Dots and CdTe Quantum Dots for Visual Detection of Ciprofloxacin in Seawater. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process 2023, 167, 107800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, J.; Zhou, S.; Wu, X.; Tang, S.; Zhao, P.; Tang, K.; Chen, Y.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, H. Down/Up-Conversion Dual-Mode Ratiometric Fluorescence Imprinted Sensor Embedded with Metal-Organic Frameworks for Dual-Channel Multi-Emission Multiplexed Visual Detection of Thiamphenicol. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 309, 119762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jalili, R.; Khataee, A.; Rashidi, M.R.; Razmjou, A. Detection of Penicillin G Residues in Milk Based on Dual-Emission Carbon Dots and Molecularly Imprinted Polymers. Food Chem. 2020, 314, 126172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jalili, R.; Khataee, A. Application of Molecularly Imprinted Polymers and Dual-Emission Carbon Dots Hybrid for Ratiometric Determination of Chloramphenicol in Milk. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 146, 111806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, L.; Li, D.; Du, Y.; Jiang, G.; Han, S.; Qin, S. Preparation and Characterization of Molecularly Imprinted Ratio Fluorescent Probes for Dimenidazole. Chin. J. Anal. Lab. 2020, 39, 1066–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Jin, X.; Xing, Y.; Ni, G.; Peng, J. Construction of An NAND Logic Gate Based on Molecularly Imprinted Dual-Emission Quantum Dot Composites for the Detection of Antibiotics. Anal. Methods 2019, 11, 2033–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, N.; Li, H.; Tian, Y.; Tan, L.; Cheng, S.; Wang, J. Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensor for Visual Detection of 17beta-Estradiol In Milk: A Generalized Strategy Toward Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescence Construction. Mikrochim. Acta 2024, 191, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, J.; Xiao, Y.; Huang, J.; Huang, M.; Zhang, S.; Li, K. A Novel Molecular Imprinted Probe with Hybrid Ratio Fluorescent for Visual Detection of Imazapyr. Microchem. J. 2024, 198, 110116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Hu, W.; Pei, F.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Tong, Z.; Mu, X.; Du, B.; Xia, M.; Wang, F.; et al. A Ratiometric Fluorescence Imprinted Sensor Based on N-CDs and Metal–Organic Frameworks for Visual Smart Detection of Malathion. Food Chem. 2024, 438, 138068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; You, J.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Z.; Sun, A.; Hao, G.; Shi, X. Machine Learning-Assisted Wide-Gamut Fluorescence Visual Test Paper for Propazine Determination in Fish and Seawater Samples. Sens. Actuators B 2024, 413, 135843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Hu, X.; Chen, S.; Qu, X. One-Pot Preparation of Ratiometric Fluorescent Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Nanosensor for Sensitive and Selective Detection of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid. Sensors 2024, 24, 5039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Zhang, W.; Liu, X.; Zhang, H. Preparation of Complex Biological Sample-Compatible “Turn-On”-Type Ratiometric Fluorescent Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Microspheres via One-Pot Surface-Initiated ATRP. Mikrochim. Acta 2022, 189, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hou, Y.; Zou, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, H. Biological Sample-Compatible Ratiometric Fluorescent Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Microspheres by RAFT Coupling Chemistry. Langmuir 2020, 36, 12403–12413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, G.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, X.; Zhang, R.; Qin, X.; Sun, H.; Yang, X.; Rong, J. A Versatile Microfluidic Paper Chip Platform Based on MIPs for Rapid Ratiometric Sensing of Dual Fluorescence Signals. Microchem. J. 2020, 157, 105050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Tang, K.; Zhou, Q.; Wang, X.; Wang, R.; Zhang, Z. Integrating Intelligent Logic Gate Dual-Nanozyme Cascade Fluorescence Capillary Imprinted Sensors for Ultrasensitive Simultaneous Detection of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid and 2,4-Dichlorophenol. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95, 18139–18148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, Y.; Xu, W.; Hong, J.; Zheng, Y.; Fan, H.; Zhang, J.; Fei, J.; Zhu, W.; Hong, J. A Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensor Based on Blue/Red Carbon Quantum Dots for the Visual Determination of Thiamethoxam. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 238, 115559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X.; Han, L.; Liu, H.; Sun, B. A Smartphone-Based Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensing System for On-Site Detection of Pyrethroids by Using Blue-Green Dual-Emission Carbon Dots. Food Chem. 2022, 379, 132154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, C.; Liao, J.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, H.; Shi, X. Random Forest Algorithm-Enhanced Dual-Emission Molecularly Imprinted Fluorescence Sensing Method for Rapid Detection of Pretilachlor in Fish and Water Samples. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 439, 129591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hao, G.; Tian, H.; Zhang, Z.; Qin, X.; Yang, T.; Yuan, L.; Yang, X. A Dual-Channel and Dual-Signal Microfluidic Paper Chip for Simultaneous Rapid Detection of Difenoconazole and Mancozeb. Microchem. J. 2023, 190, 108674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Z.; Li, Y.; Zeng, C.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, S.; Liu, W.; Chen, Q.; Pang, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, R.; et al. Dual-Template Molecularly Imprinted Double Emission Proportional Fluorescence Sensor Based on CsPbBr3 and CsPb(Br/I)3 Perovskite Quantum Dots for Visual, Selective and Sensitive Detection of Methyl Eugenol and Aristolochic Acid A. Sens. Actuators B 2024, 417, 136189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, J.; Cai, X.; Zhou, Q.; Yan, Z.; Li, K. Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe for Visual and Fluorescent Determination of Aristolochic Acid I Based on a Schiff-Base Fluorescent Compound. Microchim. Acta 2020, 187, 623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alanazi, A.Z.; Alhazzani, K.; Mostafa, A.M.; Barker, J.; El-Wekil, M.M.; Ali, A.B.H. Selective and Reliable Fluorometric Quantitation of Anti-Cancer Drug in Real Plasma Samples Using Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Dots after MMIPs Solid Phase Microextraction: Monitoring Methotrexate Plasma Level. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2024, 238, 115862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Fang, Y.; Zhu, D.; Wang, J.; Wu, Y.; Wang, T.; Wang, Y. Hollow Structure Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensor for the Selective and Sensitive Detection of Dopamine. Analyst 2023, 148, 2844–2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Dai, J.; Xu, Y.; Dai, X.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, W.; Sellergren, B.; Pan, G. Molecularly Imprinted Fluorescent Test Strip for Direct, Rapid, and Visual Dopamine Detection in Tiny Amount of Biofluid. Small 2019, 15, e1803913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ling, J.; Zhang, W.; Cheng, Z.; Ding, Y. High-Sensitivity Detection for Cantharidin by Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensor Based on Molecularly Imprinted Nanoparticles of Quantum Dots. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2022, 112, 358–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.; Wang, C.; Liu, E.; Hu, X.; Hao, H.; Fan, J. A Novel Ascorbic Acid Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensor Based on ZnCdS Quantum Dots Embedded Molecularly Imprinted Polymer and Silica-Coated CdTeS Quantum Dots. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 337, 116438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, X.; Gao, X.; Qiao, Z.; Yu, J.; Fu, Y.; Chen, L. Synthesis of Carbon Quantum Dot Molecularly Imprinted Composites and Detection of Metronidazole by Fluorescence Method. Chin. J. Anal. Lab. 2020, 39, 1416–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Tian, X.; Xu, X. A Molecular Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensor Based on Blue/Orange MXene Quantum Dots for Visual Detection of Histamine. Food Chem. 2024, 460, 140519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, P.; Guo, W.; Li, R.; Yang, Y.; Du, Q. Dual Recognition Ratio Fluorescence-Based Sensor for Sensitive Detection of Adenosine. Microchem. J. 2023, 195, 109392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, H.; Cao, M.; Hu, J.; Zhu, L.; Su, C.; Du, S.; Yang, J.; Tang, Y.; Chen, L. Fluorescent Turn-On Assay of C-type Natriuretic Peptide Using A Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescent Probe with High Selectivity and Sensitivity. Mikrochim. Acta 2020, 187, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Q.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Xiong, H.; Chen, L. Ternary Emission of a Blue-, Green-, and Red-Based Molecular Imprinting Fluorescence Sensor for the Multiplexed and Visual Detection of Bovine Hemoglobin. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 6561–6568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Farooq, S.; Wu, H.; Nie, J.; Ahmad, S.; Muhammad, I.; Zeeshan, M.; Khan, R.; Asim, M. Application, Advancement and Green Aspects of Magnetic Molecularly Imprinted Polymers in Pesticide Residue Detection. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 804, 150293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Xiao, Y.; Huang, J.; Huang, M.; Li, K. A Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensor for Visual Detection of 1-Naphthol Based on Fluorescence-Enhanced CdTeS QDs via APTES Modification. Mikrochim. Acta 2024, 191, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Hu, W.; Pei, F.; Du, B.; Tong, Z.; Mu, X.; Xia, M.; Wang, F.; Liu, B. Novel Dual-Emission Fluorescence Imprinted Sensor Based on Mg, N-CDs and Metal-Organic Frameworks for Rapid and Smart Detection of 2, 4, 6-Trinitrophenol. Talanta 2024, 266, 125115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turnipseed, S.B.; Storey, J.M.; Wu, I.L.; Andersen, W.C.; Madson, M.R. Extended Liquid Chromatography High Resolution Mass Spectrometry Screening Method for Veterinary Drug, Pesticide and Human Pharmaceutical Residues in Aquaculture Fish. Food Addit. Contam. Part. A Chem. Anal. Control Expo. Risk Assess. 2019, 36, 1501–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ensafi, A.A.; Nasr-Esfahani, P.; Rezaei, B. Simultaneous Detection of Folic Acid and Methotrexate By An Optical Sensor Based on Molecularly Imprinted Polymers on Dual-Color Cdte Quantum Dots. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 996, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, C.; Zhang, X.; Dong, Z.; Wang, L.; Megharaj, M.; Naidu, R. Smartphone App-Based/Portable Sensor for the Detection of Fluoro-Surfactant PFOA. Chemosphere 2018, 191, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, T.; Xu, Y.; Meng, M.; Li, C. Pvdf-Based Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescent Test Paper with Improved Visualization Effect for Catechol Monitoring. Microchem. J. 2022, 178, 107369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Huang, T.; Hu, B.; Meng, M.; Yan, Y. An Ultrasensitive Pvdf-Based Molecularly Imprinted Fluorescent Test Strip for the Rapid and Off-Line Detection of 4-Np With Improved Anti-Coffee Ring Effect. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 16587–16601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Cheng, L.; Ding, S.; Wang, G.; Choo, J.; Chen, L. Sers-Based Test Strips: Principles, Designs and Applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 189, 113360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dittrich, P.S.; Manz, A. Lab-On-a-Chip: Microfluidics in Drug Discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nishat, S.; Jafry, A.T.; Martinez, A.W.; Awan, F.R. Paper-Based Microfluidics: Simplified Fabrication and Assay Methods. Sens. Actuators B 2021, 336, 129681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Wang, W.; Shao, J.; Chen, J.; Dong, X. Small Molecular Cyanine Dyes for Phototheranostics. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 516, 215986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Chasteen, J.L.; Smith, B.D. Cy5 Dye Cassettes Exhibit Through-Bond Energy Transfer and Enable Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensing. J. Org. Chem. 2024, 89, 3309–3318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Udhayakumari, D. Mechanistic Innovations in Fluorescent Chemosensors for Detecting Toxic Ions: PET, ICT, ESIPT, FRET and AIE Approaches. J. Fluoresc. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, X.; He, W. Research Advances in Excited State Intramolecular Proton Transfer Fluorescent Probes Based on Combined Fluorescence Mechanism. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2021, 49, 184–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chi, H.; Liu, G. A Novel Dual-Template Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensor Based on Three-Emission Carbon Quantum Dots for Accurate Naked-Eye Detection of Aflatoxin B1 and Zearalenone in Vegetable Oil. Microchem. J. 2023, 192, 108961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Q.; Li, X.; Ning, G.; Leng, K.; Tian, B.; Liu, C.; Tang, W.; Xu, H.; Loh, K.P. Highly Photoluminescent Two-Dimensional Imine-Based Covalent Organic Frameworks for Chemical Sensing. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 2349–2352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guo, L.; Yang, L.; Li, M.; Kuang, L.; Song, Y.; Wang, L. Covalent Organic Frameworks for Fluorescent Sensing: Recent Developments and Future Challenges. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 440, 213957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, X.; Lu, W.; Wang, Y.; Song, X.; Wang, C.; Kirlikovali, K.O.; Li, P. Recent Advancements of Photo- And Electro-Active Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks. Sci. China Chem. 2022, 65, 2077–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, C.; Dai, R.; Zhao, L. Research on Photoelectrochemical Sensing Applications of Hydrogen- Bonded Organic Frameworks. J. Mol. Struct. 2024, 1303, 137625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Type | Analyte | Fluorescence Sources | Functional Monomer | Crosslinker | Polymerization Method | Working Mechanism | Imprinting Strategy | Linear Range | LOD | Real Sample | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pharmaceuticals analysis | NOR | CDs | MAA | EDGMA | – | ICT | Surface imprinting | 5–50 nM | 1.35 nM | Tap water, river water | 93–106.8 | 2.0–3.6 | [79] |
DOX | CdTe QDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | IFE | Dummy template imprinting | 0.1–50 μM | 0.061 μM | Seawater, reservoir water, urine | 91.6–107.5 | 2.9–4.6 | [80] | |
CDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | AIE, IFE | – | 0.05–20 mg/L | 14.21 ng/mL | Lake water, milk | 90.16–97.18 | <4.77 | [53] | ||
TC | WO3-x QDs | MAA | EDGMA | – | PET, IFE | – | 0.01–10.0 μmol/L 20.0–80.0 μmol/L | 3.23 nmol/L and 6.37 μmol/L | Milk, egg | 92.7–102.9 | <1.59 | [81] | |
CDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | ET | – | 25–2000 nM | 7.9 nM | Milk | 94.2–103.7 | 1.5–5.3 | [82] | ||
QDs | AM | EGDMA | Precipitation polymerization | ET | – | 10–160 μmol/L | 0.35 μmol/L | Milk | 96.3–106.2 | 1.9–4.3 | [83] | ||
CDs | AM | EGDMA | – | ET | Surface imprinting | 0–50 nM | 1.19 nM | River water, tap wate | 99.13–102.75 | 0.67–0.98 | [38] | ||
SDZ | CDs | 4-VP | MBAAM | – | ET | – | 2–20 μmol/L | 4.2 nmol/L | Lake water, tap water | 94.1–96.5 | 1.6–3.4 | [84] | |
CdTe QDs | AM | MBAAM | – | – | – | 0–100 μmol/L | 11 nmol/L | Tap water, lake water | 92.0–95.1 | <3.6 | [85] | ||
FZD | CNDs | AMPS | EDGMA | Suspension polymerization | IFE | – | 5–400 mg/L | 1.98 mg/L | Chicken feed, honey, pork | 90–110 | <3.7 | [39] | |
CAP | QDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | PET | Stimuli-responsive | 0.015–0.12 nM 0.12–17.22 nM | 0.009 nM | Lake water, chicken, fish, human urine | 94.0–108.0 | 2.1–4.2 | [68] | |
NH2-UiO-66, CdTe QDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | PET | – | 10 pM–0.5 nM 0.5 nM–4.5 nM | 3.8 pM | Meat, milk, honey | 98.2–101.2 | 2.1–3.6 | [86] | ||
CIP | CdTe QDs, CDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | ET | – | 0.5–20 μM | 0.09 μM | Seawater | 96.2–103.1 | 0.85–2.89 | [87] | |
TAP | CDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | PET | – | 5.0 nM–6.0 μM 6.0 μM–26.0 μM | 50 μg/kg | Fish, shrimp, beef, milk | 95.0–105.0 | 3.1–4.5 | [88] | |
PNG | CDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | EF | – | 1–32 nM | 0.34 nM | Milk | 98–103 | <0.9 | [89] | |
CLP | CDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | ET | _ | 0.1–3 μg/L | 0.035 μg/L | Milk | 96.5–106.6 | 1.1–3.5 | [90] | |
DMZ | CDs, CdSe | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | – | – | 0.06–14.1 μg/mL | 47 pg/mL | Pork, honey, eggs | 98.0–104.0 | <3.9 | [91] | |
KS | QDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | ET | – | 3.00–105 μM | 0.24 μM. | River water | 102.5–112.6 | 1.12–3.85 | [92] | |
SS | QDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | ET | – | 3.00–118 μM | 0.22 μM. | River water | 97.7–106.6 | 2.17–6.21 | [92] | |
E2 | CdTe QDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | PET | Surface imprinting | 0.011–50 μg/L | 3.3 ng/L | Tap water, river water, seawater, milk | 92.4–110.6 | <2.5 | [93] | |
IMA | QDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | PET | – | 5.0–80.0 μM | 1.4 μM | Puerariae Lobatae Radix, soil | 85.5–98.0 | <4.2 | [94] | |
DEL | CdSe/ZnS QDs | APTES | TEOS | _ | _ | – | 0.01–40.0 mg/L | 1.34 µg/L | Aquatic products, seawater | 98.5–109.0 | <7.5 | [36] | |
Mal | N-CDs, Eu-MOF | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | – | – | 1–10 μM | 0.05 μM | Lettuce, tap water, soil | 93.0–99.3 | <3.1 | [95] | |
1-NP | QDs | APTES | TEOS | – | PET | – | 6.0–140.0 μM | 0.45 μM | Lycium barbarum, Dendrobium officinale | 94–105 | <4.41 | [93] | |
Propazine | QDS | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | PET | – | 0.005–2.000 mg/L | 0.001 mg/L | Seawater, fish | 92.0–114.6 | <6.3 | [96] | |
2,4-D | CdTe QDs, NBD | 4-VP | EGDMA | – | – | Surface imprinting | 0−25 μM | 0.13 μM | Drinking water, lake water, urban runoff water, paddy field water | 99.2–100.8 | 1.5–3.3 | [97] | |
NBD | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | PET | Surface imprinting | 0.1–3 μM | 0.023 μM | River water, tap water | 94–108 | <5 | [32] | ||
CdTe QDs | 4-VP | EGDMA | – | – | Surface imprinting | 0–25 μM | 0.12 μM | Milk | 96.0–104.0 | ≤4.0 | [98] | ||
CdTe QDs, NBD | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | FRET | Surface imprinting | 0.56–80 μM | 90 nM | Soybean sprouts, lake water | 86.2–109.5 | <4.19 | [78] | ||
CdTe QDs, NBD | 4-VP | EGDMA | – | – | Surface imprinting | 0−15 μM | 0.13 μM | Milk | 96.0−103.2 | 1.5−5.5 | [99] | ||
CdTe QDs, | APTES | TEOS | – | ET | Surface imprinting | 0.51–80 μmol/L | 0.17 μmol/L | Cucumber | 96.6–104.2 | 5.5–6.1 | [100] | ||
CDs, FBM | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | PET, IFE | – | 1.0 × 10−12−1.2 × 10−9 M | 7.5 × 10−13 M | River water, grass, cabbage, apple | 7.1−103.3 | 1.3–2.7 | [101] | ||
IDP | QDs | APTES | TEOS | – | ET | – | 5 ng/mL–0.5 μg/mL | 3.55 ng/mL | River water and corn | 97.64–109.88 | 1.00–4.65 | [73] | |
TMX | CDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | – | – | 0.05–25 μM | 13.5 nM | Fruit, Chinese cabbages, river water | 91.40–105.7 | 1.64–3.49 | [102] | |
LC | CDs | APTES | TEOS | – | ET | Surface imprinting | 1–150 μg/L | 0.048 μg/L | Tap water, tea, cucumber, apple | 87.93–101.4 | 1.5–5.1 | [103] | |
CF | SiO2@Y2O3:(Eu3+, Tb3+) | MAA | DMAEA | Sol–gel method | FRET, PET | _ | 10–100 μg/ml | 4 μg/ml | Rhubarb, wolfberry | 85.7–92.2 | <3 | [41] | |
Pretilachlor | QDs | APTES | TEOS | Microemulsion polymerization | PET | Surface imprinting | 0.001–5.0 mg/L | 0.05 μg/L | Fish, river water | 92.2–107.6 | <6.5 | [104] | |
Difenoconazole | CDs, NBD | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | PET | Surface imprinting | 0.3~60 μmol/L | 75 nmol/L | Tomato | 102.1–111.2 | 3.1–4.2 | [55] | |
CDs, CdTe QDs | APTES | TEOS | – | IFE | – | – | 0.18 μg/mL | Cucumber | 102.2–108.8 | 4.7–5.6 | [105] | ||
FA | CdTe QDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | – | Surface imprinting | 0.05–50 ppm | 0.005 ppm | FA tablets, milk powder | 89.39–103.43 | <3.37 | [76] | |
QDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | PET | – | 0.01–50 ppm | 0.0052 ppm | Milk powder, folic acid tablets, porcine serum | 99.5–108.0 | <3.0 | [75] | ||
CdTe QDs, | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | PET | Surface imprinting | 0.23–113 μM | 48 nM | Pinach, broccoli, tomatoes, oranges | 94.8–104.2 | – | [59] | ||
AAs | QDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | PET | Multi-Template Imprinting | 24–1200 nM | 9.58 nM | Asarum | 90.10–97.62 | 1.3–2.4 | [106] | |
ME | QDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | IFE | Multi-Template Imprinting | 17.1–343 nM | 6.46 nM | Asarum | 97.82–107.93 | 1.3–4.0 | [106] | |
AAI | CDs | 4-VP | EGDMA | – | PET | 1.0–120.0 μmol/L | 0.45 μmol/L | Asarum | 5.5–107.3 | 2.0 | [107] | ||
MTX | CDs | APTES | TEOS | Copolymerization | IFE | – | 5–2000 ng/mL | 1.5 ng/mL | Rabbit plasma, parenteral | 97.80–99.20 | 1.28–2.53 | [108] | |
DA | QDs, CDs | AM, VPBA | MBAAM | Precipitation polymerization | – | – | 0–600 nM | 12.35 nM | Human serum | 98.02–104.06 | <4.45 | [109] | |
DA | CdTe QDs | VPBA | MBAAm | – | ET | Surface imprinting | 0–1.2 × 10−6 M | (100–150) × 10−9 M | Human serum | 100.14–104.46 | <5 | [110] | |
CTD | CDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | ET | Surface imprinting | 0.5–1000 nM | 0.15 nM | Blood | 96.12–107.40 | 2.87–3.96 | [111] | |
AA | CdTeS QDs, ZnCdS QDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | ET | – | 1–500 μM | 0.78 μM | Vitamin C tablets | 96.0–99.0 | <1.7 | [112] | |
CuNCs, CDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | – | Surface imprinting | 4.0–22.0 μM | 1.56 μM | Vitamin C tablet, human serum | 81.69–106.11 | 0.10–0.44 | [44] | ||
ACO | FeS2 QDs | MAA, AM | EDGMA | Sol–gel method | ET | – | 0.05–5.0 μM | 24 nM | Fuzi Lizhong Pills | 95.2–103.1 | <5.0 | [66] | |
Metronidazole | CDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | – | – | 25–1000 nmol/L | 7.2 nmol/L | Honey | 92.3–95.1 | 2.5–4.6 | [113] | |
Biomarkers analysis | Histamine | QDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | PET | – | 1–60 μM | 21.9 nM | Mackerel, frozen atlantic cod, canned tuna | 96.52–105.32 | 1.57–5.57 | [114] |
AD | BA-EuMOFs | – | TEOS | – | FRET | Surface imprinting | 1–50 mg/L | 0.26 mg/L | Human urine | 96.11–101.79 | <2.87 | [115] | |
BSA | QDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | PET | – | 2–64 μM | 0.5 μM | Milk, power milk, human serum, bovine calf serum | 95.9–104.8 | <4 | [16] | |
L-Tyr | CdTe QDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | IFE | Surface imprinting | 1.0 × 10–10–2.5 × 10−8 M | 8.0 × 10−11 M | Urine, serum | 99.07–101.18 | 2.00–3.57 | [17] | |
dsDNA | QDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | PRET | Surface imprinting | 0.089–1.79 μg/mL | 19.48 ng/mL | Urine | 102.6–106.0 | 2.07–3.15 | [26] | |
CNP | NBD, CDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | PET | Surface imprinting | 5–80 pg/mL | 2.87 pg/mL | Human serum | 97.3–104 | <4.7 | [116] | |
BHb | CdTe QDs | APTES | TEOS | Sol–gel method | PET | Surface imprinting | 0.025−3 μM | 7.8 nM | Urine | 99.25−111.7 | <3.2 | [117] | |
PE | CDs | APTES | TEOS | – | FRET | Surface imprinting | 5–200 ng/mL | 1.5 ng/mL | Human serum | 95.94–104.26 | 1.62–4.65 | [49] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yan, J.; Liu, S.; Sun, D.; Peng, S.; Ming, Y.; Ostovan, A.; Song, Z.; You, J.; Li, J.; Fan, H. Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensors for Analysis of Pharmaceuticals and Biomarkers. Sensors 2024, 24, 7068. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24217068
Yan J, Liu S, Sun D, Peng S, Ming Y, Ostovan A, Song Z, You J, Li J, Fan H. Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensors for Analysis of Pharmaceuticals and Biomarkers. Sensors. 2024; 24(21):7068. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24217068
Chicago/Turabian StyleYan, Jingyi, Siwu Liu, Dani Sun, Siyuan Peng, Yongfei Ming, Abbas Ostovan, Zhihua Song, Jinmao You, Jinhua Li, and Huaying Fan. 2024. "Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensors for Analysis of Pharmaceuticals and Biomarkers" Sensors 24, no. 21: 7068. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24217068
APA StyleYan, J., Liu, S., Sun, D., Peng, S., Ming, Y., Ostovan, A., Song, Z., You, J., Li, J., & Fan, H. (2024). Molecularly Imprinted Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensors for Analysis of Pharmaceuticals and Biomarkers. Sensors, 24(21), 7068. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24217068