Evaluation of Welded Lap Joints Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Dispersion Curves
2.2. Numerical Model
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Validation of Numerical Mode
3.2. Guided Waves in Pristine Conditions
3.2.1. Actuation of Symmetric Mode
3.2.2. Actuation of Antisymmetric Mode
3.3. Effects of Corrosion on Guided Waves
3.3.1. Actuation of Symmetric Mode
3.3.2. Actuation of Antisymmetric Mode
3.4. Effects of Disbonding on Guided Waves
3.4.1. Actuation of Symmetric Mode
3.4.2. Actuation of Antisymmetric Mode
3.5. Baseline-Free Inspection
4. Conclusions
- Welded lap joints have resulted in scattered and superposed wave modes when fundamental Lamb modes were excited in pristine conditions. The A0 incident experienced significant transmission losses of 9.46 dB compared to a slight attenuation of 2.89 dB for the S0 incident. The antisymmetric actuation, however, provided higher resolution downstream signals in comparison to the symmetric actuation due to the dominance of the A0 mode in the medium.
- The presence of corrosion in lap joints reduced transmission losses by more than 28% for both the S0 and A0 incidents. The results suggest that using the A0 incident to determine the corrosion in a pitch-catch arrangement can potentially improve the signal resolution and consequently reduce the complexity of signal processing.
- Introducing disbonding in the lap joint has significant effects on the S0 incident, leading to a transmission loss of 7.36 dB, while relatively negligible losses are observed for the A0 incident. Unique modes, such as RF-S0 and MC-A0, were also noticed in the upstream signals, making the use of the S0 incident more attractive to determine disbonding.
- Monitoring MC-A0 can essentially be used as a signature for detecting the presence of corrosion or disbonding without relying on baseline signals. This converted mode exhibited a noticeable gain in the range of 5 dB to 11 dB in the simulated damage scenarios.
- Another distinctive signature was observed from monitoring the MC-S0 which experienced a gain due to the presence of corrosion and disbonding, in contrast to the power loss observed in the pristine state. These signatures can potentially be used to assist in identifying the type of flaw in the welded lap joints.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pandurangan, P.; Buckner, G.D. Vibration analysis for damage detection in metal-to-metal adhesive joints. Exp. Mech. 2006, 46, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dugnani, R.; Zhuang, Y.; Kopsaftopoulos, F.; Chang, F.-K.K.K. Adhesive bond-line degradation detection via a cross-correlation electromechanical impedance—Based approach. Struct. Health Monit. 2016, 15, 650–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, W.J.; Rose, J.L.; Galán, J.M.; Abascal, R. Ultrasonic guided wave scattering in a plate overlap. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2005, 52, 892–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrison, P.; Altammar, H.; Salowitz, N. Selective actuation and sensing of antisymmetric ultrasonic waves using shear-deforming piezoelectric transducers. Struct. Health Monit. 2020, 12, 978–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altammar, H.; Dhingra, A.; Salowitz, N. Damage Detection Using d15 Piezoelectric Sensors in a Laminate Beam Undergoing Three-Point Bending. Actuators 2019, 8, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, X.; Fan, Z.; Puliyakote, S.; Castaings, M. Remote monitoring of bond line defects between a composite panel and a stiffener using distributed piezoelectric sensors. Smart Mater. Struct. 2018, 27, 035014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, M.; Santos, J. Adhesive Single-Lap Joint Evaluation Using Ultrasound Guided Waves. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 6523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drinkwater, B.W.; Wilcox, P.D. Ultrasonic arrays for non-destructive evaluation: A review. NDT Int. 2006, 39, 525–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nicassio, F.; Carrino, S.; Scarselli, G. Non-linear Lamb Waves for Locating Defects in Single-Lap Joints. Front. Built. Environ. 2020, 6, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Memmolo, V.; Monaco, E.; Boffa, N.D.; Maio, L.; Ricci, F. Guided wave propagation and scattering for structural health monitoring of stiffened composites. Compos Struct. 2018, 184, 568–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hellier, C.J. Handbook of Nondestructive Evaluation; McGraw-Hill Education: Berkshire, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Chen, H.; Ma, T.; Du, J.; Yi, L.; Yong, Y.K. An analysis of thickness-shear vibrations of an annular plate with the Mindlin plate equations. In Proceedings of the 2015 Joint Conference of the IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium & The European Frequency and Time Forum, Denver, CO, USA, 12–16 April 2015; pp. 402–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sulejmani, S.; Sonnenfeld, C.; Geernaert, T.; Luyckx, G.; Mergo, P.; Urbanczyk, W.; Chah, K.; Thienpont, H.; Berghmans, F. Disbond monitoring in adhesive joints using shear stress optical fiber sensors. Smart Mater. Struct. 2014, 23, 075006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mei, H.; James, R.; Haider, M.F.; Giurgiutiu, V. Multimode guided wave detection for various composite damage types. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, H.; Tang, T.; Yang, H.; Wang, J.; Song, J.; Peng, G. The state-of-the-art brief review on piezoelectric energy harvesting from flow-induced vibration. Shock. Vib. 2021, 2021, 8861821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ong, W.H.; Rajic, N.; Chiu, W.K.; Rosalie, C. Lamb wave–based detection of a controlled disbond in a lap joint. Struct. Health Monit. 2018, 17, 668–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salamone, S.; Fasel, T.; Bartoli, I.; Srivastava, A.; Di Scalea, F.L.; Todd, M. Health monitoring approach for adhesively bonded joints. Mater. Eval. 2009, 67, 828–836. [Google Scholar]
- Fasel, T.R.; Todd, M.D. An adhesive bond state classification method for a composite skin-to-spar joint using chaotic insonification. J. Sound. Vib. 2010, 329, 3218–3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, M.J.; Faia, P. Propagation of ultrasonic lamb waves in aluminium adhesively bonded lap joints and in single plates. Res. Nondestruct. Eval. 2009, 20, 178–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rucka, M.; Wojtczak, E.; Lachowicz, J. Damage Imaging in Lamb Wave-Based Inspection of Adhesive Joints. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baudot, A.; Moysan, J.; Payan, C.; Ylla, N.; Galy, J.; Verneret, B.; Baillard, A. Improving adhesion strength analysis by the combination of ultrasonic and mechanical tests on single-lap joints. J. Adhes. 2014, 90, 555–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mori, N.; Kusaka, T. Reflection and transmission characteristics of Lamb waves at an adhesive lap joint of plates. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2019, 145, 3075–3085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jankauskas, A.; Mazeika, L. Ultrasonic guided wave propagation through welded lap joints. Metals 2016, 6, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaboty, A.; Dupont-Marillia, F.; Bélanger, P. Propagation of Low Frequency Ultrasonic Guided Waves through Welded Lap Joint. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 2021, 40, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fromme, P.; Wilcox, P.D.; Lowe, M.J.S.; Cawley, P. On the development and testing of a guided ultrasonic wave array for structural integrity monitoring. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2006, 53, 777–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nagy, P.B. Ultrasonic detection of kissing bonds at adhesive interfaces. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 1991, 5, 619–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kundu, T.; Maji, A.; Ghosh, T.; Maslov, K. Detection of kissing bonds by Lamb waves. Ultrasonics 1998, 35, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jagadeeshwar, T.L.; Kalyani, S.; Rajagopal, P.; Srinivasan, B. Statistics-based baseline-free approach for rapid inspection of delamination in composite structures using ultrasonic guided waves. Struct. Health Monit. 2022, 21, 2719–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, H.; Liu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Dai, F.; Liu, Y.; Leng, J. A baseline-free approach of locating defect based on mode conversion and the reciprocity principle of Lamb waves. Ultrasonics 2020, 102, 106063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huber, A. Dispersion Calculator 2.4 User’s Manual; German Aerospace Center: Cologne, Germany, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Quaegebeur, N.; Ostiguy, P.C.; Masson, P. Correlation-based imaging algorithm for bolt loosening monitoring on realistic aerospace structure. A Roadmap to Intell Struct. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, “A Roadmap to Intelligent Structures”, Stanford, CA, USA, 10–12 September 2013; Volume 2, pp. 1936–1943. [Google Scholar]
- Marks, R.; Clarke, A.; Featherston, C.; Paget, C.; Pullin, R. Lamb wave interaction with adhesively bonded stiffeners and disbonds using 3D vibrometry. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, S.S. Mechanical Vibrations, 6th ed.; Pearson Education, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; Volume 67. [Google Scholar]
- Bathe, K.-J. Finite Element Procedures, 2nd ed.; Prentice Hall; Pearson Education, Inc.: Watertown, MA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Giurgiutiu, V. Lamb wave generation with piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring. Proc. SPIE 2003, 5056, 483492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raghavan, A.; Cesnik, C.E.S. Modeling of piezoelectric-based Lamb wave generation and sensing for structural health monitoring. Smart Struct Mater 2004 Sensors Smart Struct Technol Civil. Mech. Aerosp. Syst. 2004, 5391, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, X.; Yuan, F.G. Diagnostic Lamb waves in an integrated piezoelectric sensor/actuator plate: Analytical and experimental studies. Smart Mater. Struct. 2001, 10, 907–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giurgiutiu, V. Structural Health Monitoring with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors, 2nd ed.; Elsevier Inc.: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alleyne, D.; Cawley, P. A two-dimensional Fourier transform method for the measurement of propagating multimode signals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1991, 89, 1159–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huthwaite, P.; Ribichini, R.; Cawley, P.; Lowe, M. Mode selection for corrosion detection in pipes and vessels via guided wave tomography. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2013, 60, 1165–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mode | (mm/μs) | (mm/μs) | Numerical Power Loss, (dB) | Numerical Power Loss, (dB) [23] |
---|---|---|---|---|
S0 | 5.275 | 5.128 | 2.89 | 4.3 |
MC-A0 | 2.580 | 2.513 | ------ | ----- |
Mode | (mm/μs) | (mm/μs) | Numerical Power Loss, (dB) |
---|---|---|---|
A0 | 2.580 | 2.645 | 9.46 |
MC-S0 | 5.275 | 5.467 | ---- |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Altammar, H.; Faseeulla Khan, M. Evaluation of Welded Lap Joints Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves. Sensors 2024, 24, 1384. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051384
Altammar H, Faseeulla Khan M. Evaluation of Welded Lap Joints Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves. Sensors. 2024; 24(5):1384. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051384
Chicago/Turabian StyleAltammar, Hussain, and Mohammad Faseeulla Khan. 2024. "Evaluation of Welded Lap Joints Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves" Sensors 24, no. 5: 1384. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051384
APA StyleAltammar, H., & Faseeulla Khan, M. (2024). Evaluation of Welded Lap Joints Using Ultrasonic Guided Waves. Sensors, 24(5), 1384. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051384