Strontium (II)-Selective Potentiometric Sensor Based on Ester Derivative of 4-tert-butylcalix(8)arene in PVC Matrix

Abstract

Membranes of 4-tert-butylcalix(8)arene-octaacetic acid octaethyl ester (I) as an electroactive material, sodium tetraphenyl borate (NaTPB) as an anion excluder, and tri-n-butyl phosphate (TBP) as a solvent mediator in poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) matrix have been tried for a strontium-selective sensor. The best performance was exhibited by the membrane having a composition 5:100:150:2 (I: PVC: TBP: NaTPB (w/w)). This sensor exhibits a good potentiometric response to Sr²⁺ over a wide concentration range (3.2 × 10 ^–5 –1.0 × 10 ^–1 M) with a Nernstian slope (30 mV/ decade). The response time of the sensor is 10 s and it has been used for a period of four months without any drift in potentials. The selectivity coefficient values are in the order of 0.01 for mono-, bi-, and trivalent cations which indicate a good selectivity for Sr²⁺ over a large number of cations. The useful pH range for the sensor was found to be 3-10 and it works well in mixtures with non-aqueous content up to 25 % (v/v). The sensor has been used as an indicator electrode in the potentiometric titration of Sr²⁺ against EDTA.

Introduction

Strontium is an important alkaline earth metal which finds application in production of glasses for colour television sets and ferrite magnets [1], in refining of zinc and added to tin and lead alloys for increasing hardness and durability [2]. The determination of strontium thus, assumes importance and various instrumental methods for its detection used are atomic absorption spectrometry [3], flame photometry [4], ICP-AES [5], etc. Though these methods do provide an accurate determination, they are not very appropriate for large scale monitoring in view of high cost and requirement of sample pretreatment. In such situations, a potentiometric determination by ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) is desirable. It provides an easy, convenient and low cost procedure of analysis in short time. The analysis by ISEs can be nondestructive, requires low sample volumes and generally no sample pretreatment, and is also applicable to turbid and coloured samples. Thus, the analysis by ISEs is a preferred procedure for those ions for which good ISEs are available.

Researchers in this field had been attempting to prepare ISEs for various ions during the last three decades. However, it has not been possible to have highly selective electrodes available for Sr²⁺ determination. Several electrodes based on the use of neutral carriers [6-9] and inorganic ion exchangers [10-13] as electroactive phase of the membrane are reported. However, these electrodes have not been found very successful as they exhibit a significant interference to other alkaline earth metals, high response time and function over a limited pH range. Therefore, it is desirable to further explore different materials for the preparation of membranes which may function as selective sensor for Sr²⁺. An essential requirement of a material to be employed as an electroactive phase of the membrane is its high specificity for a particular ion. Efforts are, therefore, being made in recent times to use newer materials such as calixarenes, cryptands, porphins, etc. Calixarenes have emerged as selective materials for alkali and alkaline earth metals [14] and therefore, can be fruitfully applied for developing ISEs for these metals. Recently, we have used 4-tert-butylcalix(8)arene for preparing PVC-based membranes to be employed as Sr²⁺ sensor [15]. The performance of the sensor is comparable with the existing sensors and has not shown a significant improvement in selectivity. Therefore, we have extended our earlier work on the membranes of 4-tert-butylcalix(8)arene by employing its derivative, 4-tert-butylcalix(8)arene-octaacetic acid octaethyl ester, expecting it to show a more specific response behavior towards strontium. It is documented that ester derivatives of calixarenes [16-19] tend to show a better selectivity than the parent calixarene due to the change in cavity size, conformation and increased number of binding sites. The results on the membranes of the derivative of 4-tert-butylcalix(8)arene are presented in this communication and show an improvement in selectivity, pH range and response time.

Experimental

Reagents

4-tert-butylcalix(8)arene-octaacetic acid octaethyl ester (I) was obtained from Acros Organics, USA; high-molecular weight poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) and tris-(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate (TEP), Aldrich, USA; dioctylphthalate (DOP), GSC, India; dibutyl(butyl)phosphonate (DBBP), Mobile, USA; 1-chloronapthalene (CN) and tri-n-butyl phosphate (TBP), E. Merck, Germany; sodium tetraphenyl borate (NaTPB),BDH, England were used. Analytical reagent-grade tetrahydrofuran (THF), nitric acid and sodium hydroxide were obtained from Ranbaxy, India. Solutions of different concentration were prepared by diluting the stock solution of 0.1 M concentration.

Preparation of membrane

Sr²⁺-selective membranes were prepared by dissolving a mixture of I, anion excluder (NaTPB), plasticizer and PVC in THF. The solution was poured into circular acrylic rings placed on a glass plate and the solvent was then, allowed to evaporate at room temperature. The resulting membrane of 0.5 mm thickness was obtained. It was then, cut to size and attached to a ‘Pyrex’ tube with the help of araldite (Ciba Geigy, India) and equilibrated in 0.5 M Sr²⁺ solution for 2-3 days. A number of such membranes were prepared and those which generate stable potentials and exhibited satisfactory response with regard to working concentration range and slope were selected for further studies. The composition of these membranes is given in

Table 1. Composition of PVC membranes of 4-tert-butylcalix(8)arene-octaacetic acidoctaethyl ester and performance characteristics of Sr²⁺-selective electrode.

Sensor No.	Composition of the membrane (w/w)								Working concentration range (M)	Slope (mV/dec.)	Response time (s)
	(I)	PVC	DOP	TEP	DBBP	CN	TBP	NaTPB
1	5	100						2	3.2×10-4-1.0×10-1	31.0	60
2	5	100	150					2	1.6×10-4-1.0×10-1	27.0	45
3	5	100		150				2	1.2×10-4-1.0×10-1	21.0	40
4	5	100			150			2	6.3×10-5-1.0×10-1	35.1	40
5	5	100				150		2	5.0×10-5-1.0×10-1	24.0	30
6	5	100					150	2	3.2×10-5-1.0×10-1	30.0	10

.

Potential Measurements

The potential measurements were carried out at 25 ± 0.1 °C with a digital potentiometer (Model 5652 A, ECIL, India) and Century Microvoltmeter (Model CVM 301, India) by setting up the following cell assembly, where saturated calomel electrodes (SCE) were used as reference electrodes:

Internal Reference Electrode (SCE)

Internal solution 0.1 M Sr2+

Membrane

Test solution

External Reference Electrode (SCE)

Results and Discussion

Performance characteristics of sensor

The potentials of the cells set-up with the sensors having membranes with and without plasticizers were measured in the concentration range of 1.0 × 10 ^-6 - 1.0 ×10 ^-1 M of Sr²⁺ solution and plotted in Figure 1. The working concentration range and slope for different sensors have been determined from these plots and summarized in Table 1. The sensor No. 1 having a membrane without plasticizer exhibited a narrow working concentration range of 3.2 × 10 ^-4 - 1.0 × 10 ^-1 M with a slope 31 mV/decade of concentration. The response time, time taken by the sensor to generate a stable potential, of this sensor was found to be 60 s. Thus, this sensor exhibited a short working concentration range with a slow response and a slope slightly higher than Nernstian (29.5 mV/decade). In order to improve the performance of the membrane, different plasticizers viz. DOP, TEP, 1-CN, TBP and DBBP, were added to the membrane and the results obtained are also given in Table 1. It is seen that all plasticizers tend to improve the working concentration range, lower the response time and decrease the slope except DBBP, which increases it.

A comparison of the performance characteristics of all the sensors clearly revealed that the sensor No. 6 having a membrane with TBP plasticizer is the best as it exhibits the widest concentration range of 3.2 × 10 ^-5 - 1.0 × 10 ^-1 M, an almost Nernstian slope (30 mV/decade) and a minimum response time of 10 ± 1 s. Thus, all further studies were carried out with cells employing sensor No. 6. Further, a repeated monitoring of potentials (20 measurements) on any day of investigation at the same portion of the sample (1.0 × 10^-3 M) gave a standard deviation of 0.2 mV. The sensor was fairly stable and was used over a period of four months without showing any drift in potential. However, when not in use, the electrodes were stored in 0.1 M Sr²⁺ solution.

Effect of pH and non-aqueous medium

In order to study the effect of pH on the performance of the sensor, the potentials were determined at two concentrations (1.0 × 10 ^-3 and 1.0 × 10 ^-2 M) of Sr²⁺ ions as a function of pH. The pH of the solution was varied by the addition of NaOH and HNO₃. The results obtained (Figure 2) indicate that the potential remains constant over pH 3 to pH 10. Thus, a useful pH range for this sensor is 3 to 10. Below pH 3, the change in the potential is due to cofluxing of hydrogen ions and above pH 10, the decrease in potential appears due to the formation of SrOH⁺ ions [20].

The versatility of the sensor was further explored by studying its performance in partially non-aqueous media (methanol-water and ethanol-water mixtures) and the results are compiled in

Table 2. Performance of Sr²⁺-selective sensor (No. 6) in partially non-aqueous medium.

Non aqueous contents % (v/v)	Slope (mV/dec.) (±1.0)	Working concentration range (M)
Nil	30.0	3.2 × 10-5 -1.0 × 10 −1
Methanol
5	30.0	3.2 × 10-5 -1.0 × 10 −1
10	30.0	3.2 × 10-5 -1.0 × 10 −1
15	29.6	3.9 × 10-5 -1.0 × 10 −1
20	29.6	3.9 × 10-5 -1.0 × 10 −1
25	29.0	5.0 × 10-5 -1.0 × 10 −1
30	25.0	1.9 × 10-4 -1.0 × 10 −1
Ethanol
5	30.0	3.2 × 10-5 -1.0 × 10 −1
10	30.0	3.2 × 10-5 -1.0 × 10 −1
15	30.0	3.2 × 10-5 -1.0 × 10 −1
20	29.8	3.6 × 10-5 -1.0 × 10 −1
25	29.0	5.0 × 10-5 -1.0 × 10 −1
30	26.4	1.0 × 10-4 -1.0 × 10 −1

. The sensor does not show any appreciable change in the working concentration range and slope in mixtures having up to 25% (v/v) non-aqueous content. Above 25% non-aqueous content, the working concentration range and slope of the sensor are considerably shortened. Further, the reproducibility of the potential data is reduced. Therefore, the sensor can be employed in mixtures having up to 25% (v/v) non-aqueous content.

Selectivity of the sensor

The most important characteristic of any ion-selective sensor is its response to the primary ion in the presence of other ions of the solution; it is expressed as the selectivity coefficient (K^Pot_Sr²⁺_,B). The selectivity coefficient was determined by the fixed interference method and is reported in

Table 3. Selectivity coefficient values observed for the Sr²⁺-selective sensor (No. 6) for various interfering ions (B) using fixed interference method.

Interfering ion (B)	Selectivity coefficient (KpotSr2+, B)
Na+	2.0× 10-2
K+	2.5× 10-2
Rb+	2.0 × 10-2
Cs+	5.1 × 10-2
NH4+	3.2 × 10-2
Ag+	3.4 × 10-2
Ca2+	3.2 × 10-2
Mg2+	5.0 × 10-2
Ba2+	3.9 × 10-2
Ni2+	2.0 × 10-2
Hg2+	2.0 × 10-2
Pb2+	6.3 × 10-2
Cd2+	6.3 × 10-2
Cu2+	3.2 × 10-2
Mn2+	3.2 × 10-2
Co2+	3.9 × 10-2
Zn2+	5.9 × 10-2
Cr3+	3.0 × 10-2
Fe3+	2.5 × 10-2
Al3+	3.2 × 10-2

. A value of the selectivity coefficient equal to 1.0 indicates the same response to both the primary and interfering ion, whereas a value smaller than 1.0 reflects selectivity for the primary ion. It is seen from Table 3 that selectivity coefficient values are much smaller than 1.0. Thus, the electrode under consideration is sufficiently selective towards Sr²⁺ over alkali, alkaline earth metals and several common transition metal ions. The most important factor governing the selectivity characteristics of any ligand is the extent of preorganization and arrangement of the polar binding groups or atoms into a rigid conformation of optimum dimensions for the target ions [21]. The present ionophore in the membrane has highly polar ester groups, which hold the metal ion strongly into its cavity. From potentiometric selectivity data presented here, it is obvious that the present ionophore interacts strongly with Sr²⁺ ion and can be used successfully as sensing agent for a strontium sensor. Further, this sensor represents an improvement on already reported sensors based on 4-tert-butylcalix(8)arene, which showed a significant interference to Na⁺ and Pb²⁺ ions, whereas the sensor under consideration shows an appreciable selectivity to Sr²⁺ over Na⁺ and Pb²⁺ ions. In view of a good selectivity of the sensor, it can be used for Sr²⁺ determination in the presence of many foreign ions by direct potentiometry.

Analytical application (titration)

The sensor has been used as an indicator electrode for determining Sr²⁺ by potentiometric titration. For this purpose, a 10 ml solution of Sr²⁺ (1.0 × 10^-3 M) was titrated against EDTA solution (1.0 × 10^-2 M) at pH 10 using ammonia buffer, and the potentials obtained are plotted in Fig. 3. The titration plot is not conventional sigmoid-type because the sensor, though selective torwards Sr²⁺, is not specific to it and responds to a small extent to other ions. Thus, the sensor is responding mainly to the Sr²⁺ concentration and to some extent increase in the Na⁺-ion concentration (available from EDTA). The combined potential response leads to the plot achieved with a sharp break, which corresponds to a 1:1 stoichiometry of the Sr-EDTA complex. This type of behavior is characteristic for many ISEs, which are not specific to the primary ion and have been used to determine the concentration of primary ions by potentiometric titration [22-24]. Thus, the present sensor might be used as an indicator electrode for determining Sr²⁺ by potentiometric titration.

Conclusions

The investigation carried out on a number of membranes for a Sr²⁺-selective sensor shows that one with the composition 5:2:150:100 (I: NaTPB: TBP: PVC (w/w)) gives the best performance in terms of reproducibility and other sensor characteristics. The sensor based on this membrane shows a wide working concentration range (3.2 × 10 ^-5 - 1.0 × 10 ^-1 M), a fast response time (10 s), a good selectivity to Sr²⁺, a wide pH range (3-10), an adequate shelf life (∼ 4 months) and it works well in partially non-aqueous medium containing up to 25 % (v/v) non-aqueous content (methanol and ethanol). Most reported electrodes [6-13,15] generally showed an interference to Ba²⁺, Hg²⁺, K⁺, Na⁺, and Pb²⁺ ions and exhibit a large response time, a small pH range and a short life time. The sensor under consideration is an improvement over existing sensors in that: (i) it does not show a significant interference to Ba²⁺, Hg²⁺, K⁺ , Na⁺ _, and Pb²⁺ ions, (ii) it functions satisfactorily over a wide pH range (3-10), (iii) it has a longer shelf life (∼ 4 months) and (iv) it shows a faster response time (10 s). Thus, the sensor prepared can be used for Sr²⁺ determination by direct potentiometry or potentiometric titration.