Next Article in Journal
Impact of Clostridioides difficile Therapy on Nosocomial Acquisition of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci
Previous Article in Journal
Cyclic Peptide-Gadolinium Nanocomplexes as siRNA Delivery Tools
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Antiarrhythmic Activity of Novel Pyrrolidin-2-one Derivative S-75 in Adrenaline-Induced Arrhythmia

Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14(11), 1065; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14111065
by Klaudia Lustyk 1,*, Kinga Sałaciak 1, Paula Zaręba 2, Agata Siwek 3, Jacek Sapa 1 and Karolina Pytka 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14(11), 1065; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14111065
Submission received: 26 August 2021 / Revised: 13 October 2021 / Accepted: 14 October 2021 / Published: 20 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this article, the authors investigated the antiarrhythmic activity of pyrrolidine-2-one derivative S-75 showed that it had prophylactic and therapeutic antiarrhythmic activity in the adrenaline-induced arrhythmia model because of its inhibitory action on α1-adrenoceptor but not β1-adrenoceptor. The experiments were carefully carried out, and the paper will provide useful information on α1-adrenoceptor antagonists as antiarrhythmic agents. My comments and questions are as follows:

 

Major comment

  1. Figure 1A: Why did S-75 prolong PQ interval in the isolated rat’s heart? In the Langendorff model, the activity of the autonomic nervous system might be minimal. S-75 had a higher affinity toward the L-type Ca2+ channel among the author’s tested channels. Consequently, it is possible that the prolonging effect of S-75 on the PQ and RR interval is mediated by the L-type Ca2+ channel but not by α1-adrenoceptor.

 

  1. Figure 1D: Which does figure 1D indicate heart rate or RR interval? If it indicates RR interval, the result of S-75 can be interpreted as a negative chronotropic effect.

 

Minor comments

  1. Page 4, line 127: Please describe the results in calcium- and aconitine-induced arrhythmia in the result section.

 

  1. Result section: Please correct the heading numberings.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

I consider that the idea of this study, to evaluate the antiarrhythmic activity of novel pyrrolidin-2-one derivative S-75, is very interesting. The article is well-written and comprehensive, with clear and legible tables and it may be accepted for publication. I consider that the findings are interesting and that the results obtained can make significant contributions to further large studies. However, I recommend emphasizing much better the original elements of their article.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop