Plant Phenolics and Extracts in Animal Models of Preeclampsia and Clinical Trials—Review of Perspectives for Novel Therapies
, Tomasz M. Karpiński 2, Michał Szulc 3, Karolina Wielgus 1, Radosław Kujawski 3, Hubert Wolski 4,5 and Agnieszka Seremak-Mrozikiewicz 5,6,7Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
In my view, the authors have made a good work in revising the literature existing to date on the field. This review seems enough clear and well organized. Just few concerns about unclear parts and English revision, which I grouped together in the attached file.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Type of the Paper (Review)
Title: Plant phenolics and extracts in animal models of pre-eclampsia and clinical trials – review of perspectives for novel therapies
Minor error:
1-Comments: Page 2, Line 73: Reference[7,8] instead of [7, 8], no space between the number, please check the similar mistake throughout the manuscript
2-Comments: Need to uniform (write the same way): anti-hyperglycemic and antihyperglycemic; antihypertensive and anti-hypertensive; anti-oxidant and antioxidant; anti-inflammatory and antiinflammatory
2a) Line 415: antihyperglycemic; Line 118: anti-hyperglycemic
2b) Line 30, 50, 84, 78, 160, 381: anti-hypertensive; Line 119, 142, 416, 193, 432, 471, 615, 620, 844, 876: antihypertensive
2c) Line 180: anti-oxidant; Line 50 77, 109, 118,471, 489, 506, 568, 573, 576 609, 634, 666, 785, 842, 866, 876: antioxidant
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
The authors answered my concerns correctly, so I now believe the manuscript is worth publishing