Next Article in Journal
TLC–Densitometry for Determination of Omeprazole in Simple and Combined Pharmaceutical Preparations
Next Article in Special Issue
Plant Metabolites as SARS-CoV-2 Inhibitors Candidates: In Silico and In Vitro Studies
Previous Article in Journal
HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor Statins Activate the Transcriptional Activity of p53 by Regulating the Expression of TAZ
Previous Article in Special Issue
Search for Novel Potent Inhibitors of the SARS-CoV-2 Papain-like Enzyme: A Computational Biochemistry Approach
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 15
Issue 8
10.3390/ph15081013
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efficacy of Kan Jang® in Patients with Mild COVID-19: Interim Analysis of a Randomized, Quadruple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

by
Levan Ratiani
1,
Elene Pachkoria
1,
Nato Mamageishvili
2,
Ramaz Shengelia
2,
Areg Hovhannisyan
3 and
Alexander Panossian
4,*
1
The First University Clinic of Tbilisi State Medical University, Gudamakari St., Tbilisi 0141, Georgia
2
Department for History of Medicine and Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, Tbilisi State Medical University, Vazha-Pshavela Ave. 33, Tbilisi 0162, Georgia
3
Institute of Fine Organic Chemistry, National Academy of Science, Azatutian Ave. 26, Yerevan 375014, Armenia
4
Phytomed AB, Bofinkvagen 1, 31275 Våxtorp, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15(8), 1013; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15081013
Submission received: 5 July 2022 / Revised: 7 August 2022 / Accepted: 10 August 2022 / Published: 17 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue COVID-19 in Pharmaceuticals)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Kan Jang®, the fixed combination of Andrographis paniculata (Burm. F.) Wall. ex. Nees and Eleutherococcus senticosus (Rupr. & Maxim.) Maxim extracts, is a herbal medicinal product for relieving symptoms of upper respiratory tract infections. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of Kan Jang®/Nergecov® on duration and the relief of inflammatory symptoms in adults with mild COVID-19. 86 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and mild symptoms for one to three days received supportive treatment (paracetamol) and six Kan Jang® (daily dose of andrographolides—90 mg) or placebo capsules a day for 14 consecutive days in this randomized, quadruple-blinded, placebo-controlled, two-parallel-group study. The primary efficacy outcomes were the decrease in the acute-phase duration and the severity of symptoms score (sore throat, runny nose, cough, headache, fatigue, loss of smell, taste, pain in muscles), an increase in cognitive functions, physical performance, quality of life, and decrease in IL-6, c-reactive protein, and D-dimer in blood. Kan Jang®/Nergecov® was effective in reducing the risk of progression to severe COVID-19, decreasing the disease progression rate by almost 2.5-fold compared to placebo. Absolute risk reduction by Kan Jang treatment is 14%, the relative risk reduction is 243.9%, and the number Needed to Treat is 7.14. Kan Jang®/Nergecov® reduces the duration of disease, virus clearance, and days of hospitalization and accelerates recovery of patients, relief of sore throat, muscle pain, runny nose, and normalization of body temperature. Kan Jang®/Nergecov® significantly relieves the severity of inflammatory symptoms such as sore throat, runny nose, and muscle pain, decreases pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 level in the blood, and increases patients’ physical performance (workout) compared to placebo. In this study, for the first time we demonstrate that Kan Jang®/Nergecov® is effective in treating mild COVID-19.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Over 137 interventional clinical trials of antiviral treatments in Mild COVID-19 are currently in progress, and 52 studies have been completed [1]. Most of these studies are focused on the efficacy of conventional drugs, including antiviral (remdesivir), anti-inflammatory (dexamethasone), and anti-malarial (hydroxychloroquine) drugs, and show only moderate benefit along with many adverse effects. Other studies are conducted with herbal preparations, such as Andrographis paniculata (Burm. F.) Wall. ex. Nees extracts [2,3,4,5,6,7,8], Shen Cao Gan Jiang Tang decoction (fixed combination of Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch., Zingiber officinale Roscoe, and Panax ginseng C.A.Mey.) [9], Bronchipret sirup (fixed combination of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.), ivy (Hedera helix L.) or cowslip (Primula veris L.) [10], Lian Hua Qing Wen Capsules (the major ingredients of LH consisted of Forsythia suspensa (Thunb.) Vahl, Lonicera japonica Thunb., Ephedra sinica Stapf, Isatis indigotica Fortune ex Lindl., Pogostemon cablin (Blanco) Benth, Rheum palmatum L., Glycyrrhiza uralensis, Dryopteris crassirhizoma Nakai, Rhodiola crenulata (Hook.f. and Thomson) H.Ohba, Houttuynia cordata Thunb., Prunus sibirica L., gypsum, and 1-menthol) [11] and natural compounds of plant origin or their derivatives such as cannabidiol [12], artemisinin/artesunate [13], resveratrol [14], curcumin and quercetin [15,16] and iso-andrographolide-19-sodium sulfate [17].
Remarkably, some of these products include adaptogenic plants (Panax Ginseng, Andrographis, Glycyrrhiza, Rhodiola species), which increase resilience and survival due to activation of repair and detoxifying processes and normalization of cellular homeostasis. It was suggested that adaptogens could help prevent and treat COVID-19 at various stages of progression and resolve the disease due to their pleiotropic effects on virus replication, the immune system, and recovery of oxidative stress-induced damage in compromised cells and tissues [18]. Recently, the clinical efficacy of Chisan®/ADAPT-232 (a fixed combination of Rhodiola, Schisandra, and Eleutherococcus) in ameliorating Long COVID-19 symptoms has been demonstrated [19].
However, published studies with Andrographis paniculata extracts, officially used in Thailand [20,21,22] for treating the acute phase of COVID-19, are contradictory [2,3,4].
A retrospective cohort open-label observational study of the efficacy of Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Wall. ex Nees crude extract in capsules (total dose of andrographolide 180 mg/day for five consecutive days) in addition to supportive treatment (antipyretics, mucolytics, expectorants, antihistamines, oral rehydration salts, and anxiolytics) in hospitalized mild COVID-19 patients does not reveal a significant difference in the incidence rates of developing pneumonia versus supportive treatment [4].
On the contrary, two randomized, placebo-controlled studies show superior efficacy of Andrographis paniculata extract (APE, at the daily dose of 60 mg andrographolide, for five days) in 63 adults with mild COVID-19 vs. placebo, clinical recovery rates, pneumonia, changes of serum CRP levels, and nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 detection by rRT-PCR on Day 5 [2,3].
These results are in line with the results of a prospective, multicenter, open-label, and randomized controlled trial of Xiyanping intravenous injection (iso-andrographolide-19-sodium sulfate, a synthetic derivative of andrographolide, the primary anti-inflammatory compound of Herbal Andrographidis) in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19, where significant reduction in the time to cough relief, fever resolution and virus clearance were demonstrated [17]. Furthermore, they agree with preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies of Andrographis paniculata and Eleutherococcus senticosus preparations [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. Antiviral activity of Eleutherococcus extracts were demonstrated in experimental model systems in which rodents were infected with H1N1 influenza A virus [23,24,25,26], human rhinovirus and respiratory syncytial virus [24]. The antiviral effect of Andrographis extracts [27] were demonstrated against H1N1 influenza A [28,29,30], H5N1 avian influenza [31], Chikungunya [32] Dengue [33,34], and SARS-CoV-2 [35,36,37,38] viruses.
Recently, the predicted antiviral effect of Andrographis extracts against SARS-CoV-2 virus docking and replication by targeting Nsp5, Nsp3, Nsp12, Nsp1 structural proteins and S2 Spike glycoprotein receptor to type-II transmembrane serine protease enzymes of host cells was also demonstrated by in silico modeling [39,40,41,42,43], suggesting the potential efficacy of Andrographolide (I) and its derivatives in COVID-19.
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 i001
Furthermore, it has been shown that Andrographis is more active in combination with Eleutherococcus in preventing the growth of SARS-CoV-2 in isolated Vero E6 human primary embryonic kidney epithelial cells [38]. The synergistic interaction of ES and AP was demonstrated in the expression of genes involved in inflammatory and immune responses [44]. The synergistic effect is assumed to be associated with their impact on neuroprotection, tumor cell proliferation, regulation of Nrf2-mediated signaling proteins, and enzymes related to antioxidants, metabolization, and detoxification [45,46].
Both adaptogenic plants, Andrographis paniculata (Burm. F.) Wall. ex. Nees, Acanthaceae (AP), Eleutherococcus senticosus (Rupr. & Maxim.) Maxim, Araliaceae (ES), and their fixed combination Kan Jang are known for antiviral, immunomodulatory, and anti-inflammatory activity [18] and clinical efficacy in the respiratory tract of patients with infectious diseases [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57]. Kan Jang® is a registered herbal medicinal product in Denmark (marketing authorization Nr 6132293) with well-established use for alleviating symptoms of viral respiratory diseases, such as common colds and influenza, since 1997.
This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of Kan Jang®, in 140 patients with mild and moderate COVID-19 inflammatory symptoms [58], in the last three days) and not requiring Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. However, after recruiting 86 patients, the limitation of 3 days has been amended for seven days starting from 2022-05-06 due to the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in Georgia and the lack of patients admitting into the hospital with mild COVID-19 symptoms within three days of the manifestations of the symptoms. Therefore, this article provides the interim analysis results in the subgroup of patients with mild and moderate COVID-19 inflammatory symptoms in the last three days.

2. Results

2.1. Patients

Demographic and Baseline Characteristics

Nighty eight patients with confirmed diagnoses based on a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, experiencing mild to moderate COVID-19 symptoms, were assessed for eligibility. Eighty six patients with at least three of eight COVID symptoms (fatigue, headache, nasal discharge, loss of smell, taste, cough, muscle pain, and body temperature from 37 to 38 °C) for the last three days before admission to the hospital, were randomly assigned to two treatment groups, Kan Jang®, (A) and Placebo (B), Figure 1.
The groups did not show differences in baseline demographic, physical, and other critical clinical measurements, Table 1, carried out during the study or identified as important indicators of prognosis or response to therapy characteristics.

2.2. Efficacy

2.2.1. Primary Endpoints

The primary efficacy endpoints were: (i) the rate of patients (%) with clinical deterioration, (ii) the duration of hospitalization, (iii) the time to virus clearance, and (iv) the duration of the acute phase of disease assessed as the time from the start of study medicine to complete symptom resolution, (v) fever resolution and relief the severity of fatigue, headache, sore throat, cough, rhinorrhea (nasal discharge/runny nose), myalgia (muscle pain), loss of smell and taste.

The Rate of Patients with Clinical Deterioration and Duration of Hospitalization in the Treatment Group and Control Group

In Kan Jang®, Group A of 34 patients, four were dropouts, and three were withdrawn from the study due to lack of efficacy and disease progression; they continued the treatment with steroids and antibiotics. Figure 1.
In Placebo Group B, of 52 patients, 11 were dropouts, and ten were withdrawn from the study due to lack of efficacy and disease progression; they continued the treatment with steroids and antibiotics. Figure 1.
Therefore:
  • Group A’s (Kan Jang, 30 patients) disease progression rate (10.0%).
  • Group B’s (placebo, 41 patients) disease progression rate (24.39%).
Where p < 0.05 (significant result) at 90% significance level (Confidence 90%), power 78.9%. Figure 2a.
The primary endpoint was met since Kan Jang® significantly reduced disease progression rate compared to placebo. The disease progression rate in the placebo group was 24.39%, which is 143.9% higher than the disease progression rate in the Kan Jang Group (10.00%), Figure 2. Absolute risk reduction by Kan Jang treatment is 14% (ARR = 0.14), while the relative risk reduction (RRR, %) = 243.9%. The number of patients required to treat with Kan Jang to prevent one additional bad outcome (defined as the Number Needed to Treat, NNT = 1/ARR = 7.14) comprises 7.14.

Virus Clearance and Body Temperature

The percentage of patients with a negative SARS-CoV-2 virus test was 14% lower in the Kan Jang group compared to placebo after seven days (76.47% vs. 90.38%, difference −13.91 ± 8.5%, p = 0.89) and 14 days (35.05% vs. 48.86%, difference −13.81 ± 9.7%; p =0.90) of the treatment, Figure 3a. The rate of virus clearance was faster, and the time to virus clearance in 50% of patients was 2.6 days shorter in the Kan Jang group (11.4 days) compared to placebo (14 days); hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 1.780, 95% CI of ratio from 0.7382 to 4.291, Figure 3a.
Duration of increased body temperature (from >37 °C to <38 °C) was also shorter in the Kan Jang group vs. placebo group; median recovery in Kan Jang® was seven days, while in placebo it was nine days; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 1.125, 95% CI of ratio from 0.5778 to 2.191 (Figure 3b).

The Duration and Severity of Inflammatory Symptoms

The occurrence of various inflammatory symptoms was quite different at the baseline of the cohort of COVID-19 patients recruited in this study (Table 1); the most common symptoms were fatigue (in 100% of patients), headache (in 85% of patients), sore throat (in 42% of patients), muscle pain and cough (in 38% of patients), while rhinorrhea and loss of smell were observed correspondingly in 12% and 8% of patients. No patient with loss of taste was recorded at the beginning of the study.
The severity of all inflammatory symptoms gradually decreased from the baseline to the end of therapy (Day 14) and the follow-up period (21 days) in both groups of patients. However, a significant improvement over time of treatment and the follow-up period in the Kan Jan group compared to placebo was observed in relief of the severity of sore throat, cough, myalgia (muscle pain), and rhinorrhea (nasal discharge/runny nose), myalgia, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6.
The therapeutic efficacy of Kan Jang® was assessed by comparing (i) differences in the time to resolve inflammatory symptoms (Figure 4a, Figure 5a, Figure 6a and Figure S1 in Supplementary File S2) in the Kan Jang® and placebo groups of patients and (ii) differences in the relief in severity of inflammatory symptoms from the baseline (Figure 4b, Figure 5b, Figure 6b and Figure S2 in Supplementary File S2) in the Kan Jang® and placebo patient groups. Treatment groups were compared for all efficacy outcome measures to assess primary and secondary endpoints.
Assessment of the efficacy of Kan Jang treatment on the severity of overall inflammatory symptoms, including runny nose, plugged nose, sneezing, sore throat, cough, hoarseness, head congestion, chest congestion, and feeling tired, using Wisconsin URS subway, did not reveal a significant difference compared to the placebo effect, despite considerable improvement in both groups over the time of treatment and the follow-up period, Figures S3 and S4 in Supplementary File S2.
The rate of reduction in cough in the Kan Jang group was insignificantly higher than in the placebo group, Figure 7a; e.g., the percent of patients with cough in the Kan Jang group was 13% less than in the placebo group, and the median recovery in Kan Jang® was nine days, while in placebo it was eleven days; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 1.345, 95% CI of ratio from 0.4683 to 3.863, Figure 7a. Surprisingly, the decrease in the severity of the cough was insignificantly smaller in Kan Jang vs. placebo, Figure 7b.

2.2.2. Secondary Endpoints

Secondary endpoints comprised the measures of (i) immune response marker IL-6 concentration in the serum, (ii) blood hypercoagulation marker Dimer-D, (iii) inflammatory marker C-reactive protein, (iv) physical activity, (v) physical performance, (vi) cognitive performance, and (vii) severity of respiratory symptoms and quality of life by Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey Questionary Score.

Blood Serum Markers of Immune Response and Inflammation

At the beginning of the study, the baseline level of all selected markers of immune response and inflammation, IL-6, C-reactive protein, and D-dimer, were significantly higher than normal blood values, Table 1. In 7 days of the treatment with Kan Jang, the level of IL-6 reached the standard limit of 7 pg/mL, while in the placebo group, two days longer, Figure 8a. Between-groups comparison of the changes of level of cytokine IL-6 in the blood from the baseline over time shows significant interaction (p = 0.0186), Figure 8b. The Kan Jang® treatment has a statistically significant (p < 0.0001) effect on cytokine IL-6 in blood compared to the placebo.
The level of C-reactive protein and D-dimer was also normalized in the blood of all patients at the end of treatment; however, the Kan Jang® treatment had no statistically significant difference in effects on C-reactive protein and D-dimer compared to placebo p > 0.05, Figure S5 in Supplementary File S2.

Physical Activity, Physical and Cognitive Performance, and Quality of Life Scores

The Kan Jang® treatment significantly increases patients’ physical performance/workout time (in min) compared to the placebo, Figure 9a; between-groups comparison of the changes from the baseline over time of treatment and follow-up period shows significant interaction (p = 0.0173), Figure 9a. However, subjective assessment of overall physical activity (Figure 9b) and cognitive performance scores (Figure S6 in Supplementary File S2) using self-assessment questionaries did not provide a statistically significant difference between Kan Jang® and placebo groups.

2.3. Safety

No adverse events were noted in the study. Regardless of causality, adverse events were monitored for all patients from the first dose and through the one-week follow-up period.

3. Discussion

Recently it was suggested that adaptogens could be useful in prophylaxis and treatment of viral infections, including SARS-CoV-2 infection at all stages of progression of inflammation [18], including the acute phase of the disease and the chronic post COVID period (long COVID, usually for three months from the onset of COVID-19 with symptoms that last for at least two months, mainly fatigue, shortness of breath, cognitive dysfunction, etc.). Indeed, recently, it has been demonstrated that a fixed combination of Rhodiola, Schisandra, and Eleutherococcus (Chisan/ADAPT-232) can increase physical performance and reduce the duration of fatigue and chronic pain in patients with long COVID-19 symptoms. Chisan® also reduced the blood level of pro-inflammatory markers IL-6, C-reactive protein, and creatinine, suggesting prevention of renal failure progression in long COVID [19]. Another fixed combination of adaptogens (Andrographis and Eleutherococcus, Kan Jang) was studied in the acute phase of COVID-19. In this study, we, for the first time, show that Kan Jang effectively relieves sore throat, muscle pain, and runny nose in COVID-19, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6. This is in line with previous studies of Kan Jang in other upper respiratory tract infections, such as common cold, rhinitis, sinusitis [47,51,54,55], and influenza [53].
This effect is associated with the anti-inflammatory effect of Kan Jang on the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6, which is decreasing to normal levels in the blood of patients within seven days of treatment (Figure 7), presumably with faster virus clearance, Figure 3a. Additionally, Kan Jang significantly improves patients’ physical performance (workout), increasing the time of walking during the first week of recovery. Figure 8.
Furthermore, the duration of increased body temperature (Figure 3b) and hospitalization (Figure 2b) decreased in the Kan Jang group of patients vs. placebo.
Finally, the rate of patients with clinical deterioration and disease progression was significantly lower in the Kan Jang group vs. the placebo, Figure 2a. The disease progression rate in the placebo group was 24.39%, which is about 2.5-fold higher than the disease progression rate in the Kan Jang Group (10.00%), Figure 2. Absolute risk reduction by Kan Jang treatment is 14% (ARR = 0.14), while the relative risk reduction (RRR, %) = 243.9%. The number of patients required to treat with Kan Jang to prevent one additional bad outcome (defined as the Number Needed to Treat, NNT = 1/ARR = 7.14) comprises 7.14. The higher ARR and lower NNT are, the more effective the intervention is.
Unlike Xiyanping injection (iso-andrographolide-19-sodium sulfate) [17] or Lian Hua Qing Wen herbal combination [11], Kan Jang treatment does not relieve cough and fatigue in 32 patients in our study. However, it cannot be excluded that these effects will be observed in the larger sample size at the end of our study.
The treatment with Kan Jang® was well tolerated, and no adverse events were recorded in this study. This is in line with previous clinical studies where only four adverse events were recorded in one [47] of six studies [47,51,53,54,55,57] with 494 patients in the Kan Jang group. In that study, the only common adverse reaction was mild pruritus observed in four patients in the Kan Jang® group and six in the placebo group (odds ratio 5852, z-statistics 0.807, p = 0.4194), and no severe adverse reactions were observed.
It comprises 0.76% of the seven studies’ 526 patients in the Kan Jang® groups. That is significantly less than 131 mild to moderate adverse events observed in 690 (19%) patients of ten studies of Andrographis paniculata herbal preparations that are essentially safe [59], and 383 (4.04%) adverse events in 9490 participants using andrographolide derivative injections, which can be life-threatening, mainly gastrointestinal, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, and anaphylaxis [59].
Kan Jang has an excellent safety profile [47,48], presumably due to the adaptogenic and antitoxic effects of Eleutherococcus [60]. Cytoprotective (neuroprotective, hepatoprotective, cardioprotective), stress-protective, antioxidant, antitoxic and immunomodulating activity of Eleutherococcus preparations were demonstrated in many experimental models on isolated cells and (in vitro and ex vivo) animals [60,61,62].
This evidence of the safety of the Kan Jang combination shows that pharmacological activity and toxicity of multi-component drugs are different from their ingredients, and the effects observed on purified compounds cannot be extrapolated to their combinations with other substances and vice versa, due to their multiple synergistic and antagonistic interactions in the organism [44,45,46]. In other words, the results obtained in this study are product specific and cannot be applied to mono herbal drugs, e.g., Andrographis extract, which in turn is the mixture of 39 compounds such as andrographolides, flavonoids, etc. and deregulates quite a different number of genes than expected from a simple calculation of a number of constituents of the plant extracts [44], Table 2.
Currently, only a few antiviral drugs are approved by drug regulatory authorities against COVID-19: Paxlovid™ [63], Remdesivir, Bebtelovimab (in USA) [64] Molnupiravir (in UK) [65], and Andrographis (in Thailand) [20,21,22] for treating non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The FDA has also approved the immune modulators for certain hospitalized adults with COVID-19, e.g., Olumiant (baricitinib), Interleukin-6 receptor blocker [66].
In this context, an important difference in the mode and mechanisms of action of Kan-Jang and Andrographis compared with other drugs, is its multitarget effects both directly on virus-receptor binding, viral membrane fusion into the host cell, viral replication, transcription, translocation, assembly, and release to infect other host cells [18,67], as well as indirect antiviral activity due to multiple effects on innate and adaptive immune systems, inflammatory response, and essentially on recovery of oxidative stress-induced damage in compromised cells [18].
Overall, the safety of Kan Jang is an essential advantage compared to the safety of all other anti-COVID-19 drugs [63,68,69]. For instance, the recently approved Paxlovid™ (Pfizer), a co-packaged combination of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir tablets, which effectively reduces the risk of progression (ARR of 6.2%, NNT = 17) to severe COVID-19 in symptomatic adults at high risk of progression to severe COVID-19 [59]. That is, the safety of Kan Jang compared to Paxlovid™, which, unlike Kan Jang, induces dysgeusia, diarrhea, hypertension, and myalgia [63].
The limitations of our study are a short duration of symptoms of COVID-19 before treatment (for three days), and lack of concomitant chronic diseases, which increase the risk of progression of disease and intensive care therapy for patients. Further studies are required in patients with a more extended pretreatment period of COVID-19 symptoms (up to 7 days) and patients at high risk of progression of pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and septic shock.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Design, Recruitment, and Screening of Patients, Schedule of Examinations

This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, quadruple-blind, two-parallel-group (Figure 1 and Supplementary File S1), phase II interventional study was conducted at the Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia, with the approval of the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of Tbilisi State Medical University and National Council on Bioethics (Registration Nr 3-2021/87, date of final protocol approval 25 March 2021). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04847518. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04847518 (accessed on 6 June 2022).
Recruitment for the study was initiated on 24 April 2021, and the 86th patient was recruited on 22 October 2021.
All essential principles of the declaration of Helsinki, the ICH guidelines, and EMEA clinical trials guidelines were considered. In the course of the initial visit to the University Clinic, patients’ exclusion and inclusion criteria were verified against the eligibility checklist, and patients interested in participating received relevant information about the study. All patients provided written informed consent to enter the study before inclusion. The patients had enough time to consider the information, to confirm that they understood it and were willing to participate in the study. The patient’s information sheet described the study procedures, the aims, expected benefits, and potential risks in Georgian and English. Patients were evaluated by a physical examination, and suitable lab tests were conducted. Patients underwent randomization when inclusion criteria were met.
Overall, 98 patients were assessed for eligibility, and a subgroup of 86 patients with mild COVID symptoms [45] for the last three days, were randomized and included in the interim analysis of the study (Supplementary File S1, Full Analysis Dataset), which is still in progress. In total, 69 patients (80% randomized) completed their respective treatment cycles according to protocol, while 17 (20%) discontinued therapy after receiving at least one dose of study preparations due to the patient’s request. Fifty-eight patients, who completed the treatment, were evaluated for treatment efficacy for two weeks (visits 2 and 3) of treatment and one week after completing the treatment (follow-up visit 4) and compiled. Primary efficacy subset: 15 patients were lost in the first week of treatment. The distribution between the study groups and the disposition of patients are shown in the flow chart in Figure 1. The schedule of procedures and examinations is shown in Table 3.

4.1.1. Study Population, Inclusion, and Exclusion Criteria

The population for this study aged 18 years and older of either sex (mean age: 48.85 ± 13.86 years) consisted of COVID-19 patients in stable, moderate condition (i.e., not requiring Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission) with confirmed diagnosis based on positive SARS-CoV-2 test and at least three of eight mild to moderate COVID-19 symptoms [58], such as fatigue, headache, sore throat, nasal discharge, cough, pain in muscles, loss of taste and smell (Table 1) for the last three days before recruitment for the study. Subjects must be under observation in the hospital, be enabled to take medication alone, and give written informed consent.
Patients admitted with severe acute respiratory syndrome under invasive mechanical ventilation and diagnosed with an etiologic agent other than COVID 19 were excluded from the study. Other exclusion criteria were: acute and chronic pulmonary diseases, chronic rhinosinusitis, renal failure or creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL, type 2 diabetes, autoimmune disease, patients taking antibiotics for a reason other than COVID-19 at enrollment, chronically suppressed immune system (AIDS, lymphoma, corticosteroid therapy, chemo-or radiotherapy for last six months), cancer patients taking immunosuppressive drugs, pregnant or lactating women, subjects participating in other clinical studies or taking any medication influencing the outcome measures during the clinical trial.

4.1.2. Participant Withdrawal

According to the study protocol, the participants should be withdrawn if they develop an allergy or hypersensitivity to study preparation, in case serious side effects appear, in case abnormal clinical biochemistry values are found, and in case of subjects who do not comply with the study protocol. Patients were free to withdraw from the clinical study at any time without giving a reason.

4.1.3. Data Sets Analyzed

All enrolled and randomly allocated treatment patients were included in the intention to treat (ITT) analysis. Efficacy subset analysis per protocol (PP) was performed for the subset of patients with mild COVID symptoms at the baseline (visit 1) and when they completed the study therapy (visits 3 and 4). A per-protocol (PP) analysis aims to identify a treatment effect on the symptoms. Therefore, some patients were excluded from the complete analysis set (ITT), and the PP population was used for the PP analysis, Figure 1.

4.2. Intervention and Comparator

Pharmaceutical-grade standardized extracts of Andrographis paniculata L. Nees. (herb) and Eleutherococcus senticosus (Rupr. & Maxim.) Maxim (root) genuine extracts, as well as their fixed combination, Kan Jang®, were manufactured, tested, and then released for human use as per ICH Q7A and EMEA guidelines for Good Agricultural and Collecting Practice and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) of active pharmaceutical ingredients at the Swedish Herbal Institute, which holds a valid EU-GMP license to produce pharmaceuticals.
One capsule of Kan Jang®/Nergecov® (size 0, batch No. 40154, Expiry date: February 2024) contains 260 mg of A. paniculata native extract SHA-10 (drug-native extract ratio of 4.5–8.1: 1, extraction solvent 70% ethanol), including 15 mg of diterpene lactones (andrographolide and 14-deoxy-11,12-didehydroandrograholide), and 18.75 mg of E. senticosus native extract (drug-native extract ratio of 17–30: 1, extraction solvent 70% ethanol, 0.25 mg Eleutherosides B and E), for details see Supplementary File S5. The matrix contained inactive excipients (microcrystalline cellulose and magnesium stearate). The placebo capsules (size 0, batch No 40154) containing the inactive excipients were identical to the Kan Jang® capsules. Both preparations’ appearance, smell, and color were similar and organoleptically undistinguishable.
The investigational products (IPs) were packaged, blinded, labeled, and packed by the Swedish Herbal Institute AB, Sweden, according to national requirements regarding the use for clinical trial investigation. The label included the drug name, study code, and storage conditions. Placebo and Kan Jang® packages were provided to patients in packages containing 90 capsules in six blisters (the amount required for the treatment period of 14 days is 84 capsules). Each patient received packages on visit 1 (Day 1). The principal investigator (PR) recorded the participant’s ID (the name of the patient allocated to the treatment code number) on the label and provided that package to the patients at the visit 1.
Herbal preparation was qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed according to product specifications. All analytical methods were validated for accuracy, precision, and selectivity. Reference samples were retained at the Swedish Herbal Institute AB (Vallberga, Sweden).
The investigational product was accessible only to authorized personnel and maintained under controlled storage conditions specified on the label and in the investigator’s brochure.

4.2.1. Doses and Treatment Regimens

The daily dose of the study intervention was two capsules three times per day for two consecutive weeks with a daily intake of 1560 mg of the dry extract A. paniculata SHA-10, corresponding to 90 mg of diterpene lactones andrographolides from Andrographis paniculata herb and 112.5 mg of dry extract of E. senticosus, in the Kan Jang® group. All the patients were provided with diary cards on which the daily consumption of study preparation was recorded. The number of consumed capsules during treatment by every single patient was verified for compliance with the duration of the treatment/illness (days at the clinic). The principal investigator was responsible for maintaining drug accountability records.

4.2.2. Randomization and Blinding

Study preparations were labeled by a quality assurance responsible person (QP) at the manufacturing site. The QP did use a random numbers sequence, which was generated by PRISM GraphPad software (2017 Online version, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) “Random number generator” (https://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/randomize1.cfm, accessed on 16 February 2022). The randomization sequence comprises a table of two columns (A and B) filled with randomly distributed unique numbers from 1 to 160. It provided the information on the content of each package—how placebo and verum packages/containers were labeled. QP as-signed the codes A and B to Kan Jang and placebo sets of packages.

4.2.3. Allocation Concealment

All the packages have allocation concealed random numbers printed on the label. The randomization sequence list and code were blinded from the PI, so the PI assigned the packages sequentially as per numbers. The random sequence was disclosed to the statistician before the statistical evaluation of the results when 86 patients had completed the treatment.

4.2.4. Implementation and Blinding

At the first visit, participants received a consecutive number starting from 1 to 86. They were linked to a unique number according to the randomization sequence. Patients were sequentially enrolled by the PI and assigned to a random number, and received the capsules in the package. The investigator produced the participant list and gave the treatment code number (from 1 to 86) to every single patient. He recorded the patients’ names in case report forms (CRF) and on the labels of the package. The table shows the names of patients and corresponding study preparation numbers (treatment number mentioned on the label of packages).
Blinding for trial subjects was achieved using labeled packages containing capsules of the same appearance. The study product was delivered to the clinic pre-labeled and coded according to the randomization list.
The study participants’ list, identifying the patients and the investigational product packages (numbers), were kept by the principal investigator. The treatment code providing the information about the actual assignment of groups A and B to Kan Jang® and placebo were broken by QP, and after that, a statistical analysis of the datasets was completed, and the results of the study were obtained. Thus, the study was quadruple-blind since study preparations were blinded to all investigators, care providers, participants, and outcome assessors.

4.2.5. Evaluation of Compliance

Patients were asked to take their daily dose of 6 capsules. They were questioned about their overall compliance with the study protocol upon their visits, and the study personnel measured the remaining capsules. He verified patients’ records in a unique form enclosed in the case report form. The doctor monitored overall compliance with the study protocol upon their visits and counted the remaining capsules at the treatment.

4.3. Efficacy and Safety Outcomes and Endpoints

The efficacy endpoints were the differences in duration and the relief of inflammatory symptoms in Kang Jang and placebo groups of patients. The outcomes include changes in the severity of inflammatory symptoms, measured by means of various scales’ scores, from the baseline to the end of therapy (Day 14) and follow-up period (21 days after randomization).
The primary efficacy outcome measures of the study were: (i) the rate of patients (%) with clinical deterioration, (ii) duration of hospitalization, (iii) the time to virus clearance, (iv) the duration of the acute phase of disease assessed as the time from the start of study medicine to complete symptom resolution, (v) fever resolution and relief, the severity of fatigue, headache, sore throat, cough, rhinorrhea (nasal discharge/runny nose), myalgia (muscle pain), loss of smell and taste.
Secondary endpoints comprised the measures of (i) Immune response marker IL-6 concentration in the serum, (ii) blood hypercoagulation marker Dimer-D, (iii) inflammatory marker C-reactive protein, (iv) physical activity (v) physical performance, (vi) cognitive performance, and (vii) severity of respiratory symptoms and quality of life by Wisconsin upper respiratory symptom survey questionary score.
Safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring the incidence and duration of adverse events.

4.4. Statistical Analysis

All the clinical data were recorded in standardized case report forms and tabulated in an Excel dataset (Supplementary File S1), which was used in statistical analysis by Prism software (version 3.03 for Windows; GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA).
Statistical analysis was performed using “observed” data for time-to-event outcomes of the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, defined as all randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose of the study product.
The mean outcomes were evaluated at baseline for patients who received Kang Jang vs. placebo by the Student’s parametric independent-measures t-test (variables with normal distribution) or Mann–Whitney non-parametric test, depending on the results of the D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test. Within-group repeated measures analysis of variables was conducted with one-way ANOVA (data with normal distribution) or the Friedman non-parametric rank test.
For assessment of the duration of the symptoms, Kaplan–Meier curves were generated for all endpoints, and medians were calculated from those curves. The treatment arms were compared by Gehan–Breslow–Wilcoxon and Mantel–Cox log-rank tests depending on the results of the normality test. The estimates of treatment hazard ratios based on log-rank tests and 95% CIs were calculated.
Evaluation of the efficacy of study preparation was achieved by comparison of mean changes from the baseline (differences before and after treatment of particular participant) between groups using two-way between–within ANOVA in which an interaction effect indicates a different response over time between the two groups and would therefore indicate a treatment effect, as well as by multiple comparison t-test (one unpaired test per row). The level of statistical significance was set at 5% in all methods.

Sample Size Considerations

Assuming that the standardized difference of means between groups for the symptoms is 0.6 (this assumption is made on the results of previous studies [47,51,53,55,57] where target differences and SD were estimated), and the power of 80% is acceptable to detect this difference as statistically significant at the 5% level, the sample size of 86 patients (42 patients in each of two groups) was calculated using monograms while comparing sample size and power for two treatment groups. Additionally, the sample size was calculated using the formula n = 16σ2/W2, where n is the minimal sample size, σ is the variance, and W is the confidence interval size. This method suggested a minimal sample size of 28. The necessary sample size was estimated at 80, i.e., 40 subjects per arm. Predicting a 30% dropout rate, which would increase our intended sample size, 70 patients in each group would be enough to detect a statistically significant difference between study groups. The proposed sample size (n = 140, or 70 per treatment condition) has 90% power to detect an effect size of 0.76 and 80% power to detect an effect size of 0.85, using a 2-group t-test with a 0.05 two-sided significance level.

5. Conclusions

This study provides new evidence on the clinical efficacy and safety of adaptogens, specifically Kan Jang®/Nergecov®, in the acute phase of mild COVID-19. Kan Jang®/Nergecov® reduces the risk of progression of disease, significantly reduces the duration of disease, virus clearance, and days of hospitalization, and accelerates recovery of patients, relief of sore throat, muscle pain, runny nose, and normalization of body temperature. Kan Jang®/Nergecov® significantly relieves the severity of inflammatory symptoms such as sore throat, runny nose, and muscle pain decreases pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 level in the blood, and increases patients’ physical performance (workout) compared to placebo.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ph15081013/s1, Supplementary File S1, Data set: Supplementary File S2, Table S1, Figures S1–S8: Supplementary File S3, CONSORT checklist: Supplementary File S4, CRF Form: Supplementary File S5, Certificate of Analysis (CoA).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P.; methodology, A.P.; software, A.H., A.P. and N.M.; formal analysis, A.P.; investigation, L.R. and E.P.; resources, L.R.; data curation, E.P., N.M. and A.H.; writing—original draft preparation, A.P.; writing—review and editing, A.P. and E.P.; supervision, R.S. and A.H.; project administration, R.S. and L.R.; funding acquisition, R.S. and L.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Swedish Herbal Institute AB in Vallberga, Sweden; Grant Nr 2021-1, dated 20 February 2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted at the Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia, with the approval of the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of Tbilisi State Medical University and the National Council on Bioethics (Registration Nr 3-2021/87, date of final protocol approval 25 March 2021). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04847518. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04847518 (accessed on 6 June 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

All participants provided written informed consent to join the study before inclusion.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of the Swedish Herbal Institute for the supply of investigational products and Georg Wikman, Daniel Törnbrink, and Audrey Dessouroux for critical comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. AP is self-employed at the research and development company Phytomed AB and has no shares or financial interest in any pharmaceutical company. The funders had no role in the study’s design, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. ClinicalTrials.Gov. Long Covid. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=mild+COVID&age_v=&gndr=&type=Intr&rslt=&Search=Apply (accessed on 30 May 2022).
  2. Wanaratna, K.; Leethong, P.; Inchai, N.; Chueawiang, W.; Sriraksa, P.; Tabmee, A.; Sirinavin, S. Efficacy and safety of Andrographis paniculata extract in patients with mild COVID-19: A randomized controlled trial. medRxiv 2021, 1–19. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Efficacy-and-safety-of-Andrographis-paniculata-in-A-Wanaratna-Leethong/1f40a6181de4e0f15ab296673794210e82236455 (accessed on 12 August 2022).
  3. Rattanaraksa, D.; Khempetch, R.; Poolwiwatchaikool, U.; Nimitvilai, S.; Loatrakul, O.; Srimanee, P. The efficacy and safety of Andrographis paniculata extract for treatment of COVID-19 patients with mild symptoms. Reg. Med. J. 2022, 40, 269–281. [Google Scholar]
  4. Tanwettiyanont, J.; Piriyachananusorn, N.; Sangsoi, L.; Boonsong, B.; Sunpapoa, C.; Tanamatayarat, P.; Kanchanasurakit, S.; Na-Ek, N. The efficacy of Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Wall. ex Nees crude extract in hospitalized mild COVID-19 patients: A retrospective cohort study. medRxiv 2022. [Google Scholar]
  5. Identifier TCTR20210514003—Andrographolide as a Medical Tool for Reduction of Hospitalization in Mild or Asymptomatic COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Trial. TCTR; 14/05/2021; TrialID: TCTR20210514003. Available online: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/en/ictrp-TCTR20210514003 (accessed on 12 August 2022).
  6. Identifier TCTR20210809004—Comparison Efficacy and Safety of Andrographis paniculata Extract Capsules and Placebo in COVID-19 Patients: Double Blind Randomized Control Trial. Available online: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/en/ictrp-TCTR20210809004 (accessed on 12 August 2022).
  7. Identifier TCTR20210906002—Prospective Study of Andrographolide and Favipiravir versus Favipiravir Monotherapy to Prevent Severe Pulmonary Involvement in Patients with COVID-19. Available online: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/pt/ictrp-TCTR20210906002 (accessed on 12 August 2022).
  8. Andrographis paniculata vs. Boesenbergia rotunda vs. Control in Asymptomatic COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05019326?term=Andrographis&cond=COVID-19&draw=2&rank=1 (accessed on 30 May 2022).
  9. ClinicalTrials.Gov. Efficacy Evaluation of Shen Cao Gan Jiang Tang on Mild and Moderate COVID-19 Patients. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05055427 (accessed on 16 February 2022).
  10. Effect of Bronchipret on Antiviral Immune Response in Patients with Mild COVID-19-Full Text View-ClinicalTrials.Gov. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05276375?term=Bronchipret&type=Intr&cond=mild+COVID&draw=2&rank=1 (accessed on 30 May 2022).
  11. Hu, K.; Guan, W.J.; Bi, Y.; Zhang, W.; Li, L.; Zhang, B.; Liu, Q.; Song, Y.; Li, X.; Duan, Z.; et al. Efficacy and safety of Lianhuaqingwen capsules, a repurposed Chinese herb, in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Phytomedicine 2021, 85, 153242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT04467918 CANnabiDiol for COVID-19 Patients with Mild to Moderate Symptoms (CANDIDATE). Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04467918?term=Cannabidiol&type=Intr&cond=mild+COVID&draw=2&rank=1 (accessed on 30 May 2022).
  13. ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT04387240. Evaluating the Efficacy of Artesunate in Adults with Mild Symptoms of COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04387240?term=Artemisinin+%2F+Artesunate&type=Intr&cond=mild+COVID&draw=2&rank=1 (accessed on 30 May 2022).
  14. ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT04400890. Randomized Proof-of-Concept Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Explore the Effectiveness of Resveratrol, a Plant Polyphenol, for COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04400890?term=Resveratrol&type=Intr&cond=mild+COVID&draw=2&rank=1 (accessed on 30 May 2022).
  15. ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT04603690. Oral Curcumin, Quercetin and Vitamin D3 Supplements for Mild to Moderate Symptoms of COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04603690?term=Curcumin&type=Intr&cond=mild+COVID&draw=2&rank=2 (accessed on 30 May 2022).
  16. ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT05130671. Nutritional Supplementation of Flavonoids Quercetin and Curcumin for Early Mild Symptoms of COVID-19. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05130671?term=Curcumin&type=Intr&cond=mild+COVID&draw=2&rank=1 (accessed on 30 May 2022).
  17. Zhang, X.; Lv, L.; Zhou, Y.; Xie, L.; Xu, Q.; Zou, X.; Ding, Y.; Tian, J.; Fan, J.; Fan, H.; et al. Efficacy and safety of Xiyanping injection in the treatment of COVID-19: A multicenter, prospective, open-label and randomized controlled trial. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 4401–4410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Panossian, A.; Brendler, T. The Role of Adaptogens in Prophylaxis and Treatment of Viral Respiratory Infections. Pharmaceuticals 2020, 13, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Karosanidze, I.; Kiladze, U.; Kirtadze, N.; Giorgadze, M.; Amashukeli, N.; Parulava, N.; Iluridze, N.; Kikabidze, N.; Gudavadze, N.; Gelashvili, L.; et al. Efficacy of Adaptogens in Patients with Long COVID-19: A Randomized, Quadruple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yuvejwattana, S. Thailand Clears Use of Herbal Medicine for COVID-19 Treatment. Bloomberg. Available online: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-30/thailand-clears-use-of-herbal-medicine-for-covid-19-treatment (accessed on 30 May 2022).
  21. Yearsley, C. Thailand Approves Asian Herb Andrographis to Treat COVID-19. HerbalGram 2021, 129, 35–37. [Google Scholar]
  22. Karbwang, J.; Na-Bangchang, K. Repurposed drugs for COVID-19 treatment. J. Thai Trad. Alt. Med. 2021, 19, 285–302. [Google Scholar]
  23. Protasova, S.F.; Zykov, M.P. Antiviral effect of Eleutherococcus in experimental influenza infection. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Eleutherococcus, New Data on Eleutherococcus, Moscow, Russia, 1984; pp. 170–174. [Google Scholar]
  24. Glatthaar-Saalmüller, B.; Sacher, F.; Esperester, A. Antiviral activity of an extract derived from roots of Eleutherococcus senticosus. Antivir. Res. 2001, 50, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yan, W.; Chen, J.; Wei, Z.; Wang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Tembo, D.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X. Effect of eleutheroside B1 on non-coding RNAs and protein profiles of influenza A virus-infected A549 cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2020, 45, 753–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yan, W.; Zheng, C.; He, J.; Zhang, W.; Huang, X.A.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X. Eleutheroside B1 mediates its anti-influenza activity through POLR2A and N-glycosylation. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2018, 42, 2776–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jadhav, A.K.; Karuppayil, S.M. Andrographis paniculata (Burm. F) Wall ex Nees: Antiviral properties. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 5365–5373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ding, Y.; Chen, L.; Wu, W.; Yang, J.; Yang, Z.; Liu, S. Andrographolide inhibits influenza A virus-induced inflammation in a murine model through NF-κB and JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Microbes Infect. 2017, 19, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ko, H.C.; Wei, B.L.; Chiou, W.F. The effect of medicinal plants used in Chinese folk medicine on RANTES secretion by virus-infected human epithelial cells. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 107, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yu, B.; Dai, C.Q.; Jiang, Z.Y.; Li, E.Q.; Chen, C.; Wu, X.L.; Chen, J.; Liu, Q.; Zhao, C.L.; He, J.X.; et al. Andrographolide as an Anti-H1N1 drug and the mechanism related to retinoic acid-inducible gene-I-like receptors signaling pathway. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2014, 20, 540–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sornpet, B.; Potha, T.; Tragoolpua, Y.; Pringproa, K. Antiviral activity of five Asian medicinal pant crude extracts against highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2017, 10, 871–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wintachai, P.; Kaur, P.; Lee, R.C.; Ramphan, S.; Kuadkitkan, A.; Wikan, N.; Ubol, S.; Roytrakul, S.; Chu, J.J.; Smith, D.R. Activity of andrographolide against chikungunya virus infection. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Panraksa, P.; Ramphan, S.; Khongwichit, S.; Smith, D.R. Activity of andrographolide against dengue virus. Antivir. Res. 2017, 139, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ramalingam, S.; Karupannan, S.; Padmanaban, P.; Vijayan, S.; Sheriff, K.; Palani, G.; Krishnasamy, K.K. Anti-dengue activity of Andrographis paniculata extracts and quantification of dengue viral inhibition by SYBR green reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Ayurveda 2018, 39, 87–91. [Google Scholar]
  35. Phumiamorn, S.; Sapsutthipas, S.; Pruksakorn, P.; Trisiriwanich, S. In Vitro Study on Antiviral Activity of Andrographis paniculata against COVID-19. 2020. Available online: https://www3.dmsc.moph.go.th/en/ (accessed on 21 December 2021).
  36. Sangiamsuntorn, K.; Suksatu, A.; Pewkliang, Y.; Thongsri, P.; Kanjanasirirat, P.; Manopwisedjaroen, S.; Charoensutthivarakul, S.; Wongtrakoongate, P.; Pitiporn, S.; Chaopreecha, J.; et al. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of Andrographis paniculata extract and its major component andrographolide in human lung epithelial cells and cytotoxicity evaluation in major organ cell representatives. J. Nat. Prod. 2021, 84, 1261–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rajagopal, K.; Varakumar, P.; Baliwada, A.; Byran, G. Activity of phytochemical constituents of Curcuma longa (turmeric) and Andrographis paniculata against coronavirus (COVID-19): An in silico approach. Future J. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 6, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Asea, A.; Kaur, P.; Wikman, K.G. Antiviral Activity and Synergy of Herba Andrographidis and Radix Eleutherococci Preparations against SARSCoV-2 Infected Vero E6 Human Primary Embryonic Kidney Epithelial Cells. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2021, 6, 148. [Google Scholar]
  39. Enmozhi, S.K.; Raja, K.; Sebastine, I.; Joseph, J. Andrographolide as a potential inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 main protease: An in silico approach. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021, 39, 3092–3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, C.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, P.; Zhong, W.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Xu, Y.; Li, M.; Li, X.; et al. Analysis of therapeutic targets for SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of potential drugs by computational methods. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2020, 10, 766–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Majumdar, M.; Singh, V.; Misra, T.K.; Roy, D.N. In silico studies on structural inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 main protease Mpro by major secondary metabolites of Andrographis paniculata and Cinchona officinalis. Biologia 2022, 77, 1373–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Latha, D.; Hrishikesh, D.; Shiban, G.; Chandrashekar, C.; Bharath, B.R. In silico, in vitro screening of plant extracts for anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity and evaluation of their acute and sub-acute toxicity. Phytomed. Plus 2022, 2, 100233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vijayakumar, M.; Janani, B.; Kannappan, P.; Renganathan, S.; Al-Ghamdi, S.; Alsaidan, M.; Abdelaziz, M.A.; Peer Mohideen, A.; Shahid, M.; Ramesh, T. In silico identification of potential inhibitors against main protease of SARS-CoV-2 6LU7 from Andrographis panniculata via molecular docking, binding energy calculations and molecular dynamics simulation studies. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 29, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Panossian, A.; Seo, E.J.; Wikman, G.; Efferth, T. Synergy assessment of fixed combinations of Herba Andrographidis and Radix Eleutherococci extracts by transcriptome-wide microarray profiling. Phytomedicine 2015, 22, 981–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Seo, E.J.; Klauck, S.M.; Efferth, T.; Panossian, A. Adaptogens in chemobrain (Part II): Effect of plant extracts on chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity in neuroglia cells. Phytomedicine 2019, 58, 152743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Panossian, A.; Seo, E.J.; Klauck, S.M.; Efferth, T. Adaptogens in chemobrain (part IV): Adaptogenic plants prevent the chemotherapeutics-induced imbalance of redox homeostasis by modulation of expression of genes encoding Nrf2-mediated signaling proteins and antioxidant, metabolizing, detoxifying enzymes in neuroglia cells. Longhua Chin. Med. 2020, 3, 4. [Google Scholar]
  47. Narimanyan, M.; Jamalyan, K.; Balyan, A.; Barth, A.; Palm, S.; Wikman, G.; Panossian, A. Early intervention with Kan Jang® to treat upper-respiratory tract infections: A randomized, quadruple-blind study. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2021, 11, 552–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Panossian, A.; Wikman, G. Efficacy of Andrographis paniculata in upper respiratory tract (URT) infectious diseases and the mechanism of action. In Evidence and Rational Based Research on Chinese Drugs; Wagner, H., Ulrich Merzenich, G., Eds.; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2012; pp. 137–180. [Google Scholar]
  49. Coon, J.T.; Ernst, E. Andrographis paniculata in the treatment of upper respiratory tract infections: A systematic review of safety and efficacy. Planta Med. 2004, 70, 293–298. [Google Scholar]
  50. Cáceres, D.D.; Hancke, J.L.; Burgos, R.A.; Wikman, G.K. Prevention of common colds with Andrographis paniculata dried extract. A Pilot double blind trial. Phytomedicine 1997, 4, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gabrielian, E.S.; Shukarian, A.K.; Goukasova, G.I.; Chandanian, G.L.; Panossian, A.G.; Wikman, G.; Wagner, H. A double blind, placebo-controlled study of Andrographis paniculata fixed combination Kan Jang in the treatment of acute upper respiratory tract infections including sinusitis. Phytomedicine 2002, 9, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hancke, J.; Burgos, R.; Caceres, D.; Wikman, G. A double-blind study with a new monodrug Kan Jang®: Decreases of symptoms and improvement in the recovery from common colds. Phytother. Res. 1995, 9, 559–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kulichenko, L.L.; Kireyeva, L.; Malyshkina, E.N.; Wikman, G. A randomized, controlled study of Kan Jang® versus amantadine in the treatment of influenza in Volgograd. J. Herb. Pharmacother. 2003, 3, 77–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Melchior, J.; Palm, S.; Wikman, G. Controlled clinical study of standardized Andrographis paniculata extract in common cold—A pilot trial. Phytomedicine 1997, 3, 315–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Melchior, J.; Spasov, A.A.; Ostrovskij, O.V.; Bulanov, A.E.; Wikman, G. Double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot and phase III study of activity of standardized Andrographis paniculata Herba Nees extract fixed combination (Kan Jang®) in the treatment of uncomplicated upper-respiratory tract infection. Phytomedicine 2000, 7, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Saxena, R.C.; Singh, R.; Kumar, P.; Yadav, S.C.; Negi, M.P.; Saxena, V.S.; Joshua, A.J.; Vijayabalaji, V.; Goudar, K.S.; Venkateshwarlu, K.; et al. A randomised double blind placebo controlled clinical evaluation of extract of Andrographis paniculata (KalmCold) in patients with uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infection. Phytomedicine 2010, 17, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Spasov, A.A.; Ostrovskij, O.V.; Chernikov, M.V.; Wikman, G. Comparative controlled study of Andrographis paniculata fixed combination, Kan Jang and an Echinacea preparation as adjuvant, in the treatment of uncomplicated respiratory disease in children. Phytother. Res. 2004, 18, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. World Health Organization. Clinical Management of Severe Acute Respiratory Infection When Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Infection Is Suspected: Interim Guidance. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/clinical-management-of-novel-cov.pdf (accessed on 30 May 2022).
  59. Shang, Y.X.; Shen, C.; Stub, T.; Zhu, S.J.; Qiao, S.Y.; Li, Y.Q.; Wang, R.T.; Li, J.; Liu, J.P. Adverse Effects of Andrographolide Derivative Medications Compared to the Safe use of Herbal Preparations of Andrographis paniculata: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 773282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Brekhman, I.I. On antitoxic action of Eleutherococcus. Mosc. Med. 1982, 37. [Google Scholar]
  61. Seo, E.J.; Klauck, S.M.; Efferth, T.; Panossian, A. Adaptogens in chemobrain (Part III): Antitoxic effects of plant extracts towards cancer chemotherapy-induced toxicity-transcriptome-wide microarray analysis of neuroglia cells. Phytomedicine 2019, 56, 246–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. HMPC—Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products. Assessment Report on Eleutherococcus senticosus (Rupr. et Maxim.) Maxim, Radix. EMA/HMPC/680615/2013. 25 March 2014, pp. 1–51. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/herbal-report/final-assessment-report-eleutherococcus-senticosus-rupr-et-maxim-maxim-radix_en.pdf (accessed on 30 May 2022).
  63. Lamb, Y.N. Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir: First Approval. Drugs 2022, 82, 585–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Antiviral Drugs That Are Approved, Authorized, or under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19. Last Updated: 29 April 2022. In COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines. National Institutes of Health. pp. 140–221. Available online: https://files.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/guidelines/section/section_36.pdf (accessed on 29 April 2022).
  65. Molnupiravir_COVID19-MSD-Art 5(3)-Conditions for Use (Europa.eu). Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/referral/lagevrio-also-known-molnupiravir-mk-4482-covid-19-article-53-procedure-conditions-use-conditions_en.pdf. (accessed on 7 August 2022).
  66. World Health Organization. Therapeutics and COVID-19. Therapeutic Management of Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19. Last Updated: 24 February 2022. Available online: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/management/clinical-management/hospitalized-adults--therapeutic-management/ (accessed on 7 August 2022).
  67. Lim, X.Y.; Chan, J.; Tan, T.Y.; Teh, B.P.; Mohd Abd Razak, M.R.; Mohamad, S.B.; Syed Mohamed, A.F. Andrographis paniculata (Burm. F.) Wall. Ex Nees, Andrographolide, and Andrographolide Analogues as SARS-CoV-2 Antivirals? A Rapid Review. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2021, 16, 1934578X211016610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Izcovich, A.; Siemieniuk, R.A.; Bartoszko, J.J.; Ge, L.; Zeraatkar, D.; Kum, E.; Qasim, A.; Khamis, A.M.; Rochwerg, B.; Agoritsas, T.; et al. Adverse effects of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir when used for COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ Open 2022, 12, e048502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gupte, V.; Hegde, R.; Sawant, S.; Kalathingal, K.; Jadhav, S.; Malabade, R.; Gogtay, J. Safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir in hospitalised COVID-19 patients: A retrospective analysis of active surveillance database. BMC Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the trial. For details on the disposition of patients, see Supplementary File S1.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the trial. For details on the disposition of patients, see Supplementary File S1.
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g001
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) The rate of patients with clinical deterioration in the treatment and control groups; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 0.4234, 95% CI of ratio from 0.132 to 1.357. (b) Duration of hospitalization in the treatment group and control group; Kaplan–Meier curves show the percent of patients hospitalized over the time from randomization (Day 1) to the end of the treatment (Day 14) and followed up for one week (Day 21) in the treatment and control groups; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 0.9398, 95% CI of ratio from 0.4978 to 1.774.
Figure 2. (a) The rate of patients with clinical deterioration in the treatment and control groups; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 0.4234, 95% CI of ratio from 0.132 to 1.357. (b) Duration of hospitalization in the treatment group and control group; Kaplan–Meier curves show the percent of patients hospitalized over the time from randomization (Day 1) to the end of the treatment (Day 14) and followed up for one week (Day 21) in the treatment and control groups; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 0.9398, 95% CI of ratio from 0.4978 to 1.774.
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g002
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) The virus clearance in the treatment and control groups: Kaplan–Meier curves show the percent of patients with SARS-CoV-2 virus over the time from randomization (Day 1) to the end of the treatment (Day 14) and the follow-up period for one week (Day 21) in the treatment and control groups; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 1.891, 95% CI of ratio from 0.5969 to 1.675. (b) Duration of increased body temperature (from >37 °C to <38 °C) in the treatment and control groups; median recovery: Kan Jang®—7 days, placebo—9 days; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 1.125, 95% CI of ratio from 0.5778 to 2.191.
Figure 3. (a) The virus clearance in the treatment and control groups: Kaplan–Meier curves show the percent of patients with SARS-CoV-2 virus over the time from randomization (Day 1) to the end of the treatment (Day 14) and the follow-up period for one week (Day 21) in the treatment and control groups; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 1.891, 95% CI of ratio from 0.5969 to 1.675. (b) Duration of increased body temperature (from >37 °C to <38 °C) in the treatment and control groups; median recovery: Kan Jang®—7 days, placebo—9 days; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 1.125, 95% CI of ratio from 0.5778 to 2.191.
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g003
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Time to relieve sore throat in the treatment and control groups: Kaplan–Meier curves show the percent of patients with a sore throat over the time from randomization (Day 1) to the end of the treatment (Day 14) and follow up for one week (Day 21); median recovery, Kan Jang® was 7 days, placebo was 11 days; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 2.427, 95% CI of ratio from 0.9352 to 6.296. (b) Relief of the sore throat; the changes in the severity of the symptom from the baseline of patients in group A (Kan Jang) and group B (placebo) over the time from Day 1 to Day 21. Between-groups comparison of the changes in the severity of the symptom from the baseline over time shows significant interaction (p < 0.0001). The Kan Jang® treatment has a statistically significant effect on the relief of the sore throat compared to the placebo. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.0001.
Figure 4. (a) Time to relieve sore throat in the treatment and control groups: Kaplan–Meier curves show the percent of patients with a sore throat over the time from randomization (Day 1) to the end of the treatment (Day 14) and follow up for one week (Day 21); median recovery, Kan Jang® was 7 days, placebo was 11 days; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 2.427, 95% CI of ratio from 0.9352 to 6.296. (b) Relief of the sore throat; the changes in the severity of the symptom from the baseline of patients in group A (Kan Jang) and group B (placebo) over the time from Day 1 to Day 21. Between-groups comparison of the changes in the severity of the symptom from the baseline over time shows significant interaction (p < 0.0001). The Kan Jang® treatment has a statistically significant effect on the relief of the sore throat compared to the placebo. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.0001.
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g004
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Time to resolution of runny nose in the treatment and control groups: Kaplan–Meier curves show the percent of patients with runny nose over the time from randomization (Day 1) to the end of the treatment (Day 14) and follow up for one week (Day 21) and in the treatment and control groups; median recovery: Kan Jang®, was 14 days, placebo was 14 days; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 1.534, 95% CI of ratio from 0.17 to 13.57. (b) Reduction in nasal discharge; the changes in the severity of the symptom from the baseline of patients in group A (Kan Jang) and group B (placebo) over the time from Day 1 to Day 21. Between-groups comparison of the changes in the severity of the symptom from the baseline over time shows significant interaction (p = 0.0397). The Kan Jang® treatment has a statistically significant effect on the reduction in nasal discharge compared to the placebo. * p < 0.05.
Figure 5. (a) Time to resolution of runny nose in the treatment and control groups: Kaplan–Meier curves show the percent of patients with runny nose over the time from randomization (Day 1) to the end of the treatment (Day 14) and follow up for one week (Day 21) and in the treatment and control groups; median recovery: Kan Jang®, was 14 days, placebo was 14 days; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 1.534, 95% CI of ratio from 0.17 to 13.57. (b) Reduction in nasal discharge; the changes in the severity of the symptom from the baseline of patients in group A (Kan Jang) and group B (placebo) over the time from Day 1 to Day 21. Between-groups comparison of the changes in the severity of the symptom from the baseline over time shows significant interaction (p = 0.0397). The Kan Jang® treatment has a statistically significant effect on the reduction in nasal discharge compared to the placebo. * p < 0.05.
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g005
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Time to muscle pain relief in the treatment and control groups. Kaplan–Meier curves show the percent of patients with the muscle pain over the time from randomization (Day 1) to the end of the treatment (Day 14) and follow-up for one week (Day 21); median recovery, Kan Jang® was 9 days, placebo was 11 days; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 1.345, 95% CI of ratio from 0.4683 to 3.863. (b) Relief of the muscle pain; the changes in the severity of the symptom from the baseline of patients in group A (Kan Jang) and group B (placebo) over the time from Day 1 to Day 21. Between-groups comparison of the changes in the severity of the symptom from the baseline over time shows significant interaction (p < 0.0001). The Kan Jang® treatment has a statistically significant effect on muscle pain relief compared to the placebo. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001, *** p < 0.0001.
Figure 6. (a) Time to muscle pain relief in the treatment and control groups. Kaplan–Meier curves show the percent of patients with the muscle pain over the time from randomization (Day 1) to the end of the treatment (Day 14) and follow-up for one week (Day 21); median recovery, Kan Jang® was 9 days, placebo was 11 days; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 1.345, 95% CI of ratio from 0.4683 to 3.863. (b) Relief of the muscle pain; the changes in the severity of the symptom from the baseline of patients in group A (Kan Jang) and group B (placebo) over the time from Day 1 to Day 21. Between-groups comparison of the changes in the severity of the symptom from the baseline over time shows significant interaction (p < 0.0001). The Kan Jang® treatment has a statistically significant effect on muscle pain relief compared to the placebo. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001, *** p < 0.0001.
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g006
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Time to cough relief in the treatment and control groups. Kaplan–Meier curves show the percent of patients with muscle pain over the time from randomization (Day 1) to the end of the treatment (Day 14) and follow-up for one week (Day 21); median recovery: Kan Jang® was 9 days, placebo was 11 days; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 1.345, 95% CI of ratio from 0.4683 to 3.863. (b) The changes in the severity of the cough from the baseline of patients in group A (Kan Jang) and group B (placebo) over the time from Day 1 to Day 21. Between-groups comparison of the changes in the severity of the symptom from the baseline over time shows significant interaction (p < 0.0001). The Kan Jang® treatment has a statistically significant effect on cough compared to the placebo. *—p < 0.05.
Figure 7. (a) Time to cough relief in the treatment and control groups. Kaplan–Meier curves show the percent of patients with muscle pain over the time from randomization (Day 1) to the end of the treatment (Day 14) and follow-up for one week (Day 21); median recovery: Kan Jang® was 9 days, placebo was 11 days; hazard ratio Kan Jang/placebo = 1.345, 95% CI of ratio from 0.4683 to 3.863. (b) The changes in the severity of the cough from the baseline of patients in group A (Kan Jang) and group B (placebo) over the time from Day 1 to Day 21. Between-groups comparison of the changes in the severity of the symptom from the baseline over time shows significant interaction (p < 0.0001). The Kan Jang® treatment has a statistically significant effect on cough compared to the placebo. *—p < 0.05.
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g007
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) Concentration of IL-6 (mean ± SD) in the blood of patients in group A (Kan Jang) and group B (placebo) over the time from Day 1 to Day 14. (b) The changes from the baseline of the levels (mean ± SD) of cytokine IL-6 in the blood of patients in group A (Kan Jang) and group B (placebo) over the time from Day 1 to Day 14. Between-groups comparison of the changes in the level of cytokine IL-6 in the blood from the baseline over time shows a significant difference (p = 0.0486) between groups A and B. The Kan Jang® treatment has a statistically significant effect on cytokine IL-6 in blood compared to the placebo.
Figure 8. (a) Concentration of IL-6 (mean ± SD) in the blood of patients in group A (Kan Jang) and group B (placebo) over the time from Day 1 to Day 14. (b) The changes from the baseline of the levels (mean ± SD) of cytokine IL-6 in the blood of patients in group A (Kan Jang) and group B (placebo) over the time from Day 1 to Day 14. Between-groups comparison of the changes in the level of cytokine IL-6 in the blood from the baseline over time shows a significant difference (p = 0.0486) between groups A and B. The Kan Jang® treatment has a statistically significant effect on cytokine IL-6 in blood compared to the placebo.
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g008
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g009 550
Figure 9. Between-groups comparison of the changes from the baseline of (a) physical performance/workout time (in min) and (b) the overall physical activity of patients in group A (Kan Jang) and group B (placebo) over the time from Day 1 to Day 21. * p < 0.05.
Figure 9. Between-groups comparison of the changes from the baseline of (a) physical performance/workout time (in min) and (b) the overall physical activity of patients in group A (Kan Jang) and group B (placebo) over the time from Day 1 to Day 21. * p < 0.05.
Pharmaceuticals 15 01013 g009
Table
Table 1. Baseline demographic characteristics, outcome measures, and laboratory biochemical and hematological measurements.
Table 1. Baseline demographic characteristics, outcome measures, and laboratory biochemical and hematological measurements.
Unit Group A
Kan Jang
ADAPT n = 50		 Group B PlaceboSignif. of Difference
Parameters nMeanSD.nMeanSD.p-Value
Ageyears3449.8216.335244.7316.850.170
GenderMale/Female3412/22 (0.54)5224/28 (0.86)0.156
BMIkg/m23425.113.2135224.603.2030.470
Start of symptomsdays34<3 52<3
Viral load, SARS-CoV2%3410052100
Body temperature°C3437.60.395237.60.440.903
Fatigue100% patientsA.U.341.770.47521.790.530.403
Headache85% patientsA.U.311.680.47421.760.480.538
Sore throat42% patientsA.U.181.5000.514181.5000.618>0.999
Cough38% patientsA.U.151.4670.516181.2220.4280.266
Pain in muscles38% patientsA.U.111.6360.674221.7730.4290.314
Runny nose12% patientsA.U.51.8000.44761.6670.516>0.999
Loss of smell8% patientsA.U.21.0001.41450.1600.5480.619
Loss of taste0% of patientsA.U.0- 0- -
Physical activityA.U.3413.883.4805214.403.2340.410
Physical activity (daily walk)min348.82410.945214.1315.330.120
Decreased attention (d2-test)%E (errors)3418.2729.725221.6317.510.563
URTIWI score3413.214.2415212.064.4250.235
QOLWI score3432.6216.005235.0215.390.248
Blood serum IL-6 (normal level <7 pg/mL)pg/mL3419.50 *76.435211.89 *20.460.738
D-dimer (normal range from 0.1 to 0.5 mg/L)mg/L341.085 *2.033525.94 *38.750.596
C-reactive protein (normal level <5 mg/L)mg/L3412.66 *12.815218.65 *25.570.791
ALT (normal level <35 U/L)U/L3427.6919.905227.7722.150.988
AST (normal level <32 U/L)U/L3427.8224.085227.6222.410.956
Total WBC count, (normal range: 3.6–11.0 × 109 cells/L)109/L345.4531.247525.4961.9240.907
Erythrocytes, RBC (normal range: 3.8–5.8 × 1012 cells/L)1012/L344.7640.4795213.60 *63.690.475
Hemoglobin. Hb (normal range 13.5–17.0 g/dl)g/dl3413.001.6945213.431.8230.272
Hematocrit, HCT (normal range: 40–50, L/L)L/L3441.315.1595241.446.8520.465
Platelet Count (normal range 150–380 × 103 cells/μL)103 μL34194.645.9052204.349.570.336
Neutrophils count (normal range: 1.8–7.5 × 109 cells/L)109/L346.3860.996526.71610.360.147
Lymphocyte count (normal range: 1.0–4.0 × 109 cells/L)109/L342.5901.020522.3669.7560.309
Monocyte count ((normal range: 0.1–1.0 × 109 cells/L)109/L341.035 *2.184520.5463.5520.094
Eosinophil count ((normal range: 0.1–0.4 × 109 cells/L)109/L340.12680.111520.09020.7180.124
Basophil Count ((normal range: 0.01–0.1 × 109 cells/L)109/L340.04780.0261520.04240.2620.330
*—over the normal range.
Table
Table 2. The number of compounds (n) identified in the Andrographis extract (A), Eleutherococcus extract (B), and KanJang (C), and their pharmacological effect expressed as a number of deregulated genes (N) in host cells.
Table 2. The number of compounds (n) identified in the Andrographis extract (A), Eleutherococcus extract (B), and KanJang (C), and their pharmacological effect expressed as a number of deregulated genes (N) in host cells.
Herbal ExtractsChemical Composition:
Number of Compounds
Identified in Extracts,
n		Pharmacological Effect on
Gene Expression in Target Cells: Number of Deregulated Genes in Host Cells,
N
A—Andrographis39207
B—Eleutherococcus35211
C—Kan Jang combination74250
D—Andrographolide1626
Table
Table 3. Schedule of examinations and procedures.
Table 3. Schedule of examinations and procedures.
TreatmentFollow-Up
Day 1
Screening		Day 3Day 5Day 7Day 9Day 11Day 14Day
21
Doctor’s visits1 Baseline 2 34
Eligibility check/Information*
Informed consent*
Clinical examination* * **
Enrollment and allocation to intervention*
Treatment (Kan Jang and placebo)*******
Biomarker assessments
Body temperature (fever)********
COVID-19 PCR test* * **
Blood serum cytokine IL-6 (pg/mL)** * *
D-dimer (mg/L)* * *
C-reactive protein (mg/L)* * *
Blood cells count analysis* * *
ALT/AST* *
Clinician and observer reported outcomes assessments
Cognitive performance (tests for
attention and memory): d2 test		* * **
Wisconsin URS Survey Score****
Drug intake accountability *
Adverse events * **
Patient-reported outcomes assessments
Mild COVID symptoms:
  • Fatigue
  • Headache
  • Loss of smell
  • Loss of taste
  • Rhinorrhea (nasal discharge)
  • Cough
  • Pain in muscles
  • Sore throat
********
Workout, min* * **
Physical activity (questionnaire)* * **
Paracetamol intake recording*******
Rescue medication intake recording*******
*—days of examinations and procedures.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ratiani, L.; Pachkoria, E.; Mamageishvili, N.; Shengelia, R.; Hovhannisyan, A.; Panossian, A. Efficacy of Kan Jang® in Patients with Mild COVID-19: Interim Analysis of a Randomized, Quadruple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15081013

AMA Style

Ratiani L, Pachkoria E, Mamageishvili N, Shengelia R, Hovhannisyan A, Panossian A. Efficacy of Kan Jang® in Patients with Mild COVID-19: Interim Analysis of a Randomized, Quadruple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Pharmaceuticals. 2022; 15(8):1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15081013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ratiani, Levan, Elene Pachkoria, Nato Mamageishvili, Ramaz Shengelia, Areg Hovhannisyan, and Alexander Panossian. 2022. "Efficacy of Kan Jang® in Patients with Mild COVID-19: Interim Analysis of a Randomized, Quadruple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial" Pharmaceuticals 15, no. 8: 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15081013

APA Style

Ratiani, L., Pachkoria, E., Mamageishvili, N., Shengelia, R., Hovhannisyan, A., & Panossian, A. (2022). Efficacy of Kan Jang® in Patients with Mild COVID-19: Interim Analysis of a Randomized, Quadruple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Pharmaceuticals, 15(8), 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15081013

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop