Next Article in Journal
N-Substituted 2-(Benzenosulfonyl)-1-Carbotioamide Derivatives Exert Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Effects via Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Pathway: Synthesis, In Silico and In Vitro Studies
Next Article in Special Issue
Anti-COVID Drugs (MMV COVID Box) as Leishmanicidal Agents: Unveiling New Therapeutic Horizons
Previous Article in Journal
Squalene Peroxidation and Biophysical Parameters in Acne-Prone Skin: A Pilot “In Vivo” Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 16
Issue 12
10.3390/ph16121705
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of a Difluorinated Alkoxy Sulfonyl Chloride as a Novel Antitumor Agent for Hepatocellular Carcinoma through Activating Fumarate Hydratase Activity

by
Jin Jin
1,2,
Xujun Liang
1,2,
Wu Bi
1,2,
Ruijie Liu
1,2,
Sai Zhang
1,2,
Yi He
1,2,
Qingming Xie
1,2,
Shilei Liu
1,2,
Ji-Chang Xiao
3,* and
Pengfei Zhang
1,2,*
1
NHC Key Laboratory of Cancer Proteomics, Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
2
National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
3
Key Laboratory of Organofluorine Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(12), 1705; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16121705
Submission received: 31 October 2023 / Revised: 18 November 2023 / Accepted: 5 December 2023 / Published: 8 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Strategies in Drug Design and Development of Small Molecules as Therapeutic Agents)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fenofibrate is known as a lipid-lowering drug. Although previous studies have reported that fenofibrate exhibits potential antitumor activities, IC50 values of fenofibrate could be as high as 200 μM. Therefore, we investigated the antitumor activities of six synthesized fenofibrate derivatives. We discovered that one compound, SIOC-XJC-SF02, showed significant antiproliferative activity on human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) HCCLM3 cells and HepG2 cells (the IC50 values were 4.011 μM and 10.908 μM, respectively). We also found this compound could inhibit the migration of human HCC cells. Transmission electron microscope and flow cytometry assays demonstrated that this compound could induce apoptosis of human HCC cells. The potential binding sites of this compound acting on human HCC cells were identified by mass spectrometry-cellular thermal shift assay (MS-CETSA). Molecular docking, Western blot, and enzyme activity assay-validated binding sites in human HCC cells. The results showed that fumarate hydratase may be a potential binding site of this compound, exerting antitumor effects. A xenograft model in nude mice demonstrated the anti-liver cancer activity and the mechanism of action of this compound. These findings indicated that the antitumor effect of this compound may act via activating fumarate hydratase, and this compound may be a promising antitumor candidate for further investigation.

1. Introduction

Primary liver cancer was the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide in 2020 and has the sixth highest incidence of malignancy (8.3%), with approximately 906,000 new cases and 830,000 deaths [1]. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) comprises approximately 85% of the total cases of primary liver cancer worldwide [2]. HCC severely threatens the life and health of human beings and brings a serious burden to families and society. HCC most often occurs in patients with a history of cirrhosis due to long-term alcoholism, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The continuous cycle of inflammation and healing in liver cells is believed to be the root cause of the development of HCC. Numerous therapeutic measures have been developed, such as surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and liver transplantation [3]; however, the coexistence of inflammation and cirrhosis complicates the early diagnosis of HCC [4]. Surgical resection is the cornerstone of early-stage HCC. Detection of early-stage HCC means that the cancer can be treated with surgical resection, gaining a relatively favorable prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of more than 70% [5]. In addition, the recurrence rate after resection is about 80%, with a high fatality rate [6]. Furthermore, the majority of HCC patients are already in the middle and late stages when diagnosed, losing the chance to receive surgery, and can only choose non-surgical resection. Chemotherapy, especially molecular targeted drug therapy, is attracting increasing attention in the treatment of middle and late-stage patients with HCC. In 2016, the only first-line systemic therapy for unresectable HCC approved by the Food and Drug Administration was sorafenib, which is a multi-targeted oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that can curb cell proliferation of the tumor cell via inhibiting the activity of Raf-1, B-Raf, and kinases in the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway. Moreover, sorafenib can inhibit angiogenesis by targeting the receptor tyrosine kinase (c-Kit), FMS-like tyrosine kinase (FLT-3), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2, VEGFR-3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR-β), and other tyrosine kinases [7,8,9]. Unfortunately, most patients do not experience a long-term benefit, mainly due to the early onset of sorafenib resistance [10]. Compared with other solid cancers, HCC is considered a chemotherapy-resistant tumor, with excessive expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, the P-glycoprotein gene product, and the multidrug resistance gene, MDR-1, so systemic chemotherapy is not routinely used [11,12,13]. The prognosis of HCC is disappointing, with a 3-year survival rate of 12.7% and a median survival of 9 months [14].
Fenofibrate is regarded as a third-generation fibrate lipid-lowering drug that has been suitable for patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia and mixed dyslipidemia for many years in clinical practice. Its ester bond is rapidly hydrolyzed in vivo by esterases in tissues and plasma to form the active metabolite fenofibrate acid acting as a hypolipidemic agent by activating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPRAα) [15,16,17]. In recent years, fenofibrate has been found to exert antitumor effects by inhibiting tumor cell proliferation and metabolism, inhibiting neovascularization, inhibiting cell motility migration, inducing apoptosis, and blocking the cell cycle. It is not dependent on the PPRAα pathway [18,19,20,21,22], and many studies have proven that fenofibrate can be used as an important potential antitumor agent, demonstrated by a variety of human malignant tumor types, such as pancreatic cancer [18], breast cancer [23], hepatocellular carcinoma [19,24], high-grade glioma [17,25,26,27], prostate cancer [20,28,29], endometrial cancer [30,31], oral cancer [32,33], lung cancer [34,35], lymphoma and multiple myeloma [36], mantle cell lymphoma [37], neuroblastoma [38], melanoma [39]. Fenofibrate may also increase the efficacy of vaccines against solid tumors by reprogramming cells within tumors to increase fatty acid metabolism [40]. However, the inhibition effect of fenofibrate on tumor cells in vitro and in vivo is less pronounced, and its half-inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for tumor cell growth inhibition are relatively large, reaching up to 200 μM [41,42].
There are many known fibric acid derivatives, but fenofibrate was most studied in antitumor research as described above, and the inhibition effect of fenofibrate on tumor cells is unsatisfactory. The pharmacokinetics and safety of fenofibrate are well known in clinical practice; therefore, a series of fenofibrate derivatives based on the chemical structure formula of fenofibrate have been designed to improve the outcome of the treatment of HCC. The present study investigated the anticancer potency of the screened fenofibrate derivative SIOC-XJC-SF02, 2-{4-[4-(2-Fluorosulfonyl-vinyl)-benzoyl]-phenoxy}-2-methyl-propionic acid isopropyl ester (C22H23FO6S) (The spectral results for SIOC-XJC-SF02 are presented in the Supplementary Material.) in HCC, in vitro and in vivo. The underlying mechanisms were also investigated. Our data indicated that compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 inhibited cell proliferation and induced cell apoptosis via the targeting of fumarate hydratase. This study suggests that fenofibrate derivative SIOC-XJC-SF02 is a promising leading compound for anti-hepatocellular carcinoma.

2. Results

2.1. Compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 Decreases the Viability of Human HCC Cells

To identify the antitumor properties of novel fenofibrate derivatives, six compounds were prepared to evaluate their antitumor activities (Figure 1 and Table 1). The fenofibrate derivative SIOC-XJC-SF02 (Figure 2) showed potent antitumor activity compared with all of the other compounds, and the IC50 values of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 acting on HepG2 cells were 10.908 μM and 4.011 μM against HCCLM3 cells. The effects of compound SIOC-XJC-SF06 acting on HepG2 cells were also evaluated; IC50 values were 4.182 μM, but the amount of compound SIOC-XJC-SF06 synthesis was insufficient. These results indicated that the cell viability of HepG2 cells and HCCLM3 cells incubated with increasing concentrations of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 decreased in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, it was observed that compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 exhibited better antitumor activity on HCCLM3 cells compared with HepG2 cells.
Primary analysis of the structure-activity relationship of these fenofibrate derivatives indicated that the Cl atom of fenofibrate replaced by different chemical atomic groups was likely significant for their anti-liver cancer activity, such as SIOC-XJC-SF02 and SIOC-XJC-SF06.

2.2. Compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 Induces Apoptosis of Human HCC Cells

To determine the effect of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 on cell apoptosis, transmission electron microscopy assay and Hoechst 33258 staining were conducted to observe the morphological changes of apoptotic cells, and flow cytometry was performed to evaluate the cell apoptotic ratio. The results of the transmission electron microscopy assay and Hoechst 33258 staining indicated that HepG2 cells and HCCLM3 cells treated with compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 showed typical apoptotic morphological changes compared with the vehicle. In cells treated with SIOC-XJC-SF02, it could be observed that chromatin edged at the periphery of the nuclear membrane, chromatin condensed, and cytoplasm was concentrated (Figure 3a–e).
Flow cytometry analysis was performed to detect the apoptosis of HepG2 cells and HCCLM3 treated with different concentrations of SIOC-XJC-SF02 for 48 h. As shown in Figure 3f,g, the apoptosis rate increased significantly with the rising concentration of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02.

2.3. Compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 Inhibits Migration of Human HCC Cells

The wound healing assay and transwell assay are vital for assessing the migration ability of tumor cells. Therefore, the two methods mentioned above were used to indicate the anti-migration effects of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 on human HCC cells.
As shown in Figure 4, the exposure of HepG2 cells and HCCLM3 cells to compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 resulted in significant suppression of migration. Compared with the control group, cells treated with SIOC-XJC-SF02 formed a wider scratch distance and decreased in a concentration-dependent manner. HepG2 cells incubated with 10 μM compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 showed a significant scratch distance (Figure 4a), and the migration was completely suppressed with 12 μM of SIOC-XJC-SF02 (Figure 4c).

2.4. Preliminary Exploration and Identification of Potential Binding Sites of Compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 against HepG2 Cells

To further explore the binding sites of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02, mass spectrometry-cellular thermal shift assay (MS-CETSA) was conducted by exploiting the biophysical properties of proteins and their stability when combined with the compound [43]. The results showed that the score of the melting curve fitting for fumarate hydratase (A0A0S2Z4C3) was 1.035 (Figure 5a). We speculated that the binding sites of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 against hepatocellular carcinoma cells may be fumarate hydratase (A0A0S2Z4C3).
The results of the molecular docking assay showed that compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 may combine with fumarate hydratase (Figure 5b), and the affinity was −7.4 (kcal/mol), and the location of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 combined with fumarate hydratase were four hydrogen bonds: glycine, lysine, proline, and serine (Figure 5c). Fumarate hydratase-IN-1, as the control, was chosen to perform molecular docking for fumarate hydratase, and the results are shown in Figure 5d. The molecular docking binding energy of fumarate hydratase-in-1 was −8.4 (kcal/mol), and the result was stable. Moreover, its binding energy was similar to SIOC-XJC-SF02.
As shown in Figure 5e,f, the mitochondrial FH activity was affected by compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 in a dose-dependent manner, and Western blot results further indicated that compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 enhanced the activity of FH.

2.5. Compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 Suppresses Tumor Growth of HepG2 Cell Xenografts in Nude Mice

To evaluate the effect of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 on the growth and development of liver cancer in vivo, HepG2 cell xenografts in nude mice were established. The compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 group (20 mg/kg), 5-FU as a positive control group (30 mg/kg), and the vehicle as the control group were administered by intraperitoneal injection every two days. As shown in Figure 6, compared to the vehicle group, tumor volume was significantly decreased with the treatment of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02, and the antitumor effect was approximately the same as the 5-FU group on the 14th day (Figure 6a).
Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to detect the expression levels of Ki-67, caspase-3, and fumarate hydratase in tumor tissues (Figure 7). Ki-67, which represents a marker of cell proliferation, showed a significant decrease in 5-FU and SIOC-XJC-SF02 groups. In addition, the expression levels of caspase-3 and fumarate hydratase were increased in the 5-FU and SIOC-XJC-SF02 groups. These results were consistent with the conclusions of in vitro experiments.

3. Discussion

This manuscript investigated six fenofibrate derivatives for their antitumor effects, and a difluorinated alkoxy sulfonyl chloride (compound SIOC-XJC-SF02) performed promising antitumor effects, which has not been reported previously. The ADMET properties of SIOC-XJC-SF02 predicated via SwissADME (http://www.swissadme.ch/index.php, accessed on 26 October 2023) are shown as follows: pharmacokinetics—GI absorption, High; BBB permeant, No; P-gp substrate, No; Log kp (skin permeation) −5.58 cm/s; bioavailability score 0.55; lipophilicity, Log Po/w (MLOGP) 2.55. Furthermore, the effects on anti-liver cancer and underlying mechanisms of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 were revealed in cell and animal experiments.
Compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 showed better antitumor activities on human HCC cells compared with other fenofibrate derivatives. The primary analysis of the structure–activity relationship stated that the Cl atom of fenofibrate replaced by different chemical atomic groups is significant for the antitumor effect of fenofibrate derivatives. The IC50 value of HepG2 cells treated with compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 differed from compound SIOC-XJC-SF06, considering that the Cl atom of fenofibrate was replaced by different chemical atomic groups. Therefore, more studies are needed to research the differences in the future to optimize the chemical structure of fenofibrate derivatives.
Induction of cell apoptosis is a momentous objective of antitumor therapy [44]. In this manuscript, we observed that under the treatment of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02, the morphological changes of HepG2 cells and HCCLM3 cells occurred. Therefore, we estimated whether the treatment of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 induced cancer cell apoptosis. The results showed that compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 increased the apoptosis rate significantly in a dose-dependent manner in HCC cells. These results identified that compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 exerted an antitumor effect via inducing apoptosis in human HCC cells.
The inhibition effect of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 against human HCC cells was approximately the same as the positive control 5-FU on the 14th day in vivo. However, the tumor volumes of nude mice in the compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 group were almost always lower than in the 5-FU group. These results require further study for the optimization of the chemical structure of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 to produce a low-toxicity and effective anti-liver cancer drug in the future.
Identification of binding sites of drugs is a crucial step for an approved drug [45]. The compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 cannot be modified with present experimental techniques. Therefore, MS-CETSA was selected to discover and identify the potential binding sites of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 after consulting many relevant literature [43,46]. MS-CETSA is based on the biophysical principle of ligand-induced thermal stabilization of proteins, meaning when the proteins bind to a drug molecule, the melting temperature of the proteins increases, resulting in the detection of proteins in the soluble fraction [43]. Theoretically, any modification of protein will affect its thermal stability [47]. Compounds that alter the melting point of proteins are considered as the binding agents for the proteins. MS-CETSA was used to report that P2X4 is a cellular target protein of indophagolin [48]. Compound DD100097 was demonstrated to act on LdNMT(N-myristoyltransferase, NMT) in the Leishmania protozoa parasite [49]. Therefore, MS-CETSA was performed to explore the binding sites of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 acting on the HCC cells. The results indicated that mitochondrial fumarate hydratase may be the antitumor binding site of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 acting on human HCC cells. The above results were further supported by mitochondrial fumarate hydratase activity assay, molecular docking assay, and Western blot assay.
The mitochondrial fumarate hydratase acts as a homotetramer. The gene of FH is located at 1q43, consists of 22,153 base pairs, transcribed into 10 exons, and then translated into 510 amino acid monomers (NCBI gene ID 2271, UniProt P07954). Each monomer has three structural domains: the central structural domain responsible for the interaction between the monomers, the N-terminal cleavage enzyme 1 structural domain, and the C-terminal fumarase C structural domain [50]. FH is a key enzyme in the tricarboxylic acid cycle (also called the citric acid cycle), responsible for the generation of cellular energy through oxidative phosphorylation, which reversibly catalyzes water reaction to convert fumarate to L-malate [51,52]. The absence of FH and subsequent accumulation of fumarate lead to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a phenotypic transition associated with the initiation, invasion, and metastasis of cancer [53]. Fumarate inhibits HPHs belonging to the 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase family. Other members of this family are the enzymes of 10–11 translocation (TET) and are involved in DNA methylation. TET enzymes oxidize 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-HMC) and other oxidized methylcytosines, ultimately allowing DNA demethylation [54]. TET2 mutations with importance in epigenetic regulation were identified in several human cancers [55]. Fumarate is identified as an inhibitor of TETs, and demonstrated that fumarate downregulated 5-HMC levels, introducing a potential epigenetic role for fumarate [54]. In a subsequent study, fumarate’s role is associated with EMT epigenetic regulation [53]. Normally, mitochondria provide most of the energy needed to sustain cell life activities. However, when it is necessary to eliminate cancer cells physiologically or therapeutically, mitochondria can trigger apoptosis and cell-programmed death [56]. It has been widely reported that FH is closely associated with the development of various tumors, such as uterine smooth muscle tumors [57], renal cell carcinoma [58], pancreatic cancer [59], gastric cancer [60], and lung cancer [61]. Human type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC2) cells were cultivated, and the results showed that accumulation of fumarate in cells lacking FH contributed to PTEN inhibition to activate PI3K/AKT signaling, tumor growth in PRCC2, and the development of sunitinib resistance in PRCC2 cells [58]. FH has a protective effect in maintaining appropriate macrophage cytokine and interferon responses [62]. However, there are not so many reports on the relationship between the enhanced activity of fumarate hydratase and tumor growth. Compound SIOC-XJC-SF02, a novel derivative of fenofibrate, may exert its antitumor effects indirectly through other pathways to enhance the activity of fumarate hydratase or directly in combination with it.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials and Reagent

Six fenofibrate derivatives were synthesized at the Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry (purity: >98%, HPLC) according to a previous protocol [63]. The primary antibodies, including Ki-67 and Caspase-3, and the second antibodies used in this study were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (CST, Danvers, MA, USA). The primary antibody, fumarate hydratase, was purchased from the Proteintech Group (Wuhan, China).

4.2. Cell Lines and Cell Culture

Human hepatoma carcinoma cell lines HepG2 and HCCLM3 were provided by the Cancer Research Institute of Central South University (Changsha, China). HepG2 cells were cultured in DMEM (high glucose) (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, USA) containing 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, USA). HCCLM3 cells were cultured in RMPI-1640 medium (FBS, Gibco, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum containing 1% penicillin/streptomycin. These cell lines were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator.

4.3. Cell Proliferation Assay

The Cell Counting Kit-8 (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) was used to evaluate cell proliferation, which was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells ((1–3) × 103 per well) were seeded in a 96-well plate (Corning, New York, NY, USA) in 100 μL complete medium for 8–24 h, added with different concentrations of test compounds. The compounds were solubilized in DMSO (<0.1% in the final concentration). After treatment for 48 h, 10 μL of the CCK-8 reagent was added with 100 μL of pure DMEM (high glucose) or RMPI-1640 medium and incubated with cells for 2 h. The optical density was determined at 450 nm. IC50 values were determined through the dose–response curves.

4.4. Transmission Electron Microscope Assay

Cells for transmission electron microscope assay were harvested by a cell scraper after compound treatment, centrifuged, fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde, washed with PBS, dehydrated, permeabilized, embedded, sectioned, stained, finally observed by transmission electron microscope.

4.5. Transwell Assay

Cells (2 × 103 per well) were seeded in the top chamber of an 8.0 µm membrane of a 24-well plate, which were inoculated with 100 µL DMEM. Different concentrations of compound with 500 μL DMEM containing 10% FBS were added in the bottom chamber. After treatment for 24 h, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, stained with 0.1% crystalline violet, and photographed.

4.6. Wound Healing Assay

The 6-well plate was used for the wound healing assay, the bottom of which was drawn horizontal lines; 5 × 105 cells per well were seeded and filled the whole well, and the same sterile 200 µL pipette tip was used to scratch along the direction vertically to the marker line, incubated with different concentrations of compound, and photographed after 0 h and 24 h.

4.7. Hoechst 33258 Staining

Cells (2 × 105/well) were seeded in the 6-well plate, grown for 24 h, and co-incubated with different concentrations of the compound for 48 h. Cells were washed three times with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (v/v) for 5 min at room temperature, and then washed with PBS, stained with Hoechst 33258 solution (Solarbio, Beijing, China) at a final concentration of 1 mg/mL for 10 min at room temperature, finally subjected to UV microscopy immediately with filters for blue fluorescence (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).

4.8. Annexin V/PI Flow Cytometry Assay for Apoptosis

Cells (3 × 105 cells per well) were seeded in 6-well plates, grown for 24 h, treated with different concentrations of compound for 48 h, collected by trypsinization, washed twice with cold PBS by centrifugation for 5 min at 1500× g, then, the cells were labeled with Annexin V-FITC and PI (Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA) for 30 min in darkness at room temperature, as described by the instruction of products, and then subjected to FACScan flow cytometer for analysis. Finally, the experimental data were analyzed using the FlowJo VX software.

4.9. Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Cells treated with different concentrations of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 were harvested in ice-cold whole-cell extract buffer RIPA supplemented with PMSF (Beyotime Biotech, Shanghai, China). The collected lysates were centrifuged at 14,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C, and the protein concentration was measured via the BCA Protein Assay Kit (CWBiotech, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Proteins were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (PVDF, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), and then membranes were blocked with 5% fat-free milk in 1× TBS with 0.1% Tween-20 (Bio Froxx, Einhausen, Germany) for 2 h at room temperature. The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, then washed with PBS added with Tween-20 for 30 min and incubated with secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. The ECL Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) visualized protein bands on the membrane, and chemiluminescent images were collected by the Syngene G:BOX Chemi XX9 imager (Syngene, Frederick, MD, USA).

4.10. In Vivo Animal Experiment

BALB/c male nude mice (4–5 weeks old) were purchased from BEIJING HFK Biot SCIENCE CO., Ltd. (Beijing, China) and raised in individually ventilated cages in a specific pathogen-free environment in the Laboratory Animal Center of Central South University. To build the xenografted tumor model, HepG2 cells (8 × 106 cells per mouse) were inoculated subcutaneously into the left armpit of nude mice after being sterilized with 75% alcohol. When the tumor volume reached ~50 mm3, nude mice were randomly divided into three groups (n = 5/group): vehicle control (experimental solvent with compound-free) (group 1); 5-FU, 30.0 mg/kg every 2 days (group 2); compound SIOC-XJC-SF02, 20.0 mg/kg every 2 days (group 3). The compound was dissolved in PEG300 (Selleck, Texas, USA) and Tween-80 (Bio Froxx, Einhausen, Germany). Nude mice in all three groups received intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections. The tumor volume of nude mice was estimated every two days via the eq. V = (L × W2)/2, where L is the length, and W is the width of the tumor, and the length and width were measured with vernier calipers. After treatment for 14 days, nude mice of all three groups were sacrificed, and the tumors were removed, weighed, photographed, and fixed in 10% formaldehyde for immunohistochemistry (IHC) and hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining.

4.11. Immunohistochemical Analysis

The Universal Two-step kit (PV-9000, Beijing Zhongshan Jinqiao Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was used for immunohistochemistry, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Tumor samples from nude mice were embedded in paraffin, then dewaxed, hydrated, repaired by antigen, blocked by endogenous peroxidase, circled around the tumor tissue by immunohistochemistry pen, sealed for 1 h at 37 °C, incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4 °C (The following concentrations of antibodies were used: Ki-67 (Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, USA, 1:800); fumarate hydratase (Proteintech, Wuhan, China, 1:400); and caspase-3 (Proteintech, Wuhan, China, 1:200)), added reaction enhancement solution and enhanced enzyme-labeled goat anti-mouse/rabbit IgG polymer in order, both for 20 min at 37 °C, added freshly prepared DAB, rinsed in tap water and distilled water, incubated with hematoxylin for 2 min, rinsed in tap water for 2 min, returned to blue with lithium carbonate, washed in anhydrous ethanol, dried, sealed, covered. Images were captured using an OLYMPUS BX51 inverted microscope (Tokyo, Japan).

4.12. Mass Spectrometry-Cellular Thermal Shift Assay (MS-CETSA)

Cells were collected to prepare cell lysate, washed twice with cold PBS, scraped with the cell scraper, centrifuged, resuspended in PBS containing protease inhibitor and 1.5 mM MgCl2 (Sigma, Frankfurter Strasse, Germany), and mechanically broken on ice for 2 min. The concentration of protein was measured by the BCA Protein Quantification Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) and adjusted to 2 mg/mL, and the crude lysate was divided into 2 aliquots: experimental groups treated with compound SIOC-XJC-SF02; control groups treated with DMSO. The concentration of DMSO in control groups was consistent with the experimental groups. Crude lysate was then divided into 16 aliquots for MS-CETSA experiments (8 aliquots treated with compound SIOC-XJC-SF02, 8 aliquots treated with DMSO). Each compound and vehicle were heated with different temperatures in parallel (37.0 °C, 44.0 °C, 46.9 °C, 49.8 °C, 52.9 °C, 55.5 °C, 58.6 °C, and 66.3 °C) for 3 min. The following steps were performed according to the related literature [64,65,66].

4.13. Molecular Docking

The name of the protein was queried by the UniProt database (https://www.uniprot.org/). The pdb format file (PDB code: 5UPP, Resolution: 1.80 Å, RCSB PDB—5UPP: Crystal structure of human fumarate hydratase: https://www.rcsb.org/structure/5UPP) for the protein was downloaded by the PDB database (RCSB PDB: Homepage: https://www.rcsb.org/). The protein was removed from the solvent and organic by PyMOL software (https://pymol.org/2/). The compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 was analyzed and combined with the proteins via Autodock Vina software (https://vina.scripps.edu/) [67].

4.14. Enzymatic Activity Assay of Fumarate Hydratase

The measuring of mitochondria fumarate hydratase activity was performed using a Fumarate Hydratase Activity Kit (SuZhou Grace Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The optical density was determined at 340 nm after preheating for 30 min.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrated the inhibitory effect of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 on human HCC cells in vitro and in vivo for the first time and explored the possible mechanisms via MS-CETSA. These results reveal that compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 can exert antitumor effect as a new leading compound. Our findings are also promising for the future design of antitumor activity of a difluorinated alkoxy sulfonyl chloride. The 2-quinolyl-1,3-tropolones were also demonstrated to induce apoptotic cell death of ovarian cancer (OVCAR-3, OVCAR-8) and colon cancer (HCT 116) cell lines and affect ERK signaling [68]. Synthetic compounds could improve the efficiency of antitumor drug research.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ph16121705/s1, Figure S1. 1H NMR spectrum (400 MHz, CDCl3) of SIOC-XJC-SF02. Figure S2.19F NMR spectrum (376 MHz, CDCl3) of SIOC-XJC-SF02. Figure S3. 13C NMR spectrum (100 MHz, CDCl3) of SIOC-XJC-SF02.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.Z.; methodology, P.Z., X.L., W.B. and R.L.; software, S.Z., Y.H., Q.X. and S.L.; validation, P.Z. and W.B.; formal analysis, J.J.; investigation, P.Z., X.L., W.B. and J.J.; resources, P.Z.; data curation, J.J.; writing—original draft preparation, P.Z. and J.J.; writing—review and editing, P.Z.; visualization, J.J.; supervision, P.Z. and J.-C.X.; project administration, P.Z. and J.-C.X.; funding acquisition, P.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82073008), the Primary Research & Developement Plan of Hunan Province (No. 2020SK2071), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (No. 2020JJ4924), and the Support by the Open Sharing Fund for the Large-scale Instruments and Equipments of Central South University (No. CSUZC202247).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of the Department of Laboratory Animals of Central South University (protocol code: 2018-sydw-0111 and date of approval: 2018.04). The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of the Animal Ethics Committee of Central South University (Changsha, Hunan Province, China).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Acknowledgments

We thank all members of the NHC Key Laboratory of Cancer Proteomics (Xiangya Hospital, CSU). The author would like to thank Ji-chang Xiao for providing the compounds and Ji Hongchao for researching ProSAP software (https://hcji.github.io/ProSAP_Pages/).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: Globocan Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Thun, M.; Linet, M.S.; Cerhan, J.R.; Haiman, C.A.; Schottenfeld, D. (Eds.) Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu, Z.; Liu, X.; Liang, J.; Liu, Y.; Hou, X.; Zhang, M.; Li, Y.; Jiang, X. Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Prospects. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 765101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tsuchiya, N.; Sawada, Y.; Endo, I.; Saito, K.; Uemura, Y.; Nakatsura, T. Biomarkers for the Early Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 10573–10583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sugawara, Y.; Hibi, T. Surgical Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Biosci. Trends 2021, 15, 138–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tung-Ping Poon, R.; Fan, S.T.; Wong, J. Risk Factors, Prevention, and Management of Postoperative Recurrence after Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2000, 232, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wilhelm, S.M.; Carter, C.; Tang, L.; Wilkie, D.; McNabola, A.; Rong, H.; Chen, C.; Zhang, X.; Vincent, P.; McHugh, M.; et al. BAY 43-9006 Exhibits Broad Spectrum Oral Antitumor Activity and Targets the RAF/MEK/ERK Pathway and Receptor Tyrosine Kinases Involved in Tumor Progression and Angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 7099–7109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tanaka, S.; Arii, S. Molecular Targeted Therapies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Semin. Oncol. 2012, 39, 486–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abdelgalil, A.A.; Alkahtani, H.M.; Al-Jenoobi, F.I. Sorafenib. Profiles Drug Subst. Excip. Relat. Methodol. 2019, 44, 239–266. [Google Scholar]
  10. Xia, S.; Pan, Y.; Liang, Y.; Xu, J.; Cai, X. The Microenvironmental and Metabolic Aspects of Sorafenib Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. eBioMedicine 2020, 51, 102610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kato, A.; Miyazaki, M.; Ambiru, S.; Yoshitomi, H.; Ito, H.; Nakagawa, K.; Shimizu, H.; Yokosuka, O.; Nakajima, N. Multidrug Resistance Gene (MDR-1) Expression as a Useful Prognostic Factor in Patients with Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Surgical Resection. J. Surg. Oncol. 2001, 78, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiang, W.; Lu, Z.; He, Y.; Diasio, R.B. Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Activity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Implication in 5-Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 1997, 3, 395–399. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Soini, Y.; Virkajärvi, N.; Raunio, H.; Pääkkö, P. Expression of P-Glycoprotein in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Potential Marker of Prognosis. J. Clin. Pathol. 1996, 49, 470–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Giannini, E.G.; Farinati, F.; Ciccarese, F.; Pecorelli, A.; Rapaccini, G.L.; Di Marco, M.; Benvegnù, L.; Caturelli, E.; Zoli, M.; Borzio, F.; et al. Prognosis of Untreated Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Hepatology 2015, 61, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. McKeage, K.; Keating, G.M. Fenofibrate: A Review of Its Use in Dyslipidaemia. Drugs 2011, 71, 1917–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Montagner, A.; Polizzi, A.; Fouché, E.; Ducheix, S.; Lippi, Y.; Lasserre, F.; Barquissau, V.; Régnier, M.; Lukowicz, C.; Benhamed, F.; et al. Liver PPARα Is Crucial for Whole-Body Fatty Acid Homeostasis and Is Protective against Nafld. Gut 2016, 65, 1202–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wilk, A.; Wyczechowska, D.D.; Zapata, A.; Dean, M.J.; Mullinax, J.; Marrero, L.; Parsons, C.H.; Peruzzi, F.; Culicchia, F.; Ochoa, A.C.; et al. Molecular Mechanisms of Fenofibrate-Induced Metabolic Catastrophe and Glioblastoma Cell Death. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2014, 35, 182–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hu, D.; Su, C.; Jiang, M.; Shen, Y.; Shi, A.; Zhao, F.; Chen, R.; Shen, Z.; Bao, J.; Tang, W. Fenofibrate Inhibited Pancreatic Cancer Cells Proliferation via Activation of p53 Mediated by Upregulation of LncRNA MEG3. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 471, 290–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yamasaki, D.; Kawabe, N.; Nakamura, H.; Tachibana, K.; Ishimoto, K.; Tanaka, T.; Aburatani, H.; Sakai, J.; Hamakubo, T.; Kodama, T.; et al. Fenofibrate Suppresses Growth of the Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell via PPARα-Independent Mechanisms. Eur. J. Cell. Biol. 2011, 90, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Piwowarczyk, K.; Wybieralska, E.; Baran, J.; Borowczyk, J.; Rybak, P.; Kosińska, M.; Włodarczyk, A.J.; Michalik, M.; Siedlar, M.; Madeja, Z.; et al. Fenofibrate Enhances Barrier Function of Endothelial Continuum within the Metastatic Niche of Prostate Cancer Cells. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2015, 19, 163–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, X.; Jang, S.S.; An, Z.; Song, H.; Kim, W.D.; Yu, J.R.; Park, W.Y. Fenofibrate Decreases Radiation Sensitivity via Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor A-Mediated Superoxide Dismutase Induction in Hela Cells. Radiat. Oncol. J. 2012, 30, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, T.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Yang, G.; Shao, Z.; Luo, J.; Fan, M.; Ni, C.; Wu, Z.; Hu, X. Fenofibrate Induces Apoptosis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells via Activation of Nf-Κb Pathway. BMC Cancer 2014, 14, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Murad, H.; Collet, P.; Huin-Schohn, C.; Al-Makdissy, N.; Kerjan, G.; Chedotal, A.; Donner, M.; Devignes, M.D.; Becuwe, P.; Schohn, H.; et al. Effects of PPAR and RXR Ligands in Semaphorin 6B Gene Expression of Human MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2006, 28, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jiao, H.L.; Zhao, B.L. Cytotoxic Effect of Peroxisome Proliferator Fenofibrate on Human HepG2 Hepatoma Cell Line and Relevant Mechanisms. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2002, 185, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Binello, E.; Mormone, E.; Emdad, L.; Kothari, H.; Germano, I.M. Characterization of Fenofibrate-Mediated Anti-Proliferative Pro-Apoptotic Effects on High-Grade Gliomas and Anti-Invasive Effects on Glioma Stem Cells. J. Neurooncol. 2014, 117, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Han, D.-f.; Zhang, J.-x.; Wei, W.-j.; Tao, T.; Hu, Q.; Wang, Y.-y.; Wang, X.-f.; Liu, N.; You, Y.-p. Fenofibrate Induces G0/G1 Phase Arrest by Modulating the PPARα/FoxO1/p27kip Pathway in Human Glioblastoma Cells. Tumor Biol. 2015, 36, 3823–3829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Han, D.; Wei, W.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Yu, T.; Hu, Q.; Liu, N.; et al. Nf-Κb/RelA-PKM2 Mediates Inhibition of Glycolysis by Fenofibrate in Glioblastoma Cells. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 26119–26128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, H.; Zhu, C.; Qin, C.; Tao, T.; Li, J.; Cheng, G.; Li, P.; Cao, Q.; Meng, X.; Ju, X.; et al. Fenofibrate Down-Regulates the Expressions of Androgen Receptor (AR) and AR Target Genes and Induces Oxidative Stress in the Prostate Cancer Cell Line LNCaP. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 432, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wybieralska, E.; Szpak, K.; Górecki, A.; Bonarek, P.; Miękus, K.; Drukała, J.; Majka, M.; Reiss, K.; Madeja, Z.; Czyż, J. Fenofibrate Attenuates Contact-Stimulated Cell Motility and Gap Junctional Coupling in Du-145 Human Prostate Cancer Cell Populations. Oncol. Rep. 2011, 26, 447–453. [Google Scholar]
  30. Holland, C.M.; Saidi, S.A.; Evans, A.L.; Sharkey, A.M.; Latimer, J.A.; Crawford, R.A.; Charnock-Jones, D.S.; Print, C.G.; Smith, S.K. Transcriptome Analysis of Endometrial Cancer Identifies Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors as Potential Therapeutic Targets. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2004, 3, 993–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Saidi, S.A.; Holland, C.M.; Charnock-Jones, D.S.; Smith, S.K. In Vitro and in Vivo Effects of the PPAR-Alpha Agonists Fenofibrate and Retinoic Acid in Endometrial Cancer. Mol. Cancer 2006, 5, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tsai, S.C.; Tsai, M.H.; Chiu, C.F.; Lu, C.C.; Kuo, S.C.; Chang, N.W.; Yang, J.S. Ampk-Dependent Signaling Modulates the Suppression of Invasion and Migration by Fenofibrate in Cal 27 Oral Cancer Cells through Nf-Κb Pathway. Environ. Toxicol. 2016, 31, 866–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jan, C.I.; Tsai, M.H.; Chiu, C.F.; Huang, Y.P.; Liu, C.J.; Chang, N.W. Fenofibrate Suppresses Oral Tumorigenesis via Reprogramming Metabolic Processes: Potential Drug Repurposing for Oral Cancer. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 12, 786–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Liang, H.; Kowalczyk, P.; Junco, J.J.; Santiago, H.L.K.-D.; Malik, G.; Wei, S.J.; Slaga, T.J. Differential Effects on Lung Cancer Cell Proliferation by Agonists of Glucocorticoid and PPARα Receptors. Mol. Carcinog. 2014, 53, 753–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Skrypnyk, N.; Chen, X.; Hu, W.; Su, Y.; Mont, S.; Yang, S.; Gangadhariah, M.; Wei, S.; Falck, J.R.; Jat, J.L.; et al. PPARα Activation Can Help Prevent and Treat Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 621–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Schmeel, L.C.; Schmeel, F.C.; Schmidt-Wolf, I.G.H. In Vitro Apoptosis Induction by Fenofibrate in Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma. Anticancer Res. 2017, 37, 3513–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zak, Z.; Gelebart, P.; Lai, R. Fenofibrate Induces Effective Apoptosis in Mantle Cell Lymphoma by Inhibiting the TNFα/NF-κB Signaling Axis. Leukemia 2010, 24, 1476–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Su, C.; Shi, A.; Cao, G.; Tao, T.; Chen, R.; Hu, Z.; Shen, Z.; Tao, H.; Cao, B.; Hu, D.; et al. Fenofibrate Suppressed Proliferation and Migration of Human Neuroblastoma Cells via Oxidative Stress Dependent of Txnip Upregulation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 460, 983–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Huang, Y.C.; Liu, K.C.; Chiou, Y.L.; Yang, C.H.; Chen, T.H.; Li, T.T.; Liu, L.L. Fenofibrate Suppresses Melanogenesis in B16-F10 Melanoma Cells via Activation of the P38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2013, 205, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chekaoui, A.; Ertl, H.C.J. PPARα Agonist Fenofibrate Enhances Cancer Vaccine Efficacy. Cancer Res. 2021, 81, 4431–4440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, P.; Yu, D.; Sheng, W.; Geng, F.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, S. PPARα Activation by Fenofibrate Ameliorates Radiation-Induced Skin Injury. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2022, 36, e207–e210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tao, T.; Zhao, F.; Xuan, Q.; Shen, Z.; Xiao, J.; Shen, Q. Fenofibrate Inhibits the Growth of Prostate Cancer through Regulating Autophagy and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 503, 2685–2689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Martinez Molina, D.; Jafari, R.; Ignatushchenko, M.; Seki, T.; Larsson, E.A.; Dan, C.; Sreekumar, L.; Cao, Y.; Nordlund, P. Monitoring Drug Target Engagement in Cells and Tissues Using the Cellular Thermal Shift Assay. Science 2013, 341, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Evan, G.I.; Vousden, K.H. Proliferation, Cell Cycle and Apoptosis in Cancer. Nature 2001, 411, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Madhukar, N.S.; Khade, P.K.; Huang, L.; Gayvert, K.; Galletti, G.; Stogniew, M.; Allen, J.E.; Giannakakou, P.; Elemento, O. A Bayesian Machine Learning Approach for Drug Target Identification Using Diverse Data Types. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Savitski, M.M.; Reinhard, F.B.; Franken, H.; Werner, T.; Savitski, M.F.; Eberhard, D.; Molina, D.M.; Jafari, R.; Dovega, R.B.; Klaeger, S.; et al. Tracking Cancer Drugs in Living Cells by Thermal Profiling of the Proteome. Science 2014, 346, 1255784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fraser, J.A.; Madhumalar, A.; Blackburn, E.; Bramham, J.; Walkinshaw, M.D.; Verma, C.; Hupp, T.R. A Novel p53 Phosphorylation Site within the MDM2 Ubiquitination Signal: II. A Model in Which Phosphorylation at SER269 Induces a Mutant Conformation to p53. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 37773–37786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Carnero Corrales, M.A.; Zinken, S.; Konstantinidis, G.; Rafehi, M.; Abdelrahman, A.; Wu, Y.W.; Janning, P.; Müller, C.E.; Laraia, L.; Waldmann, H. Thermal Proteome Profiling Identifies the Membrane-Bound Purinergic Receptor P2X4 as a Target of the Autophagy Inhibitor Indophagolin. Cell Chem. Biol. 2021, 28, 1750–1757.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Corpas-Lopez, V.; Moniz, S.; Thomas, M.; Wall, R.J.; Torrie, L.S.; Zander-Dinse, D.; Tinti, M.; Brand, S.; Stojanovski, L.; Manthri, S.; et al. Pharmacological Validation of N-Myristoyltransferase as a Drug Target in Leishmania donovani. ACS Infect. Dis. 2019, 5, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bulku, A.; Weaver, T.M.; Berkmen, M.B. Biochemical Characterization of Two Clinically-Relevant Human Fumarase Variants Defective for Oligomerization. Open Biochem. J. 2018, 12, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Puthan Veetil, V.; Fibriansah, G.; Raj, H.; Thunnissen, A.M.; Poelarends, G.J. Aspartase/Fumarase Superfamily: A Common Catalytic Strategy Involving General Base-Catalyzed Formation of a Highly Stabilized Aci-Carboxylate Intermediate. Biochemistry 2012, 51, 4237–4243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. King, A.; Selak, M.A.; Gottlieb, E. Succinate Dehydrogenase and Fumarate Hydratase: Linking Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Cancer. Oncogene 2006, 25, 4675–4682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sciacovelli, M.; Gonçalves, E.; Johnson, T.I.; Zecchini, V.R.; da Costa, A.S.; Gaude, E.; Drubbel, A.V.; Theobald, S.J.; Abbo, S.R.; Tran, M.G.; et al. Fumarate Is an Epigenetic Modifier that Elicits Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition. Nature 2016, 537, 544–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Laukka, T.; Mariani, C.J.; Ihantola, T.; Cao, J.Z.; Hokkanen, J.; Kaelin, W.G., Jr.; Godley, L.A.; Koivunen, P. Fumarate and Succinate Regulate Expression of Hypoxia-Inducible Genes via Tet Enzymes. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 4256–4265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Delhommeau, F.; Dupont, S.; Della Valle, V.; James, C.; Trannoy, S.; Massé, A.; Kosmider, O.; Le Couedic, J.P.; Robert, F.; Alberdi, A.; et al. Mutation in TET2 in Myeloid Cancers. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 2289–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Green, D.R.; Kroemer, G. Pharmacological Manipulation of Cell Death: Clinical Applications in Sight? J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 2610–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ooi, A. Advances in Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Carcinoma (HLRCC) Research. Semin. Cancer. Biol. 2020, 61, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ge, X.; Li, M.; Yin, J.; Shi, Z.; Fu, Y.; Zhao, N.; Chen, H.; Meng, L.; Li, X.; Hu, Z.; et al. Fumarate Inhibits Pten to Promote Tumorigenesis and Therapeutic Resistance of Type2 Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma. Mol. Cell 2022, 82, 1249–1260.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, T.; Yu, Q.; Li, J.; Hu, B.; Zhao, Q.; Ma, C.; Huang, W.; Zhuo, L.; Fang, H.; Liao, L.; et al. O-Glcnacylation of Fumarase Maintains Tumour Growth under Glucose Deficiency. Nat. Cell Biol. 2017, 19, 833–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yu, H.E.; Wang, F.; Yu, F.; Zeng, Z.L.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Y.X.; Jin, Y.; Wang, D.S.; Qiu, M.Z.; Pu, H.Y.; et al. Suppression of Fumarate Hydratase Activity Increases the Efficacy of Cisplatin-Mediated Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, H.; Ju, Q.; Ji, J.; Zhao, Y. Pan-Cancer Analysis Reveals Fh as a Potential Prognostic and Immunological Biomarker in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Dis. Markers 2021, 2021, 8554844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hooftman, A.; Peace, C.G.; Ryan, D.G.; Day, E.A.; Yang, M.; McGettrick, A.F.; Yin, M.; Montano, E.N.; Huo, L.; Toller-Kawahisa, J.E.; et al. Macrophage Fumarate Hydratase Restrains Mtrna-Mediated Interferon Production. Nature 2023, 615, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, W.; Deng, X.; Zhang, F.X.; Lin, J.H.; Xiao, J.C.; Liang, S.H. Synthesis and 18F Labeling of Alkenyl Sulfonyl Fluorides via an Unconventional Elimination Pathway. Org. Lett. 2022, 24, 4992–4997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dziekan, J.M.; Yu, H.; Chen, D.; Dai, L.; Wirjanata, G.; Larsson, A.; Prabhu, N.; Sobota, R.M.; Bozdech, Z.; Nordlund, P. Identifying Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylase as the Target of Quinine Using Cellular Thermal Shift Assay. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaau3174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Franken, H.; Mathieson, T.; Childs, D.; Sweetman, G.M.; Werner, T.; Tögel, I.; Doce, C.; Gade, S.; Bantscheff, M.; Drewes, G.; et al. Thermal Proteome Profiling for Unbiased Identification of Direct and Indirect Drug Targets Using Multiplexed Quantitative Mass Spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 2015, 10, 1567–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zinn, N.; Werner, T.; Doce, C.; Mathieson, T.; Boecker, C.; Sweetman, G.; Fufezan, C.; Bantscheff, M. Improved Proteomics-Based Drug Mechanism-of-Action Studies Using 16-Plex Isobaric Mass Tags. J. Proteome Res. 2021, 20, 1792–1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Eberhardt, J.; Santos-Martins, D.; Tillack, A.F.; Forli, S. Autodock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python Bindings. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2021, 61, 3891–3898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gusakov, E.A.; Topchu, I.A.; Mazitova, A.M.; Dorogan, I.V.; Bulatov, E.R.; Serebriiskii, I.G.; Abramova, Z.I.; Tupaeva, I.O.; Demidov, O.P.; Toan, D.N.; et al. Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 2-Quinolyl-1,3-Tropolone Derivatives as New Anti-Cancer Agents. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 4555–4571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceuticals 16 01705 g001
Figure 1. Chemical structure of the fenofibrate derivatives.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of the fenofibrate derivatives.
Pharmaceuticals 16 01705 g001
Pharmaceuticals 16 01705 g002
Figure 2. Influence of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells on proliferation induced by compound SIOC-XJC-SF02. (a,b) show the antitumor activity of SIOC-XJC-SF02 on HepG2 cells and HCCLM3 cells, respectively (IC50: 10.908 μM and 4.011 μM, respectively).
Figure 2. Influence of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells on proliferation induced by compound SIOC-XJC-SF02. (a,b) show the antitumor activity of SIOC-XJC-SF02 on HepG2 cells and HCCLM3 cells, respectively (IC50: 10.908 μM and 4.011 μM, respectively).
Pharmaceuticals 16 01705 g002
Pharmaceuticals 16 01705 g003aPharmaceuticals 16 01705 g003b
Figure 3. Changes of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells induced by compound SIOC-XJC-SF02. (a–c) Compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 (0–8 μM) induced morphological changes in HepG2 cells after 24 h (5000×, bar = 5 μm). (d,e) Compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 (0–12 μM) induced morphological changes in HepG2 cells (d) and HCCLM3 cells (e) after 48 h. (f,g) Compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 (0–12 μM) induced morphological changes in HepG2 cells (f) and HCCLM3 cells (g) after 48 h (Four-quadrant diagrams: Abscissa: RedFL1::AnnexinV, Ordinate: BluFL4::7AAD.). All experimental data was analyzed using GraphPad software (https://www.graphpad.com/) and ordinary one-way ANOVA. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001 vs. control.
Figure 3. Changes of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells induced by compound SIOC-XJC-SF02. (a–c) Compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 (0–8 μM) induced morphological changes in HepG2 cells after 24 h (5000×, bar = 5 μm). (d,e) Compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 (0–12 μM) induced morphological changes in HepG2 cells (d) and HCCLM3 cells (e) after 48 h. (f,g) Compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 (0–12 μM) induced morphological changes in HepG2 cells (f) and HCCLM3 cells (g) after 48 h (Four-quadrant diagrams: Abscissa: RedFL1::AnnexinV, Ordinate: BluFL4::7AAD.). All experimental data was analyzed using GraphPad software (https://www.graphpad.com/) and ordinary one-way ANOVA. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001 vs. control.
Pharmaceuticals 16 01705 g003aPharmaceuticals 16 01705 g003b
Pharmaceuticals 16 01705 g004aPharmaceuticals 16 01705 g004b
Figure 4. Influence of SIOC-XJC-SF02 on migration in HepG2 cells and HCCLM3 cells. HepG2 cells (a) and HCCLM3 cells (b) were treated with SIOC-XJC-SF02 (0, 4, 8, and 10 μM) to observe the scratch distance after grown for 24 h. HepG2 cells (c) and HCCLM3 cells (d) were treated with SIOC-XJC-SF02 (0, 4, 8, 10, and 12 μM) for 24 h to observe the number of migratory cells. The data of the scratch experiments were analyzed using GraphPad software and ordinary one-way ANOVA. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001 vs. control.
Figure 4. Influence of SIOC-XJC-SF02 on migration in HepG2 cells and HCCLM3 cells. HepG2 cells (a) and HCCLM3 cells (b) were treated with SIOC-XJC-SF02 (0, 4, 8, and 10 μM) to observe the scratch distance after grown for 24 h. HepG2 cells (c) and HCCLM3 cells (d) were treated with SIOC-XJC-SF02 (0, 4, 8, 10, and 12 μM) for 24 h to observe the number of migratory cells. The data of the scratch experiments were analyzed using GraphPad software and ordinary one-way ANOVA. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.0001 vs. control.
Pharmaceuticals 16 01705 g004aPharmaceuticals 16 01705 g004b
Pharmaceuticals 16 01705 g005aPharmaceuticals 16 01705 g005b
Figure 5. Compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 (0–16 μM) changed the expression level of fumarate hydratase (FH). (a) The melting curve of fumarate hydratase was obtained via MS-CETSA. (b) Results of molecular docking of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 with fumarate hydratase. Red arrows indicate compound SIOC-XJC-SF02. (c) Specific locations of the docking of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 combined with fumarate hydratase. (d) Results of molecular docking of compound fumarate hydratase-IN-1 with fumarate hydratase. Red arrows indicate compound fumarate hydratase-IN-1. (e) The expression level of FH was determined by Western blotting using specific antibodies. GAPDH was used as an internal control. (f) The expression level of mitochondrial fumarate hydratase activity was significantly decreased with the treatment of 12 μM SIOC-XJC-SF02 in HCCLM3 cells. These data were analyzed by GraphPad software and ordinary one-way ANOVA. **** p < 0.0001, compared to the control.
Figure 5. Compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 (0–16 μM) changed the expression level of fumarate hydratase (FH). (a) The melting curve of fumarate hydratase was obtained via MS-CETSA. (b) Results of molecular docking of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 with fumarate hydratase. Red arrows indicate compound SIOC-XJC-SF02. (c) Specific locations of the docking of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 combined with fumarate hydratase. (d) Results of molecular docking of compound fumarate hydratase-IN-1 with fumarate hydratase. Red arrows indicate compound fumarate hydratase-IN-1. (e) The expression level of FH was determined by Western blotting using specific antibodies. GAPDH was used as an internal control. (f) The expression level of mitochondrial fumarate hydratase activity was significantly decreased with the treatment of 12 μM SIOC-XJC-SF02 in HCCLM3 cells. These data were analyzed by GraphPad software and ordinary one-way ANOVA. **** p < 0.0001, compared to the control.
Pharmaceuticals 16 01705 g005aPharmaceuticals 16 01705 g005b
Pharmaceuticals 16 01705 g006
Figure 6. Antitumor effects of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 against xenografted tumors in nude mouse. (a) Tumor volumes of the animals were measured every two days. (b) Photographed tumors from corresponding animals. Experimental data were analyzed by using GraphPad software and ordinary one-way ANOVA. * p < 0.05, compared to the vehicle.
Figure 6. Antitumor effects of compound SIOC-XJC-SF02 against xenografted tumors in nude mouse. (a) Tumor volumes of the animals were measured every two days. (b) Photographed tumors from corresponding animals. Experimental data were analyzed by using GraphPad software and ordinary one-way ANOVA. * p < 0.05, compared to the vehicle.
Pharmaceuticals 16 01705 g006
Pharmaceuticals 16 01705 g007
Figure 7. Representative images of immunohistochemical analysis for Ki-67, caspase-3, and fumarate hydratase in tumor sections (magnification: 400×, Scale bar: 4 μm).
Figure 7. Representative images of immunohistochemical analysis for Ki-67, caspase-3, and fumarate hydratase in tumor sections (magnification: 400×, Scale bar: 4 μm).
Pharmaceuticals 16 01705 g007
Table 1. Cytotoxic activity of fenofibrate derivatives against cancer cell lines.
Table 1. Cytotoxic activity of fenofibrate derivatives against cancer cell lines.
CompoundCellIC50 a
SIOC-XJC-SF01HepG2>50 μM
SIOC-XJC-SF02HepG210.908 μM
SIOC-XJC-SF03HepG2>50 μM
SIOC-XJC-SF04HepG2>50 μM
SIOC-XJC-SF05HepG2>50 μM
SIOC-XJC-SF06HepG24.182 μM
a IC50 values are indicated as the means ± SD (standard error) of at least three independent experiments. The cells were continuously treated with compounds for 48 h.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, J.; Liang, X.; Bi, W.; Liu, R.; Zhang, S.; He, Y.; Xie, Q.; Liu, S.; Xiao, J.-C.; Zhang, P. Identification of a Difluorinated Alkoxy Sulfonyl Chloride as a Novel Antitumor Agent for Hepatocellular Carcinoma through Activating Fumarate Hydratase Activity. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1705. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16121705

AMA Style

Jin J, Liang X, Bi W, Liu R, Zhang S, He Y, Xie Q, Liu S, Xiao J-C, Zhang P. Identification of a Difluorinated Alkoxy Sulfonyl Chloride as a Novel Antitumor Agent for Hepatocellular Carcinoma through Activating Fumarate Hydratase Activity. Pharmaceuticals. 2023; 16(12):1705. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16121705

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Jin, Xujun Liang, Wu Bi, Ruijie Liu, Sai Zhang, Yi He, Qingming Xie, Shilei Liu, Ji-Chang Xiao, and Pengfei Zhang. 2023. "Identification of a Difluorinated Alkoxy Sulfonyl Chloride as a Novel Antitumor Agent for Hepatocellular Carcinoma through Activating Fumarate Hydratase Activity" Pharmaceuticals 16, no. 12: 1705. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16121705

APA Style

Jin, J., Liang, X., Bi, W., Liu, R., Zhang, S., He, Y., Xie, Q., Liu, S., Xiao, J. -C., & Zhang, P. (2023). Identification of a Difluorinated Alkoxy Sulfonyl Chloride as a Novel Antitumor Agent for Hepatocellular Carcinoma through Activating Fumarate Hydratase Activity. Pharmaceuticals, 16(12), 1705. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16121705

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop