Next Article in Journal
Targeted Delivery Strategies for Multiple Myeloma and Their Adverse Drug Reactions
Next Article in Special Issue
R-Baclofen Treatment Corrects Autistic-like Behavioral Deficits in the RjIbm(m):FH Fawn-Hooded Rat Strain
Previous Article in Journal
An In Silico Study Based on QSAR and Molecular Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulation for the Discovery of Novel Potent Inhibitor against AChE
Previous Article in Special Issue
Clinical and Family Implications of Cannabidiol (CBD)-Dominant Full-Spectrum Phytocannabinoid Extract in Children and Adolescents with Moderate to Severe Non-Syndromic Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): An Observational Study on Neurobehavioral Management
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Targeting Microglia in Neuroinflammation: H3 Receptor Antagonists as a Novel Therapeutic Approach for Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease, and Autism Spectrum Disorder

1
Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates
2
Zayed Center for Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain P.O. Box 1551, United Arab Emirates
3
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 59911, United Arab Emirates
4
Department of Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan
5
Centre for Global Health Research, Saveetha Medical College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 602105, India
6
Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140401, India
7
School of Bioengineering & Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, India
8
Department of Biotechnology, School of Applied & Life Sciences (SALS), Uttaranchal University, Dehradun 248007, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(7), 831; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070831
Submission received: 15 May 2024 / Revised: 20 June 2024 / Accepted: 21 June 2024 / Published: 25 June 2024

Abstract

:
Histamine performs dual roles as an immune regulator and a neurotransmitter in the mammalian brain. The histaminergic system plays a vital role in the regulation of wakefulness, cognition, neuroinflammation, and neurogenesis that are substantially disrupted in various neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disorders. Histamine H3 receptor (H3R) antagonists and inverse agonists potentiate the endogenous release of brain histamine and have been shown to enhance cognitive abilities in animal models of several brain disorders. Microglial activation and subsequent neuroinflammation are implicated in impacting embryonic and adult neurogenesis, contributing to the development of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Acknowledging the importance of microglia in both neuroinflammation and neurodevelopment, as well as their regulation by histamine, offers an intriguing therapeutic target for these disorders. The inhibition of brain H3Rs has been found to facilitate a shift from a proinflammatory M1 state to an anti-inflammatory M2 state, leading to a reduction in the activity of microglial cells. Also, pharmacological studies have demonstrated that H3R antagonists showed positive effects by reducing the proinflammatory biomarkers, suggesting their potential role in simultaneously modulating crucial brain neurotransmissions and signaling cascades such as the PI3K/AKT/GSK-3β pathway. In this review, we highlight the potential therapeutic role of the H3R antagonists in addressing the pathology and cognitive decline in brain disorders, e.g., AD, PD, and ASD, with an inflammatory component.

1. Introduction

Histamine achieves its physiological impact through interactions with four subtypes of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), namely H1, H2, H3, and H4 receptors (H1–4R). Notably, these have served as valuable focal points for drug development. For instance, the H1R, which is primarily targeted by antihistamines such as diphenhydramine and desloratadine, is commonly prescribed to alleviate allergy symptoms. Meanwhile, histamine H2R antagonists like ranitidine are utilized to treat gastric ulcers by mitigating the secretion of gastric acid [1,2]. These classes of drugs have achieved significant global success and widespread utilization. Additionally, the H3R contribute to neurotransmission within the central nervous system, thereby influencing cognitive modulation [3]. The H3R are primarily found in the presynaptic neurons, where they act as auto-receptors modulating the synthesis and release of histamine. Additionally, H3R also act as hetero-receptors, influencing additional neurotransmitters such as GABA, dopamine, glutamate, serotonin, norepinephrine, and acetylcholine [4]. The histamine H4R is expressed in various cell types, including dendritic cells, T cells, basophils, eosinophils, and mast cells. Antagonists targeting the H4R exhibit anti-inflammatory properties and hold promise for treating both inflammation and pruritus [5]. The histaminergic system is pivotal in regulating alertness, cognitive function, inflammatory response in the brain, and neurogenesis [6,7,8].
It is now recognized that both neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders involve overlapping cellular and molecular mechanisms [9]. Neuroinflammation, synaptic dysfunction, and stem cell depletion are observed in both neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders [10]. Abnormalities in the histaminergic system are believed to potentially contribute to neurodegenerative disorders, like Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD) [11,12]. AD is an age-related degenerative neurological condition that leads to a gradual and irreversible decline in cognitive function. It leads to cognitive impairment and dementia among the elderly population. AD is classified as a mixed proteinopathy marked by the existence of two primary pathological features: extracellular amyloid beta (Aβ) plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tau tangles (NFTs) [13]. In specific brain regions, AD also involves glial activation, neuronal loss, synaptic remodeling, and impaired synaptic function [14]. PD results from the gradual and continuous degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta [15]. The symptoms include bradykinesia, rigidity, rest tremor, and impaired gait [16]. Microglia, the primary immune cells residing in the central nervous system (CNS), are thought to be essential contributors in the development of disorders associated with the CNS. Various stimuli can activate microglia, leading to increased neuroinflammation and the progression of brain disorders [17]. Microglia can exhibit different M1/M2 phenotypes depending on the specific microenvironment, and maintaining a balanced ratio between these phenotypes is essential for restoring CNS homeostasis [18]. Microglial activation and proliferation in the brain is a prominent feature of AD and PD [19,20,21].
A recent review delved into the correlation between brain development and altered neuroinflammation, highlighting its impact on synaptogenesis and synaptic plasticity. The review put forward the idea that a deficiency in brain histamine might render the developing brain susceptible to inflammatory challenges and neurodevelopmental disorders encompassing Tourette’s syndrome (TS), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), as indicated by outcomes from both preclinical and clinical studies [22]. ASD is a diverse group of pervasive developmental disorders characterized by deficiencies in social interaction skills, difficulties in communication, and the presence of repetitive behaviors. These traits manifest early in childhood, beginning at birth, and persist throughout adulthood, leading to lifelong disabilities [23]. Increasing evidence suggests a link between alterations in neuroimmunity and the development of ASD and AD. Patients with ASD and AD exhibit similar patterns of cognitive deficits, impaired sociability, and abnormal behavior [24]. The literature increasingly emphasizes important shared features and potential common pathomechanisms in AD, PD, and ASD. Alterations in the key proteins associated with neurodegeneration, such as Aβ, tau, and α-synuclein, are increasingly implicated in the etiopathology of ASD [25].
Exploring antagonists of H3R has been under scrutiny as a therapeutic for various CNS disorders, encompassing AD, epilepsy, narcolepsy, ADHD, and learning deficits induced by fetal alcohol exposure [26,27]. Pitolisant, a H3R antagonist and inverse agonist, has obtained approval for the treatment of narcolepsy in the EU. Preclinical studies suggested the favorable impact of H3R antagonists, such as pitolisant, as they exhibit a positive effect in improving memory impairments, particularly in AD models. Currently, pitolisant is undergoing trials for the treatment of photosensitive epilepsy, as well as in children with ASD, showcasing its progress as a H3R antagonist with promising therapeutic potential [28]. In recent times, considerable research has been conducted on the role of histamine in microglia-mediated inflammation. An emerging therapeutic approach to enhance the treatment of neurocognitive disorders involves the inhibition of excessive microglial activation and the preservation of a balanced microglial phenotypic profile. Studies have reported that H3R antagonists exhibit cognition-enhancing effects, in addition to the suppression of inflammatory responses through inhibiting the activation of glial cells [8,29]. This review offers a comprehensive summary and consolidates the current understanding of experimental and clinical discoveries on the involvement of H3R antagonists in the modulation of microglial functions. Additionally, it explores their potential application in the treatment of neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disorders like AD, PD, and ASD.

2. Microglia-Mediated Neuroinflammation

The primary and principal form of active innate immune defense in the CNS is represented by a distinct population of macrophage-like cells known as microglia [30]. These cells are critical for the balance and stability of the brain’s microenvironment, and their actions are determined by the external signals they receive [31]. Neuroinflammation constitutes an immune response triggered by infections, oxidative stress, irritants, or damage within neuronal tissues. It has been linked to a decline in cognitive function and an elevated risk of dementia [32]. Microglia play a crucial role in detecting and eliminating undesired neuronal connections [33]. This process, known as synaptic pruning, strengthens neural circuits and enhances neuronal network efficiency. The dynamic interaction between neurons and microglia is not only essential for the growth and maturation of the brain but also plays a pivotal role in processes such as synaptic plasticity, contributing significantly to memory and learning [34]. In the resting state, factors such as BDNF released by microglia are essential for maintaining homeostatic synaptic plasticity. These factors are involved in regulating processes like long-term potentiation (LTP) and the excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission at the synapses [19,35]. Additionally, microglia contribute to critical facets of brain function, such as supporting neuronal survival, promoting neurogenesis, and facilitating oligodendrogenesis [17].
Microglia, when exposed to different stimuli such as debris, protein aggregates, and pathogens, undergo phagocytic activation. Termed microglial activation, the process implies a balance between the production of proinflammatory cytokines and the synthesis and release of anti-inflammatory molecules. This equilibrium prevents an exaggerated inflammatory response and microglial activation, safeguarding against potential tissue damage and the interruption of brain homeostasis [36,37]. Microglia undergo divergent differentiation in response to cytokines or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. This differentiation leads to the polarization of microglia in two distinct states: classically activated microglia (M1) and alternatively activated microglia (M2). M2 microglia further demonstrate refined phenotypes, such as adopting the type 2 alternative activation (M2b) and acquired deactivated states (M2c) [38]. M1 microglia are distinguished by the release of proinflammatory mediators, contributing to oxidative and nitrosative stress, ultimately leading to tissue damage caused by inflammation. On the other hand, M2 microglia elicit beneficial outcomes through the release of neurotrophic factors and anti-inflammatory cytokines. These factors aid in resolving inflammation and orchestrating neural repair and restoration [17,39].
Under normal conditions, microglia keep a dormant neuron-specific monitoring state (M0 phenotype). However, they actively extend processes from their cell bodies, consistently monitoring the brain for potential damage. This ongoing surveillance involves a comprehensive assessment of the brain for any signs of harm at regular intervals. M1 microglia, recognized as proinflammatory cells, swiftly respond to appropriate stimuli and act as the initial line of defense for the neuroimmune system, typically appearing within hours of stimulation. Using immune receptors like Toll-like receptors, microglia recognize harmful stimuli. Upon activation, M1 microglia release high levels of proinflammatory cytokines [40]. M1 microglia, expressing NADPH oxidase and iNOS, produce ROS and nitric oxide, contributing to neurological damage. M1 microglia express various molecules like MHC-II; integrins (CD11b and CD11c); and various costimulatory molecules (CD36, CD45, and CD47) and Fc receptors. In contrast, M2 microglia with anti-inflammatory functions release neuroprotective factors. They release growth factors (FGF, CSF-1, NGF, BDNF, neurotrophins, and GDNF), promoting inflammation resolution, tissue repair, and neuron survival [41]. In response to pathological injury, microglial cells swiftly undergo activation and polarization, exhibiting various behaviors such as phagocytosis, chemotaxis, and cytokine secretion. The nature of their response depends on the severity of the injury. Mild injuries lead to the activation of microglial cells into the M2 state, marked by distal branches, small cell body-like changes, and the secretion of anti-inflammatory factors contributing to tissue repair and neuroprotection [42]. However, severe or prolonged tissue damage triggers the complete activation of microglial cells into the M1 state characterized by amoeboid changes and thick protrusions [43].
Upon recurrent stimuli, such as the accumulation of Aβ in the initial phases of AD, activated microglia undergo a shift towards a less defensive and more neurotoxic state known as “primed” microglia [44]. This shift is characterized by an increased sensitivity to proinflammatory stimuli, a phenomenon known as microglia priming. Aging microglia also exhibit increased sensitivity to proinflammatory stimuli [36]. The heightened response of primed microglia involves the release of proinflammatory cytokines. In the natural aging process, microglia show a tendency towards adopting the conventional M1 phenotype, resulting in an increased baseline release of proinflammatory cytokines. These cytokines have a negative impact on neurogenesis in the hippocampus. This persistent activation, release of proinflammatory cytokines, and a reduction in phagocytic activity ultimately result in reduced synaptic plasticity and the impairment of learning and memory [45]. Hence, in pathological circumstances, microglia undergo a shift from their typical “homeostatic state” to an activated “disease-associated state”. With the progression of the disease, microglia may gradually lose their ability to regulate effectively and transition into a “neurodegenerative disease state”. This transition renders them dysfunctional and potentially harmful to the CNS [46].
Astrocytes are another group of specialized glial cells with diverse functions, essential for brain homeostasis, neuronal development, synaptic connectivity, and the support and protection of neurons in the CNS [47]. Astrocytes form intricate networks with neurons and other cells. During early neurodevelopment, astrocytes promote the formation, migration, and neuronal cells connectivity, promoting the formation of synapses and establishment of neuronal circuits [48]. They establish tripartite structures with neurons, contributing to synaptic communication. Astrocytes have the ability to detect and react to alterations in their nearby environment, including neurotransmitters, to modulate neuronal signaling and provide protection to neurons against oxidative damage and injuries [22,49,50]. The activation of astrocytes induces the generation of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and ROS. This activation can also stimulate microglial activity. Consequently, these processes contribute to heightened excitotoxicity, apoptosis, and neurodegeneration [22].
Microglia and astrocytes can polarize into two states: proinflammatory (M1 and A1) and anti-inflammatory (M2 and A2). Microglia are a more attractive therapeutic target than astrocytes in inflammatory neurological diseases, as they are the primary responders to damage, thereby initiating and sustaining the immune response [51]. The activation of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) by pathogen- or damage-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs/DAMPs) triggers the M1 phenotype in microglia. By targeting microglia, it may be possible to reduce the harmful inflammatory response and protect neurons from secondary damage. Microglia express a variety of receptors, such as TLRs, whereas astrocytes primarily express TLR3, with a limited expression of TLR1, TLR4, TLR5, and TLR9 and no expression of TLR2, TLR6, TLR7, TLR8, and TLR10. The limited expression of TLRs in astrocytes also suggests their reduced capacity to respond directly to various pathogens and instead depend on microglia to detect pathogens and communicate with astrocytes to activate them [52]. In the CNS, TLRs primarily recognize infectious pathogens or endogenous ligands released during injury and stress. The degree of astrocytic responses to TLR ligands, compared to microglia, remains debatable. Astrocytic responses to TLR3 and TLR4 activation are thought to be entirely dependent on microglia. Specifically, TLR4 activation by LPS shows that microglia directly initiate or facilitate astrocytic responses through soluble mediators, highlighting the critical role of microglia–astrocyte communication in CNS injury or inflammation [53]. TNF-α is the most abundant proinflammatory factor released by microglia when activated by TLR4 agonists. Studies show that astrocyte cultures alone release very low levels of inflammatory cytokines, nitric oxide (NO), and ROS in response to LPS stimulation. These findings suggest that astrocytic immune responses under inflammatory conditions rely on microglia, as astrocytes alone do not produce sufficient levels of proinflammatory factors like TNF-α and NO after LPS stimulation [53].
Emerging evidence indicates that activated microglial cells play a crucial role in modulating astrocytosis and determining astrocyte’s fate under various pathological conditions [54]. Astrocyte activation is often secondary to microglial activation, making microglia a more direct target for modulating the primary immune response in the CNS. Microglia can enhance the inflammatory activation of astrocytes by increasing the expression of cytokines and chemokines, particularly through the activation of NF-κB signaling. Reactive microglia produce cytokines that induce the conversion of astrocytes to the neurotoxic A1 phenotype. Once A1 astrocytes are induced, they lose their crucial functions, such as supporting synaptic pruning and neuronal survival, instead promoting neuroinflammation, contributing to the progression of neurodegenerative diseases [50,55]. The release of proinflammatory cytokines also inhibits the expression of Cx-43, a key protein in astrocyte gap junctions. This inhibition hampers astrocytic communication, which may further prevent their neuroprotective functions [56]. AHR signaling in microglia controls the expression of proinflammatory genes (Ccl2, IL-1b, and Nos2) in astrocytes by modulating the microglial production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-B and transforming growth factor (TGF)-α. Microglial VEGF-B enhances NF-κB translocation in astrocytes through FLT-1 signaling, promoting their pathogenic activity during EAE, while TGF-α interacts with the ErbB1 receptor in astrocytes to mitigate EAE progression and encourage the production of neuroprotective factors [57]. Microglia also regulate astrocyte functions in neuroinflammation through mechanisms such as stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)1α signaling via C-X-C chemokine receptor (CXCR)4, which drives astrocyte glutamate release. Microglial TNF-α enhances this glutamate release, contributing to neuron excitotoxicity. By modulating microglial activity, it is possible to indirectly regulate astrocytic responses and CNS inflammation.
Traditionally, researchers have assessed microglial function using morphology and immunochemical markers. The M1–M2 paradigm simplifies microglial activation investigation. However, accumulating evidence challenges this model, suggesting microglia do not strictly adhere to the M1–M2 dichotomy. Transcriptome studies reveal diverse activation patterns in microglia, challenging the notion that M1 and M2 represent distinct cell subtypes. Instead, a spectrum of intermediate phenotypes exists, rendering the current paradigm inadequate for describing in vivo microglial activation. Microglia can transition between phenotypes in different CNS environments, ensuring their protective role by adapting their phenotype as needed. Numerous microglia phenotypes are currently recognized, each characterized by a variety of morphological, molecular, metabolic, and functional traits [37]. The prevailing consensus is that these distinct phenotypes correspond to a range of functions performed by microglia [43]. Despite limitations, the classification is extensively used to illustrate that microglia may exhibit either protective (M2) or detrimental (M1) characteristics dependent on the circumstances [58,59]. This review primarily focusses on the binary categorization of microglia to examine the microglial transition from the M1 to M2 phenotype in AD, PD, and ASD and the role of H3R antagonists as a therapeutic strategy.

2.1. Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

2.1.1. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s Disease

Neuroinflammation is frequently observed in AD. Microglia are recognized to have significant involvement in regulating this inflammation within the brain [60]. Pascoal et al. (2021) led positron emission tomography imaging studies on individuals with AD, offering evidence that microglial activation in the brain is not solely a consequence of the progression of the disease. Instead, their findings suggest that microglial activation is a crucial upstream mechanism required for the development of the disease [61]. By detecting Aβ aggregates or damage- or pathogen-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs or PAMPs), cells can potentially cause inflammation in the CNS. Numerous pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) are found in cells’ cytoplasm or on their surface, which are accountable for identifying PAMPs and DAMPs [21]. This interaction initiates inflammatory signaling cascades and a range of immune reactions. There are five major PRR families, including the TLR, RLR, NLR, CLR, and ALR. Through this PAMP/DAMP-mediated signaling response, a cascade is initiated that leads to the release of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, prompting cell death, as well as the elimination of infected cells [62].
In AD, neuroinflammation in the brain manifests through the activation of microglia and astrocytes and increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. These changes serve as distinct markers of neuroinflammation in AD patients [59,63]. Impairment in the effective clearance of Aβ proteins, either due to neuronal damage or excessive production, disrupts microglial activity. This disruption results in the buildup of Aβ proteins, resulting in plaque formation in the brain. Microglia possess various receptors, such as TLR4 and TLR6, CD36, and NLRP3 domains, that bind to Aβ. These receptors are triggered by DAMPs, including adenosine triphosphate. The binding of Aβ to CD36, TLR4, or TLR6 receptors results in the activation of microglia and subsequent secretion of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. During microglia activation, key cytokines released include TNF-α and IL-1β. TNF-α binds to its receptor on the cell membrane, initiating apoptosis by means of the extrinsic pathway [64]. Reactive astrocytes significantly contribute to the neuroinflammatory processes linked to AD. Reactive astrocytes that are recruited to Aβ plaques secrete cytokines such as IL-1β and TNF-α. These are potent mediators of inflammation. IL-1β and TNF-α can promote the activation of microglia and stimulate the release of additional proinflammatory molecules, creating a cycle of neuroinflammation [65,66] (Figure 1). In addition to eliminating amyloid oligomers and fibrils, microglia may establish a physical barrier surrounding plaques and fibrils, thus impeding their dissemination and mitigating their toxic effects [67]. The release of certain proteases, that cause the breakdown of amyloid also influence the elimination of amyloid plaques [34,68].
However, the persistent activation of microglia by amyloid plaques can be detrimental, leading to chronic inflammation and excessive accumulation of amyloid plaques, thereby accelerating neurodegeneration [68]. During the pathogenesis of AD, there is a heightened production of proinflammatory cytokines and other damaging components [69]. Microglial activation is seen at the pre-plaque stage in preclinical models of AD, suggesting that neuroinflammation occurs early in AD progression [59]. This activation triggers the production of proinflammatory mediators, leading to the overexpression of apoptotic proteins by disrupting the PI3K-AKT-GSK-3β pathway [70]. This signaling pathway governs diverse activities, encompassing cell division, differentiation, cell survival, motility, synaptic plasticity, and memory. GSK-3β (pGSK-3β) activation also promotes apoptosis in various conditions, whereas its inhibition supports cell survival [71]. GSK3β participates in a series of events that include the hyperphosphorylation of tau protein, Aβ production, and local inflammatory responses, all contributing to the initiation and advancement of AD [72]. Throughout adulthood and the aging process, there is the persistent activation of microglia, which contributes to a substantial decrease in neurogenesis. In animal models, this is evidenced by a diminished rate of cell proliferation. This diminished neurogenesis has implications for hippocampal function, resulting in reduced learning and memory capabilities and contributing to cognitive degeneration in aging individuals [73]. Table 1 lists the drugs under investigation in clinical trials targeting neuroinflammation for beneficial effects in AD.

2.1.2. Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s Disease

PD involves the gradual degeneration of dopaminergic neurons within the substantia nigra, leading to reduced dopamine release into the striatum. This neurodegenerative process gives rise to movement disorders such as tremors, stiffness, and bradykinesia, as well as cognitive impairments like dementia. Additionally, PD manifests with mental symptoms such as depression and anxiety, along with disruptions in sleep patterns and bowel functions [74,75]. Elevated levels of innate immune system mediators, including chemokines and cytokines released by microglia, are present in the brains of individuals diagnosed with PD. TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6 have specifically been proposed as potential biomarkers for PD [76]. Elevated levels of TNF-α in the bloodstream were demonstrated in patients with PD experiencing more pronounced cognitive impairment, depression, sleep disturbances, and fatigue [76,77,78]. Several research investigations have shown that aggregated α-synuclein released into the extracellular space from degenerating or deceased dopaminergic neurons can directly stimulate microglial activation toward the M1 phenotype. This activation involves the activation of NADPH oxidase, leading to increased release of ROS and proinflammatory mediators [15,18].
Based on the findings from both preclinical and clinical research, the initial microglial response contributes to the improved survival of neurons in addition to the preservation of injured dopaminergic neurons in context of PD [79]. The deregulated release of proinflammatory cytokines, however, has been related to a prolonged hyperactivation of microglia, making them contributors to toxic and neurodegenerative processes in PD [80]. In fact, the postmortem analysis revealed higher amounts of the TNF-α, interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-2, IL-4, and IL-6, as well as TGF-β1 and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), in PD patients [81]. Similar results, including the detection of IL-1, IL-2, IL-4, TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3, have been observed in the cerebrospinal fluid of subjects. Such cytokine production creates a distinctive network in the brain that affects typical glial and neural function [82]. PD’s ongoing neurodegeneration has been linked to the prolonged microglial neuroinflammatory response, their pathological interactions with neighboring resident glial cells like astrocytes, and the infiltration of immune cells from the periphery, such as lymphocytes and macrophages [83]. Reactive astrocytes were also identified in the substantia nigra pars compacta of individuals with PD. The malfunction of astrocytes plays a role in the neurodegeneration of dopaminergic neurons in PD [84]. The early recognition of neuroinflammation in PD is of paramount importance so as to understand the pathways of disease progression but also for discovering novel targeted opportunities to modulate or obstruct the neuroinflammatory process. Table 2 enlists the drugs under investigation in clinical trials targeting neuroinflammation for the treatment of PD.

2.1.3. Neuroinflammation in ASD

Many reviews have focused on the role of microglia and neuroinflammation in ASD [85,86,87]. The etiology of ASD involves the downregulation of genes associated with synaptic function and upregulation of immune-related genes. Postmortem studies in brains of ASD patients show changes in microglia density. Individuals with ASD exhibit microglial activation and neuroinflammation [36]. Various environmental factors play a role in the development of ASD, many of which impact the immune response during prenatal or early postnatal development [88]. The brain regions implicated in autism-related behaviors, particularly limited social interaction and repetitive behaviors, include the hippocampus and cerebellum. Studies suggest that changes in social behavior in adult mice may be attributed to cerebellar inflammation, given its role in cognitive functions [89,90,91]. The activation of astrocytes and microglia in the cortex and cerebellum leads to the increased expression of IL-6, TNF-α, and MCP-1 in different brain regions of individuals with autism [92,93,94]. Hence, the regulation of microglial activation and the suppression of cytokine and free radical production might be a therapeutic approach for treating ASD. Table 3 enlists drugs currently undergoing clinical trials targeting neuroinflammation for the treatment of ASD.

3. The Role of H3R Modulators in Neurodegenerative and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

3.1. Pharmacology and Signaling of Histamine H3Rs

Located within the hypothalamus in the tuberomammillary nucleus (TMN), histaminergic neurons serve as the principal source of histamine synthesis in the brain [96]. The intricate mechanisms underlying the synthesis and multifaceted roles of histamine have been comprehensively explored in several notable reviews [97,98,99]. H3R are a type of GPCR that were initially discovered on presynaptic histaminergic neurons, where they function as auto-receptors and limit histamine release in the brain [100]. In addition to their role as auto-receptors, H3R have been observed to regulate the release of various neurotransmitters crucial for cognition, including dopamine, serotonin, and acetylcholine, on non-histaminergic neurons, functioning as heteroreceptors [101,102,103,104,105]. Figure 2 depicts a schematic representation of H3R functioning as auto- and heteroreceptors to modulate histamine and diverse neurotransmitters in the brain.
H3R activation, leads to inhibition of adenylate cyclase, resulting in a decline in the cyclic AMP (cAMP) levels and suppression of the downstream signaling pathways, like the activation of protein kinase A (PKA) and transcription of genes induced by cAMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB). The Gαi/o proteins, which, coupled with H3R, play a role in this inhibition. Additionally, the Gβγ complexes of Gαi/o proteins hinder the opening of voltage-activated calcium channels, leading to a decrease in neurotransmitter release. H3R is also known to form receptor heterodimers with other receptors, such as dopamine D1 and D2 receptors. The activation of H3 receptors triggers various effector proteins such as PI3K, MAPKs, and PLA2. These pathways lead to the phosphorylation of protein kinase B (PKB) by PI3K and activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) by MAPK. The activation of H3R also inhibits glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) through PKB. Additionally, H3R activation results in the inhibition of the Na+/H+ exchanger’s activity [4,106]. Figure 3 depicts the diverse signaling pathways mediated by H3R in the CNS.

3.2. Role of Histamine in Microglial Activation

Histamine plays a dual function within the brain, serving as both a neurotransmitter and a modulator of the innate immune system. This dual functionality contributes to its influence on inflammatory reactions in the brain [6,107]. All four subsets of histamine receptors are expressed by microglia, impacting their behavior differently and play a regulatory role in various microglial functions, such as chemotaxis, migration, cytokine secretion, and autophagy [108]. Astrocytes also modulate neuroprotective responses through the expression of H1R, H2R, and H3R. In addition, histamine inhibits the generation of IL-1β and TNF-α while promoting the production of GDNF by astrocytes, thereby exerting neuroprotective effects [109]. Frick et al. (2016) conducted in vivo investigations to examine the impact of histamine on microglial activation. Using immunohistochemistry, the researchers examined the impact of the deficiency of histamine in histidine decarboxylase (Hdc) KO mouse, as well as histamine receptor stimulation in wild-type mice. The study revealed that histamine regulates microglia through H4R [11]. In Hdc KO mice with chronic histamine deficiency, microglia exhibited decreased ramifications and reduced expression of insulin-like growth factor-1, indicating a possible disruption in the histaminergic regulation of microglia. Interestingly, histamine has been described to exhibit both positive and detrimental effects on microglial activity [110]. Ferreira et al. (2012) showed that histamine triggers primary microglial cell motility by activating H4R, dependent upon the presence of α5β1 integrin expression. This process involves the p38 MAPK and AKT signaling pathways. These findings suggest that histamine functions as an inflammatory mediator with harmful effects on the brain. However, histamine reduced the production of IL-1β in response to LPS and diminished the microglial motility, as well as their phagocytic and ROS production capabilities, demonstrating the anti-inflammatory action of histamine as a positive effect on microglial function [111]. Several other studies have confirmed that histamine activates H1- and H4Rs to cause microglia cells to produce proinflammatory cytokines, indicating the adverse impact of histamine on microglial functions [110,112,113]. The subsequent activation through H1- and H4Rs could also be partially hindered by antagonizing both receptor subtypes.
Recent research has provided additional evidence in support that histamine can reduce the proinflammatory phenotype of microglia, known as SOD1-G93A. This study indicated that histamine’s beneficial effects were specifically observed in the presence of inflammatory SOD1-G93A microglia, while it had a proinflammatory effect on non-transgenic cells [114]. Histamine triggered a decrease in NF-κB and NADPH oxidase 2 (NOX2). The outcomes of the study highlight a distinct function of histamine under normal physiological conditions compared to its role during an inflammatory response. Another study additionally showcased the dual nature of histamine in regulating microglial responses. In vitro experiments were conducted to assess the impact of histamine on microglial phagocytosis and ROS production in the presence of an LPS-induced inflammatory stimulus. Interestingly, both histamine and LPS independently increased FcγR-microglial phagocytosis. However, when exposed simultaneously to histamine and LPS, the increase in microglial phagocytosis induced by each compound individually was inhibited. Moreover, while histamine and LPS separately elevated the microglial ROS levels compared to the control, their combined exposure significantly attenuated these individual effects. It implies that, while histamine can induce a detrimental, proinflammatory phenotype in microglia on its own, it can have the opposite effect when faced with an inflammatory challenge [2]. This discovery opens new possibilities for utilizing histamine therapeutically to specifically improve the processes associated with inflammation in disorders characterized by microglia-induced inflammation. Another study demonstrated that inflammatory stimuli in the periphery, like LPS, can instigate immune memory within the brain. This phenomenon is predominantly facilitated by microglia and can result in either heightened immune response (training) or suppressed immune response (tolerance). This immune memory may play a role in modulating various neurological pathologies and shed light on the dual role of histamine [115].
Saika et al. (2020) investigated the intriguing possibility of using chemo-genetic techniques to modulate microglial function [116]. Astrocytic and microglial GPCRs play a crucial role in integrating extracellular signals by regulating intracellular Ca2+ signaling and modulating the cAMP levels, as well as the release of various chemo-active substances. Aberrant glial Ca2+ signaling and the altered release of chemo-active substances are common in CNS disorders. Targeting microglial and astrocytic GPCRs may offer insights into various pathophysiological conditions and potential therapeutic approaches. Designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs (DREADDs) serve as valuable tools for studying GPCR-mediated signaling in astrocytes and microglia. A review by Bossuyt et al. (2023) highlighted the recent findings on the DREADD-induced modulation of astrocytes and microglia [117]. Gi-DREADD activation in microglia has been found to attenuate proinflammatory signaling mediators by inhibiting Ca2+ levels and downregulating the transcription factor IRF8 and reducing IL-1β. Gs-coupled signaling, specially β2-AR receptor activation, has been found to reduce microglial activation and promote the anti-inflammatory phenotype through the cAMP/PKA/CREB, p38 MAPK and PI3K pathways [118,119,120,121]. Gi-DREADD activation in hippocampal astrocytes further reduced the LPS-induced upregulation of inflammatory markers and alleviated cognitive impairment. In medial basal hypothalamus astrocytes, Gi-DREADD activation decreased IL-1β, TNF-α, CCL2, and CCL5. This modulation of proinflammatory cytokines by DREADDs holds considerable promise for intervening in the neuroinflammation component of AD, PD, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [117].

3.3. Role of H3R in Microglia Activation and Neuroinflammation

Microglia expresses H3R, and activation of this receptor decreased both forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation and ATP-induced Ca2+ transients. Iida and colleagues found that, in mouse primary microglia cultures, H3R activation suppressed essential microglial functions such as chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and the production of proinflammatory mediators [122]. However, in subsequent investigations utilizing ex vivo mouse hippocampal organotypic slices and in vivo models, the authors demonstrated the inhibitory effect of the H3R inverse agonist JNJ10181457 on microglial phagocytosis and cytokine expression. JNJ10181457 inhibited microglial chemotaxis in hippocampal slices and reduced the phagocytosis of dead cells. In vivo phagocytosis was also inhibited by JNJ10181457. It also suppressed LPS-induced expression of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα in microglia, further indicating the inhibition of microglial activation. Additionally, it showed efficacy in ameliorating depression-like behaviors induced by LPS [123]. Furthermore, similar effects were also observed with thioperamide, a H3R antagonist, as it alleviated neuroinflammation in LPS-treated BV2 microglial cells. Under LPS-induced neuroinflammatory conditions, inhibiting H3R with thioperamide significantly reduced microglial activation. Additionally, thioperamide decreased the transcription and expression of proinflammatory cytokines [124]. These findings highlight the significant influence of the local environment on microglial activity, suggesting that varying extracellular microenvironments could lead to different roles for H3R in microglial functions both in vitro and in vivo.

3.4. Involvement of Brain H3R in Neurodegenerative and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

3.4.1. Alzheimer’s Disease

In the development of AD, neuroinflammation has been identified as a pivotal factor. Among the innate immune cells, microglia emerge as central participants in this inflammatory process. Activated microglia exhibit a range of phenotypes and engage in intricate interactions with Aβ and tau species, as well as neuronal circuits [59]. In AD, microglia respond to Aβ by producing various proinflammatory mediators. This activation of microglia subsequently triggers the activation of astrocytes. The activated astrocytes become involved in the inflammatory process alongside microglia, as described by Osborn et al. in 2016 [125]. Activation of both microglia and astrocytes, particularly the A1-type astrocytes, can contribute to progression of the disease by releasing proinflammatory cytokines that can induce neuronal damage, leading to cognitive deficits [55,126].
The disruption of hippocampal neurogenesis is also a key factor in the cognitive deterioration seen in AD. Persistent neuroinflammation is identified to have detrimental effects on hippocampal neurogenesis [127,128]. Reduced neurogenesis in the subventricular zone (SVZ) and subgranular zone (SGZ) has been convincingly linked to the neuroinflammatory states. This correlation may offer insights into the impaired formation of short-term memories observed in individuals with AD. Histamine has been demonstrated to boost neurogenesis and facilitate neuronal differentiation and the dendritic arbor complexity. Blocking the H3R has been found to promote neurogenesis in conditions such as traumatic brain injury and aging. Furthermore, it aids in the migration of neural stem cells (NSCs) [6,129,130]. Investigations have indicated the involvement of microglia in neurogenesis [39,131]. M2 microglia polarization driven by IL-4 in the hippocampus has been shown to stimulate BDNF-dependent neurogenesis. On the other hand, mediators associated with M1 microglia, such as IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α, are identified to have an adverse effect on hippocampal neurogenesis [132,133]. They achieve this by diminishing the proliferation and viability of newly formed cells. The agents that can induce M2 polarization or prevent M1 polarization can be of potential therapeutic value in AD.
Guilloux and colleagues demonstrated that the chronic administration of S38093, a H3R antagonist/inverse agonist, enhances hippocampal neurogenesis in young adult and aged mice, as well as in a transgenic model of AD. Furthermore, improvement was also observed in the performance of aged mice in a context discrimination test [134]. Selective inactivation of H3Rs has been found to boost the process of neurogenesis in the hippocampal subgranular zone, a critical region for cognitive functions and vulnerable to AD [96]. Accordingly, S38093 administration resulted in increased neurogenesis in the hippocampal region in adult 129/SvEvTac mice and aged C57Bl/6JRj mice, as well as in a rodent model of AD (APPSWE). These effects were achieved through the stimulation of BDNF-IX, BDNF-IV, and BDNF-I transcripts, as well as increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in aged mice [134].
Deficits in the CREB signaling pathway are seen in AD pathology [135]. Research suggests that the activation of CREB leads to a decreased expression of NF-κB and proinflammatory cytokines [136]. Activation of the CREB pathway has also been shown to promote microglial polarization towards a M2 phenotype, characterized by anti-inflammatory properties [137]. The activation of downstream signaling pathways of H3R, such as CREB, has been linked to ameliorating cognitive impairments and reducing Aβ pathology in AD [138]. Interestingly, this has also been shown to suppress inflammatory responses by inhibiting the activation of glial cells [8]. H3R antagonists exhibit neuroprotective effects through the cAMP/CREB and PI3K/AKT/GSK3β signaling cascades [106,139]. Wang et al. (2019) investigated a novel compound called LC1405, a H3R antagonist in mitigating cognitive deficits induced by Aβ. The outcomes of the research demonstrated the effectiveness of LC1405 in slowing down the disease advancement in a mouse model of AD (APP/PS1). It enhanced memory and learning abilities, preventing neurodegeneration and structural abnormalities. Additionally, it alleviated cholinergic dysfunction. LC1405 administration resulted in the upregulation of acetylcholine and histamine, activating neuroprotective cAMP/CREB and AKT/GSK3β cellular signaling pathways mediated through H3R [140].
In a study involving APP/PS1 mice, H3 receptor antagonist thioperamide reduced inflammation within the hippocampus and cerebral cortex, with decreased reactivity of the astroglial and microglial cells. Inhibition by thioperamide transformed the astrocytes from a reactive A1 state to a protective A2 state and suppressed the expression of phosphorylated p-P65 NF-κB. These effects were mediated through the cAMP/CREB pathway. Thioperamide exhibited the ability to block gliosis and the release of proinflammatory cytokines, but H89, a CREB signaling inhibitor, eliminated these effects. In addition, thioperamide reduced cognitive decline and Aβ-deposition. However, these effects were reversed upon treatment with H89. Hence, H3R antagonists have anti-inflammatory effects in the brain by modulating astrocyte reactivity and reducing inflammation-associated markers [8]. Thioperamide was also found to reduce microglial activity, suppress inflammation, and promote neurogenesis in the LPS-induced model of neuroinflammation [124]. Furthermore, thioperamide alleviated neuroinflammation in BV2 microglial cells in vitro. Through the activation of the PKA/CREB pathway, thioperamide facilitated the transition of microglia from a proinflammatory M1 phenotype to an anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. Simultaneously, it inhibited the NF-κB signaling pathway. Thioperamide’s activation of CREB fostered the interaction between CREB and CREB binding protein (CBP), resulting in the increased secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4 and IL-10) and BDNF. Conversely, it reduced the interaction between NF-κB and CBP, resulting in reduced levels of proinflammatory cytokines. Figure 4 illustrates the neuroprotective action exhibited by H3R antagonists.
The significant resemblance between H3R and H4R leads to notable similarities in ligand affinities, enabling the concurrent activation of both receptors. Dual-acting ligands targeting H3R and H4R hold promise for therapeutic applications across various pathological conditions, including neuropathic pain, cancer, PD, and inflammatory disorders [5]. The manipulation of histaminergic receptors using a pharmacological agent capable of selectively inhibiting H3Rs while stimulating H4Rs has been shown to replicate neuroprotective effects in a mouse model of AD. Clobenpropit, a H3R inverse antagonist and partial H4R agonist, demonstrated a protective effect against amyloid peptide-induced neuronal damage in a rat model of AD [141]. A prior investigation revealed that a bilateral intrahippocampal injection of Clobenpropit significantly ameliorated spatial memory impairments following MK801 treatment in rats. This improvement was attributed to its ability to modulate various neurotransmitters, including histamine, dopamine, acetylcholine, and serotonin [142]. In another study, Clobenpropit exhibited a protective role against mitochondrial dysfunction and neuroinflammation. The investigation assessed the effect of a 30-day pretreatment with Clobenpropit on cognitive impairment, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuroinflammation induced by LPS. The outcomes of the study exhibited improved spatial learning and memory with the administration of Clobenpropit. Additionally, Clobenpropit exhibited anti-inflammatory properties, reducing the levels of COX-2 enzymes and proinflammatory cytokines while elevating anti-inflammatory cytokines in the brain. In conclusion, the results proposed that Clobenpropit holds promise as a neuroprotective agent for addressing neuroinflammation, cognitive decline, and mitochondrial damage in the brain [143].
Multiple studies have revealed that enhancing autophagy can have a positive effect on learning behavior and the reduction of Aβ accumulation and BACE1 degradation [144,145]. The outcomes of a study indicated that thioperamide improved cognitive deficits in mice with APP/PS1 mutations by upregulating the autophagy levels that were blocked by an autophagic inhibitor called 3-MA. The in vitro studies further confirmed that thioperamide exerted protective effects on primary neurons against Aβ-induced injury by enhancing autophagy that were reversed significantly by inhibiting autophagy using 3-MA or siRNA targeting Atg7. Furthermore, the study found that the reduced Aβ deposition and the accumulation of BACE1 in the hippocampus and cortex, both associated with Aβ pathology, were reversed by inhibiting autophagy using 3-MA. This suggests that the improved effect of thioperamide on Aβ pathology is linked to the upregulation of autophagy [138]. Consequently, the utilization of H3R antagonists and inverse agonists have demonstrated promise in decreasing the buildup of Aβ aggregates and promoting autophagy through the involvement of the CREB protein. Furthermore, these compounds have shown potential in ameliorating memory deficits. Also, by elevating histamine release and subsequently promoting hippocampal neurogenesis, these agents have been found to attenuate cognitive dysfunction.

3.4.2. Parkinson’s Disease

PD is the second-most widespread neurodegenerative disease. PD is frequently associated with the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta, resulting in dopamine depletion in the striatum [75]. The primary neurons projecting from the striatum are the GABAergic medium-spiny projection neurons (MSNs), which express either the D1 receptor (D1R) or the D2 receptor (D2R). Dopamine regulates the upper motor neurons through direct and indirect pathways. In the direct pathway, D1R-expressing MSNs extend projections to the substantia nigra pars reticulata and internal segments of the globus pallidus, promoting motor activation. In the indirect pathway, D2R-expressing MSNs send projections through the external part of the globus pallidus [1]. In PD, there is reduced activity in the D1R-positive direct pathway MSNs and increased activity in the D2R-positive indirect pathway MSNs. This imbalance results in the heightened firing of GABAergic nigrothalamic neurons and diminished activity in thalamocortical pathways [96]. Approximately 85% of MSNs expressing both D1R and D2R in the striatum also contain H3R, which can potentiate D2R effects and inhibit D1R effects [146]. H3R interact differentially with D1R and indirect D2R MSNs in the striatum. H3R and D2R potentiate each other, while H3R inhibits D1R effects. Overall, H3R has complex, opposing interactions with D1R and cooperative interactions with D2R in striatal regulation [97].
The important role of microglia in the neuroinflammatory response in PD has been documented [147]. Consequently, targeting the suppression of microglial activation can be a potential therapeutic strategy in the treatment of PD [148]. There have been inconsistent findings regarding the involvement of the neuronal histaminergic system. Post-mortem analysis of brain tissues from individuals with PD has revealed a significant accretion of Lewy bodies or Lewy neurites in the TMN, indicating its severe damage during the progression of PD. A study reported elevated histamine levels in specific regions responsible for motor behavior, such as the substantia nigra, putamen, and globus pallidus, in PD patients [149]. The elevated density of histaminergic fibers has been found in the brains of patients with PD. Although histamine production in the TMN remains relatively unchanged in PD, the altered expression of histamine-related genes in regions receiving innervation from histaminergic neurons could potentially contribute to PD pathology [150,151]. Several investigations have provided evidence of the amelioration of various symptoms in PD through the use of H3R antagonists [152]. In post-mortem cases of PD, an increase in histaminergic nerve fibers, along with an upregulation of H3R, was observed [153]. This study revealed that the prolonged administration of H3R ligands, such as Clobenpropit, led to a notable decrease in brain pathology. This reduction was accomplished through the lowering of phosphorylated τ-protein and α-synuclein levels in the cerebrospinal fluid. Furthermore, Masini et al. (2017) showed that thioperamide rescued the normal rest/activity cycle and attenuated memory impairment in an experimental model of parkinsonism [154]. Targeting the histaminergic system in PD is an area of interest worth exploring [155]. In the therapy of PD, the deactivation of MAO A or MAO B has been established as a fundamental principle. Furthermore, a high expression of MAOs in neuronal tissues is believed to contribute to oxidative stress, leading to increased neuronal cell death. The H3R antagonist Ciproxifan has showed efficacy on both enzyme isoforms [156]. In a single-blinded trial involving patients with PD, Pitolisant has been found to alleviate excessive sleepiness without significant effects on the motor performance. Hence, the compounds that enhance local histamine release in specific brain regions may offer therapeutic insights for the treatment of PD.

3.4.3. Autism Spectrum Disorder

Multiple lines of evidence indicate the beneficial use of H3R antagonists in reducing autism-like stereotypes and repetitive behaviors in different models for ASD [29,157,158,159]. Considering the growing body of research, previous studies have reported indications of ongoing neuroinflammatory processes in different brain regions, which encompass microglial activation, among individuals with ASD and other neuropsychiatric conditions [88]. ASD has been associated with the diagnosis of chronic or excessive neuroinflammation. The persistent activation of glia and changes in inflammatory function observed in this context may contribute to the behavioral characteristics seen in ASD [91,160]. The prolonged microglial activation due to the excessive release of proinflammatory cytokines is associated with neuronal cell death and the loss of synaptic connections leading to detrimental processes of synaptic dysfunction and neurodegeneration, ultimately contributing to the pathology of various neurological conditions [161,162]. Furthermore, previous research findings have highlighted the significant involvement of NF-κB in neuroinflammation. Research has indicated a significant increase in NF-κB expression within activated microglial cells in both experimental animals and post-mortem samples from individuals diagnosed with ASD [163]. These observations underscore the potential contribution of NF-κB in driving neuroinflammatory processes associated with neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. This association emphasizes the relevance of targeting neuroinflammatory mechanisms in the development of appropriate therapeutic strategies.
Interestingly, numerous histamine H3R antagonists exhibited promising results in various neurological disorders by targeting neuroinflammation such as H3R antagonist ST713, which decreased NF-κB and considerably reduced the elevated levels of measured cytokines in BTBR mice, a strain of mice with idiopathic autistic features [164]. A study conducted by Eissa et al. in 2019 revealed that TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6 were elevated in autistic mice [165]. These findings align with previous research indicating that heightened neuroinflammation in individuals with autism is associated with elevated levels of TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, and TGF-β [161,166]. Furthermore, when E100, a dual-active H3 receptor antagonist and acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, was systemically administered to valproic acid-exposed mice, it greatly reduced the levels of proinflammatory cytokines. Additionally, the neuroprotective effects of E100 against heightened levels of proinflammatory cytokines were reversed when combined with a CNS penetrant H3R agonist, underscoring the involvement of brain histamine in the neuroprotection shown by E100 in mice exhibiting ASD-like traits. The delivery of E100 significantly lowered the heightened levels of NF-κB. These findings indicate that, in animals with ASD-like characteristics, brain histamine plays a pivotal role in enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of E100. Further, immunofluorescence labeling showed that, when mice were exposed to valproic acid, they exhibited a higher presence of activated microglia. However, when valproic acid-exposed mice were treated with E100, microglial activation significantly decreased, indicating a reduction in microglial activation due to E100. Importantly, this effect caused by E100 was completely reversed upon the co-administration of (R)-α-methyl histamine, an agonist at H3R, suggesting that brain histamine plays a role in facilitating E100’s protective effects against disturbed microglia in these mice [165].
In another investigation, it was observed that exposure to valproic acid significantly increased the expression of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α) in mice when subjected to LPS. However, treatment with DL77, an antagonist at H3R, markedly reduced these proinflammatory cytokines [158]. An additional noteworthy observation from the study was the abrogation of the protective effects of DL77 on proinflammatory cytokines upon administration of the H3R agonist, which further suggests the involvement of histaminergic neurotransmission in facilitating the neuroprotective function of DL 77. Neuroinflammation plays a pivotal role in the behavioral manifestations observed in ASD [167]. Therefore, a potential therapeutic approach for treating ASD may involve the mitigation of neuroinflammation by managing microglial activation and the suppression of proinflammatory mediators and free radicals. The role of histamine in targeting microglial activation and suppressing proinflammatory neurotoxicity could represent an effective therapeutic strategy for fostering neuroprotection and mitigating ASD-like behaviors. The current evidence indicates a potential association between chronic neuroinflammation and cognitive deficits, with preclinical studies demonstrating the ameliorative effects of H3R antagonists and inverse agonists on neuroinflammatory processes in ASD.

3.5. Procognitive Effects of H3R Modulators in Preclinical Studies

The literature consistently highlights the beneficial effects of various H3R antagonists and inverse agonists in addressing cognitive damage in AD, PD, anxiety, schizophrenia, depression, and sleep disorders [4,99,168,169,170]. These findings provide a promising approach for addressing neuropathological features that commonly cooccur. The treatment with (R)-α-methylhistamine (RAMH), a CNS-penetrant H3R agonist, has been demonstrated to negatively impact cognitive function in various preclinical models [4]. Conversely, studies involving H3R knockout mice have shown enhanced cognitive function [171]. Furthermore, cognitive deficits have been alleviated through the inhibition of H3R by antagonists, as observed in several rodent models [172,173,174]. Manipulating the histaminergic system through either pharmacological means with α-FMH or genetically with HDC-/- did not lead to any impairment in short-term recognition memory or fear memory within the inhibitory avoidance paradigm in mice [175]. The H3R agonist VUF16839 hindered short-term social recognition tests in mice, and this impairment was reversed by donepezil, indicating the activation of H3-heteroreceptors regulating acetylcholine release rather than histamine [175]. H3R antagonists/inverse agonists show potential therapeutic benefit in enhancing spatial memory.
In a study using the Morris water maze, for evaluating spatial-working memory S38093, a H3R antagonist/inverse agonist demonstrated an improvement in scopolamine-induced amnesia [176]. Similarly, improved escape latencies in the Morris water maze following the administration of the GSK189254 H3R antagonist/inverse agonist was observed in a rodent model of amnesia [172]. In preclinical models, CUS was observed to decrease the BDNF levels in both the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus of mice, which was countered by the H3R antagonist ciproxifan [177]. Another H3R antagonist, JNJ-10181457, demonstrated antidepressant-like properties in a depression model induced by LPS. It also reduced the immobility time in TST and the generation of proinflammatory cytokines from microglial cells [123]. ST-1283, a H3R antagonist, reduced depression-like behaviors evaluated in FST, TST, and a novelty suppressed feeding test [178]. Table 4 and Table 5 summarize various preclinical and clinical studies of H3R modulators in various brain disorders.
While numerous preclinical studies have demonstrated the potential of various H3R antagonists and inverse agonists to enhance the cognitive abilities in rodents, clinical trials involving agents such as GSK239512 and ABT-288 have yielded limited efficacy in improving cognitive functions among patients with mild-to-moderate AD. While GSK239512 demonstrated some improvement in episodic memory, it did not affect working memory. Overall, H3R antagonists had modest and selective effects on cognitive function based on clinical observations [211,212].

4. Discussion

In recent times, notable attention has been directed towards the design and development of H3R antagonists as a potential therapeutic strategy for CNS-related disorders. Mounting evidence indicates a substantial involvement of neuroinflammation in the initiation and progression of cognitive decline in various neurological disorders [213,214]. The targeting of neuroinflammatory processes associated with various neurodegenerative diseases has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach. Extensive preclinical research has provided compelling evidence supporting the potential application of H3R antagonists in addressing cognitive impairments associated with AD and other related conditions [104]. In 1986, De Almeida and Izquierdo proposed the role of histamine in brains regulating different memory phases [215]. Extensive animal studies have provided substantial evidence regarding the cognition-promoting benefits of thioperamide and other H3R inverse agonists/antagonists [193,197,203,216].
While histamine is recognized for its role in enhancing inflammation in the peripheral system, there is growing evidence suggesting a dual role for histamine in modulating microglial inflammatory responses within the CNS 2]. Histamine itself can activate microglia and promote inflammation, but it also demonstrates anti-inflammatory effects under conditions of stress-induced pathology [111]. Additionally, H1R activation leads to microglial activation and proinflammatory effects, whereas activation of the H2R leads to microglial inhibition and anti-inflammatory effects [108,110]. H3R ligands with neuroprotective properties have the potential to prevent neuronal degeneration and slow down the progression of various brain disorders [71]. Most of the recent research work has demonstrated that there is a connection between neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative disorders, and H3 receptor antagonists demonstrated a favorable impact by reducing the inflammatory biomarkers, suggesting the potential role of these antagonists to concurrently regulate vital brain neurotransmissions and influence numerous signaling pathways related to the development of AD and PD, such as the PI3K/AKT/GSK-3β pathway [217].
In individuals with AD, several histopathological changes are observed, including impaired cholinergic neurotransmission, Aβ plaque buildup within the brain, the presence of intracellular NFT’s, and the advancement of oxidative stress and inflammation-induced damage. The current drugs approved for AD offer only symptomatic relief but fail to halt neurodegeneration. Given the complexity of the disease, relying on a single compound targeting a specific receptor is insufficient to achieve significant therapeutic effects [218]. To address this challenge, a new pharmacological approach involves designing single molecules capable of simultaneously modulating multiple targets [170,219]. These molecules are known as multitarget-directed ligands (MTDLs) and are primarily developed as potential therapeutics for treating multifactorial diseases like neurodegenerative disorders [220]. There has been significant interest in developing multitarget compounds that include H3R-blocking properties [221]. Eissa et al. (2019) assessed the impact of a novel dual-active ligand, E100, on autism-like behaviors and neuroinflammation in an animal model of ASD developed by valproic acid exposure. In this study, E100, which has a high affinity for H3R antagonism and balanced acetylcholinesterase inhibition, showed dose-dependent improvement in repetitive and compulsive behaviors. E100 also attenuated anxiety levels in the mice. Additionally, pretreatment with E100 led to a decrease in microglial activation. The proinflammatory cytokines and the expression of iNOS, COX-2, and NF-κB were also reduced in the cerebellum and hippocampus [165].
In another study systemic treatment with a novel antagonist targeting H3R/D2R/D3R receptors, called ST-2223, improved social deficits and reduced anxiety levels associated with ASD in male Black and Tan Brachyury (BTBR) mice [209,210]. Furthermore, the study demonstrated its beneficial effects in reducing oxidative stress, as evident by a decrease in brain malondialdehyde levels and elevation in the levels of reduced glutathione, superoxide dismutase, and catalase. Patnaik et al. (2018) demonstrated a noteworthy decrease in the breakdown of the blood–brain barrier, deposition of the Aβ peptide, and neuronal damage with the treatment with BF-2649, a H3R inverse agonist, and Clobenpropit, a H3R antagonist with partial H4 agonist properties. Clobenpropit demonstrates a more effective neuroprotective capacity compared to BF-2649 when administered at equivalent doses [141]. The compounds exhibiting H3 antagonistic action along with partial H4 agonistic activity could provide increased therapeutic potential for mitigating pathologies linked to AD. Studies in mice have demonstrated that H3R antagonists/inverse agonists can induce hippocampal neurogenesis, offering potential advantages for addressing age-related cognitive deficits [6].
Ghamari et al. (2019) reviewed the challenges in designing non-imidazole-based H3R antagonists/inverse agonists. Obstacles include an affinity for hERG K+ channels causing cardiotoxicity, phospholipidosis concerns, and prolonged duration of action, leading to insomnia. Receptor occupancy over 80% induces insomnia, emphasizing the importance of appropriate dosage schemes in clinical investigations. Characterizing ligands with brief-to-moderate receptor residence times is suggested to address this issue. The complex pharmacology of H3R (splice variants, oligomerization, constitutive activity, and differential signaling pathways) complicates the design process. The authors recommend special attention to the structural information for a rational compound design and using assays with multiple H3R isoforms for a comprehensive assessment [98].
Overall, the inhibition of H3R to regulate histamine release can offer numerous advantageous outcomes for brain health. It can reduce the activity of microglial cells, promote a transition from a proinflammatory state (M1) to an anti-inflammatory state (M2), mitigate neuroinflammation, and enhance hippocampal neurogenesis. As a result, this intervention can ultimately enhance cognitive function and has potential therapeutic outcomes. Considering the preclinical outcomes, targeting brain H3R with novel H3R antagonists represents a promising avenue, holding potential implications for the treatment of neurocognitive conditions.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Advancements in understanding neurotransmitter systems and synaptic neurophysiology have facilitated progress in the management of neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders. Microglia influence the inflammatory response that occurs in various pathologies, contributing to neuroinflammation. Accumulating evidence indicates a potential association between cognitive deficits and chronic neuroinflammation. Numerous lines of evidence show the significant contribution of the histaminergic system in the regulation of neurological disorders. Histamine H3R antagonists/inverse agonists are a promising and novel category of medications that have demonstrated the ability to alleviate various neuroinflammatory processes and improve cognitive function in preclinical models of AD, PD, epilepsy, depression, and autism. Recognizing microglia’s pivotal role in neuroinflammation and neurodevelopment and modulating microglial activation through H3R antagonists present a potential therapeutic strategy in neurological disorders exhibiting neuroinflammation. H3R antagonists/inverse agonists can serve as active elements in dual- or multitargeting drugs designed for the treatment of neurocognitive disorders. Advances in chemo-genetic approaches can provide more insights into these neurological disorders, aiding in the development of therapeutics to target the histaminergic system. Further investigations are needed to validate the involvement of different signaling pathways in the beneficial effects of H3R antagonists in animal models of AD, PD, and ASD. Additionally, there is a need to assess the precise impact of H3R antagonists on diverse neurotransmitters within the brain, elucidating their role in the observed neuroprotective effects. Furthermore, it is crucial to explore the specific functions of histamine receptors in distinct regions of the brain and cell types, which would facilitate the development of targeted and specific ligands for histamine receptors, ultimately leading to more efficient treatment options.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.S.; Methodology, S.D.T., S.A. and B.S.; Formal Analysis, S.D.T. and S.A.; Investigation, S.D.T. and S.A.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, S.D.T., S.A., N.E., A.A., N.K.J. and S.O.; Scheme Drawn, S.D.T., S.A., N.E., N.K.J. and S.O.; Writing—Review and Editing, S.D.T., S.A., N.E., S.O. and B.S.; Supervision, B.S.; Funding Acquisition, B.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Office of Graduate Studies and Research of UAE University is thanked for the support provided to Bassem Sadek with intramural research grants (12R207, 12M099, and 12M182).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

This manuscript is a review, and most of the studies referred to herein this article have been appropriately cited in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

AChEIAcetylcholinesterase inhibitors
Amyloid-beta
ALRAbsent in melanoma 2 (AIM2)-like receptor
AKTProtein kinase B
BACE1β-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme 1
BDNFBrain-derived neurotrophic factor
BTBRBlack and Tan Brachyury
CBPCREB Binding Protein
CLRC-type lectin receptor
CREBcAMP-responsive element binding protein
CSF 1Colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1)
CUSChronic unpredictable stress
DAMPsDamage associated molecular pattern
EAEExperimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
FGFFibroblast growth factor
FSTForced swimming test
GPCRsG protein-coupled receptors
GABAGamma-aminobutyric acid
GDNFGlial cell-derived neurotrophic factor
GSK3βGlycogen synthase kinase 3β
HNMTHistamine N-methyltransferase
IRF8Interferon regulatory factor 8
LTPLong-term potentiation
MAPKsMitogen-activated protein kinases
NADPHNicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
NFTsNeurofibrillary tau tangles
NF-κBNuclear factor kappa light chain enhancer of activated B cells
NLRNod-like receptors
NGFNerve growth factor
PAMPsPathogen associated molecular pattern
PI3KPhosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
RAMH(R)-α-methylhistamine
ROS Reactive Oxygen Species
RLRRetinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I)-like receptor
TLRToll-like receptor
TMNTuberomammillary nucleus
TNFαTumor Necrosis Factor α
TGFβTransforming growth factor β
TSTTail suspension Test
VEGFVascular endothelial growth factor

References

  1. Panula, P.; Nuutinen, S. The Histaminergic Network in the Brain: Basic Organization and Role in Disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013, 14, 472–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Barata-Antunes, S.; Cristóvão, A.C.; Pires, J.; Rocha, S.M.; Bernardino, L. Dual Role of Histamine on Microglia-Induced Neurodegeneration. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis. 2017, 1863, 764–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Abdulrazzaq, Y.M.; Bastaki, S.M.A.; Adeghate, E. Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonists—Roles in Neurological and Endocrine Diseases and Diabetes Mellitus. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 150, 112947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sadek, B.; Saad, A.; Sadeq, A.; Jalal, F.; Stark, H. Histamine H3 Receptor as a Potential Target for Cognitive Symptoms in Neuropsychiatric Diseases. Behav. Brain Res. 2016, 312, 415–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mehta, P.; Miszta, P.; Rzodkiewicz, P.; Michalak, O.; Krzeczyński, P.; Filipek, S. Enigmatic Histamine Receptor H4 for Potential Treatment of Multiple Inflammatory, Autoimmune, and Related Diseases. Life 2020, 10, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Saraiva, C.; Barata-Antunes, S.; Santos, T.; Ferreiro, E.; Cristóvão, A.C.; Serra-Almeida, C.; Ferreira, R.; Bernardino, L. Histamine Modulates Hippocampal Inflammation and Neurogenesis in Adult Mice. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Provensi, G.; Passani, M.B.; Costa, A.; Izquierdo, I.; Blandina, P. Neuronal Histamine and the Memory of Emotionally Salient Events. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 177, 557–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, J.; Liu, B.; Xu, Y.; Luan, H.; Wang, C.; Yang, M.; Zhao, R.; Song, M.; Liu, J.; Sun, L.; et al. Thioperamide Attenuates Neuroinflammation and Cognitive Impairments in Alzheimer’s Disease via Inhibiting Gliosis. Exp. Neurol. 2022, 347, 113870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hickman, R.A.; O’Shea, S.A.; Mehler, M.F.; Chung, W.K. Neurogenetic Disorders across the Lifespan: From Aberrant Development to Degeneration. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2022, 18, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schor, N.F.; Bianchi, D.W. Neurodevelopmental Clues to Neurodegeneration. Pediatr. Neurol. 2021, 123, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Frick, L.; Rapanelli, M.; Abbasi, E.; Ohtsu, H.; Pittenger, C. Histamine Regulation of Microglia: Gene-Environment Interaction in the Regulation of Central Nervous System Inflammation. Brain Behav. Immun. 2016, 57, 326–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zlomuzica, A.; Dere, D.; Binder, S.; De Souza Silva, M.A.; Huston, J.P.; Dere, E. Neuronal Histamine and Cognitive Symptoms in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuropharmacology 2016, 106, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zare-shahabadi, A.; Masliah, E.; Johnson, G.V.W.; Rezaei, N. Autophagy in Alzheimer’s Disease. Rev. Neurosci. 2015, 26, 385–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Satpati, A.; Neylan, T.; Grinberg, L.T. Histaminergic Neurotransmission in Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease: A Review of Therapeutic Opportunities and Gaps. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2023, 9, e12379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Badanjak, K.; Fixemer, S.; Smajić, S.; Skupin, A.; Grünewald, A. The Contribution of Microglia to Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhu, Z.; Yang, C.; Iyaswamy, A.; Krishnamoorthi, S.; Sreenivasmurthy, S.G.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.; Tong, B.C.-K.; Song, J.; Lu, J.; et al. Balancing mTOR Signaling and Autophagy in the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fatoba, O.; Itokazu, T.; Yamashita, T. Microglia as Therapeutic Target in Central Nervous System Disorders. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 144, 102–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tang, Y.; Le, W. Differential Roles of M1 and M2 Microglia in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016, 53, 1181–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hansen, D.V.; Hanson, J.E.; Sheng, M. Microglia in Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Cell Biol. 2017, 217, 459–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Q.-S.; Heng, Y.; Yuan, Y.-H.; Chen, N.-H. Pathological α-Synuclein Exacerbates the Progression of Parkinson’s Disease through Microglial Activation. Toxicol. Lett. 2017, 265, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Merighi, S.; Nigro, M.; Travagli, A.; Gessi, S. Microglia and Alzheimer’s Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Carthy, E.; Ellender, T. Histamine, Neuroinflammation and Neurodevelopment: A Review. Front. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 680214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sato, A.; Ikeda, K. Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Autism Spectrum Disorder Through Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin. Biol. Psychiatry Glob. Open Sci. 2022, 2, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fu, Y.; Xie, G.; Liu, R.; Xie, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J. From Aberrant Neurodevelopment to Neurodegeneration: Insights into the Hub Gene Associated with Autism and Alzheimer’s Disease. Brain Res. 2024, 1838, 148992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jęśko, H.; Cieślik, M.; Gromadzka, G.; Adamczyk, A. Dysfunctional Proteins in Neuropsychiatric Disorders: From Neurodegeneration to Autism Spectrum Disorders. Neurochem. Int. 2020, 141, 104853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Savage, D.D.; Rosenberg, M.J.; Wolff, C.R.; Akers, K.G.; El-Emawy, A.; Staples, M.C.; Varaschin, R.K.; Wright, C.A.; Seidel, J.L.; Caldwell, K.K.; et al. Effects of a Novel Cognition-Enhancing Agent on Fetal Ethanol-Induced Learning Deficits. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 2010, 34, 1793–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Scammell, T.E.; Arrigoni, E.; Lipton, J. Neural Circuitry of Wakefulness and Sleep. Neuron 2017, 93, 747–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hua, Y.; Song, M.; Guo, Q.; Luo, Y.; Deng, X.; Huang, Y. Antiseizure Properties of Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonists Belonging 3,4-Dihydroquinolin-2(1H)-Ones. Molecules 2023, 28, 3408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Eissa, N.; Awad, M.A.; Thomas, S.D.; Venkatachalam, K.; Jayaprakash, P.; Zhong, S.; Stark, H.; Sadek, B. Simultaneous Antagonism at H3R/D2R/D3R Reduces Autism-like Self-Grooming and Aggressive Behaviors by Mitigating MAPK Activation in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 24, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Song, G.J.; Suk, K. Pharmacological Modulation of Functional Phenotypes of Microglia in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2017, 9, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hemonnot, A.-L.; Hua, J.; Ulmann, L.; Hirbec, H. Microglia in Alzheimer Disease: Well-Known Targets and New Opportunities. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2019, 11, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Uddin, M.S.; Mamun, A.A.; Labu, Z.K.; Hidalgo-Lanussa, O.; Barreto, G.E.; Ashraf, G.M. Autophagic Dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease: Cellular and Molecular Mechanistic Approaches to Halt Alzheimer’s Pathogenesis. J. Cell Physiol. 2019, 234, 8094–8112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Stratoulias, V.; Venero, J.L.; Tremblay, M.-È.; Joseph, B. Microglial Subtypes: Diversity within the Microglial Community. EMBO J. 2019, 38, e101997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hickman, S.; Izzy, S.; Sen, P.; Morsett, L.; El Khoury, J. Microglia in Neurodegeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 2018, 21, 1359–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Parkhurst, C.N.; Yang, G.; Ninan, I.; Savas, J.N.; Yates, J.R.; Lafaille, J.J.; Hempstead, B.L.; Littman, D.R.; Gan, W.-B. Microglia Promote Learning-Dependent Synapse Formation through Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor. Cell 2013, 155, 1596–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wolf, S.A.; Boddeke, H.W.G.M.; Kettenmann, H. Microglia in Physiology and Disease. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2017, 79, 619–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bivona, G.; Iemmolo, M.; Agnello, L.; Lo Sasso, B.; Gambino, C.M.; Giglio, R.V.; Scazzone, C.; Ghersi, G.; Ciaccio, M. Microglial Activation and Priming in Alzheimer’s Disease: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sarlus, H.; Heneka, M.T. Microglia in Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 3240–3249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Franco, R.; Fernández-Suárez, D. Alternatively Activated Microglia and Macrophages in the Central Nervous System. Prog. Neurobiol. 2015, 131, 65–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Guo, S.; Wang, H.; Yin, Y. Microglia Polarization From M1 to M2 in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022, 14, 815347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Colonna, M.; Butovsky, O. Microglia Function in the Central Nervous System During Health and Neurodegeneration. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 35, 441–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Amanollahi, M.; Jameie, M.; Heidari, A.; Rezaei, N. The Dialogue Between Neuroinflammation and Adult Neurogenesis: Mechanisms Involved and Alterations in Neurological Diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2023, 60, 923–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, J.; He, W.; Zhang, J. A Richer and More Diverse Future for Microglia Phenotypes. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, J.-W.; Zong, Y.; Cao, X.-P.; Tan, L.; Tan, L. Microglial Priming in Alzheimer’s Disease. Ann. Transl. Med. 2018, 6, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cornell, J.; Salinas, S.; Huang, H.-Y.; Zhou, M. Microglia Regulation of Synaptic Plasticity and Learning and Memory. Neural Regen. Res. 2022, 17, 705–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sandhu, J.K.; Kulka, M. Decoding Mast Cell-Microglia Communication in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Escartin, C.; Galea, E.; Lakatos, A.; O’Callaghan, J.P.; Petzold, G.C.; Serrano-Pozo, A.; Steinhäuser, C.; Volterra, A.; Carmignoto, G.; Agarwal, A.; et al. Reactive Astrocyte Nomenclature, Definitions, and Future Directions. Nat. Neurosci. 2021, 24, 312–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ricci, G.; Volpi, L.; Pasquali, L.; Petrozzi, L.; Siciliano, G. Astrocyte-Neuron Interactions in Neurological Disorders. J. Biol. Phys. 2009, 35, 317–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Olsen, M.L.; Khakh, B.S.; Skatchkov, S.N.; Zhou, M.; Lee, C.J.; Rouach, N. New Insights on Astrocyte Ion Channels: Critical for Homeostasis and Neuron-Glia Signaling. J. Neurosci. 2015, 35, 13827–13835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wahis, J.; Hennes, M.; Arckens, L.; Holt, M.G. Star Power: The Emerging Role of Astrocytes as Neuronal Partners during Cortical Plasticity. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2021, 67, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Matejuk, A.; Ransohoff, R.M. Crosstalk Between Astrocytes and Microglia: An Overview. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 507878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gao, C.; Jiang, J.; Tan, Y.; Chen, S. Microglia in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Mechanism and Potential Therapeutic Targets. Sig. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jha, M.K.; Jo, M.; Kim, J.-H.; Suk, K. Microglia-Astrocyte Crosstalk: An Intimate Molecular Conversation. Neuroscientist 2019, 25, 227–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Shinozaki, Y.; Shibata, K.; Yoshida, K.; Shigetomi, E.; Gachet, C.; Ikenaka, K.; Tanaka, K.F.; Koizumi, S. Transformation of Astrocytes to a Neuroprotective Phenotype by Microglia via P2Y1 Receptor Downregulation. Cell Rep. 2017, 19, 1151–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Liddelow, S.A.; Guttenplan, K.A.; Clarke, L.E.; Bennett, F.C.; Bohlen, C.J.; Schirmer, L.; Bennett, M.L.; Münch, A.E.; Chung, W.-S.; Peterson, T.C.; et al. Neurotoxic Reactive Astrocytes Are Induced by Activated Microglia. Nature 2017, 541, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Calafatti, M.; Cocozza, G.; Limatola, C.; Garofalo, S. Microglial Crosstalk with Astrocytes and Immune Cells in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1223096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Linnerbauer, M.; Wheeler, M.A.; Quintana, F.J. Astrocyte Crosstalk in CNS Inflammation. Neuron 2020, 108, 608–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ransohoff, R.M. A Polarizing Question: Do M1 and M2 Microglia Exist? Nat. Neurosci. 2016, 19, 987–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Leng, F.; Edison, P. Neuroinflammation and Microglial Activation in Alzheimer Disease: Where Do We Go from Here? Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2021, 17, 157–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dani, M.; Wood, M.; Mizoguchi, R.; Fan, Z.; Walker, Z.; Morgan, R.; Hinz, R.; Biju, M.; Kuruvilla, T.; Brooks, D.J.; et al. Microglial Activation Correlates in Vivo with Both Tau and Amyloid in Alzheimer’s Disease. Brain 2018, 141, 2740–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pascoal, T.A.; Benedet, A.L.; Ashton, N.J.; Kang, M.S.; Therriault, J.; Chamoun, M.; Savard, M.; Lussier, F.Z.; Tissot, C.; Karikari, T.K.; et al. Microglial Activation and Tau Propagate Jointly across Braak Stages. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 1592–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kawai, T.; Akira, S. The Roles of TLRs, RLRs and NLRs in Pathogen Recognition. Int. Immunol. 2009, 21, 317–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hensley, K. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s Disease: Mechanisms, Pathologic Consequences, and Potential for Therapeutic Manipulation. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2010, 21, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kaur, D.; Sharma, V.; Deshmukh, R. Activation of Microglia and Astrocytes: A Roadway to Neuroinflammation and Alzheimer’s Disease. Inflammopharmacology 2019, 27, 663–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Avila-Muñoz, E.; Arias, C. When Astrocytes Become Harmful: Functional and Inflammatory Responses That Contribute to Alzheimer’s Disease. Ageing Res. Rev. 2014, 18, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Carter, S.F.; Herholz, K.; Rosa-Neto, P.; Pellerin, L.; Nordberg, A.; Zimmer, E.R. Astrocyte Biomarkers in Alzheimer’s Disease. Trends Mol. Med. 2019, 25, 77–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Wang, S.; Colonna, M. Microglia in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Target for Immunotherapy. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2019, 106, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Simard, A.R.; Soulet, D.; Gowing, G.; Julien, J.-P.; Rivest, S. Bone Marrow-Derived Microglia Play a Critical Role in Restricting Senile Plaque Formation in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuron 2006, 49, 489–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Businaro, R.; Corsi, M.; Asprino, R.; Di Lorenzo, C.; Laskin, D.; Corbo, R.M.; Ricci, S.; Pinto, A. Modulation of Inflammation as a Way of Delaying Alzheimer’s Disease Progression: The Diet’s Role. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2018, 15, 363–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bilanges, B.; Posor, Y.; Vanhaesebroeck, B. PI3K Isoforms in Cell Signalling and Vesicle Trafficking. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 515–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bhowmik, M.; Khanam, R.; Vohora, D. Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonists in Relation to Epilepsy and Neurodegeneration: A Systemic Consideration of Recent Progress and Perspectives. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 167, 1398–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Blandina, P.; Munari, L.; Giannoni, P.; Mariottini, C.; Passani, M.B. Histamine Neuronal System as a Therapeutic Target for the Treatment of Cognitive Disorders. Future Neurol. 2010, 5, 543–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Galvan, V.; Jin, K. Neurogenesis in the Aging Brain. Clin. Interv. Aging 2007, 2, 605–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Forno, L.S. Neuropathology of Parkinson’s Disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 1996, 55, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Toulouse, A.; Sullivan, A.M. Progress in Parkinson’s Disease-Where Do We Stand? Prog. Neurobiol. 2008, 85, 376–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Scalzo, P.; Kümmer, A.; Cardoso, F.; Teixeira, A.L. Increased Serum Levels of Soluble Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha Receptor-1 in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease. J. Neuroimmunol. 2009, 216, 122–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Dobbs, R.J.; Charlett, A.; Purkiss, A.G.; Dobbs, S.M.; Weller, C.; Peterson, D.W. Association of Circulating TNF-Alpha and IL-6 with Ageing and Parkinsonism. Acta Neurol. Scand. 1999, 100, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Liu, B.; Gao, H.-M.; Hong, J.-S. Parkinson’s Disease and Exposure to Infectious Agents and Pesticides and the Occurrence of Brain Injuries: Role of Neuroinflammation. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111, 1065–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tansey, M.G.; McCoy, M.K.; Frank-Cannon, T.C. Neuroinflammatory Mechanisms in Parkinson’s Disease: Potential Environmental Triggers, Pathways, and Targets for Early Therapeutic Intervention. Exp. Neurol. 2007, 208, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mishra, A.; Bandopadhyay, R.; Singh, P.K.; Mishra, P.S.; Sharma, N.; Khurana, N. Neuroinflammation in Neurological Disorders: Pharmacotherapeutic Targets from Bench to Bedside. Metab. Brain Dis. 2021, 36, 1591–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hirsch, E.C.; Vyas, S.; Hunot, S. Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s Disease. Park. Relat. Disord. 2012, 18 (Suppl. S1), S210–S212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Hanna, L.; Poluyi, E.; Ikwuegbuenyi, C.; Morgan, E.; Imaguezegie, G. Peripheral Inflammation and Neurodegeneration; a Potential for Therapeutic Intervention in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). Egypt. J. Neurosurg. 2022, 37, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lee, Y.; Lee, S.; Chang, S.-C.; Lee, J. Significant Roles of Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s Disease: Therapeutic Targets for PD Prevention. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2019, 42, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kwon, H.S.; Koh, S.-H. Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Disorders: The Roles of Microglia and Astrocytes. Transl. Neurodegener. 2020, 9, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Estes, M.L.; McAllister, A.K. Immune Mediators in the Brain and Peripheral Tissues in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2015, 16, 469–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Koyama, R.; Ikegaya, Y. Microglia in the Pathogenesis of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Neurosci. Res. 2015, 100, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Petrelli, F.; Pucci, L.; Bezzi, P. Astrocytes and Microglia and Their Potential Link with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2016, 10, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Eissa, N.; Sadeq, A.; Sasse, A.; Sadek, B. Role of Neuroinflammation in Autism Spectrum Disorder and the Emergence of Brain Histaminergic System. Lessons Also for BPSD? Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 521283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Martin, L.A.; Goldowitz, D.; Mittleman, G. Repetitive Behavior and Increased Activity in Mice with Purkinje Cell Loss: A Model for Understanding the Role of Cerebellar Pathology in Autism. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010, 31, 544–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Depino, A.M. Peripheral and Central Inflammation in Autism Spectrum Disorders. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 53, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lucchina, L.; Depino, A.M. Altered Peripheral and Central Inflammatory Responses in a Mouse Model of Autism. Autism Res. 2014, 7, 273–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Chez, M.G.; Dowling, T.; Patel, P.B.; Khanna, P.; Kominsky, M. Elevation of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Autistic Children. Pediatr. Neurol. 2007, 36, 361–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Li, X.; Chauhan, A.; Sheikh, A.M.; Patil, S.; Chauhan, V.; Li, X.-M.; Ji, L.; Brown, T.; Malik, M. Elevated Immune Response in the Brain of Autistic Patients. J. Neuroimmunol. 2009, 207, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Theoharides, T.C.; Tsilioni, I.; Patel, A.B.; Doyle, R. Atopic Diseases and Inflammation of the Brain in the Pathogenesis of Autism Spectrum Disorders. Transl. Psychiatry 2016, 6, e844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Malek, M.; Ashraf-Ganjouei, A.; Moradi, K.; Bagheri, S.; Mohammadi, M.-R.; Akhondzadeh, S. Prednisolone as Adjunctive Treatment to Risperidone in Children With Regressive Type of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Clin. Neuropharmacol. 2020, 43, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Hu, W.; Chen, Z. The Roles of Histamine and Its Receptor Ligands in Central Nervous System Disorders: An Update. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 175, 116–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ellenbroek, B.A.; Ghiabi, B. The Other Side of the Histamine H3 Receptor. Trends Neurosci. 2014, 37, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Ghamari, N.; Zarei, O.; Arias-Montaño, J.-A.; Reiner, D.; Dastmalchi, S.; Stark, H.; Hamzeh-Mivehroud, M. Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonists/Inverse Agonists: Where Do They Go? Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 200, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Cheng, L.; Liu, J.; Chen, Z. The Histaminergic System in Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Arrang, J.M.; Garbarg, M.; Schwartz, J.C. Auto-Inhibition of Brain Histamine Release Mediated by a Novel Class (H3) of Histamine Receptor. Nature 1983, 302, 832–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Schlicker, E.; Betz, R.; Göthert, M. Histamine H3 Receptor-Mediated Inhibition of Serotonin Release in the Rat Brain Cortex. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 1988, 337, 588–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Schlicker, E.; Fink, K.; Hinterthaner, M.; Göthert, M. Inhibition of Noradrenaline Release in the Rat Brain Cortex via Presynaptic H3 Receptors. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 1989, 340, 633–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Schlicker, E.; Fink, K.; Detzner, M.; Göthert, M. Histamine Inhibits Dopamine Release in the Mouse Striatum via Presynaptic H3 Receptors. J. Neural Transm. Gen. Sect. 1993, 93, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Brioni, J.D.; Esbenshade, T.A.; Garrison, T.R.; Bitner, S.R.; Cowart, M.D. Discovery of Histamine H3 Antagonists for the Treatment of Cognitive Disorders and Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2011, 336, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wong, T.-S.; Li, G.; Li, S.; Gao, W.; Chen, G.; Gan, S.; Zhang, M.; Li, H.; Wu, S.; Du, Y. G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Neurodegenerative Diseases and Psychiatric Disorders. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Bongers, G.; Sallmen, T.; Passani, M.B.; Mariottini, C.; Wendelin, D.; Lozada, A.; van Marle, A.; Navis, M.; Blandina, P.; Bakker, R.A.; et al. The Akt/GSK-3β Axis as a New Signaling Pathway of the Histamine H3 Receptor. J. Neurochem. 2007, 103, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Rocha, S.M.; Pires, J.; Esteves, M.; Graça, B.; Bernardino, L. Histamine: A New Immunomodulatory Player in the Neuron-Glia Crosstalk. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2014, 8, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Iida, T.; Yanai, K.; Yoshikawa, T. Histamine and Microglia. In The Functional Roles of Histamine Receptors; Yanai, K., Passani, M.B., Eds.; Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 59, pp. 241–259. ISBN 978-3-031-16996-0. [Google Scholar]
  109. Xu, J.; Zhang, X.; Qian, Q.; Wang, Y.; Dong, H.; Li, N.; Qian, Y.; Jin, W. Histamine Upregulates the Expression of Histamine Receptors and Increases the Neuroprotective Effect of Astrocytes. J. Neuroinflamm. 2018, 15, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhang, W.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Qu, C.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, S. Histamine Induces Microglia Activation and the Release of Proinflammatory Mediators in Rat Brain Via H1R or H4R. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2020, 15, 280–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Ferreira, R.; Santos, T.; Gonçalves, J.; Baltazar, G.; Ferreira, L.; Agasse, F.; Bernardino, L. Histamine Modulates Microglia Function. J. Neuroinflamm. 2012, 9, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Dong, H.; Zhang, W.; Zeng, X.; Hu, G.; Zhang, H.; He, S.; Zhang, S. Histamine Induces Upregulated Expression of Histamine Receptors and Increases Release of Inflammatory Mediators from Microglia. Mol. Neurobiol. 2014, 49, 1487–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Zhu, J.; Qu, C.; Lu, X.; Zhang, S. Activation of Microglia by Histamine and Substance P. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 34, 768–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Apolloni, S.; Fabbrizio, P.; Amadio, S.; Napoli, G.; Verdile, V.; Morello, G.; Iemmolo, R.; Aronica, E.; Cavallaro, S.; Volonté, C. Histamine Regulates the Inflammatory Profile of SOD1-G93A Microglia and the Histaminergic System Is Dysregulated in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Wendeln, A.-C.; Degenhardt, K.; Kaurani, L.; Gertig, M.; Ulas, T.; Jain, G.; Wagner, J.; Häsler, L.M.; Wild, K.; Skodras, A.; et al. Innate Immune Memory in the Brain Shapes Neurological Disease Hallmarks. Nature 2018, 556, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Saika, F.; Matsuzaki, S.; Kobayashi, D.; Ideguchi, Y.; Nakamura, T.Y.; Kishioka, S.; Kiguchi, N. Chemogenetic Regulation of CX3CR1-Expressing Microglia Using Gi-DREADD Exerts Sex-Dependent Anti-Allodynic Effects in Mouse Models of Neuropathic Pain. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Bossuyt, J.; Van Den Herrewegen, Y.; Nestor, L.; Buckinx, A.; De Bundel, D.; Smolders, I. Chemogenetic Modulation of Astrocytes and Microglia: State-of-the-Art and Implications in Neuroscience. Glia 2023, 71, 2071–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Sharma, M.; Arbabzada, N.; Flood, P.M. Mechanism Underlying Β2-AR Agonist-Mediated Phenotypic Conversion of LPS-Activated Microglial Cells. J. Neuroimmunol. 2019, 332, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Yi, M.-H.; Liu, Y.U.; Liu, K.; Chen, T.; Bosco, D.B.; Zheng, J.; Xie, M.; Zhou, L.; Qu, W.; Wu, L.-J. Chemogenetic Manipulation of Microglia Inhibits Neuroinflammation and Neuropathic Pain in Mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 2021, 92, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Ding, X.; Liao, F.-F.; Su, L.; Yang, X.; Yang, W.; Ren, Q.-H.; Zhang, J.-Z.; Wang, H.-M. Sciatic Nerve Block Downregulates the BDNF Pathway to Alleviate the Neonatal Incision-Induced Exaggeration of Incisional Pain via Decreasing Microglial Activation. Brain Behav. Immun. 2022, 105, 204–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Parusel, S.; Yi, M.-H.; Hunt, C.L.; Wu, L.-J. Chemogenetic and Optogenetic Manipulations of Microglia in Chronic Pain. Neurosci. Bull. 2023, 39, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Iida, T.; Yoshikawa, T.; Matsuzawa, T.; Naganuma, F.; Nakamura, T.; Miura, Y.; Mohsen, A.S.; Harada, R.; Iwata, R.; Yanai, K. Histamine H3 Receptor in Primary Mouse Microglia Inhibits Chemotaxis, Phagocytosis, and Cytokine Secretion. Glia 2015, 63, 1213–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Iida, T.; Yoshikawa, T.; Kárpáti, A.; Matsuzawa, T.; Kitano, H.; Mogi, A.; Harada, R.; Naganuma, F.; Nakamura, T.; Yanai, K. JNJ10181457, a Histamine H3 Receptor Inverse Agonist, Regulates in Vivo Microglial Functions and Improves Depression-like Behaviours in Mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 488, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Wang, J.; Liu, B.; Sun, F.; Xu, Y.; Luan, H.; Yang, M.; Wang, C.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, Z.; Yan, H. Histamine H3R Antagonist Counteracts the Impaired Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Neuroinflammation. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2022, 110, 109045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Osborn, L.M.; Kamphuis, W.; Wadman, W.J.; Hol, E.M. Astrogliosis: An Integral Player in the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease. Prog. Neurobiol. 2016, 144, 121–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Pekny, M.; Wilhelmsson, U.; Pekna, M. The Dual Role of Astrocyte Activation and Reactive Gliosis. Neurosci. Lett. 2014, 565, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Green, H.F.; Nolan, Y.M. Inflammation and the Developing Brain: Consequences for Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Behavior. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2014, 40, 20–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Ryan, S.M.; Nolan, Y.M. Neuroinflammation Negatively Affects Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Cognition: Can Exercise Compensate? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2016, 61, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Rangon, C.-M.; Schang, A.-L.; Van Steenwinckel, J.; Schwendimann, L.; Lebon, S.; Fu, T.; Chen, L.; Beneton, V.; Journiac, N.; Young-Ten, P.; et al. Myelination Induction by a Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist in a Mouse Model of Preterm White Matter Injury. Brain Behav. Immun. 2018, 74, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Liao, R.; Chen, Y.; Cheng, L.; Fan, L.; Chen, H.; Wan, Y.; You, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Jiang, L.; Chen, Z.; et al. Histamine H1 Receptors in Neural Stem Cells Are Required for the Promotion of Neurogenesis Conferred by H3 Receptor Antagonism Following Traumatic Brain Injury. Stem Cell Rep. 2019, 12, 532–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Xiong, X.-Y.; Liu, L.; Yang, Q.-W. Functions and Mechanisms of Microglia/Macrophages in Neuroinflammation and Neurogenesis after Stroke. Prog. Neurobiol. 2016, 142, 23–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Belarbi, K.; Arellano, C.; Ferguson, R.; Jopson, T.; Rosi, S. Chronic Neuroinflammation Impacts the Recruitment of Adult-Born Neurons into Behaviorally Relevant Hippocampal Networks. Brain Behav. Immun. 2012, 26, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Zhang, J.; Rong, P.; Zhang, L.; He, H.; Zhou, T.; Fan, Y.; Mo, L.; Zhao, Q.; Han, Y.; Li, S.; et al. IL4-Driven Microglia Modulate Stress Resilience through BDNF-Dependent Neurogenesis. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabb9888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Guilloux, J.-P.; Samuels, B.A.; Mendez-David, I.; Hu, A.; Levinstein, M.; Faye, C.; Mekiri, M.; Mocaer, E.; Gardier, A.M.; Hen, R.; et al. S 38093, a Histamine H3 Antagonist/Inverse Agonist, Promotes Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Improves Context Discrimination Task in Aged Mice. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Scott Bitner, R. Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein (CREB) Phosphorylation: A Mechanistic Marker in the Development of Memory Enhancing Alzheimer’s Disease Therapeutics. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2012, 83, 705–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Wu, X.; Fu, S.; Liu, Y.; Luo, H.; Li, F.; Wang, Y.; Gao, M.; Cheng, Y.; Xie, Z. NDP-MSH Binding Melanocortin-1 Receptor Ameliorates Neuroinflammation and BBB Disruption through CREB/Nr4a1/NF-κB Pathway after Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Mice. J. Neuroinflamm. 2019, 16, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Luan, B.; Yoon, Y.-S.; Le Lay, J.; Kaestner, K.H.; Hedrick, S.; Montminy, M. CREB Pathway Links PGE2 Signaling with Macrophage Polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 15642–15647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Wang, J.; Liu, B.; Xu, Y.; Yang, M.; Wang, C.; Song, M.; Liu, J.; Wang, W.; You, J.; Sun, F.; et al. Activation of CREB-Mediated Autophagy by Thioperamide Ameliorates β-Amyloid Pathology and Cognition in Alzheimer’s Disease. Aging Cell 2021, 20, e13333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Mariottini, C.; Scartabelli, T.; Bongers, G.; Arrigucci, S.; Nosi, D.; Leurs, R.; Chiarugi, A.; Blandina, P.; Pellegrini-Giampietro, D.E.; Beatrice Passani, M. Activation of the Histaminergic H3 Receptor Induces Phosphorylation of the Akt/GSK-3β Pathway in Cultured Cortical Neurons and Protects against Neurotoxic Insults. J. Neurochem. 2009, 110, 1469–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Wang, L.; Fang, J.; Jiang, H.; Wang, Q.; Xue, S.; Li, Z.; Liu, R. 7-Pyrrolidinethoxy-4′-Methoxyisoflavone Prevents Amyloid β–Induced Injury by Regulating Histamine H3 Receptor-Mediated cAMP/CREB and AKT/GSK3β Pathways. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Patnaik, R.; Sharma, A.; Skaper, S.D.; Muresanu, D.F.; Lafuente, J.V.; Castellani, R.J.; Nozari, A.; Sharma, H.S. Histamine H3 Inverse Agonist BF 2649 or Antagonist with Partial H4 Agonist Activity Clobenpropit Reduces Amyloid Beta Peptide-Induced Brain Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2018, 55, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Huang, Y.-W.; Hu, W.-W.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, L.-S.; Shen, H.-Q.; Timmerman, H.; Leurs, R.; Yanai, K. Effect of the Histamine H3-Antagonist Clobenpropit on Spatial Memory Deficits Induced by MK-801 as Evaluated by Radial Maze in Sprague-Dawley Rats. Behav. Brain Res. 2004, 151, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Mani, V.; Arfeen, M.; Ali, H.M.; Abdel-Moneim, A.-M.H.; Aldubayan, M.; Alhowail, A. Neuroprotective Effect of Clobenpropit against Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Cognitive Deficits via Attenuating Neuroinflammation and Enhancing Mitochondrial Functions in Mice. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Steele, J.W.; Lachenmayer, M.L.; Ju, S.; Stock, A.; Liken, J.; Kim, S.H.; Delgado, L.M.; Alfaro, I.E.; Bernales, S.; Verdile, G.; et al. Latrepirdine Improves Cognition and Arrests Progression of Neuropathology in an Alzheimer’s Mouse Model. Mol. Psychiatry 2013, 18, 889–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Feng, T.; Tammineni, P.; Agrawal, C.; Jeong, Y.Y.; Cai, Q. Autophagy-Mediated Regulation of BACE1 Protein Trafficking and Degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 1679–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Schneider, E.H.; Neumann, D.; Seifert, R. Modulation of Behavior by the Histaminergic System: Lessons from HDC-, H3R- and H4R-Deficient Mice. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2014, 47, 101–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Perry, V.H. Innate Inflammation in Parkinson’s Disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012, 2, a009373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Vedam-Mai, V. Harnessing the Immune System for the Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease. Brain Res. 2021, 1758, 147308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Rinne, J.O.; Anichtchik, O.V.; Eriksson, K.S.; Kaslin, J.; Tuomisto, L.; Kalimo, H.; Röyttä, M.; Panula, P. Increased Brain Histamine Levels in Parkinson’s Disease but Not in Multiple System Atrophy. J. Neurochem. 2002, 81, 954–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Anichtchik, O.V.; Peitsaro, N.; Rinne, J.O.; Kalimo, H.; Panula, P. Distribution and Modulation of Histamine H3 Receptors in Basal Ganglia and Frontal Cortex of Healthy Controls and Patients with Parkinson’s Disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2001, 8, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Shan, L.; Bossers, K.; Luchetti, S.; Balesar, R.; Lethbridge, N.; Chazot, P.L.; Bao, A.-M.; Swaab, D.F. Alterations in the Histaminergic System in the Substantia Nigra and Striatum of Parkinson’s Patients: A Postmortem Study. Neurobiol. Aging 2012, 33, 1488.e1–1488.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Łażewska, D.; Olejarz-Maciej, A.; Reiner, D.; Kaleta, M.; Latacz, G.; Zygmunt, M.; Doroz-Płonka, A.; Karcz, T.; Frank, A.; Stark, H.; et al. Dual Target Ligands with 4-Tert-Butylphenoxy Scaffold as Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonists and Monoamine Oxidase B Inhibitors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Sharma, A.; Muresanu, D.F.; Patnaik, R.; Menon, P.K.; Tian, Z.R.; Sahib, S.; Castellani, R.J.; Nozari, A.; Lafuente, J.V.; Buzoianu, A.D.; et al. Histamine H3 and H4 Receptors Modulate Parkinson’s Disease Induced Brain Pathology. Neuroprotective Effects of Nanowired BF-2649 and Clobenpropit with Anti-Histamine-Antibody Therapy. Prog. Brain Res. 2021, 266, 1–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Masini, D.; Lopes-Aguiar, C.; Bonito-Oliva, A.; Papadia, D.; Andersson, R.; Fisahn, A.; Fisone, G. The Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist Thioperamide Rescues Circadian Rhythm and Memory Function in Experimental Parkinsonism. Transl. Psychiatry 2017, 7, e1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Nowak, P.; Bortel, A.; Dabrowska, J.; Biedka, I.; Slomian, G.; Roczniak, W.; Kostrzewa, R.M.; Brus, R. Histamine H(3) Receptor Ligands Modulate L-Dopa-Evoked Behavioral Responses and L-Dopa Derived Extracellular Dopamine in Dopamine-Denervated Rat Striatum. Neurotox. Res. 2008, 13, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Hagenow, S.; Stasiak, A.; Ramsay, R.R.; Stark, H. Ciproxifan, a Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist, Reversibly Inhibits Monoamine Oxidase A and B. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Baronio, D.; Castro, K.; Gonchoroski, T.; de Melo, G.M.; Nunes, G.D.F.; Bambini-Junior, V.; Gottfried, C.; Riesgo, R. Effects of an H3R Antagonist on the Animal Model of Autism Induced by Prenatal Exposure to Valproic Acid. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0116363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Eissa, N.; Jayaprakash, P.; Azimullah, S.; Ojha, S.K.; Al-Houqani, M.; Jalal, F.Y.; Łażewska, D.; Kieć-Kononowicz, K.; Sadek, B. The Histamine H3R Antagonist DL77 Attenuates Autistic Behaviors in a Prenatal Valproic Acid-Induced Mouse Model of Autism. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Molenhuis, R.T.; Hutten, L.; Kas, M.J.H. Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonism Modulates Autism-like Hyperactivity but Not Repetitive Behaviors in BTBR T+Itpr3tf/J Inbred Mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2022, 212, 173304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Kern, J.K.; Geier, D.A.; Sykes, L.K.; Geier, M.R. Relevance of Neuroinflammation and Encephalitis in Autism. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2016, 9, 166220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Vargas, D.L.; Nascimbene, C.; Krishnan, C.; Zimmerman, A.W.; Pardo, C.A. Neuroglial Activation and Neuroinflammation in the Brain of Patients with Autism. Ann. Neurol. 2005, 57, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. McTighe, S.M.; Neal, S.J.; Lin, Q.; Hughes, Z.A.; Smith, D.G. The BTBR Mouse Model of Autism Spectrum Disorders Has Learning and Attentional Impairments and Alterations in Acetylcholine and Kynurenic Acid in Prefrontal Cortex. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Young, A.M.H.; Campbell, E.; Lynch, S.; Suckling, J.; Powis, S.J. Aberrant NF-KappaB Expression in Autism Spectrum Condition: A Mechanism for Neuroinflammation. Front. Psychiatry 2011, 2, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Venkatachalam, K.; Eissa, N.; Awad, M.A.; Jayaprakash, P.; Zhong, S.; Stölting, F.; Stark, H.; Sadek, B. The Histamine H3R and Dopamine D2R/D3R Antagonist ST-713 Ameliorates Autism-like Behavioral Features in BTBR T+tf/J Mice by Multiple Actions. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 138, 111517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Eissa, N.; Azimullah, S.; Jayaprakash, P.; Jayaraj, R.L.; Reiner, D.; Ojha, S.K.; Beiram, R.; Stark, H.; Łażewska, D.; Kieć-Kononowicz, K.; et al. The Dual-Active Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist and Acetylcholine Esterase Inhibitor E100 Ameliorates Stereotyped Repetitive Behavior and Neuroinflammmation in Sodium Valproate Induced Autism in Mice. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2019, 312, 108775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Deckmann, I.; Schwingel, G.B.; Fontes-Dutra, M.; Bambini-Junior, V.; Gottfried, C. Neuroimmune Alterations in Autism: A Translational Analysis Focusing on the Animal Model of Autism Induced by Prenatal Exposure to Valproic Acid. Neuroimmunomodulation 2018, 25, 285–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Thomas, S.D.; Jha, N.K.; Ojha, S.; Sadek, B. mTOR Signaling Disruption and Its Association with the Development of Autism Spectrum Disorder. Molecules 2023, 28, 1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Shan, L.; Bao, A.-M.; Swaab, D.F. The Human Histaminergic System in Neuropsychiatric Disorders. Trends Neurosci. 2015, 38, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Alhusaini, M.; Eissa, N.; Saad, A.K.; Beiram, R.; Sadek, B. Revisiting Preclinical Observations of Several Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonists/Inverse Agonists in Cognitive Impairment, Anxiety, Depression, and Sleep–Wake Cycle Disorder. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 861094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Hafez, D.E.; Dubiel, M.; La Spada, G.; Catto, M.; Reiner-Link, D.; Syu, Y.-T.; Abdel-Halim, M.; Hwang, T.-L.; Stark, H.; Abadi, A.H. Novel Benzothiazole Derivatives as Multitargeted-Directed Ligands for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2023, 38, 2175821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Rizk, A.; Curley, J.; Robertson, J.; Raber, J. Anxiety and Cognition in Histamine H3 Receptor−/− Mice. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004, 19, 1992–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Medhurst, A.D.; Atkins, A.R.; Beresford, I.J.; Brackenborough, K.; Briggs, M.A.; Calver, A.R.; Cilia, J.; Cluderay, J.E.; Crook, B.; Davis, J.B.; et al. GSK189254, a Novel H3 Receptor Antagonist That Binds to Histamine H3 Receptors in Alzheimer’s Disease Brain and Improves Cognitive Performance in Preclinical Models. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2007, 321, 1032–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Galici, R.; Boggs, J.D.; Aluisio, L.; Fraser, I.C.; Bonaventure, P.; Lord, B.; Lovenberg, T.W. JNJ-10181457, a Selective Non-Imidazole Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist, Normalizes Acetylcholine Neurotransmission and Has Efficacy in Translational Rat Models of Cognition. Neuropharmacology 2009, 56, 1131–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Delay-Goyet, P.; Blanchard, V.; Schussler, N.; Lopez-Grancha, M.; Ménager, J.; Mary, V.; Sultan, E.; Buzy, A.; Guillemot, J.-C.; Stemmelin, J.; et al. SAR110894, a Potent Histamine H3-Receptor Antagonist, Displays Disease-Modifying Activity in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Tauopathy. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2016, 2, 267–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Rani, B.; Silva-Marques, B.; Leurs, R.; Passani, M.B.; Blandina, P.; Provensi, G. Short- and Long-Term Social Recognition Memory Are Differentially Modulated by Neuronal Histamine. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Panayi, F.; Sors, A.; Bert, L.; Martin, B.; Rollin-Jego, G.; Billiras, R.; Carrié, I.; Albinet, K.; Danober, L.; Rogez, N.; et al. In Vivo Pharmacological Profile of S 38093, a Novel Histamine H3 Receptor Inverse Agonist. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 803, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Kumar, A.; Dogra, S.; Sona, C.; Umrao, D.; Rashid, M.; Singh, S.K.; Wahajuddin, M.; Yadav, P.N. Chronic Histamine 3 Receptor Antagonism Alleviates Depression like Conditions in Mice via Modulation of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Hypothalamus-Pituitary Adrenal Axis. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2019, 101, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Bahi, A.; Schwed, J.S.; Walter, M.; Stark, H.; Sadek, B. Anxiolytic and Antidepressant-like Activities of the Novel and Potent Non-Imidazole Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist ST-1283. Drug Des. Devel Ther. 2014, 8, 627–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Alachkar, A.; Łażewska, D.; Kieć-Kononowicz, K.; Sadek, B. The Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist E159 Reverses Memory Deficits Induced by Dizocilpine in Passive Avoidance and Novel Object Recognition Paradigm in Rats. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Sadek, B.; Saad, A.; Subramanian, D.; Shafiullah, M.; Łażewska, D.; Kieć-Kononowiczc, K. Anticonvulsant and Procognitive Properties of the Non-Imidazole Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist DL77 in Male Adult Rats. Neuropharmacology 2016, 106, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Bahi, A.; Sadek, B.; Nurulain, S.M.; Łażewska, D.; Kieć-Kononowicz, K. The Novel Non-Imidazole Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist DL77 Reduces Voluntary Alcohol Intake and Ethanol-Induced Conditioned Place Preference in Mice. Physiol. Behav. 2015, 151, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Alachkar, A.; Azimullah, S.; Lotfy, M.; Adeghate, E.; Ojha, S.K.; Beiram, R.; Łażewska, D.; Kieć-Kononowicz, K.; Sadek, B. Antagonism of Histamine H3 Receptors Alleviates Pentylenetetrazole-Induced Kindling and Associated Memory Deficits by Mitigating Oxidative Stress, Central Neurotransmitters, and c-Fos Protein Expression in Rats. Molecules 2020, 25, 1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Abdalla, S.; Eissa, N.; Jayaprakash, P.; Beiram, R.; Kuder, K.J.; Łażewska, D.; Kieć-Kononowicz, K.; Sadek, B. The Potent and Selective Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist E169 Counteracts Cognitive Deficits and Mitigates Disturbances in the PI3K/AKT/GSK-3β Signaling Pathway in MK801-Induced Amnesia in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Bardgett, M.E.; Davis, N.N.; Schultheis, P.J.; Griffith, M.S. Ciproxifan, an H3 Receptor Antagonist, Alleviates Hyperactivity and Cognitive Deficits in the APPTg2576 Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2011, 95, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Chauveau, F.; De Job, E.; Poly-Thomasson, B.; Cavroy, R.; Thomasson, J.; Fromage, D.; Beracochea, D. Procognitive Impact of Ciproxifan (a Histaminergic H3 Receptor Antagonist) on Contextual Memory Retrieval after Acute Stress. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2019, 25, 832–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Taheri, F.; Esmaeilpour, K.; Sepehri, G.; Sheibani, V.; Ur Rehman, N.; Maneshian, M. Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist, Ciproxifan, Alleviates Cognition and Synaptic Plasticity Alterations in a Valproic Acid-Induced Animal Model of Autism. Psychopharmacology 2022, 239, 2673–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Taheri, F.; Esmaeilpour, K.; Sepehri, G.; Sheibani, V.; Shekari, M.A. Amelioration of Cognition Impairments in the Valproic Acid-Induced Animal Model of Autism by Ciproxifan, a Histamine H3-Receptor Antagonist. Behav. Pharmacol. 2023, 34, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Brown, J.W.; Whitehead, C.A.; Basso, A.M.; Rueter, L.E.; Zhang, M. Preclinical Evaluation of Non-Imidazole Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonists in Comparison to Atypical Antipsychotics for the Treatment of Cognitive Deficits Associated with Schizophrenia. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013, 16, 889–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Bhowmik, M.; Saini, N.; Vohora, D. Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonism by ABT-239 Attenuates Kainic Acid Induced Excitotoxicity in Mice. Brain Res. 2014, 1581, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Fox, G.B.; Esbenshade, T.A.; Pan, J.B.; Radek, R.J.; Krueger, K.M.; Yao, B.B.; Browman, K.E.; Buckley, M.J.; Ballard, M.E.; Komater, V.A.; et al. Pharmacological Properties of ABT-239 [4-(2-{2-[(2R)-2-Methylpyrrolidinyl]Ethyl}-Benzofuran-5-Yl)Benzonitrile]: II. Neurophysiological Characterization and Broad Preclinical Efficacy in Cognition and Schizophrenia of a Potent and Selective Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2005, 313, 176–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Trofimiuk, E.; Wielgat, P.; Car, H. Selective H3 Antagonist (ABT-239) Differentially Modifies Cognitive Function Under the Impact of Restraint Stress. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2021, 14, 614810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Esbenshade, T.A.; Browman, K.E.; Miller, T.R.; Krueger, K.M.; Komater-Roderwald, V.; Zhang, M.; Fox, G.B.; Rueter, L.; Robb, H.M.; Radek, R.J.; et al. Pharmacological Properties and Procognitive Effects of ABT-288, a Potent and Selective Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2012, 343, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Foley, A.G.; Prendergast, A.; Barry, C.; Scully, D.; Upton, N.; Medhurst, A.D.; Regan, C.M. H3 Receptor Antagonism Enhances NCAM PSA-Mediated Plasticity and Improves Memory Consolidation in Odor Discrimination and Delayed Match-to-Position Paradigms. Neuropsychopharmacology 2009, 34, 2585–2600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Browman, K.E.; Komater, V.A.; Curzon, P.; Rueter, L.E.; Hancock, A.A.; Decker, M.W.; Fox, G.B. Enhancement of Prepulse Inhibition of Startle in Mice by the H3 Receptor Antagonists Thioperamide and Ciproxifan. Behav. Brain Res. 2004, 153, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Bernaerts, P.; Lamberty, Y.; Tirelli, E. Histamine H3 Antagonist Thioperamide Dose-Dependently Enhances Memory Consolidation and Reverses Amnesia Induced by Dizocilpine or Scopolamine in a One-Trial Inhibitory Avoidance Task in Mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2004, 154, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Orsetti, M.; Ghi, P.; Di Carlo, G. Histamine H(3)-Receptor Antagonism Improves Memory Retention and Reverses the Cognitive Deficit Induced by Scopolamine in a Two-Trial Place Recognition Task. Behav. Brain Res. 2001, 124, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Griebel, G.; Pichat, P.; Pruniaux, M.-P.; Beeské, S.; Lopez-Grancha, M.; Genet, E.; Terranova, J.-P.; Castro, A.; Sánchez, J.A.; Black, M.; et al. SAR110894, a Potent Histamine H3-Receptor Antagonist, Displays Procognitive Effects in Rodents. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2012, 102, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Gao, Z.; Hurst, W.J.; Czechtizky, W.; Francon, D.; Griebel, G.; Nagorny, R.; Pichat, P.; Schwink, L.; Stengelin, S.; Hendrix, J.A.; et al. Discovery of a Potent, Selective, and Orally Bioavailable Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist SAR110068 for the Treatment of Sleep-Wake Disorders. Bioorg Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23, 6141–6145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Hino, N.; Marumo, T.; Kotani, M.; Shimazaki, T.; Kaku-Fukumoto, A.; Hikichi, H.; Karasawa, J.-I.; Tomishima, Y.; Komiyama, H.; Tatsuda, E.; et al. A Novel Potent and Selective Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist Enerisant: In Vitro Profiles, In Vivo Receptor Occupancy, and Wake-Promoting and Procognitive Effects in Rodents. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2020, 375, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Raddatz, R.; Hudkins, R.L.; Mathiasen, J.R.; Gruner, J.A.; Flood, D.G.; Aimone, L.D.; Le, S.; Schaffhauser, H.; Duzic, E.; Gasior, M.; et al. CEP-26401 (Irdabisant), a Potent and Selective Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist/Inverse Agonist with Cognition-Enhancing and Wake-Promoting Activities. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2012, 340, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Femenía, T.; Magara, S.; DuPont, C.M.; Lindskog, M. Hippocampal-Dependent Antidepressant Action of the H3 Receptor Antagonist Clobenpropit in a Rat Model of Depression. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015, 18, pyv032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Chen, Z. Effect of Histamine H3-Receptor Antagonist Clobenpropit on Spatial Memory of Radial Maze Performance in Rats. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2000, 21, 905–910. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  203. Brabant, C.; Charlier, Y.; Tirelli, E. The Histamine H3-Receptor Inverse Agonist Pitolisant Improves Fear Memory in Mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2013, 243, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Nirogi, R.; Grandhi, V.R.; Medapati, R.B.; Ganuga, N.; Benade, V.; Gandipudi, S.; Manoharan, A.; Abraham, R.; Jayarajan, P.; Bhyrapuneni, G.; et al. Histamine 3 Receptor Inverse Agonist Samelisant (SUVN-G3031): Pharmacological Characterization of an Investigational Agent for the Treatment of Cognitive Disorders. J. Psychopharmacol. 2021, 35, 713–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Khan, N.; Saad, A.; Nurulain, S.M.; Darras, F.H.; Decker, M.; Sadek, B. The Dual-Acting H3 Receptor Antagonist and AChE Inhibitor UW-MD-71 Dose-Dependently Enhances Memory Retrieval and Reverses Dizocilpine-Induced Memory Impairment in Rats. Behav. Brain Res. SreeTestContent1 2016, 297, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Sadek, B.; Khan, N.; Darras, F.H.; Pockes, S.; Decker, M. The Dual-Acting AChE Inhibitor and H3 Receptor Antagonist UW-MD-72 Reverses Amnesia Induced by Scopolamine or Dizocilpine in Passive Avoidance Paradigm in Rats. Physiol. Behav. 2016, 165, 383–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Eissa, N.; Jayaprakash, P.; Stark, H.; Łażewska, D.; Kieć-Kononowicz, K.; Sadek, B. Simultaneous Blockade of Histamine H3 Receptors and Inhibition of Acetylcholine Esterase Alleviate Autistic-Like Behaviors in BTBR T+ Tf/J Mouse Model of Autism. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Eissa, N.; Azimullah, S.; Jayaprakash, P.; Jayaraj, R.L.; Reiner, D.; Ojha, S.K.; Beiram, R.; Stark, H.; Łażewska, D.; Kieć-Kononowicz, K.; et al. The Dual-Active Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonist and Acetylcholine Esterase Inhibitor E100 Alleviates Autistic-Like Behaviors and Oxidative Stress in Valproic Acid Induced Autism in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Eissa, N.; Venkatachalam, K.; Jayaprakash, P.; Falkenstein, M.; Dubiel, M.; Frank, A.; Reiner-Link, D.; Stark, H.; Sadek, B. The Multi-Targeting Ligand ST-2223 with Histamine H3 Receptor and Dopamine D2/D3 Receptor Antagonist Properties Mitigates Autism-Like Repetitive Behaviors and Brain Oxidative Stress in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Eissa, N.; Venkatachalam, K.; Jayaprakash, P.; Yuvaraju, P.; Falkenstein, M.; Stark, H.; Sadek, B. Experimental Studies Indicate That ST-2223, the Antagonist of Histamine H3 and Dopamine D2/D3 Receptors, Restores Social Deficits and Neurotransmission Dysregulation in Mouse Model of Autism. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Grove, R.A.; Harrington, C.M.; Mahler, A.; Beresford, I.; Maruff, P.; Lowy, M.T.; Nicholls, A.P.; Boardley, R.L.; Berges, A.C.; Nathan, P.J.; et al. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 16-Week Study of the H3 Receptor Antagonist, GSK239512 as a Monotherapy in Subjects with Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2014, 11, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Haig, G.M.; Pritchett, Y.; Meier, A.; Othman, A.A.; Hall, C.; Gault, L.M.; Lenz, R.A. A Randomized Study of H3 Antagonist ABT-288 in Mild-To-Moderate Alzheimer’s Dementia. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2014, 42, 959–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Terrando, N.; Eriksson, L.I.; Ryu, J.K.; Yang, T.; Monaco, C.; Feldmann, M.; Jonsson Fagerlund, M.; Charo, I.F.; Akassoglou, K.; Maze, M. Resolving Postoperative Neuroinflammation and Cognitive Decline. Ann. Neurol. 2011, 70, 986–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Sousa, C.; Golebiewska, A.; Poovathingal, S.K.; Kaoma, T.; Pires-Afonso, Y.; Martina, S.; Coowar, D.; Azuaje, F.; Skupin, A.; Balling, R.; et al. Single-Cell Transcriptomics Reveals Distinct Inflammation-Induced Microglia Signatures. EMBO Rep. 2018, 19, e46171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. de Almeida, M.A.; Izquierdo, I. Memory Facilitation by Histamine. Arch. Int. Pharmacodyn. Ther. 1986, 283, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  216. Bardgett, M.E.; Points, M.; Roflow, J.; Blankenship, M.; Griffith, M.S. Effects of the H(3) Antagonist, Thioperamide, on Behavioral Alterations Induced by Systemic MK-801 Administration in Rats. Psychopharmacology 2009, 205, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Bitner, R.S.; Markosyan, S.; Nikkel, A.L.; Brioni, J.D. In-Vivo Histamine H3 Receptor Antagonism Activates Cellular Signaling Suggestive of Symptomatic and Disease Modifying Efficacy in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuropharmacology 2011, 60, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Sharma, K. Cholinesterase Inhibitors as Alzheimer’s Therapeutics (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 20, 1479–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Godyń, J.; Zaręba, P.; Stary, D.; Kaleta, M.; Kuder, K.J.; Latacz, G.; Mogilski, S.; Reiner-Link, D.; Frank, A.; Doroz-Płonka, A.; et al. Benzophenone Derivatives with Histamine H3 Receptor Affinity and Cholinesterase Inhibitory Potency as Multitarget-Directed Ligands for Possible Therapy of Alzheimer’s Disease. Molecules 2023, 28, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Kumar, N.; Kumar, V.; Anand, P.; Kumar, V.; Ranjan Dwivedi, A.; Kumar, V. Advancements in the Development of Multi-Target Directed Ligands for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2022, 61, 116742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Lopes, F.B.; Aranha, C.M.S.Q.; Fernandes, J.P.S. Histamine H3 Receptor and Cholinesterases as Synergistic Targets for Cognitive Decline: Strategies to the Rational Design of Multitarget Ligands. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2021, 98, 212–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Potential relationship between neurodegenerative diseases and glial cells. The aggregated proteins like amyloid-β, tau, and α-synuclein induce changes in microglia and astrocytes, causing them to adopt proinflammatory phenotypes. Activated microglia are often classified as M1 or M2 phenotypes. Resting microglia polarize to the M1 phenotype and produce proinflammatory substances such as TNFα, IL-1, IL-6, IL-12, NO, and ROS. Activated astrocytes are usually divided into the A1 and A2 phenotypes. The M1 microglia’s production of the proinflammatory cytokines causes the A1 neurotoxic phenotype and encourages the secretion of TNF α, IL-1, and IL-6. The proinflammatory microglia/astrocytes release factors that can disrupt synaptic function and cause neuronal cell damage. These disruptions contribute to the progression of neurodegenerative diseases.
Figure 1. Potential relationship between neurodegenerative diseases and glial cells. The aggregated proteins like amyloid-β, tau, and α-synuclein induce changes in microglia and astrocytes, causing them to adopt proinflammatory phenotypes. Activated microglia are often classified as M1 or M2 phenotypes. Resting microglia polarize to the M1 phenotype and produce proinflammatory substances such as TNFα, IL-1, IL-6, IL-12, NO, and ROS. Activated astrocytes are usually divided into the A1 and A2 phenotypes. The M1 microglia’s production of the proinflammatory cytokines causes the A1 neurotoxic phenotype and encourages the secretion of TNF α, IL-1, and IL-6. The proinflammatory microglia/astrocytes release factors that can disrupt synaptic function and cause neuronal cell damage. These disruptions contribute to the progression of neurodegenerative diseases.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00831 g001
Figure 2. H3 receptors functioning as auto- and heteroreceptors.
Figure 2. H3 receptors functioning as auto- and heteroreceptors.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00831 g002
Figure 3. Signaling pathways associated with the histamine H3 receptor. The activation of H3R leads to the activation of Gαi/o proteins and subsequent inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (AC), resulting in the suppression of the cAMP/PKA cascade. Consequently, there is a downregulation of the pro-survival transcription factor CREB. H3 receptor stimulation also activates the MAPK and PI3K pathways. The activation of the PI3K enzyme subsequently activates AKT, leading to the inactivation of the proapoptotic protein GSK-3β through phosphorylation. H3 receptor activation also increases the action of enzyme PLA2, leading to the release of arachidonic acid. H3R also play a role in inhibiting the Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE), responsible for buffering intraneuronal pH, and reducing the intracellular levels of Ca2+.
Figure 3. Signaling pathways associated with the histamine H3 receptor. The activation of H3R leads to the activation of Gαi/o proteins and subsequent inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (AC), resulting in the suppression of the cAMP/PKA cascade. Consequently, there is a downregulation of the pro-survival transcription factor CREB. H3 receptor stimulation also activates the MAPK and PI3K pathways. The activation of the PI3K enzyme subsequently activates AKT, leading to the inactivation of the proapoptotic protein GSK-3β through phosphorylation. H3 receptor activation also increases the action of enzyme PLA2, leading to the release of arachidonic acid. H3R also play a role in inhibiting the Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE), responsible for buffering intraneuronal pH, and reducing the intracellular levels of Ca2+.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00831 g003
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the neuroprotective action exhibited by H3 receptor antagonists. The inhibition of H3R results in decreased activity of microglial cells, which encourages a shift from the proinflammatory M1 state to an anti-inflammatory M2 state. This transition alleviates neuroinflammation and supports hippocampal neurogenesis, ultimately enhancing cognitive function.
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the neuroprotective action exhibited by H3 receptor antagonists. The inhibition of H3R results in decreased activity of microglial cells, which encourages a shift from the proinflammatory M1 state to an anti-inflammatory M2 state. This transition alleviates neuroinflammation and supports hippocampal neurogenesis, ultimately enhancing cognitive function.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00831 g004
Table 1. Promising medications targeting neuroinflammation in AD.
Table 1. Promising medications targeting neuroinflammation in AD.
CompoundMechanism of ActionNCT Identifier
IndomethacinCOX1/2 inhibitorNCT00432081
SimufilamInhibitor of Filamin A protein; reducing Aβ levels and mitigating synaptic dysfunctionNCT05575076
CandesartanDecreases NO and TNF-α levelsNCT02646982
MinocyclineInhibition of eIF2αNCT01463384
PioglitazonePPARγ agonistNCT00982202
Simvastatinimmuno-modulatory and anti-inflammatoryNCT00486044
AtomoxetineReduces NF-κB expressionNCT01522404
BaricitinibJanus kinase inhibitor; reduces neuroinflammationNCT05189106
AL002Monoclonal antibody, enhance microglial clearance of AβNCT04592874
NE3107inhibits activation of NF-κB; MAPK-1/3 inhibitorNCT04669028
NilvadipineLower brain amyloid and improve memory functionNCT02017340.
Masitinibtyrosine kinase inhibitorNCT01872598.
BaricitinibJanus kinase inhibitor; reduces neuroinflammationNCT05189106
L-SerineDietary amino acid, reduces inflammation in brainNCT03062449
MontelukastActs as an antagonist at the Cysteinyl leukotriene type 1 receptor, reducing buildup of Aβ protein.NCT03402503
Pepinemab (VX15)monoclonal antibody targeting semaphorin 4D, alleviates inflammation.NCT04381468
SenicapocCalcium-activated potassium channel blockerNCT04804241
CanakinumabAnti-IL-1β monoclonal antibodyNCT04795466
Edonerpic (T-817MA)stimulates sigma receptors, safeguard synaptic plasticity and offers defense against Aβ aggregates.NCT04191486
Neflamapimod (VX-745)p38 MAPK-α inhibitor; reduces synaptic dysfunctionNCT03435861
Edicotinib (JNJ-40346527)reduces neurodegeneration and microglial proliferationNCT04121208
Emtricitabinereduces neuroinflammation.NCT04500847
XPro1595TNF inhibitor; reduces neuroinflammationNCT03943264
CelecoxibCOX-2 inhibitorNCT00065169
EntanerceptTNF-α inhibitorNCT00203359
CyclophosphamateImmuno-suppressor and alkylating agentNCT00013650
Table 2. Promising medications targeting neuroinflammation in PD.
Table 2. Promising medications targeting neuroinflammation in PD.
CompoundMechanism of ActionNCT Identifier
Semaglutideanti-inflammatory and neuroprotective in idiopathic PDNCT03659682
RifaximinModifies Gut Microbiota and Attenuates InflammationNCT03958708
SargramostimRecombinant GM-CSFNCT01882010
ExenatideGLP1 analogueNCT01971242
PioglitazonePPARγ agonistNCT01280123
NabiloneCannabinoid system agonistNCT03769896
PRX002mAb directed at α-synucleinNCT02157714
BIIB054mAb targeting α-synucleinNCT02459886
AFFITOPE PD01Avaccine targeting α-synucleinNCT02216188
AFFITOPE PD03Avaccine targeting α-synucleinNCT02267434
UB-312vaccine targeting α-synucleinNCT04075318
Radotinibc-Abl Tyrosine kinase inhibitorNCT04691661
K0706c-Abl Tyrosine kinase inhibitorNCT03655236
FB-101c-Abl Tyrosine kinase inhibitorNCT04165837
SulforaphaneAnti-inflammation and neuroprotectionNCT05084365
Montelukastcysteinyl LT 1 antagonistNCT06113640
Table 3. Promising medications in clinical trials for ASD.
Table 3. Promising medications in clinical trials for ASD.
CompoundMechanism of ActionNCT Identifier/Reference
TaurineAmino acidNCT05980520
PrednisoloneCorticosteroid[95]
L1-79Tyrosine hydroxylase inhibitorNCT05067582
STP1PDE inhibitor and an NKCC1 inhibitorNCT04644003
MinocyclineModulates microglia polarization and neuroinflammationNCT04075318
N-acetylcysteineAntioxidantNCT03008889
SulforaphaneAnti-inflammation and neuroprotectionNCT02879110
TideglusibGSK-3 inhibitor.NCT02586935
OxytocinRegulation of synaptic functionNCT01944046
Luteolinantioxidant, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects.NCT01847521
Omega-3 Fatty AcidsLower inflammation in brainNCT01695200
Table 4. Summary of the preclinical studies of H3R modulators in various neurological disorders.
Table 4. Summary of the preclinical studies of H3R modulators in various neurological disorders.
H3R ModulatorsPharmacological EffectReference
H3R Antagonists
DL77Reduced stereotypies and social deficits in preclinical investigations in a model of ASD, attenuated the increase in TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β.[158]
Improved cognitive impairments in dizocilpine induced memory impairment in rats.[179]
Increased anticonvulsant activity in epilepsy models.[180]
Dose dependent reduction in both ethanol intake and preference.[181]
E177Enhancement of memory in PTZ-kindled animals, mitigation of oxidative stress.[182]
E169Improvement of memory impairments caused by MK-801.[183]
ST-1283Anxiolytic and antidepressant-like effect[178]
CiproxifanReduction in hyperactivity, and memory impairment in APPTg2576 mice. [184]
Attenuation of impaired sociability and repetitive behavior in the VPA model of ASD.[157]
Improved retrieval of contextual memory in stress and nonstress conditions.[185]
Alleviation of learning and memory decline in ASD model induced by VPA.[186,187]
Improvement in depression-like behavior.[177]
JNJ10181457Restored cognitive function following scopolamine-induced deficits in rats. Normalized Acetylcholine neurotransmission in a model of cognitive impairment.[173]
ABT-239Reduced Ketamine/MK-801 induced impairments in cognitive tests in rodents.[188]
Attenuated KA-mediated behavioral anomalies and excitotoxicity.[189]
Improved attention and cognition, as demonstrated by improved performance in inhibitory avoidance tests and social memory tasks.[190]
Prevented cognitive deficits following chronic restraint stress. [191]
ABT-288Improvement in social recognition memory, spatial learning, and reference memory.[192]
GSK189254Improved cognitive performance in object recognition, passive avoidance, and water maze tests.[172,193]
ThioperamideEnhanced pre-pulse inhibition in schizophrenia model.[194]
Reversed amnesia caused by scopolamine and dizocilpine.[195]
Improved cognitive function in a model of cognitive impairment induced by scopolamine.[196]
Rescues the normal rest/activity cycle and improved memory function in experimental parkinsonism.[154]
SAR110894Prevented tau aggregation in the hippocampus. NFTs were reduced in the hippocampus, and amygdala, mitigation of episodic memory deficits.[174,197]
SAR110068Attenuated memory and attentional deficits [197]
Decreased slow-wave sleep[198]
EnerisantMitigated the decline in object and social memory induced by scopolamine.[199]
CEP-26401 (irdabisant)Enhanced performance in the rat social recognition model assessing short-term memory.[200]
ST713Attenuated expression of NF-kB and considerably reduced elevated levels of the measured cytokines in BTBR mice, mitigated repetitive self-grooming and aggression.[29]
Dose-dependent improvement of social deficits, alleviation of repetitive behaviors in model of ASD. Reduced levels of NF-κB p65, COX-2, and iNOS.[164]
ClobenpropitMarked improvement in the deficits of working and reference memory induced by MK-801.[142]
Reversed memory deficits, No effects on anxiety-like behavior.[201]
Reduction in behavioral deficits. Lowered proinflammatory cytokines and elevated levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines in brain tissues.[143]
Attenuated memory impairment induced by scopolamine.[202]
H3R inverse agonists
BF 2649Significant decreases in injuries to neuronal and glial cells, decrease in the number of Aβ positive cells in the cortex in a model of AD in rats. [141]
Improves fear memory and reverses memory deficits induced by dizocilpine.[203]
S 38093Improved spatial working memory, improvement in cognition.[176]
Samelisant (SUVN-G3031)Enhanced cognitive function in social recognition and object recognition task[204]
Dual-active H3R antagonists and AChE inhibitors (AChEI)
UW-MD-71Improved performance and enhanced memory. Ameliorated the dizocilpine-induced amnesic effects.[205]
UW-MD-72Reduction in memory impairments caused by Scopolamine and dizocilpine.[206]
E100Reduced repetitive stereotypic behaviors in autistic mice, mitigated oxidative stress with decreased microglial activation and decreased levels of NF-κB, COX-2, and iNOS.[165,207,208]
Multiple-active H3R/D2R/D3R antagonists
ST-2223Improvement in core ASD-related behaviors and modulated altered levels of monoaminergic neurotransmitters, mitigation of oxidative stress.[209,210]
Table 5. Summary of clinical trials involving H3R antagonists and inverse agonists.
Table 5. Summary of clinical trials involving H3R antagonists and inverse agonists.
CompoundClinical Indication/ConditionClinical Trial IdentifierStatus
GSK239512Mild-to-moderate ADNCT00675090Completed
GSK239512SchizophreniaNCT01009060Completed
ABT-288Mild-to-moderate ADNCT01018875Completed
AZD5213Mild-to-moderate ADNCT01548287Completed
AZD5213Tourette’s DisorderNCT01904773Completed
GSK189254Mild cognitive impairment, dementiaNCT00474513Completed
SAR110894Add-on therapy for mild-to-moderate ADNCT01266525Completed
TS-091NarcolepsyNCT03267303Completed
JNJ-17216498NarcolepsyNCT00424931Completed
BF2.649NarcolepsyNCT01638403Completed
PF-03654746NarcolepsyNCT01006122Completed
GSK239512SchizophreniaNCT01009060Completed
MK0249SchizophreniaNCT00506077Completed
ABT-288SchizophreniaNCT01077700Completed
GSK239512ADNCT01009255Completed
MK0249ADNCT00420420Completed
ABT-288ADNCT01018875Completed
BF2.649PDNCT01036139Completed
NCT01066442Completed
JNJ-31001074Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (Adults)NCT00566449Completed
MK-3134Dementia NCT01181310Completed
BF2.649EDS in Obstructive sleep apneaNCT02739568Completed
BF2.649Autism Spectrum DisorderNCT05953389Not yet recruiting
GSK189254HyperalgesiaNCT00387413Completed
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Thomas, S.D.; Abdalla, S.; Eissa, N.; Akour, A.; Jha, N.K.; Ojha, S.; Sadek, B. Targeting Microglia in Neuroinflammation: H3 Receptor Antagonists as a Novel Therapeutic Approach for Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease, and Autism Spectrum Disorder. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 831. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070831

AMA Style

Thomas SD, Abdalla S, Eissa N, Akour A, Jha NK, Ojha S, Sadek B. Targeting Microglia in Neuroinflammation: H3 Receptor Antagonists as a Novel Therapeutic Approach for Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease, and Autism Spectrum Disorder. Pharmaceuticals. 2024; 17(7):831. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070831

Chicago/Turabian Style

Thomas, Shilu Deepa, Sabna Abdalla, Nermin Eissa, Amal Akour, Niraj Kumar Jha, Shreesh Ojha, and Bassem Sadek. 2024. "Targeting Microglia in Neuroinflammation: H3 Receptor Antagonists as a Novel Therapeutic Approach for Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease, and Autism Spectrum Disorder" Pharmaceuticals 17, no. 7: 831. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070831

APA Style

Thomas, S. D., Abdalla, S., Eissa, N., Akour, A., Jha, N. K., Ojha, S., & Sadek, B. (2024). Targeting Microglia in Neuroinflammation: H3 Receptor Antagonists as a Novel Therapeutic Approach for Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease, and Autism Spectrum Disorder. Pharmaceuticals, 17(7), 831. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070831

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop