Next Article in Journal
Liver Fibrosis Stages Affect Organic Cation Transporter 1/2 Activities in Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Oral Treatment with the Pectin Fibre Obtained from Yellow Passion Fruit Peels Worsens Sepsis Outcome in Mice by Affecting the Intestinal Barrier
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 17
Issue 7
10.3390/ph17070864
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Selective Antineoplastic Potential of Fractionated Caribbean Native Ganoderma Species Extracts on Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells

by
Luz V. Arroyo-Cruz
1,
Sebastián Sagardía-González
2,
Kurt Miller
2,
Taotao Ling
3,
Fatima Rivas
3 and
Michelle M. Martínez-Montemayor
1,*
1
Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Universidad Central del Caribe, Bayamón 00960-6032, Puerto Rico
2
Huerto Rico, Carolina 00987, Puerto Rico
3
Department of Chemistry, Louisiana State University, 133 Choppin Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(7), 864; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070864
Submission received: 7 June 2024 / Revised: 24 June 2024 / Accepted: 25 June 2024 / Published: 1 July 2024
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype characterized by the absence of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 expression. It is known for its high malignancy, invasiveness, and propensity for metastasis, resulting in a poor prognosis due to the absence of beneficial therapeutic targets. Natural products derived from mushrooms have gained significant attention in neoplastic therapy due to their potential medicinal properties. The therapeutic potential of Ganoderma lucidum in breast cancer has been highlighted by our group, suggesting its use as an adjuvant treatment. The present study aims to assess the potential antineoplastic capacity of two Caribbean native Ganoderma species found in Puerto Rico, Ganoderma multiplicatum (G. multiplicatum) and Ganoderma martinicense (G. martinicense). Antiproliferative studies were conducted via cell viability assays after cultivation, harvesting, and fractionation of both species. The obtained results indicate that most of the fractions show some cytotoxicity against all cell lines, but 33% of the fractions (F1, F2, F7, F12) display selectivity towards cancer cell models. We demonstrate for the first time that native Ganoderma species can generate metabolites with anti-TNBC properties. Future avenues will focus on structure elucidation of the most active fractions of these Ganoderma extracts.

1. Introduction

Cancer, in its various manifestations, is a battle that continues to challenge humanity. Among its most elusive variants is triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a disease that demands new strategies in the fight for life. Globally, TNBC accounts for about 15–20% of all breast cancer (BC) cases [1,2]. Between 8.8 and 15% of BC cases in the United States are TNBC, which is more common in African American and Hispanic women [3,4,5]. In Puerto Rico, TNBC tumors account for 9.5% of BC cases [6]. The five-year survival rate for TNBC is 77%, which is significantly lower than those for other BC subtypes (93%), underscoring the urgent need for more effective therapies [4,7,8]. TNBC is a subtype characterized by the absence of three specific markers in cancer cells: estrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptors (PRs), and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) [7]. Being negative for ERs, PRs, and HER2 makes TNBC particularly challenging to treat, as it does not respond to targeted therapies that are effective in BC tumors that display these receptors [1,9]. Finally, TNBC tends to be more aggressive and metastasizes quicker than other BC types, and is often diagnosed in advanced stages, further complicating treatment [10].
In the search for innovative solutions against TNBC, we explored the promising properties of extracts from the medicinal mushroom Ganoderma species. Ganoderma genus, commonly known as “Reishi” in Japan or “Lingzhi” in China, have been used for centuries in traditional Chinese and Japanese medicine for their health benefits [11,12]. Ganoderma species contain a variety of bioactive compounds, such as triterpenoids and polysaccharides, which have been studied for their potential medicinal qualities [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Previously, we reported the properties of ergosterol peroxide (EP), a bioactive compound isolated from the Ganoderma lucidum (G. lucidum) mushroom. We show EP’s selective anti-cancer properties in a TNBC model [22,23,24,25,26].
Different fractions extracted from Ganoderma spp. exhibit varying levels of cytotoxicity against triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells due to their diverse bioactive compounds, including lanostane triterpenoids, meroterpenoid dimers, triterpenes, and polysaccharides [13,27,28,29,30]. These compounds target different pathways, including cancer cell growth and survival, apoptosis, cell proliferation, and modulating oxidative stress pathways, resulting in differential cytotoxic effects.
Certainly, it is widely recognized that environmental factors play a fundamental role in mushroom morphology, shape, size, and context color, and the production of secondary metabolites [31,32,33]. The stress to which wild species are subjected can act as the trigger for the production and concentration of these metabolites [32,33,34]. In the Caribbean Island of Puerto Rico, neotropical species of Ganoderma can be found in the wild that are morphologically similar to and allied with G. lucidum.
In this brief report, we explore an exceptional natural resource, neotropical extracts from Ganoderma multiplicatum (G. multiplicatum) and Ganoderma martinicense (G. martinicense), in the search for selective therapeutic alternatives against TNBC. We hypothesize that these Puerto Rican native Ganoderma spp. (G. multiplicatum and G. martinicense) are potential producers of anti-TNBC compounds. To investigate whether native Ganoderma species (G. multiplicatum and G. martinicense) had selective cytotoxicity against TNBC cells, large-scale cultures of both native G. multiplicatum and G. martinicense were conducted, followed by alcoholic extraction and fractionation of their individual extracts. Cell viability assays were performed to determine the anti-cancer potential of each fraction that was divided based on polarity and mass [35]. Our work demonstrates for the first time the selective antineoplastic potential of native Puerto Rican Ganoderma species on TNBC cells, while showing no detectable cytotoxicity to noncancerous cell models.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Native Ganoderma spp. Fungi Procedures

2.1.1. Collection and Isolation

Wild samples of the Ganoderma complex (Ganoderma sect. Ganoderma, those with “varnished” or laccate pilei) were harvested from logs, tree stumps, and otherwise declining trees in different habitats across Puerto Rico (Figure 1). G. multiplicatum was collected in June (Mushroom Observer #: MO 369977; Cultural Code: PR30; collection date: 18 June 2019; GPS: 18.1314, −67.1386) and July (Mushroom Observer #: MO 373519; collection date: 9 July 2019; GPS: 18.1314, −67.1192) 2019 in a forest in Miradero, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico. G. martinicense was collected in September 2019 (Mushroom Observer #: MO 383819; collection date: 23 September 2019; GPS: 18.32865, −65.316) near Flamenco beach, Culebra, Puerto Rico. Fruiting bodies were photographed in situ and sent to the Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, for molecular identification. Mushroom tissue was harvested from the context of the fresh collections within a week of harvest and transferred to a selective medium for Basidiomycota according to Loyd et al.’s specifications [34]. Once the medium was colonized, the mycelium was isolated and transferred to malt extract agar (MEA) without antibiotic or other supplements.

2.1.2. Identification

Sequences of the genetic markers were obtained from pure Ganoderma cultures on MEA. The DNA was extracted, amplified, and sequenced at the University of Minnesota using previously described methods [36]. Cultures were stored on agar slants, and dried Ganoderma fruiting bodies were placed in frozen storage pending ongoing taxonomic work.

2.1.3. Culture and Harvest

MEA cultures of the species G. multiplicatum (Supplementary Materials, Figure S1a), and G. martinicense (Supplementary Materials, Figure S1b) were mailed to the Huerto Rico, LLC laboratory, which was in Bayamón, Puerto Rico, to test the viability of commercial cultivation. Agar cultures were transferred to a sterilized rye grain substrate, prepared by mixing rye grains with 1% gypsum (CaSO4 2H2O) in 16 oz wide-mouth mason jars with filtered lids and hydrating them to 55% ± 3% and sterilizing them at 15 psi (120 °C) for one hour. Once cooled, the grain spawn was inoculated by aseptically placing squares of colonized MEA into bags of sterilized grain spawn in front of a flow hood and agitating the bags to distribute the inoculant. Bags were then sealed and placed in a dark incubation room at room temperature until fully colonized.
The colonized grain spawn was used to further inoculate a bulk substrate consisting of a 1:1 mix of hardwood sawdust and woodchips from a local wood mill. The source of the wood was local angiosperm trees, including cahoba (Swietenia spp.), almendrón (Terminalia catappa), and majó (Hibiscus elatus). Once combined, the woodchips and sawdust were mixed with gypsum (CaSO4 2H2O) at a rate of 2%, then hydrated to 65% ± 3% water content and loaded into polypropylene autoclave bags (8.25 × 4.75 in). Bags were sterilized at 15 psi (120 °C) for one hour in an autoclave. The cooled bulk spawn was inoculated with the colonized grain spawn in front of a flow hood at a ratio of 1:10, agitated, and allowed to fully colonize the substrate in a dark room at 27 °C.
The fully colonized spawn bags were cut open to allow oxygen exchange and stimulate growth, then moved to a climate-controlled fruiting room, and maintained at 90% humidity and 21 °C for two months while the Ganoderma fruiting bodies developed. The fruiting bodies were harvested at the beginning of spore production when the fruiting bodies had a shelf-like appearance.

2.1.4. Drying and Pulverization

Harvested fruit bodies of the cultivated Ganoderma species were placed in a food dehydrator or sliced into smaller units to fit the dehydrator shelves. The material was dehydrated for 24–48 h at 43–42 °C or until moisture was evaporated and the fruiting bodies were rendered brittle and lightweight. This material was further snapped by hand or cut with a knife until small enough to mill through a Baratza Encore burr grinder on a fine grind setting. The resulting powder was stored in an airtight Ziploc bag (Supplementary Materials, Figure S1c).

2.2. Native Ganoderma spp. Experimental Chemistry Procedures

Fractionation

The dried, pulverized specimen stem and mushroom body (100 g) were placed in a Soxhlet extractor setup and extracted with 600 mL of isopropanol under re-fluxing conditions for 48 h. The resulting mixture was filtered and concentrated under vacuum at 35 °C using a rotary evaporator (Buchi 215, Buchi Corporation, New Castle, DE, USA), which afforded a dark brown gum (9.5 g). Due to the experimental scale limitation, the remaining mushroom tissue was exposed to another 48 h extraction with CH2Cl2 and later combined with the initial mixture to provide an additional 0.7 g of the extract. The mixture was subjected to silica gel chromatographic separation (5.8 × 16 cm, EtOAc−nHexane, step gradient elution 0:100, 20:80, 40:60, 60:40, 80:20, and 100:0, and then with acetone) to obtain 13 fractions. LC-MS and TLC analyses of the fractions derived from these partition processes revealed that the fractions contained major nonpolar compounds with characteristic colors (Supplementary Materials, Figure S2) indicating terpenes when sprayed with anisaldehyde sulfuric acid after TLC analysis.

2.3. Experimental Breast Cancer Cellular Procedure

2.3.1. Cell Culture

The human TNBC cell line SUM149PT (CVCL_3422) was obtained from BioIVT LLC (Westbury, NY, USA) and cultured in Ham’s F-12 Nutrient Mix (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% or 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Corning, NY, USA) as in [24]. The human noncancerous mammary epithelial cell line MCF-10A (CVCL_0598, ATCC® CRL-10317™) was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC®, Manassas, VA, USA) and was cultured in DMEM/Ham’s F12 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 10% or 5% horse serum (HR; Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA) as described in [22]. Culture media components were purchased from Life Technologies/Gibco (Rockville, MD, USA) [22]. All cell lines were incubated at 37 °C and maintained in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2 in accordance with sterile cell culture practices [37]. Cells were tested regularly to ensure they were free from mycoplasma infection using the Mycoplasma Detection Kit (ASB-1310001, Nordic BioSite AB, Täby, Sweden).

2.3.2. Cell Viability Assay

Thirty thousand cells/well of the SUM149PT cell line or fifty thousand cells/well of the MCF-10A cells were seeded in 48-well plates in 10% FBS or HS media and cultured for 24 h. Then, the media cells were changed to 5% FBS or HS, continuing with 1 h of incubation. Next, cells were treated in duplicate with the vehicle (0.13%, 0.75% or 0.50% DMSO) or each of the G. multiplicatum and G. martinicense fractions (0–12.5 µM, 0–75 µM or 0–50 µM, concentration curve) for 72 h of incubation. After the treatment period, the cells were fixed (cold methanol) and the nuclei were stained [0.4% propidium iodide (PI) (Sigma Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA)]. Fluorescence units were measured using a GloMax® Microplate Reader (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Cell viability was calculated as the percent of surviving cells after treatment relative to the vehicle as in [24].

2.4. Data Analysis

We expressed data as mean ± S.E.M., and calculated p-values using nonparametric t-tests with the Mann–Whitney test. We performed statistical analyses using Graph Pad Prism v. 10.01 (San Diego, CA, USA), and we considered differences significant when p ≤ 0.05. We calculated the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) using dose–response curve fittings with the nonlinear regression parameter dose–response–inhibition using Graph Pad Prism. We conducted experiments in three or more independent biological replicates and calculated the mean by adding the independent replicates of each experiment and dividing the value by the total number of independent replicates (e.g., n = 3).

3. Results

3.1. Caribbean Native Ganoderma spp.

Two native Ganoderma species (G. multiplicatum and G. martinicense) were collected, isolated, identified, and cultivated to obtain the harvest shown in Supplementary Figure S1a,b, respectively. After the drying and spraying steps (Supplementary Materials, Figure S1c), the samples were sent to Louisiana State University for chemical processing. Fractionation was conducted on the native Ganoderma species to obtain seven fractions from G. multiplicatum and six fractions from G. martinicense (Supplementary Materials, Figure S2).

3.2. Antineoplastic Potential of Native Ganoderma spp. on TNBC Cells

To determine the cytotoxicity of each fraction on TNBC (SUM149PT) or noncancerous cells (MCF-10A), cell viability assays were performed using each of the 13 fractions from G. multiplicatum and G. martinicense. Table 1 shows the results of the mean inhibitory concentrations (IC50) and statistically significant differences between cells (p-value) of the medicinal mushroom fractions evaluated. G. martinicense F14 did not cause any toxicity on either the cancerous or the noncancerous cells evaluated. Therefore, its values are not provided on the table below.
Twelve fractions were evaluated, and those that exhibited the greatest bioactivity against TNBC SUM149PT cells were F7 (IC50 = 3.9 µM, p < 0.0007) and F1 (IC50 = 8.4 µM) (Figure 2). These effects occurred exclusively on cancer cells, without having significant adverse bioactivity on noncancerous MCF-10A cells (IC50 = 1116 µM, and IC50 = 497.9 µM, respectively), providing therapeutic indices (TIs) of 286.2 and 59.3, respectively. Fractions F2 (IC50 = 11.3 µM) and F12 (IC50 = 11.5 µM) closely followed in bioactivity potency against SUM149PT cells (Supplementary Materials, Figures S3–S6). Our findings show for the first time the efficient antineoplastic potential and selectivity of fractions from native Puerto Rican Ganoderma species on TNBC cells. Interestingly, of all the fractions evaluated, only F6 (IC50 = 15.4 µM, p < 0.05) exhibited greater bioactivity against MCF-10A cells (Supplementary Materials, Figures S3–S6) compared to SUM149PT cancer cells.

4. Discussion

TNBC presents a formidable challenge in oncology due to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options, highlighting the urgent need for innovative therapeutic strategies [38,39]. Our study elucidates the potential of natural products, specifically medicinal mushrooms of the Ganoderma genus, as sources of anti-TNBC compounds. TNBC, characterized by the absence of ERs, PRs, and HER2 expression, is notorious for its high malignancy, invasiveness, and propensity for metastasis, necessitating multimodal chemotherapy with limited efficacy [40,41].
Phytochemicals derived from plants have shown significant potential in breast cancer therapy by targeting various pathways involved in cancer progression. They can reduce cell proliferation, induce apoptosis, decrease metastasis, suppress angiogenesis, and reduce the migratory properties of cancer cells [42,43]. These compounds affect both estrogen-dependent and estrogen-independent breast cancer cell proliferation and breast cancer stem cells [44]. Research on phytochemicals like Indol-3-Carbinol, Resveratrol, Curcumin, Quercetin, and others has demonstrated promising results in breast cancer cell lines [45,46]. Dietary recommendations for breast cancer patients emphasize consuming foods rich in flavonol polyphenols to potentially reduce the cancer recurrence risk [47]. Additionally, phytochemicals are being explored as adjuvants to conventional treatments due to their antioxidant properties [48].
The exploration of medicinal mushrooms in cancer therapy has garnered significant interest, emphasizing the importance of integrative approaches in oncology [49,50]. G. lucidum, renowned for its immunomodulatory and antineoplastic properties, has been extensively studied [22,23,24,25,29,51,52,53,54]. Our investigation extends this research by evaluating the anti-TNBC potential of two understudied, native Ganoderma species found in Puerto Rico (Figure 3), G. multiplicatum, and G. martinicense.
It should be noted that these species of Ganoderma are not exclusive to Puerto Rico. G. multiplicatum is a pantropical species originally described in Venezuela, but it has also been reported in Brazil, French Guyana, China, New Guinea, and Egypt, and recently in Iran, Vietnam, and India [55,56,57,58]. G. martinicense is a neotropical species distributed from the Caribbean area to Uruguay and Argentina but is also a new record for North America [32,33,57,59].
Our findings reveal that most fractions from both Ganoderma species exhibited selective inhibition of TNBC cells, underscoring their potential as sources of anti-TNBC compounds. Particularly noteworthy is the observation that fractions F1, F2, and F7 from G. multiplicatum and F12 from G. martinicense displayed high cytotoxicity against TNBC cells while sparing noncancerous cells, suggesting a promising avenue for further exploration. Only fraction F6 from G. multiplicatum presented a high cytotoxic capacity against noncancerous cells. In general, G. multiplicatum exhibited greater antineoplastic potential compared to G. martinicense, with a limited amount of literature documenting the latter’s properties. Researchers only reported that G. multiplicatum showed good antibacterial and antifungal activity [13,58]. At the time of this study, to the best of our knowledge, no other literature has been found that documents any properties of G. martinicense.
Our study fills a crucial gap by demonstrating the anti-TNBC activity of Caribbean native Ganoderma species, highlighting the importance of environmental factors in secondary metabolite production [32,34]. Moving forward, it is imperative to identify and characterize the active compounds present in the most promising fractions, paving the way for in-depth mechanistic studies and preclinical evaluations. Furthermore, elucidating the mechanisms of action and potential clinical applications of Ganoderma species in TNBC treatment warrants further investigation.
Using G. martinicense and G. multiplicatum as therapeutics may be an effective strategy for the chemoprevention and adjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer, highlighting the need for additional research to characterize their compounds and evaluate their clinical impact. Among our limitations, we must highlight the current absence of a phytochemical analysis. These are steps that we will be completing with the progress of a later investigation.
In conclusion, our study underscores the therapeutic potential of Caribbean native Ganoderma species as sources of anti-TNBC compounds [14]. Future research endeavors should focus on harnessing the bioactive components of Ganoderma for the development of targeted therapies against TNBC, ultimately improving clinical outcomes for patients with this aggressive subtype of breast cancer.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ph17070864/s1: Figure S1: Appearance of the native G. multiplicatum, and G. martinicense; Figure S2: Fractionated native Ganoderma spp. medicinal compounds; Figure S3: Cell viability assays of G. multiplicatum in SUM149PT (TNBC cell line) and MCF-10A (human noncancerous cell line); Figure S4: Cell viability assays of G. martinicense in SUM149PT (TNBC cell line) and MCF-10A (human noncancerous cell line); Figure S5: Compounds of G. multiplicatum with statistically significant differences (p-values); Figure S6: Compounds of G. martinicense with statistically significant differences (p-values).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.M.-M., S.S.-G., K.M., T.L. and F.R.; methodology, M.M.M.-M., S.S.-G., K.M., T.L. and F.R.; formal analysis, M.M.M.-M. and L.V.A.-C.; investigation, L.V.A.-C.; resources, M.M.M.-M., S.S.-G. and F.R.; writing—original draft preparation, L.V.A.-C.; writing—review and editing, M.M.M.-M., S.S.-G., K.M., T.L. and F.R.; visualization, L.V.A.-C.; supervision, M.M.M.-M.; project administration, M.M.M.-M.; funding acquisition, M.M.M.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Sciences #R16GM145488, #SC3GM111171; National Institutes of Health #U54GM133807, #S21MD001830; U.S. Department of Agriculture/National Institute of Food and Agriculture/Small Business Innovation Research #2022-33530-37064; Puerto Rico Science, Technology & Research Trust Therapeutic Accelerator Program grant number 2022-00121; and Susan G. Komen ASPIRE #ASP231046822.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to recognize the support given by the American Society for Cell Biology for the 2022 travel award to Gabrielle M. Silverio; Robert A. Blanchette for the identification and storage of the mushrooms, as well as for the editing of the manuscript; Mercedes Lacourt-Ventura for administrative and technical contributions; Gabrielle M. Silverio, Yowan D. Morales, and Paola S. Rivera for contributions to parts of the viability assays; Mireliz A. Arroyo-Cruz for the Puerto Rico Map art contribution; and especially Estela Estape and Barbara Riestra, who provided invaluable feedback.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kinnel, B.; Singh, S.K.; Oprea-Ilies, G.; Singh, R. Targeted therapy and mechanisms of drug resistance in breast cancer. Cancers 2023, 15, 1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Almansour, N.M. Triple-negative breast cancer: A brief review about epidemiology, risk factors, signaling pathways, treatment and role of artificial intelligence. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 836417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Prakash, O.; Hossain, F.; Danos, D.; Lassak, A.; Scribner, R.; Miele, L. Racial disparities in triple negative breast cancer: A review of the role of biologic and non-biologic factors. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 576964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, W.; Bai, Y.; Sun, C.; Lv, Z.; Wang, S. Racial and regional disparities of triple negative breast cancer incidence rates in the United States: An analysis of 2011-2019 NPCR and SEER incidence data. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 1058722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yap, Y. Outcomes in breast cancer—Does ethnicity matter? ESMO Open 2023, 8, 101564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rosario-Rosado, R.V.; Nazario, C.M.; Hernández-Santiago, J.; Schelske-Santos, M.; Mansilla-Rivera, I.; Ramírez-Marrero, F.A.; Ramos-Valencia, G.; Climent, C.; Nie, J.; Freudenheim, J.L. Breast cancer in a Caribbean population in transition: Design and implementation of the atabey population-based case-control study of women in the San Juan metropolitan area in Puerto Rico. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yin, L.; Duan, J.-J.; Bian, X.-W.; Yu, S.-C. Triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtyping and treatment progress. Breast Cancer Res. 2020, 22, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Quirindongo-Rivera, C.; Rullán-Varela, V.; Underill, Z.; Rivera, M.; Ortiz-Ortiz, K.J.; Martínez-Montemayor, M.M. Characteriza-tion of inflammatory breast cancer in Hispanic women from Puerto Rico. J. Cancer 2022, 13, 3495–3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Y.; Zhang, H.; Merkher, Y.; Chen, L.; Liu, N.; Leonov, S.; Chen, Y. Recent advances in therapeutic strategies for triple-negative breast cancer. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2022, 15, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yao, H.; He, G.; Yan, S.; Chen, C.; Song, L.; Rosol, T.J.; Deng, X. Triple-negative breast cancer: Is there a treatment on the horizon? Oncotarget 2017, 8, 1913–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lin, Z. Ganoderma (Lingzhi) in Traditional Chinese Medicine and Chinese Culture. In Ganoderma and Health; Lin, Z., Yang, B., Eds.; Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Springer: Singapore, 2019; Volume 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, L.; Li, J.-Q.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z.-M.; Liu, H.-G.; Wang, Y.-Z. Traditional uses, chemical components and pharmacological activities of the genus Ganoderma P. Karst.: A review. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 42084–42097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sharifi, A.; Naseri, M.H.; Jahedi, S.; Sarkary, B.; Rooz, S.S.K.; Khosravani, S.M.; Kalantar, E. Antimicrobial potentials of crude fractions of polysaccharides of Ganoderma spp. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 6, 6817–6821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Suárez-Arroyo, I.J.; Loperena-Alvarez, Y.; Rosario-Acevedo, R.; Martínez-Montemayor, M.M. Ganoderma spp.: A promising adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Medicines 2017, 4, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Barbieri, A.; Quagliariello, V.; Del Vecchio, V.; Falco, M.; Luciano, A.; Amruthraj, N.J.; Nasti, G.; Ottaiano, A.; Berretta, M.; Iaffaioli, R.V.; et al. Anticancer and anti-inflammatory properties of Ganoderma lucidum extract effects on melanoma and triple-negative breast cancer treatment. Nutrients 2017, 9, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Merdivan, S.; Lindequist, U. Ergosterol peroxide: A mushroom-derived compound with promising biological activities—A review. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2017, 19, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lu, J.; He, R.; Sun, P.; Zhang, F.; Linhardt, R.J.; Zhang, A. Molecular mechanisms of bioactive polysaccharides from Ganoderma lucidum (Lingzhi), a review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 150, 765–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Seweryn, E.; Ziała, A.; Gamian, A. Health-promoting of polysaccharides extracted from Ganoderma lucidum. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, L.; Chen, H.-P.; Li, X.; Liu, J.-K. Ganoaustralins A and B, unusual aromatic triterpenes from the mushroom Ganoderma australe. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Galappaththi, M.C.A.; Patabendige, N.M.; Premarathne, B.M.; Hapuarachchi, K.K.; Tibpromma, S.; Dai, D.-Q.; Suwannarach, N.; Rapior, S.; Karunarathna, S.C. A review of Ganoderma triterpenoids and their bioactivities. Biomolecules 2022, 13, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rijia, A.; Krishnamoorthi, R.; Rasmi, M.; Mahalingam, P.U.; Kim, K.-S. Comprehensive analysis of bioactive compounds in wild Ganoderma applanatum mushroom from Kerala, South India: Insights into dietary nutritional, mineral, antimicrobial, and antioxidant activities. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Martínez-Montemayor, M.M.; Acevedo, R.R.; Otero-Franqui, E.; Cubano, L.A.; Dharmawardhane, S.F. Ganoderma lucidum (reishi) inhibits cancer cell growth and expression of key molecules in inflammatory breast cancer. Nutr. Cancer 2011, 63, 1085–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Suárez-Arroyo, I.J.; Rosario-Acevedo, R.; Aguilar-Perez, A.; Clemente, P.L.; Cubano, L.A.; Serrano, J.; Schneider, R.J.; Martínez-Montemayor, M.M. Anti-tumor effects of Ganoderma lucidum (Reishi) in inflammatory breast cancer in in vivo and in vitro models. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Suárez-Arroyo, I.J.; Rios-Fuller, T.J.; Feliz-Mosquea, Y.R.; Lacourt-Ventura, M.; Leal-Alviarez, D.J.; Maldonado-Martinez, G.; Cubano, L.A.; Martínez-Montemayor, M.M. Ganoderma lucidum combined with the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib synergize to reduce inflammatory breast cancer progression. J. Cancer 2016, 7, 500–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rios-Fuller, T.J.; Ortiz-Soto, G.; Lacourt-Ventura, M.; Maldonado-Martinez, G.; Cubano, L.A.; Schneider, R.J.; Martinez-Montemayor, M.M. Ganoderma lucidum extract (GLE) impairs breast cancer stem cells by targeting the STAT3 pathway. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 35907–35921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Acevedo-Díaz, A.; Ortiz-Soto, G.; Suárez-Arroyo, I.J.; Zayas-Santiago, A.; Montemayor, M.M.M. Ganoderma lucidum extract reduces the motility of breast cancer cells mediated by the RAC–lamellipodin axis. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, Q.; Zhang, S.; Yang, L.; Xie, Q.; Dai, H.; Yu, Z.; Zhao, Y. Lanostane Triterpenoids and Ergostane Steroids from Ganoderma luteomarginatum and Their Cytotoxicity. Molecules 2022, 27, 6989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Min, B.-S.; Gao, J.-J.; Nakamura, N.; Hattori, M. Triterpenes from the spores of Ganoderma lucidum and their cytotoxicity against meth-A and LLC tumor cells. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2000, 48, 1026–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qin, F.-Y.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Zhang, J.-J.; Cheng, Y.-X. Meroterpenoid dimers from Ganoderma mushrooms and their biological activities against triple negative breast cancer cells. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 888371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wu, J.M.; Hsieh, T.-C. Suppression of proliferation and oxidative stress by extracts of Ganoderma lucidum in the ovarian cancer cell line OVCAR-3. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2011, 28, 1065–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rai, R.D.; Singh, S.K.; Yadav, M.C. Biological diversity in the genus Ganoderma. In Mushroom Biology and Biotechnology; Rai, R.D., Singh, S.K., Yadav, M.C., Tewar, R.P., Eds.; Mushroom Society of India: Chambaghat, India, 2007; pp. 79–87. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342878128 (accessed on 15 January 2024).
  32. Campi, M.; Mancuello, C.R.; Ferreira, F.P.; Maubet, Y.; Cristaldo, E.; Robledo, G. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of four native species of the Ganodermataceae Family (Agaricomycetes) from Paraguay. Int. J. Med. Mushrooms 2021, 23, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Loyd, A.L.; Linder, E.R.; Smith, M.E.; Blanchette, R.A.; Smith, J.A. Cultural characterization and chlamydospore function of the Ganodermataceae present in the Eastern United States. Mycologia 2019, 111, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Campi, M.; Mancuello, C.; Ferreira, F.; Maubet, Y.; Cristaldo, E.; Gayoso, E.; Robledo, G. Does the source matter? Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity from mycelium in liquid medium, wild and cultivated fruiting bodies of the neotropical species Ganoderma tuberculosum. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2023, 13, e6148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tu, Y.; Jeffries, C.; Ruan, H.; Nelson, C.; Smithson, D.; Shelat, A.A.; Brown, K.M.; Li, X.-C.; Hester, J.P.; Smillie, T.; et al. Automated high-throughput system to fractionate plant natural products for drug discovery. J. Nat. Prod. 2010, 73, 751–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Loyd, A.L.; Barnes, C.W.; Held, B.W.; Schink, M.J.; Smith, M.E.; Smith, J.A.; Blanchette, R.A. Elucidating “lucidum”: Distinguishing the diverse laccate Ganoderma species of the United States. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hay, R.; American Type Culture Collection. ATCC Quality Control Methods for Cell Lines; American Type Culture Collection: Rockville, MD, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  38. Foulkes, W.D.; Smith, I.E.; Reis-Filho, J.S. Triple-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 363, 1938–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, S.; Fang, Y. Research on the mechanism of pulsatilla potentially useful for the treatment of triple negative breast cancer based on network pharmacology. Res. Sq. 2021, preprint, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Komatsu, M.; Yoshimaru, T.; Matsuo, T.; Kiyotani, K.; Miyoshi, Y.; Tanahashi, T.; Rokutan, K.; Yamaguchi, R.; Saito, A.; Imoto, S.; et al. Molecular features of triple negative breast cancer cells by genome-wide gene expression profiling analysis. Int. J. Oncol. 2012, 42, 478–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Robles, A.J.; Du, L.; Cichewicz, R.H.; Mooberry, S.L. Maximiscin induces DNA damage, activates DNA damage response pathways, and has selective cytotoxic activity against a subtype of triple-negative breast cancer. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 1822–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bhattacharya, T.; Dutta, S.; Akter, R.; Rahman, H.; Karthika, C.; Nagaswarupa, H.P.; Murthy, H.C.A.; Fratila, O.; Brata, R.; Bungau, S. Role of Phytonutrients in Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics Perspective in Curing Breast Cancer. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chiou, Y.; Li, S.; Ho, C.; Pan, M. Prevention of Breast Cancer by Natural Phytochemicals: Focusing on Molecular Targets and Combinational Strategy. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2018, 62, e1800392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Israel, B.B.; Tilghman, S.L.; Parker-Lemieux, K.; Payton-Stewart, F. Phytochemicals: Current strategies for treating breast cancer (review). Oncol. Lett. 2018, 15, 7471–7478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rizeq, B.; Gupta, I.; Ilesanmi, J.; AlSafran, M.; Rahman, M.; Ouhtit, A. The power of phytochemicals combination in cancer chemoprevention. J. Cancer 2019, 11, 4521–4533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Vini, R.; Sreeja, S. Punica granatum and its therapeutic implications on breast carcinogenesis: A review. BioFactors 2015, 41, 78–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Braakhuis, A.J.; Campion, P.; Bishop, K.S. Reducing Breast Cancer Recurrence: The Role of Dietary Polyphenolics. Nutrients 2016, 8, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Forcados, G.E.; James, D.B.; Sallau, A.B.; Muhammad, A.; Mabeta, P. Oxidative Stress and Carcinogenesis: Potential of Phytochemicals in Breast Cancer Therapy. Nutr. Cancer 2017, 69, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jeitler, M.; Michalsen, A.; Frings, D.; Hübner, M.; Fischer, M.; Koppold-Liebscher, D.A.; Murthy, V.; Kessler, C.S. Significance of medicinal mushrooms in integrative oncology: A narrative review. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 580656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, M.; Yu, F. Research progress on the anticancer activities and mechanisms of polysaccharides from Ganoderma. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 891171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Boh, B. Ganoderma lucidum: A potential for biotechnological production of anti-cancer and immunomodulatory drugs. Recent Pat. Anti-Cancer Drug Discov. 2013, 8, 255–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhao, S.; Ye, G.; Fu, G.; Cheng, J.-X.; Yang, B.B.; Peng, C. Ganoderma lucidum exerts anti-tumor effects on ovarian cancer cells and enhances their sensitivity to cisplatin. Int. J. Oncol. 2011, 38, 1319–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shin, M.-J.; Chae, H.-J.; Lee, J.W.; Koo, M.H.; Kim, H.-J.; Seo, J.B.; Yanillia, S.; Park, S.H.; Lo, H.E.; Kim, S.-H.; et al. Lucidumol A, purified directly from Ganoderma lucidum, exhibits anticancer effect and cellular inflammatory response in colorectal cancer. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2022, 2022, 7404493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Andrejč, D.C.; Knez, Ž.; Marevci, M.K. Antioxidant, antibacterial, antitumor, antifungal, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and nevro-protective activity of Ganoderma lucidum: An overview. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 934982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bhosle, S.; Ranadive, K.; Bapat, G.; Garad, S.; Deshpande, G.; Vaidya, J. Taxonomy and Diversity of Ganoderma from the Western parts of Maharashtra (India). Mycosphere 2010, 1, 249–262. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/216521482 (accessed on 20 February 2024).
  56. Correia de Lima Júnior, N.; Baptista Gibertoni, T.; Malosso, E. Delimitación de algunos Ganoderma (Ganodermataceae) lacados neotropicales: Filogenia molecular y morfología. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2014, 62, 1197–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Morera, G.; Lupo, S.; Alaniz, S.; Robledo, G. Diversity of the Ganoderma species in Uruguay. Neotrop. Biodivers. 2021, 7, 570–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nguyen, T.T.T.; Nguyen, T.T.T.; Nguyen, H.D.; Nguyen, T.K.; Pham, P.T.V.; Tran, L.T.T.; Tran, M.H. Integrating in silico and in vitro studies to screen anti-Staphylococcus aureus activity from Vietnamese Ganoderma multiplicatum and Ganoderma sinense. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2023, 18, 1934578X231167289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhou, L.-W.; Nakasone, K.K.; Burdsall, H.H.; Ginns, J.; Vlasák, J.; Miettinen, O.; Spirin, V.; Niemelä, T.; Yuan, H.-S.; He, S.-H.; et al. Polypore diversity in North America with an annotated checklist. Mycol. Prog. 2016, 15, 771–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceuticals 17 00864 g001
Figure 1. Locations in Puerto Rico where the Ganoderma species were collected. Wild samples of the Ganoderma spp. were harvested from logs, tree stumps, and otherwise declining trees in different habitats across Puerto Rico. G. multiplicatum was collected in a forest in Miradero, Mayagüez, and G. martinicense was collected near Flamenco Beach, Culebra. (Map author: Mireliz A. Arroyo-Cruz).
Figure 1. Locations in Puerto Rico where the Ganoderma species were collected. Wild samples of the Ganoderma spp. were harvested from logs, tree stumps, and otherwise declining trees in different habitats across Puerto Rico. G. multiplicatum was collected in a forest in Miradero, Mayagüez, and G. martinicense was collected near Flamenco Beach, Culebra. (Map author: Mireliz A. Arroyo-Cruz).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00864 g001
Pharmaceuticals 17 00864 g002
Figure 2. Effects of Caribbean native G. multiplicatum medicinal fractions in TNBC (SUM149PT) and noncancerous (MCF-10A) cell lines. SUM149PT and MCF-10A cells were seeded and treated. (a,b) Cytotoxic effects of compound F1 against SUM149PT and MCF-10A, respectively. The TI for F1 resulted in a value of 59.3. (c,d) Great cytotoxic effects of compound F7 against SUM149PT and MCF-10A, respectively. The TI for F7 resulted in a value of 286.2. (e) Significant difference (p-value) of compound F7 determined between SUM149PT and MCF-10A cell means. Bars represent mean ± SEM of at least 3 biological replicates. *** p < 0.0001 when comparing SUM149PT and MCF-10A cell means.
Figure 2. Effects of Caribbean native G. multiplicatum medicinal fractions in TNBC (SUM149PT) and noncancerous (MCF-10A) cell lines. SUM149PT and MCF-10A cells were seeded and treated. (a,b) Cytotoxic effects of compound F1 against SUM149PT and MCF-10A, respectively. The TI for F1 resulted in a value of 59.3. (c,d) Great cytotoxic effects of compound F7 against SUM149PT and MCF-10A, respectively. The TI for F7 resulted in a value of 286.2. (e) Significant difference (p-value) of compound F7 determined between SUM149PT and MCF-10A cell means. Bars represent mean ± SEM of at least 3 biological replicates. *** p < 0.0001 when comparing SUM149PT and MCF-10A cell means.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00864 g002
Pharmaceuticals 17 00864 g003
Figure 3. Graphical summary of this study. We assessed the antineoplastic capacity of two Caribbean native species of Ganoderma found in Puerto Rico: Ganoderma multiplicatum (collected at a forest in Miradero, Mayagüez) and Ganoderma martinicense (collected near Flamenco Beach, Culebra). We conducted a cell viability assay after cultivating, harvesting, and fractionating both species. The obtained results indicate that most of the fractions show some cytotoxicity against all cell lines, but 33% of the fractions (F1, F2, F7, F12) display selectivity towards cancer cell models. This summary figure was created using BioRender.com.
Figure 3. Graphical summary of this study. We assessed the antineoplastic capacity of two Caribbean native species of Ganoderma found in Puerto Rico: Ganoderma multiplicatum (collected at a forest in Miradero, Mayagüez) and Ganoderma martinicense (collected near Flamenco Beach, Culebra). We conducted a cell viability assay after cultivating, harvesting, and fractionating both species. The obtained results indicate that most of the fractions show some cytotoxicity against all cell lines, but 33% of the fractions (F1, F2, F7, F12) display selectivity towards cancer cell models. This summary figure was created using BioRender.com.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00864 g003
Table 1. Cytotoxicity of two Caribbean native Ganoderma species extracts, determined via the cell viability assay.
Table 1. Cytotoxicity of two Caribbean native Ganoderma species extracts, determined via the cell viability assay.
Medicinal MushroomFraction No.IC50 (µM)Statistically Significant Differences (p-Value) Therapeutic Index (TI)
(MCF-10A/SUM149PT)
SUM149PTMCF-10A
Ganoderma multiplicatum18.4497.9NDM 159.3
211.3>75NDM 1>6.6
340.4>750.0021>1.9
449.2>750.0110>1.5
5198.4>750.0009>0.4
611015.40.04610.1
73.911160.0007286.2
Ganoderma martinicense1168.74.9 × 1090.00847.2 × 1011
1211.5>500.0007>4.3
13105.2>500.0004>0.5
15637.1>500.7016>0.1
16239.4377.40.10691.6
Note: 1 NDM = not determined. The mean inhibitory concentration (IC50) value was expressed as the mean of three independent experiments. Statistically significant differences (p-value) were determined between the means of SUM149PT and MCF-10A cells. F1 and F2 lack p-values since the viability curves running between both cell lines (SUM149PT [0–12.5 µM], MCF-10A [0–70 µM]) were different and it was impossible to perform the analysis.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arroyo-Cruz, L.V.; Sagardía-González, S.; Miller, K.; Ling, T.; Rivas, F.; Martínez-Montemayor, M.M. Selective Antineoplastic Potential of Fractionated Caribbean Native Ganoderma Species Extracts on Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 864. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070864

AMA Style

Arroyo-Cruz LV, Sagardía-González S, Miller K, Ling T, Rivas F, Martínez-Montemayor MM. Selective Antineoplastic Potential of Fractionated Caribbean Native Ganoderma Species Extracts on Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Pharmaceuticals. 2024; 17(7):864. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070864

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arroyo-Cruz, Luz V., Sebastián Sagardía-González, Kurt Miller, Taotao Ling, Fatima Rivas, and Michelle M. Martínez-Montemayor. 2024. "Selective Antineoplastic Potential of Fractionated Caribbean Native Ganoderma Species Extracts on Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells" Pharmaceuticals 17, no. 7: 864. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070864

APA Style

Arroyo-Cruz, L. V., Sagardía-González, S., Miller, K., Ling, T., Rivas, F., & Martínez-Montemayor, M. M. (2024). Selective Antineoplastic Potential of Fractionated Caribbean Native Ganoderma Species Extracts on Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Pharmaceuticals, 17(7), 864. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17070864

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop