Next Article in Journal
The Two-Sided Experimental Model of ImmunoCAP Inhibition Test as a Useful Tool for the Examination of Allergens Cross-Reactivity on the Example of α-Gal and Mammalian Meat Sensitization—A Preliminary Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Analysis of the Properties of 44 ABC Transporter Genes from Biocontrol Agent Trichoderma asperellum ACCC30536 and Their Responses to Pathogenic Alternaria alternata Toxin Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of the bHLH Transcription Factor Family and Its Response to Abiotic Stress in Mongolian Oak (Quercus mongolica)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of the Heat-Shock Protein Gene in L. edodes and Expression Pattern Analysis under Heat Shock
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Disarm The Bacteria: What Temperate Phages Can Do

1
College of Veterinary Medicine, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45(2), 1149-1167; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45020076
Submission received: 28 December 2022 / Revised: 28 January 2023 / Accepted: 29 January 2023 / Published: 1 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Engineering: Gene Expression Regulation and Its Application)

Abstract

:
In the field of phage applications and clinical treatment, virulent phages have been in the spotlight whereas temperate phages received, relatively speaking, less attention. The fact that temperate phages often carry virulent or drug-resistant genes is a constant concern and drawback in temperate phage applications. However, temperate phages also play a role in bacterial regulation. This review elucidates the biological properties of temperate phages based on their life cycle and introduces the latest work on temperate phage applications, such as on host virulence reduction, biofilm degradation, genetic engineering and phage display. The versatile use of temperate phages coupled with their inherent properties, such as economy, ready accessibility, wide variety and host specificity, make temperate phages a solid candidate in tackling bacterial infections.

1. Introduction

A bacteriophage (hereafter phage) is the virus that parasitizes bacteria, and is recognized as for its ability to lyse its host. As the most prevalent and widely distributed group of viruses on earth, phages are estimated to be around 1031 in the biosphere [1]. Shortly after being discovered in the 1910s, phages drew attention on account of their therapeutic potential to treat infectious diseases [2]. Moreover, successful phage treatment had been performed on several infections such as those caused by Shigella dysenteriae, Salmonella, and Escherichia coli [3]. Regardless, due to the rapid rising of antibiotics, further development on phage therapy was interrupted [4]. In recent years, with the growing concern about antibiotic resistance and immediate needs for a more reliable substitute [5], research on phages as well as phage treatment is burgeoning again [6,7,8,9,10]. Antibiotics such as beta-Lactam have been confirmed to promote interbacterial gene transfer and, thus, potentially increase bacterial virulence [11]. Due to its merits, such as high specificity and accessibility, phage therapy emerges as a novel antibacterial counterweight under the inevitable trend of antibiotic misuse [6,12,13,14]. Compared to antibiotics, phages persist as biological entities and play a significant role in mediating and regulating the bacterial community, physiology and evolution which, furthermore, affects the ecological system [15]. For instance, phages’ contribution to carbon cycling and bacteria diversity is of great value in the ecosystem [16]. Cell lysis induced by phages has a major impact on dissolved organic carbon turnover and nutrient cycling in food web processes and biogeochemical cycles [17]. Through gene transfer, phage infection casts a vast influence on the diversity of prokaryotic species [18]. Meanwhile, the constant contact between bacteria and phage closely affects the dynamic state of human intestinal microflora [19,20]. Thus, in-depth research and understanding should be carried out before phage therapy can be fully credited and broadly implemented.
Taxonomically, phages are categorized primarily according to their morphology and genome, and more refined and comprehensive classification is under way [21]. Based on their lifecycle, phages are differentiated into virulent phages and temperate phages. In the first case phage reproduction always leads to host death [22], which is not necessarily the case for the second. The unique reproductive manner of temperate phages involves integration into the host genome and replication along with the host [23]. The integration renders a bacterium and temperate phage as lysogen and prophage, respectively [24,25]. In this review, we mainly pivot our attention to temperate phages. On account of their distinct way of living, a vast variety of interactions and mechanisms await exploration and employment. However, phage therapy often brings to mind the use of virulent phages (also known as lytic phages), referring to their ability to kill bacteria “quick and clean” [24]. Compared to virulent phages, temperate phages are in lack of sophisticated exploration and utilization in further clinical treatment. To fully understand and better employ the advantages of temperate phages, a thorough recognition of phage–bacteria interaction and the successful experiments based on these insights up to the present is needed.

2. Temperate Phage

Temperate phages are detected in a large proportion of bacteria [22]. When integrated to the host genome, the prophage genome can account for up to 20% of the bacteria genome [26]. A total of 46% of bacteria are estimated to be lysogens [27,28]. Among marine viruses, temperate phages are reckoned to be omnipresent in the Vibrionaceae family [29], members of which are often naturally endemic to warm marine and estuarine waters. There are abundant temperate phages that have lysogenized the most destructive fish pathogens, such as Flavobacterium psychrophilum, which currently causes considerable economic losses in salmonid aquaculture [30]. Around 50% of bacteria harbors at least one prophage [27], whereas the majority of phages only parasitize on one bacterium and retain high host specificity [6].
To date, phage lambda, which infects E. coli, is perhaps the most thoroughly studied and widely applied temperate phage [31]. The lambda DNA is double stranded, with a genome of about 50 Kb [32]. Genetically, phage lambda possesses “moron” genes with differential function, location, size and GC contents to the rest of phage genome [33]. Although these moron genes do not usually participate in the essential functioning of the phage lifecycle, their potential for providing a selective advantage is indubitable [25].
Phage lambda could reproduce many generations in a lysogenic cycle. The lytic-driving genes persist in prophage, yet repressed, which is the key lysogenic maintaining force [34]. Under certain stressors, such as antibiotics, this lysogenic status will be induced and switched into the lytic, which consequently leads to host lysis [35]. Prophage stability is attributed to the domestication of prophage elements within the host genome; however, there is also a case demonstrating that the lytic cycle could be restarted through certain DNA recombinations [36]. Once the phage lambda turns on its lytic cycle switch, it can produce around one hundred new virions from each bacteria lysis [37]. The transformation between two lifecycles provides temperate phages with more possibility of surviving [35].
Of note, the interactions between temperate phages and the host genome are complicated. Prophage-induced lysis can impose beneficial effects on the bacterial population and, thus, is preferred in the interest of the overall situation [38]. Most of the bacterial virulence genes are carried by temperate phages [39]. Prophage behaviors can give rise to or increase host bacteria virulence [40]. Nevertheless, there is also proven evidence of eliminated or decreased virulence as a result of temperate phage involvement [41,42]. For instance, a previous study showed that the integration site of PHB09 is specifically located within a pilin gene of Bordetella bronchiseptica and decreased the virulence of parental strain B. bronchiseptica Bb01 in mice [42]. vB_SauS_JS02 is a Siphoviridae temperate phage infecting S. aureus and shows stronger host inhibition activity than antibiotic ceftazidime [43].

3. Temperate Phage Life Cycle

Using lambda phage as a role model, we can obtain basic insights of the life cycle of temperate phages and the host–phage interrelationship. Temperate phage development that may occur through the whole life cycle could be categorized into five major phases. (1) Diffusion: the phage gets through the biofilm to approach the host bacteria. (2) Absorption and injection: the phage binds with receptor proteins on the surface of the bacteria and injects the phage genome. (3) Integration and replication: the phage genome inserts into the bacteria genome and becomes a prophage, or persists independently as plasmid. (4) Induction and packaging: the prophage becomes activated and enters the lytic cycle. (5) Lysis of host bacterium: the progeny phage is released from the bacteria [16,44,45,46].
There is expansive diversity in each step to help the phage adapt to multiple conditions [47]. Upon each step, a choice has to be made for the phage (or prophage) to proceed precisely at the genetic level [35]. A number of factors determine the phage’s reproduction circuits. These factors include the genome size of the host bacteria, population growth status and other bacterial pathogens, temperature, etc [27]. Crucially, the decision has to be made quickly and accurately, without any compromised or mixed states of cycles [35].
Here, we introduce the mechanism and interaction in the order of the temperate phage life cycle. Understanding the close relationship between the phage and host in a life-cycle order will help us to build a more holistic and intuitive perception towards phage antibacterial activity (Figure 1).

3.1. Step One—Diffusion

In this initial phase, phages diffuse and penetrate through the biofilm to locate and target bacteria. Composed of polymeric substances and bacteria-secreted enzymes and proteins, the biofilm matrix wraps around the microbial community and serves as a powerful physical barrier against not only phages but also immune system and antimicrobial agents [48,49]. Bacterial biofilm formation and toxin production are indicators of bacterial virulence [50,51]. A plethora of chronic and difficult-to-treat infections are associated with biofilm formation [52]. Therefore, penetration through the biofilm is vital for a successful phage infection.
There is growing evidence supporting the theory that phages can promote biofilm formation [53,54]. However, a great part of the phages is reported to be able to encode and produce biofilm degrading enzymes, referred to as depolymerase [55], such as capsular polysaccharides, exopolysaccharides, and lipopolysaccharides [56]. Found mostly as part of phage tail fiber or tail spike proteins, these depolymerases function as a weapon to depolymerize bacterial capsules and facilitate phage absorption [57].

3.2. Step Two—Absorption and Injection

When initiating infection, phages first adsorb to specific receptors on the surface of bacteria [58]. Bacteria can obtain phage resistance by deleting or inactivating phage-specific receptors [59]. The binding of phages to their receptors exerts selective pressure on bacteria, which alters the expression of the receptors, thereby preventing phage infection [60]. If phage receptors are associated with virulence factors or antibiotic resistance mechanisms in the target bacteria, such fitness trade-offs might reduce the virulence or antibiotic resistance of the pathogenic bacteria [61].
However, most of the temperate phages are limited in their receptor binding proteins (RBPs) and are obligated to specific hosts [58,62]. Evolutionarily selected pressure as well as artificial genetic engineering by swapping genes can increase the number of RBPs [63]. For a group of phages with different RBPs, certain combinations of those phages can achieve the goal of expanding receptor range [64,65,66,67,68].

3.3. Step Three—Integration and Replication

Many phages encode an integrase that integrates phage DNA into the host chromosome [69]. Phages can exist as plasmids outside of the chromosome as well [70,71]. The highly regulated integration and excision process ensures the efficient and accurate switch between the lytic and lysogenic pathway [72]. Not only does prophage influence the virulence of bacteria, it also regulates the host gene expression. The excision of prophage in Listeria monocytogenes is key in escaping cell phagosomes [73].
Lysogenic conversion is the process of prophage gene expressing as a part of host genome and is reciprocal for the prophage and host [74]. Prophages can affect bacterial infectivity, toxin secretion, virulence regulation, surface modification, immune stimulation and evasion, and microbiome competition [75,76]. The insertion of phage genomes in the bacterial genome can disrupt biofilm formation-related genes, leading to a reduction in biofilm formation [76].
To make sure of their chance of survival, phages develop a number of defense mechanisms to eliminate unwanted host-sharing. The known mechanisms are divided into three groups: blocking genome injection, expressing repressor protein, and binding inhibition [77]. In addition, phage-inducible chromosomal islands (PICIs) can also provide impressive protection to resident phages against other intruding phages and mobile elements with the aid of helper phages [78].
With regard to phage–phage interaction within one same host, intricate coordination can be achieved upon triggering SOS responses by two phages sharing one host. In L. monocytogenes strain 10403S, the two coexisting prophages regulate simultaneous induction and lytic activity under SOS conditions. Moreover, the host can also benefit from the cooperation of its habitants. To maintain harmonious coexistence of two prophages, AriS is discovered as a conserved phage protein and is demonstrated to be capable of avoiding SOS response and phage induction by inhibiting RecA [79].

3.4. Step Four—Induction and Packaging

Prophages can be induced into the lytic cycle under a series of stressors, such as antibiotics and UV rays [80]. Some of them trigger selective induction, and only certain prophages can be induced [81]. Pyocyanin produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibits a selective induction to phage phiMBL3 [82]. In addition, the bacterial SOS response induces prophage in a non-selective manner. The SOS response is a survival strategy when facing stressors that may endanger the host and damage DNA [83]. Separated from the SOS response, prophage induction can also be triggered by chemicals such as acyl-homoserine lactones under high bacteria density condition [84].
Normally, the progeny phage is packaged, released, and keeps infecting the next host [85]. However, this process of packaging is also accident-prone. Transduction, also known as phage-mediated gene transfer, occurs in three different mechanisms: specialized transduction, generalized transduction, and lateral transduction. Both specific transduction and general transduction are the result of phage mispackaging [86]. Generalized transduction happens when a phage accidentally packages random bacteria DNA, which can be “uploaded” in the next eligible host [87]. In comparison, specialized transduction is usually favored by host bacteria on account of the possible acquisition of phage DNA that may contribute to host fitness and virulence [88]. Lateral transduction happens when DNA packaging begins with delayed excision of intact and functional prophages. It also means that the prophage genomes remain integral to the host genome while they are replicated, which eventually leads to the presence of multiple copies of the phage genome in the host genome. Such transduction mechanism results in a higher frequency of host DNA transfer [89].

3.5. Step Five—Lysis of Host Bacteria

Single-stranded DNA phages cause hydrolysis of the host bacterial cell wall by synthesizing enzymes that interfere with host bacterial peptidoglycan synthesis, whereas double-stranded DNA phages, such as phage lambda, hydrolyze the host bacterial peptidoglycan structure by lysin or endolysin, which are synthesized late in replication [90].
In a nutshell, the above steps illustrate the life cycle of temperate phages, using the lambda phage as an example. The interactions between temperate phages and their bacterial hosts are complex and intimate. While new mechanisms are being discovered, we should also look at how we can better exploit the intimate relationship between phage and bacteria to help in the fight against pathogenic bacteria.

4. Temperate Phages for Therapeutic Purposes

As we discussed in the temperate phage life cycle, the transduction and lysogenic conversion may cause undesirable outcome such as virulence promotion (Table 1). For instance, the production of temperate phage Pf can lead to a significant virulence increase in infections in its host, Pseudomonas, and may affect the entire lung ecosystem [91]. Mice infected with Pseudomonas strains that are deleted of Pf4 prophage survive significantly longer, which indicates that the presence of prophage Pf4 is a virulence contributor [92]. Furthermore, prophages without virulence genes may result in virulent effects on host bacteria, and increased virulence can occur without virulence-related genes. Lysogenic MRSA strains (SA14+) exhibited improved virulence, stress tolerance, and biofilm-forming abilities when a temperate PHB21 containing no virulence gene was inserted [93]. A change in temperate phage status in host cells can also lead to unwanted consequences. For instance, the entire gut virome analysis supports that virome changes are associated with inflammatory bowel disease patients’ guts. A transition from lysogenic to lytic replication in the gut may result in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [94]. In the gut of autism spectrum disorder patients after Microbiota Transfer Therapy treatment, an altered phage community coupled with increased bacteria community diversity is observed, suggesting the putative role of phages in gut dysbiosis [95].
Nevertheless, temperate phages also have their advantages that cannot be ignored. A wide variety of temperate phages are found in nature and can be easily induced in the laboratory [115]. Temperate phages are easier to obtain than lytic phages and, as biotechnology matures, temperate phages can be modified and assigned specific properties [116]. Here, we discuss some successful applications of temperate phages to reduce host bacterial virulence. There are a handful of methods that can be applied to achieve the goal, including biofilm degradation, phage cocktails with expanded host ranges, genetic engineering, and phage display (Table 1).

4.1. Host Virulence Reduction

Temperate phages have been widely demonstrated to promote bacterial virulence, which is the most important factor in causing infections [117]. However, there is no lack of evidence indicating that phages can reduce bacterial virulence, intrinsically or after proper modification. For example, reducing virulence to gain phage resistance, or reducing virulence to increase host fitness (Figure 2A).
Hosts prevent invasion by reducing virulence. The presence of prophage in the form of plasmid can provide host bacteria with resistance to other foreign DNA at the cost of host virulence. p2 is proposed to be an intact plasmid prophage in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Mutant Kp1604Δp2 exhibits an increase in host virulence which is determined by mouse infection models. The mutant p2 minus strain leads to 100% mortality compared to the 70% mortality of the p2 carrying strain, indicating that the presence of p2 decreases the virulence of its host [96].
In L. monocytogenes, there is a classic trade-off situation. The cell wall of Listeria and its associated proteins are responsible for most of the interactions with the mammalian host [118]. The temperate phage ΔLCRA500, which has been knocked out of the gp32, gp33 and integrase genes, has marked lytic ability and a specific Listeria serotype 4b host range. In order to prevent phage adsorption, L. monocytogenes 4b underwent a mutation associated with phosphoribonate glycosylation, resulting in the loss of galactose from the phosphoribonate molecule. This loss of galactose not only prevented phage adsorption, but also led to a reduction in bacterial virulence [97].
Virulence shrinks under massive phage predation: A phage mixture targeting different extracellular structures such as receptors causes a huge impact on the bacterial fitness, virulence, and pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa. Secretory virulence factors, such as elastase, pyocyanin, and pyoverdine, significantly facilitate the P. aeruginosa colonization of new niches but are not directly related to the cell response to phage infection. The change in P. aeruginosa PAO1 biology is related to the number of phages that cause selection pressure on the population. The more phages appear in the environment, the deeper and more noticeable are the phenotypic changes involving a reduction of various virulence factors’ production levels [119].
To further investigate temperate phages’ potential to benefit clinical treatment, temperate phage PHB09′s interaction with its host B. bronchiseptica Bb01 has been elucidated in detail. Isolated from sewage water, temperate phage PHB09 is reported to attenuate host virulence by lysogenization. Not only does the temperate phage reduce the virulence of its host both in vivo and in vitro, most likely by inserting and thus disrupting the pilin protein gene, but the vaccine made of lysogenic B. bronchiseptica strain Bb01+ also showed effective protection of mice challenged with virulent B. bronchiseptica. Moreover, in the sight of possible risks rising from prophage induction and phage releasing, neither antibiotic resistance genes nor reversion of bacteria virulence are observed. All induced bacteria are lysed eventually. Thus, the successful virulence attenuation of prophage PHB09 proposes a promising frontier of temperate phages being developed as vaccines [42].
Conducted by Bao’s team, an alleviating effect of temperate phage pre-treatment is observed on intestinal dysbiosis and inflammation in challenged mice. As opposed to the streptomycin treatment, the pre-treatment of mice with temperate phages safeguarded a stable and more diverse gut ecosystem and protected the intestinal system of mice against the pathogen challenge [120].

4.2. Biofilm Degradation

Biofilms can inhibit drug penetration, and thereby significantly reduce the killing efficiency of antimicrobials [114]. Biofilms can also help bacteria to adhere better to the site of infection, causing chronic infection. Thus, in terms of reducing biofilm formation, temperate phages can produce enzymes that degrade biofilms [109], and this degradation can be enhanced by the addition of certain ions [65]. From this point of view, temperate phages have a promising application in the treatment of pathogenic bacterial infections (Figure 2B).
Temperate phage cocktails enhanced with ions. Biofilm can provide a sanctuary for bacteria being hunted by antibiotics. The thick matrix of biofilm formed by bacteria is a special shield against antibiotics because of the reduced drug penetration and the accessibility [121]. A phage cocktail consisting of four temperate phages of the Siphovirdae family, administered with metal ions Ca2+ and Zn2+, shows the enhanced bactericidal impact both in vitro and in vivo compared to the phage cocktail alone. In this experiment, the reason ions such as Ca2+ and Zn2+ can offer an advantage to the phage cocktail is likely because of the promoted fluidity and stability of cocktail phages in the biofilm. The possible gene transfer through these temperate phages is avoided thanks to the lack of virulence gene in the studied four phages. In addition, by decreasing host virulence, prophage can also be a good helper in outcompeting other bacteria. The antibacterial effect of this recipe is determined by the biofilm removal efficiency, where added ions proved a higher bacterial CFU reduction ability. Moreover, using Galleria mellonella larvae as animal model against MRSA S-18 infection, the survival rate resulting from ions–phages therapy is 10% higher than the phage cocktail alone [65].
Temperate phage encoded enzyme to eradicate biofilm. A temperate phage of Pseudomonas has been proved to be able to produce a lyase, LKA1gp49, to degrade LPS. LKA1gp49 is a lyase that degrades the O5-serotype specific polysaccharide. This enzyme degrades LPS molecules embedded in the cell envelope and disperses the biofilm matrix, resulting in an increased diffusion rate for small molecules. LKA1gp49 lyase efficiently reduces P. aeruginosa virulence in the in vivo G. mellonella infection model and sensitizes bacterial cells to the lytic activity of the serum complement. LKA1gp49 could also be a potential additive for antimicrobials, as it does not interrupt the efficacy of ciprofloxacin and gentamicin [109].
Combined with antibiotics: Temperate phage can provide enhancement efficacy in killing bacteria with antibiotics [122,123]. The outcome is dependent on the type of phage, type of antibiotics and their respective concentration. Therefore, the results alter dramatically even with one small change of the elements [124]. For instance, Burkholderia cenocepacia is one of the most important opportunistic pathogens in causing high mortality rates in cystic fibrosis (hereafter CF) patients [125]. CF is a chronic genetic disease, caused by a loss in the gene to keep osmotic balance [126,127]. The thick mucus formed as a result of osmotic imbalance blocks airways in the respiratory system and makes it difficult for the antibiotic to penetrate and reach the infecting bacteria [128]. With universal awareness of its antibiotic resistance, finding a suitable antimicrobial therapy substitute is paramount.
Temperate Burkholderia phage AP3 combined with antibiotics demonstrates increased bactericidal effects in in vivo experiments with moth larvae. This finding could be considered as a potent lead against bacterial strains belonging to B. cenocepacia IIIA lineage, which are commonly isolated from CF patients [98]. Attention should be paid to antibiotic resistance change when practicing temperate phage therapy in CF patients. P. aeruginosa is the cause of a typically challenging infection endocarditis. Increased resistance to antibiotics and a broadened host range of P. aeruginosa is observed, along with disease progression [129].
For temperate phages, the prophage induction through the SOS response and resensitization to antibiotics are the two main synergy mechanisms [130]. In the work of Amany M Al-Anany, in vitro bacterial eradication is observed after the coadministration of E. coli temperate phage HK97 and antibiotic ciprofloxacin. This synergy works in line with the depletion of lysogens which ciprofloxacin specially targets [101]. The restoration of antibiotic sensitivity to two antibiotics, streptomycin and nalidixic acid, can be realized by the introduction of specific genes, rpsL and gyrA, respectively, in the process of temperate phage lysogenization [102].

5. Temperate Phage Gene Engineering and Display

In addition to functioning as a killing machine, a temperate phage can be a powerful and stable vector, for instance, carrying vaccines into bacteria and acting as a medium for protein expression. The engineering of a phage integration site or the inhibition of the toxins’ gene expression can also take a toll on host virulence. Temperate phages are a robust platform for genetic engineering and modification [131].
Phage vaccine: Temperate phage lambda’s potential for delivering a DNA vaccine has been exploited and substantiated [132]. It is economical, and has excellent stability, easy production and, most importantly, no concern of antibiotic resistance [133]. With all these appealing advantages, temperate phage is a promising candidate for vaccines. Recombined with targeted DNA, temperate phage λ can carry particulate DNA into the human system and provide protection from degradation, making sure the antigen presenting cells can recognize and capture them. A phage vaccine has only been administered by sub-cutaneous and intramuscular injections, but an oral form of delivery is also possible dependent on its stability in water [103]. A vaccine made from temperate phage λ using the phage display technique showed significant efficiency in eliciting an anti-PCV2 immune response after the first vaccination without adjuvant [104]. Using temperate phage M13 surface display, the diverse cloning of tumor-associated antigens in prostate cancer is achieved and makes it a desirable candidate for vaccine development in prostate cancer [105]. Vaccines consisting of filamentous phage are also considered a viable alternative. The filamentous phage inoculation induced both humoral and cellular immune responses against HSV-1 in BALB/c mice [106].
Lambda PLP: Phage-like particles (PLPs) derived from phage lambda have physicochemical properties compatible with drug standards, and in vitro particle tracking and cellular targeting is achieved by displaying fluorescein-5-carboximide (F5M) and trastuzumab (Trz), respectively. Phage-derived nanodrugs are modular systems that can be easily adapted to combined approaches, including imaging, biomarker targeting and the intracellular delivery of therapeutics. A ‘designer nanoparticle’ system that can be rapidly engineered in a tunable and unambiguous manner, trz-PLP binds to oncogenically active human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and is internalized by HER2 overexpressing subtypes of breast cancer cells, but not by breast cancers lacking HER2 amplified breast cancers. The robust internalization of Trz PLPs resulted in increased intracellular Trz concentrations, prolonged cell growth inhibition and the regulation of cellular programs associated with HER2 signaling, proliferation, metabolism and protein synthesis compared to Trz treatment. The robustness and flexibility of lambda PLP provides a platform that adapts to a wide range of utility and customized features [107].
Engineered endolysins: Bacteriophage-derived endolysins are cell wall hydrolases which could hydrolyze the peptidoglycan layer from inside and outside bacterial pathogens [134]. A genetically modified endolysin PM-477 produced by Gardnerella phage exhibits the ability to completely disrupt bacterial biofilms of Gardnerella vaginalis. G. vaginalis is a common vaginal bacterium, but can cause bacterial vaginosis under abnormal growth. This engineered endolysin PM-477 has a strong specificity and efficiency against Gardnerella strains, and has no effect on beneficial Lactobacillus or other species of vaginal bacteria [112].
Temperate phage display: The temperate phage M13 phage has a wide range of applications in biomedical materials, and is used for different therapeutic applications [135]. This is due to its unique biological characteristics: safety, ready modification and the ability to form nanofiber shapes and self-assemble into nanofiber matrices. Bhattarai‘s team has engineered and edited an M13 phage, a phage carrying two functional peptides; the integrin binding peptide (RGD), and a polymorphic membrane protein D (PmpD) fragment from Chlamydia trachomatis, a globally prevalent human pathogen for which there is no effective approved vaccine [136]. Compared to C. trachomatis infection alone, engineered phages stably express RGD motifs and C. trachomatis peptides and significantly reduce C. trachomatis infection in HeLa and primary cervical cells [99].
Gene insertion led to attenuated phenotype: The Rickettsia parkeri mutant strain is genetically modified by inserting a transposon into the gene encoding the phage integrase in the bacterial genome. Such a mutant exhibits significantly reduced virulence, significantly smaller phage plaques and improved histopathological alterations in intravenously infected mice compared to the parental wild type. Furthermore, single-dose intradermal immunization of this mutant strain provided mice with complete protection against the lethal R. parkeri rickettsioses in mice. Such a live attenuated rickettsial mutant strain could be used as a novel potential vaccine candidate for the treatment of spotted fever rickettsial disease [111].
Modification of phage genes to inhibit toxin production: Produced by some E. coli, Shiga toxin (Stx) is causative of gastrointestinal diseases and hemolytic uremic syndrome with high incidence and lethality [137]. Shiga-producing E. coli is one of the four pathogens among the mostly benign intestinal commensal E. coli strains [138]. Notably, the virulence factor related to Shiga toxin production is introduced by two lambda-like prophages, which are one of the main genetic elements in causing virulence.
To curb toxin release, the temperate phage λ was genetically engineered to express a deterrent that neutralizes Stx production in E. coli, and the genetic mosaicism of the λ phage was exploited to create a hybrid phage capable of overcoming the phage resistance mechanism. The phage demonstrated superior toxin inhibition in both in vivo and in vitro infections. In the foodborne pathogen EHEC, the λ prophage 933W both produces Stx2 and inhibits phage overlap infection of other λ phages [41].
Gene-modified phage with CRISPR-Cas3 system: CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats)-Cas (CRISPR associated) system is a defense system in bacteria, possessed by around 40% of bacteria [139]. To exclude foreign DNA from infecting bacteria, bacteria initiate the CRISPR-Cas system by recognizing, “memorizing”, foreign DNA, and make targeted cleavage upon reoccurring infection attempt [140]. Temperate phage infection can cause maladaptive immunopathological effects on its host and lead to self-targeting of the CRISPR-Cas system, which inhibits the growth of host bacteria [141]. In type 1 Crispr-Cas system, the cascade complexes show a remarkable fast speed in scanning DNA sequences and providing protection [142].
A genetically engineered lambda phage exhibits enhanced killing ability and host specificity when incorporated with the CRISPR-Cas3 system and knockdown of the lytic gene cro. This engineered phage specifically and effectively eliminates enterohemorrhagic E. coli infection and validates the superior performance over wild-type phages through in vitro and in vivo experiments. In addition, there is no evidence in this study showing that EHEC developed resistance to an engineered lambda phage [100].
Encode proteins that block the QS system: The Quorum Sensing (QS) system is a communication system amongst bacteria to modulate community behaviors, a regulatory system that controls the expression of virulence factors and secreted public goods [143]. These circuits enable bacteria to measure the density of their neighbors via receptors. The population-sensing receptors then activate a signaling cascade that leads to global transcriptional changes [144]. Moreover, temperate phages can benefit from QS signals. In vibriophage VP882, through spying on the host-produced anti inducers during QS process, VP882 is capable of manipulating its own cycle switch [145].
P. aeruginosa phage DMS3 can protect bacteria from the attack of other phages by inhibiting bacterial quorum sensing. DMS3 encodes a QS anti-activator protein aqs1 that is expressed immediately after phage infection. aqs1 inhibits the activity of LasR, a major QS regulator, and restrains twitching motility and superinfection. Although there is a 100-fold increase in the number of cells killed by DMS3aqs1 infection compared to wild-type DMS3 infection, no more phages were produced. This suggests a role for anti-phage mechanisms. Aqs 1 offers a counterstrategy through which phages might simultaneously silence multiple antiphage defenses [108].
Converted into the stable lytic phage: A virulent mutant SA13m obtained through the random deletion of temperate phage SA13 exhibits active lytic activity and no sign of lysogenicity. The application of SA13m in sterilized milk showed that S. aureus was reduced a non-detectable levels, suggesting that SA13m can efficiently control the growth of S. aureus in food [75]. Two temperate phages are transformed into lytic phages and made into a three-phage cocktail along with one lytic phage. The cocktail is administered to a cystic fibrosis patient and recovering signs are observed after six months’ treatment [113]. An Enterococcus faecalis temperate phage is converted to a lytic phage for therapeutical purposes. By the deletion of the putative lysogeny gene module and replacement of the putative cro promoter from the recombinant phage genome with a 50 nisin-inducible promoter, the temperate phage is rendered virulent and with expanded host range [110].

6. Conclusions

Temperate phages, because of their natural biological properties, play an integral and indispensable role in the war between phage and bacterium. Temperate phages have contributed a variety of new genetic resources to the bacterial gene pool. Found in half of the bacteria, temperate phages have more accessibility than virulent phages [146]. With proper intervention, or purposeful selection such as genetic engineering, temperate phages are a powerful tool to combat bacterial infections by delivering vaccines and degrading biofilm. Therefore, the study of complex but highly resilient interrelationships between phages and bacteria is of great importance. In this review, we organized previous and recent studies as well as demonstrated empirical research. Mounted cases have highlighted the fact that temperate phage recognition and utilization is heading towards the right direction.
However, there is also room for improvement, for instance in the underutilization of the induction of hidden lysogenic phages. The actual employment of induced temperate phages can be more technically demanding, considering the need to remove integrase and integrate related genes. Targeted embedding of phages to disrupt virulence genes is a promising direction for research, of course making sure that the phages do not carry any virulence genes or integrases.
In summary, this paper focuses on the life cycle of temperate phages and the interactions they have with their host bacteria. Most importantly, this paper illustrates an array of temperate phage applications we could employ in order to combat bacterial infection and benefit clinical treatment. Many experiments have demonstrated the great efficacy and usefulness of temperate phages in the treatment of bacterial diseases, but more in-depth studies are yet to be discovered.

Author Contributions

Software, J.S.; formal analysis, Y.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.Z., Z.L. and J.S.; writing—review and editing, S.Z.; project administration, Y.C.; funding acquisition, Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by grants from the Innovation Capability Improvement Project for Science and Technology SMEs in Shandong Province (2022TSGC2384) and the Natural Science Youth Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2022QC028), and Linyi City Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Waste Recycling and Public Health Improvement Project (CXGC2022A27).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict to interest.

References

  1. Rohwer, F.; Edwards, R. The Phage Proteomic Tree: A Genome-Based Taxonomy for Phage. J. Bacteriol. 2002, 184, 4529–4535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Watts, G. Phage therapy: Revival of the bygone antimicrobial. Lancet (London, England) 2017, 390, 2539–2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fruciano, D.E.; Bourne, S. Phage as an Antimicrobial Agent: D’Herelle’s Heretical Theories and Their Role in the Decline of Phage Prophylaxis in the West. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2007, 18, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hutchings, M.I.; Truman, A.W.; Wilkinson, B. Antibiotics: Past, present and future. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2019, 51, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gulumbe, B.H.; Haruna, U.A.; Almazan, J.; Ibrahim, I.H.; Faggo, A.A.; Bazata, A.Y. Combating the menace of antimicrobial resistance in Africa: A review on stewardship, surveillance and diagnostic strategies. Biol. Proced. Online 2022, 24, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gelman, D.; Eisenkraft, A.; Chanishvili, N.; Nachman, D.; Glazer, S.C.; Hazan, R. The history and promising future of phage therapy in the military service. J. Trauma: Inj. Infect. Crit. Care 2018, 85 (Suppl. S2), S18–S26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, Y.; Yang, L.; Sun, E.; Song, J.; Wu, B. Characterisation of a newly detected bacteriophage infecting Bordetella bronchiseptica in swine. Arch. Virol. 2019, 164, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, S.; Guan, L.; Li, X.; Hu, D.; Gao, D.; Song, J.; Chen, H.; Qian, P. A Novel Tail-Associated O91-Specific Polysaccharide Depolymerase from a Podophage Reveals Lytic Efficacy of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e00145-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, Y.; Sun, E.; Song, J.; Yang, L.; Wu, B. Complete Genome Sequence of a Novel T7-Like Bacteriophage from a Pasteurella multocida Capsular Type A Isolate. Curr. Microbiol. 2018, 75, 574–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhangxiang, L.; Chen, H.; Li, X.; Qian, P. Complete genome sequence of the novel phage vB_EcoS_PHB17, which infects Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Arch. Virol. 2019, 164, 3111–3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Maiques, E.; Úbeda, C.; Campoy, S.; Salvador, N.; Lasa, I.; Novick, R.P.; Barbé, J.; Penadés, J.R. β-Lactam Antibiotics Induce the SOS Response and Horizontal Transfer of Virulence Factors in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 2726–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chen, Y.; Sun, E.; Yang, L.; Song, J.; Wu, B. Therapeutic Application of Bacteriophage PHB02 and Its Putative Depolymerase Against Pasteurella multocida Capsular Type A in Mice. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, Y.; Guo, G.; Sun, E.; Song, J.; Yang, L.; Zhu, L.; Liang, W.; Hua, L.; Peng, Z.; Tang, X.; et al. Isolation of a T7-Like Lytic Pasteurella Bacteriophage vB_PmuP_PHB01 and Its Potential Use in Therapy against Pasteurella multocida Infections. Viruses 2019, 11, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, Y.; Sun, E.; Song, J.; Tong, Y.; Wu, B. Three Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis bacteriophages from the Siphoviridae family are promising candidates for phage therapy. Can. J. Microbiol. 2018, 64, 865–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Clokie, M.R.J.; Millard, A.D.; Letarov, A.V.; Heaphy, S. Phages in nature. Bacteriophage 2011, 1, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Olszak, T.; Latka, A.; Roszniowski, B.; Valvano, M.A.; Drulis-Kawa, Z. Phage Life Cycles Behind Bacterial Biodiversity. Curr. Med. Chem. 2017, 24, 3987–4001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Albright, M.B.N.; Gallegos-Graves, L.V.; Feeser, K.L.; Montoya, K.; Emerson, J.B.; Shakya, M.; Dunbar, J. Experimental evidence for the impact of soil viruses on carbon cycling during surface plant litter decomposition. ISME Commun. 2022, 2, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Weinbauer, M.G. Ecology of prokaryotic viruses. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 28, 127–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shkoporov, A.N.; Turkington, C.J.; Hill, C. Mutualistic interplay between bacteriophages and bacteria in the human gut. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022, 20, 737–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Song, J.; Yang, D.; Liu, W.; Chen, H.; Wu, B.; Qian, P. Isolation and characterization of a novel temperate bacteriophage from gut-associated Escherichia within black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L. [Diptera: Stratiomyidae]). Arch. Virol. 2019, 164, 2277–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Turner, D.; Kropinski, A.; Adriaenssens, E. A Roadmap for Genome-Based Phage Taxonomy. Viruses 2021, 13, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dion, M.B.; Oechslin, F.; Moineau, S. Phage diversity, genomics and phylogeny. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2020, 18, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hampton, H.G.; Watson, B.N.J.; Fineran, P.C. The arms race between bacteria and their phage foes. Nature 2020, 577, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rohwer, F.; Segall, A.M. A century of phage lessons. Nature 2015, 528, 46–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Taylor, V.L.; Fitzpatrick, A.D.; Islam, Z.; Maxwell, K.L. The Diverse Impacts of Phage Morons on Bacterial Fitness and Virulence. Adv. Virus Res. 2019, 103, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Panis, G.; Franche, N.; Méjean, V.; Ansaldi, M. Insights into the Functions of a Prophage Recombination Directionality Factor. Viruses 2012, 4, 2417–2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Touchon, M.; Bernheim, A.; Rocha, E.P. Genetic and life-history traits associated with the distribution of prophages in bacteria. ISME J. 2016, 10, 2744–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Paul, J.H. Prophages in marine bacteria: Dangerous molecular time bombs or the key to survival in the seas? ISME J. 2008, 2, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wendling, C.C.; Goehlich, H.; Roth, O. The structure of temperate phage–bacteria infection networks changes with the phylogenetic distance of the host bacteria. Biol. Lett. 2018, 14, 20180320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Castillo, D.; Espejo, R.; Middelboe, M. Genomic structure of bacteriophage 6H and its distribution as prophage in Flavobacterium psychrophilum strains. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014, 351, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Cortes, M.G.; Lin, Y.; Zeng, L.; Balázsi, G. From Bench to Keyboard and Back Again: A Brief History of Lambda Phage Modeling. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2021, 50, 117–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Casjens, S.R.; Hendrix, R.W. Bacteriophage lambda: Early pioneer and still relevant. Virology 2015, 479–480, 310–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tsao, Y.-F.; Taylor, V.L.; Kala, S.; Bondy-Denomy, J.; Khan, A.N.; Bona, D.; Cattoir, V.; Lory, S.; Davidson, A.R.; Maxwell, K.L. Phage Morons Play an Important Role in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Phenotypes. J. Bacteriol. 2018, 200, e00189-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Little, J.W.; Michalowski, C.B. Stability and Instability in the Lysogenic State of Phage Lambda. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 6064–6076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Węgrzyn, G.; Węgrzyn, A. Genetic Switches During Bacteriophage λ Development. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 2005, 79, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Dragoš, A.; Priyadarshini, B.; Hasan, Z.; Strube, M.L.; Kempen, P.J.; Maróti, G.; Kaspar, C.; Bose, B.; Burton, B.M.; Bischofs, I.B.; et al. Pervasive prophage recombination occurs during evolution of spore-forming Bacilli. ISME J. 2021, 15, 1344–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wong, S.; Alattas, H.; Slavcev, R.A. A snapshot of the λ T4rII exclusion (Rex) phenotype in Escherichia coli. Curr. Genet. 2021, 67, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Obeng, N.; Pratama, A.A.; van Elsas, J.D. The Significance of Mutualistic Phages for Bacterial Ecology and Evolution. Trends Microbiol. 2016, 24, 440–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bloch, S.; Lewandowska, N.; Węgrzyn, G.; Nejman-Faleńczyk, B. Bacteriophages as sources of small non-coding RNA molecules. Plasmid 2021, 113, 102527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fortier, L.-C.; Sekulovic, O. Importance of prophages to evolution and virulence of bacterial pathogens. Virulence 2013, 4, 354–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hsu, B.B.; Way, J.C.; Silver, P.A. Stable Neutralization of a Virulence Factor in Bacteria Using Temperate Phage in the Mammalian Gut. Msystems 2020, 5, e00013-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chen, Y.; Yang, L.; Yang, D.; Song, J.; Wang, C.; Sun, E.; Gu, C.; Chen, H.; Tong, Y.; Tao, P.; et al. Specific Integration of Temperate Phage Decreases the Pathogenicity of Host Bacteria. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, L.; Shahin, K.; Soleimani-Delfan, A.; Ding, H.; Wang, H.; Sun, L.; Wang, R. Phage JS02, a putative temperate phage, a novel biofilm-degrading agent for Staphylococcus aureus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 75, 643–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, M.; Zhang, T.; Yu, M.; Chen, Y.-L.; Jin, M. The Life Cycle Transitions of Temperate Phages: Regulating Factors and Potential Ecological Implications. Viruses 2022, 14, 1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Gandon, S. Why Be Temperate: Lessons from Bacteriophage λ. Trends Microbiol. 2016, 24, 356–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mäntynen, S.; Laanto, E.; Oksanen, H.M.; Poranen, M.M.; Díaz-Muñoz, S.L. Black box of phage–bacterium interactions: Exploring alternative phage infection strategies. Open Biol. 2021, 11, 210188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Abedon, S.T. Phage evolution and ecology. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 67, 1–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pires, D.P.; Melo, L.D.; Azeredo, J. Understanding the Complex Phage-Host Interactions in Biofilm Communities. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2021, 8, 73–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Flemming, H.-C.; Wingender, J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Márquez, D.L.; Díaz-Orejas, R.; Portillo, F.G.-D. Toxin-antitoxins and bacterial virulence. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2016, 40, 592–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Biancalani, T.; Gore, J. Disentangling bacterial invasiveness from lethality in an experimental host-pathogen system. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2019, 15, e8707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Sanchez, C.J., Jr.; Mende, K.; Beckius, M.L.; Akers, K.S.; Romano, D.R.; Wenke, J.C.; Murray, C.K. Biofilm formation by clinical isolates and the implications in chronic infections. BMC Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gödeke, J.; Paul, K.; Lassak, J.; Thormann, K.M. Phage-induced lysis enhances biofilm formation in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. ISME J. 2011, 5, 613–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Secor, P.R.; Sweere, J.M.; Michaels, L.A.; Malkovskiy, A.V.; Lazzareschi, D.; Katznelson, E.; Rajadas, J.; Birnbaum, M.E.; Arrigoni, A.; Braun, K.R.; et al. Filamentous Bacteriophage Promote Biofilm Assembly and Function. Cell Host Microbe 2015, 18, 549–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chhibber, S.; Nag, D.; Bansal, S. Inhibiting biofilm formation by Klebsiella pneumoniae B5055 using an iron antagonizing molecule and a bacteriophage. BMC Microbiol. 2013, 13, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, H.; Wilksch, J.J.; Strugnell, R.A.; Gee, M.L. Role of Capsular Polysaccharides in Biofilm Formation: An AFM Nanomechanics Study. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 13007–13013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Van Houdt, R.; Michiels, C. Biofilm formation and the food industry, a focus on the bacterial outer surface. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 109, 1117–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bertozzi Silva, J.; Storms, Z.; Sauvageau, D. Host receptors for bacteriophage adsorption. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2016, 363, fnw002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sun, J.; Geng, P.; Wan, X.; Yuan, Z.; Xiong, H.; Hu, X. [Advances of phage receptor binding proteins]. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao Chin. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 37, 2614–2622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Labrie, S.J.; Samson, J.E.; Moineau, S. Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gao, D.; Ji, H.; Wang, L.; Li, X.; Hu, D.; Zhao, J.; Wang, S.; Tao, P.; Li, X.; Qian, P. Fitness Trade-Offs in Phage Cocktail-Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Results in Increased Antibiotic Susceptibility and Reduced Virulence. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0291422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. de Jonge, P.A.; Nobrega, F.L.; Brouns, S.J.; Dutilh, B.E. Molecular and Evolutionary Determinants of Bacteriophage Host Range. Trends Microbiol. 2019, 27, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Dunne, M.; Prokhorov, N.S.; Loessner, M.J.; Leiman, P.G. Reprogramming bacteriophage host range: Design principles and strategies for engineering receptor binding proteins. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2021, 68, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Song, J.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y. Phage Engineering for Targeted Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, X.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Duan, X.; Zhang, F.; Guo, A.; Tao, P.; Chen, H.; Li, X.; Qian, P. Exploring the Benefits of Metal Ions in Phage Cocktail for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infection. Infect. Drug Resist. 2022, 15, 2689–2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lood, C.; Haas, P.-J.; van Noort, V.; Lavigne, R. Shopping for phages? Unpacking design rules for therapeutic phage cocktails. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2022, 52, 236–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mapes, A.C.; Trautner, B.W.; Liao, K.S.; Ramig, R.F. Development of expanded host range phage active on biofilms of multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bacteriophage 2016, 6, e1096995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fischer, S.; Kittler, S.; Klein, G.; Glünder, G. Impact of a Single Phage and a Phage Cocktail Application in Broilers on Reduction of Campylobacter jejuni and Development of Resistance. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Khaleel, T.; Younger, E.; McEwan, A.R.; Varghese, A.S.; Smith, M.C.M. A phage protein that binds φC31 integrase to switch its directionality. Mol. Microbiol. 2011, 80, 1450–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ravin, N. Replication and Maintenance of Linear Phage-Plasmid N15. Microbiol. Spectr. 2015, 3, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Pfeifer, E.; Sousa, J.A.M.D.; Touchon, M.; Rocha, E.P.C. Bacteria have numerous distinctive groups of phage–plasmids with conserved phage and variable plasmid gene repertoires. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, 2655–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Rutherford, K.; Yuan, P.; Perry, K.; Sharp, R.; Van Duyne, G.D. Attachment site recognition and regulation of directionality by the serine integrases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, 8341–8356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Rabinovich, L.; Sigal, N.; Borovok, I.; Nir-Paz, R.; Herskovits, A.A. Prophage Excision Activates Listeria Competence Genes that Promote Phagosomal Escape and Virulence. Cell 2012, 150, 792–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Fang, Y.; Mercer, R.G.; McMullen, L.M.; Gänzle, M.G. Induction of Shiga Toxin-Encoding Prophage by Abiotic Environmental Stress in Food. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e01378-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. In Proceedings of theChang, Y.; Bai, J.; Lee, J.-H.; Ryu, S. Mutation of a Staphylococcus aureus temperate bacteriophage to a virulent one and evaluation of its application. Food Microbiol. 2019, 82, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nepal, R.; Houtak, G.; Shaghayegh, G.; Bouras, G.; Shearwin, K.; Psaltis, A.J.; Wormald, P.-J.; Vreugde, S. Prophages encoding human immune evasion cluster genes are enriched in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from chronic rhinosinusitis patients with nasal polyps. Microb. Genom. 2021, 7, 000726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Bondy-Denomy, J.; Qian, J.; Westra, E.R.; Buckling, A.; Guttman, D.S.; Davidson, A.R.; Maxwell, K.L. Prophages mediate defense against phage infection through diverse mechanisms. ISME J. 2016, 10, 2854–2866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Fillol-Salom, A.; Rostøl, J.T.; Ojiogu, A.D.; Chen, J.; Douce, G.; Humphrey, S.; Penadés, J.R. Bacteriophages benefit from mobilizing pathogenicity islands encoding immune systems against competitors. Cell 2022, 185, 3248–3262.e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Azulay, G.; Pasechnek, A.; Stadnyuk, O.; Ran-Sapir, S.; Fleisacher, A.M.; Borovok, I.; Sigal, N.; Herskovits, A.A. A dual-function phage regulator controls the response of cohabiting phage elements via regulation of the bacterial SOS response. Cell Rep. 2022, 39, 110723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hu, J.; Ye, H.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Han, D. Prophage Activation in the Intestine: Insights Into Functions and Possible Applications. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 785634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jones, E.C.; Uphoff, S. Single-molecule imaging of LexA degradation in Escherichia coli elucidates regulatory mechanisms and heterogeneity of the SOS response. Nat. Microbiol. 2021, 6, 981–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Jancheva, M.; Böttcher, T. A Metabolite of Pseudomonas Triggers Prophage-Selective Lysogenic to Lytic Conversion in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 8344–8351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Campoy, S.; Hervàs, A.; Busquets, N.; Erill, I.; Teixidó, L.; Barbé, J. Induction of the SOS response by bacteriophage lytic development in Salmonella enterica. Virology 2006, 351, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ghosh, D.; Roy, K.; Williamson, K.E.; Srinivasiah, S.; Wommack, K.E.; Radosevich, M. Acyl-Homoserine Lactones Can Induce Virus Production in Lysogenic Bacteria: An Alternative Paradigm for Prophage Induction. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 7142–7152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Fillol-Salom, A.; Alsaadi, A.; de Sousa, J.A.M.; Zhong, L.; Foster, K.R.; Rocha, E.P.C.; Penadés, J.R.; Ingmer, H.; Haaber, J. Bacteriophages benefit from generalized transduction. PLOS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1007888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Colavecchio, A.; Cadieux, B.; Lo, A.; Goodridge, L.D. Bacteriophages Contribute to the Spread of Antibiotic Resistance Genes among Foodborne Pathogens of the Enterobacteriaceae Family—A Review. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Sternberg, N. The production of generalized transducing phage by bacteriophage lambda. Gene 1986, 50, 69–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kwoh, D.Y.; Kemper, J. Bacteriophage P22-mediated specialized transduction in Salmonella typhimurium: Identification of different types of specialized transducing particles. J. Virol. 1978, 27, 535–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Humphrey, S.; Fillol-Salom, A.; Quiles-Puchalt, N.; Ibarra-Chávez, R.; Haag, A.F.; Chen, J.; Penadés, J.R. Bacterial chromosomal mobility via lateral transduction exceeds that of classical mobile genetic elements. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Catalao, M.J.; Gil, F.; Moniz-Pereira, J.; São-José, C.; Pimentel, M. Diversity in bacterial lysis systems: Bacteriophages show the way. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 554–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Secor, P.R.; Burgener, E.B.; Kinnersley, M.; Jennings, L.K.; Roman-Cruz, V.; Popescu, M.; Van Belleghem, J.D.; Haddock, N.; Copeland, C.; Michaels, L.A.; et al. Pf Bacteriophage and Their Impact on Pseudomonas Virulence, Mammalian Immunity, and Chronic Infections. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Rice, S.A.; Tan, C.H.; Mikkelsen, P.J.; Kung, V.; Woo, J.; Tay, M.; Hauser, A.; McDougald, D.; Webb, J.; Kjelleberg, S. The biofilm life cycle and virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa are dependent on a filamentous prophage. ISME J. 2009, 3, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Yang, D.; Wang, S.; Sun, E.; Chen, Y.; Hua, L.; Wang, X.; Zhou, R.; Chen, H.; Peng, Z.; Wu, B. A temperate Siphoviridae bacteriophage isolate from Siberian tiger enhances the virulence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus through distinct mechanisms. Virulence 2022, 13, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Clooney, A.G.; Sutton, T.D.; Shkoporov, A.N.; Holohan, R.K.; Daly, K.M.; O’Regan, O.; Ryan, F.J.; Draper, L.A.; Plevy, S.E.; Ross, R.P.; et al. Whole-Virome Analysis Sheds Light on Viral Dark Matter in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 26, 764–778.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Kang, D.-W.; Adams, J.B.; Gregory, A.C.; Borody, T.; Chittick, L.; Fasano, A.; Khoruts, A.; Geis, E.; Maldonado, J.; McDonough-Means, S.; et al. Microbiota Transfer Therapy alters gut ecosystem and improves gastrointestinal and autism symptoms: An open-label study. Microbiome 2017, 5, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Cai, M.; Pu, B.; Wang, Y.; Lv, L.; Jiang, C.; Fu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, W.; Dong, K.; Yang, Y.; et al. A Plasmid With Conserved Phage Genes Helps Klebsiella pneumoniae Defend Against the Invasion of Transferable DNA Elements at the Cost of Reduced Virulence. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 827545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sumrall, E.T.; Shen, Y.; Keller, A.P.; Rismondo, J.; Pavlou, M.; Eugster, M.R.; Boulos, S.; Disson, O.; Thouvenot, P.; Kilcher, S.; et al. Phage resistance at the cost of virulence: Listeria monocytogenes serovar 4b requires galactosylated teichoic acids for InlB-mediated invasion. PLOS Pathog. 2019, 15, e1008032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Roszniowski, B.; Latka, A.; Maciejewska, B.; Vandenheuvel, D.; Olszak, T.; Briers, Y.; Holt, G.S.; Valvano, M.A.; Lavigne, R.; Smith, D.L.; et al. The temperate Burkholderia phage AP3 of the Peduovirinae shows efficient antimicrobial activity against B. cenocepacia of the IIIA lineage. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 1203–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bhattarai, S.R.; Yoo, S.Y.; Lee, S.-W.; Dean, D. Engineered phage-based therapeutic materials inhibit Chlamydia trachomatis intracellular infection. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 5166–5174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Jin, M.; Chen, J.; Zhao, X.; Hu, G.; Wang, H.; Liu, Z.; Chen, W.-H. An Engineered λ Phage Enables Enhanced and Strain-Specific Killing of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0127122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Al-Anany, A.M.; Fatima, R.; Hynes, A.P. Temperate phage-antibiotic synergy eradicates bacteria through depletion of lysogens. Cell Rep. 2021, 35, 109172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Edgar, R.; Friedman, N.; Molshanski-Mor, S.; Qimron, U. Reversing Bacterial Resistance to Antibiotics by Phage-Mediated Delivery of Dominant Sensitive Genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 744–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Jepson, C.D.; March, J.B. Bacteriophage lambda is a highly stable DNA vaccine delivery vehicle. Vaccine 2004, 22, 2413–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Gamage, L.N.; Ellis, J.; Hayes, S. Immunogenicity of bacteriophage lambda particles displaying porcine Circovirus 2 (PCV2) capsid protein epitopes. Vaccine 2009, 27, 6595–6604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Fosså, A.; Alsøe, L.; Crameri, R.; Funderud, S.; Gaudernack, G.; Smeland, E.B. Serological cloning of cancer/testis antigens expressed in prostate cancer using cDNA phage surface display. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2004, 53, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hashemi, H.; Bamdad, T.; Jamali, A.; Pouyanfard, S.; Mohammadi, M.G. Evaluation of humoral and cellular immune responses against HSV-1 using genetic immunization by filamentous phage particles: A comparative approach to conventional DNA vaccine. J. Virol. Methods 2010, 163, 440–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Catala, A.; Dzieciatkowska, M.; Wang, G.; Gutierrez-Hartmann, A.; Simberg, D.; Hansen, K.C.; D’Alessandro, A.; Catalano, C.E. Targeted Intracellular Delivery of Trastuzumab Using Designer Phage Lambda Nanoparticles Alters Cellular Programs in Human Breast Cancer Cells. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 11789–11805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Shah, M.; Taylor, V.L.; Bona, D.; Tsao, Y.; Stanley, S.Y.; Pimentel-Elardo, S.M.; McCallum, M.; Bondy-Denomy, J.; Howell, P.L.; Nodwell, J.R.; et al. A phage-encoded anti-activator inhibits quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 571–583.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Olszak, T.; Shneider, M.M.; Latka, A.; Maciejewska, B.; Browning, C.; Sycheva, L.V.; Cornelissen, A.; Danis-Wlodarczyk, K.; Senchenkova, S.N.; Shashkov, A.S.; et al. The O-specific polysaccharide lyase from the phage LKA1 tailspike reduces Pseudomonas virulence. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhang, H.; Fouts, D.E.; DePew, J.; Stevens, R.H. Genetic modifications to temperate Enterococcus faecalis phage ϕEf11 that abolish the establishment of lysogeny and sensitivity to repressor, and increase host range and productivity of lytic infection. Microbiology 2013, 159 Pt 6, 1023–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Arroyave, E.; Hyseni, I.; Burkhardt, N.; Kuo, Y.-F.; Wang, T.; Munderloh, U.; Fang, R. Rickettsia parkeri with a Genetically Disrupted Phage Integrase Gene Exhibits Attenuated Virulence and Induces Protective Immunity against Fatal Rickettsioses in Mice. Pathogens 2021, 10, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Landlinger, C.; Tisakova, L.; Oberbauer, V.; Schwebs, T.; Muhammad, A.; Latka, A.; Van Simaey, L.; Vaneechoutte, M.; Guschin, A.; Resch, G.; et al. Engineered Phage Endolysin Eliminates Gardnerella Biofilm Without Damaging Beneficial Bacteria in Bacterial Vaginosis Ex Vivo. Pathogens 2021, 10, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Payaslian, F.; Gradaschi, V.; Piuri, M. Genetic manipulation of phages for therapy using BRED. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2021, 68, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Nunez, C.; Kostoulias, X.; Peleg, A.; Short, F.; Qu, Y. A comprehensive comparison of biofilm formation and capsule production for bacterial survival on hospital surfaces. Biofilm 2017, 5, 100105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Howard-Varona, C.; Hargreaves, K.R.; Abedon, S.T.; Sullivan, M.B. Lysogeny in nature: Mechanisms, impact and ecology of temperate phages. ISME J. 2017, 11, 1511–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Łobocka, M.; Dąbrowska, K.; Górski, A. Engineered Bacteriophage Therapeutics: Rationale, Challenges and Future. Biodrugs 2021, 35, 255–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Diard, M.; Hardt, W.-D. Evolution of bacterial virulence. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Schubert, W.-D.; Urbanke, C.; Ziehm, T.; Beier, V.; Machner, M.P.; Domann, E.; Wehland, J.; Chakraborty, T.; Heinz, D.W. Structure of Internalin, a Major Invasion Protein of Listeria monocytogenes, in Complex with Its Human Receptor E-Cadherin. Cell 2002, 111, 825–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Markwitz, P.; Olszak, T.; Gula, G.; Kowalska, M.; Arabski, M.; Drulis-Kawa, Z. Emerging Phage Resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 Is Accompanied by an Enhanced Heterogeneity and Reduced Virulence. Viruses 2021, 13, 1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bao, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, S.; Pang, M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Olaniran, A.; Xiao, Y.; Schmidt, S.; et al. Dysbiosis and intestinal inflammation caused by Salmonella Typhimurium in mice can be alleviated by preadministration of a lytic phage. Microbiol. Res. 2022, 260, 127020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Hathroubi, S.; Mekni, M.A.; Domenico, P.; Nguyen, D.; Jacques, M. Biofilms: Microbial Shelters Against Antibiotics. Microb. Drug Resist. 2017, 23, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Tagliaferri, T.L.; Jansen, M.; Horz, H.-P. Fighting Pathogenic Bacteria on Two Fronts: Phages and Antibiotics as Combined Strategy. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Li, X.; He, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wei, J.; Hu, T.; Si, J.; Tao, G.; Zhang, L.; Xie, L.; Abdalla, A.E.; et al. A combination therapy of Phages and Antibiotics: Two is better than one. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 17, 3573–3582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Liu, C.G.; Green, S.I.; Min, L.; Clark, J.R.; Salazar, K.C.; Terwilliger, A.L.; Kaplan, H.B.; Trautner, B.W.; Ramig, R.F.; Maresso, A.W. Phage-Antibiotic Synergy Is Driven by a Unique Combination of Antibacterial Mechanism of Action and Stoichiometry. mBio 2020, 11, e01462-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Rhodes, K.A.; Schweizer, H.P. Antibiotic resistance in Burkholderia species. Drug Resist. Updat. 2016, 28, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Endres, T.M.; Konstan, M.W. What Is Cystic Fibrosis? Jama 2022, 327, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Elborn, J.S. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet (London, England) 2016, 388, 2519–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Shteinberg, M.; Haq, I.J.; Polineni, D.; Davies, J.C. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet (London, England) 2021, 397, 2195–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Tariq, M.A.; Everest, F.L.C.; Cowley, L.A.; Wright, R.; Holt, G.S.; Ingram, H.; Duignan, L.A.M.; Nelson, A.; Lanyon, C.V.; Perry, A.; et al. Temperate Bacteriophages from Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lung Infections Show Disease-Specific Changes in Host Range and Modulate Antimicrobial Susceptibility. Msystems 2019, 4, e00191-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Łusiak-Szelachowska, M.; Międzybrodzki, R.; Drulis-Kawa, Z.; Cater, K.; Knežević, P.; Winogradow, C.; Amaro, K.; Jończyk-Matysiak, E.; Weber-Dąbrowska, B.; Rękas, J.; et al. Bacteriophages and antibiotic interactions in clinical practice: What we have learned so far. J. Biomed. Sci. 2022, 29, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Peng, H.; Chen, I.A. Phage engineering and the evolutionary arms race. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2021, 68, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. de Vries, C.R.; Chen, Q.; Demirdjian, S.; Kaber, G.; Khosravi, A.; Liu, D.; Van Belleghem, J.D.; Bollyky, P.L. Phages in vaccine design and immunity; mechanisms and mysteries. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2021, 68, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Iwagami, Y.; Casulli, S.; Nagaoka, K.; Kim, M.; Carlson, R.I.; Ogawa, K.; Lebowitz, M.S.; Fuller, S.; Biswas, B.; Stewart, S.; et al. Lambda phage-based vaccine induces antitumor immunity in hepatocellular carcinoma. Heliyon 2017, 3, e00407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Rahman, M.U.; Wang, W.; Sun, Q.; Shah, J.A.; Li, C.; Sun, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, B.; Chen, W.; Wang, S. Endolysin, a Promising Solution against Antimicrobial Resistance. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Warner, C.M.; Barker, N.; Lee, S.-W.; Perkins, E.J. M13 bacteriophage production for large-scale applications. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 37, 2067–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Chavda, V.P.; Pandya, A.; Kypreos, E.; Patravale, V.; Apostolopoulos, V. Chlamydia trachomatis: Quest for an eye-opening vaccine breakthrough. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2022, 21, 771–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Carter, M.Q.; Laniohan, N.; Pham, A.; Quiñones, B. Comparative genomic and phenotypic analyses of the virulence potential in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O121:H7 and O121:H10. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 1043726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Chibani-Chennoufi, S.; Sidoti, J.; Bruttin, A.; Kutter, E.; Sarker, S.; Brüssow, H. In Vitro and In Vivo Bacteriolytic Activities of Escherichia coli Phages: Implications for Phage Therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 2558–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Makarova, K.S.; Wolf, Y.I.; Alkhnbashi, O.S.; Costa, F.; Shah, S.A.; Saunders, S.J.; Barrangou, R.; Brouns, S.J.J.; Charpentier, E.; Haft, D.H.; et al. An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13, 722–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Czarnek, M.; Bereta, J. The CRISPR-Cas system—from bacterial immunity to genome engineering. Postep. Hig. I Med. Dosw. (Online) 2016, 70, 901–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Rollie, C.; Chevallereau, A.; Watson, B.N.J.; Chyou, T.-Y.; Fradet, O.; McLeod, I.; Fineran, P.C.; Brown, C.M.; Gandon, S.; Westra, E.R. Targeting of temperate phages drives loss of type I CRISPR–Cas systems. Nature 2020, 578, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Vink, J.N.; Martens, K.J.; Vlot, M.; McKenzie, R.E.; Almendros, C.; Bonilla, B.E.; Brocken, D.J.; Hohlbein, J.; Brouns, S.J. Direct Visualization of Native CRISPR Target Search in Live Bacteria Reveals Cascade DNA Surveillance Mechanism. Mol. Cell 2020, 77, 39–50.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Bruger, E.L.; Snyder, D.J.; Cooper, V.S.; Waters, C.M. Quorum sensing provides a molecular mechanism for evolution to tune and maintain investment in cooperation. ISME J. 2021, 15, 1236–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Jugder, B.-E.; Batista, J.H.; Gibson, J.A.; Cunningham, P.M.; Asara, J.M.; Watnick, P.I. Vibrio cholerae high cell density quorum sensing activates the host intestinal innate immune response. Cell Rep. 2022, 40, 111368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Silpe, J.E.; Bassler, B.L. A Host-Produced Quorum-Sensing Autoinducer Controls a Phage Lysis-Lysogeny Decision. Cell 2019, 176, 268–280.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Amankwah, S.; Abdusemed, K.; Kassa, T. Bacterial Biofilm Destruction: A Focused Review On The Recent Use of Phage-Based Strategies With Other Antibiofilm Agents. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2021, 14, 161–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Life cycle of temperate phage. Temperate phage ejects its genome into host bacteria during infection and persists as either prophage or separate plasmid. For lysogenic life, temperate phage replicates along with host bacterium, until prophage induction is triggered and leads to host lysis.
Figure 1. Life cycle of temperate phage. Temperate phage ejects its genome into host bacteria during infection and persists as either prophage or separate plasmid. For lysogenic life, temperate phage replicates along with host bacterium, until prophage induction is triggered and leads to host lysis.
Cimb 45 00076 g001
Figure 2. Different angles of temperate applications. (A)Trade-off between virulence and phage resistance. Temperate phages can reduce bacteria virulence through a virulence–phage resistance trade-off mechanism. Facing massive predation, bacteria mutate their surface protein gene and avoid temperate phage binding. At the same time, the virulence decreases as the cost of the mutation. (B) Biofilm degradation. Certain biofilm degrading enzymes produced by temperate phages can accelerate the penetration towards target bacteria. With the addition of metal ions and antibiotics, the bactericidal effect is enhanced.
Figure 2. Different angles of temperate applications. (A)Trade-off between virulence and phage resistance. Temperate phages can reduce bacteria virulence through a virulence–phage resistance trade-off mechanism. Facing massive predation, bacteria mutate their surface protein gene and avoid temperate phage binding. At the same time, the virulence decreases as the cost of the mutation. (B) Biofilm degradation. Certain biofilm degrading enzymes produced by temperate phages can accelerate the penetration towards target bacteria. With the addition of metal ions and antibiotics, the bactericidal effect is enhanced.
Cimb 45 00076 g002
Table 1. List of temperate phages with their favorable characteristics described.
Table 1. List of temperate phages with their favorable characteristics described.
PhageHostFunctionDescriptionReference
PHB09B. bronchisepticaVirulence shrinks under massive phage predationPHB09 inserted and thus disrupted pilin protein gene, but the vaccine made of lysogenic B. bronchiseptica strain Bb01+ also showed effective protection of mice challenged with virulent B. bronchiseptica.[42]
p2K. pneumoniaeHost prevents invasion by reducing virulenceThe presence of a plasmid form of prophage can provide host bacterium with resistance to other foreign DNA at the cost of the host virulence.[96]
ΔLCRA500L.monocytogenesHost prevents invasion by reducing virulenceThe temperate phage ΔLCRA500, which has been knocked out of the gp32, gp33 and integrase genes, has marked lytic ability and a specific Listeria serotype 4b host range.[97]
PHB22a, PHB25a, PHB38a, and PHB40a Methicillin-Resistant
S. aureus S-18
Temperate phage cocktails enhanced with ionsThe antibacterial effect of this recipe is determined by the biofilm removal efficiency, where added ions proved higher bacterial CFU reduction ability. Moreover, using G. mellonella larvae as animal model against MRSA S-18 infection, the survival rate resulting from ions–phages therapy is 10% higher.[65]
SA13mS.aureusConverted into stable lytic phageA virulent mutant SA13m obtained through random deletion of temperate phage SA13 exhibits active lytic activity and no sign of lysogenicity. Application of SA13m in sterilized milk showed that S. aureus was reduced to non-detectable levels, suggesting that SA13m can efficiently control the growth of S. aureus in food.[75]
AP3B.cenocepaciaCombined with antibioticsTemperate Burkholderia phage AP3 combined with antibiotics demonstrates increased bactericidal effects in in vivo experiments with moth larvae.[98]
M13C. trachomatisTemperate phage displayCompared to C. trachomatis infection alone, engineered phages stably express RGD motifs and C. trachomatis peptides and significantly reduce C. trachomatis infection in HeLa and primary cervical cells.[99]
933WE. coliModification of phage genes to inhibit toxin productionThe phage demonstrated superior toxin inhibition in both in vivo and in vitro infections. In the foodborne pathogen EHEC, the λ prophage 933W both produces Stx2 and inhibits phage overlap infection of other λ phages.[41]
E. coliGene-modified phage with CRISPR-Cas3 systemA genetically engineered λ phage exhibits enhanced killing ability and host specificity when incorporated with CRISPR-Cas3 system and knockdown of the lytic gene cro. This engineered phage specifically and effectively eliminates enterohemorrhagic E. coli infection and validated the superior performance over wild-type phages through in vitro and in vivo experiments. In addition, there is no evidence in this study showing that EHEC developed resistance to engineered lambda phage.[100]
HK97E. coliCombined with antibioticsIn vitro bacterial eradication is observed after coadministration of E. coli temperate phage HK97 and antibiotic ciprofloxacin. This synergy works in line with the depletion of lysogens which ciprofloxacin specially targets.[101]
λE. coliCombined with antibioticsThe restoration of antibiotic sensitivity to two antibiotics, streptomycin and nalidixic acid, can be realized by the introduction of specific genes rpsL and gyrA, respectively, in the process of temperate phage lysogenization.[102]
λE. coliPhage vaccineRecombined with targeted DNA, phage λ can carry the particulate DNA into human system and become protected from degradation, making sure the antigen presenting cells can recognize and capture them.[103]
λE. coliPhage vaccineA vaccine made from temperate phage λ using phage display technique showed significant efficiency in eliciting anti-PCV2 immune response after the first vaccination without adjuvant.[104]
M13E. coliPhage vaccineUsing temperate phage M13 surface display, the diverse clone of tumor-associated antigens in prostate cancer is achieved and makes it a desirable candidate for vaccine development in prostate cancer.[105]
Filamentous phageE. coliPhage vaccineThe filamentous phage inoculation induced both humoral and cellular immune response against HSV-1 in BALB/c mice.[106]
λE. coliLambda PLPPhage-like particles (PLPs) are derived from phage lambda, and robust internalization of Trz PLPs resulted in increased intracellular Trz concentrations, prolonged cell growth inhibition and regulation of cellular programs associated with HER2 signaling, proliferation, metabolism and protein synthesis compared to Trz treatment.[107]
λE. coliReverse antibiotic sensitivityUsing lysogenic conversion, a sensitivity cassette is brought into the bacteria genome and unwanted recombination is managed to be avoided.[102]
DMS3P.aeruginosaEncode proteins that block QS systemP. aeruginosa phage DMS3 can protect bacteria from attack by other phages by inhibiting bacterial quorum sensing. DMS3 encodes a QS anti-activator protein aqs1 that is expressed immediately after phage infection. aqs1 inhibits the activity of LasR, a major regulator of quorum sensing, and restrains twitching motility and superinfection.[108]
LKA1P.aeruginosaLyase production to eradicate biofilmA temperate phage of Pseudomonas has been proved to be able to produce a lyase, LKA1gp49, to degrade LPS. LKA1gp49 lyase efficiently reduces P. aeruginosa virulence in the in vivo G. mellonella infection model, and sensitizes bacterial cells to the lytic activity of serum complement.[109]
Ef11E. faecalisConverted into stable lytic phageBy deletion of putative lysogeny gene module and replacement of putative cro promoter from the recombinant phage genome with a 50 nisin-inducible promoter, the temperate phage is rendered virulent and with expanded host range.[110]
3A2R. parkeriGene insertion led to attenuated phenotypeThe R. parkeri mutant strain is genetically modified by inserting a transposon into the gene encoding the phage integrase in the bacterial genome. Such a mutant exhibited significantly reduced virulence, significantly smaller phage plaques and improved histopathological alterations in intravenously infected mice compared to the parental wild type.[111]
Gardnerella phageG. vaginalisEngineered endolysinsA genetically modified endolysin PM-477 produced by Gardnerella phage exhibits the ability to completely disrupt bacterial biofilms of G. ardnerella vaginalis and has no effect on beneficial Lactobacillus or other species of vaginal bacteria.[112]
ZoeJ and BPsM. abscessusConverted into stable lytic phageTwo temperate phages are transformed into lytic phages and made into a three-phage cocktail along with one lytic phage. The cocktail is administered to a cystic fibrosis patient and recovering signs are observed after six months’ treatment.[113]
BP96115SalmonellaVirulence shrinks under massive phage invasionAs opposed to the streptomycin treatment, pre-treatment of mice with temperate phage safeguarded a stable and more diverse gut ecosystem and protected the intestinal system of mice against the pathogen challenge.[114]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhou, S.; Liu, Z.; Song, J.; Chen, Y. Disarm The Bacteria: What Temperate Phages Can Do. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 1149-1167. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45020076

AMA Style

Zhou S, Liu Z, Song J, Chen Y. Disarm The Bacteria: What Temperate Phages Can Do. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2023; 45(2):1149-1167. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45020076

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhou, Shiyue, Zhengjie Liu, Jiaoyang Song, and Yibao Chen. 2023. "Disarm The Bacteria: What Temperate Phages Can Do" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 45, no. 2: 1149-1167. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45020076

APA Style

Zhou, S., Liu, Z., Song, J., & Chen, Y. (2023). Disarm The Bacteria: What Temperate Phages Can Do. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 45(2), 1149-1167. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45020076

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop