Next Article in Journal
Transcriptome Analysis of Embryogenic and Non-Embryogenic Callus of Picea Mongolica
Next Article in Special Issue
Increase in Double Negative B Lymphocytes in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Remission and Their Correlation with Early Differentiated T Lymphocyte Subpopulations
Previous Article in Journal
Heme Interactions as Regulators of the Alternative Pathway Complement Responses and Implications for Heme-Associated Pathologies
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Skin-Whitening and Antioxidant Effects of Protocatechuic Acid (PCA) Derivatives in Melanoma and Fibroblast Cell Lines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Genomic, Epigenomic, Transcriptomic, Proteomic and Metabolomic Approaches in Atopic Dermatitis

1
Department of Dermatology, ‘Colentina’ Clinical Hospital, 020125 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Dermatology, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
3
Department of Dermatology, ‘Ponderas’ Academic Hospital, 014142 Bucharest, Romania
4
Department of Dermatology, “Prof. N.C. Paulescu” National Institute of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Diseases, 011233 Bucharest, Romania
5
Department of Physiology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45(6), 5215-5231; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45060331
Submission received: 9 May 2023 / Revised: 3 June 2023 / Accepted: 7 June 2023 / Published: 20 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research in Chronic Dermatoses)

Abstract

:
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a high prevalence in the developed countries. It is associated with atopic and non-atopic diseases, and its close correlation with atopic comorbidities has been genetically demonstrated. One of the main roles of genetic studies is to comprehend the defects of the cutaneous barrier due to filaggrin deficit and epidermal spongiosis. Recently, epigenetic studies started to analyze the influence of the environmental factors on gene expression. The epigenome is considered to be a superior second code that controls the genome, which includes alterations of the chromatin. The epigenetic changes do not alter the genetic code, however, changes in the chromatin structure could activate or inhibit the transcription process of certain genes and consequently, the translation process of the new mRNA into a polypeptide chain. In-depth analysis of the transcriptomic, metabolomic and proteomic studies allow to unravel detailed mechanisms that cause AD. The extracellular space and lipid metabolism are associated with AD that is independent of the filaggrin expression. On the other hand, around 45 proteins are considered as the principal components in the atopic skin. Moreover, genetic studies based on the disrupted cutaneous barrier can lead to the development of new treatments targeting the cutaneous barrier or cutaneous inflammation. Unfortunately, at present, there are no target therapies that focus on the epigenetic process of AD. However, in the future, miR-143 could be an important objective for new therapies, as it targets the miR-335:SOX axis, thereby restoring the miR-335 expression, and repairing the cutaneous barrier defects.

1. Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a high prevalence in the high-income countries [1,2,3,4,5]. Moreover, in low- and middle-income countries too, its prevalence has shown an increasing trend [6]. Both sexes are affected equally, with a peak observed in the first year of life [7,8,9,10]. Children have a prevalence between 15 and 25%; in some countries, such as the United States the prevalence is 30% [11]. On the other hand, adults have a prevalence between 1 and 10%, the presence of the disease being associated with the late onset or persistence from childhood [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Although AD can become symptomatic at any age, in 60% of the cases it develops in the first year of life, in 80–90% of the cases it develops until the age of 5 and only 26% of the adults develop the disease after 60 years of age. AD is considered to be an inherited and multifactorial disease [11,13,14,21,24].
The complex etiology of atopic dermatitis involving interactions between genetic predisposition, favoring and triggering factors causes skin barrier abnormalities and immune dysfunctions critical in the pathogenesis of the disease [7,11,12,25,26]. The positive history of atopic diseases is the biggest risk factor known in the development of AD [11,12,23]. The genetic factors increase the susceptibility for atopy but they do not always lead to clinical manifestations of the disease [11,12,25]. The discovery of the filaggrin gene in 2006 had a significant impact in the understanding of the atopic diseases in the subgroup related with filaggrin deficit [27,28]. AD is associated with other atopic diseases from the atopic march, such as allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis, and food allergies; it is also with non-atopic diseases [1,29,30,31,32,33]. The neuropsychiatric disorders have a major impact on patients’ life. Many people suffer from depression, and anxiety [33,34,35,36] and they have a higher risk of suicide [33,37,38], sleep deprivation, and reduced quality of life. The chronic psychological stress increases the symptoms of AD creating a vicious circle [33,39,40,41,42]. The serotonin metabolism is altered by the high level of proinflammatory cytokines, leading to higher levels of depression and anxiety [43,44,45,46].
Clinically, patients present with erythematous papules, plaques or vesicles, excoriated papules or plaques or chronic lichenified hyperpigmented lesions [47]. Usually, children have widespread polymorphic lesions that can involve any area of the body while adults present with circumscribed localized lesions usually on the arms, legs, hands, neck and the periorbital area, most of the time linearly distributed and lichenified. The lesions have chronic relapses and are associated with pruritus. According to Hanifin and Rajka, the diagnosis of AD requires the presence of at least three major criteria and three minor criteria. Over the years, other simplified diagnosis methods have been published [8,48,49,50,51,52]. Histopathologically, acute lesions present with moderate spongiosis, mild acanthosis and exocytosis of inflammatory cells. In subacute lesions, the degree of acanthosis increases. With time, the lesions develop scales and crusts above the thickened epidermis and dermal perivascular inflammatory infiltrate [53].
One of the main roles of genetic studies is to comprehend the defects of the cutaneous barrier [27]. The evolution of technology has allowed for a more precise analysis of the “nomes” (genome, epigenome, transcriptome, proteome, metabolome and phenome) for understanding the mechanisms that cause AD. Genetic studies based on the disrupted cutaneous barrier lead to the development of new treatments targeting the cutaneous barrier or cutaneous inflammation [54,55,56].

2. Etiology, Pathogenesis, Physiopathology

The principal gene associated in several population with AD is the filaggrin gene, which is responsible for the integrity of the epithelium. Even if its mutations are a strong genetic risk factor in the European and Asian population, in African population their detection rate is very low. Moreover, investigations across different ethnicities are still limited [57]. Furthermore, the genetic factors increase the susceptibility for atopy, but they do not necessarily determine the clinical manifestations of the disease (Figure 1). The phenotype is the result of the complex interactions between the disrupted cutaneous barrier, the immunological responses and the environment. The skin barrier is very complex, with the capacity to maintain the equilibrium between the internal and the external environment.
Patients with AD have a decreased bacterial diversity with decreased commensal flora but with significant Staphylococcus aureus; a higher bacterial diversity is observed after the treatment of the lesions or after their favorable evolution [59,60,61]. At the skin level, the quantity of Staphylococcus aureus is associated with the severity of the disease and with the number of relapses [62]. The complex pathophysiological processes associated with spongiosis and the consequences of filaggrin deficit lead to an excessive colonization due to a modified pH and also because the bacteria can migrate easily into the dermis. The migration causes cutaneous inflammation that leads to other cutaneous barrier imbalances [62,63,64,65,66,67]. In contrast, the intestinal microbiome influences AD in three ways: immunological, metabolic and neuroendocrine [68]. Probiotics interact in different ways with the intestinal epithelium, maintaining their balance. By modulating the release of various cytokines, they can induce the activation of the immune system signals, but can also induce the opposite effect, that is, tolerance [68,69,70,71]. Colonization of the skin with Staphylococcus aureus influences the severity and the number of relapses of AD, the relationship between them being directly proportional [62]. On the other hand, intestinal colonization can have a protective role in AD, as recent studies have demonstrated that it promotes the maturation of the immune system. There is little data about other Staphylococcus species, but several studies have concluded that a colonization of the skin with these species can have a positive impact in preventing AD by inhibiting the growth of Staphylococcus aureus [61,68,72]. On the other hand, a significant number of studies have demonstrated a high correlation between the lower amount of Malassezia, the high amount of filamentous fungi and also between Candida, Staphylococcus aureus and AD. The treatment targets to increase the amount of Malassezia in order to decrease the fungal colonization [73].

3. The Genome

Since the first genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on AD were published in the late 2000s, there were identified more than 30 loci, most of them associated with the development of the cutaneous barrier and immunologic dysfunctions. These studies are helpful in understanding the genetic risk [74,75,76]. On the other hand, the proteome-wide association study (PheWAS) reverse the research design of GWAS, analyzing more phenotypic variants associated with one genetic mutation. The purpose of the second type of study was to explain genetic pleiotropy [27,74,77]. Nowadays, it is possible to perform more extensive studies on rare mutations with the aid of whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). WES analyzes the genetic sequencing of the exons DNA that encodes proteins and regions of the exons from the non-coding RNA. WES is rather helpful in studying rare diseases and in finding rare mutations that cause polygenic diseases. WGS sequences intergenic regions and exons because many of the regulatory mechanisms are situated in the intergenic regions of the DNA [27,78]. The mendelian randomization (MR) is useful in investigating the causal relationships. It uses the genetic variants to deduct the nongenetic variants caused by the environment. The genetic variants are already present before the onset of the disease, leading to less confusions while studying the risk factors (Figure 2) [74,79,80].
Studies on people from North America and Asia have shown that AD is associated with cardiometabolic diseases, obesity or overweight, hypertension, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, type II diabetes, etc. There is also a vicious circle among genetic factors, inflammation, sedentary lifestyle and corticotherapy, which can precipitate type II diabetes. In addition, due to pruritus, the quality of life decreases, sleep is affected, people becomes more sedentary, all of which increases the morbidity and the mortality of cardiovascular diseases [33,82,83,84,85,86,87]. For example, two potentially modifiable AD risk factors were analyzed using GWAS: vitamin D and obesity. The relationship between low vitamin D levels and AD resulted not to be a causal one [32,64], while the body mass index is highly associated with AD [32,65]. Further, modifying the risk factors associated with AD can decrease the incidence and the prevalence of the disease [74,82,88].
There are more than 70 genes associated with AD, and they are divided into five groups: genes leading to cutaneous barrier disfunction, genes associated with altered innate responses, genes associated with acquired immune responses, genes associated with stress response of the keratinocytes and genes involved in the vitamin D metabolism [58].
The filaggrin gene, located on chromosome 1q21.3, is responsible for the integrity of the cutaneous epithelium. Filaggrin is a structural and functional insoluble protein. Together with its precursor, profilaggrin and its degradation products, trans urocanic acid and pyrrolidone carboxylic acid, it contributes to the aggregation of intermediate filaments of keratin, inhibition of TEWL (transepidermal water loss), epidermal hydration, acidification, immunomodulation, and antibacterial effect. During keratinocyte differentiation, profilaggrin is dephosphorylated and degraded into monomers, which concentrate in the keratin cytoskeleton to form a large amount of protein–lipid matrix [59,89]. The null mutations of the gene are a major risk factor for AD but also for other atopic diseases, such as allergic asthma [28,58,90,91,92]. However, they show a certain population specificity, with important differences observed across various ethnicities. The frequency of the null mutations differs from country to country; around 10% of the Europeans are the carriers of a null mutation situated on exon 3 of the filaggrin gene [13,74,93]. It was explained by the natural immunization for infections which can be stimulated due to a permeable cutaneous barrier caused by the mutation [27,94].
A child’s risk of developing AD is 1.5 times higher if one of the parents has one atopic disease. The risk increases up to 3–5 times if one or both parents have AD. The concordance rate between monozygotic twins is 72–86%, while between dizygotic twins is 21–23%, which emphasizes the importance of the genetic component [58,91,92]. The carriers of two mutant alleles are almost always affected by AD, while patients with heterozygous mutations have an 8-fold risk of developing it [58,91]. Further, the number of filaggrin monomers that repeat in a sequence is responsible for the clinical phenotype and the onset and the severity of the disease [58,92].
Besides the filaggrin gene, there are two other important genes. One leads to cutaneous barrier disfunction by regulating the filaggrin expression: ovo-like transcriptional repressor 1 (OLOV1), and the other one is associated with the innate immune response: interleukin 13 (IL-13) [58,95]. OLOV1 is a transcription factor that regulates filaggrin expression while IL-13 is responsible for type 2 T helper (Th2) cell responses [58]. The immune genes polymorphism is also associated with an increased risk of AD via the Th2 cells [59,96,97] since the Th2 responses predominate in AD. The Th2 responses decrease the production of cutaneous barrier proteins (filaggrin, loricrin, involucrin, cell adhesion proteins, desmosines, and claudins). Moreover, they impair the homeostasis of other epitheliums leading to an imbalanced immune response, which, in the end, is associated with systemic inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness and alimentary allergies [59,89,98,99,100,101,102,103]. The IL-4 and IL-13 cytokines have an important role in producing chemokines, skin barrier disfunction due to lowering filaggrin expression, suppression of the antimicrobial peptides and allergic inflammation [59,98,104]. There are also other polymorphic genes involved in the development of AD, such as signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT), thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TLSP), interferon regulatory factor 2, Toll-like receptor 2, high affinity Ig E receptor α (FcƐRI α), and vitamin D receptor; however, their importance is still under evaluation (Figure 3) [59,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112].
All these genetic studies lead to the development of new treatments targeting the impaired cutaneous barrier and skin inflammation. Unfortunately, there are only a few systemic immunomodulatory biologic therapies approved for AD: Dupilumab (monoclonal antibody blocking IL-4 and IL-13) and Tralokilumab (human monoclonal antibody blocking IL-13). Lebrikizumab, another monoclonal antibody blocking IL-13, has the same mechanisms of action as Tralokilumab but it is still in phase three of development [54,55,56]. In the future, therapies could become more precise and also the adverse reactions and the costs for the treatments could decrease. Once the genetic risk is identified at birth, newborns could benefit from preventive treatments as daily emollients that prevent skin dryness and repair the skin barrier. Some studies state that AD prevention could decrease the risk of developing other comorbidities, such as asthma [74,114,115,116].

4. The Epigenome

The genetic studies demonstrated that the disease expresses in some carriers of mutations but at the same time, it also manifests in patients that do not carry any mutation [26,30,31]. Recently, the epigenetic studies started to analyze the influence of the environmental factors on gene expression [26]. The epigenome is considered a superior second code that controls the genome [26]. The epigenome includes alterations of the chromatin (covalent alterations of histone proteins, DNA methylations, and non-coding RNA-dependent regulations). These alterations can affect the DNA and the histone proteins, thereby modifying the gene expression in the genome [26]. The epigenetic changes do not directly modify the genetic code but changes in the chromatin structures could activate or inhibit the transcription of some genes and, moreover, the translation of the new mRNA [58,74,106,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128].
The covalent alterations of histone proteins affect the chromatin compression level from lightly to tightly packed; the one lightly compressed becomes accessible for transcription [58,74,106,117,118,121]. The main epigenetic mechanism that has an impact on the gene expression regulation is the methylation of the cytosine, mostly where cytosine is followed by guanine. This mechanism blocks the transcription process, while the demethylation of cytosine stimulates the transcription [58,106,118,124,125,126]. Last but not least, the micro-RNAs are small non-coding proteins essential in regulating the posttranscriptional gene expression in the nucleated cells, as they are involved in many cellular processes. The micro-RNAs are involved in apoptosis, morphogenesis, proliferation, regulation of the cellular metabolism, signal transduction and cell differentiation [58,124,125,126,129,130]. The transcription of mi-RNA results in pri-mi-RNA, which is processed by the enzyme Drosha, generating pre-mi-RNA. Then, the mi-RNA leaves the nucleus and is processed in the cytoplasm by the DICER enzyme into a single-stranded mi-RNA. Drosha is a class 2 ribonuclease III enzyme, that in humans, is encoded by the DROSHA (formerly RNASEN) gene. It is the primary nuclease that executes the initiation step of miRNA processing in the nucleus [131]. When a micro-RNA binds to a specific mRNA it destabilizes it, leading to degradation in the cytoplasm and the removal of the mRNA. This process stops the translation and the gene function is inhibited. About 1–3% of the human genome could be regulated by epigenetic mechanisms [58,124,125,126,129,130].
Patients with AD have a different epigenetic profile due to variations in methylation profile and alterations in the expression of some specific micro-RNAs. The atopy was demonstrated to be imprinted in chromosomes 3, 6, 11, 13, and 14 [58,117,118,132,133,134,135,136]. Alterations in the expression of specific miRNAs are involved in regulating the expression of some genes that determine LTh2 polarization in the functionality of some LTreg, inflammatory processes, formation of tight junctions, proliferation and apoptosis of epidermal keratinocytes and also in the synthesis of cytokines and chemokines [133,135,137,138,139,140,141].
Some micro-RNAs were demonstrated to have more impact in the development of AD, and thus they could become the target of new possible treatments in the future. Ten species of miRNA are overexpressed in the atopic skin, while thirty-four species of miRNA are downregulated (Table 1) [58,117,118,132,133,134,135,136].
MiR-155 is overexpressed in patients with AD and it is essential for the differentiation of Th17 and regulatory T cells (Treg). Its overexpression is associated with sustained inflammation, severity of the disease and the percentage of Th17 lymphocytes [58,106,118,124,129,136,137,138,139,142,143,144]. The downregulation of the miR molecules from the Let-7-a-d family in patients with AD leads to the overproduction of IL-13 and CCR7 that promotes the predominance of Th2 responses. MiR-375 acts similarly, inducing the synthesis of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), thereby blocking the expression of the transcription factor Kruppel-like factor 5 (KLF5) [58,129,138]. MiR-151a is involved in the pathogenesis of AD as it regulates the beta2 receptor of IL-12. It decreases the expression of the receptor when the molecule is stimulated. Along with hsa-mir-144-3p, it has been proposed as a possible biomarker in AD. The increased expression of hsa-mir-144-3p was observed in the umbilical cord fluid. On the other hand, the increased level of miR-151a was observed in the serum of AD patients [58,144]. MiR-29b has a positive correlation with SCORAD (tool for scoring the AD) [133]. MiR-143 inhibits IL-13, that when expressed, downregulates filaggrin, involucrin and loricrin [133]. MiR-335 and SOX work codependently: miR-335 is suppressed in patients with AD while SOX is upregulated. On the other hand, in healthy skin, the opposite phenomenon occurs. SOX6 is a transcription factor that suppresses epidermal differentiation by recruiting components of SWI/SNF-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily A (SMARCA) complexes involved in keratinocyte differentiation. The loss of miR-335, together with the upregulation of SOX, affect the keratinocytes differentiation and cornification [145].
Facundes et al. tried to demonstrate whether IgG molecules from AD patients could regulate the functional properties of the thymic gamma-delta T cells (Tγδ), interact with the cell membranes of the Tγδ cells and also determine if they can control the miRNA expression. They concluded that the IgG molecules inhibit the expression of α4β7 integrin molecules, stimulate cutaneous lymphocyte-associated antigen (CLA) expression, interact with the Tγδ cell membrane through the receptors that are functionally differentiated by CTL activity and also interconnect with miR-181b-5p [146].
A lot of risk factors can alter the epigenome, from environment (pollution, and microbes) to therapy and supplement (probiotics, prebiotics, and folic acid), to pet allergens, obesity, stress, and smoking. The epigenetic changes during pregnancy could also affect the newborn, and then the offspring epigenome [58].
Smoking during pregnancy is associated with the early onset of atopic diseases in childhood [26]. Indirectly, it decreases Treg cells in the blood of the umbilical cord, which is associated with high risk of developing AD and alimentary allergies [26]. On the other hand, it increases the expression of miR-223 in the umbilical cord, which is associated with the decrease in Treg lymphocytes and an increased risk of developing AD under the age of three [26]. Furthermore, miR-223 inhibits the insulin growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) that has an important role in cellular metabolism, cellular proliferation and apoptosis [26]. The pollution decreases the expression of interferon gamma (IFNG) by methylation, leading to the development of Th2 dependent allergic reactions [26].
There is a positive association between the composition of commensal bacteria and the risk of developing allergies [58,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154]. The children treated with antibiotics from an early age are at risk of developing allergies [26]. Moreover, the alteration of the function and the composition of the intestinal microbiome is involved in the pathogenesis of the metabolic diseases through pathways that involve covalent alterations of histone proteins, DNA methylations and non-coding RNA-dependent regulations [155,156,157]. A comparison between the methylation profile of the newborn blood cells from the umbilical cord of those living in rural areas and those living in urban areas revealed that in the blood cells of those living in urban areas, there was a decrease in IL-13 production with a lower activity of the Th2 cells, which is beneficial in allergy prevention [26]. Early exposure to microorganisms may influence the regulation of the gene expression, thus promoting a Th1 response [58,158,159,160,161,162].
A study found that the promoter gene Forkhead Box P3 (FOXP3) suffers demethylation in children whose mothers drink unpasteurized cow milk during pregnancy. Breastfeeding with unpasteurized cow milk leads to increased demethylation of the FOXP3 promoter gene in peripheral blood cells and increased Ltreg cells [58,158,159,160,161].
Simpson et al. performed a study on breast milk from 415 women, analyzing the miRNA profile, the influence of probiotics on the miRNA and the relationship between some changes in the miRNA profile and the development of AD in newborns. The expression of some miRNA differed between the placebo group and the group taking probiotics, however, further studies are still needed [130].
To date, there are no target therapies that focus on the epigenetic process of AD. In the future, MiR-143 could be an important target for new therapies. Furthermore, Liew et al. have recently demonstrated that Belinostat, whose target is the miR-335:SOX axis, restores miR-335 expression, thereby repairing the cutaneous barrier defects [133,145].

5. The Transcriptome, Proteome and Metabolome

The transcriptomic, metabolomic and proteomic analyses are quite laborious studies that help us better understand the pathological mechanisms of the disrupted skin barrier.
Cole et al. collected a high number of transcriptomes of atopic skin and demonstrated the importance of the extracellular space and lipidic metabolism [163]. Independent of the mutation type of the filaggrin gene, the carriers have an aberrant defense response. The study used the direct RNA sequencing for quantifying the entire transcriptome of the atopic skin of 26 patients. The conclusion was that even if seven genes that encode the extracellular region proteins are closely related to filaggrin expression, filaggrin expression does not modify the lipid composition of the horny layer. The expression of cartilage intermediate layer protein gene (CILP) leads to the most significant reduction in the expression of the null mutant filaggrin gene compared to the wild type. An overlap of the functional networks of proteins was identified that form the defense response through IFN 1. The amplification of this network can be associated with the response of the dysfunctional skin to viral infections in AD patients. However, this amplification could be a partially functional, suboptimal mechanism to compensate the high frequency of viral infections, including eczema herpeticum [163].
Using skin tape stripping, Goleva et al. identified around 45 proteins as the principal components in the anomalies of the atopic skin; most of them are expressed in patients with AD and food allergies [164]. The most important ones are the keratin intermediate filaments (KRT 5, KRT 8, KRT 10, KRT 14, KRT 16, KRT 17, and KRT 77), the proteins associated with inflammatory response (S100 calcium binding proteins, alarmins, and serine proteinase inhibitor glade B members), and the antioxidant and glycolytic enzymes. A high level of antioxidant and glycolytic enzymes prove the high energy need of those patients and also their need for defense with antioxidants at the skin barrier level [164]. All these anomalies are statistically correlated with the TEWL measured using the Tewameter device, along with total serum IgE (immunoglobulin E) and Staphylococcus aureus colonization [164,165,166,167]. The endotype of patients with AD and food allergies unfortunately persists into adulthood as well. TEWL allows for a non-invasive measurement of transcutaneous water loss. However, besides the impaired integrity of the cutaneous epithelium, TEWL can be influenced by skin thickness, skin temperature, anatomical site and also by the activity of the sweat glands [168,169,170]. Thus, its investigation may be crucial and it can explain the differences between various populations.
Transcutaneous water loss may precede the clinical manifestations of AD (eczema), so TEWL could be useful in the prevention of AD. Measurement of transcutaneous water loss in the first days of life could predict the development of AD in children independent of the filaggrin gene. The main proteins identified via skin tape stripping are positively associated with transcutaneous water loss and allergic sensitization [164,171].
There are numerous metabolites and metabolic pathways associated with atopic diseases since childhood, especially with allergic asthma. The easiest way is to analyze them from urine samples. The principal metabolites associated with AD are tryptophan, indoleacetic acid (increased in patients with AD and elevated total serum IgE), glycolic acid, taurocholic acid, taurochenodeoxycholic and glycochenodeoxycholic (decreased in patients with AD independent of the total serum IgE level), and cholic and chenodeoxycholic (increased in patients with AD and elevated total serum IgE) [172,173,174]. Other metabolites associated with AD are the acid 2-hydroxybutyrate (increased in patients with AD), hydroxyloctadecadienoic acids (increased in patients with AD and elevated total serum IgE), and sphingomyelins (altered levels in patients with AD and elevated total serum IgE) [172,173,174,175].
However, even if important progress has been achieved, investigations across different ethnic groups are still limited, and hence further studies on transcriptomes, proteomes, and metabolomes are needed for a more accurate understanding of these processes [163,164,172].

6. Conclusions

In the last two decades, the understanding of AD has significantly improved. The genetic studies based on the disrupted cutaneous barrier can lead to the development of immunomodulatory systemic biological therapies [26]. Further, DNA and RNA sequencing will substantially improve the prevention and the target therapies of the disease [54,55,56]. Along with other findings on genetic associations in AD and once the costs for genotyping becomes lower and the drugs become rather precise, the adverse reactions will decrease and the treatments will become less expensive [74]. On the other hand, preventing the risk factors of epigenetic changes, such as pollution, smoking, obesity, and stress, will decrease the incidence and prevalence of AD in the future. Moreover, the recent advances in the research of transcriptomes, proteomes and metabolomes, strengthen our confidence that they will have an important impact in unraveling the AD mechanisms, thereby opening new therapeutic pathways. Even though there are only a few systemic immunomodulatory biologic therapies approved for AD at present, in the future miRNAs could be an important target for new therapies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.B. (Dalia Bratu); methodology, D.B. (Dalia Bratu), D.B. (Daniel Boda), C.C.; formal analysis, C.C.; investigation, D.B. (Dalia Bratu); resources, D.B. (Daniel Boda); data curation, D.B. (Dalia Bratu); writing—original draft preparation, D.B. (Dalia Bratu), D.B. (Daniel Boda), C.C.; writing—review and editing, D.B. (Daniel Boda), C.C.; supervision, D.B. (Daniel Boda), C.C.; project administration, C.C.; funding acquisition, C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant of the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CCCDI—UEFISCDI, project number PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2021-2243, within PNCDI III.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy (25838/01.10.2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The presented study will be integrated in the PhD thesis of first author D.Br., contract no. 25838/01.10.2021.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Han, H.; Roan, F.; Ziegler, S.F. The Atopic March: Current Insights into Skin Barrier Dysfunction and Epithelial Cell-Derived Cytokines. Immunol. Rev. 2017, 278, 116–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aberg, N.; Hesselmar, B.; Aberg, B.; Eriksson, B. Increase of Asthma, Allergic Rhinitis and Eczema in Swedish Schoolchildren between 1979 and 1991. Clin. Exp. Allergy 1995, 25, 815–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Burr, M.L.; Butland, B.K.; King, S.; Vaughan-Williams, E. Changes in Asthma Prevalence: Two Surveys 15 Years Apart. Arch. Dis. Child. 1989, 64, 1452–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Sears, M.R.; Rea, H.H.; Rothwell, R.P.; O’Donnell, T.V.; Holst, P.E.; Gillies, A.J.; Beaglehole, R. Asthma Mortality: Comparison between New Zealand and England. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 1987, 294, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Eichenfield, L.F.; Hanifin, J.M.; Beck, L.A.; Lemanske, R.F., Jr.; Sampson, H.A.; Weiss, S.T.; Leung, D.Y. Atopic Dermatitis and Asthma: Parallels in the Evolution of Treatment. Pediatrics 2003, 111, 608–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Lopez Carrera, Y.I.; Al Hammadi, A.; Huang, Y.-H.; Llamado, L.J.; Mahgoub, E.; Tallman, A.M. Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in the Developing Countries of Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East: A Review. Dermatol. Ther. 2019, 9, 685–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kolb, L.; Ferrer-Bruker, S.J. StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ständer, S. Atopic Dermatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 1136–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. McKenzie, C.; Silverberg, J.I. The Prevalence and Persistence of Atopic Dermatitis in Urban United States Children. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019, 123, 173–178.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ardern-Jones, M.R.; Flohr, C.; Reynolds, N.J.; Harwood, C.A. Rook’s Textbook of Dermatology, 9th ed.; Griffiths, C.E., Bleiker, T., Chalmers, R., Creamer, D., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: Oxford, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  11. Torres, T.; Ferreira, E.O.; Gonçalo, M.; Mendes-Bastos, P.; Selores, M.; Filipe, P. Update on Atopic Dermatitis. Acta Med. Port. 2019, 32, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Nutten, S. Atopic Dermatitis: Global Epidemiology and Risk Factors. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2015, 66 (Suppl. S1), 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Weidinger, S.; Beck, L.A.; Bieber, T.; Kabashima, K.I.A. Atopic Dermatitis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2018, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Expert Perspectives on Management of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Multidisciplinary Consensus Addressing Current and Emerging Therapies|Elsevier Enhanced Reader. Available online: https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S2213219817306153?token=2F2F5707254043C4CF0CD6D299DE60FF94511623AC54E7B725F343D5916329C140A05D9E0700247768E5549B4BF4A5EC&originRegion=eu-west-1&originCreation=20220121141803 (accessed on 21 January 2022).
  15. Wollenberg, A.; Barbarot, S.; Bieber, T.; Christen-Zaech, S.; Deleuran, M.; Fink-Wagner, A.; Gieler, U.; Girolomoni, G.; Lau, S.; Muraro, A.; et al. Consensus-Based European Guidelines for Treatment of Atopic Eczema (Atopic Dermatitis) in Adults and Children: Part I. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2018, 32, 657–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Deckers, I.A.G.; McLean, S.; Linssen, S.; Mommers, M.; van Schayck, C.P.; Sheikh, A. Investigating International Time Trends in the Incidence and Prevalence of Atopic Eczema 1990-2010: A Systematic Review of Epidemiological Studies. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Abuabara, K.; Yu, A.M.; Okhovat, J.P.; Allen, I.E.; Langan, S.M. The Prevalence of Atopic Dermatitis beyond Childhood: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies. Allergy Eur. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018, 73, 696–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Silverberg, J.I.; Hanifin, J.M. Adult Eczema Prevalence and Associations with Asthma and Other Health and Demographic Factors: A US Population-Based Study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 132, 1132–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barbarot, S.; Auziere, S.; Gadkari, A.; Girolomoni, G.; Puig, L.; Simpson, E.L.; Margolis, D.J.; de Bruin-Weller, M.; Eckert, L. Epidemiology of Atopic Dermatitis in Adults: Results from an International Survey. Allergy 2018, 73, 1284–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. DaVeiga, S.P. Epidemiology of Atopic Dermatitis: A Review. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2012, 33, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kapur, S.; Watson, W.; Carr, S. Atopic Dermatitis. Allergy Asthma. Clin. Immunol. 2018, 14, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Odhiambo, J.A.; Williams, H.C.; Clayton, T.O.; Robertson, C.F.; Asher, M.I.; ISAAC Phase Three Study Group. Global Variations in Prevalence of Eczema Symptoms in Children from ISAAC Phase Three. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 124, 1251–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Davies, E.; Rogers, N.K.; Lloyd-Lavery, A.; Grindlay, D.J.C.; Thomas, K.S. What’s New in Atopic Eczema? An Analysis of Systematic Reviews Published in 2015. Part 1: Epidemiology and Methodology. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2018, 43, 375–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Waldman, A.R.; Ahluwalia, J.; Udkoff, J.; Borok, J.F.; Eichenfield, L.F. Atopic Dermatitis. Pediatr. Rev. 2018, 39, 180–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kantor, R.; Silverberg, J.I. Environmental Risk Factors and Their Role in the Management of Atopic Dermatitis. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2017, 13, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Solomon, I.; Ilie, M.; Draghici, C.; Voiculescu, V.; Căruntu, C.; Boda, D.; Zurac, S. The Impact of Lifestyle Factors on Evolution of Atopic Dermatitis: An Alternative Approach (Review). Exp. Ther. Med. 2019, 17, 1078–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Brown, S.J.; Elias, M.S.; Bradley, M. Genetics in Atopic Dermatitis: Historical Perspective and Future Prospects. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2020, 100, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Palmer, C.N.A.; Irvine, A.D.; Terron-Kwiatkowski, A.; Zhao, Y.; Liao, H.; Lee, S.P.; Goudie, D.R.; Sandilands, A.; Campbell, L.E.; Smith, F.J.D.; et al. Common Loss-of-Function Variants of the Epidermal Barrier Protein Filaggrin Are a Major Predisposing Factor for Atopic Dermatitis. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fishbein, A.B.; Silverberg, J.I.; Wilson, E.J.; Ong, P.Y. Update on Atopic Dermatitis: Diagnosis, Severity Assessment, and Treatment Selection. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2020, 8, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Czarnowicki, T.; Krueger, J.G.; Guttman-Yassky, E. Novel Concepts of Prevention and Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis through Barrier and Immune Manipulations with Implications for the Atopic March. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 139, 1723–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tran, M.M.; Lefebvre, D.L.; Dharma, C.; Dai, D.; Lou, W.Y.W.; Subbarao, P.; Becker, A.B.; Mandhane, P.J.; Turvey, S.E.; Sears, M.R.; et al. Predicting the Atopic March: Results from the Canadian Healthy Infant Longitudinal Development Study. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018, 141, 601–607.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Eller, E.; Kjaer, H.F.; Høst, A.; Andersen, K.E.; Bindslev-Jensen, C. Development of Atopic Dermatitis in the DARC Birth Cohort. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2010, 21, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Andersen, Y.M.F.; Egeberg, A.; Skov, L.; Thyssen, J.P. Comorbidities of Atopic Dermatitis: Beyond Rhinitis and Asthma. Curr. Dermatol. Rep. 2017, 6, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Whiteley, J.; Emir, B.; Seitzman, R.; Makinson, G. The Burden of Atopic Dermatitis in US Adults: Results from the 2013 National Health and Wellness Survey. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2016, 32, 1645–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yu, S.H.; Silverberg, J.I. Association between Atopic Dermatitis and Depression in US Adults. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2015, 135, 3183–3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Yaghmaie, P.; Koudelka, C.W.; Simpson, E.L. Mental Health Comorbidity in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 131, 428–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Kimata, H. Prevalence of Suicidal Ideation in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis. Suicide Life Threat. Behav. 2006, 36, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zachariae, R.; Zachariae, C.; Ibsen, H.H.W.; Mortensen, J.T.; Wulf, H.C. Psychological Symptoms and Quality of Life of Dermatology Outpatients and Hospitalized Dermatology Patients. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2004, 84, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Camfferman, D.; Kennedy, J.D.; Gold, M.; Martin, A.J.; Lushington, K. Eczema and Sleep and Its Relationship to Daytime Functioning in Children. Sleep Med. Rev. 2010, 14, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wittkowski, A.; Richards, H.L.; Griffiths, C.E.M.; Main, C.J. The Impact of Psychological and Clinical Factors on Quality of Life in Individuals with Atopic Dermatitis. J. Psychosom. Res. 2004, 57, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yu, S.H.; Attarian, H.; Zee, P.; Silverberg, J.I. Burden of Sleep and Fatigue in US Adults With Atopic Dermatitis. Dermat. Contact Atopic Occup. Drug 2016, 27, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Drucker, A.M.; Wang, A.R.; Li, W.Q.; Sevetson, E.; Block, J.K.; Qureshi, A.A. The Burden of Atopic Dermatitis: Summary of a Report for the National Eczema Association. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2017, 137, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Sandhu, J.K.; Wu, K.K.; Bui, T.L.; Armstrong, A.W. Association between Atopic Dermatitis and Suicidality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2019, 155, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Koo, J.; Marangell, L.B.; Nakamura, M.; Armstrong, A.; Jeon, C.; Bhutani, T.; Wu, J.J. Depression and Suicidality in Psoriasis: Review of the Literature Including the Cytokine Theory of Depression. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2017, 31, 1999–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Davami, M.H.; Baharlou, R.; Vasmehjani, A.A.; Ghanizadeh, A.; Keshtkar, M.; Dezhkam, I.; Atashzar, M.R. Elevated IL-17 and TGF-β Serum Levels: A Positive Correlation between T-Helper 17 Cell-Related Pro-Inflammatory Responses with Major Depressive Disorder. Basic Clin. Neurosci. 2016, 7, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lindqvist, D.; Janelidze, S.; Hagell, P.; Erhardt, S.; Samuelsson, M.; Minthon, L.; Hansson, O.; Björkqvist, M.; Träskman-Bendz, L.; Brundin, L. Interleukin-6 Is Elevated in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Suicide Attempters and Related to Symptom Severity. Biol. Psychiatry 2009, 66, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bieber, T. Atopic Dermatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 1483–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Siegfried, E.C.; Hebert, A.A. Diagnosis of Atopic Dermatitis: Mimics, Overlaps, and Complications. J. Clin. Med. 2015, 4, 884–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Brunner, P.M.; Guttman-Yassky, E. Racial Differences in Atopic Dermatitis. Ann. Allergy. Asthma Immunol. 2019, 122, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Yew, Y.W.; Thyssen, J.P.; Silverberg, J.I. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Regional and Age-Related Differences in Atopic Dermatitis Clinical Characteristics. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2019, 80, 390–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bratu, D.; Boda, D.; Caruntu, C. Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in Monitoring Atopic Dermatitis Treated with Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors. Healthcare 2023, 11, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Akan, A.; Dibek-Mısırlıoğlu, E.; Civelek, E.; Vezir, E.; Kocabaş, C.N. Diagnosis of Atopic Dermatitis in Children: Comparison of the Hanifin-Rajka and the United Kingdom Working Party Criteria. Allergol. Immunopathol. 2020, 48, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bieber, T. Atopic Dermatitis. Ann. Dermatol. 2010, 22, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Adam, D.N.; Gooderham, M.J.; Beecker, J.R.; Hong, C.H.; Jack, C.S.; Jain, V.; Lansang, P.; Lynde, C.W.; Papp, K.A.; Prajapati, V.H.; et al. Expert Consensus on the Systemic Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Special Populations. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2023, 37, 1135–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Drucker, A.M.; Eyerich, K.; de Bruin-Weller, M.S.; Thyssen, J.P.; Spuls, P.I.; Irvine, A.D.; Girolomoni, G.; Dhar, S.; Flohr, C.; Murrell, D.F.; et al. Use of Systemic Corticosteroids for Atopic Dermatitis: International Eczema Council Consensus Statement. Br. J. Dermatol. 2018, 178, 768–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Gooderham, M.J.; Hong, C.; Albrecht, L.; Bissonnette, R.; Dhadwal, G.; Gniadecki, R.; Grewal, P.; Kirchhof, M.G.; Landells, I.; Lansang, P.; et al. Approach to the Assessment and Management of Adult Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: A Consensus Document. J. Cutan. Med. Surg. 2018, 22, 3S–5S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Chiricozzi, A.; Maurelli, M.; Calabrese, L.; Peris, K.; Girolomoni, G. Overview of Atopic Dermatitis in Different Ethnic Groups. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nedoszytko, B.; Reszka, E.; Gutowska-Owsiak, D.; Trzeciak, M.; Lange, M.; Jarczak, J.; Niedoszytko, M.; Jablonska, E.; Romantowski, J.; Strapagiel, D.; et al. Genetic and Epigenetic Aspects of Atopic Dermatitis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kim, J.; Kim, B.E.; Leung, D.Y.M. Pathophysiology of Atopic Dermatitis: Clinical Implications. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019, 40, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bjerre, R.D.; Bandier, J.; Skov, L.; Engstrand, L.; Johansen, J.D. The Role of the Skin Microbiome in Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review. Br. J. Dermatol. 2017, 177, 1272–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Kong, H.H.; Oh, J.; Deming, C.; Conlan, S.; Grice, E.A.; Beatson, M.A.; Nomicos, E.; Polley, E.C.; Komarow, H.D.; Mullikin, J.; et al. Temporal Shifts in the Skin Microbiome Associatedwith Disease Flares and Treatment in Childrenwith Atopic Dermatitis. Genome Res. 2012, 22, 850–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Edslev, S.M.; Agner, T.; Andersen, P.S. Skin Microbiome in Atopic Dermatitis. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2020, 100, 358–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cabanillas, B.; Novak, N. Atopic Dermatitis and Filaggrin. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2016, 42, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jakasa, I.; Koster, E.S.; Calkoen, F.; McLean, W.H.I.; Campbell, L.E.; Bos, J.D.; Verberk, M.M.; Kezic, S. Skin Barrier Function in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Atopic Dermatitis in Relation to Filaggrin Loss-of-Function Mutations. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2011, 131, 540–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Seidenari, S.; Giusti, G. Objective Assessment of the Skin of Children Affected by Atopic Dermatitis: A Study of PH, Capacitance and TEWL in Eczematous and Clinically Uninvolved Skin. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1995, 75, 429–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kezic, S.; Kemperman, P.M.J.H.; Koster, E.S.; De Jongh, C.M.; Thio, H.B.; Campbell, L.E.; Irvine, A.D.; McLean, I.W.H.; Puppels, G.J.; Caspers, P.J. Loss-of-Function Mutations in the Filaggrin Gene Lead to Reduced Level of Natural Moisturizing Factor in the Stratum Corneum. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 2117–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Van Smeden, J.; Bouwstra, J.A. Stratum Corneum Lipids: Their Role for the Skin Barrier Function in Healthy Subjects and Atopic Dermatitis Patients. Curr. Probl. Dermatol. 2016, 49, 8–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lee, S.Y.; Lee, E.; Park, Y.M.; Hong, S.J. Microbiome in the Gut-Skin Axis in Atopic Dermatitis. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2018, 10, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Lebeer, S.; Vanderleyden, J.; De Keersmaecker, S.C.J. Host Interactions of Probiotic Bacterial Surface Molecules: Comparison with Commensals and Pathogens. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ueno, N.; Fujiya, M.; Segawa, S.; Nata, T.; Moriichi, K.; Tanabe, H.; Mizukami, Y.; Kobayashi, N.; Ito, K.; Kohgo, Y. Heat-Killed Body of Lactobacillus Brevis SBC8803 Ameliorates Intestinal Injury in a Murine Model of Colitis by Enhancing the Intestinal Barrier Function. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2011, 17, 2235–2250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Smits, H.H.; Engering, A.; Van Der Kleij, D.; De Jong, E.C.; Schipper, K.; Van Capel, T.M.M.; Zaat, B.A.J.; Yazdanbakhsh, M.; Wierenga, E.A.; Van Kooyk, Y.; et al. Selective Probiotic Bacteria Induce IL-10-Producing Regulatory T Cells in Vitro by Modulating Dendritic Cell Function through Dendritic Cell-Specific Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 3-Grabbing Nonintegrin. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2005, 115, 1260–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Iwase, T.; Uehara, Y.; Shinji, H.; Tajima, A.; Seo, H.; Takada, K.; Agata, T.; Mizunoe, Y. Staphylococcus Epidermidis Esp Inhibits Staphylococcus Aureus Biofilm Formation and Nasal Colonization. Nature 2010, 465, 346–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tao, R.; Li, R.; Wang, R. Dysbiosis of Skin Mycobiome in Atopic Dermatitis. Mycoses 2022, 65, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Løset, M.; Brown, S.J.; Saunes, M.; Hveem, K. Genetics of Atopic Dermatitis: From DNA Sequence to Clinical Relevance. Dermatology 2019, 235, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Esparza-Gordillo, J.; Weidinger, S.; Fölster-Holst, R.; Bauerfeind, A.; Ruschendorf, F.; Patone, G.; Rohde, K.; Marenholz, I.; Schulz, F.; Kerscher, T.; et al. A Common Variant on Chromosome 11q13 Is Associated with Atopic Dermatitis. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41, 596–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Paternoster, L.; Standl, M.; Waage, J.; Baurecht, H.; Hotze, M.; Strachan, D.P.; Curtin, J.A.; Bønnelykke, K.; Tian, C.; Takahashi, A.; et al. Multi-Ancestry Genome-Wide Association Study of 21,000 Cases and 95,000 Controls Identifies New Risk Loci for Atopic Dermatitis. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 1449–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Rastegar-Mojarad, M.; Ye, Z.; Kolesar, J.M.; Hebbring, S.J.; Lin, S.M. Opportunities for Drug Repositioning from Phenome-Wide Association Studies. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 342–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Taylan, F.; Nilsson, D.; Asad, S.; Lieden, A.; Wahlgren, C.-F.; Winge, M.C.G.; Bilcha, K.D.; Nordenskjöld, M.; Bradley, M. Whole-Exome Sequencing of Ethiopian Patients with Ichthyosis Vulgaris and Atopic Dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 136, 507–509.e19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Lawlor, D.A.; Harbord, R.M.; Sterne, J.A.C.; Timpson, N.; Davey Smith, G. Mendelian Randomization: Using Genes as Instruments for Making Causal Inferences in Epidemiology. Stat. Med. 2008, 27, 1133–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Davey Smith, G.; Ebrahim, S. ‘Mendelian Randomization’: Can Genetic Epidemiology Contribute to Understanding Environmental Determinants of Disease? Int. J. Epidemiol. 2003, 32, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Ritchie, M.D.; Holzinger, E.R.; Li, R.; Pendergrass, S.A.; Kim, D. Methods of Integrating Data to Uncover Genotype–Phenotype Interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015, 16, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhang, A.; Silverberg, J.I. Association of Atopic Dermatitis with Being Overweight and Obese: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2015, 72, 606–616.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Silverberg, J.I.; Greenland, P. Eczema and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in 2 US Adult Population Studies. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 135, 721–728.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Silverberg, J.I. Atopic Disease and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in US Children. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 137, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Silverberg, J.I. Association between Adult Atopic Dermatitis, Cardiovascular Disease, and Increased Heart Attacks in Three Population-Based Studies. Allergy 2015, 70, 1300–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Donath, M.Y.; Shoelson, S.E. Type 2 Diabetes as an Inflammatory Disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Poetker, D.M.; Reh, D.D. A Comprehensive Review of the Adverse Effects of Systemic Corticosteroids. Otolaryngol. Clin. N. Am. 2010, 43, 753–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Manousaki, D.; Paternoster, L.; Standl, M.; Moffatt, M.F.; Farrall, M.; Bouzigon, E.; Strachan, D.P.; Demenais, F.; Lathrop, M.; Cookson, W.O.C.M.; et al. Vitamin D Levels and Susceptibility to Asthma, Elevated Immunoglobulin E Levels, and Atopic Dermatitis: A Mendelian Randomization Study. PLoS Med. 2017, 14, e1002294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Egawa, G.; Kabashima, K. Barrier Dysfunction in the Skin Allergy. Allergol. Int. 2018, 67, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Weidinger, S.; Illig, T.; Baurecht, H.; Irvine, A.D.; Rodriguez, E.; Diaz-Lacava, A.; Klopp, N.; Wagenpfeil, S.; Zhao, Y.; Liao, H.; et al. Loss-of-Function Variations within the Filaggrin Gene Predispose for Atopic Dermatitis with Allergic Sensitizations. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2006, 118, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. McLean, W.H.I. Filaggrin Failure—from Ichthyosis Vulgaris to Atopic Eczema and Beyond. Br. J. Dermatol. 2016, 175, 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Brown, S.J.; Kroboth, K.; Sandilands, A.; Campbell, L.E.; Pohler, E.; Kezic, S.; Cordell, H.J.; McLean, W.H.I.; Irvine, A.D. Intragenic Copy Number Variation within Filaggrin Contributes to the Risk of Atopic Dermatitis with a Dose-Dependent Effect. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2012, 132, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Irvine, A.D.; McLean, W.H.I.; Leung, D.Y.M. Filaggrin Mutations Associated with Skin and Allergic Diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 1315–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Irvine, A.D.; McLean, W.H.I. Breaking the (Un)Sound Barrier: Filaggrin Is a Major Gene for Atopic Dermatitis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2006, 126, 1200–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Tsuji, G.; Hashimoto-Hachiya, A.; Kiyomatsu-Oda, M.; Takemura, M.; Ohno, F.; Ito, T.; Morino-Koga, S.; Mitoma, C.; Nakahara, T.; Uchi, H.; et al. Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Activation Restores Filaggrin Expression via OVOL1 in Atopic Dermatitis. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e2931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Tan, Q.; Yang, H.; Liu, E.; Wang, H. P38/ERK MAPK Signaling Pathways Are Involved in the Regulation of Filaggrin and Involucrin by IL-17. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 8863–8867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Leonardi, S.; Cuppari, C.; Manti, S.; Filippelli, M.; Parisi, G.F.; Borgia, F.; Briuglia, S.; Cannavò, S.P.; Salpietro, A.; Arrigo, T.; et al. Serum Interleukin 17, Interleukin 23, and Interleukin 10 Values in Children with Atopic Eczema/Dermatitis Syndrome (AEDS): Association with Clinical Severity and Phenotype. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015, 36, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Howell, M.D.; Kim, B.E.; Gao, P.; Grant, A.V.; Boguniewicz, M.; DeBenedetto, A.; Schneider, L.; Beck, L.A.; Barnes, K.C.; Leung, D.Y.M. Cytokine Modulation of Atopic Dermatitis Filaggrin Skin Expression. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 124, R7–R12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Meinke, M.C.; Richter, H.; Kleemann, A.; Lademann, J.; Tscherch, K.; Rohn, S.; Schempp, C.M. Characterization of Atopic Skin and the Effect of a Hyperforin-Rich Cream by Laser Scanning Microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2014, 20, 051013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Nygaard, U.; van den Bogaard, E.H.; Niehues, H.; Hvid, M.; Deleuran, M.; Johansen, C.; Vestergaard, C. The “Alarmins” HMBG1 and IL-33 Downregulate Structural Skin Barrier Proteins and Impair Epidermal Growth. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2017, 97, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Cuppari, C.; Manti, S.; Salpietro, A.; Valenti, S.; Capizzi, A.; Arrigo, T.; Salpietro, C.; Leonardi, S. HMGB1 Levels in Children with Atopic Eczema/Dermatitis Syndrome (AEDS). Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2016, 27, 99–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Dharmage, S.C.; Lowe, A.J.; Matheson, M.C.; Burgess, J.A.; Allen, K.J.; Abramson, M.J. Atopic Dermatitis and the Atopic March Revisited. Allergy 2014, 69, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Lowe, A.J.; Leung, D.Y.M.; Tang, M.L.K.; Su, J.C.; Allen, K.J. The Skin as a Target for Prevention of the Atopic March. Ann. Allergy, Asthma Immunol. 2018, 120, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Boguniewicz, M. Biologic Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis: Moving Beyond the Practice Parameter and Guidelines. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2017, 5, 1477–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Kaufman, B.P.; Guttman-Yassky, E.; Alexis, A.F. Atopic Dermatitis in Diverse Racial and Ethnic Groups-Variations in Epidemiology, Genetics, Clinical Presentation and Treatment. Exp. Dermatol. 2018, 27, 340–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Bin, L.; Leung, D.Y.M. Genetic and Epigenetic Studies of Atopic Dermatitis. Allergy Asthma. Clin. Immunol. 2016, 12, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Esaki, H.; Ewald, D.A.; Ungar, B.; Rozenblit, M.; Zheng, X.; Xu, H.; Estrada, Y.D.; Peng, X.; Mitsui, H.; Litman, T.; et al. Identification of Novel Immune and Barrier Genes in Atopic Dermatitis by Laser Capture Micro-Dissection. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 135, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Lee, Y.L.; Yen, J.J.Y.; Hsu, L.C.; Kuo, N.W.; Su, M.W.; Yang, M.F.; Hsiao, Y.P.; Wang, I.J.; Liu, F.T. Association of STAT6 Genetic Variants with Childhood Atopic Dermatitis in Taiwanese Population. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2015, 79, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Gao, P.S.; Leung, D.Y.M.; Rafaels, N.M.; Boguniewicz, M.; Hand, T.; Gao, L.; Hata, T.R.; Schneider, L.C.; Hanifin, J.M.; Beaty, T.H.; et al. Genetic Variants InInterferon Regulatory Factor 2(IRF2) Are Associated with Atopic Dermatitis AndEczema Herpeticum. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2012, 132, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Salpietro, C.; Rigoli, L.; Del Giudice, M.M.; Cuppari, C.; Di Bella, C.; Salpietro, A.; Maiello, N.; La Rosa, M.; Marseglia, G.L.; Leonardi, S.; et al. TLR2 and TLR4 Gene Polymorphisms and Atopic Dermatitis in Italian Children: A Multicenter Study. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2011, 24, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Suzuki, H.; Makino, Y.; Nagata, M.; Furuta, J.; Enomoto, H.; Hirota, T.; Tamari, M.; Noguchi, E. A Rare Variant in CYP27A1 and Its Association with Atopic Dermatitis with High Serum Total IgE. Allergy 2016, 71, 1486–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Heine, G.; Hoefer, N.; Franke, A.; Nöthling, U.; Schumann, R.R.; Hamann, L.; Worm, M. Association of Vitamin D Receptor Gene Polymorphisms with Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Adults. Br. J. Dermatol. 2013, 168, 855–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Yang, G.; Seok, J.K.; Kang, H.C.; Cho, Y.-Y.; Lee, H.S.; Lee, J.Y. Skin Barrier Abnormalities and Immune Dysfunction in Atopic Dermatitis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Horimukai, K.; Morita, K.; Narita, M.; Kondo, M.; Kitazawa, H.; Nozaki, M.; Shigematsu, Y.; Yoshida, K.; Niizeki, H.; Motomura, K.; et al. Application of Moisturizer to Neonates Prevents Development of Atopic Dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 134, 824–830.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Tsakok, T.; Woolf, R.; Smith, C.H.; Weidinger, S.; Flohr, C. Atopic Dermatitis: The Skin Barrier and Beyond. Br. J. Dermatol. 2019, 180, 464–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Simpson, E.L.; Chalmers, J.R.; Hanifin, J.M.; Thomas, K.S.; Cork, M.J.; McLean, W.H.I.; Brown, S.J.; Chen, Z.; Chen, Y.; Williams, H.C. Emollient Enhancement of the Skin Barrier from Birth Offers Effective Atopic Dermatitis Prevention. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 134, 818–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Martin, M.J.; Estravís, M.; García-Sánchez, A.; Dávila, I.; Isidoro-García, M.; Sanz, C. Genetics and Epigenetics of Atopic Dermatitis: An Updated Systematic Review. Genes 2020, 11, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Liang, Y.; Chang, C.; Lu, Q. The Genetics and Epigenetics of Atopic Dermatitis-Filaggrin and Other Polymorphisms. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2016, 51, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Stemmler, S.; Hoffjan, S. Trying to Understand the Genetics of Atopic Dermatitis. Mol. Cell. Probes 2016, 30, 374–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bonamonte, D.; Filoni, A.; Vestita, M.; Romita, P.; Foti, C.; Angelini, G. The Role of the Environmental Risk Factors in the Pathogenesis and Clinical Outcome of Atopic Dermatitis. Biomed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 2450605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Mu, Z.; Zhang, J. The Role of Genetics, the Environment, and Epigenetics in Atopic Dermatitis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1253, 107–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Leitch, C.S.; Natafji, E.; Yu, C.; Abdul-Ghaffar, S.; Madarasingha, N.; Venables, Z.C.; Chu, R.; Fitch, P.M.; Muinonen-Martin, A.J.; Campbell, L.E.; et al. Filaggrin-Null Mutations Are Associated with Increased Maturation Markers on Langerhans Cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 138, 482–490.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Ziyab, A.H.; Karmaus, W.; Holloway, J.W.; Zhang, H.; Ewart, S.; Arshad, S.H. DNA Methylation of the Filaggrin Gene Adds to the Risk of Eczema Associated with Loss-of-Function Variants. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2013, 27, e420–e423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Harb, H.; Renz, H. Update on Epigenetics in Allergic Disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 135, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Bernstein, B.E.; Meissner, A.; Lander, E.S. The Mammalian Epigenome. Cell 2007, 128, 669–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Botchkarev, V.A.; Gdula, M.R.; Mardaryev, A.N.; Sharov, A.A.; Fessing, M.Y. Epigenetic Regulation of Gene Expression in Keratinocytes. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2012, 132, 2505–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Makeyev, E.V.; Maniatis, T. Multilevel Regulation of Gene Expression by MicroRNAs. Science 2008, 319, 1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Krol, J.; Loedige, I.; Filipowicz, W. The Widespread Regulation of MicroRNA Biogenesis, Function and Decay. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11, 597–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Rebane, A.; Akdis, C.A. MicroRNAs: Essential Players in the Regulation of Inflammation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 132, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Simpson, M.R.; Brede, G.; Johansen, J.; Johnsen, R.; Storrø, O.; Sætrom, P.; Øien, T. Human Breast Milk MiRNA, Maternal Probiotic Supplementation and Atopic Dermatitis in Offspring. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Lee, D.; Shin, C. Emerging Roles of DROSHA beyond Primary MicroRNA Processing. RNA Biol. 2018, 15, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Sonkoly, E.; Ståhle, M.; Pivarcsi, A. MicroRNAs and Immunity: Novel Players in the Regulation of Normal Immune Function and Inflammation. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2008, 18, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Yu, X.; Wang, M.; Li, L.; Zhang, L.; Chan, M.T.V.; Wu, W.K.K. MicroRNAs in Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2020, 24, 5966–5972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Li, H.M.; Xiao, Y.J.; Min, Z.S.; Tan, C. Identification and Interaction Analysis of Key Genes and MicroRNAs in Atopic Dermatitis by Bioinformatics Analysis. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2019, 44, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Yan, F.; Meng, W.; Ye, S.; Zhang, X.; Mo, X.; Liu, J.; Chen, D.; Lin, Y. MicroRNA-146a as a Potential Regulator Involved in the Pathogenesis of Atopic Dermatitis. Mol. Med. Rep. 2019, 20, 4645–4653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Sonkoly, E.; Wei, T.; Janson, P.C.J.; Sääf, A.; Lundeberg, L.; Tengvall-Linder, M.; Norstedt, G.; Alenius, H.; Homey, B.; Scheynius, A.; et al. MicroRNAs: Novel Regulators Involved in the Pathogenesis of Psoriasis? PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Sonkoly, E.; Ståhle, M.; Pivarcsi, A. MicroRNAs: Novel Regulators in Skin Inflammation. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2008, 33, 312–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Lu, T.X.; Rothenberg, M.E. Diagnostic, Functional, and Therapeutic Roles of MicroRNA in Allergic Diseases. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 132, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  139. Sonkoly, E.; Janson, P.; Majuri, M.-L.; Savinko, T.; Fyhrquist, N.; Eidsmo, L.; Xu, N.; Meisgen, F.; Wei, T.; Bradley, M.; et al. MiR-155 Is Overexpressed in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis and Modulates T-Cell Proliferative Responses by Targeting Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte–Associated Antigen 4. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 126, 581–589.e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Stevens, M.L.; Zhang, Z.; Johansson, E.; Ray, S.; Jagpal, A.; Ruff, B.P.; Kothari, A.; He, H.; Martin, L.J.; Ji, H.; et al. Disease-Associated KIF3A Variants Alter Gene Methylation and Expression Impacting Skin Barrier and Atopic Dermatitis Risk. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Johansson, E.; Biagini Myers, J.M.; Martin, L.J.; He, H.; Pilipenko, V.; Mersha, T.; Weirauch, M.; Salomonis, N.; Ryan, P.; LeMasters, G.K.; et al. KIF3A Genetic Variation Is Associated with Pediatric Asthma in the Presence of Eczema Independent of Allergic Rhinitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 140, 595–598.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Melnik, B.C.; John, S.; Schmitz, G. Milk: An Exosomal MicroRNA Transmitter Promoting Thymic Regulatory T Cell Maturation Preventing the Development of Atopy? J. Transl. Med. 2014, 12, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Yao, R.; Ma, Y.-L.; Liang, W.; Li, H.-H.; Ma, Z.-J.; Yu, X.; Liao, Y.-H. MicroRNA-155 Modulates Treg and Th17 Cells Differentiation and Th17 Cell Function by Targeting SOCS1. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Ma, L.; Xue, H.-B.; Wang, F.; Shu, C.-M.; Zhang, J.-H. MicroRNA-155 May Be Involved in the Pathogenesis of Atopic Dermatitis by Modulating the Differentiation and Function of T Helper Type 17 (Th17) Cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2015, 181, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  145. Liew, W.C.; Sundaram, G.M.; Quah, S.; Lum, G.G.; Tan, J.S.L.; Ramalingam, R.; Common, J.E.A.; Tang, M.B.Y.; Lane, E.B.; Thng, S.T.G.; et al. Belinostat Resolves Skin Barrier Defects in Atopic Dermatitis by Targeting the Dysregulated MiR-335:SOX6 Axis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 146, 606–620.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Fagundes, B.O.; de Sousa, T.R.; Nascimento, A.; Fernandes, L.A.; Sgnotto, F.d.R.; Orfali, R.L.; Aoki, V.; Duarte, A.J. da S.; Sanabani, S.S.; Victor, J.R. IgG from Adult Atopic Dermatitis (AD) Patients Induces Nonatopic Neonatal Thymic Gamma–Delta T Cells (ΓδT) to Acquire IL-22/IL-17 Secretion Profile with Skin-Homing Properties and Epigenetic Implications Mediated by MiRNA. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. White, G.P.; Watt, P.M.; Holt, B.J.; Holt, P.G. Differential Patterns of Methylation of the IFN-γ Promoter at CpG and Non-CpG Sites Underlie Differences in IFN-γ Gene Expression Between Human Neonatal and Adult CD45RO T Cells. J. Immunol. 2002, 168, 2820–2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  148. Kaminuma, O.; Kitamura, F.; Miyatake, S.; Yamaoka, K.; Miyoshi, H.; Inokuma, S.; Tatsumi, H.; Nemoto, S.; Kitamura, N.; Mori, A.; et al. T-Box 21 Transcription Factor Is Responsible for Distorted TH2 Differentiation in Human Peripheral CD4+ T Cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 123, 813–823.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Fujimaki, W.; Takahashi, N.; Ohnuma, K.; Nagatsu, M.; Kurosawa, H.; Yoshida, S.; Dang, N.H.; Uchiyama, T.; Morimoto, C. Comparative study of regulatory T cell function of human CD25+ CD4+ T cells from thymocytes, cord blood, and adult peripheral blood. Clin. Dev. Immunol. 2008, 2008, 305859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Schaub, B.; Liu, J.; Schleich, I.; Höppler, S.; Sattler, C.; von Mutius, E. Impairment of T Helper and T Regulatory Cell Responses at Birth. Allergy 2008, 63, 1438–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Breton, C.V.; Byun, H.-M.; Wenten, M.; Pan, F.; Yang, A.; Gilliland, F.D. Prenatal Tobacco Smoke Exposure Affects Global and Gene-Specific DNA Methylation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2009, 180, 462–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Tang, W.; Levin, L.; Talaska, G.; Cheung, Y.Y.; Herbstman, J.; Tang, D.; Miller, R.L.; Perera, F.; Ho, S.-M. Maternal Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and 5′-CpG Methylation of Interferon-γ in Cord White Blood Cells. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 1195–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Hinz, D.; Bauer, M.; Röder, S.; Olek, S.; Huehn, J.; Sack, U.; Borte, M.; Simon, J.C.; Lehmann, I.; Herberth, G. Cord Blood Tregs with Stable FOXP3 Expression Are Influenced by Prenatal Environment and Associated with Atopic Dermatitis at the Age of One Year. Allergy 2012, 67, 380–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Herberth, G.; Bauer, M.; Gasch, M.; Hinz, D.; Röder, S.; Olek, S.; Kohajda, T.; Rolle-Kampczyk, U.; von Bergen, M.; Sack, U.; et al. Maternal and Cord Blood MiR-223 Expression Associates with Prenatal Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Low Regulatory T-Cell Numbers. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 133, 543–550.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Cao, S.; Feehley, T.J.; Nagler, C.R. The Role of Commensal Bacteria in the Regulation of Sensitization to Food Allergens. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588, 4258–4266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Amberbir, A.; Medhin, G.; Erku, W.; Alem, A.; Simms, R.; Robinson, K.; Fogarty, A.; Britton, J.; Venn, A.; Davey, G. Effects of Helicobacter Pylori, Geohelminth Infection and Selected Commensal Bacteria on the Risk of Allergic Disease and Sensitization in 3-Year-Old Ethiopian Children. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2011, 41, 1422–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Sharma, M.; Li, Y.; Stoll, M.L.; Tollefsbol, T.O. The Epigenetic Connection Between the Gut Microbiome in Obesity and Diabetes. Front. Genet. 2020, 10, 1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  158. Schaub, B.; Liu, J.; Höppler, S.; Schleich, I.; Huehn, J.; Olek, S.; Wieczorek, G.; Illi, S.; von Mutius, E. Maternal Farm Exposure Modulates Neonatal Immune Mechanisms through Regulatory T Cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 123, 774–782.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Lluis, A.; Depner, M.; Gaugler, B.; Saas, P.; Casaca, V.I.; Raedler, D.; Michel, S.; Tost, J.; Liu, J.; Genuneit, J.; et al. Increased Regulatory T-Cell Numbers Are Associated with Farm Milk Exposure and Lower Atopic Sensitization and Asthma in Childhood. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 133, 551–559.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Michel, S.; Busato, F.; Genuneit, J.; Pekkanen, J.; Dalphin, J.-C.; Riedler, J.; Mazaleyrat, N.; Weber, J.; Karvonen, A.M.; Hirvonen, M.-R.; et al. Farm Exposure and Time Trends in Early Childhood May Influence DNA Methylation in Genes Related to Asthma and Allergy. Allergy 2013, 68, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Schieck, M.; Sharma, V.; Michel, S.; Toncheva, A.A.; Worth, L.; Potaczek, D.P.; Genuneit, J.; Kretschmer, A.; Depner, M.; Dalphin, J.-C.; et al. A Polymorphism in the TH2 Locus Control Region Is Associated with Changes in DNA Methylation and Gene Expression. Allergy 2014, 69, 1171–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Brand, S.; Teich, R.; Dicke, T.; Harb, H.; Yildirim, A.Ö.; Tost, J.; Schneider-Stock, R.; Waterland, R.A.; Bauer, U.-M.; von Mutius, E.; et al. Epigenetic Regulation in Murine Offspring as a Novel Mechanism for Transmaternal Asthma Protection Induced by Microbes. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 128, 618–625.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Cole, C.; Kroboth, K.; Schurch, N.J.; Sandilands, A.; Sherstnev, A.; O’Regan, G.M.; Watson, R.M.; Irwin McLean, W.H.; Barton, G.J.; Irvine, A.D.; et al. Filaggrin-Stratified Transcriptomic Analysis of Pediatric Skin Identifies Mechanistic Pathways in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 134, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Goleva, E.; Calatroni, A.; Lebeau, P.; Berdyshev, E.; Taylor, P.; Kreimer, S.; Cole, R.N.; Leung, D.Y.M. Skin tape proteomics identifies pathways associated with transepidermal water loss and allergen polysensitization in atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021, 146, 1367–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Simpson, E.L.; Villarreal, M.; Jepson, B.; Rafaels, N.; David, G.; Hanifin, J.; Taylor, P.; Boguniewicz, M.; Yoshida, T.; De Benedetto, A.; et al. Patients with Atopic Dermatitis Colonized with Staphylococcus Aureus Have a Distinct Phenotype and Endotype. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2018, 138, 2224–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  166. Chamlin, S.L.; Kao, J.; Frieden, I.J.; Sheu, M.Y.; Fowler, A.J.; Fluhr, J.W.; Williams, M.L.; Elias, P.M. Ceramide-Dominant Barrier Repair Lipids Alleviate Childhood Atopic Dermatitis: Changes in Barrier Function Provide a Sensitive Indicator of Disease Activity. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2002, 47, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Flohr, C.; Perkin, M.; Logan, K.; Marrs, T.; Radulovic, S.; Campbell, L.E.; MacCallum, S.F.; Irwin McLean, W.H.; Lack, G. Atopic Dermatitis and Disease Severity Are the Main Risk Factors for Food Sensitization in Exclusively Breastfed Infants. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2014, 134, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  168. Alexander, H.; Brown, S.; Danby, S.; Flohr, C. Research Techniques Made Simple: Transepidermal Water Loss Measurement as a Research Tool. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2018, 138, 2295–2300.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  169. Zouboulis, C.C.; Elewa, R.; Ottaviani, M.; Fluhr, J.; Picardo, M.; Bernois, A.; Heusèle, C.; Camera, E. Age Influences the Skin Reaction Pattern to Mechanical Stress and Its Repair Level through Skin Care Products. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2018, 170, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Kottner, J.; Lichterfeld, A.; Blume-Peytavi, U. Transepidermal Water Loss in Young and Aged Healthy Humans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2013, 305, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Yu, W.; Freeland, D.M.H.; Nadeau, K.C. Food Allergy: Immune Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 16, 751–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Schjødt, M.S.; Gürdeniz, G.; Chawes, B. The Metabolomics of Childhood Atopic Diseases: A Comprehensive Pathway-Specific Review. Metabolites 2020, 10, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Huang, Y.; Chen, G.; Liu, X.; Shao, Y.; Gao, P.; Xin, C.; Cui, Z.; Zhao, X.; Xu, G. Serum Metabolomics Study and Eicosanoid Analysis of Childhood Atopic Dermatitis Based on Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 13, 5715–5723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Crestani, E.; Harb, H.; Charbonnier, L.-M.; Leirer, J.; Motsinger-Reif, A.; Rachid, R.; Phipatanakul, W.; Kaddurah-Daouk, R.; Chatila, T.A. Untargeted Metabolomic Profiling Identifies Disease-Specific Signatures in Food Allergy and Asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 145, 897–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  175. Turi, K.N.; Romick-Rosendale, L.; Gebretsadik, T.; Watanabe, M.; Brunwasser, S.; Anderson, L.J.; Moore, M.L.; Larkin, E.K.; Peebles, R.S.; Hartert, T.V. Using Urine Metabolomics to Understand the Pathogenesis of Infant Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Infection and Its Role in Childhood Wheezing. Metabolomics 2018, 14, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The etiology of atopic dermatitis. The complex etiology of the atopic dermatitis includes interactions between genetic predisposition, favoring and triggering factors. All these factors cause skin barrier abnormalities and immune dysfunctions critical in the pathogenesis of the disease. Adapted from Nedoszytko et al. 2020 [58].
Figure 1. The etiology of atopic dermatitis. The complex etiology of the atopic dermatitis includes interactions between genetic predisposition, favoring and triggering factors. All these factors cause skin barrier abnormalities and immune dysfunctions critical in the pathogenesis of the disease. Adapted from Nedoszytko et al. 2020 [58].
Cimb 45 00331 g001
Figure 2. From genome to metabolome. The evolution of technology allowed for a more precise analysis of the “nomes” (genome, epigenome, transcriptome, proteome, metabolome and phenome) for understanding the mechanisms that cause the AD. Genetic studies based on the disrupted cutaneous barrier lead to the development of new treatments targeting the cutaneous barrier or cutaneous inflammation. Adapted with permission from Ritchie et al. 2015 [81].
Figure 2. From genome to metabolome. The evolution of technology allowed for a more precise analysis of the “nomes” (genome, epigenome, transcriptome, proteome, metabolome and phenome) for understanding the mechanisms that cause the AD. Genetic studies based on the disrupted cutaneous barrier lead to the development of new treatments targeting the cutaneous barrier or cutaneous inflammation. Adapted with permission from Ritchie et al. 2015 [81].
Cimb 45 00331 g002
Figure 3. Skin barrier abnormalities and immune dysfunction in atopic dermatitis. The decrease in filaggrin, ceramides, antimicrobial peptides and serine protease inhibitors have a negative impact on AD, as the increase in serine proteases and the disorders of the tight junction affect the permeability of the cutaneous barrier. On the other hand, the immune dysfunction increases the risk of AD via the Th2 cells. Adapted from Yang et al. 2020 [113].
Figure 3. Skin barrier abnormalities and immune dysfunction in atopic dermatitis. The decrease in filaggrin, ceramides, antimicrobial peptides and serine protease inhibitors have a negative impact on AD, as the increase in serine proteases and the disorders of the tight junction affect the permeability of the cutaneous barrier. On the other hand, the immune dysfunction increases the risk of AD via the Th2 cells. Adapted from Yang et al. 2020 [113].
Cimb 45 00331 g003
Table 1. MiRNA species related to AD.
Table 1. MiRNA species related to AD.
MiRNA SpeciesADReferences
MiR-155- overexpressed
- essential for the differentiation of Th17 and Treg
- associated with sustained inflammation, severity of the disease, and the percentage of Th17
[58,106,117,123,129,136,137,138,139,142,143,144]
Let-7-a-d-family- downregulated
- overproduction of IL-13 and CCR17
- predominance of Th2 responses
[58,129,138]
MiR-375- similar with Let-7-a-d-family
- induces the synthesis of TSLP
- blocks the expression of KLF5
[58,129,138]
MiR-151a- regulates the beta2 receptor of IL-12
- increased
- biomarker AD
[58,143]
hsa-mir-144-3p- biomarker AD
- umbilical cord fluid
[58,143]
MiR-29b- positive correlation with SCORAD[133]
MiR-143- inhibits IL-13 (when IL-13 is expressed,
it downregulates filaggrin, involucrin and loricrin)
[133]
MiR-335 and SOX work
codependently
- miR-335 is suppressed,
while SOX is upregulated
[145]
Abbreviations: AD—atopic dermatitis; miR—microribonucleic acid; Th1—T helper cells 17; Treg—regulatory T cells; IL-13—interleukin 13; TSLP—thymic stromal lymphopoietin; KLF5—Kruppel-like factor 5; SCORAD—tool for scoring AD; SOX—a transcription factor.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bratu, D.; Boda, D.; Caruntu, C. Genomic, Epigenomic, Transcriptomic, Proteomic and Metabolomic Approaches in Atopic Dermatitis. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 5215-5231. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45060331

AMA Style

Bratu D, Boda D, Caruntu C. Genomic, Epigenomic, Transcriptomic, Proteomic and Metabolomic Approaches in Atopic Dermatitis. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2023; 45(6):5215-5231. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45060331

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bratu, Dalia, Daniel Boda, and Constantin Caruntu. 2023. "Genomic, Epigenomic, Transcriptomic, Proteomic and Metabolomic Approaches in Atopic Dermatitis" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 45, no. 6: 5215-5231. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45060331

APA Style

Bratu, D., Boda, D., & Caruntu, C. (2023). Genomic, Epigenomic, Transcriptomic, Proteomic and Metabolomic Approaches in Atopic Dermatitis. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 45(6), 5215-5231. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb45060331

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop