Oral Immunotherapy (OIT): A Personalized Medicine
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Quality of Life (QoL)
3. Immunologic Changes with OIT
4. Sustained Unresponsiveness
5. Multiple Food OIT
6. Desensitization Efficacy
7. Personalized Medicine
- with IgE binding to a boarder diversity of peptides;
- with high IgE-binding intensity to allergens:
- with the highest level of serum- specific IgE or the largest skin test response;
- with more severe reactions at low doses;
- with more severe asthma;
- who show a tendency towards a decrease in the specific IgE levels.
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Brotons-Canto, A.; Martín-Arbella, N.; Gamazo, C.; Irache, J.M. New pharmaceutical approaches for the treatment of food allergies. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2018, 15, 675–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sánchez-García, S.; Cipriani, F.; Ricci, G. Food Allergy in childhood: Phenotypes, prevention and treatment. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2015, 26, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wood, R.A. Food allergen immunotherapy: Current status and prospects for the future. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 137, 973–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- PALISADE Group of Clinical Investigators; Vickery, B.P.; Vereda, A.; Casale, T.B.; Beyer, K.; du Toit, G.; Hourihane, J.O.; Jones, S.M.; Shreffler, W.G.; Marcantonio, A.; et al. AR101 Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 1991–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Burbank, A.J.; Sood, P.; Vickery, B.P.; Wood, R.A. Allergen Immunotherapy for food allergy. Immunol. Allergy Clin. N. Am. 2016, 36, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Narisety, S.D.; Frischmeyer-Guerrerio, P.A.; Keet, C.A.; Gorelik, M.; Schroeder, J.; Hamilton, R.G.; Wood, R.A. A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of sublingual versus oral immunotherapy for the treatment of peanut allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 135, 1275–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wasserman, R.L.; Factor, J.M.; Baker, J.W.; Mansfield, L.E.; Katz, Y.; Hague, A.R.; Paul, M.M.; Sugerman, R.W.; Lee, J.O.; Lester, M.R.; et al. Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy: Multipractice experience with epinephrine-treated reactions. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2014, 2, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barni, S.; Mori, F.; Piccorossi, A.; Sarti, L.; Pucci, N.; Maresca, M.; Giovannini, M.; Liccioli, G.; Novembre, E. Low-Dose Oral Food Challenge with Hazelnut: Efficacy and Tolerability in Children. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2019, 178, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martorell, A.; Alonso, E.; Echeverría, L.; Escudero, C.; García-Rodríguez, R.; Blasco, C.; Bone, J.; Borja-Segade, J.; Bracamonte, T.; Claver, A.; et al. Expert panel selected from members of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Allergology, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (SEICAP) and the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (SEAIC). Oral Immunotherapy for Food Allergy: A Spanish Guideline. Immunotherapy Egg and Milk Spanish Guide (ITEMS Guide). Part I: Cow Milk and Egg Oral Immunotherapy: Introduction, Methodology, Rationale, Current State, Indications, Contraindications, and Oral Immunotherapy Build-up Phase. J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 2017, 27, 225–237. [Google Scholar]
- Vickery, B.P.; Scurlock, A.M.; Kulis, M.; Steele, P.H.; Kamilaris, J.; Berglund, J.P.; Burk, C.; Hiegel, A.; Carlisle, S.; Christie, L.; et al. Sustained unresponsiveness to peanut in subjects who have completed peanut oral immunotherapy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 133, 468–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skripak, J.M.; Nash, S.D.; Rowley, H.; Brereton, N.H.; Oh, S.; Hamilton, R.G.; Matsui, E.C.; Burks, A.W.; Wood, R.A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of milk oral immunotherapy for cow’s milk allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008, 122, 1154–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Keet, C.A.; Seopaul, S.; Knorr, S.; Narisety, S.; Skripak, J.; Wood, R.A. Long-term follow-up of oral immunotherapy for cow’s milk allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 132, 737–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Burks, A.W.; Wood, R.A.; Jones, S.M.; Sicherer, S.H.; Fleischer, D.M.; Scurlock, A.M.; Vickery, B.P.; Liu, A.H.; Henning, A.K.; Lindblad, R.; et al. Consortium of Food Allergy Research. Sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy: Long-term follow-up of a randomized multicenter trial. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 135, 1240–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jones, S.M.; Burks, A.W.; Keet, C.; Vickery, B.P.; Scurlock, A.M.; Wood, R.A.; Liu, A.H.; Sicherer, S.H.; Henning, A.K.; Lindblad, R.W.; et al. Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR). Long-term treatment with egg oral immunotherapy enhances sustained unresponsiveness that persists after cessation of therapy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 137, 1117–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mikkelsen, A.; Mehlig, K.; Borres, M.P.; Oxelmark, L.; Björkelund, C.; Lissner, L. Monitoring the impact of cow’s milk allergy on children and their families with the FLIP questionnaire—A six-month follow-up study. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2015, 26, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brożek, J.L.; Terracciano, L.; Hsu, J.; Kreis, J.; Compalati, E.; Santesso, N.; Fiocchi, A.; Schünemann, H.J. Oral immunotherapy for IgE-mediated cow’s milk allergy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2012, 42, 363–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romantsik, O.; Bruschettini, M.; Tosca, M.A.; Zappettini, S.; Della Casa Alberighi, O.; Calevo, M.G. Oral and sublingual immunotherapy for egg allergy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014, 11, CD010638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nurmatov, U.; Devereux, G.; Worth, A.; Healy, L.; Sheikh, A. Effectiveness and safety of orally administered immunotherapy for food allergies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Nutr. 2014, 111, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vazquez-Ortiz, M.; Alvaro, M.; Piquer, M.; Giner, M.T.; Dominguez, O.; Lozano, J.; Jiménez-Feijoo, R.; Cambra, F.J.; Plaza, A.M. Life-threatening anaphylaxis to egg and milk oral immunotherapy in asthmatic teenagers. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014, 113, 482–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nieto, A.; Fernandez-Silveira, L.; Mazon, A.; Caballero, L. Life-threatening asthma reaction caused by desensitization to milk. Allergy 2010, 65, 1342–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vázquez-Ortiz, M.; Alvaro-Lozano, M.; Alsina, L.; Garcia-Paba, M.B.; Piquer-Gibert, M.; Giner-Muñoz, M.T.; Lozano, J.; Domínguez-Sánchez, O.; Jiménez, R.; Días, M.; et al. Safety and predictors of adverse events during oral immunotherapy for milk allergy: Severity of reaction at oral challenge, specific IgE and prick test. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2013, 43, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hofmann, A.M.; Scurlock, A.M.; Jones, S.M.; Palmer, K.P.; Lokhnygina, Y.; Steele, P.H.; Kamilaris, J.; Burks, A.W. Safety of a peanut oral immunotherapy protocol in children with peanut allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 124, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trendelenburg, V.; Beyer, K.; Blumchen, K. Efficacy and safety balance of oral and sublingual immunotherapy in food allergy. Curr. Treat. Options Allergy 2014, 1, 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, S.M.; Pons, L.; Roberts, J.L.; Scurlock, A.M.; Perry, T.T.; Kulis, M.; Shreffler, W.G.; Steele, P.; Henry, K.A.; Adair, M.; et al. Clinical efficacy and immune regulation with peanut oral immunotherapy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 124, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Varshney, P.; Jones, S.M.; Scurlock, A.M.; Perry, T.T.; Kemper, A.; Steele, P.; Hiegel, A.; Kamilaris, J.; Carlisle, S.; Yue, X.; et al. A randomized controlled study of peanut oral immunotherapy: Clinical desensitization and modulation of the allergic response. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 127, 654–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rigbi, N.E.; Goldberg, M.R.; Levy, M.B.; Nachshon, L.; Golobov, K.; Elizur, A. Changes in patient quality of life during oral immunotherapy for food allergy. Allergy. 2017, 72, 1883–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vazquez-Ortiz, M.; Alvaro, M.; Piquer, M.; Dominguez, O.; Giner, M.T.; Lozano, J.; Jiménez-Feijoo, R.; Plaza, A.M. Impact of oral immunotherapy on quality of life in egg allergic children. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2015, 26, 291–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burks, A.W.; Jones, S.M.; Wood, R.A.; Fleischer, D.M.; Sicherer, S.H.; Lindblad, R.W.; Stablein, D.; Henning, A.K.; Vickery, B.P.; Liu, A.H.; et al. Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR). Oral immunotherapy for treatment of egg allergy in children. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thyagarajan, A.; Jones, S.M.; Calatroni, A.; Pons, L.; Kulis, M.; Woo, C.S.; Kamalakannan, M.; Vickery, B.P.; Scurlock, A.M.; Wesley Burks, A.; et al. Evidence of pathway-specific basophil anergy induced by peanut oral immunotherapy in peanut-allergic children. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2012, 42, 1197–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vickery, B.P.; Lin, J.; Kulis, M.; Fu, Z.; Steele, P.H.; Jones, S.M. Peanut oral immuotherapy modifies IgE and IgG4 response to major peanut allergens. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 131, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Begin, P.; Nadeau, K.C. Changes in peanut-specific T-cell clonotype with oral immunotherapy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 135, 1636–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Syed, A.; Garcia, M.A.; Lyu, S.C.; Bucayu, R.; Kohli, A.; Ishida, S.; Berglund, J.P.; Tsai, M.; Maecker, H.; O’Riordan, G.; et al. Peanut oral immunotherapy results in increased antigen-induced regulator T-cell function and hypomethylation of forkhead box pro-tein 3 (FOXP3). J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 133, 500–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gorelik, M.; Narisety, S.D.; Guerrerio, A.L.; Chichester, K.L.; Keet, C.A.; Bieneman, A.P.; Hamilton, R.G.; Wood, R.A.; Schroeder, J.T.; Frischmeyer-Guerrerio, P.A. Suppression of the immunologic response to peanut during oral immunotherapy is often transient. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 135, 1283–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fernández Teruel, T.; Pinto Fernández, C.; Capataz Ledesma, M.; Fuentes-Aparicio, V.; Zapatero Remón, Á.P.A. Evolución y grado de satisfacción tras inducción de tolerancia oral con huevo. Allergol. Immunopathol. Proc. 2014, 1, 281. [Google Scholar]
- Martorell, C.; Marin, E.; Michavila, A.; Felix, R.; Jarque, A.; Cerda, J.C.; Moreno, M.A.; de las Marinas, M.D.; Martorell, A. Persistencia de la tolerancia adquirida tras tratamiento de mantenimiento de un protocolo de inducción de tolerancia oral con dosis máxima de 17 mL de clara pasteurizada. Allergol. Immunopathol. Proc. 2013, 1, 240. [Google Scholar]
- Martín-Muñoz, M.F.; Muñoz, C.; Fuentes, V.; Marín, A.M.; Martorell, A.; Plaza, A.M. Inmunoterapia oral con huevo (ITOH) en niños con alergia persistente. Valoración de diferentes pautas de mantenimiento. J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 2014, 24 (Suppl. S2), 73. [Google Scholar]
- García Rodríguez, R.; Urra, J.M.; Feo-Brito, F.; Galindo, P.A.; Borja, J.; Gómez, E.; Lara, P.; Guerra, F. Oral rush desensitization to egg: Efficacy and safety. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2011, 41, 1289–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muraro, A.; Roberts, G.; Clark, A.; Eigenmann, P.A.; Halken, S.; Lack, G.; Moneret-Vautrin, A.; Niggemann, B.; Rancé, F. EAACI Task Force on Anaphylaxis in Children. The management of anaphylaxis in childhood: Position paper of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Allergy 2007, 62, 857–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martorell Aragonés, A.; Félix Toledo, R.; Cerdá Mir, J.C.; Martorell Calatayud, A. Oral rush desensitization to cow milk. Following of desensitized patients during three years. Allergol. Immunopathol. (Madr.) 2007, 35, 174–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Meglio, P.; Giampietro, P.G.; Carello, R.; Gabriele, I.; Avitabile, S.; Galli, E. Oral food desensitization in children with IgE-mediated hen’s egg-allergy: A new protocol with raw hen’s egg. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2013, 24, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández Suárez, H.R.; Almeida Sanchez, Z.; Alvarez-Perea, A.; Rubí Ruiz, M.T.; Infante Herrero, S.; Zapatero Remón, L. Long term follow up of patients that have received immunotherapy with cow’s milk. Allergy 2014, 69 (Suppl. S99), 282. [Google Scholar]
- Meglio, P.; Bartone, E.; Plantamura, M.; Arabito, E.; Giampietro, P.G. A protocol for oral desensitization in children with IgE-mediated cow’s milk allergy. Allergy 2004, 59, 980–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Longo, G.; Barbi, E.; Berti, I.; Meneghetti, R.; Pittalis, A.; Ronfani, L.; Ventura, A. Specific oral tolerance induction in children with very severe cow’s milk-induced reactions. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2008, 121, 343–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Narisety, S.D.; Skripak, J.M.; Steele, P.; Hamilton, R.G.; Matsui, E.C.; Burks, A.W.; Wood, R.A. Open-label maintenance after milk oral immunotherapy for IgE-mediated cow’s milk allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009, 124, 610–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pajno, G.B.; Caminiti, L.; Ruggeri, P.; De Luca, R.; Vita, D.; La Rosa, M.; Passalacqua, G. Oral immunotherapy for cow’s milk allergy with a weekly up-dosing regimen: A randomized single-blind controlled study. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010, 105, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martorell, A.; De la Hoz, B.; Ibáñez, M.D.; Bone, J.; Terrados, M.S.; Michavila, A.; Plaza, A.M.; Alonso, E.; Garde, J.; Nevot, S.; et al. Oral desensitization as a useful treatment in 2-year-old children with cow’s milk allergy. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2011, 41, 1297–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Keet, C.A.; Frischmeyer-Guerrerio, P.A.; Thyagarajan, A.; Schroeder, J.T.; Hamilton, R.G.; Boden, S.; Steele, P.; Driggers, S.; Burks, A.W.; Wood, R.A. The safety and efficacy of sublingual and oral immunotherapy for milk allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012, 129, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goldberg, M.R.; Nachshon, L.; Appel, M.Y.; Elizur, A.; Levy, M.B.; Eisenberg, E.; Sampson, H.A.; Katz, Y. Efficacy of baked milk oral immunotherapy in baked milk–reactive allergic patients. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 136, 1601–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takahashi, M.; Taniuchi, S.; Soejima, K.; Hatano, Y.; Yamanouchi, S.; Kaneko, K. Two-weeks-sustained unresponsiveness by oral immunotherapy using microwave heated cow’s milk for children with cow’s milk allergy. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 2016, 12, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ebrahimi, M.; Gharagozlou, M.; Mohebbi, A.; Hafezi, N.; Azizi, G.; Movahedi, M. The Efficacy of Oral Immunotherapy in Patients with Cow’s Milk Allergy. Iran. J. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017, 16, 183–192. [Google Scholar]
- Amat, F.; Kouche, C.; Gaspard, W.; Lemoine, A.; Guiddir, T.; Lambert, N.; Zakariya, M.; Ridray, C.; Nemni, A.; Saint-Pierre, P.; et al. Is a slow-progression baked-milk protocol of oral immunotherapy always a safe option for children with cow’s milk allergy? A randomized controlled trial. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2017, 47, 1491–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Efron, A.; Zeldin, Y.; Gotesdyner, L.; Stauber, T.; Maoz Segal, R.; Binson, I.; Dinkin, M.; Dinkowitz, L.; Shahar, D.; Deutch, M.; et al. A Structured Gradual Exposure Protocol to Baked and Heated Milk in the Treatment of Milk Allergy. J. Pediatr. 2018, 203, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Inuo, C.; Tanaka, K.; Suzuki, S.; Nakajima, Y.; Yamawaki, K.; Tsuge, I.; Urisu, A.; Kondo, Y. Oral Immunotherapy Using Partially Hydrolyzed Formula for Cow’s Milk Protein Allergy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2018, 177, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mota, I.; Piedade, S.; Gaspar, Â.; Benito-Garcia, F.; Sampaio, G.; Borrego, L.M.; Morais-Almeida, M. Cow’s milk oral immunotherapy in real life: 8-year long-term follow-up study. Asia Pac. Allergy 2018, 8, e28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kauppila, T.K.; Paassilta, M.; Kukkonen, A.K.; Kuitunen, M.; Pelkonen, A.S.; Makela, M.J. Outcome of oral immunotherapy for persistent cow’s milk allergy from 11 years of experience in Finland. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2019, 30, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Schryver, S.; Mazer, B.; Clarke, A.E.; St Pierre, Y.; Lejtenyi, D.; Langlois, A.; Torabi, B.; Zhao, W.W.; Chan, E.S.; Baerg, I.; et al. Adverse Events in Oral Immunotherapy for the Desensitization of Cow’s Milk Allergy in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2019, 7, 1912–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berti, I.; Badina, L.; Cozzi, G.; Giangreco, M.; Bibalo, C.; Ronfani, L.; Barbi, E.; Ventura, A.; Longo, G. Early oral immunotherapy in infants with cow’s milk protein allergy. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2019, 30, 572–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blumchen, K.; Ulbricht, H.; Staden, U.; Dobberstein, K.; Beschorner, J.; de Oliveira, L.C.; Shreffler, W.G.; Sampson, H.A.; Niggemann, B.; Wahn, U.; et al. Oral peanut immunotherapy in children with peanut anaphylaxis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2010, 126, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anagnostou, K.; Clark, A.; King, Y.; Islam, S.; Deighton, J.; Ewan, P. Efficacy and safety of high-dose peanut oral immunotherapy with factors predicting outcome. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2011, 41, 1273–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anagnostou, K.; Islam, S.; King, Y.; Foley, L.; Pasea, L.; Bond, S.; Palmer, C.; Deighton, J.; Ewan, P.; Clark, A. Assessing the efficacy of oral immunotherapy for the desensitisation of peanut allergy in children (STOP II): A phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2014, 383, 1297–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kukkonen, A.K.; Uotila, R.; Malmberg, L.P.; Pelkonen, A.S.; Mäkelä, M.J. Double-blind placebo-controlled challenge showed that peanut oral immunotherapy was effective for severe allergy without negative effects on airway inflammation. Acta Paediatr. 2017, 106, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vickery, B.P.; Berglund, J.P.; Burk, C.M.; Fine, J.P.; Kim, E.H.; Kim, J.I.; Keet, C.A.; Kulis, M.; Orgel, K.G.; Guo, R.; et al. Early oral immunotherapy in peanut-allergic preschool children is safe and highly effective. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 139, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bird, J.A.; Spergel, J.M.; Jones, S.M.; Rachid, R.; Assa’ad, A.H.; Wang, J.; Leonard, S.A.; Laubach, S.S.; Kim, E.H.; Vickery, B.P.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of AR101 in Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy: Results of ARC001, a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Clinical Trial. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2018, 6, 476–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nachshon, L.; Goldberg, M.R.; Katz, Y.; Levy, M.B.; Elizur, A. Long-Term outcome of Peanut Oral Immunotherapy—Real Life Experience. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2018, 29, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nagakura, K.I.; Yanagida, N.; Sato, S.; Nishino, M.; Asaumi, T.; Ogura, K.; Ebisawa, M. Low-dose oral immunotherapy for children with anaphylactic peanut allergy in Japan. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2018, 29, 512–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nagakura, K.I.; Sato, S.; Yanagida, N.; Nishino, M.; Asaumi, T.; Ogura, K.; Ebisawa, M. Oral Immunotherapy in Japanese Children with Anaphylactic Peanut Allergy. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2018, 175, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Anvari, S.; Tran, D.; Nguyen, A.; Devaraj, S.; Davis, C.M. Peanut oral immunotherapy dose variations do not result in allergic reactions. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2018, 29, 218–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, Y.; Chew, J.L.; Tan, M.M.; Soh, J.Y. Efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy: A pilot study in Singaporean children. Asia Pac. Allergy 2018, 9, e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fauquert, J.L.; Michaud, E.; Pereira, B.; Bernard, L.; Gourdon-Dubois, N.; Rouzaire, P.O.; Rochette, E.; Merlin, E.; Evrard, B.; PITA Group. Peanut Gastro-Intestinal Delivery Oral Immunotherapy in Adolescents: Results of the build-up phase of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PITA study). Clin. Exp. Allergy 2018, 48, 862–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blumchen, K.; Trendelenburg, V.; Ahrens, F.; Gruebl, A.; Hamelmann, E.; Hansen, G.; Heinzmann, A.; Nemat, K.; Holzhauser, T.; Roeder, M.; et al. Efficacy, Safety, and Quality of Life in a Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Low-Dose Peanut Oral Immunotherapy in Children with Peanut Allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2019, 7, 479–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wasserman, R.L.; Hague, A.R.; Pence, D.M.; Sugerman, R.W.; Silvers, S.K.; Rolen, J.G.; Herbert, M. Real-World Experience with Peanut Oral Immunotherapy: Lessons Learned From 270 Patients. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2019, 7, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Buchanan, A.D.; Green, T.; Jones, S.M.; Scurlock, A.M.; Christie, L.; Althage, K.A.; Steele, P.H.; Pons, L.; Helm, R.M.; Lee, L.A.; et al. Egg oral immunotherapy in nonanaphylactic children with egg allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007, 119, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vickery, B.P.; Pons, L.; Kulis, M.; Steele, P.; Jones, S.M.; Burks, A.W. Individualized IgE-based dosing of egg oral immunotherapy and the development of tolerance. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010, 105, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Escudero, C.; Del Rio, P.R.; Sánchez-Garcia, S.; Pérez-Rangel, I.; Pérez, N.; García-Fernández, C.; Ibañez, M.D.; Sánchez-García, S.; Pérez-Rangel, I.; García-Fernández, C. Early sustained unresponsiveness after short-course egg oral immunotherapy: A randomized controlled study in egg allergic children. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2015, 45, 1833–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giavi, S.; Vissers, Y.M.; Muraro, A.; Lauener, R.; Konstantinopoulos, A.P.; Mercenier, A.; Wermeille, A.; Lazzarotto, F.; Frei, R.; Bonaguro, R.; et al. Oral immunotherapy with low allergenic hydrolyzed egg in egg allergic children. Allergy 2016, 71, 1575–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yanagida, N.; Sato, S.; Asaumi, T.; Nagakura, K.; Ogura, K.; Ebisawa, M. Safety and Efficacy of Low-Dose Oral Immunotherapy for Hen’s Egg Allergy in Children. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2016, 171, 265–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Rangel, I.; Rodríguez Del Río, P.; Escudero, C.; Sánchez-García, S.; Sánchez-Hernández, J.J.; Ibáñez, M.D. Efficacy and safety of high-dose rush oral immunotherapy in persistent egg allergic children. A randomized clinical trial. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017, 118, 356–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akashi, M.; Yasudo, H.; Narita, M.; Nomura, I.; Akasawa, A.; Ebisawa, M.; Takahashi, T.; Ohya, Y. Randomized controlled trial of oral immunotherapy for egg allergy in Japanese patients. Pediatr. Int. 2017, 59, 534–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maeta, A.; Matsushima, M.; Muraki, N.; Asano, M.; Takaoka, Y.; Kameda, M.; Takahashi, K. Low-Dose Oral Immunotherapy Using Low-Egg-Allergen Cookies for Severe Egg-Allergic Children Reduces Allergy Severity and Affects Allergen-Specific Antibodies in Serum. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2018, 175, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Itoh-Nagato, N.; Inoue, Y.; Nagao, M.; Fujisawa, T.; Shimojo, N.; Iwata, T.; J-OIT group. Desensitization to a whole egg by rush oral immunotherapy improves the quality of life of guardians: A multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, delayed-start design study. Allergol. Int. 2018, 67, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bird, J.A.; Clark, A.; Dougherty, I.; Brown, L.S.; Arneson, A.; Crain, M.; Parrish, C. Baked egg oral immunotherapy desensitizes baked egg allergic children to lightly cooked egg. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2019, 7, 667–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martín-Muñoz, M.F.; Alonso Lebrero, E.; Zapatero, L.; Fuentes Aparicio, V.; Piquer Gibert, M.; Plaza Martín, A.M.; Muñoz, C.; Belver, M.T.; Martorell-Calatayud, C.; Martorell-Aragonés, A.; et al. Egg OIT in clinical practice (SEICAP II): Maintenance patterns and desensitization state after normalizing the diet. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2019, 30, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elizur, A.; Appel, M.Y.; Nachshon, L.; Levy, M.B.; Epstein-Rigbi, N.; Pontoppidan, B.; Lidholm, J.; Goldberg, M.R. Walnut oral immunotherapy for desensitisation of walnut and additional tree nut allergies (Nut CRACKER): A single-centre, prospective cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health. 2019, 3, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez del Río, P.; Díaz-Perales, A.; Sanchez-García, S.; Escudero, C.; do Santos, P.; Catarino, M.; Ibañez, M.D. Oral immunotherapy in children with IgE-mediated wheat allergy: Outcome and molecular changes. J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 2014, 24, 240–248. [Google Scholar]
- Sato, S.; Utsunomiya, T.; Imai, T.; Yanagida, N.; Asaumi, T.; Ogura, K.; Koike, Y.; Hayashi, N.; Okada, Y.; Shukuya, A.; et al. Wheat oral immunotherapy for wheat-induced anaphylaxis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 136, 1131–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okada, Y.; Yanagida, N.; Sato, S.; Ebisawa, M. Better management of wheat allergy using a very low-dose food challenge: A retrospective study. Allergol. Int. 2016, 65, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khayatzadeh, A.; Gharaghozlou, M.; Ebisawa, M.; Shokouhi Shoormasti, R.; Movahedi, M. A Safe and Effective Method for Wheat Oral Immunotherapy. Iran. J. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016, 15, 525–535. [Google Scholar]
- Rekabi, M.; Arshi, S.; Bemanian, M.H.; Rekabi, V.; Rajabi, A.; Fallahpour, M.; Molatefi, R.; Shokri, S.; Eslami, N.; Ahmadian, J.; et al. Evaluation of a new protocol for wheat desensitization in patients with wheat-induced anaphylaxis. Immunother. 2017, 9, 637–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bégin, P.; Winterroth, L.C.; Dominguez, T.; Wilson, S.P.; Bacal, L.; Mehrotra, A.; Kausch, B.; Trela, A.; Hoyte, E.; O’Riordan, G.; et al. Safety and feasibility of oral immunotherapy to multiple allergens for food allergy. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 2014, 10, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nurmatov, U.; Dhami, S.; Arasi, S.; Pajno, G.B.; Fernandez-Rivas, M.; Muraro, A.; Roberts, G.; Akdis, C.; Alvaro-Lozano, M.; Beyer, K.; et al. Allergen immunotherapy for IgE-mediated food allergy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy 2017, 72, 1133–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vazquez-Ortiz, M.; Alvaro, M.; Piquer, M.; Dominguez, O.; Machinena, A.; Martín-Mateos, M.A.; Plaza, A.M. Baseline specific IgE levels are useful to predict safety of oral immunotherapy in egg-allergic children. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2014, 44, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dello Iacono, I.; Tripodi, S.; Calvani, M.; Panetta, V.; Verga, M.C.; Miceli Sopo, S. Specific oral tolerance induction with raw HE in children with very severe egg allergy: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 2013, 24, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leonard, S.A.; Caubet, J.C.; Kim, J.S.; Groetch, M.; Nowak-Wegrzyn, A. Baked milk-and egg-containing diet in the management of milk and egg allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2015, 3, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.S.; Nowak-Wegrzyn, A.; Sicherer, S.H.; Noone, S.; Moshier, E.L.; Sampson, H.A. Dietary baked milk accelerates the resolution of cow’s milk allergy in children. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2011, 128, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leonard, S.A.; Sampson, H.A.; Sicherer, S.H.; Noone, S.; Moshier, E.L.; Godbold, J.; Nowak-Wegrzyn, A. Dietary baked egg accelerates resolution of egg allergy in children. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2012, 130, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Reference, Year | Design | Sample Size (n) | Subject Age (yrs) | Maintenance Dose | Duration | Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Meglio P. et al., 2004 [42] | open-label | 21 | 6–10 | 200 mL | 6 mon | 72% achieved desensitization to 200 mL of cow’s milk daily |
Longo G. et al., 2008 [43] | randomized open-label | 30 | 5–17 | 150 mL | 10-day rush escalation, 1 yr maintenance | 36% completely tolerant (≥150 mL) and 54% partially tolerant (5–150 mL) |
Skripak JM. et al., 2008 [11] | randomized, placebo-controlled | 13 | 6–17 | 500 mg milk protein | 23 wk | Median milk challenge threshold increased from 40 mg at baseline to 5140 mg after OIT |
Narisety SD. et al., 2009 [44] | open-label (follow-up) | 13 | 6–16 | 500–4000 mg milk protein | 3–17 mo | Ongoing milk intake demonstrated tolerance from 1000 to 16,000 mg (median, 7000) with 33% tolerating 16,000 mg on OFC |
Pajno GB. et al., 2010 [45] | randomized, placebo-controlled | 15 | 4–10 | 200 mL | 18 wk | 67% tolerant to 200 mL cow’s milk |
Martorell A. et al., 2011 [46] | randomized, placebo-controlled | 30 | 2–3 | 200 mL | 1 yrs | 90% showing complete desensitization |
Keet CA. et al., 2012 [47] | randomized, placebo-controlled | 20 for OIT | 6–17 | 1000–2000 mg | 60 wk | 70% of patients receiving OIT passed an 8 g OFC.; only 40% passed OFC when treatment was discontinued for 6 wk |
Goldberg M. et al., 2015 [48] | open | 14 | 6.5–12.7 | 1.3 g of BM protein | 12 mo | Only 3 (21%) of 14 patients tolerated the 1.3 g/d BM dose. Patients who successfully reached maintenance had decreased milk-specific IgE reactivity. |
Takahashi M. et al., 2016 [49] | open | 31 (48 tot, 31 OIT, 17 controls) | 5–17 | 200 mL of microwave heated cow’s milk every day (fresh cow milk was warmed in a microwave oven at 550 W for100 s) | 12 mo | No children in the untreated group did not pass an open food challenge to CM. Of the 31 children in the OIT group, 14 (p = 0.002) achieved desensitization, and eight (p = 0.036) achieved two-weeks-SU to CM at 1 year from the start of OIT. Two years after the start of OIT, both the rate of desensitization and the rate of the two-week-SU in the OIT group significantly increased compared with the rates at one year (p = 0.025 and p = 0.008, respectively). |
Ebrahimi M. et al., 2017 [50] | open | 14 | 3.5–7 | 200 to 250 mL of cow’s milk each day for 90 days. | 90 days | The median of the difference of the wheel diameter with the control, decreased from 10 to 6 mm. After the OIT, the sIgE level of cow’s milk proteins and casein decreased from 39.30 to 10.40 and 7.72 to 2.83 (KU/L), respectively. The study doesn’t show data of sustained responsiveness in the follow-up. |
Amat F. et al., 2017 [51] | randomized | 43 (18 high-risk arm, 23 low-risk arm) | 3–10 | “low-risk arm”: from extensively heated baked milk to the half-heated baked milk and then raw milk until 2720 mg of milk protein per day. “high-risk arm”: immediately raw milk | 9 mo | Fifteen children (36.6%) were classified as responders, 11 (26.8%) were partial responders, with an average gain in threshold of tolerance of 697 mg [27.2–2550], and 15 children (36.6%) remained non-responders. The study doesn’t evaluate sustained unresponsiveness to milk proteins |
Efron A. et al., 2018 [52] | retrospective, case-control | 43 (110 tot, 43 OIT, 67 controls) | 1–4 | First OFC—cookie containing ~1 g milk protein heated in frying and baking. Second OFC—pancake containing ~1 g milk protein heated in frying. Third OFC—toast containing ~4 g cheese proteins (mostly casein). Fourth OFC—yogurt containing ~4 gr of unheated cheese proteins. | 12–18 mo (3 mo each product) | At last follow-up, 86% of treated children were tolerant to unheated milk proteins vs. 52% of controls (p = 0.003). |
Inuo C. et al., 2018 [53] | randomized, double-blind, controlled | 25 (13 pHF-pHF, 12 eHF-pHF) | 1–9 | two double-blind groups: a partially hydrolyzed cow’s milk protein-based formula (pHF)-pHF group and an extensively hydrolyzed cow’s milk protein-based formula (eHF)-pHF group | 16 wk | There was a significant increase in the threshold in the pHF-pHF group (p = 0.048), but not in the eHFpHF group (p = 0.23). Among the participants with a severe allergy, whose baseline thresholds were <4 mL, there was a significant change in thresholds between baseline and at the end of the trial in the pHF-pHF group (p = 0.023). |
Mota I. et al., 2018 [54] | prospective | 42 | 2–18 | 200 mL | 36 mo | During the maintenance phase, 92% maintained diet without restrictions including daily ingestion of 200 mL of CM (36 of 39 adherent patients). Overall, 93% were adherent patients (39 of 42), since they keep daily ingestion of 200-mL CM. |
Kauppila T. et al., 2019 [55] | open | 180 (296 OIT, 64 controls) | 5–17 | 200 mL | 11 yrs of follow-up | Out of the initial study group, 244/296 (83%) patients participated in the long-term follow-up. Among these patients, 136/244 (56%) consumed ≥2 dL of milk daily. The median follow-up time was 6.5 years. Of the recorded markers and clinical factors, the baseline milk sIgE level was most associated with maintaining milk OIT (p < 0.001). |
De Schryver S. et al., 2019 [56] | open | 26 (52 tot, 26 OIT and 26 controls) | 6–18 | 200 mL | 1 mo | Among the 26 children randomized to OIT, 18 were defined as desensitized to milk. The difference in the percentage of milk-desensitized children between the groups attributed to the OIT is 69.2% |
Berti I. et al., 2019 [57] | open | 68 | 3–11 mo | up dosing until 150 mL | 3.5–16 mo | Sixty-six infants (97%) reached the target of the protocol |
Reference, Year | Design | Sample Size (n) | Subject Age (yrs) | Maintenance Dose (mg) | Duration | Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jones SM. et al., 2009 [24] | open-label | 29 | 1–16 | 1800 | 36 mo | 93% passed 3.9 g peanut OFC |
Blumchen K. et al., 2010 [58] | randomized, open-label | 23 | 3–14 | 500 | 7-day rush escalation, 8 wk maintenance | 64% reached their maintenance dose of 500 mg peanut |
Varshney P. et al., 2011 [25] | randomized, placebo-controlled | 19 | 3–11 | 2000 | 48 wk | 84% passed 5000 mg peanut OFC |
Anagnostou K. et al., 2011 [59] | open-label | 22 | 4–18 | 800 | 32 wk | 64% tolerated 6.6 g OFC |
Anagnostou K. et al., 2014 [60] | randomized, placebo-controlled | 39 | 7–16 | 800 | 26 wk | 62% tolerated 1400 mg challenge |
Vickery BP. et al., 2014 [10] | open-label | 24 | 1–16 | ≤ 4000 | ≤ 5 y | 1 mo after OIT stopped, 50% achieved sustained unresponsiveness to 5000 mg OFC |
Narisety SD. et al., 2015 [6] | randomized, placebo-controlled | 16 | 7–13 | 2000 | 12 mo | Significantly greater increase in OFC threshold in OIT vs. SLIT, low rate of sustained unresponsiveness |
Kukkonen K. et al., 2017 [61] | double-blind, placebo-controlled | 39 (60 tot, 39 OIT and 21 controls) | 6–18 | 100-2000 | 8 mo | 85% of patients passed the build-up phase, and 67% tolerated 5 g of peanuts during the post-treatment challenge |
Vickery B. et al., 2017 [62] | double-blind, placebo-controlled | 40 (40 OIT and 154 controls) | 9–36 mo | 300-3000 | 29 mo | overall 78% of subjects receiving E-OIT demonstrated sustained unresponsiveness to peanut four weeks after stopping E-OIT and reintroduced peanut into the diet |
Bird JA. et al., 2018 [63] | double-blind, placebo-controlled | 29 (tot 55, 29 OIT and 26 controls) | 4–26 | 300 | 20-34 wk | 79% and 62% AR101 subjects tolerated > 443 mg and 1043 mg respectively, versus 5 of 26 (19%) and 0 of 26 (0%) placebo subjects (both p < 0.0001) |
PALISADE group, 2018 [4] | double-blind, placebo-controlled | 372 (496 tot, 372 OIT and 124 controls) | 4–17 | 300 | 24 wk | 250 of 372 participants (67.2%) who received active treatment, as compared with 5 of 124 participants (4.0%) who received placebo, were able to ingest a dose of 600 mg or more of peanut protein, without dose-limiting symptoms, at the exit food challenge |
Nachshon L. et al., 2018 [64] | prospective | 139 (145 tot, 139 < 18 y) | 4–18 | 1200 or 3000 | 6 mo | Of the 145 patients treated, 113 (77.9%) were fully desensitized to 3000 mg of peanut protein, 20 (13.8%) patients were partially desensitized to 300-2400 mg, and 12 patients (8.3%) failed. 63/64 patients (98.4%) consuming 1200 mg maintenance dose were successfully re-challenged to 3000 mg. All patients in the high dose group (3000 mg) who continued regular consumption and arrived for follow-up (n = 22) passed a challenge to 3000 mg. |
Nagakura K. et al., 2018 PAI [65] | prospective, open-label | 24 (24 OIT, 10 controls) | 5–18 | 133 | 12 mo | 16 children (67%) passed the 133-mg OFC, and 14 (58%) passed the 795-mg OFC. Only 1 child (10%) in the historical control group passed the 133-mg OFC (p = 0.006). Ultimately, eight children (33%) in the OIT group achieved sustained unresponsiveness |
Nagakura K. et al., 2018 [66] | double-blind, placebo-controlled | 22 (22 OIT, 11 controls) | 5–18 | 795 | 2 y | 15/22 patients (68.1%) in the OIT group achieved sustained unresponsiveness, whereas only 2 (18.1%) in the control group passed the second OFC |
Anvari S. et al., 2018 [67] | double-blind, placebo-controlled | 15 | 5–16 | 3900 | 3 mo | OIT participants who underwent dose variations on the unexpired lots of peanut flour were able to successfully tolerate the 100% dose increase, following a two-week tolerance of a 50% dose reduction on an unexpired lot of peanut flour |
Zhong Y. et al., 2018 [68] | open-label | 7 (9 total, 7 completed protocol) | 8–14 | 3000 | 12 mo | Of the seven who completed OIT, six tolerated 6000 mg of peanut protein at the first OFC at six months of maintenance phase; the last patient was afraid of consuming more than 3000 mg of peanut protein but passed the challenge with 3000 mg. After 12 months of maintenance therapy, only 3 of the 7 subjects consented to 4 weeks of abstinence. Of these, only 1 passed the challenge with 6000 mg of peanut protein. |
Fauquert JL. et al., 2018 [69] | double-blind, placebo-controlled | 21 (30 tot, 21 OIT and nine controls) | 12–18 | 400 IN CAPSULES | 24 wk | Unresponsiveness to 400 mg of peanut protein was achieved in 17/21 peanut group patients (two patients withdrew) and 1/9 in the placebo group |
Blumchen K. et al., 2019 [70] | double-blind, placebo-controlled | 31 (62 tot, 31 OIT and 31 controls) | 3–17 | 125–250 | 16 mo | Twenty-three of 31 (74.2%) children of the active group tolerated at least 300 mg peanut protein at final food challenge compared with 5 of 31 (16.1%) in the placebo group (p < 0.001). Thirteen of 31 (41.9%) children of the active versus 1 of 31 (3.2%) of the placebo group tolerated the highest dose of 4.5 g peanut protein at final OFC (p < 0.001) |
Wasserman RL. et al., 2019 [71] | retrospective record | 270 | 4–18 | 3000 | 36 mo | All patients who reached the 3000 mg target dose (214/262 81%) were challenged with 6000 mg of peanut protein and all but 1 patient passed the challenge. 14 had demonstrated sustained unresponsiveness with 6000 mg |
Reference, Year | Design | Sample Size | Subject Age (yrs) | Maintenance Dose | Duration | Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Buchanan AD. et al., 2007 [72] | open-label | 7 | 1–16 | 300 mg | 24 mo | 57% passed 8 g OFC. 29% passed OFC after 3–4 mo period of egg avoidance |
Vickery BP. et al., 2010 [73] | open-label | 8 | 3–13 | 300–3600 mg | 18–50 mo | 75% passed a 10 g OFC 1 mo after stopping OIT |
Burks AW. et al., 2012 [28] | randomized, placebo controlled | 40 | 5–11 | 1600 mg | 22 mo | 75% passed 10 g OFC, but only 28% demonstrated SU on re-challenge 6–8 wk later |
Escudero C. et al., 2015 [74] | double-blind, placebo-controlled | 30 (61 to, 30 OIT, 31 controls) | 5–17 | 1 undercooked egg every 48 h | 3 mo | At 4 months, 1/31 (3%) in CG passed DBPCFC and 11/30 (37%) of OITG (95% CI, 14 to 51%; p = 0.003 |
Giavi S. et al., 2016 [75] | double-blind, placebo-controlled | 29 | 1–5.5 | 9000 mg of low allergenic hydrolyzed egg (HydE) preparation | 6 mo | No statistically significant difference was observed on the final OFC (36% and 21% had a negative OFC in the treatment and placebo groups, respectively) |
Yanagida N. et al., 2016 [76] | open-label | 21 (33 tot, 21 OIT and 12 controls) | 5–18 | 62 to 194 mg (= 1/32 of a heated whole egg) of egg protein in a scrambled form once daily | 12 mo | Respectively, 71% (15/21) and 0% (0/12) of the patients in the OIT and control groups exhibited sustained unresponsiveness to 1/32 of a whole egg 2 weeks after stopping OIT after 12 months (p < 0.001); 33% (7/21) and 0% (0/12; p = 0.032), respectively, showed sustained unresponsiveness to 1/2 of a whole egg. |
Jones SM. et al., 2016 (follow-up of Burks et al., 2012) [14] | randomized, placebo-controlled | 40 (55 tot, 40 OIT and 15 controls) | 5–18 | 1600 mg | 22 mo | Of 40 E-OIT-treated subjects, 20 (50.0%) of 40 demonstrated SU by year 4. SU after E-OIT is enhanced with a longer duration of therapy and increases the likelihood of tolerating unbaked egg in the diet. |
Pérez-Rangel I. et al., 2017 [77] | double-blind, placebo-controlled | 15 (33 to, 15 OIT and 14 controls) | 5–18 | 1 undercooked egg every 48 h | 5 mo | A total of 32 patients underwent the egg ROIT protocol (ROIT2). Thirty-one children (96.9%) completed the build-up phase, and 30 completed the maintenance phase, with a 93.8% rate of treatment success at five months |
Akaschi M. et al., 2017 [78] | double-blind, placebo-controlled | 18 (36 tot, 18 OIT, 18 controls) | 3–15 | 4000 mg of dry egg powder | 6 mo | Eight of the 14 (57%) patients in the OIT group passed 4 g of dry egg powder whereas none of the 16 patients in the “eliminate egg” group |
Maeta A. et al., 2018 [79] | open-label | 13 | 3–8 | 10 LAC, each containing 79–110 mg of egg white protein | 4 mo | After the OIT, 7 participants tolerated 2 g of hard-boiled EW. Four participants did not show any improvement in response to OIT. |
Itoh-Nagato N. et al., 2018 [80] | double-blind, placebo-controlled | 45 | 5–15 | 60 g of cooked egg and 1 g of EWP | The early start group received rush OIT for three months, while the late-start group continued the egg elimination diet (control). In the next stage, both groups received OIT until all participants had finished 12 months of maintenance OIT | The ratio of the participants in whom an increase of the TD was achieved in the first stage was significantly higher in the early-start group (87.0%), than in the late-start group (22.7%). |
Bird JA. et al., 2019 [81] | open-label | 13 | 1–18 | 3800 mg of BE | 2 y | Eight subjects completed 12 months of BE OIT, and seven subjects passed the 3.8 g BE OFC. After an additional year of daily 3.8 g BE ingestion, six subjects were challenged and 5 passed a 6 g LCE OFC. The study suggests that egg-allergic children reactive to BE may be able to undergo BE OIT to accelerate desensitization to LCE. |
Martín-Muñoz MF. et al., 2019 [82] | Double-blind, placebo-controlled | 76 (101 tot, 76 OIT and 25 controls) | 6–9 | 3300 g protein (30 mL of PEW) in 38 patients daily, in 38 patients every two days. | 12 mo | At T12, 4/25 (16%) of the total control patients passed the PEW DBPCFC vs. 64/76 (84.21%) OIT patients who had reached the target dose or total desensitization. (p = 0.000). At T24, 97.43% OIT patients passed the challenge. Daily OIT maintenance achieves better adherence, effectiveness, and safety |
Reference, Year | Design | Samples Size (n) | Subject Age | Maintenance Dose (mg) | Duration | Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Elizur A et al., 2019 [83] | randomized, elimination diet controlled | 73 | 4–20 yrs | 1200 | 18 mo | 89% desensitized (passed the OFC with 4000 mg of walnut) |
Reference, year | Design | Samples Size (n) | Subject Age (yrs) | Maintenance Dose | Duration | Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rodriguez del Rio et al., 2014 [84] | prospective, no control | 6 | 5–11 | 13 g | 6 mo | 85% desensitized |
Sato S et al., 2015 [85] | prospective, historical control | 29 | Median age: 9 | 1300 mg starting dose Ending dose 5200 mg | 24 mo | 88.9% desensitized, 61.1% sustained unresponsiveness (passed the OFC with 4000 mg of wheat) |
Okada et al., 2016 [86] | retrospective | 57 | 1–11.8 | 400 mg | 1 yrs | 32 patients (86%) tolerated very low dose OFC (53 g of wheat protein) |
Khayatzadeh A et al., 2016 [87] | case-control | 13 | 5.5–19 | 5.2 g of wheat protein | Build-up phase: 3–6 days; maintenance phase: 3 months | 12 out of 13 completed maintenance phase: 12 out of 12 were desensitized |
Rekabi M et al., 2017 [88] | prospective, no control | 12 | 2–10 | 30–70 g | up-dosing phase: 7.5 months; maintenance dose: 18 months | 12 out of 12 patients tolerated 50 g of pasta |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mori, F.; Barni, S.; Liccioli, G.; Novembre, E. Oral Immunotherapy (OIT): A Personalized Medicine. Medicina 2019, 55, 684. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55100684
Mori F, Barni S, Liccioli G, Novembre E. Oral Immunotherapy (OIT): A Personalized Medicine. Medicina. 2019; 55(10):684. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55100684
Chicago/Turabian StyleMori, Francesca, Simona Barni, Giulia Liccioli, and Elio Novembre. 2019. "Oral Immunotherapy (OIT): A Personalized Medicine" Medicina 55, no. 10: 684. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55100684
APA StyleMori, F., Barni, S., Liccioli, G., & Novembre, E. (2019). Oral Immunotherapy (OIT): A Personalized Medicine. Medicina, 55(10), 684. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55100684