Peptide-Based Drug Delivery Systems
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Cell Penetrating Peptides
2.1. Molecular Mechanisms of Delivery of Cell Penetrating Peptides
2.2. Drug Delivery Systems with CPPs
3. Targeted Delivery of Peptides
3.1. Molecular Mechanism of Targeted Delivery of Peptides
3.2. DDSs with Targeting Peptides
4. Stimuli-Responsive Peptides
4.1. Enzyme-Responsive Peptides
4.2. pH-Responsive Peptides
5. Peptide-Based Self-Assembly Scaffolds
6. Ongoing/Recently Completed Clinical Trials
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Varanko, A.; Saha, S.; Chilkoti, A. Recent trends in protein and peptide-based biomaterials for advanced drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020, 156, 133–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prasad, V.; McCabe, C.; Mailankody, S. Low-value approvals and high prices might incentivize ineffective drug development. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 15, 399–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsharkasy, O.M.; Nordin, J.Z.; Hagey, D.W.; de Jong, O.G.; Schiffelers, R.M.; Andaloussi, S.E.; Vader, P. Extracellular vesicles as drug delivery systems: Why and how? Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020, 159, 332–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossen, S.; Hossain, M.K.; Basher, M.K.; Mia, M.N.H.; Rahman, M.T.; Uddin, M.J. Smart nanocarrier-based drug delivery systems for cancer therapy and toxicity studies: A review. J. Adv. Res. 2019, 15, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bukhovets, A.V.; Fotaki, N.; Khutoryanskiy, V.V.; Moustafine, R.I. Interpolymer Complexes of Eudragit® Copolymers as Novel Carriers for Colon-Specific Drug Delivery. Polymers 2020, 12, 1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franco, P.; De Marco, I. Eudragit: A Novel Carrier for Controlled Drug Delivery in Supercritical Antisolvent Coprecipitation. Polymers 2020, 12, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Porfiryeva, N.N.; Nasibullin, S.F.; Abdullina, S.G.; Tukhbatullina, I.K.; Moustafine, R.I.; Khutoryanskiy, V.V. Acrylated Eudragit® E PO as a novel polymeric excipient with enhanced mucoadhesive properties for application in nasal drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 562, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Davoodi, P.; Lee, L.Y.; Xu, Q.; Sunil, V.; Sun, Y.; Soh, S.; Wang, C.H. Drug delivery systems for programmed and on-demand release. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 132, 104–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Din, F.U.; Aman, W.; Ullah, I.; Qureshi, O.S.; Mustapha, O.; Shafique, S.; Zeb, A. Effective use of nanocarriers as drug delivery systems for the treatment of selected tumors. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 7291–7309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Gao, H.; Wei, G.; Huang, Y.; Yu, H.; Gan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Mei, L. Recent progress in drug delivery. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2019, 9, 1145–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rastogi, S.; Shukla, S.; Kalaivani, M.; Singh, G.N. Peptide-based therapeutics: Quality specifications, regulatory considerations, and prospects. Drug Discov. Today 2019, 24, 148–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultankulov, B.; Berillo, D.; Kauanova, S.; Mikhalovsky, S.; Mikhalovska, L.; Saparov, A. Composite Cryogel with Polyelectrolyte Complexes for Growth Factor Delivery. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mansurov, N.; Chen, W.C.; Awada, H.; Huard, J.; Wang, Y.; Saparov, A. A Controlled Release System for Simultaneous Delivery of Three Human Perivascular Stem Cell-derived Factors for Tissue Repair and Regeneration. J. Tissue. Eng. Regen. Med. 2018, 12, e1164–e1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jimi, S.; Jaguparov, A.; Nurkesh, A.; Sultankulov, B.; Saparov, A. Sequential Delivery of Cryogel Released Growth Factors and Cytokines Accelerates Wound Healing and Improves Tissue Regeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nurkesh, A.; Jaguparov, A.; Jimi, S.; Saparov, A. Recent Advances in the Controlled Release of Growth Factors and Cytokines for Improving Cutaneous Wound Healing. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smagul, S.; Kim, Y.; Smagulova, A.; Raziyeva, K.; Nurkesh, A.; Saparov, A. Biomaterials Loaded with Growth Factors/Cytokines and Stem Cells for Cardiac Tissue Regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogay, V.; Mun, E.A.; Kudaibergen, G.; Baidarbekov, M.; Kassymbek, K.; Zharkinbekov, Z.; Saparov, A. Progress and Prospects of Polymer-Based Drug Delivery Systems for Bone Tissue Regeneration. Polymers 2020, 12, 2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, J.; Park, C.; Yi, G.; Lee, D.; Koo, H. Active Targeting Strategies Using Biological Ligands for Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems. Cancers 2019, 11, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bunggulawa, E.J.; Wang, W.; Yin, T.; Wang, N.; Durkan, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, G. Recent advancements in the use of exosomes as drug delivery systems. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cooper, B.M.; Iegre, J.; DH, O.D.; Ölwegård Halvarsson, M.; Spring, D.R. Peptides as a platform for targeted therapeutics for cancer: Peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs). Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 1480–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, D.; Wang, J.; Xu, D. Cell-penetrating peptides as noninvasive transmembrane vectors for the development of novel multifunctional drug-delivery systems. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2016, 229, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tesauro, D.; Accardo, A.; Diaferia, C.; Milano, V.; Guillon, J.; Ronga, L.; Rossi, F. Peptide-Based Drug-Delivery Systems in Biotechnological Applications: Recent Advances and Perspectives. Molecules 2019, 24, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Agrawal, P.; Bhalla, S.; Usmani, S.S.; Singh, S.; Chaudhary, K.; Raghava, G.P.; Gautam, A. CPPsite 2.0: A repository of experimentally validated cell-penetrating peptides. Nucleic. Acids Res. 2016, 44, D1098–D1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.J.; Huang, Y.W.; Aronstam, R.S. Intracellular Delivery of Nanoparticles Mediated by Lactoferricin Cell-Penetrating Peptides in an Endocytic Pathway. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2019, 19, 613–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, H.J.; Huang, Y.W.; Chiou, S.H.; Aronstam, R.S. Polyhistidine facilitates direct membrane translocation of cell-penetrating peptides into cells. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Reid, L.M.; Verma, C.S.; Essex, J.W. The role of molecular simulations in understanding the mechanisms of cell-penetrating peptides. Drug Discov. Today 2019, 24, 1821–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoshida, S.; Pacitto, R.; Inoki, K.; Swanson, J. Macropinocytosis, mTORC1 and cellular growth control. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 1227–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Borrelli, A.; Tornesello, A.L.; Tornesello, M.L.; Buonaguro, F.M. Cell Penetrating Peptides as Molecular Carriers for Anti-Cancer Agents. Molecules 2018, 23, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nakase, I.; Noguchi, K.; Aoki, A.; Takatani-Nakase, T.; Fujii, I.; Futaki, S. Arginine-rich cell-penetrating peptide-modified extracellular vesicles for active macropinocytosis induction and efficient intracellular delivery. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komin, A.; Russell, L.M.; Hristova, K.A.; Searson, P.C. Peptide-based strategies for enhanced cell uptake, transcellular transport, and circulation: Mechanisms and challenges. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2017, 110–111, 52–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arukuusk, P.; Pärnaste, L.; Margus, H.; Eriksson, N.K.; Vasconcelos, L.; Padari, K.; Pooga, M.; Langel, U. Differential endosomal pathways for radically modified peptide vectors. Bioconj. Chem. 2013, 24, 1721–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruseska, I.; Zimmer, A. Internalization mechanisms of cell-penetrating peptides. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2020, 11, 101–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hu, G.; Zheng, W.; Li, A.; Mu, Y.; Shi, M.; Li, T.; Zou, H.; Shao, H.; Qin, A.; Ye, J. A novel CAV derived cell-penetrating peptide efficiently delivers exogenous molecules through caveolae-mediated endocytosis. Vet. Res. 2018, 49, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mettlen, M.; Chen, P.H.; Srinivasan, S.; Danuser, G.; Schmid, S.L. Regulation of Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2018, 87, 871–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haucke, V.; Kozlov, M.M. Membrane remodeling in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. J. Cell Sci. 2018, 131, jcs216812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kaksonen, M.; Roux, A. Mechanisms of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Futaki, S.; Nakase, I. Cell-Surface Interactions on Arginine-Rich Cell-Penetrating Peptides Allow for Multiplex Modes of Internalization. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 2449–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guidotti, G.; Brambilla, L.; Rossi, D. Cell-Penetrating Peptides: From Basic Research to Clinics. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 38, 406–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Böhmová, E.; Machová, D.; Pechar, M.; Pola, R.; Venclíková, K.; Janoušková, O.; Etrych, T. Cell-penetrating peptides: A useful tool for the delivery of various cargoes into cells. Physiol. Res. 2018, 67, S267–S279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, Y.M.; Li, Y.T.; Liang, J.F.; Park, Y.J.; Chang, L.C.; Yang, V.C. PTD-modified ATTEMPTS system for enhanced asparaginase therapy: A proof-of-concept investigation. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2008, 130, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Borchers, A. Hemostatic Drugs. In Small Animal Critical Care Medicine, 2nd ed.; Silverstein, D.C., Hopper, K., Eds.; W.B. Saunders: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2015; pp. 893–898. [Google Scholar]
- Shin, M.C.; Zhang, J.; Min, K.A.; He, H.; David, A.E.; Huang, Y.; Yang, V.C. PTD-Modified ATTEMPTS for Enhanced Toxin-based Cancer Therapy: An In Vivo Proof-of-Concept Study. Pharm. Res. 2015, 32, 2690–2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wu, J.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, M.; Shan, W.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, Y. Biomimetic Viruslike and Charge Reversible Nanoparticles to Sequentially Overcome Mucus and Epithelial Barriers for Oral Insulin Delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 9916–9928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yamakoshi, Y. Dental and Oral Biology, Biochemistry. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128012383000374?via%3Dihub (accessed on 5 November 2021).
- Fawley, J.; Gourlay, D.M. Intestinal alkaline phosphatase: A summary of its role in clinical disease. J. Surg. Res. 2016, 202, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hatting, M.; Tavares, C.D.; Sharabi, K.; Rines, A.K.; Puigserver, P. Insulin regulation of gluconeogenesis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2018, 1411, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, L.; Chen, X.W.; Huang, X.; Song, B.L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y. Regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism in health and disease. Sci. China Life Sci. 2019, 62, 1420–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Xie, H.; Liu, Y.; Xia, C.; Cun, X.; Long, Y.; Chen, X.; Deng, M.; Guo, R.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Knockdown of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha by tumor targeted delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 system suppressed the metastasis of pancreatic cancer. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2019, 304, 204–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Mao, A.; Xu, M.; Weng, Q.; Mao, J.; Ji, J. CRISPR-Cas9 for cancer therapy: Opportunities and challenges. Cancer Lett. 2019, 447, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chalbatani, G.M.; Dana, H.; Gharagouzloo, E.; Grijalvo, S.; Eritja, R.; Logsdon, C.D.; Memari, F.; Miri, S.R.; Rad, M.R.; Marmari, V. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) in cancer therapy: A nano-based approach. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Singh, A.; Trivedi, P.; Jain, N.K. Advances in siRNA delivery in cancer therapy. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2018, 46, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; Guo, S.; Wu, L.; Chen, P.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Ju, H. Near-infrared boosted ROS responsive siRNA delivery and cancer therapy with sequentially peeled upconversion nano-onions. Biomaterials 2019, 225, 119501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Han, M.; Sun, Y.; Hua, Y.; Chen, G.; Zhang, L. Oligoarginine mediated collagen/chitosan gel composite for cutaneous wound healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 122, 1120–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iqbal, J.; Anwar, F.; Afridi, S. Targeted Drug Delivery Systems and Their Therapeutic Applications in Cancer and Immune Pathological Conditions. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets 2017, 17, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, R.; Wei, T.; Goldberg, H.; Wang, W.; Cullion, K.; Kohane, D.S. Getting drugs across biological barriers. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Savjani, K.T.; Gajjar, A.K.; Savjani, J.K. Drug solubility: Importance and enhancement techniques. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lian, Z.; Ji, T. Functional peptide-based drug delivery systems. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 6517–6529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazak, R.; Hi, M.; Achy, S.E.; Hussein, W.; Refaat, T. Passive targeting of nanoparticles to cancer: A comprehensive review of the literature. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 2, 904–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ulbrich, K.; Holá, K.; Šubr, V.; Bakandritsos, A.; Tuček, J.; Zbořil, R. Targeted Drug Delivery with Polymers and Magnetic Nanoparticles: Covalent and Noncovalent Approaches, Release Control, and Clinical Studies. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 5338–5431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goyal, R.; Ramakrishnan, V. Peptide-based drug delivery systems. In Characterization and Biology of Nanomaterials for Drug Delivery; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 25–45. [Google Scholar]
- Arosio, D.; Manzoni, L.; Corno, C.; Perego, P. Integrin-Targeted Peptide- and Peptidomimetic-Drug Conjugates for the Treatment of Tumors. Recent Pat. Anti-Cancer Drug Discov. 2017, 12, 148–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamidi, H.; Ivaska, J. Every step of the way: Integrins in cancer progression and metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2018, 18, 533–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Nieberler, M.; Reuning, U.; Reichart, F.; Notni, J.; Wester, H.J.; Schwaiger, M.; Weinmüller, M.; Räder, A.; Steiger, K.; Kessler, H. Exploring the Role of RGD-Recognizing Integrins in Cancer. Cancers 2017, 9, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Santino, F.; Giacomini, D.; Gentilucci, L. Integrin-Targeting Peptides for the Design of Functional Cell-Responsive Biomaterials. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Majumder, P. Integrin-Mediated Delivery of Drugs and Nucleic Acids for Anti-Angiogenic Cancer Therapy: Current Landscape and Remaining Challenges. Bioengineering 2018, 5, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhu, Y.S.; Tang, K.; Lv, J. Peptide-drug conjugate-based novel molecular drug delivery system in cancer. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2021, 42, 857–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Q.; Li, X.; Cui, M.N.; Sun, J.L.; Ji, H.Y.; Ni, B.B.; Yan, M.X. CD13: A Key Player in Multidrug Resistance in Cancer Chemotherapy. Oncol. Res. 2020, 28, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Valentinis, B.; Porcellini, S.; Asperti, C.; Cota, M.; Zhou, D.; Di Matteo, P.; Garau, G.; Zucchelli, C.; Avanzi, N.R.; Rizzardi, G.P.; et al. Mechanism of Action of the Tumor Vessel Targeting Agent NGR-hTNF: Role of Both NGR Peptide and hTNF in Cell Binding and Signaling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, P.; Zou, M.; Wang, S.; Li, T.; Liu, C.; Wang, L.; Wang, L.; Luo, F.; Wu, T.; Yan, J. Construction and characterization of a truncated tissue factor-coagulation-based composite system for selective thrombosis in tumor blood vessels. Int. J. Oncol. 2019, 55, 823–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kessler, T.; Baumeier, A.; Brand, C.; Grau, M.; Angenendt, L.; Harrach, S.; Stalmann, U.; Schmidt, L.H.; Gosheger, G.; Hardes, J.; et al. Aminopeptidase N (CD13): Expression, Prognostic Impact, and Use as Therapeutic Target for Tissue Factor Induced Tumor Vascular Infarction in Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Transl. Oncol. 2018, 11, 1271–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gai, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Long, Y.; Sun, L.; Liu, Q.; Qin, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, D.; Lan, X. Evaluation of an Integrin α(v)β(3) and Aminopeptidase N Dual-Receptor Targeting Tracer for Breast Cancer Imaging. Mol. Pharm. 2020, 17, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schultz, C. Targeting the extracellular matrix for delivery of bioactive molecules to sites of arthritis. Br. J. Pharm. 2019, 176, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Formica, F.A.; Barreto, G.; Zenobi-Wong, M. Cartilage-targeting dexamethasone prodrugs increase the efficacy of dexamethasone. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2019, 295, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lingasamy, P.; Tobi, A.; Kurm, K.; Kopanchuk, S.; Sudakov, A.; Salumäe, M.; Rätsep, T.; Asser, T.; Bjerkvig, R.; Teesalu, T. Tumor-penetrating peptide for systemic targeting of Tenascin-C. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lingasamy, P.; Tobi, A.; Haugas, M.; Hunt, H.; Paiste, P.; Asser, T.; Rätsep, T.; Kotamraju, V.R.; Bjerkvig, R.; Teesalu, T. Bi-specific tenascin-C and fibronectin targeted peptide for solid tumor delivery. Biomaterials 2019, 219, 119373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahsan, A.; Ramanand, S.G.; Bergin, I.L.; Zhao, L.; Whitehead, C.E.; Rehemtulla, A.; Ray, D.; Pratt, W.B.; Lawrence, T.S.; Nyati, M.K. Efficacy of an EGFR-specific peptide against EGFR-dependent cancer cell lines and tumor xenografts. Neoplasia 2014, 16, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hossein-Nejad-Ariani, H.; Althagafi, E.; Kaur, K. Small Peptide Ligands for Targeting EGFR in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cells. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Du, C.; Qi, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Min, H.; Han, X.; Lang, J.; Qin, H.; Shi, Q.; et al. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Targeting Peptide Nanoparticles Simultaneously Deliver Gemcitabine and Olaparib To Treat Pancreatic Cancer with Breast Cancer 2 (BRCA2) Mutation. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 10785–10796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pedchenko, V.; Zent, R.; Hudson, B.G. Alpha(v)beta3 and alpha(v)beta5 integrins bind both the proximal RGD site and non-RGD motifs within noncollagenous (NC1) domain of the alpha3 chain of type IV collagen: Implication for the mechanism of endothelia cell adhesion. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 2772–2780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vhora, I.; Patil, S.; Bhatt, P.; Misra, A. Protein–and peptide–drug Conjugates: An emerging drug delivery technology. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 2015, 98, 1–55. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Evans, B.J.; King, A.T.; Katsifis, A.; Matesic, L.; Jamie, J.F. Methods to Enhance the Metabolic Stability of Peptide-Based PET Radiopharmaceuticals. Molecules 2020, 25, 2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, X.; Wang, H.; Shi, P.; Meng, A.M. Characterization of a fusion protein of RGD4C and the β-lactamase variant for antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy. OncoTargets Ther. 2014, 7, 535–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cao, Y.; Wu, T.; Zhang, K.; Meng, X.; Dai, W.; Wang, D.; Dong, H.; Zhang, X. Engineered Exosome-Mediated Near-Infrared-II Region V(2)C Quantum Dot Delivery for Nucleus-Target Low-Temperature Photothermal Therapy. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 1499–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Wang, X.; Luo, Q.; Li, Y.; Lin, X.; Fan, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Liu, X. Fabrication of Red Blood Cell-Based Multimodal Theranostic Probes for Second Near-Infrared Window Fluorescence Imaging-Guided Tumor Surgery and Photodynamic Therapy. Theranostics 2019, 9, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Xie, Y.; Li, J.; Peng, Z.H.; Sheinin, Y.; Zhou, J.; Oupický, D. Tumor-Penetrating Nanoparticles for Enhanced Anticancer Activity of Combined Photodynamic and Hypoxia-Activated Therapy. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 2227–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tung, B.T.; Nham, D.T.; Hai, N.T.; Thu, D.K. Curcuma longa, the polyphenolic curcumin compound and pharmacological effects on liver. Diet. Interv. Liver Dis. 2019, 125–134. [Google Scholar]
- Giordano, A.; Tommonaro, G. Curcumin and cancer. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tian, T.; Zhang, H.X.; He, C.P.; Fan, S.; Zhu, Y.L.; Qi, C.; Huang, N.P.; Xiao, Z.D.; Lu, Z.H.; Tannous, B.A.; et al. Surface functionalized exosomes as targeted drug delivery vehicles for cerebral ischemia therapy. Biomaterials 2018, 150, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Negussie, A.H.; Miller, J.L.; Reddy, G.; Drake, S.K.; Wood, B.J.; Dreher, M.R. Synthesis and in vitro evaluation of cyclic NGR peptide targeted thermally sensitive liposome. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2010, 143, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Yan, J.; He, W.; Yan, S.; Niu, F.; Liu, T.; Ma, B.; Shao, Y.; Yan, Y.; Yang, G.; Lu, W.; et al. Self-Assembled Peptide-Lanthanide Nanoclusters for Safe Tumor Therapy: Overcoming and Utilizing Biological Barriers to Peptide Drug Delivery. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 2017–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, R.; Teng, L.; Gao, L.; Su, T.; Fu, L.; Qiu, Z.; Bi, Y. Advances in Multiple Stimuli-Responsive Drug-Delivery Systems for Cancer Therapy. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021, 16, 1525–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darvin, P.; Chandrasekharan, A.; Kumar, T.S. Introduction to smart drug delivery systems. Biomim. Nanoeng. Mater. Adv. Drug Deliv. 2019, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Li, F.; Qin, Y.; Lee, J.; Liao, H.; Wang, N.; Davis, T.P.; Qiao, R.; Ling, D. Stimuli-responsive nano-assemblies for remotely controlled drug delivery. J. Control. Release Off. J. Control. Release Soc. 2020, 322, 566–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.; Amiji, M.M. Stimuli-Responsive Drug Delivery Systems; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, G.; Deng, G.; Zhang, H.; Sun, Y.; An, F. Protease-triggered bioresponsive drug delivery for the targeted theranostics of malignancy. Acta Pharm. Sinica. B 2021, 11, 2220–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamath, S.D.; Kalyan, A.; Kircher, S.; Nimeiri, H.; Fought, A.J.; Benson, A., 3rd; Mulcahy, M. Ipilimumab and Gemcitabine for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase Ib Study. Oncologist 2020, 25, e808–e815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Principe, D.R.; Narbutis, M.; Kumar, S.; Park, A.; Viswakarma, N.; Dorman, M.J.; Kamath, S.D.; Grippo, P.J.; Fishel, M.L.; Hwang, R.F.; et al. Long-Term Gemcitabine Treatment Reshapes the Pancreatic Tumor Microenvironment and Sensitizes Murine Carcinoma to Combination Immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 2020, 80, 3101–3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Amrutkar, M.; Gladhaug, I.P. Pancreatic Cancer Chemoresistance to Gemcitabine. Cancers 2017, 9, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ahmed, A.A.; Marchetti, C.; Ohnmacht, S.A.; Neidle, S. A G-quadruplex-binding compound shows potent activity in human gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gondi, C.S.; Rao, J.S. Cathepsin B as a cancer target. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2013, 17, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, C.; Pan, D.; Li, J.; Hu, J.; Bains, A.; Guys, N.; Zhu, H.; Li, X.; Luo, K.; Gong, Q.; et al. Enzyme-responsive peptide dendrimer-gemcitabine conjugate as a controlled-release drug delivery vehicle with enhanced antitumor efficacy. Acta Biomater. 2017, 55, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, Y.; Guan, C.; Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Zuo, H.; Xia, T.; Xu, P.; Ouyang, J. Doxorubicin-Loaded CuS Nanoparticles Conjugated with GFLG: A Novel Drug Delivery System for Lymphoma Treatment. Nano 2019, 14, 1950013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pugazhendhi, A.; Edison, T.; Velmurugan, B.K.; Jacob, J.A.; Karuppusamy, I. Toxicity of Doxorubicin (Dox) to different experimental organ systems. Life Sci. 2018, 200, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatterjee, K.; Zhang, J.; Honbo, N.; Karliner, J.S. Doxorubicin cardiomyopathy. Cardiology 2010, 115, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Katsuta, E.; Yan, L.; Nagahashi, M.; Raza, A.; Sturgill, J.L.; Lyon, D.E.; Rashid, O.M.; Hait, N.C.; Takabe, K. Doxorubicin effect is enhanced by sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling antagonist in breast cancer. J. Surg. Res. 2017, 219, 202–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, N.; Woodle, M.C.; Mixson, A.J. Advances in delivery systems for doxorubicin. J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, J.; Li, N.; Cao, L.; Gao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Shuai, Q.; Xie, J.; Luo, K.; Yang, J.; Gu, Z. DOX-loaded peptide dendritic copolymer nanoparticles for combating multidrug resistance by regulating the lysosomal pathway of apoptosis in breast cancer cells. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 1157–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, H.; Yao, D.; Wang, D. Fibronectin-Targeting and Cathepsin B-Activatable Theranostic Nanoprobe for MR/Fluorescence Imaging and Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy for Triple Negative Breast Cancer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 33564–33574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dókus, L.E.; Lajkó, E.; Ranđelović, I.; Mező, D.; Schlosser, G.; Kőhidai, L.; Tóvári, J.; Mező, G. Phage Display-Based Homing Peptide-Daunomycin Conjugates for Selective Drug Targeting to PANC-1 Pancreatic Cancer. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sinha, R.; Purkayastha, P. Daunomycin delivery by ultrasmall graphene quantum dots to DNA duplexes: Understanding the dynamics by resonance energy transfer. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 9756–9763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, Z.; Barthwal, R. Affinity of anticancer drug daunomycin toward Tetrahymena telomeric G-Quadruplex DNA D-[GGGG (TTGGGG) 3]. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 6347–6359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Miletto, I.; Fraccarollo, A.; Barbero, N.; Barolo, C.; Cossi, M.; Marchese, L.; Gianotti, E. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles incorporating squaraine-based photosensitizers: A combined experimental and computational approach. Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 3038–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Itoh, Y.; Nagase, H. Matrix metalloproteinases in cancer. Essays Biochem. 2002, 38, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Han, M.; Huang-Fu, M.Y.; Guo, W.W.; Guo, N.N.; Chen, J.; Liu, H.N.; Xie, Z.Q.; Lin, M.T.; Wei, Q.C.; Gao, J.Q. MMP-2-Sensitive HA End-Conjugated Poly(amidoamine) Dendrimers via Click Reaction To Enhance Drug Penetration into Solid Tumor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 42459–42470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, F.; Xu, D.; Su, H.; Zhang, W.; Sun, X.; Monroe, M.K.; Chakroun, R.W.; Wang, Z.; Dai, W.; Oh, R. Supramolecular prodrug hydrogelator as an immune booster for checkpoint blocker–based immunotherapy. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaaz8985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reunanen, N.; Kähäri, V. Matrix metalloproteinases in cancer cell invasion. In Madame Curie Bioscience Database; Landes Bioscience: Austin, TX, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Carlini, A.S.; Gaetani, R.; Braden, R.L.; Luo, C.; Christman, K.L.; Gianneschi, N.C. Enzyme-responsive progelator cyclic peptides for minimally invasive delivery to the heart post-myocardial infarction. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Nosrati, H.; Mojtahedi, A.; Danafar, H.; Kheiri Manjili, H. Enzymatic stimuli-responsive methotrexate-conjugated magnetic nanoparticles for target delivery to breast cancer cells and release study in lysosomal condition. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2018, 106, 1646–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wong, P.T.; Choi, S.K. Mechanisms and implications of dual-acting methotrexate in folate-targeted nanotherapeutic delivery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 1772–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sušjan, P.; Benčina, M.; Hafner-Bratkovič, I. Differential Effect of Extracellular Acidic Environment on IL-1β Released from Human and Mouse Phagocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andreev, O.A.; Engelman, D.M.; Reshetnyak, Y.K. pH-sensitive membrane peptides (pHLIPs) as a novel class of delivery agents. Mol. Membr. Biol. 2010, 27, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wyatt, L.C.; Lewis, J.S.; Andreev, O.A.; Reshetnyak, Y.K.; Engelman, D.M. Applications of pHLIP Technology for Cancer Imaging and Therapy. Trends Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 653–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, C.; Mertz, B. Protonation Enhances the Inherent Helix-Forming Propensity of pHLIP. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 8536–8542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huang, W.; Zhao, H.; Wan, J.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, X.; Gan, L. pH- and photothermal-driven multistage delivery nanoplatform for overcoming cancer drug resistance. Theranostics 2019, 9, 3825–3839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.; Hou, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, P.; Kang, M.; Jin, Q.; Ji, J.; Gao, M. Metformin-Induced Stromal Depletion to Enhance the Penetration of Gemcitabine-Loaded Magnetic Nanoparticles for Pancreatic Cancer Targeted Therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 4944–4954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Svoronos, A.A.; Bahal, R.; Pereira, M.C.; Barrera, F.N.; Deacon, J.C.; Bosenberg, M.; DiMaio, D.; Glazer, P.M.; Engelman, D.M. Tumor-Targeted, Cytoplasmic Delivery of Large, Polar Molecules Using a pH-Low Insertion Peptide. Mol. Pharm. 2020, 17, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, W.; Chen, L.; Kang, L.; Jin, M.; Sun, P.; Xin, X.; Gao, Z.; Bae, Y.H. Nanomedicine-based combination anticancer therapy between nucleic acids and small-molecular drugs. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2017, 115, 82–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matson, J.B.; Stupp, S.I. Self-assembling peptide scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Feger, G.; Angelov, B.; Angelova, A. Prediction of Amphiphilic Cell-Penetrating Peptide Building Blocks from Protein-Derived Amino Acid Sequences for Engineering of Drug Delivery Nanoassemblies. J. Phys. Chem. B 2020, 124, 4069–4078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Berillo, D.; Mattiasson, B.; Galaev, I.Y.; Kirsebom, H. Formation of macroporous self-assembled hydrogels through cryogelation of Fmoc-Phe-Phe. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 368, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wakabayashi, R.; Suehiro, A.; Goto, M.; Kamiya, N. Designer aromatic peptide amphiphiles for self-assembly and enzymatic display of proteins with morphology control. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 640–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pandit, G.; Roy, K.; Agarwal, U.; Chatterjee, S. Self-Assembly Mechanism of a Peptide-Based Drug Delivery Vehicle. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 3143–3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fatouros, D.G.; Lamprou, D.A.; Urquhart, A.J.; Yannopoulos, S.N.; Vizirianakis, I.S.; Zhang, S.; Koutsopoulos, S. Lipid-like self-assembling peptide nanovesicles for drug delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 8184–8189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, N.; Zhou, Z.; Song, Y.; Li, M.; Yu, X.; Hu, B.; Yu, Z. In situ oxidation-regulated self-assembly of peptides into transformable scaffolds for cascade therapy. Nano Today 2021, 38, 101198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, T.; Li, X.; He, S.; Xu, D.; Yin, L.; Huang, X.; Deng, S.; Yue, W.; Zhong, W. Instant Self-Assembly Peptide Hydrogel Encapsulation with Fibrous Alginate by Microfluidics for Infected Wound Healing. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 6, 5001–5011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kumar, V.A.; Taylor, N.L.; Shi, S.; Wickremasinghe, N.C.; D’Souza, R.N.; Hartgerink, J.D. Self-assembling multidomain peptides tailor biological responses through biphasic release. Biomaterials 2015, 52, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Yang, M.; Xu, D.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, L.; Dustin, D.; Lund, R.; Liu, L.; Dong, H. Filamentous supramolecular peptide-drug conjugates as highly efficient drug delivery vehicles. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 4827–4830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, H.; Park, J.; Jiang, Y.; Woodrow, K.A. Rational design of charged peptides that self-assemble into robust nanofibers as immune-functional scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2017, 55, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Z.; Yue, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, X.; Gong, J.; Wang, L.; He, B.; Liu, Z.; Sun, Y.; Liu, J.; et al. Designer D-form self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds for 3-dimensional cell cultures. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 4902–4913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez, L.; Pinazo, A.; Pons, R.; Infante, M. Gemini surfactants from natural amino acids. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 205, 134–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jin, W.; Purves, R.; Krol, E.; Badea, I.; El-Aneed, A. Mass Spectrometric Detection and Characterization of Metabolites of Gemini Surfactants Used as Gene Delivery Vectors. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2020, 31, 366–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, F.; Chen, Y.; Liu, J.; Xing, Z.; Fan, J.; Zhang, W.; Qiu, F. Facile design of gemini surfactant-like peptide for hydrophobic drug delivery and antimicrobial activity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 591, 314–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neubauer, D.; Jaśkiewicz, M.; Bauer, M.; Olejniczak-Kęder, A.; Sikorska, E.; Sikora, K.; Kamysz, W. Biological and Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Arginine-Rich Peptide Gemini Surfactants with Lysine and Cystine Spacers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al-Dulaymi, M.; Michel, D.; Chitanda, J.M.; El-Aneed, A.; Verrall, R.E.; Grochulski, P.; Badea, I. Molecular engineering as an approach to modulate gene delivery efficiency of peptide-modified gemini surfactants. Bioconj. Chem. 2018, 29, 3293–3308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cardoso, A.M.; Morais, C.M.; Cruz, A.R.; Cardoso, A.L.; Silva, S.G.; do Vale, M.L.; Marques, E.F.; Pedroso de Lima, M.C.; Jurado, A.l.S. Gemini surfactants mediate efficient mitochondrial gene delivery and expression. Mol. Pharm. 2015, 12, 716–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hathout, R.M.; Metwally, A.A.; Woodman, T.J.; Hardy, J.G. Prediction of drug loading in the gelatin matrix using computational methods. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 1549–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Athar, M.; Lone, M.Y.; Jha, P.C. Designing of calixarene based drug carrier for dasatinib, lapatinib and nilotinib using multilevel molecular docking and dynamics simulations. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2018, 90, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Metwally, A.A.; El-Ahmady, S.H.; Hathout, R.M. Selecting optimum protein nano-carriers for natural polyphenols using chemoinformatics tools. Phytomedicine 2016, 23, 1764–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Casalini, T. Not only in silico drug discovery: Molecular modeling towards in silico drug delivery formulations. J. Control. Release 2021. [CrossRef]
- Kumthekar, P.; Tang, S.-C.; Brenner, A.J.; Kesari, S.; Piccioni, D.E.; Anders, C.; Carrillo, J.; Chalasani, P.; Kabos, P.; Puhalla, S. ANG1005, a brain-penetrating peptide–drug conjugate, shows activity in patients with breast cancer with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and recurrent brain metastases. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 2789–2799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Dharmaratne, N.U.; Kaplan, A.R.; Glazer, P.M. Targeting the Hypoxic and Acidic Tumor Microenvironment with pH-Sensitive Peptides. Cells 2021, 10, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aiello, R.J.; Gayle, S.; Bechtold, J.; Bourassa, P.; Csengery, J.; Deshpande, K.; Jones, K.; Lopresti-Morrow, L.; Maguire, R.; Marshall, D. CBX-12: A low pH targeting alphalex™-exatecan conjugate for the treatment of solid tumors. In Proceedings of the AACR Annual Meeting 2020, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 27–28 April and 22–24 June 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Richardson, P.G.; Oriol, A.; Larocca, A.; Bladé, J.; Cavo, M.; Rodriguez-Otero, P.; Leleu, X.; Nadeem, O.; Hiemenz, J.W.; Hassoun, H.; et al. Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Heavily Pretreated Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 757–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schjesvold, F.; Robak, P.; Pour, L.; Aschan, J.; Sonneveld, P. OCEAN: A randomized Phase III study of melflufen + dexamethasone to treat relapsed refractory multiple myeloma. Future Oncol. 2020, 16, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bendell, J.C.; Wang, J.S.-Z.; Bashir, B.; Richardson, D.L.; Bennett, G.; Campbell, C.; Hennessy, M.G.; Jeffrey, P.; Kirui, J.; Mahnke, L. BT5528-100 phase I/II study of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary clinical activity of BT5528 in patients with advanced malignancies associated with EphA2 expression. Am. Soc. Clin.Oncol. 2020, 38, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rigby, M.; Bennett, G.; Chen, L.; Mudd, G.; Beswick, P.; Harrison, H.; Watcham, S.; Allen, H.; Brown, A.; Van Rietschoten, K. Abstract C061: BT8009, a Bicycle Toxin Conjugate targeting Nectin-4, shows target selectivity, and efficacy in preclinical large and small tumor models. In Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics, Boston, MA, USA, 26–30 October 2019. [Google Scholar]
Delivery Vehicle | Therapeutic Agent | Mechanism of Action of the Therapeutic Agent | Application | Outcome | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PLGA nanoparticles | Insulin | Secretion of glucagon, transcriptional regulation of gluconeogenic genes | Diabetes mellitus treatment | Blood glucose reduction by 32% in three h | [43] |
Cationic liposomes | CRISPR/Cas9 | Correction of mutated tumor genes | Pancreatic cancer treatment | ~70% tumor volume suppression | [48] |
Upconversion nano-onions | Small interference RNA | Gene silencing through the cleavage of messenger RNAs | Liver cancer treatment | ~80% tumor volume inhibition | [52] |
Collagen/chitosan gel | Collagen/chitosan | Increased angiogenesis, collagen deposition, granulation tissue formation | Wound healing | 98 ± 4.7% surface healing after 2 weeks | [53] |
Delivery Vehicle/Targeting Agent | Drug | Mechanism of Action of the Drug | Cancer Type | Outcome | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEGylated lysine dendrimer nanoparticles | Gemcitabine | Antiproliferative properties through the blockage of cell cycle progression | Breast cancer | 89.9% tumor growth inhibition | [101] |
Copper sulfide nanoparticles | DOX | Generation of ROS, inhibition of topoisomerase II, disruption of gene expression | Lymphoma | 49.6 ± 1.3% apoptosis rate | [102] |
mPEGylated dendron | DOX | Generation of ROS, inhibition of topoisomerase II, disruption of gene expression | Breast cancer | 31% apoptotic rate | [107] |
CREKA (Cys–Arg–Glu–Lys–Ala) peptide Fibronectin–targeting | Squaraine photosensitizer | Induction of cytotoxicity through the generation of ROS | Triple negative breast cancer | 83.5 ± 8.7% tumor inhibition rate | [108] |
SKAAKN (Cys–Lys–Ala–Ala–Lys–Asn) peptide | Daunomycin | Topoisomerase II poison, generation of ROS, DNA impairment | Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma | 0.1 ± 0.1% cell viability | [109] |
Delivery Vehicle/Targeting Agent | Drug | Mechanism of Action of the Drug | Cancer Type | Outcome | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gold nanocages | DOX | Generation of ROS, inhibition of topoisomerase II, disruption of gene expression. | Breast cancer | 97% tumor growth inhibition | [124] |
PEGylated Fe3O4 nanoparticles | Gemcitabine | Antiproliferative properties through the blockage of cell cycle progression | Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma | 91.2% tumor growth inhibition after 30 days of treatment | [125] |
38 amino acid long | Peptide nucleic acids | Synthesis of functional proteins and the degradation of mRNA through RNA interference | Melanoma | 7 kDa peptide translocation | [126] |
# | Study Title | Disease | Treatment (Intervention) | Estimated Enrollment | Current Status and Phase | Trial Number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ANG1005 in Breast Cancer Patients With Recurrent Brain Metastases | Breast Cancer, Brain Metastases | Participants intravenously received ANG1005 up to a maximum of one year, or until disease progression or adverse events | 72 participants | Completed, Phase II | NCT02048059 |
2 | ANG1005 in Leptomeningeal Disease From Breast Cancer (ANGLeD) | Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis, Leptomeningeal Metastases, Brain Metastases, HER2–negative Breast Cancer | Participants intravenously received ANG1005 or active comparator: Physician’s Best Choice (capecitabine or eribulin or high-dose intravenous (IV) methotrexate) | 150 participants | Not yet recruiting, Phase III | NCT03613181 |
3 | Study of CBX–12 in Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Refractory Solid Tumors | Solid Tumor Adult, Epithelial Ovarian Cancer, Small Cell Lung Carcinoma | CBX–12 administered on a daily × 5 every 3 weeks schedule or a daily × 3 every 3 weeks schedule in ovarian and small lung cancer cohorts | 112 participants | Recruiting, Phase I/II | NCT04902872 |
4 | A Study of Melphalan Flufenamide (Melflufen) in Combination With Dexamethasone in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients (HORIZON) | Multiple Myeloma | Patients received intravenously 40 mg of melflufen on day 1 of each 28-day cycle and once weekly oral 40 mg of dexamethasone (20 mg in patients older than 75 years) | 157 participants | Not yet recruiting, Phase II | NCT02963493 |
5 | A Study of Melphalan Flufenamide (Melflufen)–Dex or Pomalidomide–Dex for RRMM Patients Refractory to Lenalidomide (OCEAN) | Multiple Myeloma | Patients received intravenously 40 mg of melflufen on day 1 of each 28-day cycle and once weekly oral 40 mg of dexamethasone or Pomalidomide 4 mg orally daily on days 1 to 21 and dexamethasone 40 mg once weekly of each 28-day cycle | 495 participants | Active, not recruiting, Phase III | NCT03151811 |
6 | Study BT5528–100 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Associated With EphA2 Expression | Advanced Solid Tumor Identified as Positive for EphA2 Tumor Expression by Central Laboratory (Phase I), Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Identified as Positive for EphA2 Tumor Expression by Central Laboratory (Phase II) | Patients receive intravenous infusion of BT5528 once a week alone or with nivolumab on a 4-week cycle at the selected dose | 166 participants | Recruiting, Phase I/II | NCT04180371 |
7 | Study BT8009–100 in Subjects With Nectin–4 Expressing Advanced Solid Tumors Malignancies | Advanced Solid Tumor, Urinary Bladder Neoplasm, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Stomach Neoplasm, Esophageal Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasm | Patients receive intravenous infusion of BT8009 once weekly alone or with nivolumab on a 4-week cycle at the selected dose | 146 participants | Recruiting, Phase I/II | NCT04561362 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Berillo, D.; Yeskendir, A.; Zharkinbekov, Z.; Raziyeva, K.; Saparov, A. Peptide-Based Drug Delivery Systems. Medicina 2021, 57, 1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57111209
Berillo D, Yeskendir A, Zharkinbekov Z, Raziyeva K, Saparov A. Peptide-Based Drug Delivery Systems. Medicina. 2021; 57(11):1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57111209
Chicago/Turabian StyleBerillo, Dmitriy, Adilkhan Yeskendir, Zharylkasyn Zharkinbekov, Kamila Raziyeva, and Arman Saparov. 2021. "Peptide-Based Drug Delivery Systems" Medicina 57, no. 11: 1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57111209
APA StyleBerillo, D., Yeskendir, A., Zharkinbekov, Z., Raziyeva, K., & Saparov, A. (2021). Peptide-Based Drug Delivery Systems. Medicina, 57(11), 1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57111209