Next Article in Journal
The Role of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) in Detecting Choroidal Neovascularization in Different Stages of Best Macular Dystrophy: A Case Series
Next Article in Special Issue
Targeted Therapies in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: A Focus on FGFR Inhibitors
Previous Article in Journal
The Prevalence of Ureaplasma Urealyticum and Mycoplasma Hominis Infections in Infertile Patients in the Northeast Region of Romania
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Novel Targeted Therapies for Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma

by
Alessandro Rizzo
1,2,* and
Giovanni Brandi
1,2
1
Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, 40138 Bologna, Italy
2
Division of Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2021, 57(3), 212; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57030212
Submission received: 29 January 2021 / Revised: 9 February 2021 / Accepted: 22 February 2021 / Published: 26 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Features and Targeted Therapies in Cholangiocarcinoma)
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) includes a group of rare and aggressive hepatobiliary malignancies, including extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), with the former further subdivided into distal (dCCA) and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) [1,2]. Notably enough, these subgroups not only arise from different anatomical locations of the biliary tree, but also present notable differences in terms of prognosis, etiology, biology, and epidemiology [3,4].
Over the last decade, the advent of next-generation sequencing has paved the way towards the identification of important molecular features of CCA, with a large number of reports observing genetic aberrations that are exclusive to specific CCA subtypes [5,6]. These findings have led to the development of several molecularly targeted therapies in this setting, with approximately 50% of CCA patients harboring potentially druggable aberrations [7,8]. In fact, a number of potential therapeutic targets have been described, including fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) fusions, mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-1, BRAF mutations, and neurotrophic tyrosine kinase (NTRK) gene fusions [9,10,11,12].
As regards FGFR targeted agents, the FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3 inhibitor pemigatinib received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in April 2020 for previously treated CCA patients harboring FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements [13,14,15]. The approval was based on the results of the phase II FIGHT-202 clinical trial, where pemigatinib reported an overall response rate (ORR) of 35% and a median overall survival (OS) of 21.1 months, after a median follow-up of 17.8 months [16]. In addition, several other FGFR inhibitors are being assessed and are currently in different stages of development in CCA patients, including derazantinib, infigratinib, and futibatinib, with the latter recently showing an ORR of 37.3% and median duration of response of 8.3 months in the FOENIX-CCA2 clinical trial [17,18,19].
Similarly, IDH inhibitors are being investigated in CCA, with IDH-1 mutations occurring in approximately 13–15% of iCCA patients [20]. The recently published ClarIDHy phase III trial compared the IDH-1 inhibitor ivosidenib versus placebo in IDH-1 mutant CCA who had received up to two lines of systemic treatment [21]. Notably enough, the ivosidenib arm showed improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared to the placebo group, with median PFS of 2.7 months and 1.4 months, respectively (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.25–0.54; one-sided p < 0.0001) as well as a trend towards superior OS.
In addition, several other molecularly targeted treatments have recently reported interesting results, as witnessed by the findings of the phase II ROAR trial assessing the combination of dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600E-mutated CCA [22,23]; moreover, an impressive number of phase I to III clinical trials are evaluating novel targeted therapies, as monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents, and might further modify the therapeutic landscape of CCA in the next years [24,25].
However, important issues remain to be addressed. First, the efficacy of targeted treatments is considerably limited by the onset on acquired resistance, with secondary polyclonal mutations representing a notable challenge in this setting [26,27]. Thus, the CCA medical community is showing growing interest towards the use of liquid biopsy, since this tool has the potential to track the emerging of polyclonal mutations and to guide treatment selection [28]. Second, combination therapies are being explored, with the aim of producing a synergist effect [29,30]. Third, the lack of predictive biomarkers able to guide therapeutic choices represents another important unmet need in this setting.
This Special Issue aims at highlighting several key open questions in CCA management and future perspectives for patients with advanced CCA, including novel targeted therapies, liquid biopsy, experimental treatments, and potential predictive biomarkers.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Razumilava, N.; Gores, G.J. Classification, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 11, e13–e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Rizzo, A.; Brandi, G. BILCAP trial and adjuvant capecitabine in resectable biliary tract cancer: Reflections on a standard of care. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Banales, J.M.; Cardinale, V.; Carpino, G.; Marzioni, M.; Andersen, J.B.; Invernizzi, P.; Lind, G.E.; Folseraas, T.; Forbes, S.J.; Fouassier, L.; et al. Cholangiocarcinoma: Current knowledge and future perspectives consensus statement from the European Network for the Study of Cholangiocarcinoma (ENS-CCA). Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 13, 261–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rizvi, S.; Gores, G.J. Emerging molecular therapeutic targets for cholangiocarcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2017, 67, 632–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lamarca, A.; Barriuso, J.; McNamara, M.G.; Valle, J.W. Molecular targeted therapies: Ready for “prime time” in biliary tract cancer. J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 170–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Massa, A.; Varamo, C.; Vita, F.; Tavolari, S.; Peraldo-Neia, C.; Brandi, G.; Rizzo, A.; Cavalloni, G.; Aglietta, M. Evolution of the Experimental Models of Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ricci, A.D.; Rizzo, A.; Brandi, G. Immunotherapy in Biliary Tract Cancer: Worthy of a Second Look. Cancer Control. 2020, 27, 1073274820948047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Valle, J.W.; Lamarca, A.; Goyal, L.; Barriuso, J.; Zhu, A.X. New Horizons for Precision Medicine in Biliary Tract Cancers. Cancer Discov. 2017, 7, 943–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Churi, C.R.; Shro_, R.; Wang, Y.; Rashid, A.; Kang, H.C.; Weatherly, J.; Zuo, M.; Zinner, R.; Hong, D.; Meric-Bernstam, F.; et al. Mutation Profiling in Cholangiocarcinoma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e115383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Tella, S.H.; Kommalapati, A.; Borad, M.J.; Mahipal, A. Second-line therapies in advanced biliary tract cancers. Lancet Oncol. 2020, 21, e29–e41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ricci, A.D.; Rizzo, A.; Brandi, G. The DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway in biliary tract cancer (BTC): A new Pandora’s box? ESMO Open. 2020, 5, e001042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tariq, N.U.; McNamara, M.G.; Valle, J.W. Biliary tract cancers: Current knowledge, clinical candidates and future challenges. Cancer Manag. Res. 2019, 11, 2623–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Chakrabarti, S.; Kamgar, M.; Mahipal, A. Targeted Therapies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: An Evolving Paradigm. Cancers 2020, 12, 2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mertens, J.C.; Rizvi, S.; Gores, G.J. Targeting cholangiocarcinoma. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2018, 1864, 1454–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Morizane, C.; Ueno, M.; Ikeda, M.; Okusaka, T.; Ishii, H.; Furuse, J. New developments in systemic therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 48, 703–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Abou-Alfa, G.K.; Sahai, V.; Hollebecque, A.; Vaccaro, G.; Melisi, D.; Al-Rajabi, R.; Paulson, A.S.; Borad, M.J.; Gallinson, D.; Murphy, A.G.; et al. Pemigatinib for previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020, 21, 671–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rizzo, A.; Ricci, A.D.; Brandi, G. Futibatinib, an investigational agent for the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Evidence to date and future perspectives. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2020, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mazzaferro, V.; El-Rayes, B.F.; Droz dit Busset, M.; Cotsoglou, C.; Harris, W.P.; Damjanov, N.; Masi, G.; Rimassa, L.; Personeni, N.; Braiteh, F.; et al. Derazantinib (ARQ 087) in advanced or inoperable FGFR2 gene fusion-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2019, 120, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Botrus, G.; Raman, P.; Oliver, T.; Bekaii-Saab, T. Infigratinib (BGJ398): An investigational agent for the treatment of FGFR-altered intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2021, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, B.; Meng, H.; Tian, Y.; Wang, Y.; Song, T.; Zhang, T.; Wu, Q.; Cui, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, W.; et al. Distinct clinical and prognostic implication of IDH1/2 mutation and other most frequent mutations in large duct and small duct subtypes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. BMC Cancer 2020, 20, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Abou-Alfa, G.K.; Macarulla, T.; Javle, M.M.; Kelley, R.K.; Lubner, S.J.; Adeva, J.; Cleary, J.M.; Catenacci, D.V.; Borad, M.J.; Bridgewater, J.; et al. Ivosidenib in IDH1-mutant, chemotherapy-refractory cholangiocarcinoma (ClarIDHy): A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020, 21, 796–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rizzo, A.; Ricci, A.D.; Brandi, G. Combination therapy of dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600E-mutated biliary tract cancer. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 2020. S1499-3872(20)30248-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Subbiah, V.; Lassen, U.; Élez, E.; Italiano, A.; Curigliano, G.; Javle, M.; de Braud, F.; Prager, G.W.; Greil, R.; Stein, A.; et al. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAFV600E-mutated biliary tract cancer (ROAR): A phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multicentre basket trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020, 21, 1234–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rizzo, A.; Ricci, A.D.; Brandi, G. Recent advances of immunotherapy for biliary tract cancer. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  25. Vogel, A.; Bathon, M.; Saborowski, A. Immunotherapies in clinical development for biliary tract cancer. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Saborowski, A.; Lehmann, U.; Vogel, A. FGFR inhibitors in cholangiocarcinoma: What’s now and what’s next? Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2020, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Goyal, L.; Shi, L.; Liu, L.Y.; Fece de la Cruz, F.; Lennerz, J.K.; Raghavan, S.; Leschiner, I.; Elagina, L.; Siravegna, G.; Ng, R.W.S.; et al. TAS-120 Overcomes Resistance to ATP-Competitive FGFR Inhibitors in Patients with FGFR2 Fusion-Positive Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2019, 9, 1064–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Rizzo, A.; Ricci, A.D.; Tavolari, S.; Brandi, G. Circulating Tumor DNA in Biliary Tract Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Cancer Genom. Proteom. 2020, 17, 441–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sipra, Q.U.A.R.; Shroff, R. The impact of molecular profiling on cholangiocarcinoma clinical trials and experimental drugs. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2020, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rizzo, A.; Ricci, A.D.; Brandi, G. PD-L1, TMB, MSI, and Other Predictors of Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Biliary Tract Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rizzo, A.; Brandi, G. Novel Targeted Therapies for Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma. Medicina 2021, 57, 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57030212

AMA Style

Rizzo A, Brandi G. Novel Targeted Therapies for Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma. Medicina. 2021; 57(3):212. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57030212

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rizzo, Alessandro, and Giovanni Brandi. 2021. "Novel Targeted Therapies for Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma" Medicina 57, no. 3: 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57030212

APA Style

Rizzo, A., & Brandi, G. (2021). Novel Targeted Therapies for Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma. Medicina, 57(3), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57030212

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop