Next Article in Journal
How Did Prenatal Education Impact Women’s Perception of Pregnancy and Postnatal Life in a Romanian Population
Next Article in Special Issue
A Systematic Review on TeleMental Health in Youth Mental Health: Focus on Anxiety, Depression and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Previous Article in Journal
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease as a Phenotype of Bronchiectasis for Long-Term Clinical Presentation and Treatment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 57
Issue 6
10.3390/medicina57060580
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

New Psychoactive Substances and Suicidality: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature

by
Stefania Chiappini
1,2,*,
Alessio Mosca
2,
Andrea Miuli
2,
Maria Chiara Santovito
2,
Laura Orsolini
3,
John Martin Corkery
1,
Amira Guirguis
4,
Mauro Pettorruso
2,
Giovanni Martinotti
1,2,
Massimo Di Giannantonio
2 and
Fabrizio Schifano
1
1
Psychopharmacology, Drug Misuse and Novel Psychoactive Substances Research Unit, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire AL10 9EU, UK
2
Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, “G. D’Annunzio” University, 66100 Chieti, Italy
3
Unit of Clinical Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Neurosciences/DIMSC, School of Medicine and Surgery, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy
4
Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Sciences 2, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8QA, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2021, 57(6), 580; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57060580
Submission received: 23 April 2021 / Revised: 3 June 2021 / Accepted: 3 June 2021 / Published: 6 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prevalence of Depression, Depressive Symptoms, and Suicidal Ideation)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Over the past twenty years a large number of new psychoactive substances (NPS) have entered and modified the recreational drug scene. Their intake has been associated with health-related risks, especially so for vulnerable populations such as people with severe mental illness, who might be at higher risk of suicidality or self-injurious behavior. This paper aims at providing an overview of NPS abuse and the effects on mental health and suicidality issues, by performing a literature review of the current related knowledge, thereby identifying those substances that, more than others, are linked to suicidal behaviors. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive and updated overview of the literature regarding suicidality and NPS categories has been undertaken. An electronic search was performed, including all papers published up to March 2021, using the following keywords “NPS” OR “new psychoactive substances” OR “novel psychoactive substances” OR “synthetic cannabinoids” OR “phenethylamines” OR “synthetic cathinones” OR “tryptamines” OR “piperazines” OR “new synthetic opioids” OR “designer benzodiazepines” AND (“suicide” OR “suicidality”) NOT review NOT animal on the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science online databases. Results: Suicidality and self-injurious behavior appear to be frequently associated with some NPS such as cathinones, synthetic cannabinoids, and new synthetic opioids. The results are organized according to the substances recorded. Conclusion: The growing use of NPS has become a significant clinical issue, causing increasing concern and challenges for clinicians working in both mental health and emergency departments. Thus, considering the associations between NPS and suicidality or self-injurious behaviors, areas where suicide-prevention efforts and strategies might be focused are the early detection, monitoring, and restriction of NPS.

1. Introduction

The development and diffusion of new psychoactive substances (NPS) on the market has recently become a cause of serious concern [1]. In fact, in parallel with a decrease or stabilization in the use of internationally controlled drugs, the market for NPS continues to increase, with the Internet playing a pivotal role in contributing to this complex scenario [1]. The NPS market comprises a large number of substances, with new compounds being introduced continually [2]. These substances are drawn from a broad range of drug types and are not controlled by international drug laws. At the end of 2019, the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) was monitoring around 790 NPS, 53 of which had been reported for the first time in Europe in 2019, a number which represents a decrease compared with data previously recorded, reflecting the results of sustained efforts to restrict NPS production and control their diffusion [2]. Nonetheless, the number of NPS is vast, and includes the following categories: stimulants (e.g., cathinones, phenethylamines; tryptamines, etc.); synthetic cannabinoids; new benzodiazepines (e.g., etizolam, flualprazolam); synthetic opioids (e.g., fentanyl derivatives); hallucinogens (e.g., 1P-LSD and 4-AcO-DMT); and dissociatives [1,2,3]. Given their complex pharmacodynamics, there is an increasing level of concern about the onset of acute/chronic psychopathological consequences associated with NPS intake [1,3,4,5,6,7]. Moreover, the concurrent use of a range of different NPS, and/or medications, may be a reason for further clinical complications, including the emergence of substance-related psychotic phenomena [1,4,5,6,7,8]. Indeed, the consumption and frequent poly-consumption of NPS result in death, suicide, serious injury, and adverse effects on health [9].
Suicide is among the top twenty leading causes of death worldwide, with more deaths due to suicide than malaria, breast cancer, or war and homicide. Interestingly, suicide is the second leading cause of death in young people aged 15–29 years for both sexes, after road injury [10]. The risk of suicide in patients with psychiatric disorders is 5–15 times higher than in the general population [11,12,13]. In addition, substance use was found to be an independent risk factor for suicide attempt [14]. Substance use disorder (SUD) is considered an important risk factor for suicide, with vulnerable categories identified as younger age, history of psychiatric care, and opioid and alcohol use [15,16,17]. Indeed, substance use, substance intoxication, and pathological substance use have been demonstrated to be positively associated with suicidal behavior [18]. Moreover, neurobiological alterations, such as dopamine transporter availability in the basal ganglia, might be correlated to clinical presentations and psychopathological issues, including hopelessness, anhedonia, and dissociation, which may lead to suicidal thoughts, attempts, and actions [19].
During the Covid-19 pandemic, concerns about mental health and substance use have grown, including concerns about suicidal ideation. In a survey from June 2020, 13% of adults reported new or increased substance use due to coronavirus-related stress, and 11% of adults reported thoughts of suicide in the past 30 days [20]. Suicide rates have long been on the rise and may worsen due to the pandemic. Early 2020 data show that drug overdose deaths were particularly pronounced from March to May 2020, coinciding with the start of pandemic-related lockdowns. Several reasons, such as anxiety, fear of contagion, uncertainty, social isolation, chronic stress, economic difficulties, and other psychosocial issues related to the CoViD-19 pandemic have been leading to a relapse or exacerbation of pre-existing dual disorders and the onset of new dual disorders, thus increasing suicidality [21].
Aim of the study: The main outcome of this review was to investigate any correlation between the use of NPS and suicidality, performing a literature review of the current related knowledge, in order to understand if NPS abuse might be related with suicidal ideation and behavior, which are the most involved NPS, and identify categories of the users involved.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Systematic Literature Review Procedures

A systematic electronic search was performed on the 13 September 2020 on the following scientific search engines: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS). The following search strategies were used, respectively, in PubMed: (“NPS” OR “new psychoactive substances” OR “novel psychoactive substances” OR “synthetic cannabinoids” OR “phenethylamines” OR “synthetic cathinones” OR “tryptamines” OR “piperazines” OR “new synthetic opioids” OR “designer benzodiazepines”) AND (“suicide” OR “suicidality”) NOT review NOT animal; in Scopus: (TITLE-ABS-KEY (nps) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (new AND psychoactive AND substances) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (novel AND psychoactive AND substances) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (synthetic AND cannabinoids) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (phenethylamines) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (synthetic AND cathinones) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (tryptamines) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (piperazines) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (new AND synthetic AND opioids) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (designer AND benzodiazepines) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (suicide) OR TITLE-ABS-KEY (suicidality) AND NOT TITLE-ABS-KEY (review) AND NOT TITLE-ABS-KEY (animal)); and WoS: ((“NPS” OR “new psychoactive substances” OR “novel psychoactive substances” OR “synthetic cannabinoids” OR “phenethylamines” OR “synthetic cathinones” OR “tryptamines” OR “piperazines” OR “new synthetic opioids” OR “designer benzodiazepines”) AND (“suicide” OR “suicidality”) NOT review NOT animal). The systematic review was structured in accordance with the PRISMA [22] and PROSPERO guidelines [23]. Identified studies were assessed at title/abstract and full text screening against eligibility criteria.

2.2. Data Synthesis Strategy

The searching of results was carried out individually by three investigators (A.Mi., A.M., and M.C.S.) and supervised by S.C. and M.P., doubtful cases were discussed with the professors G.M., M.D.G. and F.S. The selection and eligibility phase of the articles was carried out independently by the three members selected and then subjected to a final cross-check. Any doubts not solved by the team on the understanding of the topic covered in the article were requested directly from the author, if contactable. The data were collected in a Word table containing the first author’s name and year of publication of the study, study design, demographic variables (gender, age, psychiatric history), details on NPS taken (dosage, route of administration) and any other substances in combination, effects on suicidal behaviours, and suicidal ideation or abuse in order to commit the act/attempt. The data synthesis was carried out independently by two team members (A.M. and M.C.S.) and compared at the end of the extraction process.
The exclusion criteria for both selection phases were: (1) non-original research (e.g., review, commentary, editorial, book chapter); (2) non full-text articles (e.g., meeting abstract); (3) language other than English; (4) animal/in vitro studies; (5) articles not dealing with misuse of selected NPS (cannabinoids, phenethylamines, cathinones); (6) articles not dealing with suicide/suicidality; and (7) articles not dealing with substances consumed for the purpose of committing suicide.
Removing duplicate articles (n = 167), from a total of 486 papers (PubMed = 170; Scopus = 264; WoS = 50; other sources = 2), a total of 319 records were screened, and, among these, 261 were irrelevant to the subject after reading the title and abstract (animal/in vitro studies, not dealing with NPS misuse or with serotonin syndrome), 20 were not written in English, and four were non-original articles (e.g., review, metanalysis, commentary, letter to the editor without data available, book chapter). Of the 34 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 15 did not match the inclusion criteria for our review, and three were unavailable. Finally, 16 articles were taken into consideration for analysis (the operational method is illustrated in Figure 1).
All the processes were conducted individually by A.Mi., A.M., and M.C.S., creating an Excel database. For dubious or missing results, the authors of the articles were contacted directly. All these research methods were approved by PROSPERO (identification code CRD42021234217).
For the purposes of this review, suicidal ideation refers to any thoughts of death, intention to kill oneself, or plan to end one’s life. Non-fatal suicidal behavior is understood as intentional self-injurious behaviour that is non-habitual and with a non-fatal outcome, while suicide refers to the act of deliberately killing oneself and is synonymous with fatal suicidal behavior [10].

3. Results

Sixteen eligible articles were finally identified and included in this systematic review. All results are summarized in Table 1.
The studies retrieved included: six case reports [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]; eight retrospective studies [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]; one cohort study [39]; and one case-control study [40]. Data mostly came from European countries, e.g., Finland [36]; Poland [26,28]; Slovenia [25]; Spain [37], and the United Kingdom (UK) [24,33]; but also from Australia [31,32]; Japan [34,35]; Turkey [39,40]; and the United States (US) [27]. Most cases involved young males (total M/F = 1837/223 = 8.23). NPS identified included the following categories: synthetic cathinones, e.g., 4-methyl methcathinone (4-MMC or mephedrone), 3- methyl methcathinone (3-MMC), 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV), alpha-pyrrolidinohexiophenone, alpha-pyrrolidinopentiophenone, 4- 4-chloromethcathinone and 4-fluoromethcathinone (flephedrone) [7,26,30,31,33,34,35,36,37,38]; synthetic cannabinoids, e.g., AB-CHMINACA, AB-FUBINACA, and JWH-018 [32,33,34,35,37,39,40]; phenetylamines, e.g., the β-keto-N-methylbenzodioxolylbutanamine (βk-MBDB) [24,28,31,33,37]; tryptamines [33]; piperazines [33]; aminoindanes [33]; the ketamine analogue methoxethamine [34]; synthetic opioids, e.g., acetyl fentanyl [35]; and a mix of synthetic cannabinoids and synthetic cathinones [25] or mix of drugs in general [37]. The most common route of administration, when indicated, was oral [24,25,26,28]; in one case the substance was smoked [27] and in one inhaled [30]. The dose was reported in one case only [28]. Psychiatric comorbidities, including a mood/anxiety disorder [25,30,39], a psychotic disorder [27,30], history of attempted suicide [24], or a SUD [25,27,40], were reported. Concomitant drugs used with NPS were benzodiazepines [25]; alcohol [24]; cannabis [30]; other NPS or a mix of other traditional licit drugs, or other prescription drugs, e.g., benzodiazepines, opioids, antidepressants, antipsychotics [31,32,33,34,35,36,38]; in the case of suicide by self-poisoning several drugs were detected in the post-mortem toxicological urine screening, including opiates/opioids, cocaine, amphetamines, benzodiazepines, antidepressants, antihistamines, mood stabilizers, Z-drugs, and antipsychotics, as well as cardiac drugs from the beta-blocker group and painkillers [26]. Finally, in several cases the outcome was fatal [24,26,28,31,32,33,36]. When reported, severe fatal self-poisonings [26,28,39], defenestration [24,33], hanging [33,39], burning [39], and firearms [33,39] were described.

4. Discussion

To the best of our understanding, the current data represent the first systematic review of cases of suicide/suicide attempt involving NPS reported in the literature. Overall, the most represented NPS presenting an associated with these cases were the synthetic cathinones (e.g., 4-MMC, 3-MMC, MDPV, bk-MBDB. flephedrone, alpha-pyrrolidinohexiophenone, alpha-pyrrolidinopentiophenone, and 4-chloromethcathinone) and cannabinoids (e.g., AB-CHMINACA, AB-FUBINACA, and JWH-018). Both groups have been recognized as the largest categories of NPS identified in Europe last year [2] and were found in the increasing number of drug-related deaths recorded [41,42]. Cathinones are analogues of the naturally occurring cathinone found in khat (Catha edulis), and act as central nervous system stimulants related to the reuptake inhibition of noradrenaline, serotonin, and dopamine [1,5,7]. Cathinone intoxication might result in malignant serotonin syndrome, eventually causing a multi-organ dysfunction syndrome, coma, and consequently cardiac arrest and death [6]. Similarly to other stimulant NPS, such as phenethylamines [31], cathinone poisonings include psychiatric effects, e.g., psychomotor agitation, behaviour that is inadequate to reality, and even delusions and psychosis [1,5,7,43]. An increasing number of fatal poisonings, symptoms of addiction, and psychiatric disorders, including the risk of self-harm and suicide attempt, have been associated with the abuse of mephedrone, and cathinones in general, especially if they are combined with other psychoactive substances [36,44,45,46]. Consistent with data from previous studies [38], it is not clear whether the predominance of cathinones amongst cases of suicide reflects epidemiology or a propensity to induce suicidal behaviours.
Synthetic cannabinoids have been shown to have significant medical and psychiatric adverse effects, including violent behavior, suicidal ideation, and self-harm amongst others [1,5,7,43]. Although the long-term risks of synthetic cannabinoids are still unclear, some studies suggest the possibility of inducing chronic psychotic symptoms and worsening underlying psychiatric illness [5,7,29]. The toxic effects of synthetic cannabinoids appear more severe and diverse than those associated with cannabis. In particular, synthetic cannabinoids exhibit cardiovascular and central nervous system effects more typically associated with psychostimulants. Synthetic cannabinoids have also been associated with delirium, psychosis, hallucinations, paranoia, and acute anxiety [1,5,7,43]. Death related to synthetic cannabinoid toxicity might be attributed to cardiovascular disease, agitated delirium, multiple organ failure, violent suicide, and traumatic accident [7,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. As recorded by Kamijo et al. [34,35] consumption of NPS, specifically of synthetic cannabinoids and cathinones, can result in harmful behaviors, including violence to others or objects, traffic accidents, and self-injury or suicide attempts. Due the high prevalence of cathinones involved in hangings and other mechanical suicides (i.e., not suicide by drug overdose), a “cathinone phenomenon” has already been described [33,54]. Thus, considering the prevalence of synthetic cathinones and cannabinoids among the NPS here reported, most cases resulted in a fatal outcome. Overall, NPS use can result in severe and unpredictable consequences, which might be difficult to manage. Treatment of NPS intoxications, where recorded, was based on symptomatic and supportive care, because no specific antidote is available for synthetic cannabinoid and/or synthetic cathinone poisoning. All patients attempting suicide were admitted to emergency rooms or intensive care units. Oliveira et al. [27] presented a case of a suicide attempt by self-inflicted penetrating wound to the neck; the young man was brought to the emergency room after which he was transferred to the Psychiatry Department, exhibiting consistent improvement with his usual antipsychotic regimen. Unfortunately, according to the review findings, data on the users’ psychiatric diagnoses might have been underestimated or underrecognized, as they were not recorded. Interestingly, apart from cases associated with previous or ongoing psychopathological alterations, most cases appeared to be severe drug intoxications leading to disinhibition, impulsivity, loss of self-control, and alterations in judgment, thereby making suicide or suicidality more likely [37]. A case of schizophrenia was recorded [27]. Klavž et al. [25] reported a case of suicide attempt in a young man diagnosed with epilepsy, depression, drug dependence, and antisocial personality disorder. A history of suicide attempt [24,40] and of SUD were recorded in several cases [25,27,40], consistent with the literature identifying them as risk factors for suicide [10,18]. SUD has often been related to aggressive and suicidal behavior in previous research, and genetic contributing factors thought to be associated with suicide and aggression involve polymorphisms genes related to serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine systems, such as Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT; rs737865, rs6269, rs4633) [52].
Regarding worldwide data [10], globally the suicide rate is 1.8 times higher in males than in females, suggesting that men are at higher risk of substance use and that gender is an important variable in the etiology of suicidal behavior. Moreover, the specific role of gender in the association between substance use and suicidal behavior is complex and was not adequately investigated in the reviewed literature [10].

Study Limitations

Despite the interesting data, the present review represents only a first assessment of data on NPS and suicidality, as provided by the current literature. The data may be influenced by publication bias, as studies that report negative or null associations often go unpublished. Furthermore, the use of an NPS might be underestimated, underrecognized, or complicated by difficulties in the analytical detection of NPS [55,56]. The majority of commonly employed designer drugs cannot be detected by routine hospital toxicological diagnostic management, especially in cases with an unclear and incomplete medical history. Therefore, physical examination of the patient becomes the basic tool in the diagnostic process [55,56]. Thus, considering that the possibility of identifying NPS in urine samples is complex and limited, a match between self-reported drug use and objective data is recommended, but might not always be considered reliable [37]. Another challenging limitation of this study is the difficulty/impossibility of establishing toxic/lethal concentrations, with there being an overlap between concentrations found in living and deceased individuals. In addition, due to various influences, the postmortem concentrations described should be regarded with reservation, and, due to the impossible implementation of systematic studies (e.g., controlled administration of NPS to living humans) for ethical reasons, no concentration–effect relationships can be established for the substances of interest. Moreover, often data extracted from post-mortem records exclude psychiatric diagnoses or concomitant (licit/illicit) drugs used. Finally, an interesting missing element is the sourcing of the NPS used (e.g., smart shops, Internet, etc.), which has not been reported here. Lastly, this review only included studies published in English.

5. Conclusions

Synthetic drugs constitute one of the most significant drug problems worldwide [2]. Consumption of NPS-containing products might cause severe health consequences and be involved in numerous drug-related deaths and suicides, as already described [57]. We have summarized here the current knowledge regarding NPS use and cases of suicide or suicide attempts. People with mental disorders, including SUDs, are at risk of suicide [10]; thus, early interventions in suicide prevention should include the identification of potential risk factors, such as psychiatric illnesses, SUDs, and the abuse of licit/illicit drugs and NPS, which must be explored, assessed, and addressed in the management plan of likely suicidal thoughts or behaviours. For these reasons, it is necessary to educate the scientific community, health care professionals, and drug users on the psychological and medical aspects of taking NPS, and especially combining them with additional substances. This can result in harmful effects and greater risks of psychopathological consequences, including not only hospitalization but suicide attempts. Public health policy, research, and clinical attention should focus on suicide prevention and reduction of the morbidity and mortality associated with suicidal behaviour.

Author Contributions

F.S., S.C., G.M. conceived the idea of this paper; data were extracted by A.M.(Andrea Miuli), M.C.S. and A.M. (Alessio Mosca), whilst F.S., M.P., G.M., A.G., M.D.G. supervised all stages of the process and were consulted to resolve any possible disagreement. S.C., A.M. (Andrea Miuli) and J.M.C. drafted the first version and revised it after contributions from F.S., A.G., L.O. and G.M., J.M.C. checked the final version for correct English usage. All authors approved the final version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

F.S. was a member of the UK Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD; 2011–2019) and is currently a member of the EMA Advisory Board (Psychiatry). G.M. has been a consultant and/or a speaker and/or has received research grants from Angelini, Doc Generici, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Servier, Recordati. M.D.G.: has been a consultant and/or a speaker and/or has received research grants from Angelini, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Servier, Recordati. J.M.C. is a member of the ACMD’s Novel Psychoactive Substances and Technical Committees. S.C., A.G., M.P., M.C.S., A.M. (Alessio Mosca), A.M. (Andrea Miuli): nothing to be declared.

References

  1. Schifano, F. Recent Changes in Drug Abuse Scenarios: The New/Novel Psychoactive Substances (NPS) Phenomenon. Brain Sci. 2018, 8, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. European Monitoring Centre for Drug and Drug Addiction. European Drug Report 2020. Trends and Development. Available online: https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/13236/TDAT20001ENN_web.pdf (accessed on 17 April 2021).
  3. Orsolini, L.; Corkery, J.M.; Chiappini, S.; Guirguis, A.; Vento, A.; De Berardis, D.; Papanti, D.; Schifano, F. ‘New/Designer Benzodiazepines’: An Analysis of the Literature and Psychonauts’ Trip Reports. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2020, 18, 809–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Orsolini, L.; Chiappini, S.; Corkery, J.M.; Guirguis, A.; Papanti, D.; Schifano, F. The use of new psychoactive substances (NPS) in young people and their role in mental health care: A systematic review. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2019, 19, 1253–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Schifano, F.; Orsolini, L.; Papanti, D.; Corkery, J. NPS: Medical Consequences Associated with Their Intake. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 2017, 32, 351–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Schifano, F.; Chiappini, S.; Miuli, A.; Corkery, J.M.; Scherbaum, N.; Napoletano, F.; Arillotta, D.; Zangani, C.; Catalani, V.; Vento, A.; et al. New psychoactive substances (NPS) and serotonin syndrome onset: A systematic review. Exp. Neurol. 2021, 339, 113638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schifano, F.; Napoletano, F.; Chiappini, S.; Guirguis, A.; Corkery, J.M.; Bonaccorso, S.; Ricciardi, A.; Scherbaum, N.; Vento, A. New/emerging psychoactive substances and associated psychopathological consequences. Psychol. Med. 2021, 51, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Martinotti, G.; De Risio, L.; Vannini, C.; Schifano, F.; Pettorruso, M.; Di Giannantonio, M. Substance-related exogenous psychosis: A postmodern syndrome. CNS Spectr. 2021, 26, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Soria, M.L. New psychoactive substances: Popular and dangerous. Span. J. Leg. Med. 2018, 44, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. World Health Organization (WHO). Suicide in the World. Global Health Estimates. 2019. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/suicide-in-the-world (accessed on 17 April 2021).
  11. Bachmann, S. Epidemiology of Suicide and the Psychiatric Perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Bertolote, J.M.; Fleischmann, A. Suicide and psychiatric diagnosis: A worldwide perspective. World Psychiatry 2002, 1, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Harris, E.C.; Barraclough, B. Suicide as an outcome for mental disorders. A meta-analysis. Br. J. Psychiatry 1997, 170, 205–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Carrasco-Barrios, M.T.; Huertas, P.; Martín, P.; Martín, C.; Castillejos, M.C.; Petkari, E.; Moreno-Küstner, B. Determinants of Suicidality in the European General Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020, 17, 4115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Abroms, M.; Sher, L. Dual Disorders and Suicide. J. Dual. Diagn. 2016, 12, 148–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hesse, M.; Thylstrup, B.; Seid, A.K.; Skogen, J.C. Suicide among people treated for drug use disorders: A Danish national record-linkage study. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Schneider, B. Substance use disorders and risk for completed suicide. Arch. Suicide Res. 2009, 13, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Breet, E.; Goldstone, D.; Bantjes, J. Substance use and suicidal ideation and behaviour in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pettorruso, M.; d’Andrea, G.; Martinotti, G.; Cocciolillo, F.; Miuli, A.; Di Muzio, I.; Collevecchio, R.; Verrastro, V.; De-Giorgio, F.; Janiri, L.; et al. Hopelessness, Dissociative Symptoms, and Suicide Risk in Major Depressive Disorder: Clinical and Biological Correlates. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Czeisler, M.É.; Lane, R.I.; Petrosky, E.; Wiley, J.F.; Christensen, A.; Njai, R.; Weaver, M.D.; Robbins, R.; Facer-Childs, E.R.; Barger, L.K.; et al. Mental Health, Substance Use, and Suicidal Ideation During the COVID-19 Pandemic—United States, June 24–30, 2020. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020, 69, 1049–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sher, L. Dual disorders and suicide during and following the COVID-19 pandemic. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2021, 33, 49–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Moher, D.; Shamseer, L.; Clarke, M.; Ghersi, D.; Liberati, A.; Petticrew, M.; Shekelle, P.; Stewart, L.A. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement. Syst. Rev. 2015, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Bernardo, W.M. PRISMA Statement and PROSPERO. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2017, 43, 383–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Carter, N.; Rutty, G.N.; Milroy, C.M.; Forrest, A.R. Deaths associated with MBDB misuse. Int. J. Legal Med. 2000, 113, 168–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Klavž, J.; Gorenjak, M.; Marinšek, M. Suicide attempt with a mix of synthetic cannabinoids and synthetic cathinones: Case report of non-fatal intoxication with AB-CHMINACA, AB-FUBINACA, alpha-PHP, alpha-PVP and 4-CMC. Forensic Sci. Int. 2016, 265, 121–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Margasińska-Olejak, J.; Celiński, R.; Fischer, A.; Stojko, J. A fatal case of poisoning of a 19-year-old after taking 3-MMC. Forensic Sci. Int. 2019, 300, e34–e37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Oliveira, P.M.D.S.; Morais, A.S.F.; Madeira, N.G.G.F. Synthetic Cannabis Analogues and Suicidal Behavior: Case Report. J. Addict. Med. 2017, 11, 408–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rojek, S.; Kłys, M.; Strona, M.; Maciów, M.; Kula, K. “Legal highs”—Toxicity in the clinical and medico-legal aspect as exemplified by suicide with bk-MBDB administration. Forensic Sci. Int. 2012, 222, e1–e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Thomas, S.; Bliss, S.; Malik, M. Suicidal ideation and self-harm following K2 use. J. Okla State Med. Assoc. 2012, 105, 430–433. [Google Scholar]
  30. Thornton, S.L.; Gerona, R.R.; Tomaszewski, C.A. Psychosis from a bath salt product containing flephedrone and MDPV with serum, urine, and product quantification. J. Med. Toxicol. 2012, 8, 310–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Darke, S.; Duflou, J.; Peacock, A.; Farrell, M.; Lappin, J. Characteristics and circumstances of death related to new psychoactive stimulants and hallucinogens in Australia. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019, 204, 107556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Darke, S.; Duflou, J.; Farrell, M.; Peacock, A.; Lappin, J. Characteristics and circumstances of synthetic cannabinoid-related death. Clin. Toxicol. (Phila.) 2020, 58, 368–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Elliott, S.; Evans, J. A 3-year review of new psychoactive substances in casework. Forensic Sci. Int. 2014, 243, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kamijo, Y.; Takai, M.; Fujita, Y.; Hirose, Y.; Iwasaki, Y.; Ishihara, S.; Yokoyama, T.; Yagi, K.; Sakamoto, T. A multicenter retrospective survey of poisoning after consumption of products containing synthetic chemicals in Japan. Intern. Med. 2014, 53, 2439–2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kamijo, Y.; Takai, M.; Fujita, Y.; Sakamoto, T. A multicenter retrospective survey of poisoning after consumption of products containing novel psychoactive substances from 2013 to 2014 in Japan. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse 2016, 42, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kriikku, P.; Rintatalo, J.; Pihlainen, K.; Hurme, J.; Ojanperä, I. The effect of banning MDPV on the incidence of MDPV-positive findings among users of illegal drugs and on court decisions in traffic cases in Finland. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2015, 129, 741–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Martinotti, G.; Schiavone, S.; Negri, A.; Vannini, C.; Trabace, L.; De Berardis, D.; Pettorruso, M.; Sensi, S.L.; Di Giannantonio, M. Suicidal Behavior and Club Drugs in Young Adults. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ordak, M.; Nasierowski, T.; Muszynska, E.; Bujalska-Zadrozny, M. The Psychiatric Characteristics of People on a Mephedrone (“bath salts”) Binge. Subst. Use Misuse. 2020, 55, 1610–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Oznur, T.; Oznur, H.; Bolu, A.; Atik, S.; Akgun, A.; Kaymak, S.; Celik, C.; Ozmenler, K.N.; Uzun, O. Relationship Between Suicide Attempts and Synthetic Cannabinoids in Adjustment Disorder. J. Psychiatry Neurol. Sci. 2018, 31, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Pehlivan, S.; Aytac, H.M.; Kurnaz, S.; Pehlivan, M.; Cetinay Aydin, P. Evaluation of COMT (rs4680), CNR2 (rs2501432), CNR2 (rs2229579), UCP2 (rs659366), and IL-17 (rs763780) gene variants in synthetic cannabinoid use disorder patients. J. Addict. Dis. 2020, 38, 495–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kraemer, M.; Boehmer, A.; Madea, B.; Maas, A. Death cases involving certain new psychoactive substances: A review of the literature. Forensic Sci. Int. 2019, 298, 186–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kronstrand, R.; Guerrieri, D.; Vikingsson, S.; Wohlfarth, A.; Gréen, H. Fatal Poisonings Associated with New Psychoactive Substances. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2018, 252, 495–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shafi, A.; Gallagher, P.; Stewart, N.; Martinotti, G.; Corazza, O. The risk of violence associated with novel psychoactive substance misuse in patients presenting to acute mental health services. Hum. Psychopharmacol. 2017, 32, e2606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Loi, B.; Corkery, J.M.; Claridge, H.; Goodair, C.; Chiappini, S.; Gimeno Clemente, C.; Schifano, F. Deaths of individuals aged 16–24 years in the UK after using mephedrone. Hum. Psychopharmacol. Clin. Exp. 2015, 30, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ordak, M.; Nasierowski, T.; Muszynska, E. The growing problem of mephedrone use in Warsaw, Poland, 2010–2018. Lancet Psychiatry 2018, 5, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Ordak, M.; Nasierowski, T.; Bujalska-Zadrozny, M. The problem of mephedrone in Europe: Causes and suggested solutions. Eur. Psychiatry 2019, 55, 43–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Adamowicz, P. Fatal intoxication with synthetic cannabinoid MDMB-CHMICA. Forensic Sci. Int. 2016, 261, e5–e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Angerer, V.; Jacobi, S.; Franz, F.; Auwärter, V.; Pietsch, J. Three fatalities associated with the synthetic cannabinoids 5F-ADB, 5F-PB-22, and AB-CHMINACA. Forensic Sci. Int. 2017, 281, e9–e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Behonick, G.; Shanks, K.G.; Firchau, D.J.; Mathur, G.; Lynch, C.F.; Nashelsky, M.; Jaskierny, D.J.; Meroueh, C. Four postmortem case reports with quantitative detection of the synthetic cannabinoid, 5F-PB-22. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2014, 38, 559–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gerostamoulos, D.; Drummer, O.H.; Woodford, N.W. Deaths linked to synthetic cannabinoids. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol. 2015, 11, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kronstrand, R.; Roman, M.; Andersson, M.; Eklund, A. Toxicological findings of synthetic cannabinoids in recreational users. J. Anal. Toxicol. 2013, 37, 534–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Labay, L.M.; Caruso, J.L.; Gilson, T.P.; Phipps, R.J.; Knight, L.D.; Lemos, N.P.; McIntyre, I.M.; Stoppacher, R.; Tormos, L.M.; Wiens, A.L.; et al. Synthetic cannabinoid drug use as a cause or contributory cause of death. Forensic Sci. Int. 2016, 260, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sharp, P.; Hudson, S.; Hikin, L.; Smith, P.R.; Morley, S.R. The changing pattern of synthetic cannabinoid use within England, April 2014 to March 2018. Med. Sci. Law 2019, 59, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Durkin, E.; Elliott, S.; Evans, J. The high prevalence of cathinone-derivatives in suicides—A comparative study. In Proceedings of the Society of Forensic Toxicologists Meeting, Richmond, VA, USA, 18–22 October 2010. [Google Scholar]
  55. Graziano, S.; Anzillotti, L.; Mannocchi, G.; Pichini, S.; Busardò, F.P. Screening methods for rapid determination of new psychoactive substances (NPS) in conventional and non-conventional biological matrices. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2019, 163, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wille, S.M.R.; Richeval, C.; Nachon-Phanithavong, C.; Cannaert, A.; Di Fazio, V.; Gaulier, J.M.; Allorge, D.; Stove, C.; Samyn, N. Challenges and considerations for the detection of NPS in biological matrices. Toxicol. Anal. Clin. 2018, 30, S44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. European Monitoring Centre for Drug and Drug Addiction. Drug-Related Deaths and Mortality in Europe. 2019. Available online: https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/11485/20193286_TD0319444ENN_PDF.pdf (accessed on 17 April 2021).
Medicina 57 00580 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow-chart of study search and selection process according to PRISMA guidelines.
Figure 1. Flow-chart of study search and selection process according to PRISMA guidelines.
Medicina 57 00580 g001
Table
Table 1. Main findings of the retrieved studies.
Table 1. Main findings of the retrieved studies.
Ref.Population (n TOT)Mean Age
(YRS, SD)		Type of NPSPsychiatric ComorbidityDosage and ROAPoly-Abuse (substance)Concomitant DrugsActions Taken and OutcomeNotes
CASE REPORTS
Carter et al., 2000 [24]n = 1 (M)33N-methyl-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2- butanamide (MBDB)History of attempted suicideND dose; oralAlcoholNoneSuicide (died falling from a height)MBDB blood concentration of 1.2 mg/l
Klavž et al., 2016 [25]n = 1 (M)38Mix of synthetic cannabinoids and synthetic cathinones (AB-CHMINACA, AB-FUBINACA, Alpha-pyrrolidinohexiophenone, Alpha-pyrrolidinopentiophenone and 4- 4-chloromethcathinone)Epilepsy; Depression; Drug dependence; Antisocial Personality DisorderND dose; oralBenzodiazepinesLamotrigine, Fluoxetine, Valproate, Diazepam, Zolpidem and PromazineSuicide attempt
Margasińska-olejak et al., 2019 [26]n = 1 (F)193- methyl methcathinone (3-MMC)NDND dose; probably oralNoneOpiates, Methadone, Cocaine, Amphetamines, Benzodiazepines, Antidepressants, Phenothiazine derivatives, Carbamazepine, Z-drugs, Haloperidol, Risperidone, as well as cardiac drugs from the beta-blocker group and painkillersSuicide by self-poisoning3-MMC blood concentration of 800 ng/ml
Oliveira et al., 2017 [27]n = 1 (M)32Mix of several synthetic cannabis analogues (‘Shiva Ultra Strong’)Paranoid schizophrenia; history of drug abuse (alcohol and heroin); on treatment with Haloperidol Decanoate 100 mg/28 days; Clozapine 200 mg/day; and Lorazepam 2.5 mg dayND dose; smokedNoneNoneSuicide attempt by self-inflicted penetrating wound to the neck; brought to the emergency room after which he was transferred to the Psychiatry Department, exhibiting consistent improvement with his usual antipsychotic regimen
Rojek et al., 2012 [28]n = 1 (M)212-methylamino-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl) butan-1-one (bk-MBDB)ND10 tablets of unspecified dose; oralNoneNoneSuicide attempt; after admitted to Intensive Care unit, he died from cardiac and respiratory arrestThe preparation was called ‘Amphibia’; serum concentration was found 20 mg/L
Thomas et al. [29]n = 1 (M)20K2NDND dose, smokedNoneNoneBrought by police to the ED with acute agitation, confusion, suicidal ideation, and self-inflicted trauma after smoking. Once medically stabilized, he was transferred to the inpatient psychiatric unit for continued monitoring
Thornton et al., 2012 [30]n = 1 (M)233,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV),
and 4-fluoromethcathinone (flephedrone)		He had a history of being prescribed Clonazepam, Quetiapine, Aripiprazole, Valproic acid, and LithiumND dose; inhaledCannabisNoneArrived to the ED with bizarre behaviour, suicidality, and hallucinations. He was physically and chemically restrained. Agitation and psychosis solved after IV lorazepam (6 mg) and droperidol (2.4 mg)MDPV serum concentrations was 186 ng/mL; flephedrone serum concentration was 346 ng/mL
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES
Darke et al., 2019 [31]n = 82 (M = 71) cases where new psychoactive stimulants were contributing to death were retrieved from the National Coronial Information System (2000–2017)30,7 (SD = 10.4)Cathinones or phenethylaminesNDNDNDPsychostimulants (e.g., methamphetamine, MDMA, cocaine, dimethylamylamine); Opioids (e.g., morphine, methadone, fentanyl, buprenorphine, tramadol, oxycodone, hydromorphone); Alcohol; Cannabis; Synthetic cannabinoids; Hypnosedatives; Antidepressants; AntipsychoticsUnspecified suicide,
n = 10 (M = 8)
Of the cases of suicide, 8 were positive for cathinones (methcathinone, MDPV and alpha-pyrrolidinopentiophenone) and two for phenethylamines
Darke et al., 2020 [32]n = 55 (M = 50) cases where synthetic cannabinoid use was a mechanism contributory to death were retrieved from the National Coronial Information System (2000–2017)37,2 (SD = 12.0)Unspecific synthetic cannabinoids (most commonly reported synthetic cannabinoids were AB-CHMINACA and JWH-018)NDNDOther substances were present in 42 (76.4%) cases, including Alcohol (34.5%), Cannabis (23.6%), other NPS (cathinone, phenethylamine), and PhencyclidineAntidepressants, Benzodiazepines, and Antipsychotics were each present in substantial minorities. Also, Psychostimulants (methamphetamine, MDMA, phentermine) and Opioids (morphine, methadone, buprenorphine, tramadol, oxycodone) were recordedUnspecified suicide,
n = 6 (M = 5)
Elliot and Evans, 2014 [33]n = 203 NPS-related deaths detected post-mortem samples between January 2010 and December 2012 (17% were fatal hangings and 5% involved other manners of mechanical suicide, e.g., struck by a train, asphyxia, fatal gunshot wound or jump/fall)NDCathinones (e.g., mephedrone, MDPV, 4-methylethcathinone) were involved in 41% of hangings or other mechanical suicides (i.e., not suicide by drug overdose); other NPS detected: Piperazine; Tryptamine; Phenethylamines; Aminoindans; Synthetic cannabinoidsNDNDNDParacetamol (13.4%), Citalopram (12.7%), Diazepam (8.4%), Mirtazapine (8.0%), Zopiclone (6.8%), and Cocaine (6.5%)Suicide, n = 44
Kamijo et al., 2014 [34]n = 518 (M = 425) patients who were transported to emergency facilities between January 2006 and December 2012 after consuming synthetic chemicals28.4Synthetic cannabinoids, synthetic cathinones, and methoxetamineNDInhalation, ingestion, sniffing, inserted anallyNDAlcohol, BenzodiazepinesSelf-injury or suicide attempts were observed in four patients
Kamijo et al., 2016 [35]n = 589 (M = 528) patients who were transported to emergency facilities after consuming NPS-containing products (January 2013-December 2014)30Synthetic cannabinoids (AB-CHMINACA); synthetic cathinones (α-PHP and 2-(ethyl amino)-1-(4-methylphenyl) pentan-1-one); acetyl-fentanylNDInhalation, ingestion, inserted anallyBarbiturates; Cannabinoids; Phencyclidine; Amphetamines; Opiates; CocaineBenzodiazepines, AntidepressantsSelf-injury or suicide attempt, n = 6
Kriikku et al., 2015 [36]n = 38 (M = 30) 3, 4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV)-positive post-mortem cases28.3MDPV; other NPS were present in 24 % of the casesNDNDNDAmphetamines; Opioids; Alcohol; Benzodiazepines; CannabisUnspecified suicide,
n = 9		MDPV blood concentration was 0.12 mg/L; victims in MDPV-positive suicides were significantly younger than those in other MDPV-positive fatalities
Martinotti et al., 2021 [37]n = 38 on 110 subjects admitted to the Can Misses Hospital’s psychiatry ward in Ibiza (2015–2019)NDPsychodepressors (e.g., opioids, alcohol, benzodiazepines), Psychostimulants (e.g., cocaine, amphetamines, synthetic cathinones); Psychodysleptics (e.g., cannabinoids, psychedelics, dissociatives)NDNDMultiple substance use was recorded (77.7%)NDSuicide thoughts was evidenced in 35% (n = 38) of the sample as to the suicide item of the HM.A.-D, with 18% (n = 20) reporting a severe suicide risk. The assessment of suicidal risk at admission as to the C-SSRS was performed in 63 subjects of the total sample: 25 (39%) patients were positive for suicide attempts (n = 6), suicidal ideation (n = 9), or death ideation (n = 10)Suicide Ideation Intensity overall and in the previous month was higher in users of opioids and in general of psychodepressors. Impulsivity and loss of self-control may be determinants of the increased suicidality irrespectively of any major ongoing psychiatric background
Ordak et al., 2020 [38]n = 601 (M = 559) patients addicted to mephedrone who were admitted to a psychiatric hospital between 2010 and 2018 due to regular mephedrone intake26–35MephedroneNDNDOpioids; Benzodiazepines; Alcohol; CannabinoidsOpioids, BenzodiazepinesSuicide attempts, n = 147Growing year-on year percentage of people who attempted suicide because of regular mephedrone intake. The more psychoactive substances were combined, the greater was the risk of attempted suicide
COHORT STUDIES
Oznur et al., 2018 [39]n = 77 (M, performing compulsory military service)22.38 (SD = 3.92)Unspecified synthetic cannabinoidsAdjustment disorder; 49.4% of the sample had a history of suicide and 63.7% had a self-mutilation historyNDNDND16 out of 27 people who used synthetic cannabinoids attempted suicide (59.3%); also, 18 of 27 cases using synthetic cannabinoids (66.7%) had a history of suicide attempts.
Of all the patients who attempted suicide, 83.1% (n = 64) selected methods unlikely to fail including firearms, hanging, jumping, cutting tools, and burning, while 16.9% (n = 13) chose a method with a greater chance of rescue (drug overdose)		There was a significant relationship between the use of synthetic cannabinoids and suicide attempts. No statistically significant relationship was found between the suicide attempt and other substances, except synthetic cannabinoids
CASE-CONTROL STUDIES
Pehlivan et al., 2020 [40]n = 94 (M = 92)28.03Unspecified synthetic cannabinoidsSUDNDNDNDSuicide attempts,
n = 19		The COMT variants were associated with self-mutilation (Val108Met) or attempted suicide (Val158Met) in patients with synthetic cannabinoids use disorder
C-SSRS: Columbia suicide severity rating scale; COMT: Catechol-O-methyltransferase; ED: emergency department; F: female; HM.A.-D: Hamilton depression scale; M: male; N/A: not applicable; NPS: new psychoactive substances; ROA: route of administration; SD: standard deviation; SUD: substance use disorder.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chiappini, S.; Mosca, A.; Miuli, A.; Santovito, M.C.; Orsolini, L.; Corkery, J.M.; Guirguis, A.; Pettorruso, M.; Martinotti, G.; Di Giannantonio, M.; et al. New Psychoactive Substances and Suicidality: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature. Medicina 2021, 57, 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57060580

AMA Style

Chiappini S, Mosca A, Miuli A, Santovito MC, Orsolini L, Corkery JM, Guirguis A, Pettorruso M, Martinotti G, Di Giannantonio M, et al. New Psychoactive Substances and Suicidality: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature. Medicina. 2021; 57(6):580. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57060580

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chiappini, Stefania, Alessio Mosca, Andrea Miuli, Maria Chiara Santovito, Laura Orsolini, John Martin Corkery, Amira Guirguis, Mauro Pettorruso, Giovanni Martinotti, Massimo Di Giannantonio, and et al. 2021. "New Psychoactive Substances and Suicidality: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature" Medicina 57, no. 6: 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57060580

APA Style

Chiappini, S., Mosca, A., Miuli, A., Santovito, M. C., Orsolini, L., Corkery, J. M., Guirguis, A., Pettorruso, M., Martinotti, G., Di Giannantonio, M., & Schifano, F. (2021). New Psychoactive Substances and Suicidality: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature. Medicina, 57(6), 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57060580

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop