Next Article in Journal
Fertility Preservation in Endometrial Cancer—Treatment and Molecular Aspects
Next Article in Special Issue
Tongue Base Ectopic Thyroid Tissue—Is It a Rare Encounter?
Previous Article in Journal
Characteristics and Outcomes of Liver Transplantation Recipients after Tranexamic Acid Treatment and Platelet Transfusion: A Retrospective Single-Centre Experience
Previous Article in Special Issue
Myoepithelial Carcinoma Arising in a Salivary Duct Cyst of the Parotid Gland: Case Presentation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 59
Issue 2
10.3390/medicina59020220
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Prevalence and Treatment Costs of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer in Cluj-Napoca Maxillofacial Center

by
Cosmin Ioan Faur
1,
Mădălina Anca Moldovan
1,*,
Mădălina Văleanu
2,
Horațiu Rotar
1,
Laura Filip
1 and
Rareș Călin Roman
1
1
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Radiology, Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 33 Moților Street, 400001 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 6 Pasteur Street, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2023, 59(2), 220; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020220
Submission received: 28 November 2022 / Revised: 3 January 2023 / Accepted: 19 January 2023 / Published: 23 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Pathology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: An increasing incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is noted, as well as an increasing cost of the treatment, with NMSC becoming a public health problem. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and treatment costs of surgically treated NMSC from the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Cluj-Napoca County Hospital. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and the charge data of hospitalization from the informatic system of Cluj-Napoca County Hospital. All patients benefited from standard surgical excision with the reconstruction of the post-excisional defect. A statistical analysis of the costs related to the patients’ features, period and conditions of hospitalization, materials, medication, and paraclinical investigations was performed. Results: Between 2015 and 2019, 133 patients with NMSC were addressed to our department, with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) being four-fold higher than squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Most NMSC cases were diagnosed in stage I or II, and they benefited from local reconstruction. The treatment costs progressively increased in the last five years, reaching a total cost of EUR ~13.000 in 2019. The treatment cost per episode was higher for SCC compared to BCC, while the total cost of treatment in 5 years was higher for BCC. Low income, immunosuppression, comorbidities, flap reconstruction option, long-lasting surgery, and prolonged hospitalization were associated with an increased cost of the treatment. Conclusion: The prevalence and treatment cost of surgically treated NMSC of the head and neck region increased in the last five years, with high-cost drivers being related to patients and treatment options.

1. Introduction

Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is an important health problem due to increased incidence in the last years and the increased morbidity and costs of the treatment [1,2]. However, the real incidence of NMSC is unknown. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates 2–3 million malignant skin tumors per year which are most likely under-reported, especially in light of a recent study that estimated 3.3 million people who suffered from 5.4 million NMSC cases, part of them presenting more than one skin tumor [3]. In addition, the GLOBOCAN project of the International Agency for Research on Cancer reported an incidence of 1,198,000 new cases of NMSC (excluding basal cell carcinoma) in all sites worldwide in 2020, which was four-fold higher than malignant melanoma (324.000 new cases) [1]. The incidence of NMSC in the European population varies depending on geographical area, histopathological type, and age [4]. The prevalence of head and neck NMSC reported in Northeastern Romania was 72.5% and in Poland was 90% [5,6].
Most histopathological variants of the NMSC are basal cell carcinoma (BCC) (75–80%) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (20–25%), the remnant variants (1%) being Merkel cell carcinoma, sebaceous carcinoma, apocrine adenocarcinoma, and other rare tumors [7]. In Europe, BCC presents a high incidence in Western Europe, especially in the Netherlands (87.5/100,000 person-years), Switzerland, and Italy (70/100,000 person-years), and a low incidence in Central and Eastern Europe, with Croatia presenting the lowest incidence (33.6/100.000 person-years). In addition to BCC, SCC has a high incidence in Western Europe (Switzerland 28.9/100.000 person-years), followed by Northern Europe, and a low incidence in Central and Eastern Europe (Croatia 8.9/100,000 person-years) [1,2,3,4].
The risk factors for developing NMSC are fair skin, increased number of freckles, sunburns, sun exposure, radiation, and immunosuppression [4,5,6,7,8]. Owing to the UV-associated risk, Australia and New Zealand are the countries with the highest risk of developing NMSC [1]. In addition, aging is an independent risk factor for the occurrence of head and neck NMSC. The head and neck region is prone to developing NMSC, being a highly sun-exposed area [5,6].
BCC causes significant morbidity due to local destructive spread and high local recurrence risk but has low metastatic potential [9]. On the contrary, SCC has a high propensity for metastatic spread, and hence a poor prognosis. SCC mortality is usually associated with locoregional and distant metastases [10]. The 5-year survival rates of NMS depend on age, immunosuppression status, surgical margins, and tumor features being higher for BCC compared to SCC [11]. Overall, NMSC has a better prognostic than other skin cancers, such as malignant melanoma or Merkel carcinoma [12,13].
NMSC treatment can be conducted by standard surgical excision, Mohs micrographic surgery, or destructive methods, such as curettage, cautery, cryosurgery, photodynamic therapy, and the application of local drugs [14]. Surgical excision, which encompasses 85% of cases, reports a five-year cure rate of 99% for BCC and 97% for SCC [15]. The cost of cancer treatment is high, being an economic and clinical burden to the National Healthcare system, as well as an economic burden to individuals [13]. The NMSC diagnosis and treatment costs are more expensive than those of malignant melanoma, due to higher incidence, even though the cost of malignant melanoma is higher per person-year [16,17]. Moreover, the NMSC treatment costs increased in the last years more than other skin cancers, being four-fold more expensive than malignant melanoma treatment [15,16,17,18]. BCC has a higher total cost of treatment compared with SCC [19]. Generally, the costs of head and neck cancers are higher compared with other locations, and the patients tend to be poorer and to have accrued lower levels of education than patients with other cancers [13,15,20]. Moreover, head and neck NMSC treatment has a higher cost than other anatomical regions, with the highest cost in nose BCC and auricle SCC tumors [5,16,19]. The costs also vary in different geographical areas due to different incidence and treatment protocols [21].
NMSC is not usually reported to a cancer database, hence the incidence and cost of the treatment are difficult to assess. Moreover, there are a few studies that discuss the head and neck NMSC treatment costs, and from our knowledge, none are reported in Romania. We aim to evaluate the prevalence and the direct costs of surgical treatment of head and neck NMSC from the Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Cluj-Napoca County Hospital.

2. Materials and Methods

We conducted a retrospective study on patients who were addressed to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of Cluj-Napoca County Hospital between the first of January 2015 to the 31st of December 2019. We enrolled the patients who were hospitalized for at least 24 h in our department and had a histopathological result of head and neck BCC or SCC and primary or recurrent tumors. All the patients were treated by surgical excision and reconstruction of the defect. We excluded the patients who had an inconclusive histopathologic result, melanoma, Merkel cell skin cancer, or other rare malignant skin tumors, as well as benign skin lesions and the patients that underwent oncological treatment. All the included patients were staged according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (eighth edition) [22,23]. The patients’ comorbidities were classified based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk stratification to have an objective assessment of the general health status [24]. Not all the patients responded to education formation and economical status at hospital admission. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy (AVZ 20/03.02.2022), and it is in accordance with the updated Declaration of Helsinki.

2.1. Data Collection and Cost Analysis

We reviewed the clinical data and the charge data of hospitalization from the informatic system of Cluj-Napoca County Hospital. The data extracted from the electronic medical records included the following: patients’ demographics and associated medical diagnoses; the results of histopathological examinations; tumor characteristics, such as site; clinical and pathologic stage; treatment modality; and the discharge bill. The histopathological subtypes were classified according to the major pattern present in the specimen, many of them (89%) having 2 or more histopathological variants in the same specimen. We categorized the treatment after standard surgical excision as per primam closure, skin graft, and local flap reconstruction.
We analyzed only the direct costs of care related to the hospitalization for NMSC surgical treatment (hospitalization accommodation costs, material costs, medication costs, and paraclinical examinations costs), without assessment of the direct costs of follow-up or the indirect (e.g., productivity costs) or intangible costs (e.g., monetary value of health loss and reduces the quality of life) [21,25]. The costs were presented as total treatment costs for NMSC, BCC, and SCC tumors and as individual mean costs of the tumors’ treatment related to the number of patients or episodes of cancer. A patient is defined as a person that suffered from at least one malignant skin tumor in the time interval. An episode (of cancer) is defined as a malignant skin tumor of a patient treated in one setting appointment (hospitalization). Hence, the means of cost per episode and per patient were constructed.
The costs are reported in Euros, with an exchange medium rate calculated after the Romanian National Bank rank (e.g., 5-year medium exchange rate Euro-RON). In addition, the costs are adjusted to the inflation rate up to 2022, according to the Romanian National Bank.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

The SPSS 25.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis and data description. The level of statistical significance was set at α =0.05. Mean ± standard deviation was used to describe normally distributed continuous quantitative data and absolute and relative frequencies (%) were used for qualitative data.
The comparison of the means was performed by the Student t-test for normally distributed data of two independent groups. The non-parametric Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to compare the means of two independent groups with non-normal distribution. The Kruskal–Wallis test was also used for the comparison between more than two groups with non-normal distribution, and then the Tukey HSD test was used for post hoc analysis. Chi-Square or Fisher Exact tests were used to compare qualitative variables. Univariate regression analysis was used to estimate costs.

3. Results

3.1. Demographical and Epidemiological Consideration of the Population

From a total of 195 patients who were addressed for skin tumors to our service between 2015 and 2019, 144 patients presented malignant tumors, including 133 (92%) BCC and SCC patients (Figure 1). This study enrolled 102 (76%) BCC patients, 27 (20%) SCC patients, and 4 (4%) patients with both skin cancers, which presented 152 episodes of cancer. Most of the BCC tumors were nodular (66 tumors), infiltrative (33 tumors), or basosquamous (13 tumors) differentiated, the rest (8 tumors) being less frequent histopathological BCC variants. SCC grading revealed 11 well-differentiated, 18 intermediate-differentiated, and 3 poorly differentiated tumors, with only 5 of the SCC tumors (15%) being non-keratinizing lesions. Sixteen patients had two NMSCs with different localizations, excised during the 5-year period (eleven BCC patients, one SCC, and four patients had one BCC and one SCC). One 74-year-old female patient presented four hospitalizations between 2018 and 2019 for BCC tumors located in different head and neck regions.
The mean ± standard deviation age of the NMSC patients was 67 ± 13 years, being slightly increased for SCC subpopulations (69 ± 15 years) compared to SCC ones (67 ± 13 years). The maximum prevalence of NMSC episodes was in the seventh decade of life, as can be seen in Table 1. The male-to-female ratio was 1.3:1 and most of the patients (60.53%) had an urban place of residence. In addition, most of the patients (61 subjects) that responded to the admission questionnaire did have any education following high school, and only 32 patients had university studies. In addition, many of these patients had low-income economic status.
We found 148 primary tumor excisions of NMSC (117 BCC and 31 SCC) and 4 recurrence tumor excisions (3 BCC and 1 SCC). The tumor distribution in the head and neck regions is seen in Table 1. The nasal and cheek regions were highly involved by NMSC tumors. The skin malignant tumors were diagnosed frequently in stage I (97 tumors) or II (31 tumors) and were frequently managed by radical excision (146 tumors) with flap reconstruction (84 cases) or primary closure (50 cases) (Table 1). The surgical defects located in nasal, cheek, and orbital regions often required flap reconstructions, and the ones located in frontal and temporal areas had more primary closures than flap reconstructions (p < 0.05) (Figure 2).
The surgical excisions and reconstructions last less than 1 h or between 1 and 2 h for most of the tumors (Table 1). The patients were hospitalized between 1 (61 patients) and 10 days (1 stage IV patient), with a median (Q1, Q3) of 2 (1;3) days of hospital staying. A total of 342 days (264 BCC and 78 SCC) were needed for the head and neck skin cancer treatment in the 5 years.
Even if the first stage of NMSC cases were frequently surgically treated in less than one hour, there was no statistical significance regarding the correlation between the tumor stage and the time required by surgery to be performed (Figure 3). However, there was a statistically significant correlation between the tumor stage and the hospitalization days. Stages I and II were mostly treated within one to three days of hospitalization (Figure 4). In addition, the days of hospitalization were statistically correlated with the type of reconstruction, with primary closure and skin grafts requiring fewer hospitalization days than local flap reconstruction (Figure 5). On the contrary, the hospitalization days were not statistically correlated with ASA risk, even though most ASA risk I patients required one to three days of hospitalization (Figure 6).

3.2. The Cost of NMSC Treatment

The direct costs of NMSC in 5 years of treatment were approximately EUR 45.000, with an average cost/patient and cost/episode of EUR 336 and EUR 294, respectively. The costs of treatment/episode had a statistically significant increase (p = 0.03) from EUR 228 in 2015 to EUR 352 in 2019, with a mean increase of approximately 28 EUR/year (Figure 7). The total treatment cost/5 years was more expensive (approximately EUR 34.000) for BCC than SCC (approximately EUR 11.300). However, the average treatment cost/patient was higher for SCC (EUR 352) than for BCC (EUR 316). The most expensive treatment (EUR 2064) was applied to a temporal BCC patient that was hospitalized for 10 days in 2017.
Additional to the costs of the surgery and the accommodation, the total direct costs of treatment included EUR 2774 for the drugs administrated during the hospitalization, EUR 2384 for the supplies, and EUR 5670 for the paraclinical examinations for the 5 years of analysis. However, the costs of the surgery and the accommodation cannot be differentiated and individually assessed due to the lack of data illustrated in the informatic system of the hospital. The details of the treatment costs are seen in Table 2. Except for the medication, the medium cost of the supplies and paraclinical examination was higher for SCC in comparison with BCC.
The average cost per day of treatment for NMSC was EUR 131, with SCC being more expensive to treat (EUR 138) in comparison with BCC (EUR 127). However, the cost increased with the days of hospitalization, being 9-fold higher for more than 7 days of hospital staying than for 1 day of hospitalization.

3.3. Cost of NMSC Treatment Related to the Demographical and Clinical Features

Starting from the third decade of life, the treatment cost of NMSC statistically significantly increased (p = 0.04) by approximately 10% to 25% per decade (Table 1). The male patients and the subjects that had a rural place of living presented higher costs of treatment, however, without any statistical significance. Moreover, the patients that underwent technical schools and subjects with lower income presented higher costs of treatment, with the economic status classification being the only statistically significant result (p = 0.004).
Immunosuppression was a general status-related factor that influenced the treatment costs, with immunosuppressed patients presenting a statistically significant higher cost of treatment compared with the non-immunosuppressed subjects (Table 1). ASA risk classification also statistically increased the cost of NMSC, with the third class presenting a 39% higher cost compared to the first class.
The orbital region presented the highest cost of NMSC treatment. In addition to tumor location, the tumor stage did not present statistical significance, even if stage IV had approximately 4-fold increased treatment costs compared to stage I.
Re-excision costs were 1.57-fold higher than radical treatment of a primary tumor, without any statistical significance. In addition, standard excision surgery associated with flap reconstruction or surgery that lasts more than two hours presented the highest treatment cost (p < 0.001).

4. Discussion

The prevalence of NMSC tumors of the head and neck region in our study (approximately 90% of the malignant skin tumors) was higher than that reported in northeastern Romania, however, the BCC to SCC ratio (4:1) was in accordance with the literature [1,5,6]. In addition, we had similar results regarding the age-related risk for NMSC development, with approximately 80% of the episodes of cancer in our research occurring in subjects older than 60 years, with a slightly increased age of SCC subjects [21,26]. We found that the nose was the most frequent tumor site for NMSC lesion development.
We identified increasing costs of NMSC treatment per year in the last 5 years, which could be attributed to the increasing number of patients and to the treatment costs of cancer episodes, expected to be much higher in the next years as the costs were constantly raising by 28 EUR/year. The increasing costs of the treatment rely on the new technologies and better quality of life offered by the new therapies [27]. However, our findings underestimate the real total costs of NMSC treatment, which has a complex calculation [20,26]. The direct cost of treatment represents approximately 72% of the total cost related to NMSC treatment, without including the oncological treatment, follow-up, patients’ loss of income, quality-of-life changes, and economic reintegration [21,25]
We included only patients that were addressed to a Maxillofacial hospital, without subjects that were treated by other specialists, such as Plastic Surgery or Dermatology physicians, where the treatment options and the associated costs may be different from our standard surgical excision [15,21,26]. In addition, this research was limited to the hospitalized patients and charge data, aiming to identify the economic burden of the healthcare system and to observe the cost distribution patterns and high-cost drivers. However, the costs of hospitalized patients are higher than ambulatory-treated patients [15]. Still, the cost of NMSC treatment in Romania is cheaper than in other countries, such as Australia or other Northern or Western European countries [21,26].
Different from other studies, we could not find an association between the place of living or sex and NMSC increased cost. In the research of Tran et al. and Doran et al., urban place of residence or female patients presented higher costs of NMSC treatment compared with rural place of living and male patients [19,21]. Elderly patients presented a higher cost of treatment compared to young adults due to various arguments. Firstly, the prevalence of NMSC in senior people is higher compared to young adults [21,26]. Secondly, elderly people require special medical attention due to the increased prevalence of comorbidities, quantified in our study by the ASA risk. The patients classified as high ASA risk had a significantly higher cost compared to the low-risk subjects [20]. However, our results did not indicate a statistical correlation between the increased number of hospitalization and advanced ASA risk. In addition, immunosuppressed patients had a higher cost of treatment compared with non-immunosuppressed ones, with five out of the six immunosuppressed patients included in this study being aged more than 60 years old.
The increased costs of NMSC treatment for technical school and low-income patients were consistent with other research. The subjects that are exposed more to professional emissions and have low income are prone to developing NMSC cancers, and the treatment costs are higher compared with patients of other education and economic status [6,20]. However, we found a statistical significance of increasing costs related only to educational formation.
The head and neck NMSC treatment is more expensive than other anatomical regions, such as the thorax and limbs, but it is lower compared with head and neck mucosal malignancies (e.g., SCC of oral cavity or oropharynx) [19,20]. However, 19% of head and neck cancers are located on the skin [25]. Particularly, the orbital region had the highest cost of treatment per episode, which may be due to the difficulty of local reconstruction of this anatomical area [28,29]. These results are different from other research, where nasal and auricle NMSC had the highest treatment costs [5,16,19]. In our research, the nasal region presented an average cost of treatment per episode lower than the orbital region, but the total cost of treatment was the highest compared with other anatomical regions, due to the highest number of NMSC episodes.
Although the treatment cost of BCC per 5 years was higher compared to SCC, the BCC treatment cost per episode was cheaper than SCC, similar to other research [19,26]. These findings may be explained by the increased rates of BCC tumors and the more radical treatment required by SCC tumors, as well as the more paraclinical examinations needed perioperatively by SCC tumors to evaluate the locoregional or distant metastasis [17,30,31].
Different from the study by Chen et al. that observed a significant increase in treatment costs in the advanced stages of the disease, we observed an approximately 4-fold increase in the treatment costs of stage IV compared with stage I, but our results had no statistical significance [15]. However, the costs may be related to the more complex surgical procedure and to the more careful postoperative medical attention in advanced stages compared to early stages [32].
The local flap was approximately 60% more expensive than the skin graft. The result of this type of reconstruction is more aesthetic compared to the skin graft due to its similar color and texture to the adjacent facial tissues [33]. Both variants of reconstruction are used for tumors of increased dimensions, where the primary closure is not possible. However, the local flaps require an increased procedure time compared to other types of reconstruction, with the time needed to perform the surgery also being a factor that increased the costs [25]. A procedure that lasts longer than 2 h has more than double the costs compared with surgeries that can be performed faster (1 h). In addition, the local flap required more days of hospitalization than the primary closure or skin graft.
In our study, the high length of hospitalization was associated with higher costs of treatment. This finding may rely on the general health status of the patient or on the complex surgical procedure that requires many days of medical attention [31]. However, we found a statistical correlation between the hospital stay and the reconstruction type and tumor stage, without ASA risk. The median length the hospitalization for NMSC patients was 2 days, indicating that the surgical treatment of NMSC can be performed as a fast-track surgery, especially for patients with low ASA risk and early stages of cancer.
We enrolled a limited number of patients, which may influence the statistical analysis. Due to COVID-19 lockdowns, the number of patients that were addressed to Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for head and neck skin tumors was reduced, hence, we limited the inclusion criteria to the 31st of December 2019 [34]. However, the majority of included patients were clustered in stage I or II, similar to other research [35].
Another limitation of our study was the lack of capacity to particularly assess the cost of the surgical procedure due to the lack of specific data in our hospital’s informatic system.

5. Conclusions

Non-melanoma skin cancers are an important health problem due to increasing prevalence and treatment costs in the last years. The factors that can increase the costs of the treatment are related to the patient, such as age, low income, immunosuppression, and comorbidities, and to the procedure, such as flap reconstruction option, long-lasting surgery, and prolonged hospitalization.

Author Contributions

C.I.F., M.A.M., H.R., L.F. and R.C.R. conceptualized the study design and wrote part of the manuscript; C.I.F., M.A.M. and R.C.R. collected the patients’ medical history from the informatic system; M.V. performed the data analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy (AVZ 20/03.02.2022), and it is in accordance with the updated Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

All authors read and agreed on the submission form of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Eisemann, N.; Waldmann, A.; Geller, A.C.; Weinstock, M.A.; Volkmer, B.; Greinert, R.; Breitbart, E.W.; Katalinic, A. Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Incidence and Impact of Skin Cancer Screening on Incidence. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2014, 134, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Cancer.Net Editorial Board. Skin Cancer (Non-Melanoma): Statistics. Available online: https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/skin-cancer-non-melanoma/statistics (accessed on 1 October 2022).
  4. Lomas, A.; Leonardi-Bee, J.; Bath-Hextall, F. A systematic review of worldwide incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Br. J. Dermatol. 2012, 166, 1069–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fijałkowska, M.; Koziej, M.; Antoszewski, B. Detailed Head Localization and Incidence of Skin Cancers. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 12391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Andrese, E.; Solovăstru, L.G.; Taranu, T.; Iancu, T.S. Epidemiological and pathological aspects of skin cancer in North East of Romania. Rev. Med. Chir. Soc. Med. Nat. 2014, 118, 457–462. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ciążyńska, M.; Kamińska-Winciorek, G.; Lange, D.; Lewandowski, B.; Reich, A.; Sławińska, M.; Pabianek, M.; Szczepaniak, K.; Hankiewicz, A.; Ułańska, M.; et al. The Incidence and Clinical Analysis of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kasumagic-Halilovic, E.; Hasic, M.; Ovcina-Kurtovic, N. A Clinical Study of Basal Cell Carcinoma 394 A Clinical Study of Basal Cell Carcinoma. Med Arch. 2019, 73, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Marzuka, S.B. Basal cell carcinoma: Pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, histopathology, and management. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2015, 88, 167–179. [Google Scholar]
  10. Riihilä, P.; Nissinen, L.; Knuutila, J.; Nezhad, P.R.; Viiklepp, K.; Kähäri, V.M. Complement System in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Lubov, J.; Labbé, M.; Sioufi, K.; Morand, G.B.; Hier, M.P.; Khanna, M.; Sultanem, K.; Mlynarek, A.M. Prognostic Factors of Head and Neck Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. J. Otolaryngol.—Head Neck Surg. 2021, 50, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Steding-Jessen, M.; Birch-Johansen, F.; Jensen, A.; Schüz, J.; Kjær, S.K.; Dalton, S.O. Socioeconomic Status and Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study of Incidence and Survival in Denmark. Cancer Epidemiol. 2010, 34, 689–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mariotto, A.B.; Robin Yabroff, K.; Shao, Y.; Feuer, E.J.; Brown, M.L. Projections of the Cost of Cancer Care in the United States: 2010–2020. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2011, 103, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Newlands, C.; Currie, R.; Memon, A.; Whitaker, S.; Woolford, T. Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2016, 130, S125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chen, J.T.; Kempton, S.J.; Rao, V.K. The Economics of Skin Cancer: An Analysis of Medicare Payment Data. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.—Glob. Open 2016, 4, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Duarte, A.F.; Sousa-Pinto, B.; Freitas, A.; Delgado, L.; Costa-Pereira, A.; Correia, O. Skin Cancer Healthcare Impact: A Nation-Wide Assessment of an Administrative Database. Cancer Epidemiol. 2018, 56, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ruiz, E.S.; Morgan, F.C.; Zigler, C.M.; Besaw, R.J.; Schmults, C.D. Analysis of National Skin Cancer Expenditures in the United States Medicare Population, 2013. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2019, 80, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Guy, G.P.; Machlin, S.R.; Ekwueme, D.U.; Yabroff, K.R. Prevalence and Costs of Skin Cancer Treatment in the U.S., 2002−2006 and 2007–2011. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2015, 48, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Tran, D.A.; Coronado, A.C.; Sarker, S.; Alvi, R. Estimating the Health Care Costs of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer in Saskatchewan Using Physician Billing Data. Curr. Oncol. 2019, 26, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Massa, S.T.; Osazuwa-Peters, N.; Adjei Boakye, E.; Walker, R.J.; Ward, G.M. Comparison of the Financial Burden of Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer with Other Cancer Survivors. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2019, 145, 239–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Doran, C.M.; Ling, R.; Byrnes, J.; Crane, M.; Searles, A.; Perez, D.; Shakeshaft, A. Estimating the Economic Costs of Skin Cancer in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zanoni, D.K.; Patel, S.G.; Shah, J.P. Changes in the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging of Head and Neck Cancer: Rationale and Implications. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2019, 21, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Amin, M.B.; Edge, S.B.; Greene, F.L.; Schilsky, R.L.; Brookland, R.K.; Washington, M.K.; Gershenwald, J.E.; Compton, C.C.; Hess, K.R.; Sullivan, D.C.; et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual; American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC): Chicago, IL, USA, 2017; ISBN 9783319406176. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mayhew, D.; Mendonca, V.; Murthy, B.V.S. A Review of ASA Physical Status—Historical Perspectives and Modern Developments. Anaesthesia 2019, 74, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Pang, J.; Crawford, K.; Faraji, F.; Ramsey, C.; Kemp, A.; Califano, J.A. An Analysis of 1-Year Charges for Head and Neck Cancer: Targets for Value-Based Interventions. Otolaryngol.—Head Neck Surg. 2020, 163, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mofidi, A.; Tompa, E.; Spencer, J.; Kalcevich, C.; Peters, C.E.; Kim, J.; Song, C.; Mortazavi, S.B.; Demers, P.A. The Economic Burden of Occupational Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Due to Solar Radiation. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 2018, 15, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Tangka, F.K.; Trogdon, J.G.; Richardson, L.C.; Howard, D.; Sabatino, S.A.; Finkelstein, E.A. Cancer Treatment Cost in the United States. Cancer 2010, 116, 3477–3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Iglesias, M.E.; Santesteban, R.; Larumbe, A. Oncologic Surgery of the Eyelid and Orbital Region. Actas Dermo-Sifiliogr. (Engl. Ed.) 2015, 106, 365–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yüce, S.; Demir, Z.; Selçuk, C.T.; Çelebioğlu, S. Reconstruction of Periorbital Region Defects: A Retrospective Study. Ann. Maxillofac. Surg. 2014, 4, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Dacosta Byfield, S.; Chen, D.; Yim, Y.M.; Reyes, C. Age Distribution of Patients with Advanced Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer in the United States. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2013, 305, 845–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Whitney, R.L.; Bell, J.F.; Tancredi, D.J.; Romano, P.S.; Bold, R.J.; Joseph, J.G. Hospitalization Rates and Predictors of Rehospitalization among Individuals with Advanced Cancer in the Year After Diagnosis. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Brambullo, T.; Azzena, G.P.; Toninello, P.; Masciopinto, G.; De Lazzari, A.; Biffoli, B.; Vindigni, V.; Bassetto, F. Current Surgical Therapy of Locally Advanced CSCC: From Patient Selection to Microsurgical Tissue Transplant. Review. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 5185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Egeler, S.A.; Huang, A.; Johnson, A.R.; Ibrahim, A.; Bucknor, A.; Peymani, A.; Mureau, M.A.M.; Lin, S.J. Regional Incidence of and Reconstructive Management Patterns in Melanoma and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer of the Head and Neck: A 3-Year Analysis in the Inpatient Setting. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2020, 73, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Asai, Y.; Nguyen, P.; Hanna, T.P. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Skin Cancer Diagnosis: A Population-Based Study. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jambusaria-Pahlajani, A.; Kanetsky, P.A.; Karia, P.S.; Hwang, W.T.; Gelfand, J.M.; Whalen, F.M.; Elenitsas, R.; Xu, X.; Schmults, C.D. Evaluation of AJCC Tumor Staging for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma and a Proposed Alternative Tumor Staging System. JAMA Dermatol. 2013, 149, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Medicina 59 00220 g001 550
Figure 1. Year distribution of the skin cancer patients.
Figure 1. Year distribution of the skin cancer patients.
Medicina 59 00220 g001
Medicina 59 00220 g002 550
Figure 2. Correlation between tumor location and type of reconstruction used to repair the surgical defect.
Figure 2. Correlation between tumor location and type of reconstruction used to repair the surgical defect.
Medicina 59 00220 g002
Medicina 59 00220 g003 550
Figure 3. Correlation between tumor stage and time required to perform surgery.
Figure 3. Correlation between tumor stage and time required to perform surgery.
Medicina 59 00220 g003
Medicina 59 00220 g004 550
Figure 4. Correlation between tumor stage and days of hospitalization.
Figure 4. Correlation between tumor stage and days of hospitalization.
Medicina 59 00220 g004
Medicina 59 00220 g005 550
Figure 5. Correlation between days of hospitalization and type of reconstruction.
Figure 5. Correlation between days of hospitalization and type of reconstruction.
Medicina 59 00220 g005
Medicina 59 00220 g006 550
Figure 6. Correlation between days of hospitalization and ASA risk.
Figure 6. Correlation between days of hospitalization and ASA risk.
Medicina 59 00220 g006
Medicina 59 00220 g007 550
Figure 7. Direct treatment costs of NMSC: (a) total costs/5 years for SCC and BCC; (b) the increasing NMSC treatment costs/episode during 5 years of analysis; (c) the increasing BCC and SCC treatment costs/episode during 5 years of analysis.
Figure 7. Direct treatment costs of NMSC: (a) total costs/5 years for SCC and BCC; (b) the increasing NMSC treatment costs/episode during 5 years of analysis; (c) the increasing BCC and SCC treatment costs/episode during 5 years of analysis.
Medicina 59 00220 g007
Table
Table 1. Non-melanoma skin cancer epidemiology and treatment costs.
Table 1. Non-melanoma skin cancer epidemiology and treatment costs.
Malignant Skin Cancer EpisodesNMSC Treatment Cost Per Episode
NMSC
n = episodes (n%)		BCC n = episodes
(n%)		SCC n = episodes
(n%)		p value (BCC vs. SCC among subsets) *Mean ± standard deviation (Euro) **p Value (costs comparison among subsets) ***
Age decade distribution
20–302 (1.31%)1 (0.83%)1 (3.13%)0.31110 ± 90.04
30–405 (3.27%)4 (3.33%)1 (3.13%)177 ± 67
40–5018 (11.76%)15 (12.5%)3 (9.38%)205 ± 90
50–605 (3.27%)4 (3.33%)1 (3.13%)226 ± 42
60–7037 (24.18%)33 (27.5%)4 (12.5%)248 ± 150
70–8054 (35.29%)41 (34.17%)13 (40.63%)281 ± 224
80–9030 (19.61%)22 (18.33%)8 (25%)352 ± 210
90–1001 (0.65%)-1 (3.13%)-
Sex
Female64 (42.1%)49 (40.83%)15 (46.85%)0.53323 ± 2710.17
Male88 (57.9%)71 (59.17%)17 (53.13%)271 ± 245
Place of living
Rural60 (39.47%)45 (37.5%)15 (46.88%)0.33331 ± 3270.44
Urban92 (60.53%)75 (62.5%)17 (53.13%)266 ± 190
Educational formation
Elementary school5 (3.76%)2 (1.87%)3 (9.68%)0.13331 ± 3290.16
Medium school24 (18.05%)21 (19.63%)3 (9.68%)242 ± 159
Technical school9 (6.77%)8 (7.48%)1 (3.23%)523 ± 622
High School19 (14.29%)16 (14.95%)3 (9.68%)258 ± 293
College15 (11.28%)11 (10.28%)4 (12.9%)214 ± 163
Economic status
Low income42 (27.45%)23 (19.17%)10 (31.25%)0.66300 ± 331<0.01
Medium income26 (16.99%)47 (39.16%)3 (9.38%)283 ± 282
Upper income4 (2.61%)3 (2.5%)1 (3.13%)103 ± 4
Immunosuppression
Yes6 (3.95%)3 (2.5%)3 (9.38%)0.07419 ± 2120.04
No146(96.05%)117 (97.5%)29 (90.63%)277 ± 213
ASA risk classification
I50 (32.89%)40 (33.33%)10 (31.25%)0.91242 ± 2190.03
II54 (35.53%)42 (35%)12 (37.5%)333 ± 106
III48 (31.58%)38 (31.67%)10 (31.25%)339 ± 142
Tumor’s location (head and neck regions)
Auricular11 (7.24%)6 (5%)5 (15.63%)0.14214 ± 1130.14
Cervical2 (1.32%)1 (0.83%)1 (3.13%)215 ± 49
Frontal17 (11.18%)11 (9.17%)6 (18.75%)332 ± 303
Cheek29 (19.08%)24 (20%)5 (15.63%)329 ± 225
Infraorbital7 (4.61%)6 (5%)1 (3.13%)203 ± 61
Labial5 (3.29%)4 (3.33%)1 (3.13%)376 ± 225
Mental3 (1.97%)3 (2.5%)-143 ± 33
Orbital14 (9.21%)13 (10.83%)1 (3.13%)421 ± 340
Nasal46 (30.26%)40 (33.33%)6 (18.75%)256 ± 154
Temporal18 (11.84%)12 (10%)6 (18.75%)301 ± 456
Stage of the disease
I97 (63.82%)83 (69.17%)14 (43.75%)0.002253 ± 1510.65
II31 (20.39%)25 (20.83%)6 (18.75%)307 ± 184
III21 (13.82%)11 (9.17%)10 (31.25%)371 ± 446
IV3 (1.97%)1 (0.83%)2 (6.25%)974 ± 715
Type of reconstruction
Primary closure50 (32.68%)37 (30.83%)13 (40.63%)0.52198 ± 116<0.01
Skin graft8 (5.23%)6 (5%)2 (6.25%)220 ± 134
Local flap94 (61.44%)77 (64.17%)17 (53.13%)352 ± 315
Time needed for surgical procedure
<1 h66 (43.42%)53 (44.16%)13 (40.62%)-257 ± 177<0.01
1–2 h66 (43.42%)52 (43.33%)14 (43.75%)340 ± 155
>2 h20 (13.16%)15 (12.5%)5 (15.62%)647 ± 581
Days of hospitalization
169 (45.39%)56 (46.66%)13 (40.62%)0.53139 ± 31<0.01
236 (23,68%)31 (25.83%)5 (15.62%)281 ± 190
318 (11,84%)13 (10.83)5 (15.62%)357 ± 46
414 (9,21%)9 (7,5%)5 (15.62%)475 ± 58
54 (2,63%)3 (2.5%)1 (3.12%)596 ± 29
65 (3,28%)4 (3.33%)1 (3.12%)627 ± 70
7>6 (3,94%)4 (3,33%)2 (6.25%)1177 ± 526
* Statistical analysis of episode comparison between BCC and SCC subsets; ** average treatment costs of NMSC related to the cancer episodes; *** statistical analysis of NMSC cost between different subsets.
Table
Table 2. Averages of direct cost details of head and neck skin cancers for five years of treatment related to patient and episode of cancer.
Table 2. Averages of direct cost details of head and neck skin cancers for five years of treatment related to patient and episode of cancer.
Costs (EUR)NMSCBCCSCC
Total direct costs
Average cost per patient336317252
Average cost per episode294282341
Drug costs
Average cost per patient202213
Average cost per episode181912
Paraclinical examination costs
Average cost per patient423849
Average cost per episode373348
Supply costs
Average cost per patient181717
Average cost per episode151517
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Faur, C.I.; Moldovan, M.A.; Văleanu, M.; Rotar, H.; Filip, L.; Roman, R.C. The Prevalence and Treatment Costs of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer in Cluj-Napoca Maxillofacial Center. Medicina 2023, 59, 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020220

AMA Style

Faur CI, Moldovan MA, Văleanu M, Rotar H, Filip L, Roman RC. The Prevalence and Treatment Costs of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer in Cluj-Napoca Maxillofacial Center. Medicina. 2023; 59(2):220. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020220

Chicago/Turabian Style

Faur, Cosmin Ioan, Mădălina Anca Moldovan, Mădălina Văleanu, Horațiu Rotar, Laura Filip, and Rareș Călin Roman. 2023. "The Prevalence and Treatment Costs of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer in Cluj-Napoca Maxillofacial Center" Medicina 59, no. 2: 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020220

APA Style

Faur, C. I., Moldovan, M. A., Văleanu, M., Rotar, H., Filip, L., & Roman, R. C. (2023). The Prevalence and Treatment Costs of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer in Cluj-Napoca Maxillofacial Center. Medicina, 59(2), 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59020220

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop