Next Article in Journal
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Flow Signal in Non-Treatment-Naïve Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treated with Faricimab
Previous Article in Journal
Endogenous IL-7 Variation in Relation to Lymphocyte Subtypes in Septic Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Women’s Awareness of the Possible Risk of Stroke Associated with the Use of Oral Contraceptives Pills in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

by
Fawaz E. Edris
1,
Rehab Ahmed A. Alasiri
1,
Abdullah Faisal Albukhari
2,
Mohammed Arab Sadiq
3,
Wojood Mubarak Alahmadi
4,
Alhanouf Radhyan Alruwaili
4,
Nojuod Fares Alhadidi
4,
Iman Hamid Alenezi
5,
Hussein Talal Sabban
6,
Abdulrahim Gari
1,
Mamdoh Eskandar
7,
Umme Salma
8,* and
Ahmed Baker A. Alshaikh
8
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Umm AlQura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
2
College of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh 21911, Saudi Arabia
3
College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Dammam 34253, Saudi Arabia
4
College of Medicine, Vision Colleges, Riyadh 13226, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ministry of Health, Arar 73311, Saudi Arabia
6
GREI Consultant, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Jeddah 23425, Saudi Arabia
7
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, College of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha 62527, Saudi Arabia
8
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Jouf University, Sakaka 72343, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2025, 61(2), 259; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61020259 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 16 December 2024 / Revised: 29 January 2025 / Accepted: 30 January 2025 / Published: 3 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Epidemiology & Public Health)

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: One of the most widely used reversible contraceptive techniques among women of reproductive age worldwide is oral contraceptives (OCPs). Despite their widespread use, OCPs are associated with increased risks of stroke, yet the extent of awareness of these risks among women remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to evaluate the level of awareness among women resident in Saudi Arabia regarding the potential risk of stroke linked to the use of OCPs. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted targeting women of reproductive age (18–49 years). Data was collected through an online self-administrated questionnaire distributed via social media platforms, encompassing sociodemographic characteristics, OCP usage patterns, and awareness of stroke risks, perceived side effects of OCPs, symptoms of stroke, and methods to reduce stroke incidence. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23, with descriptive statistics for categorical data and chi-square tests to assess associations. Results: A total of 516 women participated in the study. Of these, 148, or over a quarter (28.7%), of the participants reported using oral contraceptive pills; 86, or more than half (58%), who use OCPs are not sure what type of OCPs they use; 60, or over half of the participants (40.5%), have been using for less than a year. Over two thirds of the participants (350, 67.8%) are not aware that using OCP increases the risk of stroke. The most recognized side effect of OCPs use was weight gain (38.2%), while awareness of stroke as a side effect was significantly lower (24.6%). Additionally, 62.8% of respondents identified selecting the appropriate type of contraceptive as the best way to prevent stroke while taking OCPs. Conclusions: this study highlights the need for increased awareness and education about the potential risk of cerebral thrombosis associated with OCP use among Saudi women. Addressing this knowledge gap through targeted educational initiatives could help mitigate the risks and improve overall public health outcomes.

1. Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines family planning as “the ability of individuals and couples to anticipate and attain their desired number of children and the spacing and timing of their births,” encompassing the use of contraceptive methods and therapeutic interventions for unintentional infertility [1]. Contraceptive methods include oral tablets, injectables, intrauterine devices (IUDs), sterilization, condoms, lactational amenorrhea, and natural rhythm methods [2,3]. Among these, oral contraceptives (OCs) are one of the most widely utilized reversible methods of contraception among women of reproductive age globally [4]. Oral contraceptives generally consist of estrogen and progesterone, which inhibit ovulation by suppressing the release of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) from the pituitary gland. In addition to contraception, OCs offer protective benefits against several health conditions, including endometrial and ovarian cancers, dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, iron-deficiency anemia, ectopic pregnancy, pelvic inflammatory disease, and ovarian cysts [5,6,7]. However, their use is associated with potential health risks, including an increased likelihood of venous thromboembolism, stroke, breast cancer, cervical cancer, and cardiovascular events, particularly in smokers [8,9]. Reported side effects include weight changes, nausea, abdominal bloating, breast tenderness, dermatological issues, and irregular menstrual cycles [10,11]. While the primary indication for OCs is pregnancy prevention, approximately 14% of women use them for non-contraceptive purposes, such as managing menstrual disorders and related conditions, including migraines, uterine fibroids, irregular menstruation, endometriosis-associated pain, and acne [12,13]. Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide, affecting approximately 15 million individuals annually and resulting in over 5 million deaths [14]. The incidence of stroke has been rising in Saudi Arabia due to significant lifestyle and environmental changes over the past two decades. Recent studies report an annual incidence rate of 29 cases per 100,000 population in the country [15,16]. Stroke, characterized as a cerebrovascular disease, is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Risk factors for stroke are broadly classified into modifiable factors—such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, cardiovascular diseases, atrial fibrillation, sedentary lifestyle, obesity, smoking, and alcohol consumption—and non-modifiable factors, including age and gender [17,18,19]. These factors play critical roles in the primary and secondary prevention of stroke. An underrecognized risk factor for stroke is the use of oral contraceptives [20,21,22]. In 1969, Vessey et al. were the first to report an association between oral contraceptives and an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and cerebral thrombosis in women [23,24,25]. Subsequent observational studies have yielded mixed results, leaving the question of whether oral contraceptive use elevates stroke risk unresolved [21,26,27]. However, recent meta-analyses provide evidence suggesting a significant association between oral contraceptive use and increased risks of ischemic stroke (IS) and hemorrhagic stroke (HS). For instance, a meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant rise in the risk of ischemic stroke among current OC users, while another highlighted a slight increase in the risk of hemorrhagic stroke [28,29]. In Saudi Arabia, where larger family sizes are culturally valued, contraceptive use remains prevalent. The Saudi Household Survey (2018) indicated that 30.4% of women of reproductive age use contraceptives, with oral contraceptives being most commonly used by women in their twenties [30,31,32]. Oral contraceptive pills include estrogen, which suppresses follicular growth and prevents ovulation. The most frequently used oral contraceptives are combinations of ethinyl estradiol and various progestins [33,34,35]. The development of venous thromboembolism in oral contraceptive (OC) users may be linked to heightened blood coagulability, which includes changes in coagulation factors, inhibitors, fibrinolytic activity, and platelet functioning, along with structural alterations in veins and arteries, such as endothelial proliferation and altered venous flow. In contrast, the mechanisms behind arterial complications, such as myocardial infarction and stroke, are more intricate and involve increased platelet activity, fibrin deposition, higher arterial blood pressure, and modifications in glucose tolerance and lipid metabolism. Once an atherogenic lesion forms, reversing it becomes difficult due to the self-sustaining mechanisms associated with the arterial lesion [36,37,38,39]. Oral contraceptive pills that contain estrogen elevate the plasma levels of clotting factors II, VII, X, VIII, fibrinogen, and thrombin-activable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI). These changes promote thrombus formation and inhibit the breakdown of clots. Among these factors, factor VII is particularly significant in clot formation. Estrogen, being a lipophilic hormone, influences gene transcription for various proteins. Although the precise mechanisms are complex and not fully understood, estrogen crosses the cell membrane of target tissues. Once inside the cytoplasm, it binds to nuclear receptors (either estrogen receptor alpha or beta). The estrogen–receptor complex then moves into the nucleus, where it binds to specific sites known as estrogen response elements. This binding enables RNA polymerase II to transcribe proteins in specific regions of DNA, activating gene transcription. However, estrogen’s influence on gene transcription is multifaceted and extends beyond the actions of the estrogen–receptor complex on DNA. Additionally, estrogen receptors affect signaling pathways, such as the MAPK and IP3 kinase pathways, which can also lead to gene expression changes. Consequently, the high levels of estrogen in oral contraceptives can contribute to clot formation, increasing the risk of ischemic stroke [40,41,42].
The present study aims to evaluate women’s awareness of the potential risk of stroke associated with oral contraceptive use. By addressing this knowledge gap, the research seeks to contribute to the growing body of evidence regarding the health implications of oral contraceptives and enhance public health awareness in Saudi Arabia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted to evaluate the awareness of Saudi women regarding the potential risk of thrombosis associated with oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use.

2.2. Study Setting and Population

The study targeted women of reproductive age (15–49 years) residing in Saudi Arabia. Participants were recruited from five provinces: the Central, Eastern, Western, Northern, and Southern regions.

2.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • Saudi women aged 15–49 years.
  • Current or past users of oral contraceptive pills.
  • Women able to understand Arabic and willing to participate.
  • Exclusion Criteria:
  • Women who refused to participate.
  • Women with cognitive impairments or medical conditions that might confound awareness assessment.

2.4. Sample Size Determination

Using the WHO sample size calculator, the minimum required sample size was calculated to be 385 participants, considering a 95% confidence interval, an anticipated population proportion of 50%, and a margin of error of 5%. Accounting for a 10% non-response rate, the final target sample size was set at 424 participants. Ultimately, 516 responses were received and analyzed.

2.5. Data Collection Tool

Data were collected through an online self-administered questionnaire, designed in both Arabic and English to enhance accessibility and comprehension. The questionnaire was developed based on validated tools from previous studies and reviewed by a panel of medical experts to ensure content validity. A pilot study involving 25 women was conducted to test clarity and feasibility, with no major modifications required. Pilot responses were excluded from the final analysis.
The questionnaire comprised three main sections:
  • Informed Consent: Participants provided voluntary consent before proceeding.
  • Sociodemographic Information: Age, marital status, education level, employment status, physical activity, smoking habits, and region of residence.
  • Awareness Assessment: Questions related to OCP usage patterns, perceived side effects, awareness of stroke risk, symptoms of stroke, and preventive strategies.

2.6. Data Collection Procedure

The questionnaire was distributed online via social media platforms to maximize reach. Participants were informed about the study’s objectives and their right to withdraw at any point without repercussions.

2.7. Data Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages, were calculated for categorical variables. Chi-square tests were performed to assess associations between sociodemographic factors and awareness levels. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Awareness scores were categorized as follows:
  • Good Awareness: ≥60% of the total score.
  • Poor Awareness: <60% of the total score.

2.8. Ethical Considerations

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Research Board (IRB) at Umm Al-Qura University (Approval No. HAPO-02-K-012-2024-10-2212, Date: 27 October 2024). Participation was voluntary, with confidentiality and anonymity strictly maintained. Participants were informed about their rights to withdraw at any stage without consequences.

3. Results

3.1. Participant Demographics and Characteristics

A total of 516 participants completed the study questionnaire. The vast majority (488, 94.6%) of the participants are Saudi nationals. Nearly half of participants are between 20 and 30 years old (255, 49.4%) followed by below 20 years (164, 31.8%). Concerning the education level, over half of the participants (277, 53.7%) have a bachelor’s degree. Regarding employment status, the majority (473, 91.7%) of the participants are not working. Most participants reported either occasionally (259, 50.2%) or seldom (186, 36%) engage in physical activity. The majority (489, 94.8%) of the surveyed participants are non-smokers. Over two thirds of the participants are single (352, 68.2%), while the least percentage are divorced (10, 1.9%). The survey included participants from five provinces: Central, Eastern, Western, Northern, and Southern. The highest percentage of participants live in the Central Province (224, 43.4%), followed by Western (165, 32.0%) and Eastern (31, 6.0%). Over a quarter (148, 28.7%) of the participants reported using oral contraceptive pills, as shown in Table 1.

3.2. The Awareness of the Risk of Stroke Associated with OCPs

Figure 1 indicates that awareness of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) is notably high among the studied participants, with the majority selecting the combination pill. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of individuals do not utilize oral contraceptive pills (OCPs). Weight gain is the most recognized possible adverse impact.

3.3. Pattern of OCPS Use

Table 2 illustrates the awareness of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs). Among the informed, the predominant kind of oral contraceptive pill utilized is the combination pill, accounting for 51 instances (9.9%). A mere 11 consumers (2.1%) are cognizant of the progestin-only tablet; 86 users (16.7%) are uncertain about the sort of oral contraceptive pill they utilize; 368 individuals (71.3%) did not utilize oral contraceptive pills (OCPs).
Among those who utilize oral contraceptive pills, the majority had been taking them for less one year. Forty-eight individuals (9.3%) have used them for a duration of 1 to 5 years. Forty-five (8.7%) and forty-three (8.3%) have utilized them for over five years. A substantial segment of 380 individuals (73.6%) questioned do not utilize oral contraceptive pills (OCPs).

3.4. Awareness Related to the Potential Risk of Stroke

Over two thirds of the participants (350, 67.8%) are not aware that using OCP increases the risk of stroke, as shown in Figure 1.
The most well-known possible adverse effects of OCP use among the participants were weight gain, stroke, and amenorrhea, which were reported by 197 participants (38.2%), 127 participants (24.6%), and 56 participants (10.9%), respectively. The most common symptoms of stroke reported by the participants are paralysis or weakness (356, 67%), headache with altered consciousness (38, 7.4%), and confusion (35, 6.8%).
Approximately 62.8% of participants stated that the best way to prevent stroke while taking OCPs is to select the appropriate form of contraception. About 88 (17.1%) and 38 (7.4%) of the participants, respectively, indicated routine blood pressure and weight checks, as well as maintaining a healthy weight through regular exercise and a balanced diet, as ways to prevent stroke while using OCPs as showed in Table 3.

3.5. Chi-Square Analysis

Table 4 presents the results of a chi-square analysis of the relationship between stroke risk scores and various personal data categories for a sample of 516 individuals. The different personal data categories that were analyzed, including nationality, age, educational level, employment status, physical activity, smoking status, marital status, province, and the number of individuals in each category who had a high or low stroke risk score. The statistical significance of the relationship between each personal data category and stroke risk score. A p-value (0.270) greater than 0.05 is typically considered statistically not significant. There is a statistically non-significant difference in stroke risk scores between Saudi and non-Saudi participants (p = 0.110, <0.05). There is a statistically non-significant trend of increasing stroke risk scores with age (p = 0.081, <0.05). There is a statistically non-significant difference in stroke risk scores between individuals with different levels of education (p = 0.767, <0.05). There is a statistically non-significant difference in stroke risk scores between individuals with different employment statuses (p = 0.510, <0.05). There is a statistically non-significant difference in stroke risk scores between individuals with different levels of physical activity (p = 0.666, <0.05). There is a statistically non-significant difference in stroke risk scores between smokers and non-smokers (p = 0.056, <0.05). There is a statistically non-significant difference in stroke risk scores between individuals with different marital statuses (p = 0.607, <0.05). There is a statistically significant difference in stroke risk scores between individuals from different provinces (p < 0.05). Overall, the table suggests that several personal data factors are associated with an increased risk of stroke.

4. Discussion

This study aimed to assess the awareness of women regarding the potential risk of stroke associated with the use of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs). According to the current study, 28% of participants either presently or formerly used OCPs, and 58% of those did not know what kind of OCP they used. The results of the study showed that women have a comparatively poor awareness of the risk of stroke, with only 32.2% of participants knowing that using OCP increases the risk of stroke. These results are less than those of a prior study that assessed women’s knowledge, attitudes, and practices around contraceptives and their side effects in the Jazan region of Saudi Arabia. It stated that around half of the individuals had either used or were now using OCPs. Overall understanding revealed that most participants knew about the OCP, with almost 95% of the women confirmed that they knew how to use them [43,44].
Furthermore, our results are marginally lower than those of comparable studies conducted in Saudi Arabia, where OCP users accounted for almost 57% of the population [45,46]. Furthermore, this is less than another survey done in Jordan, where 54% of respondents said they knew how to use the OCP [47,48]. Notably, our study was conducted through an online survey, whereas other research relied on in-person interviews. This could account for variations in OCP usage prevalence and knowledge. Furthermore, 68.2% of the study’s participants were single, suggesting that they may not have been very interested in learning about contraceptive options. Their ignorance of the issue draws attention to a serious knowledge gap in public health that must be filled.
The study revealed that weight gain is the most commonly known side effect of OCPs, reported by 38.2% of participants. In contrast, awareness of more serious potential risks, such as stroke, was significantly lower. These findings are consistent with previous research that has shown general public awareness of the more common, less severe side effects of OCPs, while underestimating the more serious health risks [49,50]. This discrepancy may be due to insufficient health education and counseling provided to women when prescribing OCPs.
The significant association between OCP use and the risk of cerebral thrombosis has been well documented in the literature. Vessey et al. first reported this association in 1969, and numerous studies have since confirmed these findings [51]. A meta-analysis by Xu et al. demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the risk of first-ever ischemic stroke among current OCP users [52]. Similarly, another meta-analysis by Xu et al. found a slight but significant increase in the risk of hemorrhagic stroke among OCP users [51]. Despite these established risks, our study indicates that awareness of these potential complications remains low among Saudi women.
Cerebral thrombosis, which involves the formation of a blood clot in the cerebral veins or sinuses, can lead to serious neurological complications, including stroke. The risk factors for cerebral thrombosis in the context of OCP use include the combination of estrogen and progestin hormones, which can increase the coagulability of blood, leading to thrombus formation [53,54]. The findings of our study underscore the urgent need for enhanced educational efforts to inform women about these risks.
The low awareness of the thrombotic risks associated with OCPs in our study population may be attributed to several factors. Cultural and social norms in Saudi Arabia may limit open discussions about contraception and its potential risks. Additionally, healthcare providers may not be sufficiently emphasizing the importance of these risks during consultations. A study conducted in Al-Qunfudah, Saudi Arabia, also found that the level of knowledge about OCPs among women of reproductive age was suboptimal, reinforcing our findings [46].
To address this gap in awareness, it is essential to implement comprehensive educational programs targeting both healthcare providers and women of reproductive age. Healthcare providers should be encouraged to discuss the full spectrum of potential risks associated with OCP use, including stroke. Public health campaigns utilizing social media platforms, which have proven effective in reaching a wide audience in Saudi Arabia, should also be employed to disseminate information about the risks of OCPs.
Our study contains a number of shortcomings. Given that women who have access to the internet and are more literate are more likely to participate, the use of an online questionnaire may have introduced selection bias. Recall bias may also result from the data’s self-reported nature. To obtain a more comprehensive knowledge of women’s awareness and perceptions of OCP hazards, future research should think about utilizing a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys with qualitative interviews. This study examined the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) users’ understanding of the risk of stroke, which had not been previously examined in Saudi Arabia.

5. Conclusions

This study emphasizes a significant lack of awareness among Saudi women concerning the stroke risks linked to oral contraceptive pills (OCPs). Tackling this with focused education and improved guidance from healthcare professionals is crucial to enable women to make knowledgeable choices and lower avoidable health risks. Raising awareness will improve public health results and guarantee safer contraceptive methods.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: all authors; writing—original draft: F.E.E. and A.B.A.A.; writing—review and editing: R.A.A.A., A.F.A., M.A.S., W.M.A., A.R.A., N.F.A., I.H.A., H.T.S., A.G., M.E. and U.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The ethical approval of this research-by- Umm Alqura University and the Approval No. (HAPO-02-K-012-2024-10-2212).

Informed Consent Statement

The participants filled out the online questionnaire because they were interested in it. Participants consent was waived according to the Institutional Review Board of Umm Alqura University.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gonie, A.; Wudneh, A.; Nigatu, D.; Dendir, Z. Determinants of family planning use among married women in bale eco-region, Southeast Ethiopia: A community based study. BMC Women’s Health 2018, 18, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hubacher, D.; Trussell, J. A definition of modern contraceptive methods. Contraception 2015, 92, 420–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Colquitt, C.; Martin, T. Contraceptive Methods. J. Pharm. Pract. 2017, 30, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lidegaard, Ø.; Milsom, I. Oral contraceptives and thrombotic diseases: Impact of new epidemiological studies. Contraception 1996, 53, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. De Leo, V.; Musacchio, M.; Cappelli, V.; Piomboni, P.; Morgante, G. Hormonal contraceptives: Pharmacology tailored to women’s health. Hum. Reprod. Update 2016, 22, 634–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jensen, J.; Speroff, L. Health benefits of oral contraceptives. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am. 2000, 27, 705–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mishell, D. Noncontraceptive health benefits of oral steroidal contraceptives. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1982, 142 Pt 2, 809–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mørch, L.; Skovlund, C.; Hannaford, P.; Iversen, L.; Fielding, S.; Lidegaard, Ø. Contemporary Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of Breast Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 2228–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Brabaharan, S.; Veettil, S.; Kaiser, J.; Rao, V.; Wattanayingcharoenchai, R.; Maharajan, M.; Insin, P.; Talungchit, P.; Anothaisintawee, T.; Thakkinstian, A.; et al. Association of Hormonal Contraceptive Use With Adverse Health Outcomes. JAMA Netw. Open 2022, 5, e2143730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sulak, P.; Scow, R.; Preece, C.; Riggs, M.; Kuehl, T. Hormone Withdrawal Symptoms in Oral Contraceptive Users. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000, 95, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Hahn, R. Compliance considerations with estrogen replacement: Withdrawal bleeding and other factors. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1989, 161 Pt 2, 1854–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Burkman, R.; Collins, J.; Shulman, L.; Williams, J. Current perspectives on oral contraceptive use. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001, 185 (Suppl. 2), S4–S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cagnacci, A.; Bruni, V.; Di Carlo, C.; Fruzzetti, F. How often is oral contraception used for contraception? The need of benefit’s formalisation. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2023, 28, 81–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Johnson, C.; Nguyen, M.; Roth, G.; Nichols, E.; Alam, T.; Abate, D.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdelalim, A.; Abraha, H.; Abu-Rmeileh, N.; et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 439–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Alqahtani, B.; Alenazi, A.; Hoover, J.; Alshehri, M.; Alghamdi, M.; Osailan, A.; Khunti, K. Incidence of stroke among Saudi population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol. Sci. 2020, 41, 3099–3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hussien, A.; Alshehri, A.; Alanazi, F.; Aljabal, A.; Alanazi, A.; Alqayidi, A.; Alghamdi, I. Characterization of Demographic, Clinical, and Laboratory Risk Factors for Stroke in a Tertiary Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Cureus 2024, 16, e58266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Johansson, A.; Drake, I.; Engström, G.; Acosta, S. Modifiable and Non-Modifiable Risk Factors for Atherothrombotic Ischemic Stroke among Subjects in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Boehme, A.; Esenwa, C.; Elkind, M. Stroke Risk Factors, Genetics, and Prevention. Circ. Res. 2017, 120, 472–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Harshfield, E.; Georgakis, M.; Malik, R.; Dichgans, M.; Markus, H. Modifiable Lifestyle Factors and Risk of Stroke. Stroke 2020, 52, 931–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Bousser, M.; Kittner, S. Oral Contraceptives and Stroke. Cephalalgia 2000, 20, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xuereb, M.; Pullicino, P. Oral contraceptive use and risk of stroke [letter]. Stroke 1988, 19, 922–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Carlton, C.; Banks, M.; Sundararajan, S. Oral Contraceptives and Ischemic Stroke Risk. Stroke 2018, 49, e157–e159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vandenbroucke, J.; Rosing, J.; Bloemenkamp, K.; Middeldorp, S.; Helmerhorst, F.; Bouma, B.; Rosendaal, F. Oral contraceptives and the risk of venous thrombosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 344, 1527–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Martinelli, I.; Sacchi, E.; Landi, G.; Taioli, E.; Duca, F.; Mannucci, P. High risk of cerebral-vein thrombosis in carriers of a prothrombin-gene mutation and in users of oral contraceptives. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 338, 1793–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Petitti, D.; Wingerd, J.; Pellegrin, F.; Ramcharan, S. Oral contraceptives, smoking, and other factors in relation to risk of venous thromboembolic disease. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1978, 108, 480–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zeitoun, K.; Carr, B. Is There an Increased Risk of Stroke Associated with Oral Contraceptives? Drug Saf. 1999, 20, 467–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Johansson, T.; Fowler, P.; Ek, W.; Skalkidou, A.; Karlsson, T.; Johansson, Å. Oral Contraceptives, Hormone Replacement Therapy, and Stroke Risk. Stroke 2022, 53, 3107–3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Olsen, T.; Andersen, K. Absolute risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in Danish women using oral contraceptives. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2022, 145, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Petitti, D.; Sidney, S.; Bernstein, A.; Wolf, S.; Quesenberry, C.; Ziel, H. Stroke in users of low-dose oral contraceptives. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996, 335, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mahfouz, M.; Elmahdy, M.; Ryani, M.; Abdelmola, A.; Kariri, S.; Alhazmi, H.; Almalki, S.; Adhabi, O.; Hindi, S.; Muqri, N.; et al. Contraceptive Use and the Associated Factors among Women of Reproductive Age in Jazan City, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Abdel-Salam, D.; Albahlol, I.; Almusayyab, R.; Alruwaili, N.; Aljared, M.; Alruwaili, M.; Alnasser, R. Prevalence, Correlates, and Barriers of Contraceptive Use among Women Attending Primary Health Centers in Aljouf Region, Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Albawardi, I.; Alqahtani, A.; Aljamea, D.; Aljaafari, S.; Aldulijan, F.; Almuhaidib, S.; Elamin, M.; Qahtani, N. Hormonal Contraception Use and Depression Among Women in Saudi Arabia. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 2022, 15, 1677–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Schlaff, W.; Lynch, A.; Hughes, H.; Cedars, M.; Smith, D. Manipulation of the pill-free interval in oral contraceptive pill users: The effect on follicular suppression. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004, 190, 943–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bastianelli, C.; Farris, M.; Rosato, E.; Brosens, I.; Benagiano, G. Pharmacodynamics of combined estrogen-progestin oral contraceptives 3. Inhibition of ovulation. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 11, 1085–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Landgren, B.; Csemiczky, G. The effect of follicular growth and luteal function of “missing the pill”. A comparison between a monophasic and a triphasic combined oral contraceptive. Contraception 1991, 43, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Speroff, L. Oral contraceptives and arterial and venous thrombosis: A clinician’s formulation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1998, 179, S25–S36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Böttiger, L.E.; Boman, G.; Eklund, G.; Westerholm, B. Oral contraceptives and thromboembolic disease: Effects of lowering oestrogen content. Lancet 1980, 1, 1097–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Dulíček, P.; Ivanová, E.; Kostal, M.; Sadílek, P.; Beránek, M.; Žák, P.; Hirmerová, J. Analysis of Risk Factors of Stroke and Venous Thromboembolism in Females With Oral Contraceptives Use. Clin. Appl. Thromb./Hemost. 2018, 24, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Reed, S.; Koro, C.; DiBello, J.; Becker, K.; Bauerfeind, A.; Franke, C.; Heinemann, K. Prospective controlled cohort study on the safety of a monophasic oral contraceptive containing nomegestrol acetate (2.5 mg) and 17β-oestradiol (1.5mg) (PRO-E2 study): Risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2021, 26, 439–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nettleton, W.; King, V. The Risk of MI and Ischemic Stroke with Combined Oral Contraceptives. Am. Fam. Physician 2016, 94, 691–692. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gillum, L.; Mamidipudi, S.; Johnston, S. Ischemic stroke risk with oral contraceptives: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2000, 284, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bonnar, J. Coagulation effects of oral contraception. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1987, 157 Pt 2, 1042–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Schwartz, S.; Petitti, D.; Siscovick, D.; Longstreth, W.; Sidney, S.; Raghunathan, T.; Quesenberry, C.; Kelaghan, J. Stroke and use of low-dose oral contraceptives in young women: A pooled analysis of two US studies. Stroke 1998, 29, 2277–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Siritho, S.; Thrift, A.; McNeil, J.; You, R.; Davis, S.; Donnan, G. Risk of Ischemic Stroke Among Users of the Oral Contraceptive Pill: The Melbourne Risk Factor Study (MERFS) Group. Stroke J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2003, 34, 1575–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yasmeen, A.; Syed, M.; Meraya, A.; Albarraq, A.; Makeen, H.; Alqahtani, S.; Abubaker, M.; Syed, N. Utilization pattern and side effect profile of oral anticonceptives: A community-based cross-sectional study among Saudi women. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 2020, 42, 887–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Basri, S.; Abdali, J.; Alzubaidi, H.; Almarhabi, A.; Alzubaidi, M.; Qarni, G.; Alzubaidi, N.; Aldabli, A.; AlMagaadi, A.; Alamri, L.; et al. Knowledge of Reproductive Age Women About Oral Contraceptive Pills in Al-Qunfudah, Saudi Arabia. Open Access J. Contracept. 2022, 13, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Barakat, M.; Al-Qudah, R.; Akour, A.; Al-Qudah, N.; Bashi, Y. Unforeseen uses of oral contraceptive pills: Exploratory study in Jordanian community pharmacies. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0244373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Barakat, M.; Al-Qudah, R.; Akour, A.; Abu-Asal, M.; Thiab, S.; Bashi, Y. Knowledge and beliefs about the use/abuse of oral contraceptive pills among males: A mixed-method explanatory sequential study in community pharmacy settings. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0251302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Arthur-Norman, P.; Otu, D.; Owusu, F.; Aboagye, A.; Aboagye, R. Knowledge, Attitude and Usage of Female Oral Contraceptive Pills among Female Hawkers in the Central Business District, Kumasi, Ghana. Int. STD Res. Rev. 2024, 13, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. O’Hara, C.; Shan, T.; Yau, J. Knowledge of non-contraceptive benefits of and willingness to consider taking oral contraceptive pills among a low-risk female population: A cross-sectional study. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2024, 29, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Li, F.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, J.; He, H.; Qin, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Xie, Z. Oral Contraceptive Use and Increased Risk of Stroke: A Dose–Response Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Front. Neurol. 2019, 10, 993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Xu, Z.; Li, Y.; Tang, S.; Huang, X.; Chen, T. Current use of oral contraceptives and the risk of first-ever ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Meta-Anal. Thromb. Res. 2015, 136, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Alsheef, M.; Alotaibi, M.; Zaidi, A.; Alshamrani, A.; Alhamidi, A.; Zaidi, S.; Alanazi, N.; Alhathlool, S.; Alarfaj, O.; Alhazzaa, M.; et al. Prevalence of cerebral venous thrombosis with the use of oral contraceptive pills during the Holy month of Ramadan. Saudi Med. J. 2020, 41, 1063–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Vasaghi-Gharamaleki, M.; Hooshamndi, E.; Habibagahi, M.; Gholamzadeh, M.; Vardanjani, H.; Fadakar, N.; Ostovan, V.; Rahimi-Jaberi, A.; Ashjazadeh, N.; Petramfar, P.; et al. Frequency and outcome of cerebral venous thrombosis attributed to oral contraceptive pills. Neurol. Asia 2024, 29, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Frequency distribution of the awareness of the risk of stroke associated with OCPs use among women (n = 516).
Figure 1. Frequency distribution of the awareness of the risk of stroke associated with OCPs use among women (n = 516).
Medicina 61 00259 g001
Table 1. Personal characteristics of study participants, Saudi Arabia (n = 516).
Table 1. Personal characteristics of study participants, Saudi Arabia (n = 516).
Personal DataNo.%
Nationality
Saudi48894.6
Non-Saudi285.4
Age
below 2016431.8
20–30 25549.4
31–407214.0
41–50193.7
Above 5061.2
Educational level
High school or below18335.5
Diploma448.5
Bachelor’s degree27753.7
Ph.D. or higher122.3
Employment status
Not working47391.7
Working full time346.6
Working part time71.4
Retired20.4
Physical activity
Seldom18636.0
Occasionally25950.2
Often7113.8
Smoking status
Non-smoker48994.8
Current smoker214.1
Ex-smoker61.2
Marital status
Single35268.2
Married15429.8
Divorced101.9
Province
Central 22443.4
Eastern316.0
Western16532.0
Northern438.3
Southern5310.3
Use of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs)
Yes13626.4
No38073.6
Table 2. Pattern of OCPS use among studied participants.
Table 2. Pattern of OCPS use among studied participants.
ItemsCategoriesNo.%
Which type of OCP do you use?The combined pill519.9
The progesterone-only pill112.1
I don’t know the type8616.7
I do not use it36871.3
How long have you been using OCPs?Less than one year489.3
1–5 year458.7
More than 5 years438.3
Never38073.6
Table 3. Awareness of participants regarding the potential sides effect of OCPs use and the possible risk of stroke.
Table 3. Awareness of participants regarding the potential sides effect of OCPs use and the possible risk of stroke.
Awareness ItemsNo.%
What potential health effects do you know are associated with the use of oral contraceptive pills?
Stroke12724.6
Weight gain, owing to fluid retention or an anabolic effect, or both19738.2
Flushing, dizziness, depression or irritability5310.3
Skin changes (e.g., acne and/or an increase in pigmentation)51.0
Amenorrhoea of variable duration on cessation of taking the pill5610.9
Nausea142.7
Tender breasts142.7
Headache295.6
Bloating51.0
Mood changes51.0
Headache20.4
High blood pressure30.6
Heart attack30.6
Thrombus/ clot in the lung10.2
Myocardial infarction20.4
Specifically, are you aware of the risk of stroke associated with OCP use?
Yes16632.2
No35067.8
What symptoms do you think are linked with a stroke?
Paralysis or weakness on one or both sides of the body35667.0
Loss of bowel control (incontinence)244.7
Confusion, including trouble with speaking and understanding356.8
Headache with altered consciousness or vomiting387.4
Numbness of the face, arm or leg, particularly on one side of the body193.7
Trouble with seeing, in one or both eyes51.0
Trouble with walking, including dizziness and lack of co-ordination.91.7
Pain in the hands and feet that gets worse with movement and temperature changes30.6
Trouble controlling or expressing emotions.122.3
Depression152.9
How do you think we can reduce the incidence of stroke when using OCP?
Choose the right type of contraceptive method32462.8
Regular check-ups for weight, blood pressure8817.1
Maintaining a healthy weight, exercising regularly, eating a balanced diet low in saturated fats and cholesterol.387.4
Use alternative forms of contraception, such as non-hormonal methods like condoms or intrauterine devices (IUDs).387.4
Manage stress152.9
Drinking enough water regularly132.5
Table 4. Chi square analysis of stroke risk scores and personal data (n = 516).
Table 4. Chi square analysis of stroke risk scores and personal data (n = 516).
Personal DataCategoriesStroke Risk Scorep Value
Nationality
Saudi1590.270
Non-Saudi7
Age
below 20500.110
20–30 78
31–4029
41–509
Above 500
Educational level
High School or below740.081
Diploma14
Bachelor’s degree78
PhD or higher0
Employment status
Not working1520.767
Working full time 12
Working part time2
Retired0
Physical activity
Seldom570.510
Occasionally 82
Often 27
Smoking status
Non-smoker1590.666
Current smoker6
Ex-smoker1
Marital status
Single1020.056
Married59
Divorced5
Province
Central 670.697
Eastern11
Western57
Northern 11
Southern 20
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Edris, F.E.; Alasiri, R.A.A.; Albukhari, A.F.; Sadiq, M.A.; Alahmadi, W.M.; Alruwaili, A.R.; Alhadidi, N.F.; Alenezi, I.H.; Sabban, H.T.; Gari, A.; et al. Assessment of Women’s Awareness of the Possible Risk of Stroke Associated with the Use of Oral Contraceptives Pills in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Medicina 2025, 61, 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61020259

AMA Style

Edris FE, Alasiri RAA, Albukhari AF, Sadiq MA, Alahmadi WM, Alruwaili AR, Alhadidi NF, Alenezi IH, Sabban HT, Gari A, et al. Assessment of Women’s Awareness of the Possible Risk of Stroke Associated with the Use of Oral Contraceptives Pills in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Medicina. 2025; 61(2):259. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61020259

Chicago/Turabian Style

Edris, Fawaz E., Rehab Ahmed A. Alasiri, Abdullah Faisal Albukhari, Mohammed Arab Sadiq, Wojood Mubarak Alahmadi, Alhanouf Radhyan Alruwaili, Nojuod Fares Alhadidi, Iman Hamid Alenezi, Hussein Talal Sabban, Abdulrahim Gari, and et al. 2025. "Assessment of Women’s Awareness of the Possible Risk of Stroke Associated with the Use of Oral Contraceptives Pills in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study" Medicina 61, no. 2: 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61020259

APA Style

Edris, F. E., Alasiri, R. A. A., Albukhari, A. F., Sadiq, M. A., Alahmadi, W. M., Alruwaili, A. R., Alhadidi, N. F., Alenezi, I. H., Sabban, H. T., Gari, A., Eskandar, M., Salma, U., & Alshaikh, A. B. A. (2025). Assessment of Women’s Awareness of the Possible Risk of Stroke Associated with the Use of Oral Contraceptives Pills in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Medicina, 61(2), 259. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61020259

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop