Next Article in Journal
New Dimeric Members of the Phomoxanthone Family: Phomolactonexanthones A, B and Deacetylphomoxanthone C Isolated from the Fungus Phomopsis sp.
Next Article in Special Issue
Chitosan-Alginate Biocomposite Containing Fucoidan for Bone Tissue Engineering
Previous Article in Journal
Cytotoxic, Cytostatic and HIV-1 PR Inhibitory Activities of the Soft Coral Litophyton arboreum
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of Two Novel Anti-Fibrotic Benzopyran Compounds Produced by Engineered Strains Derived from Streptomyces xiamenensis M1-94P that Originated from Deep-Sea Sediments
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 11
Issue 12
10.3390/md11124937
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Eight New Peptaibols from Sponge-Associated Trichoderma atroviride

by
Irina Panizel
1,2,
Oded Yarden
3,
Micha Ilan
2 and
Shmuel Carmeli
1,*
1
Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Chemistry and Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
2
Department of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
3
Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2013, 11(12), 4937-4960; https://doi.org/10.3390/md11124937
Submission received: 24 September 2013 / Revised: 28 October 2013 / Accepted: 11 November 2013 / Published: 11 December 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances and New Perspectives in Marine Biotechnology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Eight new and four known peptaibols were isolated from a strain of the fungus, Trichoderma atroviride (NF16), which was cultured from an Axinellid sponge collected from the East Mediterranean coast of Israel. The structures of the pure compounds were determined using HRMS, MS/MS and one- and two-dimensional NMR measurements. The isolated compounds belong to the trichorzianines, a family of 19-residue linear hydrophobic peptides containing a high proportion of α-aminoisobutyric acid (Aib), an acetylated N-terminus and a C-terminal amino alcohol. These new peptaibols exhibited antimicrobial activity against environmental bacteria isolated from the Mediterranean coast of Israel.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Peptaibols are linear peptides of 5–20 residues, characterized by an acetate or acyl group in the N-terminus, C-terminal amino alcohol, a high proportion of α-aminoisobutyric acid (Aib) and other dialkylamino acids, such as isovaline (Iva). Most peptaibols were isolated from Trichoderma spp. or other closely related genera of fungi [1,2]. Peptaibols are produced by nonribosomal peptide synthetases [3]. To date, more than 300 peptaibols have been described, and their properties are summarized in the Peptaibol Database [4]. Peptaibols exhibit antimicrobial activity against fungi and Gram-positive bacteria and have an important role in biocontrol by Trichoderma spp. They act synergistically with cell wall degrading enzymes to inhibit the growth of fungal pathogens [5]. Trichorzianines are a subgroup of 19-residue peptaibols, initially isolated from Trichoderma harzianum [6,7,8]. They have similar amino acids sequences, except for differences in residues 5 (Aib or Iva), 14 (Leu or Val), 16 (Ile or Leu), 18 (Gln or Glu) and 19 (Pheol or Trpol) (Table S1 in the supporting material). A study, in which a trichorzianine type A (neutral trichorzianines) mixture was analyzed by MS/MS, revealed that in addition to the above-mentioned variable residues, other residues might be changed. In position 2, Ala might be substituted with Gly, in position 3 Ala with Gly or Aib, in position 5 Aib with Iva or Val, in positions 7, 8 and 9 Aib with Ala and in position 14 Val or Ile or Leu with Ala [9]. Recent investigation of five marine-derived T. atroviride strains afforded a new class of 17 residue-long peptaibols along with 19-residue peptaibols [10]. Peptaibols initially isolated from Trichoderma atroviride are termed atroviridins [11] and neoatroviridins [12]. LC-MS/MS study of T. atroviride peptaibols [2,13] revealed trichorzianines isolated from T. harzianum [7,8], as well.
In the current research, eight new and four known trichorzianines were isolated from the extract of T. atroviride (strain NF16), which was cultivated from an Axinellid sponge, collected by SCUBA diving from the Mediterranean Sea near Akhziv, Israel, as a part of a study on the chemical ecology of sponge-associated fungi. In re-isolation and culture trials, T. atroviride was re-isolated from both Axinella polypoides and A. verrucosa specimens (from 75% to 90% of the specimens; n = 4 and n = 11, respectively).

2. Results and Discussion

The culture medium was treated with Amberlite XAD-7 HP, and the compounds absorbed to the resin were washed from it with acetone. The crude acetone extract was subject to a Sephadex LH-20 column, and the active fraction was repeatedly separated on a preparative reversed phase HPLC column. The twelve peptaibols isolated in this study vary in four of 19 positions: position 5 was occupied by Aib or Iva, position 9 by Ala or Aib, position 14 by Leu or Val and position 17 by Glu, Glu-OMe or Gln (Table 1).

2.1. Structure Elucidation of Trichorzianine 1938 (TA1938) (1)

Trichorzianine 1938 (TA1938) (1) was isolated as an amorphous white solid. In the ESI+ TOF MS of 1, the quasi-molecular ions m/z 1939.1 ([M + H]+), m/z 1961.2 ([M + Na]+), m/z 981.1 ([M + H + Na]2+), m/z 992.0 ([M + 2Na]2+), and m/z 669.0 ([M + 3Na]3+) were observed. High-resolution mass measurement established its molecular formula, C91H151N21O25, for the [M + Na]+ ion of 1, at m/z 1961.1099. In addition to the molecular ions, some prominent fragment ions were also present in the ESI+ spectrum; including the two complementary fragments, m/z 1122.7 and m/z 817.5, derived from the cleavage between the proline nitrogen and carboxyl group of the adjacent amino acid, characteristic of the peptaibols [14]. These two fragments were advantageous in the structural elucidation of 1 by MS/MS (Figure 1).
Table
Table 1. Trichorzianines (TA) 1–12 isolated from Trichoderma atroviride (NF16). Positions marked in grey differ between compounds. TA1938, trichorzianine 1938. Aib, α-amino-isobutyric acid.
Table 1. Trichorzianines (TA) 1–12 isolated from Trichoderma atroviride (NF16). Positions marked in grey differ between compounds. TA1938, trichorzianine 1938. Aib, α-amino-isobutyric acid.
Compound nameNew/known12345678910111213141516171819
TA1938 (1)newAcAibAlaAlaAibIvaGlnAibAibAibSerLeuAibProLeuAibIleGluGlnPheol
TA1909 (2)newAcAibAlaAlaAibAibGlnAibAibAlaSerLeuAibProLeuAibIleGlnGlnPheol
TA1895 (3)newAcAibAlaAlaAibAibGlnAibAibAlaSerLeuAibProValAibIleGlnGlnPheol
TA1896 (4)newAcAibAlaAlaAibAibGlnAibAibAlaSerLeuAibProValAibIleGlu-OMeGlnPheol
TA1924 (5)newAcAibAlaAlaAibIvaGlnAibAibAibSerLeuAibProValAibIleGlu-OMeGlnPheol
TA1910 (6)newAcAibAlaAlaAibIvaGlnAibAibAlaSerLeuAibProValAibIleGlu-OMeGlnPheol
TA1924a (7)newAcAibAlaAlaAibAibGlnAibAibAibSerLeuAibProLeuAibIleGlu-OMeGlnPheol
TA1909a (8)newAcAibAlaAlaAibIvaGlnAibAibAlaSerLeuAibProValAibIleGlnGlnPheol
TA.VIb (9)knownAcAibAlaAlaAibAibGlnAibAibAibSerLeuAibProValAibIleGlnGlnPheol
TA.VIa (10)knownAcAibAlaAlaAibIvaGlnAibAibAibSerLeuAibProLeuAibIleGlnGlnPheol
TA.VII (11)knownAcAibAlaAlaAibIvaGlnAibAibAibSerLeuAibProValAibIleGlnGlnPheol
TA.Vb (12)knownAcAibAlaAlaAibAibGlnAibAibAibSerLeuAibProLeuAibIleGlnGlnPheol
Marinedrugs 11 04937 g001 1024
Figure 1. Secondary MS fragmentation of trichorzianine 1938 (1) ions at m/z 1122.5, b12-ion (A); and m/z 839.5, y7-ion (B).
Figure 1. Secondary MS fragmentation of trichorzianine 1938 (1) ions at m/z 1122.5, b12-ion (A); and m/z 839.5, y7-ion (B).
Marinedrugs 11 04937 g001
The 1H and 13C NMR spectra (Table 2 and Supplementary Figures S1 and S2) revealed that 1 is composed of the amino alcohol, phenylalaninol (Pheol), acetate, the non-proteinogenic amino acids, α-amino-isobutyric acid (Aib) and isovaline, and the proteinogenic amino acids, leucine, isoleucine, serine, glutamine, glutamic acid, proline and alanine. According to the MS/MS data (Figure 1), Aib appeared seven times in the molecule. The presence of the amino alcohol and isovaline and a high proportion of Aib indicated that the compound belonged to the peptaibol family. The amino acid sequence of the peptide, which was partially determined by the MS/MS, was confirmed and completed by analysis of the 2D NMR data (Table 2 and Supplementary Figures S3–S6). Initially, the structure of the amino acids were determined through interpretation of the COSY, TOCSY, HSQC and HMBC correlations, followed by their connection into the complete planar peptide structure through the HMBC and ROESY correlations and MS/MS data.
Table
Table 2. NMR data of trichorzianine 1938 a in DMSO-d6.
Table 2. NMR data of trichorzianine 1938 a in DMSO-d6.
Position δC, mult. bδH, mult., J (Hz)LR C–H correlations cNOE correlations d
Ac1171.1 s Ac-2, 1Aib-NH,4
223.1 q1.93 s 1Aib-NH,3,4
1Aib1175.7 e s 2Ala-NH, 1Aib-NH,3,4
255.8 s 1Aib-NH,3,4
326.2 g q1.35 s1Aib-NH1Aib-NH
424.0 h q1.32 s1Aib-31Aib-NH
NH 8.56 s Ac-2, 1Aib-3,4
2Ala1174.5 s 3Ala-NH, 2Ala-2,3
250.9 d4.02 m2Ala-NH,32Ala-NH,3
316.8 q1.31 d2Ala-NH,22Ala-NH,2
NH 8.25 d (5.2) 3Ala-NH, 2Ala-2,3
3Ala1174.5 s 4Aib-NH, 3Ala-2,3
251.0 d3.99 m3Ala-NH,33Ala-NH,3, 4Aib-NH
316.2 q1.33 d3Ala-NH,23Ala-NH,2
NH 7.68 d (5.6) 4Aib-NH, 3Ala-2,3, 2Ala-NH
4Aib1175.0 s 5Iva-NH
256.0 f s 4Aib-NH,3,4
326.1 g q1.43 k s4Aib-NH,44Aib-NH
423.2 h q1.35 l s4Aib-NH,34Aib-NH
NH 7.87 s 4Aib-2,3, 3Ala-NH,2
5Iva1176.4 s 6Gln-NH, 5Iva-3,NH
258.6 s 5Iva-NH,3a,3b,4,5
3a25.6 t2.20 m5Iva-45Iva-4,3b
3b 1.62 m 5Iva-4,3a
47.4 q0.74 t5Iva-3a,3b5Iva-NH,3a,3b
522.7 q1.35 l s5Iva-NH,3a5Iva-NH,
NH 7.47 s 5Iva-4,5
6Gln1174.0 s 7Aib-NH, 6Gln-2
256.0 d3.78 m6Gln-NH,3,4a,4b7Aib-NH, 6Gln-NH,3,4a,4b
326.2 t1.97 m6Gln-2,4a,4b,NH6Gln-2,4a,4b,NH, 7Aib-NH
4a 31.6 i t 2.15 m6Gln-3,NH2b6Gln-2,3,4b,NH,NH2a
4b 2.23 m 6Gln-2,3,4a
5173.6 s 6Gln-3,4a,4b,NH2a,b
NH2a 7.17 s 6Gln-4a,NH2b
NH2b 6.76 s 6Gln-NH2a
NH 7.74 m 6Gln-2,3,4a
7Aib1175.8 e s 8Aib-NH, 7Aib-NH,3,4
256.1 f s 7Aib-NH,3,4
325.8 g q1.42 k s7Aib-NH,47Aib-NH
422.6 h q1.34 s7Aib-NH7Aib-NH
NH 7.86 s 6Gln-2,3, 7Aib-3,4, 8Aib-NH
8Aib1175.9 e s 9Aib-NH, 8Aib-3,4
256.1 f s 8Aib-NH,3,4
326.3 g q1.42 k s8Aib-NH,48Aib-NH
423.3 h q1.39 l s8Aib-38Aib-NH
NH 7.55 8Aib-3,4, 7Aib-NH, 9Aib-NH
9Aib1176.4 s 10Ser-NH, 9Aib-3,4
256.1 f s 9Aib-NH,3,4
326.5 g q1.46 k s9Aib-NH,4
423.0 h q1.42 l s9Aib-39Aib-NH
NH 7.77 9Aib-4, 8Aib-NH
10Ser1170.6 s 11Leu-NH, 10Ser-2,3a-
258.9 d4.02 m 10Ser-NH,3a,3b, 11Leu -NH
3a61.2 t3.73 m10Ser-NH,210Ser-NH,2
3b 3.78 m 10Ser-NH,2
OH
NH 7.74 m 10Ser-2,3a,3b
11Leu1173.7 j s 12Aib-NH, 11Leu-2
251.5 d4.27 m11Leu-NH,412Aib-NH, 11Leu-NH,3a,3b,5, 13Pro-5a
3a39.2 t1.56 m11Leu-2,5,611Leu-2,3b,5
3b 1.70 m 11Leu-NH,2,3a,5
423.9 d1.73 m11Leu-5,611Leu-NH,6
520.5 q0.76 d11Leu-6,3b11Leu-2,3a,3b
623.0 q0.82 d11Leu-5,3b11Leu-4
NH 7.59 d (8.0) 10Ser-2, 11Leu-2,3b,4
12Aib1173.0 s 12Aib-NH,3,4
256.2 f s 12Aib-NH,3,4
325.8 g q1.39 s12Aib-NH12Aib-NH
423.2 h q1.49 s12Aib-NH12Aib-NH, 13Pro-5b
NH 7.89 s 13Pro-5a,5b, 11Leu-2, 12Aib-3,4
13Pro1173.4 s 14Leu-NH, 13Pro-2,3a
263.1 d4.21 t (8.0)13Pro-3a,414Leu-NH,5, 13Pro-3b,4
3a28.7 t1.59 m13Pro-2,5b13Pro-3b,5a
3b2.22 m13Pro-3a,2,4,5b
426.2 t1.86 m13Pro-213Pro-2,3b,5a,5b
5a48.7 t3.44 m13Pro-3b13Pro-2,3a,4,5b, 11Leu-2, 14Leu-NH, 12Aib-NH
5b3.69 m13Pro-4,5a, 12Aib-NH,3
14Leu1173.7 j s 15Aib-NH, 14Leu-2
253.4 d3.91 m14Leu-NH,414Leu-3a,3b,4,5,6,NH, 15Aib-NH
3a38.7 t1.51 m14Leu-2,5,614Leu-2,3b,6,NH
3b 1.78 m 14Leu-2,3a,6,NH
424.8 d1.68 m14Leu-5,614Leu-2,5,NH
523.0 q0.92 d (6.0)14Leu-614Leu-2,4, 13Pro-2
621.0 q0.82 m14Leu-514Leu-2,3a,3b
NH 7.72 m 14Leu-2,3a,3b,4, 13Pro-2,5a
15Aib1175.4 s 16Ile-NH, 15Aib-NH,3,4
256.3 f s 15Aib-NH,3,4
326.1 g q 1.44 k s15Aib-415Aib -NH
423.4 h q 1.37 l s15Aib-NH,315Aib-NH
NH 7.64 s 16Ile-NH, 15Aib-3,4, 14Leu-2
16Ile1172.0 s 17Glu-NH, 16Ile-2-
258.9 d3.93 m16Ile-NH,4b,616Ile-NH,3,4b,6
335.6 d1.88 m16Ile-2,4a,4b,5,616Ile-NH,2,6
4a25.0 t1.20 m16Ile-2,3,5,616Ile-NH,4b
4b 1.47 m 16Ile-NH,2,4a,5
511.5 q0.82 m16Ile-4a16Ile-4b
615.6 q0.86 d16Ile-4a,216Ile-NH,2,3
NH 6.96 s 16Ile-2,3,4a,4b,6, 15Aib-NH
17Glu1171.3 s 18Gln-NH, 17Glu-2,3a,3b
253.6 d4.06 m17Glu-NH,4a,4b18Gln-NH, 17Glu-NH,3a,3b,4a,4b
3a26.5 t1.87 m17Glu-2,4a,4b17Glu-NH,2,4b
3b 1.97 m 17Glu-NH,2.4a
4a30.4 t2.25 m17Glu-2,3a,3b17Glu-NH,2,3b
4b 2.37 m 17Glu-NH,2,3a
5173.8 j s 17Glu-4b
NH 7.68 d (5.6) 17Glu-2,3a,3b,4a,4b
18Gln1170.8 s 19PheOH-NH, 18Gln-2,3a,3b
253.1 d4.06 m18Gln-NH,3a,3b,4a,4b19PheOH-NH, 18Gln-NH,3a,3b,,4b
3a27.7 d1.83 m18Gln-2,4a,4b,NH18Gln-NH,2,3b,4a
3b 1.70 m 18Gln-NH,2,3a,4b
4a31.7 i t2.05 m18Gln-NH2a,2,3a,3b18Gln-3a
4b 1.97 m 18Gln-NH,NH2b,2,3b
5173.6 18Gln-NH2a,b,3a,3b,4a,4b
NH2a 6.65 s 18Gln-NH2b
NH2b 7.10 s 18Gln-NH2a,4b
NH 7.46 d 19PheOH-NH, 18Gln-2,3a,3b,4b
19PheOH1a62.7 t3.29 m19PheOH-2,3a,3b19PheOH-NH,2,3a,3b,5
1b 3.32 m 19PheOH-NH,2,3a,3b
252.5 d3.86 m19PheOH-1a,1b,3a,3b,NH19PheOH-NH,1a,1b,3a,3b,5
3a36.6 t2.61 dd (13.4, 8.2)19PheOH-1a,1b,2,519PheOH-NH,1a,1b,2,5
3b 2.84 dd (13.2,4.8) 19PheOH-1a,1b,2,5
4139.2 s 19PheOH-2,3a,3b,5
5129.4 d7.21 m19PheOH-3a,3b,6,719PheOH-1a,2,3a,3b,7,NH
6128.2 d7.19 m19PheOH-5,7
7126.0 d7.12 m19PheOH-5,619PheOH-5,NH
OH
NH 7.27 d (8) 18Gln-NH,2, 19PheOH-1a,1b,2,3a,5,7
a Carried out on an AVANCE-400 Bruker instrument; b multiplicity and assignment are from HSQC experiment; c values determined from HMBC experiment; nJCH = 8 Hz, recycle time 1 s; d selected NOE’s from a ROESY experiment; e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l these signals may interchange.
According to the MS/MS spectra (Figure 1), the difference of 85 mass units appears seven times, in the positions 1, 4, 7 (or 6), 8, 9, 12 (or 11) and 15. The difference of 213 mass units in positions 6–7, which was explained by a couple of amino acids, glutamine (128) and Aib (85), could also be explained by the amino acids, valine or isovaline (99) and asparagine (114). The difference of 198 mass units in positions 11–12, which was explained by the amino acids, leucine (123) and Aib (85), could also be explained by the presence of two Vxx (valine or isovaline). However, according to the NMR data, valine and asparagine were not present in the molecule, and the only isovaline was assigned to position 5 according to the MS/MS and NMR data analysis. In the NMR spectra, signals typical of α-amino-isobutyric acid (Aib) were observed, including eight singlet amide signals resonating at δH 7.47 (assigned to the isovaline), 7.89, 8.56, 7.55, 7.64, 7.77, 7.86 and 7.87 ppm, multiple carbon signals resonating at δC 55.8–56.3, typical of carbons α to carboxyl; all of them, except one, (δC 56.0, assigned to 6glutamine) are quaternary according to the HSQC spectrum and multiple overlapping singlet methyl signals in the region of 1.30–1.49 ppm of the 1H NMR spectrum. According to the HSQC map, some of the protons of these methyl signals were bound to carbons resonating between 22.6 and 23.4 or between 25.8 and 26.7 ppm, while one to a carbon at 24.2 ppm. In addition to the Aib methyls, a proton signal of a single methyl of isovaline, one of the methylene protons of the isoleucine and methyl signals of 2alanine and 3alanine, resonate in the region of 1.30–1.49 ppm. Four methyl carbons, resonating between 22.6 and 23.4 ppm, were assigned to 11leucine, 14leucine, acetate and 5isovaline, in addition to the seven Aib methyls. In the region of 25.8–26.7 ppm, three methylene carbons of 13proline, 6glutamine and 17glutamic acid resonate beside the Aib methyl groups. Due to signal overlap, some geminal methyl groups and carbon α to carboxyls of Aib could not be distinguished unambiguously and remain interchangeable. Carboxyamides and amide protons were assigned according to HMBC correlations with amide protons and carboxyamide carbons of the neighboring amino acids, when the amino acids were connected to the full peptide chain.
The structure determination of acetyl-1Aib started with the methyl protons (δH 1.93, s, δC 23.1) that exhibited an HMBC correlation with the carboxyamide (δC 171.1), which, in turn, was connected to a singlet amide proton resonating at δH 8.56. The amide proton and two singlet methyl groups (δH 1.32 and 1.35) exhibited HMBC correlations with a carboxyamide (one of the three carbons resonating at δC 175.7–175.9) and to a quaternary carbon α to a carboxyamide, resonating at δC 55.8), assigning the amino acid as 1Aib. The amide proton exhibited ROESY correlations to the methyl signals (δH 1.35, δC 26.5 and δH 1.32, δC 24.1). The carbon of the second methyl group exhibited an HMBC correlation with the protons of the first methyl (δH 1.35). These correlations allowed the assignment of the acetyl-1Aib sub-structure.
The assignment of the structure of 2alanine and 3alanine started with COSY correlations of the protons of two doublet methyl groups (δH 1.31, δH 1.33) with the α-protons resonating at δH 4.02 and 3.99, respectively, which, in turn, were connected to amide protons resonating at 8.25 and 7.68 ppm, respectively. This structure was reinforced by HMBC correlations (see Table 2). HMBC correlations connected the methyl groups and α-protons (δH 1.31, 1.33, 4.02, 3.99) to carboxyamide carbons resonating at δC 174.5, culminating in the structure of the two alanine residues.
A singlet amide proton resonating at δH 7.87 exhibited an HMBC correlation with the quaternary carbon resonating at δC 56.0 ppm and ROESY and HMBC correlations with two singlet methyl residues (δH 1.35, δC 23.2 and δH 1.43, δC 26.1), assigning the signals, except for the carboxyamide carbon of 4Aib. The other Aib residues in positions 7, 8, 9, 12 and 15 were assigned in a similar way.
The methyl protons (δH 0.74 t, δC 7.4) exhibited COSY correlation to methylene protons (δH 2.20 and 1.62) and HMBC correlation to the methylene carbon (δC 25.6). HMBC correlations of a quaternary carbon at δC 58.6, typical of a carbon α to carboxyamide, with the methyl and the methylene protons, established it as the isovaline C-2 carbon, which, in turn, was coupled by HMBC correlations to an amide proton (δH 7.47) and with a single methyl group (δH 1.35). Several singlet methyl groups, most belonging to Aib residues, resonated at 1.35 ppm, interfering with the assignment of this methyl carbon by HSQC. However, this carbon was assigned by HMBC correlation of the amide proton (δH 7.47) with a carbon resonating at 22.7 ppm. HMBC correlations of the amide (δH 7.47), one of the methylene protons (δH 2.20), and amide proton of the neighboring amino acid, 6glutamine with a carboxyamide carbon resonating at δC 174.6 ppm, established it as the 5isovaline carboxyamide.
The structure determination of 6glutamine and 18glutamine was initiated through COSY correlations of the two pairs of singlet amide protons resonating at 7.17 and 6.76 ppm and at 7.10 and 6.65 ppm, respectively. These amide protons exhibited HMBC correlations to two carbonyl signals resonating at δC 173.6, thus establishing two primary amides. These amides were connected through HMBC correlations of the amide protons resonating at 6.65 ppm and 6.76 ppm to two methylene carbons resonating at 31.7–31.6 ppm (6C-4 and 18C-4, δH 2.15, 2.23 and 2.05, 1.97, respectively), which, in turn, exhibited HMBC correlations with two pairs of methylene protons, (6Gln-3, δH 1.97, 2H, δC 26.2) and (18Gln-3, δH 1.70, 1.83 ppm, δC 27.7). One of the C-3 carbons (26.2 ppm) exhibited HMBC correlations to the pair of methylene-4 protons resonating at 2.15 and 2.23 ppm, while the second C-3 carbon (27.7 ppm) exhibited HMBC correlation with the methylene protons at 1.97 ppm and 2.05 ppm (H-4a, H-4b), allowing the differentiation between the two spin systems. HMBC correlations of C-3 carbons at 26.2 and 27.7 ppm with the methine protons resonating at δH 3.78 (δC 56.0) and δH 4.06 (δC 53.1), respectively, established the methines at position 2 of these amino acids. This assignment was further supported by the COSY correlations of H2-3 with H-2 of both spin systems. The α-amide protons were assigned through the COSY correlation of the α-proton, resonating at 3.78 ppm with the amide proton resonating at 7.74 ppm, and that at 4.06 ppm with that at 7.47 ppm, and reinforced by the HMBC correlations of C-2 carbons with these amide protons. HMBC correlations of the carbon resonating at 174.0 ppm with the proton resonating at 3.78 ppm, and of the carbon resonating at 170.8 ppm with protons resonating at 4.06 ppm, 1.70 ppm and 1.83 ppm, established those carbons as the carboxyamides of the glutamine residues.
The structure elucidation of 10serine was based on COSY correlations of the oxymethylene protons (δH 3.73, 3.78; δC 61.2) with a proton resonating at 4.02 ppm (δC 58.9), which, in turn, was connected to an amide proton resonating at δH 7.74. HMBC correlations of the protons resonating at δH 4.02 and 3.73 with the carbon resonating at δC 170.6 established the latter as a serine carboxyamide. The hydroxyl proton was not observed in the NMR spectrum of TA1938, but was observed at chemical shifts of 4.70–4.85 ppm in some of the other peptaibols (TA1895, TA1909, TA1909A, TA1896 and TA.Vb).
Two methyl groups, H3-5 and H3-6 (δH 0.76 d, 0.82 d), were coupled to the same methine proton (H-4, δH 1.73, C-4: δC 23.9) through COSY correlations. In the HMBC spectrum, the two methyl groups exhibit correlations to C-4 (23.9 ppm) and to a methylene carbon (δC 39.2, C-3, δH 1.56 and 1.70). COSY correlations coupled H-3b and H-3a through H-2 (δH 4.27) to an amide resonating at δH 7.59 and HMBC correlation to one of the three carbons resonating at δC 173.7–173.8, establishing the structure of 11leucine.
The structure elucidation of the 13proline was initiated with COSY correlation of the aminomethylene protons resonating at δH 3.44 and 3.69 (H-5a and H-5b) with methylene protons resonating at δH 1.86 (H-4a and -4b). The later protons were coupled through COSY correlations to protons of additional methylene δH 1.59 and 2.22 (H-3a and H-3b), which, in turn, exhibited COSY correlations with a methine proton (δH 4.21, t). The chemical shifts of this proton and the carbon to which it was attached (δC 63.1, established through HSQC experiment) indicated their location α to a carboxyamide and amine. HMBC correlations between the methine carbon (δC 63.1 d, C-2) and H-3b (δH 2.22), C-3 (δC 28.7, CH2) and H-2, C-5 (δC 48.7) and H-3b reinforced this structure. H-2 (δH 4.21) was connected through HMBC correlation to a carbon that resonated at δC 173.4, which was assigned as C-1 of this residue. No HMBC or ROESY correlations were present, which could prove the ring closure. However, the chemical shifts of the H-5a, H-5b and C-5 (δH 3.44 and 3.69, δC 48.7) indicated their vicinity to a nitrogen atom. Besides, none of the carbons or protons of this residue exhibited correlations with any of the amide protons, indicating a tertiary amide. In addition, the chemical shifts of the carbons and protons were similar to those of proline in TA1909 (2), in which a 3J HMBC correlation between C-2 (δC 63.0) and H-5b (δH 3.71) was observed, indicating the closure of a pyrrolidine ring. Based on the above evidences, the structure of this amino acid was established as proline.
The structure elucidation of 14leucine started with COSY correlations of two methyl groups resonating at δH 0.92 and 0.82 (H3-5 and H3-6, respectively) with the same methine proton that resonated at δH 1.68 (H-4). In the HMBC spectrum, H3-5 and -6 exhibited correlations with a methine carbon (δC 24.8, C-4) and a methylene carbon, (δC 38.7, C-3, δH 1.51 and 1.78, H-3a and H-3b, respectively). H-3a and H-3b exhibited COSY correlations with a proton resonating at δH 3.91 (H-2), which, in turn, was correlated with the amide proton resonating at δH 7.72. HMBC correlation connected H-2 and one of three carbons resonating at δC 173.7–173.8. This HMBC correlation was weak, but the connectivity was reinforced by the HMBC correlation of this carbon with the amide proton δH 7.64 of the adjacent amino acid, 15Aib.
The structure elucidation of 16isoleucine started with COSY correlation of protons of a doublet methyl, (H3-6, resonating at δH 0.86, δC 15.7) with a methine proton, H-3 (δH 1.88). Methine-3 carbon (δC 35.6) exhibited HMBC correlations with the protons of CH3-6, the protons of an additional triplet methyl group (δH 0.82) and protons of a methylene (δH 1.20 and 1.47, δC 25.0 by HSQC). COSY correlations of the methylene protons with the methyl protons at δH 0.82 determined the ethyl segment. COSY correlations coupled the ethyl moiety through the methine proton at 1.88 ppm to a downfield shifted methine (H-2, δH 3.93, C-2, δC 58.9) and the later to an amide proton resonating at δH 6.96. H-2 presented an HMBC correlation to a carbon resonating at δC 170.6 that was assigned as the carboxyamide carbon of the isoleucine residue. In the 13C NMR spectrum, three carbons resonate at 173.7–173.8 ppm. Two of them were attributed to 11leucine and 14leucine. The third one exhibited an HMBC correlation to a proton that resonated at 2.37 ppm (H-4b, δC 30.4, δH-4a 2.25). The protons of the later methylene were coupled through COSY correlations to protons that resonated at δH 1.97 and 1.87 (H-3a and H-3b, δC 26.5), which, in turn, were connected to an α-proton resonating at 4.06 ppm and to an amide proton (δH 7.68). HMBC correlations of the carbon resonating at δC 171.3 with the protons at δH 4.06, 1.97 and 1.87 established it as the glutamic acid carboxamide, establishing the structure of 17glutamic acid.
The four aromatic carbons presented in the 13C spectrum were assigned to 19phenylalaninol. The carbon at δC 139.2 was identified as a quaternary carbon and the other three carried protons (δC 126.0, δH 7.12), (δC 128.2, δH 7.18) and (δC 129.4, δH 7.21). The signal intensity of the carbons and integration of the protons indicated that two pairs of symmetric aromatic protons resonate at 7.18 and 7.21 ppm and one proton resonates at δH 7.12 ppm, in accordance with a mono-substituted phenyl ring. COSY correlations coupled the later proton with the protons resonating at δH 7.18 (H-6,6′, δC 128.2) and to those resonating at δH 7.21 (H-5,5′, δC 129.4). This was reinforced by HMBC correlations (see Table 2). The assignment of the aliphatic part of the amino alcohol was based on HMBC correlations of the aromatic carbons, C-4 and C-5, with the two methylene protons, δH 2.84 and 2.61 ppm (H-3a, H-3b), which were coupled by COSY correlations to a methine proton resonating at δH 3.86 (H-2). This methine proton was connected to an amide proton (δH 7.27 ppm) and to the protons of an oxymethylene resonating at δH 3.29 and 3.32 (H-1a and H-1b, δC 62.7). The hydroxyl proton of the phenylalaninol did not appear in the NMR spectra of 1, but was present in other trichorzianine: TA1895, TA1909, TA1909A, TA1896 and TA.Vb.
The assembling of the amino acids to the planar peptide structure was based on HMBC correlations from the carboxyamide carbon of an amino acid to the amide protons of the adjacent amino acid, by NOE correlations (from ROESY experiment) of the α- or amide proton of an amino acid with the α- or amide proton of the adjacent amino acid and by interpretation of MS/MS data. The structure of the peptide with the most significant HMBC and NOE correlations that led to the structure elucidation are summarized in Figure 2. The sequence Ac-1Aib-2Ala-3Ala-4Aib-5Iva/Val was inferred from MS/MS data. 1Aib carboxyamide carbon resonated (δC 175.7–175.9) closely with those of 7Aib and 8Aib, excluding an unequivocal proof of the HMBC correlation of 2Ala-NH with 1Aib-C-1.
Marinedrugs 11 04937 g002 1024
Figure 2. Structure of trichorzianine 1938 (1) with HMBC ( Marinedrugs 11 04937 i001) and ROESY ( Marinedrugs 11 04937 i002) correlations.
Figure 2. Structure of trichorzianine 1938 (1) with HMBC ( Marinedrugs 11 04937 i001) and ROESY ( Marinedrugs 11 04937 i002) correlations.
Marinedrugs 11 04937 g002
The carboxyamides carbons of 2Ala and 3Ala resonated at the same chemical shift (δC 174.5), not allowing the confirmation of their connection by HMBC correlation, but NOE correlation of 2Ala-NH with 3Ala-NH confirmed their vicinity. NOE correlation of 3Ala-H-2 with 4Aib-NH and HMBC correlation of 4Aib-C-1 with 5Iva-NH established the 3Ala-4Aib-5Iva partial structure. The connection of 5Iva with 6Gln could not be proven either by HMBC or NOE correlations, since the carboxyamides of 5Iva and 9Aib (δC 174.6) and the doublet amide protons of 6Gln and 10Ser (δH 7.74) resonated at the same chemical shifts. The correlation of these chemical shifts (δC 174.6 with δH 7.74) in the HMBC map remained unequivocal, while no correlations between 5Iva and 6Gln were observed in the ROESY map. The MS/MS data suggested that 5Iva was connected either to Gln or Aib. HMBC and especially NOE correlations (Table 2) confirmed the 6Gln-7Aib-8Aib-9Aib substructure, and in conjugation, with the MS/MS data, the 5Iva-6Gln-7Aib-8Aib-9Aib-10Ser sequence could be secured. 10Ser was connected to 11Leu based on the HMBC correlation of 10Ser-carboxyamide with 11Leu-NH. 11Leu- and 14Leu- carboxyamides resonated close one to the other (δC 173.7–173.8), not allowing unambiguous assignment of their neighboring amino acid residues. However, NOE correlations of 12Aib-NH with 11Leu-NH and 13Pro-5-Ha and 5-Hb established the 11Leu-12Aib-13Pro sequence. HMBC correlation of 13Pro-C-1 with 14Leu-NH established the connectivity of the latter two amino acids. NOE correlations of 15Aib-NH with 14Leu-H-2 and 16Ile-NH determined the 14Leu-15Aib-16Ile fragment. The rest of the sequence, 16Ile-17Glu-18Gln-19Pheol, could be secured with correlations from the HMBC map, resulting in the full planar structure of 1.

2.2. Structure Elucidation of 2–12

The structures of compounds 2–12 were determined in a similar manner to that of TA1938 (1). Compounds 2–12 vary from 1 in the amino acid residues of positions 5, 9, 14 and 17. 1H- and 13C-NMR data of the new trichorzianines are summarized in Table 3 and Table 4. Schemes of the secondary fragmentation in the MS/MS (Supplementary Figures S7–S15), complete NMR data (Supplementary Tables S2–S12 and Figures S16–S29) and the assemblage of the amino acids to the planar peptide structures (Supplementary Figures S30–S40) of compounds 2–12 are displayed in the supplementary material. The presence of Glu-OMe in compounds 4–7 was supported by the direct connectivity of the OMe-proton signal with the side-chain carboxyl carbon of Glu.
Table
Table 3. 1H NMR chemical shifts of trichorzianines 2–8 in DMSO-d6.
Table 3. 1H NMR chemical shifts of trichorzianines 2–8 in DMSO-d6.
Position TA1909 (2) aTA1895 (3) aTA1896 (4) bTA1924 (5) bTA1910 (6) aTA1924a (7) aTA1909a (8) a
Ac21.93 s1.92 s1.92 s1.92 s1.92 s1.93 s1.93 s
1Aib31.35 s1.35 s1.35 s1.35 s1.35 s1.36 s1.36 s
41.32 s1.32 s1.32 s1.32 s1.33 s1.32 s1.33 s
NH8.57 s8.57 s8.58 s8.54 s8.57 s8.57 s8.56 s
2Ala23.99 m3.98 m3.98 m4.00 m4.01 m4.01 m4.01 m
31.31 d1.31 d1.31 d1.30 d1.31 d1.31 d1.31 d
NH8.27 d 8.27 d 8.27 d 8.24 d 8.26 d 8.27 d 8.25 d
3Ala23.99 m3.99 m3.98 m4.02 m4.01 m4.01 m4.01 m
31.33 d1.33 d1.33 d1.33 d 1.33 d 1.33 d1.33 d
NH7.69 d 7.69 d 7.70 d 7.68 d 7.68 d 7.71 m7.68 d
4Aib31.41 d s1.39 c s1.43 c s1.43 s1.45 c s1.45 s1.46 s
41.36 c s1.38 s1.38 d s1.35 s1.35 d s1.38 c s1.35 c s
NH7.81 s7.81 s7.82 s7.86 s7.87 s7.83 s7.87 s
5Iva/5Aib3a1.44 s1.42 e s1.43 c s2.20 m2.21 m1.44 s2.21 m
3b 1.62 m1.62 m 1.62 m
41.39 s1.37 d s1.35 s0.73 t 0.73 m1.36 c s0.73 t
5 1.35 c s1.35 s 1.36 s
NH7.54 s7.53 s7.53 s7.46 s7.47 s7.55 s7.47 s
6Gln23.74 m3.73 m3.74 m3.78 m3.78 m3.77 m3.78 m
31.98 m1.99 m1.99 m1.95 m1.97 m1.97 m1.97 m
4a2.13 m2.13 m2.13 m2.14 m2.14 m2.15 m2.14 m
4b2.23 m2.23 m2.23 m2.23 m2.23 m2.23 m2.23 m
NH2a7.13 s7.13 s7.17 s7.16 s7.16 s7.16 s7.16 s
NH2b6.75 s6.75 s6.75 s6.74 s6.77 s6.76 s6.76 s
NH7.74 m7.74 m7.74 m7.72 m7.73 m7.77 m7.73 m
7Aib31.41 d s 1.41 c s1.44 s1.42 d s1.43 c s1.45 d s1.43 d s
41.34 c s 1.37 d s1.39 d s1.35 c s1.36 d s1.35 c s1.36 c s
NH7.90 s7.89 s7.89 s7.84 s7.90 s7.86 s7.90 s
8Aib31.46 c s1.45 s1.46 s1.42 d s1.45 c s1.43 d s1.43 d s
41.38 d s1.35 d s1.39 d s1.38 c s1.35 d s1.35 c s1.39 c s
NH7.597.58 s7.58 s7.54 s7.55 s7.59 s7.55 s
9Ala/9Aib23.94 m3.93 m3.93 m 3.96 m 3.96 m
31.40 d1.40 d1.40 d1.46 s1.40 d1.48 s1.40 d
4 1.42 s 1.43 s
NH7.73 m7.73 m7.73 m7.75 s7.72 s7.79 s7.72 s
10Ser24.09 m4.09 m4.09 m4.02 m4.10 m4.03 m4.11 m
3a3.72 m3.72 m3.73 m3.76 m3.73 m3.75 m3.72 m
3b3.77 m3.77 m3.77 m3.78 m3.76 m3.79 m3.76
OH4.86 t 4.85 t 4.85 t ---4.87 t
NH7.77 m7.77 m7.76 m7.73 m7.76 d 7.74 m7.76 m
11Leu24.27 m4.27 m4.27 m4.28 m4.28 m4.27 m4.28 m
3a1.54 m1.52 m1.53 m1.55 m1.55 m1.56 m1.55 m
3b1.67 m1.65 m1.66 m1.68 m1.67 m1.70 m1.67 m
41.73 m1.68 m1.69 m1.69 m1.69 m1.73 m1.69 m
50.76 d 0.77 d 0.77 m 0.76 d 0.78 d 0.76 m0.78 d
60.81 d0.83 d 0.83 d0.83 d0.84 d0.82 d0.84 d
NH7.43 d 7.44 d 7.43 m 7.59 d 7.44 d 7.59 d 7.44 m
12Aib31.40 s1.38 e s 1.36 s1.38 s 1.39 s 1.37 s1.40 s
41.46 s1.45 s 1.47 s1.48 s 1.46 s 1.49 s1.49 s
NH7.78 s7.91 s7.89 s7.93 s7.91 s7.92 s7.93 s
13Pro24.21 t 4.23 t 4.21 t 4.22 t 4.22 t 4.21 t 4.24 t
3a1.58 m1.64 m1.64 m1.65 m1.65 m1.60 m1.65 m
3b2.22 m2.22 m2.22 m2.22 m2.22 m2.24 m2.22 m
41.84 m1.84 m1.84 m1.86 m1.86 m1.86 m1.86 m
5a3.38 m3.47 m3.47 m3.52 m3.48 m3.45 m3.48 m
5b3.71 m3.69 m3.69 m3.67 m3.70 m3.70 m3.70 m
14Leu/14Val23.94 m3.76 m3.68 m3.72 m3.68 m3.90 m3.77 m
3a1.51 m2.22 m2.22 m2.21 m2.21 m1.52 m2.21 m
3b1.78 m 1.78 m
41.67 m0.93 d 0.93 d 0.93 d 0.94 d 1.68 m0.94 d
50.91 d 0.86 d 0.86 d0.87 d 0.89 d 0.92 d 0.88 d
60.82 d 0.82 d
NH7.74 m7.59 m7.59 m7.58 m7.59 d 7.72 m7.60 d
15Aib31.42 d s1.43 s1.42 c s1.42 d s1.43 c s 1.42 d s 1.45 d s
41.35 c s1.37 d s1.35 s1.35 c s1.38 d s 1.36 c s1.39 c s
NH7.63 s7.48 s7.45 s7.43 s7.43 s7.63 s7.43 s
16Ile23.91 m3.84 t3.87 t3.88 m3.88 m3.93 m3.87 m
31.87 m1.88 m1.88 m1.88 m1.88 m1.88 m1.88 m
4a1.20 m1.20 m1.20 m1.20 m1.20 m1.20 m1.20 m
4b1.47 m1.47 m1.47 m1.50 m1.50 m1.47 m1.50 m
50.81 t0.81 t 0.80 t0.80 t 0.81 t0.82 t0.81 t
60.85 d 0.85 d 0.85 d0.84 d0.85 d0.86 d0.86 d
NH6.96 d 7.22 m7.20 m7.20 m7.21 m6.94 d7.22 m
17Gln/17Glu24.03 m3.95 m4.01 m4.01 m4.02 m4.06 m3.97 m
3a1.85 m1.90 m1.98 m1.95 m1.95 m1.87 m1.90 m
3b1.94 m 1.97 m
4a2.08 m2.13 m2.41 m2.40 m2.49 m2.37 m2.13 m
4b2.18 m2.23 m2.47 m2.30 m2.40 m2.44 m2.23 m
NH7.69 d7.69 d7.67 d7.68 d7.68 d7.68 m7.69 d
OMe 3.55 s3.55 s3.55 s3.54 s
NH2a6.72 s6.72 s 6.72 s
NH2b7.13 s7.13 s 7.13 s
18Gln24.04 m4.00 m4.01 m4.03 m4.03 m4.06 m4.03 m
3a1.83 m1.81 m1.83 m1.81 m1.83 m1.83 m1.85 m
3b1.70 m1.70 m1.70 m1.70 m1.72 m1.70 m1.72 m
4a2.03 m2.04 m2.05 m2.05 m2.05 m2.05 m2.05 m
4b1.97 m1.97 m1.97 m1.97 m1.98 m1.97 m1.98 m
5
NH2a6.64 s6.62 s6.51 s6.61 s6.63 s6.65 s6.63 s
NH2b7.10 s7.07 s7.05 s7.04 s7.07 s7.10 s7.07 s
NH7.47 d 7.44 d7.45 d7.44 d7.46 d7.48 d 7.46 d
19Pheol1a3.28 m3.30 m3.30 m3.30 m3.30 m3.28 m3.30 m
1b3.32 m3.32 m3.33 m3.33 m3.33 m3.32 m3.33 m
23.86 m3.84 t 3.86 m3.86 m3.86 m3.87 m3.86 m
3a2.61 dd 2.61 dd 2.61 dd 2.61 dd 2.62 dd 2.61 dd 2.63 dd
3b2.83 dd 2.83 dd 2.83 dd 2.84 dd 2.84 dd 2.84 dd 2.84 dd
57.20 m7.22 m7.21 m7.21 m7.22 m7.21 m7.22 m
67.19 m7.18 m7.19 m7.19 m7.20 m7.19 m7.20 m
77.11 m7.11 m7.11 m7.11 m7.12 m7.13 m7.12 m
OH4.70 t 4.69 t4.67 t 4.69 t
NH7.27 d 7.15 m7.18 m 7.18 m7.19 m7.30 d 7.18 m
a Instrument 1H frequency 400 MHz; b Instrument 1H frequency 500 MHz; c,d,e These signals may interchange in columns.
Table
Table 4. 13C NMR data of new trichorzianines in DMSO-d6.
Table 4. 13C NMR data of new trichorzianines in DMSO-d6.
Position TA1909 (2) aTA1895 (3) aTA1896 (4) bTA1924 (5) bTA1910 (6) aTA1924a (7) aTA1909a (8) a
Ac1171.1 s171.2 s171.1s171.0 s171.1 s171.1 s171.1 s
223.1 q23.3 q23.2 q23.0 q23.0 q23.1 q23.1 q
1Aib1176.0 e s176.0 e s175.9 e s175.6 e s175.8 s175.9 e s175.8 e s
255.7 d s55.8 d s55.8 s55.8 s55.8 s55.7 d s55.8 d s
326.5 g q26.8 q26.5 g q26.5 q26.5 q26.5 q26.3 q
424.1 q24.2 q24.1 q24.1 q24.1 q24.1 q23.7 q
2Ala1174.8 s174.6 s174.6 s174.5 s174.6 s 174.6 s
251.0 d51.0 d51.0 d50.8 d50.9 d50.9 d50.9 d
316.8 q16.8 q16.8 q16.8 q16.9 q16.8 q16.9 q
3Ala1174.8 s174.8 s174.8 s174.5 s174.6 s174.7 s174.6 s
251.4 d51.3 d51.3 d51.0 d51.1 d51.2 d51.1 d
316.1 q16.1 q16.1 q16.2 q16.2 q16.1 q16.2 q
4Aib1175.0 s175.0 s175.0 s175.0 s175.0 s175.0 s175.0 s
256.0 s56.0 s55.7 d s55.9 d s56.4 s56.0 d s56.4 s
326.2q25.8 j q26.2 g q26.5 q26.0 g q26.1 q26.3 g q
423.3 f q22.6 f q23.4 h q22.9 h q23.1 f q22.5 f q23.3 f q
5Aib/5Iva1176.0 e s176.0 e s175.9 e s176.4 s176.2 s176.0 e s176.2 s
255.8 d s55.7 d s55.8 d s58.6 s58.5 s55.8 d s58.5 s
326.7 g q26.7 g s26.5 g q 25.6 t25.8 t26.6 q25.9 t
422.6 q22.8 f q22.6 h q 7.4 q7.4 q22.7 f q7.4 q
5 22.7 h q22.7 q 22.6 q
6Gln1174.1 s174.1 s174.1 s173.8 s174.1 s173.8 s174.1 s
256.2 d d56.4 d56.4 d56.0 d56.0 d56.0 d56.0 d
326.2 t26.5 t26.2 t26.2 t26.2 t26.2 t26.2 t
431.5 c t31.5 c t31.5 c t31.6 c t 31.6 c t31.5 c t 31.7 c t
5173.6 s173.6 k s173.6 f s173.8 s173.6 s173.7 s173.6 f s
7Aib1176.0 e s176.0 e s176.0 e s175.7 e s176.0 e s176.0 e s176.0 e s
256.0 s56.0 s55.9 d s55.9 d s56.4 d s55.9 d s56.2 d s
326.4 g q26.2 j q26.5 g q26.2 g q26.3 g q26.2 q26.2 g q
423.0 q23.0 f q22.9 h q22.6 h q22.7 e q22.8 f q22.9 f q
8Aib1176.3 s176.2 s176.2 s175.9 e s176.4 s175.6 s176.4 s
256.0 s56.0 s56.0 d s56.1 d s56.0 s56.0 d s56.1 d s
326.8 h q26.8 q26.8 g q25.8 g q26.8 g q26.6 g q26.4 g q
422.7 q23.2 h q23.3 h q23.0 h q22.9 e q22.8 f q23.2 e q
9Ala/9Aib1174.7 s174.6 s174.6 s176.5 s174.6 s176.4 s174.6 s
251.9 d51.8 d51.8 d56.0 d s51.7 d56.1 d s51.7 d
316.5 q16.5 q16.5 q26.2 g q16.5 q26.5 g q16.5 q
4 23.2 h q 22.9 f q
10Ser1170.7 s170.7 s170.7 s170.6 s170.6 s170.6 s170.6 s
258.3 d58.2 d58.2 d58.8 d58.1 d58.9 d58.1 d
361.1 t61.1 t61.1 t61.0 t61.1 t61.2 t61.0 h t
11Leu1173.5 s173.3 s173.3 s173.5 s173.3 s173.7 s173.3 s
251.6 d51.5 d51.5 d51.4 d51.4 d51.6 d51.4 d
339.5 t39.5 t39.5 t39.8 t39.8 t39.2 t39.8 t
424.0 d24.2 d24.2 d24.1 d24.2 d23.9 d24.0 d
520.6 q21.0 q20.8 q20.8 q20.9 q20.5 q21.0 q
623.0 q23.1 q23.1 q23.4 q22.9 q23.0 q22.9 q
12Aib1173.0 s172.7 s172.8 s172.8 s172.8 s173.0 s172.7 s
255.9 s56.4 s56.1 d s56.1 d s56.2 d s56.3 d s56.1 d s
325.6 q 26.3 g q 26.4 g q26.4 g q 26.4 q 25.8 q 25.5 q
423.4 f q 23.1 q 23.2 h q22.6 q 23.0 q 23.1 q22.9 q
13Pro1173.4 s173.8 s173.8 s173.7 s173.8 s173.3 s173.8 s
263.0 d63.0 d63.0 d63.0 d63.0 d63.0 d63.0 d
328.8 t28.8 t28.8 t28.7 t28.7–28.8 t28.7 t29.1 t
425.9 t25.8 t25.8 t26.0 t25.9 t26.1 t26.0 t
548.7 t48.6 t48.6 t48.5 t48.6 t48.7 t48.6 t
14Leu/14Val1173.7172.7172.6172.7 s172.7 s173.8 s172.7 s
253.1 d61.0 d61.1 d61.1 d61.1 d53.6 d61.1 h d
338.7 t28.8 d28.8 d28.8 d28.7–28.8 d38.7 t28.8 d
424.8 d19.1 q19.1 k q19.1 q19.2 q24.8 d19.2 q
523.0 q19.1 q19.2 k q19.2 q19.1 q23.0 q19.2 q
621.1 q 20.9 q
15Aib1175.4 s175.7 s175.6 s175.6 s175.7 s175.3 s175.7 s
256.3 s56.4 s56.2 d s55.9 d s56.1 d s56.2 d s56.1 d s
326.3 g q 26.4 g q 26.2 g q26.6 g q26.5 g q26.1 g q26.3 g q
423.4 f q 23.4 f q 22.9 h q23.3 h q23.3 f q23.4 f q23.2 f q
16Ile1172.0 s172.4 s172.3 s172.2 s172.3 s171.9 s172.4 s
258.9 d59.6 d59.5 d59.5 d59.5 d58.9 d59.6 d
335.6 d35.5 d35.5 d35.5 d35.5 d35.6 d35.5 d
425.0 t25.4 t25.3 t25.4 t25.4 t25.0 t25.4 t
511.4 q11.4 q11.4 q11.4 q11.4 q11.5 q11.4 q
615.7 q15.7 q15.7 q15.7 q15.7 q15.7 q15.7 q
17Glu/17Gln1171.5 s171.8 s171.4 s171.6 s171.4 s171.1 s171.8 s
253.8 d54.3 d53.7 d53.8 d53.7 d53.1 d54.3 d
327.1 t26.8 t26.0 t26.3 t26.3 t26.5 t26.8 t
431.7 c t31.8 c t30.2 t30.5 t30.2 t30.1 t31.7 c t
5173.7 s173.7 k s173.0 s172.9 s173.0 s172.9 s173.7 f s
OMe 51.4 q51.4 q51.4 q51.4 q
18Gln1170.9 s171.0 s170.9 s170.9 s170.9 s170.8 s171.0 s
253.1 d53.4 d53.3 d53.3 d53.3 d53.0 d53.4 d
327.7 t27.5 t27.5 t27.5 t27.5 t27.7 t27.4 t
431.7 c t31.7 c t31.7 c t31.7 c t31.7 c t31.6 c t31.5 c t
5173.7173.8 k s173.5 f s173.6 s173.6173.6 s173.8 f s
19PheOH162.7 t62.9 t62.8 t62.8 t62.8 t62.7 t62.9 t
252.6 d52.6 d52.6 d52.6 d52.6 d52.5 d52.6 d
336.7 t36.7 t36.7 t36.7 t36.7 t36.6 t36.7 t
4139.2 s139.3 s139.3 s139.3 s139.3 s139.2 s139.3 s
5129.4 d129.4 d129.4 d129.4 d129.4 d129.4 d129.4 d
6128.2 d128.1 d128.1 d128.1 d128.1 d128.1 d128.1 d
7126.0 d126.0 d125.9 d126.0 d126.0 d126.0 d126.0 d
a Instrument 13C frequency 100 MHz; b Instrument 13C frequency 125 MHz; c,d,e,f,g,h,k These signals may interchange in columns.

2.3. Determination of the Absolute Stereochemistry

Marfey’s analysis [15] of TA1938 (1) using l-FDAA as derivatizing reagent established the l-configuration of Ile, Leu × 2, Glu × 3 (one from glutamic acid, two from glutamine), Pro and Ser. Advanced Marfey analysis [16] of TA1938 using l-FDAA and d-FDAA as derivatizing agents and analysis by LC/MS established the l-configuration of Ala × 2. Iva configuration was not established, and Aib is not chiral. Configuration of phenylalaninol was established as l in TA1909 (2) by Marfey’s analysis preceded by Jones oxidation [17] and comparison to the Phe standard and assumed as l in other compounds, due to the similarity of their structures. Marfey’s analysis of TA1910 (6) using l-FDAA as derivatizing reagent established the l-configuration of Ile, Leu, Glu × 3 (one from glutamic acid, two from glutamine), Pro, Ser and Val. Marfey’s analysis of TA1895 (5) using l-FDAA as derivatizing reagent established the l-configuration of Val. The configurations of other amino acids were established by comparison of Marfey’s chromatograms to those of TA1938 (1). Retention times were found similar, meaning that absolute configurations of amino acids are as in TA1938 (1). Marfey’s analysis of TA1909 (2), TA1896 (4), TA1924 (5), TA1924A (7) and TA1909A (8) using l-FDAA was performed by comparison to Marfey’s chromatograms of TA1938 (1) and other peptaibols.

2.4. Antibacterial Bioassay

The antibacterial activity of the isolated trichorzianines (1–12) was tested against five environmental bacteria and three laboratory bacterial strains (detailed in the Experimental Section). MIC (minimal inhibitory concentration) was designated as the lowest concentration in which bacterial growth was inhibited to 0%–10% and MEC (minimal effective concentration) as the lowest concentration in which bacterial growth was inhibited to 70%. The results that were obtained after 48 h of incubation are summarized in Figure 3.
Marinedrugs 11 04937 g003 1024
Figure 3. Antibacterial activity of trichorzianines after 48 h (A) Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (µg/mL); (B) minimal effective concentration (MEC) (µg/mL). + represents Gram-positive bacteria; −, Gram-negative bacteria. Value of 250 µg/mL means no activity (MIC > 200 µg/mL).
Figure 3. Antibacterial activity of trichorzianines after 48 h (A) Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (µg/mL); (B) minimal effective concentration (MEC) (µg/mL). + represents Gram-positive bacteria; −, Gram-negative bacteria. Value of 250 µg/mL means no activity (MIC > 200 µg/mL).
Marinedrugs 11 04937 g003
Examination of the trichorzianines activity (Figure 3) shows a general pattern. The tested trichorzianines exhibited stronger activity against environmental bacteria than against the laboratory strains. When compared within each group (environmental/laboratory), Gram-positive bacteria were more sensitive than Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli was resistant to all the tested compounds at all concentrations). Upon comparison of pairs of compounds differing in a single amino acid, no correlation was found between change in the amino acid sequence and activity.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Experimental Procedures

MS data were acquired using MALDI-Synapt Waters mass spectrometer using positive ES ionization. UV spectra were recorded on an Agilent 8453 spectrophotometer. Optical rotation values were obtained on a Jasco P-1010 polarimeter. IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Vector 22 spectrophotometer. 1H- and 13C-NMR and 2D NMR data were recorded on spectrometers: Bruker ARX 500 (500.13 MHz for 1H, 125.8 MHz for 13C), Bruker AVANCE 400 (400.13 MHz for 1H, 100.62 MHz for 13C) and Bruker AVANCE 400 (400.17 MHz for 1H, 100.63 MHz for 13C), at room temperature, in 5 mm NMR tubes, with tetramethylsilane (TMS, δ 0.0 ppm) as the internal standard. COSY-45, gTOCSY, gROESY, gHSQC and gHMBC spectra were recorded using standard Bruker pulse sequences. HPLC chromatography rations were performed on Jasco (model PU-2080 plus intelligent pump, model LG-2080-04 plus quaternary gradient unit), Merck-Hitachi (model L-6200A intelligent pump, model L-4200 UV-Vis detector) and Agilent 1100 series HPLC system.

3.2. Biological Material

The sponge, Axinella sp., was collected by SCUBA diving at a depth of 19 m in the Mediterranean Sea, Akhziv, Israel. The sponge sample was sealed underwater in a bag with seawater and brought, cooled, to the laboratory for isolation and culturing of fungi. A pure fungal strain was obtained by inoculating slices of the sponge (initially rinsed with sterile Ca2+- and Mg2+-free artificial seawater) in potato dextrose agar (PDA, Difco) tubes containing chloramphenicol (0.25 g/L) and subsequent re-inoculations on PDA plates. Fungal genomic DNA was extracted from 15–20 mg of ground lyophilized mycelia grown in Potato Dextrose Broth (PDB, Difco), as described in [18]. The fungus was identified as Trichoderma atroviride based on its PCR-amplified ITS region, using primers ITS1 and ITS4 [19] and cycling parameters as in [20], followed by sequencing and comparison to the GenBank database (Trichokey [21], BLAST [22]). The strain was maintained on PDA. To determine the abundance of T. atroviride in the sponges, 25 new Axinella spp. specimens were collected. Pure fungal strains were isolated by dispersing 100 µL of the liquid obtained from a sponge sample ground by pestle and mortar on PDA plates containing chloramphenicol (0.25 g/L) and subsequent re-inoculations on PDA plates. Other details of fungal isolation were as described above. DNA was extracted by a protocol based on [23] using SDS–lysozyme-proteinase K lysis.

3.3. Culture Procedure

For the initial screening, a culture of 1 L of the fungus was grown. The culture was incubated for three weeks, at room temperature, in the horizontal position in 850-mL tissue culture flasks containing 200 mL of PDB. For the isolation of the active compounds, 15 L of the fungus were cultured in the same manner.

3.4. Isolation Procedure

The medium was filtered through glass wool to separate it from the mycelium and adsorbed on Amberlite XAD7HP, followed by washing of the organic compounds from the resin with acetone (method based on [24]). Briefly, after adding 20 g of Amberlite XAD-7-HP resin for each liter of medium, the medium was stirred for two h on a magnetic stirrer, followed by decanting the liquid. Then, the resin was washed with two small portions of acetone in order to remove water, extracted twice with acetone and washed with distilled water. The acetone was filtered and evaporated. The 15-L medium yielded 8.3 g of the crude extract. During initial separation, the fractionation was guided by 1H-NMR and anti-bacterial assays. At the later stages of the separation, while according to NMR and MS spectra, it became clear that there was a mixture of peptaibols, it was determined by MS and MS/MS whether the fraction was pure or required further purification. The crude extract was separated on a Sephadex LH-20 column using MeOH–CHCl3 (1:1). Fractions 1–6 from this separation (5.8 g) were further separated on a Sephadex LH-20 column using MeOH–CHCl3 (2:1). Fractions 1–6 from this separation (4.2 g) were separated on an open column C18-reversed phase column and eluted with solvent of decreasing polarity from water to methanol (10% steps of methanol each fraction). Fractions 8–11 and column wash in methanol (total weight 3.0 g) were separated on a Sephadex LH-20 using MeOH–CHCl3 (1:1). Fractions 1–13 (2.7 g) were separated again on a Sephadex LH20, using MeOH–H2O (7:3). Fractions 4–8 from this separation (2.36 g) were separated on an HPLC column (Hibar, Lichrospher 60 RP-Select B, 5 µm, 250 × 20 mm, flow rate 5 mL/min, UV detection, eluent 55–50:45–50 acetonitrile/water), to give 14 fractions, four of which (fractions 6 to 9) were found to be active. Fraction 7 (236 mg) was separated by HPLC (Hibar, Lichrospher 60 RP-Select B, 5 µm, 250 × 20 mm, flow rate 5 mL/min, UV detection, eluent 53:47 acetonitrile/aq. TFA (0.1%)) followed by HPLC separation (Cosmosil, 5C-8 MS Waters, 250 × 20 mm, UV detection, eluent with 81.5–83:18.5–17 methanol/aq. TFA (0.1%)) were used to afford TA1909 (tR 92 min, 5.2 mg) and TA1895 (tR 99 min, 3.7 mg). Fraction 6 (391.5 mg) was separated by HPLC (Hibar, Lichrospher 60 RP-Select B, 5 µm, 250 × 20 mm, flow rate 5 mL/min, UV detection, eluent 53:47 acetonitrile/aq. TFA (0.1%)) to two fractions: one yielded TA1896 (4.8 mg) and the second yielded, again, TA1909 (6.2 mg), as well as TA1895 (2.4 mg), by following HPLC separations. Fraction 8 (291.3 mg) was separated by repeated HPLC separations, resulting in TA1909a (2.2 mg), TA.VIb (5.2 mg), TA.Vb (9.7 mg), TA.VIa (1.8 mg), TA1924a (2.2 mg), TA.VII (1.9 mg) and TA1910 (4.0 mg). HPLC separations of Fraction 9 yielded TA1938 (7.8 mg), TA1924 (2.8 mg), TA.VIa (8.3 mg) and TA.VII (6.7 mg).
Trichorzianine 1938 (1): amorphous white solid; Marinedrugs 11 04937 i003 −25 (c 0.68, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 203 (4.61); IR (KBr) νmax 3320, 2960, 2360, 1661, 1541, 1204 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR (see Table 2); HR TOF-MS-ES+ m/z 1961.1099 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C91H151N21NaO25, 1961.1088). Retention time of amino acid (AA) Marfey’s derivatives: l-Ile 44.5 min (d-Ile 47.1 min), l-Leu 45.3 min (d-Leu 47.7 min), l-Pro 35.8 min (d-Pro 36.4 min), l-Glu 32.7 min (d-Glu 33.6 min) and l-Ser 29.7 min (d-Ser 33.2 min). Advanced Marfey: l-Ala (l-Ala-l-FDAA, 3.40 min; l-Ala-d-FDAA, 3.99 min). Iva, not determined; Pheol, (l as in TA1909).
Trichorzianine 1909 (2): amorphous white solid; Marinedrugs 11 04937 i003 −23 (c 0.4, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 203 (4.46); IR (ATR probe) νmax 3309, 1647, 1541, 1201 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR (see Table 3 and Table 4 and Supplementary Table S3); HR TOF-MS-ES+ m/z 1932.0946 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C89H148N22NaO24, 1932.0935). Retention time of amino acid (AA) Marfey’s derivatives: l-Ile 44.2 min (d-Ile 47.8 min), l-Leu 45.0 min (d-Leu 47.7 min), l-Pro 35.5 min (d-Pro 36.4 min), l-Glu 32.7 min (d-Glu 33.6 min), l-Pheol: as l-Phe 45.6 min (D-Phe 47.7 min), l-Ser 29.4 min (d-Ser 33.2 min) and Ala, (l as in TA1938).
Trichorzianine 1895 (3): white powder; Marinedrugs 11 04937 i003 −32 (c 0.26, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 203 (4.48); IR (ATR probe) νmax 3308, 2936, 1638, 1537, 1202, 1047 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR (see Table 3 and Table 4 and Supplementary Table S4); HR TOF-MS-ES+ m/z 1918.0864 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C88H146N22NaO24, 1918.0778). Retention time of amino acid (AA) Marfey’s derivatives: l-Ile 44.3 min (d-Ile 47.8 min), l-Leu 45.0 min (d-Leu 47.7 min), l-Pro 35.6 min (d-Pro 36.4 min), l-Glu 32.7 min (d-Glu 33.6 min), l-Ser 29.5 min (d-Ser 33.2 min) and l-Val 40.9 min (d-Val 43.7 min). Pheol, (l as in TA1909); Ala, (l as in TA1938).
Trichorzianine 1896 (4): amorphous, white solid; Marinedrugs 11 04937 i003 −18 (c 0.48, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 203 (4.56); IR (ATR probe) νmax 3312, 1653, 1540, 1201 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR (see Table 3 and Table 4 and Supplementary Table S5); HR TOF-MS-ES+ m/z 1933.0819 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C89H147N21NaO25, 1933.0775). Retention time of amino acid (AA) Marfey’s derivatives: l-Ile 44.3 min (d-Ile 47.8 min), l-Leu 45.1 min (d-Leu 47.7 min), l-Pro 35.7 min (d-Pro 36.4 min), l-Glu 32.7 min (d-Glu 33.6 min), l-Ser 29.6 min (d-Ser 33.2 min), l-Val 41.0 min (d-Val 43.7 min), Pheol, (l as in TA1909) and Ala, (l as in TA1938).
Trichorzianine 1924 (5): amorphous, white solid; Marinedrugs 11 04937 i003 −17 (c 0.26, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 203 (4.48); IR (KBr) νmax 3335, 2966, 2363, 1663, 1541, 1207 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR (see Table 3 and Table 4 and Supplementary Table S6); HR TOF-MS-ES+ m/z 1961.1240 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C91H151N21NaO25, 1961.1088). Retention time of amino acid (AA) Marfey’s derivatives: l-Ile 44.4 min (d-Ile 47.8 min), l-Leu 45.1 min (d-Leu 47.7 min), L-Val 41.0 min (D-Val 43.7 min), l-Pro 35.7 min (d-Pro 36.4 min), l-Glu 32.7 min (d-Glu 33.6 min) and l-Ser 29.3 min (d-Ser 33.2 min). Iva, not determined; Pheol, (l as in TA1909); Ala, (l as in TA1938).
Trichorzianine 1910 (6): amorphous, white solid; Marinedrugs 11 04937 i003 −36 (c 0.39, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 203 (4.60); IR (ATR probe) νmax 3310, 1654, 1541, 1217 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR (see Table 3 and Table 4 and Supplementary Table S7); HR TOF-MS-ES+ m/z 1947.0995 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C90H149N21NaO25, 1947.0931). Retention time of amino acid (AA) Marfey’s derivatives: l-Ile 44.5 min (d-Ile 47.8 min), l-Leu 45.3 min (d-Leu 48.1 min), l-Pro 35.8 min (d-Pro 37.0 min), l-Glu 33.4 min (d-Glu 34.1 min), l-Ser 29.8 min (d-Ser 33.6 min) and l-Val 41.2 min (d-Val 44.1 min). Iva, not determined; Pheol, (l as in TA1909); Ala, (l as in TA1938).
Trichorzianine 1924A (7): amorphous, white solid; Marinedrugs 11 04937 i003 −30 (c 0.21, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 203 (4.67); IR (ATR probe) νmax 3310, 1655, 1541, 1204 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR (see Table 3 and Table 4 and Supplementary Table S8); HR TOF-MS-ES+ m/z 1961.1086 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C90H149N21NaO25, 1961.1088). Retention time of amino acid (AA) Marfey’s derivatives: l-Ile 44.4 min (d-Ile 47.8 min), l-Leu 45.2 min (d-Leu 48.1 min), l-Pro 35.7 min (d-Pro 37.0 min), l-Glu 32.7 min (d-Glu 34.1 min) and l-Ser 29.7 min (d-Ser 33.6 min), Pheol, (l as in TA1909); Ala, (l as in TA1938).
Trichorzianine 1909A (8): amorphous, white solid; Marinedrugs 11 04937 i003 −49 (c 0.20, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 203 (4.60); IR (ATR probe) νmax 3312, 2292, 1661, 1541, 1204 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR (see Table 3 and Table 4 and Supplementary Table S9); HR TOF-MS-ES+ m/z 1932.1022 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C89H148N22NaO24, 1,932.0935). Retention time of amino acid (AA) Marfey’s derivatives: l-Ile 44.5 min (d-Ile 47.8 min), l-Leu 45.2 min (d-Leu 48.1 min), l-Val 41.1 min (d-Val 44.1 min), l-Pro 35.9 min (d-Pro 37.0 min), l-Glu 32.7 min (d-Glu 34.1 min) and l-Ser 29.7 min (d-Ser 33.6 min). Iva, not determined; Pheol, (l as in TA1909); Ala, (l as in TA1938).

3.5. Antibacterial Bioassay

Antibacterial activity of the fractions was tested against 3 environmental bacteria: 2 Bacilli from the same sponge from which the fungus was isolated (NB70, NB36) and Sporosarcina sp. from the sediment (NB90). Bacteria were cultured in 5 mL liquid media (Marine broth or Lennox broth) on a shaker. According to OD measurement at 620 nm, bacterial cultures were diluted with growth medium to a concentration giving OD absorbance of 0.4 at 620 nm, followed by an additional 1000-fold dilution. Tested fractions were diluted in DMSO to a concentration of 10 mg/mL, followed by further dilutions to 1, 0.5 and 0.25 mg/mL, 10% DMSO in purified water. The test was performed in 96 well plates, in three replicates for each concentration, each replicate on a different plate. The arrangement of the compounds on the plates was random. Into each well, 60 µL of growth media, 40 µL of the compound, and 100 µL of the diluted bacteria were added, to give a final concentrations of 0.2, 0.1 and 0.05 mg/mL, 2% DMSO. Plates were incubated on a shaker at 25 °C. OD was read at the beginning of the experiment (subtracted from later measurements) and after 24 and 48 h. The percentage of growth was calculated relatively to the positive control: a well containing the same bacteria in 2% DMSO without the compounds.
Antibacterial activity of the pure trichorzianines was tested on five environmental bacteria: from the sediment, Sporosarcina sp. (NB90), from the same sponge, Bacillus sp. (NB36), from Axinella polypoides Microbacterium sp. (PII.14), Rhodobacteraceae (PI.03), Shewanella sp. (PIII.07) and 3 laboratory strains (S. albus, B. subtilis and E. coli). Bacterial stocks were prepared as described above. Compounds were prepared in DMSO at a concentration of 20 mg/mL and diluted with purified water to 2 mg/mL, 10% DMSO. The test was performed in 96 well plates in liquid medium for bacterial growth (Lennox Broth or Marine Broth) with DMSO at a final concentration of 1% and a series of dilutions of the tested compound, the highest of which was 0.2 mg/mL (for some of the compounds two of the three replicates were prepared at lower concentrations). Into the well containing the highest concentration, 160 µL of medium and 40 µL of the sample (2 mg/mL, 10% DMSO) were added, to give a final concentration of 0.4 mg/mL, 2% DMSO. Into the other wells, 100 µL of the growth medium containing 2% DMSO were inserted, followed by the addition of 100 µL from the previous well. In this manner, a series of 2-fold dilutions was prepared in 2% DMSO, the highest concentration being 0.4 mg/mL. Subsequently, 100 µL of the bacteria were added to each well, diluting their contents to 0.2 mg/mL at the highest concentration, 1% DMSO. OD at 620 nm was measured at the beginning of the experiment (subtracted from later measurements) and after 24 and 48 h of growth. The percentage of growth was calculated relative to the positive control: a well containing the same bacteria in 1% DMSO without the compounds.

4. Conclusions

The Trichoderma atroviride strain isolated from Axinellid sponge yielded 12 trichorzianines, eight of which are new and four known. The isolated peptaibols belong to the trichorzianine family. This family was previously isolated from T. harzianum, as well as T. atroviride. The profile of the peptaibols described here differs from previous reports on these compounds in T. atroviride: some of the new compounds include glutamic acid as the seventeenth residue, which contains only glutamine in all known trichorzianines. In contrast, not all of the known compounds were isolated here. For example, none of the isolated compounds contained glutamic acid as the eighteenth residue or tryptophanol as the nineteenth residue. In fact, some fractions contained Trpol, but further purification was impossible, due to the small available quantity of the material.
All isolated trichorzianines exhibited moderate antibacterial activity (MIC 12.5–200 µg/mL) against tested environmental bacteria, except for TA.VII, which showed no activity and TA1924 which did not inhibit Gram-negative bacteria. The absence of activity in tests as seen for TA.VII is not unusual and could indicate either activity on a narrow range of microorganisms or on antibacterial activity that is not expressed in the lab or in liquid medium. Laboratory bacterial strains were much more resistant to the peptaibols: E. coli exhibited no inhibition, and S. albus and B. subtilis were inhibited by some of the peptaibols (MIC 50–200 µg/mL).

Acknowledgments

We thank Noam Tal, The Mass Spectrometry Laboratory of The School of Chemistry, Tel Aviv University, for the mass spectra measurements. We thank Zahi Paz for help with fungal identification. We thank Markus Haber, Pierre Sauleau, Boaz Mayzel and Amir Gur from Micha Ilan’s group, for the collection of the sponge samples. This study was supported by the Israel Science Foundation grant (ISF 996/06).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chugh, K.J.; Wallace, B.A. Peptaibols: Models for ion channels. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2001, 29, 565–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schuhmacher, R.; Stoppacher, N.; Zeilinger, S. Peptaibols of Trichoderma atroviride: Screening, Identification, and Structure Elucidation by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. In Communicating Current Research and Education Topics and Trends in Applied Microbiology; Méndez-Vilas, A., Ed.; Formatex: Badajoz, Spain, 2007; pp. 609–617. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kleinkauf, H.; Dohren, H. Nonribosomal biosynthesis of peptide antibiotics. Eur. J. Biochem. 1990, 192, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  4. Peptaibol Database. Available online: http://www.cryst.bbk.ac.uk/peptaibol (accessed on 14 May 2012).
  5. Benitez, T.; Rincon, A.M.; Limon, M.C.; Codon, A.C. Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma strains. Int. Microbiol. 2004, 7, 249–260. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bodo, B.; Rebuffat, S.; El Hajii, M.; Davoust, D. Structure of Trichorzianine A IIIC, an antifungal peptide from Trichoderma harzianum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 6011–6017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. El Hajii, M.; Rebuffat, S.; Lecommandeur, D.; Bodo, B. Isolation and sequence determination of trichorzianines A antifungal peptides from Trichoderma harzianum. Int. J. Peptide Prot. Res. 1987, 29, 207–215. [Google Scholar]
  8. Rebuffat, S.; El Hajii, M.; Hennig, P.; Davoust, D.; Bodo, B. Isolation, sequence and conformation of seven trichorzianines B from Trichoderma harzianum. Int. J. Peptide. Prot. Res. 1989, 34, 200–210. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pocsfalvi, G.; Scala, F.; Lorito, M.; Ritieni, A.; Randazzo, G.; Ferranti, P.; Vekey, K.; Malorni, A. Microheterogeneity characterization of a trichorzianine-A mixture from Trichoderma harzianum. J. Mass. Spectrom. 1998, 33, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Carroux, A.; van Bohemen, A.-I.; Roullier, C.; du Pont, T.R.; Vansteelandt, M.; Bondon, A.; Zalouk-Vergnoux, A.; Pouchus, Y.F.; Ruiz, N. Unprecedented 17-residue peptaibiotics produced by marine-derived Trichoderma atroviride. Chem. Biodivers. 2013, 10, 772–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Oh, S.U.; Lee, S.J.; Kim, J.H.; Yoo, I.D. Structural elucidation of new antibiotic peptides, atroviridins A, B and C from Trichoderma atroviride. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oh, S.U.; Yun, B.S.; Lee, S.J.; Kim, J.H.; Yoo, I.D. Atroviridins A–C and neoatroviridins A–D, novel peptaibol antibiotics produced by Trichoderma atroviride F80317. I. Taxonomy, fermentation, isolation and biological activity. J. Antibiot. 2002, 55, 557–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Stoppacher, N.; Reithner, B.; Omann, M.; Zeilinger, S.; Krska, R.; Schuhmacher, R. Profiling of trichorzianines in culture samples of Trichoderma atroviride by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 21, 3963–3970. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sabareesh, V.; Balaram, P. Tandem electrospray mass spectrometric studies of proton and sodium ion adducts of neutral peptides with modified N- and C-termini: Synthetic model peptides and microheterogeneous peptaibol antibiotics. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 20, 618–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Marfey, P. Determination of d-amino acids. II. Use of a bifunctional reagent, 1,5-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene. Carlsberg Res. Commun. 1987, 49, 591–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fujii, K.; Shimoya, T.; Ikai, Y.; Oka, H.; Harada, K. Further application of Advanced Marfey’s method for determination of absolute configuration of primary amino compound. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2579–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bowden, K.; Heilbron, I.M.; Jones, E.R.H.; Weedon, B.C.L. Researches on acetylenic compounds. Part I. The preparation of acetylenic ketones by oxidation of acetylenic carbinols and glycols. J. Chem. Soc. 1946, 39–45. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gal-Hemed, I.; Atanasova, L.; Komon-Zelazowska, M.; Druzhinina, I.S.; Viterbo, A.; Yarden, O. Marine isolates of Trichoderma as potential halotolerant agents of biological control for arid-zone agriculture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 5100–5109. [Google Scholar]
  19. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. In PCR Protocol: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.A., Gellfand, D.H., Sninisky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  20. Paz, Z.; Komon-Zelazowska, M.; Druzhinina, I.S.; Aveskamp, M.M.; Shnaiderman, A.; Aluma, Y.; Carmeli, S.; Ilan, M.; Yarden, O. Diversity and potential antifungal properties of fungi associated with a Mediterranean sponge. Fungal Divers. 2010, 42, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. International Subcommission on Trichderma and Hypocrea Taxonomy. Available online: http://www.isth.info (accessed on 11 August 2011).
  22. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed on 20 September 2012).
  23. Pitcher, D.J.; Saunders, N.A.; Owen, R.J. Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidinium thiocyanate. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1989, 8, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Oh, D.C.; Jensen, P.R.; Fenical, W. Zygosporamide, a cytotoxic cyclic depsipeptide from the marine-derived fungus Zygosporium masonii. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 8625–8628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Supplementary Files

  • Supplementary File 1:

    Supplementary Materials (PDF, 3895 KB)

    • Share and Cite

    MDPI and ACS Style

    Panizel, I.; Yarden, O.; Ilan, M.; Carmeli, S. Eight New Peptaibols from Sponge-Associated Trichoderma atroviride. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 4937-4960. https://doi.org/10.3390/md11124937

    AMA Style

    Panizel I, Yarden O, Ilan M, Carmeli S. Eight New Peptaibols from Sponge-Associated Trichoderma atroviride. Marine Drugs. 2013; 11(12):4937-4960. https://doi.org/10.3390/md11124937

    Chicago/Turabian Style

    Panizel, Irina, Oded Yarden, Micha Ilan, and Shmuel Carmeli. 2013. "Eight New Peptaibols from Sponge-Associated Trichoderma atroviride" Marine Drugs 11, no. 12: 4937-4960. https://doi.org/10.3390/md11124937

    APA Style

    Panizel, I., Yarden, O., Ilan, M., & Carmeli, S. (2013). Eight New Peptaibols from Sponge-Associated Trichoderma atroviride. Marine Drugs, 11(12), 4937-4960. https://doi.org/10.3390/md11124937

    Article Metrics

    Back to TopTop